Exhibit 13
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
FINANCIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
Financial Summary | |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
Reports of Management and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes | |
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information | |
Shareholder Information | |
Corporate Officers and Operating Management | |
19 |
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(millions of dollars except as noted and per share data)
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||
Operations | |||||||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 11,856 | $ | 11,339 | $ | 11,130 | $ | 10,186 | $ | 9,534 | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 5,933 | 5,780 | 5,965 | 5,569 | 5,328 | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 4,159 | 3,914 | 3,823 | 3,468 | 3,260 | ||||||||||||||
Impairments and dissolution | 11 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 154 | 62 | 64 | 63 | 43 | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 1,595 | 1,549 | 1,258 | 1,086 | 907 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | 1,133 | 1,054 | 866 | 753 | 631 | ||||||||||||||
Financial Position | |||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable - net | $ | 1,231 | $ | 1,114 | $ | 1,131 | $ | 1,098 | $ | 1,033 | |||||||||
Inventories | 1,068 | 1,019 | 1,034 | 971 | 920 | ||||||||||||||
Working capital - net | 798 | 515 | (115 | ) | 630 | 1,273 | |||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment - net | 1,096 | 1,042 | 1,021 | 1,021 | 966 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | 6,753 | 5,779 | 5,699 | 6,383 | 6,235 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 1,211 | 1,907 | 1,116 | 1,122 | 1,632 | ||||||||||||||
Total debt | 1,953 | 1,950 | 1,799 | 1,722 | 1,705 | ||||||||||||||
Shareholders’ equity | 1,878 | 868 | 996 | 1,775 | 1,792 | ||||||||||||||
Per Common Share Information | |||||||||||||||||||
Average shares outstanding (thousands) | 91,839 | 92,197 | 96,190 | 100,898 | 101,715 | ||||||||||||||
Book value | $ | 20.20 | $ | 9.41 | $ | 10.52 | $ | 17.72 | $ | 17.35 | |||||||||
Net income - diluted (1), (2) | 11.99 | 11.15 | 8.77 | 7.25 | 6.02 | ||||||||||||||
Net income - basic (2) | 12.33 | 11.43 | 9.00 | 7.46 | 6.20 | ||||||||||||||
Cash dividends | 3.36 | 2.68 | 2.20 | 2.00 | 1.56 | ||||||||||||||
Financial Ratios | |||||||||||||||||||
Return on sales | 9.6 | % | 9.3 | % | 7.8 | % | 7.4 | % | 6.6 | % | |||||||||
Asset turnover | 1.8 | x | 2.0 | x | 2.0 | x | 1.6 | x | 1.5 | x | |||||||||
Return on assets | 16.8 | % | 18.2 | % | 15.2 | % | 11.8 | % | 10.1 | % | |||||||||
Return on equity (3) | 130.5 | % | 105.8 | % | 48.8 | % | 42.0 | % | 41.6 | % | |||||||||
Dividend payout ratio (4) | 30.1 | % | 30.6 | % | 30.3 | % | 33.2 | % | 37.7 | % | |||||||||
Total debt to capitalization | 51.0 | % | 69.2 | % | 64.4 | % | 49.2 | % | 48.8 | % | |||||||||
Current ratio | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||
Interest coverage (5) | 11.4 | x | 26.1 | x | 20.6 | x | 18.3 | x | 22.2 | x | |||||||||
Net working capital to sales | 6.7 | % | 4.5 | % | (1.0 | )% | 6.2 | % | 13.3 | % | |||||||||
Effective income tax rate (6) | 29.0 | % | 32.0 | % | 31.2 | % | 30.7 | % | 30.4 | % | |||||||||
General | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 239 | $ | 234 | $ | 201 | $ | 167 | $ | 157 | |||||||||
Total technical expenditures (7) | 153 | 150 | 155 | 144 | 140 | ||||||||||||||
Advertising expenditures | 351 | 338 | 299 | 263 | 247 | ||||||||||||||
Repairs and maintenance | 100 | 99 | 96 | 87 | 83 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 172 | 170 | 169 | 159 | 152 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 26 | 28 | 30 | 29 | 27 | ||||||||||||||
Shareholders of record (total count) | 6,787 | 6,987 | 7,250 | 7,555 | 7,954 | ||||||||||||||
Number of employees (total count) | 42,550 | 40,706 | 39,674 | 37,633 | 34,154 | ||||||||||||||
Sales per employee (thousands of dollars) | $ | 279 | $ | 279 | $ | 281 | $ | 271 | $ | 279 | |||||||||
Sales per dollar of assets | 1.76 | 1.96 | 1.95 | 1.60 | 1.53 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Diluted net income per common share for 2016 includes an $.86 per share charge for Valspar acquisition costs, partially offset by a $.40 per share increase related to an income tax accounting change due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. See Notes 2 and 14, respectively. |
(2) | All earnings per share amounts are presented using the treasury stock method. See Note 15. |
(3) | Based on net income and shareholders’ equity at beginning of year. |
(4) | Based on cash dividends per common share and prior year’s diluted net income per common share. |
(5) | Ratio of income before income taxes and interest expense to interest expense. |
(6) | Based on income before income taxes. |
(7) | See Note 1 for a description of technical expenditures. |
20 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
SUMMARY
The Sherwin-Williams Company, founded in 1866, and its consolidated wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are engaged in the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers primarily in North and South America with additional operations in the Caribbean region, Europe and Asia. The Company is structured into four reportable segments – Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (collectively, the “Reportable Segments”) – and an Administrative Segment in the same way it is internally organized for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources. See pages 8 through 17 of this report and Note 18, on pages 72 through 75 of this report, for more information concerning the Reportable Segments.
The Company’s financial condition, liquidity and cash flow continued to be strong in 2016 as net operating cash topped $1.000 billion for the fourth straight year primarily due to improved operating results in our Paint Stores and Global Finishes Groups. Net working capital increased $282.8 million at December 31, 2016 compared to 2015 due to a significant increase in cash and other current assets partially offset by a significant increase in current liabilities. Cash and cash equivalents increased $684.0 million which were generated from cash flow from operations. Other current assets increased $150.3 million primarily due to an interest rate lock asset, while current portion of long-term debt increased $697.3 million resulting from 1.35% senior notes becoming due in 2017. In April 2016, the Company entered into a $7.3 billion bridge credit agreement (Bridge Loan) and a $2.0 billion term loan credit agreement (Term Loan) as committed financing for the pending acquisition of The Valspar Corporation (Acquisition) as disclosed in Note 2. No balances were drawn against these facilities as of December 31, 2016. Debt issuance costs of $65.1 million related to these facilities were incurred and recorded in Other current assets. Of this amount, $61.1 million was amortized and included in Interest expense for year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has been able to arrange sufficient short-term borrowing capacity at reasonable rates, and the Company has sufficient total available borrowing capacity to fund its current operating needs. Net operating cash decreased $138.9 million to $1.309 billion in 2016 from $1.447 billion in 2015 as an increase in net income was not enough to offset increased cash used for working capital accounts due to timing of payments. Strong net operating cash provided the funds necessary to invest in new stores and manufacturing and distribution facilities, return cash to shareholders through dividends, and build a cash reserve needed for the pending Acquisition expected to be completed in early 2017.
Results of operations for the Company were strong and improved in many areas in 2016, primarily due to an improving domestic architectural paint market. Consolidated net sales increased 4.6 percent in 2016 to $11.856 billion from $11.339 billion in 2015 due primarily to higher paint sales volume in the Paint Stores and the impact of a change in revenue classification beginning in the third quarter related to grossing up third-party service revenue and related costs which were previously netted and immaterial in prior periods (Revenue reclassification). The Revenue reclassification increased net sales 1.1 percent. This prospective change primarily impacts the Paint Stores and Global Finishes Groups. This change had no impact on segment profit, but reduced segment profit as a percent to net sales of the affected groups. Consolidated gross profit as a percent of consolidated net sales increased to 50.0 percent in 2016 from 49.0 percent in 2015 due primarily to increased paint sales volume and improved operating efficiency, partially offset by the Revenue reclassification. Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased $245.9 million in 2016 compared to 2015 and increased as a percent of consolidated net sales to 35.1 percent in 2016 as compared to 34.5 percent in 2015 due primarily to new store openings and Acquisition expenses. Amortization of credit facility costs incurred in early 2016 and interest on debt issued in July 2015 increased interest expense $92.3 million in 2016. The effective income tax rate was 29.0 percent for 2016 and 32.0 percent for 2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to the Company's adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 which reduced the income tax provision (Income tax accounting change). See Notes 1 and 14 for more information. Diluted net income per common share increased 7.5 percent to $11.99 per share for 2016, including an $.86 per share charge for costs associated with the Acquisition partially offset by an increase of $.40 per share related to the Income tax accounting change, from $11.15 per share a year ago.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report are the responsibility of management. The consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements contain certain amounts that were based upon management’s best estimates, judgments and assumptions. Management utilized certain outside economic sources of information when developing the bases for their estimates and assumptions. Management used assumptions based on historical results, considering the current economic trends, and other assumptions to form the basis for determining appropriate carrying values of assets and liabilities
21 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
that were not readily available from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Also, materially different amounts may result under materially different conditions, materially different economic trends or from using materially different assumptions. However, management believes that any materially different amounts resulting from materially different conditions or material changes in facts or circumstances are unlikely to significantly impact the current valuation of assets and liabilities that were not readily available from other sources.
All of the significant accounting policies that were followed in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 1, on pages 44 through 48, of this report. The following procedures and assumptions utilized by management directly impacted many of the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements.
Non-Traded Investments
The Company has investments in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate markets and certain other investments that have been identified as variable interest entities. The Company does not have the power to direct the day-to-day operations of the investments and the risk of loss is limited to the amount of contributed capital, and therefore, the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the Consolidation Topic of the ASC, the investments are not consolidated. For affordable housing investments entered into prior to the January 1, 2015 adoption of ASU No. 2014-01, the Company uses the effective yield method to determine the carrying value of the investments. Under the effective yield method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense over the period that the tax credits are recognized. For affordable housing investments entered into on or after the January 1, 2015 adoption of ASU No. 2014-01, the Company uses the proportional amortization method. Under the proportional amortization method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received. The Company has no ongoing capital commitments, loan requirements or guarantees with the general partners that would require any future cash contributions other than the contractually committed capital contributions that are disclosed in the contractual obligations table on page 29 of this report. See Note 1, on page 44 of this report, for more information on non-traded investments.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable were recorded at the time of credit sales net of provisions for sales returns and allowances. All provisions for allowances for doubtful collection of accounts are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses and were based on management’s best judgment and assessment, including an analysis of historical bad debts, a
review of the aging of Accounts receivable and a review of the current creditworthiness of customers. Management recorded allowances for such accounts which were believed to be uncollectible, including amounts for the resolution of potential credit and other collection issues such as disputed invoices, customer satisfaction claims and pricing discrepancies. However, depending on how such potential issues are resolved, or if the financial condition of any of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate and their ability to make required payments became impaired, increases in these allowances may be required. At December 31, 2016, no individual customer constituted more than 5 percent of Accounts receivable.
Inventories
Inventories were stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined principally on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method based on inventory quantities and costs determined during the fourth quarter. Inventory quantities were adjusted during the fourth quarter as a result of annual physical inventory counts taken at all locations. If inventories accounted for on the LIFO method are reduced on a year-over-year basis, then liquidation of certain quantities carried at costs prevailing in prior years occurs. Management recorded the best estimate of net realizable value for obsolete and discontinued inventories based on historical experience and current trends through reductions to inventory cost by recording a provision included in Cost of goods sold. Where management estimated that the reasonable market value was below cost or determined that future demand was lower than current inventory levels, based on historical experience, current and projected market demand, current and projected volume trends and other relevant current and projected factors associated with the current economic conditions, a reduction in inventory cost to estimated net realizable value was made. See Note 3, on page 48 of this report, for more information regarding the impact of the LIFO inventory valuation.
Purchase Accounting, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In accordance with the Business Combinations Topic of the ASC, the Company used the purchase method of accounting to allocate costs of acquired businesses to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The excess costs of acquired businesses over the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized as Goodwill. The valuations of the acquired assets and liabilities will impact the determination of future operating results. In addition to using management estimates and negotiated amounts, the Company used a variety of information sources to determine the estimated fair values of acquired assets and liabilities including: third-party appraisals for the estimated value and lives of identifiable intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; third-party actuaries for the estimated obligations
22 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
of defined benefit pension plans and similar benefit obligations; and legal counsel or other experts to assess the obligations associated with legal, environmental and other contingent liabilities. The business and technical judgment of management was used in determining which intangible assets have indefinite lives and in determining the useful lives of finite-lived intangible assets in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC.
As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performs impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis, as well as whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate impairment has more likely than not occurred. An optional qualitative assessment allows companies to skip the annual two-step quantitative test if it is not more likely than not that impairment has occurred based on monitoring key Company financial performance metrics and macroeconomic conditions. The qualitative assessment is performed when deemed appropriate.
In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment per the Segment Reporting Topic of the ASC or one level below the operating segment (component level) as determined by the availability of discrete financial information that is regularly reviewed by operating segment management or an aggregate of component levels of an operating segment having similar economic characteristics. At the time of goodwill impairment testing (if performing a quantitative assessment), management determines fair value through the use of a discounted cash flow valuation model incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each reporting unit. If the calculated fair value is less than the current carrying value, impairment of the reporting unit may exist. The use of a discounted cash flow valuation model to determine estimated fair value is common practice in impairment testing. The key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation model for impairment testing include discount rates, growth rates, cash flow projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates are set by using the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) methodology. The WACC methodology considers market and industry data as well as Company-specific risk factors for each reporting unit in determining the appropriate discount rates to be used. The discount rate utilized for each reporting unit is indicative of the return an investor would expect to receive for investing in such a business. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates, sales projections and cash flow projections for each reporting unit. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual cash flow estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. As an
indicator that each reporting unit has been valued appropriately through the use of the discounted cash flow valuation model, the aggregate of all reporting units fair value is reconciled to the total market capitalization of the Company.
The Company had six reporting units with goodwill as of October 1, 2016, the date of the annual impairment test. The annual impairment review performed as of October 1, 2016 resulted in goodwill impairment in the Latin America Coatings Group of $10.5 million. The impairment related primarily to lower than anticipated cash flow in the Latin America Coatings Group. None of the other reporting units had impairment or were deemed at risk for impairment.
In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at the asset level, as determined by appropriate asset valuations at acquisition. Management utilizes the royalty savings method and valuation model to determine the estimated fair value for each indefinite-lived intangible asset or trademark. In this method, management estimates the royalty savings arising from the ownership of the intangible asset. The key assumptions used in estimating the royalty savings for impairment testing include discount rates, royalty rates, growth rates, sales projections and terminal value rates. Discount rates used are similar to the rates developed by the WACC methodology considering any differences in Company-specific risk factors between reporting units and trademarks. Royalty rates are established by management and valuation experts and periodically substantiated by valuation experts. Operational management, considering industry and Company-specific historical and projected data, develops growth rates and sales projections for each significant trademark. Terminal value rate determination follows common methodology of capturing the present value of perpetual sales estimates beyond the last projected period assuming a constant WACC and low long-term growth rates. The royalty savings valuation methodology and calculations used in 2016 impairment testing are consistent with prior years.
The discounted cash flow and royalty savings valuation methodologies require management to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the valuations are performed. Actual results could differ from these assumptions. Management believes the assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating fair value considering the current economic conditions. See Note 4, on pages 49 through 50 of this report, for a discussion of goodwill and intangible assets and the impairment tests performed in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC.
Property, Plant and Equipment and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Property, plant and equipment was stated on the basis of cost and depreciated principally on a straight-line basis using
23 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
industry standards and historical experience to estimate useful lives. In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, if events or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable or the useful life had changed, impairment tests were performed or the useful life was adjusted. Undiscounted future cash flows were used to calculate the recoverable value of long-lived assets to determine if such assets were impaired. Where impairment was identified, management determined fair values for assets using a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets. Growth models were developed using both industry and Company historical results and forecasts. If the usefulness of an asset was determined to be impaired, then management estimated a new useful life based on the period of time for projected uses of the asset. Such models and changes in useful life required management to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the valuation or determination was performed. Actual results could differ from these assumptions. Management believes the assumptions used are reflective of what a market participant would have used in calculating fair value or useful life considering the current economic conditions. All tested long-lived assets or groups of long-lived assets had undiscounted cash flows that were substantially in excess of their carrying value. See Notes 4 and 5, on pages 49 through 53 of this report, for a discussion of the reductions in carrying value or useful life of long-lived assets in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC.
Exit or Disposal Activities
Management is continually re-evaluating the Company’s operating facilities against its long-term strategic goals. Liabilities associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized as incurred in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic of the ASC and property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC. Provisions for qualified exit costs are made at the time a facility is no longer operational, include amounts estimated by management and primarily include post-closure rent expenses or costs to terminate the contract before the end of its term and costs of employee terminations. Adjustments may be made to liabilities accrued for qualified exit costs if information becomes available upon which more accurate amounts can be reasonably estimated. If impairment of property, plant and equipment exists, then the carrying value is reduced to fair value estimated by management. Additional impairment may be recorded for subsequent revisions in estimated fair value. See Note 5, on pages 50 through 53 of this report, for information concerning impairment of property, plant and equipment and accrued qualified exit costs.
Other Liabilities
The Company retains risk for certain liabilities, primarily worker’s compensation claims, employee medical benefits, and automobile, property, general and product liability claims. Estimated amounts were accrued for certain worker’s compensation, employee medical and disability benefits, automobile and property claims filed but unsettled and estimated claims incurred but not reported based upon management’s estimated aggregate liability for claims incurred using historical experience, actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and actuarially-developed models for estimating certain liabilities. Certain estimated general and product liability claims filed but unsettled were accrued based on management’s best estimate of ultimate settlement or actuarial calculations of potential liability using industry experience and actuarial assumptions developed for similar types of claims.
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
To determine the Company’s ultimate obligation under its defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans other than pensions, management must estimate the future cost of benefits and attribute that cost to the time period during which each covered employee works. To determine the obligations of such benefit plans, management uses actuaries to calculate such amounts using key assumptions such as discount rates, inflation, long-term investment returns, mortality, employee turnover, rate of compensation increases and medical and prescription drug costs. Management reviews all of these assumptions on an ongoing basis to ensure that the most current information available is being considered. An increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside management’s control could have a direct impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
In accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company recognizes each plan’s funded status as an asset for overfunded plans and as a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. Actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs are recognized and recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity. The amounts recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will continue to be modified as actuarial assumptions and service costs change, and all such amounts will be amortized to expense over a period of years through the net pension and net periodic benefit costs.
The deficit in market value of equity securities held by the plans versus the expected returns in 2016 will increase the future amortization of actuarial losses. The amortization of actuarial losses on plan assets and decrease in discount rates on projected benefit obligations will increase net pension costs in 2017. See Note 6, on pages 54 through 59 of this report, for
24 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
information concerning the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans other than pensions.
Debt
The fair values of the Company’s publicly traded long-term debt were based on quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s non-traded long-term debt were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. See Note 1, on page 44 of this report, for the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s long-term debt, and Note 7, on pages 60 through 61 of this report, for a description of the Company’s long-term debt arrangements.
Environmental Matters
The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites and at a number of third-party sites. The Company accrues for environmental-related activities for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and for which costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. All accrued amounts were recorded on an undiscounted basis. Environmental-related expenses included direct costs of investigation and remediation and indirect costs such as compensation and benefits for employees directly involved in the investigation and remediation activities and fees paid to outside engineering, actuarial, consulting and law firms. Due to uncertainties surrounding environmental investigations and remediation activities, the Company’s ultimate liability may result in costs that are significantly higher than currently accrued. See page 29 and Note 8, on pages 61 through 62 of this report, for information concerning the accrual for extended environmental-related activities and a discussion concerning unaccrued future loss contingencies.
Litigation and Other Contingent Liabilities
In the course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including, but not limited to, litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial, contractual and antitrust claims. Management believes that the Company has properly accrued for all known liabilities that existed and those where a loss was deemed probable for which a fair value was available or an amount could be reasonably estimated in accordance with all present U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. However, because litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties and the ultimate result of any present or future litigation is unpredictable, the Company’s ultimate liability may result in costs that are significantly higher than currently accrued. In the event that the Company’s loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the
liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties involved, any potential liability determined to be attributable to the Company arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. See Note 9 on pages 62 through 65 of this report for information concerning litigation.
Income Taxes
The Company estimated income taxes in each jurisdiction that it operated. This involved estimating taxable earnings, specific taxable and deductible items, the likelihood of generating sufficient future taxable income to utilize deferred tax assets and possible exposures related to future tax audits. To the extent these estimates change, adjustments to deferred and accrued income taxes will be made in the period in which the changes occur.
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company early adopted an Income tax accounting change related to ASU No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which simplifies various provisions related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. The changes have been applied prospectively beginning on January 1, 2016 in accordance with the ASU and prior years have not been restated. See Note 14, on pages 69 and 70 of this report, for information concerning the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties and current and deferred tax expense.
Stock-Based Compensation
The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. The Company follows the “modified prospective” method as described in the Topic whereby compensation cost is recognized for all share-based payments granted after December 31, 2005.
The Company estimates the fair value of option rights using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model which requires management to make estimates for certain assumptions. Management and a consultant continuously review the following significant assumptions: risk-free interest rate, expected life of options, expected volatility of stock and expected dividend yield of stock. An increase or decrease in the assumptions or economic events outside management’s control could have a direct impact on the Company’s results of operations. See Note 12, on pages 67 and 68 of this report, for more information on stock-based compensation.
Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue was primarily generated from the sale of products. All sales of products were recognized when
25 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
shipped and title had passed to unaffiliated customers. Collectibility of amounts recorded as revenue is reasonably assured at time of sale. Discounts were recorded as a reduction to sales in the same period as the sale resulting in an appropriate net sales amount for the period. Standard sales terms are final and returns or exchanges are not permitted unless expressly stated. Estimated provisions for returns or exchanges, recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales, were established in cases where the right of return existed. The Company offered a variety of programs, primarily to its retail customers, designed to promote sales of its products. Such programs required periodic payments and allowances based on estimated results of specific programs and were recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales. The Company accrued the estimated total payments and allowances associated with each transaction at the time of sale. Additionally, the Company offered programs directly to consumers to promote the sale of its products. Promotions that reduced the ultimate consumer sale prices were recorded as a reduction resulting in net sales at the time the promotional offer was made, generally using estimated redemption and participation levels. The Company continually assesses the adequacy of accruals for customer and consumer promotional program costs earned but not yet paid. To the extent total program payments differ from estimates, adjustments may be necessary. Historically, these total program payments and adjustments have not been material.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CASH FLOW
Overview
The Company’s financial condition, liquidity and cash flow continued to be strong in 2016 as net operating cash topped $1.000 billion for the fourth straight year primarily due to improved operating results in our Paint Stores and Global Finishes Groups. Net working capital increased $282.8 million at December 31, 2016 compared to 2015 due to a significant increase in cash and other current assets partially offset by a significant increase in current liabilities. Cash and cash equivalents increased $684.0 million which were generated from cash flow from operations. Other current assets increased $150.3 million primarily due to an interest rate lock asset, while current portion of long-term debt increased $697.3 million resulting from 1.35% senior notes becoming due in 2017. In April 2016, the Company entered into a $7.3 billion bridge credit agreement (Bridge Loan) and a $2.0 billion term loan credit agreement (Term Loan) as committed financing for the pending Acquisition as disclosed in Note 2. No balances were drawn against these facilities as of December 31, 2016. Debt issuance costs of $65.1 million related to these facilities were incurred and recorded in Other current assets. Of this amount, $61.1 million was amortized and included in Interest expense for year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has been able to
arrange sufficient short-term borrowing capacity at reasonable rates, and the Company has sufficient total available borrowing capacity to fund its current operating needs.
Net operating cash decreased $138.9 million to $1.309 billion in 2016 from $1.447 billion in 2015 due primarily to an increase in working capital from timing of payments of $244.2 million partially offset by an increase in net income of $78.9 million. Net operating cash decreased as a percent to sales to 11.0 percent in 2016 compared to 12.8 percent in 2015. Strong net operating cash provided the funds necessary to invest in new stores, manufacturing and distribution facilities, return cash to shareholders through dividends, and build a cash reserve needed for the pending Acquisition expected to be completed in early 2017. In 2016, the Company used a portion of Net operating cash and Cash and cash equivalents to spend $239.0 million in capital additions and improvements and pay $312.1 million in cash dividends to its shareholders of common stock.
Net Working Capital
Total current assets less Total current liabilities (net working capital) increased $282.8 million to a surplus of $798.1 million at December 31, 2016 from a surplus of $515.3 million at December 31, 2015. The net working capital increase is due to a significant increase in current assets only partially offset by a significant increase in current liabilities. Cash and cash equivalents increased $684.0 million. Accounts receivable increased $116.7 million, Inventories increased $49.8 million and Deferred tax net assets decreased $30.7 million while the remaining current assets increased $150.3 million, primarily due to an interest rate lock asset. Current portion of long-term debt increased $697.3 million resulting from 1.35% senior notes becoming due in 2017. Short-term borrowings increased $1.3 million. Accounts payable decreased $123.0 million while Accrued taxes decreased $4.4 million and all other current liabilities, excluding current portion of long-term debt, increased $116.1 million. As a result of the net effect of these changes, the Company’s current ratio improved to 1.28 at December 31, 2016 from 1.24 at December 31, 2015. Accounts receivable as a percent of Net sales increased to 10.4 percent in 2016 from 9.8 percent in 2015. Accounts receivable days outstanding was flat at 54 days in 2016 and 2015. In 2016, provisions for allowance for doubtful collection of accounts decreased $9.0 million, or 18.2 percent. Inventories were flat as a percent of Net sales at 9.0 percent in 2016 and 2015. Inventory days outstanding was down at 79 days in 2016 versus 83 days in 2015. Accounts payable decreased in 2016 to $1.035 billion compared to $1.158 billion last year due primarily to timing of payments. The Company has sufficient total available borrowing capacity to fund its current operating needs.
26 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill, which represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired in purchase business combinations, decreased $16.4 million in 2016 due primarily to an impairment charge of $10.5 million and foreign currency translation rate fluctuations. The goodwill impairment charge related primarily to lower than anticipated cash flow in the Latin America Coatings Group.
Intangible assets decreased $0.4 million in 2016. Decreases from amortization of finite-lived intangible assets of $25.6 million were partially offset by $21.6 million of capitalized software costs. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations and other adjustments accounted for the other increases. Acquired finite-lived intangible assets included assets such as covenants not to compete, customer lists and product formulations. Costs related to designing, developing, obtaining and implementing internal use software are capitalized and amortized in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC. See Note 4, on pages 49 through 50 of this report, for a description of goodwill, identifiable intangible assets and asset impairments recorded in accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC and summaries of the remaining carrying values of goodwill and intangible assets.
Deferred Pension and Other Assets
Deferred pension assets of $225.5 million at December 31, 2016 represent the excess of the fair value of assets over the actuarially determined projected benefit obligations, primarily of the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan. The decrease in Deferred pension assets during 2016 of $19.4 million, from $244.9 million last year, was due to an increase in the projected benefit obligations primarily resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions, and a decrease in the fair value of plan assets. In accordance with the accounting prescribed by the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the decrease in the value of the Deferred pension assets is offset in Cumulative other comprehensive loss and is amortized as a component of Net pension costs over a defined period of pension service. See Note 6, on pages 54 through 59 of this report, for more information concerning the excess fair value of assets over projected benefit obligations of the salaried defined benefit pension plan and the amortization of actuarial gains or losses relating to changes in the excess assets and other actuarial assumptions.
Other assets decreased $14.4 million to $421.9 million at December 31, 2016 due primarily to net decreases in various long-term investments.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Net property, plant and equipment increased $54.0 million to $1.096 billion at December 31, 2016 due primarily to capital expenditures of $239.0 million partially offset by depreciation
expense of $172.1 million, sale or disposition of assets with remaining net book value of $7.9 million and currency translation and other adjustments of $5.6 million. Capital expenditures during 2016 in the Paint Stores Group were primarily attributable to the opening of new paint stores and renovation and improvements in existing stores. In the Consumer Group, capital expenditures during 2016 were primarily attributable to improvements and normal equipment replacements in manufacturing and distribution facilities. Capital expenditures in the Global Finishes Group were primarily attributable to improvements in existing manufacturing and distribution facilities. The Administrative Segment incurred capital expenditures primarily for information systems hardware. In 2017, the Company expects to spend more than 2016 for capital expenditures. The predominant share of the capital expenditures in 2017 is expected to be for various productivity improvement and maintenance projects at existing manufacturing, distribution and research and development facilities, new store openings and new or upgraded information systems hardware. The Company does not anticipate the need for any specific long-term external financing to support these capital expenditures.
Debt
There were no borrowings outstanding under the domestic commercial paper program at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. There were $625.9 million in borrowings outstanding under this program at December 31, 2014 with a weighted-average interest rate of 0.3 percent. Borrowings outstanding under various foreign programs at December 31, 2016 were $40.7 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 7.9 percent. At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, foreign borrowings were $39.5 million and $53.6 million with weighted-average interest rates of 7.0 percent and 6.0 percent, respectively. Long-term debt, including the current portion, increased $1.4 million during 2016 resulting primarily from amortization of debt issuance costs. On July 28, 2015, the Company issued $400.0 million of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2025 and $400.0 million of 4.55% Senior Notes due 2045. The notes are covered under a shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 28, 2015. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, which included repayment of a portion of the Company’s outstanding short-term borrowings in 2015.
In April 2016, the Company entered into a $7.3 billion Bridge Loan and a $2.0 billion Term Loan as committed financing for the pending Acquisition as disclosed in Note 2. No balances were drawn against these facilities as of December 31, 2016. During the first six months of 2016, in anticipation of a probable issuance of new long-term fixed rate debt, the Company entered into a series of interest rate lock agreements (collectively, the interest rate locks) on a combined notional amount of $3.6 billion. The objective of the interest rate locks is
27 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
to hedge the variability in the future semi-annual payments on the anticipated debt attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate (U.S. Treasury) during the hedge periods. The future semi-annual interest payments are exposed to interest rate risk due to changes in the benchmark interest rate from the inception of the hedge to the time of issuance. The interest rate locks were evaluated for hedge accounting treatment and were designated as cash flow hedges. Therefore, the interest rate locks are recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and changes in fair value (to the extent effective) are recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss. Amounts recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will be reclassified to Interest expense in periods following the settlement of the interest rate locks. The Company will evaluate hedge effectiveness each period until settlement. At December 31, 2016, an interest rate lock asset of $137.2 million was included in Other current assets, and the related pretax gain of $137.2 million was recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss.
See Note 7, on pages 60 through 61 of this report, for a detailed description of the Company’s debt outstanding and other available financing programs.
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
In accordance with the accounting prescribed by the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company’s total liability for unfunded or underfunded defined benefit pension plans increased $2.6 million to $53.2 million primarily due to changes in the actuarial assumptions of the Company's foreign plans. Postretirement benefits other than pensions increased $1.8 million to $265.1 million at December 31, 2016 due primarily to changes in the actuarial assumptions.
Effective July 1, 2009, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was revised. Prior to July 1, 2009, the contribution was based on six percent of compensation for covered employees. Under the revised plan, such participants are credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula. Amounts previously recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss in accordance with the provisions of the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC were modified in 2009 resulting in a decrease in comprehensive loss due primarily to the change in the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan and an increase in the excess plan assets over the actuarially calculated projected benefit obligation in the domestic defined benefit pension plans. Partially offsetting this decreased loss were modifications to actuarial assumptions used to calculate projected benefit obligations.
Effective October 1, 2011, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was frozen for new hires, and all newly hired U.S. non-collectively bargained employees are eligible to
participate in the Company’s domestic defined contribution plan. Effective January 1, 2017, the domestic salaried defined benefit plan was amended. Contribution credits earned prior to January 1, 2017 are subject to the hypothetical returns achieved on each participant’s allocation of units from investments in various investment funds as directed by the participant. Effective January 1, 2017, contribution credits are credited interest at an annual fixed rate equal to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 24-month average second segment rate.
The assumed discount rate used to determine the actuarial present value of projected defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit obligations for domestic plans was decreased from 4.40 percent to 4.20 percent at December 31, 2016 due to decreased rates of high-quality, long-term investments and foreign defined benefit pension plans had similar discount rate decreases for the same reasons. The rate of compensation increases used to determine the projected benefit obligations increased to 3.4 percent in 2016 from 3.1 percent for domestic pension plans and similar increases on most foreign plans. In deciding on the rate of compensation increases, management considered historical Company increases as well as expectations for future increases. The expected long-term rate of return on assets remained at 6.0 percent for 2016 for domestic pension plans and was slightly lower for most foreign plans. In establishing the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets for 2016, management considered the historical rates of return, the nature of investments and an expectation for future investment strategies. The assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the net periodic benefit cost of postretirement benefits other than pensions for 2016 were 5.0 percent and 11.5 percent, respectively, for medical and prescription drug cost increases, both decreasing gradually to 4.5 percent in 2025. In developing the assumed health care cost trend rates, management considered industry data, historical Company experience and expectations for future health care costs.
For 2017 Net pension cost and Net periodic benefit cost recognition for domestic plans, the Company will use a discount rate of 4.20 percent, an expected long-term rate of return on assets of 5.0 percent, a rate of compensation increase of 3.4 percent. Lower discount rates and expected long-term rates of return on plan assets will be used for most foreign plans. Use of these assumptions and amortization of actuarial losses will result in a domestic Net pension cost in 2017 that is expected to be approximately $9.3 million higher than in 2016 and a Net periodic benefit cost for postretirement benefits other than pensions that is expected to decrease $0.5 million in 2017 compared to 2016. See Note 6, on pages 54 through 59 of this report, for more information on the Company’s obligations and funded status of its defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefits other than pensions.
28 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities decreased $30.2 million during 2016 due primarily to a decrease in non-current deferred tax liabilities of $65.2 million partially offset by an increase in accruals for extended environmental-related liabilities of $34.0 million.
Environmental-Related Liabilities
The operations of the Company, like those of other companies in the same industry, are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only govern current operations and products, but also impose potential liability on the Company for past operations. Management expects environmental laws and regulations to impose increasingly stringent requirements upon the Company and the industry in the future. Management believes that the Company conducts its operations in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and has implemented various programs designed to protect the environment and promote continued compliance.
Depreciation of capital expenditures and other expenses related to ongoing environmental compliance measures were included in the normal operating expenses of conducting business. The Company’s capital expenditures, depreciation and other expenses related to ongoing environmental compliance measures were not material to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, cash flow or results of operations during 2016. Management does not expect that such capital expenditures, depreciation and other expenses will be material to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, cash flow or results of operations in 2017. See Note 8, on pages 61 through 62 of this report, for further information on environmental-related long-term liabilities.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
On March 19, 2016, the Company and Valspar entered into a definitive agreement under which the Company will acquire Valspar for $113 per share in an all cash transaction. The transaction is subject to certain conditions and regulatory approvals. See Note 2 for more information.
The Company has certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contractual obligations and commercial commitments. The following table summarizes such obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2016:
(thousands of dollars) | Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less than 1 Year | 1–3 Years | 3–5 Years | More than 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 1,927,001 | $ | 701,679 | $ | 1,002 | $ | 508 | $ | 1,223,812 | ||||||||||
Operating leases | 1,600,329 | 342,565 | 559,012 | 372,511 | 326,241 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 40,739 | 40,739 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest on Long-term debt | 1,091,271 | 62,234 | 106,205 | 106,161 | 816,671 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (1) | 63,098 | 63,098 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other contractual obligations (2) | 214,221 | 86,742 | 61,596 | 43,458 | 22,425 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 4,936,659 | $ | 1,297,057 | $ | 727,815 | $ | 522,638 | $ | 2,389,149 | ||||||||||
(1) | Relate to open purchase orders for raw materials at December 31, 2016. |
(2) | Relate primarily to estimated future capital contributions to investments in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate partnerships and various other contractual obligations. |
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Commitments | Total | Less than 1 Year | 1–3 Years | 3–5 Years | More than 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit | $ | 43,658 | $ | 43,658 | ||||||||||||||||
Surety bonds | 70,417 | 70,417 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other commercial commitments | 24,456 | 24,456 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial commitments | $ | 138,531 | $ | 138,531 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
29 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
Warranties
The Company offers product warranties for certain products. The specific terms and conditions of such warranties vary depending on the product or customer contract requirements. Management estimated the costs of unsettled product warranty claims based on historical results and experience. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the accrual for product warranty claims and adjusts the accrual as necessary. Changes in the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims during 2016, 2015 and 2014, including customer satisfaction settlements during the year, were as follows:
(thousands of dollars) | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Balance at January 1 | $ | 31,878 | $ | 27,723 | $ | 26,755 | |||||
Charges to expense | 38,954 | 43,484 | 37,879 | ||||||||
Settlements | (36,413 | ) | (39,329 | ) | (36,911 | ) | |||||
Balance at December 31 | $ | 34,419 | $ | 31,878 | $ | 27,723 | |||||
Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity increased $1.011 billion to $1.878 billion at December 31, 2016 from $867.9 million last year primarily due to an increase in retained earnings of $820.6 million and an increase in Other capital of $158.1 million. Retained earnings increased $820.6 million during 2016 due to net income of $1.133 billion partially offset by $312.1 million in cash dividends paid. The increase in Other capital of $158.1 million was due primarily to the recognition of stock-based compensation expense and stock option exercises. Cumulative other comprehensive loss decreased $46.7 million due primarily to unrealized gains of $85.0 million on the interest rate locks, partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation effects of $18.6 million attributable to the weakening of most foreign operations’ functional currencies against the U.S. dollar and $20.8 million in net actuarial losses and prior service costs of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans net of amortization.
The Company did not make any open market purchases of its common stock for treasury during 2016. The Company acquires its common stock for general corporate purposes, and depending on its cash position and market conditions, it may acquire shares in the future. The Company had remaining authorization from its Board of Directors at December 31, 2016 to purchase 11.65 million shares of its common stock.
The Company's 2016 annual cash dividend of $3.36 per common share represented 30.1 percent of 2015 diluted net income per common share. The 2016 annual dividend represented the thirty-eighth consecutive year of dividend payments since the dividend was suspended in 1978. The Company is temporarily modifying its practice of paying 30.0 percent of the prior year’s diluted net income per common share in cash dividend. At a meeting held on
February 15, 2017, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend to $.85 per common share. This quarterly dividend, if approved in each of the remaining quarters of 2017, would result in an annual dividend for 2017 of $3.40 per common share or a 28.4 percent payout of 2016 diluted net income per common share. See the Statements of Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity, on page 43 of this report, and Notes 10, 11 and 12, on pages 66 through 68 of this report, for more information concerning Shareholders’ equity.
Cash Flow
Net operating cash decreased $138.9 million to $1.309 billion in 2016 from $1.447 billion in 2015 due primarily to an increase in cash used in working capital of $244.2 million, due to timing of payments, partially offset by an increase in net income of $78.9 million. Strong net operating cash provided the funds necessary to invest in new stores, manufacturing and distribution facilities, return cash to shareholders through dividends, and build a cash reserve needed for the pending Acquisition expected to be completed in early 2017. Net investing cash usage increased $15.1 million to a usage of $303.8 million in 2016 from a usage of $288.6 million in 2015 due primarily to increased cash used for other investments of $37.6 million and increased capital expenditures of $4.7 million partially offset by increased proceeds from sale of assets of $27.1 million. Net financing cash improved $673.0 million to a usage of $307.4 million in 2016 from a usage of $980.4 million in 2015 due primarily to decreased treasury stock purchases of $1.035 billion and decreased net payments on short-term borrowings of $629.3 million partially offset by decreased net proceeds of long-term debt of $798.1 million and increased payments of cash dividends of $62.4 million. In 2016, the Company used Net operating cash and Cash and cash equivalents on hand to spend $239.0 million in capital additions and improvements, pay $312.1 million in cash dividends to its shareholders of common stock, and build a cash reserve needed for the pending Acquisition.
Management considers a measurement of cash flow that is not in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to be a useful tool in its determination of appropriate uses of the Company’s Net operating cash. Management reduces Net operating cash, as shown in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, by the amount reinvested in the business for Capital expenditures and the return of investment to its shareholders by the payments of cash dividends. The resulting value is referred to by management as “Free Cash Flow” which may not be comparable to values considered by other entities using the same terminology. The reader is cautioned that the Free Cash Flow measure should not be compared to other entities unknowingly, and it does not consider certain non-discretionary cash flows, such as mandatory debt and interest payments. The amount shown below should not be considered an alternative to Net operating
30 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
cash or other cash flow amounts provided in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles disclosed in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, on page 42 of this report. Free Cash Flow as defined and used by management is determined as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
(thousands of dollars) | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Net operating cash | $ | 1,308,572 | $ | 1,447,463 | $ | 1,081,528 | |||||
Capital expenditures | (239,026 | ) | (234,340 | ) | (200,545 | ) | |||||
Cash dividends | (312,082 | ) | (249,647 | ) | (215,263 | ) | |||||
Free cash flow | $ | 757,464 | $ | 963,476 | $ | 665,720 | |||||
Litigation
Titanium dioxide suppliers antitrust class action lawsuit. The Company was a member of the plaintiff class related to Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation that was initiated in 2010 against certain suppliers alleging various theories of relief arising from purchases of titanium dioxide made from 2003 through 2012. The Court approved a settlement less attorney fees and expense, and the Company timely submitted claims to recover its pro-rata portion of the settlement. There was no specified deadline for the claims administrator to complete the review of all claims submitted. In October 2014, the Company was notified that it would receive a disbursement of settlement funds, and the Company received a pro-rata disbursement net of all fees of approximately $21.4 million. The Company recorded this settlement gain in the fourth quarter of 2014.
See page 25 of this report and Note 9 on pages 62 through 65 for more information concerning litigation.
Market Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk associated with interest rate, foreign currency and commodity fluctuations. The Company occasionally utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall financial risk management policy, but does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company entered into foreign currency option and forward currency exchange contracts with maturity dates of less than twelve months in 2016, 2015 and 2014, primarily to hedge against value changes in foreign currency. There were no material foreign currency option and forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The Company believes it may be exposed to continuing market risk from foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations. However, the Company does not expect that foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations or hedging contract losses will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In 2016, the Company entered into a series of interest rate lock agreements which were designated as cash flow hedges. See Notes 1 and 13 on pages 44 and 69 of this report.
Financial Covenant
Certain borrowings contain a consolidated leverage covenant. The covenant states the Company’s leverage ratio is not to exceed 3.50 to 1.00 (or 5.25 to 1.00 after pending Acquisition closing). The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total indebtedness (the sum of Short-term borrowings, Current portion of long-term debt and Long-term debt) at the reporting date to consolidated “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization” (EBITDA) for the 12-month period ended on the same date. Refer to the “Results of Operations” caption below for a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net income. At December 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with the covenant. The Company’s Notes, Debentures and revolving credit agreement contain various default and cross-default provisions. In the event of default under any one of these arrangements, acceleration of the maturity of any one or more of these borrowings may result. See Note 7 on pages 60 through 61 of this report.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Participants in the Company’s ESOP are allowed to contribute up to the lesser of twenty percent of their annual compensation or the maximum dollar amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches six percent of eligible employee contributions. The Company’s matching contributions to the ESOP charged to operations were $85.5 million in 2016 compared to $80.4 million in 2015. At December 31, 2016, there were 10,710,973 shares of the Company’s common stock being held by the ESOP, representing 11.5 percent of the total number of voting shares outstanding. See Note 11, on page 66 of this report, for more information concerning the Company’s ESOP.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2016 vs. 2015
Shown below are net sales and segment profit and the percentage change for the current period by segment for 2016 and 2015:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
(thousands of dollars) | 2016 | 2015 | Change | |||||||
Net Sales: | ||||||||||
Paint Stores Group | $ | 7,790,157 | $ | 7,208,951 | 8.1 | % | ||||
Consumer Group | 1,584,413 | 1,577,955 | 0.4 | % | ||||||
Global Finishes Group | 1,889,106 | 1,916,300 | -1.4 | % | ||||||
Latin America Coatings Group | 586,926 | 631,015 | -7.0 | % | ||||||
Administrative | 5,000 | 5,083 | -1.6 | % | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 11,855,602 | $ | 11,339,304 | 4.6 | % | ||||
31 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
(thousands of dollars) | 2016 | 2015 | Change | |||||||
Income Before Income Taxes: | ||||||||||
Paint Stores Group | $ | 1,622,697 | $ | 1,433,504 | 13.2 | % | ||||
Consumer Group | 319,228 | 308,833 | 3.4 | % | ||||||
Global Finishes Group | 239,000 | 201,881 | 18.4 | % | ||||||
Latin America Coatings Group | (17,391 | ) | 18,494 | -194.0 | % | |||||
Administrative | (568,301 | ) | (413,746 | ) | -37.4 | % | ||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 1,595,233 | $ | 1,548,966 | 3.0 | % | ||||
Consolidated net sales for 2016 increased due primarily to higher paint sales volume in our Paint Stores Group and the impact of the Revenue reclassification beginning in the third quarter related to grossing up third-party service revenue and related costs which were previously netted and immaterial in prior periods. The Revenue reclassification increased sales in the year 1.1 percent. This prospective change primarily impacts the Paint Stores and Global Finishes Groups. This change had no impact on segment profit, but reduced segment profit as a percent to net sales of the affected groups. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased 2016 consolidated net sales 1.4 percent. Net sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries decreased 3.7 percent to $1.722 billion for 2016 versus $1.789 billion for 2015 due primarily to unfavorable foreign currency translation rates. Net sales of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 6.1 percent to $10.133 billion for 2016 versus $9.550 billion for 2015.
