-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, QhR8OtINCUGa1utv0GRxCDzXEHaBKwFHbkfOWPgrEb4rIm3eq0+kuT85NIBzo7CY WWZ/9dy9c1oWsGr0ogSllQ== 0000950137-07-000311.txt : 20070112 0000950137-07-000311.hdr.sgml : 20070112 20070112170123 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950137-07-000311 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 11 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20061031 FILED AS OF DATE: 20070112 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20070112 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: PLATO LEARNING INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000893965 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: MISCELLANEOUS PUBLISHING [2741] IRS NUMBER: 363660532 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1031 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 333-72523 FILM NUMBER: 07529325 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 10801 NESBITT AVENUE SOUTH CITY: BLOOMINGTON STATE: MN ZIP: 55437 BUSINESS PHONE: 8477817800 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 10801 NESBITT AVENUE SOUTH CITY: BLOOMINGTON STATE: MN ZIP: 55437 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: TRO LEARNING INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19940218 10-K 1 c11362e10vk.htm ANNUAL REPORT e10vk
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006
Commission file number 0-20842
PLATO Learning, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   36-3660532
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (IRS Employer Identification Number)
     
10801 Nesbitt Avenue South, Bloomington, MN   55437
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(952) 832-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, Par Value $.01
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer þ     Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, as of April 28, 2006 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $237,000,000.
The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $.01, outstanding as of December 31, 2006 was 23,756,622 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on March 21, 2007 (the “2007 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference in Parts II and III.
 
 

 


 

PLATO LEARNING, INC.
Form 10-K
Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
             
        Page
PART I
   
 
       
Item 1.       1  
Item 1A.       8  
Item 1B.       13  
Item 2.       13  
Item 3.       13  
Item 4.       13  
   
 
       
PART II
   
 
       
Item 5.       14  
Item 6.       15  
Item 7.       16  
Item 7A.       33  
Item 8.       34  
Item 9.       66  
Item 9A.       66  
Item 9B.       67  
   
 
       
PART III
   
 
       
Item 10.       68  
Item 11.       70  
Item 12.       70  
Item 13.       70  
Item 14.       71  
   
 
       
PART IV
   
 
       
Item 15.       72  
   
 
       
Signatures     73  
   
 
       
Exhibit Index     74  
 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
 Forms of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement
 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (As Amended and Restated)
 Directors Compensation Plan, as amended
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 Power of Attorney
 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

 


Table of Contents

PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
          PLATO Learning, Inc. is a leading provider of computer and web-based instruction, curriculum planning and management, assessment, and related professional development and support services to K–12 schools. We also provide these products and services to two- and four-year colleges, teacher education programs, correctional institutions, and military education programs. We benefit from our 42-year heritage and proven track record of student achievement based on our award-winning instructional solutions. Our courseware and web-based accountability and assessment software are designed to help educators meet the demands of the No Child Left Behind (“NCLB”) and Reading First federal legislation, as well as U.S. Department of Education initiatives on mathematics and science, special education, and ensuring teacher quality. We also offer online and onsite staff professional development, alignment, and correlation services to ensure optimal classroom integration of our products and to help schools meet their accountability requirements and school improvement plans.
          Our research-based courseware library includes thousands of hours of mastery-based instruction covering discrete learning objectives in the subject areas of reading, writing, language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies. Our web-based assessment and alignment tools ensure that instruction is differentiated and targeted and that curriculum is aligned to local, state, provincial, and national standards. Educators are able to identify each student’s instructional needs and prescribe an individual learning program using PLATO Learning courseware and assessments, educational web sites, and the school’s own textbooks and other core and supplemental instructional materials. A variety of reports are available to help educators identify gaps in student understanding and ensure that standards are being addressed. The web-based accountability and assessment products involve parents, students, teachers, and administrators in the learning process.
          We operate our principal business in one industry segment, which is the development and marketing of educational software and related services.
Market
          Based on the most recent market data from Simba Information, the U.S. market for electronic instructional materials, particularly K–12 courseware products was $1.79 billion in 2005, an increase of 6.3% over 2004. Comprehensive courseware is now the fastest growing segment of the electronic materials market. The supplemental materials market has been reported by Education Market Research at $2.205 billion growing at an annual rate of 6.8%. Further, by 2008, Simba also reports that school districts will spend over $640 million on low-stakes formative assessment for the classroom with a combined annual growth rate of 20.4%. Growth in this market will be fueled over the next few years by an increasing emphasis on quality of education at local, state, and national levels and the increase in assessment requirements for grades 3 through 8.
          Schools have largely met the infrastructure and hardware goals that drove their technology purchases five years ago. Ninety-nine percent of the nation’s K-12 public schools have Internet access, 84% have high-speed Internet access, wide area networks (WANS) have become widespread with 79% of all schools connected, and local area networks (LANS) are

1


Table of Contents

found in 96% of schools, according to Market Data Retrieval’s Technology in Education report. Increasingly, our customers are turning to computer-aided and web-based methods of instruction as a complement or supplement to their instructor-led programs due to the flexibility, cost-efficiency, and demonstrated effectiveness of e-learning products.
          The post-secondary market is one of the strongest in the education industry due to increasing student enrollments, the growth in online education, and the need for basic skills remediation prior to the pursuit of college-level coursework. The National Center for Educational Statistics reports that 28 percent of college freshmen need remedial coursework in mathematics, reading, or writing, as do 42 percent of freshmen at community colleges. According to MIR College Textbook National Market Reports, the potential dollar value of the market for developmental mathematics instructional materials is $151 million. Total post-secondary spending on academic software is expected to be $637 million in 2006 according to The College Technology Review (2004-05, Market Data Retrieval).
Products
          Customers use our products to:
    ensure that NCLB requirements for “adequate yearly progress” are met;
 
    support schools’ needs for curriculum aligned to local, state, and national standards;
 
    assess and identify individual student instructional needs and prescribe a personalized course of instruction;
 
    develop foundational reading and mathematics skills;
 
    complement instructor-led education and focus on difficult subject matter;
 
    supplement classroom learning and provide additional instruction and practice;
 
    monitor and report on student learning progress in relation to local, state, provincial, and national academic standards;
 
    prepare students for standards-based and high-stakes state examinations;
 
    develop teacher skills and abilities to align instructional time to standards and guide instructional decisions to increase classroom effectiveness;
 
    assist learners in community, technical, and four-year colleges in meeting their college-level reading, mathematics, and writing skills;
 
    prepare adult students to complete high-school graduation and GED requirements;
 
    support adult learners in job training programs and workplace training; and,
 
    provide support for skill development in youth and adult correctional education programs.
PLATO® Instructional Solutions
          PLATO Learning courseware is appropriate in context and learning style for learners on grade level, as well as for learners in remedial or advanced programs. Our courseware employs sophisticated interactive simulations, online coaching, and advanced multimedia and graphics to create an engaging and exciting learning environment that fosters critical-thinking skills. The research-based instructional strategy, design, and modular structure of the courseware allow educators to provide personalized instruction to meet both individual student needs and specific program objectives.

2


Table of Contents

          Our courseware is recognized for its rigorous academic content, instructional integrity, innovative instructional design, and ability to captivate, engage, and motivate students. As in past years, leading industry associations and publications recognized our products in multiple categories, receiving 13 awards in 2006.
          We regularly update our instructional content library and continually develop new products to extend and enhance our product and solution offerings. The majority of our products have been developed or updated within the last five years. In 2006, we introduced several new products and initiatives, including PLATO® Courses, a series of semester-long online courses for middle and high school learners; PLATO® Exam Interventions, learning paths aligned to state-specific high-stakes exit exams; and Straight Curve™ Mathematics Series 2, the inaugural product in our new product line for supplemental, on-grade-level and advanced instruction.
Curriculum Management and Content Delivery Platforms
          The PLATO Learning Environment™, the PLATO® Web Learning Network, and the PLATO® Pathways Learning Management System provide curriculum management infrastructure and a platform for delivering our content and assessment solutions in web-based or LAN/WAN/stand-alone environments.
          The PLATO Learning Environment, introduced in July 2006, provides a unified, easy-to-use curriculum management system and content delivery platform, which is delivered using an Application Service Provider (“ASP”) model over the Internet. In addition to delivering our instructional content, this system efficiently manages every activity that impacts student achievement and increases staff productivity by integrating functionality in the critical areas of planning, instruction, assessment, data management, reporting, and communication.
          The PLATO Web Learning Network is the technological predecessor to the PLATO Learning Environment and is also delivered via the web in an ASP model. This management system offers the same targeted, personalized instruction keyed to program goals, as well as high-quality instructional content and essential student management services. PLATO Pathways is an easy-to-use software program and versatile educational tool that integrates assessment, instruction, and management for the LAN/WAN/stand-alone environment.
          PLATO Learning software is configured for computers using Microsoft and Macintosh operating systems. There are multiple ways in which our software can be delivered, including over the Internet, client-hosted intranet and our customers’ local area network.
Accountability and Assessment Solutions
          PLATO Learning’s Accountability and Assessment Solutions, sold on an annual or multi-year subscription basis, are aligned to state and national performance standards and consist of the PLATO Learning Environment™, PLATO® Orion Curriculum & Standards Integrator, and PLATO® eduTest Assessment. They are designed to analyze student performance and suggest personalized learning options based on a school’s textbooks and other resources, the PLATO Learning Environment database of web sites, and PLATO Learning courseware. Local and state performance indicators are incorporated into daily lessons, and student assignments are made based on those indicators using lesson plans and templates. PLATO eduTest Assessment also provides an item and test authoring web tool that allows a school district to edit our assessments or create their own to satisfy additional needs in specific subjects, grades, and languages. There are also assessment solutions for GED preparation and for teacher and paraprofessional certification. PLATO eduTest provides classroom benchmark and formative assessment via a web-delivered platform.

3


Table of Contents

          PLATO Learning Accountability and Assessment Solutions help educators tailor their curriculum to the needs of each individual student and address the requirements of local, state, and federal accountability legislation, as well as programs such as Title I and special education. They also address the challenging issues of data-driven decision making and continuous school improvement planning identified in the NCLB legislation. To help educators and parents keep effective records of student progress, the system creates online reports for every student. In addition, educators can view individual student reports and class performance data, while administrators can view data by class, school, or district.
Services
          PLATO® Services ensure that customers receive the consultation, training, and services needed to successfully implement their PLATO Learning system and integrate educational technology into their day-to-day teaching and learning environment. Our skilled consultants work with schools to develop customized staff development plans that are tied to standards and/or a school’s unique accountability and assessment needs. To help schools meet their accountability mandates and the goals of their school improvement plans, we offer services in three areas:
    PLATO® Professional Services, for immediate in-service and long-range professional development needs;
 
    PLATO® Software Services, for pre- and post-implementation technical and software support, including telephone and web-based support;
 
    PLATO® Data Services provide correlation of instructional content to local, state, provincial, and national standards, ensure data is efficiently entered, and assist in accessing and utilizing assessment data to make informed instructional decisions.
          Schools are offered a choice of delivery schedules so that staff development can take place at times convenient to them throughout the school year and throughout the school day, after school and during planning time, for large or small groups, and one-on-one. Schools are able to minimize the expense and inconvenience of bringing in substitute teachers while their staff attends in-service training. The PLATO Professional Service model is built on the recommended staff development standards of the National Staff Development Council.
Support Services and Customer Care
          Our field engineers and technicians provide onsite implementation and specialized technical consulting to those customers who desire to supplement their technical staff. Our customers can access our product specialists and software analysts to answer questions or solve problems with their PLATO Learning software. Support is available via a toll-free telephone number, e-mail, and the PLATO Support web site. Through PLATO® Support Services customers also receive updates and enhancements to their PLATO Learning software.
          Our customer support group provides a full range of support services to ensure customer satisfaction. Full-time professionals, with general technical expertise and extensive operational knowledge of our products, provide pre-sale technical consultation and support to our field sales organization and are responsible for the final technical review and approval of all proposed delivery platforms and installation configurations. These professionals consult and coordinate with the customer, account manager, and installation team regarding site preparation and system installation. They also monitor customer satisfaction and support requirements.

4


Table of Contents

Strategy
          Our strategy is to be the premier provider of integrated, technology-delivered teaching and learning solutions for K–12 and post-secondary markets by providing a broad range of interactive, multimedia educational courseware tied to standards, delivered over the Internet, to serve the needs of teachers and learners in K–12 and post-secondary markets. Critical elements of our strategy include:
    designing products that are easy for educators to use in the classroom and meet specific instructional needs and applicable academic standards using the design and structural advantages inherent in our proprietary software;
 
    building best-of-class, structured business processes and competencies as competitive advantages;
 
    expanding sales of instructional management, assessment, math, science, and reading courseware and professional services, including subscription-based products, that generate higher profit margins, more stable and predictable financial results, and greater growth opportunities;
 
    building the PLATO Learning brand to promote the attributes of innovation, ingenuity, and a passionate commitment to education while differentiating from the competition as an integrated solution provider with a superior offering;
 
    building our products to claim a leadership position in the elementary and secondary school markets;
 
    targeting NCLB, Reading First, Title I, teacher quality, and special education funds that are highly appropriate for our products and services; and,
 
    addressing the needs for learner preparation to meet college-level standards and for GED and employability skills development in adult education and job training.
Sales and Marketing
          Our sales and marketing efforts are designed to expand market share in our core markets and reinforce our reputation for product quality, service, and customer satisfaction. We target potentially large and growing market segments to which existing and future products and services can be sold.
          Our sales channel is primarily made up of direct sales and inside sales. We also utilize strategic sales resources, distributors, and a reseller network using e-commerce, catalogs, and a comprehensive Internet web site (www.plato.com).

5


Table of Contents

Competition
          In all of our markets, we compete primarily against more traditional methods of education and training, principally live classroom instruction and print supplemental materials. Within the e-learning market, we compete most directly with other learning system providers, including divisions within Pearson plc, McGraw-Hill Macmillan, Scholastic, WRC Media, Houghton Mifflin Riverdeep Group plc and Renaissance Learning. Generally, WRC Media’s Compass Learning competes in the elementary market and McGraw-Hill Macmillan in the adult and college markets. Pearson and Houghton Mifflin Riverdeep each offers a K–12 line of products. In the post-secondary education and training markets there are many regional and specialized competitors. We also compete with companies providing single-title retail products, software publishers, and Internet content and service providers.
          We compete primarily on the basis of the breadth, depth, and recognized quality of our courseware and services, as well as our ability to deliver flexible, timely, cost-effective, and customized solutions to the education and training needs of our customers. We believe our stability, longevity, record of student improvement, and product development capabilities also differentiate us from the competition. Based on our experience, we believe that these are key factors that buyers use in evaluating competitive offerings.
Product Development
          Our product development group develops, enhances, and maintains our courseware, assessment, instructional management software, and delivery system platforms. We utilize both domestic and offshore resources. In fiscal year 2006 approximately 40% of our total product development spending was incurred offshore.
          We employ a rigorous multi-phased product development methodology and process management system. Based on classical instructional design concepts and models, as well as systems development management techniques, our product development methodology has been constructed to specifically address the creation of individualized, student-controlled, interactive instruction using the full multimedia capabilities of today’s personal computing, communication, and other related technologies. Our rigorous instructional design and software development methodology assures the instructional effectiveness and content integrity of the resulting product. These procedures ensure that the most appropriate and highest quality production values are achieved in the development of all courseware. Our innovative product architectures and advanced group-based rapid prototyping technologies shorten time-to-market and development costs.
Proprietary Rights
          Our courseware is proprietary and we protect it primarily under a combination of the laws of copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. We also utilize license agreements, employment agreements, employment termination agreements, third-party non-disclosure agreements, and other methods to protect our proprietary rights. We regard many of our intellectual property rights as essential to our business and enforce our intellectual property rights when we become aware of any infringements or potential infringements and believe they warrant such action.

6


Table of Contents

          In 1989, Control Data assigned to us the registered copyrights in the then-existing PLATO courseware. We rely on the laws of copyright to protect all versions of PLATO courseware and software, but in many instances have not registered our copyrights. Our courseware also contains certain copyrighted material that we have acquired through various acquisitions. In addition, we license a limited amount of software from third-party developers to incorporate into our courseware and software products.
          We own and maintain numerous federal registrations of various trademarks and service marks, including, but not limited to, the PLATO, Straight Curve, CyberEd, NetSchools, Lightspan, Academic Systems, and eduTest marks in the United States and in other countries that are important to our business.
          We have a number of technological mechanisms to prevent or inhibit unauthorized copying of our software products and generally require the execution of a written license agreement, which restricts use and copying of our courseware and software products.
Backlog
          Our deferred revenue was approximately $41.8 million and $40.4 million at October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At October 31, 2006, we expect approximately $8.1 million of our deferred revenue to be recognized subsequent to fiscal year 2007. These deferred revenue balances exclude amounts that we expect to earn in the future from a U.S. Department of Navy contract, and customer orders of approximately $0.4 million that have not met certain revenue recognition criteria and are not yet billable to customers.
Seasonality
          Our quarterly operating results fluctuate as a result of a number of factors including the business and sales cycle, the amount and timing of new product introductions, client spending patterns, budget cycles and fiscal year ends, and promotional programs, as well as the mix of perpetual license fee and subscription product sales. We historically have experienced our lowest revenues in the first quarter and higher levels of revenues in each of the next three quarters. Because of these factors, the results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.
Employees
          As of October 31, 2006, we had approximately 540 employees. We also contract with offshore resources in the development of new products. We have never experienced a work stoppage as a result of a labor dispute, and none of our employees are represented by a labor organization.
Non-Audit Services Performed by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
          Pursuant to Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are responsible for disclosing to investors the non-audit services approved by our Audit Committee to be performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. Non-audit services are defined as services other than those provided in connection with an audit or a review of our financial statements. During the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Audit Committee pre-approved non-audit services, consisting primarily of tax planning and compliance services.

7


Table of Contents

Web Site Access to Reports
          Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Definitive Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, are made available free of charge on our web site (www.plato.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Statements of changes in beneficial ownership of our securities on Form 4 by our executive officers and directors are made available on our web site by the end of the business day following the submission of such filings to the SEC. All reports mentioned above are also available from the SEC’s web site (www.sec.gov).
Forward-Looking Statements
          In addition to historical information, this Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“the Act”). The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Act. Forward-looking statements include, among others, our ability to improve the productivity of our sales organization, our expectations for order growth in 2007, our expectation that we will achieve profitability in 2008 and other statements about our future performance, the continuation of historical trends, the sufficiency of our sources of capital for future needs, the effect of restructuring activities on our ability to achieve long-term growth, and the expected impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I Item 1A of this Form 10-K. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements based on circumstances or events, which occur in the future. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in this report on Form 10-K and in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risks Relating to Our Industry
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from public school funding, which is dependent on support from federal, state, and local governments. Changes in funding for public school systems could reduce our revenues and impede the growth of our business.
          The availability of funding to purchase our products is subject to the many factors that can affect government funding, including downturns in general economic conditions, which reduce government tax revenues and may affect education funding, emergence of other priorities that can divert government funding from educational objectives, periodic changes in government leadership that can change spending priorities, and the government appropriations process, which is often slow and unpredictable.

8


Table of Contents

          In some instances, customers rely on specific funding appropriations to purchase our products. Curtailments, delays, or reductions in this funding can delay or reduce revenues we had otherwise forecasted to receive. In addition, funding difficulties experienced by schools or colleges can cause those institutions to be more resistant to price increases in our products, compared to other businesses that might better be able to pass on price increases to their customers.
          The growth of our business depends on continued investment by public school systems in interactive educational technology and products. Changes to funding of public school systems can slow this type of investment and adversely affect our revenues and market opportunities.
Competition in our industry is intense and growing, which could adversely affect our performance.
          Our industry is intensely competitive, rapidly evolving, and subject to technological change. We compete primarily against organizations offering educational and training software and services, including comprehensive curriculum software publishers, companies providing single-title retail products, and Internet content and service providers. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us. The demand for e-learning products and services has grown significantly with the advent of on-line educational institutions, improvements in Internet access and reductions in the cost of technology. While this growing demand presents opportunities for us, it also results in the addition or consolidation of competitors. Increased competition in our industry could result in price reductions, reduced operating margins, or loss of market share, which could seriously harm our business, cash flows, and operating results.
Risks Relating to Our Company
We have made significant changes to our sales organization and personnel in fiscal 2005 and 2006 which, along with other changes, have resulted in low sales productivity. If we are unable to stabilize and increase the productivity of our sales organization in fiscal year 2007, our revenues and profitability will be adversely affected.
          In fiscal years 2005 and 2006, we implemented significant changes to our sales organization and processes that resulted in a high percentage of new account managers for most of fiscal year 2006. In addition, we have placed greater emphasis in our sales efforts on expanding beyond our traditional customer base to larger school districts and expanded applications of our products. These changes in personnel, products and target customers negatively affected sales productivity during the year. While we believe these changes were necessary for the long-term success of our sales and marketing efforts, they may continue to negatively affect our sales performance in fiscal year 2007 or beyond. If we are unable to retain our sales personnel and enhance their productivity, it will have an adverse affect on customer relationships, revenues and our ability to become profitable.
The success of our long-term strategy is dependent on growth in market acceptance of interactive educational technology as an alternative to traditional supplemental materials used in the classroom. If such acceptance does not occur, we will not recover investments made in these products and our future revenues and profitability will be adversely affected.
          Historically, our products have been sold to schools primarily as credit recovery and remedial learning solutions. These solutions are generally delivered to students who require extra learning activities outside of the traditional classroom setting. The business strategy we implemented late in fiscal year 2005 resulted in the expansion of our software products beyond

9


Table of Contents

these traditional applications. As a result, significant investments have been, and will continue to be made in software products targeted for use by teachers and students as supplemental materials in on-grade level classroom applications. Traditionally, these supplemental materials consist of print and other materials purchased by schools or created by the instructor to supplement primary classroom materials such as text books. Broader acceptance of technology products, like those sold by the Company, for use as supplemental classroom materials may not occur due to a number of factors, including:
    some teachers may be reluctant to change customary classroom teaching practices to use interactive educational technology;
 
    we may be unable to continue to demonstrate improvements in academic performance in classrooms that use our educational software for these purposes; and
 
    teacher, parent, and student preferences for interactive educational technology are subject to changes in popular entertainment and educational theory.
          As a result, there are no assurances that our revenues from these products will grow to levels necessary to earn an acceptable return on the related investments. This could have a material, adverse affect on our future revenues and ability to become profitable.
The success of our business model is dependent on growth in market acceptance of online, subscription products delivered over the Internet. If this acceptance does not grow or is otherwise diminished, our revenues will continue to decline and we may never become profitable.
          Currently our products can be purchased by customers on a perpetual license basis for installation in their own computing environment, or on a subscription basis via access to our hosted computer facilities over the Internet. The business strategy we implemented late in fiscal year 2005 resulted in a shift in our new product marketing and development to products which will only be delivered on a subscription basis via Internet access to our hosted computer facilities.
          This transition to a subscription-based business model will continue to limit our revenue growth in the near term as one-time license fee revenues are replaced with recurring, subscription-based revenues. Longer term, our ability to generate revenue growth and to become profitable is dependent on significant growth of subscription license fees on Internet-based products. Market acceptance of software products delivered over the Internet can be negatively affected by factors such as customers’ confidentiality concerns with regard to student information that is stored outside of their controlled computing environments, existing investments in owned courseware, technology infrastructure, and related personnel, customer preferences with regard to perpetual licenses vs. annual subscription decisions, and availability, reliability and security of access to the Internet within a school district.
          If we are unable to substantially increase revenues from online subscription products, we will be unable to execute our current business model. As a result, we may need to reevaluate that business model which may affect our ability to achieve profitability.
The success of our product investment strategy and our ability to remain competitive against companies with access to larger amounts of capital is dependent on our ability to maintain our cost-effective off-shore development resources. If we are unable to do so, we would experience significant product delays and increases in product development costs which would adversely affect our strategy, competitive position, revenues and profitability.

10


Table of Contents

          Late in 2005, we made significant changes to our product development strategy by placing a larger emphasis on off-shore development resources. More than 40% of our total product development and maintenance spending in fiscal year 2006 was incurred on these resources. We believe this strategy provides us greater flexibility, cost savings, and a greater return on our development investments, and is critical to our ability to quickly transition our products to a subscription-based business model, respond quickly to market changes and to compete against companies with access to larger amounts of capital than we have. However, this dependence introduces risks common to many outsourcing relationships. These risks include the supplier’s ability to maintain sufficient capacity, control costs, and hire, train, and retain qualified resources, as well as risks associated with our limited direct control and physical access to these resources. Our supplier agreements contain provisions intended to limit some of these risks; however, there can be no assurance that they will be effective at doing so. If our supplier relationships are suddenly and adversely affected, it would cause significant product delays and increased development costs which would have a material negative effect on our competitive position, revenues and profitability.
Our future success is dependent on Internet technology developments, our ability to adapt to these and other technological changes and to meet evolving industry standards.
          Our ability to execute our strategy of delivering our products on a subscription basis over the Internet and generating the related expected revenues is dependent on the development and maintenance of Internet technology as well as our ability to adapt our solutions to this technology.
          We may encounter difficulties responding to these and other technological changes that could delay our introduction of products and services. Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change and obsolescence, frequent product introduction, and evolving industry standards. Our future success will, to a significant extent, depend on our ability to enhance our existing products, develop and introduce new products, satisfy an expanded range of customer needs, and achieve market acceptance. We may not have sufficient resources to make the necessary investments to develop and implement the technological advances required to maintain our competitive position.
Our business is seasonal, and until we complete our planned transition to subscription-based products, our business will be difficult to predict. As a result, we will continue to experience unexpected fluctuations in our quarterly revenues and cash flows which may adversely affect our stock price and the implementation of our strategy.
          Until we complete our transition to subscription-based products, we expect sales of perpetual license products to continue to account for a meaningful amount of our revenues. As a result, our operating results will continue to be difficult to predict and may fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter due to factors such as the size, timing, and product mix of license vs. subscription orders. In addition, public school budget cycles result in purchases that have historically been concentrated in the last two quarters of our fiscal year. Accordingly, our annual operating performance can be materially and adversely affected if operational performance factors such as sales productivity and new product introductions do not align with these purchasing patterns. If such annual results are not achieved we may have to delay or adjust components of our strategy implementation which may affect our ability to achieve profitability.
We rely on statistical studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of our products.

