10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ	Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
	or
o	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the transition period from                      to

Commission file number 1-11656

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	42-1283895
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

110 N. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)

(312) 960-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N / A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES       þ       NO       o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES       þ       NO       o

The number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding on May 6, 2005
was 237,851,712.

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

INDEX

		PAGE
		NUMBER
Part I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1: Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004		3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004		4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004		5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6
	Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		26
	Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company		31
	Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		34
	Item 4: Controls and Procedures		35
Part II	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1: Legal Proceedings		36
	Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds		36
	Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities		36
	Item 4: Submission of Mattes to a Vote of Security Holders		36
	Item 5: Other Information		36
	Item 6: Exhibits		36
	SIGNATURE		37

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

MARCH 31, 2005 AND DECEMBER 31, 2004

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except for per share and per unit amounts)

	March 31, 2005			December 31, 2004
	(In thousands)
Assets
Investment in real estate:
Land	$	2,863,060		$	2,859,552
Buildings and equipment		18,318,991			18,251,258
Less accumulated depreciation		(1,611,476	)		(1,453,488	)
Developments in progress		575,129			559,969
Net property and equipment		20,145,704			20,217,291
Investment in and loans to/from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates		1,978,021			1,945,541
Investment land and land held for development and sale		1,664,299			1,638,013
Net investment in real estate		23,788,024			23,800,845
Cash and cash equivalents		49,135			39,581
Accounts receivable, net		251,082			242,425
Deferred expenses, net		157,433			153,231
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,504,340			1,482,543
Total assets	$	25,750,014		$	25,718,625
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Mortgage notes and other debt payable	$	20,392,810		$	20,310,947
Deferred tax liabilities		1,414,565			1,414,565
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,055,347			895,520
Total liabilities		22,862,722			22,621,032
Minority interests:
Preferred		219,275			403,161
Common		543,378			551,282
Total minority interests		762,653			954,443
Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Preferred stock: $100 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock: $.01 par value; 875,000,000 shares authorized; 237,597,603 and 234,724,082 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		2,376			2,347
Additional paid-in capital		2,422,471			2,378,237
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		(298,951	)		(227,511	)
Notes receivable-common stock purchase		(1,237	)		(5,178	)
Unearned compensation-restricted stock		(2,601	)		(1,060	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		2,581			(3,685	)
Total stockholders’ equity		2,124,639			2,143,150
	$	25,750,014		$	25,718,625

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED

MARCH 31, 2005 AND 2004

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except for per share and per unit amounts)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2005			2004
	(In thousands, except for
	per share amounts)
Revenues:
Minimum rents	$	410,484		$	221,694
Tenant recoveries		182,007			102,222
Overage rents		13,586			8,352
Land sales		61,406			—
Management and other fees		19,563			18,701
Other		22,487			8,857
Total revenues		709,533			359,826
Expenses:
Real estate taxes		53,504			28,121
Repairs and maintenance		53,817			24,659
Marketing		12,368			10,440
Other property operating costs		89,763			41,196
Land sales operations		54,105			—
Provision for doubtful accounts		4,254			2,784
Property management and other costs		34,637			25,012
General and administrative		2,811			2,190
Depreciation and amortization		163,309			72,904
Total expenses		468,568			207,306
Operating income		240,965			152,520
Interest income		2,217			417
Interest expense		(245,028	)		(87,087	)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		1,307			(7	)
Income allocated to minority interests		(12,856	)		(25,438	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		26,460			17,930
Income from continuing operations		13,065			58,335
Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interests		—			788
Net income	$	13,065		$	59,123
Basic earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.06		$	0.27
Discontinued operations		—			—
Total basic earnings per share	$	0.06		$	0.27
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.06		$	0.27
Discontinued operations		—			—
Total diluted earnings per share	$	0.06		$	0.27
Distributions declared per share	$	0.36		$	0.30
Comprehensive income, net:
Net income	$	13,065		$	59,123
Other comprehensive income, net of minority interest:
Net unrealized gains on financial instruments		6,127			326
Minimum pension liability adjustment		(107	)		(83	)
Foreign currency translation		(44	)		—
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities		290			—
Comprehensive income, net	$	19,331		$	59,366

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 and 2004

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2005			2004
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net Income	$	13,065		$	59,123
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Minority interests, including discontinued operations		12,856			25,636
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		(26,460	)		(17,930	)
Provision for doubtful accounts, including discontinued operations		4,254			2,797
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates		8,585			18,144
Depreciation, including discontinued operations		158,544			66,859
Amortization, including discontinued operations		6,757			9,382
Participation expense pursuant to Contingent Stock Agreement		20,214			—
Land development and acquisition expenditures, net of cost of land sales		3,160			—
Debt assumed by purchasers of land		(1,118	)		—
Net changes:
Accounts receivable		(12,911	)		(6,885	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(6,797	)		402
Deferred expenses		(9,435	)		(8,281	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(35,179	)		(15,763	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		135,535			133,484
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition/development of real estate and improvements and additions to properties		(118,908	)		(157,821	)
Increase in investments in unconsolidated affiliates		(8,717	)		(4,781	)
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates in excess of income		13,345			25,070
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable for common stock purchases		3,941			238
Loan repayments from unconsolidated affiliates, net		—			(8,884	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(110,339	)		(146,178	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash distributions paid to common stockholders		(84,505	)		(65,193	)
Cash distributions paid to holders of Common Units		(20,085	)		(16,788	)
Cash distributions paid to holders of perpetual and convertible preferred units		(8,544	)		(10,277	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, including from common stock plans		27,729			8,211
Proceeds from issuance of mortgage notes and other debt payable		1,238,147			769,000
Principal payments on mortgage notes and other debt payable		(1,166,860	)		(672,071	)
Deferred financing costs		(1,524	)		(1,927	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(15,642	)		10,955
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		9,554			(1,739	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		39,581			10,677
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	49,135		$	8,938
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	265,378		$	87,529
Interest capitalized		14,954			1,947
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Common stock issued in exchange for Operating Partnership Units	$	18,661		$	257
Common stock issued in exchange for convertible preferred units		1,006			—
Assumption of debt in conjunction with acquisition of property		—			134,902
Common stock issued pursuant to Contingent Stock Agreement		18,098			—
Operating Partnership Units issued as consideration for purchase of real estate		—			25,132
Debt assumed by purchasers of land		1,118			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 ORGANIZATION

Readers of this quarterly report should refer to the Company’s (as defined below) audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (Commission File No. 1-11656), as certain footnote disclosures which would substantially duplicate those contained in the 2004 annual audited financial statements have been omitted from this report. Capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this quarterly report have the same meanings as in the Company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

General

General Growth Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“General Growth”), is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, referred to as a “REIT.” General Growth was organized in 1986 and through its subsidiaries and affiliates owns, operates, manages, leases, acquires, develops, expands and finances operating properties located primarily throughout the United States and develops and sells land for residential, commercial and other uses primarily in master-planned communities. The operating properties consist of retail centers, office and industrial buildings and mixed-use and other properties. Land development and sales operations are predominantly related to large-scale, long-term community development projects in and around Columbia, Maryland; Summerlin, Nevada; and Houston, Texas. In these notes, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to General Growth and its subsidiaries (the “Company”).

Substantially all of our business is conducted through GGP Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership” or “GGPLP”). As of March 31, 2005, General Growth owned an approximate 81% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 19% minority interest is held by limited partners that include trusts for the benefit of the families of the original stockholders of the Company and subsequent contributors of properties to the Operating Partnership. These minority interests are represented by common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (the “Common Units”). In addition, the Operating Partnership currently has preferred units of limited partnership interest (the “Preferred Units”) outstanding. The Preferred Units are, under certain circumstances, convertible into Common Units and they may be exchanged by their holders, under certain circumstances, for shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis as described below in this Note 1.

In addition to holding ownership interests in various joint ventures, the Operating Partnership generally conducts its operations through the following subsidiaries:

•   GGPLP L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (the “LLC”), has ownership interests in the majority of our properties (other than those acquired in The Rouse Company merger (the “TRC Merger”, Note 2)).

•   The Rouse Company LP (“TRCLP”), which includes both a REIT and taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”), has ownership interests in Consolidated Properties and Unconsolidated Properties (as defined below).

•   General Growth Management, Inc. (“GGMI”), a TRS, manages, leases, and performs various other services for some of our Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates (as defined below) and 30 properties owned by unaffiliated third parties.

In this report, we refer to our ownership interests in majority owned or controlled properties as “Consolidated Properties”, to our ownership interests in joint ventures in which we own a non-controlling interest as “Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates” and the properties owned by such joint ventures as the “Unconsolidated Properties.” Our “Company Portfolio” includes both the Unconsolidated Properties and our Consolidated Properties.

6 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of General Growth, our subsidiaries and joint ventures in which we have a controlling interest. We also consolidate the accounts of certain variable interest entities that were acquired in the TRC Merger (Note 2) and are considered special purpose entities and where we are the primary beneficiary. Income allocated to minority interests in these joint ventures includes the share of such properties’ operations (generally computed as the respective joint venture partner ownership percentage) applicable to such non-controlling venturers.

Acquisitions (Note 2) are accounted for utilizing the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the results of operations are included in our results of operations from the respective dates of acquisition. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been included. The results for the interim periods ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for the full fiscal year.

Preferred Stock

Various classes of preferred stock of General Growth have been created to permit the future potential conversion of certain equity interests assumed by us in conjunction with various acquisitions, into General Growth equity interests. As no such preferred stock has been issued, such additional classes of preferred stock have not been presented in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.

Minority Interests

Common

Changes in outstanding Operating Partnership Common Units for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were as follows:

	Units
December 31, 2004		55,532,263
Conversion of Preferred Units		59,229
Exchanges for General Growth common stock		(1,911,051	)
March 31, 2005		53,680,441

7 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Preferred

Components of minority interest–preferred at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.

												Carrying Amount
							Per Unit					(in thousands)
	Coupon			Issuing	Number		Liquidation		Redeemable			March 31,		December 31,
Security Type	Rate			Entity	of Units		Preference		by Issuer			2005		2004
Perpetual Preferred Units
Redeemable Preferred Units (“RPUs”)		8.95	%	LLC		940,000	$	250		(1	)	$	60,000	$	235,000
Cumulative Preferred Units (“CPUs”)		8.25	%	LLC		20,000		250		N/A			5,000		5,000
Price Development Company (“PDC”) Series C		8.75	%	PDC		320,000		25		(2	)		—		8,000
													65,000		248,000
Convertible Preferred Units
Series B-JP Realty		8.50	%	GGPLP		1,401,353		50		N/A			70,068		70,975
Series C-Glendale Galleria		7.00	%	GGPLP		641,528		50		N/A			32,077		32,176
Series D-Foothills Mall		6.50	%	GGPLP		532,750		50		N/A			26,637		26,637
Series E-Four Seasons Town Centre		7.00	%	GGPLP		502,658		50		N/A			25,132		25,132
													153,914		154,920
Other preferred stock of consolidated subsidiaries		N/A		various		361		1,000		(3	)		361		241
Total Minority Interest-Preferred												$	219,275	$	403,161

(1)	$175,000 called for redemption on March 25, 2005 in May 2005 (included in accounts payable and accrued expenses) and $60,000 redeemable by issuer in April 2007.
(2)	Called for redemption on March 31, 2005 in May 2005 (included in accounts payable and accrued expenses).
(3)	Redeemable on demand, under certain circumstances.

Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

Information related to our EPS calculations is summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005				2004
	Basic		Diluted		Basic		Diluted
	(In thousands)
Numerators:
Income from continuing operations	$	13,065	$	13,065	$	58,335	$	58,335
Discontinued operations, net of minority interests		—		—		788		788
Net income	$	13,065	$	13,065	$	59,123	$	59,123
Denominators:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		235,812		235,812		217,553		217,553
Effect of dilutive securities - options		—		776		—		926
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted		235,812		236,588		217,553		218,479

Dilutive EPS excludes options where the exercise price was higher than the average market price of our common stock and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive and options for which the conditions which must be satisfied prior to the issuance

8 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

of any such shares were not achieved. Such options totaled 1,199,132 in 2005 and 1,008,651 in 2004. Outstanding Common Units have also been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because there would be no effect on EPS as the minority interests’ share of income would also be added back to net income.

