-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, SQ3WFz7OL/0c89iBHenuRNpaEvio+Rv4rhNgbq+phEsQ96G3LYOZc3rLHnLzlyxg G3HCF27Ybc2P5TLUK1uc/g== 0000950124-01-001239.txt : 20010314 0000950124-01-001239.hdr.sgml : 20010314 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950124-01-001239 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K405 PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20001231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20010313 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000894158 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS [2834] IRS NUMBER: 133808303 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K405 SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-12584 FILM NUMBER: 1566812 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 425 WOODSMILL RD CITY: ST LOUIS STATE: MO ZIP: 63017 BUSINESS PHONE: 3145799899 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 425 WOODSMILL RD CITY: ST LOUIS STATE: MO ZIP: 63017 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: SHEFFIELD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19940606 10-K405 1 c60732e10-k405.txt FORM 10-K 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED) Commission file number 1-12584 SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter) DELAWARE 13-3808303 (State of Incorporation) (IRS Employee Identification Number) 425 SOUTH WOODSMILL ROAD 63017 (314) 579-9899 ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI (Zip Code) (Registrant's telephone, (Address of principal executive offices) including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: Title of Class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock. $.01 par value American Stock Exchange SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X]Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] The aggregate market value at March 6, 2001 of the voting stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing price of $3.70 per share of such stock on the American Stock Exchange on such date) was approximately $77,515,000. Solely for the purposes of this calculation, shares held by the registrant's directors and executive officers and beneficial owners of 10% or more of the Company's Common Stock of the registrant have been excluded. Such exclusion should not be deemed a determination or an admission by the registrant that such persons are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant. Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: At March 6, 2001, there were outstanding 28,829,276 shares of the registrant's Common Stock, $.01 par value. 2 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Certain portions of the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2000 are incorporated by reference in Items 6, 7 and 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and attached as Exhibit 13 hereto. Certain portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than April 30, 2001 pursuant to Regulation 14A are incorporated by reference in Items 10 through 13 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 2 3 PART I The following contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty. Although the Company believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this report will prove to be accurate. The Company's actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in the forward-looking statements. See "Business -- Certain Risk Factors that May Affect Future Results, Financial Condition and Market Price of Securities" included herein for a discussion of factors that could contribute to such material differences. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives and plans of the Company will be achieved. ITEM 1. BUSINESS THE COMPANY Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly Sheffield Medical Technologies Inc.) ("Sheffield" or the "Company") was incorporated under Canadian law in October 1986. In May 1992, the Company became domesticated as a Wyoming Corporation pursuant to a "continuance" procedure under Wyoming law. In January 1995, the Company's shareholders approved the proposal to reincorporate the Company in Delaware, which was effected on June 13, 1995. The Company is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on development and commercialization of later stage pharmaceutical opportunities utilizing proprietary pulmonary delivery technologies over a range of therapeutic areas. Through our alliances with Elan Corporation plc ("Elan"), Zambon Group SpA ("Zambon"), and Siemens AG ("Siemens"), Sheffield is currently developing nine respiratory and systemic (non-respiratory) therapies to be delivered through the Company's Metered Solution Inhaler, or MSI, and Aerosol Drug Delivery System, or ADDS. Sheffield believes these pulmonary delivery technologies will allow the Company to capitalize on the growing drug delivery market by providing both advanced respiratory treatments and patient-friendly alternatives for therapies that can currently be administered only by injection or other inconvenient means. In 1997, the Company acquired rights to the MSI, a portable nebulizer-based pulmonary delivery system, through a worldwide exclusive license and supply arrangement with Siemens. In June 1998, Sheffield sublicensed to Zambon worldwide marketing and development rights to respiratory products to be delivered by the MSI. During the second half of 1998, the Company acquired the rights to an additional pulmonary delivery technology, the ADDS from a subsidiary of Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. ("Aeroquip-Vickers"). The ADDS technology is a new generation propellant-based pulmonary delivery system. Additionally, during 1998, Sheffield licensed from Elan, the Ultrasonic Pulmonary Drug Absorption System ("UPDAS(TM)"), a novel disposable unit dose nebulizer system, and Elan's Absorption Enhancing Technology ("Enhancing Technology"), a therapeutic agent to increase the systemic absorption of drugs. In October 1999, the Company licensed Elan's Nanocrystal(TM) dispersion technology to be used in developing certain steroid products. BUSINESS STRATEGY The Company's business strategy is to seek out opportunities to acquire and develop commercially attractive pharmaceutical products, primarily in the area of pulmonary drug delivery. The Company recognizes that no single technology in the area of pulmonary drug delivery will meet the needs of patients and providers of the wide variety of compounds (both for respiratory disease and systemic disease therapy) that may benefit therapeutically and commercially from pulmonary delivery. As a result, it remains the Company's goal to acquire or in-license a portfolio of pulmonary delivery technologies to meet the broadest based market opportunity. The Company intends to selectively enter into joint ventures or other forms of strategic alliances to defray or reduce significant development and manufacturing costs associated with these opportunities that otherwise might be borne by the Company while retaining certain commercial rights. 3 4 The Company will continue to be opportunistic in the acquisition and/or in-licensing of technologies or products that meet the Company's strategic objectives. Such opportunities include: (1) technologies or products that meet the needs of healthcare communities that are not currently served, (2) technologies or products that can effectively be developed when viewed in light of the commercial opportunity and competitive environment within the U.S. market, (3) technologies or products that will be of substantive interest to other companies with regard to co-development and co-marketing with limited incremental investment by the Company, and (4) products and technologies with the potential for marketing to a specialty group or limited physician audience. The Company plans to pay special attention to platform technologies that can be developed into multiple applications in varying therapeutic categories. STRATEGIC ALLIANCES The Company believes a less costly, more predictable path to commercial development of therapeutics can be achieved through the creative use of collaborations and alliances, combined with state-of-the-art technology and experienced management. The Company is applying this strategy to the development of both respiratory and systemic pharmaceutical products to be delivered through the Company's proprietary pulmonary delivery systems. Using these pulmonary delivery systems as platforms, the Company has established strategic alliances for developing its initial products with Elan, Siemens and Zambon. In a collaboration with Zambon, the Company is developing a range of pharmaceutical products delivered by the MSI to treat respiratory diseases. Under its agreement with Zambon, MSI commercial rights for respiratory products have been sublicensed to Zambon in return for an equity investment in the Company (approximately 10%). Zambon has committed to fund the development costs for respiratory compounds delivered by the MSI, as well as make certain milestone payments and pay royalties on net sales to the Company resulting from these MSI products. Initial products for respiratory disease therapy delivered through the MSI include albuterol, ipratropium, cromolyn and inhaled steroids. The Company has maintained co-marketing rights for the U.S. The Company's ability to co-market MSI respiratory products in the U.S. requires no additional payment to Zambon by the Company. Zambon and the Company are having discussions regarding the possible modification of their agreement, including the future marketing arrangements for the MSI respiratory products in the United States. As part of a strategic alliance with Elan, a world leader in pharmaceutical delivery technology, the Company is developing therapies for systemic diseases to be delivered to the lungs using both the ADDS and MSI. In 1998, the systemic applications of the MSI and ADDS were licensed to Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd. ("SPD"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In addition, two Elan technologies, UPDAS and the Enhancing Technology, have also been licensed to SPD. The Company has retained exclusive rights outside of the strategic alliance to respiratory disease applications utilizing the ADDS technology and the two Elan technologies. Two systemic compounds for pulmonary delivery are currently under development. For the treatment of breakthrough pain, the Company is developing morphine delivered through the MSI. Ergotamine, a therapy for the treatment of migraine headaches, is currently being developed for use in the ADDS. In addition to the above alliance with Elan, in 1999, the Company and Elan formed a joint venture, Respiratory Steroid Delivery, Ltd. ("RSD"), a 80.1% owned subsidiary of the Company and 19.9% owned by Elan, to develop certain inhaled steroid products to treat certain respiratory diseases using Elan's NanoCrystal(TM) dispersion technology. The inhaled steroid products to be developed include a propellant-based steroid formulation for delivery though the ADDS, a solution-based unit-dose-packaged steroid formulation for delivery using a conventional tabletop nebulizer, and a solution-based steroid formulation for delivery using the MSI system. Outside of these alliances, the Company owns the worldwide rights to respiratory disease applications of all of its technologies, subject only to the MSI respiratory rights sublicensed to Zambon. In addition to the above, the Company has several agreements in place for the manufacture of its delivery systems. Siemens, a multi-national engineering and electronics conglomerate, serves as the manufacturer of the MSI. Siemens also provides ongoing technical support in the design and testing of pharmaceutical products in the MSI. The interchangeable drug-containing cartridges in the MSI are being assembled and filled by Cheasapeake Biological Laboratories of Baltimore, Maryland. During 1999, the Company signed an agreement with an aerosol manufacturer, Medeva Pharmaceuticals MA, Inc., for the manufacture and supply of certain products to be delivered by the ADDS. 4 5 The Company is also currently in discussions with a number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies about potential collaborations for developing specific compounds (both respiratory and systemic) in the ADDS. Unlike the MSI, ADDS is a technology that lends itself to individual product applications in the respiratory market. While the ADDS technology may be applicable to a wide range of respiratory products, the Company believes that a full line of products delivered by ADDS is not necessary for commercial success. The reverse is true with the MSI, since one of the MSI's primary competitive advantages is the delivery of a range of drugs in interchangeable cartridges used with the parent nebulizer device. PULMONARY DELIVERY MARKET ENVIRONMENT The Company competes in the pulmonary delivery market. The principal use of pulmonary delivery has been in the treatment of respiratory diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ("COPD") and cystic fibrosis. There is significant advantage in aerosol therapy for respiratory disease. Pulmonary administration delivers the medication directly onto the lung's epithelial surfaces. In many cases, this means that drugs can be effective in very low doses -- reducing the side effects usually associated with systemic administration. In 1998, industry sources estimate there were approximately 35.5 million asthma patients and 49.5 million COPD patients worldwide. These sources indicate that the number of newly diagnosed patients is growing at a rate in excess of 10% annually due to an increase in worldwide air pollution levels and the overall aging of the population. By the year 2005, the Company expects that there will be more than 19 million asthma patients in the United States alone. In addition, the competitive marketplace has been significantly affected by the worldwide phase out of clorofluorocarbons ("CFCs") pursuant to the Montreal Protocol. CFCs are the propellants traditionally used in metered dose inhalers ("MDIs"), which are the most common form of pulmonary delivery. Companies in the respiratory market have initiated significant programs to redevelop existing products using alternative propellants, dry powders or nebulizers. There is considerable interest in applying pulmonary delivery technology to systemic therapies that would benefit from the relatively easy administration to the circulatory system through the lungs. Work on pulmonary delivery of insulin by other pulmonary delivery companies has received significant public notice. There is a range of therapies that could provide a significant market opportunity if available in a pulmonarily delivered form. Today, three types of devices are widely used in pulmonary drug administration: metered dose inhalers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulizers. Metered Dose Inhalers. Currently, MDIs are the most commonly used pulmonary delivery system. It is estimated that in the United States 80% of pulmonary drug delivery is via MDI, with the majority of this use coming from adults with asthma and COPD. The main components of an MDI include a canister containing the drug mixed with propellant and surfactant, a mouthpiece that acts as the delivery conduit and the actuator seat for the release of the drug. The initial velocity of particles as they leave an inhaler is very high -- approximately 2-7 meters per second -- resulting in wasted drug if the patient is not able to coordinate his/her breath with the delivery of aerosol into the mouth. A number of studies have demonstrated that as many as 60% of patients cannot accurately time their inspiration with the actuation of their inhaler which results in under medication and lack of compliance. Typically, less than 20% of delivered drug actually reaches the lungs. The primary advantages of an MDI include its small size, portability, fast usage time, and its availability for use with most respiratory drugs. Disadvantages of an MDI include patient coordination issues and efficient dose delivery. Additionally, because the use of CFCs traditionally used in MDIs are being phased out by international agreement (Montreal Protocol), alternative propellants and formulations are being developed. Over time, all current MDI users will be required to move to a non-CFC MDI or other alternative delivery systems. The majority of U.S. patients favor aerosol MDIs although a sizable percentage may not coordinate them properly. Dry Powder Inhalers. Dry powder inhalers ("DPIs") were introduced in the 1960s as single-dose inhalers. In these devices, the drug is loaded as a unit dose that is mechanically released as a powder for inhalation prior to each use. To date, these relatively cumbersome systems have been the primary form of DPI available in the United States, and account for approximately 1% of the total aerosol delivery market. 5 6 The inconvenience of the single dose DPI has been overcome outside of the U.S. with the development and introduction of multi-dose DPIs that can deliver up to 200 doses of medication. However, like the single dose systems, they are inspiratory flow rate dependent; that is, the amount of drug delivered to the lung depends on the patient's ability to inhale. Two of the most significant advantages of DPIs include (1) no hand-breath coordination is required as with MDIs; and (2) they contain no CFCs. However, most require a high inspiratory flow rate, which can be problematic in younger patients or patients with compromised lung function. In addition, they often present difficulties for those with manual disabilities (e.g., arthritis) or limited vision and, depending upon the powder load delivered, they may induce acute bronchospasm in sensitive individuals. Additionally, multi-dose powder inhalers are subject to moisture sensitivity either from the environment or patient breath and have had difficulty meeting U.S. regulatory standards for dose-to-dose variation. Nebulizers. The third widely-used aerosol delivery system is the nebulizer. Jet nebulizers, which are the most commonly used nebulizer, work on a stream of compressed air or oxygen that is forced through a narrow tube lying just above the surface of the liquid to be nebulized. It takes approximately 10 to 15 minutes to nebulize this amount of liquid. Studies suggest keeping the duration of nebulization below 10 minutes, as longer durations are associated with poor compliance. During nebulization only about 10% of the drug is delivered to the lungs; about 80% gets trapped in the reservoir, tubing and mask; the rest is exhaled. Nebulizers can be used for a wide range of patients, but are especially useful for those older and younger patients who cannot manage other inhaler devices. Nebulizers also play a key role in emergency room and intensive care treatment for patients with acute bronchospasm. Another feature exclusive to nebulizers is that a mixture of drugs can be administered in one sitting. However, currently approved nebulizers are bulky table-top units that are time consuming, have a high initial cost (often in excess of the amount reimbursable by managed care) and can be noisy during operation. METERED SOLUTION INHALER The MSI pulmonary drug delivery system has been developed to provide the therapeutic benefit of nebulization with the convenience of pressurized MDIs in one system. The MSI was developed to meet specific needs within the respiratory market, particularly for pediatric and geriatric patients suffering from asthma and COPD. Description of the MSI The MSI is comprised of two main components: (1) a reusable, pocket-size inhaler unit developed and manufactured for the Company by Siemens; and (2) drug cartridges containing multiple doses of drug formulation assembled and filled by Chesapeake Biological Laboratories. The cartridges are an integral part of the total system. The cartridge plus each drug formulation will be the subject of a separate drug device combination New Drug Application ("NDA"). The basic technology of the system involves the rapid nebulization of therapeutic agents using ultrasonic waves. This produces a concentrated cloud of medication delivered through the mouthpiece over a two to three second period for inhalation. The key components of the technology are housed in the inhaler unit. They are the rechargeable battery-operated motor, ultrasonic horn and drug cartridge. The pocketsize MSI allows for administration of a range of drugs in a single, simple-to-use, environmentally friendly delivery system. Each cartridge contains, depending on formulation, approximately a one to two month supply of the drug. To use the MSI system, a patient simply selects the appropriate color-coded drug cartridge and places it into the chamber of the inhaler unit. Pressing the "on" button activates a small electrical motor that transports a precise dose of drug from the cartridge chamber to the ultrasonic horn -- transforming the solution into an aerosolized cloud. The patient's inspiratory breath carries this cloud of medication directly to the lungs where it is needed. The dose delivered by the MSI is very accurate and consistent because: (1) the MSI is designed to be inspiratory flow rate independent; that is, delivery of the drug does not depend upon the patient's ability to inhale forcefully, and (2) the MSI does not require a high level of coordination between inspiration and actuation of the device. The patient's natural breath carries the medication directly to the lungs, minimizing the amount of drug deposited in the mouth and throat. 6 7 MSI Advantages The Company believes that the MSI provides significant advantages over other drug delivery systems. It is particularly suited for younger and older asthma patients, as well as for older COPD patients who have difficulty using MDIs and currently have to depend on larger, more time-consuming tabletop nebulizers for delivery of their medications. These potential advantages include: Accuracy. The superior engineering and patient-friendly design of the MSI is intended to provide minimal dose-to-dose variability. Patients can therefore expect to receive the right therapeutic dose consistently. Testing of the MSI system has shown that dose-to-dose variability with the MSI is significantly better than the current FDA requirement. Enhanced Patient Compliance. The pocketsize, portable MSI unit is designed to combine the therapeutic benefits of nebulization with the convenience of pressurized metered dose inhalers. The drug dose is precisely measured and delivered in seconds, as compared to 10 to 15 minutes or more for the typical nebulizer. The device is easy to operate, requiring minimal coordination between actuation and inhalation for proper drug delivery. These benefits are expected to improve patient compliance with the proper administration of their respiratory medication. Another expected factor in enhanced patient compliance is the broad range of drugs that can be accommodated by the MSI, allowing patients on multiple medications to rely on one simple delivery system. Inspiratory Flow Rate Independence. Unlike most of the DPIs currently available (or in development), the MSI is designed to achieve a consistent and significant level of drug deposition over a broad range of inspiratory flow rates. This is especially important in younger patients or patients with compromised lung function (e.g., during an asthma attack) who have a difficult time breathing normally. Versatility. Many asthma and COPD patients are taking multiple inhalation medications. The MSI accommodates drug cartridges to allow for the administration of a broad range of frequently used respiratory drugs in a single, simple-to-use delivery system. The system includes an early warning mechanism that signals when the batteries need recharging or when the dosator is not functioning properly and a dose counter indicating when a new inhaler unit is required. These user-friendly features result in a simplified dosing procedure for both patients and their caregivers. Pulmonary Targeting. The particle size of the inhaled medication affects the effectiveness of drug delivery to the lung. Generally, a drug is "respirable" if the particle size is between two and five microns. Larger particles tend to deposit in the inhaler or in the patient's mouth and throat. Smaller particles tend to be exhaled. Within the respirable range, the MSI is designed to deliver particles specifically targeted for certain portions of the lungs; for example, the central lung for local treatment or the deep lung for enhanced absorption into the blood stream for systemic therapies. Environmentally Friendly. CFCs, the most commonly used propellant for MDI aerosols, are believed to adversely affect the Earth's ozone layer. They are subject to worldwide regulations aimed at eliminating their production and use within the decade under the Montreal Protocol. The MSI does not use CFCs or any other type of ozone depleting propellant. Economical. The Company believes that the MSI offers significant value to the patient because it is designed to allow a single device to be used with a complete family of respiratory medications available in cost-effective interchangeable cartridges. The inhaler unit itself is expected to have a life of two to three years. The initial cost of the inhaler unit is expected to be within the cost range that managed care providers will reimburse patients. The Company anticipates the combined cost to the patient of the device plus the drug filled cartridges will be comparable to the average cost per dose of the standard metered dose inhaler. MSI Product Pipeline in Development The Company is implementing a broad development strategy for the MSI. The Company and Zambon are developing a range of widely used respiratory drugs for delivery in the MSI. Potential candidates for respiratory disease therapy include albuterol, ipratropium, cromolyn, inhaled bronchial steroids and combination products, each of which is described below. Most patients who experience respiratory disease commonly use multiple medications to treat their conditions. 