Net sales in the Paint Stores Group in 2016 increased due primarily to higher architectural paint sales volume across all end market segments and the impact of the Revenue reclassification. Net sales from stores open for more than twelve calendar months, excluding the Revenue reclassification, increased 5.3 percent for the full year. During 2016, the Paint Stores Group opened 109 new stores and closed 15 redundant locations for a net increase of 94 stores, increasing the total number of stores in operation at December 31, 2016 to 4,180 in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. The Paint Stores Group’s objective is to expand its store base an average of two and a half percent each year, primarily through internal growth. Sales of products other than paint, excluding the Revenue reclassification, increased approximately 13.2 percent for the year over 2015. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of general merchandise sold.
Net sales of the Consumer Group increased primarily due to higher volume sales to most of the Group's retail customers, partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes
decreased net sales 1.1 percent in the year. Sales of wood care coatings, brushes, rollers, caulk and other paint related products, were all up at least mid to high-single digits as compared to 2015 while sales of aerosol products were down slightly. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of paint-related merchandise sold. The Consumer Group plans to continue its promotions of new and existing products in 2017 and continue expanding its customer base and product assortment at existing customers.
The Global Finishes Group’s net sales in 2016, when stated in U.S. dollars, decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 2.6 percent for 2016. In 2016, the Global Finishes Group opened 5 new branches and closed 13 locations decreasing the total from 296 to 288 branches open in the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe and Asia at year-end. In 2017, the Global Finishes Group expects to continue expanding its worldwide presence and improving its customer base.
The Latin America Coatings Group’s net sales in 2016, when stated in U.S. dollars, decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency translation rate changes and lower paint sales volume partially offset by selling price increases. Paint sales volume percentage decreased in the low-single digits as compared to 2015. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 13.5 percent for 2016. In 2016, the Latin America Coatings Group opened 49 new stores and closed 1 location for a net increase of 48 stores, increasing the total to 339 stores open in North and South America at year-end. In 2017, the Latin America Coatings Group expects to continue expanding its regional presence and improving its customer base.
Net sales in the Administrative segment, which primarily consist of external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space and leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary business, decreased by an insignificant amount in 2016.
Consolidated gross profit increased $363.0 million in 2016 and improved as a percent to net sales to 50.0 percent from 49.0 percent in 2015 due primarily to higher paint sales volume and improved operating efficiencies partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Excluding the effect of the Revenue reclassification, consolidated gross profit percent to net sales was 50.4 percent for 2016. The Paint Stores Group’s gross profit for 2016 increased $360.7 million compared to 2015 due primarily to higher paint sales volume. The Paint Stores Group's gross profit margins increased primarily due to higher paint sales volume partially offset by the effect of the Revenue reclassification. The Consumer Group’s gross profit increased $19.8 million due primarily to improved operating efficiency and increased paint sales volume. The Consumer Group’s gross profit margins increased for those same reasons. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit for 2016 increased
32 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
$8.8 million due primarily to improved operating efficiencies and decreasing raw material costs partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit increased as a percent of sales for those same reasons. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased Global Finishes Group’s gross profit by $15.7 million for 2016. The Latin America Coatings Group’s gross profit for 2016 decreased $21.8 million and decreased as a percent of sales, when stated in U.S. dollars, primarily due to unfavorable currency translation rate changes and increasing raw material costs. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes and lower volume sales were only partially offset by selling price increases in 2016 compared to 2015. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased gross profit by $30.6 million for 2016. The Administrative segment’s gross profit decreased by $4.4 million.
SG&A increased by $245.9 million due primarily to increased expenses to support higher sales levels and net new store openings as well as the impact of Acquisition expenses of $58.4 million recorded in the Administrative segment. SG&A increased as a percent of sales to 35.1 percent in 2016 from 34.5 percent in 2015 primarily due to those same reasons. Excluding Acquisition expenses, SG&A as a percent of sales was 34.6 percent in 2016. In the Paint Stores Group, SG&A increased $171.0 million for the year due primarily to increased spending due to the number of new store openings and general comparable store expenses to support higher sales levels. The Consumer Group’s SG&A increased by $6.5 million for the year in support of increased sales levels. The Global Finishes Group’s SG&A decreased by $22.1 million for the year relating primarily to foreign currency translation rate fluctuations reducing SG&A by $16.0 million. The Latin America Coatings Group’s SG&A increased by $6.8 million for the year partially offset by foreign currency translation rate fluctuations of $16.8 million. The Administrative segment’s SG&A increased $83.8 million primarily due to Acquisition expenses and incentive compensation.
Other general expense - net decreased $17.9 million in 2016 compared to 2015. The decrease was mainly caused by a decrease of $19.2 million of expense in the Administrative segment, primarily due to a year-over-year increase in gain on sale of assets of $29.8 million partially offset by an increase in provisions for environmental matters of $11.9 million. See Note 13, on page 68 of this report, for more information concerning Other general expense - net.
As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performed an annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2016. The impairment tests in 2016 resulted in $10.7 million impairment of goodwill and trademarks recorded in the Latin America Coatings Group. No impairments were recorded in 2015. See Note 4, on pages 49 and 50 of this report, for more information concerning the impairment of intangible assets.
Amortization of credit facility costs incurred in early 2016 and interest on debt issued in July 2015 increased interest expense $92.3 million in 2016.
Other (income) expense - net increased to $4.6 million income from $6.1 million expense in 2015. This was primarily due to decreased net expense from banking activities of $2.4 million and decreased miscellaneous net expenses of $5.2 million both primarily recorded in the Administrative segment. Additionally, foreign currency related transaction losses were $7.3 million in 2016 compared to $9.5 million in 2015, primarily in the Global Finishes and Latin America Coatings Groups. See Note 13, on page 68 of this report, for more information concerning Other (income) expense - net.
Consolidated Income before income taxes in 2016 increased $46.3 million due primarily to an increase of $363.0 million in gross profit partially offset by an increase of $245.9 million in SG&A and an increase of $60.2 million in interest expense, interest and net investment income and other expenses. Income before income taxes increased $189.2 million in the Paint Stores Group, $10.4 million in the Consumer Group, and $37.1 million in the Global Finishes Group but decreased $35.9 million in the Latin America Coatings Group when compared to 2015. The Administrative segment had a decreased impact on Income before income taxes of $154.6 million when compared to 2015 resulting primarily from Acquisition expenses and increased Interest expense. Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries decreased 20.7 percent to $60.1 million for 2016 versus $75.8 million for 2015. Segment profit of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 4.2 percent to $1.535 billion for 2016 versus $1.473 billion for 2015.
Net income increased $78.9 million in 2016 primarily due to the increase in Income before income taxes and the Income tax accounting change.
The effective income tax rate was 29.0 percent for 2016 and 32.0 percent for 2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to the Income tax accounting change. Excluding the impact of Acquisition expense tax benefits and the Income tax accounting change, the effective income tax rate was 32.3 percent for 2016. Diluted net income per common share increased 7.5 percent to $11.99 per share for 2016, including an $.86 per share charge for expenses associated with the Acquisition partially offset by an increase of $.40 per share related to the Income tax accounting change, from $11.15 per share a year ago. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased diluted net income per common share by $.14 per share for the year.
Management considers a measurement that is not in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles a useful measurement of the operational profitability of the Company. Some investment professionals also utilize such a measurement as an indicator of the value of profits and cash that are generated strictly from operating activities, putting aside working capital and certain other balance sheet changes. For this measurement, management increases Net income for significant non-operating and non-cash expense items to arrive at an amount known as EBITDA. The reader is cautioned that the following value for EBITDA should not be compared to other entities unknowingly. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to Net income or Net operating cash as an indicator
33 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
of operating performance or as a measure of liquidity. The reader should refer to the determination of Net income and Net operating cash in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles disclosed in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, on pages 40 and 42 of this report. EBITDA as used by management is calculated as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
(thousands of dollars) | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,132,703 | $ | 1,053,849 | $ | 865,887 | |||||
Interest expense | 154,088 | 61,791 | 64,205 | ||||||||
Income taxes | 462,530 | 495,117 | 392,339 | ||||||||
Depreciation | 172,074 | 170,323 | 169,087 | ||||||||
Amortization | 25,637 | 28,239 | 29,858 | ||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 1,947,032 | $ | 1,809,319 | $ | 1,521,376 | |||||
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - 2015 vs. 2014
Shown below are net sales and segment profit and the percentage change for the current period by segment for 2015 and 2014:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
(thousands of dollars) | 2015 | 2014 | Change | |||||||
Net Sales: | ||||||||||
Paint Stores Group | $ | 7,208,951 | $ | 6,851,581 | 5.2 | % | ||||
Consumer Group | 1,577,955 | 1,420,757 | 11.1 | % | ||||||
Global Finishes Group | 1,916,300 | 2,080,854 | -7.9 | % | ||||||
Latin America Coatings Group | 631,015 | 771,378 | -18.2 | % | ||||||
Administrative | 5,083 | 4,963 | 2.4 | % | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 11,339,304 | $ | 11,129,533 | 1.9 | % | ||||
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
(thousands of dollars) | 2015 | 2014 | Change | |||||||
Income Before Income Taxes: | ||||||||||
Paint Stores Group | $ | 1,433,504 | $ | 1,201,420 | 19.3 | % | ||||
Consumer Group | 308,833 | 252,859 | 22.1 | % | ||||||
Global Finishes Group | 201,881 | 201,129 | 0.4 | % | ||||||
Latin America Coatings Group | 18,494 | 40,469 | -54.3 | % | ||||||
Administrative | (413,746 | ) | (437,651 | ) | 5.5 | % | ||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 1,548,966 | $ | 1,258,226 | 23.1 | % | ||||
Consolidated net sales for 2015 increased due primarily to higher paint sales volume in the Paint Stores and Consumer Groups. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased 2015 consolidated net sales 3.3 percent. Net sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were down 18.8 percent to $1.789 billion for 2015 versus $2.204 billion for 2014 due
primarily to unfavorable foreign currency translation rates. Net sales of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 7.0 percent to $9.550 billion for 2015 versus $8.926 billion for 2014.
Net sales in the Paint Stores Group in 2015 increased primarily due to higher architectural paint sales volume across all end market segments. Net sales from stores open for more than twelve calendar months increased 4.2 percent for the full year. During 2015, the Paint Stores Group opened 113 new stores and closed 30 redundant locations for a net increase of 83 stores, increasing the total number of stores in operation at December 31, 2015 to 4,086 in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean. The Paint Stores Group’s objective is to expand its store base an average of two and a half percent each year, primarily through internal growth. Sales of products other than paint increased approximately 8.0 percent for the year over 2014. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of general merchandise sold.
Net sales of the Consumer Group increased due primarily to a new agreement to sell architectural paint under the HGTV HOME® by Sherwin-Williams brand through a large U.S. national retailer's stores network. Sales of wood care coatings, brushes, rollers, caulk and other paint related products, were all up at least mid to high-single digits as compared to 2014 while sales of aerosol products were down slightly. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of paint-related merchandise sold.
The Global Finishes Group’s net sales in 2015, when stated in U.S. dollars, decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Paint sales volume percentage increased slightly as compared to 2014. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 7.5 percent for 2015. In 2015, the Global Finishes Group opened 3 new branches and closed 7 locations decreasing the total from 300 to 296 branches open in the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe and Asia at year-end.
The Latin America Coatings Group’s net sales in 2015, when stated in U.S. dollars, decreased due primarily to unfavorable currency translation rate changes and lower paint sales volume partially offset by selling price increases. Paint sales volume percentage decreased in the mid-single digits as compared to 2014. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes in the year decreased net sales by 19.3 percent for 2015. In 2015, the Latin America Coatings Group opened 17 new stores and closed 2 locations for a net increase of 15 stores, increasing the total to 291 stores open in North and South America at year-end.
Net sales in the Administrative segment, which primarily consist of external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space and leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary business, increased by an insignificant amount in 2015.
34 |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | |
Consolidated gross profit increased $394.7 million in 2015 and improved as a percent to net sales to 49.0 percent from 46.4 percent in 2014 due primarily to higher paint sales volume, improved operating efficiencies, and decreasing raw material costs partially offset by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Gross profit for 2014 included the 2014 TiO2 settlement of $21.4 million received by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2014. The Paint Stores Group’s gross profit for 2015 increased $329.3 million compared to 2014 due primarily to higher paint sales volume. The Paint Stores Group's gross profit margins increased for that same reason. The Consumer Group’s gross profit increased $133.6 million due primarily to improved operating efficiency and increased paint sales volume. The Consumer Group’s gross profit margins increased for those same reasons. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit for 2015 decreased $29.0 million due primarily unfavorable currency translation rate changes partially offset by improved operating efficiencies and decreasing raw material costs. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit increased as a percent of sales due primarily to improved operating efficiencies and decreasing raw material costs. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased Global Finishes Group’s gross profit by $51.4 million for 2015. The Latin America Coatings Group’s gross profit for 2015 decreased $43.9 million and decreased as a percent of sales, when stated in U.S. dollars, primarily due to unfavorable currency translation rate changes and increasing raw material costs. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes and lower volume sales were only partially offset by selling price increases in 2015 compared to 2014. Foreign currency translation rate fluctuations decreased gross profit by $41.5 million for 2015. The Administrative segment’s gross profit increased by $4.8 million.
SG&A increased by $90.6 million due primarily to increased expenses to support higher sales levels and net new store openings as well as the impact from a new paint program launch at a national retailer. SG&A increased as a percent of sales to 34.5 percent in 2015 from 34.3 percent in 2014 primarily due to those same reasons. In the Paint Stores Group, SG&A increased $95.4 million for the year due primarily to increased spending due to the number of new store openings and general comparable store expenses to support higher sales levels. The Consumer Group’s SG&A increased by $79.7 million for the year due to a new paint program launch at a national retailer. The Global Finishes Group’s SG&A decreased by $37.4 million for the year relating primarily to foreign currency translation rate fluctuations reducing SG&A by $44.2 million. The Latin America Coatings Group’s SG&A decreased by $22.0 million for the year relating primarily to foreign currency translation rate fluctuations of $27.9 million. The Administrative segment’s SG&A decreased $25.2 million primarily due to incentive compensation.
Other general expense - net decreased $7.2 million in 2015 compared to 2014. The decrease was mainly caused by a decrease of $6.1 million of expense in the Administrative segment, primarily due to a year-over-year decrease in
provisions for environmental matters of $5.0 million. See Note 13, on page 68 and 69 of this report, for more information concerning Other general expense - net.
As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, management performed an annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2015. The impairment tests in 2015 and 2014 resulted in no impairment of goodwill and trademarks. See Note 4, on pages 49 and 50 of this report, for more information concerning the impairment of intangible assets.
Interest expense, included in the Administrative segment, decreased $2.4 million in 2015 versus 2014 due primarily to lower borrowing rates partially offset by higher average debt levels.
Other expense (income) - net decreased to $6.1 million expense from $15.4 million income in 2014. This was primarily due to a $6.3 million gain on the early termination of a customer agreement recorded in the Global Finishes Group and a $6.2 million realized gain resulting from final asset valuations related to the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex recorded in the Administrative segment, both recorded in the third quarter of 2014. Additionally, foreign currency related transaction losses of $9.5 million in 2015 versus foreign currency related transaction losses of $3.6 million in 2014, primarily in the Global Finishes and Latin America Coatings Groups, were unfavorable comparisons. See Note 13, on page 69 of this report, for more information concerning Other expense (income) - net.
Consolidated Income before income taxes in 2015 increased $290.7 million due primarily to an increase of $394.7 million in gross profit partially offset by an increase of $90.6 million in SG&A and an increase of $13.5 million in interest expense, interest and net investment income and other expenses. Income before income taxes increased $232.1 million in the Paint Stores Group, $56.0 million in the Consumer Group, and $0.8 million in the Global Finishes Group but decreased $22.0 million in the Latin America Coatings Group when compared to 2014. The Administrative segment had a favorable impact on Income before income taxes of $23.9 million when compared to 2014. Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries decreased 34.5 percent to $75.8 million for 2015 versus $115.6 million for 2014. Segment profit of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries increased 28.9 percent to $1.473 billion for 2015 versus $1.143 billion for 2014.
Net income increased $188.0 million in 2015 due to the increase in Income before income taxes.
The effective income tax rate for 2015 was 32.0 percent. The effective income tax rate for 2014 was 31.2 percent. Diluted net income per common share increased 27.1 percent to $11.15 per share for 2015 from $8.77 per share a year ago. Unfavorable currency translation rate changes decreased diluted net income per common share by $.26 per share.
35 |
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We recognize that internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and is subject to the possibility of human error or the circumvention or the overriding of internal control. Therefore, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, we believe we have designed into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In order to ensure that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016, we conducted an assessment of its effectiveness under the supervision and with the participation of our management group, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. This assessment was based on the criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our assessment of internal control over financial reporting under the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, we have concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, and their report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is included on page 37 of this report.
J. G. Morikis
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
A. J. Mistysyn
Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
J. M. Cronin
Senior Vice President - Corporate Controller
36 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company
We have audited The Sherwin-Williams Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). The Sherwin-Williams Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, The Sherwin-Williams Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Sherwin-Williams Company as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 and our report dated February 22, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Cleveland, Ohio
February 22, 2017
37 |
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company
We are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report of The Sherwin-Williams Company and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and for the years then ended in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial information included in this report contains certain amounts that were based upon our best estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe were reasonable under the circumstances.
We have conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As discussed in the Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting on page 36 of this report, we concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.
The Board of Directors pursues its responsibility for the oversight of the Company’s accounting policies and procedures, financial statement preparation and internal control over financial reporting through the Audit Committee, comprised exclusively of independent directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment and compensation of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with financial management, internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm to review the adequacy of financial controls, the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the nature, extent and results of the audit effort. Both the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm have private and confidential access to the Audit Committee at all times.
We believe that the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and related financial information included in this report fairly reflect the form and substance of all material financial transactions and fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods presented.
