-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, N1b6Vukimk9TWXqNaDdMLkHaErv0jR97xQu7ZTnGJrUDPvdkVz/K3VMR3eO6CPBz 2TY06nbD96/TduYkeTmDlw== 0001104659-02-002543.txt : 20020515 0001104659-02-002543.hdr.sgml : 20020515 20020515154933 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001104659-02-002543 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20020331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20020515 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ANIKA THERAPEUTICS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000898437 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (NO DIAGNOSTIC SUBSTANCES) [2836] IRS NUMBER: 043145961 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-14027 FILM NUMBER: 02652028 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 236 WEST CUMMINGS PARK CITY: WOBURN STATE: MA ZIP: 01801 BUSINESS PHONE: 6179326616 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 236 WEST CUMMINGS PARK CITY: WOBURN STATE: MA ZIP: 01801 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: ANIKA RESEARCH INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19930309 10-Q 1 j3944_10q.htm 10-Q SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from           to           

 

Commission File Number 000-21326

 


 

Anika Therapeutics, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Massachusetts

 

04-3145961

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

236 West Cummings Park, Woburn, Massachusetts

 

01801

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (781) 932-6616

 

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.  Yes ý    No o

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date.

 

At May 8, 2002 there were 9,934,280 outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.

 

 



 

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheet

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

March 31,
2002

 

December 31,
2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and equivalents

 

$

10,447,648

 

$

9,064,977

 

Short-term marketable securities

 

2,000,000

 

3,994,401

 

Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $25,000

 

2,053,279

 

2,240,929

 

Inventories

 

3,166,344

 

3,726,982

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

343,224

 

540,476

 

Total current assets

 

18,010,495

 

19,567,765

 

Property and equipment, at cost

 

9,544,917

 

9,530,047

 

Less:  accumulated depreciation

 

(6,854,363

)

(6,583,175

)

 

 

2,690,554

 

2,946,872

 

Long-term deposits

 

148,160

 

148,160

 

Notes receivable from officers

 

253,000

 

253,000

 

Total assets

 

$

21,102,209

 

$

22,915,797

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

702,815

 

$

954,585

 

Accrued expenses

 

1,697,156

 

1,842,399

 

Deferred revenue

 

402,633

 

15,001

 

Total current liabilities

 

2,802,604

 

2,811,985

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value; 750,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Undesignated preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,250,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized, 9,991,943 shares issued

 

99,919

 

99,919

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

31,640,234

 

31,640,234

 

Treasury stock (at cost, 57,663 shares)

 

(279,756

)

(279,756

)

Accumulated deficit

 

(13,160,792

)

(11,356,585

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

18,299,605

 

20,103,812

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

21,102,209

 

$

22,915,797

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

2



 

Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

March 31,
2002

 

March 31,
2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product revenue

 

$

2,384,717

 

$

2,178,617

 

License revenue

 

5,000

 

 

Total revenue

 

2,389,717

 

2,178,617

 

Cost of product revenue

 

2,087,414

 

1,968,948

 

Gross profit

 

302,303

 

209,669

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Research & development

 

1,089,874

 

1,347,870

 

Selling, general & administrative

 

1,079,495

 

1,452,810

 

Total operating expenses

 

2,169,369

 

2,800,680

 

Loss from operations

 

(1,867,066

)

(2,591,011

)

Interest income

 

62,859

 

272,580

 

Net loss

 

$

(1,804,207

)

$

(2,318,431

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted net loss per common share

 

$

(0.18

)

$

(0.23

)

Shares used to calculate basic and diluted net loss per common share

 

9,934,280

 

9,934,280

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

3



 

Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Three Months Ended

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

March 31,
2002

 

March 31,
2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(1,804,207

)

$

(2,318,431

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

271,188

 

224,262

 

Amortization of deferred compensation

 

 

73,366

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

187,650

 

440,844

 

Inventories

 

560,638

 

(39,307

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

197,252

 

155,443

 

Accounts payable

 

(251,770

)

(96,681

)

Accrued expenses

 

(145,243

)

195,240

 

Deferred revenue

 

387,632

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

(596,860

)

(1,365,264

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of short-term marketable securities

 

1,994,401

 

7,039,849

 

Purchase of short-term marketable securities

 

 

(7,420,246

)

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(14,870

)

(134,361

)

Deposits

 

 

835

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

1,979,531

 

(513,923

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

1,382,671

 

(1,879,187

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

9,064,977

 

8,265,936

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

10,447,648

 

$

6,386,749

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

4



 

ANIKA THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

1.              Nature of Business

 

Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (“Anika” or the “Company”) develops, manufactures and commercializes therapeutic products and devices intended to promote the protection and healing of bone, cartilage and soft tissue. These products are based on hyaluronic acid (“HA”), a naturally occurring, biocompatible polymer found throughout the body. Due to its unique biophysical and biochemical properties, HA plays an important role in a number of physiological functions such as the protection and lubrication of soft tissues and joints, the maintenance of the structural integrity of tissues, and the transport of molecules to and within cells. The Company’s currently marketed products consist of ORTHOVISC®, which is an HA product used in the treatment of some forms of osteoarthritis in humans, and HYVISC®, which is an HA product used in the treatment of equine osteoarthritis. ORTHOVISC® is currently approved for sale and is being marketed in Canada, parts of Europe, Turkey, and Israel. In the U.S., ORTHOVISCÒ is currently limited to investigational use. The Company manufactures AMVISC® and AMVISC® Plus for Bausch & Lomb Surgical, which are HA products used as viscoelastic supplements in ophthalmic surgery.  STAARVISCÒII, an injectable ophthalmic viscoelastic, is produced for STAAR Surgical Company, and ShellGelÔ is produced for Cytosol Ophthalmics, Inc.

 

2.              Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  In the opinion of management, these consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2002, the results of it’s operations for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 and it’s cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001.

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual financial statements filed with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2002.  See “Risk Factors and Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results”.

 

3.              Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

5



 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Anika Therapeutics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Anika Securities Corporation and Anika Therapeutics UK, Ltd.  All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consists of cash and investments with original maturities of 90 days or less.

 

Marketable Securities

 

The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.  Short-term marketable securities consist of commercial paper with maturities within twelve months of the balance sheet date. The Company classifies these marketable securities as held to maturity, and accordingly they are carried at amortized cost. Aggregate fair value, amortized cost and average maturity for marketable securities held at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 are as follows:

 

 

 

March 31, 2002

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross Unrealized
Holding Gain(Loss)

 

Fair Value

 

Commercial Bond (weighted average maturity of 12 months)

 

$

2,000,000

 

$

(12,200)

 

$

1,987,800

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2001

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gross Unrealized
Holding Gain(Loss)

 

Fair Value

 

Commercial Paper (weighted average maturity of 5.5 months)

 

$

3,994,401

 

$

39,802

 

$

4,034,203

 

 

During the three months ending March 31, 2002, securities classified as held to maturity, with an amortized cost aggregating $2,032,000, including interest and realized gains of $37,599, matured.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Product revenue is recognized upon shipment to the customer as long as there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is probable.  ORTHOVISCÒ has been sold through several distribution arrangements as well as two outsource order processing arrangements (“logistic agents”). Sales of product through third party logistics agents in certain markets are recognized as revenue upon shipment by the logistics agent to the customer.  The Company recognizes non-refundable up-front or milestone payments received as part of supply, distribution, and marketing arrangements, ratably over the terms of the agreements to which the payments apply.  Amounts received or billed prior to meeting the Company’s revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in the accompanying balance sheet.

 

Reporting Comprehensive Income

 

SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income(loss) and its components in the financial statements. Comprehensive income(loss) is

 

6



 

the total of net income(loss) and all other non-owner changes in equity including such items as unrealized holding gains/losses on securities, foreign currency translation adjustments and minimum pension liability adjustments. The Company had no other items of comprehensive income(loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 except for its reported net loss.

 

Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information

 

Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-makers, in making decisions regarding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s chief decision-making group consists of two individuals: the chief executive officer and president, and the  chief financial officer. Based on the criteria established by SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the Company has one reportable operating segment, the results of which are disclosed in the accompanying financial statements.  Substantially all of the operations and assets of the Company have been derived from and are located in the United States.

 

Revenues by geographic location in total and as a percentage of total revenues are as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2002

 

2001

 

 

 

Revenue

 

Percent of
Revenue

 

Revenue

 

Percent of
Revenue

 

United States

 

$

1,863,103

 

77.9

%

$

1,440,482

 

66.1

%

Middle East

 

59,115

 

2.5

 

11,950

 

0.6

 

Other/Europe

 

467,499

 

19.6

 

726,185

 

33.3

 

Total

 

$

2,389,717

 

100.0

%

$

2,178,617

 

100.0

%

 

Since early 2001, sales of product for the Turkish market have been made to a European-based entity and have accordingly been classified in the “Other/Europe” category since that time.