Notes Receivable – Officers

Notes receivable – officers were as follows:

(In thousands)	March 31, 2005		December 31, 2004
Income tax withholdings reported in Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	174	$	623
Reported as a reduction to Stockholders’ equity		1,237		5,178
	$	1,411	$	5,801

During February 2005, one of the officers voluntarily repaid his note, which had an outstanding balance of $4.2 million at December 31, 2004.

Revenue Recognition and Related Matters

As of March 31, 2005, straight-line rents receivable, which represent the current net cumulative rents recognized prior to when billed and collectible as provided by the terms of the leases, of approximately $101,609 are included in accounts receivable, net in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet (see Note 8). Minimum rent revenues also include amounts collected from tenants to allow the termination of their leases prior to their scheduled termination dates and accretion related to above and below-market leases on properties acquired as provided by FASB Statements No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”) and No. 142, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”) as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(In Thousands)	2005		2004
Lease termination fees	$	2,566	$	2,989
Above and below-market lease accretion		7,631		5,557

Management fees primarily represent management and leasing fees, financing fees and fees for other ancillary services performed by us for the benefit of the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates and properties owned by third parties and are recognized as revenues when earned. Fees recognized by us for services performed for the Unconsolidated Properties were approximately $17.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and approximately $14.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

Business Segment Information

We have the following reportable segments:

•   Retail and Other - includes the operation and management of regional shopping centers, office and industrial properties, downtown specialty marketplaces, the retail and non-retail rental components of mixed-use projects and community retail centers

•   Community Development - includes the development and sale of land, primarily in large-scale, long-term community development projects in and around Columbia, Maryland; Summerlin, Nevada; and Houston, Texas

Our two business segments offer different products or services and are managed separately because each requires different operating strategies or management expertise. Prior to the TRC Merger, substantially all of our business

9 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

involved ownership and operation of shopping centers. As we evaluated operating results and resource allocation on a property-by-property basis, we had concluded that we had a single reportable segment. We do not distinguish or group our consolidated operations on a geographic basis. Further, all material operations are within the United States and no customer or tenant comprises more than 3% of consolidated revenues.

The operating measure used to assess operating results for the business segments is Real Estate Property Net Operating Income (“NOI”). Management believes that NOI provides useful information about a property’s operating performance.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, except that we account for real estate ventures in which we have joint interest and control and certain other minority interest ventures using the proportionate share method rather than the equity method. This difference affects only the reported revenues and operating expenses of the segments and has no effect on our reported net earnings.

Employee Benefit and Stock Plans

Incentive Stock Plans

General Growth has incentive stock plans designed to attract and retain officers and key employees. Our incentive stock plans provide for stock and option grants to employees in the following forms:

•   Restricted and unrestricted stock grants

•   Options that vest generally over a fixed period of time

•   Threshold-vesting stock options (“TSOs”)

The plans also provide for option grants to directors. The terms of the 2003 Incentive Stock Plan provide for the issuance of up to 9,000,000 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the plan, of which 6,658,000 are currently available for future grants as of the date of this report. Pursuant to the 1998 Incentive Plan, at December 31, 2004, the aggregate number of shares of our common stock which may be issued subject to TSOs granted was limited to 6,000,000, subject to certain customary adjustments to prevent dilution. After receiving the approval of our shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting, we increased the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 1998 Incentive Plan to 11,000,000.

The following is a summary of the TSOs that have been awarded through March 31, 2005:

	TSO Grant Year
	2005			2004			1999-2003
Exercise price	$	35.41		$	30.94		$	14.35	*
Threshold vesting stock price	$	49.66		$	43.39		$	20.13	*
Fair value of options on grant date	$	2.34		$	1.59		$	1.07	*
Shares:
Original grant		1,000,000			1,031,480			4,523,952
Forfeited		(13,591	)		(72,212	)		(827,928	)
Vested and exchanged for cash		—			—			(2,647,509	)
Vested and exercised		—			—			(770,685	)
Outstanding		986,409			959,268			277,830

* Weighted average amounts

Increases in the price of the common stock subsequent to the respective grant dates have caused all the TSOs granted in 2003 and prior years to become vested. The granting and vesting of the TSOs and subsequent increases in the

10 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

price of our common stock resulted in the recognition of compensation expense of approximately $125,000 and $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

During the second quarter of 2002, the Company elected to prospectively adopt the fair value based employee stock-based compensation expense recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). The Company had previously applied the intrinsic value based expense recognition provisions set forth in APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). SFAS 123 states that the adoption of the fair value based method is a change to a preferable method of accounting. The transition rules for adoption of SFAS 123 provide that prior grants of options, whether from the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (now expired) or the 1998 Incentive Plan, are accounted for under APB 25. Had compensation costs for such prior grants of options been recorded under SFAS 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been nominally reduced but there would have been no effect on reported basic or diluted earnings per share.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The General Growth Properties, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) was established to assist eligible employees in acquiring a stock ownership interest in General Growth. Under the ESPP, eligible employees make payroll deductions over a six-month purchase period. At the end of the six-month purchase period, the amounts withheld are used to purchase shares of our common stock at a purchase price equal to 85% of the lesser of the closing price of a share of our common stock on the first or last trading day of the purchase period. A maximum of 1,500,000 shares of our common stock are reserved for issuance under the ESPP. Since the inception of the ESPP, an aggregate of 1,038,290 shares of our common stock have been sold under the ESPP, including 65,176 shares for the purchase period ending December 31, 2004 which were purchased at a price of $25.18 per share.

Restricted Stock

Pursuant to the 2003 Incentive Stock Plan, in February 2005 and 2004, certain officers were granted a total of 66,000 and 55,000 shares, respectively, of restricted common stock. In addition, pursuant to the 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, certain officers were granted a total of 105,000 shares of restricted common stock in February 2003 and 150,000 shares in September 2002. The 2005 grant, the 2004 grant and 60,000 of the shares granted in 2003 had a one-year restriction period. The remaining 45,000 shares granted in 2003 and the 2002 grants vest over three years. As this restricted stock represents an incentive for future periods, we are recognizing the related compensation expense ratably over the applicable vesting periods.

Management Savings Plan

The General Growth Management Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) permits all eligible employees to defer a portion of their compensation in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Under the 401(k) Plan, contributions were made to match the contributions of the participants. We match 100% of the first 4% of earnings contributed by plan participants and 50% of the next 2% of the participant’s earnings contributions. Matching contributions were made of approximately $5.3 million in 2004 and $4.4 million in 2003.

TRC Plan

As a result of the TRC Merger, we assumed a retiree benefits plan that provides postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to former TRC employees who met minimum age and service requirements. The retiree benefits plan requires payment of a portion of the cost of participants’ life insurance coverage and contributions to the cost of participants’ medical coverage based on years of service, subject to a maximum annual contribution.

11 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Amounts related to this plan, which has now been frozen, were not material as of or for the period ended December 31, 2004 or March 31, 2005.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. For example, significant estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to useful lives of assets, capitalization of development and leasing costs, recoverable amounts of receivables and deferred taxes, initial valuations and related amortization periods of deferred costs and intangibles, particularly with respect to property acquisitions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the 2004 consolidated financial statements, including discontinued operations (Note 7), have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

NOTE 2 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, RENOVATIONS, EXPANSIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS

The Rouse Company

We acquired The Rouse Company (“TRC”), a real estate development and management company, on November 12, 2004 (the “TRC Merger”) for a purchase price, including debt and other liabilities assumed, of approximately $14.4 billion. Immediately following the TRC Merger, TRC was, through a series of transactions, converted to a limited partnership (“TRCLP”) wholly-owned by the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. The results of TRCLP’s operations have been included in our consolidated financial statements since that date.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition. These fair values were based, in part, on preliminary third-party market valuations. Because these fair values were based on currently available information and assumptions and estimates that we believe are reasonable at this time, they have been and will continue to be subject to adjustment as additional information becomes available.

(In Thousands)
Land	$	1,314,711
Buildings and equipment		8,210,348
Developments in progress		362,808
Investment in and loans to/from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates		1,262,106
Investment land and land held for development and sale		1,673,300
Cash and cash equivalents		29,077
Accounts receivable		84,424
Prepaid expenses and other assets:
Below-market ground leases		381,433
Above-market tenant leases		141,048
Deferred tax assets		145,243
Goodwill		411,900
Other		391,271
	$	14,407,669

12 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Also in 2004, we made the following acquisitions which have been reflected in our consolidated financial statements since the dates of the respective acquisitions:

	Acquisition
	Date
50% ownership interest in Burlington Town Center	January 7
Redlands Mall	January 16
The remaining 50% ownership interest in Town East Mall	March 1
Four Seasons Town Centre	March 5
Ownership interest in GSG de Cost Rica SRL (“GGP/Sambil Costa Rica”)	April 30
50% ownership interest in Hoover Mall Holding, L.L.C.	May 11
Mall of Louisiana	May 12
Grand Canal Shoppes	May 17
50% ownership interest in GGP/NIG Brazil	July 30
Stonestown Galleria	August 13

In addition to the acquisitions discussed above, we have entered into a separate agreement (the “Phase II Agreement”), to acquire the multi-level retail space that is planned to be part of The Palazzo in Las Vegas, Nevada that will be connected to the existing Venetian and the Sands Expo and Convention Center facilities (the “Phase II Acquisition”) and the Grand Canal Shoppes described above. The Palazzo is currently under development and is expected to be completed in 2007. If completed as specified under the terms of the Phase II Agreement, we will purchase, payable upon grand opening, the Phase II Acquisition retail space at a price computed on a 6% capitalization rate on the projected net operating income of the Phase II retail space, as defined by the Phase II Agreement (“Phase II NOI”), up to $38 million and on a capitalization rate of 8% on Phase II NOI in excess of $38 million, all subject to a minimum purchase price of $250 million. Based on current preliminary plans and estimated rents, the actual purchase price would be more than double the minimum purchase price. The Phase II Agreement is subject to the satisfaction of separate and customary closing conditions.

Accounting for Acquisitions

Acquisitions of properties are accounted for utilizing the purchase method and accordingly, the results of operations are included in our results of operations subsequent to the respective dates of acquisition. The purchase prices for all property acquisitions are subject to certain prorations and adjustments. Estimates of future cash flows and other valuation techniques are used to allocate the purchase price of acquired property between land, buildings and improvements, equipment and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities such as amounts related to in-place at-market leases, acquired above and below-market leases and tenant relationships. Initial valuations are subject to change until such information is finalized no later than 12 months from the applicable acquisition dates.

As of March 31, 2005, acquired in-place leases totaled approximately $595.2 million ($539.0 million net of accumulated amortization) and acquired below-market leases (net of above-market leases) totaled approximately $164.1 million ($107.5 million net of accumulated amortization). These amounts are estimates as purchase price allocations for certain recent acquisitions may be subsequently revised as additional information becomes available. Amortization of these intangible assets and liabilities, and similar assets and liabilities from our Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates, resulted in additional net income of approximately $5.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

13 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 3 INVESTMENTS IN AND LOANS FROM UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AFFILIATES

The Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates constitute our investment in real estate joint ventures that own and/or develop shopping centers and other retail and investment property. Generally, we share in the profits and losses, cash flows and other matters relating to our investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates in accordance with our respective ownership percentages. We manage most of the properties owned by these joint ventures. Some of the joint ventures have elected to be taxed as REITs. Since we have joint interest and control of the Unconsolidated Properties with our venture partners, we account for these joint ventures using the equity method.

Certain of the properties were contributed to the joint venture subject to existing financing, as modified by certain replacement financing (“Retained Debt”), in order to balance the net equity values of the properties contributed by each of the venture partners. We are obligated to fund all amounts related to Retained Debt including any shortfalls of any subsequent sale or refinancing proceeds of the properties against their respective loan balances to the extent of such Retained Debt. Retained Debt totaled $148.1 million as of March 31, 2005 and $148.7 million as of December 31, 2004.