11


Table of Contents

          We rely on statistical studies to demonstrate that our curriculum-based educational software improves student achievement and believe that these studies accurately reflect the performance of our products. However, these studies involve risks such as limited sample sizes, which yield results that may not be representative of the general population of students who use our products; dependence on cooperation from students and other participants, potentially resulting in inaccurate or incomplete responses that could distort results; the application of different methodologies and data collection techniques by schools studying our products, making results difficult to aggregate and compare; and a biased or unreliable view of the results of these studies because, in some cases, we facilitate the collection and analysis of data, and select and pay researchers to conduct, aggregate, and/or present the results of some of these studies.
Misuse or misappropriation of our proprietary rights or inadvertent infringement by us on the rights of others could adversely affect our results of operations.
          We regard many of our intellectual property rights as essential to our business. We rely on a combination of the laws of copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, as well as license agreements, employment and employment termination agreements, third-party non-disclosure agreements, and other methods to protect our proprietary rights. We enforce our intellectual property rights when we become aware of any infringements or potential infringements and believe they warrant such action. If we were unsuccessful in our ability to protect these rights, our operating results could be adversely affected.
          Although we believe our products and services have been independently developed and that none of our products or services infringes on the rights of others, third parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future. We may be required to modify our products, services or technologies or obtain a license to permit our continued use of those rights. We may not be able to do so in a timely manner or upon reasonable terms and conditions. Failure to do so could harm our business and operating results.
          We have a number of technological mechanisms to prevent or inhibit unauthorized copying of our software products and generally require the execution of a written license agreement, which restricts use and copying of our software products. However, if such copying or misuse were to occur to any substantial degree, our operating results could be adversely affected.
Claims relating to data collection from our user base and content available on or accessible from our web sites may subject us to liabilities and additional expense.
          We currently utilize the names of teachers and students who are registering for our online subscription products for purposes of accessing our web sites, and may in the future collect other personal information relating to students, teachers, and parents. As a result, we may be exposed to claims for misuses of information collected from our users, such as for unauthorized marketing purposes, and we could face additional expenses to analyze and comply with increasing regulation in this area. The Federal Trade Commission, for example, has enacted regulations governing collection of personal information from children under the age of thirteen and is expected to issue and enforce additional regulations in this area. We could also be subject to claims relating to content that is published on our web sites or that is accessible from our network through links to other web sites. In addition to subjecting us to potential liability, claims of this type could require us to change our web sites in a manner that could be less attractive to our customers and divert our financial and development resources.

12


Table of Contents

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
          None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
          We lease all of our facilities, including our corporate headquarters in Bloomington, Minnesota. We have sales offices throughout the United States and continue to be a party to several office facility leases in the United Kingdom. Our leased facilities are adequate to meet our current and expected business requirements.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
          As previously disclosed, Credit Suisse First Boston and several of its clients, including Lightspan, Inc. (which we acquired in November 2003), were defendants in a securities class action lawsuit captioned Liu, et al. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., et al. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged that Credit Suisse First Boston, its affiliates, and the securities issuer defendants (including Lightspan, Inc.) manipulated the price of the issuer defendants’ shares in the post-initial public offering market. On April 1, 2005, the complaint was dismissed with prejudice, and all subsequent plaintiff motions and appeals have been denied or rejected, including a final petition to the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari which was denied on December 4, 2006.
          From time to time, we may become involved in litigation arising out of operations in the normal course of business. As of October 31, 2006, we were not party to any pending legal proceedings the adverse outcome of which could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial position or cash flows.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
          None.

13


Table of Contents

PART II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
          Our common stock has traded publicly on the NASDAQ market under the symbol “TUTR” since December 23, 1992. The quarterly ranges of high and low prices per share of our common stock were as follows:
                                 
    2006   2005
Fiscal Quarter   High   Low   High   Low
First
  $ 8.75     $ 6.68     $ 9.04     $ 6.45  
Second
    10.23       7.75       8.16       6.91  
Third
    10.08       4.87       8.75       6.33  
Fourth
    7.17       4.94       8.59       6.11  
Holders
          As of January 8, 2007, there were approximately 860 record holders of our Common Stock, excluding stockholders whose stock is held either in nominee name and/or street name brokerage accounts. Based on information available to us, there were approximately 3,250 holders of our Common Stock whose stock is held either in nominee name and/or street name brokerage accounts.
Dividends
          We did not declare or pay cash dividends on our common stock in fiscal years 2006 or 2005. While future cash dividend payments are at the discretion of our Board of Directors, our current intentions are to reinvest all earnings in the development and growth of our business.
Repurchases
          We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during 2006. Our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan in December 2001, which authorizes us to repurchase up to $15 million of our common stock in the open market and in privately negotiated transactions. The plan has no set termination date and the timing of any repurchases will be dependent on prevailing market conditions and alternative uses of capital. The approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be repurchased under the plan is $1.3 million.

14


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
                                         
    2006   2005   2004   2003   2002
(In thousands, except per share amounts)                   (2)                
For the year ended October 31:
                                       
Revenues
  $ 90,719     $ 121,804     $ 141,801     $ 82,192     $ 74,391  
Gross profit (1)
    49,936       56,996       91,248       54,011       53,028  
Operating expenses:
                                       
Sales and marketing
    38,598       49,996       61,586       39,438       37,335  
General and administrative
    16,619       18,420       19,469       13,182       12,422  
Product maintenance and development
    5,496       5,646       5,973       2,267       3,405  
Amortization of intangibles
    3,711       4,322       4,308       587       603  
Restructuring, impairment and other charges
    9,093       6,025             802       360  
Operating loss
    (23,581 )     (27,413 )     (88 )     (2,265 )     (1,097 )
Other income, net
    1,701       586       290       157       556  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    600       860       2,030       (441 )     600  
Net loss
    (22,480 )     (27,687 )     (1,828 )     (1,667 )     (1,141 )
Basic and diluted loss per share
  $ (0.95 )   $ (1.18 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.10 )   $ (0.07 )
 
                                       
At October 31:
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 33,094     $ 46,901     $ 29,235     $ 23,834     $ 30,390  
Marketable securities
          213       16,223       3,862        
Accounts receivable, net
    18,529       22,768       41,852       39,176       33,034  
Total assets
    176,230       197,328       232,744       149,962       147,583  
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
    18       57       42       308       567  
Deferred revenue
    41,846       40,431       51,575       26,564       18,837  
Total liabilities
    61,780       62,501       73,294       40,030       34,000  
Stockholders’ equity
  $ 114,450     $ 134,827     $ 159,450     $ 109,932     $ 113,583  
 
(1)   Gross profit in 2006 was reduced by $1,089 of asset impairment charges related to purchased technology intangible assets. Gross profit in 2005 was reduced by $13,194 of asset impairment charges related to certain capitalized product development and purchased technology assets. See Notes 7 and 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
(2)   In 2004, we acquired Lightspan, Inc. See Note 4 to Consolidated Financial Statements.

15


Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year
          Our fiscal year is from November 1 to October 31. Unless otherwise stated, references to the years 2006, 2005, and 2004 relate to the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. References to future years also relate to our fiscal year ending October 31.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
          Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. We continually evaluate our critical accounting policies and estimates, and have identified the policies relating to the following areas as those that are significant to our financial statement presentation, and require difficult, subjective, or complex judgments:
    Revenue recognition
 
    Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
    Capitalized product development costs
 
    Valuation of our deferred income taxes
 
    Valuation and impairment analysis of goodwill and identified intangible assets
          Our discussion of these policies is intended to supplement, but not replace, the more detailed discussion of these and other accounting policies and disclosures contained in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
          Revenue Recognition. Our revenue recognition policy is considered critical for several reasons. Revenue recognition rules for software companies are complex, can involve significant judgment, and can vary across the variety of products and services we offer. As a result, revenue results can be difficult to predict and any delay in recognizing revenue could cause our operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter.
          We follow specific and detailed guidelines in determining the proper amount of revenue to be recorded. In general, revenue from the sale of courseware licenses is recognized when all of the following conditions are met: (i) a written customer order has been executed, (ii) courseware has been delivered, (iii) the license fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectibility of the fee is probable. Certain judgments can affect how these specific rules are applied to individual transactions. These judgments typically involve whether collectibility can be considered probable and whether fees are fixed or determinable. Provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, if collectibility of the fee is not probable, revenue is not recognized until payments are received; or, if the fee due from the customer is not fixed or determinable, revenue is not recognized until the payments become due. In 2005, we implemented a policy which requires, in most instances, that a purchase order signed by the customer be received by us prior to the recognition of revenue. We believe this policy change has reduced the level of judgment with respect to these revenue recognition criteria.

16


Table of Contents

          Our transactions often consist of multiple element, or “bundled”, arrangements. Software revenue recognition rules require that these orders be analyzed to determine the relative fair value of each bundled element, the amount of revenue to be recognized upon shipment, if any, and the period and conditions under which deferred revenue should be recognized.
          In addition to providing our courseware licenses on a one-time, perpetual license basis, certain courseware is also provided on a subscription basis. Revenues from products sold on a subscription basis are initially recorded as deferred revenue on our balance sheet and then recognized as revenue ratably over the subscription period.
          We also provide professional services related to our products, including consulting, training, and implementation services, as well as ongoing software support and maintenance. Consulting, training, and implementation services are not essential to the functionality of our software products. Accordingly, revenues from these services are recognized separately. Software support and maintenance is recognized ratably over the support period, and consulting, training and implementation services are recognized as the services are performed.
          Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We determine an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon an analysis of the collectibility of specific accounts, historical experience, and the aging of our trade and installment accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statement of operations. The assumptions and estimates used to determine the allowance are subject to revision and can involve significant judgment. The primary factors that impact these assumptions include our credit assessment process, our historical experience, and the efficiency and effectiveness of our billing and collection functions. In 2005, we significantly reduced the variety of payment terms offered to our customers and implemented credit and other policies which had the effect of significantly reducing our bad debt exposure.
          Capitalized Product Development Costs. Our investments in product development are significant, and the rules that govern how these costs are accounted for in our financial statements can have a significant impact on our operating results from period to period.
          Our product development activities relate to the research, development, enhancement, and maintenance of our software products. Costs related to the initial design and development of new products and the routine enhancement and maintenance of existing products are expensed as incurred. When projects reach technological feasibility we begin capitalization of the related project costs. Capitalization ends when a product is available for general release to our customers, at which time amortization of the capitalized costs begins. A significant portion of our product development costs qualify for capitalization due to the concentration of our development efforts on the content of our courseware. The amortization of these costs is included in cost of revenues related to license fees and subscriptions.
          We evaluate our capitalized costs on a quarterly basis to determine if the unamortized balance related to any product, or group of products, exceeds its estimated net realizable value. Estimating net realizable value requires us to use judgment in projecting future revenues and cash flows to be generated by the product and thereby quantifying the amount, if any, to be written off. Actual cash flows realized could differ materially from those estimated. In addition, any future changes to our software product offerings could result in write-offs of previously capitalized costs and have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations. Our analysis as of October 31, 2005 resulted in an impairment charge of these assets of $4.4 million. Our analysis as of October 31, 2006 did not result in an impairment charge.

17


Table of Contents

          In the third quarter of 2006, we changed our estimate of the useful lives of platform, math and science products released after the second quarter 2006 from three years to four years on the basis that these products are projected to have longer useful lives. All other product amortization periods have remained at three years. The effect of the policy change on our 2006 results was not material, but it could be material in the future as we expect platform, math, and science products to continue to be a significant portion of our capitalized product development spending going forward.
          Valuation of Deferred Income Taxes. Our accounting policy for the valuation of deferred income taxes is considered critical for several reasons. Significant judgment is required in the assessment of the need for a valuation allowance. In addition, income tax accounting rules, in combination with purchase accounting rules applied in the acquisition of Lightspan in 2004, result in a complex tax accounting situation in which we currently do not recognize tax benefits on operating losses or on the realization of deferred tax assets, but regardless of our operating results, recognize tax expense on future tax liabilities related to tax deductible goodwill.
          The majority of our deferred tax assets represent net operating loss carryforwards which are available to offset future taxable income. These loss carryforwards include those acquired in the acquisition of Lightspan in 2004, as well as carryforward losses that existed prior to, or were incurred after the acquisition. Our ability to realize the benefit of these loss carryforwards is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income. At the time of the acquisition, our history of cumulative operating losses, including those at Lightspan prior to the acquisition, was evidence that we would not be able to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit of carryforward losses. As a result, our deferred tax assets were fully reserved at that time and, under purchase accounting rules, the write-off was recorded as an increase to goodwill. Because we do not expect to be profitable in 2007, our deferred tax assets continue to be fully reserved at October 31, 2006.
          Excluded from our calculation of net deferred tax assets is a deferred tax liability related to tax deductible goodwill. The timing of the reversal of this difference is considered indefinite because it will not reverse until the underlying assets that created the goodwill are disposed of or sold. Accordingly, this timing difference cannot be used to support the realization of other deferred tax assets which have definite lives.
          Our net deferred tax assets will remain fully reserved until the related tax benefits are realized through the generation of taxable income in a particular year, or until we can demonstrate a history of generating taxable income. In either case, the related tax benefits will not be recorded as an income tax benefit in the consolidated statements of operations until the portion of deferred tax assets that resulted in an increase to goodwill is fully realized.
          Goodwill and Identified Intangible Assets. Goodwill and identified intangible assets are recorded when the purchase price paid for an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the tangible assets acquired. Most of the companies we have acquired have not had significant tangible assets. As a result, a significant portion of the purchase price paid in acquisitions has been allocated to identified intangible assets and/or goodwill.
          Identified intangible assets are amortized to expense over their expected useful lives and goodwill is not amortized. Once established, these assets are subject to periodic impairment assessments to determine if their current carrying values are recoverable based on information available at the time these assessments are made. Significant assumptions and estimates are required in making these assessments. Accordingly, the assumptions and estimates we use in

18


Table of Contents

implementing this policy affect the amount of identified intangible asset amortization and impairment charges, if any, reflected in our operating results. As discussed below, our impairment assessments at October 31, 2006 and 2005 resulted in impairment charges on identified intangible technology, trademark and customer assets acquired in previous acquisitions.
General Factors Affecting our Financial Results
          There are a number of general factors that affect our results from period to period. These factors are discussed below.
          Revenue. We are strategically transitioning our business model from one that emphasized the sale of one-time perpetual licenses to our software, for which revenue is generally recognized up-front upon delivery, to one that emphasizes the sale of subscription-based products, for which revenue is recognized over the subscription period. As a result, this transition will affect the comparability of our revenues from period to period until it is complete. The transition became most evident in the third quarter of 2006 when many of our new subscription-based products became available. As subscription revenues grow as a percentage of total revenues, we expect our period to period revenues to become more comparable and predictable.
          Until our transition to subscription-based products is closer to completion, a meaningful portion of our revenues will continue to be derived from perpetual licenses to our software products. These revenues are reported as license fees in our consolidated statement of operations. Changes in the quantity and size of individual license fee transactions can have a significant impact on revenues in a period. In addition, as is common in the software industry, a large portion of our customer orders tend to occur in the final weeks or days of each fiscal quarter. As a result, license revenues can be heavily influenced by events such as funding approvals that may be outside our control during this short span of time. Our business is also seasonal, with the largest portion of our license fees typically coming in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year, and professional service fees being the greatest during periods in which schools are in session. While this seasonality does not generally impact the comparability of our annual results, it can significantly impact our results from quarter to quarter.
          Gross Profit. Our gross profit during a period is dependent on a number of factors. License fee revenues have high gross profit due to the low direct cost of delivering these products. As a result, the mix of license fee revenues to total revenues in a given period significantly influences reported total gross profit. In addition, a large portion of our costs of revenue are fixed in nature. These costs include amortization of capitalized software development and purchased technology, depreciation and other infrastructure costs to support our hosted subscription services, customer support operations, and full-time professional services personnel who deliver our training services. Accordingly, increases in revenues allow us to leverage these costs resulting in higher gross profit, while decreases in revenues have the opposite effect.
          Operating Expenses. Incentive compensation is a significant variable component of our sales and marketing expenses, approximating 8% to 10% of total revenues in any given period. Sales and marketing expenses also include costs such as travel, tradeshows, and conferences that can vary with revenue activity or individual events that occur during the period.
          General and administrative expenses are substantially fixed in nature. However, certain components such as our provision for bad debts, professional fees, and other expenses can vary based on business results, individual events, or initiatives we may be pursuing at various times throughout the year.

19


Table of Contents

          Product maintenance and development expense in our consolidated statement of operations does not reflect our total level of spending in these areas. Costs to enhance or maintain existing products, or to develop products prior to achieving technological feasibility, are charged to product maintenance and development expense as incurred. Costs incurred to develop new products after technological feasibility is achieved, which represent the majority of our total development spending, are capitalized and amortized to cost of revenues. Accordingly, product maintenance and development expense in our consolidated statement of operations can fluctuate from period to period, in terms of both total dollars and as a percentage of revenue, based on the nature and timing of activities occurring during the period.
          Amortization of intangibles represents the amortization of certain identified intangible assets acquired through various acquisitions. While these expenses are generally predictable from period to period because they are fixed over the course of their individual useful lives, they can be affected by events and other factors that result in impairment of these assets and a corresponding reduction in future amortization.
Overview of Financial Results
          The transition of our Company that we began in fiscal year 2005 continued in 2006. Compared to fiscal 2005, our revenues declined 25.5%, to $90.7 million, and our net loss decreased to ($22.5) million, or ($0.95) per share, from ($27.7) million, or ($1.18) per share.
          The transition of our Company began in 2005 when we took a number of significant actions to change the strategic direction of the Company. These actions included:
    Significant leadership changes across the organization;
 
    The development of a new strategic product roadmap consisting of products that will be offered only on a subscription basis and which we believe will make our product offerings the strongest in the industry;
 
    The restructuring of our sales and development organizations to align them with our new business direction;
 
    The development of the internal systems, processes, and disciplines necessary to support our long-term growth plans.
          In executing these actions, we incurred in 2005 non-cash technology impairment charges of $13.2 million, cash and non-cash restructuring and other charges totaling $6.0 million, and reduced our operating expenses from 2004. The continuing transition into 2006 also resulted in non-cash impairment charges of $7.0 million on previously acquired technology, customer and trademark intangible assets, cash restructuring charges of $3.2 million, and reduced operating expenses from 2005.
          In 2006, we released two important subscription-based products from the roadmap that was completed in 2005. In July 2006, we released the first phase of the PLATO Learning Environment, our online management system which will be the foundation for all new products going forward. Also in July, we released our Straight Curve elementary math product which represents our first product designed to be used as supplemental materials for on-grade level teaching and learning. The release of these products was not only important to our product strategy, but it also marked the beginning of the financial effects we expect to experience as we transition away from perpetual license products, for which revenue is recognized up-front on delivery, to subscription license products, for which revenue is recognized over the subscription period.

20


Table of Contents

          The revenue decrease from 2005 to 2006 reflected a more rapid decline in perpetual license fee orders than we anticipated. Orders for perpetual license products declined from $57.2 million in 2005 to $37.0 million in 2006, resulting in a 40% decline in license fee revenues. Subscription orders, on the other hand, increased nearly 50% to $26.3 million. Subscription revenues, however, increased only slightly over 2005 as the new subscription products were not released until later in the fiscal year.
          The restructuring of our sales organization and processes that began in 2005 has proven more challenging than we anticipated. We continue to believe these changes were necessary to the long-term success of our sales and marketing efforts, but they resulted in a high percentage of new account managers for most of fiscal year 2006. In addition, we have placed greater emphasis in our sales efforts on expanding beyond our traditional customer base to larger school districts and expanded applications of our products. These changes in personnel, products and target customers negatively affected sales productivity during the year as total orders declined 15%, from $108.2 million in 2005 to $92.4 million in 2006, which also affected revenue.
          In response to the lower order and revenue levels, we continued to manage our cost structure in 2006. Total operating expenses declined $10.9 million, or 13% despite a $3.1 million increase in restructuring, impairment and other charges. Operating expenses declined in all functional areas of the company, with sales and marketing expenses making up the majority of the decline, decreasing from $50.0 million in 2005 to $38.6 million in 2006. As a result of our cost management activities we have reduced our breakeven point to less than $100 million of revenue.
          We will continue in 2007 to execute the strategy we began late in 2005, developing market leading new products that will be offered online, over the Internet on a subscription basis. The changes we made in our product development process late in 2005 have exceeded our expectations with new products being developed on time and under budget. We will continue to develop our sales organization and expect sales productivity to improve in 2007. However, the changes in personnel, products and target customers will continue to challenge us in these efforts and this remains a risk for our performance in 2007. In addition to this risk, our business faces other risks that we discuss in more detail in Item 1A of Part I of this report.
          Our outlook for 2007 is consistent with the continuation of our transition from perpetual license products to subscription products and our expectation that sales productivity will improve. Sales order growth over 2006 is expected to be in the range of 10% to 15%. Revenue, however, is expected to decline by 6% to 11% as our order mix continues to transition from perpetual license products to subscription products. We expect to report a net loss in 2007, but expect it to improve 15% to 30% from the net loss in 2006, excluding restructuring, impairment and other charges as expected cost reductions will more than offset the revenue decline. For a more detailed discussion of our 2007 outlook, see the section captioned “Fiscal Year 2007 Outlook” below.

21


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
          Our discussion and analysis of results of operations should be read in conjunction with the section above captioned “General Factors Affecting our Financial Results”.
Revenues
          See Note 1 to consolidated financial statements for discussion of the reclassification of revenues and related cost of revenues previously reported as “other” in our statement of operations.
          The following tables summarize certain key information to aid in the understanding of our discussion and analysis of revenues:
Sales Order Information (in thousands)
                                         
    2006     2005        
            Change from             Change from        
    Amount     2005     Amount     2004     2004  
Order Value:
                                       
License fees
  $ 36,974       (35.4 %)   $ 57,201       (39.5 %)   $ 94,587  
Subscriptions:
                                       
Courseware
    18,651       194.2 %     6,339       (10.0 %)     7,042  
Assessment and other
    7,608       (32.0 %)     11,192       (32.3 %)     16,526  
 
                                 
Total subscriptions
    26,259       49.8 %     17,531       (25.6 %)     23,568  
 
                                       
Services
    29,177       (12.7 %)     33,424       25.8 %     26,562  
 
                                 
 
  $ 92,410       (14.6 %)   $ 108,156       (25.3 %)   $ 144,717  
 
                                 
Percent of Total Order Value:
                                       
License fees
    40 %             53 %             66 %
Subscriptions:
                                       
Courseware
    20 %             6 %             5 %
Assessment and other
    8 %             10 %             11 %
 
                                 
Total subscriptions
    28 %             16 %             16 %
 
                                       
Services
    32 %             31 %             18 %
 
                                 
 
    100 %             100 %             100 %
 
                                 
Sales Orders Greater than $100,000
                                         
    2006   2005    
            Change from           Change from    
    Amount   2005   Amount   2004   2004
Number
    119       (22.7 %)     154       (27.7 %)     213  
Value ($000)
  $ 29,885       (16.8 %)   $ 35,903       (46.7 %)   $ 67,317  
Average Value ($000)
  $ 251       7.7 %   $ 233       (26.2 %)   $ 316  

22


Table of Contents

Revenue By Category (in thousands)
                                         
    2006   2005    
            Change from           Change from    
    Amount   2005   Amount   2004   2004
License fees
  $ 37,322       (40.3 %)   $ 62,527       (27.4 %)   $ 86,163  
Subscriptions
    18,176       1.0 %     17,997       (16.6 %)     21,572  
Services
    35,221       (14.7 %)     41,280       21.2 %     34,066  
 
                                 
 
  $ 90,719       (25.5 %)   $ 121,804       (14.1 %)   $ 141,801  
 
                                 
2006 vs. 2005.
          The decline in total orders from $108.2 million in 2005 to $92.4 million in 2006 reflects several factors:
    The transition in the way we license our products. In 2006, we continued the transition of our products from those that are licensed on a perpetual basis, which have higher one-time selling prices, to those that are licensed on a subscription basis, which have lower selling prices but are renewable at the end of each subscription period. This transition was the primary factor contributing to the 35.4% decline in perpetual license orders from 2005 to 2006, the 194.2% increase in subscription courseware orders over the same period, and the decline in the number of large orders (those greater than $100,000) from 154 in 2005, to 119 in 2006. The 32.0% decline in orders for assessment and other subscription products reflects the maturity of these products.
 
    The timing and availability of new products. In 2006 we released two new products which represented key milestones in the subscription-based product strategy we began executing in late 2005. Straight Curve™ Mathematics was introduced in our third quarter with very positive reviews; however, the release did not align well with schools’ buying cycles. Our new online instructional management system, the PLATO Learning Environment™, was introduced late in the third quarter. Though early acceptance was strong, some customers delayed their purchasing decisions to wait for additional features, scheduled to be released early in fiscal year 2007, resulting in both an accelerated decline in perpetual license sales and lower than anticipated subscription sales.
 
