10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _________ to ________

Commission file number: 000-21202

Textmunication Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	58-1588291
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1940 Contra Costa Blvd. Pleasant Hill, CA	94523
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number: 925-777-2111

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	not applicable

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class

Common Stock, par value $0.0001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company.

[  ] Large accelerated filer	[  ] Accelerated filer
[  ] Non-accelerated filer	[X] Smaller reporting company
	[  ] Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $49,983

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 3,975,519,454 common shares as of June 14, 2018

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	11
Item 2.	Properties	11
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	12
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	12
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	14
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	17
Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	18
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	18
Item 9B.	Other Information	18
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	19
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	22
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	22
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	23
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	23
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	23

2

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

We are a developing player in the mobile marketing and loyalty industry, providing cutting-edge mobile marketing solutions, rewards and loyalty to our clients. With a powerful yet intuitive suite of services, clients are able to reach more customers faster and reward them for repeat business. We help clients reach their marketing and revenue goals by educating clients with the most effective tools in mobile marketing, rewards, paperless redemption and loyalty.

In the past 4 years, we have grown to over 500 clients and more than 800 different locations in the United States and Canada. We have achieved this with an expanded focus on a variety of industries, including restaurants, retailers, entertainment venues and other partnership opportunities. We have decided to focus our energy on the gym, health and fitness club market. However, we are also working with Quick Service Restaurants (QSR), Beauty/Tanning salons, hospitality, entertainment, digital marketing and sporting events

We have also entered into the IT consulting business through our acquisition of a minority interest in Aspire Consulting, LLC. We plan to assist our controlling partner in the development of this consulting business in addition to improving the market position of our mobile marketing business.

Our principal executive office is located at 1940 Contra Costa Blvd. Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 and our telephone number is (925-777-2111).

Mobile Marketing Business

Principal Products and Services

We are an online mobile marketing platform service that will connect merchants with their customers and allow them to drive loyalty and repeat business in a non-intrusive, value added medium. We provide a mobile marketing platform where merchants can send customers the most up-to-date offers, discounts, alerts and events schedules, such as, for instance, happy hours, trivia night, and other campaigns. The consumer can also access specials and promotions that merchants choose to distribute through us by opting keywords designated to the merchant’s keywords. This allows consumers to take their information wherever they go and learn about the latest buzz as soon as it is available, providing the consumer with events, deals, and messages on their cellphone via SMS messaging. We are a mobile marketing platform that connects the mass consumer to the content that they crave – anywhere, anytime, through virtually any mobile device for all local events and promotions.

Our mobile marketing solutions apply to any industry, offering a new and innovative way to reach out to a merchant’s customer base. Some examples include:

●  Gyms – guest promotions, reminders, new rates, fitness tips;

● Bars – happy hours, special events, discount pricing;

● Boutiques – invite only trunk show, spring sale, discount on a clothing line, carrying a new line of clothes;

● Dentists – special promotion for teeth whitening;

● Investor Relations – sending notifications to investors on news alerts and company updates;

● Digital Marketing – promoting marketing updates from global clients using SMS in their portfolio;

● Salons – promotion on products, new line of products, introducing a new stylist;

● Restaurants – Dine about town participation, discount coupons; and

● Real Estate Agents – Introducing a new home on the market, price reduction, or an open house event.

Additionally, we are a mobile marketing platform that allows merchants to get more impact out of their promotions. Our merchants will be able to recommend promotions to their customers proactively, which will help merchants increase foot traffic and revenue. Utilizing the information that is being collected, our merchants can better target their clients. This system empowers merchants and enables them to adjust programs at a moment’s notice.

3

Our Focus

We began providing SMA text advertising in 2009 to small businesses, including bars, salons, restaurants and medical professionals. We have changed our strategy and decided that instead of directing our energy on smaller businesses we will focus on larger chain and franchise businesses in the Gym, Health and Fitness Club market place offering unique automated solutions to help clubs communicate with their members and increase membership. In order to entrench ourselves as firmly as possible in this marketplace we have add-on service provided with companies that provide billing solutions to the Gym, Health & Fitness Club market place. We now have relationships with the following Gym, Health & Fitness Club billing providers: ASF Payment Solutions, ClubSystems, ABC Financial, Motionsoft, Paramount Acceptance and Jonas Fitness. These sources have access to a combined 17,000 gyms and fitness centers. We plan on introducing new services such as Rich Communication Services (RCS). This new service will shift the paradigm in the mobile communication market by sending rich images, interactive buttons and video in a single text.

Below is a list of services that we intend to perform for the health and fitness industry:

SMS Texting

New Sales:

●  Leads/Inquiries (e.g., Text gym to 87365 for a 7-day pass)

● Appointment reminders (daily sales appointments/automated)

● Referrals/Referral programs

● Gym locator & directions (e.g., find your nearest club Text zip code to 87365)

● Welcome to the club text to new members (combined w/ an offer, guest pass for a friend, personal training, and more)

Inside sales:

● Bring a guest (or more) free day, week or month

● Upgrades

● Retail & juice zone

● Personal training sales

● Membership renewals (automated)

Member Communication & retention:

● Fitness & diet tips

● Class updates

● Event info

● Happy B-day alerts (automated)

● Automated texts delivered to people that have not been in for a workout in 30 days.

Operations:

● Delinquent accounts (automated)

● Cancelled accounts (automated)

● Surveys/feedback

● Expired credit card notifications (automated)

Our goal is to partner with the industry leading enterprise software providers to the Health and Fitness Industry. We believe the top five enterprise software providers in the health and fitness industry account for more than 50% of the total gyms and fitness centers worldwide. By integrating our web based platform into the existing infrastructure of an enterprise software provider, we can then uniquely market our service to gyms and fitness centers on a ‘turnkey’ basis. We believe this provides a significant competitive advantage to us. Our monthly billing rates range between $49-$299 per club. Over the next 24 months our goal is to become an add-on component to the billing features of at least 50% of the gym billing providers so that we can attract as many as 5,000 Gym, Health & Fitness clubs in the US. We then intend to expand internationally where there are as many as 165,000 Gyms, Health & Fitness clubs as of 2016. In addition, we plan on utilizing the same strategy in the salon, entertainment, hospitality, sporting event and healthcare markets. We are also looking at new technologies and services such as Rich Communication Services (RCS) which will help us expand our leadership in the health and fitness market.

TXMT Platform Features

We offer our clients a mobile marketing platform. We completed our new Generation 3 software platform named “Smart Automated Messaging” or SAM. This new platform will have the ability to send more than one billion SMS per month. Our new platform should attract new API partners, open new markets and broaden the capacity to send more messages than our GEN2 platform. We now offer White Label, API, Integrated API and Standalone SMS options. We can compete with Tier One SMS providers and open new opportunities with the completion of SAM. The total cost to develop SAM was $96,000 and our ongoing costs to add enhancements, develop new APIs and maintain the platform is $8000 per month. Our new software platform can take on thousands of new clients and deliver on new services such as Rich Communication Services (RCS) which will be launched in Q3 or Q4 of 2018 with our technology partner OpenMarket.

4

Our current platform offers the following:

● Mobile Coupons - Engage your customers! Drive in traffic and boost sales through mobile coupons delivered with expiration dates and unique tracking codes right to their mobile phones;

● Mobile Voting/Polls - Instantly gather invaluable customer opinions; no more guessing at what they want or wondering what they think of a product or service; the client can get their opinions on what they want or think, and proactively plan for success;

● Multimedia Messaging - Use a promotional hook for the consumer to interact with a brand by texting to a unique keyword to download branded content such as video, images, ringtones and games; now it is easier than ever to mobilize their brand on their consumers’ phones;

● SMS Reminders - Remind clients about appointments, anniversaries, b-days, oil changes, tune ups, and more via text; individual, group and bulk mobile messaging; engage with those who have raised their hands and said they want to have an ongoing relationship with a brand via mobile; deliver news on products and services and provide mobile offers and coupons to drive sales which can include expiration dates and single use promotion codes;

● Text 2 Web - Mobilize the website with text messaging functionality to promote interaction with customers; showcase text 2 web responses on the client’s website to have fresh user-generated content that increases the stickiness of the client’s website; Contests/Instant Contesting - make any traditional media interactive with contests that can create buzz and lead to further engagement; have concert attendees enter contests for seat upgrades, backstage passes, and more; generate a local customer database from in-location giveaways;

● Web Widgets/Online Forms - Textmunication supplies an online sign up page so customers can join the client’s program on its website or social media accounts without having to text-in; with the web widget gives the client the ability to obtain further information such as email, date of birth, gender, name, and more; and

● API – Our APIs are fast, simple and reliable and built in such a way that they integrate with any system or application. Our ready-made scripts help you to connect to our gateway through your chosen programming language. These scripts all work with the HTTP API. We offer both Direct API and API integration through our UI. Both models allow for a seamless sharing of information. Our API growth will be a driving revenue factor for us going forward.

● MyLA- Loyalty and rewards program for client’s customers who frequently make purchases. Customers register their personal such as mobile cell number information to the merchant through our proprietary Application on a tablet or online that they will use in the future when making a purchase to receive new product updates, specials and promotional merchandise.

Features of our HTTP/S API:

API supports text, Unicode, binary SMS and flash messaging in the following ways:

● Supports extended length messages;

● Converts ringtones and logos into the correct format;

● Delivery acknowledgement and Sender ID;

● Gateway escalation: Should the message be delayed for a predefined length of time, it can be escalated to an alternative delivery gateway. Queuing lets you specify up to 3 prioritized queues which your messages can be sent out on; and

● Batch sending and two-way messaging.

White label - (Fully Customized Design)

We provide an all-inclusive, branded platform that delivers everything you need to create a user interface that will seamlessly appear and takes it much further than just the standard logo and dashboard by providing a branded SMS message system, sign-up forms, alerts and customized buttons. The merchants will never know that you didn’t build it from scratch. Our pricing system makes it simple for our white labels to maintain full control over pricing plans. Our white label reseller program provides a powerful platform for resellers rebranded as their own and pay wholesale rates and keep 100% of their profit. Seamless set-up within 72 hours includes payment integration and shortcode activation with over hundred domestic and international carriers. Resellers set their own pricing plans, text credits and keywords. Analytics, reports and account monitoring are available for tracking customers.

5

Our Vertical Markets are the following:

● QSR Restaurants (Quick Service Restaurant);

● Gyms, Health and Fitness;

● Entertainment (Casinos, Golf Courses, bowling centers, Comedy Clubs); and

● Retail stores

● Real Estate

● Hospitality

● Digital marketing agencies

● Investor relation firms

Referral Partners

We have signed up more than 500 Gym, Health and Fitness Clubs from our relationships listed above . We have spent our efforts developing strategic partnerships in the fitness and salon sectors. These relationships allow us the ability to scale our business due to their status and control in their respective markets. Many of these relationships are on an exclusive basis. Textmunication has positioned itself as the SMS mobile marketing leader in both the fitness and salon markets. By integrating with software management systems, the clubs and salons using the software platform will have the SMS option easily available to them. Our new White Label program takes our strategic partnerships to the next level. Our White Label program is owned by our partners on the front-end while we support the technology and database. This provides a solution controlled by our partners allowing for more visibility to their end clients.

Marketing Plan and Personnel

The goal is to build engaging content for potential clients to make it clear what we do and that we excel at it. The target audience for potential and existing clients is larger chain and franchise businesses in the Gym, Health and Fitness Club market. We also intend to continue marketing to small to medium businesses that have need of our services.

Our objectives to meet this goal include the following:

● revamping our website and setting up Google analytics for tracking SEO and keywords;

● setting up accounts for Facebook and LinkedIn for paid advertisements;

● designing and participating in various social media sites;

● blogging, preparing newsletters, and engaging in email campaigns; and

● hosting web seminars with attendance driven by the foregoing;

To accomplish these objectives, we will need to hire bloggers, programmers, and graphic, web and video developers.

We also need to revamp our website, purchase marketing software and materials, Google Analytics, hire IR/PR consultants, set aside money for conventions, and advertise for Facebook, LinkedIn and other social media.

Competition

In the past few years, the number of mobile marketing options and companies have grown rapidly. The markets for the products and services that we offer are very competitive, are rapidly evolving and have relatively low barriers to entry. We compete with all general advertising and marketing companies who eventually will want to include mobile marketing in their suite of product offerings, and who may develop their own similar products and compete with us for market share. These potential competitors may have more mature lines of distribution than us, be better financed than us, or may create a product offering that is superior to ours. Any of these factors can cause a competitor to take market share away from us or otherwise substantially hurt our business. We believe that competition in our market is based predominantly on:

●  Price;

● Brand recognition;

● Product and service components and deliverables;

● Track record of creating and keeping satisfied clients;

● Success of underlying marketing programs; and

● Order delivery performance and customer service.

6

Government Regulation

We are subject to a number of laws and regulations that affect companies generally and specifically those conducting business in the mobile messaging market, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. Existing and future laws and regulations may impede our growth. These regulations and laws may cover online marketing, e-mail marketing, telemarketing, taxation, privacy, data protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, mobile communications, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, web services, the provision of online payment services, unencumbered internet access to our services, the design and operation of websites, and the characteristics and quality of products and services. It is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, libel, and personal privacy apply to the internet, e-commerce, digital content, and web services. Unfavorable regulations and laws could diminish the demand for our products and services and increase our cost of doing business.

We expect that the regulation of our industry generally will continue to increase and that we will be required to devote increasing amounts of legal and other resources to address this regulation. In addition, the application of existing domestic and international laws and regulations relating to issues such as user privacy and data protection, marketing, advertising, consumer protection and mobile disclosures in many instances is unclear or unsettled.