 

Product revenue by significant customers is as follows:

 

 

 

Percent of Product Revenue
Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2002

 

2001

 

AMVISCâ

 

 

 

 

 

Bausch & Lomb

 

54.1

%

60.1

%

HYVISCâ

 

 

 

 

 

Boehringer Ingelheim

 

12.9

%

5.3

%

ORTHOVISCâ

 

 

 

 

 

Pharmaren AG

 

5.0

%

18.2

%

 

 

72.0

%

83.6

%

 

4.              Earnings Per Share

 

The Company reports earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, which establishes standards for computing and presenting earnings (loss) per share.

 

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares

 

7



 

outstanding during the period. Under the treasury stock method, the dilutive unexercised options are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period or at issuance, if later. The assumed proceeds are then used to purchase common shares at the average market price during the period. For periods where the Company has incurred a loss, dilutive net loss per share is equal to basic net loss per share.  Accordingly, the dilutive effect of outstanding options totaling 126,750 and 18,022, respectively at March 31, 2002 and 2001, are excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding because to include them would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.

 

5.              Inventories

 

Inventories consist of the following:

 

 

 

March 31,
2002

 

December 31,
2001

 

Raw materials

 

$

1,272,089

 

$

1,542,511

 

Work-in-process

 

1,537,816

 

1,971,067

 

Finished goods

 

356,439

 

213,404

 

Total

 

$

3,166,344

 

$

3,726,982

 

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.  Work-in-process and finished goods inventories include materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead.

 

6.              Notes Receivable from Officers

 

Notes receivable from officers of $253,000 consists of loans made to one officer and two former officers.  The notes receivable from the former officers are secured by mortgages on their primary residences.  Interest accrues at annual rates between 6.00% to 6.22%.   The maturity of a note in the amount of $75,000 to the Company’s former chief executive officer, which is secured by a mortgage on his primary residence, was extended and the Company expects repayment on or about June 12, 2002.  The maturity of a note to another former officer, which is secured by a mortgage on his primary residence, is due on August 12, 2004.  The Company believes that both notes are fully collectible.

 

7.              Licensing and Distribution Agreement

 

In July 2000, the Company entered into a seven-year supply agreement (the “BLS Agreement”) with Bausch & Lomb Surgical, a unit of Bausch & Lomb.  Under the terms of the BLS Agreement, effective January 1, 2001, the Company became Bausch & Lomb’s exclusive provider of AMVISC® and AMVISC® Plus, ophthalmic viscoelastic products, in the U.S. and international markets.  The BLS Agreement expires December 31, 2007, superceding an existing supply contract with Bausch & Lomb Surgical that was set to expire December 31, 2001 (the “Old BLS Agreement”).  The BLS Agreement is subject to early termination and/or reversion to a non-exclusive basis under certain circumstances.  The BLS Agreement lifts contractual restrictions on the Company’s sales of certain ophthalmic products to other companies contained in the Old BLS Agreement, subject to payment of royalties to Bausch & Lomb by the Company.   The Company agreed to a reduction in unit selling prices effective April 1, 2000, and the elimination of minimum unit purchase obligations by Bausch & Lomb Surgical Under the terms of the BLS Agreement, the price for units sold in a calendar year is dependent on total unit volume of sales of certain ophthalmic products during the year. Accordingly, unit prices for sales occurring in the three months ended March 31, 2002 are subject to possible retroactive price adjustments when the actual annual unit volume for 2002 becomes known.  In accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy, revenue is not recognized if the sale price is not fixed or determinable, and any amounts received in

 

8



 

excess of revenue recognized is recorded as deferred revenue. At March 31, 2002, the deferred revenue under the BLS Agreement amounted to approximately $358,000.

 

In April 2001, the Company entered into a five-year supply agreement with Cytosol Ophthalmics, Inc.  Under the terms of the agreement, effective April 11, 2001, the Company became Cytosol Ophthalmic’s exclusive provider of sterile sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic viscoelastic products, in the U.S. and international markets.  Under the agreement, in lieu of up-front payments, the Company is entitled to an increase in the price per unit of $2 per unit for the initial 50,000 units purchased.  As a result, revenue of $2 per unit for the initial 50,000 units purchased will be deferred at the time of shipment and recognized ratably over the term of the agreement.  The agreement expires April 11, 2006.  The agreement is subject to early termination and/or reversion to a non-exclusive basis under certain circumstances. At March 31, 2002, deferred revenue under this agreement amounted to approximately $35,000. At March 31, 2002, deferred revenue also includes $10,000 relating to fees paid to the Company under its agreement with AMA Pharmaceuticals.

 

8.              Legal Matters

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation.   The SEC has issued a formal order of investigation and has required the Company to provide information in connection with certain revenue recognition matters.  The Company has been cooperating fully.  These matters, relating to the Company’s historical accounting for and disclosures concerning sales of ORTHOVISCÒ under a long-term supply and distribution agreement with Zimmer, were also the subject of the Company’s March 15, 2000 disclosure concerning an informal SEC inquiry and the restatement of results for 1998 and the first three quarters of 1999.  As reported on August 14, 2001, as a result of the SEC’s on-going investigation, the Company, in conjunction with its independent auditors, determined to again restate its financial results for the fourth quarter of 1998 and the first quarter of 1999.  As a result of that investigation, the Company has been informed that the staff of the Boston District Office of the SEC (the “Staff”) is considering recommending that the SEC authorize civil injunctive actions against the Company and others, including former officers of the Company, concerning these matters.  The Company has been invited by the Staff to submit its views as to why a civil injunctive action against the Company should not be instituted, and is currently in discussions with the Staff concerning possible resolution of the proposed recommendation by settlement.  The Company is not in a position to predict whether such a settlement will be reached.  In addition, if the Company expends substantial additional costs and fees in responding to this matter, then the matter may have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.

 

9



 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding:

                  the Company’s future sales and product revenues, including possible retroactive price adjustments, expectations regarding unit volumes or other offsets to price reductions;

                  the Company’s efforts to increase sales of ophthalmic viscoelastic products;

                  the Company’s manufacturing capacity and work-in-process manufacturing;

                  the timing, scope, and rates of patient enrollment in clinical trials and related costs;

                  FDA or other regulatory approvals and/or reimbursement approvals of new or potential products;

                  the development of possible new products;

                  possible negotiations or renegotiations with existing or new distribution and collaboration partners; and

                  the possible resolution of the SEC investigation by settlement, and the effect of the SEC investigation on the Company’s financial position if the Company expends substantial additional costs and fees in its response to the investigation.

 

Statements identified by words such as “will,” “likely,” “may,” “believe,” “expect,” and other expressions, that are predictions of, or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters, also identify forward-looking statements.  Such forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, including those factors described in the section titled “Risk Factors and Certain Factors Affecting Future Operating Results” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  The Company’s actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from anticipated results, performance or achievement, expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements.  Such forward looking statements are based upon the current assumptions and beliefs of management and are only expectations of future results.  Additional factors that might cause such a difference are set forth herein and in the “Management’s Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 10 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as factors described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and the Company’s press releases and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

The Company derives a substantial portion of its revenue from the sale of AMVISCâ and AMVISCâPlus to Bausch & Lomb Surgical.  For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, AMVISC sales accounted for 54.1% and 60.1% of product revenue, respectively.

 

Results of Operations

 

Product revenue. Product revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2002 was $2,384,717, an increase of $206,100, or 9.5%, from $2,178,617 recorded in the corresponding quarter of 2001. This increase is due to $224,000 higher ophthalmic product sales and $192,000 higher revenue from sales of HYVISC®, offset somewhat by lower sales of ORTHOVISC, attributable to lower sales for the Turkish market.

 

License revenue.  There was license revenue of $5,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002 related to up-front payments on a five year supply agreement with a purchaser of the Company’s ophthalmic products.

 

Gross profit. Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2002 was $302,303, an increase of $92,634, or 44.2%, from a gross profit of $209,669 recorded in the prior year corresponding quarter.  Gross margin in the first quarter of 2002, as compared with the first quarter of 2001, benefited from improved manufacturing cost performance resulting from the Company’s efforts over the past year to reduce work in process inventories.

 

10



 

 

Research & development. Research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2002 decreased by $257,996, or 19.1%, to $1,089,874 from $1,347,870 recorded in the corresponding quarter of the prior year.  R&D expenditures for the most recent quarter continue to include patient accrual costs for the current clinical trial for ORTHOVISC, Anika’s product for osteoarthritis of the knee, for which the Company is currently seeking FDA approval.  R&D expenditures for the first quarter of last year included the commencement of this ORTHOVISC trial, as well as expenses related to initiating pre-clinical trial expenses related to the development of INCERT, a therapy for preventing post-surgical adhesions. As previously disclosed, the Company determined not to commence a clinical trial for INCERT® in the prior year.

 

Selling, general and administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2002 decreased by $373,315 or 25.7%, to $1,079,495 from $1,452,810 in the corresponding quarter of the prior year.    The decrease is largely attributable to lower professional service fees and lower ORTHOVISC selling expenses in foreign markets.