    The productivity of our sales organization. In 2005 and early 2006, we made significant changes to our sales organization and processes which resulted in a high percentage of new account managers for most of fiscal year 2006. In addition, we have placed greater emphasis in our sales efforts on expanding beyond our traditional customer base to larger school districts, which requires the development of new customer relationships. We have also expanded the applications of our products which require new selling techniques for our sales force. These changes in personnel, target customers and product emphasis negatively affected sales productivity during the year.
          Total revenues decreased 25.5% to $90.7 million in 2006 from $121.8 million in 2005, reflecting the decline in total orders discussed above, particularly the $20.2 million decline in perpetual license fee orders, and the higher mix of

23


Table of Contents

subscription orders. Subscription revenues increased only slightly in 2006 compared to 2005 due to the timing of the release of new subscription orders later in our fiscal year as discussed above. Services revenues declined 14.7% from 2005 on a decline in orders for professional services and for technical services, which are tied closely to perpetual license orders, partially offset by an increase in software support services which benefited from improved pricing discipline and an emphasis on obtaining renewals from existing perpetual license customers.
2005 vs. 2004.
          Total revenues in 2005 declined 14.1% to $121.8 million, from $141.8 million in 2004, reflecting a significant decrease in license fee orders and revenues. The number of orders greater than $100,000 declined 27.7%, and the related value of these orders declined by 46.7%. These declines reflect the beginning of our emphasis on subscription-based products as discussed above, and lower sales productivity caused by changes we made during 2005 in the sales organization, and the systems, processes and procedures they use. Many of these changes resulted in significant voluntary and involuntary turnover in our sales organization. The decline in sales productivity also contributed to decreases in subscription revenues during the year.
          Service revenues increased 21.2% in 2005 and benefited from the large deferred revenue balances at the beginning of the year. Service revenue growth also reflects an increase in supplemental educational services, which were provided for the first time in 2005, and increases in software support fees from a growing customer base and delivery of training services.
Gross Profit
          See Note 1 to consolidated financial statements for discussion of the reclassification of revenues and related cost of revenues previously reported as “other” in our statement of operations.
          The following tables summarize the percentage of total revenue, and the gross profit percentage for each revenue category to aid in the understanding of our discussion and analysis of gross profit:
Percentage of Total Revenue
                         
Revenue Category   2006   2005   2004
License fees
    41.2 %     51.3 %     60.8 %
Subscriptions
    20.0 %     14.8 %     15.2 %
Services
    38.8 %     33.9 %     24.0 %
 
                       
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                       
Gross Profit Percentage
                                         
                            Increase (Decrease)
Revenue Category   2006   2005   2004   2005 to 2006   2004 to 2005
License fees
    64.6 %     71.7 %     73.6 %     (7.1 %)     (1.9 %)
Subscriptions
    50.5 %     46.8 %     65.2 %     3.7 %     (18.4 %)
Services
    50.3 %     41.0 %     40.4 %     9.3 %     0.6 %
Total (1)
    55.0 %     46.8 %     64.3 %     8.2 %     (17.5 %)
 
(1)   Total gross profit percentage reflects asset impairment changes of $1.1 million and $13.2 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively that are not included in the revenue category gross profit percentages in this table.

24


Table of Contents

2006 vs. 2005.
          The 2006 total gross profit percentage increased to 55.0% in 2006 from 46.8% in 2005, primarily due to a reduction in asset impairment charges on capitalized product development costs and purchased technology assets from $13.2 million in 2005 to $1.1 million in 2006.
    The 2005 impairment charges were triggered by changes in product development strategies formalized in the fourth quarter of 2005 as part of our strategic product planning process. These changes, as well as our 2005 financial performance, resulted in a reduction in anticipated future cash flows from products in development or purchased in previous acquisitions. Impairment charges related to products in development were $4.4 million, and were primarily related to instructional management products which were expected to be phased out or discontinued when a replacement product was released in 2006. Impairment charges related to purchased technology assets were $8.8 million, and were primarily related to products which were expected to be replaced sooner than originally anticipated, which together with our 2005 financial performance, resulted in a decrease in the anticipated future cash flows from these products relative to the cash flows expected at the time these assets were purchased.
 
    The 2006 impairment charge of $1.1 million related to technology assets purchased in a previous acquisition. As a result of our 2006 financial performance, our estimate of future cash flows attributable to these assets was reduced resulting in the impairment charge.
          Excluding the effects of the impairment charges from both periods, our gross profit percentage declined from 57.6% to 56.2% primarily due to lower revenues and changes in the mix of revenues. Higher margin license fee revenues decreased from 51.3% to 41.2% of total revenue, while lower margin service revenues increased from 33.9% to 38.8% of total revenues. These changes in revenue mix were due to the factors discussed under “Revenues” above.
          The changes from 2005 to 2006 in the gross profit percentages of each revenue category were as follows:
    The decline in the license fee gross profit percentage, from 71.7% in 2005 to 64.6% in 2006, was the result of lower license fee revenues, as discussed above, on a base of primarily fixed costs.
 
    The increase in the subscription gross profit percentage, from 46.8% in 2005 to 50.5% in 2006, was due to a reduction in royalty fees due to a non-recurring charge in 2005 and the renegotiation of an agreement which resulted in lower royalty fees in 2006. Also contributing to the increase were higher subscription revenues on a base of primarily fixed costs which include amortization of capitalized software development and purchased technology, and depreciation and other infrastructure costs to support these hosted services.

25


Table of Contents

    The increase in the services gross profit percentage, from 41.0% in 2005 to 50.3% in 2006, was due to improvements in the productivity and utilization of resources in our services organization and to an increase in the mix of software support services revenues which have low variable costs.
2005 vs. 2004.
          The 2005 total gross profit percentage decreased from 64.3% in 2004 to 46.8% in 2005, primarily due to $13.2 million in asset impairment charges in 2005 on capitalized product development costs and purchased technology assets as discussed above.
          Excluding the effect of the impairment charges, our gross profit percentage declined 6.7 percentage points from 2004, primarily due to changes in the mix of our revenues. Higher margin license fee revenues declined from 60.8% to 51.3% of total revenue, while lower margin service revenues increased from 24.0% to 33.9% of total revenues. These changes in revenue mix are discussed under “Revenues” above. The decline in the license fee gross profit percentage, from 73.6% in 2004 to 71.7% in 2005, was the result of lower license fee revenues, as discussed above, on a base of primarily fixed costs. The decline in subscription margins in 2005 was due to additional non-recurring royalty fees incurred in 2005 and to lower subscription revenues on a base of primarily fixed costs which include amortization of capitalized software development and purchased technology, and depreciation and other infrastructure costs to support these hosted services.
Operating Expenses
          The following table summarizes the percentage of total revenue and percentage change in total spending from the previous year for certain operating expense line items to aid in the understanding of our discussion and analysis of our operating expenses:
                                         
    Percent of Total Revenue   Increase (Decrease)
                            2005 to   2004 to
    2006   2005   2004   2006   2005
Sales and marketing
    42.5 %     41.0 %     43.4 %     (22.8 %)     (18.8 %)
General and administrative
    18.3 %     15.1 %     13.7 %     (9.8 %)     (5.4 %)
Product maintenance and development
    6.1 %     4.6 %     4.2 %     (2.7 %)     (5.5 %)
Amortization of intangibles
    4.1 %     3.6 %     3.0 %     (14.1 %)     0.3 %
 
                                       
Operating expenses excluding restructuring, impairment and other charges
    71.0 %     64.3 %     64.3 %     (17.8 %)     (14.2 %)
 
                                       
Restructuring, impairment and other charges
    10.0 %     5.0 %     N/A       50.9 %     N/A  
 
                                       
Total operating expenses
    81.0 %     69.3 %     64.3 %     (12.9 %)     (7.6 %)
 
                                       
2006 vs. 2005.
          Total 2006 operating expenses were $73.5 million in 2006, compared to $84.4 million in 2005. These amounts include restructuring, impairment and other charges of $9.1 million in 2006 and $6.0 million in 2005. Excluding these charges from both periods, operating expenses decreased $14.0 million, or 17.8%.

26


Table of Contents

          Sales and marketing expenses were $38.6 million in 2006 as compared to $50.0 million in 2005. These decreases primarily reflect the effect of the sales organization changes we initiated in 2005 that resulted in voluntary and involuntary sales force attrition and reduced salaries, travel, professional services, facilities and other related costs. Also contributing to the decline was the realignment of our service resources from sales support to billable activities (which shifted some costs from selling expense to cost of revenues), and decreased commissions resulting from the decrease in revenues.
          General and administrative expenses were $16.6 million in 2006 as compared to $18.4 million in 2005 due primarily to a $1.6 million reduction in bad debt expense. The reduction in bad debt expense reflects sustained improvements in the quality of our accounts receivable attributable to tighter credit and other policies we implemented in 2005. Other cost reductions in general and administrative expenses were largely offset by stock-based compensation expense following the implementation in 2006 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. These expenses totaled $1.7 million, of which $1.5 million were recorded in general and administrative expense.
          Product maintenance and development expenses for 2006 were $5.5 million, comparable to the $5.6 million reported for 2005. Total product development spending, which represents spending on projects that are capitalized and those that are expensed, was $20.8 million in 2006, or 22.9% of total revenues, compared to total spending in 2005 of $15.1 million, or 12.4% of total revenues. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we began the implementation of our new product strategy which accounts for the significant increase in total spending and the emphasis on new product development activities, which are generally capitalized.
          Amortization of intangibles represents the amortization of identified intangible assets, other than technology, acquired in acquisitions. Amortization of $3.7 million in 2006 represented a decrease of 14.1% from 2005 as certain assets acquired in earlier acquisitions became fully amortized during 2006.
          Restructuring, impairment and other charges included in operating expenses in 2006 were $9.1 million compared to $6.0 million in 2005. The 2006 expense includes the following
    A non-cash impairment charge of $6.0 million related to customer and trademark intangible assets acquired in previous acquisitions. This impairment charge was triggered by our 2006 actual financial performance and corresponding reductions in anticipated future revenues attributable to those assets. These reductions related primarily to declines we experienced in the sale of certain perpetual license or maturing products that are sold to these customers, or that contain these trademarks.
 
    Cash restructuring charges of $1.6 million related to U.K. facilities actions taken in 2005. These charges, which represent estimates of our remaining lease obligations on these facilities, include initial estimates of charges for a facility that was not formally vacated until 2006 and updated estimates for facilities vacated in 2005.
 
    Cash restructuring charges of $1.5 million for severance and other costs related to actual and anticipated U.S. workforce reductions as we continue to align our cost structure with actual and expected revenue levels.

27


Table of Contents

2005 vs. 2004.
          Total 2005 operating expenses, including restructuring and other charges of $6.0 million, were $84.4 million. Excluding these charges, total operating expenses decreased $12.9 million from 2004, or 14.2%, for the reasons outlined below.
          Sales and marketing expenses were $50.0 million in 2005 as compared to $61.6 million in 2004, representing a decrease in both dollars and percentage of total revenue. These decreases primarily reflect the sales organization changes and cost reductions we initiated in 2005. Also contributing to the decline was the realignment of our service resources from sales support to billable activities (which shifted some costs from selling expense to cost of revenues) and decreased commissions resulting from the decrease in revenues.
          General and administrative expenses were $18.4 million in 2005 as compared to $19.5 million in 2004, representing a decrease in total spending of 5.4%, but an increase as a percent of total revenues. The decline in total spending was due primarily to a reduction in bad debt expense due to tighter credit and payment terms and the reduction in total revenues. Cost reduction activities initiated in 2005 also resulted in additional savings, but were offset by increased professional fees for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, senior management and board member changes, and process improvement initiatives in 2005. Had these additional expenses not been incurred in 2005, we would have expected general and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenue to remain flat, or decline slightly, from 2004.
          Product development expenses for 2005 were $5.6 million, representing a 5.5% decrease from the $6.0 million reported for 2004. Product development expense decreased due primarily to a shift in spending mix toward more capitalized projects compared to 2004. Total product spending, which represents spending on projects that are capitalized and those that are expensed, was $15.1 million in 2005, which was comparable to total spending in 2004 of $15.2 million.
          Amortization of intangibles represents the amortization of identified intangible assets, other than technology, acquired in acquisitions, the last of which was the Lightspan acquisition in November 2003. Amortization of $4.3 million in 2005 was comparable to 2004, given that the related assets are amortized on a straight-line basis and did not change from 2004 to 2005.
          Restructuring and other charges in 2005 totaled $6.0 million related to restructuring activities in our U.K. subsidiary and our North American operations, primarily in our sales and development organizations. The North American restructuring activities were designed to lower costs and align these organizations with our new business direction, while the U.K. activities were designed to lower costs in line with revenue expectations in this geographic market. These costs consist of $3.1 million in severance and related benefits paid to terminated employees, $1.6 million related to executive officer terminations under employment agreements, $0.5 million in costs related to facility closures, and $0.8 million in other charges. No restructuring costs were incurred in 2004.
          On October 26, 2005, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved an acceleration of the vesting of all stock options having an exercise price greater than the closing price of $7.34 of our common stock on that date. The acceleration covered approximately 760,000 outstanding options with a weighted average exercise price of $8.39. Approximately 600,000 of these options were held by executive management, who are restricted from selling such shares, subject to certain exceptions, prior to the date on which the exercise would have been permitted under the option’s original vesting terms. The objectives of the acceleration were to

28


Table of Contents

eliminate pre-tax compensation expense of $2.6 million that otherwise would have been recognized in future consolidated financial statements upon the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, on November 1, 2005, and to improve employee retention.
Interest Income
          Interest income increased from $1.0 million in 2005 to $1.7 million in 2006. An increase in interest rates earned on investments more than offset the decrease in our average cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances over the prior year.
          Interest income increased from $0.4 million in 2004 to $1.0 million in 2005. This increase reflected an increase in our average cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances and the related interest rates earned on these investments.
Income Taxes
          As discussed earlier under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates,” as a result of the Lightspan acquisition, our net deferred tax assets as of the acquisition date, excluding the deferred tax liability relating to tax deductible goodwill, were fully reserved in the first quarter of 2004, resulting in an increase to goodwill in purchase accounting. Accordingly, any reversal of this valuation allowance due to the subsequent realization of the deferred tax assets is recorded as a reduction to goodwill, as opposed to recording an income tax benefit in the consolidated statement of operations.
          In 2006, we recorded income tax expense of $0.6 million related to tax deductible goodwill which cannot be offset against existing deferred tax assets.
          In 2005, we recorded income tax expense of $0.9 million, consisting of $0.6 million related to tax deductible goodwill which cannot be offset against existing deferred tax assets, and $0.3 million related to income taxes paid in states in which income taxes are not filed on a unitary, or consolidated legal entity basis. Because these states do not allow for the preparation of a consolidated tax return, certain legal entities under which we operate in the U.S. may have taxable income in these states which can not be offset by losses from other legal entities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
          Cash and Cash Equivalents. On October 31, 2006, cash and cash equivalents were $33.1 million, a decrease of $13.8 million from $46.9 million at October 31, 2005. Investments in internal and purchased software product development were $18.3 million, an increase of $8.9 million over the prior year resulting from two new significant products released in July 2006 – our Straight Curve Mathematics product and PLATO Learning Environment, our instructional management product which will be the foundation for all new products going forward. Offsetting these investments was $7.0 million in cash from operations consisting of the net loss of $22.5 million, offset by non-cash depreciation, amortization and impairment charges of $22.4 million, stock compensation expense of $1.7 million and working capital changes of $5.1 million. Non-cash depreciation, amortization and impairment charges and the related effect of that impairment on the 2006 amortization. The decrease in receivables of $4.2 million reflects lower fourth quarter orders compared to the fourth quarter 2005 offset by improved collections. Cash provided by financing activities included $0.8 million from the exercise of employee stock options. Equipment and leasehold improvement purchases in 2006 totaled $3.2 million reflecting significant investments in sales organization productivity and management tools.

29


Table of Contents

          At October 31, 2005, cash and cash equivalents were $46.9 million, an increase of $17.7 million from October 31, 2004. Approximately $16.0 million of this increase represents the net conversion of long-term and short-term marketable securities to cash and cash equivalents during the year. The balance of the increase reflects cash flows from operations in 2005 of $9.8 million and $2.8 million in proceeds primarily from the exercise of employee stock options, offset by investments of $9.4 million in capitalized product development and $1.4 million in equipment and leasehold improvements. Cash flows from operations in 2005 were down $17.2 million from 2004, reflecting the significant increase in our net loss in 2005. The 2005 investments in capitalized new product development were comparable to 2004 levels and primarily related to math and science courseware and an instructional management platform. Equipment and leasehold improvement purchases in 2005 were down significantly from 2004, which included significant early investments in sales organization productivity tools.
          Working Capital and Liquidity. At October 31, 2006, our principal sources of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents totaling of $33.1 million and net accounts receivable of $18.5 million. Our revolving loan agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which provided for a maximum $12.5 million line of credit, expired on January 31, 2006. Negotiations are in progress to replace this agreement.
          Working capital, defined as current assets minus current liabilities, was $8.8 million and $25.4 million at October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in working capital was primarily due to $13.8 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents as discussed above, a $4.2 million decrease in net accounts receivable, offset by a $1.5 million decrease in current deferred revenues. The decrease in receivables reflects lower fourth quarter 2006 orders compared to fourth quarter 2005. The decrease in the current portion of deferred revenues was generally driven by an increase in the average length of subscription periods on orders, resulting in a greater amount being recorded as long-term. Total deferred revenue, including amounts expected to be recognized in periods beyond October 31, 2007, increased $1.4 million, from $40.4 million at the end of 2005 to $41.8 million at the end of 2006.
          Our future liquidity needs will depend on, among other factors, the timing and extent of product development expenditures, order volume, the timing and collection of receivables, and expenditures in connection with possible acquisitions or stock repurchases. We believe that existing cash and marketable securities balances and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.
          Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments. Our contractual obligations and commercial commitments consist primarily of future minimum payments due under operating leases and royalty and software license agreements. In addition, any future borrowings under any revolving loan agreement as discussed above would require future use of cash. On March 3, 2006, we signed a revised agreement with a third-party provider of content used in certain of our software products. Under the revised agreement we were required to pay a total of $3.0 million in non-refundable license fees. These payments are recorded in our balance sheet as product development costs and are being amortized to cost of subscription revenues. The agreement also requires us to pay additional fees on a per-license basis. The agreement expires in October 2007. Total amounts payable under the revised agreement are expected to be comparable to those under the former agreement. Other than this agreement, there were no significant changes to our contractual obligations during the year ended October 31, 2006.

30


Table of Contents

                                         
    Payments Due by Period (in thousands)  
            1 Year     1 to 3     3 to 5     More than  
Contractual Obligations   Total     or Less     Years     Years     5 Years  
Operating leases
  $ 6,990     $ 2,346     $ 3,529     $ 962     $ 153  
Royalty agreements
    563       250       313              
Capital leases obligations
    57       39       18              
 
                             
Total
  $ 7,610     $ 2,635     $ 3,860     $ 962     $ 153  
 
                             
          At October 31, 2006, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures.
Disclosures about Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
          We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of October 31, 2006 or 2005.
Fiscal Year 2007 Outlook
          Sales order growth in 2007 is expected to be in the range of 10% to 15% over 2006 as a result of an anticipated increase in sales productivity and the availability of new products. This growth is expected to occur in the last three quarters of the year.
          Revenue for the year is expected to decline by 6% to 11% from 2006 due to the continued transition from perpetual license orders, for which revenue is recognized up-front upon shipment, to subscription license orders, for which revenue is initially deferred and then recognized over the subscription period. As a result, license fee revenues are expected to decline approximately 50% from 2006, while services revenues are expected to decline by approximately 20%. These declines will be partially offset by an expected increase in subscription revenues. We also expect that the revenue decline will be greater earlier in the year given the expected concentration of order growth in the last three quarters of the year, and the higher mix of subscription orders, for which revenue is initially deferred.
          The total gross profit percentage is expected to be similar to that achieved in 2006, excluding impairment charges. We have taken further actions to reduce our operating costs to partially offset the effect of lower revenues, and amortization expense will be lower due to 2006 impairment charges; therefore, operating expenses are expected to decline by 10% to 12% from 2006, excluding restructuring, impairment and other charges. As a result, the net loss for 2007 is expected to improve by 15% to 30% from the net loss in 2006, excluding restructuring, impairment and other charges, even though revenue will decline. Because we expect the revenue decline to be greater earlier in the year, and a substantial portion of our cost of revenue and operating expenses are fixed, we expect that our gross profit percentage will be lower and our net loss will be greater earlier in the year, and that these will improve as we move through the balance of the year. We expect to achieve profitability in 2008, when the transition from perpetual to subscription license products is largely completed.
          The tax provision in 2007 is expected to be approximately $0.6 million reflecting tax deductible goodwill from a previous acquisition that creates a deferred tax liability that cannot be offset against deferred tax assets.
          Cash and marketable securities at October 31, 2007, are expected to be similar to the balance at the end of 2006, as we expect to continue to heavily invest in new product development, increasing our spending on capitalized product development projects in 2007 from 2006. As a result of the expected order growth and transition to subscription products, we expect deferred revenue to increase by up to 50% by the end of 2007 over the end of 2006.

31


Table of Contents

          These results could vary significantly depending on the level of orders achieved, the timing of those orders, the order mix between perpetual, subscription and services products and the length of subscription periods.
Interest Rate Risk
          As of October 31, 2006, we have no interest-bearing debt, and as a result, have minimal risk relating to interest rate fluctuations. As discussed above, we are in the process of replacing a revolving line of credit we previously had with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. When we finalize a new agreement, we could be exposed to future interest rate fluctuations.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
          Our foreign operations are not a significant component of our business, and as a result, risks relating to foreign currency fluctuation are considered minimal.
New Accounting Pronouncements
          In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. SFAS 123(R) focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as expense in the financial statements as services are performed. Prior to SFAS 123(R), only the pro forma disclosures of fair value were required. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “TOPIC 14: Share-Based Payment” which addresses the interaction between SFAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. As discussed above and in Notes 12 and 13 to Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted SFAS 123(R) at the beginning of fiscal year 2006.
          In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements and the potential under current practice for the build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet. The Company has adopted the bulletin during 2006. The adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), to establish a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expand disclosures on fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective beginning in our fiscal year 2009 and are currently not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
          In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” Interpretation 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Interpretation 48 is effective for our fiscal year 2008. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

32


Table of Contents

          In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections — a Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3” (“SFAS 154”). SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior period financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
          The information appearing under the captions “Interest Rate Risk” and “Foreign Currency Exchange Risk” in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

33


Table of Contents


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of PLATO Learning, Inc.:
          We have completed an integrated audit of PLATO Learning, Inc.’s 2006 and 2005 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006 and audits of its 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated financial statements
          In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PLATO Learning, Inc. and its subsidiaries at October 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
          As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, on November 1, 2005.
Internal control over financial reporting
          Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006 and 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006 and 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

35


Table of Contents

          A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
          Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 11, 2007

36


Table of Contents

PLATO LEARNING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                         
    YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
REVENUES:
                       
License fees
  $ 37,322     $ 62,527     $ 86,163  
Subscriptions
    18,176       17,997       21,572  
Services
    35,221       41,280       34,066  
 
                 
Total revenues
    90,719       121,804       141,801  
 
                 
COST OF REVENUES:
                       
License fees
    13,204       17,684       22,736  
Subscriptions
    9,000       9,576       7,506  
Services
    17,490       24,354       20,311  
Impairment charges
    1,089       13,194        
 
                 
Total cost of revenues
    40,783       64,808       50,553  
 
                 
Gross profit
    49,936       56,996       91,248  
 
                 
OPERATING EXPENSES:
                       
Sales and marketing
    38,598       49,996       61,586  
General and administrative
    16,619       18,420       19,469  
Product maintenance and development
    5,496       5,646       5,973  
Amortization of intangibles
    3,711       4,322       4,308  
Restructuring, impairment and other charges
    9,093       6,025        
 
                 
Total operating expenses
    73,517       84,409       91,336  
 
                 
Operating loss
    (23,581 )     (27,413 )     (88 )
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
                       
Interest income
    1,684       1,026       432  
Interest expense
    (34 )     (90 )     (122 )
Other, net
    51       (350 )     (20 )
 
                 
EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES:
    (21,880 )     (26,827 )     202  
Income tax expense
    600       860       2,030  
 
                 
NET LOSS
  $ (22,480 )   $ (27,687 )   $ (1,828 )
 
                 
 
                       
LOSS PER SHARE:
                       
Basic and diluted
  $ (0.95 )   $ (1.18 )   $ (0.08 )
 
                 
 
                       
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
                       
Basic and diluted
    23,679       23,381       22,637  
 
                 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

37


Table of Contents

PLATO LEARNING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
                 
    OCTOBER 31,  
    2006     2005  
ASSETS
               
 
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 33,094     $ 46,901  
Marketable securities
          213  
Accounts receivable, net
    18,529       22,768  
Inventories
    1,832       4,026  
Other current assets
    6,346       6,351  
 
           
Total current assets
    59,801       80,259  
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net
    6,308       5,711  
Product development costs, net
    25,363       14,753  
Goodwill
    71,865       71,865  
Identified intangible assets, net
    10,545       22,505  
Other long-term assets
    2,348       2,235  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 176,230     $ 197,328  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 4,685     $ 2,938  
Accrued employee salaries and benefits
    5,990       7,772  
Accrued liabilities
    6,622       8,933  
Deferred revenue
    33,736       35,218  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    51,033       54,861  
Long-term deferred revenue
    8,110       5,213  
Deferred income taxes
    2,531       1,931  
Other long-term liabilities
    106       496  
 
           
Total liabilities
    61,780       62,501  
 
           
Commitments and contingent liabilities (see Note 11)
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000 shares authorized; 23,761 shares issued and 23,741 outstanding at October 31, 2006; 23,637 shares issued and 23,617 shares outstanding at October 31, 2005
    237       236  
Additional paid in capital
    168,597       166,295  
Treasury stock at cost, 20 shares
    (205 )     (205 )
Accumulated deficit
    (53,017 )     (30,537 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (1,162 )     (962 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    114,450       134,827  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 176,230     $ 197,328  
 
           
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

38


Table of Contents

PLATO LEARNING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
                         
    YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
                       
Net loss
  $ (22,480 )   $ (27,687 )   $ (1,828 )
 
                 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Realization of acquired deferred tax assets
                1,422  
Deferred income taxes
    600       628       608  
Impairment charges
    7,044       13,194        
Amortization of capitalized product development costs
    7,706       7,272       6,941  
Amortization of identified intangible and other long-term assets
    5,249       8,352       7,648  
Depreciation and amortization of equipment and leasehold improvements
    2,408       3,393       3,358  
Provision for doubtful accounts
    (380 )     1,245       2,305  
Stock-based compensation
    1,650       39       217  
Gain on sale of marketable securities
    (37 )            
Loss on disposal of equipment
    166       289       53  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
Accounts receivable
    4,619       17,839       4,786  
Inventories
    2,194       (1,343 )     (22 )
Other current and long-term assets
    (441 )     (1,846 )     (1,986 )
Accounts payable
    1,748       (2,258 )     (164 )
Other current and long-term liabilities
    (4,480 )     1,863       (4,183 )
Deferred revenue
    1,415       (11,144 )     7,838  
 
                 
Total adjustments
    29,461       37,523       28,821  
 
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    6,981       9,836       26,993  
 