In addition to its regulation of wireless telecommunications providers generally, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, has examined, or is currently examining, how and when consumers enroll in mobile services, what types of disclosures consumers receive, what services consumers are purchasing and how much consumers are charged. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, has been asked to regulate how mobile marketers can use consumers’ personal information. Consumer advocates claim that many consumers do not know when their information is being collected from cell phones and how such information is retained, used and shared with other companies. Consumer groups have asked the FTC to: identify practices that may compromise privacy and consumer welfare; examine opt-in procedures to ensure consumers are aware of what data is at issue and how it will be used; investigate marketing tactics that target children; and create policies to halt abusive practices. The FTC has expressed interest in the mobile environment and services that collect sensitive data, such as location-based information.

The principal laws and regulations that pertain to us and our customers in connection with their utilization of our platform, include:

● Deceptive Trade Practice Law in the U.S. The FTC and state attorneys general are given broad powers by legislatures to curb unfair and deceptive trade practices. These laws and regulations apply to mobile marketing campaigns and behavioral advertising. The general guideline is that all material terms and conditions of the offer must be “clearly and conspicuously” disclosed to the consumer prior to the buying decision. The balancing of the desire to capture a potential customer’s attention, while providing adequate disclosure, can be challenging in the mobile context due to the lack of screen space available to provide required disclosures.

● Behavioral Advertising. Behavioral advertising is a technique used by online publishers and advertisers to increase the effectiveness of their campaigns. Behavioral advertising uses information collected from an individual’s web-browsing behavior, such as the pages they have visited or the searches they have made, to select which advertisements to display to that individual. This data can be valuable for online marketers looking to personalize advertising initiatives or to provide geo-tags through mobile devices. Many businesses adhere to industry self-governing principles, including an opt-out regime whereby information may be collected until an individual indicates that he or she no longer agrees to have this information collected. The FTC is considering regulations in this area, which may include implementation of a more rigorous opt-in regime. An opt-in policy would prohibit businesses from collecting and using information from individuals who have not voluntarily consented. Among other things, the implementation of an opt-in regime could require substantial technical support and negatively impact the market for our mobile advertising products and services. A few states have also introduced bills in recent years that would restrict behavioral advertising within the state. These bills would likely have the practical effect of regulating behavioral advertising nationwide because of the difficulties behind implementing state-specific policies or identifying the location of a consumer. There have also been a large number of class action suits filed against companies engaged in behavioral advertising.

● Behavioral Advertising-Privacy Regulation. Our business is affected by U.S. federal and state laws and regulations governing the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of data that we receive from and about our users. In recent years, regulation has focused on the collection, use, disclosure and security of information that may be used to identify or that actually identifies an individual, such as an Internet Protocol address or a name. Although the mobile and Internet advertising privacy practices are currently largely self-regulated in the U.S., the FTC has conducted numerous discussions on this subject and suggested that more rigorous privacy regulation is appropriate, including regulation of non-personally identifiable information which could, with other information, be used to identify an individual.

● Marketing-Privacy Regulation. In addition, there are U.S. federal and state laws that govern SMS and telecommunications-based marketing, generally requiring senders to transmit messages (including those sent to mobile devices) only to recipients who have specifically consented to receiving such messages. U.S. federal laws also govern e-mail marketing, generally imposing an opt-out requirement for emails sent within an existing business relationship.

7

● SMS and Location-Based Marketing Best Practices and Guidelines. We are a member of the Mobile Marketing Association, or MMA, a global association of 700 agencies, advertisers, mobile device manufacturers, wireless operators and service providers and others interested in the potential of marketing via the mobile channel. The MMA has published a code of conduct and best practices guidelines for use by those involved in mobile messaging activities. The guidelines were developed by a collaboration of the major carriers and they require adherence to them as a condition of service. We voluntarily comply with the MMA code of conduct. In addition, the Cellular Telephone Industry Association, or CTIA, has developed Best Practices and Guidelines to promote and protect user privacy regarding location-based services. We also voluntarily comply with those guidelines, which generally require notice and user consent for delivery of location-based services.

● The United States Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The TCPA prohibits unsolicited voice and text calls to cell phones through the use of an automatic telephone-dialing system (ATDS) unless the recipient has given prior consent. The statute also prohibits companies from initiating telephone solicitations to individuals on the national Do-Not-Call list, and restricts the hours when such messages may be sent. Violations of the TCPA can result in statutory damages of $500 per violation (i.e., for each individual text message). U.S. state laws impose additional regulations on voice and text calls. We believe that our platform does not employ an ATDS within the meaning of the TCPA based on case law construing that term.

● CAN-SPAM. The U.S. Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act, or CAN SPAM Act, prohibits all commercial e-mail messages, as defined in the law, to mobile phones unless the device owner has given “express prior authorization.” Recipients of such messages must also be allowed to opt-out of receiving future messages the same way they opted-in. Senders have ten business days to honor opt-out requests. The FCC has compiled a list of domain names used by wireless service providers to which marketers may not send commercial e-mail messages. Senders have 30 days from the date the domain name is posted on the FCC site to stop sending unauthorized commercial e-mail to addresses containing the domain name. Violators are subject to fines of up to $6.0 million and up to one year in jail for some spamming activities. Carriers, the FTC, the FCC, and State Attorneys General may bring lawsuits to enforce alleged violations of the Act.

● Communications Privacy Acts. Foreign and U.S. federal and state laws impose liability for intercepting communications while in transit or accessing the contents of communications while in storage.

● Security Breach Notification Requirements. In the U.S., various states have enacted data breach notification laws, which require notification of individuals and sometimes state regulatory bodies in the event of breaches involving certain defined categories of personal information. This new trend suggests that breach notice statutes may be enacted in other jurisdictions, including by the U.S. at the federal level, as well.

● Children. The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act prohibit the knowing collection of personal information from children under the age of 13 without verifiable parental consent, and strictly regulate the transmission of requests for personal information to such children. Other countries do not recognize the ability of children to consent to the collection of personal information. In addition, it is likely that behavioral advertising regulations will impose special restrictions on use of information collected from minors for this purpose.

Intellectual Property

Although we believe that our business methodology is proprietary in terms of how we deliver our service to our client, and how we use mobile marketing, we currently hold no patents, copyrights or trademarks. It is our plan to trademark our key products as we develop them, subject to applicable laws and regulations, however, we have not filed for any such protection as of yet. It is our policy to enter into confidentiality agreements with any outsourced sales or service providers so that our proprietary methodology, customer’s lists and business information are contractually protected, and we intend to enforce any such contractual provisions as the law allows in the event of a breach. We cannot assure you that these contractual arrangements will prevent third parties from acquiring or using our proprietary business information to compete against us.

IT Consulting

We own a minority 49% interest in Aspire Consulting, LLC.

Aspire is headquartered in Gaithersburg, Maryland. It provides IT consulting and solution based services as a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Concern (SDVOSBC) to commercial, state and federal contractors. Aspire’s leadership and advisory board consists of executives from Cyber Security, Healthcare, Quality Management, Unified Communications and Financial Services.

8

On December 16, 2003, the Veterans Benefits Act (the “Act”) was passed by Congress. Section 308 of the Act established a procurement program for SDVOSBCs. This procurement program provides that federal contracting officers may restrict competition to SDVOSBCs and award a sole source or set-aside contract where certain criteria are met.

The purpose of the procurement program is to provide procuring agencies with the authority to set acquisitions aside for exclusive competition among SDVOSBCs, as well as the authority to make sole source awards to SDVOSBCs if certain conditions are met.

Aspire meets the requirements of a SDVOSBC and is eligible for the procurement program. Aspire was verified as SDVOSB by U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Center for Verification and Evaluation (CVE) on December 2, 2015. This verification allows Aspire to compete for SDVOSB set-aside contracts in both federal and state government sectors. Acceptance into the Veterans First Contracting Program within the VA System ensures legitimately owned and controlled VOSBs and SDVOSBs are able to compete for VA VOSB and SDVOSB set-aside contracts and are credited by VA’s large prime contractors for subcontract plan achievements.

Aspire provides cutting edge IT solutions and consulting services built on technologists and professional subject matter experts. Aspire’s services are comprised of the following:

IT Consulting	Application Services	Professional Services
IT Strategy & Planning	Development, Maintenance and Support	IT Service Management
IT Performance/QA/PMO	Verification and Validation	Human Capital Solutions
BPO, BPM	Information Management	Infrastructure and Development Solutions
IT Process Improvement	E-Commerce and Web Development	Managed Services
Security & Compliance
Enterprise Architecture

IT Strategy and Planning

Aspire helps clients navigate through strategic planning to create change and achieve corporate alignment. Its value based management methodology allows it to help clients align their decisions to business needs.

IT Performance and Governance

Aspire’s modern governance models provide a bridge for stronger relationships with IT and the client ensuring alignment with IT operational priorities. Its IT Service Management (ITIL) and Business Intelligence expertise make it an ideal partner in this area.

BPO/IT Process Improvement

Aspire strives to make organizations more competitive by driving down costs and increasing performance. Its team will draw on real-world experience and deep industry best practice knowledge to help clients achieve a more effective and efficient IT organization.

IT Security and Compliance

Aspire helps to reduce IT related risk, securing client’s critical information assets, and ensuring regulatory compliance through the application of industry-leading security practices. Domain expertise across multiple industries helps Aspire to fully assess risk and ensure compliance.

Development and Maintenance

Aspire designs and develops custom software for enterprise-wide and mission-critical solutions. It supports current programs with top developers in all technologies. It has proven experience across the technology spectrum with adherence to Quality Control and Assurance standards to ensure results meet requirements.

Verification and Validation

Aspire’s QA team has vast experience making sure software systems meet specification and performance objectives. This is done independent of the client’s development, testing, and user acceptance team environments. It provides the client an unbiased approach to testing and certifies that the application does what it is intended to do. This also provides a good audit for applications working in compliant environments.

9

Information Management

Aspire provides data integration, information architecture, information delivery, business intelligence and information management. It conducts business and technology assessments across each category. Aspire creates and executes an information strategy that supports the business demands for better and more comprehensive information for business decision making.

IT Service Management

Aspire designs, configures, and installs the leading business service management tools to meet the needs of its client’s environment. Experienced consultants understand both the technical nature of client applications as well as the real-world usability needs of their business.

Infrastructure & Development

Aspire designs and implements virtualized infrastructure solutions that optimize distribution and availability of IT services. This end-to-end service provides critical details for planning and design as well as best practices implementation.

Human Capital Solutions

Aspire supports on-site/off-site IT with resources across the entire SDLC spectrum. It targets Cloud, Big Data/Analytics, Mobile and Security. Aspire provides “Best of Breed” technical and IT experts to deliver cost cutting solutions.

Managed Services

Aspire provides outsourced IT service management. Specialties include - service desk, applications and database

support.

Business Process Outsourcing

Aspire provides financial, document management, electronic healthcare, human resources and procurement support. Aspire is knowledgeable in process efficiency and improvements, coupled with resource expertise with functions from assessments to post-deployment and process management support.

IT Outsourcing

Aspire provides security and risk management, business continuity planning, IT assessment, systems/networks, infrastructure, project management, agile lifecycle management and business strategy support.

Domain Expertise

Aspire provides healthcare, banking, human resources, financial services and technology expertise. It has extensive vendor experience ranging from back office support to design, testing, deployment, and optimization, highlighted by our expertise in virtualization and domain management technologies.

Recent Developments

Aspire was notified on March 1, 2017 that it has been awarded a significant 10-year government contract. Aspire is a teammate on an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracting vehicle. The team consists of several well-known companies serving specialty areas within Health IT.

The Strategic Partners Acquisition Readiness Contract (SPARC) is a cost-effective, innovative solution for procuring information technology (IT) professional services from a pool of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) experienced partners. SPARC is a $25B 10-year multiple award performance-based contract. There are currently 85 teams (small and large) divided into various set-aside procurement divisions.

Aspire is a subcontractor to Northrop Grumman on the Social Security Administration (SSA) ITSSC2 contract which is expected to kick-off in July 2018. They are also a subcontractor to Cogent Solutions on the Veterans Affairs VECTOR program. This program has yet to begin. Aspire submitted a proposal for Maryland Consulting and Technical Services+ (CATS+). This contracting vehicle enables State government to procure IT consulting services for all its agencies. The contract notification should occur in Q4 of 2018. Aspire has two contracts pending with the state of Maryland. Details of both contracts will be made public as more information becomes available.

10

Employees

We will need to pay our management team and consultants that assist with managerial and administration efforts in the next twelve months. We have 5 employees, including a CEO, COO, VP of Sales, Lead Developer, Marketing Director and Client Success Manager. We have 5 consultants that assist with development, systems engineering, and inside sales. We recently contracted an API Engineer and Scalability Engineer to help build-out our new SMS software platform. We do not have employment agreements or written consulting agreements with any of our personnel, except for our CEO, Wais Asefi. His employment agreement obligates us to pay him $120,000 annually. In order to compensate him and all of the above managerial and administrative support, we estimate we will require and additional $100,000 in revenue in the next twelve months.

We intend to hire sales personnel to help grow our business. Our anticipated sales force will work in teams of two. There will be a position for LDR (Lead Development & Research), who is responsible for originating new leads and converting those leads into scheduled appointments for an AR (Account Representative), who will perform an online demo overview about our company and the services we offer. We expect to pay an LDR $25,000 annually and the AE $30,000 annually.

We hope to eventually have a team in place for each our targeted customer groups, which are as follows:

● Lifestyle: salons, spas, health clubs, gyms, fitness centers, massage, hotels, etc.

● Entertainment: golf, comedy, bars & nightclubs, casinos, bowling, etc.

