Be
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
(Mark One)
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended
OR
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
|
Trading Symbol(s) |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary Shares, each representing 1/20 of a share of 6.375% Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
Accelerated filer ☐ |
|
Non-accelerated filer☐ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2021, was $
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS)
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item No. |
|
|
|
Report Page |
|
|
|||
1. |
|
|
4 |
|
1A. |
|
|
8 |
|
1B. |
|
|
23 |
|
2. |
|
|
23 |
|
3. |
|
|
31 |
|
4. |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|||
5. |
|
|
32 |
|
6. |
|
|
32 |
|
7. |
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
33 |
7A. |
|
|
56 |
|
8. |
|
|
57 |
|
9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
57 |
9A. |
|
|
57 |
|
9B. |
|
|
57 |
|
9C. |
|
Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections |
|
57 |
|
|
|||
10. |
|
|
58 |
|
11. |
|
|
58 |
|
12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
59 |
13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
|
59 |
14. |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|||
15. |
|
|
60 |
|
16. |
|
|
64 |
3
PART I
Item 1. |
BUSINESS |
Overview
SITE Centers Corp., an Ohio corporation (the “Company” or “SITE Centers”), a self-administered and self-managed Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”), is in the business of acquiring, owning, developing, redeveloping, leasing and managing shopping centers. Unless otherwise provided, references herein to the Company or SITE Centers include SITE Centers Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures.
The Company is self-administered and self-managed, and therefore, has not engaged, nor does it expect to retain, any REIT advisor. The Company manages all of the Portfolio Properties as defined herein. At December 31, 2021, the Company owned approximately 32.0 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) (42.2 million square feet of total GLA) through all its properties (wholly-owned and joint venture) and managed approximately 0.6 million total square feet of GLA for Retail Value Inc. (“RVI”), an owner and operator of one shopping center listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
The primary source of the Company’s income is generated from the rental of the Company’s Portfolio Properties to tenants. The Company’s shopping centers and land are collectively referred to as the “Portfolio Properties.” In addition, the Company generates revenue from its management contracts with its unconsolidated joint ventures and RVI.
On July 1, 2018, SITE Centers completed the spin-off of RVI. At the time of the spin-off, RVI owned 48 shopping centers, composed of 36 continental U.S. assets and 12 of SITE Centers’ shopping centers in Puerto Rico, representing $2.7 billion of gross book asset value and 16 million square feet of GLA. At December 31, 2021, RVI owned one remaining shopping center in Gulfport, Mississippi representing 0.6 million square feet of GLA.
Strategy
The overall investment, operating and financing policies of the Company, which govern a variety of activities, such as capital allocations, dividends and status as a REIT, are determined by management and the Board of Directors. Although management and the Board of Directors have no present intention to materially amend or revise the Company’s policies, the Board of Directors may do so from time to time without a vote of the Company’s shareholders.
The Company's mission is to own and manage open-air shopping centers located in suburban, high household income communities. The Company strives to deliver attractive total shareholder returns through earnings and cash flow growth, a sustainable dividend and a strong balance sheet that is well positioned through various economic cycles.
Looking forward, growth opportunities within the core property operations include rental increases and continued lease-up of the portfolio and the adaptation of existing site plans and square footage to generate higher blended rental rates and operating cash flows. Additional growth opportunities include acquisitions and tactical redevelopment. Management intends to use retained cash flow, proceeds from the sale of lower growth assets and proceeds from equity offerings and debt financings to fund capital expenditures relating to new leasing activity and acquisitions, including opportunistic investments and tactical redevelopment activity.
The Company believes the following serve as cornerstones for the execution of its strategy:
|
• |
Maximization of recurring cash flows through strong leasing and core property operations; |
|
• |
Growth in Company cash flows through capital recycling, especially the redeployment of capital from mature, slower growing assets into acquisitions that offer operational and tactical redevelopment potential; |
|
• |
Enhancement of property cash flows through creative, proactive tactical redevelopment efforts that result in the profitable adaptation of site plans to better suit retail tenant and community demands; |
|
• |
Risk mitigation through continuous focus on maintaining prudent leverage levels and lengthy average debt maturities, as well as access to a diverse selection of capital sources, including the secured and unsecured debt markets, unsecured lines of credit, common equity and capital from a wide range of joint venture partners and |
|
• |
Sustainability of growth through a constant focus on relationships with investor, tenant, employee, community and environmental constituencies. |
4
COVID-19 Pandemic
In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic, and it continues to spread throughout the United States and other countries across the world. Beginning in mid-March 2020, federal, state and local governments took various actions to limit the spread of COVID-19, including ordering the temporary closure of non-essential businesses (which included many of the Company’s tenants) and imposing significant social distancing guidelines and restrictions on the continued operations of essential businesses and the subsequent reopening of non-essential businesses. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning in March 2020, the majority of the Company’s employees began to perform their responsibilities remotely, and the Company implemented safety protocols to protect those employees whose roles required them to be present in the Company’s offices. In October 2020, the Company reopened its offices in order to allow all employees to return on a voluntary basis, and in September 2021, the Company began to require that all employees report to the office at least two times each week. The Company continues to closely monitor local levels of infection associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and has taken additional steps as needed in order to protect the health and safety of its workforce, including a relaxation of office attendance requirements in late 2021 as a result of the Omicron variant and rising infection levels.
The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the collection of rents from April 2020 through December 2020. During the second half of 2020 and early 2021, the Company worked with tenants to maximize the collection of unpaid 2020 rents by offering rent deferment on a case-by-case basis, often in exchange for concessions in the form of tenant extensions of lease terms, the relaxation of leasing restrictions and co-tenancy provisions and, in some cases, alterations of control areas allowing for future redevelopment of the shopping center.
During the course of 2021, the Company’s rental collections normalized close to pre-pandemic levels. As of December 31, 2021, a substantial majority of tenants, including tenants previously on the cash basis of accounting, were paying their monthly rent and any deferred rents relating to prior periods. Included in 2021 results was $13.8 million of net revenue, at SITE Centers’ share, primarily related to contractual rents paid from cash-basis tenants that were contractually due in 2020. The majority of the deferral arrangements relating to 2020 revenue were repaid during 2021, and therefore, the impact of 2020 rent collections is expected to be minimal in future periods. At December 31, 2021, $0.2 million remained outstanding under deferral arrangements for tenants that are not accounted for on the cash basis.
As of February 10, 2022, the Omicron variant has not had a material impact on the Company’s rent collections or leasing activity though some tenants have experienced challenges in maintaining regular operating hours as a result of related labor shortages. Future rent collection may be negatively impacted by additional surges in COVID-19 contagion, the emergence of new COVID-19 variants that are more infectious or resistant to existing vaccines, decreases in the effectiveness of existing vaccines, and any implementation of additional restrictions on tenant businesses as a result thereof. For a further discussion of the impact of the COVID‑19 pandemic on the Company’s business, see Item 1A. Risk Factors in Part I of this Report on Form 10-K and “Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financing Activities” and “Economic Conditions” included in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations in Part II of this Report on Form 10-K.
Narrative Description of Business
The Company’s portfolio as of December 31, 2021, consisted of 136 shopping centers (including 47 centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures) and approximately 60 acres of developable land. The shopping centers are located in 21 states. The following tables present the operating statistics affecting base and percentage rental revenues summarized by the following portfolios: pro rata combined shopping center portfolio, wholly-owned shopping center portfolio and joint venture shopping center portfolio:
|
Pro Rata Combined Shopping Center Portfolio December 31, |
|
|||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Centers owned (at 100%) |
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
Aggregate occupancy rate |
|
90.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
89.0 |
% |
Average annualized base rent per occupied square foot |
$ |
18.33 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
18.50 |
|
|
Wholly-Owned Shopping Centers December 31, |
|
|
Joint Venture Shopping Centers December 31, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
2020 |
|
||||
Centers owned |
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
Aggregate occupancy rate |
|
90.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
89.2 |
% |
|
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
87.3 |
% |
Average annualized base rent per occupied square foot |
$ |
18.52 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
18.75 |
|
|
$ |
15.15 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.36 |
|
5
Recent Developments
See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are incorporated herein by reference, for information on certain recent developments of the Company.
Tenants and Competition
The Company has established close relationships with a large number of major national and regional tenants. The Company’s management is associated with, and actively participates in, many shopping center and REIT industry organizations. Notwithstanding these relationships, numerous real estate companies and developers, private and public, compete with the Company in leasing space in shopping centers to tenants. The Company competes with other real estate companies and developers in terms of rental rate, property location, availability of space, management services and property condition.
The Company’s five largest tenants based on the Company’s aggregate annualized base rental revenues, including its proportionate share of joint venture aggregate annualized base rental revenues, are TJX Companies, Inc., Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., PetSmart, Inc., Michaels Companies, Inc. and Ross Stores, Inc., representing 5.8%, 2.7%, 2.6%, 2.3% and 1.9%, respectively, of the Company’s aggregate annualized base rental revenues at December 31, 2021. For more information on the Company’s tenants, see Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the caption “Company Fundamentals.”
Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust
As of December 31, 2021, the Company met the qualification requirements of a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a result, the Company, with the exception of its taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”), will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it meets certain requirements of the Code.
Human Capital Management
As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s workforce was composed of 293 full-time equivalent employees compared to 323 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2020. At the end of 2021, the Company’s workforce was approximately 37% male and 63% female, and women represented approximately 46% of the Company’s managers (defined by reference to the EEO-1 job class categories to include executive/senior-level officials and managers and first/mid-level officials and managers). The ethnicity of the Company’s workforce at the end of 2021 was approximately 80% White, 12% Black, 4% Hispanic, 2% Asian and 2% other (based on EEO categories). During 2021, the size and the diversity of the Company’s workforce decreased as a result of RVI’s sale of its remaining Puerto Rico properties, which had been managed by local Company employees. Of the Company’s employees, 73% of employees were assigned to work in the corporate headquarters in Beachwood, Ohio, with the rest working in regional offices or remotely. Many of the Company’s employees have a long tenure with the Company, with approximately 82% of the Company’s employees having been with the Company for over 5 years and 53% for over 10 years.
The Company’s primary human capital management objective is to attract, develop, engage and retain the highest quality talent. To support this objective, the Company offers competitive pay and benefit programs, a broad focus on wellness and flexible work arrangements designed to allow employees to meet personal and family needs. The Company also takes steps to measure and improve upon its level of employee engagement and to create a diverse and inclusive workplace. The Company’s employees are expected to exhibit honest, ethical and respectful conduct in the workplace. At least once every two years the Company requires its employees to complete training modules on sexual harassment and discrimination and to acknowledge and certify their compliance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Senior members of its accounting, finance and capital markets departments are also required to acknowledge and agree to the Company’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers on an annual basis. The Company’s culture is also underpinned by its employees’ commitment to the Company’s core values of being Fearless, Authentic, Curious and Thoughtful (the Company’s Matters of FACT) in the conduct of their responsibilities.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, beginning in March 2020, the majority of the Company’s employees began to perform their responsibilities remotely, and the Company implemented safety protocols to protect those employees whose roles required them to be present in the Company’s offices. In October 2020, the Company reopened its offices in order to allow all employees to return on a voluntary basis, and in September 2021, the Company began to require that all employees report to the office at least two times each week. The Company continues to closely monitor local levels of infection associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and has taken additional steps as needed in order to protect the health and safety of its workforce, including a relaxation of office attendance requirements in late 2021 as a result of new COVID-19 variants and rising infection levels.
Information Technology and Cybersecurity
The Company depends on the proper functioning, availability and security of its information systems, including financial, data processing, communications and operating systems, as well as proprietary software programs that are important to the efficient
6
operation of the business. The Company also utilizes certain software applications provided by third parties, grants access to certain of the Company’s systems to third parties who provide outsourced functions or other services and increasingly stores and transmits data by means of connected information technology or “cloud” systems. Any significant failures or other disruption of the Company’s critical information systems, including as a result of ransomware attacks or other cyber incidents, that impact the availability or other proper functioning of these systems or that result in the compromise of sensitive or confidential information, including information of tenants, employees and others, could result in liability to third parties and have a significant impact on the Company’s operations and reputation.
The frequency and sophistication of global cybersecurity threats have increased in recent years, primarily through phishing and ransomware campaigns. The Company’s objective for managing increasing cybersecurity risk is to avoid or minimize the impacts of external threat events or other efforts to breach the Company’s systems. The Company works to achieve this objective by hardening its networks and systems against attack by adopting “defense-in-depth” and “zero-trust” methodologies. The Company has a formal process in place for incident response and business continuity, which the Company refers to as its Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan, that encompasses tactics related to cybersecurity, systems and facilities availability and information privacy. The Company has established an internal Security and Privacy Governance Committee comprised of members of management to help review and discuss cybersecurity risks on a periodic basis. The role of the committee is to oversee the development and implementation of the Company’s Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan, to discuss the implementation of various security measures and to receive reports on the Company’s cybersecurity training and awareness program and engagement of third parties to conduct periodic external security testing. The Company’s audit services and technology teams conduct third-party risk assessments during the procurement of solutions and services and annually on agreement renewal. As a complement to these measures, the Company also conducts annual cybersecurity awareness training for all employees, new-hire cybersecurity training, periodic simulated phishing tests and additional training for employees who travel outside the United States. The Company’s Audit Committee is briefed on information security matters, including current data security and recovery initiatives and external security testing results, at least once each year by the Company’s Senior Vice President of Information Technology and the Senior Director of Audit Services.
The Company’s information technology systems are protected through physical and software safeguards, as well as backup systems the Company considers to be appropriate. However, such safeguards may ultimately prove to be insufficient to protect against all incidents the Company experiences. Furthermore, these systems are vulnerable to interruption from events beyond the Company’s control. To mitigate the potential for such occurrences at the Company’s primary data center, the Company has implemented various systems, including redundant telecommunication facilities, replication of critical data and backups to multiple off-site locations, a fire suppression system to protect the Company’s on-site data center and electrical power protection and generation facilities. The Company also has a catastrophic disaster recovery plan and alternate processing capability available for its critical data processes in the event of a catastrophe that renders the primary data center unusable.
The Company has not experienced any cyber-incidents that have materially obstructed the availability of its information systems and data. The Company has experienced incidents involving malware, email phishing and other events intended to disrupt information systems, wrongfully obtain valuable information or cause other types of malicious events that could have resulted in harm to the business. To the Company’s knowledge, the various protections the Company has employed have been effective in identifying these types of events at a point when the impacts on the business could be minimized.
The Company also maintains cybersecurity insurance; however, there is no assurance that the insurance the Company maintains will cover all cybersecurity breaches or that policy limits will be sufficient to cover all related losses.
Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability
At SITE Centers, the term “sustainability” is defined as: sustainable value, sustainable growth, sustainable property operations, sustainable employee health and wellness, sustainable governance policies and sustainable interaction with the Company’s stakeholders and communities. Detailed information regarding the Company’s approach to sustainability can be found on the Company's website in its Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report. This report is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standard, which summarizes environmental and social performance, and includes disclosures with respect to certain Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) standards. The content of the Company’s sustainability reports is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other report or document filed with the SEC, unless expressly noted.
Information About the Company’s Executive Officers
The section below provides information regarding the Company’s executive officers as of February 10, 2022:
David R. Lukes, age 52, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of SITE Centers and has been a member of SITE Centers’ Board of Directors since March 2017. Prior to joining SITE Centers, Mr. Lukes served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Equity One, Inc., an owner, developer and operator of shopping centers, from June 2014 until March 2017 and served as its Executive Vice President from May 2014 to June 2014. Mr. Lukes also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears
7
Holding Corporation affiliate Seritage Realty Trust, a REIT primarily engaged in the re-leasing of shopping centers, from 2012 through April 2014 and as President and Chief Executive Officer of Olshan Properties, a privately-owned real estate firm specializing in commercial real estate, from 2010 through 2012. From 2002 to 2010, Mr. Lukes served in various senior management positions at Kimco Realty Corporation, including serving as its Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2010. Mr. Lukes has also served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of RVI since April 2018 and as an Independent Director of Citycon Oyj, an owner and manager of shopping centers in the Nordic region listed on the Nasdaq Helsinki, since 2017. Mr. Lukes holds a Bachelor of Environmental Design from Miami University, a Master of Architecture from the University of Pennsylvania and a Master of Science in real estate development from Columbia University.
Conor M. Fennerty, age 36, has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of SITE Centers since November 2019. From April 2017 to November 2019, Mr. Fennerty served as SITE Centers’ Senior Vice President of Capital Markets. Prior to joining SITE Centers, Mr. Fennerty served as a Vice President and Senior Analyst at BlackRock, Inc., a global funds manager, from July 2014 to April 2017, an Analyst at Cohen & Steers Capital Management, a specialist asset manager focused on real assets, from May 2012 to July 2014, and prior to that, a member of the global investment research division of Goldman Sachs from May 2010 to May 2012. Mr. Fennerty earned a Bachelor of Science in business administration with a major in finance from Georgetown University.
Christa A. Vesy, age 51, is Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of SITE Centers, a position she assumed in March 2012. From July 2016 to March 2017, Ms. Vesy also served as SITE Centers’ Interim Chief Financial Officer. In these roles, Ms. Vesy has overseen the property and corporate accounting, tax and financial reporting functions for SITE Centers. Previously, Ms. Vesy served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of SITE Centers since November 2006. Ms. Vesy has also served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of RVI since November 2019, as its Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since February 2018 and as its Director since May 2021. Prior to joining SITE Centers, Ms. Vesy worked for The Lubrizol Corporation, where she served as manager of external financial reporting and then as controller for the lubricant additives business segment. Prior to joining Lubrizol, from 1993 to September 2004, Ms. Vesy held various positions with the Assurance and Business Advisory Services group of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a registered public accounting firm, including Senior Manager from 1999 to September 2004. Ms. Vesy graduated with a Bachelor of Science in business administration from Miami University. Ms. Vesy is a certified public accountant (CPA) and member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).
John M. Cattonar, age 40, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of SITE Centers since May 2021. Previously, Mr. Cattonar served as Senior Vice President of Investments of SITE Centers from April 2017 to May 2021. Prior to joining SITE Centers, Mr. Cattonar served as Vice President of Asset Management for Equity One from August 2015 to March 2017 and at Sears Holding Corporation’s affiliate Seritage Realty Trust from July 2012 to July 2015. Mr. Cattonar earned a Master of Science in Real Estate Development from Columbia University and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Corporate Headquarters
The Company is an Ohio corporation incorporated in 1992. The Company’s executive offices are located at 3300 Enterprise Parkway, Beachwood, Ohio 44122, and its telephone number is (216) 755-5500. The Company’s website is www.sitecenters.com. The Company uses the Investors Relations section of its website as a channel for routine distribution of important information, including press releases, analyst presentations and financial information. The information the Company posts to its website may be deemed to be material, and investors and others interested in the Company are encouraged to routinely monitor and review the information that the Company posts on its website in addition to following the Company’s press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. The Company posts filings made with the SEC to its website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC, including the Company’s annual, quarterly and current reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, respectively, the Company’s proxy statements and any amendments to those reports or statements. All such postings and filings are available on the Company’s website free of charge. In addition, this website allows investors and other interested persons to sign up to automatically receive e-mail alerts when the Company posts news releases and financial information on its website. The SEC also maintains a website (https://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The content on, or accessible through, any website referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, is not incorporated by reference into, and shall not be deemed part of, this Form 10-K unless expressly noted.
Item 1A. |
RISK FACTORS |
Summary of Risk Factors
The following is a summary of material risks that could affect the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows. The risks summarized below are discussed in greater detail in the risk factors that follow and are not the only risks the Company faces. The Company’s business operations could also be affected by additional factors that are not presently known to it or that the Company currently considers to be immaterial to its operations. Investors should carefully consider
8
each of the following risks and all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected.
Risks Related to the Company’s Business, Properties and Strategies
|
• |
The economic performance and value of the Company’s shopping centers depend on many factors, including the economic climate and local conditions, each of which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s cash flows and operating results. |
|
• |
E-commerce may continue to have an adverse impact on the Company’s tenants and business. |
|
• |
The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and could continue to have, a significant impact on the Company and its tenants’ businesses. |
|
• |
The Company relies on major tenants, making it vulnerable to changes in the business and financial condition of, or demand for its space by, such tenants. |
|
• |
The Company’s dependence on rental income may adversely affect its ability to meet its debt obligations and make distributions to shareholders. |
|
• |
The Company’s expenses may remain constant or increase even if income from the Company’s properties decreases. |
|
• |
Property ownership through partnerships and joint ventures could limit the Company’s control of those investments and reduce its expected return. |
|
• |
The Company’s real estate assets may be subject to impairment charges. |
|
• |
The Company’s acquisition activities may not produce the cash flows that it expects and may be limited by competitive pressures or other factors. |
|
• |
Real estate property investments are illiquid; therefore, the Company may not be able to dispose of properties when desired or on favorable terms. |
|
• |
The Company’s development, redevelopment and construction activities could affect its operating results. |
|
• |
The Company’s real estate investments may contain environmental risks that could adversely affect its results of operations. |
|
• |
The Company’s properties could be subject to damage from natural disasters and weather-related factors; an uninsured loss on the Company’s properties or a loss that exceeds the limits of the Company’s insurance policies could subject the Company to lost capital or revenue on those properties. |
|
• |
Violent crime, including terrorism and mass shootings, or civil unrest may affect the markets in which the Company operates its business and its profitability. |
|
• |
A disruption, failure or breach of the Company’s networks or systems, including as a result of cyber-attacks, could harm its business. |
Risks Relating to the Company’s Indebtedness and Capital Structure
|
• |
The Company depends on external sources of capital. Disruptions in the financial markets could affect the Company’s ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on the Company and the market price of the Company’s common shares. |
|
• |
Changes in the Company’s credit ratings or the debt markets, as well as market conditions in the credit markets, could adversely affect the Company’s publicly traded debt and revolving credit facilities. |
|
• |
The Company’s ability to increase its debt could adversely affect its cash flows. |
|
• |
The Company’s cash flows and operating results could be adversely affected by required payments of debt or related interest and other risks of its debt financing. |
|
• |
The Company’s financial condition could be adversely affected by financial covenants. |
|
• |
The Company may incur significant debt prepayment costs as a result of repaying indebtedness prior to its stated maturity. |
|
• |
The Company has variable-rate debt and interest rate risk. |
|
• |
The Company may be adversely affected by the potential discontinuation of LIBOR. |
Risks Related to the Company’s Taxation as a REIT
|
• |
If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could have significant tax liability. |
|
• |
Compliance with REIT requirements may negatively affect the Company’s operating decisions. |
|
• |
The Company may be forced to borrow funds to maintain its REIT status, and the unavailability of such capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all, may cause the Company to curtail its investment activities and/or to dispose of assets at inopportune times, which could materially and adversely affect the Company. |
|
• |
Dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates. |
|
• |
Certain foreign shareholders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain recognized on a disposition of the Company’s common shares if the Company does not qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT. |
9
|
• |
Legislative or other actions affecting REITs could have a negative effect on the Company. |
Risks Related to the Company’s Organization, Structure and Ownership
|
• |
Provisions of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, even if that change may be considered beneficial by some of the Company’s shareholders. |
|
• |
The Company has significant shareholders who may exert influence on the Company as a result of their considerable beneficial ownership of the Company’s common shares, and their interests may differ from the interests of other shareholders. |
|
• |
The Company’s Board of Directors may change significant corporate policies without shareholder approval. |
Risks Related to the Company’s Common Shares
|
• |
Changes in market conditions could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s publicly traded securities. |
|
• |
The Company may issue additional securities without shareholder approval. |
General Risks Relating to Investments in the Company’s Securities
|
• |
The Company may be unable to retain and attract key management personnel. |
|
• |
The Company is subject to litigation that could adversely affect its results of operations. |
|
• |
Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect the Company’s business. |
The risks summarized above are discussed in greater detail below.
Risks Related to the Company’s Business, Properties and Strategies
The Economic Performance and Value of the Company’s Shopping Centers Depend on Many Factors, Including the Economic Climate and Local Conditions, Each of Which Could Have an Adverse Impact on the Company’s Cash Flows and Operating Results
The economic performance and value of the Company’s real estate holdings can be affected by many factors, including the following:
|
• |
Changes in the national, regional, local and international economic climate, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; |
|
• |
Local conditions, such as an oversupply of space or a reduction in demand for real estate in the area and population, demographic and employment trends; |
|
• |
The attractiveness of the properties to tenants; |
|
• |
The increase in consumer purchases through the internet; |
|
• |
The Company’s ability to provide adequate management services and to maintain its properties; |
|
• |
Increased operating costs if these costs cannot be passed through to tenants and |
|
• |
The expense of periodically renovating, repairing and re-letting spaces. |
Because the Company’s properties consist of retail shopping centers, the Company’s performance is linked to general economic conditions in the retail market, including conditions that affect consumers’ purchasing behaviors and disposable income. The market for retail space has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional and local economies, the adverse financial condition of some large retailing companies, the ongoing consolidation in the retail sector, increases in consumer internet purchases and the excess amount of retail space in a number of markets. The Company’s performance is affected by its tenants’ results of operations, which are impacted by macroeconomic factors that affect consumers’ ability to purchase goods and services. If the price of the goods and services offered by its tenants materially increases, including as a result of increases in taxes or tariffs resulting from, among other things, potential changes in the Code, the operating results and the financial condition of the Company's tenants and demand for retail space could be adversely affected. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect market rents for retail space. In addition, the Company may face challenges in the management and maintenance of its
10
properties or incur increased operating costs, such as real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, that may make its properties unattractive to tenants.
In addition, the Company’s properties compete with numerous shopping venues, including regional malls, outlet centers, other shopping centers and e-commerce, in attracting and retaining retailers. As of December 31, 2021, leases at the Company’s properties (including the proportionate share of unconsolidated properties) were scheduled to expire on a total of approximately 7.1% of leased GLA during 2022. For those leases that renew, rental rates upon renewal may be lower than current rates. For those leases that do not renew, the Company may not be able to promptly re-lease the space on favorable terms or with reasonable capital investments. In these situations, the Company’s financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
E-Commerce May Continue to Have an Adverse Impact on the Company’s Tenants and Business
E-commerce has been broadly embraced by the public, including throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and growth in the e‑commerce share of overall consumer sales is likely to continue in the future. Some of the Company’s tenants have been negatively impacted by increasing competition from internet retailers and this trend could affect the way current and future tenants lease space. For example, the migration toward e-commerce has led some omni-channel retailers to reduce the number and size of their traditional “brick and mortar” locations, use such locations for curbside pickup of items ordered online and increasingly rely on e-commerce and alternative distribution channels. The Company cannot predict with certainty how a continuing growth in e-commerce will impact the demand for space at its properties or how much revenue will be generated at traditional store locations in the future. If the Company is unable to anticipate and respond promptly to trends in retailer and consumer behavior, or if demand for traditional retail space significantly decreases, the Company’s occupancy levels and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
The COVID-19 Pandemic Has Had, and Could Continue to Have, a Significant Impact on the Company and Its Tenants’ Businesses
The Company’s business and the businesses of its tenants have been and could continue to be significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and the public perception of and reaction to the related risks. Beginning in March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the closure of many tenant businesses and substantially reduced foot traffic at open tenant businesses as a result of social distancing restrictions. Beginning in April 2020, a significant number of tenants failed to pay some or all of their monthly rent obligations, and the Company and its joint ventures agreed to defer a significant portion of these unpaid tenant rent obligations until 2021 and beyond. The majority of these deferred amounts have been repaid by tenants as of December 31, 2021.
Although the level and pace of tenant collections (including the payment of deferred rents) exceeded management’s expectations during 2021 and has largely reverted to pre-pandemic norms, the pandemic continues to pose risks to the Company and tenant operations. If additional surges in contagion occur, or if new COVID-19 variants emerge that are more infectious or resistant to existing vaccines, or if there are decreases in the effectiveness of existing vaccines, tenant collections could be adversely impacted and such developments could lead to new restrictions on tenant operations, nonpayment of rents, additional tenant requests for rent relief and additional tenant closures and bankruptcies, all of which could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations. Certain tenant categories remain especially vulnerable to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including movie theaters, restaurants that rely on in-person dining and entertainment.
In addition to the impacts and uncertainties listed above, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly limited the ability of the Company’s employees to access the Company’s offices and properties, which could adversely impact the Company’s ability to manage its properties and complete other operating and administrative functions that are important to its business. Efforts by the Company’s employees to work remotely could also expose the Company to additional risks, such as increased cybersecurity risk. Furthermore, any exacerbation of the COVID-19 pandemic could negatively affect global capital markets, which, in turn, could negatively affect the Company’s ability to obtain necessary financing, including property-level refinancing for its joint ventures, on favorable terms, or at all. Reduced rent collections from tenants could also impact the ability of the Company and its joint ventures to satisfy covenants and debt service obligations applicable to their financing arrangements, particularly with respect to mortgage loan indebtedness, and result in the recognition of impairment charges with respect to certain of the Company’s properties. Reduced rent collections from tenants may also have the effect of decreasing management fees collected from the Company’s joint ventures, which are often based on property cash receipts, and may also impact decisions by the Company’s Board of Directors with respect to future dividend policy. The Company’s periodic assessment of tenants’ ability to pay outstanding obligations, including rent obligations deferred because of the COVID-19 pandemic, may also result in reductions to rental revenue on account of previously accrued rents for which collection is no longer considered probable.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could also exacerbate the other risks described herein. Any of the foregoing risks, or related risks that the Company is unable to predict due to changing circumstances relating to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
11
The Company Relies on Major Tenants, Making It Vulnerable to Changes in the Business and Financial Condition of, or Demand for Its Space by, Such Tenants
As of December 31, 2021, the annualized base rental revenues of the Company’s tenants that are equal to or exceed 1.5% of the Company’s aggregate annualized shopping center base rental revenues, including its proportionate share of joint venture aggregate annualized shopping center base rental revenues, are as follows:
Tenant |
|
% of Annualized Base Rental Revenues |
|
TJX Companies, Inc. |
|
5.8% |
|
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. |
|
2.7% |
|
PetSmart, Inc. |
|
2.6% |
|
Michaels Companies, Inc. |
|
2.3% |
|
Ross Stores, Inc. |
|
1.9% |
|
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. |
|
1.9% |
|
Ulta Beauty, Inc. |
|
1.9% |
|
Gap Inc. |
|
1.9% |
|
Nordstrom, Inc. |
|
1.8% |
|
Best Buy Co., Inc. |
|
1.8% |
|
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. |
|
1.7% |
|
The Kroger Co. |
|
1.7% |
|
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. |
|
1.5% |
|
Burlington Stores, Inc. |
|
1.5% |
|
The retail shopping sector has been affected by economic conditions, including increases in consumer internet purchases, as well as the competitive nature of the retail business and the competition for market share where stronger retailers have out-positioned some of the weaker retailers. In many cases, these shifts have been accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and have resulted in weaker retailers losing market share and, in some cases, declaring bankruptcy and/or closing stores. In some cases, major tenants may declare bankruptcy or might take advantage of early termination provisions in their leases in connection with a plan to close stores. Bankruptcies, store closures and reduced expansion plans by conventional department stores and national chains in recent years have resulted in a smaller overall number of tenants requiring large store formats.