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
                       
Capitalized internal product development costs
    (15,316 )     (9,440 )     (9,238 )
Purchased product development
    (3,000 )            
Purchases of equipment and leasehold improvements
    (3,172 )     (1,400 )     (3,615 )
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
                2,460  
Purchases of marketable securities
    (11,750 )     (9,474 )     (13,176 )
Sales of marketable securities
    229       4,559       241  
Maturities of marketable securities
    11,750       21,000       500  
 
                 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    (21,259 )     5,245       (22,828 )
 
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                       
Repurchase of common stock
                (205 )
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
    741       2,764       1,941  
Repayments of capital lease obligations
    (90 )     (225 )     (239 )
 
                 
Net cash provided by financing activities
    651       2,539       1,497  
 
                 
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
    (180 )     46       (261 )
 
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (13,807 )     17,666       5,401  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    46,901       29,235       23,834  
 
                 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
  $ 33,094     $ 46,901     $ 29,235  
 
                 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

39


Table of Contents

PLATO LEARNING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands)
                                                         
    Common Stock     Retained     Accumulated        
                    Additional             Earnings     Other     Total  
            Par     Paid in     Treasury     (Accumulated     Comprehensive     Stockholders’  
    Shares     Value     Capital     Stock     Deficit)     Loss     Equity  
BALANCES, NOVEMBER 1, 2003
    16,370     $ 164     $ 123,135     $ (11,652 )   $ (1,022 )   $ (693 )   $ 109,932  
Comprehensive loss:
                                                       
Net loss
                            (1,828 )           (1,828 )
Unrealized losses on available for sale securities
                                  (74 )     (74 )
Foreign currency translation adjustments
                                  85       85  
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive loss
                                                    (1,817 )
 
                                                     
Common stock repurchased
    (20 )                 (205 )                 (205 )
Exercise of stock options and shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
    300       3       1,938                         1,941  
Stock-based compensation
    7             217                         217  
Common stock and warrants issued for acquisitions
    6,576       65       40,365       11,652                   52,082  
Common stock returned from acquisition
    (158 )     (1 )     (2,699 )                         (2,700 )
 
                                         
 
                                                       
BALANCES, OCTOBER 31, 2004
    23,075       231       162,956       (205 )     (2,850 )     (682 )     159,450  
Comprehensive loss:
                                                       
Net loss
                            (27,687 )           (27,687 )
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities
                                  77       77  
 
                                                     
Foreign currency translation adjustments
                                  (357 )     (357 )
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive loss
                                                    (27,967 )
Exercise of stock options and shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
    468       4       2,760                         2,764  
Stock-based compensation
    5             39                         39  
Contingent common stock issued for past acquisition
    69       1       540                         541  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
BALANCES, OCTOBER 31, 2005
    23,617       236       166,295       (205 )     (30,537 )     (962 )     134,827  
Comprehensive loss:
                                                       
Net loss
                            (22,480 )           (22,480 )
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities
                                  (23 )     (23 )
Foreign currency translation adjustments
                                  (177 )     (177 )
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive loss
                                                    (22,680 )
 
                                                     
Exercise of stock options and shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
    117       1       741                         742  
Stock-based compensation
    7             1,561                         1,561  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
BALANCES, OCTOBER 31, 2006
    23,741     $ 237     $ 168,597     $ (205 )   $ (53,017 )   $ (1,162 )   $ 114,450  
 
                                         
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

40


Table of Contents

PLATO LEARNING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. General
Fiscal Year
          Our fiscal year is from November 1 to October 31. Unless otherwise stated, references to the years 2006, 2005, and 2004 relate to the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. References to future years also relate to our fiscal year ended October 31.
Consolidation
          The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PLATO Learning, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
          The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, and the valuation and recoverability of capitalized product development costs, goodwill, and identified intangible assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
          Other Revenues: Amounts previously reported as other revenues and other cost of revenues in the consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2005 and 2004 periods were reclassified beginning in the first quarter of 2006 to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on previously reported total revenues, total cost of revenues, or gross profit. The table below presents the reconciliation of amounts as previously reported in fiscal year 2005 and 2004 to the amounts as reported in fiscal year 2006. Amounts reclassified to license fees relate to third-party software sold in conjunction with PLATO software, and to third party hardware devices that are the exclusive hardware platform for our Achieve Now software product. Amounts reclassified to services relate to sales of third-party hardware sold in connection with our technical services offering and to bundled software, services, and hardware provided under a Navy contract with the U.S. Department of Defense. We believe the 2006 reclassification of these amounts results in a presentation of revenues and related cost of revenues that is most representative of management’s current view of the Company’s revenue activities.

41


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Revenue     Cost of Revenue  
In thousands   License     Service     Other     License     Service     Other  
 
                                   
Year ended October 31, 2005
                                               
As previously classified
  $ 57,803     $ 38,342     $ 7,662     $ 12,353     $ 21,809     $ 7,876  
Reclassifications
    4,724       2,938       (7,662 )     5,331       2,545       (7,876 )
 
                                   
As reclassfied
  $ 62,527     $ 41,280     $     $ 17,684     $ 24,354     $  
 
                                   
                                                 
    Revenue     Cost of Revenue  
In thousands   License     Service     Other     License     Service     Other  
 
                                   
Year ended October 31, 2004
                                               
As previously classified
  $ 80,078     $ 30,030     $ 10,975     $ 15,060     $ 17,373     $ 10,614  
Reclassifications
    6,085       4,036       (10,975 )     7,676       2,938       (10,614 )
 
                                   
As reclassfied
  $ 86,163     $ 34,066     $     $ 22,736     $ 20,311     $  
 
                                   
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
          All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Any such investments are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Marketable Securities
          We account for marketable securities in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”). SFAS 115 addresses the accounting and reporting for investments in fixed maturity securities and for equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. All of our marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value as determined by quoted market prices, with unrealized gains and losses, net of related tax effects, reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The cost basis of securities sold is determined using the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in interest income.
          Included in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss is an unrealized gain of $23,000 for October 31, 2005 and an unrealized loss of $54,000 for October 31, 2004 related to available-for-sale securities. As of October 31, 2006, we had no securities classified as available for sale and the gross realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities, which are included in other income, were not material in all periods presented.
Accounts Receivable
          Accounts receivable are initially recorded at fair value upon the sale of products or services to our customers. Installment receivables, a component of accounts receivable, represent amounts not yet billed that are due within one year from the balance sheet date. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts at an amount estimated to be sufficient to provide adequate protection against losses resulting from extending credit to our customers. In judging the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts, we consider multiple factors including historical bad debt experience, the general economic environment, the need for specific client reserves, and the aging of our receivables. The provision for doubtful accounts is included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statement of operations. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing these factors.

42


Table of Contents

Concentration of Credit Risk
          Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade accounts receivable. We perform evaluations of our customers’ credit worthiness and require no collateral from our customers. Although many of our customers are dependent upon various government funding sources and are subject to appropriation of funds, we do not believe there is a significant concentration of risk associated with any specific governmental program or funding source.
Inventories
          Inventories, consisting primarily of third party hardware, media, documentation, and packaging materials, are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market. We review our inventory on a regular basis with the objective of assessing its net realizable value. We adjust the carrying value of inventory according to our estimates of the net realizable value of individual inventory components relative to their purchase or carrying value.
Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
          Equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The straight-line method of depreciation is used over the estimated useful lives of the assets. This is generally three to five years for equipment, and the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life for leasehold improvements. Upon retirement or disposition, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is included in our results of operations. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
          We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). Under SFAS 142, goodwill is not amortized but must be reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The first step of the test used to identify potential impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. We operate as one reporting unit and for purposes of this test use our market capitalization plus a control premium to approximate the fair value of the Company. If our fair value exceeds our book value, our goodwill is considered not impaired, and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If our book value exceeds fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. For this step the implied fair value of the goodwill is compared with the book value of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. Any loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. After an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of goodwill is its new accounting basis. Subsequent reversal of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited once the measurement of that loss is completed. We completed our annual goodwill impairment assessments as of October 31, 2006 and 2005. Goodwill was not impaired and no impairment charges were recorded.

43


Table of Contents

Long Lived Assets
          We review identified intangible and other long lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If such events or changes in circumstances are present, the undiscounted cash flows method is used to determine whether the asset is impaired. Cash flows would include the estimated terminal value of the asset and exclude any interest charges. To the extent the carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows over the estimated remaining life of the asset, the impairment is measured using discounted cash flows. Considerable judgment is required in the evaluation of whether certain events or circumstances lead to an indication of impairment, and in the assumptions used in determining the amount and period over which future revenues are expected to be earned, related costs, terminal values, and discount rates. In 2006 and 2005, we recorded asset impairment charges on certain long-lived purchased technology, customer and trademark assets. See Note 8 for further discussion of these charges.
Financial Instruments
          The carrying value of our marketable securities approximates their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. Marketable securities as of October 31, 2005 consisted entirely of common stock.
Revenue Recognition
          We recognize revenue in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition”, as amended and modified, as well as Technical Practice Aids issued from time to time by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.” We license software under non-cancelable perpetual license and subscription agreements. We also provide related professional services, including consulting, training, and implementation services, as well as ongoing customer support and maintenance. Consulting, training, and implementation services are not essential to the functionality of our software products. Accordingly, revenues from these services are recognized separately.
          Revenue from the sale of perpetual licenses is recognized upon meeting the following criteria: (i) a written customer order has been executed, (ii) courseware has been delivered, (iii) the license fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectibility of the fee is probable.
          For software arrangements that include more than one element, we allocate the total arrangement fee among each deliverable based on vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of the relative fair value of each deliverable. VSOE is determined using the price charged when that element is sold separately. For software arrangements in which we have fair value of all undelivered elements, but not of a delivered element, the residual method is used to record revenue. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered element(s) and is recognized as revenue. For software arrangements in which we do not have VSOE for undelivered elements, revenue is deferred until the earlier of when VSOE is determined for the undelivered elements or when all elements for which we do not have VSOE have been delivered.
          If collectibility of the fee is not probable, revenue is recognized as payments are received from the customer provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. If the fee due from the customer is not fixed or determinable, revenue is recognized as the payments become due provided all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

44


Table of Contents

          Revenue from the sale of software under subscription arrangements is recognized on a ratable basis over the subscription period starting the later of the first day of the subscription period or when all revenue recognition criteria identified above have been met.
          Services revenue consists of software support and maintenance, which is deferred and recognized ratably over the support period, and consulting, training, and implementation services, which are recognized as the services are performed.
Advertising and Sales Promotion Costs
          Advertising and sales promotion costs, which are expensed as incurred, were $453,000, $1,191,000 and $1,648,000 for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Product Development Costs
          Our product development costs relate to the research, development, enhancement, and maintenance of our software products and include employee salary expense, third-party contractor fees, and overhead costs such as facilities expenses. The amortization of capitalized product development costs is included in cost of revenues related to license fees and subscriptions. Research and development costs, relating principally to the design and development of new products prior to the achievement of technological feasibility, and the routine enhancement, and maintenance of existing products, are expensed as incurred.
          We capitalize product development costs when the projects under development reach technological feasibility. The majority of our product development costs qualify for capitalization due to the concentration of our development efforts on the content of our products. Technological feasibility is established when we have completed all planning, designing, coding, and testing activities necessary to establish that a product can be produced to meet its design specifications. Capitalization ends when a product is available for general release to our customers, at which time amortization of the capitalized costs begins.
          We amortize these costs using the greater of: (a) the amount determined by the ratio of the product’s current revenue to total expected future revenue, or (b) the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the product, which is four years for all platform, math and science products released after July 2006, and three years for all other products. During all periods presented, we used the straight-line method to amortize the capitalized costs as this method resulted in greater amortization.
          We evaluate our capitalized costs on a quarterly basis to determine if the unamortized cost related to any product, or class of products, exceeds its estimated net realizable value. If an impairment is determined to exist, a related charge is recorded in our statement of operations. In 2005, we recorded asset impairment charges of $4,412,000 related to capitalized product development costs for certain products. See Note 7 for further discussion of these charges. There were no impairment charges on capitalized product development costs in 2006.

45


Table of Contents

          Purchased product development represents non-refundable amounts paid under a revised license agreement, signed in the second quarter of 2006, for software used in one of our subscription products. The amount is being amortized on a straight-line basis through April 2008.
          Fully amortized product development costs are written off when it is determined that these assets are no longer substantially in use in existing products. These write-offs have no effect on total assets or our results of operation.
Stock-Based Compensation
          Effective November 1, 2005, we began recording compensation expense associated with stock options and other forms of equity compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”), as interpreted by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. Prior to November 1, 2005, we accounted for our stock-based compensation arrangements according to the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS 123”), and related interpretations. Accordingly, no related compensation expense was recorded for awards granted with no intrinsic value and the pro forma disclosures required by SFAS 123 were presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. See Notes 12 and 13 for additional stock-based compensation disclosures under FAS 123(R).
          The effect of the adoption of SFAS 123(R) on our fiscal year 2006 results was to increase our net loss by $1,650,000, and our net loss per share by $0.07.
          SFAS 123(R) also requires that the cash retained as a result of the tax deductibility of the increase in the value of share-based arrangements be presented as a component of cash flows from financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), such amounts were presented as a component of cash flows from operating activities. Due to our tax net operating loss position, we do not realize cash savings as a result of the tax deduction for stock-based compensation. Accordingly, the adoption SFAS 123(R) had no effect on our cash flows from financing activities for the year ended October 31, 2006.
Income Taxes
          We account for income taxes using the liability method, which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in our financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some component or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Tax rate changes are reflected in income during the period such changes are enacted.

46


Table of Contents

Loss Per Share
          Basic and diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period as follows (in thousands):
                         
    2006     2005     2004  
Net loss
  $ (22,480 )   $ (27,687 )   $ (1,828 )
 
                 
 
                       
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
    23,679       23,381       22,637  
 
                 
Basic and diluted loss per share
  $ (0.95 )   $ (1.18 )   $ (0.08 )
 
                 
          Potential common shares, which consist of stock options and warrants and restricted stock, are anti-dilutive in a net loss situation and are therefore disregarded in the calculation of diluted loss per share. Therefore, the calculation of diluted loss per share for the periods presented for 2006, 2005 and 2004 excluded the effect of approximately 3,195,000, 2,994,000 and 3,420,000 potential common shares, respectively, as they were anti-dilutive.
Foreign Currency Translation
          The functional currency for each of our foreign subsidiaries is the respective local currency. All assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated from local currencies to United States dollars at period end rates of exchange, while revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. Translation adjustments arising from the translation of net assets located outside of the United States (“U.S.”) into U.S. dollars are recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The cumulative losses related to foreign currency translation adjustments included in stockholders’ equity were $1,162,000 and $985,000 at October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Any gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of operations and were not significant during the periods presented.
Comprehensive Loss
          The components of our comprehensive loss include our net loss, unrealized gains and losses on available for sale marketable securities, and foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive loss for all periods presented is included in our consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss.
New Accounting Pronouncements
          In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. SFAS 123(R) focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as expense in the financial statements as services are performed. Prior to SFAS 123(R), only the pro forma disclosures of fair value were required. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, “TOPIC 14: Share-Based Payment” which addresses the interaction between SFAS 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. As discussed above and in Notes 12 and 13 to Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted SFAS 123(R) at the beginning of fiscal year 2006.

47


Table of Contents

          In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements and the potential under current practice for the build up of improper amounts on the balance sheet. The Company has adopted the bulletin during 2006. The adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
          In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), to establish a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expand disclosures on fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective beginning in our fiscal year 2009 and are currently not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
          In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” Interpretation 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Interpretation 48 is effective for our fiscal year 2008. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
          In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections — a Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3” (“SFAS 154”). SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior period financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We do not expect the adoption of this pronouncement to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

48


Table of Contents

Note 3. Supplemental Financial Statement Information
          Supplemental information regarding our inventories is as follows (in thousands):
                 
    October 31,  
    2006     2005  
Third-party hardware
  $ 1,027     $ 1,779  
Media, documenation, and packaging materials
    805       2,247  
 
           
 
  $ 1,832     $ 4,026  
 
           
          Supplemental information regarding our cash flows is as follows (in thousands):
                         
    2006   2005   2004
Cash paid for interest
  $ 34     $ 90     $ 76  
Cash paid for income taxes
    28       274       443  
Liabilities assumed in acquisitions
                28,365  
Assets acquired in acquisitions
                29,308  
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
                       
Common stock and warrants issued for acquisitions
          541       52,082  
Common stock returned from acquisition
                2,700  
Capital lease obligations incurred
          113        
Note 4. Acquisitions
          We account for business combinations in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” All of our acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at their estimated fair values on the dates of acquisition. Operating results of the acquired companies were included in our consolidated financial statements from the dates of acquisition. Acquisition-related goodwill and identified intangible assets are subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which require goodwill to be tested periodically for impairment, but not be amortized. Identified intangible assets are amortized over their estimated lives. See Note 8 for additional information regarding goodwill and identified intangible assets.
          On November 17, 2003, we acquired Lightspan, Inc. (“Lightspan”), a publicly-held corporation and provider of curriculum-based educational software and online assessment products used in schools, at home, and in community colleges. This acquisition has strengthened our product offerings in the K-8 and post-secondary markets and enhanced our ability to provide comprehensive solutions to K-12 and adult learning institutions.
          We acquired all of the outstanding shares of Lightspan for 6,576,129 shares of our common stock valued at $52,082,000 for accounting purposes, $27,501,000 for estimated assumed liabilities, $2,700,000 for estimated severance payments, $900,000 for estimated lease termination costs, and direct acquisition fees of $2,696,000. Of the 6,576,129 shares issued, 1,301,692 were from our treasury stock. Direct acquisition fees consisted primarily of investment banking, legal, and professional fees. The number of shares issued included shares issued for Lightspan’s in-the-money stock options. The fair value of the Lightspan warrants assumed in connection with the merger and converted to PLATO warrants was not significant.

49


Table of Contents

          The purchase price consisted of the following components (in thousands):
         
Fair value of common stock issued
  $ 52,082  
Direct acquisition fees
    2,696  
Severance payments
    2,700  
Lease termination costs
    900  
Liabilities assumed
    27,501  
 
     
 
  $ 85,879  
 
     
          The allocation of the total purchase price, including acquisition fees, was as follows (in thousands):
         
Fair value of tangible assets acquired
  $ 27,644  
Fair value of identified intangible assets
    30,400  
Goodwill
    30,961  
Deferred income taxes
    (3,126 )
 
     
 
  $ 85,879  
 
     
          An appraisal firm assisted us with the valuation of identified intangible assets, consisting of $19,800,000 for customer relationships, $7,300,000 for developed content and technology, $2,300,000 for trademarks and trade names, and $1,000,000 for a non-compete agreement. These identified intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of seven years for customer relationships, nine years for developed content and technology, four and one-half years for trademarks and trade names, and two years for the non-compete agreement.
          In connection with this acquisition, we developed plans for workforce and facility reductions. The aggregate estimated costs of these plans was $3,600,000, which consisted of $2,700,000 related to the elimination of 144 positions in the United States and $900,000 related to a lease termination, which ended October 31, 2004 and had a minimum monthly lease payment of $106,000. All of these costs have been paid.
Note 5. Accounts Receivable
          The components of accounts receivable at October 31 were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    2006     2005  
Trade accounts receivable
  $ 18,450     $ 21,930  
Installment accounts receivable
    1,007       2,485  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    (928 )     (1,647 )
 
           
 
  $ 18,529     $ 22,768  
 
           
          Installment receivables to be billed more than one year after the balance sheet date are included in other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets and were $24,000 at October 31, 2006 and $132,000 at October 31, 2005.

50


Table of Contents

          The allowance for doubtful accounts activity was as follows (in thousands):
                         
    2006     2005     2004  
Balance, November 1
  $ 1,647     $ 2,712     $ 4,254  
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of other reserve adjustments
    (380 )     1,245       2,305  
Write-offs, net of recoveries
    (339 )     (2,310 )     (3,847 )
 
                 
Balance, October 31
  $ 928     $ 1,647     $ 2,712  
 
                 
          The provision for doubtful accounts is included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
Note 6. Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
          The components of equipment and leasehold improvements at October 31 were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    2006     2005  
Equipment
  $ 13,931     $ 13,855  
Leasehold improvements
    4,440       4,362  
 
           
Total
  $ 18,371     $ 18,217  
 
               
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (12,063 )     (12,506 )
 
           
 
  $ 6,308     $ 5,711  
 
           
          Depreciation and amortization expense was $2,408,000, $3,393,000, and $3,358,000 for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Note 7. Product Development Costs
          A reconciliation of capitalized product development costs is as follows (in thousands):
                         
    Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Net Carrying  
    Value     Amortization     Value  
Balance, October 31, 2004
  $ 35,951     $ (18,835 )   $ 17,116  
Capitalized internal product development costs
    9,440             9,440  
Amortization
          (7,272 )     (7,272 )
Write-off of fully amortized costs
    (7,633 )     7,633        
Impairments
    (7,569 )     3,157       (4,412 )
Currency translation
    (1,047 )     928       (119 )
 
                 
Balance, October 31, 2005
    29,142       (14,389 )     14,753  
Capitalized internal product development costs
    15,316             15,316  
Purchased product development
    3,000             3,000  
Amortization
          (7,706 )     (7,706 )
Write-off of fully amortized costs
    (6,881 )     6,881        
 
                 
Balance, October 31, 2006
  $ 40,577     $ (15,214 )   $ 25,363  
 
                 

51


Table of Contents

          Purchased product development represents non-refundable amounts paid under a revised license agreement, signed in the second quarter of 2006, for software used in one of our subscription products. The amount is being amortized on a straight-line basis through April 2008.
          Amortization expense related to capitalized product development costs was $7,706,000, $7,272,000, and $6,941,000 for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, and is included as a component of cost of revenues related to license fees and subscriptions in the consolidated statements of operations.
          In 2005, we recorded impairment charges of $4,412,000 related to capitalized product development costs. These charges, which are reported in cost of revenues, resulted from our evaluation of expected future revenues from certain products, given our 2005 financial performance, and changes in product strategies formalized in the fourth quarter. These product strategy changes were driven by the completion of our strategic planning process in 2005, and by the implementation of a formal product life cycle and investment review process. The charges were primarily related to instructional management and delivery platform products which began to be phased out when a replacement product was released in 2006.
          In 2006 and 2005, we wrote off approximately $6,881,000 and $7,633,000 of product development costs and related accumulated amortization which was fully amortized and are no longer considered substantially in use with existing products as of November 1, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Note 8. Goodwill and Identified Intangible Assets
          Goodwill has been recorded for the excess of the purchase price of acquisitions over the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets less the fair value of liabilities assumed in these acquisitions.
          There were no changes in goodwill during 2006. The changes in goodwill during 2005 were as follows (in thousands):
         
Balance, October 31, 2004
  $ 71,267  
     Release of shares from escrow
    541  
     Income tax adjustment
    233  
     Foreign currency translation
    (176 )
 
     
Balance, October 31, 2005
  $ 71,865  
 
     

52


Table of Contents

          Identified intangible assets subject to amortization, resulting from our previous acquisitions, were as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    2006     2005  
    Gross             Net     Gross             Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying     Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Value     Amortization     Value     Value     Amortization     Value  
Acquired technology
  $ 21,940     $ (17,850 )   $ 4,090     $ 23,029     $ (16,645 )   $ 6,384  
Trademarks and tradenames
    2,892       (2,744 )     148       3,680       (2,036 )     1,644  
Customer relationships and lists
    21,100       (14,793 )     6,307       21,100       (6,644 )     14,456  
Noncompete agreements
    1,000       (1,000 )           1,000       (979 )     21  
 
                                   
 
  $ 46,932     $ (36,387 )   $ 10,545     $ 48,809     $ (26,304 )   $ 22,505  
 
                                   
          Amortization expense and impairment charges related to the identified intangible assets presented above were as follows (in thousands):
                         
    Fiscal Years Ended  
    October 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
Cost of revenues:
                       
Amortization expense
  $ 1,206     $ 3,781     $ 3,340  
Impairment charges
    1,089       8,782        
 
                 
 
    2,295       12,563       3,340  
 
                 
Operating expenses
                       
Amortization expense
    3,710       4,321       4,308  
Impairment charges
    5,955              
 
                 
 
    9,665       4,321       4,308  
 
                 
 
  $ 11,960     $ 16,884     $ 7,648  
 
                 
          The estimated future amortization expense for the identified intangible assets presented above is as follows (in thousands):
                         
    Cost of     Operating        
    Revenues     Expenses     Total  
2007
  $ 821     $ 1,740     $ 2,561  
2008
    821       1,550       2,371  
2009
    749       1,550       2,299  
2010
    647       1,550       2,197  
2011
    526       65       591  
Thereafter
    526             526  
 
                 
 
  $ 4,090     $ 6,455     $ 10,545  
 
                 
          The future amortization amounts presented above are estimates. Actual future amortization expense may be different due to future acquisitions, impairments, changes in amortization periods, or other factors.