● Food & restaurant: QSR and restaurant style

● Retail: automotive, clothing, apparel, car washes

● Marketing: digital marketing and Investor Relation (IR) firms

As we continue to grow, sales teams will be added in each targeted customer group according to geographic region.

From our past experience, one team should be able to reach out to 1,600 contacts, and yield 60 demos per month. With this forecast, which is really just an estimate, one team could generate $6,000 in new sales per month. We hope to hire 2 teams for a total of $100,000 in the next twelve months.

We will have one VP of Sales over teams and more may be added as our company grows and our geographical customer base expands. The VP of Sales is responsible for leading and developing the sales team, organizing and assigning industry specifics and regions and working hand in hand with current and new partners for sustained growth. We have one VP of Sales already in place.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

For our mobile marketing business, see risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed on April 15, 2015.

For our interest in Aspire Consulting Group, LLC, see risk factors included in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 1, 2016.

Item 2. Properties

We currently do not own any real property. Our principal executive office is located at 1940 Contra Costa Blvd. Pleasant Hill, CA 94523. We currently lease our executive offices at $2,000 per month.

11

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We issued a Current Report on Form 8-K on March 6, 2017 regarding hiring the law firm Ellsworth Young LLP to vigorously protect us against abusive lending practices. In 2017, we had several cases concerning convertible promissory notes:

JSJ Investments, Inc. vs. Textmunication Holdings, Inc.

95th District Court of Dallas County, Texas

Filed on 2/7/2017

Case: DC-17-01404

On May 24, 2017, our company and JSJ Investments Inc. (“JSJ”) entered into a Final Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to execute an amendment to the 12% convertible promissory note, which allowed JSJ to convert the note’s outstanding balance and accrued interest of $53,280.57 into a fixed 262,500,000 shares of our common stock.

Auctus Fund vs. Textmunication Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court – District of Massachusetts

Filed on 3/24/2017

Case 1:17-cv-10504

On July 3, 2017, our company and Auctus Fund entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release (the “Settlement Agreement”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, we agreed to issue 550,000,000 shares of our common stock with a 5-month Leak-Out Agreement to Auctus Fund.

Textmunication Holdings, Inc. vs. Carebourn Capital.

United States District Court – District of Nevada

Filed on 4/5/2017

Case 2:17-cv-00968-JAD-VCF

On October 3, 2017, our company and Carebourn Capital agreed to settle all the outstanding principal, interest, and penalties owed under the Note for an issuance of an aggregate total of 70,000,000 shares of its common stock.

Textmunication vs. Lester Einhaus

Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, NV

Filed on 4/10/2017

Case: A-17-753743-C

This case was dismissed in October 2017.

As of December 31, 2017, all litigation has been resolved except for the following case:

Lester Einhaus vs. Textmunication

United States District Court – Northern District

Filed on 6/14/2017

Case: 1:17-cv-04478

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted under the symbol “TXHD” on the OTCPink operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. Only a limited market exists for our securities. There is no assurance that a regular trading market will develop, or if developed, that it will be sustained. Therefore, a shareholder may be unable to resell his securities in our company.

The following tables set forth the range of high and low bid prices for our common stock for the each of the periods indicated as reported by the OTCPink. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

12

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2017
Quarter Ended	High $	Low $
December 31, 2017	.001	.0001
September 30, 2017	.001	.0003
June 30, 2017	.0057	.0007
March 31, 2017	.0094	.0005

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2016
Quarter Ended	High $	Low $
December 31, 2016	.0183	.0006
September 30, 2016	.073	.016
June 30, 2016	.1049	.0199
March 31, 2016	.1309	.020

On June 14, the last sales price per share of our common stock on the OTCPink was $0.0002.

Penny Stock

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a market price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the broker’s or dealer’s duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation of such duties or other requirements of the securities laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type size and format, as the SEC shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) a monthly account statement showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement as to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity for our common stock. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling our securities.

Holders of Our Common Stock

As of June 14, 2018, we had 3,975,519,454 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, held by 93 shareholders of record, other than those held in street name.

Dividends

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

1.	we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or;
2.	our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.

We have not declared any dividends and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

13

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The information set forth below relates to our issuances of securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 during the reporting period which were not previously included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued 1,710,458,945 shares of common stock for the partial conversion and settlements of $857,717.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we issued 305,688,000 shares of common stock valued at $120,555 for the settlement of debt.

These securities were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The holders represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The investors were given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We have no equity compensation plans.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements.” These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

Revenues

For the year ended December 31, 2017, we earned revenues in the amount of $943,739, as compared with revenues of $458,271 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in revenues for 2017 over 2016 is due to more customer accounts achieved from a change in our pricing model to become more competitive. We expect to achieve greater revenues for the rest of 2018 over 2017.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales was $317,336 and $103,085 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our cost of sales increased for 2017 compared with the 2016 and was mainly attributable to increased cost of services related to servers and SMS messaging. We expect a similar or increased cost of sales for 2018.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses were $7,175,163 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared with $1,265,810 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The main reason for our increased operating expenses in 2017 was a result of stock-based compensation to our CEO, Wais Asefi.

14

We expect that our operating expenses in 2018 will resemble 2017, provided that we do not have to issue stock for services, which was the main reason for our increased expenses in 2017. Given our lack of operating capital, we have been forced to issue shares for services rendered to the company. We hope that increase revenues will lessen that trend for 2018 and beyond.

Other Expenses

We had other expenses of $1,098,734 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and other expenses of $2,431,697 for the same period ended December 31, 2016. Other expenses for 2017 consisted of $850,753 in the loss on change of derivative liabilities, $188,549 in amortization of debt discount, $37,561 in a gain on settlement of notes payable and $96,993 in interest expenses. Other expenses for 2016 consisted of $1,377,637 in the loss on change of derivative liabilities, $610,951 in amortization of debt discount, $300,016 in the loss on settlement of notes payable and $143,093 in interest expenses.

Net Loss

We had a net loss of $7,649,220 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared with net loss of $3,323,926 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2017, we had total current assets of $13,007. Our total current liabilities as of December 31, 2017 were $983,740. We had a working capital deficit of $970,733 as of December 31, 2017.

Cash flows from Operating Activities

Operating activities used $145,719 in cash the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared with $433,283 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our net loss of $7,649,220 was the main component of our negative operating cash flow, offset mainly by stock-based compensation of $6,115,100.

Cash flows from Financing Activities

Cash flows provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2017 amounted to $201,106, as compared with $347,818 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our positive cash flow in 2017 consisted mostly of proceeds from the sale of convertible promissory notes, offset by payments on loans payable.

Our optimum level of growth for success will be achieved if we are able to raise $250,000 in the next twelve months. However, funds are difficult to raise in today’s economic environment. If we are unable to raise $250,000 our ability to implement our business plan and achieve our goals will be significantly diminished.

We have experienced a history of losses. With our revenues increasing, however, we are less reliant on outside capital as we have been in the past. We will need at a minimum $120,000 in capital to operate in the next 12 months.

We are dependent on investment capital to continue our survival. We have raised money through convertible debt, almost always on unfavorable terms. There is no guarantee that these small convertible loans will be available to us in the future or on terms acceptable to us.

We do not have any formal commitments or arrangements for the sales of stock or the advancement or loan of funds at this time. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.

Going Concern

As of December 31, 2017, we have an accumulated deficit of $15,150,240. Our ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon the successful completion of additional financing arrangements and our ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations. While we are expanding our best efforts to achieve the above plans, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds that will be available for operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.

15

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2017, there were no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 of our audited financial statements included in the Form 10-K.

Item 7. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

16

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Financial Statements Required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X:

Audited Financial Statements:

F-1	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-2	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
F-3	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
F-4	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
F-5	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
F-6	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

17

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and

Board of Directors of Textmunication Holdings, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Textmunication Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In my opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis of Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on my audits. I am a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and am required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

I conducted my audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. The Company is not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of my audits I am required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing and opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, I express no such opinion.

My audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. My audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s continuing operating losses and accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the issuance of these financial statements. Management’s plans are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Boyle CPA, LLC

I have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018

Bayville, NJ

June 19, 2018

F-1

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(AUDITED)

	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	10,158		$	-
Receivables		2,849			3,757
Total current assets		13,007			3,757
Fixed assets, net		-			305
Software		45,229			-
Investment in equity method investee		452,336			454,062
Total assets		510,572			458,124
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	480,719		$	291,731
Due to related parties		11,750			11,750
Loans payable		-			3,712
Convertible notes payable, net of discount		172,230			535,464
Derivative liability		319,041			857,795
Total current liabilities		983,740			1,700,452
Total liabilities		983,740			1,700,452
Stockholders’ deficit
Preferred stock, 5,933,333 shares authorized, $0.0001 par value, 4,000,000 issued and outstanding		400			400
Series B - Preferred stock, 66,667 shares authorized, $0.0001 par value, 66,667 issued and outstanding		7			7
Series C - Preferred stock, 2,000,000 shares authorized, $0.0001 par value, 2,000,000 and zero issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.		200			-
Common stock; $0.0001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 2,435,179 and 199,403 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.		244			20
Additional paid-in capital		14,676,221			6,258,265
Accumulated deficit		(15,150,240	)		(7,501,020	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(473,168	)		(1,242,328	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	510,572		$	458,124

F-2

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(AUDITED)

	The Year Ended
	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Sales	$	943,739		$	458,271
Cost of revenues		317,336			103,085
Gross profit		626,403			355,186
Operating expenses
Officer Compensation		6,345,166			81,846
General and administrative expenses		829,997			1,183,964
Total operating expenses		7,175,163			1,265,810
Loss from operations		(6,548,760	)		(910,624	)
Other expense
Interest expense		(96,993	)		(143,093	)
Loss on change of derivative liability		(850,753	)		(1,377,637	)
Amortization of debt discount		(188,549	)		(610,951	)
Gain (loss) on settlement of notes payable		37,561			(300,016	)
Total other expense		(1,098,734	)		(2,431,697	)
Income (loss) from investment in equity method investee		(1,726	)		18,395
Net income (loss)	$	(7,649,220	)	$	(3,323,926	)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		1,794,897			132,006
Net loss per common share: basic and diluted	$	(4.26	)	$	(25.18	)

F-3

TEXTMUNICATION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(AUDITED)

	Preferred stock				Preferred stock - Series B				Preferred stock - Series C				Common Stock						Additional			Accumulated			Total Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Paid-in Capital			Deficit			Deficit
Balance, December 31, 2015		4,000,000		400		-		-		-		-		109,543			11			3,075,765			(4,177,094	)		(1,100,918	)
Preferred stock issued for investment in Aspire						66,667		7		-		-								459,995						460,002
Settlement of derivative liability																				1,573,238						1,573,238
Contributed capital																				35,277						35,277
Stock issued to settle notes payable														141,260			14			635,285						635,299
Stock issued for services														8,000			1			478,699						478,700
Shares returned for services														(59,400	)		(6	)		6						-
Net loss																							(3,323,926	)		(3,323,926	)
Balance, December 31, 2016		4,000,000		400		66,667		7		-		-		199,403			20			6,258,265			(7,501,020	)		(1,242,328	)
Stock issued to settle notes payable														1,608,879			161			921,857						922,018
Stock issued to settle debt														299,397			30			109,541						109,571
Shares issued for services														2,077,500			208			6,114,892						6,115,100
Conversion of common stock to preferred										2,000,000		200		(1,750,000	)		(175	)		(25	)					-
Settlement of derivative liability																				1,271,691						1,271,691
Net loss																							(7,649,220	)		(7,649,220	)
Balance, December 31, 2017		4,000,000		400		66,667		7		2,000,000		200		2,435,179			244			14,676,221			(15,150,240	)		(473,168	)

F-4

TEXTMUNICATION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(AUDITED)

	The Years Ended
	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss		(7,649,220	)	$	(3,323,926	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of debt discount		188,549			610,951
Loss on derivative liability		850,753			1,377,637
Non cash interest expense		81,272
Depreciation		304			725
Share based compensation		6,115,100			478,700
Loss on the settlement of debt		(37,561	)		300,016
Income from equity method investee		1,726			(18,395	)
Changes in assets and liabilities
Receivables		908			(696	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		302,450			141,705
Prepaid expenses		-
Net cash used in operating activities		(145,719	)		(433,283	)
Capitalization of software cost		(45,229	)		24,335
Net cash provided by investing activities		(45,229	)		24,335
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Contributed capital		-			35,277
Proceeds on loans payable		11,500			31,200
Payments on loans payable		(15,212	)		(125,922	)
Proceeds from convertible notes payable		204,818			468,550
Payments on convertible notes payable		-			(61,287	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		201,106			347,818
Net increase in cash		10,158			(61,130	)
Cash, beginning of period		-			61,130
Cash, end of period	$	10,158		$	-
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-
Cash paid for tax	$	-		$	-
Non-Cash investing and financing transactions
Conversion of debt for common stock	$	109,571		$	-
Conversion of convertible notes payable	$	922,018		$	-
Settlement of derivative liability	$	1,271,691		$	-

F-5

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND GOING CONCERN

The Company

Textmunication Holdings, Inc. (Company) was incorporated on May 13, 2010 under the laws of the State of California. Textmunication is an online mobile marketing platform service that will connect merchants with their customers and allow them to drive loyalty and repeat business in a non-intrusive, value added medium. For merchants we provide a mobile marketing platform where they can always send the most up-to-date offers/discounts/alerts/events schedule, such as happy hours, trivia night, and other campaigns. The consumer can also access specials and promotions that merchants choose to distribute through Textmunication by opting in to keywords designated to the merchant’s keywords.

