XML 76 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Notes to Financial Statements  
Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Anika Securities, Inc. (a Massachusetts Securities Corporation), Anika Therapeutics S.r.l. (“Anika S.r.l.”) and Anika Therapeutics Limited. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
Foreign Currency Translation
 
The functional currency of Anika S.r.l. is the Euro, and the functional currency of Anika Therapeutics Limited is the British Pound Sterling. Assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiaries are translated using the exchange rate existing on each respective balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the period. The translation adjustments resulting from this process are included in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) which resulted in a gain (loss) from foreign currency translation of (
$0.4
) million, (
$0.7
) million, and
$2.5
million for the years ended
December 31, 2019,
2018,
and
2017,
respectively.
 
Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. Recorded balances that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are remeasured to the functional currency using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date and gains or losses are recorded in the statements of operations. The Company recognized a gain (loss) from foreign currency transactions of (
$0.3
) million, (
$0.4
) million, and
$0.7
million during the years ended
December 31, 2019,
2018,
and
2017,
respectively.
 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. In determining the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, management specifically analyzes individual accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic conditions, accounts receivable aging trends, and changes in the Company’s customer payment terms. A summary of activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:
 
    December 31,
    2019   2018   2017
Balance, beginning of the year   $
1,525
    $
1,914
    $
194
 
Amounts provided    
6
     
57
     
1,609
 
Amounts recovered    
(505
)    
(360
)    
 
Amounts written off    
(33
)    
     
(6
)
Translation adjustments    
(31
)    
(86
)    
117
 
Balance, end of the year   $
962
    $
1,525
    $
1,914
 
 
Revenue Recognition - General
 
The Company adopted the guidance the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
 (ASC
606
) using the modified retrospective method effective
January 1, 2018.
The adoption of ASC
606
was applied to all contracts
not
completed as of the date of adoption. The adoption did
not
have a material impact on the amount and timing of revenue recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The Company made
no
adjustments to previously reported product and total revenue, as those periods continue to be presented in accordance with historical accounting practices under Topic
605,
Revenue Recognition
.
 
Pursuant to ASC
606,
the Company recognizes revenue when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services. The amount of revenue that is recorded reflects the consideration that the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The Company applies the following
five
-step model in order to determine this amount: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are capable of being distinct or distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation.
 
The Company has agreements with DePuy Synthes Mitek Sports Medicine, a division of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (“Mitek”) that include the grant of certain licenses, performance of development services, and the supply of product at Mitek’s option. Revenues from the agreements with Mitek represent
71%
of total revenues for the year-ended
December 31, 2019.
The Company completed the performance obligations related to granted licenses and development services under these agreements prior to
2016.
The Company has
no
remaining material performance obligations under the Mitek agreements.
 
The Company has agreements with other customers that
may
include the delivery of a license and supply of product. The upfront payments under such agreements upon the delivery of the license have
not
been material.
 
The Company’s typical supply agreements represent a promise to deliver product at the customer’s discretion that are considered distributor options. The Company assesses if these options provide a material right to the licensee, and if so, they are accounted for as separate performance obligations.  Substantially all of the Company’s supply agreements do
not
provide options that are considered material rights.
 
Certain of the Company’s agreements include sales-based royalties and milestones. As the Company considered the license to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate for these agreements, sales-based royalties and milestones are only recognized when the later of the underlying sale occurs or the performance obligation to which some or all of the sales-based royalty has been satisfied (or partially satisfied). This is generally in the same period that the Company’s licensees complete their product sales in their territory, for which the Company is contractually entitled to a percentage-based royalty. Revenue from sales-based royalties is included in product revenues.
 
Product Revenue
 
In regard to the distribution model, the Company sells its products principally to a number of distributors (i.e., its customers) under legally-enforceable, executed contracts. The Company’s distributors subsequently resell the products to sub-distributors and health care providers, among others. The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when the distributor obtains control of the Company’s product, which typically occurs upon shipment to the distributor, in return for agreed-upon, fixed-price consideration. Performance obligations are generally settled quickly after purchase order acceptance; therefore, the value of unsatisfied performance obligations at the end of any reporting period is generally insignificant.
 
The Company’s payment terms are consistent with prevailing practice in the respective markets in which the Company does business. Most of the Company’s distributors make payments based on fixed-price contract terms, which are
not
affected by contingent events that could impact the transaction price. Payment terms fall within the
one
-year guidance for the practical expedient, which allows the Company to forgo adjustment of the contractual payment amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component. The Company’s contracts with customers do
not
customarily provide a right of return, unless certain product quality standards are
not
met.
 
Some of the Company’s distributor agreements have volume based discounts with tiered pricing which are generally prospective in nature. These prospective discounts together with any free-of-charge sample units offered are evaluated as potential material rights. If the prospective discounts or free-of-charge sample units are considered material rights, these would be separate performance obligations and a portion of the sales transaction price is allocated to the material right. Revenue allocated to the material right is recognized when the additional goods are transferred to the customer or when the option expires. During
2019,
the consideration allocated to material rights was
not
significant.
 