53


Table of Contents

          In 2006, we recorded impairment charges totaling $7,044,000 on identified intangible assets acquired in previous acquisitions. Impairment charges on identified technology assets totaled $1,089,000 and were recorded in cost of revenues. These charges were triggered by our 2006 financial performance and resulting reduction in estimated future cash flows attributable to these assets. Impairment charges on identified customer and trademark intangible assets totaled $5,955,000 and are reported in operating expenses. These charges were also triggered by our 2006 actual financial performance and resulting reductions in anticipated future revenues attributable to these assets. The expected revenue reductions related primarily to accelerated declines we experienced in the sale of certain perpetual license or maturing products sold to the identified customer base, or that contain these trademarks.
          In 2005, we recorded impairment charges of $8,782,000 related to acquired technology assets. These impairment charges, which are reported in cost of revenues, resulted from our evaluation of expected future revenues from certain products given our 2005 financial performance, and changes in product strategies formalized in the fourth quarter of 2005. These charges were primarily related to products which were expected to be replaced sooner than originally anticipated which, together with our 2005 financial performance, resulted in a decrease in the anticipated future cash flows from these products relative to the cash flows expected at the time these assets were purchased.
Note 9. Debt
Revolving Loan
          Our revolving loan agreement with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which provided for a maximum $12.5 million line of credit, expired January 31, 2006. There were no borrowings outstanding at October 31, 2005. Negotiations are in progress to replace this agreement.
Capital Lease Obligations
          At October 31, 2006, we were obligated under various capital leases for equipment. Amounts due in the next twelve months under these leases are classified as a current liability in the consolidated balance sheets.
          Scheduled maturities of capital lease obligations are as follows (in thousands):
         
2007
  $ 39  
2008
    18  
 
     
 
  $ 57  
 
     
Note 10. Deferred Revenue
          The components of deferred revenue were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    October 31,  
    2006     2005  
License fees
  $ 2,282     $ 5,736  
Subscriptions
    20,192       12,546  
Services
    19,372       22,149  
 
           
Total
    41,846       40,431  
Less: long-term portion
    (8,110 )     (5,213 )
 
           
Current portion
  $ 33,736     $ 35,218  
 
           

54


Table of Contents

          The long-term portion of deferred revenues represents amounts we expect to recognize as revenue in periods beyond one year from the balance sheet date.
Note 11. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Operating Leases
          We lease our various office facilities. Certain of these operating leases contain renewal options, escalation clauses and requirements that we pay taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Estimated amounts for these costs are included in future minimum rental payments. Commitments for future minimum rental payments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
         
2007
  $ 2,346  
2008
    1,970  
2009
    1,559  
2010
    866  
2011
    96  
Thereafter
    153  
 
     
 
  $ 6,990  
 
     
          Rent expense was $4,101,000, $3,099,000, and $3,793,000 for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Amounts for 2006 and 2005 include rent expenses accrued for vacated facilities as discussed in Note 14. In 2006, accrued vacated facilities rent expense was reduced by $322,000 due to actual or expected subleasing arrangements for two of our U.K. facilities.
Royalty Agreements
          We have entered into various third-party product royalty agreements, which provide for future minimum royalty payments of approximately $563,000 through 2009.
401(k) Plan
          We have a discretionary 401(k) plan for all employees who are at least 21 years of age and have completed 6 months of service with the Company. Our discretionary contributions are funded each year and totaled $576,000 in 2006, $650,000 in 2005, and $708,000 in 2004.
Employment Agreements
          As of October 31, 2006, we had entered into various employment agreements with our executive officers, which provide for aggregate severance payments of up to approximately $4,960,000, subject to certain conditions and events.

55


Table of Contents

Legal Proceedings
          As previously disclosed, Credit Suisse First Boston and several of its clients, including Lightspan, Inc. (which we acquired in November 2003), were defendants in a securities class action lawsuit captioned Liu, et al. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., et al. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged that Credit Suisse First Boston, its affiliates, and the securities issuer defendants (including Lightspan, Inc.) manipulated the price of the issuer defendants’ shares in the post-initial public offering market. On April 1, 2005, the complaint was dismissed with prejudice, and all subsequent plaintiff motions and appeals have been denied or rejected, including a final petition to the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari which was denied on December 4, 2006.
          From time to time, we may become involved in litigation arising out of operations in the normal course of business. As of October 31, 2006, we were not party to any pending legal proceedings the adverse outcome of which could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial position or cash flows.
Note 12. Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock Issued
          Shares of common stock issued for the exercise of options and warrants and for purchases under our employee stock purchase plan were 117,000, 468,000, and 300,000 shares for 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Common Stock Repurchased
          No shares of common stock were repurchased in 2006.
Stock Incentive and Stock Option Plans
          Prior to November 1, 2005, we adopted various stock incentive plans (“Prior Stock Plans”) that authorized the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, and stock awards to directors, officers, and key employees, subject to certain conditions, including continued employment. Stock options under these plans were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Options granted to our outside directors were exercisable immediately. All other options granted become exercisable ratably over a service period of two to four years and expire, if unexercised, after eight or ten years from the grant date.
          On December 8, 2005, our Board of Directors approved the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”), which was ratified at the annual meeting of stockholders on March 2, 2006. The Plan permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares, and other stock awards. The total number of shares available for issuance under the 2006 Plan is equal to the sum of (a) the shares remaining under the Prior Stock Plans, and (b) any shares issued under the Prior Stock Plans that are forfeited, canceled, or expire without being exercised. Effective with the adoption of the 2006 Plan, shares will no longer be issued under the Prior Stock Plans. Stock options under the 2006 Plan are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. Options granted to our outside directors are exercisable immediately. All other options granted become exercisable ratably over a service period of four years and expire, if unexercised, after eight years from the grant date.

56


Table of Contents

          In addition to these plans, we also have an Employee Stock Purchase Plan under which employees are entitled to purchase our common stock at a 15% discount to the market price at the beginning or end of the quarterly purchase period as defined in the plan, which ever is lower. In December 2005, we also entered into “Bonus Unit” agreements with certain employees under which these employees are eligible for cash compensation equal to the number of bonus units multiplied by the market price of our common stock on each of October 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, provided they are employed with us on those dates. At October 31, 2006, a total of 45,000 bonus units were outstanding. As these awards are payable in cash, estimated amounts payable under these agreements are adjusted with changes in the market price of our stock and are classified as a liability in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
          Stock option transactions under these plans were as follows (share amounts in thousands):
                         
    2006     2005     2004  
Options outstanding at beginning of year
    2,652       3,093       2,659  
Options granted
    827       1,243       753  
Options exercised
    (90 )     (455 )     (128 )
Options forfeited or expired
    (513 )     (1,229 )     (191 )
 
                 
Options outstanding at end of year
    2,876       2,652       3,093  
 
                 
Options exercisable at end of year
    2,037       2,169       2,010  
 
                 
 
                       
Weighted average exercise prices:
                       
Outstanding at beginning of year
  $ 9.51     $ 10.54     $ 10.33  
Granted
    7.63       7.36       10.63  
Exercised
    6.60       5.90       5.43  
Forfeited
    10.79       11.35       11.24  
Outstanding at end of year
    8.83       9.51       10.54  
Exercisable at end of year
  $ 9.38     $ 10.05     $ 11.03  
          Stock options outstanding and exercisable at October 31, 2006 were as follows (share amounts in thousands):
                                         
            Weighted-                      
            Average                      
            Remaining     Weighted-             Weighted  
            Years     Average             Average  
Range of Exercise   Number     Contractual     Exercise     Number     Exercise  
Prices   Outstanding     Life     Price     Exercisable     Price  
$3.75 - $7.08
    637       4.8     $ 6.22       436     $ 5.84  
$7.14 - $7.50
    350       6.0       7.37       350       7.37  
$7.60 - $7.60
    629       7.1       7.60              
$7.76 - $10.26
    588       6.1       8.16       579       8.16  
$10.40 - $23.62
    672       4.2       13.79       672       13.79  
 
                             
 
    2,876       5.6     $ 8.83       2,037     $ 9.38  
 
                             

57


Table of Contents

Common Stock Warrants
          At October 31, 2006, warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock were outstanding at an exercise price of $17.00 per share. These warrants expire in May 2007.
Note 13. Stock-Based Compensation
          As described in Note 2, effective November 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), using the modified prospective transition application method. Under this method, compensation expense is recognized for employee awards granted, modified, or settled subsequent to October 31, 2005, and the unvested portion of awards granted to employees prior to November 1, 2005. We use the straight-line method to recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period of the award, which we have determined to be the vesting period, and an annual pre-vesting forfeiture rate of 8%, which was determined based on historical pre-vesting forfeiture data. The fair value of option awards in 2006 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model utilizing the following assumptions:
     
Expected life
  4.3 years
Risk-free rate of return
  4.4% - 5.1%
Volatility
  49.0%
Dividend yield
  0.0%
          In accordance with SFAS 123(R), we review our current assumptions on a periodic basis and adjust them as necessary to ensure proper option valuation. The expected life of an award was determined based on our analysis of historical exercise behavior taking into consideration various participant demographics and option characteristic criteria. The risk-free rate of return is based on the yield on zero coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS with a remaining life that is consistent with the expected life of the options being valued. Our estimate of volatility incorporated a number of the factors outlined in SFAS 123(R), but was principally determined by examining our historical stock price volatility.
          Total stock-based compensation expense recorded for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 was $1,650,000 and $39,000, respectively.
          On October 26, 2005, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved the acceleration of the vesting of all unvested options held by then current employees, including executive management, having an exercise price greater than $7.34, which was the closing price of our common stock on that date. The acceleration covered approximately 760,000 outstanding options with a range of exercise prices of $7.38 to $11.18 and a weighted average exercise price of $8.39. Approximately 600,000 of these options, having a weighted average exercise price of $7.84, are held by executive management who are restricted from selling such shares prior to the date on which the exercise would have been permitted under the option’s original vesting terms. This restriction is subject to certain exceptions, including the lapse of this restriction at the time of an executive’s termination. The objectives of the acceleration, the effect of which is included in the 2005 stock-based compensation expense amount above, were to eliminate pre-tax compensation expense of $2.6 million that would otherwise have been recognized in our future consolidated financial statements upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, on November 1, 2005, and to improve employee retention.

58


Table of Contents

          No income tax benefits were recognized related to this compensation expense due to the full valuation allowance provided on our deferred income tax assets as described in Note 15.
          Our pro forma net loss and pro forma loss per share for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, including pro forma stock-based compensation expense as if the fair-value-based method of accounting had been used on awards being accounted for under APB Opinion No. 25, were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
                 
    2005     2004  
Net loss, as reported
  $ (27,687 )   $ (1,828 )
Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net loss
    39       217  
Stock-based compensation expense determined using the fair value based method for all awards
    (5,204 )     (4,751 )
 
           
Pro forma net loss
  $ (32,852 )   $ (6,362 )
 
           
 
               
Basic and diluted per share:
               
As reported
  $ (1.18 )   $ (0.08 )
 
           
Pro forma
  $ (1.41 )   $ (0.28 )
 
           
          The weighted-average fair value of options granted and the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes stock option pricing model for 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
                 
    2005   2004
Fair value of options granted
  $ 4.18     $ 6.12  
Expected life (years)
    5       5  
Risk-free rate of return
    3.9 %     3.4 %
Volatility
    62.0 %     67.0 %
Dividend yield
    0.0 %     0.0 %
          The intrinsic value of an option is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds its exercise price. The total intrinsic value of all options exercised during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 was approximately $162,000 and $699,000, respectively. The total intrinsic value of all options outstanding at October 31, 2006 and 2005 was $132,000 and $135,000, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 was $3.41 per share and $4.18 per share, respectively.
          As of October 31, 2006 the total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based compensation arrangements was approximately $2.2 million and the related weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is approximately three years.

59


Table of Contents

Note 14. Restructuring, Impairment and Other Charges
          Restructuring, impairment and other charges are summarized as follows (in thousands):
                 
    2006     2005  
Restructuring charges:
               
Severance and related benefits for U.K. headcount reduction
  $     $ 920  
Severance and related benefits for U.S. and Canada headcount reduction
    1,450       2,193  
U.K. facility closure liabilities
    1,557       519  
Other
    131       616  
 
           
 
    3,138       4,248  
 
           
 
               
Impairment charges:
               
Identified intangible assets
    7,044       8,782  
Capitalized product development
          4,412  
 
               
Other charges:
               
Executive officer changes
          1,595  
Other
          182  
 
           
 
  $ 10,182     $ 19,219  
 
           
 
               
Amounts included in:
               
Cost of revenue
  $ 1,089     $ 13,194  
Operating expenses
    9,093       6,025  
 
           
 
  $ 10,182     $ 19,219  
 
           
Restructuring Charges
          Fiscal Year 2006: In the first nine months of fiscal year 2006, we reduced headcount in the U.S. as a continuation of restructuring activities initiated in October 2005 as discussed further below. These actions resulted in severance and related costs totaling $264,000.
          In October 2006, we initiated plans to reduce additional U.S. sales and general and administrative headcount based on fourth quarter financial performance and the resulting impact on our financial plans for 2007. Severance and related costs of $1,186,000 were recorded related to these actions. In addition to these charges, we also recorded $1,557,000 related to lease commitments on our remaining facility in the United Kingdom (“U.K”) which was vacated in the fourth quarter 2006.
          Fiscal Year 2005: In January 2005, we reduced headcount by 30 positions and closed certain facilities in the U.K. Severance costs of $452,000 and facility closing costs of $313,000 were recorded during 2005 related to these actions. Also in January 2005, we reduced headcount in the United States to reduce management layers and improve efficiency. Eight positions were eliminated and severance charges of $417,000 were recorded related to these actions.

60


Table of Contents

          In October 2005, as part of our ongoing evaluation of our U.K. operations, we initiated plans to reduce headcount by an additional 22 positions and close certain facilities. Severance costs of $468,000, facility closing costs of $138,000, and other costs of $454,000 were recorded related to these actions. Also in October 2005, we reduced headcount by 80 positions in the United States and Canada. Severance costs of $1,776,000 and facility closing costs of $68,000 were recorded related to these actions.
          Although all restructuring activities are expected to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, additional restructuring charges may be incurred in 2007 based on financial performance throughout the year.
          The restructuring reserve activity was as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Severance                    
    and related     Facility              
    benefits     closings     Other     Total  
Reserve balance at October 31, 2004
  $     $     $     $  
Provision for restructuring
    3,113       519       616       4,248  
Cash payments
    (1,515 )     (342 )     (215 )     (2,072 )
 
                       
Reserve balance at October 31, 2005
    1,598       177       401       2,176  
Provision for restructuring
    1,450       1,557       131       3,138  
Cash payments
    (1,816 )     (208 )     (169 )     (2,193 )
Other
                (47 )     (47 )
 
                       
Reserve balance at October 31, 2006
  $ 1,232     $ 1,526     $ 316     $ 3,074  
 
                       
Impairment Charges
          The impairment charges on product development and acquired identified intangible assets are more fully described in Note 7 and 8 to consolidated financial statements, respectively.
Other Charges
          In November 2004, we announced the resignations of John Murray, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and three other executive officers. The severance provisions of Mr. Murray’s employment agreement, dated January 1, 2001, provide for him to (a) be paid his current base salary of $350,000 per year through December 31, 2007, (b) be paid bonus earned for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004 and a pro rata portion of bonus, if earned, for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2005, and (c) be granted options to purchase 260,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price equal to fair market value as of the date of grant, which vest over a three-year period. In addition, certain options previously granted to Mr. Murray would accelerate and become immediately exercisable under the original terms of the options. Mr. Murray’s right to receive these benefits was subject to his compliance with the confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation obligations under the agreement and the execution of a release of claims. In March 2005, we finalized Mr. Murray’s severance arrangements and entered into an agreement to pay him $1,000,000 in lieu of the stock option

61


Table of Contents

grant mentioned above. The $1,000,000 value of this agreement was assigned to the non-compete provisions of his employment agreement and is being amortized over its three-year period. This amortization is included in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations. We recorded charges of $1,777,000 related to these executive terminations during 2005.
Note 15. Income Taxes
          The components of loss before income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
                         
    2006     2005     2004  
United States
  $ (19,255 )   $ (17,735 )   $ 3,115  
Foreign
    (2,625 )     (9,092 )     (2,913 )
 
                 
 
  $ (21,880 )   $ (26,827 )   $ 202  
 
                 
          The components of income tax expense (benefit) were as follows (in thousands):
                         
    2006     2005     2004  
Federal
  $ 600     $ 608     $ 1,874  
State and local
          252       156  
 
                 
 
  $ 600     $ 860     $ 2,030  
 
                 
 
                       
Current tax expense
  $     $ 252     $ 1,422  
Deferred tax expense
    600       608       608  
 
                 
 
  $ 600     $ 860     $ 2,030  
 
                 
          In 2006, income tax expense of $600,000 was related to tax deductible goodwill. Income tax expense of $860,000 in 2005 consisted of $252,000 of state income taxes, and $608,000 related to tax deductible goodwill. Income tax expense was $2,030,000 for 2004, as a result of taxable income from our U.S. operations, and goodwill was reduced by $1,422,000 to reflect the use of deferred tax assets that cannot be recognized as a tax benefit.
          Income tax expense (benefit) differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to earnings (loss) before income taxes as follows (in thousands):
                         
    2006     2005     2004  
U.S. federal statutory rate at 34%
  $ (7,439 )   $ (9,121 )   $ 69  
State taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax
          252       155  
Goodwill
    600       608       608  
Nondeductible expenses
    130       162       163  
No benefit from foreign loss
    892       3,091       990  
Increase in deferred tax valuation allowance
    6,417       5,868        
Other
                45  
 
                 
 
  $ 600     $ 860     $ 2,030  
 
                 

62


Table of Contents

          The components of the net deferred tax liability at October 31 were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    2006     2005  
Current:
               
Accrued liabilities and reserves
  $ 4,085     $ 5,620  
Valuation allowance
    (4,085 )     (5,620 )
 
           
Net current deferred tax asset
           
 
           
Long-term:
               
Net operating loss carryforward
    45,507       35,078  
Tax credit carryforwards
    608       608  
Product development expense recognition
    3,435       8,278  
Equipment basis difference
    153       415  
Identified intangible asset basis difference
    (4,756 )     (10,722 )
Goodwill basis difference
    (2,531 )     (1,931 )
Other
    701       (418 )
Valuation allowance
    (45,648 )     (33,239 )
 
           
Net long-term deferred tax liability
    (2,531 )     (1,931 )
 
           
 
  $ (2,531 )   $ (1,931 )
 
           
          We had a net deferred tax liability of $2,531,000 and $1,931,000 at October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to tax deductible goodwill from a previous acquisition. As this goodwill is amortized for tax purposes (but not for book purposes), the book basis of the goodwill will further exceed the tax basis, resulting in increases to the related deferred tax liability. The timing of the reversal of this difference is considered indefinite because it will not reverse until the underlying assets that created the goodwill are disposed of or sold. Accordingly, this timing difference cannot be used to support the realization of other deferred tax assets which have definite lives. We expect this liability to increase by approximately $600,000 per year, up to a total amount of approximately $8,500,000.
          At October 31, 2006 and 2005, our deferred tax assets were fully reserved. At October 31, 2006, approximately $42,249,000 of the gross deferred tax asset relates to our net operating loss carryforwards in the U.S. of approximately $105,622,000, which expire in varying amounts between 2007 and 2026. Also included in our gross deferred tax asset was $3,258,000 for our net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $10,656,000 related to our foreign subsidiaries. We have provided a full valuation allowance related to these foreign deferred income tax assets due to the uncertainty in realization of future taxable income in these jurisdictions.
          Realization of our U.S. deferred tax asset is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income in the U.S. prior to expiration of these loss carryforwards. Our merger with Lightspan in the first quarter of 2004 impacted our assessment of the realization of deferred tax assets because the merged company is considered one consolidated taxable entity. As a result of the merger, we acquired approximately $290,000,000 of Lightspan’s net operating loss carryforwards. However, based on the limitations of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, the usage of these net operating loss carryforwards is limited to approximately $3,200,000 per year. Accordingly, only approximately $45,000,000 of the acquired net operating loss carryforwards are available to the combined entity and are included in the previously disclosed U.S. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $105,622,000.

63


Table of Contents

          The combined net operating loss carryforwards at the acquisition date, which represent the majority of the merged company’s deferred tax assets at that date, were reviewed for realization primarily based upon historical results and secondarily upon projected results. Lightspan had historically incurred significant operating losses, which carry more weight than the projected results. Consequently our historical combined operating results were insufficient to support the combined post-merger deferred tax assets. As a result, net deferred tax assets, excluding the deferred tax liability relating to tax deductible goodwill, which cannot be used to support realization of the other net deferred tax assets, were fully reserved for in the purchase accounting for the Lightspan acquisition thereby increasing goodwill. Any subsequent reversal of the valuation allowance recorded on the combined entity’s pre-acquisition net deferred tax assets will be recorded as a reduction of goodwill, as opposed to a reduction of income tax expense in the consolidated financial statements.
          A similar analysis and judgment has resulted in a full valuation allowance being placed on the deferred tax assets generated subsequent to the acquisition of Lightspan. Subsequent realization of these post-combination deferred tax assets will be recorded as a reduction of income tax expense in the year realized, but not until the pre-acquisition deferred tax assets are fully utilized.
Note 16. Segment And Geographic Information
          We operate in one industry segment, which is the development and marketing of educational software and related services. Net sales by geographic area are presented by attributing revenues from external customers on the basis of the country in which the product and services are sold. Information about our geographic operations is as follows (in thousands):
                         
    2006     2005     2004  
Revenues from unaffiliated customers:
                       
United States
  $ 88,349     $ 117,406     $ 137,137  
Foreign
    2,370       4,398       4,664  
 
                 
 
  $ 90,719     $ 121,804     $ 141,801  
 
                 
 
                       
Long-term assets (at October 31):
                       
United States
  $ 116,406     $ 116,824     $ 130,597  
Foreign
    23       245       8,985  
 
                 
 
  $ 116,429     $ 117,069     $ 139,582  
 
                 

64


Table of Contents

Note 17. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
                                         
(In thousands, except per share data)   January 31   April 30   July 31   October 31   Total
2006:
                                       
Revenues
  $ 23,486     $ 19,975     $ 23,456     $ 23,802     $ 90,719  
Gross profit
    13,490       10,158       13,692       12,596       49,936  
Operating expenses
    16,970       16,307       15,738       24,502       73,517  
Net loss (1)
    (3,197 )     (5,899 )     (1,791 )     (11,593 )     (22,480 )
Basic and diluted loss per share (2)
  $ (0.14 )   $ (0.25 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.49 )   $ (0.95 )
 
                                       
2005:
                                       
Revenues
  $ 25,455     $ 31,429     $ 31,239     $ 33,681     $ 121,804  
Gross profit
    11,884       18,325       19,006       7,781       56,996  
Operating expenses
    22,388       21,186       19,163       21,672       84,409  
Net loss (3)
    (10,527 )     (2,954 )     (311 )     (13,895 )     (27,687 )
Basic and diluted loss per share (2))
  $ (0.46 )   $ (0.13 )   $ (0.01 )   $ (0.59 )   $ (1.18 )
 
(1)   In the fourth quarter of 2006, we incurred $1,089 of asset impairment charges related to certain identified technology intangible assets. These charges were recorded in cost of revenues, which reduced gross profit. Restructuring, impairment and other charges of $9,093 were included in operating expenses. See Notes 7, 8 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
(2)   The sum of the quarterly loss per share does not equal the annual loss per share due to changes in average shares outstanding.
 
(3)   In the fourth quarter of 2005, we incurred $13,194 of asset impairment charges related to certain capitalized product development and purchased technology assets. These charges were recorded in cost of revenues and reduced gross profit. Restructuring and other charges of $6,025 were included in operating expenses. See Notes 7, 8 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

65


Table of Contents

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
          None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
          As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Disclosure Committee and our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 31, 2006.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
          Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
          Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
          Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006 based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the results of this evaluation, we concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2006.
          Our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2006 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

66


Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
          There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that was conducted during the last fiscal quarter, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
          None.

67


Table of Contents

PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
          The information required by Item 10 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K with respect to identification of our directors and identification of an audit committee financial expert is set forth under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors” in our 2007 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
          Information with respect to our Executive Officers as of January 1, 2007 is as follows:
             
Name   Age   Position
Michael A. Morache
    56     President and Chief Executive Officer
David W. Smith
    62     Executive Chairman
Laurence L. Betterley (1)
    52     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
James (Brian) Blaydes
    39     Vice President, K-12 Sales
Richard M. Ferrentino
    51     Vice President, Post-Secondary Sales
Robert C. Hickcox
    53     Vice President, Professional Services
David H. LePage
    60     Senior Vice President, Operations
James T. Lynn
    54     Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Jill V. Lyttle
    51     Vice President, Human Resources
Robert J. Rueckl (1)
    45     Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
 
(1)   On January 5, 2007, we announced the resignation of Mr. Betterley as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Rueckl has been appointed as his replacement effective January 17, 2007.
          Executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, the Board of Directors.
          Michael A. Morache was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of PLATO Learning in February 2005. Mr. Morache has more than 30 years experience developing, leading, and growing information technology businesses. Prior to joining PLATO Learning, he served as President of Pearson Education Technologies (now Pearson Digital Learning) from 2000 to 2002. Mr. Morache served from 1996 to 2000 as President of NCS Services, which was acquired by Pearson plc in 2000. Prior to that he was a Vice President of Unisys Corporation from September 1995 to May 1996. Previously, he was a Senior Vice President with ALLTEL Information Services, Inc. for more than five years. He also has held significant sales, sales management, marketing, and product management positions at IBM and Fujitsu.
          David W. Smith has served as Executive Chairman of the Board of PLATO Learning since March 2005. Previously, he was interim President and Chief Executive Officer of PLATO Learning from November 2004 to February 2005. Prior to that he served as a Business Consultant. From September 2000 to December 2002, Mr. Smith was Chief Executive Officer of NCS Pearson, a provider of products, services, and technologies to customers in education, government, and business. He also served as President of the NCS Assessment and Testing Services from April 1988 to September 2000. Prior to NCS, Mr. Smith was a publisher of professional, technical, and scholarly books and materials as a senior executive with McGraw Hill Corporation’s Training Systems and College Divisions from 1984 to 1988.
          Laurence L. Betterley joined PLATO Learning in June 2004 as Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer and in November 2004 became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of

68


Table of Contents

Diametrics Medical, Inc., a publicly-held medical device company, from 1996 through 2003. From 1984 to 1996, Mr. Betterley was with Cray Research. Inc., a publicly-traded developer, manufacturer and worldwide marketer of high performance computing systems, serving in various roles including Chief Financial Officer, Vice President – Finance and Administration and Corporate Controller. Mr. Betterley began his professional career at Deloitte & Touche.
          James (Brian) Blaydes has been with PLATO Learning for more than eleven years, and currently serves as Vice President, K-12 Sales. Mr. Blaydes joined PLATO Learning in 1995 and, prior to his current role, has held positions of increasing responsibility including Account Manager, District Manager, and Regional Vice President. Prior to joining PLATO Learning, he held sales and marketing positions at Government Service Automation.
          Richard M. Ferrentino has been with PLATO Learning for four years, and currently serves as Vice President, Post-Secondary Sales. Prior to this role, he managed the science development and CyberEd catalog business for PLATO Learning for two years. Mr. Ferrentino has been in the education technology industry for almost 20 years, serving in a variety of sales, marketing, and general management roles, including General Manager of Wicat Systems, Senior Vice President of Sales and Service at Jostens Learning, and President of Invest Learning.
          Robert C. Hickcox, joined PLATO Learning in June 2005 as Vice President and Chief Information Officer and in July 2006 became Vice President, Professional Services. Prior to that, he was an independent consultant from 2001 to 2005 after a six-year career with NCS Pearson, where he most recently held the position of Vice President and Chief Information Officer. Mr. Hickcox’s business experience also includes various management positions with Digital Equipment Corporation, as well as several commissioned officer positions within the United States Air Force.
          David H. LePage has served as Senior Vice President, Operations since December 2000. From 1997 to November 2000, he was Vice President, PLATO Support Services and Distribution. From the Company’s founding in 1989 until 1997, he was Vice President, Systems Development, Client Support and Operations. Prior to joining PLATO Learning, Mr. LePage was General Manager, Systems Development and Technical Support for the Training and Education Group of Control Data Corporation.
          James T. Lynn joined PLATO Learning in May 2005 as Vice President and Chief Technology Officer. Prior to that, he was Senior Staff Systems Engineer at Lockheed Martin, where he managed advanced technology research programs and initiatives. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Lynn was the Vice President of Technology at Pearson Digital Learning, and his business experience also includes senior engineering positions with ID Certify, Motorola, and Group Technologies Corp. (formerly Honeywell DCPD).
          Jill V. Lyttle joined PLATO Learning in June 2004 as Vice President, Human Resources. Prior to that, Ms. Lyttle was Vice President, Human Resources for Prudential Financial from 1997 to 2004. She has also previously held various executive level human resource positions at Cargill, First Bank System, and International Multifoods.
          Robert J. Rueckl joined PLATO Learning in June 2005 as Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to that, Mr. Rueckl held the positions of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Vice President, Controller at Zomax Incorporated, a publicly held supply chain services company. From 1996 to 2002, Mr. Rueckl held several senior finance positions at ADC Telecommunications. Prior to ADC, Mr. Rueckl spent five years at Cray Research in several accounting and finance positions, and six years in the audit practice of KPMG.