On November 16, 2013, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (SEA) with Textmunication Holdings (Holdings). a Nevada corporation, whereby the sole shareholder of the Company received 65,640 (post split) new shares of common stock of Holdings in exchange for 100% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares.

Basis of Presentation

Our financial statements are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, as reported on our fiscal years ending on December 31, 2017 and 2016. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Textmunication Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Textmunication, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We have summarized our most significant accounting policies.

Going concern

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has incurred continuing operating losses and had an accumulated deficit of $15,150,240. The company’s ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon the successful completion of additional financing arrangements and its ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations. While the Company is expanding its best efforts to achieve the above plans, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds that will be available for operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the issuance of these financial statements. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Cash

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. At December 31, 2017 and 2016 no cash balances exceeded the federally insured limit.

F-6

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect. The Company generally does not require collateral to support customer receivables. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon a review of the outstanding accounts receivable, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. As of December 31, 2017, and 2016 the allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 and bad debt expense of $0 and $0, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification, or (“ASC”), 605, Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the service has been provided to the customer; (3) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) the collection of our fees is reasonably assured.

Thus, we recognize subscription revenue on a monthly basis, as services are provided. Customers are billed for the subscription on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual or annual basis, at the customer’s option.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reflected in the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate the respective fair values due to the short maturities of these items.

As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, fair value is measured based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that is observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

The fair value of the accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable are considered short term in nature and therefore their value is considered fair value.

F-7

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivative Financial Instruments	$	—	$	—	$	319,041	$	319,041

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2016:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivative Financial Instruments	$	—	$	—	$	857,795	$	857,795

Net income (loss) per Common Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Fully diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. Expenditures for renewals or betterments are capitalized, and repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred the cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss thereon is reflected in operations.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized. Because the Company has no net income, the tax benefit of the accumulated net loss has been fully offset by an equal valuation allowance. The Company recognizes uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions are included in Other expense. There were no uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2016 and 2017.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-8

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

The Company follows ASC Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods and Services,” for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees. In accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

Software Development Costs

The Company applies the principles of FASB ASC 985-20, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed (“ASC 985-20”). ASC 985-20 requires that software development costs incurred in conjunction with product development be charged to research and development expense until technological feasibility is established. Thereafter, until the product is released for sale, software development costs must be capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value of the related product.

The Company also applies the principles of FASB ASC 350-40, Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (“ASC 350-40”). ASC 350-40 requires that software development costs incurred before the preliminary project stage be expensed as incurred. We capitalize development costs related to these software applications once the preliminary project stage is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed, and the software will be used to perform the function intended.

For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company capitalized software development costs in the amount of $45,229 and $0 respectively.

Advertising Expenses

Advertising expenses are included in General and administrative expenses in the Statements of Operations and are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $26,389 and $4,598 in advertising expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectivly.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). ASU 2016-08 clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations and includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customers. ASU 2016-08 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09.

F-9

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The amendments in ASU 2016-10 clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. ASU 2016-10 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts from Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, which is not yet effective. The core principle of the guidance in Topic 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in ASU 2016-12 do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606, but instead affect only the narrow aspects noted in Topic 606. ASU 2016-12 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The Company will adopt the provisions of Topic 606 effective in January 1, 2018 and does not believe the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments including requirements to measure most equity investments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, to perform a qualitative assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, and to separately present financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and by type of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. ASU 2016-01 will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018 and will be applied by means of a cumulative effect adjustment to the balance sheet, except for effects related to equity securities without readily determinable values, which will be applied prospectively. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires an entity to recognize long-term lease arrangements as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet of the lessee. Under ASU 2016-02, a right-of-use asset and lease obligation will be recorded for all long-term leases, whether operating or financing, while the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization/interest expense for financing leases. The amendments also require certain new quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2019. Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not believe the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging: Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships, which clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument would not, in and of itself, be considered a termination of the derivative instrument, provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. ASU 2016-05 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. Management evaluated ASU 2016-05 and determined that the adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments, which aims to reduce the diversity of practice in identifying embedded derivatives in debt instruments. ASU 2016-06 clarifies that the nature of an exercise contingency is not subject to the “clearly and closely” criteria for purposes of assessing whether the call or put option must be separated from the debt instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative. ASU 2016-06 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Management evaluated ASU 2016-06 and determined that the adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

F-10

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting and presentation of share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for related income taxes consequences and certain classifications within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Management evaluated the impact of adopting ASU 2016-09 and determined that the new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”, requiring that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective approach which requires application of the guidance for all periods presented. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in this Update provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The amendments in Part II of this Update recharacterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period.

F-11

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

NOTE 3 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Loans due to related parties are due on demand and have no interest. Amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $11,750 and $11,750, respectively

Note 4 – LOANS PAYABLE

As of December 31, 2017, and 201, the Company has short term loans payable of $0 and $3,712, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company received proceeds of $11,500 and $31,200 and made payments of $15,212 and $125,923 respectively from certain short-term loans payable with interest rates ranging from 20%-94%. Interest recorded on the notes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1,042 and $25,515, respectively.

NOTE 5 - CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLE

Convertible notes payable consists of the following:

	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Total convertible notes payable		214,764			637,059
Less discounts		(42,534	)		(101,595	)
Convertible notes, net of discount	$	172,230		$	535,464

On February 28, 2017, we entered into a convertible promissory note pursuant to which we borrowed $14,489. Interest under the convertible promissory note is 10% per annum, and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest is due on August 27, 2017. The note is convertible at any date after the issuance date at noteholders option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price of 50% of the two lowest day market price of our common stock during the previous 20 days immediately preceding the conversion date.

On May 15, 2017, we entered into a convertible promissory note pursuant to which we borrowed $115,000. Interest under the convertible promissory note is 10% per annum, and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest is due on May 15, 2018. The note is convertible at any date after the issuance date at noteholders option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price of 64% of the lowest VWAP of our common stock during the previous 18 days immediately preceding the conversion date. The Company recorded a debt discount in the amount of $115,000 in connection with the initial valuation of the derivative liability of the note to be amortized utilizing the effective interest method of accretion over the term of the note. Further, the Company recognized a derivative liability of $166,621 and an initial loss of $51,621 based on the Black Scholes Merton pricing model.

Interest expense (excluding amortization of debt discount) related to the convertible notes payable as of the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $96,993 and $143,093, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 711,291 shares of common stock (post-split) for the partial conversion of $215,076 in convertible notes payable. The converted portion of the notes also had associated derivative liabilities with fair values on the date of conversion of $1,271,691. The conversion of the derivative liabilities has been recorded through additional paid-in capital.

F-12

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

The following table presents details of the changes in the Company’s derivative liabilities associated with its convertible notes for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Amount
Balance December 31, 2015	$	551,646
Debt discount originated from derivative liabilities		501,750
Initial loss recorded		1,563,080
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt conversion		(1,573,237	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		(185,444	)

Balance December 31, 2016	$	857,795
Debt discount originated from derivative liabilities		129,489
Reclassification of derivative liability to paid-in capital due to debt conversion		(1,271,691	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		850,753
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt settlement		(247,305	)
Balance December 31, 2017	$	319,041

The Company accounts for the fair value of the conversion features of its convertible debt in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging; Embedded Derivatives” (“Topic No. 815-15”). Topic No. 815-15 requires the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion features as an embedded derivative contained in the Company’s convertible debt. The Company is required to carry the embedded derivative on its balance sheet at fair value and account for’ any unrealized change in fair value as a component of results of operations. The Company values the embedded derivatives using the Black-Scholes pricing model.

The Black-Scholes model utilized the following inputs to value the derivative liability at the date of issuance of the convertible note and at December 31, 2017:

Fair value assumptions – derivative notes:	December 31, 2017
Risk free interest rate		0.40-1.28	%
Expected term (years)		0.01-0.159
Expected volatility		289-377	%
Expected dividends		0	%

Settlement Agreements

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a certain settlement agreement with the holder of a certain note payable in the amount of $128,000 issued on September 8, 2015 for total proceeds of $121,755. The Company paid $21,755 cash and $100,000 of the note was purchased and assigned to a new noteholder. The difference between the original note and settlement amount of $6,245 has been recorded as a gain on settlement of notes payable as of December 31, 2017. Additionally, the new note holder agreed to forgive $50,000 of the assigned debt. The forgiven debt was recorded a gain on settlement of notes payable.

On June 23, 2017, the Company entered into a certain settlement agreement with the holder of a certain note payable in the amount of $237,750 issued on July 22, 2016 and a carrying amount as of the date of settlement of $249,421 including accrued interest and an associated derivative liability of $247,305 for 550,000 shares of common stock(post-split) with a fair value on the date of settlement of $495,000. The difference between the note and settlement amount of $1,726 has been recorded as a gain on settlement of notes payable.

F-13

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

During the year ended December 31, 2017, certain notes payable issued on February 13, 2014 and October 21, 2014 was forgiven by the noteholder. The carrying value of the notes payable and accrued interest of $32,375 was recorded a gain on settlement of notes payable.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, a note payable issued on April 17, 2014 was forgiven. The carrying value of the note payable of $5,000 was recorded a gain on settlement of notes payable as of December 31, 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 70,000 shares of common stock (post-split) valued at $49,000 in settlement of a note payable issued on August 15, 2016. The carrying value of the note payable was $4,813 and difference between the fair value of the shares and note of $44,187 was recorded a loss on settlement of notes payable as of December 31, 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 100,335 shares of common stock (post-split) valued at $82,500 in partial settlement of a note payable issued on May 15, 2017. The carrying value of the settled balance of note payable was $16,503 and difference between the fair value of the shares and note of $13,598 was recorded a loss on settlement of notes payable as of December 31, 2017.

NOTE 6 – INVESTMENT IN ASPIRE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC

On January 5, 2016, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with Aspire Consulting Group, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company and certain members of Aspire. Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Company agreed to acquire 49% of all of the issued and outstanding membership units of Aspire in exchange for the issuance of 66,667 shares of the Company’s newly created Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to the Members valued at $460,002.

The Company has concluded that it has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over an Aspire through its acquired 49% equity interest and therefore has accounted for the acquisition of the interest under the equity method.

The following table presents details of the Company’s investment is Aspire as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	Amount
Balance December 31, 2015	$	-
Fair value of shares issued for ownership 49% interest in Aspire		460,002
Income from equity method investee		18,395
Distributions received from Aspire		(24,335	)
Balance December 31, 2016	$	454,062
Income from equity method investee		(1,726	)
Balance December 31, 2017	$	452,336

NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Office Lease

On January 6, 2015 the Company signed an amendment to its lease originally signed on May 9, 2008. The amended lease commenced January 1, 2015 and expires on thirty days’ notice. Current month to month lease is for $2,000 a month. Rent expense was approximately $22,908 and $23,972 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

F-14

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

Executive Employment Agreement

The Company has an employment agreement with the CEO/Chairman to perform duties and responsibilities as may be assigned by the Board of Directors. The base salary is in the amount of $100,000 per annum plus an annual discretionary bonus plus benefits commencing on December 17, 2013 and ending May 1, 2017 with an automatic renewal on each anniversary date (May 1) thereafter.

Litigations Claims and Assessments

September 9, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note pursuant to which we borrowed $50,000. Interest under the convertible promissory note was 8% per annum, and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest was due on June 7, 2016. The note was convertible at any time following the issuance date at noteholders option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price of 50% of the lowest day market price of our common stock during the 10 trading days prior the date of the notice of conversion.

On February 27, 2017, the Company and the noteholder reached a settlement agreement. The first payment of $55,000 was to be wired to the noteholder on March 15, 2017. The second and final tranche of $45,000 was due no later than April 1, 2017.

The payments under the settlement agreement were timely made by a third party and the note was assigned to the third party. The Company and the new note holder have agreed to revise the variable conversion price in favor of a fixed $0.000125 per share conversion price.

On March 6, 2017, we hired the law firm Ellsworth Young LLP to vigorously protect us against abusive lending practices. We have several cases pending concerning convertible promissory notes outstanding, including the following.

JSJ Investments, Inc. vs. Textmunication Holdings, Inc.

95th District Court of Dallas County, Texas

Filed on 2/7/2017

Case: DC-17-01404

On May 24, 2017, our company and JSJ Investments Inc. (“JSJ”) entered into a Final Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to execute an amendment to the 12% convertible promissory note, which allowed JSJ to convert the note’s outstanding balance and accrued interest of $53,280.57 into a fixed 262,500 (post split) shares of our common stock.

Auctus Fund vs. Textmunication Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court – District of Massachusetts

Filed on 3/24/2017

Case 1:17-cv-10504

On July 3, 2017, our company and Auctus Fund entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release (the “Settlement Agreement”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, we agreed to issue 550,000 (post split) shares of our common stock with a 5-month Leak-Out Agreement to Auctus Fund.

Textmunication Holdings, Inc. vs. Carebourn Capital.

United States District Court – District of Nevada

Filed on 4/5/2017

Case 2:17-cv-00968-JAD-VCF

On October 3, 2017, our company and Carebourn Capital agreed to settle all the outstanding principal, interest, and penalties owed under the Note for an issuance of an aggregate total of 70,000 (post split) shares of its common stock.

F-15

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

Textmunication vs. Lester Einhaus

Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, NV

Filed on 4/10/2017

Case: A-17-753743-C

This case was dismissed in October 2017.

As of December 31, 2017, all litigation has been resolved except for the following case:

Lester Einhaus vs. Textmunication

United States District Court – Northern District

Filed on 6/14/2017

Case: 1:17-cv-04478

NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the cumulative net operating loss carry-forward from continuing operations is approximately $12,302,086 and will expire beginning in the year 2030.