The Company receives payments from its customers based on billing schedules established in each contract. Up-front payments and fees are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due, and
may
require deferral of revenue recognition to a future period until the Company performs its obligations under these arrangements. Amounts are recorded as accounts receivable when its right to consideration is unconditional. Deferred revenue is
$0
as of
December 31, 2019
and
2018.
 
Generally, distributor contracts contain Free on Board (FOB) or Ex-Works (EXW) shipping point terms where the customer pays the shipping company directly for all shipping and handling costs. In those contracts in which the Company pays for the shipping and handling, the associated costs are generally recorded along with the product sale at the time of shipment in cost of product revenue when control over the products has transferred to the customer. The Company does
not
collect sales tax on product sales as it is
not
applicable. Value-add and other taxes collected by the Company concurrently with revenue-producing activities are excluded from revenue. The Company’s general product warranty does
not
extend beyond an assurance that the product or services delivered will be consistent with stated contractual specifications, which does
not
create a separate performance obligation. The Company recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred as the amortization period of the assets that the Company otherwise would have recognized is
one
year or less in accordance with the practical expedient in paragraph ASC
340
-
40
-
25
-
4.
These costs are included in selling, general & administrative expenses.
 
Included as a component of product revenue is sales-based royalty revenue, which represents the utilization of the Company’s intellectual property licensed by its commercial partners. The Company records royalty revenues based on estimated net sales of licensed products as reported to us by the Company’s commercial partners. Differences between actual and estimated royalty revenues have
not
been material and are typically adjusted in the following quarter when the actual amounts are known. Under its distribution model, the Company sells to a diversified base of customers and, therefore, believes there is
no
material concentration of credit risk.
 
With respect to its U.S. hybrid commercial model which pairs a small, in-house team of regional sales directors with local or regional distributors, the Company completed its implementation in the
second
half of
2019
and utilized the framework to launch TACTOSET, it’s HA-enhanced bone repair therapy designed to treat insufficiency fractures, at that time.
 
The Company recognizes revenue from TACTOSET product sales when the customer obtains control or upon utilization of the Company’s product in return for agreed-upon, fixed-price consideration. Revenues were
not
significant for the period. Performance obligations are settled upon transfer of the Company’s product to the customer or utilization of the Company’s product by the customer. The Company’s payment terms are consistent with prevailing practice in the respective markets in which the Company does business. The Company’s customers make payments based on fixed-price terms, which are
not
affected by contingent events that could impact the transaction price. Payment terms align with the
one
-year guidance for the practical expedient, which allows the Company to forgo adjustment of the contractual payment amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component. Product returns are only accepted at the discretion of the Company and are
not
expected to be significant. The Company accrues for sales returns and allowances on TACTOSET based upon research performed and current market conditions. The Company sells to a diversified base of customers and, therefore, believes there is
no
material concentration of credit risk.
 
Licensing, Milestone and Contract Revenue
 
The agreements with Mitek include variable consideration such as contingent development and regulatory milestones. As of the date of adoption of ASC
606,
there is
one
remaining regulatory milestone related to the Mitek agreements and the Company has
no
performance obligation related to this milestone. In general, variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized is
not
probable to occur.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company
considers only those investments which are highly liquid, readily convertible to cash, and that mature within
90
days from date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents consist of money market funds.
 
Investments
 
All
of the Company’s investments are classified as available-for-sale which consist of U.S. treasury bills and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of related income taxes. For securities sold prior to maturity, the cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are recorded in interest and other income, net. Interest is recorded when earned. Investments with original maturities greater than approximately
three
months and remaining maturities less than
one
year are classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining maturities greater than
one
year are classified as long-term investments. Long-term investments is
$0
as of
December 31, 2019
and
2018.
 
All of the Company’s investments are subject to a periodic impairment review. The Company recognizes an impairment charge when a decline in the fair value of its investments below the cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the extent and length of time the investment's fair value has been lower than its cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, extent of the loss related to credit of the issuer, the expected cash flows from the security, the Company’s intent to sell the security, and whether or
not
the Company will be required to sell the security prior to the expected recovery of the investment's amortized cost basis. During the years ended 
December 
31,
2019
and
2018,
the Company did
not
record any other-than-temporary impairment charges on its available-for-sale securities because it is
not
more likely than
not
that the Company will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of their cost basis.
 
Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
 
The Company has
no
significant off-balance sheet risks related to foreign exchange contracts, option contracts, or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company’s cash equivalents and investments are held with
two
major international financial institutions.
 
The Company, by policy, routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers. As a result, the Company believes that its accounts receivable credit risk exposure is limited.
 