 

Net interest income. The Company’s net interest income decreased by $209,721 to $62,859 for the three months ended March 31, 2002 from $272,580 in the corresponding quarter of the prior year.  Approximately two-thirds of the decline in interest income, as compared with first quarter of 2001, is related to the substantial decline in market interest rates for short-term investments.  The remainder of the decrease is due to lower average invested balances.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Liquidity is defined as the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature.  Historically, the Company has funded its cash requirements from available cash and short-term marketable securities.

 

At March 31, 2002, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of $12.4 million and working capital of $15.2 million compared to cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of $13.1 million and working capital of $16.8 million at December 31, 2001. Short-term marketable securities at March 31, 2002 consist of commercial paper with a  maturity of one year.  Since December 31, 2001, the Company’s investments have generally moved to shorter maturities.  As a result, approximately $2.0 million in marketable securities has shifted to cash equivalents on the balance sheet.

 

Aggregate cash used in operations in the first quarter of 2002 was $597,000. The net loss for the quarter, adjusted for depreciation and amortization was $1,533,000. The most significant elements of  working capital changes that favorably impacted cash flow were a reduction in inventory of $561,000 and an increase in deferred revenue of $388,000. The increase in deferred revenue largely relates to unit pricing provisions under the Company’s supply agreement with Bausch & Lomb (see Note 7 of the consolidated financial statements included herein).   Capital expenditures amounted to $15,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2002.  Capital expenditures in 2002 are expected to include spending for small equipment, computers, and furniture and fixtures associated with normal operations.  The Company anticipates that use of cash in 2002 will be significantly less than cash used in 2001.

 

In the first quarter of 2001, net cash used in operations was $1,365,000, including changes in working capital items of $656,000, and capital expenditures were $134,000.

 

The Company’s future capital requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend, on numerous factors, including:

 

11



 

                  market acceptance of its existing and future products;

                  the successful commercialization of products in development;

                  progress in its product development efforts;

                  the magnitude and scope of product development efforts;

                  progress with pre-clinical studies, clinical trials and product clearances by the FDA and other agencies;

                  the cost of maintaining adequate manufacturing capabilities;

                  the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights;

                  competing technological and market developments;

                  the development of strategic alliances for the marketing of certain of its products.

 

There can be no assurance that the Company will record profits in future periods. However, the Company believes that its cash and investments on hand will be sufficient to meet its requirements through at least the end of fiscal 2002.  See “Risk Factors and Certain Other Factors Affecting Future Operating Results — History of Losses; Uncertainty of Future Profitability.”

 

The terms of any future equity financings may be dilutive to the Company’s stockholders and the terms of any debt financings may contain restrictive covenants, which could limit the Company’s ability to pursue certain courses of action. The ability of the Company to obtain financing is dependent on the status of the Company’s future business prospects as well as conditions prevailing in the relevant capital markets. No assurance can be given that any additional financing will be made available to the Company or will be available on acceptable terms should such a need arise.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

In December 2001, the SEC requested that reporting companies discuss their most “critical accounting policies” in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations.  The SEC indicted that a “critical accounting policy” is one that is important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and operating results and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

 

We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.  The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results.  For a detailed discussion on the application of this and other accounting policies, see Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.  The Company’s preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q requires it to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of its financial statements, and assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition.  Product revenue is recognized upon shipment to the customer as long as there is (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement, (ii) the sales price is fixed or determinable and (iii) collection of the related receivable is probable.  Amounts billed or collected prior to recognition of revenue is classified as deferred revenue.  Determination of criteria (ii) and (iii) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the product fee and collectibility of those fees.  Under the

 

12



 

Company’s agreement with Bausch and Lomb, the price for units sold in a calendar year is dependent on total unit volume of sales of certain ophthalmic products during the year. Accordingly, unit prices for sales occurring in interim quarters are subject to possible retroactive price adjustments when the actual annual unit volume for the year becomes known.  In accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy, the amount of revenue reasonably subject to the price adjustment is recorded as deferred revenue until the annual unit volume becomes known and the sales price becomes fixed.  ORTHOVISC® has been sold through several distribution arrangements as well as outsource order-processing arrangements  (“logistic agents”.)  Sales of product through third party logistics agents in certain markets are recognized as revenue upon shipment by the logistics agent to the customer.  The Company recognizes non-refundable upfront or milestone payments received as part of supply, distribution, and marketing arrangements, ratably over the terms of the arrangements to which the payments apply.

 

Reserve for Obsolete/Excess Inventory.  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.  We regularly review raw materials and work-in-process inventories and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory if the inventory has not progressed through the manufacturing process for a period of time in excess of the typical inventory cycle period.  The reserve is adjusted in subsequent periods to reflect the current movement of the inventory through the manufacturing process.

 

RISK FACTORS AND CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS

 

Our business is subject to comprehensive and varied government regulation and, as a result, failure to obtain FDA or other governmental approvals for our products may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

                Product development and approval within the Food & Drug Administration framework takes a number of years and involves the expenditure of substantial resources.  There can be no assurance that the FDA will grant approval for our new products on a timely basis if at all, or that FDA review will not involve delays that will adversely affect our ability to commercialize additional products or expand permitted uses of existing products, or that the regulatory framework will not change, or that additional regulation will not arise at any stage of our product development process which may adversely affect approval of or delay an application or require additional expenditures by us.  In the event our future products are regulated as human drugs or biologics, the FDA’s review process of such products typically would be substantially longer and more expensive than the review process to which they are currently subject as devices.

 

In order to sell ORTHOVISC® in the United States, ORTHOVISC®  will have to meet regulatory requirements for a Class III device as determined by the FDA. Class III devices are those that generally must receive pre-market approval from the FDA (e.g. life-sustaining, life-supporting and implantable or new devices which have not been found to be substantially equivalent to legally marketed devices) and require clinical testing to ensure safety and effectiveness and FDA approval prior to marketing and distribution.  In order for us to commercially distribute ORTHOVISC® in the U.S., we must obtain a pre-market approval.  The PMA process can be expensive, uncertain and lengthy. A number of devices for which PMAs have been sought have never been approved for marketing.  The review of an application often occurs over a protracted time period, potentially taking two years or more from the filing date to complete.  We submitted a PMA application for ORTHOVISC® in December 1997.  In October 1998, we were notified by the FDA that our PMA application for ORTHOVISC® was not approvable and that additional clinical data would be required to demonstrate the effectiveness of ORTHOVISC®. We submitted an IDE to the FDA in February 1999 and received approval in late March 1999 to commence a second Phase III clinical study.  We received initial results from the Phase III clinical trial in late May 2000 that we determined did not show sufficient efficacy to support the filing of

 

13



 

a PMA application.  We have evaluated available information and announced our intention to pursue further clinical trials.  In February 2001, we commenced another Phase III clinical trial of ORTHOVISC®.  The trial is being conducted in up to 25 centers in the U.S. and Canada, with 360 patients expected to be enrolled, and with evaluation over a six-month period following treatment.  There can be no assurance that:

 

                  any additional clinical data will support the efficacy of ORTHOVISC®;

                  we will complete any additional clinical trials of ORTHOVISC®;

                  we will be able to successfully complete the FDA approval process;

                  any additional clinical trials will support a PMA application and/or FDA approval in a timely manner or at all.

 

There also can be no assurance that any delay in receiving FDA approvals will not continue to adversely affect our competitive position.   Furthermore, even if we were to receive a PMA approval:

 

                  the approval may include significant limitations on the indications and other claims sought for use for which the product may be marketed;

                  the approval may include other significant conditions to approval such as post-market testing, tracking, or surveillance requirements;

                  we may not be able to achieve meaningful sales of ORTHOVISC® in the U.S.

 

Once obtained, marketing approval can be withdrawn by the FDA for a number of reasons, including, among other things, the failure to comply with regulatory standards, or the occurrence of unforeseen problems following initial approval.  We may be required to make further filings with the FDA under certain circumstances. The FDA’s regulations require a PMA supplement for any changes that affect the safety and effectiveness of an approved device, including, but not limited to, new indications for use, labeling changes, the use of a different facility to manufacture, process or package the device, and changes in performance or design specifications.  Changes in manufacturing that affect safety and effectiveness may be deemed approved after a 30-day notice unless the FDA requests a supplement.  Our failure to receive approval of a PMA supplement regarding the use of a different manufacturing facility or any other change affecting the safety or effectiveness of an approved device on a timely basis, or at all, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.  The FDA could also limit or prevent the manufacture or distribution of our products and has the power to require the recall of such products.  Significant delay or cost in obtaining, or failure to obtain FDA approval to market products, any FDA limitations on the use of our products, or any withdrawal or suspension of approval or rescission of approval by the FDA could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

In addition, all FDA approved or cleared products manufactured by us must be manufactured in compliance with the FDA’s Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) regulations and, for medical devices, the FDA’s Good Manufacturing Practices/Quality System Regulations (GMP/QSR).  Ongoing compliance with GMP/QSR and other applicable regulatory requirements is enforced through periodic inspection by state and federal agencies, including the FDA.  The FDA may inspect us and our facilities from time to time to determine whether we are in compliance with regulations relating to medical device and manufacturing companies, including regulations concerning manufacturing, testing, quality control and product labeling practices.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with current or future FDA requirements applicable to the manufacture of products.