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 21% and 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	2017			2016
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
Net operating loss carryover	$	2,583,438		$	1,623,745
Valuation allowance		(2,583,438	)		(1,623,745	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

Due to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 2017, the corporate tax rate for those tax years beginning with 2018 has been reduced to 21%.

Note 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company is authorized to issue an aggregate of 4,000,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001. The Company is also authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001, which includes 4,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock (“Series A”), 66,667 shares of Series B preferred stock (“Series B”), and 2,000,000 shares of Series C preferred stock (“Series C”) ...

Under the Certificate of Designation, holders of Series A Preferred Stock will participate on an equal basis per-share with holders of our common stock in any distribution upon winding up, dissolution, or liquidation. Holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with the holders of our common stock on all matters submitted to shareholders at a rate of three hundred (300) votes for each share held.

On January 5, 2016, pursuant to Article III of our Articles of Incorporation, the Company’s Board of Directors voted to designate a class of preferred stock entitled Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, consisting of up 66,667 shares, par value $0.0001. Under the Certificate of Designation, holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock participate on an equal basis per-share with holders of the Company’s common stock and Series A Preferred Stock in any distribution upon winding up, dissolution, or liquidation. Holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are not entitled to voting rights.

F-16

TEXTMUNICATION HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

(AUDITED)

On May 9, 2017, the Board of Directors voted to designate a class of preferred stock entitled Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, consisting of up to 2,000,000 shares, par value $0.0001. Under the Certificate of Designation, holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will participate on an equal basis per-share with holders of common stock, Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock in any distribution upon winding up, dissolution, or liquidation. Holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with the holders of our common stock on all matters submitted to shareholders at a rate of 875 votes for each share held. Holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to convert each share held for 875 shares of common stock.

On February 16, 2017, the Company issued a total of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock (post-split) to our officer and director, Wais Asefi, as compensation for services rendered. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the officer exchanged the common shares for 2,000,000 shares of newly designated Series C Preferred stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 1,608,877 shares of common stock (post-split) for the partial conversion and settlements of $765,217. The converted portion of the notes also had associated derivative liabilities with fair values on the date of conversion of $1,271,691. The conversion of the derivative liabilities has been recorded through additional paid-in capital.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 299,397 shares of common stock (post-split) valued at $109,571 for the settlement of debt related to a 3a10 settlement.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 77,500 shares of common stock (post-split) for services valued at $115,100.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 141,260 (post split) shares of common stock with a fair value of $635,299 for the conversion of convertible notes payable. The converted portion of the notes also had associated derivative liabilities with fair values on the date of conversion of $1,573,238. The conversion of the derivative liabilities has been recorded through additional paid-in capital.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 8,000 (post split) shares of common stock valued at $478,700 for services.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s CEO returned and the Company retired 59,400 (post split) shares of common stock.

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to year the Company’s Board of Directors approved a one to one thousand (1:1000) reverse stock split. The Company financial statements have been retroactively restated to the reflect the effect of the stock split.

Subsequent to year end the Company, the Company entered into agreement to cancel a certain 10% note payable issued on September 22, 2015 in the amount of $15,000.

Subsequent to year end the Company, the Company entered into agreement to cancel a certain 8% note payable issued on September 8, 2015 in the amount of $31,126.

Subsequent to year end, the Company issued 892,882 shares of common stock (post-split) for the settlement of debt related to a 3a10 settlement.

Subsequent to year end, the Company issued 518,600 shares of common stock (post-split) for the settlement of notes payable.

F-17

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On May 15, 2018, we dismissed GBH CPAs, PC (the “Former Accountant”) as our independent registered public accounting firm and we engaged Boyle CPA, LLC (the “New Accountant”) as our independent registered public accounting firm. The engagement of the New Accountant was approved by our Board of Directors. For more information on the change in accountants, please see our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 21, 2018.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, being December 31, 2017. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon that evaluation, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financing Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. Our management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which are indicative of many small companies with small staff: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.

We plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal control over financial reporting. During the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we hope to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending December 31, 2018: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting. The remediation efforts set out in (i) and (ii) are largely dependent upon our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for non-accelerated filers set forth in Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

18

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following table sets forth the name and positions of our executive officer and director as of the date hereof.

Name	Age	Positions
Wais Asefi	47	President, CEO and Director
David Thielen	54	Chief Operating Officer
Nick Miniello	39	Vice President of Sales

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our executive officer and director:

Wais Asefi

Wais Asefi has served as our President, CEO and Director since November 17, 2013. He served as the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Textmunication, Inc., our subsidiary, since March of 2009 to the present. From August 2008 to March 2009, he was not employed. From January 2002 until July 2008, he was the founder and CEO of Metro General Insurance, an insurance agency focusing on personal lines, life and commercial insurance products.

Mr. Asefi’s background and experience in the mobile marketing business support his service as a director of our company.

Mr. Asefi does not hold and has not held over the past five years any other directorships in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

David Thielen

David Thielen was named as COO of our company on March 1, 2017, and may be considered significant in that he is also the CEO of Apsire, a company that we have a minority interest in. His contributions to the success of Aspire is directly tied to our financial success as a shareholder of Aspire.

Mr. Thielen brings more than thirty-years of executive leadership, strategic management and progressive sales experience in IT Services and Healthcare.

Mr. Thielen worked for global Healthcare surgical manufacture, DeRoyal, for more than twenty years in sales leadership positions as Regional Manager and Area Vice President. Following his career with DeRoyal, he started a successful IT Services company. While in the Washington, D.C. market, he worked in Human Capital Management with Randstad Technologies, Alltech and ICS Nett.

Mr. Thielen formed Aspire with his business partner in late 2014. Aspire is a Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) providing cutting-edge project-based solutions for both commercial and federal clients.

He will continue operating as CEO of Aspire while managing the partner relationships, sales channel and daily operations for our company. In his dual role, Mr. Thielen will continue to leverage his vast network of clients increasing partnership opportunities in Technology and Healthcare services. Mr. Thielen is a graduate of Iowa State University.

Mr. Thielen does not hold and has not held over the past five years any other directorships in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Nick Miniello

Mr. Miniello has been with our company in sales, but was named VP of Sales on January 1, 2017. His sales leadership began in 2000 within the mobile wireless industry as a Regional Manager for AT&T. As Regional Manager, Mr. Miniello earned “Top Regional Manager” for two consecutive years.

After six years with AT&T, he shifted to the fitness industry managing ‘24 Hour Fitness’ clubs for three years taking over a struggling location. His turnaround efforts earned him the “most improved” location award in the San Francisco market.

Following nine years in the mobile and fitness space, he co-founded our company in 2009 with the goal of becoming the leading SMS provider in the health and fitness industry. Mr. Miniello’s background consists of 17 years of sales and leadership experience. He has his AA degree from Los Medanos College in the San Francisco Bay area.

19

Mr. Miniello does not hold and has not held over the past five years any other directorships in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Term of Office

Our directors are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of the shareholders and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. Our executive officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by our board of directors or until their successors are appointed.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the past 10 years, none of our current directors, nominees for directors or current executive officers has been involved in any legal proceeding identified in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K, including:

1. Any petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he or she was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he or she was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

2. Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being named a subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3. Being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him or her from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

i. Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

ii. Engaging in any type of business practice; or

iii. Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

4. Being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any type of business regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, securities, investment, insurance or banking activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

5. Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

6. Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

20

7. Being subject to, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

i. Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

ii. Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

iii. Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

8. Being subject to, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Audit Committee

We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the board of directors when performing the functions of that would generally be performed by an audit committee. The board of directors approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the board of directors reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.

We do not have an audit committee financial expert because of the size of our company and our board of directors at this time. We believe that we do not require an audit committee financial expert at this time because we retain outside consultants who possess these attributes as needed.

For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, the board of directors:

1.	Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and
2.	Reviewed and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from our independent auditors on the matters relating to the auditor’s independence.

Based upon the board of directors’ review and discussion of the matters above, the board of directors authorized inclusion of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 to be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the best of our knowledge based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments thereof) received by us during or with respect to the year ended December 31, 2017, the following persons have failed to file, on a timely basis, the identified reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:

Name and principal position	Number of late reports		Transactions not timely reported		Known failures to file a required form
Wais Asefi CEO, CFO & Director		0		0		0
Rajan Natarajan Director		0		0		0
David Thielen COO		0		0		0
Nick Miniello		0		0		0

21

Code of Ethics

As of December 31, 2017, we had not adopted a Code of Ethics. We feel that the small size of our board and management did not warrant the adoption of a Code of Ethics.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our former or current executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Name and principal position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		All Other Compensation ($) (1)(2)		Total ($)
Wais Asefi		2017		120,000		-		6,000,000		-		-		6,120,000
CEO, Director		2016		110,000		2,000		-		-		-		112,000
David Thielen		2017		60,000		-		-		-		-		60,000
COO		2016		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Nick Miniello		2017		72,000		-		-		-		-		72,000
SVP of Sales		2016		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table

Mr. Asefi was appointed as our President, CEO and director on November 17, 2013. Mr. Asefi was paid $40,000 in 2012 and $60,000 in 2013 by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Textmunication, Inc. He signed an employment agreement on December 17, 2013 with Textmunication, Inc. to serve as CEO and Chairman and will receive an annual salary of $120,000 and is eligible for bonuses as determined by the Board, and other benefits, such as paid vacation, retirement benefits and life insurance as established by the company. Under the agreement, he also received an $800 per month allowance for an automobile for personal and professional use. In addition, Mr. Asefi agreed not to compete with our business for 3 years and not to solicit employees or customers of our company for a period of twelve months. The agreement has a term until May 1, 2017 but automatically renews for an additional year unless either party provides a notice of termination 90 days prior to scheduled termination. There are provisions that provide for termination for cause and resignation for good reason. We will be required to pay Mr. Asefi severance as provided under the agreement.

We have no other employment agreements with our executive officers.

On March 1, 2017, we appointed David Thielen as of Chief Operating Officer. We have an employment agreement with Mr. Thielen. He is CEO of Aspire in which we own a 49% equity interest. We pay Mr. Thielen an annual salary of $60,000.

On January 1, 2017, we appointed Nick Miniello as Vice President of Sales. We have an employment agreement with Mr. Miniello. He has not had any material interest in our company in the last two fiscal years. We pay him an annual salary of $72,000.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

As at December 31, 2017 we did not have any outstanding equity awards.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of June 14, 2018, certain information as to shares of our common stock owned by (i) each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our directors, and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise stated, the address for each beneficial owner is at 1940 Contra Costa Blvd. Pleasant Hill, CA 94523.

22

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Common Stock						Series A Preferred Stock					Series C Preferred Stock
	Number of Shares Owned			Percent of Class(2)(3)			Number of Shares Owned		Percent of Class(2)(3)			Number of Shares Owned		Percent of Class(2)(3)
Wais Asefi		2,004,000,000	(1)		50	%		4,000,000		100	%		2,000,000		100	%
David Thielen		-			-			-		-			-		-
Nick Miniello		-			-			-		-			-		-
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (3 persons)		2,004,000,000	(1)		50	%		4,000,000		100	%		2,000,000		100	%
5% Holders
NONE

(1)	Includes 250,000,000 shares of common stock, 4,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock that may convert into 4,000,000 shares of common stock, and 2,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock that may convert into 1,750,000,000 shares of common stock.
(2)	Pursuant to Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which a shareholder has sole or shared voting power or investment power, and also any shares which the shareholder has the right to acquire within 60 days, including upon exercise of common shares purchase options or warrants.
(3)	The percent of class is based on 3,975,519,454 shares of common stock outstanding, 4,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding and 1,750,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding as of June 14, 2018.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Aside from that which is disclosed in “Executive Compensation,” none of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction for the last two fiscal years or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Below is the table of Audit Fees (amounts in US$) billed by our auditor in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended:

Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31	Audit Services		Audit Related Fees		Tax Fees		Other Fees
2016	$	32,000	$	0	$	0	$	0
2017	$	23,000	$	0	$	0	$	0

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules

(a) Financial Statements and Schedules

The following financial statements and schedules listed below are included in this Form 10-K.

Financial Statements (See Item 8)

(b) Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended (1)
3.2	Bylaws, as amended (1)
3.3	Certificate of Change(1)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

¹ Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on June 6, 2014.

