XML 18 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A. Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements include the accounts of SIFCO Industries, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for all of the Company’s U.S. operations and its Irish subsidiary. For these operations, all gains and losses from completed currency transactions are included in income currently. The functional currency for the Company's other non-U.S. subsidiaries is the Euro. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange at the end of the period, and revenues and expenses are translated using average rates of exchange for the period. Foreign currency translation adjustments are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.
These unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s fiscal 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for other interim periods or the full year.
B. Accounting Policies
A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company's fiscal 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, with the exception of the following:

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
At March 31, 2016, management identified a triggering event, which resulted in the Company performing an interim impairment test at its Orange, California reporting unit and performed a financial analysis of its C*Blade reporting unit in Maniago, Italy as of March 31, 2016.  The carrying values at both reporting units, inclusive of assigned goodwill, were compared to their respective fair values and the income approach was used to estimate the fair value of these reporting units.  Significant assumptions inherent in the valuation methodologies for goodwill were employed and include, but are not limited to, prospective financial information, growth rates, terminal value and discount rates and requires the Company to make certain assumptions and estimates regarding industry economic factors and future profitability of its business.
 
When performing the income approach for each reporting unit, SIFCO incorporated the use of projected financial information and a discount rate that are developed using market participant based assumptions.  The cash flow projections are based on five-year financial forecasts developed by management that include revenue projections, capital spending trends, and investment in working capital to support anticipated revenue growth.  The selected discount rate considers the risk and nature of the respective reporting unit's cash flows and ratios of return that market participants would require to invest their capital in our plants. 

Although the Company believes its assumptions are reasonable, actual results may vary significantly and may expose the Company to material impairment charges in the future.  The methodology for determining fair values was consistent for the periods presented. 

Based on this quantitative test, we determined that the fair value of these reporting units exceeded their carrying value, and therefore Step 2 of the two-step goodwill impairment test was unnecessary.






C. Net Loss per Share
The Company’s net loss per basic share has been computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Net loss per diluted share reflects the effect of the Company’s outstanding stock options, restricted shares and performance shares under the treasury stock method. The dilutive effect of the Company’s restricted shares and performance shares were as follows:
 
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
2016
 
2015
 
2016
 
2015
Loss from continuing operations
$
(1,050
)
 
$
(1,007
)
 
$
(3,947
)
 
$
(3,212
)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 
736

Net loss
$
(1,050
)
 
$
(1,007
)
 
$
(3,947
)
 
$
(2,476
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic)
5,466

 
5,448

 
5,460

 
5,435

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Restricted shares

 
6

 

 
13

Performance shares

 

 

 
1

Weighted-average common shares outstanding (diluted)
5,466

 
5,454

 
5,460

 
5,449

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss per share – basic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.72
)
 
$
(0.59
)
Discontinued operations

 

 

 
0.14

Net loss
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.72
)
 
$
(0.45
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss per share – diluted:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.72
)
 
$
(0.59
)
Discontinued operations

 

 

 
0.14

Net loss
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.72
)
 
$
(0.45
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anti-dilutive weighted-average common shares excluded from calculation of diluted earnings per share
38

 
15

 
23

 
15



D. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to reduce risk related to variable-rate debt, which was subject to changes in market rates of interest. The interest rate swap is designated as a cash flow hedge. At June 30, 2016, the Company held one interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $8,571. Cash flows related to the interest rate swap agreement are included in interest expense. The Company’s interest rate swap agreement and its variable-rate term debt were based upon LIBOR. At June 30, 2016, the Company’s interest rate swap agreement qualified as a fully effective cash flow hedge against the Company’s variable-rate term note and its mark-to-market valuation is a $79 liability at June 30, 2016.

E. Impact to Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 completes the joint effort by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board to improve financial reporting by creating common revenue recognition guidance for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net).” The ASU 2016-08 clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.” This ASU 2016-10 clarifies the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations. These ASUs, along with subsequent updates, apply to all companies that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services, and are effective for public entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, but not before interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies have the choice to apply these ASUs either retrospectively to each reporting period presented or by recognizing the cumulative effect of applying these standards at the date of initial application and not adjusting comparative information. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of these standards and has not yet determined the impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” This ASU requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on the balance sheet and aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of ASU 2016-02 and has not yet determined its impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

On March 30, 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which makes a number of changes meant to simplify and improve accounting for share-based payments. The ASU will be effective for the Company for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently considering early adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the next reporting period, as is permitted under the standard and has not yet determined the impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.