As information becomes available regarding the status of the Company’s leases with tenants in financial distress or as the future plans for their spaces change, the Company may be required to write off and/or accelerate depreciation and amortization expense associated with a significant portion of the tenant-related deferred charges in future periods. The Company’s income and ability to meet its financial obligations could also be adversely affected in the event of the bankruptcy, insolvency or significant downturn in the business of one of these tenants or any of the Company’s other major tenants. In addition, the Company’s results could be adversely affected if any of these tenants do not renew their leases as they expire on terms favorable to the Company or at all.
The Company’s Dependence on Rental Income May Adversely Affect Its Ability to Meet Its Debt Obligations and Make Distributions to Shareholders
Substantially all of the Company’s income is derived from rental income from real property. As a result, the Company’s performance depends on its ability to collect rent from tenants. The Company’s income and funds available for repayment of indebtedness and distribution to shareholders would be negatively affected if a significant number of its tenants, or any of its major tenants, were to do the following:
|
• |
Experience a downturn in their business that significantly weakens their ability to meet their obligations to the Company; |
|
• |
Delay lease commencements; |
|
• |
Decline to extend or renew leases upon expiration; |
|
• |
Fail to make rental payments when due or |
|
• |
Close stores or declare bankruptcy. |
Any of these actions could result in the termination of tenants’ leases and the loss of rental income attributable to the terminated leases. Lease terminations by an anchor tenant or a failure by that anchor tenant to occupy the premises may also permit other tenants in the same shopping centers to terminate their leases or reduce the amount of rent they pay under the terms of their leases. In addition, the Company cannot be certain that any tenant whose lease expires will renew that lease or that the Company will be able to re-lease space on economically advantageous terms. The loss of rental revenues from a number of the Company’s major tenants and
12
its inability to replace such tenants may adversely affect the Company’s profitability and its ability to meet debt and other financial obligations and make distributions to shareholders.
The Company’s Expenses May Remain Constant or Increase Even if Income from the Company’s Properties Decreases
Costs associated with the Company’s business, such as common area expenses, utilities, insurance, real estate taxes, mortgage payments and corporate expenses, are relatively inflexible and generally do not decrease in the event that a property is not fully occupied, rental rates decrease, a tenant fails to pay rent or other circumstances cause the Company’s revenues to decrease. In addition, inflation could result in higher operating costs. If the Company is unable to lower its operating costs when revenues decline and/or is unable to pass along cost increases to tenants, the Company’s cash flows, profitability and ability to make distributions to shareholders could be adversely impacted.
Property Ownership Through Partnerships and Joint Ventures Could Limit the Company’s Control of Those Investments and Reduce Its Expected Return
Partnership or joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by the Company, including the possibility that the Company’s partner or co-venturer might become bankrupt, that its partner or co-venturer might at any time have different interests or goals than the Company and that its partner or co-venturer may take action contrary to the Company’s instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including the Company’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. In addition, the Company’s partner or co-venturer could have different investment criteria that would impact the assets held by the joint venture or its interest in the joint venture, which may also reduce the carrying value of its equity investments if a loss in the carrying value of the investment is realized. These situations could have an impact on the Company’s revenues from its joint ventures. Other risks of joint venture investments include impasse on decisions, such as the decision to sell or finance a property or leasing decisions with anchor tenants, because neither the Company’s partner or co-venturer nor the Company would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. Joint venture platforms typically contain customary buy-sell provisions, which could result in either the sale of the Company’s interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire the Company’s partner’s interest at inopportune times, as well as the termination of applicable management contracts and fees. In addition, the Company is obligated to maintain the REIT status of the Dividend Trust Portfolio joint venture’s REIT subsidiary and may be obligated to maintain the REIT status of future joint venture platforms and the Company’s failure to do so could result in substantial liability to its partner. These factors could limit the return that the Company receives from such investments, cause its cash flows to be lower than its estimates or lead to business conflicts or litigation. There is no limitation under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, or its Code of Regulations, as to the amount of funds that the Company may invest in partnerships or joint ventures. In addition, a partner or co-venturer may not have access to sufficient capital to satisfy its funding obligations to the joint venture. Furthermore, if credit conditions in the capital markets deteriorate, the Company could be required to reduce the carrying value of its equity method investments if a loss in the carrying value of the investment is realized or considered an other than temporary decline. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had $64.6 million of investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures holding 47 shopping centers.
The Company’s Real Estate Assets May Be Subject to Impairment Charges
On a periodic basis, the Company assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of its real estate assets and other investments may be impaired. A property’s value is impaired only if the estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property. In the Company’s estimate of projected cash flows, it considers factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, the effects of demand, competition and other factors. If the Company is evaluating the potential sale of an asset or development alternatives, the undiscounted future cash flows considerations include the most likely course of action at the balance sheet date based on current plans, intended holding periods and available market information. The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate assets and other investments. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s earnings because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to earnings. There can be no assurance that the Company will not take additional charges in the future related to the impairment of its assets. Any future impairment could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in the period in which the charge is taken.
The Company’s Acquisition Activities May Not Produce the Cash Flows That It Expects and May Be Limited by Competitive Pressures or Other Factors
The Company intends to acquire retail properties to the extent that suitable acquisitions can be made on advantageous terms. Acquisitions of commercial properties entail risks such as the following:
|
• |
The Company may be unable to identify, or may have difficulty identifying, acquisition opportunities that fit its investment strategy and cost of capital; |
|
• |
The Company’s estimates on expected occupancy and rental rates may differ from actual conditions; |
13
|
|
• |
The Company’s estimates of the costs of any redevelopment or repositioning of acquired properties may prove to be inaccurate; |
|
• |
The Company may be unable to operate successfully in new markets where acquired properties are located due to a lack of market knowledge or understanding of local economies; |
|
• |
The properties may become subject to environmental liabilities that the Company was unaware of at the time the Company acquired the property; |
|
• |
The Company may be unable to successfully integrate new properties into its existing operations or |
|
• |
The Company may have difficulty obtaining financing on acceptable terms or paying the operating expenses and debt service associated with acquired properties prior to sufficient occupancy. |
In addition, the Company may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on advantageous terms due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment, some of which may have greater financial resources or a lower cost of capital than the Company. The Company’s inability to successfully acquire new properties may affect the Company’s ability to achieve its anticipated return on investment, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.
Real Estate Property Investments Are Illiquid; Therefore, the Company May Not Be Able to Dispose of Properties When Desired or on Favorable Terms
Real estate investments generally cannot be disposed of quickly. In addition, the Code imposes restrictions, which are not applicable to other types of real estate companies, on the ability of a REIT to dispose of properties. Therefore, the Company may not be able to diversify or alter its portfolio in response to economic conditions or trends in retailer or consumer behavior promptly or on favorable terms. The Company’s inability to quickly respond to such changes or dispose of properties could adversely affect the value of the Company’s portfolio and its ability to repay indebtedness and make distributions to shareholders.
The Company’s Development, Redevelopment and Construction Activities Could Affect Its Operating Results
The Company intends to continue the selective development, redevelopment and construction of retail properties as opportunities arise. The Company’s development, redevelopment and construction activities include the following risks:
|
• |
Construction costs of a project may exceed the Company’s original estimates; |
|
• |
Occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not be sufficient to make the property profitable; |
|
• |
Rental rates per square foot could be less than projected; |
|
• |
Financing may not be available to the Company on favorable terms for development of a property; |
|
• |
The Company may not complete construction and lease-up on schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs; |
|
• |
The Company may not be able to obtain, or may experience delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations and |
|
• |
The Company may abandon development or redevelopment opportunities after expending resources to determine feasibility. |
Additionally, the time frame required for development, redevelopment, construction and lease-up of these properties means that the Company may wait several years for a significant cash return. If any of the above events occur, the development of properties may hinder the Company’s growth and have an adverse effect on its results of operations and cash flows. In addition, new development activities, regardless of whether they are ultimately successful, typically require substantial time and attention from management.
The Company’s Real Estate Investments May Contain Environmental Risks That Could Adversely Affect Its Results of Operations
The acquisition and ownership of properties may subject the Company to liabilities, including environmental liabilities. The Company’s operating expenses could be higher than anticipated due to the cost of complying with existing or future environmental laws and regulations. In addition, under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, the Company may be
14
considered an owner or operator of real property or to have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. As a result, the Company may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances released on or in its properties. The Company may also be liable for other potential costs that could relate to hazardous or toxic substances (including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property). The Company may incur such liability whether or not it knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Such liability could be of substantial magnitude and divert management’s attention from other aspects of the Company’s business and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition, as well as its ability to make distributions to shareholders.
The Company’s Properties Could Be Subject to Damage from Natural Disasters and Weather-Related Factors; An Uninsured Loss on the Company’s Properties or a Loss That Exceeds the Limits of the Company’s Insurance Policies Could Subject the Company to Lost Capital or Revenue on Those Properties
The Company’s properties are generally open-air shopping centers. Extreme weather conditions may impact the profitability of the Company’s tenants by decreasing traffic at or hindering access to the Company’s properties, which may decrease the amount of rent the Company collects. Furthermore, a number of the Company’s properties are located in areas that are subject to natural disasters, including Florida and California. Such properties could therefore be affected by rising sea levels, hurricanes, tropical storms and wildfires, whether caused by global climate changes or other factors. In addition, the Company’s insurance premiums have increased in recent years and the potential increase in the frequency and intensity of natural disasters, extreme weather-related events and climate change in the future may limit the types of coverage and the coverage limits the Company is able to obtain on commercially reasonable terms.
The Company currently maintains all-risk property insurance with limits of $150 million per occurrence and in the aggregate and general liability insurance with limits of $100 million per occurrence and in the aggregate, in each case subject to various conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits for certain perils such as flood and earthquake. Coverage for a named windstorm for the Company’s continental U.S. properties is subject to a deductible of up to 5% of the total insured value of each property. The amount of any insurance coverage for losses due to damage or business interruption may prove to be insufficient. Should a loss occur that is uninsured or is in an amount exceeding the aggregate limits for the applicable insurance policy, or in the event of a loss that is subject to a substantial deductible under an insurance policy, the Company could lose all or part of its capital invested in, and anticipated revenue from, one or more of the properties, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition, as well as its ability to make distributions to shareholders.
Violent Crime, Including Terrorism and Mass Shootings, or Civil Unrest May Affect the Markets in Which the Company Operates Its Business and Its Profitability
Certain of the Company’s properties are located in or near major metropolitan areas or other areas that have experienced, and remain susceptible to, violent crime, including terrorist attacks and mass shootings and civil unrest. Any kind of violent criminal acts, including terrorist acts against public institutions or buildings or modes of public transportation (including airlines, trains or buses), or civil unrest could alter shopping habits, deter customers from visiting the Company’s shopping centers or result in damage to its properties, which would have a negative effect on the Company’s business, the operations of its tenants and the value of its properties.
A Disruption, Failure or Breach of the Company’s Networks or Systems, Including as a Result of Cyber-Attacks, Could Harm Its Business
The Company relies extensively on computer systems to manage its business. While the Company maintains some of its own critical information technology systems, it also depends on third parties to provide important information technology services relating to several key business functions, such as payroll, human resources, electronic communications and certain finance functions. These systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, facility damage, computer or telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, vandalism, natural disasters, catastrophic events, human error and potential cyber threats, including phishing attacks, ransomware and other sophisticated cyber-attacks. Although the Company and such third parties employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate cyber threats, including password protection, firewalls, backup servers, threat monitoring and periodic penetration testing, the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access change frequently and there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful. Should they occur, these threats could compromise the confidential information of the Company’s tenants, employees and third-party vendors; disrupt the Company’s business operations and the availability and integrity of data in the Company’s systems; and result in litigation, violation of applicable privacy and other laws, investigations, actions, fines or penalties. In the event of damage or disruption to the Company’s business due to these occurrences, the Company may not be able to successfully and quickly recover all of its critical business functions, assets and data. Furthermore, while the Company maintains insurance, the coverage may not sufficiently cover all types of losses, claims or fines that may arise. For additional information see Item 1 “Business—Information Technology and Cybersecurity” in Part I of this Annual Report on From 10-K.
15
Risks Relating to the Company’s Indebtedness and Capital Structure
The Company Depends on External Sources of Capital. Disruptions in the Financial Markets Could Affect the Company’s Ability to Obtain Financing on Reasonable Terms and Have Other Adverse Effects on the Company and the Market Price of the Company’s Common Shares
To qualify as a REIT, the Company must, among other things, distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (excluding any net capital gains) to its stockholders each year. Because of these distribution requirements, the Company has relied on third-party sources of capital, including debt and preferred equity financings, to fund growth opportunities and capital needs. The U.S. and global equity and credit markets have experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the past, which have caused market prices of many stocks to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances materially affected liquidity in the financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive and, in certain cases, resulting in the unavailability of financing for businesses and assets similar to those operated by the Company. Uncertainty in the equity and credit markets may negatively affect the Company’s ability to access additional financing at reasonable terms or at all, which may negatively affect the Company’s ability to refinance its debt, obtain new financing or make acquisitions. These circumstances may also adversely affect the Company’s tenants, including their ability to enter into new leases, pay their rents when due and renew their leases at rates at least as favorable as their current rates.
A prolonged downturn in the equity or credit markets may cause the Company to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing and may require it to adjust its business plan accordingly. In addition, these factors may make it more difficult for the Company to sell properties or may adversely affect the price it receives for properties that it does sell, as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of financing or difficulties in obtaining financing. These events in the equity and credit markets may make it more difficult or costly for the Company to raise capital through the issuance of its equity or debt securities. These disruptions in the financial markets also may have a material adverse effect on the market value of the Company’s common shares and other adverse effects on the Company or the economy in general. There can be no assurances that government responses to the disruptions in the financial markets will restore consumer confidence, stabilize the markets or increase liquidity and the availability of equity or credit financing.
Changes in the Company’s Credit Ratings or the Debt Markets, as Well as Market Conditions in the Credit Markets, Could Adversely Affect the Company’s Publicly Traded Debt and Revolving Credit Facilities
The market value for the Company’s publicly traded debt depends on many factors, including the following:
|
• |
The Company’s credit ratings with major credit rating agencies; |
|
• |
The prevailing interest rates being paid by, or the market price for publicly traded debt issued by, other companies similar to the Company; |
|
• |
The Company’s financial condition, liquidity, leverage, financial performance and prospects and |
|
• |
The overall condition of the financial markets. |
The condition of the financial markets and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future. The U.S. credit markets have experienced severe dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the past. Furthermore, uncertain market conditions can be exacerbated by leverage. The occurrence of these circumstances in the credit markets and/or additional fluctuations in the financial markets and prevailing interest rates could have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to access capital and its cost of capital.
In addition, credit rating agencies continually review their ratings for the companies they follow, including the Company. For example, credit rating agencies may review and change their credit ratings for the Company as a result of disruptions to retail tenants and property-level revenues caused by macroeconomic trends or other developments such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The credit rating agencies also evaluate the real estate industry as a whole and may change their credit rating for the Company based on their overall view of the industry. Any rating organization that rates the Company’s publicly traded debt may lower the rating or decide, at its sole discretion, not to rate the Company’s publicly traded debt. The ratings of the Company’s publicly traded debt are based primarily on the rating organization’s assessment of the likelihood of timely payment of interest when due and the payment of principal on the maturity date. A negative change in the Company’s rating could have an adverse effect on the Company’s credit facilities and market price of the Company’s publicly traded debt, as well as the Company’s ability to access capital and its cost of capital.
The Company’s Ability to Increase Its Debt Could Adversely Affect Its Cash Flows
At December 31, 2021, the Company had outstanding debt of $1.7 billion (excluding its proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture mortgage debt aggregating $0.2 billion as of December 31, 2021). The Company intends to maintain a conservative ratio
16
of debt to asset value. The Company is subject to limitations under its credit facilities and indentures relating to its ability to incur additional debt; however, the Company’s organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount or percentage of indebtedness it may incur. If the Company were to become more highly leveraged, its cash needs to fund debt service would increase accordingly. Under such circumstances, the Company’s risk of decreases in cash flow due to fluctuations in the real estate market, reliance on its major tenants, acquisition and development costs and the other factors discussed in these risk factors could subject the Company to an even greater adverse impact on its financial condition and results of operations. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk of default on the Company’s debt obligations, which could further reduce its cash available for distribution and adversely affect its ability to dispose of its portfolio on favorable terms, which could cause the Company to incur losses and reduce its cash flows.
The Company’s Cash Flows and Operating Results Could Be Adversely Affected by Required Payments of Debt or Related Interest and Other Risks of Its Debt Financing
The Company is generally subject to the risks associated with debt financing. These risks include the following:
|
• |
The Company’s cash flows may not satisfy required payments of principal and interest; |
|
• |
The Company may not be able to refinance existing indebtedness on its properties as necessary, or the interest rate and other terms of the refinancing may be less favorable to the Company than the interest rate and terms applicable to the existing debt; |
|
• |
Required debt payments are not reduced if the economic performance of any property declines; |
|
• |
Debt service obligations could reduce funds available for distribution to the Company’s shareholders and funds available for development, redevelopment and acquisitions; |
|
• |
Any default on the Company’s indebtedness could result in acceleration of those obligations, which could result in the acceleration of other debt obligations and possible loss of property to foreclosure and |
|
• |
The Company may not be able to finance necessary capital expenditures for purposes such as re-leasing space on favorable terms or at all. |
If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and the Company cannot or does not make the mortgage payments, it may have to surrender the property to the lender with a consequent loss of any prospective income and equity value from such property, which may also adversely affect the Company’s credit ratings. Any of these risks can place strains on the Company’s cash flows, reduce its ability to grow and adversely affect its results of operations.
The Company’s Financial Condition Could Be Adversely Affected by Financial Covenants
The Company’s credit facilities and the indentures under which its senior unsecured indebtedness is, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, leverage ratios and certain coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of its assets and engage in mergers and certain acquisitions. These credit facilities and indentures also contain customary default provisions including, but not limited to, the failure to pay principal and interest issued thereunder in a timely manner, the failure to comply with the Company’s financial and operating covenants and the failure of the Company or its majority-owned subsidiaries (i.e., entities in which the Company has a greater than 50% interest) to pay when due certain indebtedness in excess of certain thresholds beyond applicable grace and cure periods. These covenants could limit the Company’s ability to obtain additional funds needed to address cash shortfalls or pursue growth opportunities or transactions that would provide substantial return to its shareholders. In addition, a breach of these covenants could cause a default or accelerate some or all of the Company’s indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition.
The Company May Incur Significant Debt Prepayment Costs as a Result of Repaying Indebtedness Prior to Its Stated Maturity
In prudently managing its capital structure and refinancing risk, in the past, the Company has chosen to retire debt prior to its stated maturity date, and in doing so, has incurred prepayment or defeasance premiums in accordance with the relevant loan agreements. If the Company chooses to retire debt prior to its stated maturity date in the future, it may incur significant debt prepayment costs or defeasance premiums, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s cash flows and results of operations.
The Company Has Variable-Rate Debt and Interest Rate Risk
The Company has indebtedness with interest rates that vary depending upon the market index. In addition, the Company has revolving credit facilities that bear interest at a variable rate on any amounts drawn on the facilities. The Company may incur
17
additional variable-rate debt in the future. Increases in interest rates on variable-rate debt would increase the Company’s interest expense, which would negatively affect net earnings and cash available for payment of its debt obligations and distributions to its shareholders.
The Company May Be Adversely Affected by the Potential Discontinuation of LIBOR
In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA,” the United Kingdom authority that regulates LIBOR) announced that numerous banks had approached the FCA and expressed a desire to cease providing LIBOR-related quotations to ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (“IBA”) for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The FCA went on to explain that it was negotiating an agreement with each of the LIBOR panel banks that would see those banks continue to voluntarily submit quotations to IBA through the end of 2021. On November 24, 2017, the FCA confirmed that the LIBOR panel banks had agreed to support LIBOR until December 31, 2021, but banks made no commitment to continue doing so after that date.
Subsequently, on March 5, 2021, IBA and the FCA made public statements regarding the future cessation of LIBOR. In particular, with respect to the 1-week and 2-month U.S. dollar (“USD”) LIBOR settings, the FCA announced that IBA would permanently cease to publish them on December 31, 2021, which IBA in fact did. With respect to the overnight, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month USD LIBOR settings, the FCA announced that IBA would permanently cease publishing them in their current form on June 30, 2023. It is unclear whether new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after such end dates, and there is considerable uncertainty regarding the publication or representativeness of LIBOR beyond such end dates.
In conjunction with the FCA’s and IBA’s announcements regarding the permanent cessation of LIBOR, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) and other U.S. banking regulators issued guidance, including on October 20, 2021, encouraging supervised financial institutions to cease entering into new contracts that use USD LIBOR as a reference rate as soon as practicable and in any event by December 31, 2021, with limited exceptions, to avoid creating safety and soundness risks and otherwise facilitate an orderly LIBOR transition.
The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), which is a group of private-market participants convened by the Federal Reserve to help ensure a successful transition from USD LIBOR to a more robust reference rate, has recommended rates derived from the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as alternatives to USD LIBOR for use in commercial loans, derivatives and other financial instruments. On October 21, 2020, the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Federal Reserve and other U.S. regulators confirmed that the use of SOFR-based rates is voluntary, and market participants should seek to transition away from LIBOR in the manner that is most appropriate given their specific circumstances. The emergence of alternatives to SOFR and their acceptance by market participants could impact contracts, securities and instruments that reference SOFR, including contracts, securities and instruments linked to USD LIBOR that would transition to SOFR upon a benchmark transition event.
On April 6, 2021, the State of New York enacted legislation addressing LIBOR contracts governed by New York law. It is purportedly designed to minimize legal uncertainty and adverse economic impacts associated with the transition from LIBOR. Other states have enacted, or are considering enacting, similar legislation. On December 8, 2021, the United States House of Representatives passed a bill called the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act of 2021 to address the impact of LIBOR’s permanent cessation on LIBOR contracts. That bill remains under consideration by the United States Senate. State and federal legislation, and other events could impact certain contracts, securities and instruments tied to USD LIBOR. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, the FCA obtained power from Parliament to, among other things, compel IBA to change the methodology it currently uses to calculate LIBOR such that a “synthetic” LIBOR could be published for use in legacy contracts. Actions taken by the FCA, including actions taken in accordance with its power to compel the calculation of “synthetic LIBOR,” could have an impact on contracts, securities and instruments linked to USD LIBOR. So too could future announcements by the FCA, IBA or U.S. banking regulators that impact contracts, securities and instruments linked to USD LIBOR that contemplate transitioning to SOFR upon a benchmark transition event. Likewise, contracts, securities and instruments linked to USD LIBOR may be impacted by decisions by USD LIBOR panel banks that give rise to or otherwise impact non-representativeness determinations that the FCA may be responsible for making before LIBOR ceases to be published. The full impact of the expected transition away from LIBOR and the potential discontinuation of LIBOR is not known. However, any replacement rate or alternative base rate could be higher or more volatile than LIBOR, which could adversely affect the Company’s cash flow, financial condition, risk management programs and operations.
The Company’s consolidated debt outstanding at December 31, 2021 included approximately $100 million of variable rate debt (maturing in January 2023) having an interest rate determined by reference to LIBOR. Should the Company seek to replace this variable rate debt or extend the maturity date, it is likely that LIBOR will need to be replaced with an alternative rate of interest. Additionally, the Company currently has the ability to elect that borrowings under its $970 million revolving credit facilities bear interest based on either LIBOR or the Alternative Base Rate. The credit agreements governing the revolving credit facilities provide that the Company’s ability to request LIBOR-based loans may be suspended in the future in connection with the cessation of LIBOR’s publication, in which case the Company will be forced to borrow at an interest rate based on the Alternative Base Rate unless and until the Company and applicable lenders agree on an alternative rate of interest to LIBOR. Any agreed upon amendment referencing an alternative rate to replace LIBOR could have adverse tax consequences to the Company. Borrowings based on the Alternative Base
18
Rate or any alternative rate of interest to LIBOR also may result in higher borrowing costs to the Company. Using alternative rates of interest to LIBOR, including SOFR-based rates such as the CME Group’s calculation of term SOFR, also may potentially create risks given various uncertainties regarding how they will behave in various economic environments, whether and to what extent they are adopted in the market, as well as how they are constructed.
Risks Related to the Company’s Taxation as a REIT
If the Company Fails to Qualify as a REIT in Any Taxable Year, It Will Be Subject to U.S. Federal Income Tax as a Regular Corporation and Could Have Significant Tax Liability
The Company intends to operate in a manner that allows it to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, REIT qualification requires that the Company satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annual or quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions of the Code, for which there are a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations. The Company’s status as a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within its control. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to qualify and remain qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not certain. Even a technical or inadvertent violation of the REIT requirements could jeopardize the Company’s REIT qualification. Furthermore, Congress or the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) might change the tax laws or regulations and the courts could issue new rulings, in each case potentially having a retroactive effect that could make it more difficult or impossible for the Company to continue to qualify as a REIT. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, the following would result:
|
• |
The Company would be taxed as a regular domestic corporation, which, among other things, means that it would be unable to deduct distributions to its shareholders in computing its taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates; |
|
• |
Any resulting tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to shareholders and could force the Company to liquidate assets or take other actions that could have a detrimental effect on its operating results and |
|
• |
Unless the Company were entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions, it would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the Company lost its qualification, and its cash available for debt service obligations and distribution to its shareholders, therefore, would be reduced for each of the years in which the Company does not qualify as a REIT. |
Even if the Company remains qualified as a REIT, it may face other tax liabilities that reduce its cash flow. The Company’s TRS is subject to taxation, and any changes in the laws affecting the Company’s TRS may increase the Company’s tax expenses. The Company may also be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and property either directly or at the level of its subsidiaries. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for debt service obligations and distribution to the Company’s shareholders.
Compliance with REIT Requirements May Negatively Affect the Company’s Operating Decisions
To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company must meet certain requirements on an ongoing basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts the Company distributes to its shareholders and the ownership of its shares. The Company may also be required to make distributions to its shareholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when the Company’s funds are otherwise needed to fund capital expenditures or debt service obligations.
As a REIT, the Company must distribute at least 90% of its annual net taxable income (excluding net capital gains) to its shareholders. To the extent that the Company satisfies this distribution requirement, but distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, the Company will be subject to a 4% non-deductible excise tax if the actual amount paid to its shareholders in a calendar year is less than the minimum amount specified under U.S. federal tax laws. From time to time, the Company may generate taxable income greater than its income for financial reporting purposes, or its net taxable income may be greater than its cash flows available for distribution to its shareholders. If the Company does not have other funds available in these situations, it could be required to borrow funds, sell its securities or a portion of its properties at unfavorable prices or find other sources of funds in order to meet the REIT distribution requirements and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax.
In addition, the REIT provisions of the Code impose a 100% tax on income from “prohibited transactions.” Prohibited transactions generally include sales of assets, other than foreclosure property, that constitute inventory or other property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. This 100% tax could affect the Company’s decisions to sell property if it believes such sales could be treated as a prohibited transaction. However, the Company would not be subject to this tax if it were to sell assets
19
through its TRS. The Company will also be subject to a 100% tax on certain amounts if the economic arrangements between the Company and its TRS are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties.
The Company May Be Forced to Borrow Funds to Maintain Its REIT Status, and the Unavailability of Such Capital on Favorable Terms at the Desired Times, or at All, May Cause the Company to Curtail Its Investment Activities and/or to Dispose of Assets at Inopportune Times, Which Could Materially and Adversely Affect the Company
To qualify as a REIT, the Company generally must distribute to shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income each year, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, and the Company will be subject to regular corporate income taxes on its undistributed taxable income to the extent that the Company distributes less than 100% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gains, each year. In addition, the Company will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions paid by the Company in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of the Company’s ordinary income, 95% of its capital gain net income and 100% of its undistributed income from prior years. The Company could have a potential distribution shortfall as a result of, among other things, differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and recognition of income for U.S. federal income tax purposes or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. In order to maintain REIT status and avoid the payment of income and excise taxes, the Company may need to borrow funds to meet the REIT distribution requirements. The Company may not be able to borrow funds on favorable terms or at all, and the Company’s ability to borrow may be restricted by the terms of the instruments governing the Company’s existing indebtedness. The Company’s access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of factors, including the market’s perception of the Company’s growth potential, current debt levels, the market price of common shares and current and potential future earnings. The Company cannot assure shareholders that it will have access to such capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all, which may cause the Company to curtail its investment activities and/or to dispose of assets at inopportune times and could materially and adversely affect the Company. The Company may make taxable in-kind distributions of common shares, which may cause shareholders to be required to pay income taxes with respect to such distributions in excess of any cash received, or the Company may be required to withhold taxes with respect to such distributions in excess of any cash shareholders receive.
Dividends Paid by REITs Generally Do Not Qualify for Reduced Tax Rates
In general, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends paid to individual U.S. shareholders is 20%. Due to its REIT status, the Company’s distributions to individual shareholders generally are not eligible for the reduced rates. However, U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts and estates generally may deduct up to 20% of the ordinary dividends (e.g., REIT dividends that are not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) received from a REIT for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. Although this deduction reduces the effective tax rate applicable to certain dividends paid by REITs (generally to 29.6%, assuming the shareholder is subject to the 37% maximum rate), such tax rate is still higher than the tax rate applicable to corporate dividends that constitute qualified dividend income. Accordingly, investors who are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including the per share trading price of the Company’s common shares.
Certain Foreign Shareholders May Be Subject to U.S. Federal Income Tax on Gain Recognized on a Disposition of the Company’s Common Shares if the Company Does Not Qualify as a “Domestically Controlled” REIT
A foreign person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain recognized on the disposition. This tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” In general, the Company will be a domestically controlled REIT if at all times during the five-year period ending on the applicable stockholder’s disposition of the Company’s stock, less than 50% in value of the stock was held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons. If the Company were to fail to qualify as a domestically controlled REIT, gain recognized by a foreign stockholder on a disposition of the Company’s common shares would be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless the common shares were traded on an established securities market and the foreign stockholder did not at any time during a specific testing period directly or indirectly own more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.
Legislative or Other Actions Affecting REITs Could Have a Negative Effect on the Company.
The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the Department of the Treasury. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, could materially and adversely affect the Company or its shareholders. The Company cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect shareholders or the Company. New legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect the Company’s ability to qualify as a REIT, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of such qualification or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Company. In addition, the law relating to the tax treatment of other entities, or an investment in other entities, could change, making an investment in such other entities more attractive
20
relative to an investment in a REIT. Furthermore, potential amendments and technical corrections, as well as interpretations and implementation of regulations by the Treasury and IRS, may have or may in the future occur or be enacted, and, in each case, they could lessen or increase the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”). In addition, states and localities, which often use federal taxable income as a starting point for computing state and local tax liabilities, continue to react to the TCJA, and these may exacerbate its negative, or diminish its positive, effects on the Company. It is impossible to predict the nature or extent of any new tax legislation, regulation or administrative interpretations, but such items could adversely affect the Company’s operating results, financial condition and/or future business planning.