7 8 Among the drugs being developed for respiratory applications in the MSI system are: ALBUTEROL. Albuterol is a beta agonist used as rescue therapy for patients with asthma and COPD. It is the largest selling respiratory compound with U.S. sales of over $500 million in all dosage forms. It is available in a metered dose inhaler and nebulizer solution as well as solid and liquid dosage forms. Status: Zambon initiated a Phase II clinical trial in December 1999 which compared the MSI to a conventional albuterol-MDI. Findings from Phase II studies indicated that MSI-albuterol and MDI-albuterol were comparable in improving lung function in the 24 adult patients. An end of Phase II meeting has been scheduled with the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). IPRATROPIUM. Ipratropium is a bronchodilator used primarily to treat COPD patients. It is useful because of its anticholinergic properties, which reduce pulmonary congestion. It is available in a metered dose inhaler, nebulizer solution and a combination product with albuterol. Status: Zambon initiated a Phase I/II clinical trial in Europe in January 2000 assessing the safety and efficacy compared to a commercially available ipratropium product delivered by a MDI and placebo in patients with COPD. The results of the study indicated that both MSI-ipratropium and MDI-ipratropium improved lung function in the COPD patients. An Investigational New Drug Application ("IND") was filed with the FDA- in May 2000. CROMOLYN. Cromolyn is a non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drug used to reduce the underlying bronchial inflammation associated with asthma. It is extremely safe and it is most commonly used to treat pediatric patients. It is available in a MDI and nebulizer solution. Status: An IND was filed with the FDA in July 2000. INHALED BRONCHIAL STEROIDS. Inhaled bronchial steroids are anti-inflammatory agents. They address the underlying inflammation in the lungs of asthma and COPD patients. They are available in a metered dose inhaler. Steroids are the fastest growing category in the respiratory market, growing at 20% per year. Status: Formulation work is currently underway. An IND is being prepared for filing with the FDA. OTHER RESPIRATORY THERAPIES. In addition to the drugs listed above, the Company and Zambon are assessing the market potential for certain other respiratory therapies. These therapies may include a combination of an anti-inflammatory and beta agonist, and an anticholinergic and beta agonist, as well as antibiotics, cystic fibrosis treatments and a range of early stage biotech compounds that target respiratory disease. SYSTEMIC APPLICATIONS: Through its development alliance with Elan, the Company is currently evaluating certain drugs for systemic treatment by pulmonary delivery through the MSI. The first of these drugs, morphine, is for the treatment of severe pain. The pain management market includes patients with cancer, post-operative, migraine headache and chronic persistent pain. Narcotic analgesics for treatment of these severe forms of pain are estimated to exceed $1.0 billion in worldwide sales in the year 2000. The Company has identified a market opportunity for a rapid-acting, non-invasive treatment for breakthrough pain. Status: In July 1999, the Company completed a gamma scintigraphy/pharmacokinetic trial comparing morphine delivered via the MSI to subcutaneous injection. The MSI demonstrated good pulmonary deposition and very rapid absorption, more rapid peak blood levels vs. subcutaneous injection and low oral and throat deposition. The Company is currently seeking to attract a partner for the continued development and commercialization of this product. 8 9 AEROSOL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM The ADDS, a new generation MDI, was developed to correct major deficiencies associated with existing MDI technology. MDIs have provided convenient, safe, self-administered treatment for over 30 years and decrease the cost of therapy because they can be used by the patient at home with minimal medical supervision. However, proper use of current MDIs requires training and precise execution of the delivery technique. For these reasons, many patients do not use their MDIs in the prescribed manner to coordinate actuation and inhalation. Incorrect technique has been shown to result in little or no benefits from MDI use in half of all adult patients and in a greater proportion of children. Moreover, because of these coordination issues, most children under age five cannot use a standard MDI. Even with correct technique, current MDIs typically deliver less than 20% of the drug to the lungs of the patient. The remainder of the drug is wasted upon deposition on the back of the mouth, or by completely missing the airway. This results from: (1) the high linear velocity (two to seven meters/second) of the aerosol jet as it discharges; (2) incomplete evaporation of the propellant leading to large size droplets that deposit in the mouth and larynx rather than reaching the lung; and (3) inadequate mixing resulting in a non-uniform distribution of drug particles in the inspiratory flow stream. Drug deposited in the mouth and throat can be swallowed and absorbed systemically or, in the case of inhaled steroids, may create a local concentration of the drug that causes immunosuppression response and the development of fungal infections. In addition, swallowing beta agonist bronchodilators may result in adverse effects on heart rate, blood pressure, glucose and potassium. From a therapeutic view, the most serious problem with MDIs is inconsistency of delivery. With existing MDIs the actual dose can vary from 0% to 300% of the intended dose. Patients may not receive sufficient drug to achieve a therapeutic effect, or they may overdose with undesirable side effects. These conditions can lead to the need for emergency treatment. A major advantage for the ADDS technology is that it uses the same aerosol canisters and valves as are currently used in existing MDIs. As a result, existing aerosol facilities will be able to produce canisters with formulations optimized for use in ADDS. The only additional step required is to place the aerosol canister in the "device" prior to final packaging. This results in a cost effective product and provides numerous benefits to patients. The device along with the canister are disposable when the canister is empty. The ADDS technology features two improvements over existing MDIs and dry powder inhalers. Fluid dynamics modeling, in-vitro and human trials indicate that up to 50% of drug emitted by the ADDS reaches the lungs with oral deposition reduced to approximately 10%. Because of this increase in efficiency, ADDS should require less drug per actuation than existing devices to achieve the same therapeutic effect. This may result in more unit doses per drug canister than a conventional MDI, with less potential for adverse reactions. ADDS also features a unique proprietary triggering mechanism that actuates at the correct time during inhalation. It is designed to automatically adjust to the patient's breathing pattern to accommodate differences in age and disease state. This synchronous trigger is designed to reduce patient coordination problems and enhance patient compliance. Description of the ADDS The ADDS technology utilizes a standard aerosol MDI canister, encased in a compact device that provides an aerosol flow-control chamber and a synchronized triggering mechanism. Manipulation of the discharged drug- containing aerosol cloud is key to optimization of the efficiency and consistency for MDIs. The ADDS design uses fluid dynamics to: (1) reduce the velocity of the drug relative to the inspiratory breath velocity (less than one meter/second); (2) increase residence time of the aerosol droplets before exiting the device to allow near complete evaporation of the propellant; (3) increase droplet dispersion and mixing, thus increasing evaporation and improving vapor fraction at every point along the flow path; (4) reduce the diameter of the drug particles at the exit plane of the device; (5) decrease inertia of droplets to reduce impaction; and (6) improve timing of dose discharge with inspiratory breath for increased drug deposition in lungs. 9 10 The unique features of ADDS are: Aerosol Flow-Control Chamber. The aerosol flow-control chamber allows the patient to inhale through the device at a normal breathing rate, instead of a forced breath. The inspiratory breath establishes flow fields within the device that mix and uniformly disperse the drug in the breath. In the mouthpiece, nearly all the propellant is evaporated leaving only drug particles to be inspired, allowing a significant increase in the amount of drug delivered to the lungs. Only small amounts of drug deposit in the mouth and throat. Synchronizing Trigger Mechanism. A triggering and timing mechanism that is synchronized with the patient's inspiratory breath controls the discharge of the metering valve. ADDS can accommodate different inspiratory flowrates, so any patient can activate the triggering device. Similarly, the timing mechanism will automatically adjust to the flow generated by the patient, delaying or hastening discharge in proportion to the total volume passing through the flow control chamber. This feature accommodates differences in inspiratory flow characteristic of pulmonary disease states in children, adults and the infirm. ADDS Advantages The Company believes that the ADDS technology possesses many potential competitive advantages over other inhalation systems in both local respiratory and systemic applications. It is applicable to all age categories, eliminating the most troublesome problems of aerosol metered dose delivery. Increased efficiency allows for potential application to proteins and peptides formerly not considered as candidates for aerosol delivery. The performance characteristics of the ADDS are expected to translate into multiple benefits, including: Improved Drug Delivery Efficiency. A higher percentage of the drug emitted by the ADDS is delivered to the lungs than current inhalation systems while approximately 10% is lost through deposition in the mouth and throat. The improved delivery efficiency enhances efficacy, reduces side effects and provides greater consistency of dose administration. Greater Patient Compliance. The ADDS reduces technique dependence for simple, consistent dose-to-dose delivery, resulting in improved compliance with prescribed therapy. Broader Patient Base. The ADDS can be prescribed for a broader patient base since it is designed to be self-administered by children and the elderly as well as adult patients. Pharmacoeconomic Benefit. The ADDS has increased delivery efficiency with less waste, so patients can receive more unit doses per standard canister. This allows for a lower drug cost per day in addition to reducing prescription and payor costs because fewer pharmacy visits are required. ADDS Product Pipeline in Development ADDS SYSTEMIC THERAPIES. The development of systemic drugs using ADDS is being conducted as part of the Company's alliance with Elan. The first product to be developed is targeted to address migraine headaches. The Company is utilizing ergotamine tartrate as a proof-of-principle product. Ergotamine, an alpha adrenergic blocking agent, is a therapy to stop or prevent vascular headaches such as migraines. Migraine headaches affect 16-18 million Americans. Worldwide annual sales for the migraine therapy market are in excess of $2.3 billion with many patients unable to get satisfactory relief from currently available therapies. In fact, it is estimated that absenteeism and medical expenses resulting from migraine total $50 billion annually. Current oral drug therapies for the treatment of migraine headaches have slow onset of action, resulting in a medical need that may be better satisfied through pulmonary delivery. Status: In December 1999, the Company completed a gamma scintigraphy/pharmacokinetic trial comparing the ADDS to a conventional MDI. The trial showed successful delivery of the drug to all regions of lung with significantly reduced mouth and throat deposition, and rapid drug absorption. The Company is currently seeking to attract a partner for the continued development and commercialization of this product. 10 11 ADDS RESPIRATORY THERAPIES. The ADDS has broad applicability across respiratory disease therapies since it utilizes basic MDI delivery methods that are the most popular forms of respiratory delivery. The ADDS technology's ability to significantly minimize oral deposition makes it especially applicable to steroids and steroid combinations with which fungal overgrowth side effects are common. In addition, U.S. patients and physicians have indicated that they prefer metered dose aerosol delivery. The ADDS technology is positioned to take advantage of this built-in market preference for MDIs with its potential for superior performance, reduced adverse reactions and cost-effectiveness. Inhaled steroids are the fastest growing segment of the respiratory market and the largest in Europe. The features of the ADDS directly minimize the aspects of inhaled steroids that remain a concern to patients and physicians. The market for inhaled steroids on a worldwide basis is approximately $2.0 billion. Status: In September 2000, the Company completed a pilot study using the ADDS to deliver an undisclosed, patented respiratory drug used to treat asthma. The study measured the distribution of this respiratory drug delivered by ADDS compared to the distribution of this same drug delivered through a commercially available MDI in 12 healthy volunteers. Results of this study demonstrated that ADDS significantly increased drug deposition in all regions of the lung. ADDS delivered approximately 200% more drug to the lungs, deposited approximately 75% less drug in the mouth, and increased dosing consistency by approximately 55% compared to the currently marketed form of this same drug. An IND is being prepared for filing with the FDA on this respiratory drug. As with MSI, there remains opportunities for developing ADDS for a range of therapies either directly by the Company or in collaboration with strategic partners. Unlike the MSI, it is potentially advantageous for the Company to partner on a product-by-product basis, concentrating on prime partners to launch the system commercially and to aid in subsequent development with products developed specifically for exclusive commercialization by the Company. INHALED STEROID PRODUCTS In October 1999, the Company and Elan formed a separate joint venture to develop three inhaled steroid products to treat certain respiratory diseases that will utilize Elan's Nanocrystal dispersion technology and Sheffield's pulmonary delivery systems. Because of the difficulties in formulating steroids for delivery through a solution-based inhalation system, only one steroid product is currently available in the United States for delivery through a nebulizer. The estimated worldwide market for inhaled steroids is $2 billion annually and growing at 20% per year. The three products being formulated using Elan's Nanocrystal technology are 1) a propellant-based steroid formulation for inhalation in the ADDS; 2) a unit-dose packaged steroid formulation for inhalation delivery in a standard commercial tabletop device; and 3) a steroid formulation for inhalation delivery using the MSI. Formulation work is currently underway in all three of these inhaled steroid products. ULTRASONIC PULMONARY DRUG ABSORPTION SYSTEM The UPDAS(TM) is a novel ultrasonic pulmonary delivery system designed by Elan as a disposable unit dose nebulizer system. UPDAS was designed primarily for the delivery of proteins, peptides and other large molecules to the lungs for absorption into the bloodstream. Elan's preliminary research with UPDAS demonstrated unique atomization that may prevent denaturing of bioactive molecules and particle size distribution that meets the targets for local and systemic delivery. ABSORPTION ENHANCING TECHNOLOGY As part of the same transaction in which the Company acquired UPDAS, the Company also acquired a worldwide exclusive license to Elan's Absorption Enhancing Technology. While not a delivery system itself, the Enhancing Technology is a therapeutic agent identified by Elan to increase the systemic absorption of drugs delivered to the lungs. The Enhancing Technology will be utilized in conjunction with the Company's other pulmonary delivery systems. 11 12 EARLY STAGE RESEARCH PROJECTS As part of the Company's focus on later stage pharmaceutical opportunities, the Company is seeking to out-license its portfolio of early stage medical research projects to companies that are committed to early stage biotechnology opportunities. The Company has determined that its early stage technologies do not fit the Company's pulmonary drug delivery strategy. Consequently, the Company plans to out-license these technologies while maintaining an interest in the technologies' promise without incurring the development costs associated with early stage research and development. Because the Company is no longer funding these projects, it is at risk of losing its rights to certain of these technologies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to sell or license its rights to any of its remaining early stage research projects or realize any milestone payments or other revenue from those early stage research projects that have been previously divested. In November 1997, the Company entered into a license arrangement for some of its early stage technologies with Lorus Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly Imutec Pharma Inc.). The arrangement licenses rights to a series of compounds for the treatment of cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma and actinic keratosis to a newly formed company, NuChem Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("NuChem") for which Lorus Therapeutics will provide funding and management of the development program. The Company holds a 20% equity interest in NuChem. Work on the lead compounds by NuChem has progressed in the pre-clinical phase. In 1999, NuChem announced that the U.S. National Cancer Institute has agreed to undertake additional in vitro screening after initial evaluation of the compounds. In 2000, NuChem chose NC 381 as its lead anti-cancer drug for further studies in preparation for clinical trials. Preclinical toxicology studies are currently underway. GOVERNMENT REGULATION The Company's research and development activities and, ultimately, any production and marketing of its licensed products, are subject to comprehensive regulation by numerous governmental authorities in the United States and other countries. Among the applicable regulations in the United States, pharmaceutical products are subject to the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Services Act, other federal statutes and regulations, and certain state and local regulations. These regulations and statutes govern the development, testing, formulation, manufacture, labeling, storage, record keeping, quality control, advertising, promotion, sale, distribution and approval of such pharmaceutical products. Failure to comply with applicable requirements can result in fines, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, refusal by the government to approve marketing of the product and criminal prosecution. A new drug may not be legally marketed for commercial use in the United States without FDA approval. In addition, upon approval, a drug may only be marketed for the indications, in the formulations and at the dosage levels approved by the FDA. The FDA also has the authority to withdraw approval of drugs in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Analogous foreign regulators impose similar approval requirements relating to commercial marketing of a drug in their respective countries and may impose similar restrictions and limitations after approval. In order to obtain FDA approval of a new product, the Company and its strategic partners must submit proof of safety, efficacy, purity and stability, and the Company must demonstrate validation of its manufacturing process. The testing and application process is expensive and time consuming, often taking several years to complete. There is no assurance that the FDA will act favorably or quickly in reviewing such applications. With respect to patented products, processes or technologies, delays imposed or caused by the governmental approval process may materially reduce the period during which the Company will have the exclusive right to exploit them. Such delays could also affect the commercial advantages derived from proprietary processes. As part of the approval process, the FDA reviews the Drug Master File (the "DMF") for a description of product chemistry and characteristics, detailed operational procedures for product production, quality control, process and methods validation, and quality assurance. As process development continues to mature, updates and modifications of the DMF are submitted. 12 13 The FDA approval process for a pharmaceutical product includes review of (i) chemistry and formulations, (ii) preclinical laboratory and animal studies, (iii) initial IND clinical studies to define safety and dose parameters, (iv) well-controlled IND clinical trials to demonstrate product efficacy and safety, followed by submission and FDA approval of a New Drug Application (the "NDA"). Preclinical studies involve laboratory evaluation of the product and animal studies to assess activity and safety of the product. Products must be formulated in accordance with United States Good Manufacturing Procedures ("GMP") requirements and preclinical tests must be conducted by laboratories that comply with FDA regulations governing the testing of drugs in animals. The results of the preclinical tests are submitted to the FDA as part of the IND application and are reviewed by the FDA prior to granting the sponsor permission to conduct clinical studies in human subjects. Unless the FDA objects to an IND application, the application will become effective 30 days following its receipt by the FDA. There can be no certainty that submission of an IND will result in FDA authorization to commence clinical studies. Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases with some amount of overlap allowed. Phase I trials normally consist of testing the product in a small number of normal volunteers for establishing safety and pharmacokinetics using single and multiple dosing regiments. In Phase II, the continued safety and initial efficacy of the product are evaluated in a limited patient population, and appropriate dosage amounts and treatment intervals are determined. Phase III trials typically involve more definitive testing of the appropriate dose for safety and clinical efficacy in an expanded patient population at multiple clinical testing centers. A clinical plan, or "protocol," accompanied by the approval of the institution participating in the trials, must be submitted to the FDA prior to commencement of each clinical trial phase. Each clinical study must be conducted under the auspices of an Institutional Review Board (the "IRB") at the institution performing the clinical study. The IRB is charged with protecting the safety of patients in trials and may require changes in a protocol, and there can be no assurance that an IRB will permit any given study to be initiated or completed. In addition, the FDA may order the temporary or permanent discontinuation of clinical trials at any time. The Company must rely on independent investigators and institutions to conduct these clinical studies. All the results of the preclinical and clinical studies on a pharmaceutical product are submitted to the FDA in the form of an NDA for approval to commence commercial distribution. The information contained in the DMF is also incorporated into the NDA. Submission of an NDA does not assure FDA approval for marketing. The application review process often requires 12 months to complete. However, the process may take substantially longer if the FDA has questions or concerns about a product or studies regarding the product. In general, the FDA requires two adequate and controlled clinical studies demonstrating efficacy with sufficient levels of statistical assurance. However, additional support may be required. The FDA also may request additional information relating to safety or efficacy, such as long-term toxicity studies. In responding to an NDA, the FDA may grant marketing approval, require additional testing and/or information, or deny the application. Accordingly, there can be no assurance about any specific time frame for approval, if any, of products by the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies. Continued compliance with all FDA requirements and conditions relative to an approved application, including product specifications, manufacturing process, labeling and promotional material, and record keeping and reporting requirements, is necessary throughout the life of the product. In addition, failure to comply with FDA requirements, the occurrence of unanticipated adverse effects during commercial marketing or the result of future studies, could lead to the need for product recall or other FDA-initiated actions that could delay further marketing until the products or processes are brought into compliance. The facilities of each pharmaceutical manufacturer must be registered with and approved by the FDA as compliant with GMP. Continued registration requires compliance with standards for GMP. In complying with GMP, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in production, record keeping and quality control to ensure technical compliance. In addition, manufacturers must comply with the United States Department of Health and Human Services and similar state and local regulatory authorities if they handle controlled substances, and they must be registered with the United States Drug Enforcement Administration and similar state and local regulatory authorities if they generate toxic or dangerous waste streams. Other regulatory agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration also monitor a manufacturing facility for compliance. Each of these organizations conducts periodic establishment inspections to confirm continued compliance with its regulations. Failure to comply with any of these regulations could mean fines, interruption of production and even criminal prosecution. 13 14 For foreign markets, a pharmaceutical company is subject to regulatory requirements, review procedures and product approvals which, generally, may be as extensive, if not more extensive, as those in the United States. Although the technical descriptions of the clinical trials are different, the trials themselves are often substantially the same as those in the United States. Approval of a product by regulatory authorities of foreign countries must be obtained prior to commencing commercial product marketing in those countries, regardless of whether FDA approval has been obtained. The time and cost required to obtain market approvals in foreign countries may be longer or shorter than required for FDA approval and may be subject to delay. There can be no assurance that regulatory authorities of foreign countries will grant approval. The Company has no experience in manufacturing or marketing in foreign countries nor in matters such as currency regulations, import-export controls or other trade laws. PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS MSI System Patents and Trademark Under its agreement with Siemens for the technology underlying the MSI system, the Company is responsible for jointly financing and prosecuting the U.S. patent applications for the benefit of the owners and licensors of this technology. To date, three U.S. patents have issued, and two U.S. and European applications each are pending. The issued U.S. patents provide protection through 2017 for the MSI device, the dosator cartridges and their combinations. Aerosol Drug Delivery System Patents As of the December 31, 2000, three U.S. patents have issued and two U.S. and four foreign applications are pending. The issued U.S. patents cover the ADDS flow control and triggering mechanism through 2018. Early Stage Research Technology Patents Under its license agreements for its early stage research projects, the Company has been responsible for financing and prosecuting patent applications for the benefit of the owners and licensors of these technologies. While the Company holds, or has held, several U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications for these early stage technologies, the Company expects to assign these patents and applications to future acquirors, if any, of these technologies. Because the Company does not intend to continue to pay for future patent fees on these early stage technologies, in the event that no acquirors are found for these technologies, the Company expects that it will allow some or all of these patents and patent applications to lapse or the rights may be returned to the licensors. COMPETITION The Company competes with approximately 25 other companies involved in developing and selling respiratory products for the U.S. market. Most of these companies possess financial and marketing resources and developmental capabilities substantially greater than the Company. Some of the products in development by other companies may be demonstrated to be superior to the Company's current or future products. Furthermore, the pharmaceutical industry is characterized by rapid technological change and competitors may complete development and reach the marketplace prior to the Company. The Company believes that competition in the respiratory category will be based upon several factors, including product efficacy, safety, reliability, availability, and price, among others. SUBSIDIARIES On January 10, 1996, Ion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Ion"), was formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. At that time, Ion acquired the Company's rights to certain early stage biomedical technologies. On April 17, 1997, CP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("CP") was formed for the purpose of acquiring Camelot Pharmacal, LLC ("Camelot"), a privately held pharmaceutical development company. The Company acquired Camelot on April 25, 1997. 