The significant accounting policies used by the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates are the same as ours.

14 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Condensed Combined Financial Information of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates

The following is condensed combined financial information for the Company’s Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for the periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

(In Thousands)	March 31, 2005			December 31, 2004
Combined Balance Sheets - Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates
Assets:
Land	$	865,934		$	852,137
Buildings and equipment		7,389,226			7,398,555
Less accumulated depreciation		(1,116,835	)		(982,616	)
Developments in progress		240,646			220,486
Net property and equipment		7,378,971			7,488,562
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		50,655			56,362
Investment land and land held for development and sale		266,701			257,555
Net investment in real estate		7,696,327			7,802,479
Cash and cash equivalents		152,436			134,399
Accounts receivable, net		133,194			119,446
Deferred expenses, net		167,928			175,446
Prepaid expenses and other assets		186,826			261,555
Total assets	$	8,336,711		$	8,493,325
Liabilities and Owners’ Equity:
Mortgage notes and other debt payable	$	5,577,192		$	5,601,137
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		373,207			417,300
Minority interest		117			117
Owners’ equity		2,386,195			2,474,771
Total liabilities and owners’ equity	$	8,336,711		$	8,493,325
Investment In And Loans To/From Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates
Owners’ equity	$	2,386,195		$	2,474,771
Less joint venture partners’ equity		(1,277,911	)		(1,258,133	)
Loans and other, net		869,737			728,903
Investment in and loans to/from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates	$	1,978,021		$	1,945,541

15 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(In Thousands)	2005			2004
Combined Statements of Operations - Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates
Revenues:
Minimum rents	$	195,833		$	125,199
Tenant recoveries		86,895			61,624
Overage rents		3,503			2,397
Land sales		16,319			—
Other		29,964			2,973
Total revenues		332,514			192,193
Expenses:
Real estate taxes		27,543			17,957
Repairs and maintenance		22,799			14,440
Marketing		7,253			6,387
Other property operating costs		60,153			25,962
Land sales operations		7,204			—
Provision for doubtful accounts		2,207			1,382
Property management and other costs		11,643			11,034
General and administrative		481			285
Depreciation and amortization		59,018			38,524
Total expenses		198,301			115,971
Operating income		134,213			76,222
Interest income		1,536			847
Interest expense		(69,239	)		(40,980	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures		1,119			1,139
Net income	$	67,629		$	37,228
Equity In Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates
Total income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates	$	67,629		$	37,228
Joint venture partners’ share of income of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates		(34,791	)		(18,608	)
Amortization of capital or basis differences		(6,378	)		(673	)
Elimination of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliate loan interest		—			(17	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates	$	26,460		$	17,930

In addition, the following is summarized financial information for certain individually significant Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

16 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

	GGP/Homart						GGP/Homart II						GGP/Teachers
	March 31,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
(In Thousands)	2005			2004			2005			2004			2005			2004
Assets:
Land	$	146,777		$	146,777		$	190,707		$	190,707		$	125,378		$	125,378
Buildings and equipment		1,769,501			1,765,800			1,983,065			1,957,969			704,582			703,700
Less accumulated depreciation		(405,283	)		(389,682	)		(219,993	)		(205,637	)		(49,131	)		(44,147	)
Developments in progress		21,627			8,586			50,020			63,970			25,380			20,847
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		10,178			10,898			—			—			29			—
Net investment in real estate		1,542,800			1,542,379			2,003,799			2,007,009			806,238			805,778
Cash and cash equivalents		28,028			20,319			28,617			23,149			17,061			19,658
Accounts receivable, net		43,872			39,254			32,442			32,265			7,995			7,990
Deferred expenses, net		48,642			48,969			58,811			59,102			8,923			8,423
Prepaid expenses and other assets		50,021			56,482			28,219			36,236			3,918			3,359
Total assets	$	1,713,363		$	1,707,403		$	2,151,888		$	2,157,761		$	844,135		$	845,208
Liabilities and Owners’ Equity:
Mortgage notes and other property payable	$	1,463,875		$	1,469,938		$	1,326,254		$	1,331,301		$	465,985		$	466,580
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		54,960			63,560			65,667			81,574			64,912			67,109
Minority interest		—			—			117			117			—			—
Owners’ equity		194,528			173,905			759,850			744,769			313,238			311,519
Total liabilities and owners’ equity	$	1,713,363		$	1,707,403		$	2,151,888		$	2,157,761		$	844,135		$	845,208

	GGP/Homart						GGP/Homart II						GGP/Teachers
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 31,						March 31,						March 31,
(In Thousands)	2005			2004			2005			2004			2005			2004
Revenues:
Minimum rents	$	59,595		$	50,129		$	45,948		$	43,706		$	20,851		$	19,831
Tenant recoveries		22,943			23,649			23,090			21,785			9,579			9,379
Overage rents		1,097			774			1,035			989			65			238
Other		1,982			1,370			1,344			1,033			470			334
Total revenues		85,617			75,922			71,417			67,513			30,965			29,782
Expenses:
Real estate taxes		7,380			7,199			7,301			6,339			2,749			2,543
Repairs and maintenance		7,135			6,458			4,683			4,420			1,817			1,827
Marketing		2,450			2,475			2,377			2,361			856			878
Other property operating costs		7,845			10,117			8,075			8,364			3,690			3,948
Provision for doubtful accounts		330			435			611			529			61			252
Property management and other costs		5,065			4,597			4,088			3,973			1,650			1,574
General and administrative		99			81			184			132			184			56
Depreciation and amortization		17,020			16,210			15,024			14,076			5,147			4,884
Total expenses		47,324			47,572			42,343			40,194			16,154			15,962
Operating income		38,293			28,350			29,074			27,319			14,811			13,820
Interest income		498			361			478			406			136			58
Interest expense		(20,329	)		(20,431	)		(16,313	)		(13,371	)		(4,793	)		(3,614	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures		1,119			1,139			—			—			—			—
Net income	$	19,581		$	9,419		$	13,239		$	14,354		$	10,154		$	10,264

17 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 4 MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT PAYABLE

Mortgage notes and other debt payable reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consisted of the following:

(In Thousands)	March 31, 2005		December 31, 2004
Fixed-rate debt:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	$	331,191	$	332,526
Other collateralized mortgage notes and other debt payable		9,968,952		9,036,659
Corporate and other unsecured term loans		1,687,849		1,750,882
Total fixed-rate debt		11,987,992		11,120,067
Variable-rate debt:
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		360,123		361,239
Other collateralized mortgage notes and other debt payable		1,668,543		2,189,059
Credit facilities		223,000		150,000
Corporate and other unsecured term loans		6,153,152		6,490,582
Total variable-rate debt		8,404,818		9,190,880
Total	$	20,392,810	$	20,310,947

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

In early December 2001, the Operating Partnership and certain Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates completed the placement of $2.55 billion of non-recourse commercial mortgage pass-through certificates (the “GGP MPTC”). The GGP MPTC was initially collateralized by 27 malls and one office building, including 19 malls then owned by certain Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates. At March 31, 2005, the GGP MPTC has a current outstanding balance of approximately $1.1 billion (including $389.5 million by Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates) and was collateralized by eleven malls and one office building, including six malls owned by Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates.

The GGP MPTC is comprised of both variable rate and fixed rate notes which require monthly payments of principal and interest. The certificates represent beneficial interests in three loan groups made by three sets of borrowers (the Operating Partnership, GGP/Homart and GGP/Homart II, and GGP Ivanhoe III). The original principal amount of the GGP MPTC was comprised of $1.235 billion attributed to the Operating Partnership, $900 million to GGP/Homart and GGP/Homart II and $415 million to GGP Ivanhoe III. The terms of the notes comprising the GGP MPTC are as follows:

			Weighted-Average
Initial Maturity	Interest Term	Interest Rate	Interest Rate
36 months (1)	Variable	LIBOR (3) plus 60 to 235 basis points	LIBOR (3) plus 79 basis points
51 months (2)	Variable	LIBOR (3) plus 70 to 250 basis points	LIBOR (3) plus 103 basis points
5 years	Fixed	5.01 to 6.18%		5.38	%

(1)	With two no-cost 12-month extension options, one of which was exercised in 2004.
(2)	With two no-cost 18-month extension options.
(3)	2.87% at March 31, 2005.

The extension options with respect to the variable rate notes are subject to obtaining extensions of the interest rate protection agreements which were required to be obtained in conjunction with the GGP MPTC.

18 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Other Collateralized Mortgage Notes and Other Debt Payable

Other collateralized mortgage notes and other debt payable consist primarily of non-recourse notes collateralized by individual or groups of properties and equipment. Substantially all of the mortgage notes are non-recourse to us. Certain mortgage notes payable may be prepaid but are generally subject to a prepayment penalty equal to a yield-maintenance premium or a percentage of the loan balance. Certain loans have cross-default provisions and are cross-collateralized. Under certain cross-default provisions, a default under any mortgage note included in a cross-defaulted package may constitute a default under all such mortgage notes in the package and may lead to acceleration of the indebtedness due on each property within the collateral package. In general, the cross-defaulted properties are under common ownership. However, fixed-rate debt (totaling $138.6 million) collateralized by two Unconsolidated Properties is cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized with debt (totaling $868.8 million) collateralized by eleven Consolidated Properties.

The fixed-rate collateralized mortgage notes and other debt payable bear interest ranging from 3.13% to 11.20%. The variable-rate collateralized mortgage notes and other debt payable bear interest at LIBOR plus 60 to 213 basis points.

Credit Facilities

2004 Credit Facility

We entered into a credit agreement on November 12, 2004 to fund the cash portion of the TRC Merger consideration and, with other cash and financing sources, fund other costs of the merger. The terms of the notes comprising the 2004 Credit Facility are as follows:

			Outstanding at
(In Millions)	Initial Capacity		March 31, 2005		December 31, 2004
Six-month bridge loan	$	1,145.0	$	433.2	$	749.9
Three-year term loan		3,650.0		3,634.2		3,650.0
Four-year term loan		2,000.0		1,995.0		2,000.0
Revolving credit facility		500.0		223.0		150.0
	$	7,295.0	$	6,285.4	$	6,549.9

The Company expects to repay the bridge loan in its entirety by May 12, 2005. Accordingly, the available six-month, $600 million extension option of the loan will not be utilized. Principal repayment of the three-year $3.6 billion term loan begins in November 2005 with semi-annual payments in 2006, quarterly payments in 2007 and a final $1.8 billion payment in November 2007. Principal repayment of the four-year $2 billion term loan began in January 2005 with quarterly payments scheduled through September 2008 and a final $1.9 billion payment in November 2008. The Company has proposed to holders of this four-year term loan to reduce the current interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25% by 50 basis points and pay a 10-basis-point consent fee for the reduction. There can be no assurance that this proposal will be accepted by the holders on these or any other terms. The credit facility currently bears interest at a weighted-average rate of LIBOR plus approximately 223 basis points.

We are generally required to apply the net proceeds of future mortgage financings and refinancings, sales of equity, and asset dispositions (including by casualty or condemnation) toward prepayment of the credit facility in accordance with various priorities set out in the credit facility. Exceptions to this requirement include capital expenditures, $500 million annually per our written request to the lenders and other items. The credit facility is secured by a pledge of the Operating Partnership’s ownership interest in TRCLP and in GGPLP L.L.C and also by a pledge of the interest in an operating account in which we will deposit any distributions the Operating Partnership receives from our interests in TRCLP.

19 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

During the term of the facility, we are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants. Upon the occurrence of an event of default contained in the credit facility, the lenders under the facilities will have the option of declaring immediately due and payable all amounts outstanding under the agreement. The credit facility contains events of default including failure to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, failure to remain listed on the New York Stock Exchange and such customary events as nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts, breach of representations and warranties, breach of covenant, cross-default to other indebtedness and certain bankruptcy events.

2003 Credit Facility

In April 2003, we established the “2003 Credit Facility,” a revolving credit facility and term loan with initial borrowing availability of approximately $779.0 million (which was subsequently increased to approximately $1.25 billion). The 2003 Credit Facility was repaid in November 2004, in conjunction with financing of the TRC Merger.