J. G. Morikis
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
A. J. Mistysyn
Senior Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer
J. M. Cronin
Senior Vice President - Corporate Controller
38 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of The Sherwin-Williams Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Sherwin-Williams Company as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Sherwin-Williams Company at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), The Sherwin-Williams Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 22, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Cleveland, Ohio
February 22, 2017
39 |
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(thousands of dollars except per common share data)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Net sales | $ | 11,855,602 | $ | 11,339,304 | $ | 11,129,533 | |||||
Cost of goods sold | 5,933,337 | 5,780,078 | 5,965,049 | ||||||||
Gross profit | 5,922,265 | 5,559,226 | 5,164,484 | ||||||||
Percent to net sales | 50.0 | % | 49.0 | % | 46.4 | % | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 4,159,435 | 3,913,518 | 3,822,966 | ||||||||
Percent to net sales | 35.1 | % | 34.5 | % | 34.3 | % | |||||
Other general expense - net | 12,368 | 30,268 | 37,482 | ||||||||
Impairment of goodwill and trademarks | 10,688 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 154,088 | 61,791 | 64,205 | ||||||||
Interest and net investment income | (4,960 | ) | (1,399 | ) | (2,995 | ) | |||||
Other (income) expense - net | (4,587 | ) | 6,082 | (15,400 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes | 1,595,233 | 1,548,966 | 1,258,226 | ||||||||
Income taxes | 462,530 | 495,117 | 392,339 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,132,703 | $ | 1,053,849 | $ | 865,887 | |||||
Net income per common share: (1) | |||||||||||
Basic | $ | 12.33 | $ | 11.43 | $ | 9.00 | |||||
Diluted | $ | 11.99 | $ | 11.15 | $ | 8.77 | |||||
(1) Presented under the treasury stock method. See Note 15. | |||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,132,703 | $ | 1,053,849 | $ | 865,887 | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (18,648 | ) | (128,245 | ) | (103,441 | ) | |||||
Pension and other postretirement benefit adjustments: | |||||||||||
Amounts recognized in Other | |||||||||||
comprehensive loss (1) | (28,385 | ) | 7,974 | (56,536 | ) | ||||||
Amounts reclassified from Other | |||||||||||
comprehensive loss (2) | 7,635 | 5,847 | 8,980 | ||||||||
(20,750 | ) | 13,821 | (47,556 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized net gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities: | |||||||||||
Amounts recognized in Other | |||||||||||
comprehensive loss (3) | 1,046 | (1,191 | ) | 366 | |||||||
Amounts reclassified from Other | |||||||||||
comprehensive loss (4) | 89 | 478 | (283 | ) | |||||||
1,135 | (713 | ) | 83 | ||||||||
Unrealized net gains on cash flow hedges: | |||||||||||
Amounts recognized in Other | |||||||||||
comprehensive loss (5) | 85,007 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 46,744 | (115,137 | ) | (150,914 | ) | ||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 1,179,447 | $ | 938,712 | $ | 714,973 | |||||
(1) Net of taxes of $17,200, $(3,399) and $24,954, in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(2) Net of taxes of $(4,691), $(1,647) and $(2,712), in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(3) Net of taxes of $(643), $736 and $(228), in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(4) Net of taxes of $(55), $(296) and $178 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(5) Net of taxes of $(52,226) in 2016.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
40 |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(thousands of dollars)
December 31, | |||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||
Current assets: | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 889,793 | $ | 205,744 | $ | 40,732 | |||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance | 1,230,987 | 1,114,275 | 1,130,565 | ||||||||
Inventories: | |||||||||||
Finished goods | 898,627 | 840,603 | 841,784 | ||||||||
Work in process and raw materials | 169,699 | 177,927 | 191,743 | ||||||||
1,068,326 | 1,018,530 | 1,033,527 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 57,162 | 87,883 | 109,087 | ||||||||
Other current assets | 381,030 | 230,748 | 251,655 | ||||||||
Total current assets | 3,627,298 | 2,657,180 | 2,565,566 | ||||||||
Goodwill | 1,126,892 | 1,143,333 | 1,158,346 | ||||||||
Intangible assets | 255,010 | 255,371 | 289,127 | ||||||||
Deferred pension assets | 225,529 | 244,882 | 250,144 | ||||||||
Other assets | 421,904 | 436,309 | 415,120 | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment: | |||||||||||
Land | 115,555 | 119,530 | 125,691 | ||||||||
Buildings | 714,815 | 696,202 | 698,202 | ||||||||
Machinery and equipment | 2,153,437 | 2,026,617 | 1,952,037 | ||||||||
Construction in progress | 117,126 | 81,082 | 59,330 | ||||||||
3,100,933 | 2,923,431 | 2,835,260 | |||||||||
Less allowances for depreciation | 2,005,045 | 1,881,569 | 1,814,230 | ||||||||
1,095,888 | 1,041,862 | 1,021,030 | |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 6,752,521 | $ | 5,778,937 | $ | 5,699,333 | |||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | |||||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 40,739 | $ | 39,462 | $ | 679,436 | |||||
Accounts payable | 1,034,608 | 1,157,561 | 1,042,182 | ||||||||
Compensation and taxes withheld | 398,045 | 338,256 | 360,458 | ||||||||
Accrued taxes | 76,765 | 81,146 | 86,744 | ||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 700,475 | 3,154 | 3,265 | ||||||||
Other accruals | 578,547 | 522,280 | 508,581 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities | 2,829,179 | 2,141,859 | 2,680,666 | ||||||||
Long-term debt | 1,211,326 | 1,907,278 | 1,115,996 | ||||||||
Postretirement benefits other than pensions | 250,397 | 248,523 | 277,892 | ||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 583,178 | 613,367 | 628,309 | ||||||||
Shareholders’ equity: | |||||||||||
Common stock - $1.00 par value: | |||||||||||
93,013,031, 92,246,525, and 94,704,173 shares outstanding | |||||||||||
at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively | 116,563 | 115,761 | 114,525 | ||||||||
Other capital | 2,488,564 | 2,330,426 | 2,079,639 | ||||||||
Retained earnings | 4,049,497 | 3,228,876 | 2,424,674 | ||||||||
Treasury stock, at cost | (4,235,832 | ) | (4,220,058 | ) | (3,150,410 | ) | |||||
Cumulative other comprehensive loss | (540,351 | ) | (587,095 | ) | (471,958 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 1,878,441 | 867,910 | 996,470 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | $ | 6,752,521 | $ | 5,778,937 | $ | 5,699,333 | |||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
41 |
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(thousands of dollars)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
Operating Activities | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,132,703 | $ | 1,053,849 | $ | 865,887 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net operating cash: | |||||||||||
Depreciation | 172,074 | 170,323 | 169,087 | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 25,637 | 28,239 | 29,858 | ||||||||
Impairment of goodwill and trademarks | 10,688 | ||||||||||
Amortization of credit facility and debt issuance costs | 63,759 | 3,096 | 3,224 | ||||||||
Provisions for environmental-related matters | 42,932 | 31,071 | 36,046 | ||||||||
Provisions for qualified exit costs | 3,038 | 9,761 | 13,578 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (68,241 | ) | 4,976 | (19,038 | ) | ||||||
Defined benefit pension plans net cost | 14,851 | 6,491 | 990 | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 72,109 | 72,342 | 64,735 | ||||||||
Net decrease in postretirement liability | (12,373 | ) | (6,645 | ) | (718 | ) | |||||
Decrease in non-traded investments | 64,689 | 65,144 | 63,365 | ||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale or disposition of assets | (30,564 | ) | (803 | ) | 1,436 | ||||||
Other | 5,101 | 3,615 | (3,021 | ) | |||||||
Change in working capital accounts: | |||||||||||
(Increase) in accounts receivable | (113,855 | ) | (56,873 | ) | (80,252 | ) | |||||
(Increase) in inventories | (52,577 | ) | (40,733 | ) | (101,112 | ) | |||||
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable | (118,893 | ) | 160,111 | 78,603 | |||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued taxes | (2,159 | ) | 4,606 | 13,187 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued compensation and taxes withheld | 60,632 | (13,128 | ) | 29,513 | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in refundable income taxes | (1,343 | ) | 19,230 | (36,601 | ) | ||||||
Other | 56,215 | (955 | ) | (20,029 | ) | ||||||
Costs incurred for environmental-related matters | (15,178 | ) | (11,995 | ) | (9,676 | ) | |||||
Costs incurred for qualified exit costs | (6,267 | ) | (11,200 | ) | (10,882 | ) | |||||
Other | 5,594 | (43,059 | ) | (6,652 | ) | ||||||
Net operating cash | 1,308,572 | 1,447,463 | 1,081,528 | ||||||||
Investing Activities | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (239,026 | ) | (234,340 | ) | (200,545 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of assets | 38,434 | 11,300 | 1,516 | ||||||||
Increase in other investments | (103,182 | ) | (65,593 | ) | (111,021 | ) | |||||
Net investing cash | (303,774 | ) | (288,633 | ) | (310,050 | ) | |||||
Financing Activities | |||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings | (899 | ) | (630,226 | ) | 591,423 | ||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt | 500 | 797,514 | 1,474 | ||||||||
Payments of long-term debt | (1,111 | ) | (500,661 | ) | |||||||
Payments for credit facility and debt issuance costs | (65,119 | ) | |||||||||
Payments of cash dividends | (312,082 | ) | (249,647 | ) | (215,263 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised | 86,831 | 89,990 | 100,069 | ||||||||
Income tax effect of stock-based compensation exercises and vesting | 89,691 | 68,657 | |||||||||
Treasury stock purchased | (1,035,291 | ) | (1,488,663 | ) | |||||||
Other | (15,473 | ) | (42,384 | ) | (24,111 | ) | |||||
Net financing cash | (307,353 | ) | (980,353 | ) | (1,467,075 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (13,396 | ) | (13,465 | ) | (8,560 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 684,049 | 165,012 | (704,157 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 205,744 | 40,732 | 744,889 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 889,793 | $ | 205,744 | $ | 40,732 | |||||
Taxes paid on income | $ | 477,786 | $ | 335,119 | $ | 310,039 | |||||
Interest paid on debt | 153,850 | 48,644 | 67,306 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
42 |
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(thousands of dollars except per common share data)
Common Stock | Preferred Stock | Unearned ESOP Compen-sation | Other Capital | Retained Earnings | Treasury Stock | Cumulative Other Comprehensive Loss | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2014 | $ | 112,902 | $ | 40,406 | $ | (40,406 | ) | $ | 1,847,801 | $ | 1,774,050 | $ | (1,639,174 | ) | $ | (321,044 | ) | $ | 1,774,535 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 865,887 | 865,887 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | (150,914 | ) | (150,914 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchased | (1,488,663 | ) | (1,488,663 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred stock | (40,406 | ) | 40,406 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 1,423 | 98,646 | (22,573 | ) | 77,496 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax effect of stock compensation | 68,657 | 68,657 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock and stock option grants (net activity) | 200 | 64,535 | 64,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends -- $2.20 per common share | (215,263 | ) | (215,263 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2014 | 114,525 | — | — | 2,079,639 | 2,424,674 | (3,150,410 | ) | (471,958 | ) | 996,470 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 1,053,849 | 1,053,849 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | (115,137 | ) | (115,137 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchased | (1,035,291 | ) | (1,035,291 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 1,134 | 88,856 | (34,357 | ) | 55,633 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax effect of stock compensation | 89,691 | 89,691 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock and stock option grants (net activity) | 102 | 72,240 | 72,342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends -- $2.68 per common share | (249,647 | ) | (249,647 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 | 115,761 | — | — | 2,330,426 | 3,228,876 | (4,220,058 | ) | (587,095 | ) | 867,910 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 1,132,703 | 1,132,703 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income | 46,744 | 46,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 706 | 86,125 | (15,774 | ) | 71,057 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock and stock option grants (net activity) | 96 | 72,013 | 72,109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends -- $3.36 per common share | (312,082 | ) | (312,082 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 116,563 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,488,564 | $ | 4,049,497 | $ | (4,235,832 | ) | $ | (540,351 | ) | $ | 1,878,441 | |||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
43 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
NOTE 1 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Sherwin-Williams Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, “the Company”). Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those amounts.
Nature of operations. The Company is engaged in the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers primarily in North and South America, with additional operations in the Caribbean region, Europe and Asia.
Reportable segments. See Note 18 for further details.
Cash flows. Management considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Fair value of financial instruments. The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported for Cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value.
Short-term investments: The carrying amounts reported for Short-term investments approximate fair value.
Investments in securities: Investments classified as available-for-sale are carried at market value. See the recurring fair value measurement table on page 45.
Non-traded investments: The Company has investments in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate markets and certain other investments that have been identified as variable interest entities.
However, because the Company does not have the power to direct the day-to-day operations of the investments and the risk of loss is limited to the amount of contributed capital, the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), the investments are not consolidated. For affordable housing investments entered into prior to the January 1, 2015 adoption of Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2014-01, the Company uses the effective yield method to determine the carrying value of the investments. Under the effective yield method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense over the period that the tax credits are recognized. For affordable housing investments entered into on or after the January 1, 2015 adoption of ASU No. 2014-01, the Company uses the proportional amortization method. Under the proportional amortization method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received. The carrying amounts of the investments, included in Other assets, were $193,413, $189,484 and $223,935 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The liabilities recorded on the balance sheets for estimated future capital contributions to the investments were $178,584, $172,899 and $198,776 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts reported for Short-term borrowings approximate fair value.
Long-term debt (including current portion): The fair values of the Company’s publicly traded debt, shown below, are based on quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s non-traded debt, also shown below, are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The Company's publicly traded debt and non-traded debt are classified as level 1 and level 2, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 7.
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | ||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount (1) | Value | Amount (1) | Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Publicly traded debt | $ | 1,907,704 | $ | 1,912,646 | $ | 1,905,650 | $ | 1,960,169 | $ | 1,114,205 | $ | 1,160,280 | |||||||||||
Non-traded debt | 4,097 | 3,783 | 4,782 | 4,555 | 5,056 | 4,812 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) Revised due to the adoption of ASU No. 2015-03. See Impact of recently issued accounting standards section. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments: The Company utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall financial risk management policy. The Company entered into foreign currency option and forward currency exchange contracts with maturity dates of less than twelve months in 2016, 2015, and 2014, primarily to hedge against value changes
in foreign currency. See Note 13. There were no material foreign currency option and forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
In 2016, the Company entered into a series of interest rate lock agreements which were designated as cash flow hedges. See Note 7.
44 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
Fair value measurements. The following tables summarize the Company’s assets and liabilities measured on a
recurring and non-recurring basis in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC:
Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Fair Value at December 31, 2016 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan asset (1) | $ | 27,452 | $ | 3,802 | $ | 23,650 | |||||||
Interest rate lock asset (2) | 137,233 | 137,233 | |||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 164,685 | $ | 3,802 | $ | 160,883 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||
Deferred compensation plan liability (3) | $ | 37,717 | $ | 37,717 | |||||||||
(1) | The deferred compensation plan asset consists of the investment funds maintained for the future payments under the Company’s executive deferred compensation plan, which is structured as a rabbi trust. The investments are marketable securities accounted for under the Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the ASC. The level 1 investments are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares. The level 2 investments are valued based on vendor or broker models. The cost basis of the investment funds is $26,357. |
(2) | The interest rate lock asset is measured at the present value of the expected future cash flows using market-based observable inputs. See note 7. |
(3) | The deferred compensation plan liability represents the value of the Company’s liability under its deferred compensation plan based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets. |
Assets and Liabilities Reported at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis. As a result of the 2016 annual goodwill impairment test performed in accordance with the Intangibles Topic of the ASC, goodwill with a carrying value of $10,455 was written-off, resulting in an impairment charge of $10,455. As a result of the 2016 annual trademark impairment test performed in accordance with the Intangibles Topic of the ASC, a trademark with a carrying value of $2,114 was written-down to its calculated fair value of $1,881, resulting in an impairment charge of $233. These fair value measurements qualify as level 2 measurements. See Note 4.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable were recorded at the time of credit sales net of provisions for sales returns and allowances. The Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $40,450, $49,420 and $53,770 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, to reduce Accounts receivable to their estimated net realizable value. The allowance was based on an analysis of historical bad debts, a review of the aging of Accounts receivable and the current creditworthiness of customers. Account receivable balances are written-off against the allowance if a final determination of uncollectibility is made. All provisions for allowances for doubtful collection of accounts are related to the creditworthiness of accounts and are included in Selling, general and administrative expenses.
Reserve for obsolescence. The Company recorded a reserve for obsolescence of $87,715, $91,217 and $90,712 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, to reduce Inventories to their estimated net realizable value.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the cost in excess of fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for by the purchase method. In accordance with the Intangibles Topic of the ASC, goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and in between annual tests if events or circumstances indicate potential impairment. See Note 4.
Intangible assets. Intangible assets include trademarks, non-compete covenants and certain intangible property rights. As required by the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, indefinite-lived trademarks are not amortized, but instead are tested annually for impairment, and between annual tests whenever an event occurs or circumstances indicate potential impairment. See Note 4. The cost of finite-lived trademarks, non-compete covenants and certain intangible property rights are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefit as follows:
Useful Life | |
Finite-lived trademarks | 5 years |
Non-compete covenants | 3 – 5 years |
Certain intangible property rights | 3 – 19 years |
Impairment of long-lived assets. In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, management evaluates the recoverability and estimated remaining lives of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. See Notes 4 and 5.
Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment is stated on the basis of cost. Depreciation is
45 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
provided by the straight-line method. Depreciation and amortization are included in the appropriate Cost of goods sold or Selling, general and administrative expense caption on the Statements of Consolidated Income. Included in Property, plant and equipment are leasehold improvements. The major classes of assets and ranges of annual depreciation rates are:
Buildings | 4.0% – 20.0% |
Machinery and equipment | 10.0% – 20.0% |
Furniture and fixtures | 10.0% – 20.0% |
Automobiles and trucks | 10.0% – 33.3% |
Standby letters of credit. The Company occasionally enters into standby letter of credit agreements to guarantee various operating activities. These agreements provide credit availability to the various beneficiaries if certain contractual events occur. Amounts outstanding under these agreements totaled $43,658, $45,407 and $23,442 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Product warranties. The Company offers product warranties for certain products. The specific terms and conditions of such warranties vary depending on the product or customer contract requirements. Management estimated the costs of unsettled product warranty claims based on historical results and experience and included an amount in Other accruals. Management periodically assesses the adequacy of the accrual for product warranty claims and adjusts the accrual as necessary. Changes in the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims during 2016, 2015 and 2014, including customer satisfaction settlements during the year, were as follows:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Balance at January 1 | $ | 31,878 | $ | 27,723 | $ | 26,755 | |||||
Charges to expense | 38,954 | 43,484 | 37,879 | ||||||||
Settlements | (36,413 | ) | (39,329 | ) | (36,911 | ) | |||||
Balance at December 31 | $ | 34,419 | $ | 31,878 | $ | 27,723 | |||||
Environmental matters. Capital expenditures for ongoing environmental compliance measures were recorded in Property, plant and equipment, and related expenses were included in the normal operating expenses of conducting business. The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites and at a number of third-party sites. The Company accrued for environmental-related activities for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs could be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. All accrued amounts were recorded on an undiscounted basis. Environmental-related expenses included direct costs of investigation and remediation and indirect costs such as
compensation and benefits for employees directly involved in the investigation and remediation activities and fees paid to outside engineering, consulting and law firms. See Notes 8 and 13.
Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan. The Company accounts for the Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan (ESOP) in accordance with the Employee Stock Ownership Plans Subtopic of the Compensation – Stock Ownership Topic of the ASC. The Company recognized compensation expense for amounts contributed to the ESOP. See Note 11.
Defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans in accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, which requires the recognition of a plan’s funded status as an asset for overfunded plans and as a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. See Note 6.
Stock-based compensation. The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. See Note 12.
Foreign currency translation. All consolidated non-highly inflationary foreign operations use the local currency of the country of operation as the functional currency and translated the local currency asset and liability accounts at year-end exchange rates while income and expense accounts were translated at average exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustments were included in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity.
Cumulative other comprehensive loss. At December 31, 2016, the ending balance of Cumulative other comprehensive loss included adjustments for foreign currency translation of $501,277, net prior service costs and net actuarial losses related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans of $125,096, unrealized net gains on marketable equity securities of $1,015 and unrealized net gains on interest rate lock cash flow hedges of $85,007. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the ending balance of Cumulative other comprehensive loss included adjustments for foreign currency translation of $482,629 and $354,384, respectively, net prior service costs and net actuarial losses related to pension and other postretirement benefit plans of $104,346 and $118,167, respectively, and unrealized losses and gains on marketable equity securities of $120 and $593, respectively.
Revenue recognition. The Company recognized revenue when products were shipped and title passed to unaffiliated customers. Collectibility of amounts recorded as revenue was reasonably assured at the time of recognition.
Third-party service revenue. The Company used subcontractors to provide installation services for customers. Under these arrangements, the Company invoiced the customer for both the product and installation and remitted payment to the subcontractor for the installation. Starting in
46 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
the third quarter of 2016, the Company recorded the installation revenue in Net sales and the payments to subcontractors in Cost of goods sold. Prior to the third quarter, these amounts were netted and immaterial.
Customer and vendor consideration. The Company offered certain customers rebate and sales incentive programs which were classified as reductions in Net sales. Such programs were in the form of volume rebates, rebates that constituted a percentage of sales or rebates for attaining certain sales goals. The Company received consideration from certain suppliers of raw materials in the form of volume rebates or rebates that constituted a percentage of purchases. These rebates were recognized on an accrual basis by the Company as a reduction of the purchase price of the raw materials and a subsequent reduction of Cost of goods sold when the related product was sold.
Costs of goods sold. Included in Costs of goods sold were costs for materials, manufacturing, distribution and related support. Distribution costs included all expenses related to the distribution of products including inbound freight charges, purchase and receiving costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs and all costs incurred to ship products. Also included in Costs of goods sold were total technical expenditures, which included research and development costs, quality control, product formulation expenditures and other similar items. Research and development costs included in technical expenditures were $58,041, $57,667 and $50,019 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The settlement gain related to the titanium dioxide litigation reduced 2014 Costs of goods sold by $21,420. See Note 9.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling costs included advertising expenses, marketing costs, employee and store costs and sales commissions. The cost of advertising was expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $351,002, $338,188 and $299,201 in advertising costs during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. General and administrative expenses included human resources, legal, finance and other support and administrative functions.
Earnings per share. Common stock held in a revocable trust (see Note 10) was not included in outstanding shares for basic or diluted income per common share calculations. All references to “shares” or “per share” information throughout this report relate to common shares and are stated on a diluted per common share basis, unless otherwise indicated. Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated using the treasury stock method in accordance with the Earnings Per Common Share Topic of the ASC. Basic net income per common share amounts were computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted net income per common share amounts were computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus all dilutive securities potentially outstanding during the year. See Note 15.
Impact of recently issued accounting standards. During the second quarter of 2016, the Company early adopted, as permitted, ASU No. 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which simplifies various provisions related to how share-based payments are accounted for and presented in the financial statements. Excess tax benefits for share-based payments are no longer recognized in other capital on the balance sheet and are instead recognized in the income tax provision on the income statement. As a result, excess tax benefits for share-based payments are now included in Net operating cash rather than Net financing cash. The changes have been applied prospectively beginning on January 1, 2016 in accordance with the ASU and prior years have not been restated. See Note 14 for additional information.
Effective January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASU No. 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs," which requires companies to present debt issuance costs associated with a debt liability as a deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability on the balance sheet rather than being capitalized as an asset. The changes have been applied retrospectively. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Effective January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASU No. 2015-07, "Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value Per Share (Or Its Equivalent)." This ASU removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient. The adoption of this ASU affects the Company's year-end disclosure of the fair value of pension assets, but there is no effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases,” which consists of a comprehensive lease accounting standard. Under the new standard, assets and liabilities arising from most leases will be recognized on the balance sheet. Leases will be classified as either operating or financing, and the lease classification will determine whether expense is recognized on a straight line basis (operating leases) or based on an effective interest method (financing leases). The new standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. A modified retrospective transition approach is required with certain practical expedients available. The Company has made significant progress with its assessment process, and anticipates this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet. While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, it currently believes the most significant impact relates to recording lease assets and related liabilities on the balance sheet for the Paint Store Group's retail operations.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and
47 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
Financial Liabilities,” which amends the guidance for certain aspects of recognition, measurement and disclosure of financial instruments. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, "Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes," which eliminates the requirement for separate presentation of current and non-current portions of deferred tax. All deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities will be presented as non-current on the balance sheet. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Either retrospective or prospective presentation can be used. The Company will adopt ASU No. 2015-17 as required. The ASU will not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers," which consists of a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The issuance of ASU No. 2015-14 in August 2015 delays the effective date of the standard to interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption is permitted. In addition to expanded disclosures regarding revenue, this pronouncement may impact timing of recognition in some arrangements with variable consideration or contracts for the sale of goods or services. The Company has made significant progress with its assessment process. In addition, the Company is currently developing plans for enhancements to its information systems and internal controls in response to the new rule requirements. The Company plans to adopt the standard using the full retrospective method of adoption, which requires the restatement of prior periods presented. The Company expects to have expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and is in process of evaluating the impact on the results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Reclassification. Certain amounts in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for 2014 and 2015 have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 presentation.