14 15 As part of its strategic alliance with Elan, on June 30, 1998, the Company formed SPD as a wholly owned subsidiary. At that time, SPD acquired the Company's rights to the systemic applications of the MSI and the ADDS. In addition, SPD acquired Elan's rights to the UPDAS and the Enhancing Technology. SPD is responsible for the development of systemic applications in both the MSI and ADDS. In addition to the above alliance with Elan, on October 18, 1999, the Company and Elan formed a new joint venture, RSD, to develop certain respiratory steroid products. The Company and Elan made equity investments in RSD representing an initial 80.1% and 19.9%, respectively, ownership in the joint venture. The joint venture is responsible for the development of the inhaled steroid products. EMPLOYEES As of March 6, 2001, the Company employed 17 persons, five of whom are executive officers. CERTAIN RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND MARKET PRICE OF SECURITIES The following are some of the factors that could affect the Company's future results. They should be considered in connection with evaluating forward-looking statements contained in this report and otherwise made by the Company or on the Company's behalf, because these factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. We have experienced significant operating losses throughout our history and expect these losses to continue for the foreseeable future. Our operations to date have consumed substantial amounts of cash and we have generated to date only limited revenues from contract research and licensing activities. We have incurred approximately $80.8 million of operating losses since our inception, including $6.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2000. Our operating losses and negative cash flow from operations are expected to continue in the foreseeable future. We will need additional financing, which if not available, could prevent us from funding or expanding our operations. Cash available for funding our operations as of December 31, 2000 was $3.0 million. As of such date, we had trade payables and accrued liabilities of $1.2 million and current research obligations of $.2 million. In addition, committed and/or anticipated funding of research and development after December 31, 2000 is estimated at approximately $3.1 million, of which $3.0 million has been committed to be funded by Elan through the issuance of our Series E cumulative convertible preferred stock. Since December 31, 2000 we have received $1.0 million as an interest-free advance against future milestone payments, and anticipate that we have sufficient cash to meet our cash requirements through December 31, 2001, assuming we do not incur unexpected costs. We need to raise substantial additional capital to fund our operations. The development of our technologies and proposed products will require a commitment of substantial funds to conduct costly and time-consuming research, preclinical and clinical testing, and to bring any such products to market. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including continued progress in developing and out-licensing our pulmonary delivery technologies, our ability to establish and maintain collaborative arrangements with others and to comply with the terms thereof, receipt of payments due from partners under research and development agreements, progress with preclinical and clinical trials, the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals, the cost involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims, the need to acquire licenses to new technology and the status of competitive products. 15 16 We intend to seek such additional funding through collaborative or partnering arrangements, the extension of existing arrangements, or through public or private equity or debt financings. Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, stockholders may be further diluted and such equity securities might have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our current stockholders. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs or obtain funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies, product candidates or products that we would otherwise seek to develop or commercialize. If adequate funds are not available from operations or additional sources of funding, our business will suffer a material adverse effect. Our products are still in development and we may be unable to bring our products to market. We have not yet begun to generate revenues from the sale of products. Our products will require significant additional development, clinical testing and investment prior to their commercialization. We do not expect regulatory approval for commercial sales of any of our products in the immediate future. Potential products that appear to be promising at early stages of development may not reach the market for a number of reasons. Such reasons include the possibility that products will not be proven to be safe and efficacious in clinical trials, that they will not be able to meet applicable regulatory standards or obtain required regulatory approvals, that they cannot be produced in commercial quantities at reasonable costs or that they fail to be successfully commercialized or fail to achieve market acceptance. If our products are not accepted by the medical community, our business will suffer. Commercial sales of our products will substantially depend upon the products' efficacy and on their acceptance by the medical community. Widespread acceptance of our products will require educating the medical community as to the benefits and reliability of the products. Our products may not be accepted and, even if accepted, we are unable to estimate the length of time it would take to gain such acceptance. We will be required to make royalty payments on products we may develop, reducing the amount of revenues with which we could fund ongoing operations. The owners and licensors of the technology rights acquired by us are entitled to receive a certain percentage of all revenues received by us from commercialization, if any, of products in respect of which we hold licenses. Accordingly, in addition to our substantial investment in product development, we will be required to make substantial payments to others in connection with revenues derived from commercialization of products, if any, developed under licenses we hold. Consequently, we will not receive the full amount of any revenues that may be derived from commercialization of products to fund ongoing operations. Our dependence on third parties for rights to technology and the development of our products could harm our business. Under the terms of existing license agreements, we are obligated to make certain payments to our licensors. In the event that we default on the payment of an installment under the terms of an existing licensing agreement, our rights thereunder could be forfeited. As a consequence, we could lose all rights under a license agreement to the related licensed technology, notwithstanding the total investment made through the date of the default. Unforeseen obligations or contingencies may deplete our financial resources and, accordingly, sufficient resources may not be available to fulfill our commitments. If we were to lose our rights to technology, we may be unable to replace the licensed technology or be unable to do so on commercially reasonable terms, which would materially adversely affect our ability to bring products based on that technology to market. In addition, we depend on our licensors for assistance in developing products from licensed technology. If these licensors fail to perform or their performance is not satisfactory, our ability to successfully bring products to market may be delayed or impeded. 16 17 We face intense competition and rapid technological changes and our failure to successfully compete or adapt to changing technology could make it difficult to successfully bring products to market. The medical field is subject to rapid technological change and innovation. Pharmaceutical and biomedical research and product development are rapidly evolving fields in which developments are expected to continue at a rapid pace. Reports of progress and potential breakthroughs are occurring with increasing frequency. Our success will depend upon our ability to develop and maintain a competitive position in the research, development and commercialization of products and technologies in our areas of focus. Competition from pharmaceutical, chemical, biomedical and medical companies, universities, research and other institutions is intense and is expected to increase. All, or substantially all, of these competitors have substantially greater research and development capabilities, experience, and manufacturing, marketing, financial and managerial resources. Further, acquisitions of competing companies by large pharmaceutical or other companies could enhance such competitors' financial, marketing and other capabilities. Developments by others may render our products or technologies obsolete or not commercially viable and we may not be able to keep pace with technological developments. We are subject to significant government regulation and failure to achieve regulatory approval for our products would severely harm our business. Our ongoing research and development projects are subject to rigorous FDA approval procedures. The preclinical and clinical testing requirements to demonstrate safety and efficacy in each clinical indication (the specific condition intended to be treated) and regulatory approval processes of the FDA can take a number of years and will require us to expend substantial resources. We may be unable to obtain FDA approval for our products, and even if we do obtain approval, delays in such approval would adversely affect the marketing of products to which we have rights and our ability to receive product revenues or royalties. Moreover, even if FDA approval is obtained, a marketed product, its manufacturer and its manufacturing facilities are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA, and a later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, manufacturer or facility may result in restrictions on such product or manufacturer. Failure to comply with the applicable regulatory requirements can, among other things, result in fines, suspensions of regulatory approvals, product recalls, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution. Additional government regulation may be established which could prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products. Sales of pharmaceutical products outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country. Even if FDA approval has been obtained, approval of a product by comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries must be obtained prior to the commencement of marketing the product in those countries. The time required to obtain such approval may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval. We have no experience in manufacturing or marketing in foreign countries nor in matters such as currency regulations, import-export controls or other trade laws. To date, we have not received final regulatory approval from the FDA or any other comparable foreign regulatory authority for any of our products or technologies. Our failure to meet product release schedules would make it difficult to predict our quarterly results and may cause our operating results to vary significantly. Delays in the planned release of our products may adversely affect forecasted revenues and create operational inefficiencies resulting from staffing levels designed to support the forecasted revenues. Our failure to introduce new products on a timely basis could delay or hinder market acceptance and allow competitors to gain greater market share. 17 18 If our intellectual property and proprietary rights are infringed, or infringe upon the rights of others, our business will suffer. Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain patent protection for our technologies, products and processes and to maintain trade secret protection and operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others. The degree of patent protection to be afforded to pharmaceutical, biomedical or medical inventions is an uncertain area of the law. In addition, the laws of foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. We may not develop or receive sublicenses or other rights related to proprietary technology that are patentable, patents that are pending may be not issued, and any issued patents may not provide us with any competitive advantages and may be challenged by third parties. Furthermore, others may independently duplicate or develop similar products or technologies to those developed by or licensed to us. If we are required to defend against charges of patent infringement or to protect our own proprietary rights against third parties, substantial costs will be incurred and we could lose rights to certain products and technologies or be required to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements. We do not have any marketing or manufacturing capabilities and will likely rely on third parties for these capabilities in order to bring products to market. We do not currently have our own sales force or an agreement with another pharmaceutical company to market all of our products that are in development. When appropriate, we may build or otherwise acquire the necessary marketing capabilities to promote our products. However, we may not have the resources available to build or otherwise acquire our own marketing capabilities, and we may be unable to reach agreements with other pharmaceutical companies to market our products on terms acceptable to us, if at all. In addition, we do not intend to manufacture our own products. While we have already entered into two manufacturing and supply agreements related to the MSI system and one related to the ADDS, these manufacturing and supply agreements may not be adequate and we may not be able to enter into future manufacturing and supply agreements on acceptable terms, if at all. Our reliance on independent manufacturers involves a number of risks, including the absence of adequate capacity, the unavailability of, or interruptions in, access to necessary manufacturing processes and reduced control over product quality and delivery schedules. If our manufacturers are unable or unwilling to continue manufacturing our products in required volumes, we will have to identify acceptable alternative manufacturers. The use of a new manufacturer may cause significant interruptions in supply if the new manufacturer has difficulty manufacturing products to our specifications. Further, the introduction of a new manufacturer may increase the variation in the quality of our products. Healthcare reimbursement policies are uncertain and may adversely impact the sale of our products. Our ability to commercialize human therapeutic and diagnostic products may depend in part on the extent to which costs for such products and technologies are reimbursed by private health insurance or government health programs. The uncertainty regarding reimbursement may be especially significant in the case of newly approved products. Reimbursement price levels may be insufficient to provide a return to us on our investment in new products and technologies. In the United States, government and other third-party payers have sought to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for new pharmaceutical products approved for marketing by the FDA, including some cases refusal to cover such approved products. Healthcare reform may increase these cost containment efforts. We believe that managed care organizations may seek to restrict the use of new products, delay authorization to use new products or limit coverage and the level of reimbursement for new products. Internationally, where national healthcare systems are prevalent, little if any funding may be available for new products, and cost containment and cost reduction efforts can be more pronounced than in the United States. 18 19 We may become subject to product liability claims and our product liability insurance may be inadequate. The use of our proposed products and processes during testing, and after approval, may entail inherent risks of adverse effects that could expose us to product liability claims and associated adverse publicity. Although we currently maintain general liability insurance, the coverage limits of our insurance policies may not be adequate. We currently maintain clinical trial product liability insurance of $2.0 million per event for certain clinical trials and intend to obtain insurance for future clinical trials of products under development. However, we may be unable to obtain or maintain insurance for any future clinical trials. Such insurance is expensive, difficult to obtain and may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. A successful claim brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage would have a material adverse effect upon us and our financial condition. We intend to require our licensees to obtain adequate product liability insurance. However, licensees may be unable to maintain or obtain adequate product liability insurance on acceptable terms and such insurance may not provide adequate coverage against all potential claims. If our common stock is delisted from the American Stock Exchange, the price of our common stock and its liquidity could decline. Our common stock is listed for trading on the American Stock Exchange, or AMEX, under the symbol "SHM". We do not satisfy discretionary AMEX guidelines for continued listing, including a guideline that a listed company that has sustained losses from operations and/or net losses in three of its four most recent fiscal years, have stockholders' equity of at least $4,000,000. We had net capital deficiency of $413,720 at December 31, 2000. We also do not satisfy a guideline against continued losses for each of the issuer's five most recent fiscal years. Our continued failure to meet the listing guidelines has been regularly reviewed by AMEX and may ultimately result in our common stock being delisted from AMEX. If our common stock were delisted from AMEX, trading of our common stock, if any, would thereafter likely be conducted in the over-the-counter market, unless we were able to list our common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market or another national securities exchange, which cannot be assured. If our common stock were to trade in the over-the-counter market it may be more difficult for investors to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock. In addition, it may become more difficult for us to raise funds through the sale of our securities. In the event of the delisting of our common stock from the AMEX and our inability to list our common stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market or another national securities exchange, the regulations of the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, require additional disclosure relating to the market for penny stocks. SEC regulations generally define a penny stock to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. A disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith is required to be delivered to a purchaser and various sales practice requirements are imposed on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions). In addition, the broker-dealer must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. If our securities become subject to the regulations applicable to penny stocks, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely affected. In such an event, the regulations on penny stocks could limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities. 19 20 The price of biotechnology/pharmaceutical company stocks has been volatile which could result in substantial losses to our stockholders. The market price of securities of companies in the biotechnology/pharmaceutical industries has tended to be volatile. Announcements of technological innovations by us or our competitors, developments concerning proprietary rights and concerns about safety and other factors may have a material effect on our business or financial condition. The market price of our common stock may be significantly affected by announcements of developments in the medical field generally or our research areas specifically. The stock market has experienced volatility in market prices of companies similar to us that has been unrelated to the operating results of such companies. This volatility may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. Our ability to issue "blank check" preferred stock may make it more difficult for a change in our control. Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock with such designations, rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors, without shareholder approval. In the event of issuance, such preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in our control and preventing shareholders from receiving a premium for their shares in connection with a change of control. We issued Series A and Series B cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock in connection with private placements in February 1997 and April 1998, respectively. All of the Series A preferred stock was converted into common stock during 1998. On July 31, 1998, all of the Series B Preferred stock was redeemed for cash. We also issued shares of our Series C cumulative convertible preferred stock in connection with the consummation of an agreement with Elan International Services, Ltd. ("Elan International") in June 1998. In October 1999, in conjunction with a licensing agreement with Elan International, we issued shares of our Series D cumulative convertible exchangeable preferred stock and Series F cumulative convertible preferred stock. In addition, we also have a commitment from Elan International to purchase shares of Series E cumulative convertible non-exchangeable preferred stock at our option (subject to satisfaction of certain conditions). Except for the previously-mentioned purchase commitment for Series E preferred stock, and additional shares of Series C, D and E preferred stock that may be payable as dividends to Elan International, as holder of the outstanding Series C, D and E preferred stock, we have no present intention to issue any additional shares of our preferred stock; however, we may issue additional shares of our preferred stock in the future. We have granted anti-dilutions rights to The Tail Wind Fund Ltd. which may require us to issue additional shares to Tail Wind, make cash payments to Tail Wind and may hinder our ability to raise additional funds. Pursuant to our December 2000 private placement with The Tail Wind Fund Ltd., until at least August 29, 2002, if we sell shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock for less than $3.5888 per share, we are obligated to issue to Tail Wind additional shares so that the number of shares purchased by Tail Wind in the December 2000 private placement plus the additional shares issued to Tail Wind equals the number of shares that Tail Wind could have purchased for $2,250,000 at the price per share at which the new shares are sold. The presence of these anti-dilution rights may negatively affect our ability to obtain additional financing. In addition, in the event that we are required to issue additional shares to Tail Wind, we may not issue an aggregate of over 5,630,122 shares of our common stock in total to Tail Wind in connection with the December 2000 private placement. If we would otherwise be required to issue more than 5,630,122 shares to Tail Wind, we must instead pay Tail Wind 105% of the cash value of such shares we do not issue. 20 21 We are obligated to issue additional securities in the future diluting our stockholders. As of December 31, 2000, we had reserved approximately 6,921,629 shares of our common stock for issuance upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants convertible into shares of our common stock, including by our officers and directors. In addition, as of December 31, 2000, we had $2,000,000 principal amount of a convertible promissory note, 13,712 shares of our Series C preferred stock, 12,870 shares of our Series D preferred stock, 1,004 shares of our Series E preferred stock and 5,000 shares of our Series F preferred stock outstanding. Each of the convertible securities provides for conversion into shares of our common stock at a discount to the market price at December 31, 2000. Our Series C, D, E and F preferred stock are convertible into 9,724,823 shares, 2,648,148 shares, 258,098 shares and 1,470,588 shares, respectively, of common stock. The convertible promissory note, including accrued interest is convertible into 1,362,578 shares of common stock. The exercise of options and outstanding warrants, the conversion of such other securities and sales of common stock issuable thereunder could have a significant dilutive effect on the market price of our common stock and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through the future sale of our equity securities. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Company's principal executive offices are located at 425 South Woodsmill Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63017. These premises consist of approximately 4,521 square feet subject to a lease that expires September 14, 2002. The monthly rent for these premises is $9,419. The Company also maintains a research facility in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and leases a small office in Rochester, New York. The Company maintains no other laboratory, research or other facilities, but primarily conducts research and development in outside laboratories under contracts with universities or research facilities. The Company believes that its existing office arrangements will be adequate to meet its reasonably foreseeable future needs. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS There are no material legal proceedings against the Company or any of its subsidiaries. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None. 21 22 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of the Company's Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange (the "AMEX") for the periods indicated.