Unsecured Term Loans

In conjunction with the TRC Merger, we assumed $1.6 billion of publicly-traded unsecured debt. Included in this total is $46.6 million of unsecured, medium-term notes which bear interest at fixed rates of 8.09% to 8.78% and mature at various dates from 2005 to 2007. The remaining $1.1 billion of publicly-traded unsecured debt bears interest at fixed rates ranging from 3.65% to 8.00% and matures at various dates from 2008 to 2013.

During August 2002, we arranged for an aggregate of $150.0 million in loans from two separate groups of banks. We borrowed $80.0 million on this loan in August 2002 and $70.0 million in September 2002. These two-year loans were repaid in 2004.

In conjunction with our acquisition of JP Realty in 2002, we assumed $100 million of ten-year senior unsecured notes which bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.29% and were issued by PDC in March 1998. The notes require semi-annual interest payments. Annual principal payments of $25 million as provided by the terms of the notes began in March 2005 and continue until the loan is fully repaid in March 2008.

Interest Rate Swaps

Concurrent with the issuance of the GGP MPTC certificates, we purchased interest rate protection agreements which were structured to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. An equal amount of interest rate protection agreements were simultaneously sold to fully offset the effect of these agreements and to recoup a substantial portion of the cost of such agreements.

To achieve a more desirable balance between fixed and variable-rate debt, we have also entered into certain swap agreements as follows:

	GGP			2004 Credit			Property
	MPTC			Agreement			Specific
Total notional amount (in millions)	$	125.0		$	350.0		$	14.1
Average fixed effective rate (pay rate)		4.59	%		3.43	%		6.84	%
Average variable interest rate of related debt (receive rate)	LIBOR + .92			LIBOR + 2.25			LIBOR + 2.13

Such swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and are intended to hedge our exposure to future interest rate changes on the related variable-rate debt.

20 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds

We had outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 of approximately $131.9 million and $194 million, respectively, primarily in connection with insurance requirements, special real estate assessments and construction obligations.

NOTE 5 COMMON DISTRIBUTIONS

The following chart summarizes our common distributions paid in 2005 and 2004.

							Operating
					General		Partnership
					Growth		Limited
	Amount per				Stockholders		Partners
Declaration Date	Share		Record Date	Payment Date	Amount		Amount
April 4, 2005	$	0.36	April 15, 2005	April 29, 2005	$	85,603	$	19,325
January 7, 2005		0.36	January 17, 2005	January 31, 2005		84,506		19,992
August 20, 2004		0.36	October 15, 2004	October 29, 2004		78,727		19,992
July 2, 2004		0.30	July 15, 2004	July 30, 2004		65,575		16,662
April 5, 2004		0.30	April 15, 2004	April 30, 2004		65,357		16,704
January 5, 2004		0.30	January 15, 2004	January 30, 2004		65,193		16,714

NOTE 6 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, from time to time, we are involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of our properties. In management’s opinion, the liabilities if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

We lease land or buildings at certain properties from third parties. Consolidated rental expense including participation rent related to these leases was $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The leases generally provide for a right of first refusal in favor of us in the event of a proposed sale of the property by the landlord.

We periodically enter into contingent agreements for the acquisition of properties. Each acquisition is subject to satisfactory completion of due diligence and, in the case of property acquired under development, completion of the project .

TRC acquired various assets, including Summerlin, a master-planned community in suburban Las Vegas, Nevada, in the acquisition of The Hughes Corporation (“Hughes”) in 1996. In connection with the acquisition of Hughes, TRC entered into a Contingent Stock Agreement (“CSA”) for the benefit of the former Hughes owners or their successors (“beneficiaries”). Under the terms of the CSA, shares of TRC common stock were issuable to the beneficiaries based on the appraised values of defined asset groups, including Summerlin, at specified termination dates through 2009 and/or cash flows from the development and/or sale of those assets prior to the termination dates.

We assumed TRC’s obligation under the CSA to issue shares of common stock twice a year to beneficiaries under the CSA. The amount of shares is based upon a formula set forth under the CSA and upon our stock price. Such issuances could be dilutive to our existing stockholders. In addition, under the assumption agreement, we agreed that following the effective time of the TRC Merger there would not be a prejudicial effect on the beneficiaries

21 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

under the CSA with respect to their receipt of securities pursuant to the CSA as a result of the TRC Merger. We further agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the beneficiaries against losses arising out of any breach by us of the foregoing covenants.

We account for the beneficiaries’ share of earnings from the assets as an operating expense. We will account for any distributions to the beneficiaries in 2009, in connection with a valuation related to assets that we own as of such date as additional investments in the related assets (that is, contingent consideration). A total of 519,164 shares of our common stock were issued in February 2005 pursuant to the CSA.

NOTE 7 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND PROPERTIES HELD FOR SALE

In August 2004, our Board of Directors approved plans to dispose of certain of the commercial/business properties originally acquired in the JP Realty acquisition in July 2002. The sale closed on November 1, 2004 for $67.4 million and a gain of approximately $11.2 million was recognized.

Pursuant to SFAS 144, the Company has reclassified the operations of the industrial properties to discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as follows. Revenues and income, before minority interests, were as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2004
Industrial properties:
Revenues	$	1,760
Income	$	936

NOTE 8 RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2004, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“VIEs”), to improve financial reporting of special purpose and other entities. We adopted FIN 46, as amended, as of December 31, 2003. Certain VIEs that are qualifying special purpose entities (“QSPEs”) will not be required to be consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46. In addition, FIN 46 expands the disclosure requirements for the beneficiary of a significant or a majority of the variable interests to provide information regarding the nature, purpose and financial characteristics of the entities. We have certain special purpose entities, primarily created to facilitate the issuance of our commercial mortgage-backed securities (Note 4) and other securitized debt or to facilitate the tax-increment financing of certain improvements at our properties. Because these special purpose entities are QSPEs, they are not required to be consolidated in our consolidated financial statements. As our Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates have operating agreements granting the independent third-party joint venturers substantive participating rights, the implementation of FIN 46 did not result in the consolidation of any previously unconsolidated affiliates.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity,” (“SFAS 150”) which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability. The effective date of a portion of the Statement has been indefinitely postponed by the FASB. We did not enter into new financial instruments subsequent to May 2003 which would fall within the scope of this statement. None of our transactions, arrangements or financial instruments has been identified that appear to meet

22 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

the criteria for liability recognition in accordance with paragraphs 9 and 10 under SFAS 150 due to the indefinite life of the joint venture arrangements. Accordingly, even if the effectiveness of the measurement and classification provision of these paragraphs is no longer postponed, we do not expect that it will be required to reclassify the liquidation amounts of such minority interests to liabilities.

On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets-An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”. The amendments made by SFAS No. 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with at broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have “commercial substance”. SFAS No. 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 153 on June 15, 2005 will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”). SFAS 123R replaces SFAS No. 123, which we adopted in the second quarter of 2002. SFAS 123R requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements and be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments used. SFAS No. 123R is effective as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On February 7, 2005, the SEC staff published certain views concerning the accounting by lessees for leasehold improvements, rent holidays, lessor funding of lessee expenditures and other tenant inducements. Although the application of these views to lessors was not specified by the SEC and a formal accounting standard modifying existing practice on these items has not been issued or proposed, we have conducted a review of our accounting relative to such items. We believe that our leasing practices and agreements with a majority of our tenants provide that leasehold improvements that we fund represent fixed assets that we own and control and that leases with such arrangements are properly accounted for as commencing at the completion of construction of such assets. A smaller percentage of our tenant leases do not provide for landlord funding but rather provide for tenant funded construction and furnishing of the leased premises prior to the formal commencement of the lease. We have concluded that the cumulative incremental straight-line rental revenue that would have been recognized on such leases if they had commenced on tenant possession of such space rather than the lease-specified commencement date to be approximately $10.1 million at December 31, 2004 which was recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2005. The recognition of straight-line rental revenue on this accelerated basis will have no effect on periodic or cumulative cash flows to be received pursuant to a tenant lease.

NOTE 9 INCOME TAXES

We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment (“REIT”) trust under sections 856-860 of the Code, commencing with our taxable year beginning January 1, 1993. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including requirements to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income and to distribute to stockholders or pay tax on 100% of capital gains and to meet certain asset and income tests. It is management’s current intention to adhere to these requirements.

We also have subsidiaries which we have elected to be treated as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries and which are, therefore, subject to Federal and state income taxes. Our primary TRSs include GGMI, entities which own our planned community properties and other TRSs acquired in the TRC Merger. Current Federal income taxes of certain of these TRSs are likely to increase in future years as we exhaust certain net loss carry forwards of such entities and as certain planned community developments are completed. Such increases could be significant.

23 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

The income tax provision was insignificant in 2004. The income tax provision (benefit) for the three months ended March 31, 2005 is as follows:

(In Thousands)
Current	$	4,726
Deferred		(6,033	)
Total	$	(1,307	)

Each TRS is a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. Net deferred tax liabilities were $1.3 billion at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

Due to the uncertainty of the realization of certain tax carryforwards, we established valuation allowances. The majority of the valuation allowances related to net operating loss carryforwards where there is uncertainty regarding their realizability and will more likely than not, expire unused. However, the deferred income tax benefit recognized in 2005 is primarily due to a reduction in certain GGMI tax asset valuation allowances due to an assessment of tax structuring opportunities now available due to the TRC Merger.

NOTE 10 SEGMENTS

We have the following reportable segments:

•   Retail and Other — includes the operation and management of regional shopping centers, office and industrial properties, downtown specialty marketplaces, the retail and non-retail rental components of mixed-use projects and community retail centers

•   Community Development — includes the development and sale of land, primarily in large-scale, long-term community development projects in and around Columbia, Maryland; Summerlin, Nevada; and Houston, Texas

Our two business segments offer different products or services and are managed separately because each requires different operating strategies or management expertise. Prior to the TRC Merger, substantially all of our business involved ownership and operation of shopping centers. As we evaluated operating results and resource allocation on a property-by-property basis, we had concluded that we had a single reportable segment. We do not distinguish or group our consolidated operations on a geographic basis. Further, all material operations are within the United States and no customer or tenant comprises more than 10% of consolidated revenues.

The operating measure used to assess operating results for the business segments is Real Estate Property Net Operating Income (“NOI”). Management believes that NOI provides useful information about a property’s operating performance.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, except that we account for real estate ventures in which we have joint interest and control and certain other minority interest ventures using the proportionate share method rather than the equity method. This difference affects only the reported revenues and operating expenses of the segments and has no effect on our reported net earnings.

Operating results for the segments and reconciliations of real estate property net operating income to income from continuing operations in the consolidated financial statements are as follows:

24 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005							2004
	Retail		Community					Retail
(In Thousands)	and Other		Development		Total			and Other
Property revenues:
Minimum rents	$	507,152	$	—		507,152		$	286,195
Tenant recoveries		225,731		—		225,731			133,952
Overage rents		15,313		—		15,313			9,489
Land sales		—		69,973		69,973			—
Other		37,039		1		37,040			11,201
Total property revenues		785,235		69,974		855,209			440,837
Property operating expenses:
Real estate taxes		67,182		—		67,182			37,297
Repairs and maintenance		64,741		—		64,741			32,134
Marketing		15,957		—		15,957			13,732
Other property operating costs		120,590		1		120,591			54,620
Land sales operations		259		59,504		59,763			—
Provision for doubtful accounts		5,311		—		5,311			3,490
Total property operating expenses		274,040		59,505		333,545			141,273
Real estate property net operating income	$	511,195	$	10,469	$	521,664		$	299,564
Real estate property net operating income of unconsolidated properties						(99,917	)		(64,810	)
Management and other fees						19,563			18,701
Discontinued operations and other revenues						412			(829	)
Property management and other costs						(34,637	)		(25,012	)
General and administrative						(2,811	)		(2,190	)
Depreciation and amortization						(163,309	)		(72,904	)
Operating income						240,965			152,520
Interest income						2,217			417
Interest expense						(245,028	)		(87,087	)
Income taxes						1,307			(7	)
Income allocated to minority interest						(12,856	)		(25,438	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates						26,460			17,930
Income from continuing operations					$	13,065		$	58,335

25 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

All references to numbered Notes are to specific notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report and which Notes are incorporated into the applicable response by reference. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with such Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes. Capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) have the same meanings as in such Notes.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

We may make forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report, in other reports and proxy statements that we file with the SEC and in other information that we release publicly or provide to investors. In addition, our senior management might make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, the media and others.