69


Table of Contents

          The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our 2007 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Ethics
          We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for all of our employees and directors, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, other executive officers, and senior financial personnel, a copy of which is available on our web site (www.plato.com). We intend to post on our web site any material changes to, or waiver from, our code of business conduct and ethics, if any, within four business days of any such event.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
          The information required by Item 11 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth under the captions “Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation” in our 2007 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Such incorporation by reference shall not be deemed to specifically incorporate by reference the information referred to in Item 402(a)(8) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
          Our equity compensation plan information as of October 31, 2006 is as follows:
                         
    Number of Securities        
    to be Issued Upon   Weighted-Average   Number of Securities
    Exercise of   Exercise Price of   Remaining Available
Plan Category   Outstanding Options   Outstanding Options   for Future Issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
    2,876,000     $8.83       1,931,000  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
                 
 
                       
Total
    2,876,000     $8.83       1,931,000  
 
                       
          All other information required by Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our 2007 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
          The information required by Item 13 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Other Compensation Arrangements” in our 2007 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein.

70


Table of Contents

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
          The information required by Item 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth under the caption “Fees Paid to Principal Accountants” in our 2007 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

71


Table of Contents

PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a)   Documents filed as a part of this report:
  1.   Financial Statements.
 
      The following Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm as set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
 
      Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
 
      Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2006 and 2005.
 
      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
 
      Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Loss for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.
 
      Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
  2.   Financial Statement Schedules.
 
      The schedules are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
 
  3.   Exhibits.
 
      See “Exhibit Index” on page 76 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the documents that are filed as Exhibits to this report or incorporated by reference herein.
(b)   See Item 15(a)(3) above.
(c)   See Item 15(a)(2) above.

72


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
             
    PLATO LEARNING, INC.    
January 12, 2007
  By   /s/ Michael A. Morache
 
Michael A. Morache
   
 
      President and Chief Executive Officer    
          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on January 12, 2007.
     
Signature:   Title:
 
   
/s/ Michael A. Morache
 
  President and Chief Executive Officer 
Michael A. Morache
  (principal executive officer)
 
   
/s/ Laurence L. Betterley
 
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
Laurence L. Betterley
  (principal financial officer)
 
   
/s/ Robert J. Rueckl
 
  Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer 
Robert J. Rueckl
  (principal accounting officer)
 
   
*
 
   
David W. Smith
  Executive Chairman
 
   
*
 
   
Joseph E. Duffy
  Director
 
   
*
 
   
Ruth L. Greenstein
  Director
 
   
 
   
 
Thomas G. Hudson
   Director
 
   
*
 
   
Debra A. Janssen
  Director
 
   
*
 
   
Susan E. Knight
  Director
 
   
*
 
   
M. Lee Pelton
  Director
 
   
*
 
   
Robert S. Peterkin
  Director
 
   
*
 
   
J. Ted Sanders
  Director
 
   
*
 
   
Warren Simmons
  Director
             
*
  By   /s/ Laurence L. Betterley
 
Laurence L. Betterley
   
 
      Attorney-in Fact    

73


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX TO FORM 10-K
     
For the Fiscal Year Ended:
October 31, 2006
  Commission File No.
0-20842
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
 
   
3.01
  Certificate of Incorporation is incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit of our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-54296).
 
   
3.02
  Amended and Restated Bylaws of PLATO Learning, Inc., Amended as of September 15, 2005, are incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2005 (File Number 0-20842).
 
   
3.03
  Certificate of Amendment of Amended Certificate of Incorporation is incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001 (File Number 0-20842).
 
   
3.04
  Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, filed November 6, 1992, is incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2002 (File Number 0-20842).
 
   
3.05
  Certificate of Amendment of Amended Certificate of Incorporation, filed March 20, 2002, is incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2002 (File Number 0-20842).
 
   
4.01
  Form of Stock Certificate is incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit of our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File Number 33-54296).
 
   
10.01
  Lease for Bloomington, Minnesota office is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.08 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2000 (File Number 0-20842).
 
   
10.02
  Form of Indemnification Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 21, 2006.
 
   
10.03
  1997 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Appendix A of our 1997 Proxy Statement (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.04
  1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to Appendix B of our 1997 Proxy Statement (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.05
  2000 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 33-45228). *

74


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
 
   
10.06
  2000 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 of our Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Number 33-45230).*
 
   
10.07
  PLATO Learning, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of our Current Report on Form 8-K/A, Amendment No. 1, dated March 3, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.08
  Resale Restriction Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2005 (File Number 0-20842).*
 
   
10.09
  Forms of stock option agreement for 2002 Stock Plan, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 7, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.10
  PLATO Learning, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29, 10.30 and 10.51 of our Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 8, 2006 (File Number 0-20842).*
 
   
10.11
  PLATO Learning, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (As Amended by the Second Amendment), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 23, 2006 (File Number 0-20842).*
 
   
10.12
  PLATO Learning, Inc. 2007 Executive Annual Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2006 (File Number 0-20842).*
 
   
10.13**
  PLATO Learning, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended.*
 
   
10.14**
  Forms of stock appreciation rights agreement for 2006 Stock Incentive Plan.*
 
   
10.15**
  PLATO Learning, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (As Amended and Restated).*
 
   
10.16
  Employment Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2005, by and between PLATO Learning, Inc. and Michael A. Morache, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 of our Current Report on Form 8-K/A, Amendment No. 1, dated February 28, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.17
  Employment Agreement with Larry Betterley is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2004 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.18
  Employment Agreement with David H. LePage is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2004 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.19
  Employment Agreement with Jill Lyttle is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2004 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.20
  Employment Agreement with James T. Lynn is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 5, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.21
  Employment Agreement with Robert C. Hickcox is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 17, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.22
  Employment Agreement with James (Brian) Blaydes is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *

75


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
 
   
10.23
  Employment Agreement with Robert J. Rueckl is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 of our Current Report 10-Q dated September 9, 2005 (File Number 0-20842).*
 
   
10.24**
  Directors Compensation Plan, as amended. *
 
   
10.25
  Fiscal 2005 Executive Annual Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.26
  Fiscal 2005 Executive Long Term Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 15, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
10.27
  Fiscal 2006 Executive Annual Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 26, 2005 (File Number 0-20842). *
 
   
21.01
  Subsidiaries of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004 (File Number 0-20842).
 
   
23.01**
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 
   
24.01**
  Power of Attorney.
 
   
31.01**
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.02**
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.01**
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.02**
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
*   Denotes management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement
 
**   Filed herewith

76

EX-10.13 2 c11362exv10w13.htm 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN, AS AMENDED exv10w13
 

Exhibit 10.13
PLATO LEARNING, INC.
2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 


 

PLATO LEARNING, INC. 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
             
Article 1.
  Establishment, Objectives and Duration     2  
Article 2.
  Definitions     2  
Article 3.
  Administration     8  
Article 4.
  Shares Subject to the Plan and Maximum Awards     9  
Article 5.
  Eligibility and Participation     10  
Article 6.
  Options     10  
Article 7.
  Stock Appreciation Rights     14  
Article 8.
  Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units     14  
Article 9.
  Performance Shares     16  
Article 10.
  Other Stock Awards     17  
Article 11.
  Performance Measures     17  
Article 12.
  Beneficiary Designation     18  
Article 13.
  Deferrals and Code Section 409A     18  
Article 14.
  Rights of Participants     20  
Article 15.
  Amendment, Modification and Termination     20  
Article 16.
  Nontransferability of Awards     22  
Article 17.
  Withholding     23  
Article 18.
  Indemnification     23  
Article 19.
  Successors     23  
Article 20.
  Breach of Restrictive Covenants     23  
Article 21.
  Legal Construction     24  
- i -

 


 

PLATO LEARNING, INC. 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
Article 1. Establishment, Objectives and Duration
     1.1 Establishment of the Plan. PLATO Learning, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby establishes this PLATO Learning, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) as set forth herein. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein will have the meanings given to them in Article 2. The Plan permits the grant of Nonstatutory Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, and other Stock Awards. In addition, the Plan provides the opportunity for the deferral of the payment of salary, bonuses and other forms of incentive compensation in accordance with Code Section 409A.
     The Board of Directors of the Company approved the Plan on December 8, 2005. The Plan shall become effective upon its ratification by an affirmative vote at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company to be held on March 2, 2006, and will remain in effect as provided in Section 1.3 hereof.
     1.2 Purpose of the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by linking the personal interests of Participants to those of Company shareholders, and by providing Participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. The Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract and retain the services of Participants upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of its business is largely dependent.
     1.3 Duration of the Plan. The Plan will commence on the Effective Date, as described in Article 2, and will remain in effect, subject to the right of the Committee to amend or terminate the Plan at any time pursuant to Article 15, until all Shares subject to it pursuant to Article 4 have been issued or transferred according to the Plan’s provisions. In no event may an Award be granted under the Plan on or after the tenth annual anniversary of the Effective Date.
Article 2. Definitions
     Whenever used in the Plan, the following terms have the meanings set forth below, and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word is capitalized:
     “Affiliates” means (a) for purposes of Incentive Stock Options, any corporation that is a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company, and (b) for all other purposes hereunder, an entity that is (directly or indirectly) controlled by, or controls, the Company.
     “Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under this Plan to a Participant of Nonstatutory Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares or other Stock Awards.
     “Award Agreement” means an agreement entered into by the Company and a Participant setting forth the terms and provisions applicable to an Award or Awards granted to the Participant or the terms and provisions applicable to an election to defer compensation under Section 8.2.

- 2 -


 

     “Board” or “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
     “Cause” shall have the meaning set forth in any employment, consulting, or other written agreement between the Participant and the Company or an Affiliate. If there is no employment, consulting, or other written agreement between the Participant and the Company or an Affiliate, or if such agreement does not define “Cause,” then “Cause” shall have the meaning specified by the Committee in connection with the grant of any Award; provided, that if the Committee does not so specify, “Cause” shall mean the Participant’s:
  (a)   willful neglect of or continued failure to substantially perform his or her duties with or obligations for the Company or an Affiliate in any material respect (other than any such failure resulting from his or her incapacity due to physical or mental illness);
 
  (b)   commission of a willful or grossly negligent act or the willful or grossly negligent omission to act that causes or is reasonably likely to cause material harm to the Company or an Affiliate; or
 
  (c)   commission or conviction of, or plea of nolo contendere to, any felony or any crime materially injurious to the Company or an Affiliate.
An act or omission is “willful” for this purpose if it was knowingly done, or knowingly omitted, by the Participant in bad faith and without reasonable belief that the act or omission was in the best interest of the Company or an Affiliate. Determination of Cause shall be made by the Committee in its sole discretion, and may be applied retroactively if, after the Participant terminates Service, it is discovered that Cause occurred during Participant’s Service.
     “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any one or more of the following:
  (a)   Any person or persons acting as a group acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) ownership of securities of the Company representing fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power of the Company’s then outstanding stock; provided, however, that a Change in Control shall not be deemed to occur by virtue of any of the following acquisitions: (i) by the Company or any Affiliate, (ii) by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Affiliate, or (iii) by any underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities;
 
  (b)   Any person or persons acting as a group acquires beneficial ownership of stock that, together with stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than fifty (50%) of the total fair market value or voting power of the Company’s then outstanding stock. The acquisition of Company stock by the Company in exchange for property, which reduces the number of outstanding Stock and increases the percentage ownership by any person to more than 50% of Company stock will be treated as a Change in Control;

- 3 -


 

  (c)   Individuals who constitute the Board immediately after the Effective Date (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board during any 12-month period, provided that any person becoming a Director subsequent thereto whose election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of a majority of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for Director, without written objection to such nomination) shall be an Incumbent Director, provided, however, that no individual initially elected or nominated as a Director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to Directors or as a result of any other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any person other than the Board shall be deemed to be an Incumbent Director;
 
  (d)   Any person or persons acting as a group acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value of at least forty percent (40%) of the total gross fair market value of all the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition. For purposes of this section, gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the Company, or the value of the assets being disposes of, without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets. The event described in this paragraph (d) shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control if the assets are transferred to (i) any owner of Company stock in exchange for or with respect to the Company’s stock, (ii) an entity in which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, at least fifty percent (50%) of the entity’s total value or total voting power, (iii) any person that owns, directly or indirectly, fifty percent (50%) of the Company stock, (iv) an entity in which a person described in (d)(3) above owns at least fifty percent (50%) of the total value or voting power. For purposes of this section, and except as otherwise provided, a person’s status is determined immediately after the transfer of the assets; or
 
  (e)   Upon the happening of any other event(s) designated in the Code, or regulations or guidance thereunder, as a Change in Control for purposes of Section 409A of the Code.
     Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control of the Company shall not be deemed to occur solely because any person owning more that fifty (50%) of the Company stock acquires additional Company stock. In no event will a Change in Control be deemed to have occurred, with respect to the Participant, if an employee benefit plan maintained by the Company or an Affiliate or the Participant is part of a purchasing group that consummates the transaction that would otherwise result in a Change in Control. The employee benefit plan or the Participant will be deemed “part of a purchasing group” for purposes of the preceding sentence if the plan or the Participant is an equity participant in the purchasing company or group, except where participation is: (i) passive ownership of less than two percent (2%) of the stock of the purchasing company; or (ii) ownership of equity participation in the purchasing company or group that is otherwise not significant, as determined prior to the Change in Control by a majority of the nonemployee continuing directors.
     “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

- 4 -


 

     “Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the composition of which shall at all times satisfy the provisions of Code Section 162(m) and shall consist of at least two directors who are “independent directors” within the meaning of the NASDAQ marketplace rules, and “nonemployee directors” within the meaning of Exchange Act Rule 16b-3.
     “Company” means PLATO Learning, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and any successor thereto as provided in Article 19.
     “Consultant” means any person, including an advisor, engaged by the Company or an Affiliate to render services to such entity and who is not a Director or an Employee.
     “Director” means any individual who is a member of the Board of Directors.
     “Disability” shall mean:
  (a)   A physical or mental condition that would qualify a Participant for a disability benefit under the long-term disability plan of the Company applicable to him or her;
 
  (b)   If the Participant is not covered by such a long-term disability plan, disability as defined for purposes of eligibility for a disability award under the Social Security Act;
 
  (c)   When used in connection with the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option following termination of employment, disability within the meaning of Code Section 22(e)(3); or
 
  (d)   Such other condition as may be determined by the Committee to constitute “disability” under Code Section 409A.
     “Effective Date” means March 2, 2006 subject to the Plan’s adoption by the Board and approval of the Plan by the Company’s shareholders.
     “Employee” means any person employed by the Company or an Affiliate in a common law employee-employer relationship. A Participant shall not cease to be an Employee for purposes of this Plan in the case of (i) any leave of absence approved by the Company or (ii) transfers between locations of the Company or among the Company, its Parent, any Subsidiary, or any successor. For purposes of Incentive Stock Options, no such leave may exceed ninety (90) days, unless reemployment upon expiration of such leave is guaranteed by statute or contract. If reemployment upon expiration of a leave of absence approved by the Company is not so guaranteed, on the one hundred and eighty-first (181st) day of such leave any Incentive Stock Option held by the Participant shall cease to be treated as an Incentive Stock Option and shall be treated for tax purposes as a Nonstatutory Stock Option. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company shall be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company.
     “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, or any successor act thereto.

- 5 -


 

     “Exercise Price” means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option.
     “Fair Market Value” of a Share on any given date shall be determined by the Committee as follows:
  (a)   If the Share is listed for trading on the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASDAQ) National Market System or one or more national securities exchanges, the last reported sales price on the NASDAQ or such principal exchange on the date in question, or if such Share shall not have been traded on such principal exchange on such date, the last reported sales price on the NASDAQ or such principal exchange on the first day prior thereto on which such Share was so traded;
 
  (b)   If the Share is not listed for trading, by any means determined fair and reasonable by the Committee, which determination shall be final and binding on all parties; or
 
  (c)   Where the Participant pays the Exercise Price and/or any related withholding taxes to the Company by tendering Shares issuable to the Participant upon exercise of an Option, the actual sale price of the Shares.
     “Incentive Stock Option” or “ISO” means an option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 that is designated as an Incentive Stock Option and that is intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422.
     “Nonstatutory Stock Option” or “NQSO” means an option to purchase Shares granted under Article 6 that is not intended to meet the requirements of Code Section 422.
     “Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonstatutory Stock Option, as described in Article 6.
     “Parent” means a “parent corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Code Section 424(e).
     “Participant” means an Employee, Consultant or Director whom the Committee has selected to participate in the Plan pursuant to Section 5.2 and who has an Award outstanding under the Plan.
     “Performance-Based Exception” means the performance-based exception from the tax deductibility limitations of Code Section 162(m) and any regulations promulgated thereunder.
     “Performance Period” means the time period during which performance objectives must be met in order for a Participant to earn Performance Shares granted under Article 9.
     “Performance Share” means an Award of Shares with an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant, which is based on the Participant’s attainment of certain performance objectives specified in the Award Agreement, as described in Article 9.
     “Personal Leave” means a leave of absence as described in Section 5.3.

- 6 -


 

     “Plan” means the PLATO Learning, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as set forth in this document, and as amended from time to time.
     “Prior Plans” means the following equity incentive plans maintained by the Company: (i) TRO Learning, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan; (ii) TRO Learning, Inc. 1997 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan; (iii) PLATO Learning, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan; (iv) PLATO Learning, Inc. 2000 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan; and (v) PLATO Learning, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan, as amended and including its sub-plan, the PLATO Learning United Kingdom Share Option Plan.
     “Restriction Period” means the period during which the transfer of Shares of Restricted Stock is limited in some way (based on the passage of time, the achievement of performance objectives, or the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion) or the Restricted Stock is not vested.
     “Restricted Stock” means a contingent grant of Shares awarded to a Participant pursuant to Article 8. The Shares awarded to the Participant will vest over the Restricted Period and according to the time-based or performance-based criteria, specified in the Award Agreement.
     “Restricted Stock Unit” or “RSU” means a notional account established pursuant to an Award granted to a Participant, as described in Article 8, that is (a) valued solely by reference to Shares, (b) subject to restrictions specified in the Award Agreement, and (c) payable only in Shares. The RSUs awarded to the Participant will vest according to the time-based or performance-based criteria specified in the Award Agreement.
     “Retirement” means Normal Retirement or Early Retirement. For purposes of this Plan, “Normal Retirement” means retirement from active employment with the Company and any Affiliate of the Company on or after age 65; or termination of employment on or after (a) reaching the age established by the Company as the normal retirement age in any employment agreement between the Participant and the Company or an Affiliate, or, in the absence of such an agreement (b) reaching age sixty-two with ten years of service with the Company or an Affiliate, provided the retirement is approved by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, unless the Participant is an officer subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, in which case the retirement must be approved by the Committee. For purposes of this Plan, “Early Retirement” means retirement, with consent of the Committee at the time of retirement, from active employment with the Company and any Affiliate of the Company, when a minimum of 70 is determined by totaling the age of the employee and the number of years of service as an active employee with the Company.
     “Service” means the provision of services to the Company or its Affiliates in the capacity of (i) an Employee, (ii) a Director, or (iii) a Consultant. For purposes of this Plan, the transfer of an Employee from the Company to an Affiliate, from an Affiliate to the Company or from an Affiliate to another Affiliate shall not be a termination of Service. However, if the Affiliate for which an Employee, Director or Consultant is providing services ceases to be an Affiliate of the Company due to a sale, transfer or other reason, and the Employee, Director or Consultant ceases to perform services for the Company or any Affiliate, the Employee, Director or Consultant shall incur a termination of Service.

- 7 -


 

     “Shares” means the shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, of the Company, or any successor or predecessor equity interest in the Company.
     “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means an Award of the contingent right to receive Shares or cash, as specified in the Award Agreement, in the future, based on the value, or the appreciation in the value, of Shares, pursuant to the terms of Article 7.
     “Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Code Section 424(f).
     “Vested” means, with respect to an Option, that such Option has become fully or partly exercisable; provided, however, that notwithstanding its status as a Vested Option, an Option shall cease to be exercisable pursuant to (and while exercisable shall be subject to) such terms as are set forth herein and in the relevant Award Agreement. Similarly, terms such as “Vest,” “Vesting,” and “Unvested” shall be interpreted accordingly.
Article 3. Administration
     3.1 The Committee. The Plan will be administered by the Committee, or by any other committee appointed by the Board whose composition satisfies the “nonemployee director” requirements of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and the regulations of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, the “independent director” requirements of the NASDAQ marketplace rules, and the “outside director” provisions of Code Section 162(m), or any successor regulations or provisions.
     3.2 Authority of the Committee. Except as limited by law and subject to the provisions of this Plan, the Committee will have full power to: select Employees, Directors and Consultants to participate in the Plan; determine the sizes and types of Awards; determine the terms and conditions of Awards in a manner consistent with the Plan; construe and interpret the Plan and any agreement or instrument entered into under the Plan; establish, amend or waive rules and regulations for the Plan’s administration; and (subject to the provisions of Article 16) amend the terms and conditions of any outstanding Award to the extent they are within the discretion of the Committee as provided in the Plan. Further, the Committee will make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable to administer the Plan. As permitted by law and consistent with Section 3.1, the Committee may delegate some or all of its authority under the Plan, including to an officer of the Company to designate the Employees (other than such officer himself or herself) to receive Options and to determine the number of Shares subject to the Options such Employees will receive.
     The duties of the Committee or its delegatee shall also include, but shall not be limited to, making disbursements and settlements of Awards, creating trusts, and determining whether to defer or accelerate the vesting of, or the lapsing of restrictions or risk of forfeiture with respect to, Options, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units, and Stock Appreciation Rights. Subject only to compliance with the express provisions of the Plan, the Committee or its delegatee may act in its sole and absolute discretion in performing the duties specifically set forth in the preceding sentence and other duties under the Plan.

- 8 -


 

     3.3 Decisions Binding. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan will be final, conclusive and binding on all persons, including, without limitation, the Company, its Board of Directors, its shareholders, all Affiliates, Employees, Participants and their estates and beneficiaries.
     3.4 Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, the Committee shall have the discretion to accelerate the vesting of Awards, eliminate any restrictions applicable to Awards, deem the performance measures to be satisfied, or take such other action as it deems appropriate, in its sole discretion.
Article 4. Shares Subject to the Plan and Maximum Awards
     4.1 Number of Shares Available for Awards.
  (a)   Subject to adjustment as provided below and in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, the maximum number of Shares that may be issued or transferred to Participants under the Plan will be 1,794,904 Shares, which represents the number of Shares available for the grant of future awards under the Company’s Prior Plans as of the Effective Date. No additional awards will be made under any Prior Plan on or after the Effective Date. Shares to be issued pursuant to Awards may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein: (i) all Shares covered by a SAR or Option shall be considered issued or transferred pursuant to the Plan to the extent it is exercised and without regard to whether Shares are actually issued to the Participant upon such exercise; and (ii) the aggregate plan limit above shall not be increased by Shares tendered in payment of an Option Exercise Price, Shares withheld by the company to satisfy a tax withholding obligation, or Shares repurchased by the Company with Exercise Price proceeds from the Participant.
 
  (b)   The total number of Shares that may be issued or transferred in connection with the Awards of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares or other full value Stock Awards shall not exceed 750,000. The maximum number of Shares that may be issued or transferred to Participants as Incentive Stock Options is 100,000. The maximum number of Shares and Share equivalent units that may be granted during any calendar year to any one Participant under all types of Awards available under the Plan is 250,000 (on an aggregate basis); provided, however, that (i) the foregoing limit will apply whether the Awards are paid in Shares or in cash; and (ii) the Participant in connection with his or her first year of Service may be granted an additional Award covering not more than an additional 200,000 Shares, which shall not count against the limits set forth initially in this sentence. All limits described in this Section 4.1(b) are subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.3.
     4.2 Lapsed Awards. Any Shares subject to an Award under the Plan or the Prior Plan that, on or after the Effective Date, are forfeited, canceled, settled or otherwise terminated without a distribution of Shares to a Participant will revert to the Plan and thereafter be deemed to be available again for Award.