Risks Related to the Company’s Organization, Structure and Ownership
Provisions of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations Could Have the Effect of Delaying, Deferring or Preventing a Change in Control, Even if That Change May Be Considered Beneficial by Some of the Company’s Shareholders
The Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations contain provisions that could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by the Company’s Board of Directors. Among other things, the Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations include provisions:
|
• |
Prohibiting any person, except for certain shareholders (including the family of Mr. Alexander Otto) as set forth in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, from owning more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common shares in order to maintain the Company’s status as a REIT; |
|
• |
Authorizing “blank check” preferred stock, which could be issued by the Board of Directors without shareholder approval and may contain voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to the Company’s common shares; |
|
• |
Providing that any vacancy on the Board of Directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office; |
|
• |
Providing that no shareholder may cumulate the shareholder’s voting power in the election of directors; |
|
• |
Providing that shareholders may not act by written consent unless such written consent is unanimous and |
|
• |
Requiring advance notice of shareholder proposals for business to be conducted at meetings of the Company’s shareholders and for nominations of candidates for election to the Board of Directors. |
These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in the Company’s management. The Company believes these provisions protect its shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics and are not intended to make the Company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay, defer or prevent an acquisition that the Board of Directors determines is not in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, which under certain circumstances could reduce the market price of its common shares.
The Company Has Significant Shareholders Who May Exert Influence on the Company as a Result of Their Considerable Beneficial Ownership of the Company’s Common Shares, and Their Interests May Differ from the Interests of Other Shareholders
The Company has shareholders, including Mr. Alexander Otto, who is a member of the Board of Directors, who, because of their considerable beneficial ownership of the Company’s common shares, are in a position to exert significant influence over the Company. These shareholders may exert influence with respect to matters that are brought to a vote of the Company’s Board of Directors and/or the holders of the Company’s common shares. Among others, these matters include the election of the Company’s Board of Directors, corporate finance transactions and joint venture activity, merger, acquisition and disposition activity, and amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations. In the context of major corporate events, the interests of the Company’s significant shareholders may differ from the interests of other shareholders. For example, if a significant shareholder does not support a merger, tender offer, sale of assets or other business combination because the shareholder judges it to be inconsistent with the shareholder’s investment strategy, the Company may be unable to enter into or consummate a transaction that would enable other shareholders to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market prices for common shares. Furthermore, significant shareholders of the Company have sold in the past, and may sell in the future, substantial amounts of the Company’s common shares in the public market to enhance the shareholders’ liquidity positions, fund alternative investments or for other reasons. This has caused in the past and may cause in the future the trading price of the Company’s common shares to decline significantly, resulting in other shareholders being unable to sell their common shares at favorable prices. The Company cannot predict or control how the Company’s significant shareholders may use the influence they have as a result of their common share holdings.
21
The Company’s Board of Directors May Change Significant Corporate Policies Without Shareholder Approval
The Company’s strategies and investment, financing and dividend policies will be determined by its Board of Directors. These strategies and policies may be amended or revised at any time at the discretion of the Board of Directors without a vote of the Company’s shareholders. A change in any of these strategies and policies could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, operating results and cash flow and on its ability to pay dividends to shareholders.
Risks Related to the Company’s Common Shares
Changes in Market Conditions Could Adversely Affect the Market Price of the Company’s Publicly Traded Securities
As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of the Company’s publicly traded securities depends on various market conditions, which may change from time to time. Among the market conditions that may affect the market price of the Company’s publicly traded securities are the following:
|
• |
The extent of institutional investor interest in the Company and the properties it owns; |
|
• |
The reputation of REITs generally and the reputation of REITs with similar portfolios; |
|
• |
The attractiveness of the securities of REITs in comparison to securities issued by other entities (including securities issued by other real estate companies or sovereign governments), bank deposits or other investments; |
|
• |
The Company’s financial condition and performance; |
|
• |
The market’s perception of the Company’s growth potential and future cash dividends; |
|
• |
An increase in market interest rates, which may lead prospective investors to demand a higher distribution rate in relation to the price paid for the Company’s shares and |
|
• |
General economic and financial market conditions. |
The Company May Issue Additional Securities Without Shareholder Approval
The Company can issue preferred shares and common shares without shareholder approval subject to certain limitations in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. Holders of preferred shares have priority over holders of common shares, and the issuance of additional shares reduces the ownership interest of existing holders in the Company.
General Risks Relating to Investments in the Company’s Securities
The Company May Be Unable to Retain and Attract Key Management Personnel
The Company may be unable to retain and attract talented executives. In the event of the loss of key management personnel to competitors, or upon unexpected death, disability or retirement, the Company may not be able to find replacements with comparable skill, ability and industry expertise. The Company’s operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected until suitable replacements are identified and retained, if at all.
The Company Is Subject to Litigation That Could Adversely Affect Its Results of Operations
The Company is a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory proceedings relating to its business. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, the Company cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such litigation or proceedings. An unfavorable outcome could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Any such litigation could also lead to increased volatility of the trading price of the Company’s common shares. For a further discussion of litigation risks, see “Legal Matters” in Note 11, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Changes in Accounting Standards Issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or Other Standard-Setting Bodies May Adversely Affect the Company’s Business
The Company’s financial statements are subject to the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which is periodically revised and/or expanded. From time to time, the Company is required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB and the SEC. It is possible that accounting standards the Company is required to adopt may require changes to the current accounting treatment that it applies to its consolidated financial
22
statements and may require it to make significant changes to its systems. Changes in accounting standards could result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Item 1B. |
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
Item 2. |
PROPERTIES |
At December 31, 2021, the Portfolio Properties included 136 shopping centers (including 47 centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures) and approximately 60 acres of developable land, including parcels located adjacent to certain of the shopping centers. At December 31, 2021, the Portfolio Properties aggregated 32.0 million square feet of Company-owned GLA (42.2 million square feet of total GLA) located in 21 states. These centers are principally located in suburban, higher household income communities in the Southeast with the highest concentrations in Florida, Georgia and North Carolina. The Company also has significant concentrations in New Jersey and Ohio.
At December 31, 2021, on a pro rata basis, the average annualized base rent per square foot was $18.33. The average annualized base rent of the Company’s 89 wholly-owned shopping centers was $18.52 per square foot, and the average annualized base rent for the 47 shopping centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures was $15.15 per square foot. The Company’s average annualized base rent per square foot does not consider tenant expense reimbursements.
The majority of the Company’s shopping centers are anchored by national tenant anchors and designed to provide a highly compelling shopping experience and merchandise mix for retail partners and consumers. The tenants of the shopping centers typically cater to the consumer’s desire for value, service and convenience and offer day-to-day necessities rather than high-priced luxury items. The properties often include discounters, specialty grocers, pet supply stores, fitness centers, quick-service restaurants and beauty supply retailers as additional anchors or tenants. The Company has established close relationships with a large number of major national and regional tenants, many of which occupy space in its shopping centers.
Information as to the Company’s 10 largest tenants based on total annualized rental revenues and Company-owned GLA at December 31, 2021, is set forth in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the caption “Executive Summary–Retail Environment and Company Fundamentals” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For additional details related to property encumbrances for the Company’s wholly-owned assets, see “Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation” (Schedule III) herein. At December 31, 2021, the Company owned an investment in 47 properties through unconsolidated joint ventures, which properties served as collateral for joint venture mortgage debt aggregating approximately $0.9 billion (of which the Company’s proportionate share is $190.5 million) and is not reflected in the consolidated indebtedness. The Company’s properties range in size from approximately 2,000 square feet to approximately 1,100,000 square feet of total GLA (with 52 properties exceeding 300,000 square feet of total GLA). On a pro rata basis, the Company’s properties were 90.0% occupied as of December 31, 2021.
Tenant Lease Expirations and Renewals
The following table shows the impact of tenant lease expirations through 2031 at the Company’s 89 wholly-owned shopping centers, assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options:
Expiration Year |
|
No. of Leases Expiring |
|
|
Approximate GLA in Square Feet (Thousands) |
|
|
Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases (Thousands) |
|
|
Average Base Rent per Square Foot Under Expiring Leases |
|
|
Percentage of Total GLA Represented by Expiring Leases |
|
|
Percentage of Total Base Rental Revenues Represented by Expiring Leases |
|
||||
2022 |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
$ |
26,361 |
|
|
$ |
20.15 |
|
|
4.5% |
|
|
8.0% |
|
2023 |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
49,335 |
|
|
|
17.59 |
|
|
9.7% |
|
|
15.0% |
|
2024 |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
49,927 |
|
|
|
17.65 |
|
|
9.8% |
|
|
15.2% |
|
2025 |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
47,715 |
|
|
|
19.02 |
|
|
8.7% |
|
|
14.5% |
|
2026 |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
35,736 |
|
|
|
16.81 |
|
|
7.3% |
|
|
10.8% |
|
2027 |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
35,426 |
|
|
|
17.81 |
|
|
6.9% |
|
|
10.8% |
|
2028 |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
16,804 |
|
|
|
18.65 |
|
|
3.1% |
|
|
5.1% |
|
2029 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
17,564 |
|
|
|
20.35 |
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
5.3% |
|
2030 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
14,946 |
|
|
|
19.31 |
|
|
2.7% |
|
|
4.5% |
|
2031 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
13,005 |
|
|
|
16.85 |
|
|
2.6% |
|
|
3.9% |
|
Total |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
16,876 |
|
|
$ |
306,819 |
|
|
$ |
18.18 |
|
|
58.3% |
|
|
93.1% |
|
23
The following table shows the impact of tenant lease expirations through 2031 at the Company’s 47 shopping centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures, assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options:
Expiration Year |
|
No. of Leases Expiring |
|
|
Approximate GLA in Square Feet (Thousands) |
|
|
Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases (Thousands) |
|
|
Average Base Rent per Square Foot Under Expiring Leases |
|
|
Percentage of Total GLA Represented by Expiring Leases |
|
|
Percentage of Total Base Rental Revenues Represented by Expiring Leases |
|
||||
2022 |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
$ |
7,352 |
|
|
$ |
21.50 |
|
|
3.4% |
|
|
6.4% |
|
2023 |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
16,151 |
|
|
|
15.34 |
|
|
10.4% |
|
|
14.2% |
|
2024 |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
20,740 |
|
|
|
12.88 |
|
|
15.9% |
|
|
18.2% |
|
2025 |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
13,165 |
|
|
|
14.04 |
|
|
9.3% |
|
|
11.5% |
|
2026 |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
16,048 |
|
|
|
14.86 |
|
|
10.7% |
|
|
14.1% |
|
2027 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
13,405 |
|
|
|
15.70 |
|
|
8.4% |
|
|
11.8% |
|
2028 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
6,778 |
|
|
|
14.70 |
|
|
4.5% |
|
|
5.9% |
|
2029 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
18.01 |
|
|
2.6% |
|
|
4.2% |
|
2030 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
2,824 |
|
|
|
15.18 |
|
|
1.8% |
|
|
2.5% |
|
2031 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
5,921 |
|
|
|
16.68 |
|
|
3.5% |
|
|
5.2% |
|
Total |
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
7,147 |
|
|
$ |
107,210 |
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
70.5% |
|
|
94.0% |
|
The rental payments under certain of these leases will remain constant until the expiration of their base terms, regardless of inflationary increases. There can be no assurance that any of these leases will be renewed or that any replacement tenants will be obtained if not renewed.
24
SITE Centers Corp.
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2021
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Center |
|
Year Developed/ Redeveloped |
|
Year Acquired |
|
SITE Ownership Interest |
|
|
Owned GLA (000's) |
|
|
Total Annualized Base Rent (000's) |
|
|
Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
Ahwatukee Foothills Towne Center |
|
2013 |
|
1998 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
$ |
11,630 |
|
|
$ |
17.56 |
|
|
AMC Theatres, Best Buy, Big Lots, Burlington, HomeGoods, Jo-Ann, Lina Home Furnishing, Marshalls, Michaels, OfficeMax, Ross Dress for Less, Sprouts Farmers Market |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
Arrowhead Crossing |
|
1995 |
|
1996 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
$ |
4,860 |
|
|
$ |
15.92 |
|
|
DSW, Golf Galaxy, Hobby Lobby, HomeGoods, Nordstrom Rack, Savers (Not Owned), Staples, T.J. Maxx |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
Deer Valley Towne Center |
|
1996 |
|
1999 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
$ |
3,479 |
|
|
$ |
20.98 |
|
|
AMC Theatres (Not Owned), Michaels, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
Paradise Village Gateway |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
$ |
3,839 |
|
|
$ |
28.38 |
|
|
PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Buena Park, CA |
|
Buena Park Place |
|
2009 |
|
2004 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
$ |
3,625 |
|
|
$ |
17.45 |
|
|
Aldi, Kohl's, Michaels |
|
|
6 |
|
|
Fontana, CA |
|
Falcon Ridge Town Center |
|
2005 |
|
2013 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
$ |
6,167 |
|
|
$ |
23.56 |
|
|
24 Hour Fitness, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, Stater Bros Markets, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Long Beach, CA |
|
The Pike Outlets(2) |
|
2015 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
$ |
5,169 |
|
|
$ |
22.61 |
|
|
Cinemark, H & M, Nike, Restoration Hardware |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Oakland, CA |
|
Whole Foods at Bay Place |
|
2006 |
|
2013 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
$ |
2,654 |
|
|
$ |
46.39 |
|
|
Whole Foods |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Richmond, CA |
|
Hilltop Plaza |
|
2000 |
|
2002 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
$ |
3,827 |
|
|
$ |
17.34 |
|
|
99 Cents Only, Century Theatre, City Sports Club, dd's Discounts, Ross Dress for Less |
|
|
10 |
|
|
Roseville, CA |
|
Ridge at Creekside |
|
2007 |
|
2014 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
$ |
5,918 |
|
|
$ |
21.94 |
|
|
Bed Bath & Beyond, buybuy BABY, Cost Plus World Market, Macy's Furniture Gallery, REI |
|
|
11 |
|
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
1000 Van Ness |
|
1998 |
|
2002 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
$ |
3,142 |
|
|
$ |
29.51 |
|
|
CGV Cinemas, The Studio Mix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Centennial, CO |
|
Centennial Promenade |
|
2002 |
|
1997 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
$ |
7,388 |
|
|
$ |
20.43 |
|
|
Conn's, Golf Galaxy, HomeGoods, IKEA (Not Owned), Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, Stickley Furniture, Total Wine & More |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Colorado Springs, CO |
|
Chapel Hills |
|
2000 |
|
2011 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
$ |
5,353 |
|
|
$ |
13.30 |
|
|
Barnes & Noble, Best Buy, Burlington, DSW, Michaels (Not Owned), Nordstrom Rack, North Academy Fitness, Old Navy, Pep Boys, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Whole Foods |
|
|
14 |
|
|
Denver, CO |
|
University Hills |
|
1997 |
|
2003 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
$ |
4,298 |
|
|
$ |
19.87 |
|
|
King Soopers, Marshalls, Michaels |
|
|
15 |
|
|
Parker, CO |
|
FlatAcres MarketCenter/ Parker Pavilions(2) |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
$ |
4,173 |
|
|
$ |
19.06 |
|
|
24 Hour Fitness, Bed Bath & Beyond, Home Depot (Not Owned), Kohl's (Not Owned), Michaels, Office Depot, Walmart (Not Owned) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Guilford, CT |
|
Guilford Commons |
|
2015 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
|
$ |
18.04 |
|
|
Bed Bath & Beyond, The Fresh Market |
|
|
17 |
|
|
Plainville, CT |
|
Connecticut Commons |
|
2013 |
|
DEV |
|
20% |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
$ |
6,889 |
|
|
$ |
13.47 |
|
|
AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, DSW, Kohl's, Lowe's, Marshalls, Old Navy, PetSmart |
|
|
18 |
|
|
Windsor, CT |
|
Windsor Court |
|
1993 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
$ |
1,540 |
|
|
$ |
19.62 |
|
|
HomeGoods (Not Owned), Stop & Shop, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Boynton Beach, FL |
|
Village Square at Golf |
|
2002 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
$ |
1,944 |
|
|
$ |
16.05 |
|
|
— |
|
|
20 |
|
|
Bradenton, FL |
|
Creekwood Crossing |
|
2001 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
$ |
2,828 |
|
|
$ |
12.01 |
|
|
Bealls, Bealls Outlet, Big Lots, Circustrix, Lowe's (Not Owned) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
Brandon, FL |
|
Lake Brandon Plaza |
|
2014 |
|
2009 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
$ |
13.73 |
|
|
Jo-Ann, Nordstrom Rack, Publix, Total Wine & More |
25
SITE Centers Corp.
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2021
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Center |
|
Year Developed/ Redeveloped |
|
Year Acquired |
|
SITE Ownership Interest |
|
|
Owned GLA (000's) |
|
|
Total Annualized Base Rent (000's) |
|
|
Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1) |
|
|
Key Tenants |
|||
|
22 |
|
|
Brandon, FL |
|
Lake Brandon Village |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
$ |
1,478 |
|
|
$ |
15.64 |
|
|
buybuy BABY, Lowe's (Not Owned), PetSmart, Sprouts Farmers Market |
|
23 |
|
|
Brandon, FL |
|
The Collection at Brandon Boulevard(2) |
|
2021 |
|
IPO |
|
100% |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
$ |
2,960 |
|
|
$ |
13.46 |
|
|
Bealls Outlet, Chuck E. Cheese's, Crunch Fitness, Kane Furniture |
|
24 |
|
|
Casselberry, FL |
|
Casselberry Commons |
|
2010 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
$ |
2,767 |
|
|
$ |
16.29 |
|
|
Publix, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx |
|
25 |
|
|
Dania, FL |
|
Sheridan Square |
|
1991 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
$ |
11.61 |
|
|
Walmart Neighborhood Market |
|
26 |
|
|
Delray Beach, FL |
|
Shoppes at Addison Place |
|
2000 |
|
2021 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
$ |
2,370 |
|
|
$ |
44.64 |
|
|
— |
|
27 |
|
|
Fort Walton Beach, FL |
|
Shoppes at Paradise Pointe |
|
2000 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
12.48 |
|
|
Publix |
|
28 |
|
|
Jupiter, FL |
|
Concourse Village |
|
2004 |
|
2015 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
$ |
2,268 |
|
|
$ |
17.56 |
|
|
Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx |
|
29 |
|
|
Melbourne, FL |
|
Melbourne Shopping Center |
|
1999 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
$ |
8.68 |
|
|
Big Lots, Indian River Antique Mall, Publix |
|
30 |
|
|
Miami, FL |
|
The Shops at Midtown Miami |
|
2006 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
$ |
9,041 |
|
|
$ |
20.76 |
|
|
Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, Marshalls, Nordstrom Rack, Ross Dress for Less, Target, west elm |
|
31 |
|
|
Miramar, FL |
|
River Run |
|
1989 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
$ |
14.21 |
|
|
Publix |
|
32 |
|
|
Naples, FL |
|
Carillon Place |
|
1994 |
|
1995 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
$ |
4,217 |
|
|
$ |
15.90 |
|
|
Bealls Outlet, DSW, OfficeMax, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx, Total Wine & More, Walmart Neighborhood Market |
|
33 |
|
|
Naples, FL |
|
Countryside Shoppes |
|
1997 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
12.31 |
|
|
Aldi, Athletica Health & Fitness |
|
34 |
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Chickasaw Trail Shopping Center |
|
1994 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
$ |
855 |
|
|
$ |
11.65 |
|
|
Presidente Supermarket |
|
35 |
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Lee Vista Promenade |
|
2016 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
$ |
4,999 |
|
|
$ |
17.88 |
|
|
Academy Sports, Bealls Outlet, Epic Theatres, HomeGoods, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less |
|
36 |
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Millenia Crossing |
|
2009 |
|
2015 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
2,324 |
|
|
$ |
26.61 |
|
|
Nordstrom Rack |
|
37 |
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
Skyview Plaza |
|
1998 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
$ |
2,159 |
|
|
$ |
13.63 |
|
|
Badcock Home Furniture &more, dd's Discounts, Presidente Supermarket, Ross Dress for Less |
|
38 |
|
|
Oviedo, FL |
|
Oviedo Park Crossing |
|
1999 |
|
DEV |
|
20% |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
11.04 |
|
|
Bed Bath & Beyond, Lowe's (Not Owned), Michaels, OfficeMax, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx |
|
39 |
|
|
Palm Beach Gardens, FL |
|
Northlake Commons |
|
2003 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
|
$ |
15.85 |
|
|
Home Depot (Not Owned), Jo-Ann, Ross Dress for Less |
|
40 |
|
|
Palm Harbor, FL |
|
The Shoppes of Boot Ranch |
|
1990 |
|
1995 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
|
$ |
27.04 |
|
|
Publix (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned) |
|
41 |
|
|
Pembroke Pines, FL |
|
Flamingo Falls |
|
2001 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
$ |
2,346 |
|
|
$ |
23.84 |
|
|
LA Fitness (Not Owned), The Fresh Market |
|
42 |
|
|
Plantation, FL |
|
The Fountains |
|
2010 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
$ |
6,519 |
|
|
$ |
16.21 |
|
|
Dick's Sporting Goods, Jo-Ann, Kohl's, Marshalls/HomeGoods, Total Wine & More, Urban Air Trampoline & Adventure Park |
|
43 |
|
|
Tamarac, FL |
|
Midway Plaza |
|
1985 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
$ |
2,834 |
|
|
$ |
14.50 |
|
|
Publix, Ross Dress for Less |
|
44 |
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
North Pointe Plaza |
|
1990 |
|
IPO |
|
100% |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
$ |
1,591 |
|
|
$ |
14.99 |
|
|
Publix, Walmart (Not Owned) |
|
45 |
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
Southtown Center |
|
2005 |
|
2019 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
1,514 |
|
|
$ |
35.98 |
|
|
— |
|
46 |
|
|
Wesley Chapel, FL |
|
The Shoppes at New Tampa |
|
2002 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
15.46 |
|
|
Office Depot (Not Owned), Publix, Ross Dress for Less |
|
47 |
|
|
Winter Garden, FL |
|
Winter Garden Village |
|
2007 |
|
2013 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
$ |
14,209 |
|
|
$ |
19.98 |
|
|
Bealls, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Burlington, Forever 21, Havertys, Jo-Ann, LA Fitness, Lowe's (Not Owned), Marshalls, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Staples, Target (Not Owned) |
26
SITE Centers Corp.
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2021
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Center |
|
Year Developed/ Redeveloped |
|
Year Acquired |
|
SITE Ownership Interest |
|
|
Owned GLA (000's) |
|
|
Total Annualized Base Rent (000's) |
|
|
Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1) |
|
|
Key Tenants |
||||
|
|
|
|
Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
Brookhaven Plaza(3) |
|
1993 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
$ |
23.48 |
|
|
— |
|
|
49 |
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
Cascade Corners(3) |
|
1993 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
7.90 |
|
|
Kroger |
|
|
50 |
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
Cascade Crossing(3) |
|
1994 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
$ |
10.93 |
|
|
Publix |
|
|
51 |
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
Hammond Springs |
|
2008 |
|
2021 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
$ |
1,839 |
|
|
$ |
28.70 |
|
|
— |
|
|
52 |
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
Perimeter Pointe |
|
2002 |
|
1995 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
$ |
4,443 |
|
|
$ |
19.05 |
|
|
Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, LA Fitness, Regal Cinemas |
|
|
53 |
|
|
Canton, GA |
|
Hickory Flat Village(3) |
|
2000 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
$ |
1,076 |
|
|
$ |
14.53 |
|
|
Publix |
|
|
54 |
|
|
Canton, GA |
|
Riverstone Plaza |
|
1998 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
$ |
3,582 |
|
|
$ |
13.04 |
|
|
Bealls Outlet, Belk, Michaels, Publix, Ross Dress for Less |
|
|
55 |
|
|
Cumming, GA |
|
Cumming Marketplace |
|
1999 |
|
2003 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
$ |
4,200 |
|
|
$ |
13.89 |
|
|
Home Depot (Not Owned), Lowe's, Marshalls, Michaels, OfficeMax, Walmart (Not Owned) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
Cumming, GA |
|
Cumming Town Center |
|
2007 |
|
2013 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
$ |
4,917 |
|
|
$ |
15.79 |
|
|
Ashley Furniture HomeStore, Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, Staples, T.J. Maxx/HomeGoods |
|
|
57 |
|
|
Cumming, GA |
|
Sharon Greens |
|
2001 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
$ |
1,057 |
|
|
$ |
12.31 |
|
|
Kroger |
|
|
58 |
|
|
Decatur, GA |
|
Flat Shoals Crossing(3) |
|
1994 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
10.74 |
|
|
Publix |
|
|
59 |
|
|
Decatur, GA |
|
Hairston Crossing |
|
2002 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
9.57 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
60 |
|
|
Douglasville, GA |
|
Market Square |
|
1990 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
|
$ |
12.49 |
|
|
Aaron's |
|
|
61 |
|
|
Ellenwood, GA |
|
Paradise Shoppes of Ellenwood |
|
2003 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
12.64 |
|
|
— |
|
|
62 |
|
|
Marietta, GA |
|
Towne Center Prado |
|
2002 |
|
1995 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
$ |
3,233 |
|
|
$ |
13.51 |
|
|
Dick's Sporting Goods Warehouse, Publix, Ross Dress for Less |
|
|
63 |
|
|
Roswell, GA |
|
Sandy Plains Village |
|
2013 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
|
$ |
13.76 |
|
|
Movie Tavern, Painted Tree Marketplace |
|
|
64 |
|
|
Snellville, GA |
|
Presidential Commons |
|
2000 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
$ |
4,604 |
|
|
$ |
12.29 |
|
|
Burlington, buybuy BABY, Home Depot, Jo-Ann, Kroger |
|
|
65 |
|
|
Stone Mountain, GA |
|
Deshon Plaza(3) |
|
1994 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
11.28 |
|
|
Publix |
|
|
66 |
|
|
Suwanee, GA |
|
Johns Creek Town Center |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
$ |
4,118 |
|
|
$ |
15.66 |
|
|
Kohl's, Michaels, PetSmart, Sprouts Farmers Market, Staples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Chicago, IL |
|
3030 North Broadway |
|
2016 |
|
2017 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
$ |
4,345 |
|
|
$ |
32.98 |
|
|
Mariano's, XSport Fitness |
||
68 |
|
|
Chicago, IL |
|
The Maxwell |
|
2014 |
|
2014 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
$ |
5,616 |
|
|
$ |
27.18 |
|
|
Burlington, Dick's Sporting Goods, Nordstrom Rack, T.J. Maxx |
||
69 |
|
|
Deer Park, IL |
|
Deer Park Town Center |
|
2004 |
|
DEV |
|
50% |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
$ |
9,110 |
|
|
$ |
32.53 |
|
|
Barnes & Noble (Not Owned), Century Theatre, Crate & Barrel, Gap |
||
70 |
|
|
Schaumburg, IL |
|
Woodfield Village Green |
|
2015 |
|
1995 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
$ |
7,560 |
|
|
$ |
22.35 |
|
|
Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Container Store, Costco (Not Owned), HomeGoods, Marshalls, Michaels, Nordstrom Rack, PetSmart, Sierra Trading Post, Trader Joe's |
||
71 |
|
|
Tinley Park, IL |
|
Brookside Marketplace |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
$ |
4,459 |
|
|
$ |
15.34 |
|
|
Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, Kohl's (Not Owned), Michaels, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx, Target (Not Owned) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
Highland, IN |
|
Highland Grove Shopping Center |
|
2001 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
$ |
4,131 |
|
|
$ |
15.20 |
|
|
Best Buy (Not Owned), Burlington, Dick's Sporting Goods (Not Owned), Kohl's, Michaels, Target (Not Owned) |
27
SITE Centers Corp.
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2021
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Center |
|
Year Developed/ Redeveloped |
|
Year Acquired |
|
SITE Ownership Interest |
|
|
Owned GLA (000's) |
|
|
Total Annualized Base Rent (000's) |
|
|
Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1) |
|
|
Key Tenants |
||||
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Merriam, KS |
|
Merriam Town Center / Merriam Village |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
$ |
4,689 |
|
|
$ |
14.42 |
|
|
Bob's Discount Furniture, Cinemark, Dick's Sporting Goods, Home Depot (Not Owned), IKEA (Not Owned), Marshalls, OfficeMax, PetSmart |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
Everett, MA |
|
Gateway Center |
|
2001 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
$ |
5,935 |
|
|
$ |
17.16 |
|
|
Costco, Dollar Tree, Home Depot, Michaels, Old Navy, Target, Total Wine & More |
|
|
75 |
|
|
Framingham, MA |
|
Shoppers World |
|
1994 |
|
1995 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
$ |
16,514 |
|
|
$ |
25.34 |
|
|
AMC Theatres, Barnes & Noble, Best Buy, DSW, Golf Galaxy, Hobby Lobby, HomeSense, Kohl's, Macy's Furniture Gallery, Marshalls, Michaels, Nordstrom Rack, PetSmart, Sierra Trading Post, T.J. Maxx |
|
|
76 |
|
|
West Springfield, MA |
|
Riverdale Shops |
|
2003 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
$ |
3,725 |
|
|
$ |
15.38 |
|
|
Kohl's, Stop & Shop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
Brentwood, MO |
|
The Promenade at Brentwood |
|
1998 |
|
1998 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
$ |
5,236 |
|
|
$ |
15.50 |
|
|
Burlington, Micro Center, PetSmart, Target, Trader Joe's |
|
|
78 |
|
|
Independence, MO |
|
Independence Commons |
|
1999 |
|
1995 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
$ |
5,590 |
|
|
$ |
15.18 |
|
|
AMC Theatres, Best Buy, Bob's Discount Furniture, Kohl's, Marshalls, Ross Dress for Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
East Hanover, NJ |
|
East Hanover Plaza |
|
1994 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
20.49 |
|
|
Costco (Not Owned), HomeGoods, HomeSense, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
Edgewater, NJ |
|
Edgewater Towne Center |
|
2000 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
$ |
1,488 |
|
|
$ |
28.78 |
|
|
Whole Foods |
|
|
81 |
|
|
Freehold, NJ |
|
Freehold Marketplace |
|
2005 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
$ |
34.14 |
|
|
Sam's Club (Not Owned), Walmart (Not Owned) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
Hamilton, NJ |
|
Hamilton Marketplace |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
$ |
9,657 |
|
|
$ |
19.73 |
|
|
Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, BJ's Wholesale Club (Not Owned), Kohl's, Lowe's (Not Owned), Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, ShopRite, Staples, Walmart (Not Owned) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
Lyndhurst, NJ |
|
Lewandowski Commons(3) |
|
1998 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
$ |
1,590 |
|
|
$ |
24.21 |
|
|
Stop & Shop |
|
|
84 |
|
|
Princeton, NJ |
|
Nassau Park Pavilion |
|
2021 |
|
1997 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
$ |
11,484 |
|
|
$ |
15.86 |
|
|
At Home, Best Buy, Burlington, buybuy BABY, Dick's Sporting Goods, Home Depot (Not Owned), HomeGoods, HomeSense, Michaels, PetSmart, Raymour & Flanigan, Target (Not Owned), T.J. Maxx, Wegmans |
|
|
85 |
|
|
Union, NJ |
|
Route 22 Retail Center |
|
1997 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
15.90 |
|
|
Big Lots, Dick's Sporting Goods, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
Voorhees, NJ |
|
Echelon Village Plaza |
|
2002 |
|
2015 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
$ |
791 |
|
|
$ |
12.81 |
|
|
The Edge Fitness Clubs |
|
|
87 |
|
|
West Long Branch, NJ |
|
Consumer Centre |
|
1993 |
|
2004 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
$ |
3,647 |
|
|
$ |
13.91 |
|
|
buybuy BABY, Dick's Sporting Goods, DSW, Home Depot |
|
|
88 |
|
|
Woodland Park, NJ |
|
West Falls Plaza |
|
1995 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
$ |
1,976 |
|
|
$ |
21.72 |
|
|
andThat!, Cost Plus World Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
Hempstead, NY |
|
The Hub |
|
2001 |
|
2015 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
$ |
3,169 |
|
|
$ |
12.94 |
|
|
Home Depot, Super Stop & Shop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
Chapel Hill, NC |
|
Meadowmont Village |
|
2002 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
$ |
2,762 |
|
|
$ |
22.65 |
|
|
Harris Teeter |
|
|
91 |
|
|
Charlotte, NC |
|
Belgate Shopping Center |
|
2017 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
$ |
4,506 |
|
|
$ |
16.32 |
|
|
Burlington, Cost Plus World Market, Furniture Row (Not Owned), Hobby Lobby, IKEA (Not Owned), Marshalls, Old Navy, PetSmart, T.J. Maxx, Walmart (Not Owned) |
28
SITE Centers Corp.