Forward-looking statements include:

•   Projections of our revenues, income, earnings per share, Funds From Operations, capital expenditures, dividends, leverage, capital structure or other financial items;

•   Descriptions of plans or objectives of our management for future operations, including pending acquisitions and debt repayment or restructuring;

•   Forecasts of our future economic performance; and

•	Descriptions of assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing.
	In this Quarterly Report, for example, we make forward-looking statements discussing our expectations about:

•   Future repayment of debt, including the ratio of variable to fixed-rate debt in our portfolio

•   Future interest rates

•   Benefits of the TRC Merger

•   Repayment of some of our debt

Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements often include words such as “anticipate”, “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “target,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements should not be unduly relied upon. They give our expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we disclaim any obligation to update them except as required by law.

There are several factors, many beyond our control, which could cause results to differ materially from our expectations. Some of these factors are described in Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report. Other factors, such as credit, market, operational, liquidity, interest rate and other risks, are described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Any factor described in this Quarterly Report could by itself, or together with one or more other factors, adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. There are also other factors that we have not described in this Quarterly Report that could cause results to differ from our expectations.

MANAGEMENT’S OVERVIEW & SUMMARY

Our primary business is the ownership, management, leasing and development of retail and office rental property. We also develop and sell land for residential, commercial and other uses primarily in master-planned communities. We strive to increase cash flow and net income by acquiring, developing, renovating and managing retail rental property in major and middle markets throughout the United States.

Our business strategy includes selectively making strategic acquisitions to enhance the yields of the acquired properties through subsequent proactive property management and leasing (including tenant remerchandising), operating cost

26 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

reductions, physical expansions, redevelopments and capital reinvestment. Some of the actions that we take to increase productivity include changing the tenant mix, adding vendor carts or kiosks and even full expansions or renovations of centers. Acquisitions have included single centers, privately held portfolios and public-to-public purchases such as TRC for $14.3 billion in November 2004. Although we have not acquired any properties to date during 2005, during 2004, we acquired TRC, 100% interests in five retail properties, the remaining 50% interest in one retail property, a 50% interest in two retail properties, a 33 1/3% ownership interest in a property to be developed in Costa Rica and a 50% interest in a joint venture owning interests in two operating retail properties, a property management company and a property to be developed in Brazil, all for an aggregate consideration of approximately $16.1 billion. The continued acquisition of property is the most significant factor in overall increases from year to year in our cash flows and net income.

The expansion and renovation of a property also results in increased cash flows and net income as a result of increased customer traffic, trade area penetration and improved competitive position of the property. As of March 31, 2005, we had 22 major approved redevelopment projects underway (each with current incurred expenditures, at our ownership share) for a total cost of approximately $627.5 million (including our ownership share of Unconsolidated Properties).

In addition to property redevelopment, we also develop retail centers from the ground-up. In August 2004, we completed the ground-up development of Jordan Creek Town Center in West Des Moines, Iowa. The center, costing approximately $175 million, is a 1.9 million square foot enclosed regional shopping mall with three anchor stores, a hotel and an amphitheater. We have two other new development projects under construction and ten other potential new developments that are projected to open in 2006 through 2008.

Our Community Development segment includes the development and sale of residential and commercial land, primarily in large-scale projects in and around Columbia, Maryland; Houston, Texas and Summerlin, Nevada. We develop and sell finished and undeveloped land in such communities to builders and other developers for residential, commercial and other uses. Land sale activity at our newest project, the Bridgelands in Houston, Texas, is expected to commence in mid to late 2005.

We believe that the most significant operating factor affecting incremental cash flow and net income is increased rents (either base rental revenue or overage rents) earned from tenants at our properties. These rental revenue increases are primarily achieved by:

• Renewing expiring leases and re-leasing existing space at rates higher than expiring or existing rates. Average annual new/renewal lease rates at our consolidated properties for 2005 were $33.23 per square foot, $.74 per square foot higher than the average annualized in place rent per square foot and $3.60 per square foot higher than the average rent per square foot for leases which expire in 2005. Lease durations for in-line specialty stores typically average close to ten years. As a result, many leases that are expiring now were signed in the early to mid 1990’s during a challenging retail environment.

• Increasing occupancy and expanding rentable square footage at the properties so that more space is generating rent. Space leased at properties which are not under redevelopment was 90.0 percent at March 31, 2005, comparable to the occupancy at March 31, 2004.

• Increased tenant sales in which we participate through overage rents. Tenant sales per square foot at our Consolidated Properties increased 17.3 percent over first quarter 2004 to $407 per square foot primarily due to our focus on acquisitions of premier properties with high productivity, including TRCLP, as well as our focus on operating income growth through aggressive management, remerchandising and reinvestment.

27 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

The following table summarizes additional operating statistics for our Consolidated Properties as well as properties which are owned through joint venture arrangements and unconsolidated for GAAP purposes (the “Unconsolidated Properties”). We provide on-site management and other services to substantially all of the Unconsolidated Properties. Because the management operating philosophies and strategies are generally the same whether the properties are consolidated or unconsolidated, we believe that financial information and operating statistics with respect to all properties, both consolidated and unconsolidated, provide important insights into our operating results, including the relative size and significance of these elements of our overall operations. Collectively, we refer to our Consolidated and Unconsolidated Properties as our “Company Portfolio.”

COMPANY PORTFOLIO DATA

	As of and/or for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
	Consolidated Retail			Unconsolidated			Retail
	Properties			Retail Properties			Portfolio (b)
OPERATING STATISTICS (a)
Space leased at centers not under redevelopment (as a %)		89.8	%		90.4	%		90.0	%
Trailing 12 month total tenant sales per sq. ft. (c)	$	407		$	434		$	416
% change in total sales (c)		3.7	%		5.0	%		4.2	%
% change in comparable sales (c)		2.6	%		2.9	%		2.7	%
Mall and Freestanding GLA excluding space under redevelopment (in sq. ft.)		42,493,200			18,849,753			61,342,953
CERTAIN FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Average annualized in place rent per sq. ft.	$	32.49		$	35.47		$	33.30
Average rent per sq. ft. for new/renewal leases (excludes 2005 acquisitions)	$	33.23		$	37.35		$	34.91
Average rent per sq. ft. for leases expiring in 2005 (excludes 2005 acquisitions)	$	29.63		$	32.31		$	30.42

(a)	Data is for 100% of the Mall GLA in each portfolio, including those centers that are owned in part by unconsolidated affiliates. Data excludes properties currently being redeveloped and/or remerchandised and miscellaneous (non-mall) properties.
(b)	Data presented in the column “Retail Portfolio” are weighted average amounts.
(c)	Due to tenant sales reporting timelines, data presented is as of February 2005.

SEASONALITY

Both our Retail and Other segment and our tenants’ businesses are seasonal in nature. Our tenants’ stores typically achieve higher sales levels during the fourth quarter because of the holiday selling season, and with lesser, though still significant, sales fluctuations associated with the Easter holiday and back-to-school events. Although we have a year-long temporary leasing program, a significant portion of the rents received from short-term tenants are collected during the months of November and December. In addition, the majority of our tenants have December or January lease years for purposes of calculating annual overage rent amounts. Accordingly, overage rent thresholds are most commonly achieved in the fourth quarter. As a result, occupancy levels and revenue production are generally highest in the fourth quarter of each year.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates for a variety of reasons, certain of which are described below.

28 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Critical accounting policies are those that are both significant to the overall presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments. For example, significant estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to useful lives of assets, revenue recognition estimates for Community Development Segment, capitalization of development and leasing costs, recoverable amounts of receivables and deferred taxes and initial valuations and related amortization periods of deferred costs and intangibles, particularly with respect to property acquisitions, as further discussed below. Our critical accounting policies as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 have not changed during the first quarter of 2005.

ACQUISITIONS

Another significant factor relating to overall increases in the Company’s cash flow and net income is the acquisition of additional properties as detailed in the following chart:

	Acquisition
	Date
2004
A 50% ownership interest in Burlington Town Center	January 7
Redlands Mall	January 16
The remaining 50% ownership interest in Town East Mall	March 1
Four Seasons Town Centre	March 5
A 33 1/3% ownership interest in GGP/Sambil Costa Rica	April 30
A 50% ownership interest in Riverchase Galleria	May 11
Mall of Louisiana	May 12
The Grand Canal Shoppes	May 17
A 50% ownership interest in GGP/NIG Brazil	July 30
Stonestown Galleria	August 13
The Rouse Company	November 12

Although the Company has not made any acquisitions in 2005, readers of this MD&A should note that, as described in the results of operations discussion below, the increases in cash flow and elements of income in 2005 versus 2004 are primarily due to the acquisition of property and the related financing of such acquisitions.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Company revenues are primarily derived from tenants in the form of fixed minimum rents, overage rents and recoveries of operating expenses. In addition, the consolidated results of operations of the Company are impacted by acquisitions. Results of operations of the Company, as discussed below, relate primarily to the revenues and expenses of the Consolidated Properties and our TRS entities. Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. As a result, results of operations of Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates are reported as “Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates.” Additionally, the following discussion of management’s analysis of operations focuses on the consolidated financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report. Trends in Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as defined by The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) have not been presented in this management discussion and analysis of operations, as FFO, under current SEC reporting guidelines, can only be considered a supplemental measure of Company operating performance.

29 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

The following table compares major revenue and expense items for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

For The Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)	2005		2004		$ Change		% Change
Total revenues	$	709,533	$	359,826	$	349,707		97.2	%
Minimum rents		410,484		221,694		188,790		85.2
Tenant recoveries		182,007		102,222		79,785		78.1
Overage rents		13,586		8,352		5,234		62.7
Land sales		61,406		—		61,406		100.0
Management and other fees		19,563		18,701		862		4.6
Total expenses		468,568		207,306		261,262		126.0
Real estate taxes		53,504		28,121		25,383		90.3
Repairs and maintenance		53,817		24,659		29,158		118.2
Other property operating costs		89,763		41,196		48,567		117.9
Land sales operations		54,105		—		54,105		100.0
Marketing		12,368		10,440		1,928		18.5
Property management and other costs		34,637		25,012		9,625		38.5
Depreciation and amortization		163,309		72,904		90,405		124.0
Interest expense		245,028		87,087		157,941		181.4
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates		26,460		17,930		8,530		47.6

Total revenues increased $331.1 million as a result of acquisitions and $18.6 million primarily as a result of higher minimum rents and operating expense recoveries from tenants.

Minimum rents increased primarily as a result of acquisitions. Minimum rents also include the net effect of above and below-market lease rent accretion pursuant to SFAS 141 and 142 (Note 1) of $7.6 million in 2005 and $5.6 million in 2004 and approximately $10.1 million related to a change in the commencement period for certain previously recorded leases. Tenant recoveries increased $75.8 million as a result of acquisitions and $4.0 million due to higher recoverable expenses at various properties. Overage rents increased $4.9 million as a result of acquisitions and $0.4 million as a result of higher tenant sales.

Land sale revenues in 2005 are due to the Community Development segment, the properties of which were acquired in the TRC Merger. Revenues in 2005 were comparable to those achieved by The Rouse Company in 2004, excluding bulk sales.

Management and other fees increased approximately $0.9 million compared to 2004. The acquisition of TRC resulted in an increase of approximately $3.8 million in fees. This increase was substantially offset by the Company acquiring the remaining 50% interest in Town East in March 2004. As the Town East venture is now consolidated in the results of operations of the Company, GGMI no longer receives a management fee from this property.

Total expenses increased $249.1 million as a result of acquisitions and $12.3 million as a result of higher depreciation and property costs related to completed developments and renovations.