As of
December 
31,
2019
and
2018,
Mitek represented
70%
and
75%,
respectively, of the Company’s accounts receivable balance,
no
other single customer accounted for more than
10%
of accounts receivable in either period.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are primarily stated at the lower of standard cost and net realizable value, with approximate cost determined using the
first
-in,
first
-out method. Work-in-process and finished goods inventories include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. Inventory costs associated with product candidates that have
not
yet received regulatory approval are capitalized if the Company believes there is probable future commercial use and future economic benefit.
 
The Company’s policy is to write-down inventory when conditions exist that suggest inventory
may
be in excess of anticipated demand or is obsolete based upon assumptions about future demand for the Company’s products and market conditions. The Company regularly evaluates the ability to realize the value of inventory based on a combination of factors including, but
not
limited to, historical usage rates, forecasted sales or usage, product end of life dates, and estimated current or future market values. Purchasing requirements and alternative usage avenues are explored within these processes to mitigate inventory exposure.
 
When recorded, inventory write-downs are intended to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value. If actual demand for the Company’s products deteriorates, or if market conditions are less favorable than those projected, additional inventory write-downs
may
be required.
Other long-term assets include inventory expected to remain on hand beyond
one
year.
  
Operating Leases
 
The Company adopted
Leases
 (ASC
842
) as of
January 1, 2019
using the modified retrospective method which did
not
require it to restate prior periods, and did
not
have an impact on retained earnings. The transition guidance associated with ASC
842
also permits certain practical expedients. The Company has elected the “package of
3”
practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance which eliminates the requirements to reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification, and initial direct costs. The Company also adopted the practical expedient to use hindsight to determine the lease term. The Company adopted an accounting policy which provides that leases with an initial term of
12
months or less and
no
purchase option the Company is reasonably certain of exercising will
not
be included within the lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet. The Company elected an accounting policy to combine the non-lease components (which include common area maintenance, taxes and insurance) with the related lease component. The Company elected this practical expedient to all asset classes upon the adoption of ASC
842.
 
At the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease based on the circumstances present. Leases with a term greater than
one
year are recognized on the consolidated balance sheet as right-of-use assets, lease liabilities, and, if applicable, long-term lease liabilities. The Company includes renewal options to extend the lease in the lease term where it is reasonably certain that it will exercise these options. Lease liabilities and the corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present values of lease payments over the lease terms. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically
not
readily determinable. As such, the Company utilizes the appropriate incremental borrowing rates, which are the rates that would be incurred to borrow on a collateralized basis, over similar terms, amounts equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. Variable payments that do
not
depend on a rate or index are
not
included in the lease liability and are recognized as incurred. Lease contracts do
not
include residual value guarantees nor do they include restrictions or other covenants. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use assets
may
be required for items such as initial direct costs paid, incentives received or lease prepayments. If significant events, changes in circumstances, or other events indicate that the lease term or other inputs have changed, the Company would reassess lease classification, remeasure the lease liability by using revised inputs as of the reassessment date, and adjust the right-of-use asset.
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which are typically:
 
Asset   Estimated useful life 
(in years)
Computer equipment and software  
3
-
10
Furniture and fixtures  
5
-
7
Equipment  
5
-
20
Leasehold improvements  
 
Shorter of useful life or term of lease
 
 
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred; additions and improvements are capitalized. Fully depreciated assets are retained in the accounts until they are
no
longer used and
no
further charge for depreciation is made in respect of these assets. When an item is sold, retired or removed from service, the cost and related accumulated depreciation is relieved, and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognized in income.
 
Construction-in-process is stated at cost, which includes the cost of construction and other direct costs attributable to the construction. Construction-in-process is
not
depreciated until such time as the relevant assets are completed and put into use.
 
Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill is the amount by which the purchase price of acquired net assets in a business combination exceeded the fair values of net identifiable assets on the date of acquisition. Acquired In-Process Research and Development (“IPR&D”) represents the fair value assigned to research and development assets that the Company acquires that have
not
been completed at the date of acquisition or are pending regulatory approval in certain jurisdictions. The value assigned to the acquired IPR&D is determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired technology into commercially viable products, estimating the resulting revenue from the projects, and discounting the net cash flows to present value.
 
 
Goodwill and IPR&D are evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Factors the Company considers important, on an overall company basis, that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the Company’s use of the acquired assets or the strategy for its overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period, or a reduction of its market capitalization relative to net book value.
 
To conduct impairment tests of goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value. If the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company’s annual assessment for impairment of goodwill as of
November 30, 2019
indicated that the fair value of its reporting unit exceeded the carrying value of the reporting unit.
 