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Textmunication Holdings, Inc.
By:	/s/ Wais Asefi
	Wais Asefi President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
	June 20, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:	/s/ Wais Asefi
	Wais Asefi
	President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
	June 20, 2018

24

EX-31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Wais Asefit, certify that;

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of Textmunication Holdings, Inc. (the “registrant”);
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 20, 2018  

	/s/ Wais Asefi
By:	Wais Asefi
Title:	Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Wais Asefi, certify that;

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of Textmunication Holdings, Inc. (the “registrant”);
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 20, 2018  

	/s/ Wais Asefi
By:	Wais Asefi
Title:	Chief Executive Officer

EX-32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Textmunication Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wais Asefit, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

By:	/s/ Wais Asefi
Name:	Wais Asefi
Title:	Chief Executive Officer
Date:	June 20, 2018

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

XML

Document and Entity Information - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017	Jun. 14, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Textmunication Holdings, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0000897078
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2017
Amendment Flag	false
Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity a Voluntary Filer	No
Entity's Reporting Status Current	No
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Public Float			$ 49,983
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		3,975,519,454
Trading Symbol	TXHD
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2017

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 10,158
Receivables	2,849	3,757
Total current assets	13,007	3,757
Fixed assets, net		305
Software	45,229
Investment in equity method investee	452,336	454,062
Total assets	510,572	458,124
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	480,719	291,731
Due to related parties	11,750	11,750
Loans payable		3,712
Convertible notes payable, net of discount	172,230	535,464
Derivative liability	319,041	857,795
Total current liabilities	983,740	1,700,452
Total liabilities	983,740	1,700,452
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, 5,933,333 shares authorized, $0.0001 par value, 4,000,000 issued and outstanding	400	400
Common stock; $0.0001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 2,435,179 and 199,403 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.	244	20
Additional paid-in capital	14,676,221	6,258,265
Accumulated deficit	(15,150,240)	(7,501,020)
Total stockholders' deficit	(473,168)	(1,242,328)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	510,572	458,124
Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, 5,933,333 shares authorized, $0.0001 par value, 4,000,000 issued and outstanding	7	7
Series C Preferred Stock [Member]
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, 5,933,333 shares authorized, $0.0001 par value, 4,000,000 issued and outstanding	$ 200

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,933,333	5,933,333
Preferred stock, shares issued	4,000,000	4,000,000
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	4,000,000	4,000,000
Common stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common stock, shares authorized	250,000,000	250,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	2,435,179	199,403
Common stock, shares outstanding	2,435,179	199,403
Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	66,667	66,667
Preferred stock, shares issued	66,667	66,667
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	66,667	66,667
Series C Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	2,000,000	2,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	2,000,000	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	2,000,000	0

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Income Statement [Abstract]
Sales	$ 943,739	$ 458,271
Cost of revenues	317,336	103,085
Gross profit	626,403	355,186
Operating expenses
Officer Compensation	6,345,166	81,846
General and administrative expenses	829,997	1,183,964
Total operating expenses	7,175,163	1,265,810
Loss from operations	(6,548,760)	(910,624)
Other expense
Interest expense	(96,993)	(143,093)
Loss on change of derivative liability	(850,753)	(1,377,637)
Amortization of debt discount	(188,549)	(610,951)
Gain (loss) on settlement of notes payable	37,561	(300,016)
Total other expense	(1,098,734)	(2,431,697)
Income (loss) from investment in equity method investee	(1,726)	18,395
Net income (loss)	$ (7,649,220)	$ (3,323,926)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	1,794,897	132,006
Net loss per common share: basic and diluted	$ (4.26)	$ (25.18)

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit - USD ($)	Preferred Stock [Member]	Preferred Stock - Series B [Member]	Preferred Stock - Series C [Member]	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Accumulated Deficit [Member]	Total
Balance at Dec. 31, 2015	$ 400			$ 11	$ 3,075,765	$ (4,177,094)	$ (1,100,918)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2015	4,000,000			109,543
Preferred stock issued for investment in Aspire		$ 7			459,995		460,002
Preferred stock issued for investment in Aspire, shares		66,667
Settlement of derivative liability					1,573,238		1,573,238
Contributed capital					35,277		35,277
Stock issued to settle notes payable				$ 14	635,285		635,299
Stock issued to settle notes payable, shares				14,260
Stock issued for services				$ 1	478,699		$ 478,700
Stock issued for services, shares				8,000			8,000
Shares returned for services				$ (6)	6
Shares returned for services, shares				(59,400)
Net loss						(3,323,926)	(3,323,926)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2016	$ 400	$ 7		$ 20	6,258,265	(7,501,020)	(1,242,328)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2016	4,000,000	66,667		199,403
Settlement of derivative liability					1,271,691		1,271,691
Contributed capital
Stock issued to settle notes payable				$ 161	921,857		922,018
Stock issued to settle notes payable, shares				1,608,879
Stock issued for services				$ 208	6,114,892		6,115,100
Stock issued for services, shares				2,077,500
Stock issued to settle debt				$ 30	109,541		109,571
Stock issued to settle debt, shares				299,397
Conversion of common stock to preferred			$ 200	$ (175)	(25)
Conversion of common stock to preferred, shares			2,000,000	(1,750,000)
Net loss						(7,649,220)	(7,649,220)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2017	$ 400	$ 7	$ 200	$ 244	$ 14,676,221	$ (15,150,240)	$ (473,168)
Balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2017	4,000,000	66,667	2,000,000	2,435,179

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss	$ (7,649,220)	$ (3,323,926)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of debt discount	188,549	610,951
Loss on derivative liability	850,753	1,377,637
Non cash interest expense	81,272
Depreciation	304	725
Share based compensation	6,115,100	478,700
Loss on the settlement of debt	(37,561)	300,016
Income from equity method investee	1,726	(18,395)
Changes in assets and liabilities
Receivables	908	(696)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	302,450	141,705
Prepaid expenses
Net cash used in operating activities	(145,719)	(433,283)
Capitalization of software cost	(45,229)	24,335
Net cash provided by investing activities	(45,229)	24,335
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Contributed capital		35,277
Proceeds on loans payable	11,500	31,200
Payments on loans payable	(15,212)	(125,922)
Proceeds from convertible notes payable	204,818	468,550
Payments on convertible notes payable		(61,287)
Net cash provided by financing activities	201,106	347,818
Net increase in cash	10,158	(61,130)
Cash, beginning of period		61,130
Cash, end of period	10,158
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for tax
Non-Cash investing and financing transactions
Conversion of debt for common stock	109,571
Conversion of convertible notes payable	922,018
Settlement of derivative liability	$ 1,271,691

XML

Basis of Presentation and Going Concern

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation and Going Concern

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND GOING CONCERN

The Company

Textmunication Holdings, Inc. (Company) was incorporated on May 13, 2010 under the laws of the State of California. Textmunication is an online mobile marketing platform service that will connect merchants with their customers and allow them to drive loyalty and repeat business in a non-intrusive, value added medium. For merchants we provide a mobile marketing platform where they can always send the most up-to-date offers/discounts/alerts/events schedule, such as happy hours, trivia night, and other campaigns. The consumer can also access specials and promotions that merchants choose to distribute through Textmunication by opting in to keywords designated to the merchant’s keywords.

On November 16, 2013, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (SEA) with Textmunication Holdings (Holdings). a Nevada corporation, whereby the sole shareholder of the Company received 65,640 (post split) new shares of common stock of Holdings in exchange for 100% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares.

Basis of Presentation

Our financial statements are presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, as reported on our fiscal years ending on December 31, 2017 and 2016. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Textmunication Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Textmunication, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We have summarized our most significant accounting policies.

Going concern

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has incurred continuing operating losses and had an accumulated deficit of $15,150,240. The company’s ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon the successful completion of additional financing arrangements and its ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations. While the Company is expanding its best efforts to achieve the above plans, there is no assurance that any such activity will generate funds that will be available for operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the issuance of these financial statements. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Cash

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. At December 31, 2017 and 2016 no cash balances exceeded the federally insured limit.

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect. The Company generally does not require collateral to support customer receivables. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon a review of the outstanding accounts receivable, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. As of December 31, 2017, and 2016 the allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 and bad debt expense of $0 and $0, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification, or (“ASC”), 605, Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the service has been provided to the customer; (3) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) the collection of our fees is reasonably assured.

Thus, we recognize subscription revenue on a monthly basis, as services are provided. Customers are billed for the subscription on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual or annual basis, at the customer’s option.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reflected in the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate the respective fair values due to the short maturities of these items.

As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, fair value is measured based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that is observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

The fair value of the accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable are considered short term in nature and therefore their value is considered fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivative Financial Instruments	$	—	$	—	$	319,041	$	319,041

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2016:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivative Financial Instruments	$	—	$	—	$	857,795	$	857,795

Net income (loss) per Common Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Fully diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. Expenditures for renewals or betterments are capitalized, and repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred the cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss thereon is reflected in operations.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized. Because the Company has no net income, the tax benefit of the accumulated net loss has been fully offset by an equal valuation allowance. The Company recognizes uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions are included in Other expense. There were no uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2016 and 2017.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

The Company follows ASC Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods and Services,” for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees. In accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

Software Development Costs

The Company applies the principles of FASB ASC 985-20, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed (“ASC 985-20”). ASC 985-20 requires that software development costs incurred in conjunction with product development be charged to research and development expense until technological feasibility is established. Thereafter, until the product is released for sale, software development costs must be capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value of the related product.

The Company also applies the principles of FASB ASC 350-40, Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (“ASC 350-40”). ASC 350-40 requires that software development costs incurred before the preliminary project stage be expensed as incurred. We capitalize development costs related to these software applications once the preliminary project stage is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed, and the software will be used to perform the function intended.

For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company capitalized software development costs in the amount of $45,229 and $0 respectively.

Advertising Expenses

Advertising expenses are included in General and administrative expenses in the Statements of Operations and are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $26,389 and $4,598 in advertising expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). ASU 2016-08 clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations and includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customers. ASU 2016-08 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The amendments in ASU 2016-10 clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. ASU 2016-10 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts from Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, which is not yet effective. The core principle of the guidance in Topic 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in ASU 2016-12 do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606, but instead affect only the narrow aspects noted in Topic 606. ASU 2016-12 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The Company will adopt the provisions of Topic 606 effective in January 1, 2018 and does not believe the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments including requirements to measure most equity investments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, to perform a qualitative assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, and to separately present financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and by type of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. ASU 2016-01 will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018 and will be applied by means of a cumulative effect adjustment to the balance sheet, except for effects related to equity securities without readily determinable values, which will be applied prospectively. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires an entity to recognize long-term lease arrangements as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet of the lessee. Under ASU 2016-02, a right-of-use asset and lease obligation will be recorded for all long-term leases, whether operating or financing, while the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization/interest expense for financing leases. The amendments also require certain new quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2019. Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not believe the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging: Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships, which clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument would not, in and of itself, be considered a termination of the derivative instrument, provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. ASU 2016-05 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. Management evaluated ASU 2016-05 and determined that the adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments, which aims to reduce the diversity of practice in identifying embedded derivatives in debt instruments. ASU 2016-06 clarifies that the nature of an exercise contingency is not subject to the “clearly and closely” criteria for purposes of assessing whether the call or put option must be separated from the debt instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative. ASU 2016-06 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Management evaluated ASU 2016-06 and determined that the adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting and presentation of share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for related income taxes consequences and certain classifications within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Management evaluated the impact of adopting ASU 2016-09 and determined that the new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”, requiring that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective approach which requires application of the guidance for all periods presented. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in this Update provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The amendments in Part II of this Update recharacterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period.

XML

Related Party Transactions

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions

NOTE 3 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Loans due to related parties are due on demand and have no interest. Amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $11,750 and $11,750, respectively

XML

Loans Payable

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Payables and Accruals [Abstract]

Loans Payable

Note 4 – LOANS PAYABLE

As of December 31, 2017, and 201, the Company has short term loans payable of $0 and $3,712, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company received proceeds of $11,500 and $31,200 and made payments of $15,212 and $125,923 respectively from certain short-term loans payable with interest rates ranging from 20%-94%. Interest recorded on the notes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1,042 and $25,515, respectively.

XML

Convertible Note Payable

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Convertible Note Payable

NOTE 5 - CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLE

Convertible notes payable consists of the following:

	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Total convertible notes payable		214,764			637,059
Less discounts		(42,534	)		(101,595	)
Convertible notes, net of discount	$	172,230		$	535,464

On February 28, 2017, we entered into a convertible promissory note pursuant to which we borrowed $14,489. Interest under the convertible promissory note is 10% per annum, and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest is due on August 27, 2017. The note is convertible at any date after the issuance date at noteholders option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price of 50% of the two lowest day market price of our common stock during the previous 20 days immediately preceding the conversion date.

On May 15, 2017, we entered into a convertible promissory note pursuant to which we borrowed $115,000. Interest under the convertible promissory note is 10% per annum, and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest is due on May 15, 2018. The note is convertible at any date after the issuance date at noteholders option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price of 64% of the lowest VWAP of our common stock during the previous 18 days immediately preceding the conversion date. The Company recorded a debt discount in the amount of $115,000 in connection with the initial valuation of the derivative liability of the note to be amortized utilizing the effective interest method of accretion over the term of the note. Further, the Company recognized a derivative liability of $166,621 and an initial loss of $51,621 based on the Black Scholes Merton pricing model.

Interest expense (excluding amortization of debt discount) related to the convertible notes payable as of the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $96,993 and $143,093, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 711,291 shares of common stock (post-split) for the partial conversion of $215,076 in convertible notes payable. The converted portion of the notes also had associated derivative liabilities with fair values on the date of conversion of $1,271,691. The conversion of the derivative liabilities has been recorded through additional paid-in capital.

The following table presents details of the changes in the Company’s derivative liabilities associated with its convertible notes for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Amount
Balance December 31, 2015	$	551,646
Debt discount originated from derivative liabilities		501,750
Initial loss recorded		1,563,080
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt conversion		(1,573,237	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		(185,444	)

Balance December 31, 2016	$	857,795
Debt discount originated from derivative liabilities		129,489
Reclassification of derivative liability to paid-in capital due to debt conversion		(1,271,691	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		850,753
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt settlement		(247,305	)
Balance December 31, 2017	$	319,041

The Company accounts for the fair value of the conversion features of its convertible debt in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging; Embedded Derivatives” (“Topic No. 815-15”). Topic No. 815-15 requires the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion features as an embedded derivative contained in the Company’s convertible debt. The Company is required to carry the embedded derivative on its balance sheet at fair value and account for’ any unrealized change in fair value as a component of results of operations. The Company values the embedded derivatives using the Black-Scholes pricing model.