- 9 -


 

     4.3 Adjustments in Authorized Shares. If the Shares, as currently constituted, are changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares of stock or other securities of the Company or of another corporation (whether because of a merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reclassification, split, reverse split, combination of shares, or otherwise, but not including a Public Offering or other capital infusion from any source) or if the number of Shares is increased through the payment of a stock dividend, then the Committee shall substitute for or add to each Share that may become subject to an Award the number and kind of shares of stock or other securities into which each outstanding Share was changed, for which each such Share was exchanged, or to which each such Share is entitled, as the case may be.
Article 5. Eligibility and Participation
     5.1 Eligibility. An Employee shall be deemed eligible for participation upon such Employee’s first day of employment. Additionally, non-Employee Directors and Consultants and/or their representatives who are chosen from time to time at the sole discretion of the Company to receive one or more Awards are also eligible to participate in the Plan.
     5.2 Actual Participation. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee will, from time to time, select those Employees, non-Employee Directors and Consultants to whom Awards will be granted, and will determine the nature and amount of each Award.
     5.3 Personal Leave Status.
  (a)   Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Committee, in its sole discretion, reserves the right to designate a Participant’s leave of absence as “Personal Leave.” No Options shall be granted to a Participant during Personal Leave. A Participant’s Unvested Options shall remain Unvested during such Personal Leave and the time spent on such Personal Leave shall not count towards the Vesting of such Options. A Participant’s Vested Options that may be exercised pursuant to Section 6.6 hereof shall remain exercisable upon commencement of Personal Leave until the earlier of (i) a period of one year from the date of commencement of such Personal Leave; or (ii) the remaining exercise period of such Options. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Participant returns to the Company from a Personal Leave of less than one year and the Participant’s Options have not lapsed, the Options shall remain exercisable for the remaining exercise period as provided at the time of grant and subject to the conditions contained herein.
 
  (b)   The Committee, in its sole discretion, may waive or alter the provisions of this Section 5.3 with respect to any Participant. The waiver or alteration of such provisions with respect to any Participant shall have no effect on any other Participant.
Article 6. Options
     6.1 Grant of Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, Options may be granted to Employees, non-Employee Directors and Consultants in the number, and upon the terms, and at any time and from time to time, as determined by the Committee.

- 10 -


 

     6.2 Award Agreement. Each Option grant will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that specifies the Exercise Price, the duration of the Option, the number of Shares to which the Option pertains, the manner, time and rate of exercise or Vesting of the Option, and such other provisions as the Committee determines. The Award Agreement will also specify whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or an NQSO.
     6.3 Exercise Price. The Exercise Price for each Share subject to an Option will be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that the exercise price of Incentive Stock Options shall in all cases be equal or greater to the Fair Market Value on the date the Option is granted.
     6.4 Duration of Options. Each Option will expire at the time determined by the Committee at the time of grant, but no later than the tenth anniversary of the date of its grant.
     6.5 Dividend Equivalents. The Committee may, but will not be required to, provide under an agreement for payments in connection with Options that are equivalent to dividends declared and paid on the Shares underlying the Options prior to the date of exercise. Such dividend equivalent agreement shall be separate and apart from the Award Agreement and shall be designed to comply separately with Code Section 409A.
     6.6 Exercise of Options. Options will be exercisable at such times and be subject to such restrictions and conditions as the Committee in each instance approves, which need not be the same for each Award or for each Participant.
     6.7 Payment. The holder of an Option may exercise the Option only by delivering a written notice, or if permitted by the Committee, in its discretion and in accordance with procedures adopted by it, by delivering an electronic notice of exercise to the Company setting forth the number of Shares as to which the Option is to be exercised, together with full payment at the Exercise Price for the Shares and any withholding tax relating to the exercise of the Option.
     The Exercise Price and any related withholding taxes will be payable to the Company in full either: (a) in cash, or its equivalent, in United States dollars; (b) if permitted in the governing Award Agreement, by tendering Shares owned by the Participant duly endorsed for transfer to the Company, or Shares issuable to the Participant upon exercise of the Option; or (c) any combination of (a) and (b); or (d) by any other means the Committee determines to be consistent with the Plan’s purposes and applicable law. The Committee, in its discretion, may require that no Shares may be tendered until such Shares have been owned by the Participant for at least six months (or such other period determined by the Committee).
     6.8 Special Provisions for ISOs. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article 6, the following special provisions shall apply to any Award of Incentive Stock Options:
  (a)   The Committee may award Incentive Stock Options only to Employees.
 
  (b)   An Option will not constitute an Incentive Stock Option under this Plan to the extent it would cause the aggregate Fair Market Value of Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable by the Participant for the first time during a calendar year (under all plans of the Company and its Affiliates) to exceed $100,000. Such Fair Market Value shall be determined as of the date on which each such Incentive Stock Option is granted.

- 11 -


 

  (c)   If the Employee to whom the Incentive Stock Option is granted owns stock possessing more than ten (10%) percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of the Company or any Affiliate, then: (i) the exercise Price for each Share subject to an Option will be at least one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the Share on the Effective Date of the Award; and (ii) the Option will expire upon the earlier of (A) the time specified by the Committee in the Award Agreement, or (B) the fifth anniversary of the date of grant.
 
  (d)   No Option that is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option may be granted under the Plan until the Company’s shareholders approve the Plan. If such shareholder approval is not obtained within 12 months after the Board’s adoption of the Plan, then no Options may be granted under the Plan that are intended to be Incentive Stock Options. No Option that is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option may be granted under the Plan after the tenth anniversary of the date the Company adopted the Plan or the Company’s shareholders approved the Plan, whichever is earlier.
 
  (e)   An Incentive Stock Option must be exercised, if at all, by the earliest of (i) the time specified in the Award Agreement, (ii) three months after the Participant’s termination of Service for a reason other than death or Disability, or (iii) twelve months after the Participant’s termination of Service for death or Disability.
 
  (f)   An Option that is intended but fails to be an ISO shall be treated as an NQSO for purposes of the Plan.
     6.9 Restrictions on Share Transferability. The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired through exercise of an Option as it deems necessary or advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which the Shares are then listed or traded, and under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to the Shares.
     6.10 Termination of Service. Unless the applicable Award Agreement provides otherwise and subject to Section 6.8(e):
  (a)   If a Participant’s Service with the Company and any Affiliate terminates by reason of death, any Option may thereafter be exercised, to the extent then exercisable, by the legal representative of the estate or by the legatee of the Participant under the will of the Participant, but may not be exercised after twelve months from the date of such death or the expiration of the stated term of the Option, whichever period is shorter. In the event of termination of Service by reason of death, if, pursuant to its terms, any Incentive Stock Option is exercised after the expiration of the exercise periods that apply for purposes of Code Section 422, the Option will thereafter be treated as a Nonstatutory Stock Option. Options that are not exercisable at the time of Participant’s death shall expire at the close of business on the date of death.

- 12 -


 

  (b)   If a Participant’s Service with the Company and any Affiliate terminates by reason of Disability, any Option held by such Participant may thereafter be exercised, to the extent it was exercisable at the time of termination due to Disability, but may not be exercised after twelve months from the date of such termination of Service or the expiration of the stated term of the Option, whichever period is the shorter. In the event of termination of Service by reason of Disability, if, pursuant to its terms, any Incentive Stock Option is exercised after the expiration of the exercise periods that apply for purposes of Code Section 422, the Option will thereafter be treated as a Nonstatutory Stock Option. Options that are not exercisable at the time of such termination of Service shall expire at the close of business on the date of such termination.
 
  (c)   If a Participant’s Service with the Company and any Affiliate terminates by reason of Retirement, any Option held by such Participant may thereafter be exercised, to the extent it was exercisable at the time of termination due to Retirement, but may not be exercised after thirty-six months from the date of such termination of Service or the expiration of the stated term of the Option, whichever period is the shorter. In the event of termination of Service by reason of Retirement, if, pursuant to its terms, any Incentive Stock Option is exercised after the expiration of the exercise periods that apply for purposes of Code Section 422, the Option will thereafter be treated as a Nonstatutory Stock Option. Options that are not exercisable at the time of such termination of Service by reason of Retirement shall expire at the close of business on the date of such termination.
 
  (d)   If a Participant’s Service terminates for any reason other than Death, Disability or Retirement, any Option held by such Participant may thereafter be exercised to the extent it was exercisable at the time of such termination, but may not be exercised after 90 days after such termination, or the expiration of the stated term of the Option, whichever period is the shorter. In the event of termination of Service by reason other than Death, Disability or Retirement and if pursuant to its terms any Incentive Stock Option is exercised after the expiration of the exercise periods that apply for purposes of Code Section 422, the Option will thereafter be treated as a Nonstatutory Stock Option. Options that are not exercisable at the time of such termination of Service shall expire at the close of business on the date of such termination. In the event a Participant’s Service with the Company is terminated for Cause, all unexercised Options granted to such Participant shall immediately terminate.
     Each Option Award Agreement will set forth the extent to which the Participant has the right to exercise the Option after his or her termination of Service. These terms will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, need not be uniform among all Options, and may reflect, among other things, distinctions based on the reasons for termination of Service. However, notwithstanding any other provision herein to the contrary, no additional Options will Vest after a Participant’s Service ceases or has terminated for any reason, whether such cessation or termination is lawful or unlawful.
     6.11 Maximum Value Options. The Committee may establish, in an Option Award Agreement, a maximum potential appreciation that may be delivered with respect to the Participant’s Options. In the event a Participant exercises his or her Options when the Fair Market Value of the Shares exceeds the maximum potential appreciation threshold set forth in the Award Agreement, the number of Shares delivered to the Participant upon exercise will be reduced as necessary to effect the maximum value restriction.

- 13 -


 

Article 7. Stock Appreciation Rights
     7.1 Grant of SARs. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, SARs may be granted to Participants at any time and from time to time, as determined by the Committee. Within the limits of Article 4, the Committee will have sole discretion to determine the number of SARs granted to each Participant and, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, to determine the terms and conditions pertaining to SARs.
     The grant price for any SAR shall be determined by the Committee, but the grant price for any SAR intended to be exempt from Code Section 409A shall in all cases be equal or greater to the Fair Market Value on the date the Option is granted. If the Committee determines that an SAR shall have a grant price that at any time can be less than the Fair Market Value on the date of grant, such SAR shall be subject to the provisions of Article 13 of the Plan.
     7.2 Exercise of SARs. SARs may be exercised upon whatever terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes.
     7.3 Award Agreement. Each SAR grant will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that specifies the grant price, whether settlement of the SAR will be made in cash or in Shares, the term of the SAR and such other provisions as the Committee determines.
     7.4 Term of SAR. The term of a SAR will be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, but may not exceed ten years.
     7.5 Payment of SAR Amount. Upon exercise of a SAR with respect to a Share, a Participant will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise of the SAR over the grant price specified in the Award Agreement. At the discretion of the Committee, the payment that may become due upon SAR exercise may be made in cash, in Shares or in any combination of the two.
     7.6 Termination of Service. Each SAR Award Agreement will set forth the extent to which the Participant has the right to exercise the SAR after his or her termination of Service. These terms will be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, need not be uniform among all SARs issued under the Plan, and may reflect, among other things, distinctions based on the reasons for termination of Service.
Article 8. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
     8.1 Grant of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, grant Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units to Participants in such amounts as it determines.
     8.2 Deferral of Compensation into Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, allow (or require, as to bonuses) selected Employees and Directors to defer the payment of any portion of

- 14 -


 

their salary or bonuses or both pursuant to this section. A Participant’s deferral under this section will be credited to the Participant in the form of Shares of Restricted Stock Units. The Committee will establish rules and procedures for the deferrals, as it deems appropriate and in accordance with Article 13 of the Plan.
     If a Participant’s compensation is deferred under this Section 8.2, he or she will be credited, as of the date specified in the Award Agreement, with a number of Restricted Stock Units no less than the amount of the deferral divided by the Fair Market Value on that date, rounded to the nearest whole unit.
     8.3 Award Agreement. Each grant of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units will be evidenced by an Award Agreement that specifies the Restriction Periods, the number of Shares or Share equivalent units granted, and such other provisions as the Committee determines.
     8.4 Other Restrictions. Subject to Article 12, the Committee may impose such other conditions or restrictions on any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units as it deems advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance objectives (Company-wide, business unit, individual, or any combination of them), time-based restrictions on vesting, and restrictions under applicable federal or state securities laws. The Committee may provide that restrictions established under this Section 8.4 as to any given Award will lapse all at once or in installments.
     The Company will retain the certificates representing Shares of Restricted Stock in its possession until all conditions and restrictions applicable to the Shares have been satisfied.
     8.5 Payment of Awards. Except as otherwise provided in this Article 8, Shares covered by each Restricted Stock grant will become freely transferable by the Participant after the last day of the applicable Restriction Period, and Share equivalent units covered by a Restricted Unit will be paid out in Shares to the Participant following the last day of the applicable Restriction Period, or on the date provided in the Award Agreement.
     8.6 Voting Rights. During the Restriction Period, Participants holding Shares of Restricted Stock may exercise full voting rights with respect to those Shares.
     8.7 Dividends and Other Distributions. During the Restriction Period, Participants awarded Shares of Restricted Stock hereunder will be credited with regular cash dividends paid on those Shares. Dividends on vested Shares shall be paid as soon as practicable as dividends are received by other Company shareholders. Dividends on unvested Shares shall be subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying Shares, and will be targeted to be paid within 2-1/2 months following the end of the calendar year in which the underlying Shares vest, but shall be paid no later than the end of the calendar year following the year in which the underlying Shares vest unless otherwise deferred pursuant to Article 13.
     An Award Agreement may provide that, during the Restriction Period, Participants awarded Restricted Stock Units shall be credited with regular cash dividend equivalents paid with respect to those Share equivalent units. Distribution of such dividend equivalents shall be made at such time as permissible under Code Section 409A and the regulations and guidance issued thereunder.

- 15 -


 

     8.8 Termination of Service. Each Award Agreement will set forth the extent to which the Participant has the right to retain unvested Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units after his or her termination of Service. These terms will be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, need not be uniform among all Awards of Restricted Stock, and may reflect, among other things, distinctions based on the reasons for termination of Service.
Article 9. Performance Shares
     9.1 Grant of Performance Shares. Subject to the terms of the Plan, Performance Shares may be granted to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time, as the Committee determines. The Award of Performance Shares may be based on the Participant’s attainment of performance objectives, or the vesting of an Award of Performance Shares may be based on the Participant’s attainment of performance objectives, each as described in this Article 9.
     9.2 Value of Performance Shares. Each Performance Share will have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value on the date of grant. The Committee will set performance objectives in its discretion which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number or value (or both) of Performance Shares that will be paid out to the Participant. For purposes of this Article 9, the time period during which the performance objectives must be met will be called a “Performance Period” and will be set by the Committee in its discretion.
     9.3 Earning of Performance Shares. Subject to the terms of this Plan, after the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Shares will be entitled to receive payout on the number and value of Performance Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding performance objectives have been achieved.
     9.4 Award Agreement. Each grant of Performance Shares will be evidenced by an Award Agreement specifying the material terms and conditions of the Award (including the form of payment of earned Performance Shares), and such other provisions as the Committee determines.
     9.5 Form and Timing of Payment of Performance Shares. Except as provided in Article 13, the target payment date of earned Performance Shares will be within the first two and one-half (2-1/2) months following the end of the later of the calendar year or tax year of the Company in which the Performance Shares is earned, but in no event later than the end of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Performance Share is earned. The Committee will pay earned Performance Shares in the form of cash, in Shares, or in a combination of cash and Shares, as specified in the Award Agreement. Performance Shares may be paid subject to any restrictions deemed appropriate by the Committee.
     9.6 Termination of Service. Each Award Agreement will set forth the extent to which the Participant has the right to retain Performance Shares after his or her termination of Service. These terms will be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, need not be uniform among all Awards of Performance Shares, and may reflect, among other things, distinctions based on the reasons for termination of Service.

- 16 -


 

Article 10. Other Stock Awards
     Subject to the terms of the Plan, other Stock Awards may be granted to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time, as the Committee determines.
Article 11. Performance Measures
     Unless and until the Committee proposes and the Company’s shareholders approve a change in the general performance measures set forth in this Article 11, the performance measure(s) to be used for purposes of Awards designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception will be chosen from among the following alternatives (or in any combination of such alternatives):
  (a)   net earnings;
 
  (b)   operating earnings or income;
 
  (c)   earnings growth;
 
  (d)   net income (absolute or competitive growth rates comparative);
 
  (e)   net income applicable to Shares;
 
  (f)   cash flow, including operating cash flow, free cash flow, discounted cash flow return on investment, and cash flow in excess of cost of capital;
 
  (g)   earnings per Share;
 
  (h)   return on shareholders’ equity (absolute or peer-group comparative);
 
  (i)   stock price (absolute or peer-group comparative);
 
  (j)   absolute and/or relative return on common shareholders’ equity;
 
  (k)   absolute and/or relative return on capital;
 
  (l)   absolute and/or relative return on assets;
 
  (m)   economic value added (income in excess of cost of capital);
 
  (n)   customer satisfaction;
 
  (o)   expense reduction;
 
  (p)   ratio of operating expenses to operating revenues;
 
  (q)   gross revenue or revenue by pre-defined business segment (absolute or competitive growth rates comparative);
 
  (r)   revenue backlog; and
 
  (s)   margins realized on delivered services.
     The Committee will have the discretion to adjust targets set for preestablished performance objectives; however, Awards designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception may not be adjusted upward, except to the extent permitted under Code Section 162(m), to reflect accounting changes or other events.

- 17 -


 

     If Code Section 162(m) or other applicable tax or securities laws change to allow the Committee discretion to change the types of performance measures without obtaining shareholder approval, the Committee will have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining shareholder approval. In addition, if the Committee determines it is advisable to grant Awards that will not qualify for the Performance-Based Exception, the Committee may grant Awards that do not so qualify.
Article 12. Beneficiary Designation
     Each Participant may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case the Participant should die before receiving any or all of his or her Plan benefits. Each beneficiary designation will revoke all prior designations by the same Participant, must be in a form prescribed by the Committee, and must be made during the Participant’s lifetime. If the Participant’s designated beneficiary predeceases the Participant or no beneficiary has been designated, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant’s death will be paid to the Participant’s estate or other entity described in the Participant’s Award Agreement.
Article 13. Deferrals and Code Section 409A
     13.1 Purpose. As provided in an Award Agreement, the Committee may permit or require a Participant to defer receipt of cash or Shares that would otherwise be due to him or her under the Plan or otherwise create a deferred compensation arrangement (as defined in Code Section 409A and the applicable regulations and guidance thereunder) in accordance with this Article 13.
     13.2 Initial Deferral Elections. The deferral of an Award or compensation otherwise payable to the Participant shall be set forth in the terms of the Award Agreement or as elected by the Participant pursuant to such rules and procedures as the Committee may establish. Any such initial deferral election by a Participant will designate a time and form of payment and shall be made at such time as provided below:
  (a)   A Participant may make a deferral election with respect to an Award (or compensation giving rise thereto) at any time in any calendar year preceding the year in which services giving rise to such compensation or Award are rendered.
 
  (b)   In the case of the first year in which a Participant becomes eligible to receive an Award or defer compensation under the Plan (aggregating other plans of its type as defined in Section 1.409A-1(c) of the applicable regulations), the Participant may make a deferral election within 30 days after the date the Participant becomes eligible to participate in the Plan; provided, that such election may apply only with respect to the portion of the Award or compensation attributable to services to be performed subsequent to the election.
 
  (c)   Where the grant of an Award or payment of compensation, or their vesting is conditioned upon the satisfaction of pre-established organizational or individual performance criteria relating to a performance period of at least 12 consecutive months in which the Participant performs Service, a Participant may make a deferral election no later 6 months prior to the end of the applicable performance period.

- 18 -


 

  (d)   Where the vesting of an Award is contingent upon the Participant’s continued Service for a period of no less than 13 months, the Participant may make a deferral election within 30 days of receiving an Award.
 
  (e)   A Participant may make a deferral election in other circumstances and at such times as may be permitted under Code Section 409A and any regulations or guidance thereunder.
     13.3 Distribution Dates. Any deferred compensation arrangement created under the Plan shall be distributed at such times as provided in the Award Agreement, which may be upon the earliest or latest of one or more of the following:
  (a)   A fixed date as set forth in the Award Agreement or pursuant to a Participant’s election;
 
  (b)   the Participant’s death;
 
  (c)   the Participant’s Disability;
 
  (d)   a Change in Control;
 
  (e)   an Unforeseeable Emergency, as defined in Section 409A and implemented by the Committee;
 
  (f)   a Participant’s termination of Service, or in the case of a Key Employee (as defined in Code Section 409A) six months following the Participant’s termination of Service; or
 
  (g)   such other events as permitted under Code Section 409A and the regulations and guidance thereunder.
     13.4 Restrictions on Distributions. No distribution may be made pursuant to the Plan if the Committee reasonably determines that such distribution would (i) violate Federal securities laws or other applicable law; (ii) be nondeductible pursuant to Code Section 162(m); or (iii) violate a loan covenant or similar contractual requirement of the Company causing material harm to the Company. In any such case, distribution shall be made at the earliest date at which Company determines such distribution would not trigger clauses (i), (ii) or (iii) above.
     13.5 Redeferrals. The Company, in its discretion, may permit Executive to make a subsequent election to delay a distribution date, or, as applicable, to change the form distribution payments, attributable to one or more events triggering a distribution, so long as (i) such election may not take effect until at least twelve (12) months after the election is made, (ii) such election defers the distribution for a period of not less than five years from the date such distribution would otherwise have been made, and (iii) such election may not be made less than twelve (12) months prior to the date the distribution was to be made.

- 19 -


 

     13.6 Termination of Deferred Compensation Arrangements. In addition, the Company may in its discretion terminate the deferred compensation arrangements created under this Plan subject to the following:
  (a)   the arrangement may be terminated within the 30 days preceding, or 12 months following, a Change in Control provided that all payments under such arrangement are distributed in full within 12 months after termination;
 
  (b)   the arrangement may be terminated in the Company’s discretion at any time provided that (i) all deferred compensation arrangements of similar type maintained by the Company are terminated, (ii) all payments are made at least 12 months and no more than 24 months after the termination, and (iii) the Company does not adopt a new arrangement of similar type for a period of five years following the termination of the arrangement;
 
  (c)   the arrangement may be terminated within 12 months of a corporate dissolution taxed under Code Section 331 or with the approval of a bankruptcy court pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(1)(A) provided that the payments under the arrangement are distributed by the latest of the (i) the end of the calendar year of the termination, (ii) the calendar year in which such payments are fully vested, or (iii) the first calendar year in which such payment is administratively practicable.
Article 14. Rights of Participants
     14.1 Employment and Service. Nothing in the Plan will confer upon any Participant any right to continue in the employ or Service of the Company or any Affiliate, or interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Affiliate to terminate any Participant’s employment or Service at any time.
     14.2 Participation. No Employee, Consultant or Director will have the right to receive an Award under this Plan, or, having received any Award, to receive a future Award.
Article 15. Amendment, Modification and Termination
     15.1 Amendment, Modification and Termination. The Committee may at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify or terminate the Plan in whole or in part. The Committee will not, however, increase the number of Shares that may be issued or transferred to Participants under the Plan, as described in the first sentence of Section 4.1 (and subject to adjustment as provided in Sections 4.2 and 4.3).
     Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee may modify, extend or renew outstanding Awards under the Plan, or accept the surrender of outstanding Awards (to the extent not already exercised) and grant new Awards in substitution of them (to the extent not already exercised). The Committee will not, however, modify any outstanding Option so as to specify a lower Exercise Price, without the approval of the Company’s shareholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no modification of an Award will materially alter or impair any rights or obligations under any Award already granted under the Plan, without the prior written consent of the Participant.

- 20 -


 

     15.2 Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Events.
  (a)   Equity Restructurings. If the outstanding Shares are increased, decreased, changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of shares or securities of the Company through a non-reciprocal transaction between the Company and its stockholders that causes the per Share fair value underlying an Award to change, such as stock dividend, stock split, spin-off, rights offering, recapitalization through a large, non-recurring cash dividend, or other similar transaction, a proportionate adjustment shall be made to the number or kind of shares or securities allocated to Awards that have been granted prior to any such change. Any such adjustment in an outstanding Stock Option (or Stock Appreciation Right) shall be made without change in the aggregate purchase price applicable to the unexercised portion of such Stock Option (or Stock Appreciation Right) but with a corresponding adjustment in the Exercise Price for each Share or other unit of any security covered by such Stock Option (or Stock Appreciation Right).
 
  (b)   Reciprocal Transactions. The Committee may, but shall not be obligated to, make an appropriate and proportionate adjustment to an Award or to the Exercise Price of any outstanding Award, and/or grant an additional Award to the holder of any outstanding Award, to compensate for the diminution in the intrinsic value of the Shares resulting from any reciprocal transaction.
 
  (c)   Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events. In recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events affecting the Company or its financial statements, or in recognition of changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, and, whenever the Committee determines that adjustments are appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, the Committee may, using reasonable care, make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards. In case of an Award designed to qualify for the Performance-Based Exception (as defined in Section 409A), the Committee will take care not to make an adjustment that would disqualify the Award.
 
  (d)   Fractional Shares and Notice. Fractional Shares resulting from any adjustment in Awards pursuant to this Section 15.2 may be settled in cash or otherwise as the Committee determines. The Company will give notice of any adjustment to each Participant who holds an Award that has been adjusted and the adjustment (whether or not such notice is given) will be effective and binding for all Plan purposes.

- 21 -


 

     15.3 Awards Previously Granted. No termination, amendment or modification of the Plan will adversely affect in any material way any Award already granted, without the written consent of the Participant who holds the Award.
     15.4 Compliance with Code Section 162(m). Awards will comply with the requirements of Code Section 162(m), if the Committee determines that such compliance is desired with respect to an Award available for grant under the Plan. In addition, if changes are made to Code Section 162(m) to permit greater flexibility as to any Award available under the Plan, the Committee may, subject to this Article 15, make any adjustments it deems appropriate.
Article 16. Nontransferability of Awards.
     Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement, no Option, SAR, Performance Share, Restricted Stock, or Restricted Stock Unit granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to a domestic relations order (as defined in Code Section 414(p)). All rights with respect to Performance Shares, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units will be available during the Participant’s lifetime only to the Participant or his or her guardian or legal representative. Except as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Award Agreement or in paragraph (a) below, all Options and SARs will be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant or his or her guardian or legal representative. The Participant’s beneficiary may exercise the Participant’s rights to the extent they are exercisable under the Plan following the Participant’s death. The Committee may, in its discretion, require a Participant’s guardian, legal representative or beneficiary to supply it with the evidence the Committee deems necessary to establish the authority of the guardian, legal representative or beneficiary to act on behalf of the Participant.
  (a)   Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any Nonstatutory Stock Options, each Participant shall be permitted at all times to transfer any or all of the Options, or, in the event the Options have not yet been issued to the Participant, the Company shall be permitted to issue any or all of the Options, to certain trusts designated by the Participant as long as such transfer or issuance is made as a gift (i.e., a transfer for no consideration, with donative intent), whether during lifetime or to take effect upon (or as a consequence of) his or her death, to his or her spouse or children. Gifts in trust shall be deemed gifts to every beneficiary and contingent beneficiary, and so shall not be permitted under this paragraph (a) if the beneficiaries or contingent beneficiaries shall include anyone other than such spouse or children. Transfers to a spouse or child for consideration, regardless of the amount, shall not be permitted under this Section.
 