NOTE 2 – ACQUISITIONS
On March 19, 2016, the Company and The Valspar Corporation (Valspar) entered into a definitive agreement under which the Company will acquire Valspar for $113 per share in an all cash transaction, or a value of approximately $9.500 billion and assumption of Valspar debt and other considerations. The transaction is subject to certain conditions and regulatory approvals. If in connection with obtaining the
required regulatory approvals, the parties are required to divest assets of Valspar or the Company representing, in the aggregate, more than $650,000 in net sales, then the per share consideration will be $105 in cash. The Company is not required to consummate the acquisition if regulatory authorities require the divestiture of assets of Valspar or the Company representing, in the aggregate, more than $1.500 billion. Valspar's architectural coatings assets in Australia are excluded from the calculation of the $650,000 and/or $1.500 billion threshold if such assets are required to be divested. A divestiture below the $650,000 threshold is expected in order to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals. The Company expects to negotiate the divestiture and complete the Valspar transaction at $113 per share in early 2017.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred SG&A and interest expense of $58,409 and $72,844, respectively, related to the anticipated acquisition of Valspar. See Note 7. The acquisition-related expenses reduced basic and diluted net income per common share by $.89 and $.86, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016. The acquisition will expand Sherwin-Williams diversified array of brands and technologies, expand its global platform and add new capabilities in the packaging and coil segments.
NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES
Inventories were stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined principally on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. The following presents the effect on inventories, net income and net income per common share had the Company used the first-in, first-out (FIFO) inventory valuation method adjusted for income taxes at the statutory rate and assuming no other adjustments. Management believes that the use of LIFO results in a better matching of costs and revenues. This information is presented to enable the reader to make comparisons with companies using the FIFO method of inventory valuation. During 2014, certain inventories accounted for on the LIFO method were reduced, resulting in the liquidation of certain quantities carried at costs prevailing in prior years. The 2014 liquidation increased net income by $196.
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Percentage of total inventories on LIFO | 79 | % | 78 | % | 76 | % | |||||
Excess of FIFO over LIFO | $ | 253,353 | $ | 251,060 | $ | 331,867 | |||||
(Decrease) increase in net income due to LIFO | (1,421 | ) | 49,658 | 3,230 | |||||||
(Decrease) increase in net income per common share due to LIFO | (.02 | ) | .53 | .03 | |||||||
48 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
NOTE 4 – GOODWILL, INTANGIBLE AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of long-lived assets may not be recoverable or the useful life may have changed, impairment tests are to be performed. Undiscounted cash flows are to be used to calculate the recoverable value of long-lived assets to determine if such assets are impaired. Where impairment is identified, a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets, is to be used to determine the fair value for the assets to measure any potential impairment. No material impairments were recorded in 2016, 2015 and 2014.
In accordance with the Goodwill and Other Intangibles Topic of the ASC, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually, and interim impairment tests are performed whenever an event occurs or
circumstances change that indicate an impairment has more likely than not occurred. October 1 has been established for the annual impairment review. At the time of impairment testing, values are estimated separately for goodwill and trademarks with indefinite lives using a discounted cash flow valuation model, incorporating discount rates commensurate with the risks involved for each group of assets. An optional qualitative assessment may alleviate the need to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test when impairment is unlikely.
The annual impairment review performed as of October 1, 2016 resulted in goodwill and trademark impairment in the Latin America Coatings Group of $10,455 and $233, respectively. The goodwill impairment charge related primarily to lower than anticipated cash flow in the Latin America Coatings Group. The trademark impairment related to lower than anticipated sales of an acquired brand. The annual impairment reviews performed as of October 1, 2015 and 2014 did not result in any goodwill or trademark impairment.
A summary of changes in the Company’s carrying value of goodwill by Reportable Segment is as follows:
Goodwill | Paint Stores Group | Consumer Group | Global Finishes Group | Latin America Coatings Group | Consolidated Totals | ||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2014 (1) | $ | 287,300 | $ | 703,351 | $ | 178,298 | $ | 9,738 | $ | 1,178,687 | |||||||||
Currency and other adjustments | (1,866 | ) | (1,145 | ) | (17,287 | ) | (43 | ) | (20,341 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2014 (1) | 285,434 | 702,206 | 161,011 | 9,695 | 1,158,346 | ||||||||||||||
Currency and other adjustments | (28 | ) | (1,135 | ) | (13,801 | ) | (49 | ) | (15,013 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 (1) | 285,406 | 701,071 | 147,210 | 9,646 | 1,143,333 | ||||||||||||||
Impairment charged to operations | (10,455 | ) | (10,455 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Currency and other adjustments | 4 | (1,197 | ) | (5,602 | ) | 809 | (5,986 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 (2) | $ | 285,410 | $ | 699,874 | $ | 141,608 | $ | — | $ | 1,126,892 | |||||||||
(1) | Net of accumulated impairment losses of $8,904 ($8,113 in the Consumer Group and $791 in the Global Finishes Group). |
(2) | Net of accumulated impairment losses of $19,359 ($8,113 in the Consumer Group, $791 in the Global Finishes Group and $10,455 in the Latin America Coatings Group). |
49 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
A summary of the Company’s carrying value of intangible assets is as follows:
Finite-lived intangible assets | Trademarks with indefinite lives | Total intangible assets | |||||||||||||||||
Software | All other | Subtotal | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average amortization period | 7 years | 11 years | 10 years | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | $ | 144,557 | $ | 313,613 | $ | 458,170 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated amortization | (103,735 | ) | (240,217 | ) | (343,952 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net value | $ | 40,822 | $ | 73,396 | $ | 114,218 | $ | 140,792 | $ | 255,010 | |||||||||
December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average amortization period | 8 years | 12 years | 11 years | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | $ | 123,863 | $ | 312,119 | $ | 435,982 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated amortization | (95,008 | ) | (228,921 | ) | (323,929 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net value | $ | 28,855 | $ | 83,198 | $ | 112,053 | $ | 143,318 | $ | 255,371 | |||||||||
December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average amortization period | 8 years | 12 years | 11 years | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | $ | 126,258 | $ | 317,005 | $ | 443,263 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated amortization | (88,384 | ) | (215,518 | ) | (303,902 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net value | $ | 37,874 | $ | 101,487 | $ | 139,361 | $ | 149,766 | $ | 289,127 | |||||||||
Amortization of finite-lived intangible assets is as follows for the next five years: $18,958 in 2017, $18,390 in 2018, $16,209 in 2019, $14,985 in 2020 and $13,177 in 2021.
NOTE 5 – EXIT OR DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES
Management is continually re-evaluating the Company’s operating facilities, including acquired operating facilities, against its long-term strategic goals. Liabilities associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized as incurred in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic of the ASC. Provisions for qualified exit costs are made at the time a facility is no longer operational. Qualified exit costs primarily include post-closure rent expenses or costs to terminate the contract before the end of its term and costs of employee terminations. Adjustments may be made to liabilities accrued for qualified exit costs if information becomes available upon which more accurate amounts can be reasonably estimated. Concurrently, property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, and if impairment exists, the carrying value of the related assets is reduced to estimated fair value. Additional impairment may be recorded for subsequent revisions in estimated fair value. Adjustments to prior provisions and additional impairment charges for property, plant and equipment of closed sites being held for disposal are recorded in Other general expense – net.
During 2016, 15 stores in Paint Stores Group, 13 branches in the Global Finishes Group, 2 facilities in Consumer Group and 1 store in the Latin America Coatings Group were closed due to lower demand or redundancy. Provisions for severance and
other qualified exit costs of $1,020 and $505 were charged to the Consumer Group and Global Finish Group, respectively. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2016 of $1,513 were recorded.
During 2015, 30 stores in the Paint Stores Group, 7 branches in the Global Finishes Group and 2 stores in the Latin America Coatings Group were closed due to lower demand or redundancy. In addition, the Global Finishes Group exited a business in Europe. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit cost of $168 and $8,329 were charged to the Paint Stores Group and Global Finishes Group, respectively. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2015 of $1,264 were recorded.
During 2014, 7 facilities and 24 stores and branches were closed due to lower demand or redundancy. In addition, the Global Finishes Group exited its business in Venezuela. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit cost of $280, $4,809 and $4,767 were charged to the Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group and Global Finishes Group, respectively. Provisions for severance and other qualified exit costs related to manufacturing facilities, distribution facilities, stores and branches closed prior to 2014 of $3,722 were recorded.
At December 31, 2016, a portion of the remaining accrual for qualified exit costs relating to facilities shutdown prior to
50 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
2014 is expected to be incurred by the end of 2017. The remaining portion of the ending accrual for facilities shutdown prior to 2014 primarily represented post-closure contractual expenses related to certain owned facilities which are closed
and being held for disposal. The Company cannot reasonably estimate when such matters will be concluded to permit disposition.
The following tables summarize the activity and remaining liabilities associated with qualified exit costs:
(Thousands of dollars) Exit Plan | Balance at December 31, 2015 | Provisions in Cost of goods sold or SG&A | Actual expenditures charged to accrual | Balance at December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2016: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | $ | 1,020 | $ | (113 | ) | $ | 907 | |||||||||
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2016: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 136 | 136 | ||||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 369 | (100 | ) | 269 | ||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2015: | ||||||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | $ | 12 | 481 | (298 | ) | 195 | ||||||||||
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2015: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 1,096 | (1,096 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 2,750 | 499 | (2,816 | ) | 433 | |||||||||||
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 184 | (81 | ) | 103 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 445 | (46 | ) | 399 | ||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 52 | (39 | ) | 13 | ||||||||||||
Global Finishes Group exit of business in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 430 | (430 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 353 | 430 | (600 | ) | 183 | |||||||||||
Severance and other qualified exit costs for facilities shutdown prior to 2014 | 1,755 | 103 | (648 | ) | 1,210 | |||||||||||
Totals | $ | 7,077 | $ | 3,038 | $ | (6,267 | ) | $ | 3,848 | |||||||
51 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
(Thousands of dollars) Exit Plan | Balance at December 31, 2014 | Provisions in Cost of goods sold or SG&A | Actual expenditures charged to accrual | Balance at December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2015: | ||||||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | $ | 168 | $ | (156 | ) | $ | 12 | |||||||||
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2015: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 1,341 | (245 | ) | 1,096 | ||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 6,988 | (4,238 | ) | 2,750 | ||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | $ | 280 | 142 | (238 | ) | 184 | ||||||||||
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 2,732 | 466 | (2,753 | ) | 445 | |||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 781 | 6 | (735 | ) | 52 | |||||||||||
Global Finishes Group exit of business in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 104 | 326 | 430 | |||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 1,080 | 324 | (1,051 | ) | 353 | |||||||||||
Paint Stores Group facility shutdown in 2013: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 654 | (654 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 1,205 | (411 | ) | 794 | ||||||||||||
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2013: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 28 | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 138 | (138 | ) | |||||||||||||
Severance and other qualified exit costs for facilities shutdown prior to 2013 | 1,514 | (553 | ) | 961 | ||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 8,516 | $ | 9,761 | $ | (11,200 | ) | $ | 7,077 | |||||||
52 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
Exit Plan | Balance at December 31, 2013 | Provisions in Cost of goods sold or SG&A | Actual expenditures charged to accrual | Balance at December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | $ | 280 | $ | 280 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 4,028 | $ | (1,296 | ) | 2,732 | |||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 781 | 781 | ||||||||||||||
Global Finishes Group exit of business in 2014: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 2,500 | (2,396 | ) | 104 | ||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 2,267 | (1,187 | ) | 1,080 | ||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group facility shutdown in 2013: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | $ | 977 | 2,126 | (2,449 | ) | 654 | ||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 1,499 | (294 | ) | 1,205 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2013: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 598 | 97 | (695 | ) | ||||||||||||
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2013: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 33 | (5 | ) | 28 | ||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 220 | (82 | ) | 138 | ||||||||||||
Latin America Coatings Group facilities shutdown in 2013: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 123 | (123 | ) | |||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2012: | ||||||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 244 | (51 | ) | 193 | ||||||||||||
Global Finishes Group facilities shutdown in 2012: | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and related costs | 2,177 | (1,863 | ) | 314 | ||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs | 83 | 83 | ||||||||||||||
Other qualified exit costs for facilities shutdown prior to 2012 | 1,365 | (441 | ) | 924 | ||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 5,820 | $ | 13,578 | $ | (10,882 | ) | $ | 8,516 | |||||||
53 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
NOTE 6 – PENSION, HEALTH CARE AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
The Company provides pension benefits to substantially all employees through primarily noncontributory defined contribution or defined benefit plans and certain health care and life insurance benefits to domestic active employees and eligible retirees. In accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, the Company recognizes an asset for overfunded defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans and a liability for unfunded or underfunded plans. In addition, actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs of such plans are recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss, a component of Shareholders’ equity. The amounts recorded in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will continue to be modified as actuarial assumptions and service costs change, and all such amounts will be amortized to expense over a period of years through the net pension cost (credit) and net periodic benefit cost.
Health care plans. The Company provides certain domestic health care plans that are contributory and contain cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. There were 22,708, 21,918 and 21,239 active employees entitled to receive benefits under these plans at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The cost of these benefits for active employees, which includes claims incurred and claims incurred but not reported, amounted to $220,589, $217,781 and $202,787 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Defined contribution pension plans. The Company’s annual contribution for its domestic defined contribution pension plan was $36,731, $35,435 and $32,384 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The contribution percentage ranges from two percent to seven percent of compensation for covered employees based on an age and service formula. Assets in employee accounts of the domestic defined contribution pension plan are invested in various investment funds as directed by the participants. These investment funds did not own a significant number of shares of the Company’s common stock for any year presented.
The Company’s annual contributions for its foreign defined contribution pension plans, which are based on various percentages of compensation for covered employees up to certain limits, were $6,676, $5,888 and $4,592 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Assets in employee accounts of the foreign defined contribution pension plans are invested in various investment funds. These investment funds did not own a significant number of shares of the Company’s common stock for any year presented.
Defined benefit pension plans. The Company has one salaried and one hourly domestic defined benefit pension plan, and twenty-one foreign defined benefit pension plans. All participants in the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan prior to January 1, 2002 retain the previous defined
benefit formula for computing benefits with certain modifications for active employees. Employees who became participants on or after January 1, 2002 are credited with certain contribution credits that range from two percent to seven percent of compensation based on an age and service formula. Contribution credits are converted into units to account for each participant’s benefits. Participants will receive a variable annuity benefit upon retirement or a lump sum distribution upon termination (if vested). Contribution credits earned prior to January 1, 2017 are subject to the hypothetical returns achieved on each participant’s allocation of units from investments in various investment funds as directed by the participant. Effective January 1, 2017, contribution credits are credited interest at an annual fixed rate equal to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 24-month average second segment rate. Contribution credits to the revised domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan are being funded through existing plan assets. Effective October 1, 2011, the domestic salaried defined benefit pension plan was frozen for new hires, and all newly hired U.S. non-collectively bargained employees are eligible to participate in the Company’s domestic defined contribution plan.
At December 31, 2016, the domestic salaried and hourly defined benefit pension plans were overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $632,797, fair value of plan assets of $847,013 and excess plan assets of $214,216. The plans are funded in accordance with all applicable regulations at December 31, 2016 and no funding will be required in 2017. At December 31, 2015, the domestic salaried and hourly defined benefit pension plans were overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $624,791, fair value of plan assets of $858,605 and excess plan assets of $233,814. At December 31, 2014, the domestic salaried and hourly defined benefit pension plan were overfunded, with a projected benefit obligation of $653,338, fair value of plan assets of $896,071 and excess plan assets of $242,733.
At December 31, 2016, eighteen of the Company’s foreign defined benefit pension plans were unfunded or underfunded, with combined accumulated benefit obligations, projected benefit obligations, fair values of net assets and deficiencies of plan assets of $121,926, $156,645, $103,468 and $53,177, respectively. An increase of $5,018 from 2015 in the combined projected benefit obligations of all foreign defined benefit pension plans was primarily due to changes in plan assumptions partially offset by the impact of the termination of an acquired Canada plan.
The Company expects to make the following benefit payments for all domestic and foreign defined benefit pension plans: $53,827 in 2017; $54,357 in 2018; $53,810 in 2019; $54,671 in 2020; $55,387 in 2021; and $276,011 in 2022 through 2026. The Company expects to contribute $3,676 to the foreign plans in 2017.
54 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
The estimated net actuarial losses and prior service costs for the defined benefit pension plans that are expected to be
amortized from Cumulative other comprehensive loss into the net pension costs in 2017 are $8,585 and $1,362, respectively.
The following table summarizes the components of the net pension costs and Cumulative other comprehensive loss related to the defined benefit pension plans:
Domestic Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Foreign Defined Benefit Pension Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net pension costs (credits): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Service costs | $ | 22,291 | $ | 21,120 | $ | 21,342 | $ | 4,225 | $ | 5,071 | $ | 5,261 | |||||||||||
Interest costs | 26,498 | 24,535 | 26,266 | 7,441 | 8,719 | 10,422 | |||||||||||||||||
Expected returns on plan assets | (50,197 | ) | (52,095 | ) | (51,293 | ) | (6,915 | ) | (9,296 | ) | (10,836 | ) | |||||||||||
Amortization of prior service costs | 1,205 | 1,310 | 1,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial losses | 4,532 | 1,962 | 1,540 | 1,910 | 1,413 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ongoing pension costs (credits) | 4,329 | (3,168 | ) | (1,848 | ) | 6,291 | 6,404 | 6,260 | |||||||||||||||
Settlement costs (credits) | 4,231 | 3,255 | (3,422 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net pension costs (credits) | 4,329 | (3,168 | ) | (1,848 | ) | 10,522 | 9,659 | 2,838 | |||||||||||||||
Other changes in plan assets and projected benefit obligation recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss (before taxes): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial losses arising during the year | 18,926 | 15,359 | 47,785 | 17,030 | 1,907 | 21,792 | |||||||||||||||||
Prior service costs arising during the year | 2,081 | 2,242 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of actuarial losses | (4,532 | ) | (1,962 | ) | (1,540 | ) | (1,910 | ) | (1,413 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service costs | (1,205 | ) | (1,310 | ) | (1,837 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Exchange rate loss recognized during year | (11,627 | ) | (5,830 | ) | (7,988 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss | 15,270 | 12,087 | 48,190 | 3,863 | (5,833 | ) | 12,391 | ||||||||||||||||
Total recognized in net pension costs (credits) and Cumulative other comprehensive loss | $ | 19,599 | $ | 8,919 | $ | 46,342 | $ | 14,385 | $ | 3,826 | $ | 15,229 | |||||||||||
The Company employs a total return investment approach for the domestic and foreign defined benefit pension plan assets. A mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of assets for a prudent level of risk. In determining the expected long-term rate of return on defined benefit pension plan assets,
management considers the historical rates of return, the nature of investments and an expectation of future investment strategies. The target allocations for plan assets are 45 – 65 percent equity securities and 30 – 40 percent fixed income securities.
55 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
The following tables summarize the fair value of the defined benefit pension plan assets at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The presentation is in accordance with the Retirement Benefits Topic of the ASC, as updated by ASU No. 2015-07 (see Note 1).
Fair value at December 31, 2016 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||
Investments at fair value: | |||||||||||||
Equity investments (1) | $ | 393,045 | $ | 321,152 | $ | 71,893 | |||||||
Fixed income investments (2) | 294,103 | 144,668 | 149,435 | ||||||||||
Other assets (3) | 14,643 | 14,643 | |||||||||||
Total investments in fair value hierarchy | 701,791 | $ | 465,820 | $ | 235,971 | ||||||||
Investments measured at NAV or its equivalent (4) | 310,230 | ||||||||||||
Investments at fair value | $ | 1,012,021 | |||||||||||
Fair value at December 31, 2015 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||
Investments at fair value: | |||||||||||||
Equity investments (1) | $ | 435,690 | $ | 372,033 | $ | 63,657 | |||||||
Fixed income investments (2) | 290,470 | 141,448 | 149,022 | ||||||||||
Other assets (3) | 16,361 | 16,361 | |||||||||||
Total investments in fair value hierarchy | 742,521 | $ | 513,481 | $ | 229,040 | ||||||||
Investments measured at NAV or its equivalent (4) | 278,423 | ||||||||||||
Investments at fair value | $ | 1,020,944 | |||||||||||
Fair value at December 31, 2014 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | ||||||||||
Investments at fair value: | |||||||||||||
Equity investments (1) | $ | 487,357 | $ | 404,542 | $ | 82,815 | |||||||
Fixed income investments (2) | 285,042 | 141,529 | 143,513 | ||||||||||
Other assets (3) | 28,435 | 28,435 | |||||||||||
Total investments in fair value hierarchy | 800,834 | $ | 546,071 | $ | 254,763 | ||||||||
Investments measured at NAV or its equivalent (4) | 282,882 | ||||||||||||
Investments at fair value | $ | 1,083,716 | |||||||||||
(1) | This category includes actively managed equity assets that track primarily to the S&P 500. |
(2) | This category includes government and corporate bonds that track primarily to the Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index. |
(3) | This category includes real estate and pooled investment funds. |
(4) | This category includes pooled investment funds and private equity funds that are measured at NAV or its equivalent using the practical expedient. Therefore, these investments are not classified in the fair value hierarchy. |
Included as equity investments in the domestic defined benefit pension plan assets at December 31, 2016 were 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a
market value of $80,622, representing 9.5 percent of total domestic plan assets. Dividends received on the Company’s common stock during 2016 totaled $1,008.