The Black-Scholes model utilized the following inputs to value the derivative liability at the date of issuance of the convertible note and at December 31, 2017:

Fair value assumptions – derivative notes:	December 31, 2017
Risk free interest rate		0.40-1.28	%
Expected term (years)		0.01-0.159
Expected volatility		289-377	%
Expected dividends		0	%

Settlement Agreements

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a certain settlement agreement with the holder of a certain note payable in the amount of $128,000 issued on September 8, 2015 for total proceeds of $121,755. The Company paid $21,755 cash and $100,000 of the note was purchased and assigned to a new noteholder. The difference between the original note and settlement amount of $6,245 has been recorded as a gain on settlement of notes payable as of December 31, 2017. Additionally, the new note holder agreed to forgive $50,000 of the assigned debt. The forgiven debt was recorded a gain on settlement of notes payable.

On June 23, 2017, the Company entered into a certain settlement agreement with the holder of a certain note payable in the amount of $237,750 issued on July 22, 2016 and a carrying amount as of the date of settlement of $249,421 including accrued interest and an associated derivative liability of $247,305 for 550,000 shares of common stock(post-split) with a fair value on the date of settlement of $495,000. The difference between the note and settlement amount of $1,726 has been recorded as a gain on settlement of notes payable.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, certain notes payable issued on February 13, 2014 and October 21, 2014 was forgiven by the noteholder. The carrying value of the notes payable and accrued interest of $32,375 was recorded a gain on settlement of notes payable.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, a note payable issued on April 17, 2014 was forgiven. The carrying value of the note payable of $5,000 was recorded a gain on settlement of notes payable as of December 31, 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 70,000 shares of common stock (post-split) valued at $49,000 in settlement of a note payable issued on August 15, 2016. The carrying value of the note payable was $4,813 and difference between the fair value of the shares and note of $44,187 was recorded a loss on settlement of notes payable as of December 31, 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 100,335 shares of common stock (post-split) valued at $82,500 in partial settlement of a note payable issued on May 15, 2017. The carrying value of the settled balance of note payable was $16,503 and difference between the fair value of the shares and note of $13,598 was recorded a loss on settlement of notes payable as of December 31, 2017.

XML

Investment in Aspire Consulting Group, LLC

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Investments Schedule [Abstract]

Investment in Aspire Consulting Group, LLC

NOTE 6 – INVESTMENT IN ASPIRE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC

On January 5, 2016, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with Aspire Consulting Group, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company and certain members of Aspire. Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, the Company agreed to acquire 49% of all of the issued and outstanding membership units of Aspire in exchange for the issuance of 66,667 shares of the Company’s newly created Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to the Members valued at $460,002.

The Company has concluded that it has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over an Aspire through its acquired 49% equity interest and therefore has accounted for the acquisition of the interest under the equity method.

The following table presents details of the Company’s investment is Aspire as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	Amount
Balance December 31, 2015	$	-
Fair value of shares issued for ownership 49% interest in Aspire		460,002
Income from equity method investee		18,395
Distributions received from Aspire		(24,335	)
Balance December 31, 2016	$	454,062
Income from equity method investee		(1,726	)
Balance December 31, 2017	$	452,336

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Office Lease

On January 6, 2015 the Company signed an amendment to its lease originally signed on May 9, 2008. The amended lease commenced January 1, 2015 and expires on thirty days’ notice. Current month to month lease is for $2,000 a month. Rent expense was approximately $22,908 and $23,972 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Executive Employment Agreement

The Company has an employment agreement with the CEO/Chairman to perform duties and responsibilities as may be assigned by the Board of Directors. The base salary is in the amount of $100,000 per annum plus an annual discretionary bonus plus benefits commencing on December 17, 2013 and ending May 1, 2017 with an automatic renewal on each anniversary date (May 1) thereafter.

Litigations Claims and Assessments

September 9, 2015, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note pursuant to which we borrowed $50,000. Interest under the convertible promissory note was 8% per annum, and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest was due on June 7, 2016. The note was convertible at any time following the issuance date at noteholders option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price of 50% of the lowest day market price of our common stock during the 10 trading days prior the date of the notice of conversion.

On February 27, 2017, the Company and the noteholder reached a settlement agreement. The first payment of $55,000 was to be wired to the noteholder on March 15, 2017. The second and final tranche of $45,000 was due no later than April 1, 2017.

The payments under the settlement agreement were timely made by a third party and the note was assigned to the third party. The Company and the new note holder have agreed to revise the variable conversion price in favor of a fixed $0.000125 per share conversion price.

On March 6, 2017, we hired the law firm Ellsworth Young LLP to vigorously protect us against abusive lending practices. We have several cases pending concerning convertible promissory notes outstanding, including the following.

JSJ Investments, Inc. vs. Textmunication Holdings, Inc.

95th District Court of Dallas County, Texas

Filed on 2/7/2017

Case: DC-17-01404

On May 24, 2017, our company and JSJ Investments Inc. (“JSJ”) entered into a Final Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the parties agreed to execute an amendment to the 12% convertible promissory note, which allowed JSJ to convert the note’s outstanding balance and accrued interest of $53,280.57 into a fixed 262,500 (post split) shares of our common stock.

Auctus Fund vs. Textmunication Holdings, Inc.

United States District Court – District of Massachusetts

Filed on 3/24/2017

Case 1:17-cv-10504

On July 3, 2017, our company and Auctus Fund entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release (the “Settlement Agreement”). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, we agreed to issue 550,000 (post split) shares of our common stock with a 5-month Leak-Out Agreement to Auctus Fund.

Textmunication Holdings, Inc. vs. Carebourn Capital.

United States District Court – District of Nevada

Filed on 4/5/2017

Case 2:17-cv-00968-JAD-VCF

On October 3, 2017, our company and Carebourn Capital agreed to settle all the outstanding principal, interest, and penalties owed under the Note for an issuance of an aggregate total of 70,000 (post split) shares of its common stock.

Textmunication vs. Lester Einhaus

Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, NV

Filed on 4/10/2017

Case: A-17-753743-C

This case was dismissed in October 2017.

As of December 31, 2017, all litigation has been resolved except for the following case:

Lester Einhaus vs. Textmunication

United States District Court – Northern District

Filed on 6/14/2017

Case: 1:17-cv-04478

XML

Income Taxes

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Taxes

NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the cumulative net operating loss carry-forward from continuing operations is approximately $12,302,086 and will expire beginning in the year 2030.

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 21% and 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	2017			2016
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
Net operating loss carryover	$	2,583,438		$	1,623,745
Valuation allowance		(2,583,438	)		(1,623,745	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

Due to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 2017, the corporate tax rate for those tax years beginning with 2018 has been reduced to 21%.

XML

Stockholders' Equity

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Equity [Abstract]

Stockholders' Equity

Note 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The Company is authorized to issue an aggregate of 4,000,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.0001. The Company is also authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001, which includes 4,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock (“Series A”), 66,667 shares of Series B preferred stock (“Series B”), and 2,000,000 shares of Series C preferred stock (“Series C”) ...

Under the Certificate of Designation, holders of Series A Preferred Stock will participate on an equal basis per-share with holders of our common stock in any distribution upon winding up, dissolution, or liquidation. Holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with the holders of our common stock on all matters submitted to shareholders at a rate of three hundred (300) votes for each share held.

On January 5, 2016, pursuant to Article III of our Articles of Incorporation, the Company’s Board of Directors voted to designate a class of preferred stock entitled Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, consisting of up 66,667 shares, par value $0.0001. Under the Certificate of Designation, holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock participate on an equal basis per-share with holders of the Company’s common stock and Series A Preferred Stock in any distribution upon winding up, dissolution, or liquidation. Holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are not entitled to voting rights.

On May 9, 2017, the Board of Directors voted to designate a class of preferred stock entitled Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, consisting of up to 2,000,000 shares, par value $0.0001. Under the Certificate of Designation, holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock will participate on an equal basis per-share with holders of common stock, Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock in any distribution upon winding up, dissolution, or liquidation. Holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with the holders of our common stock on all matters submitted to shareholders at a rate of 875 votes for each share held. Holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to convert each share held for 875 shares of common stock.

On February 16, 2017, the Company issued a total of 2,000,000 shares of our common stock (post-split) to our officer and director, Wais Asefi, as compensation for services rendered. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the officer exchanged the common shares for 2,000,000 shares of newly designated Series C Preferred stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 1,608,877 shares of common stock (post-split) for the partial conversion and settlements of $765,217. The converted portion of the notes also had associated derivative liabilities with fair values on the date of conversion of $1,271,691. The conversion of the derivative liabilities has been recorded through additional paid-in capital.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 299,397 shares of common stock (post-split) valued at $109,571 for the settlement of debt related to a 3a10 settlement.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 77,500 shares of common stock (post-split) for services valued at $115,100.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 141,260 (post split) shares of common stock with a fair value of $635,299 for the conversion of convertible notes payable. The converted portion of the notes also had associated derivative liabilities with fair values on the date of conversion of $1,573,238. The conversion of the derivative liabilities has been recorded through additional paid-in capital.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 8,000 (post split) shares of common stock valued at $478,700 for services.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s CEO returned and the Company retired 59,400 (post split) shares of common stock.

XML

Subsequent Events

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to year the Company’s Board of Directors approved a one to one thousand (1:1000) reverse stock split. The Company financial statements have been retroactively restated to the reflect the effect of the stock split.

Subsequent to year end the Company, the Company entered into agreement to cancel a certain 10% note payable issued on September 22, 2015 in the amount of $15,000.

Subsequent to year end the Company, the Company entered into agreement to cancel a certain 8% note payable issued on September 8, 2015 in the amount of $31,126.

Subsequent to year end, the Company issued 892,882 shares of common stock (post-split) for the settlement of debt related to a 3a10 settlement.

Subsequent to year end, the Company issued 518,600 shares of common stock (post-split) for the settlement of notes payable.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Cash

Cash

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. At December 31, 2017 and 2016 no cash balances exceeded the federally insured limit.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

Accounts receivable are stated at the amount management expects to collect. The Company generally does not require collateral to support customer receivables. The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon a review of the outstanding accounts receivable, historical collection information and existing economic conditions. As of December 31, 2017, and 2016 the allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 and bad debt expense of $0 and $0, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification, or (“ASC”), 605, Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the service has been provided to the customer; (3) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) the collection of our fees is reasonably assured.

Thus, we recognize subscription revenue on a monthly basis, as services are provided. Customers are billed for the subscription on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual or annual basis, at the customer’s option.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reflected in the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate the respective fair values due to the short maturities of these items.

As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, fair value is measured based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that is observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

The fair value of the accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable are considered short term in nature and therefore their value is considered fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivative Financial Instruments	$	—	$	—	$	319,041	$	319,041

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2016:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivative Financial Instruments	$	—	$	—	$	857,795	$	857,795

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Net income (loss) per Common Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Fully diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. Expenditures for renewals or betterments are capitalized, and repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred the cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss thereon is reflected in operations.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized. Because the Company has no net income, the tax benefit of the accumulated net loss has been fully offset by an equal valuation allowance. The Company recognizes uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions are included in Other expense. There were no uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2016 and 2017.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

The Company follows ASC Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods and Services,” for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees. In accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

Software Development Costs

Software Development Costs

The Company applies the principles of FASB ASC 985-20, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed (“ASC 985-20”). ASC 985-20 requires that software development costs incurred in conjunction with product development be charged to research and development expense until technological feasibility is established. Thereafter, until the product is released for sale, software development costs must be capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value of the related product.

The Company also applies the principles of FASB ASC 350-40, Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use (“ASC 350-40”). ASC 350-40 requires that software development costs incurred before the preliminary project stage be expensed as incurred. We capitalize development costs related to these software applications once the preliminary project stage is complete and it is probable that the project will be completed, and the software will be used to perform the function intended.

For the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company capitalized software development costs in the amount of $45,229 and $0 respectively.