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2021
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Center |
|
Year Developed/ Redeveloped |
|
Year Acquired |
|
SITE Ownership Interest |
|
|
Owned GLA (000's) |
|
|
Total Annualized Base Rent (000's) |
|
|
Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1) |
|
|
Key Tenants |
||||
|
92 |
|
|
Charlotte, NC |
|
Carolina Pavilion |
|
1997 |
|
2012 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
$ |
9,587 |
|
|
$ |
13.91 |
|
|
AMC Theatres, American Freight Outlet Stores, AutoZone, Bed Bath & Beyond, Big Lots, Burlington, buybuy BABY, Conn's, Floor & Decor, Frontgate Outlet Store, Jo-Ann, Nordstrom Rack, Old Navy, Ross Dress for Less, Target (Not Owned), Value City Furniture |
|
|
93 |
|
|
Charlotte, NC |
|
Cotswold Village |
|
2013 |
|
2011 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
$ |
6,096 |
|
|
$ |
24.62 |
|
|
Harris Teeter, Marshalls, PetSmart |
|
|
94 |
|
|
Clayton, NC |
|
Clayton Corners |
|
1999 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
|
$ |
13.17 |
|
|
Lowes Foods |
|
|
95 |
|
|
Cornelius, NC |
|
The Shops at The Fresh Market |
|
2001 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
|
$ |
16.60 |
|
|
The Fresh Market |
|
|
96 |
|
|
Fayetteville, NC |
|
Fayetteville Pavilion |
|
2001 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
$ |
2,801 |
|
|
$ |
13.11 |
|
|
Christmas Tree Shops, Food Lion, Marshalls, Michaels, PetSmart |
|
|
97 |
|
|
Fuquay Varina, NC |
|
Sexton Commons |
|
2002 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
26.51 |
|
|
— |
|
|
98 |
|
|
Raleigh, NC |
|
Poyner Place |
|
2012 |
|
2012 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
$ |
3,853 |
|
|
$ |
16.09 |
|
|
Cost Plus World Market, Marshalls, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, Target (Not Owned), Urban Air Trampoline & Adventure Park |
|
|
99 |
|
|
Wilmington, NC |
|
University Centre |
|
2001 |
|
IPO |
|
20% |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
$ |
4,335 |
|
|
$ |
11.07 |
|
|
Bed Bath & Beyond, Lowe's, Old Navy, Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Ross Dress for Less, Sam's Club (Not Owned) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
Winston Salem, NC |
|
Shoppes at Oliver's Crossing |
|
2003 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
$ |
14.41 |
|
|
Lowes Foods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Cincinnati, OH |
|
Kenwood Square |
|
2017 |
|
2013 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
$ |
7,005 |
|
|
$ |
18.51 |
|
|
Dick's Sporting Goods, Macy's Furniture Gallery, Marshalls/HomeGoods, Michaels, T.J. Maxx, The Fresh Market |
|
|
102 |
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
Easton Market |
|
2013 |
|
1998 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
$ |
7,388 |
|
|
$ |
14.96 |
|
|
Bed Bath & Beyond, buybuy BABY, DSW, HomeGoods, Marshalls, Michaels, Nordstrom Rack, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Sierra Trading Post, T.J. Maxx, Value City Furniture |
|
|
103 |
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
Hilliard Rome Commons |
|
2001 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
$ |
14.46 |
|
|
Burlington, HomeGoods |
|
|
104 |
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
Lennox Town Center |
|
1997 |
|
1998 |
|
50% |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
$ |
4,756 |
|
|
$ |
12.72 |
|
|
Barnes & Noble, Marshalls, Phoenix Theatres, Staples, Target |
|
|
105 |
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
Polaris Towne Center |
|
1999 |
|
2011 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
$ |
6,823 |
|
|
$ |
16.63 |
|
|
Best Buy, Big Lots, Jo-Ann, Kroger, Lowe's (Not Owned), OfficeMax, Target (Not Owned), T.J. Maxx |
|
|
106 |
|
|
Dublin, OH |
|
Perimeter Center |
|
1996 |
|
1998 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
$ |
2,412 |
|
|
$ |
17.67 |
|
|
Giant Eagle |
|
|
107 |
|
|
Mason, OH |
|
Waterstone Center |
|
1998 |
|
2014 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
|
$ |
17.35 |
|
|
Best Buy, Costco (Not Owned), Michaels, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
Stow, OH |
|
Stow Community Center |
|
2008 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
$ |
4,083 |
|
|
$ |
11.84 |
|
|
Giant Eagle, Hobby Lobby, Kohl's, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
Toledo, OH |
|
Springfield Commons |
|
1999 |
|
DEV |
|
20% |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
|
$ |
11.63 |
|
|
Burlington, Kohl's, Planet Fitness |
|
|
110 |
|
|
Westlake, OH |
|
West Bay Plaza |
|
2020 |
|
IPO |
|
100% |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
$ |
2,827 |
|
|
$ |
24.06 |
|
|
Fresh Thyme Farmers Market, HomeSense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
Hillsboro, OR |
|
Tanasbourne Town Center |
|
2001 |
|
1996 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
$ |
4,826 |
|
|
$ |
20.77 |
|
|
Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy (Not Owned), Marshalls, Michaels, Nordstrom Rack (Not Owned), Ross Dress for Less, Sierra Trading Post, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
Portland, OR |
|
The Blocks |
|
2001 |
|
2019 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
$ |
2,324 |
|
|
$ |
35.20 |
|
|
— |
29
SITE Centers Corp.
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2021
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Center |
|
Year Developed/ Redeveloped |
|
Year Acquired |
|
SITE Ownership Interest |
|
|
Owned GLA (000's) |
|
|
Total Annualized Base Rent (000's) |
|
|
Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1) |
|
|
Key Tenants |
||||
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
Boothwyn, PA |
|
Larkin's Corner |
|
1994 |
|
2015 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
$ |
2,107 |
|
|
$ |
9.56 |
|
|
ACME, Walmart |
|
|
114 |
|
|
Downingtown, PA |
|
Ashbridge Square |
|
1999 |
|
2015 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
$ |
2,614 |
|
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
|
Christmas Tree Shops, Home Depot, Jo-Ann |
|
|
115 |
|
|
Easton, PA |
|
Southmont Plaza |
|
2004 |
|
2015 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
$ |
3,823 |
|
|
$ |
16.46 |
|
|
Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, Lowe's (Not Owned), Michaels, Staples |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
Anderson, SC |
|
Midtowne Park |
|
2008 |
|
2014 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
$ |
1,655 |
|
|
$ |
9.89 |
|
|
Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, Kohl's |
|
|
117 |
|
|
Charleston, SC |
|
Ashley Crossing |
|
2011 |
|
2003 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
$ |
2,077 |
|
|
$ |
10.67 |
|
|
Food Lion, Jo-Ann, Kohl's, Marshalls |
|
|
118 |
|
|
Greenville, SC |
|
The Point(3) |
|
2005 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
$ |
1,848 |
|
|
$ |
17.98 |
|
|
REI, Whole Foods |
|
|
119 |
|
|
Mount Pleasant, SC |
|
Wando Crossing |
|
2000 |
|
1995 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
$ |
2,586 |
|
|
$ |
14.99 |
|
|
Marshalls, Michaels, T.J. Maxx, Total Wine & More, Walmart (Not Owned) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
Myrtle Beach, SC |
|
The Plaza at Carolina Forest(3) |
|
1999 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
$ |
14.31 |
|
|
Kroger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
Brentwood, TN |
|
Cool Springs Pointe |
|
2004 |
|
2000 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
$ |
3,220 |
|
|
$ |
16.26 |
|
|
Best Buy, Restoration Hardware, Ross Dress for Less |
|
|
122 |
|
|
Memphis, TN |
|
American Way(3) |
|
1988 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
6.30 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
Highland Village, TX |
|
The Marketplace at Highland Village |
|
2007 |
|
2013 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
$ |
3,665 |
|
|
$ |
18.32 |
|
|
DSW, LA Fitness, T.J. Maxx/HomeGoods, Walmart (Not Owned) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
Round Rock, TX |
|
Vintage Plaza |
|
2003 |
|
2019 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
$ |
845 |
|
|
$ |
27.01 |
|
|
— |
|
|
125 |
|
|
San Antonio, TX |
|
Bandera Pointe |
|
2002 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
$ |
5,424 |
|
|
$ |
11.94 |
|
|
Barnes & Noble, Gold's Gym, Jo-Ann, Kohl's (Not Owned), Lowe's, Old Navy, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Spec's Wine, Spirits & Finer Foods, Target (Not Owned), T.J. Maxx,Urban Air Trampoline & Adventure Park |
|
|
126 |
|
|
San Antonio, TX |
|
Terrell Plaza |
|
2012 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
$ |
1,928 |
|
|
$ |
20.12 |
|
|
Ross Dress for Less, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
127 |
|
|
San Antonio, TX |
|
Village at Stone Oak |
|
2007 |
|
DEV |
|
100% |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
$ |
5,903 |
|
|
$ |
18.23 |
|
|
Alamo Drafthouse Cinema, Hobby Lobby, HomeGoods, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
Charlottesville, VA |
|
Emmet Street North |
|
2020 |
|
2021 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
86.32 |
|
|
— |
|
|
129 |
|
|
Charlottesville, VA |
|
Emmet Street Station |
|
2018 |
|
2021 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
|
$ |
51.82 |
|
|
— |
|
|
130 |
|
|
Fairfax, VA |
|
Fairfax Towne Center |
|
1994 |
|
1995 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
$ |
4,970 |
|
|
$ |
20.23 |
|
|
Bed Bath & Beyond, Jo-Ann, Regal Cinemas, Safeway, T.J. Maxx |
|
|
131 |
|
|
Midlothian, VA |
|
Commonwealth Center |
|
2002 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
$ |
2,059 |
|
|
$ |
18.27 |
|
|
Michaels, The Fresh Market |
|
|
132 |
|
|
Richmond, VA |
|
Downtown Short Pump |
|
2000 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
$ |
2,748 |
|
|
$ |
22.90 |
|
|
Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinemas |
|
|
133 |
|
|
Richmond, VA |
|
White Oak Village |
|
2008 |
|
2014 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
$ |
6,286 |
|
|
$ |
15.68 |
|
|
JCPenney, K&G Fashion Superstore, Lowe's (Not Owned), Michaels, PetSmart, Publix, Target (Not Owned) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
Springfield, VA |
|
Springfield Center |
|
1999 |
|
2007 |
|
100% |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
$ |
4,199 |
|
|
$ |
23.76 |
|
|
Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW, Marshalls, Michaels, The Tile Shop |
|
|
135 |
|
|
Virginia Beach, VA |
|
Kroger Plaza(3) |
|
1997 |
|
2007 |
|
20% |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
3.63 |
|
|
Kroger |
|
|
136 |
|
|
Winchester, VA |
|
Apple Blossom Corners |
|
1997 |
|
IPO |
|
20% |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
$ |
2,893 |
|
|
$ |
12.04 |
|
|
Books-A-Million, HomeGoods, Kohl's, Martin's |
(1) |
Calculated as total annualized base rentals divided by Company-owned rent commenced GLA as of December 31, 2021. |
(2) |
Indicates the asset or a portion of the asset is subject to a ground lease. All other assets are owned fee simple. |
(3) |
The Company agreed to sell these assets to its joint venture partner. The transaction is expected to close by June 2022. |
30
Item 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal proceedings, which, taken together, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is also subject to a variety of legal actions for personal injury or property damage arising in the ordinary course of its business, most of which are covered by insurance. While the resolution of all matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of such legal proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial position or results of operations.
Item 4. |
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not Applicable.
31
PART II
Item 5. |
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
The Company’s common shares are listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “SITC.” As of February 10, 2022, there were 3,913 record holders. This total excludes beneficial or non-registered holders that held their shares through various brokerage firms. This figure does not represent the actual number of beneficial owners of the Company’s common shares because common shares are frequently held in “street name” by securities dealers and others for the benefit of beneficial owners who may vote the shares.
The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and, if appropriate, modifying the Company’s dividend policy. The Board of Directors intends to pursue a dividend policy retaining sufficient free cash flow to support the Company’s capital needs while still adhering to REIT payout requirements. In February 2022, the Company declared its first-quarter 2022 dividend of $0.13 per common share, payable on April 7, 2022, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 2022.
The decision to declare and pay future dividends on the Company’s common shares, as well as the timing, amount and composition of any such future dividends, will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will be subject to the Company’s cash flow from operations, earnings, financial condition, capital and debt service requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors considers relevant. The Company is required by the Code to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income. The Company intends to continue to declare quarterly dividends on its common shares; however, there can be no assurances as to the timing and amounts of future dividends.
Certain of the Company’s indentures contain financial and operating covenants including the requirement that the cumulative dividends declared or paid from December 31, 1993, through the end of the current period cannot exceed Funds From Operations (as defined in the agreement) plus an additional $20.0 million for the same period unless required to maintain REIT status.
The Company has a dividend reinvestment plan under which shareholders may elect to reinvest their dividends automatically in common shares. Under the plan, the Company may, from time to time, elect that common shares be purchased in the open market on behalf of participating shareholders or may issue new common shares to such shareholders.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
||||
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) |
|
|
Average Price Paid per Share |
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
|
|
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (Millions) |
|
||||
October 1–31, 2021 |
|
71,872 |
|
|
$ |
15.48 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
November 1–30, 2021 |
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
17.26 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
December 1–31, 2021 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
15.06 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total |
|
75,983 |
|
|
$ |
15.57 |
|
|
|
5,112,078 |
|
|
$ |
42.1 |
|
(1) |
Common shares surrendered or deemed surrendered to the Company to satisfy statutory minimum tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting and/or exercise of awards under the Company’s equity-based compensation plans. |
On November 29, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a common share repurchase program. Under the terms of the program, the Company may purchase up to a maximum value of $100 million of its common shares and the program has no expiration date. As of February 10, 2022, the Company had repurchased 5.1 million of its common shares under this program in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of approximately $57.9 million, or $11.33 per share. As of February 10, 2022, the Company had not repurchased any shares under the program in 2021 or 2022.
Item 6. |
[RESERVED] |
32
Item 7. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Company is a self-administered and self-managed Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) in the business of acquiring, owning, developing, redeveloping, leasing and managing shopping centers. As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 136 shopping centers (including 47 shopping centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures). At December 31, 2021, the Company owned approximately 32.0 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) (42.2 million square feet of total GLA) through all its properties (wholly-owned and joint venture) and managed approximately 0.6 million total square feet of GLA owned by Retail Value Inc. (“RVI”), an owner and operator of one shopping center listed on the New York Stock Exchange. As of December 31, 2021, the Company owned approximately 60 acres of developable land. At December 31, 2021, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s operating shopping center portfolio was 90.0%, and the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $18.33, both on a pro rata basis.
COVID-19 Pandemic
In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic, and it continues to spread throughout the United States and other countries across the world. Beginning in mid-March 2020, federal, state and local governments took various actions to limit the spread of COVID-19, including ordering the temporary closure of non-essential businesses (which included many of the Company’s tenants) and imposing significant social distancing guidelines and restrictions on the continued operations of essential businesses and the subsequent reopening of non-essential businesses. In order to safeguard the health of its employees and their families, the Company closed all of its offices in March 2020 and successfully transitioned to working remotely. The Company reopened its Corporate Headquarters in Cleveland, Ohio, and select regional offices on a voluntary basis in October 2020 and in September 2021, the Company began to require that all employees report to the office at least two times each week. The Company continues to closely monitor local levels of infection associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and has taken additional steps as needed in order to protect the health and safety of its workforce, including a relaxation of office attendance requirements in late 2021 as a result of the Omicron variant and rising infection levels. To date, the Company’s leasing and administrative operations have not been adversely impacted by the pandemic, as the Company’s significant investments in its information technology infrastructure and systems in prior years facilitated the transition to remote and hybrid working environments.
The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the collection of rents from April 2020 through December 2020. During the second half of 2020 and early 2021, the Company worked with tenants to maximize the collection of unpaid 2020 rents by offering rent deferment on a case-by-case basis often in exchange for concessions in the form of tenant extensions of lease terms, the relaxation of leasing restrictions and co-tenancy provisions and, in some cases, alterations of control areas allowing for future redevelopment of the shopping center.
During the course of 2021, the Company’s rental collections normalized close to pre-pandemic levels. As of December 31, 2021, a substantial majority of tenants, including tenants previously on the cash basis of accounting, were paying their monthly rent and any deferred rents relating to prior periods. Included in 2021 results was $13.8 million of net revenue, at SITE Centers’ share, primarily related to contractual rents paid from cash-basis tenants that were contractually due in 2020. The majority of the deferral arrangements relating to 2020 revenue were repaid during 2021, and therefore, the impact of 2020 rent collections is expected to be minimal in future periods. At December 31, 2021, $0.2 million remained outstanding under deferral arrangements for tenants that are not accounted for on the cash basis.
As of February 10, 2022, the Omicron variant has not had a material impact on the Company’s rent collections or leasing activity though some tenants have experienced challenges in maintaining regular operating hours as a result of related labor shortages. Future rent collections may be negatively impacted by additional surges in COVID-19 contagion, the emergence of new COVID-19 variants that are more infectious or resistant to existing vaccines, decreases in the effectiveness of existing vaccines, and any implementation of additional restrictions on tenant businesses as a result thereof. For a further discussion of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, see “Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financing Activities” and “Economic Conditions” included in this section and Item 1A. Risk Factors in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Current Strategy
The growth opportunities within the Company’s core property operations include rental rate increases, continued lease-up of the portfolio and the adaptation of existing site plans and square footage to generate higher blended rental rates and operating cash flows. Additional growth opportunities include external acquisitions and tactical redevelopment. Management intends to use retained cash flow, proceeds from the sale of lower growth assets and proceeds from equity offerings and debt financings to fund capital expenditures relating to new leasing activity, acquisitions, including opportunistic investments, and tactical redevelopment activity.
33
The Company believes the following serve as cornerstones for the execution of its strategy:
|
• |
Maximization of recurring cash flows through strong leasing and core property operations; |
|
• |
Growth in Company cash flows through capital recycling, especially the redeployment of capital from mature, slower growing assets into acquisitions that offer operational and tactical redevelopment potential; |
|
• |
Enhancement of property cash flows through creative, proactive tactical redevelopment efforts that result in the profitable adaptation of site plans to better suit tenant and community demands; |
|
• |
Risk mitigation through continuous focus on maintaining prudent leverage levels and lengthy average debt maturities, as well as access to a diverse selection of capital sources, including the secured and unsecured debt markets, unsecured lines of credit, common equity and capital from a wide range of joint venture partners and |
|
• |
Sustainability of growth through a constant focus on relationships with investor, tenant, employee, community and environmental constituencies. |
Transaction and Capital Markets Highlights
Transaction and investment highlights for the Company during 2021 include the following:
|
• |
Acquired partner Madison International’s 80% interest in six assets for $107.2 million ($134.0 million at 100%) with the mortgage debt related to the properties repaid at closing; |
|
• |
Acquired its partner’s 33% interest in a consolidated joint venture that owned one shopping center, Paradise Village Gateway (Phoenix, Arizona), for $15.1 million ($45.8 million at 100%) with the mortgage debt related to the property repaid at closing. The partner’s 33% ownership was previously reflected as non-controlling interest on the Company’s balance sheet; |
|
• |
Acquired four shopping centers (one each in Delray Beach, Florida and Atlanta, Georgia and two in Charlottesville, Virginia), one income producing parcel adjacent to Nassau Park Pavilion (Princeton, New Jersey) and one land parcel adjacent to Belgate Shopping Center (Charlotte, North Carolina) for an aggregate purchase price of $100.5 million; |
|
• |
Sold six unconsolidated shopping centers, several wholly-owned land parcels and the Hobby Lobby parcel of a shopping center for an aggregate sales price of $166.6 million, or $96.5 million at the Company’s share; |
|
• |
One of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold its sole asset, which was a parcel of undeveloped land (approximating 70 acres) in Richmond Hill, Ontario. The Company’s share of net proceeds totaled $22.1 million after accounting for customary closing costs and foreign currency translation but before income taxes; |
|
• |
Agreed to sell its 20% interest in the SAU Joint Venture to its partner, State of Utah, based on a gross asset value of $155.7 million (at 100%). The transaction is expected to close by June 2022; |
|
• |
In October 2021, the Company received a cash distribution of $190.0 million on the RVI Preferred Shares. In December 2021, RVI repurchased all of the outstanding RVI Preferred Shares from the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $1.00. As a result, the Company no longer maintains an investment in RVI and will not receive any further distributions on account of the RVI Preferred Shares; |
|
• |
Sold 2,225,698 common shares on a forward basis under its continuous equity offering program at a weighted average price of $15.77 per share before issuance costs, generating expected gross proceeds before issuance costs of $35.1 million with no shares settled to date; |
|
• |
In March 2021, issued and sold 17.25 million common shares resulting in net proceeds of $225.3 million; |
|
• |
In April 2021, redeemed all of its 6.250% Class K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (the “Class K Preferred Shares”) having an aggregate liquidation preference of $150.0 million and |
|
• |
Declared aggregate cash dividends of $0.47 per common share. |
34
Operational Accomplishments
The COVID‑19 pandemic caused a slow-down in leasing activity in 2020; however, leasing volume rebounded in late 2020, and the Company’s 2021 leasing activity exceeded 2020 levels. Although there may be some additional disruption among existing tenants due to the continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on supply chains and labor markets, the Company believes that recent strong leasing volumes are attributable to the location of the Company’s portfolio in suburban, high household income communities (which have been impacted less by the pandemic on a relative basis) and to national tenants’ strong financial positions and increasing emphasis and reliance on physical store locations to improve the speed and efficiency of fulfillment of online purchases.
Operating highlights for 2021 included:
|
• |
Signed new leases and renewals for approximately 3.5 million square feet of GLA, which included 0.9 million square feet of new leasing volume, both on a pro rata share; |
|
• |
Achieved new lease spreads of 13.1% and renewal spreads of 2.2% at the Company’s pro rata share; |
|
• |
Annualized base rent per occupied square foot on a pro rata basis decreased to $18.33 at December 31, 2021, as compared to $18.50 at December 31, 2020, primarily due to the 2021 joint venture acquisitions and |
|
• |
Continued to maintain strong aggregate occupancy on a pro rata basis of 90.0% at December 31, 2021, as compared to 89.0% at December 31, 2020. |
Retail Environment
The Company continues to see demand from a broad range of tenants for its space, particularly as larger national retailers launch new brand concepts and incorporate omni-channel strategies that leverage brick and mortar infrastructure to drive incremental business. Value-oriented retailers continue to take market share from conventional and national chain department stores. As a result, while certain of those conventional and national department stores have announced bankruptcies, store closures and/or reduced expansion plans, other retailers, specifically those in the value and convenience category, continue to expand their store fleets and launch new concepts. Many of the Company’s largest tenants, including TJX Companies, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Ross, Burlington and Five Below, have remained well positioned with access to capital while outperforming other retail categories on a relative basis despite the COVID-19 pandemic.
Company Fundamentals
The following table lists the Company’s 10 largest tenants at its wholly-owned properties and its proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture properties combined as of December 31, 2021:
|
|
|
|
At SITE Centers' Share |
|
|||
Tenant |
|
% of Total Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues |
|
|
% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA |
|
||
1. |
|
TJX Companies(A) |
|
5.8% |
|
|
6.4% |
|
2. |
|
Dick's Sporting Goods(B) |
|
2.7% |
|
|
2.8% |
|
3. |
|
PetSmart |
|
2.6% |
|
|
2.3% |
|
4. |
|
Michaels |
|
2.3% |
|
|
2.3% |
|
5. |
|
Ross Stores(C) |
|
1.9% |
|
|
2.5% |
|
6. |
|
Bed, Bath & Beyond(D) |
|
1.9% |
|
|
2.4% |
|
7. |
|
Ulta |
|
1.9% |
|
|
1.2% |
|
8. |
|
Gap(E) |
|
1.9% |
|
|
1.5% |
|
9. |
|
Nordstrom Rack |
|
1.8% |
|
|
1.5% |
|
10. |
|
Best Buy |
|
1.8% |
|
|
1.8% |
|
35
The following table lists the Company’s 10 largest tenants at 100% as of December 31, 2021:
|
|
At 100% |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Wholly-Owned Properties |
|
|
Joint Venture Properties |
|
||||||
Tenant |
|
% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues |
|
|
% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA |
|
|
% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues |
|
|
% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA |
|
TJX Companies(A) |
|
6.0% |
|
|
4.8% |
|
|
3.4% |
|
|
3.4% |
|
Dick's Sporting Goods(B) |
|
2.8% |
|
|
2.1% |
|
|
1.7% |
|
|
1.7% |
|
PetSmart |
|
2.7% |
|
|
1.8% |
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
0.9% |
|
Michaels |
|
2.3% |
|
|
1.7% |
|
|
1.9% |
|
|
1.8% |
|
Bed, Bath & Beyond(D) |
|
2.0% |
|
|
1.9% |
|
|
0.5% |
|
|
0.6% |
|
Nordstrom Rack |
|
2.0% |
|
|
1.1% |
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
0.0% |
|
Ulta |
|
2.0% |
|
|
0.9% |
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
0.7% |
|
Best Buy |
|
1.9% |
|
|
1.3% |
|
|
1.6% |
|
|
1.3% |
|
Ross Stores(C) |
|
1.9% |
|
|
1.7% |
|
|
3.1% |
|
|
3.8% |
|
Gap(E) |
|
1.8% |
|
|
1.1% |
|
|
2.2% |
|
|
1.4% |
|
|
(A) |
Includes T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, HomeGoods, Sierra Trading Post, HomeSense and Combo Store |
|
(B) |
Includes Dick’s Sporting Goods and Golf Galaxy |
|
(C) |
Includes Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts |
|
(D) |
Includes Bed Bath & Beyond and buybuy BABY |
|
(E) |
Includes Gap, Old Navy, Banana Republic and Athleta |
The Company leased approximately 5.0 million square feet (3.5 million square feet at the Company’s share) of GLA in 2021 in its wholly-owned and joint venture portfolios, comprised of 240 new leases and 363 renewals, for a total of 603 leases executed in 2021. At December 31, 2021, the Company had 339 leases expiring in 2022 with an average base rent per square foot of $20.31 on a pro rata basis. For the comparable leases executed in 2021, at the Company’s interest, the Company generated positive leasing spreads of 13.1% for new leases and 2.2% for renewals, or 3.7% on a blended basis. Leasing spreads are a key metric in real estate, representing the percentage increase over rental rates on existing leases versus rental rates on new and renewal leases, though leasing spreads exclude consideration of the amount of capital expended in connection with new leasing activity and exclude properties in redevelopment. The Company’s leasing spread calculation includes only those deals that were executed within one year of the date the prior tenant vacated and, as a result, is a good benchmark to compare the average annualized base rent of expiring leases with the comparable executed market rental rates.
For new leases executed during 2021, the Company expended a weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated at $8.34 per rentable square foot, on a pro rata basis, over the lease term, as compared to $6.81 per rentable square foot in 2020. The increase in the weighted-average cost of tenant improvements was due to the higher percentage of anchor leases executed in 2021. The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.
Summary—2021 Financial Results
The following provides an overview of the Company’s key financial metrics (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”) (in thousands except per share amounts):
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|||||
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
$ |
106,123 |
|
|
$ |
15,190 |
|
FFO attributable to common shareholders |
$ |
242,774 |
|
|
$ |
176,562 |
|
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders |
$ |
245,687 |
|
|
$ |
192,824 |
|
Earnings per share – Diluted |
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the increase in net income attributable to common shareholders, as compared to the prior year, was primarily attributable to the impact of net revenue relating to prior periods (including deferred rents) collected from cash-basis tenants in the current year, higher gains associated with the sale of joint venture assets and the valuation allowance reversal
36
recognized in 2020 related to the Company’s preferred investments in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures, partially offset by lower gain on sale of joint venture interests and lower interest income resulting from the termination of the Company’s preferred investment in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in the fourth quarter of 2020.
The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations provides information that will assist in the understanding of the Company’s financial statements and the factors that accounted for changes in certain key items in the financial statements, as well as critical accounting estimates that affected these financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries where the Company has financial or operating control. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes. In preparing these financial statements, management has used available information, including the Company’s history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. It is possible that the ultimate outcome as anticipated by management in formulating its estimates inherent in these financial statements might not materialize. Application of the critical accounting policies described below involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may use different estimates that may affect the comparability of the Company’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable
Rental income has been reduced for the elimination of unpaid contractual lease payments for tenants that are on the cash basis of accounting due to collectability concerns. When a tenant comes off the cash basis, there could be a reinstatement of the straight-line rent receivable, which would result in additional recognition of straight-line income.
The Company makes estimates of the collectability of its accounts receivable related to base rents, including straight-line rentals, expense reimbursements and other revenue or income. The Company analyzes tenant credit worthiness, as well as both current economic and tenant-specific sector trends, when evaluating the probability of collection of accounts receivable. In evaluating tenant credit worthiness, the Company’s assessment may include a review of payment history, tenant sales performance and financial position. For larger national tenants, the Company also evaluates projected liquidity, as well as the tenant’s access to capital and the overall health of the particular sector. In addition, with respect to tenants in bankruptcy, the Company makes estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims in assessing the probability of collection of the related receivable. The time to resolve these claims may exceed one year. These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s earnings because once the amount is considered not probable of being collected, earnings are reduced by a corresponding amount until the receivable is collected.
Real Estate and Long-Lived Assets
On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, and intangibles may be impaired. Impairment indicators are primarily related to change in estimated hold periods and significant, prolonged decreases in projected cash flows; however, other impairment indicators could occur. A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property. The determination of undiscounted cash flows may require significant estimates by management. In management’s estimate of projected cash flows, it considers factors such as hold period, expected future operating income (loss), trends and prospects, the effects of demand, competition and other factors. If the Company is evaluating the potential sale of an asset or development alternatives, the undiscounted future cash flows analysis is probability-weighted based upon management’s best estimate of the likelihood of the alternative courses of action. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in anticipated actions could affect the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could have a material impact on the Company’s net income. To the extent an impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the estimated fair value of the property.
