Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
Dec. 26, 2021
Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies	19. Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies Litigation The Company is involved in a number of lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including those specifically identified below, consisting of intellectual property, employment, consumer, commercial and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with ASC 450, “Contingencies” the Company has made accruals with respect to these matters where appropriate, which are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. We review these provisions at least quarterly and adjust them to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Durling et al v. Papa John’s International, Inc., is a conditionally certified collective action filed in May 2016 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that corporate restaurant delivery drivers were not properly reimbursed for vehicle mileage and expenses in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act. In July 2018, the District Court granted a motion to certify a conditional corporate collective class and the opt-in notice process has been completed. As of the close of the opt-in period on October 29, 2018, 9,571 drivers opted into the collective class. The Company continues to deny any liability or wrongdoing in this matter and is vigorously defending this action. The Company has not recorded any liability related to this lawsuit as of December 26, 2021 as it does not believe a loss is probable or reasonably estimable. In re Papa John’s Employee & Franchise Employee Antitrust Litigation is a putative class action filed in December 2018 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The suit alleges that the “no-poaching” provision previously contained in the Company’s franchise agreement constituted an unlawful agreement or conspiracy in restraint of trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The case is currently in discovery and to date no class has been certified or conditionally certified. The Company continues to deny any liability or wrongdoing in this matter and is vigorously defending this action. The Company has not recorded any liability related to this lawsuit as of December 26, 2021 as it does not believe a loss is probable or reasonably estimable.

Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 26, 2021

Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies

19. Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company is involved in a number of lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including those specifically identified below, consisting of intellectual property, employment, consumer, commercial and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with ASC 450, “Contingencies” the Company has made accruals with respect to these matters where appropriate, which are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. We review these provisions at least quarterly and adjust them to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular case.

Durling et al v. Papa John’s International, Inc., is a conditionally certified collective action filed in May 2016 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that corporate restaurant delivery drivers were not properly reimbursed for vehicle mileage and expenses in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act. In July 2018, the District Court granted a motion to certify a conditional corporate collective class and the opt-in notice process has been completed. As of the close of the opt-in period on October 29, 2018, 9,571 drivers opted into the collective class. The Company continues to deny any liability or wrongdoing in this matter and is vigorously defending this action. The Company has not recorded any liability related to this lawsuit as of December 26, 2021 as it does not believe a loss is probable or reasonably estimable.

In re Papa John’s Employee & Franchise Employee Antitrust Litigation is a putative class action filed in December 2018 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The suit alleges that the “no-poaching” provision previously contained in the Company’s franchise agreement constituted an unlawful agreement or conspiracy in restraint of trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The case is currently in discovery and to date no class has been certified or conditionally certified. The Company continues to deny any liability or wrongdoing in this matter and is vigorously defending this action. The Company has not recorded any liability related to this lawsuit as of December 26, 2021 as it does not believe a loss is probable or reasonably estimable.