2000: High Low ---- --- Fourth Quarter.......................................... $6.625 $3.250 Third Quarter........................................... 6.875 4.250 Second Quarter.......................................... 5.938 3.000 First Quarter........................................... 7.938 3.375
1999: High Low ---- --- Fourth Quarter.......................................... $5.250 $2.438 Third Quarter........................................... 2.938 2.000 Second Quarter.......................................... 3.063 2.188 First Quarter........................................... 3.500 2.000
The closing sale price for the Company's Common Stock on the AMEX on March 6, 2001 was $3.70 per share. At March 6, 2001, there were approximately 413 holders of record of the Company's Common Stock. The Company has never paid dividends on its Common Stock and does not intend to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The terms of the Company's Series C, D and E Preferred Stock generally prohibit the payment of cash dividends and other distributions on the Company's Common Stock unless full cumulative stock dividends on shares of such Series C, D and E Preferred Stock have been paid or declared in full. During 2000, the Company issued stock dividends totaling 932, 855 and 4 shares and cash dividends for fractional shares of $2,045, $750, and $750 on Series C, D and E Preferred Stock, respectively. The following unregistered securities were issued by the Company during the quarter ended December 31, 2000:
NUMBER OF SHARES SOLD/ISSUED/ OFFERING/ SUBJECT TO EXERCISE DATE OF DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONS OR PRICE SALE/ISSUANCE SECURITIES ISSUED WARRANTS PER SHARE ($) PURCHASER OR CLASS - ------------- ----------------- ------------ ------------- ------------------ Warrant to purchase shares of October 2, 2000 Common Stock, $.01 par value 35,000 $6.125 Accredited Investor December 29, 2000 Common Stock, $.01 par value 626,950 $3.5888 Accredited Investor Warrant to purchase shares of December 29, 2000 Common Stock, $.01 par value 18,808 $4.9844 Accredited Investor Warrant to purchase shares of December 29, 2000 Common Stock, $.01 par value 18,808 $4.9844 Accredited Investor Warrant to purchase shares of December 29, 2000 Common Stock, $.01 par value 112,500 $4.9844 Accredited Investor
The issuance of these securities are claimed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the issuance of any of these securities. 22 23 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2000, pertinent portions of which are attached hereto as Exhibit 13. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2000, pertinent portions of which are attached hereto as Exhibit 13. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company has no material market risk exposure. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Quarterly financial data for 2000 and 1999 is summarized below:
Three Months Ended ------------------ Mar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30 Dec 31 ------ ------ ------ ------ 2000: Total revenues $ 121,170 $ 124,505 $ 46,109 $ 214,788 Operating loss (1,475,577) (1,449,671) (1,367,362) (1,765,790) Net loss (1,457,090) (1,383,810) (1,318,141) (1,604,110) Basic and diluted net loss per share (.05) (.05) (.05) (.06) 1999: Total revenues $ 26,000 $ 101,412 $ 147,526 $ 124,440 Operating loss (1,154,642) (1,468,668) (1,418,452) (16,257,730) Net loss (1,162,656) (1,487,010) (1,454,942) (13,280,180) Basic and diluted net loss per share (.04) (.05) (.05) (.49)
The remaining information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2000, pertinent portions of which are attached hereto as Exhibit 13. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed no later than April 30, 2001, pursuant to Regulation 14A of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed no later than April 30, 2001, pursuant to Regulation 14A of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 23 24 ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed no later than April 30, 2001, pursuant to Regulation 14A of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed no later than April 30, 2001, pursuant to Regulation 14A of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a)(1) Financial Statements The following Financial Statements are included in Exhibits 13 hereto: Report of Independent Auditors Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and for the period October 17, 1986 (inception) to December, 31 2000 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (net capital deficiency) for the period from October 17, 1986 (inception) to December 31, 2000 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and for the period from October 17, 1986 (inception) to December 31, 2000 Notes to Financial Statements (a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. (a)(3) Exhibits:
NO. REFERENCE 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (10) 3.2 By-Laws of the Company (4) 4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate (2) 4.4 Certificate of Designations defining the powers, designations, (10) rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions applicable to the Company's Series C Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock.
24 25
NO. REFERENCE 4.5 Certificate of Designations defining the powers, designations, (15) rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions applicable to the Company's Series D Cumulative Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock. 4.6 Certificate of Designations defining the powers, designations, (15) rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions applicable to the Company's Series E Convertible Non-Exchangeable Preferred Stock. 4.7 Certificate of Designations defining the powers, designations, (15) rights, preferences, limitations and restrictions applicable to the Company's Series F Convertible Non-Exchangeable Preferred Stock. 10.6 Employment Agreement dated as of June 6, 1996 between the (3) Company and Thomas M. Fitzgerald* 10.6.5 Employment Agreement dated as of November 16, 1998 between the (14) Company and Scott Hoffmann* 10.8 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended* (1) 10.9 1993 Restricted Stock Plan, as amended* (1) 10.10 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan* (7) 10.11 Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Company, Camelot (6) Pharmacal, L.L.C., David A. Byron, Loren G. Peterson and Carl Siekmann dated April 25, 1997* 10.12 Employment Agreement dated as of April 25, 1997 between the (6) Company and David A. Byron* 10.13 Employment Agreement dated as of April 25, 1997 between the (6) Company and Loren G. Peterson* 10.14 Employment Agreement dated as of April 25, 1997 between the (6) Company and Carl Siekmann* 10.15 Form of the Company's 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures (8) due September 22, 2000. 10.16 Lease dated August 18, 1997 between Corporate Center, L.L.C. (5) and the Company relating to the lease of office space in St. Louis, Missouri. 10.17 Assignment and License Agreement dated as of December 3, 1997 (9) between 1266417 Ontario Limited and Ion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).
25 26
NO. REFERENCE 10.18 Sub-License Agreement dated as of December 3, 1997 between (9) 1266417 Ontario Limited and Ion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.19 Form of Sublicense and Development Agreement between Sheffield (12) Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Inpharzam International, S.A. (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.20 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1998, by (13) and between Sheffield pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Elan International Services, Ltd., which includes the Certificate of Designations of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock as Exhibit B. The Company agreed to furnish the disclosure schedules as well as Exhibits A and C, which were omitted from this filing, to the Commission upon request (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.21 Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd. Joint Development and (13) Operating Agreement dated as of June 30, 1998 among Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd., Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Elan International Services, Ltd. (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.22 License and Development Agreement dated June 30, 1998 between (13) Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd. and Elan Corporation plc. (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).
26 27
NO. REFERENCE 10.23 License and Development Agreement dated June 30, 1998 between (13) Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd. and Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Elan Corporation, plc. (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.24 License and Development Agreement dated June 30, 1998 between (13) Elan Corporation, plc and Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd. and Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.25 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 18, 1999, (15) by and between the Company and Elan (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.26 Subscription, Joint Development and Operating Agreement dated (15) as of October 18, 1999 by and among Elan Pharma International Limited, Elan, the Company and Newco. (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 010.27 License Agreement, dated as of October 19, 1999, by and (15) between the Company and Newco (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.28 License Agreement, dated as of October 19, 1999, by and (15) between Elan Pharma International Limited and Newco (portions of this exhibit were omitted and were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company's application requesting confidential treatment in accordance with Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). 10.29 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 18, 1999 by (15) and between Elan and the Company.
27 28
NO. REFERENCE 10.30 Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of December 29, 2000, (16) by and between the Company and The Tail Wind Fund Ltd 10.31 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 29, 2000, (16) by and between the Company and The Tail Wind Fund Ltd 13 Portions of the Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for (1) the year ended December 31, 2000 relating to Items 6, 7 and 8. 21 Subsidiaries of Registrant (1) 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (1) 24 Power of Attorney (Included on page 29 hereof) (1)
* Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements. - ----------------------- (1) Filed herewith. (2) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for its fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (3) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1996 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (4) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (5) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (6) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (7) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (8) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-38327) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 21, 1997. (9) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 17, 1997. (10) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (11) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 17, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (12) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 22, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (13) Incorporated by reference to exhibits to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 16, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (14) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (15) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 1999. (16) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-54446) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2001. (b) Reports on Form 8-K (1) Current Report on Form 8-K filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2000. 28 29 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Dated: March 9, 2001 /S/ -------------------------- Loren G. Peterson President and Chief Executive Officer POWER OF ATTORNEY Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and each of the undersigned do hereby appoint Loren G. Peterson and Thomas Fitzgerald and each of them severally, its or his or her true and lawful attorney to execute on behalf of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the undersigned any and all amendments to this Annual Report and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; each of such attorneys shall have the power to act hereunder with or without the other. In accordance with the Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE --------- ----- ---- /S/ Chairman and Director March 9, 2001 - ---------------------------------------- Thomas M. Fitzgerald /S/ Director, President and Chief March 9, 2001 - ---------------------------------------- Executive Officer Loren G. Peterson /S/ Director March 9, 2001 - ---------------------------------------- John M. Bailey /S/ Director March 9, 2001 - ---------------------------------------- Digby W. Barrios /S/ Director March 9, 2001 - ---------------------------------------- Todd C. Davis /S/ Vice President, Chief March 9, 2001 - ---------------------------------------- Financial Officer, Scott A. Hoffmann Treasurer and Secretary (Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer)
29
EX-10.8 2 c60732ex10-8.txt 1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN 1 EXHIBIT 10.8 SHEFFIELD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1993 STOCK OPTION PLAN (as amended through July 15, 1998) 1. Purposes of the Plan. The purposes of this 1993 Stock Option Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of responsibility within the Company, to provide additional incentive to Employees of the Company, and to promote the success of the Company's business through the grant of options to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock. Options granted hereunder may be either Incentive Stock or Non-Statutory Stock Options, at the discretion of the Board. The type of options granted shall be reflected in the terms of written Stock Option agreements. The Company intends that the Plan meet the requirements of Rule 16b-3 and that transactions of the type specified in subparagraphs (c) to (f) inclusive of Rule 16b-3 by officers and directors of the Company pursuant to the Plan will be exempt from the operation of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. Further, the Plan is intended to satisfy the performance-based compensation exception to the limitation on the Company's tax deductions imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code. In all cases, the terms, provisions, conditions and limitations of the Plan shall be construed and interpreted consistent with the Company's intent as stated in this Section 1. 2. Definitions. As used herein, the following definitions shall apply: (a) "Board" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company or, when appropriate, the Committee administering the Plan, if one has been appointed. (b) "Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. (c) "Common Stock" shall mean the common stock of the Company described in the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended. (d) "Company" shall mean SHEFFIELD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC., a Delaware corporation, and shall include any parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company as defined in Sections 425(e) and (f), respectively, of the Code. (e) "Committee" shall mean the Stock Option Committee composed of two or more directors who are Non-Employee Directors and Outside Directors and who shall be elected by and shall serve at the pleasure of the Board and shall be responsible for administering the Plan in accordance with paragraph (a) of Section 4 of the Plan. (f) "Employee" shall mean key employees, including salaried officers and directors and other key individuals employed by the Company. The payment of a director's fee by the Company shall not be sufficient to constitute "employment" by the Company. (g) "Exchange Act" shall mean the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (h) "Fair Market Value" shall mean, with respect to the date a given Option is granted or exercised, the value of the Common Stock determined by the Board in such manner as it may deem equitable for Plan purposes but, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option, no less than is required by applicable laws or regulations; provided, however, that where there is a public market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value per Share shall be the mean of the bid and asked prices of the Common Stock on the date of grant, as reported in the Wall Street Journal (or, if not so reported, as otherwise reported in the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System) or, in the event the Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Stock Market, the American Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ/National Market System, the Fair Market Value per Share shall be the closing price on such exchange on the date of grant of the Option, as reported in the Wall Street Journal. 1 2 (i) "Incentive Stock Option" shall mean an Option which is intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code. (j) "Non-Employee Director" shall mean a non-employee director as defined in Rule 16b-3. (k) "Non-statutory Stock Option" shall mean an Option which is not an Incentive Stock Option. (l) "Option" shall mean a stock option granted under the Plan. (m) "Optioned Stock" shall mean the Common Stock subject to an Option. (n) "Optionee" shall mean an Employee of the Company who has been granted one or more Options. (o) "Outside Director" shall mean an outside director as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. (p) "Parent" shall mean a "parent corporation," whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 425(e) of the Code. (q) "Plan" shall mean this 1993 Stock Option Plan. (r) "Share" shall mean a share of the Common Stock, as adjusted in accordance with Section 11 of the Plan. (s) "Stock Option Agreement" shall mean the written agreement between the Company and the Optionee relating to the grant of an Option. (t) "Subsidiary" shall mean a "subsidiary corporation," whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 425(f) of the Code. (u) "Tax Date" shall mean the date an Optionee is required to pay the Company an amount with respect to tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise of an option. 3. Common Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 11 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be optioned and sold under the Plan is Four Million (4,000,000) Shares of Common Stock. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or previously issued Shares acquired by the Company and held in treasury. If an Option should expire or become unexercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full, the unpurchased Shares covered by such Option shall, unless the Plan shall have been terminated, be available for future grants of Options. The maximum number of Shares that may be subject to options granted under the Plan to any individual in any calendar year shall not exceed 500,000 Shares and the method of counting such Shares shall conform to any requirements applicable to performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. 4. Administration of the Plan. (a) Procedure. (i) The Plan shall be administered by the Board in accordance with Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act ("Rule 16b-3"); provided, however, that the Board may appoint a Committee to administer the Plan at any time or from time to time, and, provided further, that if the Board is not "disinterested" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3, the Plan shall be administered by a Committee in accordance with Rule 16b-3. (ii) Once appointed, the Committee shall continue to serve until otherwise directed by the Board. From time to time the Board may increase the size of the Committee and appoint additional members thereof, remove members (with or without cause), appoint new members in 2 3 substitution therefor, and fill vacancies however caused: provided, however, that at no time may any person serve on the Committee if that person's membership would cause the Committee not to satisfy the "disinterested administration" requirements of Rule 16b-3. (b) Powers of the Board. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Board shall have the authority, in its discretion: (i) to grant Incentive Stock Options and Nonstatutory Stock Options; (ii) to determine, upon review of relevant information and in accordance with Section 2 of the Plan, the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock; (iii) to determine the exercise price per Share of Options to be granted, which exercise price shall be determined in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Plan; (iv) to determine the Employees to whom, and the time or times at which, Options shall be granted and the number of Shares to be represented by each Option; (v) to interpret the Plan; (vi) to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan; (vii) to determine the terms and provisions of each Option granted including, without limitation, the terms of exercise (including the period of exercisability) or forfeiture of Options granted hereunder upon termination of the employment of an Employee; (viii) to accelerate or defer (with the consent of the Optionee) the exercise date of any Option; (ix) to authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effectuate the grant of an Option previously granted by the Board; (x) to accept or reject the election made by an Optionee pursuant to Section 17 of the Plan; and (xi) to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. (c) Effect of Board's Decision. All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Board shall be final and binding on all Optionees and any other holders of any Options granted under the Plan. (d) Inability of Committee to Act. In the event that for any reason the Committee is Unable to act or if the Committee at the time of any grant, award or other acquisition under the Plan of options or Shares does not consist of two or more Non-Employee Directors, then any such grant, award or other acquisition may be approved or ratified in any other manner contemplated by subparagraph (d) of Rule 16b-3. 5. Eligibility. (a) Consistent with the Plan's purposes, Options may be granted only to Employees of the Company as determined by the Board. An Employee who has been granted an Option may, if he is otherwise eligible, be granted an additional Option or Options. Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to those Employees who meet the requirements applicable under Section 422 of the Code. (b) Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Stock Option Agreement, all Options granted to Employees of the Company under the Plan will be subject to forfeiture until such time as the Optionee has been continuously employed by the Company for one year after the date of the grant of the Options, and may not be exercised prior to such time. At such time as the Optionee has been continuously employed by the Company for one year, the foregoing restriction shall lapse and the Optionee may exercise the Options at any time otherwise consistent with the Plan. (c) With respect to Incentive Stock Options, the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted) of the Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by the employee during any calendar year (under all employee benefit plans of the Company) shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000). 6. Stockholder Approval and Effective Dates. The Plan became effective upon approval by the Board. No Option may be granted under the Plan after August 30, 2003 (ten years from the effective date of the Plan); provided, however that the Plan and all outstanding Options shall remain in effect until such Options have expired or until such Options are canceled. 7. Term of Option. Unless otherwise provided in the Stock Option Agreement, the term of each Option shall be five (5) years from the date of grant thereof. In no case shall the term of any Option exceed ten (10) 3 4 years from the date of grant thereof. Notwithstanding the above, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an Employee who, at the time the Incentive Stock Option is granted, owns ten percent (10%) or more of the Common Stock as such amount is calculated under Section 422(b)(6) of the Code ("Ten Percent Stockholder"), the term of the Incentive Stock Option shall be five (5) years from the date of grant thereof or such shorter time as may be provided in the Stock Option Agreement. If an option granted to the Company's chief executive officer or to any of the Company's other four most highly compensated officers is intended to qualify as "performance-based" compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the exercise price of such option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date such option is granted. 