Real estate taxes increased $22.8 million as a result of acquisitions and $2.6 million as a result of increased property taxes at certain of our properties, including Jordan Creek which opened in August 2004. Repairs and maintenance increased $27.9 million due to acquisitions and $1.2 million primarily as a result of higher contracted expenses. Property operating costs increased $46.5 million as a result of acquisitions and $2.1 million as a result of higher energy costs. Real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance and other property operating expenses are generally recoverable from tenants and the increases in these expenses are generally consistent with the increase in tenant recovery revenues.

Property management and other costs increased primarily as a result of acquisitions subsequent to March 31, 2004.

30 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

Marketing expenses increased due to acquisitions. Depreciation and amortization increased $87.2 million as a result of acquisitions and $2.9 million as a result of additional depreciation on completed developments and redevelopments and other capitalized building and equipment costs.

Interest expense increased $147.8 million as a result of increased debt associated with acquisitions and $10.1 million as a result of higher debt levels primarily as a result of redevelopments, working capital requirements and higher average interest rates in comparison to the same period last year.

Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates increased primarily due to the Riverchase and GGP/NIG Brazil joint venture acquisitions in 2004 and the operations of unconsolidated affiliates of TRCLP which were acquired in conjunction with the TRC Merger.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES OF THE COMPANY

Our primary uses and sources of cash are as follows:

Uses		Sources
Short-term liquidity and capital needs such as:
•	Tenant construction allowances	•	Operating cash flow, including
•	Minor improvements made to individual		the distributions of our share of
	properties that are not recoverable		cash flow produced by our
	through common area maintenance charges		Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates
	to tenants	•	Land sales from the Community
•	Dividend payments		Development segment
•	Debt repayment requirements, including
	both principal and interest
Longer-term liquidity needs such as:
•	Acquisitions	•	Secured loans collateralized by
•	New development		individual properties
•	Major renovation or expansion programs	•	Unsecured loans at either a
	at individual properties		venture or company level
•	Debt repayment requirements, including	•	Construction loans
	both principal and interest	•	Mini-permanent loans
		•	Long-term project financing
		•	Joint venture financing with
			institutional partners
		•	Equity securities
		•	Potential sale of certain office
			and industrial property acquired in
			the TRC Merger

As of March 31, 2005, we had consolidated debt of approximately $20.4 billion, of which approximately $12.5 billion bears interest at fixed rates (after taking into effect certain interest rate swap agreements) and approximately $7.9 billion bears interest at variable rates. In addition, our Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates have mortgage loans of which our allocable portion based on our respective ownership percentages is approximately $2.8 billion, including $2.0 billion which bears interest at fixed rates (after taking into effect certain interest rate swap agreements) and $0.8 billion which bears interest at variable rates. We intend to reduce the percentage of variable-rate debt to total debt throughout 2005 and 2006. In such, regard, in the first quarter of 2005, we have obtained approximately $1 billion of consolidated debt through such refinancing, with the new debt bearing interest at a weighted average rate per annum of approximately 5.1%

Except in instances where certain Consolidated Properties are cross-collateralized with the Unconsolidated Properties or we have retained or agreed to be responsible for a portion of the debt of a property when it was contributed to or acquired

31 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

by an Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliate, we have not otherwise guaranteed the debt of the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates.

Our net cash flows for the quarter were as follows:

(In Thousands)	2005			2004
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	135,535		$	133,484
Net cash used in investing activities		(110,339	)		(146,178	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(15,642	)		10,955

Substantially all of the changes were the result of acquisitions.

2004 Credit Facility

The significant terms of the notes comprising the 2004 Credit Facility are as follows:

			Outstanding at
(In Millions)	Initial Capacity		March 31, 2005
Six-month bridge loan	$	1,145.0	$	433.2
Three-year term loan		3,650.0		3,634.2
Four-year term loan		2,000.0		1,995.0
Revolving credit facility		500.0		223.0
	$	7,295.0	$	6,285.4

The Company expects to repay the bridge loan in its entirety by May 12, 2005. Accordingly, the available six-month, $600 million extension option of the loan will not be utilized. Principal repayment of the three-year $3.6 billion term loan begins in November 2005 with semi-annual payments in 2006, quarterly payments in 2007 and a final $1.8 billion payment in November 2007. Principal repayment of the four-year $2 billion term loan began in January 2005 with quarterly payments scheduled through September 2008 and a final $1.9 billion payment in November 2008. The Company has proposed to holders of this four-year term loan to reduce the current interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25% by 50 basis points and pay a 10-basis-point consent fee for the reduction. There can be no assurance that this proposal will be accepted by the holders on these or any other terms. The credit facility currently bears interest at a weighted-average rate of LIBOR plus approximately 210 basis points.

It is our current intention to repay the 2004 Credit Facility by the third quarter of 2006. Funds required for this repayment are expected to come from a variety of sources which may include any or all of the following:

•   Increased cash flow from new and existing properties, including the Community Development segment

•   Refinancing low loan-to-value mortgages on existing properties

•   Placing mortgages on currently unencumbered properties, including the Community Development segment

•   Selective asset sales of office and industrial properties

•   Strategic joint ventures

•   Equity issuances

We are generally required to apply the net proceeds of future mortgage financings and refinancings, sales of equity, and asset dispositions (including by casualty or condemnation) toward prepayment of the credit facility in accordance with various priorities set out in the credit facility. Exceptions to this requirement include capital expenditures, $500 million annually per our written request to the lenders and other items. The credit facility is secured by a pledge of the Operating Partnership’s ownership interest in TRCLP and in GGPLP L.L.C and also by a pledge of the interest in an operating account in which we will deposit any distributions the Operating Partnership receives from our interests in TRCLP.

During the term of the facility, we are subject to customary affirmative and negative covenants including limitations on indebtedness, a fixed charge coverage ratio and debt to equity levels. We do not believe these covenants create material

32 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

limitations on our liquidity or our ability to conduct our business, but may limit our ability to finance additional acquisitions with debt. Upon the occurrence of an event of default contained in the credit facility, the lenders under the facilities will have the option of declaring immediately due and payable all amounts outstanding under the agreement. The credit facility contains events of default including failure to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, failure to remain listed on the New York Stock Exchange and such customary events as nonpayment of principal, interest, fees or other amounts, breach of representations and warranties, breach of covenant, cross-default to other indebtedness and certain bankruptcy events.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table aggregates the future maturities of the Company’s contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2005:

(In Thousands)	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		Subsequent		Total
Long-term debt-principal	$	1,229,545	$	2,147,559	$	3,868,605	$	4,548,855	$	3,522,363	$	5,075,883	$	20,392,810
Retained debt-principal		132,257		61		15,734		—		—		—		148,052	(1)
Ground lease payments		8,164		10,820		10,816		10,816		10,816		476,598		528,030
Committed real estate acquisition contracts		—		30,000		250,000		—		—		—		280,000	(2)
Purchase obligations		139,962		1,100		920		—		—		—		141,982	(3)
Other long-term liabilities		—		—		—		—		—		—		0	(4)
Total	$	1,509,928	$	2,189,540	$	4,146,075	$	4,559,671	$	3,533,179	$	5,552,481	$	21,490,874

(1)	As separately detailed in Note 3.
(2)	Reflects $250 million related to the Palazzo (Note 2) and $30 million related to a commitment to purchase Whaler’s Village, a shopping center on the island of Maui, Hawaii. We have also committed to invest $17.4 million in joint ventures in Costa Rica and Brazil.
(3)	Reflects $141,982 accrued and incurred construction costs payable. Routine trade payables have been excluded. Other construction costs related to current redevelopment and development projects are currently expected to be approximately $676.5 million for consolidated properties and $459.8 for unconsolidated properties.
(4)	Other long-term liabilities related to interest expense on long-term debt or ongoing real estate taxes have not been included in the table as such amounts depend upon future amounts outstanding and future applicable real estate tax and interest rates. Interest expense was $245.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $472.2 million for fiscal 2004. Real estate tax expense was $53.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $128.3 million for fiscal 2004.

Although agreements to refinance debt maturing in 2005 and 2006 have not yet been reached, the Company currently anticipates that all of its debt will be repaid or refinanced on a timely basis.

If additional capital is required for any of the above listed obligations or for other purposes, we believe that we can increase the amounts drawn or available under our credit facilities, obtain new revolving credit facilities, obtain an interim bank loan, obtain additional mortgage financing on under-leveraged or unencumbered assets, enter into new joint venture partnership arrangements or raise additional debt or equity capital. However, there can be no assurance that we can obtain such financing on satisfactory terms. We will continue to monitor our capital structure, investigate potential investments or joint venture partnership arrangements and purchase additional properties if they can be acquired and financed on terms that we reasonably believe will enhance long-term stockholder value. In addition, we anticipate that we will continue our current practice of initially financing acquisitions with variable-rate debt. When the acquired property operating cash flow has been increased, we anticipate refinancing portions of such variable-rate acquisition debt with pooled or property-specific, non-recourse fixed-rate mortgage financing. Such replacement financing, if based on increased property cash flow, should yield increased refinancing proceeds or other more favorable financing terms.

REIT Status

In order to remain qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes, General Growth must distribute or pay tax on 100% of capital gains and at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to stockholders. The following factors, among others, will affect operating cash flow and, accordingly, influence the decisions of the Board of Directors regarding distributions:

•   Scheduled increases in base rents of existing leases

•   Changes in minimum base rents and/or overage rents attributable to replacement of existing leases with new or renewal leases

•   Changes in occupancy rates at existing properties and procurement of leases for newly developed properties

•   Necessary capital improvement expenditures or debt repayments at existing properties

•   Our share of distributions of operating cash flow generated by the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates, less oversight costs and debt service on additional loans that have been or will be incurred

•   Anticipated proceeds from sales in our Community Development Segment.

33 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

We anticipate that our operating cash flow, and potential new debt or equity from future offerings, new financings or refinancings will provide adequate liquidity to conduct our operations, fund general and administrative expenses, fund operating costs and interest payments and allow distributions to our preferred and common stockholders in accordance with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

Changes in interest rates are the most significant economic condition which would impact our financial condition. Increases in interest rates, as have occurred in the first quarter of 2005, have and will adversely impact us due to our outstanding variable rate debt which has increased substantially due to the TRC Merger. We have limited our exposure to interest rate fluctuations related to a portion of our variable-rate debt by the use of interest rate cap and swap agreements. Subject to current market conditions, we have a policy of replacing variable-rate debt with fixed-rate debt. However, in an increasing interest rate environment (which generally follows improved market conditions), the fixed rates we can obtain with such replacement fixed-rate debt will also continue to increase.

According to the National Retail Federation, the 2004 holiday season was the strongest since 1999. Despite these favorable trends, some economists remain cautious about prospects for continued improvements in retail markets and future increases in interest rates. Growth in retail markets would lead to stronger demand for leaseable space, ability to increase rents to tenants with stronger sales performance and increased rents computed as a percentage of tenant sales.

The Company and its affiliates currently have ownership interests in 163 consolidated and 58 unconsolidated operating regional malls and community centers, primarily in the United States. These properties are diversified both geographically and by property type (both major and middle market properties) and this may mitigate the impact of any economic decline at a particular property or in a particular region of the country. In addition, the diverse combination of the Company’s tenants is important because no single tenant (by trade name) comprises more than 3% of the Company’s annualized total revenues.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

As described in Note 8, new accounting pronouncements have been issued which are effective for the current year. There has not been a significant impact on the Company’s reported operations due to the application of such new statements. There are no pronouncements or interpretations that have not yet been adopted that are expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

At March 31, 2005, we had consolidated debt of $20.4 billion, including $8.4 billion of variable-rate debt of which approximately $489.1 million is subject to interest rate swap agreements, which fix the interest we are required to pay on such debt to approximately 3.83% per annum. Although the majority of the remaining variable-rate debt is subject to interest rate cap agreements pursuant to the loan agreements and financing terms, such interest rate caps generally limit the Company’s interest rate exposure only if LIBOR exceeds a rate per annum significantly higher (generally above 8% per annum) than current LIBOR rates. Therefore, a 25 basis point movement in the interest rate on the remaining approximately $7.9 billion of variable-rate debt would result in an approximately $20 million annualized increase or decrease in consolidated interest expense and operating cash flows.