 

14



 

FDA regulations depend heavily on administrative interpretation and there can be no assurance that the future interpretations made by the FDA or other regulatory bodies, with possible retroactive effect, will not adversely affect us.  In addition, changes in the existing regulations or adoption of new governmental regulations or policies could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products.

 

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in, among other things, warning letters, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, refusal of the FDA to grant pre-market clearance or PMA’s for devices, withdrawal of approvals and criminal prosecution.

 

In addition to regulations enforced by the FDA, we are subject to other existing and future federal, state, local and foreign regulations.  International regulatory bodies often establish regulations governing product standards, packing requirements, labeling requirements, import restrictions, tariff regulations, duties and tax requirements. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve and/or maintain compliance required for CE marking or other foreign regulatory approvals for any or all of our products or that we will be able to produce our products in a timely and profitable manner while complying with applicable requirements.  Federal, state, local and foreign regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of medical products are subject to change.  We cannot predict what impact, if any, such changes might have on our business.

 

The process of obtaining approvals from the FDA and other regulatory authorities can be costly, time consuming, and subject to unanticipated delays.  There can be no assurance that approvals or clearances of our products will be granted or that we will have the necessary funds to develop certain of its products.  Any failure to obtain, or delay in obtaining such approvals or clearances, could adversely affect our ability to market our products.

 

We have historically incurred operating losses and we cannot make any assurances about our future profitability.

 

From our inception through December 31, 1996 and in 1999, 2000, and 2001, we have incurred annual operating losses.  As of March 31, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $13.2 million. The continued development of our products will require the commitment of substantial resources to conduct research and preclinical and clinical development programs, and to establish sales and marketing capabilities or distribution arrangements.  Our ability  to reach profitability is highly uncertain.  To achieve profitability, we must, among other things, successfully complete development of certain of our products, obtain regulatory approvals and establish sales and marketing capabilities or distribution arrangements for certain of our products.

 

Substantial competition could materially affect our financial performance.

 

We compete with many companies, including, among others, large pharmaceutical companies and specialized medical products companies.  Many of these companies have substantially greater financial and other resources, larger research and development staffs, more extensive marketing and manufacturing organizations and more experience in the regulatory process than us.  We also compete with academic institutions, governmental agencies and other research organizations that may be involved in research, development and commercialization of products.  Because a number of companies are developing or have developed HA products for similar applications, the successful commercialization of a particular product will depend in part upon our ability to complete clinical studies and obtain FDA marketing and foreign regulatory approvals prior to our competitors, or, if regulatory approval is not obtained prior to competitors, to identify markets for our products that may be sufficient to permit meaningful sales of our products.  For example, several of our competitors have already obtained FDA and foreign regulatory approvals for

 

15



 

marketing HA products with applications similar to that of ORTHOVISCÒ.  Thus, the successful commercialization of ORTHOVISCÒ will depend in part on our ability to effectively market ORTHOVISCÒ against more established products with a longer sales history.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete against current or future competitors or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  We are currently experiencing uncertainties in the Turkish market from economic, regional, political, and competitive factors.  As a result, we are uncertain of the extent of our future sales in this market.

 

We are uncertain regarding the success of our clinical trials.

 

Several of our products, including ORTHOVISCÒ, will require clinical trials to determine their safety and efficacy for U.S. and international marketing approval by regulatory bodies, including the FDA.  In late May 2000, our initial analysis of the results of our second Phase III clinical trial of ORTHOVISCÒ did not show sufficient efficacy to support the filing of a PMA application to obtain FDA approval.  Although we have received (IDE) approval from the FDA for ORTHOVISC®,   there can be no assurance that:

 

                  any additional clinical data will support the efficacy of ORTHOVISC®,

                  we will  complete any additional clinical trials of ORTHOVISC®,

                  we will be able to successfully complete the FDA approval process for either ORTHOVISC®,

                  additional ORTHOVISC®  clinical trials will support a PMA application and/or FDA approval in a timely manner, or at all.

 

There can be no assurance that we will not encounter additional problems that will cause us to delay, suspend or terminate the clinical trials.  In addition, we cannot make any assurance that such clinical trials, if completed, will ultimately demonstrate these products to be safe and efficacious.

 

We are dependent upon marketing and distribution partners and the failure to maintain strategic alliances on acceptable terms will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our success will be dependent, in part, upon the efforts of our marketing partners and the terms and conditions of our relationships with such marketing partners.

 

We cannot assure you that such marketing partners will not seek to renegotiate their current agreements on terms less favorable to us.  Under the terms of the BLS Agreement, effective January 1, 2001, we became Bausch & Lomb’s exclusive provider of AMVISC® and AMVISC® Plus ophthalmic viscoelastic products, in the U.S. and international markets.  The BLS Agreement expires December 31, 2007, and superceded an existing supply contract with Bausch & Lomb that was set to expire December 31, 2001.  The BLS Agreement is subject to early termination and/or reversion to a non-exclusive basis under certain circumstances.  The BLS Agreement lifts contractual restrictions on our ability to sell certain ophthalmic products to other companies, subject to our payment of royalties.  We agreed to a reduction in unit selling prices retroactively effective to April 1, 2000 and the elimination of minimum unit purchase obligations of Bausch & Lomb.

 

We have not achieved incremental sales of our ophthalmic products to Bausch & Lomb and/or other companies sufficient to offset the effects of the price reduction and royalties to Bausch & Lomb and there can be no assurances that we will be able to do so in the future.  The reduction in unit prices resulted in a decrease in our revenue and gross profit from Bausch & Lomb.  We expect revenue in 2002 to be consistent with 2001.  In addition, under certain circumstances, Bausch & Lomb has the right to terminate

 

16



 

the agreement, and/or the agreement may revert to a non-exclusive basis; in each case, we cannot make any assurances that such circumstances will not occur.  For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, sales of AMVISC® products to Bausch & Lomb accounted for 65.2% and 54.1% of product revenues, respectively.  For the quarter ended March 31, 2002, sales to Bausch & Lomb amounted to 54.1% of our revenue. Although we intend to continue to seek new opthalmic product customers, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in obtaining new customers or to achieve meaningful sales to such new customers.

 

The ORTHOVISC® distribution agreement with Zimmer provided Zimmer with exclusive marketing and distribution rights to ORTHOVISC® in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia and most of Europe.  On November 10, 2000, we reached an agreement with Zimmer for an early termination of its marketing and distribution agreement for ORTHOVISC®. The termination may continue to have a material adverse effect on our ability to market ORTHOVISC®, which is likely to have a material adverse effect on our future operating results. We have relationships with logistics agents (outsource order processing providers) to distribute ORTHOVISC® to customers in Canada and European countries previously served by Zimmer.  We are seeking to establish long-term relationships with new distribution partners in those countries where Zimmer previously sold the product.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify or engage appropriate distribution or collaboration partners or effectively transition to any such partners. There can be no assurance that we will obtain European or other reimbursement approvals or, if such approvals are obtained, they will be obtained on a timely basis or at a satisfactory level of reimbursement.

 

We will need to obtain the assistance of additional marketing partners to bring new and existing products to market and to replace certain marketing partners, such as Zimmer.  Our current agreement for the distribution of HYVISC® in the United States with Boehringer Animal Health, Inc. expires at the end of May 2002.  Although we are in negotiations to extend the agreement for an additional term, there can be no assurance that Boehringer will agree or that other partners will agree to market our products on acceptable terms.  The failure to establish strategic partnerships for the marketing and distribution of our products on acceptable terms will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Our future success depends upon market acceptance of our existing and future products.

 

Our success will depend in part upon the acceptance of our existing and future products by the medical community, hospitals and physicians and other health care providers, and third-party payors. Such acceptance may depend upon the extent to which the medical community perceives our products as safer, more effective or cost-competitive than other similar products. Ultimately, for our new products to gain general market acceptance, it will also be necessary for us to develop marketing partners for the distribution of our products. There can be no assurance that our new products will achieve significant market acceptance. Failure of some or all of our future products to achieve significant market acceptance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights.