8. Exercise Price and Payment. (a) Exercise Price. The per Share exercise price for the Shares to be issued pursuant to exercise of an Option shall be determined by the Board, but in the case of an Incentive Stock Option shall be no less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant, and in the case of a Nonstatutory Stock Option shall be no less than eighty-five percent (85%) of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to an Employee who, at the time of the grant of such Incentive Stock Option, is a Ten Percent Stockholder, the per Share exercise price shall be no less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value per Share on the date of grant. (b) Payment. The price of an exercised Option and the Employee's portion of any taxes attributable to the delivery of Common Stock under the Plan, or portion thereof, shall be paid: (i) In United States dollars in cash or by check, bank draft or money order payable to the order of the Company; or (ii) At the discretion of the Board, through the delivery of shares of Common Stock with an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to the option price and withholding taxes, if any; or (iii) At the election of the Optionee pursuant to Section 17 and with the consent of the Board pursuant to Section 4(b)(x), by the Company's retention of such number of shares of Common Stock subject to the exercised Option which have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the Employee's portion of the Company's aggregate federal, state, local and foreign tax withholding and FICA and FUTA obligations with respect to income generated by the exercise of the Option by Optionee; (iv) By a combination of (i), (ii) and (iii) above; or (v) In the manner provided in subsection (c) below. The Board shall determine acceptable methods for tendering Common Stock as payment upon exercise of an Option and may impose such limitations and prohibitions on the use of Common Stock to exercise an Option as it deems appropriate. (c) Financial Assistance to Optionees. The Board may assist Optionees in paying the exercise price of Options granted under this Plan in the following manner: (i) The extension of a loan to the Optionee by the Company; or (ii) Payment by the Optionee of the exercise price in installments; or (iii) A guaranty by the Company of a loan obtained by the Optionee from a third party. The terms of any loans, installment payments or guarantees, including the interest rate and terms of repayment, and collateral requirements, if any, shall be determined by the Board, in its sole discretion. Subject to applicable margin requirements, any loans, installment payments or guarantees authorized by the Board pursuant to the Plan may be granted without security, but the maximum credit available shall 4 5 not exceed the exercise price for the Shares for which the Option is to be exercised, plus any federal and state income tax liability incurred in connection with the exercise of the Option. 9. Exercise of Option. (a) Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Stockholder. Any Option granted hereunder shall be exercisable at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Board, including performance criteria with respect to the Company and/or the Optionee, and as shall be permissible under the terms of the Plan. Unless otherwise determined by the Board at the time of grant, an Option may be exercised in whole or in part. An Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share. An Option shall be deemed to be exercised when written notice of such exercise has been given to the Company in accordance with the terms of the Option by the person entitled to exercise the Option and full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Option is exercised has been received by the company. Full payment may, as authorized by the Board, consist of any consideration and method of payment allowable under Section 8(b) of the Plan. Until the issuance (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company) of the stock certificate evidencing such Shares, no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a stockholder shall exist with respect to the Optioned Stock, notwithstanding the exercise of the Option. No adjustment will be made for a dividend or other right for which the record date is prior to the date the stock certificate is issued, except as provided in Section 11 of the Plan. Exercise of an Option in any manner shall result in a decrease in the number of Shares which thereafter may be available, both for purposes of the Plan and for sale under the Option, by the number of Shares to which the Option is exercised. (b) Termination of Status as an Employee. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Stock Option Agreement, if an Employee's employment by the Company is terminated for cause, then any Option held by the Employee shall be immediately canceled upon termination of employment and the Employee shall have no further rights with respect to such Option. Unless otherwise provided in the Stock Option Agreement, if an Employee's employment by the Company is terminated for reasons other than cause, and does not occur due to death or disability, then the Employee may, with the consent of the Board, for ninety (90) days after the date he ceases to be an Employee of the Company, exercise his Option to the extent that he was entitled to exercise it at the date of such termination. To the extent that he was not entitled to exercise the Option at the date of such termination, or if he does not exercise such Option (which he was entitled to exercise) within the time specified herein or in the applicable Stock Option Agreement, the Option shall terminate. (c) Disability. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Stock Option Agreement, notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9(b) above, in the event an Employee is unable to continue his employment with the Company as a result of his permanent and total disability (as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code), he may, but only within twelve (12) months from the date of termination, exercise his Option to the extent he was entitled to exercise it at the date of such termination. To the extent that he was not entitled to exercise the Option at the date of termination, or if he does not exercise such Option (which he was entitled to exercise) within the time specified herein or in the applicable Stock Option Agreement, the Option shall terminate. (d) Death. Unless otherwise provided in the Stock Option Agreement, if an Employee dies during the term of the Option and is at the time of his death an Employee of the Company who shall have been in continuous status as an Employee since the date of grant of the Option, the Option may be exercised at any time within twelve (12) months following the date of death (or such other period of time as is determined by the Board) by the Employee's estate or by a person who acquired the right to exercise the Option by bequest or inheritance, but only to the extent that an Employee was entitled to exercise the Option on the date of death. To the extent the Employee was not entitled to exercise the Option on the date of death, or if the Employee's estate, or person who acquired the right to exercise the Option by bequest or inheritance, does not exercise such 5 6 Option (which he was entitled to exercise) within the time specified herein or in the applicable Stock Option Agreement, the Option shall terminate. 10. Non-Transferability of Options. An Option may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution, or pursuant to a "qualified domestic relations order" under the Code and ERISA, and may be exercised, during the lifetime of the Optionee, only by the Optionee. 11. Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization or Merger. Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each outstanding Option, and the number of shares of Common Stock which have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but as to which no Options have yet been granted or which have been returned to the Plan upon cancellation or expiration of an Option, as well as the price per share of Common Stock covered by each such outstanding Option, shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been "effected without receipt of consideration." Such adjustment shall be made by the Board, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding and conclusive. Except as expressly provided herein, no issuance by the company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect and no adjustment by reason thereof, shall be made with respect to the number or price of shares of Common Stock subject to an Option. In the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Option will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed action, unless otherwise provided by the Board. The Board may, in the exercise of its sole discretion in such instances, declare that any Option shall terminate as of a date fixed by the Board and give each Optionee the right to exercise his Option as to all or any part of the Optioned Stock, including Shares as to which the Option would not otherwise be exercisable. In the event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or the merger of the Company with or into another corporation, the Option shall be assumed or an equivalent option shall be substituted by such successor corporation or a parent or subsidiary of such successor corporation, unless the Board determines, in the exercise of its sole discretion and in lieu of such assumption or substitution, that the Optionee shall have the right to exercise the option as to all of the Optioned Stock, including Shares as to which the Option would not otherwise be exercisable. If the Board makes an Option fully exercisable in lieu of assumption or substitution in the event of a merger of`sale of assets, the Board shall notify the Optionee that the Option shall be fully exercisable for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of such notice (but not later than the expiration of the term of the Option under the Option Agreement), and the Option will terminate upon the expiration of such period. 12. Time of Granting Options. The date of grant of an Option shall, for all purposes, be the date on which the Board makes the determination granting such Option. Notice of the determination shall be given to each Employee to whom an Option is so granted within a reasonable time after the date of such grant. 13. Amendment and Termination of the Plan. (a) Amendment and Termination. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan from time to time in such respects as the Board may deem advisable; provided, however, that the following revisions or amendments shall require approval of the Stockholders of the Company, to the extent required by law, rule or regulation: (i) Any material increase in the number of Shares subject to the Plan, other than in connection with an adjustment under Section 11 of the Plan; (ii) Any material change in the designation of the Employees eligible to be granted Options; or (iii) Any material increase in the benefits accruing to participants under the Plan. 6 7 (b) Effect of Amendment or Termination. Any such amendment or termination of the Plan shall not affect Options already granted and such Options shall remain in full force and effect as if this Plan had not been amended or terminated, unless mutually agreed otherwise between the Optionee and the Board, which agreement must be in writing and signed by the Optionee and the Company. 14. Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares. Shares shall not be issued pursuant to the exercise of an Option unless the exercise of such Option and the issuance and delivery of such Shares pursuant thereto shall comply with all relevant provisions of law, including, without limitation, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the requirements of any stock exchange upon which the Shares may then be listed, and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance. As a condition to the exercise of an Option, the Company may require the person exercising such Option to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the Shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the company, such a representation is required by any of the aforementioned relevant provisions of law. Inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company's counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained. In the case of an Incentive Stock Option, any Optionee who disposes of Shares of Common Stock acquired upon the exercise of an Option by sale or exchange (a) either within two (2) years after the date of the grant of the Option under which the Common Stock was acquired or (b) within one (1) year after the acquisition of such Shares of Common Stock shall notify the Company of such disposition and of the amount realized upon such disposition. 15. Reservation of Shares. The Company will at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan. 16. Option Agreement. Options shall be evidenced by Stock Option Agreements in such form as the Board shall approve. 17. Withholding Taxes. Subject to Section 4(b)(x) of the Plan and prior to the Tax Date, the Optionee may make an irrevocable election to have the Company withhold from those Shares that would otherwise be received upon the exercise of any Option, a number of Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum amount necessary to satisfy the Company's federal, state, local and foreign tax withholding obligations and FICA and FUTA obligations with respect to the exercise of such Option by the Optionee. An Optionee who is also an officer of the Company must make the above described election: (a) at least six months after the date of grant of the Option (except in the event of death or disability); and (b) either: (i) six months prior to the Tax Date, or (ii) prior to the Tax Date and during the period beginning on the third business day following the date the Company releases its quarterly or annual statement of sales and earnings and ending on the twelfth business day following such date. 18. Miscellaneous Provisions. (a) Plan Expense. Any expense of administering this Plan shall be borne by the Company. 7 8 (b) Use of Exercise Proceeds. The payment received from Optionees from the exercise of Options shall be used for the general corporate purposes of the Company. (c) Construction of Plan. The place of administration of the Plan shall be in the State of Wyoming, and the validity, construction, interpretation, administration and effect of the Plan and of its rules and regulations, and rights relating to the Plan, shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Wyoming without regard to conflict of law principles and, where applicable, in accordance with the Code. (d) Taxes. The Company shall be entitled if necessary or desirable to pay or withhold the amount of any tax attributable to the delivery of Common Stock under the Plan from other amounts payable to the Employee after giving the person entitled to receive such Common Stock notice as far in advance as practical, and the Company may defer making delivery of such Common Stock if any such tax may be pending unless and until indemnified to its satisfaction. (e) Indemnification. In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board, the members of the Board shall be indemnified by the Company against all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by them in connection with any action, suit or proceeding to which they or any of them may be party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan or any Option, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suite or proceeding, except a judgment based upon a finding of bad faith; provided that upon the institution of any such action, suit or proceeding a Board member shall, in writing, give the Company notice thereof and an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before such Board member undertakes to handle and defend it on her or his own behalf. (f) Gender. For purposes of this Plan, words used in the masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter, and the singular shall include the plural and vice versa, as appropriate. (g) No Employment Agreement. The Plan shall not confer upon any Optionee any right with respect to continuation of employment with the Company, nor shall it interfere in any way with his right or the Company's right to terminate his employment at any time. 8 EX-10.9 3 c60732ex10-9.txt 1993 RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN 1 EXHIBIT 10.9 SHEFFIELD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1993 RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN 1. Purposes of the Plan. The purposes of this Restricted Stock Plan are to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of responsibility within the Company, to provide additional incentive to employees and others who provide services to the Company, and to promote the success of the Company's business through the grant of restricted shares of the Company's Common Stock. 2. Definitions. As used herein, the following definitions shall apply: (a) "Award" shall mean a grant of one or more shares of Restricted Stock. (b) "Board" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company or, when appropriate, the Committee administering the Plan, if one has been appointed. (c) "Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. (d) "Common Stock" shall mean the common stock of the Company described in the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended. (e) "Company" shall mean SHEFFIELD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC., a Wyoming corporation, and shall include any parent or subsidiary corporation of the Company as defined in Sections 425(e) and (f), respectively, of the Code. (f) "Committee" shall mean the Committee appointed by the Board in accordance with paragraph (a) of Section 4 of the Plan, if one is appointed. (g) "Employee" shall mean any person, including salaried officers and directors, employed by the Company. (h) "Exchange Act" shall mean the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (i) "Fair Market Value" shall mean, with respect to the date a given Award is granted, the value of the Common Stock determined by the Board in such manner as it may deem equitable for Plan purposes; provided. however. that where there is a public market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value per Share shall be the mean of the bid and asked prices of the Common Stock on the date of grant, as reported in the Wall Street Journal (or, if not so reported, as otherwise reported in the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System) or, in the event the Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ/National Market System, or the NASDAQ Stock Market, the Fair Market Value per Share shall be the closing price on such exchange on the date of grant of the Award, as reported in the Wall Street Journal. (j) "Grantee" shall mean an employee or other individual who provides services to the Company who has been granted one or more shares of Restricted Stock. (k) "Parent" shall mean a "parent corporation, whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 425(e) of the Code. (l) "Plan" shall mean this 1993 Restricted Stock Plan. 1 2 (m) "Restricted Stock" shall mean Common Stock, issued and outstanding, restricted as to transfer and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. (n) "Share" shall mean a share of the Common Stock, as adjusted in accordance with Section 8 of the Plan. (o) "Stock Purchase Agreement" shall mean the written agreement between the Company and the Grantee relating to the grant of an Award. (p) "Subsidiary" shall mean a "subsidiary corporation," whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section 425(f) of the Code. (q) "Tax Date" shall mean the date a Grantee is required to pay the Company an amount with respect to tax withholding obligations in connection with an Award. 3. Common Stock Subject to the Plan. Subject to the provisions of Section 8 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be granted under the Plan is one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) Shares of Common Stock. The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or previously issued Shares acquired by the Company and held in treasury. If Restricted Stock is forfeited, the forfeited Shares shall, unless the Plan shall have been terminated, be available for future grants under the Plan. 4. Administration of the Plan. (a) Procedure. (i) The Plan shall be administered by the Board in accordance with Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act ("Rule 16b-3"); provided, however, that the Board may appoint a Committee to administer the Plan at any time or from time to time, and, provided further, that if the Board is not "disinterested" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3, the Plan shall be administered by a Committee in accordance with Rule 16b-3. (ii) Once appointed, the Committee shall continue to serve until otherwise directed by the Board. From time to time the Board may increase the size of the Committee and appoint additional members thereof, remove members (with or without cause), appoint new members in substitution therefor, and fill vacancies however caused: provided, however, that at no time may any person serve on the Committee if that person's membership would cause the Committee not to satisfy the "disinterested administration" requirements of Rule 16b-3. 5. Powers of the Board. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Board shall have the authority, in its discretion: (i) to grant Restricted Stock; (ii) to determine, upon review of relevant information and in accordance with Section 2 of the Plan, the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock; (iii) to determine the Employees and other individuals who provide services to the Company to whom, and the time or times at which, Restricted Stock shall be granted and the number of Shares to be represented by each Award; (iv) to interpret the Plan; (v) to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan; (vi) to determine the terms and provisions of each Award granted (which need not be identical) and, with the consent of the Grantee thereof, modify or amend each Award; (vii) to accelerate or defer (with the consent of the Grantee) the date of any Award; (viii) to authorize any person to execute on behalf of the Company any instrument required to effectuate the grant of an Award previously granted by the Board; (ix) to accept or reject the election made by a Grantee pursuant to Section 14 of the Plan; and (x) to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. 6. Effect of Board's Decision. All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Board shall be final and binding on all Grantees and any other holders of any Restricted Stock granted under the Plan. 2 3 7. Eligibility. Consistent with the Plan's purposes, Restricted Stock may be granted only to Employees and other individuals who provide services to the Company as determined by the Board. An Employee or other individual who provides services to the Company who has been granted Restricted Stock may, if he is otherwise eligible, be granted additional Restricted Stock. 8. Stockholder Approval and Effective Dates. The Plan became effective upon approval by the Board. No Award may be granted under the Plan after August 30, 2003 (ten years from the effective date of the Plan). 9. Restricted Stock. (a) Awards. The Committee may award Restricted Stock to any Employee or other individual who provides services to the Company. Each certificate for Restricted Stock shall be registered in the name of the Grantee and deposited by him, together with a stock power endorsed in blank, with the Company. Restricted Stock shall be awarded by a signed written agreement containing such terms and conditions as the Board may determine. At the time of an award there shall be established a restriction period of such length as shall be determined by the Board. Shares of Restricted Stock shall not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered, except as hereinafter provided, during the restriction period. Except for such restrictions on transfer, the Grantee as owner of such shares of Restricted Stock shall have all the rights of a holder of Common Stock. At the expiration of the restriction period, the Company shall redeliver to the Grantee (or his legal representative or designated beneficiary) the Restricted Stock deposited pursuant to this paragraph 7. (b) Termination. If a Grantee ceases to be an Employee or to provide services to the Company with the consent of the Board, or upon his death, retirement or total and permanent disability, the restriction imposed under paragraph 7(a) shall lapse with respect to such number of shares of Restricted Stock theretofore awarded to him as shall be determined by the Board. 10. Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization or Merger. Subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, the number of shares of Common Stock which have been authorized for issuance under the Plan but as to which no Award has yet been granted or which have been returned to the Plan upon cancellation, shall be proportionately adjusted for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock resulting from a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, combination or reclassification of the Common Stock, or any other increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock effected without receipt of consideration by the Company; provided, however, that conversion of any convertible securities of the Company shall not be deemed to have been "effected without receipt of consideration." Such adjustment shall be made by the Board, whose determination in that respect shall be final, binding and conclusive. Except as expressly provided herein, no issuance by the Company of shares of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, shall affect and no adjustment by reason thereof, shall be made with respect to the number or price of shares of Common Stock subject to the Plan. 11. Time of Granting Restricted Stock. The date of grant of Restricted Stock shall, for all purposes, be the date on which the Board makes the determination granting such Restricted Stock. Notice of the determination shall be given to each Employee or other individual who provides services to the Company to whom an Award is so granted within a reasonable time after the date of such grant. 12. Amendment and Termination of the Plan. (a) Amendment and Termination. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan from time to time in such respects as the Board may deem advisable; provided, however, that the following revisions or amendments shall require approval of the shareholders of the Company, to the extent required by law, rule or regulation: 3 4 (i) Any material increase in the number of Shares subject to the Plan, other than in connection with an adjustment under Section 8 of the Plan; (ii) Any material change in the designation of the Employees or other individuals who provide services to the Company eligible to be granted Restricted Stock; or (iii) Any material increase in the benefits accruing to participants under the Plan. (b) Effect of Amendment or Termination. Any such amendment or termination of the Plan shall not affect Restricted Stock already granted and such Restricted Stock shall remain in full force and effect as if this Plan had not been amended or terminated, unless mutually agreed otherwise between the Grantee and the Board, which agreement must be in writing and signed by the Grantee and the Company. 13. Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares. Shares shall not be issued pursuant to this Plan unless the issuance and delivery of such Shares pursuant thereto shall comply with all relevant provisions of law, including, without limitation, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the requirements of any stock exchange upon which the Shares may then be listed, and shall be further subject to the approval of counsel for the Company with respect to such compliance. As a condition to the grant of Restricted Stock the Company may require the Grantee to represent and warrant at the time of any such grant that the Shares are being acquired only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required by any of the aforementioned relevant provisions of law. Inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company's counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any Shares hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such Shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained. 14. Reservation of Shares. The Company will at all times reserve and keep available such number of Shares as shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Plan. 15. Purchase Agreement. Restricted Stock shall be evidenced by Stock Purchase Agreements in such form as the Board shall approve. 16. Withholding Taxes. Subject to Section 4(b)(ix) of the Plan and prior to the Tax Date, the Grantee may make an irrevocable election to have the Company withhold from those Shares that would otherwise be received upon the grant, a number of Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum amount necessary to satisfy the Employee's portion of the Company's federal, state, local and foreign tax withholding obligations and FICA and FUTA obligations with respect to the grant of Restricted Stock to the Grantee. A Grantee who is also an officer of the Company must make the above described election: (a) at least six months after the date of grant of the Restricted Stock (except in the event of death or disability); and (b) either: (i) six months prior to the Tax Date, or 4 5 (ii) prior to the Tax Date and during the period beginning on the third business day following the date the Company releases its quarterly or annual statement of sales and earnings and ending on the twelfth business day following such date. 17. Miscellaneous Provisions. (a) Plan Expense. Any expense of administering this Plan shall be borne by the Company. (b) Construction of Plan. The place of administration of the Plan shall be in the State of Wyoming, and the validity, construction, interpretation, administration and effect of the Plan and of its rules and regulations, and rights relating to the Plan, shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Wyoming without regard to conflict of law principles and, where applicable, in accordance with the Code. (c) Taxes. The Company shall be entitled if necessary or desirable to pay or withhold the amount of any tax attributable to the delivery of Common Stock under the Plan from other amounts payable to the Grantee after giving the person entitled to receive such Common Stock notice as far in advance as practical, and the Company may defer making delivery of such Common Stock if any such tax may be pending unless and until indemnified to its satisfaction. (d) Indemnification. In addition to such other rights of indemnification as they may have as members of the Board, the members of the Board shall be indemnified by the Company against all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by them in connection with any action, suit or proceeding to which they or any of them may be party by reason of any action taken or failure to act under or in connection with the Plan or any Restricted Stock, and against all amounts paid by them in settlement thereof (provided such settlement is approved by independent legal counsel selected by the Company) or paid by them in satisfaction of a judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding, except a judgment based upon a finding of bad faith; provided that upon the institution of any such action, suit or proceeding a Board member shall, in writing, give the Company notice thereof and an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before such Board member undertakes to handle and defend it on her or his own behalf. (e) Gender. For purposes of this Plan, words used in the masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter, and the singular shall include the plural and vice versa, as appropriate. (f) No Employment Agreement. The Plan shall not confer upon any Grantee any right with respect to continuation of employment with the Company, nor shall it interfere in any way with his right or the Company's right to terminate his employment at any time. 5 EX-13 4 c60732ex13.txt PORTIONS OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT 1 EXHIBIT 13 SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE) SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (In dollars, except per share information)
Years Ended December 31, 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 -------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues: Contract research revenue $ 501,572 $ 399,378 $ -- $ -- $ -- Sublicense revenue 5,000 -- 350,000 500,000 510,000 -------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- Total revenues 506,572 399,378 350,000 500,000 510,000 Expenses: Acquisition of research and development in-process technology -- 15,000,000 13,325,000 1,650,000 -- Research and development 3,747,437 3,421,734 2,351,301 3,729,193 3,841,818 General and administrative 2,817,535 2,277,136 3,043,070 4,627,567 3,831,204 -------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- Total expenses 6,564,972 20,698,870 18,719,371 10,006,760 7,673,022 -------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- Loss from operations (6,058,400) (20,299,492) (18,369,371) (9,506,760) (7,163,022) Interest income 124,908 91,941 60,273 56,914 163,664 Interest expense (224,360) (162,237) (251,363) (39,292) (9,531) Realized gain on sale of marketable securities 239,629 -- -- -- -- Minority interest in loss of subsidiary 155,072 2,985,000 -- -- -- -------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- Net loss $(5,763,151) $(17,384,788) $(18,560,461) $(9,489,138) $(7,008,889) ============== ============== ============= ============== ============= Basic and diluted net loss per share $(.21) $(.64) $(.85) $(.80) $(.65) Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 27,956,119 27,236,715 21,931,040 11,976,090 10,806,799 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA: Working capital (net deficiency) $ 3,439,120 $ 3,344,174 $ 1,456,833 $ (837,564) $ 1,433,773 Total assets 5,450,657 5,048,655 2,862,521 689,937 2,773,884 Long-term debt & redeemable preferred stock 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 4,019,263 27,206 Accumulated deficit (80,967,524) (73,409,828) (55,156,763) (36,157,290) (26,588,652) Stockholders' equity (net capital deficiency) (413,720) 671,073 655,205 (4,716,751) 1,695,837
- ------------------------------------- No cash dividends have been paid on Common Stock for any of the periods presented. Loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common and certain common equivalent shares outstanding. See consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes. 1 2 SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE) MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty, including without limitation, risks set forth in Part I of the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. The discussion and analysis below should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements of the Company and the related Notes to Financial Statements included on pages 6 - 17 in this Annual Report. OVERVIEW Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Sheffield" or the "Company") is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on development and commercialization of later stage pharmaceutical products that utilize the Company's unique proprietary pulmonary delivery technologies. Through its alliances with Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan"), Zambon Group SpA ("Zambon"), and Siemens AG ("Siemens"), Sheffield is currently developing respiratory and non-respiratory therapies to be delivered through its proprietary Metered Solution Inhaler ("MSI") and Aerosol Drug Delivery System ("ADDS") to address unmet market needs. In 1997, Sheffield acquired the rights to the MSI through a worldwide exclusive license and supply arrangement with Siemens. In June 1998, Sheffield sublicensed to Zambon worldwide marketing and development rights to respiratory products to be delivered by the MSI. During the second half of 1998, the Company acquired the ADDS from Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. Additionally, during 1998, Sheffield licensed from Elan the Ultrasonic Pulmonary Drug Absorption System, a novel disposable unit dose nebulizer system, and Elan's Absorption Enhancing Technology, a therapeutic agent to increase the systemic absorption of drugs. In October 1999, the Company licensed Elan's NanoCrystal(TM) technology to be used in developing certain steroid products. Sheffield's lead drug delivery technology, the MSI, is a patented, multi-dose nebulizer delivery system. The pocket-sized inhaled drug delivery system features an ultrasonic nebulizer that emits high-frequency sound waves that turn liquid medication into a fine cloud or soft mist. The MSI system combines the therapeutic benefits of nebulization with the convenience of pressurized metered dose inhalers, or MDIs, in one patient-friendly device. The MSI is comprised of a hand-held ultrasonic nebulizer and drug-filled cartridges that are inserted into the inhaler unit. The cartridges provide patients who must take multiple respiratory medications with a single, easy-to-use system. The Company believes the soft mist created by the MSI provides multiple drug administration advantages over the high-velocity MDIs and dry powder inhalers. Furthermore, the MSI system is fast and portable as compared to conventional tabletop nebulizers, which are large, cumbersome and more time consuming to use. The MSI system targets younger and older asthma patients, as well as older chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients who have difficulty using MDIs and currently depend on tabletop nebulizers for delivery of their medications. Sheffield's ADDS is a patented, new generation MDI that the Company believes has significant efficiency and performance advantages over standard MDIs. The ADDS technology utilizes a standard aerosol MDI canister, encased in a compact device that provides an aerosol flow-control chamber and a synchronized triggering mechanism. The aerosol flow-control chamber allows the patient to inhale through the device at a normal breathing rate, instead of a forced breath. The inspiratory breath establishes flow fields within the device that mix and uniformly disperse the drug in the breath. At the mouthpiece, nearly all the propellant is evaporated leaving only drug particles to be inspired, allowing a significant increase in the amount of drug delivered to the lungs. The ADDS system, like the MSI system, is designed to reduce patient coordination problems and enhance compliance with the prescribed treatment. The Company is in the development stage and to date has been principally engaged in research, development and licensing efforts. The Company has generated minimal operating revenue and will require additional capital which the Company intends to obtain through out-licensing as well as through equity and debt offerings to continue to operate its business. Even if the Company is able to successfully develop new products, there can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient revenues from the sale or licensing of such products to be profitable. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sheffield and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd. ("SPD"), Ion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and CP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and its 80.1% owned subsidiary, Respiratory Steroid Delivery, Ltd. ("RSD"). 2 3 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Revenue Contract research revenue primarily represents revenue earned from an agreement with Zambon relating to the development of respiratory applications of the MSI. Contract research revenue was $501,572 and $399,378 for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. There was no contract research revenue in 1998. The increase of $102,194 from 1999 to 2000 reflects two additional MSI respiratory programs in development in 2000 as compared to 1999. The increase also reflects certain nonrecurring MSI device development work and testing completed during 2000. Costs of contract research revenue approximate such revenue and are included in research and development expenses on the consolidated statement of operations. Future contract research revenues and expenses are anticipated to fluctuate depending, in part, upon the success of current clinical studies, and obtaining additional collaborative agreements. Sublicense revenue was $5,000, $0, and $350,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. The 1998 sublicense revenue relates to a sublicense agreement entered into during 1997 with Lorus Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly Imutec Pharma Inc.) ("Lorus"). The agreement licensed rights to a series of compounds for the treatment of cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma and actinic keratosis to a newly formed company, NuChem Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("NuChem") for which Lorus will provide funding and management of the development program. In exchange, the Company received 583,188 shares of Lorus stock with a value of $350,000. At December 31, 2000 the Company's remaining investment in Lorus of 283,188 shares had a market value of $327,422. Acquisition of Research & Development In-Process Technology Acquisition of research and development in-process technology for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $0, $15.0 million, and $13.3 million, respectively. In 1999, the Company licensed certain pulmonary NanoCrystal technology from Elan for $15.0 million. This entire payment was expensed as the license agreement restricts the Company's use of the NanoCrystal technology to certain respiratory steroid products that are currently research and development projects. In 1998, the Company acquired the ADDS from Aeroquip Corporation for $.8 million and certain pulmonary delivery technologies from Elan for $12.5 million. The 1998 acquisitions were expensed in the year acquired since the technologies had not demonstrated technological feasibility and had no alternative future uses. Research and Development Research and development expenses were $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 compared to $3.4 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The increase of $.3 million, or 9.5%, from 1999 to 2000 primarily represents costs associated with: (1) the development by the Company's subsidiary, RSD, of three steroid products initiated during the fourth quarter of 1999, (2) formulation work begun during 2000 on an undisclosed respiratory product to be delivered via the ADDS, (3) modifications made to the MSI to enhance its commercial appeal prior to the start of Phase III-albuterol clinical trials, and (4) two additional MSI respiratory programs in development in 2000 as compared to 1999. These increases were partially offset by lower development costs on the Company's two systemic programs, a therapy for breakthrough pain delivered through the MSI, and a migraine therapy delivered through the ADDS. The increase of $1.0 million from 1998 to 1999 is due to modifications being made to the MSI and with work associated with the development of the Company's systemic programs. These increases were partially offset by the shifting of responsibility for development expenses of the respiratory applications of the MSI to the Company's partner, Zambon. General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative expenses were $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 compared to $2.3 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The increase of $.5 million, or 23.7%, from 1999 to 2000 primarily reflects higher consulting and legal costs associated with expanded business development activities. The decrease of $.7 million from 1998 to 1999 was primarily attributable to indirect costs associated with completing both the Zambon and Elan agreements in 1998. In addition, the decrease between years resulted from 1998 costs associated with both the retention of the Company's former investor relations firm and settlement of a dispute with the innovator of one of the Company's early stage research projects. 3 4 Interest Interest income was $124,908 for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to $91,941 and $60,273 for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The increase of $32,967, or 35.9%, from 1999 to 2000 is primarily due to larger balances of cash available for investment and higher average yields on those investments. The $31,668 increase in interest income in 1999 from 1998 was primarily due to larger balances of cash available for investment. Interest expense was $224,360 for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to $162,237 and $251,363 for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The increase of $62,123, or 38.3%, from 1999 to 2000 resulted from a higher outstanding balance during 2000 on the Company's convertible promissory note with Elan, as well as a higher average interest rate on the note. The decrease of $89,126 in 1999 as compared to 1998 primarily reflects the 1998 conversion of the Company's Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock and 6% Convertible Subordinated Debentures into Common Stock, partially offset by higher outstanding balances on the convertible promissory note with Elan. Realized Gain on Sale of Marketable Securities Realized gain on sale of marketable securities of $239,629 for the year ended December 31, 2000 resulted from the sale of 300,000 shares of the Company's investment in Lorus common stock. As of December 31, 2000 the Company's remaining investment in Lorus of 283,188 shares had an unrealized gain of $157,467. Minority Interest in Subsidiary Minority interest in loss of subsidiary was $.2 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. RSD, a consolidated and 80.1% owned subsidiary of the Company, incurred a loss of $.8 million in 2000, resulting from costs incurred on three inhaled steroid products being developed by the subsidiary. RSD's loss of $15.0 million in 1999 resulted from the license of certain pulmonary NanoCrystal technology from Elan. The minority interest in loss of subsidiary represents Elan's portion, or 19.9%, of RSD's losses. Elan's investment in RSD, shown as minority interest in subsidiary on the consolidated balance sheets, was $0 at both December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES At December 31, 2000, the Company had $3.0 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $3.9 million at December 31, 1999. The decrease of $.9 million reflects $5.6 million of cash disbursements used primarily to fund operating activities and $.3 million to repurchase and retire 91,043 shares of the Company's Common Stock. These decreases in cash were partially offset by $2.0 million in net proceeds from a private placement of 626,950 shares of the Company's Common Stock completed in December 2000, $1.8 million in net proceeds from the exercise of Common Stock options and warrants, and $1.0 million from the issuance of 1,000 shares of the Company's Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. In December 2000, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with The Tail Wind Fund Ltd. Under the agreement, Sheffield issued and sold 626,950 shares of Common Stock and a warrant to purchase 112,500 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.9844 per share for total cash consideration of $2.3 million. The net proceeds from the transaction of $2.0 million are to be used for general corporate purposes. In October 1999, as part of a licensing agreement with Elan, the Company received gross proceeds of $17.0 million related to the issuance to Elan of 12,015 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and 5,000 shares of Series F Preferred Stock. In turn, the Company made an equity investment of $12.0 million in a joint venture, RSD, representing an initial 80.1% ownership. The remaining proceeds from this preferred stock issuance were utilized for general operating purposes. As part of the agreement, Elan has also committed to purchase, on a drawdown basis, up to an additional $4.0 million of the Company's Series E Preferred Stock, of which $3.0 million of such commitment remains outstanding. The proceeds from the Series E Preferred Stock will be utilized by the Company to fund its portion of RSD's operating and development costs. In May 1999, in conjunction with the completion of its Phase I/II MSI-albuterol trial, Zambon provided the Company with a $1.0 million interest-free advance against future milestone payments. At December 31, 2000, the Company was entitled to receive an additional $1.0 million interest-free milestone advance resulting from the demonstration of the technical feasibility of delivering an inhaled steroid formulation in the MSI. In January 2001, the Company received the funds for this advance from Zambon. Upon the attainment of certain future milestones, the Company will recognize these advances as revenue. If the Company does not achieve these future milestones, the advance must be repaid in quarterly installments of $250,000 commencing January 1, 2002. The proceeds from these advances are not restricted as to their use by the Company. 4 5 On April 15, 1998, the Company issued 1,250 shares of its Series B Preferred Stock in a private placement for an aggregate purchase price of $1.3 million. The proceeds were used to make a payment to Siemens pursuant to the MSI license agreement. During 1998, the Company entered into a sublicense agreement with Zambon that provided the Company $2.2 million in gross proceeds from the sale of 2.6 million shares of Common Stock. The Company also entered into an agreement with Elan that provided the Company approximately $17.5 million of gross proceeds from the sale of 4.6 million shares of Common Stock and 11,500 shares of the Company's Series C Preferred Stock. The proceeds from the Elan transaction were used to purchase certain pulmonary device delivery technologies from Elan for $12.5 million, the ADDS for $.8 million from Aeroquip-Vickers Inc., and to redeem $1.3 million principal amount of Series B Preferred Stock. The remaining proceeds from the Elan transaction were used for research and development, working capital and general corporate purposes. Also, as part of the 1998 Elan agreement, Elan agreed to make available to the Company a convertible promissory note that provides the Company the right to borrow up to $2.0 million, subject to satisfying certain conditions. As of December 31, 2000, $2.0 million was outstanding under this note. Since its inception, the Company has financed its operations primarily through the sale of securities and convertible debentures, from which it raised an aggregate of approximately $75.5 million through December 31, 2000, of which approximately $30.0 million has been spent to acquire certain in-process research and development technologies, and $27.9 million has been incurred to fund certain ongoing technology research projects. The Company expects to incur additional costs in the future, including costs relating to its ongoing research and development activities, and preclinical and clinical testing of its product candidates. The Company may also bear considerable costs in connection with filing, prosecuting, defending and/or enforcing its patent and other intellectual property claims. Therefore, the Company will need substantial additional capital before it will recognize significant cash flow from operations, which is contingent on the successful commercialization of the Company's technologies. There can be no assurance that any of the technologies to which the Company currently has or may acquire rights can or will be commercialized or that any revenues generated from such commercialization will be sufficient to fund existing and future research and development activities. Because the Company does not expect to generate significant cash flows from operations for at least the next few years, the Company believes it will require additional funds to meet future costs. The Company will attempt to meet its capital requirements with existing cash balances and through additional public or private offerings of its securities, debt financing, and collaboration and licensing arrangements with other companies. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such additional funds or enter into such collaborative and licensing arrangements on terms favorable to the Company, if at all. The Company's development programs may be curtailed if future financings are not completed. While the Company does not believe that inflation has had a material impact on its results of operations, there can be no assurance that inflation in the future will not impact financial markets which, in turn, may adversely affect the Company's valuation of its securities and, consequently, its ability to raise additional capital, either through equity or debt instruments, or any off-balance sheet refinancing arrangements, such as collaboration and licensing agreements with other companies. 5 6 SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage enterprise) CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS December 31, ------------ 2000 1999 ---- ---- Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents (Note 1) $3,041,948 $3,874,437 Marketable equity securities (Notes 1 and 7) 327,422 519,387 Milestone advance receivable (Note 2) 1,000,000 -- Prepaid expenses and other current assets 540,272 145,237 --------------- -------------- Total current assets 4,909,642 4,539,061 --------------- -------------- Property and equipment (Note 1): Laboratory equipment 271,748 407,624 Office equipment 211,609 178,797 Leasehold improvements 18,320 15,000 --------------- -------------- Total at cost 501,677 601,421 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (235,389) (311,752) --------------- -------------- Property and equipment, net 266,288 289,669 --------------- -------------- Patent costs, net of accumulated amortization of $9,287 and $0, respectively (Note 1) 258,897 204,283 Other assets 15,830 15,642 --------------- -------------- Total assets $ 5,450,657 $ 5,048,655 =============== ============== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY) Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $1,234,765 $ 773,206 Sponsored research payable 235,757 421,681 --------------- -------------- Total current liabilities 1,470,522 1,194,887 Convertible promissory note (Note 6) 2,000,000 2,000,000 Unearned revenue (Note 2) 2,000,000 1,000,000 Other long-term liabilities 393,855 182,695 Commitments and contingencies -- -- --------------- -------------- Total liabilities 5,864,377 4,377,582 Minority interest in subsidiary (Note 1) -- -- Stockholders' equity (net capital deficiency)(Notes 4 & 5): Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized 3,000,000 shares: Series C cumulative convertible preferred stock, authorized 23,000 shares; 13,712 and 12,780 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively 137 128 Series D cumulative convertible exchangeable preferred stock, authorized 21,000 shares; 12,870 and 12,015 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively 129 120 Series E cumulative convertible non-exchangeable preferred stock, authorized 9,000 shares; 1,004 and no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively 10 -- Series F convertible non-exchangeable preferred stock, 5,000 shares authorized; 5,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 1999 50 50 Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 60,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 28,791,643 and 27,308,846 shares at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively 287,916 273,088 Additional paid-in capital 80,108,095 73,638,128 Other comprehensive income 157,467 169,387 Deficit accumulated during development stage (80,967,524) (73,409,828) --------------- -------------- Total stockholders' equity (net capital deficiency) (413,720) 671,073 --------------- -------------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (net capital deficiency) $5,450,657 $5,048,655 =============== ==============
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 6 7 SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage enterprise) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and for the Period from October 17, 1986 (inception) to December 31, 2000
October 17, 1986 Years ended December 31, inception) to -------------------------------------------- December 31, 2000 1999 1998 2000 ---- ---- ---- ---- Revenues: Contract research revenue (Note 1) $ 501,572 $ 399,378 $ -- $ 900,950 Sublicense revenue (Note 7) 5,000 -- 350,000 1,365,000 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total revenues 506,572 399,378 350,000 2,265,950 Expenses: Acquisition of research and development in-process technology (Note 7) -- 15,000,000 13,325,000 29,975,000 Research and development 3,747,437 3,421,734 2,351,301 28,772,861 General and administrative 2,817,535 2,277,136 3,043,070 24,335,085 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total expenses 6,564,972 20,698,870 18,719,371 83,082,946 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Loss from operations (6,058,400) (20,299,492) (18,369,371) (80,816,996) Interest income 124,908 91,941 60,273 730,949 Interest expense (224,360) (162,237) (251,363) (797,715) Realized gain (loss) on sale of marketable securities 239,629 -- -- (85,286) Minority interest in loss of subsidiary (Note 1) 155,072 2,985,000 -- 3,140,072 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Loss before extraordinary item (5,763,151) (17,384,788) (18,560,461) (77,828,976) Extraordinary item -- -- -- 42,787 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net loss $ (5,763,151) $(17,384,788) $(18,560,461) $(77,786,189) ============ ============ ============ ============ Accretion of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock -- -- (23,900) (103,400) ============ ============ ============ ============ Net loss - attributable to common shares $ (5,763,151) $(17,384,788) $(18,584,361) $(77,889,589) ============ ============ ============ ============ Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (Note 1) 27,956,119 27,236,715 21,931,040 9,331,056 Basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock (Note 1): $ (.21) $ (.64) $ (.85) $ (8.35)
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 7 8 SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage enterprise) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY) For the Period from October 17, 1986 (Inception) to December 31, 2000
Notes receivable Additional Preferred Common in connection paid-in Stock Stock with sale of stock capital ----- ----- ------------------ ------- Balance at October 17, 1986 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Common stock issued -- 11,340,864 37,400 18,066,219 Reincorporation in Delaware at $.01 par value -- (11,220,369) -- 11,220,369 Common stock subscribed -- -- (110,000) -- Common stock options and warrants issued -- -- -- 240,868 Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition of Camelot Pharmacal, LLC -- 6,000 -- 1,644,000 Common stock options extended -- -- -- 215,188 Accretion of issuance costs for Series A preferred stock -- -- -- -- Comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized loss on marketable securities -- -- -- -- Net loss -- -- -- -- Comprehensive income (loss) -- -- -- -- --------- ------------ --------------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1997 -- 126,495 (72,600) 31,386,644 Common stock issued -- 144,089 62,600 12,472,966 Series C preferred stock issued 115 -- -- 11,499,885 Series C preferred stock dividends 4 -- -- 413,996 Accretion of issuance costs for Series A preferred stock -- -- -- -- Comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized loss on marketable securities -- -- -- -- Net loss -- -- -- -- Comprehensive income (loss) -- -- -- -- --------- ------------ --------------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1998 119 270,584 (10,000) 55,773,491 Common stock issued -- 2,504 10,000 89,059 Series C preferred stock dividends 9 -- -- 865,991 Series D preferred stock issued 120 -- -- 12,014,880 Series F preferred stock issued 50 -- -- 4,691,255 Common stock warrants issued -- -- -- 203,452 Comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized gain on marketable securities -- -- -- -- Net loss -- -- -- -- Comprehensive income (loss) -- -- -- -- --------- ------------ --------------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1999 298 273,088 73,638,128 -- Common stock issued -- 15,738 -- 3,796,072 Repurchase and retirement of common stock -- (910) -- (312,279) Series C preferred stock dividends 9 -- -- 931,991 Series D preferred stock dividends 9 -- -- 854,991 Series E preferred stock issued 10 -- -- 999,990 Series E preferred stock dividends -- -- -- 4,000 Common stock warrants issued -- -- -- 195,202 Comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized loss on marketable securities -- -- -- -- Net loss -- -- -- -- Comprehensive income (loss) -- -- -- -- --------- ------------ --------------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2000 $ 326 $ 287,916 $ -- $80,108,095 ========= ============ =============== =========== Other Deficit accumulated Total stockholders' comprehensive during development equity (net capital income(loss) stage deficiency) ------------ ----- ----------- Balance at October 17, 1986 $ -- $ -- $ -- Common stock issued -- -- 29,444,483 Reincorporation in Delaware at $.01 par value -- -- -- Common stock subscribed -- -- (110,000) Common stock options and warrants issued -- -- 240,868 Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition of Camelot Pharmacal, LLC -- -- 1,650,000 Common stock options extended -- -- 215,188 Accretion of issuance costs for Series A preferred stock -- (79,500) (79,500) Comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized loss on marketable securities -- -- -- Net loss -- (36,077,790) -- Comprehensive income (loss) -- -- (36,077,790) ------------- ------------------ ----------------- Balance at December 31, 1997 -- (36,157,290) (4,716,751) Common stock issued -- -- 12,679,655 Series C preferred stock issued -- -- 11,500,000 Series C preferred stock dividends -- (415,112) (1,112) Accretion of issuance costs for Series A preferred stock -- (23,900) (23,900) Comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized loss on marketable securities (222,226) -- -- Net loss -- (18,560,461) -- Comprehensive income (loss) -- -- (18,782,687) ------------- ------------------ ----------------- Balance at December 31, 1998 (222,226) (55,156,763) 655,205 Common stock issued -- -- 101,563 Series C preferred stock dividends -- (868,277) (2,277) Series D preferred stock issued -- -- 12,015,000 Series F preferred stock issued -- -- 4,691,305 Common stock warrants issued -- -- 203,452 Comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized gain on marketable securities 391,613 -- -- Net loss -- (17,384,788) -- Comprehensive income (loss) -- -- (16,993,175) ------------- ------------------ ----------------- Balance at December 31, 1999 169,387 (73,409,828) 671,073 Common stock issued -- -- 3,811,810 Repurchase and retirement of common stock -- -- (313,189) Series C preferred stock dividends -- (934,045) (2,045) Series D preferred stock dividends -- (855,750) (750) Series E preferred stock issued -- -- 1,000,000 Series E preferred stock dividends -- (4,750) (750) Common stock warrants issued -- -- 195,202 Comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized loss on marketable securities (11,920) -- -- Net loss Comprehensive income (loss) -- (5,763,151) -- Balance at December 31, 2000 -- -- (5,775,071) ------------- ------------------ ----------------- $ 157,467 $(80,967,524) $(413,720) ============= ================== =================
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 8 9 SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage enterprise) CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and for the Period from October 17, 1986 (Inception) to December 31, 2000
October 17, 1986 Years ended December 31, (inception) to ------------------------ December 31, 2000 1999 1998 2000 ---- ---- ---- ---- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $(5,763,151) $(17,384,788) $(18,560,461) $(77,786,189) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by development stage activities: Issuance of common stock, stock options/warrants for services 207,202 203,452 359,913 2,692,627 Depreciation and amortization 118,775 86,341 68,794 598,335 Non-cash acquisition of research and development in-process technology -- -- -- 1,650,000 (Gain) loss realized on sale of marketable securities (239,629) -- -- 85,286 (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses & other current assets (395,035) (106,202) 8,343 (599,313) Increase in milestone advance receivable (1,000,000) -- -- (1,000,000) (Increase) decrease in other assets (64,089) (219,925) 25,738 (224,973) Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 615,636 154,418 (279,264) 801,502 (Decrease) increase in sponsored research payable (185,924) (28,124) (20,963) 812,827 Increase in unearned revenue 1,000,000 1,000,000 -- 2,000,000 Other 59,973 151,396 (285,826) 298,048 ------------- -- ------------- ------------- ---------------- Net cash used by development stage activities (5,646,242) (16,143,432) (18,683,726) (70,671,850) ------------- -- ------------- ------------- ---------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of marketable securities 419,674 -- -- 594,759 Acquisition of laboratory and office equipment, and leasehold improvements (86,107) (136,588) (131,772) (671,819) Other -- 10,000 132,200 (57,087) ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 333,567 (126,588) 428 (134,147) ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Payments on debt and capital leases (6,435) (709,701) (54,020) (842,609) Net proceeds from issuance of: Debt -- 1,600,000 1,150,000 5,050,000 Common stock 2,015,625 -- 8,150,000 23,433,660 Preferred stock 1,000,000 16,706,305 12,750,000 33,741,117 Proceeds from exercise of warrants/stock options 1,784,185 91,563 -- 13,277,906 Repurchase and retirement of common stock (313,189) -- -- (313,189) Other -- -- (1,250,000) (500,024) ------------- ------------- ------------- ---------------- Net cash provided by financing activities 4,480,186 17,688,167 20,745,980 73,846,861 Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (832,489) 1,418,147 2,062,682 3,040,864 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 3,874,437 2,456,290 393,608 1,084 ------------- ------------- ---------------- ------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $3,041,948 $3,874,437 $2,456,290 $3,041,948 ============= ============= ============= ================ Noncash investing and financing activities: Common stock, stock options and warrants issued for services $207,202 $203,452 $359,913 $2,692,627 Common stock redeemed in payment of notes receivable -- -- 10,400 10,400 Acquisition of research and development in-process technology -- -- -- 1,655,216 Common stock issued for intellectual property rights -- -- -- 866,250 Common stock issued to retire debt -- -- -- 600,000 Common stock issued to redeem convertible securities -- -- 4,019,263 5,353,368 Securities acquired under sublicense agreement -- -- 350,000 850,000 Equipment acquired under capital lease -- -- 49,231 121,684 Notes payable converted to common stock -- -- -- 749,976 Stock dividends 1,794,545 868,277 596,195 3,441,369 Supplemental disclosure of cash information: Interest paid $2,940 $8,919 $186,519 $279,260
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 9 10 SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (a development stage enterprise) NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation - Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly Sheffield Medical Technologies Inc.) ("Sheffield" or the "Company") a Delaware corporation, is focused on the development and commercialization of later stage, lower risk pharmaceutical products that utilize the Company's unique proprietary pulmonary delivery technologies. The Company is in the development stage and to date has been principally engaged in research, development and licensing efforts. The Company has generated minimal operating revenue, sustained significant net operating losses, and requires additional capital that the Company intends to obtain through out-licensing as well as through equity and debt offerings to continue to operate its business. Even if the Company is able to successfully develop new products, there can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient revenues from the sale or licensing of such products to be profitable. Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sheffield and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd. ("SPD"), Ion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and CP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and its 80.1% owned subsidiary, Respiratory Steroid Delivery, Ltd. ("RSD"). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Investments in affiliated companies that are 50% owned or less, and where the Company does not exercise control, are accounted for using the equity method. Use of Estimates - The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits held in banks, interest bearing money market funds, and corporate commercial paper with A1 or P1 short-term ratings. Marketable Securities - Marketable securities consist of investments that can be readily purchased or sold using established markets. The Company's securities, which are classified as available-for-sale, are carried at market with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income within stockholders' equity. Property and Equipment - Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over three or five year periods for office equipment, and five years for laboratory equipment. Assets under capital leases, consisting of office equipment and leasehold improvements, are amortized over the lesser of the useful life or the applicable lease terms. Patent Costs - Costs associated with obtaining patents, principally legal costs and filing fees, are capitalized and being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining lives of the respective patents. The Company periodically evaluates the carrying amount of these assets based on current licensing and future commercialization efforts, and if warranted, impairment would be recognized. Contract Research Revenue - Contract revenue from collaborative research agreements is recorded when earned and as the related costs are incurred. Payments received which are related to future performance are deferred and recognized as revenue in the period in which they are earned. Research and Development Costs - Research and development costs ("R & D costs") are expensed as incurred, except for fixed assets to which the Company has title, which are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Income Taxes - The Company utilizes the liability method to account for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, sponsored research payable and notes payable approximate fair value. Basic Net Loss per Share of Common Stock - Basic net loss per share is calculated in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average common stock outstanding during each year. Potentially dilutive securities, such as stock options, warrants, convertible debt and preferred stock, have not been included in any years presented as their effect is antidilutive. 10 11 Stock-Based Compensation - SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, defines a fair value method of accounting for stock options and similar equity instruments. As permitted by SFAS 123, the Company continues to account for employee stock options under Accounting Principal Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees ("APB 25"), and has disclosed in a note to the financial statements pro forma net loss and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value method of accounting for its stock-based awards. Under APB 25, no expense is generally recognized at the time of option grant because the exercise price of the Company's employee stock option equals or exceeds the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Effective January 1, 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements and applies to all enterprises. Other comprehensive income or loss shown in the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 is solely comprised of unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities. The unrealized gain on marketable securities during 2000 includes reclassification adjustments of $239,629 for gains realized in income from the sale of the securities. Segment Information - Effective January 1, 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company operates in one reportable segment as defined by SFAS No. 131. 2. UNEARNED REVENUE In May 1999, in conjunction with the completion of the Phase I/II Metered Solution Inhaler ("MSI") albuterol trial, Zambon Group SpA ("Zambon") provided the Company with a $1.0 million interest-free advance against future milestone payments. In December 2000, the Company was entitled to receive an additional $1.0 million interest-free advance against future milestone payments resulting from the demonstration of the technical feasibility of delivering an inhaled steroid formulation in the MSI. As such, this receivable was reflected in the accompanying financial statements as a milestone advance receivable. In January 2001, the Company collected the funds from Zambon relating to this receivable. Upon the attainment of certain future milestones, the Company will recognize both of these advances as revenue. If the Company does not achieve these future milestones, the advances must be repaid in quarterly installments of $250,000 commencing on January 1, 2002. The proceeds from these advances are not restricted as to their use by the Company (see Note 7). 3. LEASES The Company leases its office space and certain equipment under noncancelable operating and capital leases that expire at various dates through 2003. At December 31, 2000, assets held under capital leases consisting of office equipment were $21,243, net of accumulated amortization of $27,988. Future minimum lease payments under capital and operating leases at December 31, 2000 are as follows:
Capital Operating Leases Leases 2001....................................... $9,375 $146,082 2002....................................... 9,375 81,851 2003....................................... 774 2,463 ------------- ------------- Total minimum lease payments............... 19,524 $230,396 ============= Less amount representing interest.......... (2,752) ------------- Present value of net minimum lease payments................................. 16,772 Less current maturities of capital lease obligations........................ (7,429) ------------- Capital lease obligations.................. $9,343 =============