In addition, the Company is subject to interest rate exposure as a result of the variable-rate debt collateralized by the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates for which interest rate swap agreements have not been obtained. The Company’s share (based on the Company’s respective equity ownership interests in the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates) of such remaining variable-rate debt was approximately $855.9 million at March 31, 2005. A similar 25 basis point annualized movement in the interest rate on the variable-rate debt of the Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates would result in approximately $2 million annualized increase or decrease in the Company’s equity in the income and operating cash flows from Unconsolidated Real Estate Affiliates.

34 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

The Company is further subject to interest rate risk with respect to its fixed-rate financing in that changes in interest rates will impact the fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate financing. To determine the fair market value, the fixed-rate debt is discounted at a rate based on an estimate of current lending rates, assuming the debt is outstanding through maturity and considering the debt’s collateral. At March 31, 2005, the fair value of our debt is estimated to be $20.3 billion compared to the carrying value of $20.4 billion. If LIBOR were to increase by 25 basis points, the fair value of the debt would be approximately $181 million lower than the carrying value and the fair value of our swap agreements would increase by approximately $1.8 million.

The Company has an ongoing program of refinancing its consolidated and unconsolidated variable and fixed rate debt and believes that this program allows it to vary its ratio of fixed to variable-rate debt and to stagger its debt maturities to respond to changing market rate conditions. Reference is made to the above discussions of Liquidity and Capital Resources of the Company and Note 4 for additional debt information.

The Company has not entered into any transactions using derivative commodity instruments.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report have been designed and are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. We believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

35 of 37

GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are currently subject to litigation arising in the normal course of its business. In the opinion of management, none of these lawsuits or claims against us, either individually or in the aggregate, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. In addition, we believe that we currently have adequate insurance in place to cover any such significant litigation.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

99.1 Risk Factors

36 of 37

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
	(Registrant)
Date: May 9, 2005	by:	/s/: Bernard Freibaum
		Bernard Freibaum
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

37 of 37

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Bucksbaum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of General Growth Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 9, 2005	/s/:John Bucksbaum
	John Bucksbaum
	Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bernard Freibaum, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of General Growth Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 9, 2005	/s/: Bernard Freibaum
	Bernard Freibaum
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Bucksbaum, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/: John Bucksbaum

John Bucksbaum 

Chief Executive Officer 

May 9, 2005 

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Growth Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bernard Freibaum, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/: Bernard Freibaum  

Bernard Freibaum 

Chief Financial Officer 

May 9, 2005 

EX-99.1

Exhibit 99.1

RISK FACTORS

RISKS RELATED TO REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

We invest primarily in regional mall shopping centers and other retail properties, which are subject to a number of significant risks which are beyond our control

Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk that may affect the ability of our retail properties to generate sufficient revenues to meet operating and other expenses, including debt service, lease payments, capital expenditures and tenant improvements, and to make distributions to us and our stockholders. A number of factors may decrease the income generated by a retail property, including:

•   the regional and local economy, which may be negatively impacted by plant closings, industry slowdowns, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters and other factors;

•   local real estate conditions, such as an oversupply of, or a reduction in demand for, retail space or retail goods, and the availability and creditworthiness of current and prospective tenants;

•   perceptions by retailers or shoppers of the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the retail property; and

•   the convenience and quality of competing retail properties and other retailing options such as the Internet.

Income from retail properties and retail property values is also affected by applicable laws and regulations, including tax and zoning laws, and by interest rate levels and the availability and cost of financing.

We depend on leasing space to tenants on economically favorable terms and collecting rent from these tenants, who may not be able to pay

Our results of operations will depend on our ability to continue to lease space in our properties on economically favorable terms. If the sales of stores operating in our centers decline sufficiently, tenants might be unable to pay their existing minimum rents or expense recovery charges, since these rents and charges would represent a higher percentage of their sales. If our tenants’ sales decline, new tenants would be less likely to be willing to pay minimum rents as high as they would otherwise pay. In addition, as substantially all of our income is derived from rentals of real property, our income and cash available for distribution to our stockholders would be adversely affected if a significant number of lessees were unable to meet their obligations to us. During times of economic recession, these risks will increase.

Bankruptcy or store closures of tenants may decrease our revenues and available cash

A number of companies in the retail industry, including some of our tenants, have declared bankruptcy or voluntarily closed certain of their stores in recent years. The bankruptcy or closure of a major tenant, particularly an Anchor tenant, may have a material adverse effect on the retail properties affected and the income produced by these properties and may make it substantially more difficult to lease the remainder of the affected retail properties. Our leases generally do not contain provisions designed to ensure the creditworthiness of the tenant. As a result, the bankruptcy or closure of a major tenant could result in a lower level of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

We may be negatively impacted by department store consolidations

Department store consolidations, such as K-Mart’s acquisition of Sears and Federated’s pending acquisition of May Department Stores may result in the closure of existing department stores and we may be unable to re-lease this area or to re-lease it on comparable or more favorable terms. Other tenants may be entitled to modify the terms of their existing leases in the event of such closures. Additionally, department store closures could result in decreased customer traffic which could lead to decreased sales at other stores. Rents obtained from other tenants may also be.

adversely impacted. Consolidations may also negatively affect current and future development and redevelopment projects

It may be difficult to buy and sell real estate quickly, and transfer restrictions apply to some of our mortgaged properties

Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid, and this characteristic tends to limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, significant expenditures associated with each equity investment, such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment. If income from a property declines while the related expenses do not decline, our income and cash available for distribution to our stockholders would be adversely affected. A significant portion of our properties are mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness, and if we were unable to meet our mortgage payments, we could lose money as a result of foreclosure on the properties by the various mortgagees. In addition, if it becomes necessary or desirable for us to dispose of one or more of the mortgaged properties, we might not be able to obtain a release of the lien on the mortgaged property without payment of the associated debt. The foreclosure of a mortgage on a property or inability to sell a property could adversely affect the level of cash available for distribution to our stockholders. If persons selling properties to us wish to defer the payment of taxes on the sales proceeds, we are likely to pay them in units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. In transactions of this kind, we may also agree, subject to certain exceptions, not to sell the acquired properties for significant periods of time.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We may acquire or develop new properties, and this activity is subject to various risks

We intend to continue to pursue development and expansion activities as opportunities arise. In connection with any development or expansion, we will be subject to various risks, including the following:

•   we may abandon development or expansion activities;

•   construction costs of a project may exceed original estimates or available financing, possibly making the project unfeasible or unprofitable;

•   we may not be able to obtain financing or to refinance construction loans, which generally have full recourse to us;

•   we may not be able to obtain zoning, occupancy or other required governmental permits and authorizations;

•   occupancy rates and rents at a completed project may not meet projections and, therefore, the project may not be profitable; and

•   we may need Anchor, mortgage lender and property partner approvals, if applicable, for expansion activities.

If a development project is unsuccessful, our loss could exceed our investment in the project.

If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected

We have experienced rapid growth in recent years, increasing our total consolidated assets from approximately $1.8 billion at December 31, 1996 to approximately $25.8 billion at March 31, 2005. We may continue this rapid growth for the foreseeable future by acquiring or developing properties when we believe that market circumstances and investment opportunities are attractive. We may not, however, be able to manage our growth effectively or to maintain a similar rate of growth in the future, and the failure to do so may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may incur costs to comply with environmental laws

Under various federal, state or local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances released at a property, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage or personal injuries and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by the parties in connection with the contamination. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of the hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral. Other federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations require abatement or removal of asbestos-containing materials in the event of demolition or some renovations or remodeling and also govern emissions of and exposure to asbestos fibers in the air. Federal and state laws also regulate the operation and removal of underground storage tanks. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of our properties, we could be held liable for the costs of remedial action with respect to these regulated substances or tanks or related claims.

Each of our properties has been subjected to varying degrees of environmental assessment at various times. However, the identification of new areas of contamination, a change in the extent or known scope of contamination or changes in cleanup requirements could result in significant costs to us.

We are in a competitive business

There are numerous shopping facilities that compete with our properties in attracting retailers to lease space. In addition, retailers at our properties face continued competition from discount shopping centers, lifestyle centers, outlet malls, wholesale and discount shopping clubs, direct mail, telemarketing, television shopping networks and shopping via the Internet. Competition of this type could adversely affect our revenues and cash available for distribution to stockholders.

We compete with other major real estate investors with significant capital for attractive investment opportunities. These competitors include other REITs, investment banking firms and private institutional investors. This competition has increased prices for commercial properties and may impair our ability to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms in the future.

We may not be able to obtain capital to make investments

We depend primarily on external financing to fund the growth of our business. This is because one of the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which we refer to as the “Code,” for a REIT generally is that it distributes 90% of its net taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to its stockholders. Our access to debt or equity financing depends on banks’ willingness to lend to us and on conditions in the capital markets in general. We and other companies in the real estate industry have experienced less favorable terms for bank loans and capital markets financing from time to time. Although we believe, based on current market conditions, that we will be able to finance investments we wish to make in the foreseeable future, financing might not be available on acceptable terms or may be affected by the amount of debt we have outstanding as a result of the TRC Merger.

Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, flood, earthquake, terrorism, extended coverage and rental loss insurance on all of our properties. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits of these policies are adequate and appropriate. There are, however, some types of losses, including lease and other contract claims, that generally are not insured. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property. If this happens, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the property.

If the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act is not extended beyond 2005, we may incur higher insurance costs and greater difficulty in obtaining insurance which covers terrorist-related damages. Our tenants may also experience similar difficulties.

We are subject to risks that affect the general retail environment

Our concentration in the regional mall market means that we are subject to factors that affect the retail environment generally, including the level of consumer spending, the willingness of retailers to lease space in our shopping centers, department store consolidations and tenant bankruptcies. In addition, we are exposed to the risk that terrorist activities, or the threat of such activities, may discourage consumers from visiting our malls and impact consumer confidence.

Inflation may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations

Should inflation rates increase in the future, we may experience any or all of the following:

•   Tenant sales may decrease as a result of decreased consumer spending which could result in lower percentage rents

•   We may be unable to replace or renew expiring leases with new leases at higher base and/or percentage rents

•   We may be unable to receive reimbursement from our tenants for their share of certain operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance.

Inflation also poses a potential threat to us due to the probability of future increases in interest rates. Such increases would adversely impact us due to our outstanding variable-rate debt as well as result in higher interest rates on new fixed-rate debt.

RISKS RELATING TO THE TRC MERGER

We may be unable to integrate the operations of TRCLP successfully and may not realize the full anticipated benefits of the TRC Merger

Achieving the anticipated benefits of the TRC Merger will depend in part upon our ability to integrate the two companies’ businesses in an efficient and effective manner. Our attempt to integrate two companies that have previously operated independently may result in significant challenges, and we may be unable to accomplish the integration smoothly or successfully. In particular, the necessity of coordinating geographically dispersed organizations and addressing possible differences in corporate cultures and management philosophies may increase the difficulties of integration. The integration will continue to require the dedication of significant management resources, which may temporarily distract management’s attention from the day-to-day operations of the businesses of the combined company. The process of integrating operations may cause further interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of the combined company’s businesses and the further loss of key personnel. Employee uncertainty and lack of focus during the integration process may also further disrupt the businesses of the combined company. In addition, we may face difficulties integrating aspects of the combined companies businesses that we have not historically focused on, such as the community development business. Any inability of management to integrate the operations of TRCLP successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Limitations on the sale of the TRCLP assets may affect our cash flow

We may be restricted in our ability to dispose of certain TRCLP assets until the ten-year period after TRC’s election of REIT status expires in 2008 due to the potential incurrence of substantial tax liabilities on such dispositions due to applicable REIT regulations.

Representatives of the holders of interests of a Contingent Stock Agreement have asserted that the TRC Merger is a prohibited transaction.