56 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
The following table summarizes the obligations, plan assets and assumptions used for the defined benefit pension plans, which are all measured as of December 31:
Domestic Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Foreign Defined Benefit Pension Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated benefit obligations at end of year | $ | 630,159 | $ | 621,873 | $ | 648,480 | $ | 172,047 | $ | 172,426 | $ | 203,610 | |||||||||||
Projected benefit obligations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at beginning of year | $ | 624,791 | $ | 653,338 | $ | 582,036 | $ | 201,854 | $ | 234,524 | $ | 222,996 | |||||||||||
Service costs | 22,291 | 21,120 | 21,342 | 4,225 | 5,071 | 5,261 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest costs | 26,498 | 24,535 | 26,266 | 7,441 | 8,719 | 10,422 | |||||||||||||||||
Actuarial losses (gains) | 8,132 | (40,602 | ) | 68,748 | 43,736 | (3,045 | ) | 32,551 | |||||||||||||||
Contributions and other | 2,081 | 2,242 | 947 | 1,072 | (6,692 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Settlements | (14,862 | ) | (18,707 | ) | (3,370 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange | (30,360 | ) | (17,211 | ) | (18,987 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (50,996 | ) | (33,600 | ) | (47,296 | ) | (6,108 | ) | (8,569 | ) | (7,657 | ) | |||||||||||
Balances at end of year | 632,797 | 624,791 | 653,338 | 206,873 | 201,854 | 234,524 | |||||||||||||||||
Plan assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at beginning of year | 858,605 | 896,071 | 870,386 | 162,339 | 187,645 | 184,963 | |||||||||||||||||
Actual returns on plan assets | 39,404 | (3,866 | ) | 72,256 | 33,569 | 4,844 | 20,240 | ||||||||||||||||
Contributions and other | 725 | 15,019 | 11,424 | 7,328 | |||||||||||||||||||
Settlements | (14,862 | ) | (18,707 | ) | (3,370 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange | (24,949 | ) | (14,298 | ) | (13,859 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid | (50,996 | ) | (33,600 | ) | (47,296 | ) | (6,108 | ) | (8,569 | ) | (7,657 | ) | |||||||||||
Balances at end of year | 847,013 | 858,605 | 896,071 | 165,008 | 162,339 | 187,645 | |||||||||||||||||
Excess (deficient) plan assets over projected benefit obligations | $ | 214,216 | $ | 233,814 | $ | 242,733 | $ | (41,865 | ) | $ | (39,515 | ) | $ | (46,879 | ) | ||||||||
Assets and liabilities recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred pension assets | $ | 214,216 | $ | 233,814 | $ | 242,733 | $ | 11,313 | $ | 11,068 | $ | 7,411 | |||||||||||
Other accruals | (1,522 | ) | (1,442 | ) | (810 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | (51,656 | ) | (49,141 | ) | (53,480 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 214,216 | $ | 233,814 | $ | 242,733 | $ | (41,865 | ) | $ | (39,515 | ) | $ | (46,879 | ) | |||||||||
Amounts recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial losses | $ | (134,847 | ) | $ | (120,454 | ) | $ | (107,057 | ) | $ | (45,604 | ) | $ | (41,741 | ) | $ | (47,574 | ) | |||||
Prior service costs | (6,015 | ) | (5,138 | ) | (6,448 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ | (140,862 | ) | $ | (125,592 | ) | $ | (113,505 | ) | $ | (45,604 | ) | $ | (41,741 | ) | $ | (47,574 | ) | ||||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine projected benefit obligations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 4.20 | % | 4.40 | % | 3.95 | % | 3.21 | % | 4.20 | % | 3.92 | % | |||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | 3.38 | % | 3.14 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.43 | % | 4.00 | % | 3.70 | % | |||||||||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net pension costs: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate | 4.40 | % | 3.95 | % | 4.65 | % | 4.20 | % | 3.92 | % | 4.89 | % | |||||||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on assets | 6.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 4.70 | % | 4.84 | % | 5.58 | % | |||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase | 3.14 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 3.70 | % | 4.31 | % | |||||||||||
57 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. Employees of the Company hired in the United States prior to January 1, 1993 who are not members of a collective bargaining unit, and certain groups of employees added through acquisitions, are eligible for health care and life
insurance benefits upon
retirement, subject to the terms of the unfunded plans. There were 4,524, 4,442 and 4,443 retired employees entitled to receive such postretirement benefits at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The following table summarizes the obligation and the assumptions used for postretirement benefits other than pensions:
Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions | |||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Benefit obligation: | |||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year - unfunded | $ | 263,383 | $ | 295,149 | $ | 286,651 | |||||
Service cost | 2,244 | 2,485 | 2,434 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 11,009 | 11,182 | 12,782 | ||||||||
Actuarial loss (gain) | 7,548 | (19,370 | ) | 27,757 | |||||||
Plan amendments | (9,269 | ) | (19,043 | ) | |||||||
Benefits paid | (19,047 | ) | (16,794 | ) | (15,432 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of year - unfunded | $ | 265,137 | $ | 263,383 | $ | 295,149 | |||||
Liabilities recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets: | |||||||||||
Postretirement benefits other than pensions | $ | (250,397 | ) | $ | (248,523 | ) | $ | (277,892 | ) | ||
Other accruals | (14,740 | ) | (14,860 | ) | (17,257 | ) | |||||
$ | (265,137 | ) | $ | (263,383 | ) | $ | (295,149 | ) | |||
Amounts recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss: | |||||||||||
Net actuarial losses | $ | (23,211 | ) | $ | (15,664 | ) | $ | (36,044 | ) | ||
Prior service credits | 19,205 | 25,784 | 21,043 | ||||||||
$ | (4,006 | ) | $ | 10,120 | $ | (15,001 | ) | ||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation: | |||||||||||
Discount rate | 4.10 | % | 4.30 | % | 3.90 | % | |||||
Health care cost trend rate - pre-65 | 6.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 7.00 | % | |||||
Health care cost trend rate - post-65 | 5.50 | % | 5.00 | % | 6.50 | % | |||||
Prescription drug cost increases | 10.50 | % | 11.50 | % | 6.50 | % | |||||
Employer Group Waiver Plan (EGWP) trend rate | 10.60 | % | 11.50 | % | 8.00 | % | |||||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost: | |||||||||||
Discount rate | 4.30 | % | 3.90 | % | 4.60 | % | |||||
Health care cost trend rate - pre-65 | 6.00 | % | 7.00 | % | 7.50 | % | |||||
Health care cost trend rate - post-65 | 5.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 6.50 | % | |||||
Prescription drug cost increases | 11.50 | % | 6.50 | % | 7.00 | % | |||||
58 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic benefit cost and Cumulative other comprehensive loss related to postretirement benefits other than pensions:
Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions | |||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost: | |||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 2,244 | $ | 2,485 | $ | 2,434 | |||||
Interest cost | 11,009 | 11,182 | 12,782 | ||||||||
Amortization of actuarial losses | 1,011 | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service credit | (6,578 | ) | (4,529 | ) | (503 | ) | |||||
Net periodic benefit cost | 6,675 | 10,149 | 14,713 | ||||||||
Other changes in projected benefit obligation recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss (before taxes): | |||||||||||
Net actuarial loss (gain) arising during the year | 7,548 | (19,370 | ) | 27,757 | |||||||
Prior service credit arising during the year | (9,269 | ) | (19,043 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of actuarial losses | (1,011 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of prior service credit | 6,578 | 4,529 | 503 | ||||||||
Total recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss | 14,126 | (25,121 | ) | 9,217 | |||||||
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and Cumulative other comprehensive loss | $ | 20,801 | $ | (14,972 | ) | $ | 23,930 | ||||
The estimated net actuarial losses and prior service (credits) for postretirement benefits other than pensions that are expected to be amortized from Cumulative other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost in 2017 are $43 and $(6,579), respectively.
The assumed health care cost trend rate and prescription drug cost increases used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for postretirement health care benefits for 2017 both decrease in each successive year until reaching 4.5 percent in 2025. The assumed health care and prescription drug cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement health care benefit obligation. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care and prescription drug cost trend rates would have had the following effects at December 31, 2016:
One-Percentage Point | |||||||
Increase | (Decrease) | ||||||
Effect on total of service and interest cost components | $ | 86 | $ | (131 | ) | ||
Effect on the postretirement benefit obligation | $ | 552 | $ | (1,221 | ) | ||
The Company expects to make retiree health care benefit cash payments as follows:
Expected Cash Payments | |||
2017 | $ | 14,740 | |
2018 | 16,551 | ||
2019 | 17,398 | ||
2020 | 17,990 | ||
2021 | 18,334 | ||
2022 through 2026 | 93,300 | ||
Total expected benefit cash payments | $ | 178,313 | |
59 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
NOTE 7 – DEBT
Long-term debt
Due Date | 2016 | 2015 (1) | 2014 (1) | ||||||||||
3.45% Senior Notes | 2025 | $ | 396,898 | $ | 396,536 | ||||||||
4.55% Senior Notes | 2045 | 393,637 | 393,414 | ||||||||||
4.00% Senior Notes | 2042 | 295,938 | 295,781 | $ | 295,624 | ||||||||
1.35% Senior Notes | 2017 | 697,530 | 696,240 | ||||||||||
7.375% Debentures | 2027 | 118,936 | 118,889 | 118,841 | |||||||||
7.45% Debentures | 2097 | 3,500 | 3,500 | 3,500 | |||||||||
2.00% to 8.00% Promissory Notes | Through 2027 | 2,417 | 1,628 | 1,791 | |||||||||
$ | 1,211,326 | $ | 1,907,278 | $ | 1,115,996 | ||||||||
(1) Revised due to the adoption of ASU No. 2015-03. See Note 1. | |||||||||||||
Maturities of long-term debt are as follows for the next five years: $701,679 in 2017; $754 in 2018; $248 in 2019, $252 in 2020 and $256 in 2021. Interest expense on long-term debt was $75,509, $54,634 and $56,408 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Among other restrictions, the Company’s Notes, Debentures and revolving credit agreement contain certain covenants relating to liens, ratings changes, merger and sale of assets, consolidated leverage and change of control as defined in the agreements. In the event of default under any one of these arrangements, acceleration of the maturity of any one or more of these borrowings may result. The Company was in compliance with all covenants for all years presented.
On July 28, 2015, the Company issued $400,000 of 3.45% Senior Notes due 2025 and $400,000 of 4.55% Senior Notes due 2045. The notes are covered under a shelf registration filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on July 28, 2015. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of a portion of the Company’s outstanding short-term borrowings.
In April 2016, the Company entered into a $7.300 billion bridge credit agreement (Bridge Loan) and a $2.000 billion term loan credit agreement (Term Loan) as committed financing for the Valspar acquisition as disclosed in Note 2. No balances were drawn against these facilities as of December 31, 2016. Debt issuance costs of $65,100 related to these facilities were incurred and recorded in Other current assets. Of this amount, $61,104 was amortized and included in Interest expense for year ended December 31, 2016. Periodic fees related to these facilities totaling $11,740 were also included in interest expense for this period.
During the first six months of 2016, in anticipation of a probable issuance of new long-term fixed rate debt within the next twelve months, the Company entered into a series of interest rate lock agreements (collectively, the interest rate locks) on a combined notional amount of $3.575 billion. The objective of the interest rate locks is to hedge the variability in the future semi-annual payments on the anticipated debt
attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate (U.S. Treasury) during the hedge periods. The future semi-annual interest payments are exposed to interest rate risk due to changes in the benchmark interest rate from the inception of the hedge to the time of issuance. The interest rate locks were evaluated for hedge accounting treatment and were designated as cash flow hedges. Therefore, the interest rate locks are recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and changes in fair value (to the extent effective) are recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss. Amounts recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will be reclassified to Interest expense in periods following the settlement of the interest rate locks. The Company will evaluate hedge effectiveness each period until settlement. At December 31, 2016, an interest rate lock asset of $137,233 was included in Other current assets, and the related pretax gain of $137,233 was recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss.
Short-term borrowings. On July 16, 2015, the Company and three of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Sherwin-Williams Canada, Inc. (SW Canada), Sherwin-Williams Luxembourg S.à r.l. (SW Lux) and Sherwin-Williams UK Holding Limited, entered into a multi-currency five-year $1.350 billion credit agreement (multi-currency credit agreement). The multi-currency credit agreement is being used for general corporate purposes, including the financing of working capital requirements. The multi-currency credit agreement allows the Company to extend the maturity of the facility with two one-year extension options and to increase the aggregate amount of the facility to $1.850 billion, both of which are subject to the discretion of each lender. The multi-currency credit agreement replaced the previous credit agreements for the Company, SW Canada and SW Lux in the amounts of $1.050 billion, CAD 150,000 and €95,000 (Euro), respectively. At December 31, 2016, short-term borrowings under the multi-currency credit agreement were $15,780 with a weighted average interest rate of 0.9%. Borrowings outstanding under various foreign programs were $24,959 at December 31, 2016 with a weighted average interest rate of 12.3%.
60 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
There were no borrowings outstanding under the Company's domestic commercial paper program at December 31, 2016 and 2015. At December 31, 2014 borrowings outstanding under the domestic commercial paper program totaled $625,860. The weighted average interest rate of these borrowings was 0.3%.
On May 9, 2016, the Company entered into a five-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $200,000. At December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, there were no borrowings outstanding under any of these credit agreements. On November 14, 2012, the Company entered into a three-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gave the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $250,000. The November 14, 2012 credit agreement matured in 2015. On April 23, 2012, the Company entered into a five-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit up to an aggregate availability of $250,000. On January 30, 2012, the Company entered into a five-year credit agreement, subsequently amended on multiple dates, which gives the Company the right to borrow and to obtain the issuance, renewal, extension and increase of a letter of credit of up to an aggregate availability of $500,000.
NOTE 8 – OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
The operations of the Company, like those of other companies in our industry, are subject to various domestic and foreign environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only govern current operations and products, but also impose potential liability on the Company for past operations. Management expects environmental laws and regulations to impose increasingly stringent requirements upon the Company and the industry in the future. Management believes that the Company conducts its operations in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and has implemented various programs designed to protect the environment and promote continued compliance.
The Company is involved with environmental investigation and remediation activities at some of its currently and formerly owned sites (including sites which were previously owned and/or operated by businesses acquired by the Company). In addition, the Company, together with other parties, has been designated a potentially responsible party under federal and state environmental protection laws for the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination and hazardous waste at a number of third-party sites, primarily Superfund sites. In general, these laws provide that potentially responsible
parties may be held jointly and severally liable for investigation and remediation costs regardless of fault. The Company may be similarly designated with respect to additional third-party sites in the future.
The Company initially provides for estimated costs of environmental-related activities relating to its past operations and third-party sites for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. These estimated costs are determined based on currently available facts regarding each site. If the best estimate of costs can only be identified as a range and no specific amount within that range can be determined more likely than any other amount within the range, the minimum of the range is provided. The Company continuously assesses its potential liability for investigation and remediation-related activities and adjusts its environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated and as additional accounting guidelines are issued. Included in Other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were accruals for extended environmental-related activities of $163,847, $129,856 and $114,281, respectively. Included in Other accruals at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were accruals for estimated costs of current investigation and remediation activities of $19,969, $22,493 and $16,868, respectively.
Actual costs incurred may vary from the accrued estimates due to the inherent uncertainties involved including, among others, the number and financial condition of parties involved with respect to any given site, the volumetric contribution which may be attributed to the Company relative to that attributed to other parties, the nature and magnitude of the wastes involved, the various technologies that can be used for remediation and the determination of acceptable remediation with respect to a particular site. If the Company’s future loss contingency is ultimately determined to be at the unaccrued maximum of the estimated range of possible outcomes for every site for which costs can be reasonably estimated, the Company’s accrual for environmental-related activities would be $87,021 higher than the minimum accruals at December 31, 2016.
Three of the Company’s currently and formerly owned manufacturing sites account for the majority of the accrual for environmental-related activities and the unaccrued maximum of the estimated range of possible outcomes at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2016, $153,299, or 83.4 percent of the total accrual, related directly to these three sites. In the aggregate unaccrued maximum of $87,021 at December 31, 2016, $70,513, or 81.0 percent, related to the three manufacturing sites. While environmental investigations and remedial actions are in different stages at these sites, additional investigations, remedial actions and monitoring will likely be required at each site.
61 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
Management cannot presently estimate the ultimate potential loss contingencies related to these sites or other less significant sites until such time as a substantial portion of the investigation at the sites is completed and remedial action plans are developed. In the event any future loss contingency significantly exceeds the current amount accrued, the recording of the ultimate liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the additional costs are accrued. Management does not believe that any potential liability ultimately attributed to the Company for its environmental-related matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow due to the extended period of time during which environmental investigation and remediation takes place. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s operations cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
Management expects these contingent environmental-related liabilities to be resolved over an extended period of time. Management is unable to provide a more specific time frame due to the indefinite amount of time to conduct investigation activities at any site, the indefinite amount of time to obtain environmental agency approval, as necessary, with respect to investigation and remediation activities, and the indefinite amount of time necessary to conduct remediation activities.
The Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations Topic of the ASC requires a liability to be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if a settlement date and fair value can be reasonably estimated. The Company recognizes a liability for any conditional asset retirement obligation when sufficient information is available to reasonably estimate a settlement date to determine the fair value of such a liability. The Company has identified certain conditional asset retirement obligations at various current and closed manufacturing, distribution and store facilities. These obligations relate primarily to asbestos abatement, hazardous waste Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) closures, well abandonment, transformers and used oil disposals and underground storage tank closures. Using investigative, remediation and disposal methods that are currently available to the Company, the estimated costs of these obligations were accrued and are not significant. The recording of additional liabilities for future conditional asset retirement obligations may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the costs are accrued. Management does not believe that any potential liability ultimately attributed to the Company for its conditional asset retirement obligations will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow due to the extended period of time over which sufficient information may become available regarding the closure or modification of any one or group of the Company’s facilities.
An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s operations cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
NOTE 9 – LITIGATION
In the course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including, but not limited to, litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial, contractual and antitrust claims that are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss to the Company. These uncertainties will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur confirming the incurrence of a liability or the reduction of a liability. In accordance with the Contingencies Topic of the ASC, the Company accrues for these contingencies by a charge to income when it is both probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that the Company’s loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the additional liability may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such additional liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded because it is not probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of any such loss cannot be reasonably estimated, any potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded or exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued, the Contingencies Topic of the ASC requires disclosure of the contingency when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss may have been incurred.
Lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. The Company’s past operations included the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The Company, along with other companies, is and has been a defendant in a number of legal proceedings, including individual personal injury actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by various counties, cities, school districts and other government-related entities, arising from the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The plaintiffs’ claims have been based upon various legal theories, including negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentations and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy, violations of unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws, enterprise liability, market share liability, public nuisance, unjust enrichment and other theories. The plaintiffs seek various damages and relief, including personal injury and property damage, costs relating
62 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
to the detection and abatement of lead-based paint from buildings, costs associated with a public education campaign, medical monitoring costs and others. The Company has also been a defendant in legal proceedings arising from the manufacture and sale of non-lead-based paints that seek recovery based upon various legal theories, including the failure to adequately warn of potential exposure to lead during surface preparation when using non-lead-based paint on surfaces previously painted with lead-based paint. The Company believes that the litigation brought to date is without merit or subject to meritorious defenses and is vigorously defending such litigation. The Company has not settled any material lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation. The Company expects that additional lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation may be filed against the Company in the future asserting similar or different legal theories and seeking similar or different types of damages and relief.
Notwithstanding the Company’s views on the merits, litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties, and the Company ultimately may not prevail. Adverse court rulings or determinations of liability, among other factors, could affect the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation against the Company and encourage an increase in the number and nature of future claims and proceedings. In addition, from time to time, various legislation and administrative regulations have been enacted, promulgated or proposed to impose obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigments and lead-based paints respecting asserted health concerns associated with such products or to overturn the effect of court decisions in which the Company and other manufacturers have been successful.
Due to the uncertainties involved, management is unable to predict the outcome of the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, the number or nature of possible future claims and proceedings or the effect that any legislation and/or administrative regulations may have on the litigation or against the Company. In addition, management cannot reasonably determine the scope or amount of the potential costs and liabilities related to such litigation, or resulting from any such legislation and regulations. The Company has not accrued any amounts for such litigation. With respect to such litigation, including the public nuisance litigation, the Company does not believe that it is probable that a loss has occurred, and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential losses as there is no prior history of a loss of this nature and there is no substantive information upon which an estimate could be based. In addition, any potential liability that may result from any changes to legislation and regulations cannot reasonably be estimated. In the event any significant liability is determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation, the recording of the liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties
associated with the amount of any such liability and/or the nature of any other remedy which may be imposed in such litigation, any potential liability determined to be attributable to the Company arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.
Public nuisance claim litigation. The Company and other companies are or were defendants in legal proceedings seeking recovery based on public nuisance liability theories, among other theories, brought by the State of Rhode Island, the City of St. Louis, Missouri, various cities and counties in the State of New Jersey, various cities in the State of Ohio and the State of Ohio, the City of Chicago, Illinois, the City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and the County of Santa Clara, California and other public entities in the State of California. Except for the Santa Clara County, California proceeding, all of these legal proceedings have been concluded in favor of the Company and other defendants at various stages in the proceedings.
The proceedings initiated by the State of Rhode Island included two jury trials. At the conclusion of the second trial, the jury returned a verdict finding that (i) the cumulative presence of lead pigment in paints and coatings on buildings in the State of Rhode Island constitutes a public nuisance, (ii) the Company, along with two other defendants, caused or substantially contributed to the creation of the public nuisance and (iii) the Company and two other defendants should be ordered to abate the public nuisance. The Company and two other defendants appealed and, on July 1, 2008, the Rhode Island Supreme Court, among other determinations, reversed the judgment of abatement with respect to the Company and two other defendants. The Rhode Island Supreme Court’s decision reversed the public nuisance liability judgment against the Company on the basis that the complaint failed to state a public nuisance claim as a matter of law.
The Santa Clara County, California proceeding was initiated in March 2000 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara. In the original complaint, the plaintiffs asserted various claims including fraud and concealment, strict product liability/failure to warn, strict product liability/design defect, negligence, negligent breach of a special duty, public nuisance, private nuisance, and violations of California’s Business and Professions Code. A number of the asserted claims were resolved in favor of the defendants through pre-trial proceedings. The named plaintiffs in the Fourth Amended Complaint, filed on March 16, 2011, are the Counties of Santa Clara, Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Solano and Ventura, the Cities of Oakland and San Diego and the City and County of San Francisco. The Fourth Amended Complaint asserted a sole claim for public nuisance, alleging that the presence of lead pigments for use in paint and
63 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
coatings in, on and around residences in the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions constitutes a public nuisance. The plaintiffs sought the abatement of the alleged public nuisance that exists within the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions. A trial commenced on July 15, 2013 and ended on August 22, 2013. The court entered final judgment on January 27, 2014, finding in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Company and two other defendants (ConAgra Grocery Products Company and NL Industries, Inc.). The final judgment held the Company jointly and severally liable with the other two defendants to pay $1.15 billion into a fund to abate the public nuisance. The Company strongly disagrees with the judgment.
On February 18, 2014, the Company filed a motion for new trial and a motion to vacate the judgment. The court denied these motions on March 24, 2014. On March 28, 2014, the Company filed a notice of appeal to the Sixth District Court of Appeal for the State of California. The filing of the notice of appeal effects an automatic stay of the judgment without the requirement to post a bond. The appeal is fully briefed, and the parties are waiting for the Sixth District Court of Appeal to set a date for oral argument. The date for oral argument is at the discretion of the Sixth District Court of Appeal. The Company expects the Sixth District Court of Appeal to issue its ruling within 90 days following oral argument. The Company believes that the judgment conflicts with established principles of law and is unsupported by the evidence. The Company has had a favorable history with respect to lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, particularly other public nuisance litigation, and accordingly, the Company believes that it is not probable that a loss has occurred and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential loss with respect to the case.