Advertising Expenses

Advertising Expenses

Advertising expenses are included in General and administrative expenses in the Statements of Operations and are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred $26,389 and $4,598 in advertising expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). ASU 2016-08 clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations and includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customers. ASU 2016-08 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The amendments in ASU 2016-10 clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. ASU 2016-10 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts from Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The amendments in this update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, which is not yet effective. The core principle of the guidance in Topic 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amendments in ASU 2016-12 do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606, but instead affect only the narrow aspects noted in Topic 606. ASU 2016-12 is effective January 1, 2018 to be in alignment with the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The Company will adopt the provisions of Topic 606 effective in January 1, 2018 and does not believe the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments including requirements to measure most equity investments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, to perform a qualitative assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values, and to separately present financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and by type of financial asset on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. ASU 2016-01 will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018 and will be applied by means of a cumulative effect adjustment to the balance sheet, except for effects related to equity securities without readily determinable values, which will be applied prospectively. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires an entity to recognize long-term lease arrangements as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet of the lessee. Under ASU 2016-02, a right-of-use asset and lease obligation will be recorded for all long-term leases, whether operating or financing, while the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization/interest expense for financing leases. The amendments also require certain new quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2019. Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted. Management does not believe the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging: Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships, which clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument would not, in and of itself, be considered a termination of the derivative instrument, provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. ASU 2016-05 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including in an interim period. Management evaluated ASU 2016-05 and determined that the adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments, which aims to reduce the diversity of practice in identifying embedded derivatives in debt instruments. ASU 2016-06 clarifies that the nature of an exercise contingency is not subject to the “clearly and closely” criteria for purposes of assessing whether the call or put option must be separated from the debt instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative. ASU 2016-06 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Management evaluated ASU 2016-06 and determined that the adoption of this new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting and presentation of share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for related income taxes consequences and certain classifications within the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Management evaluated the impact of adopting ASU 2016-09 and determined that the new accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The new standard will require adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case it would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)”, requiring that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the total cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective approach which requires application of the guidance for all periods presented. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in this Update provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. Management has reviewed this pronouncement and has determined that it would not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The amendments in Part II of this Update recharacterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on Recurring Basis

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivative Financial Instruments	$	—	$	—	$	319,041	$	319,041

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below for the year ended December 31, 2016:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Liabilities
Derivative Financial Instruments	$	—	$	—	$	857,795	$	857,795

XML

Convertible Note Payable (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Convertible Note Payable

Convertible notes payable consists of the following:

	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Total convertible notes payable		214,764			637,059
Less discounts		(42,534	)		(101,595	)
Convertible notes, net of discount	$	172,230		$	535,464

Schedule of Derivative Liabilities

The following table presents details of the changes in the Company’s derivative liabilities associated with its convertible notes for the year ended December 31, 2017:

	Amount
Balance December 31, 2015	$	551,646
Debt discount originated from derivative liabilities		501,750
Initial loss recorded		1,563,080
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt conversion		(1,573,237	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		(185,444	)

Balance December 31, 2016	$	857,795
Debt discount originated from derivative liabilities		129,489
Reclassification of derivative liability to paid-in capital due to debt conversion		(1,271,691	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		850,753
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt settlement		(247,305	)
Balance December 31, 2017	$	319,041

Schedule of Fair Value Assumption of Derivative Notes

The Black-Scholes model utilized the following inputs to value the derivative liability at the date of issuance of the convertible note and at December 31, 2017:

Fair value assumptions – derivative notes:	December 31, 2017
Risk free interest rate		0.40-1.28	%
Expected term (years)		0.01-0.159
Expected volatility		289-377	%
Expected dividends		0	%

XML

Investment in Aspire Consulting Group, LLC (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Investments Schedule [Abstract]

Schedule of Investment

The following table presents details of the Company’s investment is Aspire as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	Amount
Balance December 31, 2015	$	-
Fair value of shares issued for ownership 49% interest in Aspire		460,002
Income from equity method investee		18,395
Distributions received from Aspire		(24,335	)
Balance December 31, 2016	$	454,062
Income from equity method investee		(1,726	)
Balance December 31, 2017	$	452,336

XML

Income Taxes (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2017

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets

The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 21% and 34% of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:

	2017			2016
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
Net operating loss carryover	$	2,583,438		$	1,623,745
Valuation allowance		(2,583,438	)		(1,623,745	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—

XML

Basis of Presentation and Going Concern (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	Nov. 16, 2013	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Percentage of issued and outstanding shares			49.00%
Accumulated deficit		$ 15,150,240	$ 7,501,020
Share Exchange Agreement [Member]
Number of common stock shares issued during the period	65,640
Percentage of issued and outstanding shares	100.00%

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 0	$ 0
Bad debt expense	0	0
Capitalized software development costs	45,229	(24,335)
Advertising expenses	$ 26,389	$ 4,598

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Summary of Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on Recurring Basis (Details) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Derivative Financial Instruments	$ 319,041	$ 857,795
Level 1 [Member]
Derivative Financial Instruments
Level 2 [Member]
Derivative Financial Instruments
Level 3 [Member]
Derivative Financial Instruments	$ 319,041	$ 857,795

XML

Related Party Transactions (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Loans payable - related party	$ 11,750	$ 11,750

XML

Loans Payable (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Short term loan payable		$ 3,712
Proceeds from loans payable	11,500	31,200
Payments on loans payable	15,212	125,922
Interest payable	$ 1,042	$ 25,515
Minimum [Member]
Short term loan payable interest rate	20.00%
Maximum [Member]
Short term loan payable interest rate	94.00%

XML

Convertible Note Payable (Details Narrative) - USD ($)									1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 23, 2017	May 15, 2017	Apr. 01, 2017	Mar. 15, 2017	Feb. 28, 2017	Sep. 22, 2015	Sep. 09, 2015	Sep. 08, 2015	Feb. 28, 2017	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Proceeds from borrowing of convertible promissory note							$ 50,000			$ 204,818	$ 468,550
Convertible promissory note interest rate, percent per annum						10.00%	8.00%	8.00%
Debt instrument due date							Jun. 07, 2016
Debt discount in connection with initial valuation of derivative liability										(42,534)	(101,595)
Derivative liability										166,621
Settlement of derivative liability										1,271,691	1,573,238
Notes payable						$ 15,000		$ 31,126
Debt instrument issuance date						Sep. 22, 2015		Sep. 08, 2015
Repayments of notes payable			$ 45,000	$ 55,000
Gain loss on settlement of notes payable										$ 37,561	(300,016)
Notes Payable [Member]
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Debt instrument issuance date										Apr. 17, 2014
Gain loss on settlement of notes payable										$ 5,000
Notes Payable [Member] | Note Holder [Member]
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Debt instrument issuance date										Feb. 13, 2014
Gain loss on settlement of notes payable										$ 32,375
Notes Payable [Member] | Note Holder One [Member]
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Debt instrument issuance date										Oct. 21, 2014
Settlement Notes Payable [Member]
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Number of common stock shares issued in partial conversion of convertible notes payable										70,000
Notes payable										$ 49,000
Debt instrument issuance date										Aug. 15, 2016
Gain loss on settlement of notes payable										$ 44,187
Note payable carrying value										$ 4,813
Partial Settlement Notes Payable [Member]
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Number of common stock shares issued in partial conversion of convertible notes payable										100,335
Notes payable										$ 82,500
Debt instrument issuance date										May 15, 2017
Gain loss on settlement of notes payable										$ 13,598
Note payable carrying value										16,503
Settlement Agreement [Member]
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Derivative liability	$ 247,305
Number of common stock shares issued in partial conversion of convertible notes payable	550,000
Notes payable	$ 237,750				$ 128,000				$ 128,000
Debt instrument issuance date	Jul. 22, 2016								Sep. 08, 2015
Proceeds from notes payable									$ 121,755
Cash paid									21,755
Repayments of notes payable									100,000
Gain loss on settlement of notes payable	$ 1,726								6,245
Assigned note forgive value					50,000				$ 50,000
Note payable carrying value	249,421
Common stock fair value	$ 495,000
Convertible Promissory Note [Member]
Short-term Debt [Line Items]
Proceeds from borrowing of convertible promissory note		$ 115,000			$ 14,489
Convertible promissory note interest rate, percent per annum		10.00%			10.00%
Debt instrument due date		May 15, 2018			Aug. 27, 2017
Variable conversion price of common stock, percentage		64.00%			50.00%
Debt discount in connection with initial valuation of derivative liability		$ 115,000
Loss on derivative liability										51,621
Interest expense										$ 96,993	$ 143,093
Number of common stock shares issued in partial conversion of convertible notes payable										711,291
Number of common stock issued for conversion of convertible notes payable										$ 215,076
Settlement of derivative liability										$ 1,271,691

XML

Convertible Note Payable - Schedule of Convertible Note Payable (Details) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Total convertible notes payable	$ 214,764	$ 637,259
Less discounts	(42,534)	(101,595)
Convertible notes net of discount	$ 172,230	$ 535,464

XML

Convertible Note Payable - Schedule of Derivative Liabilities (Details) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Balance, beginning	$ 857,795	$ 551,646
Debt discount originated from derivative liabilities	129,489	501,750
Initial loss recorded		1,563,080
Reclassification of derivative liability to paid-in capital due to debt conversion	(1,271,691)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities	850,753	(185,444)
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt settlement	(247,305)	(1,573,237)
Balance, ending	$ 319,041	$ 857,795

XML

Convertible Note Payable - Schedule of Fair Value Assumption of Derivative Notes (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017
Risk Free Interest Rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Fair value assumptions, measurement input, percentages	0.40%
Risk Free Interest Rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Fair value assumptions, measurement input, percentages	1.28%
Expected Term [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Fair value assumptions, measurement input, term	4 days
Expected Term [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Fair value assumptions, measurement input, term	19 months 2 days
Expected Volatility [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Fair value assumptions, measurement input, percentages	289.00%
Expected Volatility [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Fair value assumptions, measurement input, percentages	377.00%
Expected Dividends [Member]
Fair value assumptions, measurement input, percentages	0.00%

XML

Investment in Aspire Consulting Group, LLC (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	Jan. 05, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016	Nov. 16, 2013
Equity interest percentage		49.00%
Aspire Consulting Group LLC [Member]
Equity interest percentage	49.00%
Share Exchange Agreement [Member]
Equity interest percentage			100.00%
Share Exchange Agreement [Member] | Aspire Consulting Group LLC [Member]
Percentage of membership unit issued and outstanding agreed to acquire	49.00%
Share Exchange Agreement [Member] | Aspire Consulting Group LLC [Member] | Series B Convertible Preferred Stock [Member]
Number of convertible preferred stock shares newly issued	66,667
Number of convertible preferred stock newly issued	$ 460,002

XML

Investment in Aspire Consulting Group, LLC - Schedule of Investment (Details) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Investments Schedule [Abstract]
Balance	$ 454,062
Fair value of shares issued for ownership 49% interest in Aspire		460,002
Income from equity method investee	(1,726)	18,395
Distributions received from Aspire		(24,335)
Balance	$ 452,336	$ 454,062

XML

Investment in Aspire Consulting Group, LLC - Schedule of Investment (Details) (Parenthetical)	Dec. 31, 2016
Investments Schedule [Abstract]
Equity method investment, ownership percentage	49.00%

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details Narrative) - USD ($)									1 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Oct. 03, 2017	Jul. 03, 2017	May 24, 2017	Apr. 01, 2017	Mar. 15, 2017	Sep. 22, 2015	Sep. 09, 2015	Sep. 08, 2015	Feb. 28, 2017	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Lease expense										$ 2,000
Rent expense										22,908	$ 23,972
Proceeds from convertible promissory note							$ 50,000			$ 204,818	$ 468,550
Note interest rate						10.00%	8.00%	8.00%
Note due date							Jun. 07, 2016
Common stock variable conversion price							50.00%
Payments of notes				$ 45,000	$ 55,000
Debt conversion price per share										$ 0.000125
Number of common stock shares issued										299,397	141,260
Carebourn Capital [Member]
Number of common stock shares issued	70,000
Executive Employment Agreement [Member] | CEO/Chairman [Member]
Base salary										$ 100,000
Settlement Agreement [Member]
Payments of notes									$ 100,000
Settlement Agreement [Member] | JSJ Investments Inc [Member]
Note interest rate			12.00%
Accrued interest			$ 53,281
Number of common stock shares issued			262,500
Settlement Agreement [Member] | Auctus Fund [Member]
Number of common stock shares issued		550,000

XML

Income Taxes (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Operating loss carry-forward from continuing operations	$ 12,302,086
Operating loss carryforwards expirations date	expire beginning in the year 2030
Effective income tax rate	21.00%	34.00%
Effective income tax reduced percentage	21.00%

XML

Income Taxes - Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets (Details) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Net operating loss carryover	$ 2,583,438	$ 1,623,745
Valuation allowance	(2,583,438)	(1,623,745)
Net deferred tax asset

XML

Stockholders' Equity (Details Narrative) - USD ($)			12 Months Ended
	May 09, 2017	Feb. 16, 2017	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Jan. 05, 2017
Common stock, shares authorized			250,000,000	250,000,000
Common stock, par value			$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, shares authorized			5,933,333	5,933,333
Preferred stock, par value			$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Number of common stock shares issued for services, shares				8,000
Number of common stock shares issued for services, value			$ 6,115,100	$ 478,700
Number of common stock shares issued in partial conversion of convertible notes payable, value			922,018
Settlement of derivative liability			$ 1,271,691	$ 1,573,238
Number of common share issued for settlement, shares			299,397	141,260
Number of common share issued for settlement			$ 109,571	$ 635,299
Partial Settlement [Member]
Number of common stock shares issued in partial conversion of convertible notes payable			1,608,877
Number of common stock shares issued in partial conversion of convertible notes payable, value			$ 765,217
Wais Asefi [Member]
Number of common stock shares issued for services, shares		2,000,000
CEO [Member]
Retirement of common shares				59,400
Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, shares authorized			10,000,000
Preferred stock, par value			$ 0.0001
Series A Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, shares authorized			4,000,000
Series B Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, shares authorized			66,667	66,667	66,667
Preferred stock, par value			$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Series C Preferred Stock [Member]
Preferred stock, shares authorized	2,000,000		2,000,000	2,000,000
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.0001		$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock voting rights	Holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with the holders of our common stock on all matters submitted to shareholders at a rate of 875 votes for each share held.
Convertible preferred stock converted shares	875
Series C Preferred Stock [Member] | Officer [Member]
Preferred stock, shares designated			2,000,000
Common Stock [Member]
Common stock, shares authorized			4,000,000,000
Common stock, par value			$ 0.0001
Number of common stock shares issued for services, shares			2,077,500	8,000
Number of common stock shares issued for services, value			$ 208	$ 1
Settlement of derivative liability
Common Stock One [Member]
Number of common stock shares issued for services, shares			77,500
Number of common stock shares issued for services, value			$ 115,100

XML

Subsequent Events (Details Narrative) - USD ($)				12 Months Ended
	Sep. 22, 2015	Sep. 09, 2015	Sep. 08, 2015	Dec. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Reverse stock split				(1:1000) reverse stock split
Note interest rate	10.00%	8.00%	8.00%
Debt instrument issuance date	Sep. 22, 2015		Sep. 08, 2015
Notes payable	$ 15,000		$ 31,126
Number of common share issued for settlement shares				299,397	141,260
Settlement of Debt [Member]
Number of common share issued for settlement shares				892,882
Settlement of Notes Payable [Member]
Number of common share issued for settlement shares				518,600