We have assumed the obligations of TRC under the CSA. The assumption includes the obligation under the CSA to issue shares of common stock twice a year to beneficiaries. The number of shares is based upon our stock price and upon a formula set forth in the CSA. Such issuances could be dilutive to our existing stockholders. Notwithstanding our assumption of the CSA, there is an on-going dispute with the beneficiaries, who are taking the position that the TRC Merger violates certain portions of the CSA in that the TRC Merger is a “prohibited transaction” because the TRC Merger, among other things, had a prejudicial effect on the beneficiaries with respect to their non-taxable receipt of securities under the CSA. We have provided the beneficiaries with certain indemnification rights relating to this issue. We also believe that all applicable requirements of the CSA have been satisfied in connection with the TRC Merger and, therefore, the TRC Merger does not constitute a “prohibited transaction”. However, we might not be able to favorably resolve these issues.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORGANIZATIONAL AND FINANCIAL STRUCTURE THAT GIVE RISE TO OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED BELOW

We share control of some of our properties with other investors and may have conflicts of interest with those investors

As of March 31, 2005, we owned partial interests in various retail and commercial properties (referred to in this Quarterly Report as the Unconsolidated Properties). We generally make all operating decisions for these properties, but we are required to make other decisions with the other investors who have interests in the relevant property or properties. For example, the consent of certain of the other relevant investors is required with respect to approving operating budgets, refinancing, encumbering, expanding or selling any of these properties. We might not have the same interests as the other investors in relation to these transactions. Accordingly, we might not be able to favorably resolve any of these issues, or we might have to provide financial or other inducement to the other investors to obtain a favorable resolution.

In addition, various restrictive provisions and rights apply to sales or transfers of interests in our jointly owned properties. These may work to our disadvantage because, among other things, we might be required to make decisions about buying or selling interests in a property or properties at a time that is disadvantageous to us or we might be required to purchase the interests of our partners in our jointly owned properties.

Bankruptcy of joint venture partners could impose delays and costs on us with respect to the jointly owned retail properties

The bankruptcy of one of the other investors in any of our jointly owned shopping centers could materially and adversely affect the relevant property or properties. Under the bankruptcy laws, we would be precluded by the automatic stay from taking some actions affecting the estate of the other investor without prior approval of the bankruptcy court, which would, in most cases, entail prior notice to other parties and a hearing in the bankruptcy court. At a minimum, the requirement to obtain court approval may delay the actions we would or might want to take. If the relevant joint venture through which we have invested in a property has incurred recourse obligations, the discharge in bankruptcy of one of the other investors might result in our ultimate liability for a greater portion of those obligations than we would otherwise bear.

Payments by our direct and indirect subsidiaries of dividends and distributions to us may be adversely affected by prior payments to these subsidiaries’ creditors and preferred security holders

Substantially all of our assets are owned through our general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership, including TRCLP. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all of its properties and assets through

subsidiaries, including subsidiary partnerships, limited liability companies and corporations that have elected to be taxed as REITs. The Operating Partnership therefore derives substantially all of its cash flow from cash distributions to it by its subsidiaries, and we, in turn, derive substantially all of our cash flow from cash distributions to us by the Operating Partnership. The creditors and preferred security holders, if any, of each of our direct and indirect subsidiaries are entitled to payment of that subsidiary’s obligations to them, when due and payable, before that subsidiary may make distributions to us. Thus, the Operating Partnership’s ability to make distributions to its partners, including us, depends on its subsidiaries’ ability first to satisfy their obligations to their creditors and preferred security holders, if any, and then to make distributions to the Operating Partnership. Similarly, our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock depends on the Operating Partnership’s ability first to satisfy its obligations to its creditors and preferred security holders, if any, and then to make distributions to us.

In addition, we will have the right to participate in any distribution of the assets of any of our direct or indirect subsidiaries upon the liquidation, reorganization or insolvency of the subsidiary only after the claims of the creditors, including trade creditors, and preferred security holders, if any, of the subsidiary are satisfied. Our common stockholders, in turn, will have the right to participate in any distribution of our assets upon the liquidation, reorganization or insolvency of us only after the claims of our creditors, including trade creditors, and preferred security holders are satisfied.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and operating flexibility

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of March 31, 2005, we had an aggregate consolidated indebtedness outstanding of approximately $20.4 billion, approximately $12.5 billion of which was secured by our properties. A majority of the secured indebtedness was non-recourse to us, while approximately $7.9 billion of our aggregate indebtedness was unsecured, recourse indebtedness of the Operating Partnership and consolidated subsidiaries. This indebtedness does not include our proportionate share of indebtedness incurred by our joint ventures. As a result of this substantial indebtedness, we are required to use a portion of our cash flow to service principal and interest on our debt, which will limit the free cash flow available for other desirable business opportunities.

Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to us and the value of our common stock including:

•   limiting our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, execution of our growth strategy or other purposes;

•   limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service the debt;

•   increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

•   limiting our ability to capitalize on business opportunities, including the acquisition of additional properties, and to react to competitive pressures and adverse changes in government regulation;

•   placing us at a competitive disadvantage as compared to our competitors that have less leverage;

•   limiting our ability or increasing the costs to refinance indebtedness; and

•   limiting our ability to enter into marketing and hedging transactions by reducing the number of counterparties with whom we can enter into such transactions as well as the volume of those transactions

The terms of the 2004 Credit Facility obtained in conjunction with the TRC Merger contain covenants and events of default that may limit our flexibility and prevent us from taking certain actions or result in the acceleration of our obligations under the facility

The terms of the 2004 Credit Facility require us to satisfy certain customary affirmative and negative covenants and to meet financial ratios and tests including ratios and tests based on leverage, interest coverage and net worth. The covenants under our 2004 Credit Facility affect, among other things, our ability to:

•   incur indebtedness;

•   create liens on assets;

•   sell assets; and

•   engage in mergers and acquisitions

Given the restrictions in our debt covenants on such activities as making capital expenditures, incurring additional indebtedness and selling or disposing of assets, we may be restricted in our ability to pursue other acquisitions, may be significantly limited in our operating and financial flexibility and may be limited in our ability to respond to changes in our business or competitive activities.

A failure to comply with these covenants, including a failure to meet the financial tests or ratios, would likely result in an event of default under the 2004 Credit Facility and would allow the lenders to accelerate our debt under the facility. If our debt is accelerated, our assets may not be sufficient to repay such debt in full.

We might fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT

Although we believe that we will remain structured and will continue to operate so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we might not continue to be so qualified. Qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. Therefore, the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may impact our ability to qualify as a REIT. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions might significantly change the tax laws with respect to the requirements for qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of qualification as a REIT.

If, with respect to any taxable year, we fail to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we would not be allowed to deduct distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and federal income tax. The corporate level income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, would apply to our taxable income at regular corporate rates. As a result, the amount available for distribution to stockholders would be reduced for the year or years involved, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. In addition, unless we were entitled to relief under the relevant statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. Notwithstanding that we currently intend to operate in a manner designed to allow us to qualify as a REIT, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause us to determine that it is in our best interest and the best interest of our stockholders to revoke the REIT election.

An ownership limit and certain anti-takeover defenses and applicable law may hinder any attempt to acquire us

The Ownership Limit. Generally, for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT under the Code, not more than 50% in value of the outstanding shares of our capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of our taxable year. The Code defines “individuals” for purposes of the requirement described in the preceding sentence to include some types of entities. Under our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, no person other than Martin Bucksbaum (deceased), Matthew

Bucksbaum (the Chairman of our Board of Directors), their families and related trusts and entities, including M.B. Capital Partners III, may own more than 7.5% of the value of our outstanding capital stock. These restrictions on transferability and ownership may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of our company or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Selected Provisions of our Charter Documents. Our board of directors is divided into three classes of directors. Directors of each class are chosen for three-year staggered terms. Staggered terms of directors may reduce the possibility of a tender offer or an attempt to change control of our company, even though a tender offer or change in control might be in the best interest of our stockholders. Our charter authorizes the board of directors:

•   to cause us to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock;

•   to classify or reclassify, in one or more series, any unissued preferred stock; and

•   to set the preferences, rights and other terms of any classified or reclassified stock that we issue.

The board of directors could establish a series of preferred stock whose terms could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of us or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Stockholder Rights Plan. We have a stockholder rights plan, which may delay, deter or prevent a change in control unless the acquirer negotiates with our board of directors and the board of directors approves the transaction. Our charter and bylaws contain other provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a change in control or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Selected Provisions of Delaware Law. We are a Delaware corporation, and Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law applies to us. In general, Section 203 prevents an “interested stockholder,” as defined in the next sentence, from engaging in a “business combination,” as defined in the statute, with us for three years following the date that person becomes an interested stockholder unless:

•   before that person became an interested stockholder, our board of directors approved the transaction in which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder or approved the business combination;

•   upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the interested stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of our voting stock outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock outstanding (but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the interested stockholder) stock held by directors who are also officers of the company and by employee stock plans that do not provide employees with the right to determine confidentially whether shares held under the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or

•   following the transaction in which that person became an interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by our board of directors and authorized at a meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder.

The statute defines “interested stockholder” to mean generally any person that is the owner of 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or is an affiliate or associate of us and was the owner of 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock at any time within the three-year period immediately before the date of determination. The provisions of this statute may delay, deter or prevent a change in control of us or other transaction that might involve a premium price or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

We have partners who have tax protection arrangements and other tax-related obligations to certain partners

We own properties through partnerships which have arrangements in place that protect the deferred tax situation of our existing third party limited partners. Violation of these arrangements could impose costs on us. As a result, we may be restricted with respect to decisions such as financing, encumbering, expanding or selling these properties.

Several of our joint venture partners are tax-exempt. As such, they are taxable to the extent of their share of unrelated business taxable income generated from these properties. As the managing partner in these joint ventures, we have obligations to avoid the creation of unrelated business taxable income at these properties. Breach of these obligations could impose costs on us. As a result, we may be restricted with respect to decisions such as financing and revenue generation with respect to these properties.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock price may be volatile, and consequently investors may not be able to resell their common stock at or above their purchase price

The price at which our common stock will trade may be volatile and may fluctuate due to factors such as:

•   our historical and anticipated quarterly and annual operating results;

•   variations between our actual results and analyst and investor expectations or changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts;

•   the performance and prospects of our industry;

•   the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;

•   investor perception of us and the industry in which we operate;

•   domestic and international economic conditions;

•   the extent of institutional investor interest in us;

•   the reputation of REITs generally and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities, including securities issued by other real estate companies, and fixed income securities;

•   our financial condition and performance; and

•   conditions and trends in general market conditions.

Fluctuations may be unrelated to or disproportionate to our financial performance. These fluctuations may result in a material decline in the trading price of our common stock.

Future sales of our common stock may depress our stock price

No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of our common stock, or the availability of common stock for future sales, will have on the market price of the stock. Sales in the public market of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock. As of March 31, 2005, approximately 62.8 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance upon exercise of conversion and/or redemption rights as to units of limited partnership interest in the operating partnership. Under our shelf registration statement, we may offer from time to time up to $2 billion worth of common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, debt securities, warrants, stock purchase contracts and/or purchase units. Approximately $.5 billion was drawn against this shelf in connection with our November 2004 warrants offering. As a result of the CSA we assumed in connection with the TRC Merger, an additional 4 million shares of our common stock have been reserved for issuance. In addition, we have reserved a number of shares of common stock for issuance under our employee benefit plans and in connection with certain other obligations, and these shares will be available for sale from time to time. We have granted options to purchase additional common stock to some of our directors, executive officers and employees. We cannot predict the effect that future sales of common stock, or the perception that sales of common stock could occur, will have on the market prices of our equity securities.

Increases in market interest rates may hurt the market price of our common stock

We believe that investors consider the distribution rate on REIT stocks, expressed as a percentage of the price of the stocks, relative to market interest rates as an important factor in deciding whether to buy or sell the stocks. If market interest rates go up, prospective purchasers of REIT stocks may expect a higher distribution rate. Higher interest rates would not, however, result in more funds being available for us to distribute and, in fact, would likely increase our borrowing costs and might decrease our funds available for distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.