Litigation seeking damages from alleged personal injury. The Company and other companies are defendants in a number of legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief from alleged personal injuries. These proceedings include claims by children allegedly injured from ingestion of lead pigment or lead-containing paint and claims for damages allegedly incurred by the children’s parents or guardians. These proceedings generally seek compensatory and punitive damages, and seek other relief including medical monitoring costs. These proceedings include purported claims by individuals, groups of individuals and class actions.
The plaintiff in Thomas v. Lead Industries Association, et al., initiated an action in state court against the Company, other alleged former lead pigment manufacturers and the Lead Industries Association in September 1999. The claims against the Company and the other defendants included strict liability, negligence, negligent misrepresentation and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentation and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy and enterprise liability. Implicit within these claims is the theory of “risk contribution” liability (Wisconsin’s theory which is similar to market share liability, except that liability can be joint and several) due to the plaintiff’s inability
to identify the manufacturer of any product that allegedly injured the plaintiff. The case ultimately proceeded to trial and, on November 5, 2007, the jury returned a defense verdict, finding that the plaintiff had ingested white lead carbonate, but was not brain damaged or injured as a result. The plaintiff appealed and, on December 16, 2010, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the final judgment in favor of the Company and other defendants.
Wisconsin is the only jurisdiction to date to apply a theory of liability with respect to alleged personal injury (i.e., risk contribution/market share liability) that does not require the plaintiff to identify the manufacturer of the product that allegedly injured the plaintiff in the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Although the risk contribution liability theory was applied during the Thomas trial, the constitutionality of this theory as applied to the lead pigment cases has not been judicially determined by the Wisconsin state courts. However, in an unrelated action filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., on November 15, 2010, the District Court held that Wisconsin’s risk contribution theory as applied in that case violated the defendants’ right to substantive due process and is unconstitutionally retroactive. The District Court's decision in Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., was appealed by the plaintiff to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On July 24, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the judgment and remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. On January 16, 2015, the defendants filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court seeking that Court's review of the Seventh Circuit's decision, and on May 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court denied the defendants' petition. The case is currently pending in the District Court. Three cases also currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (Ravon Owens v. American Cyanamid, et al., Cesar Sifuentes v. American Cyanamid, et al., and Glenn Burton, Jr. v. American Cyanamid, et al.) are being prepared for trial, although no trial dates have been set by the District Court.
In Yasmine Clark v. The Sherwin-Williams Company, et al., the Wisconsin Circuit Court, Milwaukee County, on March 25, 2014, held that the application to a pending case of Section 895.046 of the Wisconsin Statutes (which clarifies the application of the risk contribution theory) is unconstitutional as a violation of the plaintiff’s right to due process of law under the Wisconsin Constitution. On August 21, 2014, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals granted defendants' petition to hear the issue as an interlocutory appeal. On September 29, 2015, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals certified the appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its determination. Oral argument before the Wisconsin Supreme Court occurred on April 5, 2016. On April 15, 2016, the Wisconsin Supreme Court published its decision, deciding in a 3 to 3 split decision to remand the case
64 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
back to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals for its consideration. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on September 20, 2016 and remanded the case back to the Wisconsin Circuit Court for further proceedings. A trial in the Wisconsin Circuit Court is currently scheduled to begin in October 2017.
Insurance coverage litigation. The Company and its liability insurers, including certain underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, initiated legal proceedings against each other to primarily determine, among other things, whether the costs and liabilities associated with the abatement of lead pigment are covered under certain insurance policies issued to the Company. The Company’s action, filed on March 3, 2006 in the Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, is currently stayed and inactive. The liability insurers’ action, which was filed on February 23, 2006 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, has been dismissed. An ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation would mean that insurance proceeds could be unavailable under the policies at issue to mitigate any ultimate abatement related costs and liabilities. The Company has not recorded any assets related to these insurance policies or otherwise assumed that proceeds from these insurance policies would be received in estimating any contingent liability accrual. Therefore, an ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation without a determination of
liability against the Company in the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation will have no impact on the Company’s results of operation, liquidity or financial condition. As previously stated, however, the Company has not accrued any amounts for the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation and any significant liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued.
Titanium dioxide suppliers antitrust class action lawsuit. The Company was a member of the plaintiff class related to Titanium Dioxide Antitrust Litigation that was initiated in 2010 against certain suppliers alleging various theories of relief arising from purchases of titanium dioxide made from 2003 through 2012. The Court approved a settlement less attorney fees and expense, and the Company timely submitted claims to recover its pro-rata portion of the settlement. There was no specified deadline for the claims administrator to complete the review of all claims submitted. In October 2014, the Company was notified that it would receive a disbursement of settlement funds, and the Company received a pro-rata disbursement net of all fees of approximately $21,420. The Company recorded this settlement gain in the fourth quarter of 2014.
65 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
NOTE 10 – CAPITAL STOCK
At December 31, 2016, there were 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 30,000,000 shares of serial preferred stock authorized for issuance. Of the authorized serial preferred stock, 3,000,000 shares are designated as cumulative redeemable serial preferred and 1,000,000 shares are designated as convertible serial preferred stock. See Note 11. Under the amended and restated 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (2006 Employee Plan), 19,200,000 common shares may be issued or transferred. See Note 12. An aggregate of 7,720,815, 8,824,943 and 10,304,816 shares of common stock at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, were reserved for the exercise and
future grants of option rights and future grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units. See Note 12. Common shares outstanding shown in the following table included 488,714, 487,900 and 487,075 shares of common stock held in a revocable trust at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The revocable trust is used to accumulate assets for the purpose of funding the ultimate obligation of certain non-qualified benefit plans. Transactions between the Company and the trust are accounted for in accordance with the Deferred Compensation – Rabbi Trusts Subtopic of the Compensation Topic of the ASC, which requires the assets held by the trust be consolidated with the Company’s accounts.
Common Shares in Treasury | Common Shares Outstanding | ||||
Balance at January 1, 2014 | 12,772,498 | 100,129,380 | |||
Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised | 7,229 | (7,229 | ) | ||
Shares issued for exercise of option rights | 1,423,395 | ||||
Shares tendered in connection with grants of restricted stock | 108,352 | (108,352 | ) | ||
Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock | 191,979 | ||||
Treasury stock purchased | 6,925,000 | (6,925,000 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2014 | 19,813,079 | 94,704,173 | |||
Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised | 14,542 | (14,542 | ) | ||
Shares issued for exercise of option rights | 1,133,050 | ||||
Shares tendered in connection with grants of restricted stock | 111,433 | (111,433 | ) | ||
Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock | 110,277 | ||||
Treasury stock purchased | 3,575,000 | (3,575,000 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2015 | 23,514,054 | 92,246,525 | |||
Shares tendered as payment for option rights exercised | 3,441 | (3,441 | ) | ||
Shares issued for exercise of option rights | 733,876 | ||||
Shares tendered in connection with grants of restricted stock | 59,916 | (59,916 | ) | ||
Net shares issued for grants of restricted stock | 95,987 | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 | 23,577,411 | 93,013,031 | |||
NOTE 11 – STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
As of December 31, 2016, 36,013 employees contributed to the Company’s ESOP, a voluntary defined contribution plan available to all eligible salaried employees. Participants are allowed to contribute, on a pretax or after-tax basis, up to the lesser of twenty percent of their annual compensation or the maximum dollar amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches one hundred percent of all contributions up to six percent of eligible employee contributions. Such participant contributions may be invested in a variety of investment funds or a Company common stock fund and may be exchanged between investments as directed by the participant. Participants are permitted to diversify both future and prior Company matching contributions previously allocated to the Company common stock fund into a variety of investment funds.
The Company made contributions to the ESOP on behalf of participating employees, representing amounts authorized by employees to be withheld from their earnings, of $127,697, $120,514 and $109,036 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company’s matching contributions to the ESOP charged to operations were $85,525, $80,356 and $74,574 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
At December 31, 2016, there were 10,710,973 shares of the Company’s common stock being held by the ESOP, representing 11.5 percent of the total number of voting shares outstanding. Shares of Company common stock credited to each member’s account under the ESOP are voted by the trustee under instructions from each individual plan member. Shares for which no instructions are received are voted by the trustee in the same proportion as those for which instructions are received.
66 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
NOTE 12 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The amended and restated 2006 Employee Plan authorizes the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board of Directors, to issue or transfer up to an aggregate of 19,200,000 shares of common stock, plus any shares relating to awards that expire, are forfeited or canceled. The Employee Plan permits the granting of option rights, appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs), performance shares and performance units to eligible employees. At December 31, 2016, no appreciation rights, performance shares or performance units had been granted under the 2006 Employee Plan.
The 2006 Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors (Nonemployee Director Plan) authorizes the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board of Directors, to issue or transfer up to an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock, plus any shares relating to awards that expire, are forfeited or are canceled. The Nonemployee Director Plan permits the granting of option rights, appreciation rights, restricted stock and RSUs to members of the Board of Directors who are not employees of the Company. At December 31, 2016, no option rights or appreciation rights had been granted under the Nonemployee Director Plan.
The cost of the Company’s stock-based compensation is recorded in accordance with the Stock Compensation Topic of the ASC. The tax benefits associated with these share-based payments are classified as financing activities in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. At December 31, 2016, the Company had total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense of $98,080 that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.05 years. Stock-based compensation expense during 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $72,109, $72,342 and $64,735, respectively. The related tax benefit was $27,442, $27,634 and $24,816 during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09, excess tax benefits from share-based payments are recognized in the income tax provision rather than other capital (see Note 1). Therefore, in 2016, the Company's $44,233 tax benefit from options exercised was recognized in the income tax provision. The Company issues new shares upon exercise of option rights, granting of restricted stock and vesting of RSUs.
Option rights. The fair value of the Company’s option rights was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for all options granted:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||
Risk-free interest rate | 1.24% | 1.37% | 1.47% | ||
Expected life of option rights | 5.05 years | 5.05 years | 5.10 years | ||
Expected dividend yield of stock | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.19% | ||
Expected volatility of stock | .212 | .245 | .223 | ||
The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant. The expected life of option rights was calculated using a scenario analysis model. Historical data was used to aggregate the holding period from actual exercises, post-vesting cancellations and hypothetical assumed exercises on all outstanding option rights. The expected dividend yield of stock is the Company’s best estimate of the expected future dividend yield. Expected volatility of stock was calculated using historical and implied volatilities. The Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 2.00 percent to the 2016 grants. This rate was calculated based upon historical activity and is an estimate of granted shares not expected to vest. If actual forfeitures differ from the expected rate, the Company may be required to make additional adjustments to compensation expense in future periods.
Grants of option rights for non-qualified and incentive stock options have been awarded to certain officers and key employees under the 2006 Employee Plan and the 2003 Stock Plan. The option rights generally become exercisable to the extent of one-third of the optioned shares for each full year following the date of grant and generally expire ten years after the date of grant. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to option rights granted to eligible employees amounted to $42,622 at December 31, 2016. The unrecognized compensation expense is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.08 years.
The weighted-average per share grant date fair value of options granted during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, was $49.36, $50.73 and $43.11. The total intrinsic value of exercised option rights for employees was $129,230, $223,417 and $195,097. The total fair value of options vested during the year was $32,476, $32,655 and $32,313 during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. There were no outstanding option rights for nonemployee directors for 2016, 2015 and 2014.
67 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
A summary of the Company’s non-qualified and incentive stock option right activity is shown in the following table:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Optioned Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | Optioned Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | Optioned Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding beginning of year | 5,219,506 | $ | 141.58 | 5,699,892 | $ | 117.31 | 6,484,592 | $ | 96.25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted | 712,967 | 271.46 | 697,423 | 241.84 | 672,565 | 224.65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised | (733,876 | ) | 108.81 | (1,133,287 | ) | 79.41 | (1,421,045 | ) | 70.71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited | (26,653 | ) | 232.83 | (43,632 | ) | 193.60 | (31,617 | ) | 158.92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Expired | (8,235 | ) | 176.28 | (890 | ) | 87.59 | (4,603 | ) | 86.66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding end of year | 5,163,709 | $ | 163.61 | $ | 545,531 | 5,219,506 | $ | 141.58 | $ | 616,866 | 5,699,892 | $ | 117.31 | $ | 830,647 | |||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at end of year | 3,783,755 | $ | 130.59 | $ | 522,921 | 3,807,351 | $ | 110.96 | $ | 565,934 | 4,095,246 | $ | 87.79 | $ | 717,691 | |||||||||||||||||
The weighted-average remaining term for options outstanding at the end of 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, was 6.25, 6.44 and 6.57 years. The weighted-average remaining term for options exercisable at the end of 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, was 5.20, 5.47 and 5.63 years. Shares reserved for future grants of option rights, restricted stock and RSUs were 2,557,106, 3,605,437 and 4,604,924 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Restricted stock and RSUs. Grants of restricted stock and RSUs, which generally require three years of continuous employment from the date of grant before vesting and receiving the stock without restriction, have been awarded to certain officers and key employees under the 2006 Employee Plan. The February 2016 grant consisted of performance-based awards that vest at the end of a three-year period based on the Company’s achievement of specified financial goals relating to earnings per share and return on net assets employed. The February 2015 and 2014 grants consisted of a combination of performance-based awards and time-based awards. The performance based awards vest at the end of a three-year period based on the Company’s achievement of specified financial goals relating to earnings per share. The time-based awards vest at the end of a three-year period based on continuous employment. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to grants of restricted stock and RSUs to eligible employees amounted to $53,995 at December 31, 2016 and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.92 years.
Grants of restricted stock and RSUs have been awarded to nonemployee directors under the Nonemployee Plan. These grants generally vest and stock is received without restriction to the extent of one-third of the granted stock for each year following the date of grant. Unrecognized compensation expense with respect to grants of restricted stock and RSUs to nonemployee directors amounted to $1,463 at
December 31, 2016 and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.89 years.
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock and RSU activity for the years ended December 31 is shown in the following table:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 467,744 | 655,276 | 749,382 | |||||
Granted | 99,662 | 112,494 | 201,412 | |||||
Vested | (166,405 | ) | (290,901 | ) | (294,438 | ) | ||
Forfeited | (3,675 | ) | (9,125 | ) | (1,080 | ) | ||
Outstanding at end of year | 397,326 | 467,744 | 655,276 | |||||
The weighted-average per share fair value of restricted stock and RSUs granted during the year was $257.99, $285.88 and $191.60 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
NOTE 13 – OTHER
Other general expense - net. Included in Other general expense - net were the following:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Provisions for environmental matters - net | $ | 42,932 | $ | 31,071 | $ | 36,046 | |||||
(Gain) loss on sale or disposition of assets | (30,564 | ) | (803 | ) | 1,436 | ||||||
Total | $ | 12,368 | $ | 30,268 | $ | 37,482 | |||||
Provisions for environmental matters–net represent initial provisions for site-specific estimated costs of environmental
68 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
investigation or remediation and increases or decreases to environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated and as additional accounting guidelines are issued. Environmental-related accruals are not recorded net of insurance proceeds in accordance with the Offsetting Subtopic of the Balance Sheet Topic of the ASC. See Note 8 for further details on the Company’s environmental-related activities.
The (gain) loss on sale or disposition of assets represents the net realized (gain) loss associated with the sale or disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets previously used in the conduct of the primary business of the Company. The 2016 gain primarily relates to the sale of a closed domestic facility.
Other (income) expense - net. Included in Other (income) expense - net were the following:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Dividend and royalty income | $ | (4,573 | ) | $ | (3,668 | ) | $ | (4,864 | ) | ||
Net expense from financing activities | 8,667 | 11,091 | 11,367 | ||||||||
Foreign currency transaction related losses | 7,335 | 9,503 | 3,603 | ||||||||
Other income | (25,279 | ) | (23,880 | ) | (37,524 | ) | |||||
Other expense | 9,263 | 13,036 | 12,018 | ||||||||
Total | $ | (4,587 | ) | $ | 6,082 | $ | (15,400 | ) | |||
The Net expense from financing activities includes the net expense relating to changes in the Company’s financing fees.
Foreign currency transaction related losses represent net realized losses on U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and net realized and unrealized losses from foreign currency option and forward contracts. There were no material foreign currency option and forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Other income and Other expense included items of revenue, gains, expenses and losses that were unrelated to the primary business purpose of the Company. Other income for the year ended December 31, 2014 included a $6,336 gain on the early termination of a customer agreement recorded in the Global Finishes Group and a $6,198 realized gain resulting from final asset valuations related to the acquisition of the U.S./Canada business of Comex recorded in the Administrative segment. There were no other items within Other income or Other expense that were individually significant.
NOTE 14 – INCOME TAXES
As disclosed in Note 1, during the second quarter of 2016, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09. Therefore, effective January 1, 2016, excess tax benefits for share-based payments are recognized in the income tax provision rather than in
additional paid-in capital. The impact on the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 is summarized below:
2016 | ||||
Decrease in Other capital | $ | 44,233 | ||
Decrease in Income taxes and increase in Net income | $ | 44,233 | ||
Increase in Average shares and equivalents outstanding - diluted | 588,708 | |||
Increase in Basic net income per common share | $ | .48 | ||
Increase in Diluted net income per common share | $ | .40 | ||
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes using the enacted tax rates and laws that are currently in effect. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||||
Exit costs, environ-mental and other similar items | $ | 74,535 | $ | 63,851 | $ | 56,441 | |||||
Employee related and benefit items | 166,313 | 141,974 | 141,670 | ||||||||
Other items | 148,910 | 116,302 | 112,149 | ||||||||
Total deferred tax assets | 389,758 | 322,127 | 310,260 | ||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 254,430 | 241,101 | 227,765 | ||||||||
LIFO inventories | 83,659 | 89,330 | 67,835 | ||||||||
Other items | 59,746 | 33,433 | 44,378 | ||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | 397,835 | 363,864 | 339,978 | ||||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities | $ | 8,077 | $ | 41,737 | $ | 29,718 | |||||
Netted against the Company’s other deferred tax assets were valuation allowances of $17,292, $14,663 and $9,071 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These reserves resulted from the uncertainty as to the realization of the tax benefits from foreign net operating losses and other foreign assets. The Company has $26,980 of domestic net operating loss carryforwards acquired through acquisitions that have expiration dates through the tax year 2037 and foreign net operating losses of $83,354. The foreign net operating losses are related to various jurisdictions that provide for both indefinite carryforward periods and others with carryforward periods that range from the tax years 2016 to 2036.
69 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
Significant components of the provisions for income taxes were as follows:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Current: | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | 438,244 | $ | 399,677 | $ | 308,283 | |||||
Foreign | 31,125 | 30,145 | 53,045 | ||||||||
State and local | 61,402 | 60,319 | 50,049 | ||||||||
Total current | 530,771 | 490,141 | 411,377 | ||||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||
Federal | (56,891 | ) | 13,505 | (14,974 | ) | ||||||
Foreign | (2,121 | ) | (10,752 | ) | (7,361 | ) | |||||
State and local | (9,229 | ) | 2,223 | 3,297 | |||||||
Total deferred | (68,241 | ) | 4,976 | (19,038 | ) | ||||||
Total provisions for income taxes | $ | 462,530 | $ | 495,117 | $ | 392,339 | |||||
The provisions for income taxes included estimated taxes payable on that portion of retained earnings of foreign subsidiaries expected to be received by the Company. The effect of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 and the provisions of the Income Taxes Topic of the ASC was $313 in 2016, $(5,895) in 2015 and $(1,887) in 2014.
Significant components of income before income taxes as used for income tax purposes, were as follows:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Domestic | $ | 1,504,990 | $ | 1,440,511 | $ | 1,113,528 | |||||
Foreign | 90,243 | 108,455 | 144,698 | ||||||||
$ | 1,595,233 | $ | 1,548,966 | $ | 1,258,226 | ||||||
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate follows:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||
Statutory federal income tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||
Effect of: | ||||||||
State and local income taxes | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.8 | |||||
Investment vehicles | (1.5 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (2.5 | ) | ||
Domestic production activities | (2.9 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (2.5 | ) | ||
Employee share-based payments | (2.8 | ) | ||||||
Other - net | (1.1 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (1.6 | ) | ||
Effective tax rate | 29.0 | % | 32.0 | % | 31.2 | % | ||
The 2016 state and local income taxes and investment vehicles components of the effective tax rate were consistent with the 2015 tax year. The tax benefit related to domestic production activities increased in 2016 compared to 2015 due
to a significant increase in domestic taxable income and qualified production activity income in 2016 compared to 2015. The Company received a tax benefit in 2016 compared to 2015 by adopting ASU No. 2016-09.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The IRS is currently auditing refund claims that the Company filed for the 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years. As of December 31, 2016, there were no other income tax examinations being conducted by the IRS, however, the statute of limitations has not expired for the 2013, 2014 and 2015 tax years.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company is subject to non-U.S. income tax examinations for the tax years of 2009 through 2016. In addition, the Company is subject to state and local income tax examinations for the tax years 2003 through 2016.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 33,873 | $ | 31,560 | $ | 30,997 | |||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 5,674 | 4,228 | 3,370 | ||||||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years | 3,890 | 8,450 | 4,428 | ||||||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years | (5,901 | ) | (4,862 | ) | (2,349 | ) | |||||
Settlements | (3,763 | ) | (968 | ) | (4,089 | ) | |||||
Lapses of Statutes of Limitations | (968 | ) | (4,535 | ) | (797 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of year | $ | 32,805 | $ | 33,873 | $ | 31,560 | |||||
Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 is $27,686, $30,007 and $28,208 in unrecognized tax benefits, the recognition of which would have an effect on the effective tax rate.
Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016 is $2,607 related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could significantly change during the next twelve months. This amount represents a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits comprised primarily of items related to federal audits of partnership investments and expiring statutes in federal, foreign and state jurisdictions.
The Company classifies all income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, there was an increase in income tax interest and penalties of $1,410, $2,918 and $2,144, respectively. At December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company accrued $9,275, $8,550 and $5,732, respectively, for the potential payment of interest and penalties.