 

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, protect trade secrets, obtain licenses to technology owned by third parties when necessary, and conduct our business without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. The patent positions of pharmaceutical, medical products and biotechnology firms, including ours, can be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. There can be no assurance that any patent applications will result in the issuance of patents or, if any patents are issued, whether they will provide significant proprietary protection or commercial advantage, or will not be circumvented by others. In the event a third party has also filed one or more

 

17



 

patent applications for any of its inventions, we may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the PTO to determine priority of invention (see below), which could result in failure to obtain, or the loss of, patent protection for the inventions and the loss of any right to use the inventions. Even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us, such interference proceedings could result in substantial cost to us, and diversion of management’s attention away from our operations. Submission and prosecution of patent applications, litigation to establish the validity and scope of patents, assertion of patent infringement claims against others and the defense of patent infringement claims by others can be expensive and time consuming. There can be no assurance that in the event that any claims with respect to any of our patents, if issued, will not be challenged by one or more third parties, that any court or patent authority ruling on such challenge will determine that such patent claims are valid and enforceable. An adverse outcome in such litigation could cause us to lose exclusivity covered by the disputed rights. If a third party is found to have rights covering products or processes used by us, we could be forced to cease using the technologies or marketing the products covered by such rights, we could be subject to significant liabilities to such third party, or we could be required to license technologies from such third party. Furthermore, even if our patents are determined to be valid, enforceable, and broad in scope, there can be no assurance that competitors will not be able to design around such patents and compete with us using the resulting alternative technology.

 

We have a policy of seeking patent protection for patentable aspects of our proprietary technology. We intend to seek patent protection with respect to products and processes developed in the course of our activities when we believe such protection is in our best interest and when the cost of seeking such protection is not inordinate. However, no assurance can be given that any patent application will be filed, that any filed applications will result in issued patents or that any issued patents will provide us with a competitive advantage or will not be successfully challenged by third parties. The protections afforded by patents will depend upon their scope and validity, and others may be able to design around our patents. Our issued patents and any patents, which arise from our licensed application, would provide competitive protection, if at all, only in the United States. We have not, to date, pursued foreign patents equivalent to those issued or applied for in the United States.

 

Other entities have filed patent applications for or have been issued patents concerning various aspects of HA-related products or processes. There can be no assurance that the products or processes we develop will not infringe on the patent rights of others in the future. Any such infringement may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We received notice from the PTO in 1995 that a third party was attempting to provoke a patent interference with respect to one of our co-owned patents covering the use of INCERT® for post-surgical adhesion prevention. It is unclear whether an interference will be declared.  If an interference is declared, it is not possible at this time to determine the merits of the interference or the effect, if any, the interference will have on our marketing of INCERT® for this use. The existence of the interference proceeding may have a negative impact on the marketing of the INCERT® product, and no assurance can be given that we would be successful in any such interference proceeding. If the third-party interference were to be decided adversely to us, involved claims of our patent would be cancelled, our marketing of the INCERT® product may be materially and adversely affected and the third party may enforce patent rights against us which could prohibit the sale and use of INCERT® products, which could have a material adverse effect on our future operating results.

 

We also rely upon trade secrets and proprietary know-how for certain non-patented aspects of our technology. To protect such information, we require all employees, consultants and licensees to enter into confidentiality agreements limiting the disclosure and use of such information. There can be no assurance that these agreements provide meaningful protection or that they will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any such breach, or that our trade secrets, proprietary know-how, and our technological advances will not otherwise become known to others. In addition, there can be no

 

18



 

assurance that, despite precautions taken by us, others have not and will not obtain access to our proprietary technology. Further, there can be no assurance that third parties will not independently develop substantially equivalent or better technology.

 

Pursuant to the BLS Agreement, we have agreed to transfer to Bausch & Lomb, upon expiration of the term of the BLS agreement on December 31, 2007, or in connection with earlier termination in certain circumstances, our manufacturing process, know-how and technical information, which relate to AMVISC® products. Upon expiration of the BLS Agreement, there can be no assurance that Bausch & Lomb will continue to use us to manufacture AMVISC® and AMVISC® Plus. If Bausch & Lomb discontinues using  us as a manufacturer after such time, our business, financial condition, and results of operations would likely be materially and adversely affected.

 

Our manufacturing processes involve inherent risks and disruption could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our results of operations are dependent upon the continued operation of our manufacturing facility in Woburn, Massachusetts. The operation of biomedical manufacturing plants involves many risks, including the risks of breakdown, failure or substandard performance of equipment, the occurrence of natural and other disasters, and the need to comply with the requirements of directives of government agencies, including the FDA. In addition, we rely on a single supplier for syringes and a small number of suppliers for a number of other materials required for the manufacturing and delivery of our HA products. Furthermore, our manufacturing processes and research and development efforts involve animals and products derived from animals. The utilization of animals in research and development and product commercialization is subject to increasing focus by animal rights activists. The activities of animal rights groups and other organizations that have protested animal based research and development programs or boycotted the products resulting from such programs could cause an interruption in our manufacturing processes and research and development efforts. The occurrence of material operational problems, including but not limited to the events described above, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations during the period of such operational difficulties.

 

Our financial performance depends on the continued growth and demand for our products and we may not be able to successfully manage the expansion of our operations

 

Our future success depends on substantial growth in product sales. There can be no assurance that such growth can be achieved or, if achieved, can be sustained. There can be no assurance that even if substantial growth in product sales and the demand for our products is achieved, we will be able to:

 

                  develop the necessary manufacturing capabilities;

                  obtain the assistance of additional marketing partners;

                  attract, retain and integrate the required key personnel;

                  implement the financial, accounting and management systems needed to manage growing demand for our products

 

Our failure to successfully manage future growth could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Sales of our products are largely dependent upon third party reimbursement and our performance may be harmed by health care cost containment initiatives.

 

19



 

In the U.S. and other markets, health care providers, such as hospitals and physicians, that purchase health care products, such as our products, generally rely on third party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid and other health insurance and managed care plans, to reimburse all or part of the cost of the health care product. We depend upon the distributors for our products to secure reimbursement and reimbursement approvals. Reimbursement by third party payors may depend on a number of factors, including the payor’s determination that the use of our products is clinically useful and cost-effective, medically necessary and not experimental or investigational. Since reimbursement approval is required from each payor individually, seeking such approvals can be a time consuming and costly process which, in the future, could require us or our marketing partners to provide supporting scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our products separately to each payor. Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly approved health care products, and third party payors are increasingly attempting to contain the costs of health care products and services by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for new therapeutic products and by refusing in some cases to provide coverage for uses of approved products for disease indications for which the FDA has not granted marketing approval. In addition, Congress and certain state legislatures have considered reforms that may affect current reimbursement practices, including controls on health care spending through limitations on the growth of Medicare and Medicaid spending. There can be no assurance that third party reimbursement coverage will be available or adequate for any products or services we develop. Outside the U.S., the success of our products is also dependent in part upon the availability of reimbursement and health care payment systems. Lack of adequate coverage and reimbursement provided by governments and other third party payors for our products and services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

We may seek financing in the future, which could be difficult to obtain and which could dilute your ownership interest or the value of your shares.

 

We had cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities of approximately $12.4 million as of March 31, 2002.  Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend, however, on numerous factors, including:

 

              market acceptance of our existing and future products;

              the successful commercialization of products in development;

              progress in our product development efforts;

              the magnitude and scope of such product development efforts,

              progress with preclinical studies, clinical trials and product clearances by the FDA and other agencies;

              the cost and timing of our efforts to manage our manufacturing capabilities and related costs;

              the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights;

              competing technological and market developments;

              the development of strategic alliances for the marketing of certain of our products.

 

To the extent that funds generated from our operations, together with our existing capital resources are insufficient to meet future requirements, we will be required to obtain additional funds through equity or debt financings, strategic alliances with corporate partners and others, or through other sources.  The terms of any future equity financings may be dilutive to you and the terms of any debt financings may contain restrictive covenants, that limit our ability to pursue certain courses of action.  Our ability to obtain financing is dependent on the status of our future business prospects, as well as conditions prevailing in the relevant capital markets.  No assurance can be given that any additional financing will be made available to us or will be available on acceptable terms should such a need arise.

 

20



 

We could become subject to product liability claims, which, if successful, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The testing, marketing and sale of human health care products entail an inherent risk of allegations of product liability, and there can be no assurance that substantial product liability claims will not be asserted against us.  Although we have not received any material product liability claims to date and have an insurance policy of $5,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000 in the aggregate to cover such claims should they arise, there can be no assurance that material claims will not arise in the future or that our insurance will be adequate to cover all situations.  Moreover, there can be no assurance that such insurance, or additional insurance, if required, will be available in the future or, if available, will be available on commercially reasonable terms.  Any product liability claim, if successful, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our business is dependent upon hiring and retaining qualified management and scientific personnel.

 

We are highly dependent on the members of our management and scientific staff, the loss of one or more of whom could have a material adverse effect on us. In June 2001, Mr. Engle, the former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Mr. Slater, the former Vice President of Operations, ceased to be employees.  As of April 2, 2002, Mr. Sherwood, previously President and Chief Operating Officer succeeded Mr. Potter as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  Although Mr. Potter has agreed to remain the Chief Financial Officer while the Company seeks a new Chief Financial Officer in order to effect an orderly transition, we cannot make any assurances that an orderly transition will be achieved.  In addition, we also appointed a new Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing on March 25, 2002.  There can be no assurances that such management changes will not adversely affect our business.  In addition, we believe that our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled, scientific, managerial and manufacturing personnel.  We face significant competition for such personnel from other companies, research and academic institutions, government entities and other organizations.  There can be no assurance that we will be successful in hiring or retaining the personnel we require.  The failure to hire and retain such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are subject to environmental regulation and any failure to comply with applicable laws could subject us to significant liabilities and harm our business.