Rent expense relating to operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $219,859, $174,332, and $143,126, respectively. 11 12 4. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred Stock In February 1997, 35,700 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") were issued pursuant to a private placement. Holders of Series A Preferred Stock had the right, exercisable commencing May 29, 1997 and ending February 28, 1999, to convert shares of Series A Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock. The number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock was determined by reference to the lesser of (i) $3.31875 and (ii) 85% of the "current market price" per share of Common Stock, where "current market price" means, with certain exceptions, the average of the closing bid prices of Common Stock for the 10 consecutive trading days ending the last trading day before the applicable conversion date. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock earned a cumulative dividend payable in shares of Common Stock at a rate per share equal to 7.0% of the original $100 purchase price per share of the Series A Preferred Stock payable at the time of conversion. In 1997 and 1998, all of the Company's outstanding Series A Preferred Stock, plus related dividends payable, were converted to Common Stock. In April 1998, the Company issued 1,250 shares of its Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred Stock") in a private placement for an aggregate purchase price of $1.3 million. In addition, the holder of Series B Preferred Stock was issued warrants to acquire 300,000 shares of Common Stock at any time up until and including April 15, 2001 for a price of $1.00 per share. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock earned a cumulative dividend payable at a rate per share equal to 6.0% per annum. On July 31, 1998, the Company redeemed all of the Series B Preferred Stock and accrued dividends for cash. In June 1998, the Company issued 4,571,428 shares of Common Stock and 11,500 shares of Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred Stock"), convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company or of its wholly owned subsidiary, SPD, for $17.5 million pursuant to a definitive agreement with an affiliate of Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan"), Elan International Services, Ltd. ("Elan International"). The Series C Preferred Stock earns cumulative dividends payable in shares of Series C Preferred Stock at an annual rate of 7.0% on the stated value of each outstanding share of Series C Preferred Stock on the dividend date. Elan International also received a warrant to purchase 990,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company exercisable from December 31, 1998 through January 30, 2005 at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company, through SPD, acquired certain pulmonary delivery technologies for the sum of $12.5 million in cash (see Note 7). All of the outstanding Common Stock of SPD is pledged to Elan during the term of the agreement. Subject to certain conditions and the making of certain payments to the Company, Elan International has the option to acquire all or a portion of the outstanding stock of SPD. The net book value of SPD is $.1 million as of December 31, 2000. The Company issued stock dividends totaling 932 and 866 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and cash dividends for fractional shares of $2,045 and $2,278 for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. In October 1999, pursuant to a definitive agreement, the Company and Elan International formed RSD to develop certain respiratory steroid products. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company issued to Elan International 12,015 shares of Series D Cumulative Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock ("Series D Preferred Stock"), convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at $4.86 per Common Share or exchangeable for an additional 30.1% ownership interest in the new joint venture, for $12.0 million. The Series D Preferred Stock earns cumulative dividends payable in shares of Series D Preferred Stock at an annual rate of 7.0% on the stated value of each outstanding share of Series D Preferred Stock on the dividend date. The Company issued stock dividends totaling 855 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and cash dividends for fractional shares of $750 for the year ended December 31, 2000. No stock dividends were paid in 1999. Elan International also has committed to purchase, on a drawdown basis, up to $4.0 million of the Company's Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series E Preferred Stock"), convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at $3.89 per Common Share. The Series E Preferred Stock will be utilized by the Company to fund its portion of RSD's operating and development costs. During 2000, Elan International purchased $1.0 million of the Series E Preferred Stock. The Series E Preferred Stock earns cumulative dividends payable in shares of Series E Preferred Stock at an annual rate of 9.0% on the stated value of each outstanding share of Series E Preferred Stock on the dividend date. The Company issued stock dividends totaling 4 shares of Series E Preferred Stock and cash dividends for fractional shares of $750 for the year ended December 31, 2000. No stock dividends were paid in 1999. In addition to the above, the Company issued to Elan International 5,000 shares of Series F Convertible Non-Exchangeable Preferred Stock ("Series F Preferred Stock"), convertible into shares of Common Stock of the Company at $3.40 per Common Share, for $5.0 million. The proceeds of the Series F Preferred Stock was utilized by Sheffield for its own operating purposes. The holders of the Series F Preferred Stock may be entitled to receive dividends on a pari passu basis with the holders of Common Stock. As part of the transaction, Elan International also received a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company at an exercise price of $6.00 per share (see Note 7). 12 13 Common Stock During 1998, the Company entered into an agreement with Zambon for a sublicense to the Company's proprietary MSI drug delivery system (see Note 7). Pursuant to an option agreement dated April 15, 1998, the Company issued 800,000 shares of Common Stock for $650,000 in cash. On June 15, 1998, the Company entered into the definitive agreement, resulting in the issuance of an additional 1,846,153 shares of Common Stock for $1.5 million. In June 1999, the stockholders of Sheffield approved an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of Common Stock that the Company is authorized to issue from 50 million shares to 60 million shares. In December 2000, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with The Tail Wind Fund Ltd. ("Tail Wind"). Under the agreement, Sheffield issued and sold 626,950 shares of Common Stock and a warrant to purchase 112,500 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.9844 per share for total cash consideration of $2.3 million. The net proceeds from the transaction of $2.0 million will be used for general corporate purposes. Pursuant to the stock purchase agreement, until at least August 29, 2002, if Sheffield sells shares of Common Stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock for less than $3.5888 per share, Sheffield is obligated to issue to Tail Wind additional shares so that the number of shares purchased by Tail Wind in the December 2000 private placement plus the additional shares issued to Tail Wind equals the number of shares that Tail Wind could have purchased for $2.3 million at the price per share at which the new shares are sold. In addition, in the event that the Company is required to issue additional shares to Tail Wind, Sheffield may not issue an aggregate of over 5,630,122 shares of Common Stock in total to Tail Wind in connection with the December 2000 private placement. If the Company would otherwise be required to issue more than 5,630,122 shares to Tail Wind, Sheffield must instead pay Tail Wind 105% of the cash value of such shares the Company does not issue. Convertible Subordinated Debentures In September 1997, the Company consummated a private placement of $1.8 million principal amount of its 6.0% Convertible Subordinated Debentures ("Debentures") due September 22, 2000. In addition, the Company granted the holder of the Debenture warrants to purchase 140,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at $2.80 per share. A value of $115,500 was assigned to these warrants. The Debentures were convertible at the option of the holder from December 22, 1997 until maturity, subject to certain limitations, into a number of shares of Common Stock equal to (i) the principal amount of the Debenture being so converted divided by (ii) 75% of the market price of the Common Stock as of the date of conversion. For purposes of any conversion of Debentures, "market price" generally meant the average of the closing prices of the Common Stock for the five trading day period proceeding the applicable conversion date. The Debentures also earned interest at a rate of 6.0% per annum that was payable by the Company, at the option of the holder and subject to certain conditions, in shares of its Common Stock at a conversion rate generally equal to the average of the closing prices of the Common Stock for the ten trading days preceding the applicable interest payment date. During 1998, the Debentures were converted to Common Stock resulting in the issuance of 2,925,941 shares of Common Stock. 5. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS Stock Option Plan - The 1993 Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors in August 1992 and approved by the stockholders at the annual meeting in December 1993. An amendment to the Option Plan increasing the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance thereunder from 3 million shares to 4 million shares received stockholder approval on July 15, 1998. The Option Plan permits the grant to employees and officers of the Company of both incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options. The Option Plan is administered by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board, which determines the persons to whom options will be granted and the terms thereof, including the exercise price, the number of shares subject to each option, and the exercisability of each option. The exercise price of all options for Common Stock granted under the Option Plan must be at least equal to the fair market value on the date of grant in the case of incentive stock options, and 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant in the case of non-statutory stock options. Options generally expire five to ten years from the date of grant and vest either over time or upon the Company's Common Stock attaining a set market price for a certain number of trading days. As of December 31, 2000 there are 775,200 shares available for grant under the Option Plan. 13 14 Restricted Stock Plan - The 1993 Restricted Stock Plan (the "Restricted Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors in August 1992 and approved by the stockholders at the annual meeting in December 1993. The Restricted Plan authorized the grant of a maximum of 150,000 shares of Common Stock to key employees, consultants, researchers and members of the Company's Scientific Advisory Board. The Restricted Plan is administered by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board, which determines the person to whom shares will be granted and the terms of such share grants. As of December 31, 2000, no shares have been granted under the Restricted Plan. Directors Stock Option Plan - The 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan (the "Directors Plan") was adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by the stockholders on June 20, 1996. Under the Directors Plan, the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be optioned and sold is 500,000 shares of Common Stock. The Directors Plan initially granted each eligible director 15,000 stock options. To the extent that shares remain available, any new directors shall receive the grant of an option to purchase 25,000 shares. To the extent that shares remain available under the Directors Plan, on January 1 of each year commencing January 1, 1997, each eligible director shall be granted an option to purchase 15,000 shares. The exercise price of all options granted under the Directors Plan shall be the fair market value at the date of the grant. Options generally expire five years from the date of grant. As of December 31, 2000, there are 215,000 shares available for grant under the Directors Plan. SFAS No. 123 requires pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share as if the Company has accounted for its stock options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994, under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of these stock options is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2000, 1999, and 1998, risk-free interest rate ranging from 4.39% to 6.36%; expected volatility ranging from 0.526 to 0.769; expected option life of one to ten years from vesting and an expected dividend yield of 0.0%. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the stock options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's pro forma information is as follows:
2000 1999 1998 ---- ---- ---- Pro forma net loss.................... $8,206,316 $17,807,124 $18,983,921 Pro forma basic net loss per share of common stock........................ $.29 $.65 $.87
Transactions involving stock options and warrants are summarized as follows:
Years Ended December 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2000 1999 1998 --------------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------------------------- Weighted Weighted Weighted Average Average Average Common Stock Exercise Common Stock Exercise Common Stock Exercise Options/Warrants Price Options/Warrants Price Options/Warrants Price ---------------- ----- ---------------- ----- ---------------- ----- Outstanding, January 1 7,782,954 $2.59 7,910,836 $2.55 4,781,290 $3.65 Granted 1,041,040 5.34 555,040 2.97 3,162,910 1.81 Expired 660,820 2.90 315,422 3.92 283,504 4.48 Exercised 1,241,545 2.32 367,500 1.07 -- -- Canceled -- -- -- -- 180,500 5.64 Revalued(1) -- -- -- -- 430,640 -- ------------------ ----------- ---------------- ----------- ------------------ ----------- Outstanding, December 31 6,921,629 $3.02 7,782,954 $2.59 7,910,836 $2.55 ================== =========== ================ =========== ================== =========== Exercisable at end of year 5,049,613 $2.57 6,358,554 $2.51 5,028,336 $2.71 ================== =========== ================ =========== ================== ===========
(1) Certain warrants issued by the Company during 1995 contain antidilutive provisions. These warrants total 615,325, and have exercise prices ranging from $4.00 to $5.00 per share. Pursuant to the antidilutive provisions of the warrants, the common shares to be purchased under the warrants were increased to 1,045,965 and the related exercise prices were adjusted to a range of $2.44 to $2.81 per share. 14 15 During the period January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2000, the exercise prices and weighted average fair value of options and warrants granted by the Company were as follows:
Year Number of Options/Warrants Exercise Price Weighted Average Fair Value ---- -------------------------- -------------- --------------------------- 1998 3,162,910 $1.00 - 3.69 $0.99 1999 555,040 $0.82 - 6.00 $1.34 2000 1,041,040 $3.50 - 7.00 $3.37
At December 31, 2000, outstanding warrants to purchase the Company's Common Stock are summarized as follows:
Range of Weighted Average Remaining Exercise Prices Outstanding Warrants Contractual Life (Years) Weighted Average Exercise Price --------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------- $1.03 - $2.00 1,342,410 3.74 $1.82 $2.25 - $3.91 756,179 1.25 $3.09 $4.00 - $6.50 356,640 5.05 $5.52 --------- Total 2,455,229 3.16 $2.75 =========
At December 31, 2000, outstanding options to purchase the Company's Common Stock are summarized as follows:
Range of Weighted Average Remaining Exercise Prices Outstanding Options Contractual Life (Years) Weighted Average Exercise Price --------------- ------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------- $1.24 - $2.69 1,341,600 3.95 $1.90 $2.75 - $3.19 1,651,000 5.60 $2.79 $3.25 - $7.00 1,473,800 5.44 $4.76 --------- Total 4,466,400 5.05 $3.17 =========
6. CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE As part of the 1998 agreement with Elan, Elan agreed to make available to the Company a Convertible Promissory Note ("Note") that provides the Company the right to borrow up to $2.0 million, subject to satisfying certain conditions. No more than $500,000 may be drawn under the Note in any calendar quarter and at least one-half of the proceeds must be used to fund SPD's development activities. The principal outstanding under the Note bears interest at the prime rate plus 1% and, if not previously converted, matures on June 30, 2005. Prior to repayment, Elan has the right to convert all principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company's Common Stock at a conversion price of $1.75 per share. The outstanding principal balance of the Note at December 31, 2000 and 1999, was $2.0 million, and accrued interest was $.4 million and $.2 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. 7. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS Pulmonary Delivery Technologies In March 1997, the Company entered into exclusive supply and license agreements for the worldwide rights to the MSI system with Siemens AG ("Siemens"). The agreements call for Siemens to be the exclusive supplier of the MSI drug delivery system. The Company paid licensing fees of $1.1 million in both April 1997 and 1998, to Siemens pursuant to these agreements. On June 15, 1998, the Company entered into an agreement with Zambon for a sublicense to the Company's MSI system. Under this transaction, Zambon received an exclusive world-wide marketing and development sublicense for respiratory products to be delivered by the MSI system including four drugs that had been under development by the Company. The Company maintained certain co-promotion rights in the U.S. for respiratory drugs as well as the worldwide marketing and development rights for all applications of the MSI delivery system outside the respiratory products. The Company was paid an up-front fee in the form of an equity investment and will receive milestone payments upon marketing approval for each of the four products and royalties upon commercialization (see Note 2). On June 30, 1998, the Company issued certain equity securities pursuant to an agreement with Elan (see Note 4). Under the terms of the agreement, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, SPD, acquired certain pulmonary delivery technologies from Elan for $12.5 million in cash. On July 15, 1998, SPD acquired from Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. a new generation metered dose inhaler system called the Aerosol Drug Delivery System ("ADDS") for $.9 million. The payments for these technologies were expensed during 1998 as acquired R&D in-process technology since the technologies acquired had not demonstrated technological feasibility and had no alternative future uses. SPD holds the rights to all systemic disease applications of the ADDS technology while Sheffield retains the rights to develop the respiratory disease applications of ADDS. The Company is responsible for the development of these technologies. Pursuant to its agreement with Elan, at December 31, 2000, the Company was committed to fund $.1 million of additional costs related to SPD's systemic development program. 15 16 On October 18, 1999, the Company issued certain equity securities pursuant to an agreement with Elan (see Note 4). Under the terms of the agreement, the Company, through its majority owned subsidiary, RSD, licensed certain pulmonary NanoCrystal(TM) technology from Elan for $15.0 million in cash. This payment was expensed as acquired R&D in-process technology as the license agreement restricts the Company's use of the NanoCrystal technology to certain respiratory steroid products that are currently research and development. The subsidiary is responsible for the development of certain respiratory steroid products. Pursuant to its agreement with Elan, at December 31, 2000, the Company was committed to fund $3.0 million to the subsidiary for the development of these products. Early Stage Technologies The Company also is party to a number of license and research agreements, primarily with universities, hospitals, and research facilities, relating to early stage medical research projects that focus on the development of new compounds for the treatment of cancer, acquired immune deficiency syndrome and other diseases. As part of the Company's focus on later stage opportunities, the Company is seeking to out-license these projects. There can be no assurance that the Company will receive license fees or other payments related to these technologies. The Company believes these early stage technology license and research agreements will have no material impact on the financial position of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company funded approximately $.2 million related to these projects. On November 20, 1997, the Company entered into a sublicense agreement with Lorus Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly Imutec Pharma Inc.) ("Lorus"). The agreement licenses rights to a series of clotrimazole-related compounds for the treatment of cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma and actinic keratosis to a newly formed company, NuChem Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("NuChem"). In exchange, Lorus agreed to manage and fund the remaining development program. The Company received $500,000 in cash upon signing the agreement, which was recognized as revenue during the year ended December 31, 1997, and received 583,188 shares of Lorus stock valued at $350,000 which was recognized as revenue during the year ended December 31, 1998. In addition, the Company is entitled to receive additional payments upon the completion of certain milestones in the development of these compounds and retains a 20% ownership interest in NuChem. 8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS During 1998, certain stockholders provided funds for use by the Company comprised of short-term notes totaling $150,000, bearing interest at the rate of 7.0% per annum. On September 8, 1998, the Company repaid principal of $50,000 plus accrued interest. The remaining balance of the short-term notes and accrued interest was repaid on May 12, 1999. 9. INCOME TAXES At December 31, 2000, the Company had available net operating loss carryforwards for regular federal income tax purposes of approximately $42.9 million, of which $27.5 million will expire between 2007 and 2012, and $15.4 million will expire between 2018 and 2020, if not utilized. Utilization of the Company's net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation as a result of the "changes in ownership" provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Section 382. Future changes in ownership may limit net operating loss carryforwards generated in the year of change. Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company's net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2000 and 1999, which are considered noncurrent, are as follows:
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS 2000 1999 ---- ---- Net operating loss carryforwards............ $16,289,000 $14,957,000 Costs capitalized for tax purposes.......... 1,975,000 22,027,000 Deferred tax asset valuation allowance...... (18,264,000) (36,984,000) ------------------ ----------------- Net deferred tax asset................... $ -- $ -- ================== =================
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the entire deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty of its realization. The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2000 was a decrease of $18.7 million. As a result of differences between book and tax requirements for writing off intangible assets acquired, such as in-process R & D technology, the Company has capitalized the in-process R & D technology for tax purposes. The deferred tax asset will be amortized into taxable income over a useful life of 15 years. 16 17 Report of Independent Auditors The Board of Directors and Stockholders Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries (a development stage enterprise) as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (net capital deficiency), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000 and for the period October 17, 1986 (inception) through December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000 and the period from October 17, 1986 (inception) through December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP St. Louis, Missouri February 28, 2001 17
EX-21 5 c60732ex21.txt SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT 1 EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF SHEFFIELD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Name Jurisdiction of Incorporation ---- ----------------------------- 1. Ion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (100% owned subsidiary) Delaware 2. CP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (100% owned subsidiary) Delaware 3. Systemic Pulmonary Delivery, Ltd. (100% owned subsidiary) Bermuda 4. Respiratory Steroid Delivery, Ltd. (80.1% owned subsidiary) Bermuda
EX-23.1 6 c60732ex23-1.txt CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP 1 EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 33-95732, Form S-3 No.T 333-27753, Form S-3 No. 333-38327 and Form S-3 No. 333-54446) of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-95262) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the 1993 Restricted Stock Plan of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and options granted to directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors of the Company pursuant to other employee benefit plans of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-14867) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the 1996 Directors Stock Option Plan of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and options granted to directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors of the Company pursuant to other employee benefit plans of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of our report dated February 28, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP St. Louis, Missouri March 6, 2001
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----