70 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
NOTE 15 – NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Basic | |||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding | 91,838,603 | 92,197,207 | 96,190,101 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,132,703 | $ | 1,053,849 | $ | 865,887 | |||||
Net income per common share | $ | 12.33 | $ | 11.43 | $ | 9.00 | |||||
Diluted | |||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding | 91,838,603 | 92,197,207 | 96,190,101 | ||||||||
Stock options and other contingently issuable shares (1) | 2,089,921 | 1,826,885 | 1,885,334 | ||||||||
Non-vested restricted stock grants | 559,562 | 519,451 | 665,086 | ||||||||
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution | 94,488,086 | 94,543,543 | 98,740,521 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,132,703 | $ | 1,053,849 | $ | 865,887 | |||||
Net income per common share | $ | 11.99 | $ | 11.15 | $ | 8.77 | |||||
(1) | Stock options and other contingently issuable shares excludes 62,935, 34,463 and 608,477 shares at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, due to their anti-dilutive effect. |
Prior to 2016, the Company used the two-class method of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share as time-based restricted shares were considered a separate class of participating securities since they received non-forfeitable dividends. The time-based restricted shares represented less than 1% of outstanding shares, and therefore, the difference between basic and diluted earnings per share under the two-class method and treasury stock method was not
significant. Starting in 2016, there will be no additional grants of time-based restricted shares. Accordingly, 2016 basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated using the treasury stock method, and the 2015 and 2014 calculations are presented under the treasury stock method for comparability. See Notes 2 and 14 for the impact of acquisition-related expenses and the adoption of ASU 2016-09, respectively, on 2016 basic and diluted net income per common share.
NOTE 16 – SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | Full Year | |||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 2,574,024 | $ | 3,219,525 | $ | 3,279,462 | $ | 2,782,591 | $ | 11,855,602 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 1,261,745 | 1,635,793 | 1,636,289 | 1,388,438 | 5,922,265 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (1) | 164,876 | 378,064 | 386,733 | 203,030 | 1,132,703 | ||||||||||||||
Net income per common share - basic (1), (2) | 1.80 | 4.12 | 4.20 | 2.20 | 12.33 | ||||||||||||||
Net income per common share - diluted (1), (2) | 1.75 | 3.99 | 4.08 | 2.15 | 11.99 | ||||||||||||||
2015 | |||||||||||||||||||
1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | Full Year | |||||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 2,450,284 | $ | 3,132,139 | $ | 3,152,285 | $ | 2,604,596 | $ | 11,339,304 | |||||||||
Gross profit | 1,132,449 | 1,529,986 | 1,574,552 | 1,322,239 | 5,559,226 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | 131,404 | 349,937 | 374,491 | 198,017 | 1,053,849 | ||||||||||||||
Net income per common share - basic (2) | 1.42 | 3.79 | 4.06 | 2.16 | 11.43 | ||||||||||||||
Net income per common share - diluted (2) | 1.38 | 3.70 | 3.97 | 2.11 | 11.15 | ||||||||||||||
(1) First quarter 2016 net income and basic and diluted net income per common share are restated due to the early adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 in the second quarter. See Notes 1 and 14.
(2) Presented under the treasury stock method. See Note 15.
Net income in the fourth quarter of 2016 included a gain on sale of assets of $30,916, increased provisions for environmental matters of $9,330 and impairment of goodwill
and trademarks of $10,688. These non-operating items resulted in a net increase of $.03 in basic and diluted net income per common share.
71 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
NOTE 17 – OPERATING LEASES
The Company leases certain stores, warehouses, manufacturing facilities, office space and equipment. Renewal options are available on the majority of leases and, under certain conditions, options exist to purchase certain properties. Rental expense for operating leases, recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term in accordance with the Leases Topic of the ASC was $417,549, $394,359 and $376,914 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Certain store leases require the payment of contingent rentals based on sales in excess of specified minimums. Contingent rentals included in rent expense were $58,865, $55,890 and $52,379 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Rental income, as lessor, from real estate leasing activities and sublease rental income for all years presented was not significant. The following schedule summarizes the future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year at December 31, 2016:
2017 | $ | 342,565 | |
2018 | 301,546 | ||
2019 | 257,466 | ||
2020 | 214,084 | ||
2021 | 158,427 | ||
Later years | 326,241 | ||
Total minimum lease payments | $ | 1,600,329 | |
NOTE 18 – REPORTABLE SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company reports its segment information in the same way that management internally organizes its business for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the ASC. The Company has determined that it has four reportable operating segments: Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (individually, a "Reportable Segment" and collectively, the “Reportable Segments”). Factors considered in determining the four Reportable Segments of the Company include the nature of business activities, the management structure directly accountable to the Company’s chief operating decision maker (CODM) for operating and administrative activities, availability of discrete financial information and information presented to the Board of Directors. The Company reports all other business activities and immaterial operating segments that are not reportable in the Administrative segment. See pages 8 through 17 of this report for more information about the Reportable Segments.
The Company’s CODM has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer because he has final authority over performance assessment and resource allocation decisions. Because of the diverse operations of the Company, the CODM regularly receives discrete financial information about each
Reportable Segment as well as a significant amount of additional financial information about certain divisions, business units or subsidiaries of the Company. The CODM uses all such financial information for performance assessment and resource allocation decisions. The CODM evaluates the performance of and allocates resources to the Reportable Segments based on profit or loss before income taxes and cash generated from operations. The accounting policies of the Reportable Segments are the same as those described in Note 1 of this report.
The Paint Stores Group consisted of 4,180 company-operated specialty paint stores in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Grenada, Trinidad and Tobago, St. Maarten, Jamaica, Curacao, Aruba, St. Lucia and Barbados at December 31, 2016. Each store in this segment is engaged in the related business activity of selling paint, coatings and related products to end-use customers. The Paint Stores Group markets and sells Sherwin-Williams® branded architectural paint and coatings, protective and marine products, OEM product finishes and related items. These products are produced by manufacturing facilities in the Consumer Group. In addition, each store sells select purchased associated products. The loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on the business of this segment. During 2016, this segment opened 94 net new stores, consisting of 109 new stores opened (86 in the United States, 21 in Canada, 1 in Aruba and 1 in Barbados) and 15 stores closed (9 in the United States and 6 in Canada). In 2015 and 2014, this segment opened 83 and 95 net new stores, respectively. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of paint stores and their geographic location. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Paint Stores Group, supplemented with information by geographic region, product type and customer type, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Paint Stores Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Paint Stores Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment.
The Consumer Group develops, manufactures and distributes a variety of paint, coatings and related products to third-party customers primarily in the United States and Canada and the Paint Stores Group. Approximately 64 percent of the total sales of the Consumer Group in 2016 were intersegment transfers of products primarily sold through the Paint Stores Group. Sales and marketing of certain controlled brand and private labeled products is performed by a direct sales staff. The products distributed through third-party customers are intended for resale to the ultimate end-user of the product. The Consumer Group had sales to certain customers that, individually, may be a significant portion of the sales of the segment. However, the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on the overall
72 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
profitability of the segment. This segment incurred most of the Company’s capital expenditures related to ongoing environmental compliance measures at sites currently in operation. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Consumer Group, supplemented with information by product type and customer type, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Consumer Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Consumer Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment.
The Global Finishes Group develops, licenses, manufactures, distributes and sells a variety of protective and marine products, automotive finishes and refinish products, OEM product finishes and related products in North and South America, Europe and Asia. This segment meets the demands of its customers for a consistent worldwide product development, manufacturing and distribution presence and approach to doing business. This segment licenses certain technology and trade names worldwide. Sherwin-Williams® and other controlled brand products are distributed through the Paint Stores Group and this segment’s 288 company-operated branches and by a direct sales staff and outside sales representatives to retailers, dealers, jobbers, licensees and other third-party distributors. During 2016, this segment opened 5 new branches (3 in the United States and 2 in Canada) and closed 13 branches (10 in the United States, 2 in Canada and 1 in Chile) for a net decrease of 8 branches. At December 31, 2016, the Global Finishes Group consisted of operations in the United States and subsidiaries in 34 foreign countries. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Global Finishes Group reportable segment, supplemented with information about geographic divisions, business units and subsidiaries, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Global Finishes Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Global Finishes Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of branches and their geographic locations.
The Latin America Coatings Group develops, licenses, manufactures, distributes and sells a variety of architectural paint and coatings, protective and marine products, OEM product finishes and related products in North and South America. This segment meets the demands of its customers for consistent regional product development, manufacturing and distribution presence and approach to doing business. Sherwin-Williams® and other controlled brand products are distributed through this segment’s 339 company-operated stores and by a direct sales staff and outside sales representatives to retailers, dealers, licensees and other third-party distributors. During 2016, this segment opened 49 new stores (31 in South America and 18 in Mexico) and closed 1 store
in South America for a net increase of 48 stores. At December 31, 2016, the Latin America Coatings Group consisted of operations from subsidiaries in 9 foreign countries and 4 foreign joint ventures. The CODM uses discrete financial information about the Latin America Coatings Group, supplemented with information about geographic divisions, business units and subsidiaries, to assess performance of and allocate resources to the Latin America Coatings Group as a whole. In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-9, the Latin America Coatings Group as a whole is considered the operating segment, and because it meets the criteria in ASC 280-10-50-10, it is also considered a Reportable Segment. A map on the cover flap of this report shows the number of stores and their geographic locations.
The Administrative segment includes the administrative expenses of the Company’s corporate headquarters site. Also included in the Administrative segment was interest expense, interest and investment income, certain expenses related to closed facilities and environmental-related matters, and other expenses which were not directly associated with the Reportable Segments. The Administrative segment did not include any significant foreign operations. Also included in the Administrative segment was a real estate management unit that is responsible for the ownership, management and leasing of non-retail properties held primarily for use by the Company, including the Company’s headquarters site, and disposal of idle facilities. Sales of this segment represented external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space or leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary businesses. Material gains and losses from the sale of property are infrequent and not a significant operating factor in determining the performance of the Administrative segment.
Net external sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were $1,722,246, $1,788,955 and $2,203,804 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries was $60,059, $75,773 and $115,629 for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Net external sales and segment profit were adversely affected by unfavorable currency translation rate changes. Domestic operations accounted for the remaining net external sales and segment profits. Long-lived assets consisted of Property, plant and equipment, Goodwill, Intangible assets, Deferred pension assets and Other assets. The aggregate total of long-lived assets for the Company was $3,125,222, $3,132,981 and, $3,139,272 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Long-lived assets of consolidated foreign subsidiaries totaled $477,889, $497,528 and $551,364 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Total Assets of the Company were $6,752,521, $5,778,937 and $5,699,333 at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Total assets of consolidated foreign subsidiaries were $1,233,666, $1,172,064 and $1,359,991, which represented 18.3 percent, 20.3 percent and 23.9 percent of the Company’s total assets at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. No single geographic area
73 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
outside the United States was significant relative to consolidated net sales or operating profits. Export sales and sales to any individual customer were each less than 10 percent of consolidated sales to unaffiliated customers during all years presented.
In the reportable segment financial information that follows, Segment profit was total net sales and intersegment transfers less operating costs and expenses. Identifiable assets were those directly identified with each reportable segment. The Administrative segment assets consisted primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, deferred pension assets and
headquarters property, plant and equipment. The margin for each reportable segment was based upon total net sales and intersegment transfers. Domestic intersegment transfers were primarily accounted for at the approximate fully absorbed manufactured cost, based on normal capacity volumes, plus customary distribution costs for paint products. Non-paint domestic and all international intersegment transfers were accounted for at values comparable to normal unaffiliated customer sales. All intersegment transfers are eliminated within the Administrative segment.
(millions of dollars) | 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group | Consumer Group | Global Finishes Group | Latin America Coatings Group | Administrative | Consolidated Totals | ||||||||||||||||||
Net external sales | $ | 7,790 | $ | 1,585 | $ | 1,889 | $ | 587 | $ | 5 | $ | 11,856 | |||||||||||
Intersegment transfers | 2,775 | 15 | 39 | (2,829 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales and intersegment transfers | $ | 7,790 | $ | 4,360 | $ | 1,904 | $ | 626 | $ | (2,824 | ) | $ | 11,856 | ||||||||||
Segment profit (loss) (1) | $ | 1,623 | $ | 319 | $ | 239 | $ | (17 | ) | $ | 2,164 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense (2) | $ | (154 | ) | (154 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Administrative expenses and other (3) | (415 | ) | (415 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 1,623 | $ | 319 | $ | 239 | $ | (17 | ) | $ | (569 | ) | $ | 1,595 | |||||||||
Reportable segment margins | 20.8 | % | 7.3 | % | 12.6 | % | (2.7 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Identifiable assets | $ | 1,779 | $ | 2,005 | $ | 818 | $ | 369 | $ | 1,782 | $ | 6,753 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 80 | 99 | 19 | 19 | 22 | 239 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 69 | 47 | 20 | 7 | 29 | 172 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) Latin America Coatings Group's segment loss includes goodwill and trademark impairment of $10.7 million. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) Includes costs associated with the anticipated acquisition of Valspar totaling $72.8 million. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(3) Includes costs associated with the anticipated acquisition of Valspar totaling $58.4 million. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group | Consumer Group | Global Finishes Group | Latin America Coatings Group | Administrative | Consolidated Totals | ||||||||||||||||||
Net external sales | $ | 7,209 | $ | 1,578 | $ | 1,916 | $ | 631 | $ | 5 | $ | 11,339 | |||||||||||
Intersegment transfers | 2,736 | 5 | 40 | (2,781 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales and intersegment transfers | $ | 7,209 | $ | 4,314 | $ | 1,921 | $ | 671 | $ | (2,776 | ) | $ | 11,339 | ||||||||||
Segment profit | $ | 1,434 | $ | 309 | $ | 202 | $ | 18 | $ | 1,963 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | (62 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Administrative expenses and other | (352 | ) | (352 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 1,434 | $ | 309 | $ | 202 | $ | 18 | $ | (414 | ) | $ | 1,549 | ||||||||||
Reportable segment margins | 19.9 | % | 7.2 | % | 10.5 | % | 2.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Identifiable assets | $ | 1,685 | $ | 1,925 | $ | 814 | $ | 352 | $ | 1,003 | $ | 5,779 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 119 | 61 | 21 | 14 | 19 | 234 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 64 | 47 | 25 | 8 | 26 | 170 | |||||||||||||||||
74 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
(thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated) | |
2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Paint Stores Group | Consumer Group | Global Finishes Group | Latin America Coatings Group | Administrative | Consolidated Totals | ||||||||||||||||||
Net external sales | $ | 6,852 | $ | 1,421 | $ | 2,081 | $ | 771 | $ | 5 | $ | 11,130 | |||||||||||
Intersegment transfers | 2,745 | 8 | 40 | (2,793 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales and intersegment transfers | $ | 6,852 | $ | 4,166 | $ | 2,089 | $ | 811 | $ | (2,788 | ) | $ | 11,130 | ||||||||||
Segment profit | $ | 1,201 | $ | 253 | $ | 201 | $ | 40 | $ | 1,695 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | $ | (64 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Administrative expenses and other | (373 | ) | (373 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | $ | 1,201 | $ | 253 | $ | 201 | $ | 40 | $ | (437 | ) | $ | 1,258 | ||||||||||
Reportable segment margins | 17.5 | % | 6.1 | % | 9.6 | % | 4.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
Identifiable assets | $ | 1,602 | $ | 1,883 | $ | 874 | $ | 427 | $ | 913 | $ | 5,699 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 87 | 45 | 16 | 8 | 45 | 201 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 58 | 48 | 28 | 9 | 26 | 169 | |||||||||||||||||
75 |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Letter to Shareholders” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events and conditions and may discuss, among other things, anticipated future performance (including sales and earnings), expected growth, future business plans and the costs and potential liability for environmental-related matters and the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Any statement that is not historical in nature is a forward-looking statement and may be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “will,” “will likely result,” “will continue,” “plans to” and similar expressions.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of the Company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements and from the Company’s historical results and experience. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include such things as: (a) general business conditions, strengths of retail and manufacturing economies and the growth in the coatings industry; (b) legal, regulatory and other matters that may affect the timing of our ability to complete the planned acquisition of The Valspar Corporation, or Valspar, if at all, including the potential for regulatory authorities to require divestitures in connection with the proposed transaction; (c) the Company’s ability to successfully integrate past and future acquisitions into its existing operations, including Valspar, as well as the performance of the businesses acquired; (d) risks inherent in the achievement of cost synergies and the timing thereof for the planned acquisition of Valspar; (e) competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation and quality;
(f) changes in raw material and energy supplies and pricing; (g) changes in the Company’s relationships with customers and suppliers; (h) the Company’s ability to attain cost savings from productivity initiatives; (i) changes in general domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates, unemployment rates, higher labor and healthcare costs, recessions, and changing government policies, laws and regulations; (j) risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s expansion into and its operations in Asia, Europe, South America and other foreign markets, including general economic conditions, inflation rates, recessions, foreign currency exchange rates, foreign investment and repatriation restrictions, legal and regulatory constraints, civil unrest and other external economic and political factors; (k) the achievement of growth in foreign markets, such as Asia, Europe and South America; (l) increasingly stringent domestic and foreign governmental regulations including those affecting health, safety and the environment; (m) inherent uncertainties involved in assessing the Company’s potential liability for environmental-related activities; (n) other changes in governmental policies, laws and regulations, including changes in accounting policies and standards and taxation requirements (such as new tax laws and new or revised tax law interpretations); (o) the nature, cost, quantity and outcome of pending and future litigation and other claims, including the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, and the effect of any legislation and administrative regulations relating thereto; and (p) unusual weather conditions.
Readers are cautioned that it is not possible to predict or identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect future results and that the above list should not be considered to be a complete list. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
76 |
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Annual Meeting The annual meeting of shareholders will be held in the Landmark Conference Center, 927 Midland Building, 101 W. Prospect Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio on Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 9:00 A.M., local time. Headquarters 101 W. Prospect Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1075 (216) 566-2000 www.sherwin.com Investor Relations Robert J. Wells Senior Vice President - Corporate Communications and Public Affairs The Sherwin-Williams Company 101 W. Prospect Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1075 | Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Ernst & Young LLP Cleveland, Ohio Stock Trading Sherwin-Williams Common Stock— Symbol, SHW—is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Dividend Reinvestment Program A dividend reinvestment program is available to shareholders of common stock. For information, contact Wells Fargo Shareowner Services. Form 10-K The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, is available without charge. To obtain a copy, contact Investor Relations. | Transfer Agent & Registrar Our transfer agent, Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, maintains the records for our registered shareholders and can help with a wide variety of shareholder related services, including the direct deposit of dividends and online access to your account. Contact: Wells Fargo Shareowner Services P.O. Box 64874 St. Paul, MN 55164-0874 www.shareowneronline.com 1-800-468-9716 Toll-free 651-450-4064 outside the United States | ||
COMMON STOCK TRADING STATISTICS
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||
High | $ | 312.10 | $ | 292.44 | $ | 266.25 | $ | 195.32 | $ | 159.80 | |||||||||
Low | 239.35 | 218.94 | 174.29 | 153.94 | 90.21 | ||||||||||||||
Close December 31 | 268.74 | 259.60 | 263.04 | 183.50 | 153.82 | ||||||||||||||
Shareholders of record | 6,787 | 6,996 | 7,250 | 7,555 | 7,954 | ||||||||||||||
Shares traded (thousands) | 212,100 | 195,560 | 152,913 | 186,854 | 282,397 | ||||||||||||||
QUARTERLY STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter | High | Low | Dividend | Quarter | High | Low | Dividend | |||||||||||||||||||
1st | $ | 288.69 | $ | 239.35 | $ | .840 | 1st | $ | 290.89 | $ | 260.87 | $ | .670 | |||||||||||||
2nd | 300.12 | 280.32 | .840 | 2nd | 292.44 | 274.93 | .670 | |||||||||||||||||||
3rd | 312.10 | 273.53 | .840 | 3rd | 285.07 | 218.94 | .670 | |||||||||||||||||||
4th | 277.88 | 240.63 | .840 | 4th | 277.56 | 231.92 | .670 | |||||||||||||||||||
77 |
CORPORATE OFFICERS AND
OPERATING MANAGEMENT
Corporate Officers | Operating Management | |||
John G. Morikis, 53* | Joel D. Baxter, 56* | Bruce G. Irussi, 56 | ||
Chairman, President and Chief | President & General Manager | President & General Manager | ||
Executive Officer | Global Supply Chain Division | Product Finishes Division | ||
Consumer Group | Global Finishes Group | |||
Allen J. Mistysyn, 48* | ||||
Senior Vice President - Finance and | Justin T. Binns, 41 | Dennis H. Karnstein, 50 | ||
Chief Financial Officer | President & General Manager | Senior Vice President | ||
Eastern Division | Global Integration | |||
Jane M. Cronin, 49* | The Americas Group | |||
Senior Vice President - | Cheri M. Phyfer, 45 | |||
Corporate Controller | Paul R. Clifford, 53 | President & General Manager | ||
President & General Manager | Diversified Brands Division | |||
Thomas P. Gilligan, 56* | Canada Division | Consumer Group | ||
Senior Vice President - | The Americas Group | |||
Human Resources | Ronald B. Rossetto, 50 | |||
Robert J. Davisson, 56* | President & General Manager | |||
Sean P. Hennessy, 59* | President | Protective & Marine Coatings Division | ||
Senior Vice President - | The Americas Group | Global Finishes Group | ||
Corporate Planning, Development | ||||
and Administration | Pablo Garcia-Casas, 56 | David B. Sewell, 48* | ||
President & General Manager | President | |||
Catherine M. Kilbane, 53* | Latin America Division | Global Finishes Group | ||
Senior Vice President, General | The Americas Group | |||
Counsel and Secretary | Todd V. Wipf, 52 | |||
Monty J. Griffin, 56 | President & General Manager | |||
Robert J. Wells, 59* | President & General Manager | Southeastern Division | ||
Senior Vice President - Corporate | South Western Division | The Americas Group | ||
Communications and Public Affairs | The Americas Group | |||
Michael T. Cummins, 58 | Thomas C. Hablitzel, 54 | |||
Vice President - Taxes and | President & General Manager | |||
Assistant Secretary | Automotive Division | |||
Global Finishes Group | ||||
John D. Hullibarger, 36 | ||||
Vice President - Corporate Audit | Peter J. Ippolito, 52 | |||
and Loss Prevention | President & General Manager | |||
Mid Western Division | ||||
Jeffrey J. Miklich, 42 | The Americas Group | |||
Vice President and Treasurer | ||||
* Executive Officer as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | ||||
78 |