 

We are subject to a variety of local, state and federal government regulations relating to the storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, manufacture and disposal of toxic, or other hazardous substances used in the manufacture of our products. Any failure by us to control the use, disposal, removal or storage of hazardous chemicals or toxic substances could subject us to significant liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Our future operating results may be harmed by economic, political and other risks relating to international sales.

 

During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, approximately, 27.9% and 20.2%, respectively, of our product sales were sold to international distributors. During the quarter ended March 31, 2002 approximately 22.1% of our product sales were sold to international distributors. Our representatives, agents and distributors who sell products in international markets are subject to the laws and regulations of the foreign jurisdictions in which they operate and in which our products are sold. A number of risks are inherent in international sales and operations.  For example, the volume of international sales may be limited by the imposition of government controls, export license requirements, political and/or economic instability,

 

21



 

trade restrictions, changes in tariffs, difficulties in managing international operations, import restrictions and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We sell our ORTHOVISC® product to a European sales and marketing company to supply the Turkish market. The Turkish economic situation has been volatile and the impacts of this volatility on future sales of ORTHOVISC® are uncertain.  Such changes in the volume of sales may continue to have  adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Our stock price has been and may remain highly volatile, and we cannot assure you that market making in our common stock will continue.

 

The market price of shares of our common stock may be highly volatile.  Factors such as announcements of new commercial products or technological innovations by us or our competitors, disclosure of results of clinical testing or regulatory proceedings, governmental regulation and approvals, developments in patent or other proprietary rights, public concern as to the safety of products developed by us and general market conditions may have a significant effect on the market price of our common stock.  In particular, our stock price declined significantly in October 1998 following our announcement that the FDA had notified us that its PMA for ORTHOVISC® was not approvable and that additional clinical data would be required to demonstrate the effectiveness of ORTHOVISC®.  The stock price declined again in May 2000 following our announcements that initial analysis of results from the Phase III clinical trial of ORTHOVISC® did not show sufficient efficacy to support the filing of a PMA application to obtain FDA approval, and that the SEC had issued a formal order of investigation and required us to provide information in connection with certain revenue recognition matters.  The trading price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results, material announcements by us or our competitors, governmental regulatory action, conditions in the health care industry generally or in the medical products industry specifically, or other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.  In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations which have particularly affected the market prices of many medical products companies and which often have been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies.  Our operating results in future quarters may be below the expectations of equity research analysts and investors. In such event, the price of our common stock would likely decline, perhaps substantially.

 

No person is under any obligation to make a market in the common stock or to publish research reports on us, and any person making a market in the common stock or publishing research reports on us may discontinue market making or publishing such reports at any time without notice.  There can be no assurance that an active public market in our common stock will be sustained.

 

There is a risk that we may be unable to maintain our listing on the Nasdaq National Market.

 

Our common stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq National Market. Under NASDAQ’s listing maintenance standards, if the minimum bid price of our Common Stock is under $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive trading days, NASDAQ may choose to notify us that it is delisting our common stock from its National Market. If the minimum bid price of our common stock does not thereafter regain compliance for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days during the 90 days following notification by NASDAQ, our common stock may be delisted from trading on the NASDAQ. There is a risk that our common stock will not meet NASDAQ’s listing maintenance standards and fail to remain eligible for trading on the NASDAQ National Market. If our common stock is delisted, the delisting would most likely have a material adverse effect on the price and liquidity of our common stock and your ability to sell any of our Common Stock at all would be severely limited.

 

22



Our charter documents contain anti-takeover provisions that may prevent or delay any attempt to acquire us.

 

Certain provisions of our Restated Articles of Organization and Amended and Restated By-laws could have the effect of discouraging a third party from pursuing a non-negotiated takeover of us and preventing certain changes in control.  These provisions include a classified Board of Directors, advance notice to the Board of Directors of stockholder proposals, limitations on the ability of stockholders to remove directors and to call stockholder meetings, and the provision that vacancies on the Board of Directors be filled by a majority of the remaining directors.  In addition, the Board of Directors adopted a Shareholders Rights Plan in April 1998.  We are also subject to Chapter 110F of the Massachusetts General Laws which, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits a Massachusetts corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any “interested stockholder” for a period of three years following the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder.  These provisions could discourage a third party from pursuing a takeover of us at a price considered attractive by many stockholders, since such provisions could have the effect of preventing or delaying a potential acquirer from acquiring control of us and our Board of Directors.

 

The SEC commenced an investigation concerning our revenue recognition matters.

 

The SEC has issued a formal order of investigation and has required us to provide information in connection with certain revenue recognition matters.  We have been cooperating fully.  These matters, relating to our historical accounting for and disclosures concerning sales of ORTHOVISC® under a long-term supply and distribution agreement with Zimmer, were also the subject of our March 15, 2000 disclosure concerning an informal SEC inquiry and the restatement of results for 1998 and the first three quarters of 1999.  On August 14, 2001, as a result of the SEC’s ongoing investigation, we, in conjunction with our independent auditors, determined to again restate our financial results for the fourth quarter of 1998 and the first quarter of 1999 as discussed in Note 15 of the consolidated financial statements included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.    As a result of that investigation, we have been informed that the staff of the Boston District Office of the SEC (the “Staff”) is considering recommending that the SEC authorize civil injunctive actions against us and others, including former officers, concerning these matters.  We have been invited by the Staff to submit our views as to why a civil injunctive action against us should not be instituted, and are currently in discussions with the Staff concerning possible resolution of the proposed recommendation by settlement.  We are not in a position to predict whether such a settlement will be reached.  In addition, if we expend substantial additional costs and fees in responding to this matter, then the matter may have an adverse effect on our financial position.

 

Our revenues are derived from a small number of customers, the loss of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We have historically derived the majority of our revenues from a small number of customers, most of whom resell our products to end users and most of who are significantly larger companies than us.  For the year ended December 31, 2001, Bausch & Lomb accounted for 65.3% of product revenues and 83% of our accounts receivable balance and Pharmaren (an affiliate of Biomeks), our distributor to Turkey, accounted for 15.7% of product revenues and 0% of our accounts receivable balance. Our failure to generate as much revenue as expected from these customers or the failure of these customers to purchase our products would adversely affect our business. On March 11, 2002, Bausch & Lomb’s senior debt and short-term debt ratings were downgraded.  Although Bausch & Lomb emphasized at that time it was not facing any issues with respect to liquidity, any such issues that impact their ability to pay their accounts with us could adversely impact future revenues.  In addition, if present and future customers terminate their purchasing arrangements with us, significantly reduce or delay their orders, or seek to renegotiate their agreements on terms less favorable to us, our business, financial condition, and results of operations will be adversely affected.  If we accept terms less favorable than the terms of the current agreement, such renegotiations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and/or results of

 

23



 

operations.  Furthermore, we may be subject to the perceived or actual advantage the customers may have given their relative size and importance to us in any future negotiations.  Any termination, change, reduction or delay in orders could seriously harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Accordingly, unless and until we diversify and expand our customer base, our future success will significantly depend upon the timing and size of future purchases by our largest customers and the financial and operational success of these customers.  Product revenue in the future may continue to be adversely impacted by economic uncertainties associated with the Turkish market.

 

The loss of any one of our major customers or the delay of significant orders from such customers, even if only temporary, could reduce or delay our recognition of revenues, harm our reputation in the industry, and reduce our ability to accurately predict cash flow, and, as a consequence, could seriously harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

We, through our distributors, distribute ORTHOVISC® in territories such as Canada, Spain, Portugal, Turkey, and Israel. Due to the result of the unfavorable results of the U.S. ORTHOVISC® Phase III clinical trial announced on May 31, 2000, marketing efforts in these countries have been and may continue to be negatively affected.  There can be no assurance that past ORTHOVISC® sales levels will be maintained or that sales will occur at all in these countries.

 

24



 

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

As of March 31, 2002, the Company did not participate in any derivative financial instruments or other financial and commodity instruments for which fair value disclosure would be required under SFAS No. 107. All of the Company’s investments consist of money market funds and commercial paper that are carried on the Company’s books at amortized cost, which approximates fair market value. Accordingly, the Company has no quantitative information concerning the market risk of participating in such investments.

 

Primary Market Risk Exposures

The Company’s primary market risk exposures are in the areas of interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company’s investment portfolio of cash equivalent and short-term investments is subject to interest rate fluctuations, but the Company believes this risk is immaterial due to the short-term nature of these investments.  The Company’s exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations is specific to certain sales to a foreign customer and is expected to continue to be modest. The impact of currency exchange rate movements on sales to this foreign customer was immaterial for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.  Currently, the Company does not engage in foreign currency hedging activities.