The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate properties and other investments. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. If the Company’s estimates of the anticipated holding periods, projected future cash flows, or market conditions change, its evaluation of the impairment charges may be different, and such differences could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Specifically, plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease the likelihood of recording impairment losses.
37
For the acquisition of real estate assets, the Company allocates the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The Company applies various valuation methods, all of which require significant estimates by management, including discount rates, exit capitalization rates, estimated land values (per square foot), capitalization rates and certain market leasing assumptions. Further, the valuation of above- and below-market lease values are significantly impacted by management's estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease. If the Company determines that an event has occurred after the initial allocation of the asset or liability that would change the estimated useful life of the asset, the Company will reassess the depreciation and amortization of the asset. The Company is required to make subjective estimates in connection with these valuations and allocations.
Measurement of Fair Value—Real Estate and Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company is required to assess for impairment the value of certain consolidated and unconsolidated joint venture investments, as well as the underlying collateral for other investments. The fair value of real estate investments used in the Company’s impairment calculations is estimated based on the price that would be received for the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants at the measurement date. Investments without a public market are valued based on assumptions made and valuation techniques used by the Company. The availability of observable transaction data and inputs can make it more difficult and/or subjective to determine the fair value of such investments. As a result, amounts ultimately realized by the Company from investments sold may differ from the fair values presented, and the differences could be material.
The valuation of real estate assets, investments and real estate collateral for impairment is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including the income capitalization approach or discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each asset considering prevailing market capitalization rates, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations, bona fide purchase offers received from third parties and/or consideration of the amount that currently would be required to replace the asset, as adjusted for obsolescence. In general, the Company utilizes a valuation technique that is based on the characteristics of the specific asset when measuring fair value of an investment. However, a single valuation technique is generally used for the Company’s property type.
For operational real estate assets, the significant assumptions include the capitalization rate used in the income capitalization valuation, as well as the projected property net operating income. For investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, the Company also considers the valuation of any underlying joint venture debt. Valuation of real estate assets is calculated based on market conditions and assumptions made by management at the measurement date, which may differ materially from actual results if market conditions or the underlying assumptions change.
Deferred Tax Assets and Tax Liabilities—Valuation Allowance
The Company accounts for income taxes related to its taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent it believes it is more likely than not that these assets will be realized. In making such determinations, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including forecasts of future taxable income, the reversal of other existing temporary differences, available net operating loss carryforwards, tax planning strategies and recent results of operations. Several of these considerations require assumptions and significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income that are consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company is utilizing to manage its business. Based on this assessment, management must evaluate the need for, and amount of, valuation allowances against the Company’s deferred tax assets. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets if and when it has determined that an uncertainty exists regarding their realization, which would increase the provision for income taxes. To the extent facts and circumstances change in the future, adjustments to the valuation allowances may be required. In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize the deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Company would adjust the valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes. The Company makes certain estimates in the determination of the use of valuation reserves recorded for deferred tax assets. These estimates could have a direct impact on the Company’s earnings, as a difference in the tax provision would impact the Company’s earnings.
The Company has made estimates in assessing the impact of the uncertainty of income taxes. Accounting standards prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute criteria for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because higher tax expense will result in reduced earnings.
COMPARISON OF 2021 AND 2020 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the comparison of the Company’s 2021 performance to 2020 presented below, consolidated shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 2020, but excluding properties under redevelopment and those subsequently sold by the Company, are referred
38
to herein as the “Comparable Portfolio Properties.” The discussion of the Company’s 2020 performance compared to 2019 performance is set forth in — “Comparison of 2020 and 2019 Results of Operations” included in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Revenues from Operations (in thousands)
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|||
Rental income(A) |
$ |
490,799 |
|
|
$ |
414,864 |
|
|
$ |
75,935 |
|
Fee and other income(B) |
|
42,065 |
|
|
|
45,469 |
|
|
|
(3,404 |
) |
Total revenues |
$ |
532,864 |
|
|
$ |
460,333 |
|
|
$ |
72,531 |
|
(A) |
The following table summarizes the key components of the 2021 rental income as compared to 2020 (in thousands): |
Contractual Lease Payments |
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|||
Base and percentage rental income(1) |
|
$ |
353,067 |
|
|
$ |
329,165 |
|
|
$ |
23,902 |
|
Recoveries from tenants(2) |
|
|
120,530 |
|
|
|
107,132 |
|
|
|
13,398 |
|
Uncollectible revenue(3) |
|
|
9,383 |
|
|
|
(31,908 |
) |
|
|
41,291 |
|
Lease termination fees, ancillary and other rental income |
|
|
7,819 |
|
|
|
10,475 |
|
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
Total contractual lease payments |
|
$ |
490,799 |
|
|
$ |
414,864 |
|
|
$ |
75,935 |
|
|
(1) |
The changes in base and percentage rental income were due to the following (in millions): |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Acquisition of shopping centers |
|
$ |
22.8 |
|
Comparable Portfolio Properties |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Redevelopment properties |
|
|
1.8 |
|
Straight-line rents |
|
|
2.6 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
The decrease in base and percentage rental income for the Comparable Portfolio Properties is due to the timing of tenant bankruptcies and store closures in 2020 resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by rent commencements in 2021 of the vacated space.
The following tables present the statistics for the Company’s assets affecting base and percentage rental income summarized by the following portfolios: pro rata combined shopping center portfolio, wholly-owned shopping center portfolio and joint venture shopping center portfolio:
|
Pro Rata Combined Shopping Center Portfolio December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Centers owned (at 100%) |
|
136 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
Aggregate occupancy rate |
|
90.0 |
% |
|
|
89.0 |
% |
Average annualized base rent per occupied square foot |
$ |
18.33 |
|
|
$ |
18.50 |
|
|
Wholly-Owned Shopping Centers December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Centers owned |
|
89 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Aggregate occupancy rate |
|
90.0 |
% |
|
|
89.2 |
% |
Average annualized base rent per occupied square foot |
$ |
18.52 |
|
|
$ |
18.75 |
|
|
Joint Venture Shopping Centers December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Centers owned |
|
47 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Aggregate occupancy rate |
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
87.3 |
% |
Average annualized base rent per occupied square foot |
$ |
15.15 |
|
|
$ |
15.36 |
|
39
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the wholly-owned Comparable Portfolio Properties’ aggregate occupancy rate was 91.4% and 90.7%, respectively, and the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $18.60 and $18.92, respectively.
|
(2) |
Recoveries from tenants for the Comparable Portfolio Properties were approximately 80.0% and 81.9% of reimbursable operating expenses and real estate taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in the recovery rate is a result of increased operating expenses, primarily management fee expense (on increased prior-year cash receipts) and property insurance expense, which generally have lower recovery percentages based upon individual tenant leases as well as higher real estate tax expense. |
|
(3) |
Primarily relates to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rent collections, including the impact of lease modification accounting and the initial establishment of reserves in 2020 for tenants placed on the cash basis of accounting due to collectability concerns. In 2021, the net amount reported as income was primarily attributable to rental income paid in 2021 from tenants on the cash basis of accounting, which related to amounts (including deferred rents) contractually owed in 2020. |
(B) |
Increased disposition fees from RVI asset sales (primarily due to the sale of RVI’s Puerto Rico portfolio and a portfolio of five RVI U.S. assets in August 2021 and October 2021, respectively) aggregating $5.9 million were offset by lower asset management fees, property management fees and leasing commissions earned due to a decrease in the number of assets under management because of asset sales by both RVI and the Company’s joint ventures, as well as the termination of several joint ventures in 2021 and 2020 (including the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in the fourth quarter of 2020). The components of Fee and Other Income are presented in Note 2, “Revenue Recognition,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein. |
In 2022, the Company expects to record less fee income due to the continued decrease in assets under management as compared to prior years related to both RVI and joint ventures. RVI owned one asset as of December 31, 2021 (as compared to the initial portfolio of 48 properties at the time of its spin-off from the Company in July 2018). As a result, the Company entered into a new management agreement with RVI that went into effect in January 2022 and includes a property management fee for RVI’s remaining property and a reduced asset management fee to effectuate a wind-up of its operations. In addition, the Company agreed to sell its 20% interest in the 11 assets owned by the SAU Joint Venture to its joint venture partner. This transaction is expected to close by June 2022. Fee income from the SAU Joint Venture totaled $1.0 million in 2021. The Company also purchased six properties from the DDRM Properties Joint Venture in the fourth quarter of 2021 and expects that this joint venture may sell additional assets in 2022. Changes in the number of assets under management or the fee structures applicable to such arrangements will adversely impact the amount of revenue recorded in future periods. The Company’s other joint venture partners may also elect to terminate their joint venture arrangements with the Company in connection with a change in investment strategy or otherwise. See “Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.
Expenses from Operations (in thousands)
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|||
Operating and maintenance(A) |
$ |
76,716 |
|
|
$ |
68,801 |
|
|
$ |
7,915 |
|
Real estate taxes(A) |
|
76,071 |
|
|
|
69,601 |
|
|
|
6,470 |
|
Impairment charges(B) |
|
7,270 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
General and administrative(C) |
|
55,052 |
|
|
|
52,881 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
Depreciation and amortization(A) |
|
185,768 |
|
|
|
170,669 |
|
|
|
15,099 |
|
|
$ |
400,877 |
|
|
$ |
367,152 |
|
|
$ |
33,725 |
|
(A) |
The changes were due to the following (in millions): |
|
|
Operating and Maintenance |
|
|
Real Estate Taxes |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
|||
Acquisition of shopping centers |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
Comparable Portfolio Properties |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Redevelopment properties |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
The change in operating and maintenance for the Comparable Portfolio Properties is primarily a result of higher insurance expense as well as higher maintenance expenses. The change in depreciation and amortization for the Comparable Portfolio Properties is primarily a result of decreases attributable to fewer tenant write-offs and intangibles that became fully amortized in
40
2021, partially offset by accelerated depreciation on a redevelopment project and increased depreciation on building improvements.
(B) |
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded impairment charges that were triggered by a change in hold period assumptions. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded impairment charges related to an outlot and undeveloped land marketed for sale, both triggered by indicative bids received. |
Changes in (i) an asset’s expected future undiscounted cash flows due to changes in market or leasing conditions, (ii) various courses of action that may occur or (iii) holding periods could result in the recognition of additional impairment charges. Impairment charges are presented in Note 14, “Impairment Charges and Reserves,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.
(C) |
General and administrative expenses (including mark-to-market activity for the PRSUs) for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, were approximately 6.7% and 5.5% of total revenues (excluding uncollectible revenue), respectively, including total revenues of unconsolidated joint ventures and managed properties for the comparable periods. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recorded $5.6 million of expense and $0.7 million of income, respectively, related to the mark-to-market adjustment for certain PRSUs that were granted in 2018 and settled in 2021. Excluding this mark-to-market activity, general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, were 6.0% and 5.6%, respectively, of total revenues. In 2020, the Company recorded a separation charge of $1.7 million related to the elimination of the Chief Operating Officer executive position. The Company continues to expense certain internal leasing salaries, legal salaries and related expenses associated with leasing and re-leasing of existing space. |
Other Income and Expenses (in thousands)
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|||
Interest income(A) |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
11,888 |
|
|
$ |
(11,888 |
) |
Interest expense(B) |
|
(76,383 |
) |
|
|
(77,604 |
) |
|
|
1,221 |
|
Other expense, net(C) |
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
(18,400 |
) |
|
|
17,215 |
|
|
$ |
(77,568 |
) |
|
$ |
(84,116 |
) |
|
$ |
6,548 |
|
(A) |
In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company terminated its preferred equity investments in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures and, accordingly, interest income was no longer recorded (see “Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein). |
(B) |
The weighted-average debt outstanding and related weighted-average interest rate are as follows: |
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Weighted-average debt outstanding (in billions) |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
Weighted-average interest rate |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
The Company’s overall balance sheet strategy is to continue to maintain liquidity, prudent leverage levels and lengthy average debt maturities. The weighted-average interest rate (based on contractual rates and excluding fair market value of adjustments and debt issuance costs) was 4.0% and 3.7% at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Interest costs capitalized in conjunction with redevelopment projects were $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in the amount of interest costs capitalized is a result of lower redevelopment activity in 2021, partly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
(C) |
In 2020, the Company recorded debt extinguishment costs of $16.6 million related to its Senior Notes due 2022. |
Other Items (in thousands)
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|||
Equity in net income of joint ventures(A) |
$ |
47,297 |
|
|
$ |
1,516 |
|
|
$ |
45,781 |
|
Reserve of preferred equity interests, net(B) |
|
— |
|
|
|
(19,393 |
) |
|
|
19,393 |
|
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net(C) |
|
19,185 |
|
|
|
45,464 |
|
|
|
(26,279 |
) |
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(D) |
|
6,065 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
Tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries and state franchise and income taxes |
|
(1,550 |
) |
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
Income attributable to non-controlling interests, net(E) |
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
|
388 |
|
41
(A) |
The increase primarily was the result of increased gain on sale of joint venture assets in 2021 as compared to 2020 plus the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including rental income paid to joint ventures in 2021 from tenants on the cash basis of accounting that related to amounts (including deferred rents) contractually owed in 2020. See “Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein. Joint venture property sales could significantly impact the amount of income or loss recognized in future periods. See Note 3, “Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein. |
(B) |
In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company terminated its preferred equity investments in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures. |
(C) |
The net gain reported in 2021 relates primarily to two transactions. In December 2021, the Company acquired the equity interest in six assets owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture, which resulted in a Gain on Change in Control of Interests of $7.2 million. In addition, in February 2021, one of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold its sole asset, which was a parcel of undeveloped land (approximating 70 acres) in Richmond Hill, Ontario and recorded a net gain of $12.1 million primarily related to the Company’s promoted interest on the investment disposition, as well as the write-off of the accumulated foreign currency translation. In 2020, the Company sold its 15% interest in the DDRTC Joint Venture to its partner, which resulted in a Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests of $45.6 million, and terminated the BRE DDR Joint Ventures, which resulted in a Loss on Sale of Joint Venture Interests of $0.2 million. See “Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein. |
(D) |
The Company sold several land parcels in 2021 and 2020. |
(E) |
In December 2021, the Company acquired its partner’s 33% non-controlling ownership interest in Paradise Village Gateway (Phoenix, Arizona), which represents the entire amount of the non-controlling interest recorded by the Company. |
Net Income (in thousands)
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|||
Net income attributable to SITE Centers |
$ |
124,935 |
|
|
$ |
35,721 |
|
|
$ |
89,214 |
|
The increase in net income attributable to SITE Centers was primarily a result of the impact of net revenue relating to prior periods (including deferred rents) that was collected from cash-basis tenants in the current year, gains recorded from unconsolidated joint venture asset sales, higher RVI disposition fees, lower debt extinguishment costs and the valuation allowance reversal recognized in 2020 related to the Company’s preferred investments in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures, partially offset by lower gain on sale of joint venture interests and lower interest income resulting from the termination of the Company’s preferred investment in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in 2020.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Funds from Operations and Operating Funds from Operations
Definition and Basis of Presentation
The Company believes that Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and Operating FFO, both non-GAAP financial measures, provide additional and useful means to assess the financial performance of REITs. FFO and Operating FFO are frequently used by the real estate industry, as well as securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, to evaluate the performance of REITs. The Company also believes that FFO and Operating FFO more appropriately measure the core operations of the Company and provide benchmarks to its peer group.
FFO excludes GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and real estate investments, which assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions, and many companies use different depreciable lives and methods. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate and gains and losses from property dispositions, it can provide a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and acquisition, disposition and development activities. This provides a perspective of the Company’s financial performance not immediately apparent from net income determined in accordance with GAAP.
FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), adjusted to exclude (i) preferred share dividends, (ii) gains and losses from disposition of real estate property and related investments, which are presented net of taxes, (iii) impairment charges on real estate property and related investments, including reserve adjustments of preferred equity interests, (iv) gains and losses from changes in control and (v) certain non-cash items. These non-cash items principally include real property depreciation and amortization of intangibles, equity income (loss) from joint ventures and equity income (loss) from non-controlling interests and adding the Company’s proportionate share of FFO from its unconsolidated joint
42
ventures and non-controlling interests, determined on a consistent basis. The Company’s calculation of FFO is consistent with the definition of FFO provided by NAREIT.
The Company believes that certain charges, income and gains recorded in its operating results are not comparable or reflective of its core operating performance. Operating FFO is useful to investors as the Company removes non-comparable charges, income and gains to analyze the results of its operations and assess performance of the core operating real estate portfolio. As a result, the Company also computes Operating FFO and discusses it with the users of its financial statements, in addition to other measures such as net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP and FFO. Operating FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as FFO excluding certain charges, income and gains that management believes are not comparable and indicative of the results of the Company’s operating real estate portfolio. Such adjustments include gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, certain transaction fee income, transaction costs and other restructuring type costs. The disclosure of these adjustments is regularly requested by users of the Company’s financial statements.
The adjustment for these charges, income and gains may not be comparable to how other REITs or real estate companies calculate their results of operations, and the Company’s calculation of Operating FFO differs from NAREIT’s definition of FFO. Additionally, the Company provides no assurances that these charges, income and gains are non-recurring. These charges, income and gains could be reasonably expected to recur in future results of operations.
These measures of performance are used by the Company for several business purposes and by other REITs. The Company uses FFO and/or Operating FFO in part (i) as a disclosure to improve the understanding of the Company’s operating results among the investing public, (ii) as a measure of a real estate asset company’s performance, (iii) to influence acquisition, disposition and capital investment strategies and (iv) to compare the Company’s performance to that of other publicly traded shopping center REITs.
For the reasons described above, management believes that FFO and Operating FFO provide the Company and investors with an important indicator of the Company’s operating performance. They provide recognized measures of performance other than GAAP net income, which may include non-cash items (often significant). Other real estate companies may calculate FFO and Operating FFO in a different manner.
Management recognizes the limitations of FFO and Operating FFO when compared to GAAP’s net income. FFO and Operating FFO do not represent amounts available for dividends, capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties. Management does not use FFO or Operating FFO as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirements for future commitments, acquisitions or development activities. Neither FFO nor Operating FFO represents cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and neither is necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. Neither FFO nor Operating FFO should be considered an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. FFO and Operating FFO are simply used as additional indicators of the Company’s operating performance. The Company believes that to further understand its performance, FFO and Operating FFO should be compared with the Company’s reported net income (loss) and considered in addition to cash flows determined in accordance with GAAP, as presented in its consolidated financial statements. Reconciliations of these measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income (loss) have been provided below.
Reconciliation Presentation
FFO and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders were as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|||
FFO attributable to common shareholders |
$ |
242,774 |
|
|
$ |
176,562 |
|
|
$ |
66,212 |
|
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders |
|
245,687 |
|
|
|
192,824 |
|
|
|
52,863 |
|
The increase in FFO primarily was attributable to the impact of net revenue relating to prior periods (including deferred rent) collected from cash-basis tenants in the current year and lower debt extinguishment costs partially offset by the write-off of preferred share original issuance costs and lower interest income and the higher mark-to-market expense on the PRSUs. The increase in Operating FFO primarily was due to the impact of net revenue relating to prior periods (including deferred rents) collected from cash‑basis tenants in the current year, partially offset by lower interest income.
The Company’s reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP to FFO attributable to common shareholders and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders is as follows (in thousands). The
43
Company provides no assurances that these charges and gains are non-recurring. These charges and gains could reasonably be expected to recur in future results of operations.
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
$ |
106,123 |
|
|
$ |
15,190 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments |
|
180,158 |
|
|
|
165,122 |
|
Equity in net income of joint ventures |
|
(47,297 |
) |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
Joint ventures' FFO(A) |
|
21,703 |
|
|
|
19,671 |
|
Non-controlling interests (OP Units) |
|
67 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Impairment of real estate |
|
7,270 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
Reserve of preferred equity interests |
|
— |
|
|
|
19,393 |
|
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net |
|
(19,185 |
) |
|
|
(45,464 |
) |
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
(6,065 |
) |
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
FFO attributable to common shareholders |
|
242,774 |
|
|
|
176,562 |
|
RVI disposition fees |
|
(9,016 |
) |
|
|
(3,142 |
) |
Mark-to-market adjustment (PRSUs) |
|
5,589 |
|
|
|
(688 |
) |
Executive separation charge |
|
— |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
Debt extinguishment and other, net |
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
18,400 |
|
Joint ventures – debt extinguishment and other, net |
|
137 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Write-off of preferred share original issuance costs |
|
5,156 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Non-operating items, net |
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
16,262 |
|
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders |
$ |
245,687 |
|
|
$ |
192,824 |
|
|
(A) |
At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had an economic investment in unconsolidated joint ventures which owned 47 and 59 shopping center properties, respectively. These joint ventures represent the investments in which the Company recorded its share of equity in net income or loss and, accordingly, FFO and Operating FFO. |
Joint ventures’ FFO and Operating FFO are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Net income (loss) attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ |
110,032 |
|
|
$ |
(37,370 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments |
|
66,618 |
|
|
|
99,779 |
|
Impairment of real estate |
|
— |
|
|
|
33,240 |
|
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
(89,935 |
) |
|
|
(9,257 |
) |
FFO |
$ |
86,715 |
|
|
$ |
86,392 |
|
FFO at SITE Centers' ownership interests |
$ |
21,703 |
|
|
$ |
19,671 |
|
Operating FFO at SITE Centers' ownership interests |
$ |
21,840 |
|
|
$ |
19,713 |
|
Net Operating Income and Same Store Net Operating Income
Definition and Basis of Presentation
The Company uses Net Operating Income (“NOI”), which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as a supplemental performance measure. NOI is calculated as property revenues less property-related expenses. The Company believes NOI provides useful information to investors regarding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level and, when compared across periods, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition and disposition activity on an unleveraged basis.
The Company also presents NOI information on a same store basis, or Same Store Net Operating Income (“SSNOI”). The Company defines SSNOI as property revenues less property-related expenses, which exclude straight-line rental income (including reimbursements) and expenses, lease termination income, management fee expense, fair market value of leases and expense recovery adjustments. SSNOI includes assets owned in comparable periods (12 months for year-end comparisons). In addition, SSNOI is presented both including and excluding activity associated with development and major redevelopment. In addition, SSNOI excludes all non-property and corporate level revenue and expenses. Other real estate companies may calculate NOI and SSNOI in a different
44
manner. The Company believes SSNOI at its effective ownership interest provides investors with additional information regarding the operating performances of comparable assets because it excludes certain non-cash and non-comparable items as noted above. SSNOI is frequently used by the real estate industry, as well as securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, to evaluate the performance of REITs.
SSNOI is not, and is not intended to be, a presentation in accordance with GAAP. SSNOI information has its limitations as it excludes any capital expenditures associated with the re-leasing of tenant space or as needed to operate the assets. SSNOI does not represent amounts available for dividends, capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties. Management does not use SSNOI as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirements for future commitments, acquisitions or development activities. SSNOI does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. SSNOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. A reconciliation of NOI and SSNOI to their most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income (loss) is provided below.
Reconciliation Presentation
The Company’s reconciliation of net income computed in accordance with GAAP to NOI and SSNOI for the Company at 100% and at its effective ownership interest of the assets is as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||||
|
At 100% |
|
|
At the Company's Interest |
|
||||||||||
Net income attributable to SITE Centers |
$ |
124,935 |
|
|
$ |
35,721 |
|
|
$ |
124,935 |
|
|
$ |
35,721 |
|
Fee income |
|
(40,521 |
) |
|
|
(43,574 |
) |
|
|
(40,521 |
) |
|
|
(43,574 |
) |
Interest income |
|
— |
|
|
|
(11,888 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(11,888 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
76,383 |
|
|
|
77,604 |
|
|
|
76,383 |
|
|
|
77,604 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
185,768 |
|
|
|
170,669 |
|
|
|
185,768 |
|
|
|
170,669 |
|
General and administrative |
|
55,052 |
|
|
|
52,881 |
|
|
|
55,052 |
|
|
|
52,881 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
18,400 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
7,270 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
7,270 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
Equity in net income of joint ventures |
|
(47,297 |
) |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
(47,297 |
) |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
Reserve of preferred equity interests |
|
— |
|
|
|
19,393 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
19,393 |
|
Tax expense |
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net |
|
(19,185 |
) |
|
|
(45,464 |
) |
|
|
(19,185 |
) |
|
|
(45,464 |
) |
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
(6,065 |
) |
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
|
|
(6,065 |
) |
|
|
(1,069 |
) |
Income from non-controlling interests |
|
481 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
Consolidated NOI |
$ |
339,556 |
|
|
$ |
278,357 |
|
|
$ |
339,556 |
|
|
$ |
278,357 |
|
SITE Centers' consolidated joint venture |
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,286 |
) |
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
Consolidated NOI, net of non-controlling interests |
$ |
339,556 |
|
|
$ |
278,357 |
|
|
$ |
338,270 |
|
|
$ |
276,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ |
110,032 |
|
|
$ |
(37,370 |
) |
|
$ |
49,459 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
Interest expense |
|
43,379 |
|
|
|
60,010 |
|
|
|
10,557 |
|
|
|
12,068 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
66,618 |
|
|
|
99,779 |
|
|
|
15,107 |
|
|
|
18,251 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
— |
|
|
|
33,240 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
Preferred share expense |
|
— |
|
|
|
15,708 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
12,074 |
|
|
|
13,796 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
2,946 |
|
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
(89,935 |
) |
|
|
(9,257 |
) |
|
|
(42,897 |
) |
|
|
(1,784 |
) |
Unconsolidated NOI |
$ |
142,168 |
|
|
$ |
175,906 |
|
|
$ |
35,177 |
|
|
$ |
35,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consolidated + Unconsolidated NOI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
373,447 |
|
|
$ |
311,753 |
|
Less: Non-Same Store NOI adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
15,452 |
|
Total SSNOI including redevelopment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
376,508 |
|
|
$ |
327,205 |
|
Less: Redevelopment Same Store NOI adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,945 |
) |
|
|
(9,655 |
) |
Total SSNOI excluding redevelopment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
361,563 |
|
|
$ |
317,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSNOI % Change including redevelopment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
SSNOI % Change excluding redevelopment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
45
The increase in SSNOI at the Company’s effective ownership interest for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to 2020, primarily was attributable to rental income paid in 2021 by cash-basis tenants that related to amounts (including deferred rent) contractually owed in 2020 in connection with disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and redevelopment stabilization.
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The Company periodically evaluates opportunities to issue and sell additional debt or equity securities, obtain credit facilities from lenders or repurchase or refinance long-term debt as part of its overall strategy to further strengthen its financial position. The Company remains committed to monitoring liquidity and debt duration in addition to maintaining low leverage in an effort to manage its overall risk profile.
The Company’s consolidated and unconsolidated debt obligations generally require monthly or semi-annual payments of principal and/or interest over the term of the obligation. While the Company currently believes it has several viable sources to obtain capital and fund its business, including capacity under its credit facilities described below, no assurance can be provided that these obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated.
The Company has historically accessed capital sources through both the public and private markets. Acquisitions and redevelopments are generally financed through cash provided from operating activities, Revolving Credit Facilities (as defined below), mortgages assumed, secured debt, unsecured debt, common and preferred equity offerings, joint venture capital and asset sales. Total consolidated debt outstanding was $1.7 billion at December 31, 2021, compared to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2020.
The Company had an unrestricted cash balance of $41.8 million at December 31, 2021, no outstanding balance on its Revolving Credit Facilities and, accordingly, availability under the Revolving Credit Facilities of $970.0 million (subject to satisfaction of applicable borrowing conditions). The Company has $34.3 million of consolidated mortgage debt maturing in 2022 and $87.2 million of senior notes, $100.0 million outstanding on an unsecured term loan and $35.8 million of consolidated mortgage debt maturing in 2023. The Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures have $74.3 million of mortgage debt at the Company’s share maturing in 2022 and no further maturities until April 2024. The Company’s consolidated debt outstanding at December 31, 2021 included $100.0 million of variable rate debt (maturing in January 2023) having an interest rate determined by reference to LIBOR; additionally, the Company currently has the ability to elect that borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facilities bear interest based on either LIBOR or the Alternative Base Rate, though the LIBOR-based option is expected to be replaced in the future by an alternative benchmark rate of interest to be agreed upon by the Company and the applicable lenders as a result of the cessation of LIBOR’s publication expected to occur in June 2023. As of December 31, 2021, the Company anticipates that it has approximately $35 million to be incurred on its pipeline of identified redevelopment projects. The Company declared dividends of $0.47 per share in 2021 and declared a dividend of $0.13 per share in the first quarter of 2022. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to operate its business at this time.
Revolving Credit Facilities
The Company maintains an unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, arranged by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank, N.A., RBC Capital Markets and U.S. Bank National Association (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”). The Unsecured Credit Facility provides for borrowings of up to $950 million (which may be increased to $1.45 billion provided that the new lenders agree to existing terms of the facility or existing lenders increase their incremental commitments) and a maturity date of January 2024, with two six-month options to extend the maturity to January 2025 upon the Company’s request (subject to satisfaction of certain conditions). The Company also maintains an unsecured revolving credit facility with PNC Bank, National Association, which provides for borrowings of up to $20 million (the “PNC Facility,” and together with the Unsecured Credit Facility, the “Revolving Credit Facilities”), and has terms substantially the same as those contained in the Unsecured Credit Facility. The Company’s borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facilities bear interest at variable rates at the Company’s election, based on either LIBOR plus a specified spread (0.9% at December 31, 2021), or the Alternate Base Rate, as defined in the respective facility, plus a specified spread (0% at December 31, 2021). The credit agreements governing the Revolving Credit Facilities provide that the Company’s ability to request LIBOR-based loans may be suspended in the future in connection with the cessation of LIBOR’s publication, in which case the Company and the applicable lenders will agree on an alternative rate of interest to LIBOR which gives due consideration to prevailing market conventions for similar credit facilities. Should market conventions for similar credit facilities fail to standardize, legal risks could arise. See Item 1A., “Risk Factors—The Company May Be Adversely Affected by the Potential Discontinuation of LIBOR” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company also pays an annual facility fee of 20 basis points on the aggregate commitments applicable to each Revolving Credit Facility. The specified spreads and commitment fees vary depending on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”), Fitch Investor Services Inc. (“Fitch”) and their successors.
The Revolving Credit Facilities and the indentures under which the Company’s senior and subordinated unsecured indebtedness are, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants including, among other things, leverage ratios and debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets and engage in mergers and certain acquisitions. These credit
46
facilities and indentures also contain customary default provisions including the failure to make timely payments of principal and interest payable thereunder, the failure to comply with the Company’s financial and operating covenants and the failure of the Company or its majority-owned subsidiaries (i.e., entities in which the Company has a greater than 50% interest) to pay, when due, certain indebtedness in excess of certain thresholds beyond applicable grace and cure periods. In the event the Company’s lenders or note holders declare a default, as defined in the applicable agreements governing the debt, the Company may be unable to obtain further funding, and/or an acceleration of any outstanding borrowings may occur. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants in the agreements governing its debt. Although the Company believes it will continue to operate in compliance with these covenants, if the Company were to violate these covenants, the Company may be subject to higher finance costs and fees or accelerated maturities.