To conduct impairment tests of IPR&D, the fair value of the IPR&D project is compared to its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds its fair value, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value of the IPR&D project exceeds its fair value. The Company estimates the fair value for IPR&D using discounted cash flow valuation models, which require the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including but
not
limited to, estimating the timing of and expected costs to complete the in-process projects, projecting regulatory approvals, estimating future cash flows from product sales resulting from completed projects and in-process projects, and developing appropriate discount rates. The Company’s annual assessment for impairment of IPR&D indicated that the fair value of its other IPR&D assets as of
November 30, 2019
and
2018
exceeded the respective carrying values.
 
Long-Lived Assets
 
Long-lived assets primarily include property and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives. The Company’s intangible assets are comprised of purchased developed technologies, patents, and trade names. These intangible assets are carried at cost, net of accumulated amortization. Amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over the intangible assets' useful lives, which range from approximately
five
 to 
sixteen
 years. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets
may
not
be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of those assets are
no
longer appropriate. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows to the recorded value of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of non-performance. The accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
  
 A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Three levels of inputs that
may
be used to measure fair value are:
  
 
Level
1
– Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. Level
1
instruments include securities traded on active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange.
 
 
Level
2
– Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are
not
active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are directly observable in the market.
 
 
Level
3
– Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions
not
observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates of assumptions market participants would use in pricing the instrument.
 
The Company’s financial assets have been classified as Level
1.
The Company’s financial assets (which include cash equivalents and investments) have been initially valued at the transaction price and subsequently valued, at the end of each reporting period, utilizing
third
party pricing services.
 
Research and Development
 
Research and development costs consist primarily of clinical trials, salaries and related expenses for personnel, and fees paid to outside consultants and outside service providers, including costs associated with licensing, milestone and contract revenue. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Company has stock-based compensation plans under which it grants various types of equity-based awards, including restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance restricted stock units (“PSUs”), restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), performance options, and stock options. The Company measures the compensation cost of award recipients’ services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the underlying award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
 
For performance-based options with financial and business milestone achievement targets, the Company recognizes expense using the graded vesting methodology over the service period. For PSUs with financial and business milestone achievement targets, the Company recognizes expense based on the grant-date price of the Company’s shares with corresponding compensation cost recognized over the requisite service period. For performance-based equity awards, compensation cost is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions. Changes to the probability assessment and the estimated shares expected to vest will result in adjustments to the related stock-based compensation expense that will be recorded in the period of the change. If the performance targets are
not
achieved,
no
compensation cost is recognized, and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed.
 
See Note
13,
Equity Incentive Plan
, for a description of the types of stock-based awards granted, the compensation expense related to such awards, and detail of equity-based awards outstanding.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company’s income tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes. Certain items of income and expense are
not
reported in tax returns and financial statements in the same year. The tax effects of these timing differences are reported as deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are recognized for the estimated future tax effects of deductible temporary differences, tax operating losses, and tax credit carry-forwards (including investment tax credits). Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the provision for income taxes. The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent it believes that it is more likely than
not
that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will
not
be realized, the Company establishes a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the appropriate valuation. To the extent the Company establishes a valuation allowance or increases or decreases this allowance in a given period, it includes the related tax expense or tax benefit within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of operations in that period.
 
Comprehensive Income
 
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss), which includes foreign currency translation adjustments. For the purposes of comprehensive income disclosures, the Company does
not
record tax provisions or benefits for the net changes in the foreign currency translation adjustment, as it intends to indefinitely reinvest undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiary. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reported as a component of stockholders' equity.
  
Segment Information
 
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its President and Chief Executive Officer. Based on the criteria established by ASC
280,
Segment Reportin
g, the Company has
one
operating and reportable segment.
 
Contingencies
 
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved from time-to-time in various legal proceedings and other matters such as contractual disputes, which are complex in nature and have outcomes that are difficult to predict. The Company records accruals for loss contingencies to the extent that it concludes that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the related loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company considers all relevant factors when making assessments regarding these contingencies. Although the outcomes of any potential legal proceedings are inherently difficult to predict, the Company does
not
expect the resolution of any potential legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flow.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In
August 2018,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2018
-
15,
 
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic
350
-
40
)
, which amends ASU
No.
2015
-
05,
 
Customers Accounting for Fees in a Cloud Computing Agreement
, to help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement (hosting arrangement) by providing guidance for determining when the arrangement includes a software license. The most significant change will align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license. Accordingly, the amendments in ASU
2018
-
15
require an entity in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract to follow the guidance in Subtopic
350
-
40
to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as assets related to the service contract and which costs to expense. ASU
2018
-
15
is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2019.
The adoption of this standard is
not
expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
 
In
June 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
13,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
. The standard, including subsequently issued amendments, requires a financial asset measured at amortized cost basis, such as accounts receivable and certain other financial assets, to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount.
ASU
2016
-
13
is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2019
, and requires the modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. Based on the composition of the Company’s trade receivables and other financial assets, current market conditions, and historical credit loss activity, the adoption of this standard will
not
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.