 

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

See Note 7, “Legal Matters” of the consolidated financial statements.  The description of such matters is incorporated herein by reference to such financial statements.

 

25



 

Item 6.                    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

(a)

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

(3)

 

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws:

 

 

 

 

 

3.1

 

The Amended and Restated Articles of Organization of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File no. 000-21326), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 1993.

 

 

 

 

 

3.2

 

Certificate of Vote of Directors Establishing a Series of Convertible Preferred Stock, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File no. 000-21326), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 1993.

 

 

 

 

 

3.3

 

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Organization of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 1996, (File no. 000-21326), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 1997.

 

 

 

 

 

3.4

 

Certificate of Vote of Directors Establishing a Series of a Class of Stock, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-AB12 (File no. 001-14027), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 7, 1998.

 

 

 

 

 

3.5

 

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Organization of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending June 30, 1998 (File no. 001-14027), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 1998.

 

 

 

 

 

3.6

 

The Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 1996 (File no. 000-21326), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 1997.

 

 

 

 

 

(4)

 

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders

 

 

 

 

 

4.1

 

Shareholder Rights Agreement dated as of April 6, 1998 between the Company and Firstar Trust Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A12B (File no. 001-14027), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 7, 1998.

 

 

 

 

 

(10)

 

Material Contracts

 

 

 

 

 

*10.1

 

Sublease  effective as of November 2001, between MedChem Products, Inc. and the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

(11)

 

Statement Regarding the Computation of Per Share Earnings

 

 

 

 

 

11.1

 

See Note 4 to the Financial Statements included herewith.

 

26



 


*         Filed herewith

 

(b)

Reports on Form 8-K:

None

 

27



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in Woburn, Massachusetts on May 15, 2002.

 

 

Anika Therapeutics, Inc.

 

 

May 15, 2002

By:

/s/  Douglas R. Potter

 

 

 

Douglas R. Potter

 

 

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

 

(Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer)

 

28


EX-10.1 3 j3944_ex10d1.htm EX-10.1 SUBLEASE

Exhibit 10.1

SUBLEASE

 

                THIS SUBLEASE effective as of the 1st day of November, 2001 between MedChem Products, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation having an address of 160 New Boston Street, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 (hereinafter called “Sublandlord”), and Anika Research, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, having an address of 160 New Boston Street, Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 (hereinafter called “Subtenant”).

 

WITNESSETH THAT

 

                WHEREAS, by a lease dated as of December 5, 1991, as amended by a First Amendment dated October 15, 1992 and by a Second Amendment dated February 1, 1993 (the “Existing Main Lease”), Josephine G. Maggiore, as Executrix of the Estate of Benedict S. Maggiore and Paul J. Maggiore, Co–partners, leased to Sublandlord space in the building located at 160 New Boston Street, Woburn, Massachusetts (the “Main Premises”), upon the terms, covenants and conditions therein contained, a copy of which has been previously provided by Sublandlord to Subtenant under the terms of the Prior Sublease, as such term is hereinafter defined; and

 

                WHEREAS, title to the Main Premises was conveyed by Josephine G. Maggiore, as Executrix of the Estate of Benedict S. Maggiore, and Paul J. Maggiore, Co–partners, to Paul J. Maggiore,  as Trustee of the 160 NBS Realty Trust, under declaration of Trust dated December 23,1992, recorded with the Middlesex South Registry of Deeds in Book 23099, Page 82 (“Landlord”); and

 

              WHEREAS, upon the terms, covenants and conditions therein contained, Landlord and Sublandlord have entered into a lease covering the Main Premises dated June 13, 2001, which as of December 6, 2001, will supercede the Existing Main Lease (“Future Main Lease”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and

 

              WHEREAS, by a sublease dated May 3, 1993, as amended by a First Amendment dated February 7, 1994, and by a Second Amendment dated November 12, 1997 and a Third Amendment dated February 27, 1998 (the “Prior Sublease”), Sublandlord subleased to Subtenant certain space in the Main Premises, upon the terms, covenants and conditions  contained in the Prior Sublease;

 

              WHEREAS, the Prior Sublease terminated on October 31, 2001;

 

              WHEREAS, Subtenant is desirous of continuing to sublease from Sublandlord certain space in the Main Premises; and

 

                WHEREAS, Sublandlord is willing to sublease to Subtenant that portion of the Main Premises identified as the Anika Space and the Shared Space on the plan attached hereto as Exhibit B (the “Subleased Premises”), on the terms stated herein.

 

1



 

 

                NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

                1. Sublandlord hereby leases to Subtenant, and Subtenant hereby takes and leases from Sublandlord, the Subleased Premises for an initial term which commences on November 1, 2001 (the “Commencement Date”) and ends on October 31, 2003. After the expiration of the initial term, this Sublease shall thereafter remain in effect until terminated by one party upon at least ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other party. The Subleased Premises are to be delivered to Subtenant in their “as is” condition and the Subleased Premises shall be treated as delivered on the Commencement Date.

 

                2. As used in each subsequent paragraph of this Sublease, the term “Main Lease” shall through December 5, 2001 mean the Existing Main Lease. After such date, the term “Main Lease” shall mean the Future Main Lease.

 

3. Subtenant hereby expressly agrees and covenants to Landlord and to Sublandlord, that Subtenant assumes, is bound by and shall faithfully perform, all of the obligations of Sublandlord as tenant under the Main Lease, except as otherwise expressly provided for herein. It is further agreed that the relationship between, and rights of, Subtenant and Sublandlord shall, except as expressly provided for herein, be governed by the Main Lease as if they were tenant and landlord, respectively, under the Main Lease, and that Sublandlord specifically shall have all rights granted to Landlord under the Main Lease with respect  to enforcement of the provisions of this Sublease and the termination hereof; provided, however, that Sublandlord shall not be deemed to guarantee performance by Landlord of its obligations under the Main Lease, and Sublandlord shall have no liability to Subtenant for any default in this Sublease caused by the default of any other act of Landlord under the Main Lease. It is further agreed that performance by Sublandlord shall be conditional upon the performance by Landlord of its obligations under the Main Lease, which obligations Sublandlord agrees to use reasonable efforts to enforce. Sublandlord shall be entitled to exercise any of the remedies set forth in Article XI of the Main Lease if any of the events of default set forth in Section 11.1 of the Main Lease occur; provided, however, all references to ten (10) business days in subsection (a) of Section 11.1 of the Main Lease shall be reduced to five (5) business days.

 

                4. Subtenant covenants and agrees with Sublandlord to pay to Sublandlord as rent during the term hereof:

 

                4.1 Fixed Rent at the initial annual rate of  One Hundred and One Thousand Three Hundred Seventy Dollars ($101,370.00), said initial rental to be payable in equal installments of Eight Thousand Four Hundred Forty Seven Dollars and Fifty Cents ($8447.50) Dollars in advance on the first day of each month of the term of this Sublease, and at that rate for any fraction of a month at the end of the term. Such fixed rent shall increase on a per square foot basis equal to and simultaneous with each increase in fixed rent under the Main Lease. All fixed rent payments shall be payable by wire transfer to an account designated by Sublandlord.   The fixed rent is based on a total of 10,137 square feet consisting of 100% of the area identified as Anika Space on Exhibit B plus 50% of the area identified as Shared Space on Exhibit B.

2



 

 

                                4.2 Any amounts Sublandlord is required to pay Landlord pursuant to Article IV of the Main Lease attributable to the Subleased Premises, which amounts shall be paid by Subtenant to Sublandlord within five (5) business days after receipt of a bill from Sublandlord, except that Subtenant shall only be responsible for fifty percent (50%) of such amounts with respect solely to the1130 square feet of the Subleased Premises identified as Shared Space on Exhibit B.

 

                                4.3 All other costs, expenses, charges and fees required by the Main Lease with respect to the Subleased Premises shall be paid by Subtenant directly to Sublandlord or the appropriate payees in accordance with the terms of the Main Lease, except that Subtenant shall only be responsible for fifty percent (50%) of such costs, expenses, charges and fees with respect solely to the1130 square feet of the Subleased Premises identified as Shared Space on Exhibit B.  With respect to utility service, Subtenant shall pay the entire cost of any service separately metered in the Subleased Premises.  Subtenant shall also pay its pro rata share of electrical, gas and water and sewer charges, calculated on a square footage basis, unless Subtenant’s use of such services is more intense than the use of such service in the balance of the Building, in which case Subtenant shall pay a fair allocation of the extra cost attributable thereto.

 

                All payments under this Paragraph 4 shall be made by Subtenant without any set–off or deduction whatsoever, in lawful money of the United States. Such payments shall be paid to Sublandlord at Sublandlord’s office hereinabove set forth or at such other place or to such other party or parties as Sublandlord may from time to time designate by notice to Subtenant. Subtenant  shall pay Sublandlord interest at the rate set forth in Section 11.2 of the Main Lease on any payment required by this Paragraph 4 which is not made by Subtenant when due.