Consolidated Indebtedness – as of December 31, 2021
As discussed above, the Company is committed to maintaining low leverage and may utilize proceeds from equity offerings or the sale of properties or other investments to repay additional debt. These sources of funds could be affected by various risks and uncertainties. No assurance can be provided that the Company’s debt obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. See Item 1A. Risk Factors.
The Company continually evaluates its debt maturities and, based on management’s assessment, believes it has viable financing and refinancing alternatives. The Company has sought to manage its debt maturities through executing a strategy to extend debt duration, increase liquidity, maintain low leverage and improve the Company’s credit profile with a focus of lowering the Company's balance sheet risk and cost of capital.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures’ Mortgage Indebtedness – as of December 31, 2021
The Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures had aggregate outstanding indebtedness to third parties of $0.9 billion and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Such mortgages are generally non-recourse to the Company and its partners; however, certain mortgages may have recourse to the Company and its partners in certain limited situations, such as misappropriation of funds, impermissible transfer, environmental contamination and material misrepresentation. The outstanding indebtedness of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures at December 31, 2021, which matures in the subsequent 14-month period (i.e., through February 28, 2023), is as follows (in millions):
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2021 |
|
|
At SITE Centers' Share |
|
||
DDR – Domestic Retail Fund I(A) |
$ |
355.1 |
|
|
$ |
71.0 |
|
DDR SAU Retail Fund LLC(B) |
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Total debt maturities through February 2023 |
$ |
371.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.3 |
|
|
(A) |
Expected to be extended at the joint venture’s option in accordance with the loan agreement. |
|
(B) |
The Company agreed to sell its interest to its joint venture partner which is expected to close by June 2022. |
It is expected that the joint ventures will generally fund these obligations from refinancing opportunities, including extension options, or possible asset sales. No assurance can be provided that these obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. Similar to SITE Centers, the Company’s joint ventures experienced a reduction in rent collections, beginning in the second quarter of 2020, as a result of the impact of the COVID‑19 pandemic. Though rent collections at the Company’s joint ventures have improved during 2021, any future deterioration in rent collections may cause one or more of these joint ventures to be unable to refinance maturing obligations or satisfy applicable covenants, financial tests or debt service requirements or loan maturity extension conditions in the future, thereby allowing the mortgage lender to assume control of property cash flows, limit distributions of cash to joint venture members, declare a default, increase the interest rate or accelerate the loan’s maturity.
Cash Flow Activity
The Company’s cash flow activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Cash flow provided by operating activities |
$ |
282,515 |
|
|
$ |
190,170 |
|
Cash flow provided by investing activities |
|
74,451 |
|
|
|
102,478 |
|
Cash flow used for financing activities |
|
(388,127 |
) |
|
|
(237,363 |
) |
47
Changes in cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to the prior year are as follows:
Operating Activities: Cash provided by operating activities increased $92.3 million primarily due to the following:
|
• |
Increase in cash collected from tenants and |
|
• |
Reduction in interest income received from preferred investments. |
Investing Activities: Cash provided by investing activities decreased $28.0 million primarily due to the following:
|
• |
Increase in real estate assets acquired and developed of $143.3 million; |
|
• |
Decrease in proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture interests of $112.3 million; |
|
• |
Increase in distributions from joint ventures of $47.7 million and |
|
• |
Proceeds from the distribution by RVI of $190.0 million on account of the Company’s preferred investment in RVI. |
Financing Activities: Cash used for financing activities increased $150.8 million primarily due to the following:
|
• |
Increase in net debt repayments, including Revolving Credit Facilities, of $221.8 million; |
|
• |
Redemption of the Class K Preferred Shares of $150.0 million and |
|
• |
Increase in proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of offering expenses, of $225.0 million. |
RVI Preferred Shares
In 2018, RVI issued to the Company 1,000 shares of its series A preferred stock (the “RVI Preferred Shares”), which were noncumulative and had no mandatory dividend rate or maturity date. The RVI Preferred Shares ranked, with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of RVI, senior in preference and priority to RVI’s common shares and any other class or series of RVI capital stock. Subject to the requirement that RVI distribute to its common shareholders the minimum amount required to be distributed with respect to any taxable year in order for RVI to maintain its status as a REIT and to avoid U.S. federal income taxes, the RVI Preferred Shares were entitled to a dividend preference for all dividends declared on RVI’s capital stock at any time up to a “preference amount” equal to $190.0 million in the aggregate which amount could have increased by up to an additional $10 million if the aggregate gross proceeds of RVI asset sales subsequent to July 1, 2018 exceeded $2.06 billion. In October 2021, the Company received a cash distribution of $190.0 million on the RVI Preferred Shares. In December 2021, in recognition of the advanced stage of RVI’s dispositions and the aggregate value of sales relative to the $2.06 billion threshold, RVI repurchased all of the outstanding RVI Preferred Shares from the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $1.00. As a result, the Company no longer maintains an investment in RVI and will not receive any further distributions on account of the RVI Preferred Shares.
Dividend Distribution
The Company satisfied its REIT requirement of distributing at least 90% of ordinary taxable income with declared common and preferred share cash dividends of $113.0 million in 2021, as compared to $69.2 million of cash dividends paid in 2020. Because actual distributions were greater than 100% of taxable income, federal income taxes were not incurred by the Company in 2021.
The Company declared cash dividends of $0.47 per common share in 2021. In February 2022, the Company declared its first quarter 2022 dividend of $0.13 per common share payable on April 7, 2022, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 2022. The Board of Directors of the Company intends to monitor the Company’s dividend policy in order to maintain sufficient liquidity for operating and in order to maximize the Company’s free cash flow while still adhering to REIT payout requirements.
SITE Centers’ Equity
In 2021, the Company offered and sold 2,225,698 of its common shares on a forward basis under its $250 million continuous equity offering program at a weighted-average forward price of $15.77 per share before issuance costs, generating expected gross proceeds before issuance costs of $35.1 million, with no shares settled to date. The 2021 transactions may be settled at any time before the applicable settlement date at various dates through December 8, 2022. At February 10, 2022, the Company had approximately $214.9 million available for the future offering of common shares under this program.
In March 2021, the Company issued and sold 17.25 million common shares resulting in net proceeds of $225.3 million.
In April 2021, the Company redeemed all $150.0 million aggregate liquidation preference of its 6.250% Class K Preferred Shares at a redemption price of $500 per Class K Preferred Share (or $25.00 per depositary share) plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $7.2049 per Class K Preferred Share (or $0.3602 per depositary share). The Company recorded a non-cash charge of $5.1 million to net income attributable to common shareholders in 2021, which represents the difference between the redemption price and the carrying amount immediately prior to redemption, which was recorded to additional paid-in capital upon original issuance.
48
In November 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a common share repurchase program. Under the terms of the program, the Company may purchase up to a maximum value of $100 million of its common shares. Through February 10, 2022, the Company had repurchased 5.1 million of its common shares under this program in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of approximately $57.9 million, or $11.33 per share. As of February 10, 2022, the Company had not repurchased any shares under the program during 2021 or 2022.
SOURCES AND USES OF CAPITAL
The Company remains committed to maintaining sufficient liquidity, managing debt duration and maintaining prudent leverage levels in an effort to manage its overall risk profile. Equity offerings, debt financings, asset sales and cash flow from operations continue to represent a potential source of proceeds to be used to achieve these objectives.
2022 Transaction Activity
Acquisitions
In the first quarter of 2022, the Company acquired Artesia Village (Scottsdale, Arizona) for $14.5 million. The Company also acquired its partner’s 80% interest in Casselberry Commons (Casselberry, Florida) owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture for $35.6 million ($44.5 million at 100%).
Joint Venture Investments
The Company agreed to sell its 20% interest in the SAU Joint Venture to its partner, the State of Utah, based on a gross asset value of $155.7 million (at 100%). The transaction is expected to close by June 2022. Fee income from the SAU Joint Venture totaled $1.0 million in 2021.
2021 Strategic Transaction Activity
Equity Transactions
In 2021, the Company issued and sold 17.25 million common shares resulting in net proceeds of $225.3 million.
Acquisitions
During 2021, the Company purchased four shopping centers (one each in Delray Beach, Florida and Atlanta, Georgia and two in Charlottesville, Virginia), one income producing parcel adjacent to Nassau Park Pavilion (Princeton, New Jersey) and one land parcel adjacent to Belgate Shopping Center (Charlotte, North Carolina) for an aggregate purchase price of $100.5 million. The Company also acquired its partner’s 33% interest in a consolidated joint venture that owned Paradise Village Gateway (Phoenix, Arizona), for $15.1 million ($45.8 million at 100%) with the $27.6 million mortgage debt repaid at closing.
In December 2021, the Company acquired the equity interest in six assets owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture (Village Square at Golf, Boynton Beach, Florida; Shoppes at Paradise Point, Fort Walton Beach, Florida; Midway Plaza, Tamarac, Florida; North Point Plaza, Tampa, Florida; The Shoppes at New Tampa, Wesley Chapel, Florida and Paradise Shoppes of Ellenwood, Ellenwood, Georgia) for $107.2 million ($134.0 million at 100%) with $73.9 million of mortgage debt related to the properties repaid at closing. The transaction resulted in a Gain on Change in Control of Interests of $7.2 million.
The Company remains committed to taking advantage of its financial position and elevated cash resources to prudently grow its portfolio of assets in wealthy suburban communities.
Proceeds from Transactional Activity
In 2021, one of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold its sole asset, which was a parcel of undeveloped land (approximating 70 acres) in Richmond Hill, Ontario. The Company’s share of net proceeds totaled $22.1 million, after accounting for customary closing costs and foreign currency translation but before income tax. The net proceeds include $6.1 million that are held in escrow, of which $2.1 million is expected to be released to the Company in 2022 after the receipt of certain tax clearance certificates from the Canadian taxing authorities, and the remaining $4.0 million is considered contingent and should be released upon final dissolution of the partnership. The Company recorded an aggregate gain on the transaction of $14.9 million, which included its $2.8 million share of the gain reported by the joint venture, as well as $12.1 million related to the Company’s promoted interest on the disposition of the investment net of the write-off of the accumulated foreign currency translation and contingent estimated income taxes. Subsequent to the transaction, the Company has no other investments outside the United States.
49
During 2021, the Company sold six unconsolidated shopping centers, aggregating 1.0 million square feet, several wholly owned land parcels, and the Hobby Lobby parcel of a shopping center. These sales collectively generated proceeds totaling $166.6 million, of which the Company’s proportionate share of the proceeds was $96.5 million. The Company’s pro rata share of proceeds is before giving effect to the repayment of indebtedness and transaction costs.
In October 2021, the Company received a cash distribution of $190.0 million on the RVI Preferred Shares, which represents the full amount to be paid by RVI on account of the Company’s preferred investment.
Changes in investment strategies for assets may impact the Company’s hold-period assumptions for those properties. The disposition of certain assets could result in a loss or impairment recorded in future periods. The Company evaluates all potential sale opportunities taking into account the long-term growth prospects of the assets, the use of proceeds and the impact to the Company’s balance sheet, in addition to the impact on operating results.
Redevelopment Opportunities
One key component of the Company’s long-term strategic plan will be the evaluation of additional tactical redevelopment potential within the portfolio, particularly as it relates to the efficient use of the underlying real estate. The Company will generally commence construction on redevelopment projects only after substantial tenant leasing has occurred. At December 31, 2021, the Company anticipates that it has approximately $35 million to be incurred on its pipeline of identified redevelopment projects.
Redevelopment Projects
As part of its strategy to expand, improve and re-tenant various properties, at December 31, 2021, the Company had approximately $47 million in construction in progress in various active consolidated redevelopment and other projects on a net basis. The Company’s major redevelopment projects are typically substantially complete within two years of the construction commencement date. At December 31, 2021, the Company’s large-scale shopping center expansion and repurposing projects were as follows (in thousands):
Location |
|
Estimated Stabilized Quarter |
|
Estimated Gross Cost |
|
|
Cost Incurred at December 31, 2021 |
|
||
West Bay Plaza - Phase II (Cleveland, Ohio) |
|
2Q23 |
|
$ |
9,102 |
|
|
$ |
5,360 |
|
Perimeter Pointe (Atlanta, Georgia) |
|
TBD |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
9,102 |
|
|
$ |
6,631 |
|
At December 31, 2021, the Company’s tactical redevelopment projects, including outparcels, first generation space and small-scale shopping center expansions and other capital improvements, were as follows (in thousands):
Location |
|
Estimated Stabilized Quarter |
|
Estimated Gross Cost |
|
|
Cost Incurred at December 31, 2021 |
|
||
Tanasbourne Town Center (Portland, Oregon) |
|
2Q24 |
|
$ |
11,540 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
Nassau Park Pavilion (Trenton, New Jersey) |
|
3Q23 |
|
|
7,635 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
Shoppers World (Boston, Massachusetts) |
|
4Q23 |
|
|
6,672 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
University Hills (Denver, Colorado) |
|
4Q23 |
|
|
4,589 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
Hamilton Marketplace (Trenton, New Jersey) |
|
4Q22 |
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
Carolina Pavilion (Charlotte, North Carolina) |
|
4Q23 |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
West Bay Plaza (Cleveland, Ohio) |
|
1Q22 |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Other Tactical Projects |
|
N/A |
|
|
9,060 |
|
|
|
8,411 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
46,013 |
|
|
$ |
14,495 |
|
No major redevelopment projects were completed in 2021. For tactical redevelopment and larger retenanting projects completed in 2021, the assets placed in service were completed at a cost of approximately $106 per square foot.
50
2020 Strategic Transaction Activity
Acquisitions
In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company transferred and redeemed its preferred equity interests in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in exchange for the acquisition of certain of the underlying assets of the joint ventures as follows:
|
• |
On October 15, 2020, an affiliate of Blackstone transferred its common equity interest in BRE DDR IV to the Company for consideration of $1.00 and the Company’s preferred investment in the BRE DDR IV joint venture was redeemed, thereby leaving the Company as the sole owner of (i) the properties previously owned by BRE DDR IV, including Ashbridge Square, The Hub, Southmont Plaza, Millenia Crossing, Concourse Village and two properties, Echelon Village Plaza and Larkin’s Corner, in which the Company did not previously have a material economic interest, and (ii) $5.4 million in net cash. |
|
• |
On November 20, 2020, the Company transferred its common and preferred equity interests in BRE DDR III to an affiliate of Blackstone in exchange for BRE DDR III’s interests in the single-purpose subsidiaries which owned White Oak Village and Midtowne Park and $4.9 million in net cash. |
Proceeds from Transactional Activity
In 2020, the Company sold its 15% interest in the DDRTC Joint Venture to its partner, an affiliate of TIAA-CREF, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $140.4 million.
In 2020, the Company consummated the sale of certain land parcels and the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold two shopping center assets, aggregating 0.2 million square feet. These sales collectively generated proceeds totaling $28.7 million, of which the Company’s proportionate share of the proceeds was $6.6 million. The Company’s pro rata share of proceeds is before giving effect to the repayment of indebtedness and transaction costs. The Company also received $7.5 million related to the repayment of a third-party loan investment.
Redevelopment Projects
The Company invested approximately $42 million in various consolidated active redevelopment and other projects during 2020.
CAPITALIZATION
At December 31, 2021, the Company’s capitalization consisted of $1.7 billion of debt, $175.0 million of preferred shares and $3.3 billion of market equity (market equity is defined as common shares and OP Units outstanding multiplied by $15.83, the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange at December 31, 2021), resulting in a debt to total market capitalization ratio of 0.32 to 1.0, as compared to the ratio of 0.46 to 1.0 at December 31, 2020. The closing price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange was $10.12 at December 31, 2020. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s total debt consisted of $1.6 billion (for both periods) of fixed-rate debt and $0.1 billion and $0.3 billion of variable-rate debt, respectively.
Management’s strategy is to maintain access to the capital resources necessary to manage the Company’s balance sheet and to repay upcoming maturities. Accordingly, the Company may seek to obtain funds through additional debt or equity financings and/or joint venture capital in a manner consistent with its intention to operate with a conservative debt capitalization policy and to reduce the Company’s cost of capital by maintaining an investment grade rating with Moody’s, S&P and Fitch. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, as it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. The Company may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all, which may negatively affect future ratings.
The Company’s credit facilities and the indentures under which the Company’s senior and subordinated unsecured indebtedness are, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, debt service coverage and fixed-charge coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, engage in mergers and certain acquisitions and make distribution to its shareholders. Although the Company intends to operate in compliance with these covenants, if the Company were to violate these covenants, the Company may be subject to higher finance costs and fees or accelerated maturities. In addition, certain of the Company’s credit facilities and indentures permit the acceleration of maturity in the event certain other debt of the Company is in default or has been accelerated. Foreclosure on mortgaged properties or an inability to refinance existing indebtedness would have a negative impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
51
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
The Company has no consolidated debt maturing until September 2022. The Company expects to fund future maturities from utilization of its Revolving Credit Facilities, proceeds from asset sales and other investments, cash flow from operations and /or additional debt or equity financings. No assurance can be provided that these obligations will be repaid as currently anticipated or refinanced.
Other Guarantees
In conjunction with the redevelopment of shopping centers, the Company had entered into commitments with general contractors aggregating approximately $16.9 million for its consolidated properties at December 31, 2021. These obligations, composed principally of construction contracts, are generally due within 12 to 24 months, as the related construction costs are incurred, and are expected to be financed through operating cash flow, asset sales or borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facilities. These contracts typically can be changed or terminated without penalty. In addition, the Company routinely enters into contracts for the maintenance of its properties. These contracts typically can be canceled upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty and are typically payable within one year.
At December 31, 2021, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $13.2 million. The Company has not recorded any obligations associated with these letters of credit, the majority of which are collateral for insurance obligations as the Company is self-insured up to certain limits on several policies.
The Company has entered into employment contracts with its four executive officers. These contracts generally provide for base salary, bonuses based on factors including the financial performance of the Company and personal performance, participation in the Company’s equity plans and retirement plans, health and welfare benefits and reimbursement of various qualified business expenses. These employment agreements also provide for certain perquisites (e.g., health insurance coverage, car service, reimbursement of life and disability insurance premiums, etc.) and severance payments and benefits for various departure scenarios. The employment agreement for the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer extends through September 2024. The employment agreements for the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Accounting Officer extend through February 2024, May 2024 and September 2024, respectively. All of the agreements are subject to termination by either the Company or the executive without cause upon at least 90 days’ notice subject to the payment of severance and other amounts to the executive under certain circumstances.
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Despite an increase in retailer bankruptcies in 2020 stemming from the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company experienced strong momentum in new lease discussions and renewal negotiations with tenants in the second half of 2020, which continued through 2021. Ultimately, the Company executed new leases and renewals aggregating approximately 3.5 million square feet of space during the year ended December 31, 2021, on a pro rata basis, which exceeded 2020 leasing levels. Although there may be some additional disruption among existing tenants due to the continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related supply chain and labor shortages, the Company believes that recent strong leasing volumes are attributable to the location of the Company’s portfolio in suburban, high household income communities (which have been impacted less by the pandemic on a relative basis) and to its national tenants’ strong financial positions and increasing emphasis and reliance on physical store locations to improve the speed and efficiency of fulfillment of online purchases.
The Company benefits from a diversified tenant base, with only one tenant whose annualized rental revenue equals or exceeds 3% of the Company’s annualized consolidated revenues plus the Company’s proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture revenues (TJX Companies at 5.8%). Other significant tenants include Dick’s Sporting Goods, Ross Stores, Burlington and Five Below, all of which have relatively strong financial positions, have outperformed other retail categories over time and the Company believes remain well-capitalized. Historically, these tenants have provided a stable revenue base, and the Company believes that they will continue to provide a stable revenue base going forward, given the long-term nature of these leases. The majority of the tenants in the Company’s shopping centers provide day-to-day consumer necessities with a focus on value and convenience, versus discretionary items, which the Company believes will enable many of its tenants to outperform under a variety of economic conditions. The Company recognizes the risks posed by current economic conditions but believes that the position of its portfolio and the general diversity and credit quality of its tenant base should enable it to successfully navigate through a potentially challenging economic environment. The Company has relatively little reliance on overage or percentage rents generated by tenant sales performance.
The Company believes that its shopping center portfolio is well positioned, as evidenced by its historical property income growth and consistent growth in average annualized base rent per occupied square foot. Historical occupancy has generally ranged from 89% to 96% since the Company’s initial public offering in 1993. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the shopping center portfolio occupancy, on a pro rata basis, was 90.0% and 89.0%, respectively, and the total portfolio average annualized base rent per occupied
52
square foot, on a pro rata basis, was $18.33 and $18.50, respectively. The decrease in the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot primarily is due to the 2021 joint venture acquisitions. The Company’s portfolio has been impacted by tenant bankruptcies and lease expirations in recent years (which increased in number and pace in 2020 following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic), and the Company expects to expend significant amounts of capital in coming periods in connection with recently executed anchor leases and in order to re-lease remaining anchor vacancies. Although the per square foot cost of leasing capital expenditures has been predominantly consistent with the Company’s historical trends, the high volume of the Company’s recent anchor leasing activity will cause aggregate leasing capital expenditure levels to remain elevated. The weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated to be incurred over the expected lease term for new leases executed during 2021 and 2020, on a pro rata basis, was $8.34 and $6.81 per rentable square foot, respectively. The increase in the weighted-average cost of tenant improvements was due to the higher percentage of anchor leases in 2021. The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.
Beginning in March 2020, the retail sector was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Though the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tenant operations has varied by tenant category, local conditions and applicable government mandates, a significant number of the Company’s tenants experienced a reduction in sales and foot traffic, and many tenants were forced to limit their operations or close their businesses for a period of time. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the collection of rents from April 2020 through December 2020. During the second half of 2020 and early 2021, the Company worked with tenants to maximize the collection of unpaid 2020 rents by offering rent deferment on a case-by-case basis often in exchange for concessions in the form of tenant extensions of lease terms, the relaxation of leasing restrictions and co-tenancy provisions and, in some cases, alterations of control areas allowing for future redevelopment of the shopping center. During the course of 2021, the Company’s rent collections normalized close to pre-pandemic levels. As of December 31, 2021, a substantial majority of tenants, including tenants previously on the cash basis of accounting, were paying their monthly rent and any deferred rents relating to prior periods. Included in 2021 results was $13.8 million, at SITE Centers’ share, of net revenue primarily related to contractual rents paid from cash-basis tenants that was contractually due in 2020. The majority of the deferral arrangements relating to 2020 revenue were repaid during 2021, and therefore, the impact of 2020 rent collections is expected to be minimal in future periods. At December 31, 2021, $0.2 million remained outstanding under deferral arrangements for tenants that are not accounted for on the cash basis. As of February 10, 2022, the Omicron variant had not had a material impact on the Company’s rent collections or leasing activity, though some tenants have experienced challenges in maintaining regular operating hours as a result of related labor shortages.
The Company is unable to forecast the duration of the disruption to tenant and Company operations caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, or the ultimate level of collections of rents and other unpaid amounts owed by tenants that were deferred or unpaid during 2020. However, the level and pace of collections of such deferred rents and other unresolved amounts exceeded management’s expectations during 2021, especially with respect to collections from tenants previously placed on the cash basis of accounting. If new surges in contagion were to occur, or if new COVID-19 variants in addition to Omicron were to emerge that are more resistant to vaccines, or if there are decreases in the effectiveness of such vaccines, the Company’s recent success in leasing space and the collection of deferred rents and unresolved amounts could be adversely impacted and such developments could lead to new restrictions on tenant operations, nonpayment of contractual and previously deferred rents, additional tenant requests for rent relief and additional tenant closures and bankruptcies, all of which could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations in the future. Certain tenant categories remain especially vulnerable to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including movie theaters, fitness centers and local restaurants. For additional risks relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
New Accounting Standards are more fully described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including trends that might appear, should not be taken as indicative of future operations. The Company considers portions of this information to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as amended, with respect to the Company’s expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements related to acquisitions (including any related pro forma financial information) and other business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of environmental and other regulations. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact should be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “will,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because such statements
53
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control and that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements and that could materially affect the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements. For additional factors that could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements (see Item 1A. Risk Factors). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may also exacerbate the risks discussed therein and herein, any of which could have a material effect on the Company.
Factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
• |
The Company is subject to general risks affecting the real estate industry, including the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms to generate rental revenues, and any economic downturn may adversely affect the ability of the Company’s tenants, or new tenants, to enter into new leases or the ability of the Company’s existing tenants to renew their leases at rates at least as favorable as their current rates; |
|
• |
The Company could be adversely affected by changes in the local markets where its properties are located, as well as by adverse changes in national economic and market conditions; |
|
• |
The Company may fail to anticipate the effects on its properties of changes in consumer buying practices, including sales over the internet and the resulting retailing practices and space needs of its tenants, or a general downturn in its tenants’ businesses, which may cause tenants to close stores or default in payment of rent; |
|
• |
The Company is subject to competition for tenants from other owners of retail properties, and its tenants are subject to competition from other retailers and methods of distribution. The Company is dependent upon the successful operations and financial condition of its tenants, in particular its major tenants, and could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of those tenants; |
|
• |
The Company relies on major tenants, which makes it vulnerable to changes in the business and financial condition of, or demand for its space by, such tenants; |
|
• |
The Company may not realize the intended benefits of acquisition or merger transactions. The acquired assets may not perform as well as the Company anticipated, or the Company may not successfully integrate the assets and realize improvements in occupancy and operating results. The acquisition of certain assets may subject the Company to liabilities, including environmental liabilities; |
|
• |
The Company may fail to identify, acquire, construct or develop additional properties that produce a desired yield on invested capital, or may fail to effectively integrate acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties. In addition, the Company may be limited in its acquisition opportunities due to competition, the inability to obtain financing on reasonable terms or any financing at all and other factors; |
|
• |
The Company may fail to dispose of properties on favorable terms, especially in regions experiencing deteriorating economic conditions. In addition, real estate investments can be illiquid, particularly as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of financing or difficulties obtaining financing due to local or global conditions, and could limit the Company’s ability to promptly make changes to its portfolio to respond to economic and other conditions; |
|
• |
The Company may abandon a development or redevelopment opportunity after expending resources if it determines that the opportunity is not feasible due to a variety of factors, including a lack of availability of construction financing on reasonable terms, the impact of the economic environment on prospective tenants’ ability to enter into new leases or pay contractual rent or the inability of the Company to obtain all necessary zoning and other required governmental permits and authorizations; |
|
• |
The Company may not complete development or redevelopment projects on schedule as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, such as weather, labor conditions, governmental approvals, material shortages or general economic downturn, resulting in limited availability of capital, increased debt service expense and construction costs and decreases in revenue; |
|
• |
The Company’s financial condition may be affected by required debt service payments, the risk of default, restrictions on its ability to incur additional debt or to enter into certain transactions under its credit facilities and other documents governing its debt obligations and the risk of downgrades from debt rating services. In addition, the Company may encounter difficulties in obtaining permanent financing or refinancing existing debt. Borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facilities are subject to certain representations and warranties and customary events of default, including |
54
|
any event that has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial condition; |
|
• |
Changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common shares, as well as its performance and cash flow; |
|
• |
Debt and/or equity financing necessary for the Company to continue to grow and operate its business may not be available or may not be available on favorable terms; |
|
• |
Disruptions in the financial markets could affect the Company’s ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on the Company and the market price of the Company’s common shares; |
|
• |
The Company is subject to complex regulations related to its status as a REIT and would be adversely affected if it failed to qualify as a REIT; |
|
• |
The Company must make distributions to shareholders to continue to qualify as a REIT, and if the Company must borrow funds to make distributions, those borrowings may not be available on favorable terms or at all; |
|
• |
Joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by the Company, including the possibility that a partner or co-venturer may become bankrupt, may at any time have interests or goals different from those of the Company and may take action contrary to the Company’s instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including the Company’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. In addition, a partner or co-venturer may not have access to sufficient capital to satisfy its funding obligations to the joint venture or may seek to terminate the joint venture resulting in a loss to the Company of property revenues and management fees. The partner could cause a default under the joint venture loan for reasons outside the Company’s control. Furthermore, the Company could be required to reduce the carrying value of its equity investments, including preferred investments, if a loss in the carrying value of the investment is realized; |
|
• |
The Company’s decision to dispose of real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, would change the holding period assumption in the undiscounted cash flow impairment analyses, which could result in material impairment losses and adversely affect the Company’s financial results; |
|
• |
The outcome of pending or future litigation, including litigation with tenants or joint venture partners, may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition; |
|
• |
Property damage, expenses related thereto, and other business and economic consequences (including the potential loss of revenue) resulting from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters in locations where the Company owns properties may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition; |
|
• |
Sufficiency and timing of any insurance recovery payments related to damages and lost revenues from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition; |
|
• |
The Company and its tenants could be negatively affected by the impacts of pandemics and other public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic; |
|
• |
The Company is subject to potential environmental liabilities; |
|
• |
The Company may incur losses that are uninsured or exceed policy coverage due to its liability for certain injuries to persons, property or the environment occurring on its properties; |
|
• |
The Company could incur additional expenses to comply with or respond to claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act or otherwise be adversely affected by changes in government regulations, including changes in environmental, zoning, tax and other regulations; |
|
• |
Changes in accounting standards or other standards may adversely affect the Company’s business; |
|
• |
The Company’s Board of Directors, which regularly reviews the Company’s business strategy and objectives, may change the Company’s strategic plan based on a variety of factors and conditions, including in response to changing market conditions and |
55
|
|
• |
The Company and its vendors could sustain a disruption, failure or breach of their respective networks and systems, including as a result of cyber-attacks, which could disrupt the Company’s business operations, compromise the confidentiality of sensitive information and result in fines or penalties. |
Item 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The Company’s debt, excluding unconsolidated joint venture debt, is summarized as follows:
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
|
December 31, 2020 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amount (Millions) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Maturity (Years) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Interest Rate |
|
|
Percentage of Total |
|
|
Amount (Millions) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Maturity (Years) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Interest Rate |
|
|
Percentage of Total |
|
||||||||
Fixed-Rate Debt |
$ |
1,577.6 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
94.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,602.4 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
82.9 |
% |
Variable-Rate Debt |
$ |
99.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
$ |
331.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
The Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures’ indebtedness at its carrying value is summarized as follows:
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
|
December 31, 2020 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Joint Venture Debt (Millions) |
|
|
Company's Proportionate Share (Millions) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Maturity (Years) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Interest Rate |
|
|
Joint Venture Debt (Millions) |
|
|
Company's Proportionate Share (Millions) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Maturity (Years) |
|
|
Weighted- Average Interest Rate |
|
||||||||
Fixed-Rate Debt |
$ |
673.9 |
|
|
$ |
146.2 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
$ |
757.5 |
|
|
$ |
178.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Variable-Rate Debt |
$ |
199.4 |
|
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
$ |
272.1 |
|
|
$ |
54.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
The Company intends to use retained cash flow, proceeds from asset sales, equity and debt financing and variable-rate indebtedness available under its Revolving Credit Facilities to repay indebtedness and fund capital expenditures at the Company’s shopping centers. Thus, to the extent the Company incurs additional variable-rate indebtedness or needs to refinance existing fixed-rate indebtedness in a rising interest rate environment, its exposure to increases in interest rates in an inflationary period could increase. The Company does not believe, however, that increases in interest expense as a result of inflation will significantly impact the Company’s distributable cash flow.