 

                5. Subtenant covenants and agrees to use the Subleased Premises for the permitted Uses set forth in Section 1.2 of the Main Lease and for no other purpose.

 

              6. Sublandlord warrants and represents that it has no knowledge of any default by itself or by Landlord under the Main Lease; that the Main Lease is in full force and effect and that Sublandlord has a good right to sublease its interest in the same provided Sublandlord obtains the consent of Landlord in accordance with Section 6.1 of the Main Lease; and that Sublandlord has done nothing to defeat or impair this Sublease. Sublandlord further warrants and covenants that Subtenant, upon performance of Subtenant’s obligations hereunder and subject to the provisions hereof, shall for the term hereof with respect to the Subleased Premises, succeed to all rights of Sublandlord under the Main Lease and will have quiet possession of the Subleased Premises unless the Main Lease be terminated for any reason; provided, however, that this Sublease shall be in all respects subject to the Main Lease and if the Main Lease shall terminate during the term hereof for any reason, this Sublease shall terminate upon such termination with the same force and effect as if such termination date had been named herein as the termination date hereof; and if any provisions of this Sublease shall be in violation of the provisions of the Main Lease, the provisions of the Main Lease shall be deemed to limit the provisions hereof. It is expressly understood and agreed, however, that nothing stated in this Paragraph 6 shall be deemed to confer upon Subtenant any greater rights than are set forth herein nor limit any of the Subtenant’s obligations hereunder.

 

3



 

 

                7. Subtenant agrees to do nothing which will subject the Main Lease to termination by Landlord under the provisions of the Main Lease, and it is further agreed that if Subtenant is in default of the provisions of the Main Lease, Sublandlord may, but need not, cure said default specifically on behalf of and for the account of Subtenant, in which case all costs, damages, and expenses incurred by Sublandlord in connection therewith shall be paid to Sublandlord immediately upon its demand as additional rent hereunder. By curing Subtenant’s default on its behalf and account, as aforesaid, Sublandlord shall not be deemed to have waived any of its rights nor to have released Subtenant from any of its obligations under this Sublease. It is agreed, however, that Sublandlord may cure said default on its own account to preserve its interest in the Main Lease, and may terminate this Sublease pursuant to the terms hereof by reason of said default by Subtenant, if Subtenant does not pay as additional rent to Sublandlord all costs, damages and expenses incurred by Sublandlord in connection with such cure within the applicable grace period provided for in the Main Lease, as amended by Paragraph 3 above. In the event of such termination, Sublandlord shall be entitled to all remedies and damages provided for Landlord in the Main Lease, or as otherwise provided by law. In the event that the Main Lease is terminated by Landlord by reason of Subtenant’s default, Subtenant shall indemnify and hold Sublandlord harmless from such damages as Sublandlord may become liable to pay under the Main Lease  resulting from such default, plus all other expenses and costs related thereto, including without limitation attorneys’ fees.

 

                8. Subtenant shall not have the right to sublet the Subleased Premises, or any portion thereof, nor to assign or in any way transfer its interest in the same, nor to suffer or permit others to occupy the same, nor to suffer or permit the same to be assigned or transferred by operation of law or otherwise, without the prior consent of Sublandlord and Landlord, such consent to be governed by the terms of Article VI of the Lease.

 

                9. Subtenant shall not have the right to enter upon the portion of the Main Premises not subleased to Subtenant hereunder without obtaining the prior written consent of Sublandlord. Sublandlord hereby reserves a right of ingress to and egress from the front of the Building through the Subleased Premises to its remaining space in the Building, the location of which shall be reasonably acceptable to Sublandlord and Subtenant. Such access shall be available seven (7) days a week, twenty–four (24) hours per day, but otherwise subject to Subtenant’s reasonable security regulations.

 

                10. Subtenant shall maintain with respect to the Subleased Premises the insurance required by Section 8.2 of the Main Lease to be taken out by the tenant thereunder, which insurance shall name Landlord and Sublandlord as additional insureds, all in accordance with said sections of the Main Lease.

 

4



 

 

                11. At the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, Subtenant shall surrender and yield up the Subleased Premises in as good condition as they were in at the beginning of the term of this Sublease, reasonable wear and tear excepted.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subtenant shall, at the end of the term and at its own expense, remove all leasehold installations required to be removed by the tenant under the Main Lease as well as all equipment and trade fixtures of Subtenant from the Subleased Premises, and repair all injury done by such removal. All property of Subtenant remaining on the Premises after the expiration of this Sublease shall be deemed abandoned.

 

                If Subtenant shall remain in possession of the Subleased Premises after the expiration or earlier termination of this Sublease without any express agreement as to such holding over, Subtenant shall be liable to Sublandlord in accordance with Section 13.16 of the Main Lease.

 

                12. Subtenant further agrees to indemnify and hold Sublandlord harmless from any claim of Landlord under the Main Lease, and against any claim for injury to persons, including death, and for property damage, arising out of the occupancy and use of the Subleased Premises by Subtenant, its officers, agents, employees or invitees.

 

                13. All notices required to be given under this Sublease shall be sent by prepaid registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the respective parties hereto at the addresses above stated, unless in either case a different address is specified by either party to the other in writing by prepaid registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Any such notices shall be deemed to have been given upon deposit with the U.S. Mail, as aforesaid.

 

                14. Sublandlord hereby reserves the right to enter onto the Subleased Premises from time to time to ascertain whether Subtenant is in compliance with the provisions of this Sublease.

 

                15. Subtenant acknowledges and agrees that Sublandlord has the same rights of termination with respect to this Sublease as those granted to Landlord under the Main Lease.  Subtenant further agrees that Sublandlord may also terminate this Sublease upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to Subtenant if (i) Sublandlord sublets more than fifty percent (50%) of the Main Premises to a third party who does not want Subtenant to continue to occupy the Subleased Premises or (ii) Sublandlord and Landlord mutually agree to terminate the Main Lease prior to its expiration date.

 

                16. If any provision of this Sublease, or the particular application thereof, shall to any extent be held invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of such provision shall not be deemed to affect the validity of any other provision of this Sublease. Such invalid provisions shall be deemed to be stricken from this Sublease, which shall otherwise continue in full force and effect in all respects.

5



 

 

                17. This Sublease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors, assigns, heirs and legal representatives.

 

                18. This Sublease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

 

                19. Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Main Lease, Sublandlord has, as appurtenant to the Main Premises, the right to use in common with others thereto the common facilities located on the Lot (as defined in the Main Lease), including the parking spaces on the Lot. Sublandlord hereby grants Subtenant the right to use in accordance with Section 2.2 of the Main Lease up to twenty-five (25) of the parking spaces in common with Sublandlord .

 

                20. Sublandlord and Subtenant each warrant to the other that it has had no dealings with any broker or agent in connection with this Sublease and covenant to defend with counsel approved by the other party and to hold harmless and indemnify the other party from and against any and all costs, expenses or liability for any compensation, commissions and charges claimed by any broker or agent with respect to its dealings in connection with this Sublease or the negotiation thereof.

 

                21. The exercise by Sublandlord of any option set forth in Section 3.2 of the Main Lease to extend the term thereof shall have no effect on the term of this Sublease as set forth in Section 1 hereof.  However, if Sublandlord does exercise any such option, it shall have the right during the applicable renewal period to utilize at no cost all leasehold improvements made by Subtenant to the Subleased Premise during the term of this Sublease, which right shall survive the termination of this Sublease.  Subtenant shall have no right to exercise any such option should Sublandlord fail to do so.

 

              22. Subtenant agrees to allow Sublandlord access at all times to that portion of the Subleased Premises identified  as the Shared Space on Exhibit B.

 

              23. Sublandlord agrees to allow Subtenant access at all times to the rest rooms identified on Exhibit B as well as the area designated on Exhibit B as “Anika Emergency Exit” provided, however, that access to the latter area shall be limited solely for purposes of a second emergency exit.

 

              24. Sublandlord agrees to allow Subtenant to utilize at all times  the deionized water system of the Sublandlord located in both the Main Premises and the Subleased Premises. Subtenant agrees to pay on a pro rata basis for its share of the cost of such water system.

6



 

 

              25. The parties agree that Subtenant, its employees, affiliates, invitees and guests, do not have, nor shall have, access to Sublandlord’s cafeteria located in the Main Premises.

 

 

              26. Sublandlord shall have continued access to the  phone room and utility room in the Subleased Premises.

 

27. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Sublease shall not become or be deemed to have become effective until mutually executed and delivered by Subtenant and Sublandlord and consented to by Landlord in writing.

 

 

EXECUTED under seal as of the day and year written

 

SUBLANDLORD:

 

MEDCHEM PRODUCTS, INC.

 

By:

 

 

Its:

 

 

SUBTENANT:

 

ANIKA RESEARCH. INC.

 

By:

 

 

Its:

 

 

 

7


-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----