The carrying value and the fair value of the Company’s fixed-rate debt are adjusted to include the Company’s proportionate share of the joint venture fixed-rate debt. An estimate of the effect of a 100 basis-point increase at December 31, 2021 and 2020, is summarized as follows (in millions):
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
|
December 31, 2020 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
100 Basis-Point Increase in Market Interest Rate |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
100 Basis-Point Increase in Market Interest Rate |
|
||||||
Company's fixed-rate debt |
$ |
1,577.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,687.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,630.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,602.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,704.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,634.3 |
|
Company's proportionate share of joint venture fixed-rate debt |
$ |
146.2 |
|
|
$ |
149.7 |
|
|
$ |
146.8 |
|
|
$ |
178.2 |
|
|
$ |
181.6 |
|
|
$ |
177.2 |
|
The sensitivity to changes in interest rates of the Company’s fixed-rate debt was determined using a valuation model based upon factors that measure the net present value of such obligations that arise from the hypothetical estimate as discussed above. A 100 basis-point increase in short-term market interest rates on variable-rate debt at December 31, 2021, would result in an increase in interest expense of approximately $1.0 million for the Company and $0.4 million representing the Company’s proportionate share of the joint ventures’ interest expense relating to variable-rate debt outstanding for the 12-month period ended December 31, 2021. The estimated increase in interest expense for the year does not give effect to possible changes in the daily balance of the Company’s or joint ventures’ outstanding variable-rate debt or to refinancing fixed-rate debt at maturity at higher interest rates.
The Company and its joint ventures intend to continually monitor and actively manage interest costs on their variable-rate debt portfolio and may enter into swap positions based on market fluctuations. In addition, the Company believes it has the ability to obtain funds through additional equity and/or debt offerings and joint venture capital. Accordingly, the cost of obtaining such protection agreements versus the Company’s access to capital markets will continue to be evaluated. The Company has not entered, and does not plan to enter, into any derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had no other material exposure to market risk.
56
Item 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
The response to this item is included in a separate section at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Item 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
Item 9A. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), conducted an evaluation, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation as required, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) were effective as of December 31, 2021, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and were effective as of December 31, 2021, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its CEO and CFO, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on those criteria, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm as stated in their report which appears herein and is incorporated in this Item 9A. by reference thereto.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the three months ended December 31, 2021, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
Item 9C. |
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS |
Not applicable.
57
PART III
Item 10. |
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted the following corporate governance documents:
|
• |
Corporate Governance Guidelines that guide the Board of Directors in the performance of its responsibilities to serve the best interests of the Company and its shareholders; |
|
• |
Written charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and ESG Committee; |
|
• |
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers that applies to the Company’s senior financial officers, including the president, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, controllers, treasurer and chief internal auditor among others designated by the Company, if any (amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers will be disclosed on the Company’s website) and |
|
• |
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that governs the actions and working relationships of the Company’s employees, officers and directors with current and potential customers, consumers, fellow employees, competitors, government and self-regulatory agencies, investors, the public, the media and anyone else with whom the Company has or may have contact. |
Copies of the Company’s corporate governance documents are available on the Company’s website, www.sitecenters.com, under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.”
Certain other information required by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Proposal One: Election of Seven Directors—Director Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting” and “Board Governance” contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2022 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A (“2022 Proxy Statement”), and the information under the heading “Information About the Company’s Executive Officers” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.
Item 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Board Governance—Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation Tables and Related Disclosure,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Proposal Two: Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers—Compensation Committee Report” and “—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” contained in the 2022 Proxy Statement.
58
Item 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Certain information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the “Board Governance—Security Ownership of Directors and Management” and “Corporate Governance and Other Matters—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” sections of the 2022 Proxy Statement. The following table sets forth the number of securities issued and outstanding under the Company’s existing stock compensation plans, as of December 31, 2021, as well as the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|||
Plan category |
|
Number of Securities to Be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
|
|
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
|
|
|||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) |
|
|
2,591,812 |
|
(2) |
|
$ |
26.96 |
|
(3) |
|
1,781,922 |
|
(4) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,591,812 |
|
|
|
$ |
26.96 |
|
|
|
1,781,922 |
|
|
(1) |
Includes the Company’s 2002 Equity-Based Award Plan, 2004 Equity-Based Award Plan, 2008 Equity-Based Award Plan, 2012 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan and 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan. |
(2) |
Includes 273,545 stock options outstanding, 877,590 restricted stock units that are expected to be settled in shares upon vesting and 1,440,677 performance awards assuming maximum payout (as a result, this aggregate reported number may overstate actual dilution). |
(3) |
Restricted stock units and performance awards are not taken into account in the weighted-average exercise price as such awards have no exercise price. |
(4) |
All of these shares may be issued with respect to award vehicles other than just stock options or share appreciation rights or other rights to acquire shares. |
Item 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the “Proposal One: Election of Seven Directors—Transactions with the Otto Family” and “Proposal One: Election of Seven Directors—Independent Directors” and “Corporate Governance and Other Matters—Policy Regarding Related-Party Transactions” sections of the Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement.
Item 14. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Incorporated herein by reference to the “Proposal Three: Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP” section of the Company’s 2022 Proxy Statement.
59
PART IV
Item 15. |
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
a) |
1. Financial Statements |
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
The following financial statement schedules are filed herewith as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the registrant:
Schedule
II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or because the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Financial statements of the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture companies have been omitted because they do not meet the significant subsidiary definition of Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
Exhibits — The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report:
Form 10-K Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Filed or Furnished Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference
|
2.1 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on July 3, 2018; File No. 001-11690) |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on November 2, 2018; File No. 001-11690) |
|
3.2 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on November 2, 2018; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on February 28, 2012; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.2 |
|
Specimen Certificate for 6.375% Class A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares |
|
Registration Statement on Form 8-A (Filed with the SEC on June 2, 2017; File No. 001-11690) |
4.3 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on June 5, 2017; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.4 |
|
|
Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003) |
|
4.5 |
|
|
Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003) |
60
Form 10-K Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Filed or Furnished Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference
|
4.6 |
|
|
Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003) |
|
4.7 |
|
|
Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003) |
|
4.8 |
|
|
Form S-4 Registration No. 333-117034 (Filed with the SEC on June 30, 2004) |
|
4.9 |
|
|
Form S-4 Registration No. 333-117034 (Filed with the SEC on June 30, 2004) |
|
4.10 |
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on February 21, 2007; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.11 |
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on February 21, 2007; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.12 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on September 1, 2006; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.13 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on March 16, 2007; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.14 |
|
|
Form S-3 Registration No. 333-162451 (Filed on October 13, 2009) |
|
4.15 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 7, 2010; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.16 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on November 8, 2010; File No. 001-11690) |
61
Form 10-K Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Filed or Furnished Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference
|
4.17 |
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on February 28, 2011; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.18 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 9, 2011; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.19 |
|
|
Form S-3 Registration No. 333-184221 (Filed with the SEC on October 1, 2012) |
|
4.20 |
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 1, 2013; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.21 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 8, 2013; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.22 |
|
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on February 28, 2014; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.23 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on January 22, 2015; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.24 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on October 21, 2015; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.25 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on May 26, 2017; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.26 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on August 16, 2017; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.27 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 4, 2018; File No. 001-11690) |
|
4.28 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on July 29, 2019; File No. 001-11690) |
62
Form 10-K Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Filed or Furnished Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference
|
4.29 |
|
Description of Securities Registered Under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
10.1 |
|
2005 Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (May 9, 2019 Restatement)* |
|
Quarterly Report on 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 5, 2019; File No. 001-11690) |
10.2 |
|
Elective Deferred Compensation Plan (May 9, 2019 Restatement)* |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 5, 2019; File No. 001-11690) |
10.3 |
|
Adoption Agreement Elective Deferred Compensation Plan (May 9, 2019 Restatement)* |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 5, 2019; File No. 001-11690) |
10.4 |
|
2005 Equity Deferred Compensation Plan (May 9, 2019 Restatement)* |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 5, 2019; File No. 001-11690) |
10.5 |
|
|
Form S-8 Registration No. 333-181422 (Filed with the SEC on May 15, 2012) |
|
10.6 |
|
|
Form S-8 Registration No. 333-231319 (Filed with the SEC on May 9, 2019) |
|
10.7 |
|
Form of 2019 Plan Restricted Share Units Award Memorandum (governing grants made through February 2021)* |
|
Quarterly Report on 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 5, 2019; File No. 001-11690) |
10.8 |
|
Form of 2019 Plan Restricted Share Units Award Memorandum (governing November 2019 grant made to the CFO)* |
|
Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on February 27, 2020; File No. 001-11690) |
10.9 |
|
Form of 2019 Plan Restricted Share Units Award Memorandum (governing certain grants made in 2020, 2021 and 2022)* |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC October 30, 2020; File No. 001-11690) |
10.10 |
|
Form of 2012 Plan Performance-Based Restricted Share Units Award Memorandum (governing grants made in 2018 and 2019)* |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 4, 2018; File No. 001-11690) |
10.11 |
|
Form of 2019 Plan Performance-Based Restricted Share Units Award Memorandum (governing grants made in 2020)* |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 5, 2019; File No. 001-11690) |
10.12 |
|
Form of 2019 Plan Performance-Based Restricted Share Units Award Memorandum (governing grants made in 2021)* |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on April 29, 2021, File No. 001-11690) |
10.13 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC May 10, 2013; File No. 001-11690) |
|
10.14 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC May 10, 2013; File No. 001-11690) |
|
10.15 |
|
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC May 4, 2016; File No. 001-11690) |
|
10.16 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2020, by and between DDR Corp. and David R. Lukes* |
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on September 15, 2020; File No. 001-11690) |
10.17 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on February 19, 2021, File No. 001-11690) |
|
10.18 |
|
|
Current Report on form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on September 13, 2021, File No. 001-11690) |
|
10.19 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2021, by and between SITE Centers Corp. and John Cattonar* |
|
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on July 29, 2021, File No. 001-11690) |
10.20 |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on November 13, 2017; File No. 001-11690) |
|
10.21 |
|
Investors’ Rights Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2009, by and between the Company and Alexander Otto |
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on May 11, 2009; File No. 001-11690) |
10.22 |
|
Waiver Agreement, dated as of May 11, 2009, by and between the Company and Alexander Otto |
|
Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on May 11, 2009; File No. 001-11690) |
63
Form 10-K Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Filed or Furnished Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference
|
21.1 |
|
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
|
23.1 |
|
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
|
101.INS |
|
Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
101.SCH |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
101.CAL |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
101.DEF |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
101.LAB |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
101.PRE |
|
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
104 |
|
The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 has been formatted in Inline XBRL. |
|
Submitted electronically herewith |
* |
Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K. |
Item 16. |
FORM 10-K SUMMARY |
None.
64
SITE Centers Corp.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Financial statements of the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture companies have been omitted because they do not meet the significant subsidiary definition of S-X 210.1-02(w).
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of SITE Centers Corp.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SITE Centers Corp. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, including the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
F-2
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation and Related Purchase Price Allocations of Properties Acquired from an Unconsolidated Joint Venture
As described in Notes 1, 3 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements, as of December 31, 2021, the Company holds a 20% equity interest in the DDRM Properties Joint Venture with Madison International Realty. In December 2021, the Company acquired the 80% equity interest in six properties owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture for $107.2 million and stepped up the previous 20% interest due to a change in control, resulting in recognition of a $7.2 million gain on sale and change in control of interests and recognition of the aggregate gross fair value (at 100%) of the properties acquired of $134.0 million. Management used a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value for each property. The discounted cash flow analyses used to estimate the fair value of the properties acquired involves significant estimates and assumptions, including discount rates, exit capitalization rates and certain market leasing assumptions. Property fair values were then further allocated to the property level tangible assets and liabilities acquired, consisting of land, building and improvements and intangible assets and liabilities, generally including above- and below-market leases and in-place leases. As disclosed by management, the allocation process includes various valuation methods and involves significant estimates and assumptions by management related to discount rates, exit capitalization rates, estimated land values (per square foot), capitalization rates and certain market leasing assumptions. The fair value of land of an acquired property considers the value of land as if the site was unimproved based on comparable market transactions. The fair value of the building is determined as if it were vacant by applying a capitalization rate to market leasing assumptions. Above- and below-market lease values are calculated based on the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between contractual rents and estimated market rents, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining term plus the estimated term of any below-market, renewal options for below-market leases. The value of acquired in-place leases is recorded based on the present value of the estimated gross monthly market rental rate for each individual lease multiplied by the estimated period of time it would take to lease the space to a new tenant.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation and related purchase price allocations of properties acquired from an unconsolidated joint venture is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management in determining and allocating the aggregate gross fair value of the properties acquired to each individual property for purposes of establishing a basis for the purchase price allocations to the individual properties acquired and subsequent allocation of the purchase price to the property level tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired associated with each property; this in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to the discount rates, exit capitalization rates, and certain market leasing assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the individual properties acquired and the discount rates, estimated land values (per square foot), capitalization rates, and certain market leasing assumptions used to estimate the fair value of certain property level tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired, and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Company’s acquisition accounting process, including controls over the valuation and related purchase price allocations of the properties acquired. These procedures also included, among others, (i) reading the respective purchase and sale agreements and (ii) testing management’s process for estimating the fair value of the individual properties
F-3
acquired and estimating the fair value of certain property level tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. Testing management’s process included (i) evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation methods, (ii) testing the completeness and accuracy of data provided by management, (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions related to the discount rates, exit capitalization rates, and certain market leasing assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the individual properties acquired and the discount rates, estimated land values (per square foot), capitalization rates, and certain market leasing assumptions used to estimate the fair value of certain property level tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired, and (iv) for certain individual properties and property level tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of the aforementioned significant assumptions. Evaluating the reasonableness of significant assumptions relating to the discount rates, exit capitalization rates, estimated land values (per square foot), capitalization rates, and certain market leasing assumptions involved considering whether the assumptions used were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit and third party market data.
Identification and Evaluation of Impairment Indicators for Real Estate Assets
As described in Notes 1 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying value of the Company’s total net real estate assets was $3,667.3 million and net intangible assets was $34.4 million as of December 31, 2021. Management reviews its individual real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, and intangibles for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators are primarily the result of a change in hold period or significant, prolonged decreases in projected cash flows. For assets with impairment indicators, management determines if the undiscounted future cash flows are sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the identification and evaluation of impairment indicators for real estate assets is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management to identify and evaluate events or changes in circumstances indicating that the carrying value may not be recoverable, which led to a high degree of auditor judgment in evaluating audit evidence relating to management’s identification and evaluation of impairment indicators.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Company’s impairment process, including controls over the identification and evaluation of events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for identifying individual real estate assets with potential impairment indicators. Testing management’s process included evaluating management’s identification and evaluation of impairment indicators.
/s/
February 24, 2022
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1992.
F-4
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixtures and tenant improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to joint ventures, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances to affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Liabilities and Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes, net |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Term loan, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage indebtedness, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SITE Centers Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A— December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class K— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, with par value, $ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net income |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred compensation obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Less: Common shares in treasury at cost: December 31, 2020, respectively |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total SITE Centers shareholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Revenues from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fee and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business interruption income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operation expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Other (expense) income, net |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Income before earnings from equity method investments and other items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve of preferred equity interests, net |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries and state franchise and income taxes |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income attributable to non-controlling interests, net |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income attributable to SITE Centers |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Write-off of preferred share original issuance costs |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Preferred dividends |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income attributable to common shareholders |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Diluted |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Net income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation, net |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation included in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash flow hedges reclassed to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Total comprehensive income attributable to SITE Centers |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
SITE Centers Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Preferred Shares |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amounts |
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
Accumulated Distributions in Excess of Net Income |
|
|
Deferred Compensation Obligation |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
Treasury Stock at Cost |
|
|
Non- Controlling Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2018 |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issuance of common shares related to stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares for cash offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Redemption of preferred shares |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared- common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared- preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares related to stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared- common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared- preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares related to stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares for cash offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of preferred shares |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Stock-based compensation, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Acquisition of non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared- common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends declared- preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2021 |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and write-off of debt issuance costs and fair market value of debt adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on debt extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of joint ventures |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Reserve of preferred equity interests, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash distributions from joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption of buildings due to ground lease terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in notes receivable accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net change in accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net change in other operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate acquired, net of liabilities and cash assumed |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Real estate developed and improvements to operating real estate |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from disposition of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of joint venture interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from distribution of preferred investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contributions to joint ventures |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of joint venture advances, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net transactions with RVI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Repayment of) proceeds from revolving credit facilities, net |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Repayment of senior notes, including repayment costs |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of term loan and mortgage debt |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from mortgage payable and term loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of preferred shares |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of offering expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares in conjunction with equity award plans and dividend reinvestment plan |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Repurchase of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Acquisition of non-controlling interest |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to non-controlling interests and redeemable operating partnership units |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net cash flow used for financing activities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business
SITE Centers Corp. and its related consolidated real estate subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “SITE Centers”) and unconsolidated joint ventures are primarily engaged in the business of acquiring, owning, developing, redeveloping, leasing, and managing shopping centers. Unless otherwise provided, references herein to the Company or SITE Centers include SITE Centers Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company’s tenant base primarily includes national and regional retail chains and local tenants. Consequently, the Company’s credit risk is concentrated in the retail industry.
Amounts relating to the number of properties, joint ventures’ interests and acreage are unaudited.
Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. The Company considered impacts to its estimates related to COVID-19, as appropriate, within its consolidated financial statements, and there may be changes to those estimates in future periods. The Company believes that its accounting estimates are appropriate after giving consideration to the uncertainties surrounding the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the results of the Company and all entities in which the Company has a controlling interest or has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in real estate joint ventures in which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but does not have financial or operating control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the Company’s share of the earnings (or loss) of these joint ventures is included in consolidated net income (loss).
Statements of Cash Flows and Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Information
Non-cash investing and financing activities are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Consolidation of the net assets (excluding mortgages as disclosed below) of previously unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Acquisition of non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture investments related to consolidation of net assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages assumed, of previously unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages assumed, shopping center acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable related to construction in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumption of buildings due to ground lease terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared, but not paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off of preferred share original issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
Real estate assets, which include construction in progress and undeveloped land, are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Buildings |
Useful lives, ranging from 31.5 to 40 years |
Building improvements and fixtures |
Useful lives, ranging from 3 to 20 years |
Tenant improvements |
|
F-10
The Company periodically assesses the useful lives of its depreciable real estate assets and accounts for any revisions, which are not material for the periods presented, prospectively. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Significant expenditures that improve or extend the life of the asset are capitalized.
Construction in Progress and Land includes undeveloped land, as well as construction in progress related to shopping center developments and expansions. The Company capitalized certain direct costs (salaries and related personnel) and incremental internal construction costs of $
Purchase Price Accounting
The Company’s acquisitions were accounted for as asset acquisitions, and the Company capitalized the acquisition costs incurred. Upon acquisition of properties, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements and intangibles, generally including above- and below-market leases and in-place leases. The Company allocates the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a gross basis based on their relative fair values at the date of acquisition.
The fair value of land of an acquired property considers the value of land as if the site was unimproved based on comparable market transactions. The fair value of the building is determined as if it were vacant by applying a capitalization rate to market leasing assumptions. Above- and below-market lease values are calculated based on the present value (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between contractual rents and estimated market rents, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the remaining term plus the estimated term of any below-market, renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above- and below-market lease values are amortized to base rental revenue over the related lease term plus fixed-rate renewal options, as appropriate. The value of acquired in-place leases is recorded based on the present value of the estimated gross monthly market rental rate for each individual lease multiplied by the estimated period of time it would take to lease the space to a new tenant. Such amounts are amortized to expense over the remaining initial lease term.
Real Estate Impairment Assessment
The Company reviews its individual real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, and intangibles for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators are primarily related to changes in estimated hold periods and significant, prolonged decreases in projected cash flows, however other impairment indicators could occur. Decreases in cash flows may be caused by declines in occupancy, projected losses on potential future sales, market factors, significant changes in projected development costs or completion dates and sustainability of development projects. An asset with impairment indicators is considered impaired when the undiscounted future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. The determination of anticipated undiscounted cash flows is inherently subjective, requiring significant estimates made by management, and considers the most likely expected course of action at the balance sheet date based on current plans, intended holding periods and available market information. If the Company is evaluating the potential sale of an asset, the undiscounted future cash flows analysis is probability-weighted based upon management’s best estimate of the likelihood of the alternative courses of action as of the balance sheet date. If an asset’s carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. The Company recorded aggregate impairment charges of $
Disposition of Real Estate and Real Estate Investments
Sales of nonfinancial assets, such as real estate, are recognized when control of the asset transfers to the buyer, which will occur when the buyer has the ability to direct the use of, or obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset. This generally occurs when the transaction closes and consideration is exchanged for control of the asset.
A discontinued operation includes only the disposal of a component of an entity and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s financial results. The disposition of the Company’s individual properties did not qualify for discontinued operations presentation, and thus, the results of the properties that have been sold remain in income from continuing operations, and any associated gains or losses from the disposition are included in Gain on Disposition of Real Estate.
Real Estate Held for Sale
The Company generally considers assets to be held for sale when management believes that a sale is probable within a year. This generally occurs when a sales contract is executed with no substantive contingencies and the prospective buyer has significant funds at risk. Assets that are classified as held for sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell. The Company evaluated its property portfolio and did not identify any properties that would meet the above-mentioned criteria for held for sale as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
F-11
Interest and Real Estate Taxes
Interest and real estate taxes incurred relating to the construction and redevelopment of shopping centers are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the building. This includes interest incurred on funds invested in or advanced to unconsolidated joint ventures with qualifying development activities. The Company will cease the capitalization of these costs when construction activities are substantially completed and the property is available for occupancy by tenants. If the Company suspends substantially all activities related to development of a qualifying asset, the Company will cease capitalization of interest and taxes until activities are resumed.
Interest paid during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 aggregated $
Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures and Affiliate
To the extent that the Company’s cost basis in an unconsolidated joint venture is different from the basis reflected at the joint venture level, the basis difference is amortized over the life of the related assets and included in the Company’s share of equity in net income (loss) of the joint venture and, if the related asset is sold, the basis difference is written off. Periodically, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures may be impaired. An investment is impaired only if the Company’s estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment and such difference is deemed to be other than temporary. Investment impairment charges create a basis difference between the Company’s share of accumulated equity as compared to the investment balance of the respective unconsolidated joint venture. The Company allocates the aggregate impairment charge to each of the respective properties owned by the joint venture on a relative fair value basis and amortizes this basis differential as an adjustment to the equity in net income (loss) recorded by the Company over the estimated remaining useful lives of the underlying assets.
The Retail Value Inc. (“RVI”) series A preferred stock (“RVI Preferred Shares”) were classified as Investment in and Advances to Affiliate on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The RVI Preferred Shares had a liquidation and dividend preference over the common stock, but did not have any substantive voting rights, with limited exceptions, or conversion rights and did not have a stated coupon. The RVI Preferred Shares were carried at cost, subject to adjustments in certain circumstances, and were periodically evaluated for impairment. In October 2021, the Company received a cash distribution of $
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash deposits with major financial institutions, which from time to time may exceed federally insured limits. The Company periodically assesses the financial condition of these institutions and believes that the risk of loss is minimal.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents amounts on deposit with financial institutions primarily for debt service payments, real estate taxes, capital improvements and operating reserves as required pursuant to the respective loan agreement. For purposes of the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows, changes in restricted cash are aggregated with cash and cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable
The Company makes estimates of the collectability of its accounts receivable related to base rents, including straight-line rentals, expense reimbursements and other revenue or income. Rental income has been reduced for amounts the Company believes are not probable of being collected. The Company analyzes tenant credit worthiness, as well as current economic and tenant-specific sector trends when evaluating the probability of collection of accounts receivable. In evaluating tenant credit worthiness, the Company’s assessment may include a review of payment history, tenant sales performance and financial position. For larger national tenants, the Company also evaluates projected liquidity, as well as the tenant’s access to capital and the overall health of the particular sector. In addition, with respect to tenants in bankruptcy, the Company makes estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims in assessing the probability of collection of the related receivable. The time to resolve these claims may exceed one year. These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s earnings because once the amount is not considered probable of being collected, earnings are reduced by a corresponding amount until the receivable is collected. See discussion below under Revenue Recognition regarding cash-basis tenants.
Accounts receivable, excluding straight-line rents receivable, do not include estimated amounts not probable of being collected (including contract disputes) of $
F-12
Deferred Charges
External costs and fees incurred in obtaining indebtedness are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as a direct deduction from the related debt liability. Debt issuance costs related to the Company’s revolving credit facilities remain classified as an asset on the consolidated balance sheets as these costs are, at the outset, not associated with an outstanding borrowing. The aggregate costs are amortized over the terms of the related debt agreements. Such amortization is reflected in Interest Expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
Treasury Shares
The Company’s share repurchases are reflected as treasury shares utilizing the cost method of accounting and are presented as a reduction to consolidated shareholders’ equity. Reissuances of the Company’s treasury shares at an amount below cost are recorded as a charge to paid-in capital due to the Company’s cumulative distributions in excess of net income.
Revenue Recognition
For the real estate industry, leasing transactions are not within the scope of the standard. A majority of the Company’s tenant-related revenue is recognized pursuant to lease agreements and is governed by the leasing guidance. Historically, the majority of the Company’s lease commission revenue was recognized
Rental Income
Rental Income on the consolidated statements of operations includes contractual lease payments that generally consist of the following:
|
• |
Fixed-lease payments, which include fixed payments associated with expense reimbursements from tenants for common area maintenance, taxes and insurance from tenants in shopping centers and are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease, which generally ranges from |
|
|
• |
Variable lease payments, which include percentage and overage income, recognized after a tenant’s reported sales have exceeded the applicable sales breakpoint set forth in the applicable lease. |
|
|
• |
Variable lease payments associated with expense reimbursements from tenants for common area maintenance, taxes, insurance and other property operating expenses, based upon the tenant’s lease provisions, which are recognized in the period the related expenses are incurred. |
|
|
• |
Lease termination payments, which are recognized upon the effective termination of a tenant’s lease when the Company has no further obligations under the lease. |
|
|
• |
Ancillary and other property-related rental payments, primarily composed of leasing vacant space to temporary tenants, kiosk income, and parking income, which are recognized in the period earned. |
|
For those tenants where the Company is unable to assert that collection of amounts due over the lease term is probable, the Company has categorized these tenants on the cash basis of accounting. As a result, no rental income is recognized from such tenants once they have been placed on the cash basis of accounting until payments are received.
Revenues from Contracts with Customers
The Company’s revenues from contracts with customers generally relate to asset and property management fees, leasing commissions and development fees. These revenues are derived from the Company’s management agreements with RVI and unconsolidated joint ventures and, in the case of unconsolidated joint ventures, are recognized to the extent attributable to the unaffiliated ownership in the unconsolidated joint venture to which it relates. Termination rights under these contracts vary by contract but generally include termination for cause by either party, or generally due to sale of the property.
Asset and Property Management Fees
Asset and property management services include property maintenance, tenant coordination, accounting and financial services. Asset and property management services represent a series of distinct daily services. Accordingly, the Company satisfies the performance obligation as services are rendered over time.
The Company is compensated for property management services through a monthly management fee, which is typically, earned based on a specified percentage of the monthly rental receipts generated from the property under
F-13
management. The Company is compensated for asset management services through a fee that is billed to the customer monthly and recognized as revenue monthly as the services are rendered, based on a percentage of aggregate asset value or capital contributions for assets under management at the end of the quarter. The asset management fee under the RVI external management agreement is paid monthly based on the initial aggregate appraised value of the RVI properties.
Property Leasing
The Company provides strategic advice and execution to third parties, including RVI and certain joint ventures, in connection with the leasing of retail space. The Company is compensated for services in the form of a commission. The commission is paid upon the occurrence of certain contractual events that may be contingent. For example, a portion of the commission may be paid upon execution of the lease by the tenant, with the remaining paid upon occurrence of another future contingent event (e.g., payment of first month’s rent or tenant move-in). The Company typically satisfies its performance obligation at a point in time when control is transferred, generally, at the time of the first contractual event where there is a present right to payment. The Company looks to history, experience with a customer and deal-specific considerations to support its judgment that the second contingency will be met. Therefore, the Company typically accelerates the recognition of revenue associated with the second contingent event (if any) to the point in time when control of its service is transferred.
Development Services
Development services consist of construction management oversight services such as hiring general contractors, reviewing plans and specifications, performing inspections, reviewing documentation and providing accounting services. These services represent a series of distinct services and are recognized over time as services are rendered. The Company is compensated monthly for services based on percentage of aggregate amount spent on the construction during the month.
Disposition Fees
The Company receives disposition fees equal to
Contract Assets
Contract assets represent assets for revenue that have been recognized in advance of billing the customer and for which the right to bill is contingent upon something other than the passage of time. This is common for contingent portions of commissions.
Leases
The Company’s accounting policies include the following:
|
• |
As a lessee — short-term lease exception for the Company’s office leases; |
|
|
• |
As a lessor — to include operating lease liabilities in the asset group and include the associated operating lease payments in the undiscounted cash flows when considering recoverability of a long-lived asset group and |
|
|
• |
As a lessor — to exclude from lease payments taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with lease revenue-producing activity and collected by the lessor from the lessee (e.g., sales tax). |
|
ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company’s leases do not include an implicit rate, the Company used its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date of the standard in determining the present value of lease payments. For each lease, the Company utilized a market-based approach to estimate the incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”), which required significant judgment. The Company estimated base IBRs based on an analysis of (i) yields on the Company’s outstanding public debt, as well as comparable companies, (ii) observable mortgage rates and (iii) unlevered property yields and discount rates. The Company applied adjustments to the base IBRs to account for full collateralization and lease term. Operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made. The Company has
F-14
options to extend certain of the ground and office leases; however, these options were not considered as part of the lease term when calculating the lease liability, as they were not reasonably certain to be exercised. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses include certain internal leasing and legal salaries and related expenses associated with the re-leasing of existing space, which are charged to operations as incurred.
Equity-Based Plans
Compensation cost relating to stock-based payment transactions classified as equity is recognized in the financial statements based upon the grant date fair value. The forfeiture rate is based on actual experience. Stock-based compensation cost recognized by the Company was $
Income Taxes
The Company has made an election to qualify, and believes it is operating so as to qualify, as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that it makes distributions to its shareholders equal to at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and continues to satisfy certain other requirements.
In connection with the REIT Modernization Act, the Company is permitted to participate in certain activities and still maintain its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted in entities that elect to be treated as taxable subsidiaries (a “TRS”) under the Code. As such, the Company is subject to federal and state income taxes on the income from these activities.
In the normal course of business, the Company or one or more of its subsidiaries is subject to examination by federal, state and local tax jurisdictions, as well as certain jurisdictions outside the United States, in which it operates, where applicable. The Company expects to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense. For the three years ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized no material adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment for uncertain tax provisions. As of December 31, 2021, the tax years that remain subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions under applicable statutes of limitations are generally the year 2018 and forward.
Deferred Tax Assets
The Company accounts for income taxes related to its TRS under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in the income statement in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent it believes it is more likely than not that these assets will be realized. A valuation allowance is recorded against the deferred tax assets when the Company determines that an uncertainty exists regarding their realization, which would increase the provision for income taxes. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including forecasts of future taxable income, the reversal of other existing temporary differences, available net operating loss carryforwards, tax planning strategies and recent results of operations. Several of these considerations require assumptions and significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income and must be consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company is utilizing to manage its business. As a result, to the extent facts and circumstances change, an assessment of the need for a valuation allowance should be made.
Segments
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company had only
F-15
, the Company had
Fair Value Hierarchy
The standard Fair Value Measurements specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based upon whether the inputs to those valuation techniques reflect assumptions other market participants would use based upon market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs). The following summarizes the fair value hierarchy:
• Level 1 |
Quoted prices in active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; |
|
|
• Level 2 |
Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are inactive, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals and |
|
|
• Level 3 |
Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
2. |
Revenue Recognition |
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Revenue and Receivables
Beginning in March 2020, the retail sector was significantly impacted by the COVID‑19 pandemic. Though the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tenant operations varied by tenant category, local conditions and applicable government mandates, a significant number of the Company’s tenants experienced a reduction in sales and foot traffic, and many tenants were forced to limit their operations or close their businesses for a period of time, primarily in 2020. The COVID‑19 pandemic also had a significant impact on the Company’s collection of rents for April 2020 through the end of 2020. The Company engaged in discussions with most of its larger tenants that failed to satisfy all or a portion of their rent obligations and agreed to terms on rent-deferral arrangements (and, in a small number of cases, rent abatements) and other lease modifications with a significant number of such tenants. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, $
During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded net uncollectible revenue that resulted in rental income of $
For those tenants where the Company is unable to assert that collection of amounts due over the lease term is probable, regardless if the Company has entered into a deferral agreement to extend the payment terms, the Company has categorized these tenants on the cash basis of accounting. As a result, all existing accounts receivable relating to these tenants have been reserved in full, including straight-line rental income, and no rental income is recognized from such tenants once they have been placed on the cash basis of accounting until payments are received. The Company will remove the cash basis designation and resume recording rental income from such tenants on a straight-line basis at such time it believes collection from the tenants is probable based upon a demonstrated payment history, improved liquidity, the addition of credit-worthy guarantors or a recapitalization event.
F-16
Fee and Other Income
Fee and Other Income on the consolidated statements of operations includes revenue from contracts with customers and other property-related income and is recognized in the period earned as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Revenue from contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset and property management fees |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Leasing commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RVI disposition fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RVI credit facility guaranty and refinancing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from contracts with customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fee and other income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The aggregate amount of receivables from contracts with customers was $
Contract assets
Contract assets are included in Other Assets, net on the consolidated balance sheets. The significant changes in the leasing commission balances during the year ended December 31, 2021, are as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of January 1, 2021 |
$ |
|
|
Contract assets recognized |
|
|
|
Contract assets billed |
|
( |
) |
Balance as of December 31, 2021 |
$ |
|
|
All revenue from contracts with customers meets the exemption criteria for variable consideration directly allocable to wholly unsatisfied performance obligations or unsatisfied promise within a series, and therefore, the Company does not disclose the value of transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations. There is no fixed consideration included in the transaction price for any of these revenues.
3. |
Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures |
The Company’s equity method joint ventures, which are included in Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2021, are as follows:
Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures |
|
Partner |
|
Effective Ownership Percentage |
|
|
Operating Properties |
DDRM Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Trust Portfolio JV LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DDR – SAU Retail Fund, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Joint Venture Interests |
|
|
|
25.75–50.0 |
|
|
|
F-17
Condensed combined financial information of the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture investments is as follows (in thousands):
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Condensed Combined Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixtures and tenant improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress and land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage debt |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Notes and accrued interest payable to the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company's share of accumulated equity |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Basis differentials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred development fees, net of portion related to the Company's interest |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Amounts payable to the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures, net |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Condensed Combined Statements of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from operations |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expenses from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred share expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before gain on disposition of real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Company's share of equity in net income of joint ventures |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Basis differential adjustments(B) |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of joint ventures |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(A) |
For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s proportionate share was $ |
(B) |
The difference between the Company’s share of net income, as reported above, and the amounts included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations is attributable to the amortization of basis differentials, unrecognized preferred PIK, the recognition of deferred gains, differences in gain (loss) on sale of certain assets recognized due to the basis differentials and other than temporary impairment charges. |
F-18
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on revenues and receivables for the Company’s joint ventures is more fully described in Note 2.
Revenues earned by the Company related to all of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures and interest income on its preferred interests are as follows (in millions):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Revenue from contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset and property management fees |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Development fees, leasing commissions and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(A) |
Interest income recorded in 2020 and 2019 related to preferred equity interests in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures, which were transferred or redeemed in the fourth quarter of 2020. |
The Company’s joint venture agreements generally include provisions whereby each partner has the right to trigger a purchase or sale of its interest in the joint venture or to initiate a purchase or sale of the properties after a certain number of years or if either party is in default of the joint venture agreements. The Company is not obligated to purchase the interests of its outside joint venture partners under these provisions.
Disposition of Shopping Centers, Undeveloped Land and Joint Venture Interests
In 2021, one of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold its sole asset, which was a parcel of undeveloped land (approximating
In December 2021, the Company acquired the
In connection with estimating the fair value of the net assets acquired from the DDRM assets, the fair value of each property was estimated, and the aggregate gross fair value of the properties acquired was estimated to be $
Excluding the Richmond Hill and DDRM Properties Joint Venture transactions noted above, the Company’s joint ventures sold
In 2020, the Company sold its
All transactions with the Company’s equity affiliates are described above.
F-19
4. |
Investment In and Advances to Affiliate |
On July 1, 2018, the Company completed the spin-off of RVI. At the time of the spin-off, RVI owned
In connection with the spin-off, on July 1, 2018, the Company and RVI entered into a separation and distribution agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, the Company agreed to transfer the properties and certain related assets, liabilities and obligations to RVI and to distribute
On July 1, 2018, the Company and RVI also entered into an external management agreement, which, together with various property management agreements, governed the fees, terms and conditions pursuant to which SITE Centers managed RVI and its properties through December 31, 2021. The Company and RVI entered into a new external management agreement effective January 1, 2022 to govern the Company’s management of RVI’s remaining property and the wind-up of its operations. Pursuant to these management agreements, the Company has provided RVI with day-to-day management, subject to supervision and certain discretionary limits and authorities granted by the RVI Board of Directors. RVI does not have any employees. The Company and RVI also entered into a tax matters agreement, which governs the rights and responsibilities of the parties following the spin-off with respect to various tax matters and provides for the allocation of tax-related assets, liabilities and obligations.
Revenue from contracts with RVI is included in Fee and Other Income on the consolidated statements of operations and was composed of the following (in millions):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Revenue from contracts with RVI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset and property management fees |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Leasing commissions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposition fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility guaranty and refinancing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from contracts with RVI |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-20
5. |
Acquisitions |
In 2021 and 2020, the Company acquired the following shopping centers (in millions):
Asset |
|
Location |
|
Date Acquired |
|
Purchase Price |
|
|
Face Value of Mortgage Debt Assumed |
|
||
Shoppes at Addison Place |
|
Delray Beach, Florida |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Emmett Street Station |
|
Charlottesville, Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hammond Springs |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belgate Shopping Center (land parcel) |
|
Charlotte, North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emmet Street North |
|
Charlottesville, Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Home (Single Box) |
|
Princeton, New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Village Square at Golf |
|
Boynton Beach, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shoppes at Paradise Point |
|
Fort Walton Beach, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Midway Plaza |
|
Tamarac, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
North Point Plaza |
|
Tampa, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
The Shoppes at New Tampa |
|
Wesley Chapel, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Paradise Shoppes of Ellenwood |
|
Ellenwood, Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Paradise Village Gateway |
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Concourse Village |
|
Jupiter, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Millenia Crossing |
|
Orlando, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Echelon Village Plaza |
|
Voorhees, New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hub |
|
Hempstead, New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larkins Corner |
|
Boothwyn, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashbridge Square |
|
Downingtown, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southmont Plaza |
|
Easton, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midtowne Park |
|
Anderson, South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White Oak Village |
|
Richmond, Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Acquired |
|
(B) |
Acquired its partner’s |
|
(C) |
Acquired from the DDR BRE IV joint venture. The purchase price is equal to the estimated fair value of the properties plus transaction costs incurred. |
|
(D) |
Acquired from the DDR BRE III joint venture. The purchase price is equal to the estimated fair value of the properties plus transaction costs incurred. |
The fair value of acquisitions was allocated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Amortization Period (in Years) |
|||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|||
Land |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
(A) |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
(A) |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
In-place leases (including lease origination costs and fair market value of leases) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets assumed (including cash and restricted cash)(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Mortgage debt assumed at fair value |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Less: Below-market leases |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Other liabilities assumed |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Fair value of non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Net assets acquired |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Depreciated in accordance with the Company’s policy (Note 1). |
(B) |
Cash and restricted cash assumed is reflected as Distributions from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows. |
F-21
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Consideration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (including debt repaid at closing) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Gain (loss) on Sale and Change in Control of Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Carrying value of previously held common equity interests (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Transfer and redemption of preferred equity interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(A) |
|
Included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations are $
6. |
Other Assets and Intangibles, net |
Other assets and intangibles consist of the following (in thousands):
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-place leases, net |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Above-market leases, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease origination costs, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant relationships, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease ROU assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets, net |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below-market leases, net (other liabilities) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(A) Operating lease ROU assets are discussed further in Note 7.
Amortization expense related to the Company’s intangibles, excluding above- and below-market leases, was as follows (in millions):
Year |
|
Expense |
|
|
2021 |
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
Estimated net future amortization associated with the Company’s intangibles is as follows (in millions):
Year |
|
Income |
|
|
Expense |
|
||
2022 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
7. |
Leases |
Lessee
The Company is engaged in the operation of shopping centers that are either owned or, with respect to certain shopping centers, operated under long-term ground leases that expire at various dates through 2070. The Company also leases office space in the ordinary course of business under lease agreements that expire at various dates through 2029. Certain of the lease agreements include variable payments for reimbursement of common area expenses. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception.
Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
Classification |
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Operating Lease ROU Assets |
|
Other Assets, Net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating Lease Liabilities |
|
Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease expenses, including straight-line expense, included in Operating and Maintenance Expense for the Company’s ground leases and General and Administrative expense for its office leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||||||
Classification |
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Operating and Maintenance |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
General and Administrative(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lease costs |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(A) |
Includes short-term leases and variable lease costs, which are immaterial. |
Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating leases was as follows:
|
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Weighted-Average Remaining Lease Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted-Average Discount Rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement — operating cash flows from lease liabilities (in thousands) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
As determined under Topic 842, maturities of lease liabilities were as follows for the years ended December 31, (in thousands):
Year |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2022 |
|
$ |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
|
2026 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
Total lease payments |
|
|
|
|
Less imputed interest |
|
|
( |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
Lessor
Space in the Company’s shopping centers is leased to tenants pursuant to agreements that provide for terms generally ranging from
F-23
The scheduled future minimum rental income from rental properties under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant leases (including those on the cash basis), assuming no new or renegotiated leases or option extensions, as determined under Topic 842 for such premises for the years ending December 31, were as follows (in thousands):
Year |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2022 |
|
$ |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
|
2026 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
8. |
Revolving Credit Facilities |
The following table discloses certain information regarding the Company’s Revolving Credit Facilities (as defined below) (in millions):
|
|
Carrying Amount at December 31, |
|
|
Weighted-Average Interest Rate(A) at December 31, |
|
|
Maturity Date at |
|||||||
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
|
December 31, 2021 |
||
Unsecured Credit Facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNC Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Interest rate on variable-rate debt was calculated using the base rate and spreads effective at December 31, 2020. |
The Company maintains an unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, arranged by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank, N.A., RBC Capital Markets and U.S. Bank National Association (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”). The Unsecured Credit Facility provides for borrowings of up to $
The Company maintains a $
The Company’s borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facilities bear interest at variable rates at the Company’s election, based on either LIBOR plus a specified spread (
F-24
December 31, 2021) or the Alternative Base Rate, as defined in the respective facilities, plus a specified spread (
9. |
Unsecured and Secured Indebtedness |
The following table discloses certain information regarding the Company’s unsecured and secured indebtedness (in millions):
|
|
Carrying Value at December 31, |
|
|
Interest Rate(A) at December 31, |
|
|
Maturity Date at |
||||||||||
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
December 31, 2021 |
||||
Unsecured indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes(B) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2027 |
||
Senior notes – discount, net |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unamortized debt issuance costs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Senior Notes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net unamortized debt issuance costs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Term Loan |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage indebtedness – Fixed Rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2025 |
||
Mortgage indebtedness – Variable Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
||
Net unamortized debt issuance costs |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Indebtedness |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
The interest rates reflected above for the senior notes represent the range of the coupon rate of the notes outstanding. All other interest rates presented are a weighted average of the outstanding debt. Interest rate on variable-rate debt was calculated using the base rate and spreads in effect at December 31, 2021 and 2020. |
(B) |
Effective interest rates ranged from |
Senior Notes
The Company’s various fixed-rate senior notes have interest coupon rates that averaged
Term Loan
The Company maintains a term loan with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and PNC and KeyBank National Association, as syndication agents (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan accrues interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR) or the Alternative Base Rate, as defined in the facility, plus a specified spread based on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt ratings (
Mortgages Payable
Mortgages payable, collateralized by real estate with a net book value of $
F-25
Scheduled Principal Repayments
The scheduled principal payments of the Revolving Credit Facilities ($
Year |
|
Amount |
|
|
2022 |
|
$ |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
|
|
2025 |
|
|
|
|
2026 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized fair market value of assumed debt |
|
|
|
|
Net unamortized debt issuance costs |
|
|
( |
) |
Total indebtedness |
|
$ |
|
|
Total gross fees paid by the Company for the Revolving Credit Facilities and term loans in 2021, 2020 and 2019 aggregated $
10. |
Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures of financial instruments:
Other Fair Value Instruments
See discussion of fair value considerations of joint venture investments in Note 14.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities
The carrying amounts reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets for these financial instruments approximated fair value because of their short-term maturities.
Debt
The fair market value of senior notes is determined using a pricing model to approximate the trading price of the Company’s public debt. The fair market value for all other debt is estimated using a discounted cash flow technique that incorporates future contractual interest and principal payments and a market interest yield curve with adjustments for duration, optionality and risk profile, including the Company’s non-performance risk and loan to value. The Company’s senior notes and all other debt are classified as Level 2 and Level 3, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy.
Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimated fair values of financial instruments. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments.
Carrying values that are different from estimated fair values are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2021 |
|
|
December 31, 2020 |
|
||||||||||
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
||||
Senior Notes |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revolving Credit Facilities and Term Loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
11. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
Legal Matters
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal proceedings, which, taken together, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is also subject to a variety of legal actions for personal injury or property damage arising in the ordinary course of its business, most of which are covered by insurance. While the resolution of all matters
F-26
cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of such legal proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial position or results of operations.
Separation Charges
The Company recorded separation charges aggregating $
Commitments and Guaranties
In conjunction with the redevelopment of various shopping centers, the Company has entered into commitments with general contractors for the construction or redevelopment of shopping centers aggregating approximately $
At December 31, 2021, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $
12. |
Non-Controlling Interests, Preferred Shares, Common Shares and Common Shares in Treasury |
Non-Controlling Interests
In December 2021, the Company acquired its partner’s
The Company had
Preferred Shares
In 2021, the Company redeemed all $
The depositary shares, representing the Class A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (“Class A Preferred Shares”), each represent 1/20 of a Class A Preferred Share and have a liquidation value of $
The Company’s authorized preferred shares consist of the following:
|
• |
|
|
• |
|
|
• |
|
Common Share Dividends
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Common share dividends declared per share |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-27
Common Shares Issuance
In 2021, the Company issued and sold
Common Shares – Continuous Equity Program
In 2021, the Company offered and sold
Common Shares in Treasury
In 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a $
13.Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The changes in Accumulated OCI by component are as follows (in thousands):
|
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges |
|
|
Foreign Currency Items |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance, December 31, 2018 |
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash flow hedges reclassed to earnings(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2019 |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Change in cash flow hedges reclassed to earnings(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2021 |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(A) |
Classified in Interest Expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2020, $ |
(B) |
Represents the release of foreign currency translation related to the sale of a parcel of undeveloped land in Richmond Hill, Ontario, owned by one of the Company’s joint ventures (Note 3). |
14. |
Impairment Charges and Reserves |
The Company recorded impairment charges and reserves based on the difference between the carrying value of the assets or investments and the estimated fair market value as follows (in millions):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Reserve of preferred equity interests(A) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Assets marketed for sale(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped land(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impairment charges |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-28
(A) |
As a result of an aggregate valuation allowance on its preferred equity interests in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures that were transferred or redeemed in the fourth quarter of 2020. |
(B) |
In 2021, the impairment charges recorded were triggered by a change in the hold period assumptions. In 2020 and 2019, impairments recorded were triggered by indicative bids received. |
Items Measured at Fair Value
For the valuation of the preferred equity interests, prior to the closing of the transactions with Blackstone, the significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis included the discount rate, projected net operating income, the timing of the expected redemption and the exit capitalization rates. For operational real estate assets, the significant valuation assumptions included the capitalization rate used in the income capitalization valuation, as well as the projected property net operating income. For projects under development or not at stabilization, the significant assumptions included the discount rate, the timing and the estimated costs for the construction completion and project stabilization, projected net operating income and the exit capitalization rate. These valuations were calculated based on market conditions and assumptions made by management at the time the valuation adjustments and impairments were recorded, which may differ materially from actual results if market conditions or the underlying assumptions change.
The following table presents information about the fair value of real estate that was impaired, and therefore, measured on a fair value basis, along with the related impairment charge, for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. The table also indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques used by the Company to determine such fair value (in millions).
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total Impairment Charges |
|
|||||
December 31, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held and used |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held and used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred equity interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held and used |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred equity interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used by the Company to determine the fair value for the year ended December 31, 2021 (in millions):
|
|
Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Technique |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Range |
|
Average |
|
Impairment of consolidated assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Indicative Bid(A) |
|
Indicative Bid(A) |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used by the Company to determine the fair value for the year ended December 31, 2020 (in millions):
|
|
Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Description |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Technique |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Range |
|
|
Average |
|
||
Impairment of consolidated assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Indicative Bid(A) |
|
Indicative Bid(A) |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Preferred equity interests |
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow |
|
Discount Rate |
|
6.6%–10.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal Capitalization Rate |
|
6.6%–10.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI Growth Rate |
|
0% |
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Fair value measurements based upon an indicative bid and developed by third-party sources (including offers and comparable sales values), subject to the Company’s corroboration for reasonableness. The Company does not have access to certain unobservable inputs used by these third parties to determine these estimated fair values. |
F-29
15. |
Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Employee Benefits |
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s equity-based award plans provide for grants to Company employees and directors of incentive and non-qualified options to purchase common shares, rights to receive the appreciation in value of common shares, awards of common shares subject to restrictions on transfer, awards of common shares issuable in the future upon satisfaction of certain conditions and rights to purchase common shares and other awards based on common shares. Under the terms of the plans,
Stock Options
Stock options may be granted at per-share prices not less than fair market value at the date of grant and must be exercised within the maximum contractual term of
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|||
|
Number of Options (Thousands) |
|
|
Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Remaining Contractual Term (Years) |
|
|
Intrinsic Value (Thousands) |
|
||||
Balance December 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2021, all stock option compensation cost was recognized. For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash received for employee stock option exercises that were primarily settled with newly issued common shares or with treasury shares was $
Restricted Share Units
The Board of Directors approved grants to officers of the Company of restricted common share units (“RSUs”) of
Performance-Based Restricted Share Units (PRSUs)
F-30
The payout of the PRSUs will vary based on relative total shareholder return performance measured over the applicable performance period, with the ultimate payout ranging from a level of
Under the anti-dilution provisions of the Company’s equity incentive plan and the respective PRSU award agreement, the PRSUs issued in 2017 and 2018 were adjusted as of the spin-off of RVI, effective July 1, 2018, as determined by the Company’s compensation committee. The number of PRSUs was adjusted so as to retain the same intrinsic value immediately after the spin-off that the PRSU awards had immediately prior to the spin-off. In particular, upon consummation of the spin-off of RVI, the 2017 and 2018 PRSU awards were adjusted to: (1) retain the original SITE Centers’ relative total shareholder return (“RTSR”) peer group; (2) retain the SITE Centers’ beginning share price used for RTSR purposes and (3) measure ending share price as SITE Centers’ ending price plus RVI’s split-adjusted ending price (with any dividends paid during the performance period deemed reinvested into additional SITE Centers shares). Effective at the date of the spin-off, because these awards are dual-indexed to both the Company’s and RVI’s stock performance, the 2017 and 2018 PRSU awards are accounted for as liability awards and marked to fair value on a quarterly basis. In 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded a mark-to-market adjustment of $
Summary of Unvested Share Awards
The following table reflects the activity for the unvested awards pursuant to all restricted stock grants:
|
Awards (Thousands) |
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
||
Unvested at December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
As of December 31, 2021, total unrecognized compensation for the restricted awards granted under the plans as summarized above was $
Deferred Compensation Plans
The Company maintains a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all of the officers and employees of the Company in accordance with the provisions of the Code. Also, for certain officers, the Company maintains the Elective Deferred Compensation Plan and Equity Deferred Compensation Plan, both non-qualified plans, which permit the deferral of base salaries, commissions and annual performance-based cash bonuses or receipt of restricted shares. In addition, directors of the Company are permitted to defer all or a portion of their fees pursuant to the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, a non-qualified plan. All of these plans were fully funded at December 31, 2021.
F-31
16. |
Earnings Per Share |
The following table provides a reconciliation of net income and the number of common shares used in the computations of “basic” earnings per share (“EPS”), which utilizes the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding without regard to dilutive potential common shares, and “diluted” EPS, which includes all such shares (in thousands, except per share amounts).
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Numerators – Basic and Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Write-off of preferred share original issuance costs |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Preferred dividends |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Earnings attributable to unvested shares and OP Units |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net income attributable to common shareholders after allocation to participating securities |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominators – Number of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic – Average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed conversion of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRSUs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OP units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted – Average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Diluted |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Basic average shares outstanding do not include restricted shares totaling
The following potentially dilutive securities were considered in the calculation of EPS:
|
• |
For the year ended December 31, 2021, PRSUs issued to certain executives in March 2021, March 2020 and March 2019 were considered in the computation of dilutive EPS. For the year ended December 31, 2020, PRSUs issued to certain executives in March 2020, March 2019 and March 2018 were considered in the computation of dilutive EPS. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the PRSUs issued in March 2019 and March 2018 were considered in the computation of dilutive EPS and the PRSUs issued in March 2017 were not considered in the computation of dilutive EPS, as the calculation was anti-dilutive. |
|
• |
The agreements to offer and sell shares on a forward basis for approximately |
|
• |
The exchange into common shares associated with OP Units was included in the computation of diluted EPS for the year ending December 31, 2021. The exchange into common shares associated with OP Units was not included in the computation of diluted EPS for December 31, 2020 and 2019, because the effect of assuming conversion was anti-dilutive (Note 12). |
|
• |
Options to purchase |
17. |
Income Taxes |
The Company elected to be treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1993. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute at least
F-32
Company distributed sufficient taxable income for each of the
If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain foreign, state and local taxes on its income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, the Company has a TRS that is subject to federal, state and local income taxes on any taxable income generated from its operational activity.
In order to maintain its REIT status, the Company must meet certain income tests to ensure that its gross income consists of passive income and not income from the active conduct of a trade or business. The Company utilizes its TRS to the extent certain fee and other miscellaneous non-real estate-related income cannot be earned by the REIT.
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company made a net payment of $
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Book (loss) income before income taxes |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The differences between total income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income before taxes with respect to its TRS activity were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
TRS |
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Statutory Rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
Statutory rate applied to pre-tax (loss) income |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
State tax expense net of federal income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax impact of contributions of assets |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax impact of tax rate change |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Valuation allowance decrease based on impact of tax rate change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance (decrease) increase – other deferred |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Expiration of capital loss carryforward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
( |
%) |
|
|
|
% |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities of the Company’s TRS were as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets(A) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Valuation allowance |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Net deferred tax asset |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(A) |
At December 31, 2021, primarily attributable to $ |
F-33
Reconciliation of GAAP net income attributable to SITE Centers to taxable income is as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
GAAP net income attributable to SITE Centers |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Plus: Book depreciation and amortization(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Tax depreciation and amortization(A) |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Book/tax differences on losses from capital transactions |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Joint venture equity (earnings) loss, net(A) |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Deferred income |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous book/tax differences, net |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income before adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net operating loss carryforward |
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income subject to the |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(A) |
Depreciation expense from majority-owned subsidiaries and affiliates, which is consolidated for financial reporting purposes but not for tax reporting purposes, is included in the reconciliation item “Joint venture equity (earnings) loss, net.” |
Reconciliation between cash and stock dividends paid and the dividends paid deduction is as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Dividends paid |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Less: Dividends designated to prior year |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Plus: Dividends designated from the following year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Return of capital |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Dividends paid deduction |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
18. |
Segment Information |
In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company transferred and redeemed its loan investments (preferred equity interests) in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in exchange for the acquisition of certain of the underlying assets of the
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Shopping Centers |
|
|
Loan Investments |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
||||
Rental income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operation expenses |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Unallocated expenses(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Equity in net income of joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve of preferred equity interests, net |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
As of December 31, 2020: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross real estate assets |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-34
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Shopping Centers |
|
|
Loan Investments |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
||||
Rental income |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business interruption income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operation expenses |
|
( |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Net operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated expenses(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Equity in net income of joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve of preferred equity interests |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
) |
Gain on disposition of real estate, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
As of December 31, 2019: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross real estate assets |
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Notes receivable, net(B) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
( |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
(A) |
Unallocated expenses consist of General and Administrative Expenses and Interest Expense as listed in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. |
(B) |
In 2019, amount includes BRE DDR Joint Venture preferred investment interests. This note receivable was used as part of the consideration paid to acquire certain of the underlying assets of two joint ventures. |
19.Subsequent Events
In the first quarter of 2022, the Company acquired Artesia Village (Scottsdale, Arizona) for $
F-35
SCHEDULE II
SITE Centers Corp.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
For the Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019
(In thousands)
|
Balance at Beginning of Year |
|
|
Charged to Expense |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
Balance at End of Year |
|
||||
Year ended December 31, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(A) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets(B) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(A) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets(B) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(A) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets(B) |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(A) |
Includes allowances on straight-line rents and reserve of preferred equity interests and accrued interest ($ |
(B) |
Amounts charged to expense are discussed further in Note 17. |
F-36
SCHEDULE III
SITE Centers Corp.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost |
|
|
Total Cost(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction (C) |
||||
Location |
Land |
|
|
Improvements |
|
|
Land(2) |
|
|
Improvements(3) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Depreciation(4) |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Encumbrances(5) |
|
|
Acquisition (A) |
||||||||
Phoenix, AZ |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buena Park, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fontana, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Beach, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oakland, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roseville, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Centennial, CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado Springs, CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denver, CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parker, CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guilford, CT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windsor Court, CT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boynton Beach, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brandon, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brandon, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brandon, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delray Beach, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fort Walton Beach, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jupiter, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melbourne, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naples, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palm Harbor, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plantation, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tamarac, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wesley Chapel, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Winter Garden, FL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlanta, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumming, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumming, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumming, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
SCHEDULE III
SITE Centers Corp.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost |
|
|
Total Cost(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction (C) |
||||
Location |
Land |
|
|
Improvements |
|
|
Land(2) |
|
|
Improvements(3) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Depreciation(4) |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Encumbrances(5) |
|
|
Acquisition (A) |
||||||||
Douglasville, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ellenwood, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roswell, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snellville, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suwanee, GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, IL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, IL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schaumburg, IL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merriam, KS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everett, MA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Framingham, MA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brentwood, MO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Hanover, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edgewater, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freehold, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hamilton, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Princeton, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voorhees, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Long Branch, NJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hempstead, NY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte, NC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte, NC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte, NC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius, NC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cincinnati, OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Columbus, OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dublin, OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mason, OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stow, OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westlake, OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portland, OR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portland, OR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boothwyn, PA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Downingtown, PA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Easton, PA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
SCHEDULE III
SITE Centers Corp.
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2021
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost |
|
|
Total Cost(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction (C) |
||||
Location |
Land |
|
|
Improvements |
|
|
Land(2) |
|
|
Improvements(3) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Depreciation(4) |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Encumbrances(5) |
|
|
Acquisition (A) |
||||||||
Anderson, SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mount Pleasant, SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brentwood, TN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highland Village, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Round Rock, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Antonio, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Antonio, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Antonio, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlottesville, VA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlottesville, VA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fairfax, VA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richmond, VA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richmond, VA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Springfield, VA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Balance (SITE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes was approximately $ |
(2) |
Includes $ |
(3) |
Includes $ |
(4) |
Depreciation and amortization is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: |
|
Buildings |
|
Useful lives, 31.5 to |
|
Building improvements and fixtures |
|
Useful lives, ranging from 3 to |
|
Tenant improvements |
|
|
(5) |
Excludes fair market value of debt adjustments and net loan costs aggregating $ |
F-39
SCHEDULE III
The changes in Total Real Estate Assets are as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developments, improvements and expansions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments of property carrying values (Impairments) |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Disposals(A) |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Balance at end of year |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
(A) |
Includes the write-off of fully amortized tenant improvements. |
The changes in Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization are as follows (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Depreciation for year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Balance at end of year |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-40
SCHEDULE IV
SITE Centers Corp.
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
December 31, 2021
(In thousands)
The Company did not have any mortgage loans outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Changes in mortgage loans are summarized below (in thousands):
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|||||
|
2020 |
|
|
2019 |
|
||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Additions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions during period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan loss reserve |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Collections of principal and interest |
|
( |
) |
|
|
( |
) |
Balance at close of period |
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
SITE Centers Corp. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ David R. Lukes |
|
|
|
David R. Lukes, Chief Executive Officer, |
|
|
|
|
Date: February 24, 2022 |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 24th day of February, 2022.
/s/ David R. Lukes |
|
Chief Executive Officer, President & Director |
David R. Lukes |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Conor Fennerty |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer |
Conor Fennerty |
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Christa A. Vesy |
|
Executive Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer |
Christa A. Vesy |
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
/s/ Linda B. Abraham |
|
Director |
Linda B. Abraham |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Terrance R. Ahern |
|
Director |
Terrance R. Ahern |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jane E. DeFlorio |
|
Director |
Jane E. DeFlorio |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas Finne |
|
Director |
Thomas Finne |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Victor B. MacFarlane |
|
Director |
Victor B. MacFarlane |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alexander Otto |
|
Director |
Alexander Otto |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dawn M. Sweeney |
|
Director |
Dawn M. Sweeney |
|
|