  (b)   Any Options issued or transferred under this Article 16 shall be subject to all terms and conditions contained in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement. If the Committee makes an Option transferable, such Option shall contain such additional terms and conditions, as the Committee deems appropriate.

- 22 -


 

Article 17. Withholding
     17.1 Tax Withholding. The Company will have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, the minimum amount necessary to satisfy federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising under this Plan.
     17.2 Share Withholding. With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, or upon any other taxable event arising as a result of Awards granted hereunder, the Company may satisfy the minimum withholding requirement for supplemental wages, in whole or in part, by withholding Shares having a Fair Market Value (determined on the date the Participant recognizes taxable income on the Award) equal to the minimum withholding tax required to be collected on the transaction. The Participant may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, to deliver the necessary funds to satisfy the withholding obligation to the Company, in which case there will be no reduction in the Shares otherwise distributable to the Participant.
Article 18. Indemnification
     Each person who is or has been a member of the Committee or the Board, and any officer or Employee to whom the Committee has delegated authority under Section 3.1 or 3.2 of the Plan, will be indemnified and held harmless by the Company from and against any loss, cost, liability, or expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or as a result of any claim, action, suit or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken, or failure to act, under the Plan. Each such person will also be indemnified and held harmless by the Company from and against any and all amounts paid by him or her in a settlement approved by the Company, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment, of or in a claim, action, suit or proceeding against him or her and described in the previous sentence, so long as he or she gives the Company an opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the claim, action, suit or proceeding before he or she undertakes to handle and defend it. The foregoing right of indemnification will not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which a person who is or has been a member of the Committee or the Board may be entitled under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any power that the Company may have to indemnify him or her or hold him or her harmless.
Article 19. Successors
     All obligations of the Company under the Plan or any Award Agreement will be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of the successor results from a direct or indirect purchase of all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company or both, or a merger, consolidation, or otherwise.
Article 20. Breach of Restrictive Covenants
     An Award Agreement may provide that, notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, if the Participant breaches any competition, nonsolicitation or nondisclosure provisions contained in the Award Agreement, whether during or after termination of Service, the Participant will forfeit:

- 23 -


 

     (a) any and all Awards granted or transferred to him or her under the Plan, including Awards that have become Vested; and
     (b) the profit the Participant has realized on the exercise of any Options, which is the difference between the Exercise Price of the Options and the applicable Fair Market Value of the Shares (the Participant may be required to repay such difference to the Company).
Article 21. Legal Construction
     21.1 Number. Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any plural term used in this Plan includes the singular and a singular term includes the plural.
     21.2 Severability. If any provision of the Plan is held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity will not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan will be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.
     21.3 Requirements of Law. The granting of Awards and the issuance of Share or cash payouts under the Plan will be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to any approvals by governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.
     21.4 Securities Law Compliance. As to any individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer, director or ten percent beneficial owner of any class of the Company’s equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, all as defined under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, transactions under this Plan are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, or any successor rule. To the extent any provision of the Plan or action by the Committee fails to so comply, it will be deemed null and void, to the extent permitted by law and deemed advisable by the Committee.
     If at any time the Committee determines that exercising an Option or SAR or issuing Shares pursuant to an Award would violate applicable securities laws, the Option or SAR will not be exercisable, and the Company will not be required to issue Shares. The Company may require a Participant to make written representations it deems necessary or desirable to comply with applicable securities laws. No person who acquires Shares under the Plan may sell the Shares, unless he or she makes the offer and sale pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Exchange Act, which is current and includes the Shares to be sold, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Exchange Act.
     21.5 Awards to Foreign Nationals and Employees Outside the United States. To the extent the Committee deems it necessary, appropriate or desirable to comply with foreign law or practice and to further the purposes of this Plan, the Committee may, without amending the Plan, (i) establish rules applicable to Awards granted to Participants who are foreign nationals or are employed outside the United States, or both, including rules that differ from those set forth in this Plan, and (ii) grant Awards to such Participants in accordance with those rules.
     21.6 Unfunded Status of the Plan. The Plan is intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments or deliveries of Shares not yet made to a Participant by the Company, the Participant’s rights are no greater than those of a general creditor of the Company. The Committee may authorize the establishment of trusts or other arrangements to meet the obligations created under the Plan, so long as the arrangement does not cause the Plan to lose its legal status as an unfunded plan.

- 24 -


 

     21.7 Governing Law. To the extent not preempted by federal law, the Plan and all agreements hereunder will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota.
     21.8 Electronic Delivery and Evidence of Award. The Company may deliver by email or other electronic means (including posting on a web site maintained by the Company or by a third party) all documents relating to the Plan or any Award hereunder (including, without limitation, any Award Agreement and prospectus required by the SEC) and all other documents that the Company is required to deliver to its securities holders (including, without limitation, annual reports and proxy statements). In addition, evidence of an Award may be in electronic form, may be limited to notation on the books and records of the Company and, with the approval of the Board, need not be signed by a representative of the Company or a Participant. Any Shares that become deliverable to the Participant pursuant to the Plan may be issued in certificate form in the name of the Participant or in book entry form in the name of the Participant.
     21.9 No Limitation on Rights of the Company. The grant of the Award does not and will not in any way affect the right or power of the Company to make adjustments, reclassifications or changes in its capital or business structure, or to merge, consolidate, dissolve, liquidate, sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets.
     21.10 Participant to Have No Rights as a Shareholder. Before the date as of which he or she is recorded on the books of the Company as the holder of any Shares underlying an Award, a Participant will have no rights as a shareholder with respect to those Shares.

- 25 -

EX-10.14 3 c11362exv10w14.htm FORMS OF STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT exv10w14
 

Exhibit 10.14
PLATO LEARNING, INC.
2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
          PLATO Learning, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby grants to [(Name)] (the “Participant”) on this [(Date)] (the “Grant Date”) an Award of [(Number)] stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) pursuant to the provisions of the PLATO Learning, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Each SAR represents a contingent right to receive shares of the Company’s common stock, $.01 par value (“Shares”), in the future based upon the appreciation in value of the Share underlying each SAR above [(Price)] (the “Grant Price”), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement (this “Agreement”). Any term capitalized herein but not defined will have the meaning set forth in the Plan.
     1. SAR Award Subject to Acceptance of Agreement.
     The Award of any SAR pursuant to this Agreement become null and void unless the Participant shall accept this Agreement by executing it in the space provided below and return it to the Company within 30 days following the Grant Date.
     2. Terms of SAR Award.
          2.1 Maximum Term of SARs. In no event may a SAR be exercised, in whole or in part, after 5:00 p.m., Minneapolis time, on the date that is eight (8) years after the Grant Date (the “Expiration Date”).
          2.2 Vesting of SARs. The SARs will vest and become exercisable as to one-fourth of the Shares to which the SARs relate on each of the first four anniversaries of the Grant Date, contingent upon the Participant having provided continuous Service to the Company or an Affiliate from the Grant Date through each such anniversary. Any SARs that are not vested upon the termination of the Participant’s Service shall be forfeited.
          2.3 Method of Exercise and Distribution of SARs. The SARs may be exercised by written notice to the Company indicating the number of Shares to which the SARs relate being exercised. When a SAR is vested and exercisable, it may be exercised in whole or in part at any time as to any or all full Shares under the SAR. Any amount due to the Participant upon exercise of a SAR will be paid in Shares with a Fair Market Value equal to the amount, if any, by which the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise exceeds the Grant Price of the SAR, rounded down to the nearest whole Share. The Participant will not receive a distribution if the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise does not exceed the Grant Price.

 


 

          2.4 Termination of SAR. Each vested SAR shall terminate and shall cease to be exercisable as follows:
          (a) In the event of the Participant’s death or Disability, SARs may be exercised as provided in the Plan no later than 12 months from the date of such death or, if earlier, the Expiration Date;
          (b) In the event the Participant’s Service terminates by reason of Retirement, SARs may be exercised no later than 36 months from the date of such termination of Service or, if earlier, the Expiration Date;
          (c) In the event the Participant terminates Service for any reason other than death, Disability, or Retirement, SARs may be exercised no later than 90 days from the date of such termination of Service or, if earlier, the Expiration Date.
          2.5 Withholding Taxes. The Company will have the right to deduct or withhold, or require the Participant to remit to the Company, the minimum amount necessary to satisfy federal, state and local taxes, domestic or foreign, as required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising under this Plan, including by withholding Shares otherwise distributable to the Participant pursuant to this Agreement.
     3. Restrictive Covenants.
     If the Participant breaches any non-disclosure, non-compete, non-solicitation provisions pursuant to Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 or other provisions of this Agreement, whether during or after termination of Service, in addition to any other penalties or restrictions that may apply under any employment agreement, state law, or otherwise, the Participant will: (a) forfeit any and all SARs granted to him or her under this Agreement, including SARs that have become vested and exercisable; and (b) forfeit the profit the Participant has realized on the exercise of any SAR pursuant to this Agreement that the Participant exercised after terminating Service or within the six month period immediately preceding the Participant’s termination of Service (the Participant shall be required to repay such difference to the Company). In the event that the Participant shall forfeit rights to any Shares to which the SARs relate, the Participant shall, within 10 days of the date of the Company’s written request, return this Agreement to the Company for cancellation.
          3.1 Non-Disclosure. Participant agrees not to directly or indirectly, without the Company’s prior written consent: (i) use or disclose, for the benefit of any person, firm or entity other than the Company and its subsidiaries, the Confidential Business Information of the Company or any of its subsidiaries; (ii) distribute or disseminate in any way to any person, firm or entity anyone other than the Company and its subsidiaries, any Confidential Business Information in any form whatsoever; (iii) copy any Confidential Business Information other than for use by the Company or any of its subsidiaries; (iv) remove any Confidential Business Information from the premises of the Company; (v) fail to safeguard all confidential documents; and (vi) copy any confidential documents belonging to any of the Company’s customers. For purposes of this Agreement, “Confidential Business Information” means information or material that is not generally available to or used by others or the utility or value of which is not generally known or recognized as a standard practice, whether or not the underlying details are in the

 


 

public domain, including but not limited to its computerized and manual systems, procedures, reports, client lists, review criteria and methods, financial methods and practices, plans, pricing and marketing techniques, business methods and procedures and other valuable and proprietary information relating to the pricing, marketing, design, manufacture and formulation of educational software, as well as information regarding the past, present and prospective clients of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, and their particular needs and requirements, and their own confidential information. Upon termination of employment for any reason, Participant agrees to return to the Company all policy and procedure manuals, records, notes, data, memoranda, and reports of any nature (including computerized and electronically stored information) which are in Participant’s possession and/or control which relate to (i) the Confidential Business Information of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (ii) the business activities or facilities of the Company or its past, present, or prospective clients.
          3.3 Non-Compete. During the period of Participant’s Service and for a period of one (1) year following termination of this Agreement and Participant’s employment for any reason (the “Restricted Period”), Participant will not directly or indirectly, on his or her behalf, or as a partner, officer, director, trustee, member, employee, or otherwise, within the United States or in any foreign market in which Participant was engaged in activities on behalf of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, own, engage in or participate in, in any way, any business that is similar to or competitive with any actual or planned business activity engaged in or planned by the Company or any of its subsidiaries at the time the Participant was terminated. However, this Agreement shall not prohibit ownership by Participant of up to 2% of the shares of stock of any corporation the stock of which is listed on a national securities exchange or is traded in the over-the-counter market.
          3.4 Non-Solicitation. During the Restricted Period, Participant will not directly or indirectly, for the purpose of selling services and/or products provided or planned by the Company or any of its subsidiaries at the time the Participant’s employment was terminated, call upon, solicit or divert any actual customer or prospective customer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, unless employed by the Company to do so. An actual customer, for purposes of this Section, is any customer to whom the Company or any of its subsidiaries has provided services and/or products within one year prior to Participant’s termination of employment. A prospective customer, for purposes of this Section, is any prospective customer to whom the Company or any of its subsidiaries sought to provide services and/or products within one year prior to the date of Participant’s termination of employment when Participant had knowledge of or was involved in such solicitation. Participant further agrees that during the Restricted Period Participant shall not directly or indirectly induce any person to leave the employ of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or solicit any person who is currently or was an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries at any time during the twelve months prior to Participant’s termination of employment.
          3.5 Judicial Modification. If the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction declares that any term or provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable, the parties agree that (i) the court making the determination of invalidity or unenforceability shall have the power to reduce the scope, duration, or geographic area of the term or provision, to delete specific words or phrases, or to replace any invalid or unenforceable term or provision with a term or provision that is valid and enforceable and that comes closest to expressing the intention of the invalid or unenforceable term or provision, (ii) the parties shall request that the court exercise that power, and (iii) this Agreement shall be enforceable as so modified after the expiration of the time within which the judgment or decision may be appealed.

 


 

     4. Transferability of SARs. The SARs awarded under this Agreement are transferable only by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to a domestic relations order (as defined in Code Section 414(p)). Each SAR will be exercisable during the Participant’s lifetime only by the Participant or by his or her guardian or legal representative. The Committee may, in its discretion, require a guardian or legal representative to supply it with evidence the Committee deems necessary to establish the authority of the guardian or legal representative to exercise a SAR on behalf of the Participant.
     5. Securities Law Requirements.
          (a) The SARs awarded under this Agreement are not exercisable in whole or in part, if exercise may, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, violate the 1933 Act (or other federal or state statutes having similar requirements), as it may be in effect at that time, or cause the Company to violate the terms of Section 4.1 of the Plan.
          (b) The SARs are subject to the further requirement that, if at any time the Committee determines in its discretion that the registration, listing or qualification of the Shares subject to the SARs under any federal securities law, securities exchange requirements or under any other applicable law, or the consent or approval of any governmental regulatory body, is necessary as a condition of, or in connection with, the granting of a SAR, the SAR may not be exercised in whole or in part, unless the necessary registration, listing, qualification, consent or approval has been effected or obtained free of any conditions not acceptable to the Committee.
          (c) With respect to individuals subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, transactions under this Agreement are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3, or its successors under the Exchange Act. To the extent any provision of the Agreement or action by the Committee fails to so comply, the Committee may determine, to the extent permitted by law, that the provision or action will be null and void.
     6. No Obligation to Exercise SAR. The grant of a SAR imposes no obligation upon the Participant (or upon a transferee of a Participant) to exercise the SAR.
     7. No Limitation on Rights of the Company. The grant of a SAR will not in any way affect the right or power of the Company to make adjustments, reclassification or changes in its capital or business structure, or to merge, consolidate, dissolve, liquidate, sell or transfer all or any part of its business or assets.
     8. Plan and SARs Not a Contract of Employment. Neither the Plan nor this Agreement is a contract of employment, and no terms of employment of the Participant will be affected in any way by the Plan, this Agreement or related instruments except as specifically provided therein. Neither the establishment of the Plan nor this Agreement will be construed as conferring any legal rights upon the Participant for a continuation of employment, nor will it interfere with the right of the Company or any Affiliate to discharge the Participant and to treat him or her without regard to the effect that treatment might have upon him or her as a Participant.

 


 

     9. Participant to Have No Rights as a Stockholder. The Participant will have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any Shares subject to the SAR.
     10. No Deferral Rights. Notwithstanding anything in Article 13 of the Plan to the contrary, there shall be no deferral of payment, delivery or receipt of any amounts hereunder.
     11. Notice. Any notice or other communication required or permitted hereunder must be in writing and must be delivered personally, or sent by certified, registered or express mail, postage prepaid. Any such notice will be deemed given when so delivered personally or, if mailed, three days after the date of deposit in the United States mail, in the case of the Company to 10801 Nesbitt Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota, 55437, Attention: Corporate Secretary and, in the case of the Participant, to the last known address of the Participant in the Company’s records.
     12. Governing Law. This Agreement and the SARs will be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Delaware, determined without regard to its conflict of law rules.
     13. Plan Document Controls. The rights granted under this Agreement are in all respects subject to the provisions of the Plan to the same extent and with the same effect as if they were set forth fully herein. If the terms of this Agreement conflict with the terms of the Plan document, the Plan document will control.
         
  PLATO LEARNING, INC.
 
 
  By:      
    Michael A. Morache   
    President and Chief Executive Officer   
 
Accepted this                      day of
                                        , 200                    
         
 
       
 
[(Name)]
       

 

EX-10.15 4 c11362exv10w15.htm 1993 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED) exv10w15
 

Exhibit 10.15
PLATO LEARNING, INC.
1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(As Amended and Restated Effective December 7, 2006)
     1. Purpose. The purpose of the 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is to provide employees of PLATO Learning Inc. (the “Company”) and all corporations which are subsidiary corporations (within the meaning of section 424(f) of the Code) of which the Company is the common parent. (“Subsidiary Companies”) with added incentive to continue in the employment of such companies and to encourage increased efforts to promote the best interests of such companies by permitting eligible employees to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Company, par value $.01 per share (the “Stock”), at prices less than the then current market price thereof. The Plan is an “employee stock purchase plan” under section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company and its Subsidiary Companies are sometimes hereinafter called collectively the “Participating Companies.”
     2. Eligibility. Participation in the Plan shall be open to all Eligible Employees of the Participating Companies. (“Eligible Employee”) shall mean any individual who is an employee of the Company or a Subsdiairy Company for tax purposes whose customary employment with the Company or a Subsidiary Company is at least twenty (20) hours per week. No right to purchase Stock shall accrue under the Plan in favor of any person who is not an Eligible Employee, and no Eligible Employee shall acquire such right to purchase (i) if, immediately after receiving such right, such employee would own 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or any Participating Companies (as defined in section 424(f) of the Code), taking into account in determining stock ownership any stock attributable to such Eligible Employee under section 424(d) of the Code; or (ii) which would permit such Eligible Employee’s rights to purchase stock under all employee stock purchase plans from time to time in effect of the Company and its Participating Companies to accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 of fair market value of such stock for each calendar year, all determined in the manner provided by section 423(b)(8) of the Code.
     3. Effective Date of Plan; Purchase Periods. The Plan shall become effective on such date as may be specified by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company, provided that in no event shall the Plan become effective unless within 12 months of the date of its adoption by the Board it has been approved at a duly called meeting of the stockholders of the Company.
     Purchase Period shall mean each calendar quarter, starting on the first business day and ending on the last business day of such calendar quarter Purchase Date shall mean the last business day of such calendar quarter. The first Purchase Period shall commence on the date designated by the Board or a committee of directors not eligible to participate in the Plan (the “Committee”) designated by the Board to administer the Plan and shall end on the first Purchase Date thereafter. Each subsequent Purchase Period shall end on the following Purchase Date. So long as the Plan remains in effect, a new Purchase Period shall commence on the day immediately following the end of the preceding Purchase Period.

-1-


 

     4. Basis of Participation. Employees who are eligible at the adoption of the Plan shall be entitled to enroll in the Plan 30 days after his date of hire. If an employee shall not enroll in the Plan as of the day he first becomes eligible to enroll in the Plan, he shall be entitled to enroll in the Plan as of the first day of any subsequent Purchase Period. To enroll in the Plan, an eligible employee shall execute and deliver a payroll deduction authorization form (the “Authorization”) that shall become effective the first day of the next Purchase Period immediately following the date on which such Authorization is delivered. Each Authorization shall direct that payroll deductions be made by the Participating Company who is the employer of the eligible employee enrolling in the Plan for each payroll period ending during the period while such employee is a participant in the Plan.
     The amount of each payroll deduction specified in an Authorization for each such payroll period shall be an amount specified by the employee greater than or equal to $5. The total amount deducted in any one calendar year shall not exceed $21,250 (or such other amount that does not result in Purchases of Stock in excess of the limit set forth in section 423(b)(8) of the Code).
     Payroll deductions shall be made for each employee in accordance with his Authorization until his participation in the Plan terminates, his Authorization is revised, or the Plan terminates, all as hereinafter provided.
     An employee may decrease the amount of his payroll deductions by filing an executed and revised Authorization with his employer. The decrease shall take effect as of the first day of the first full payroll period immediately following the delivery of a revised Authorization. An employee may increase the amount of his payroll deductions each quarter by filing an executed and revised Authorization with his employer. The increase shall take effect as of the first day of the next Purchase Period immediately following the delivery of a revised Authorization. An employee may suspend payroll deductions at any time. Such suspension shall not terminate the employee’s participation in the Plan and shall not affect his rights under the Plan. The suspension shall take effect as of the first day of the first full payroll period immediately following the delivery of a revised Authorization. Payroll deductions shall resume as of the first day of the first full payroll period immediately following the delivery of a revised Authorization. No other changes shall be permitted except that an employee may elect to terminate his participation in the Plan as hereinafter provided.
     Each participating employee’s payroll deductions shall be credited to his purchase account under the Plan. Employees are not permitted to make lump sum contributions to purchase accounts established on their behalf. On each Purchase Date, the amount in each purchase account will be applied to the purchase of the number of whole or fractional shares of Stock determined by dividing (i) such amount by (ii) the Purchase Price (as hereinafter defined) for such purchase period.

-2-


 

     5. Purchase Price. The purchase price (the “Purchase Price”) per share of Stock hereunder for any Purchase Period shall be 85% of the fair market value of a share of Stock on (a) the beginning of the Purchase Period (or the date Authorization, if later there within), or (b) the Purchase Date, whichever is lower; provided that if such percentage results in a fraction of one cent, the Purchase Price shall be rounded to the closest full cent. The fair market value of a share of Stock for any Purchase Period shall be deemed to be the closing price of the Stock on the NASDAQ National Market System on either the first or last business day of the Purchase Period, or if there shall be no such sale of the Stock on such day, then on the first or last business day within the Purchase Period that the NASDAQ National Market System is open for business. In no event, however, shall the Purchase Price be less than the par value of the Stock.
     6. Issuance of Shares. The shares purchased on behalf of each Eligible Employee participating in the Plan will be considered to be issued and outstanding to his credit as of the close of business on the Purchase Date. As soon as practicable after each Purchase Date, individual statements showing the number of shares of Stock purchased on that Purchase Date on behalf of each participant will be delivered to each participant. Upon request, a participant may receive a stock certificate for whole shares of Stock that are purchased on the Purchase Date. As of the Purchase Date, those shares of Stock will be issued or registered to a nominee for the benefit of the Eligible Employee. The shares of Stock owned by each such employee shall be held in an individual trust account established with an institutional trustee on behalf of each participant. An employee may request that a stock certificate be issued to him evidencing the number of shares of Stock purchased on his behalf under the Plan for which he has not previously received a stock certificate, except that no certificate shall be issued for less than nine shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an employee may request that a stock certificate be issued for his full shares when the Plan is terminated. Certificates will not be issued for fractional shares. At such time as the Plan is terminated, a cash payment will be made for the purchase by the Company of any amount credited to each employee in his purchase account, along with a cash payment in lieu of fractional shares owned by an employee based upon the closing price of the Stock on the NASDAQ National Market System on the date such termination takes effect, or if there shall be no such sale of the Stock on such date, then on the next following business day on which there shall have been such a sale.
     No interest shall at any time accrue with respect to any amount credited to an employee’s purchase account. After the close of each Purchase Period, a report will be made to each employee participating in the Plan stating the entries made to his purchase account, the number of shares purchased and the applicable Purchase Price.
     7. Designation of Beneficiary. A participant may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any shares of Stock and cash, if any, from the participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such participant’s death subsequent to the end of a Purchase Period but prior to delivery to him or her of such shares of Stock and cash. In addition, a participant may file a written designation of a beneficiary who is to receive any cash from the participant’s account under the Plan in the event of such participant’s death prior to the Purchase Date of a Purchase Period.

-3-


 

     Such designation of beneficiary may be changed by the participant at any time by written notice. In the event of the death of a participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated under the Plan who is living at the time of such participant’s death, the Company shall deliver such shares of Stock and/or cash to the executor or administrator of the estate of the participant, or if no such executor or administrator has been appointed (to the knowledge of the Company), the Company, in its discretion, may deliver such shares of Stock and/or cash to the spouse or to any one or more dependents or relatives of the participant, or if no spouse, dependent or relative is known to the Company, then to such other person as the Company may designate.
     8. Termination of Participation. An employee may at any time elect to terminate his participation in the Plan. An employee’s participation in the Plan because of termination of employment or eligible status shall occur the earliest of (i) his cessation of eligibility under the Plan, (ii) his termination of employment with the Participating Companies, and (iii) his death. The cash credited on the date of such termination to such an employee’s purchase account shall be returned to him or his legal representative promptly. Any shares of Stock held for the benefit of such employee shall remain in the individual trust account until he or his legal representative (i) instructs the trustee to sell the shares on his behalf, or (ii) requests that certificates be issued in the manner described in Section 6 of this Plan.
     9. Termination or Amendment of the Plan. The Company, by action of the Board, or the Committee may terminate the Plan at any time. Notice of termination shall be given to eligible employees, but any failure to give such notice shall not impair the effectiveness of the termination.
     Without any action being required, the Plan will terminate in any event if the maximum number of shares of Stock to be sold under the Plan (as hereinafter provided in Section 13) has been purchased. If at any time the number of shares remaining available for purchase under the Plan are not sufficient to satisfy all then outstanding purchase rights, the Board or the Committee may determine an equitable basis of apportioning available shares among all eligible employees on whose behalf purchases would otherwise be made under the Plan.
     The Board or the Committee may amend the Plan from time to time in any respect in order to meet changes in legal requirements or for any other reason; provided, however, that no such amendment shall (a) materially adversely affect any purchase rights outstanding under the Plan during the Purchase Period in which such amendment is to be effected, (b) increase the maximum number of shares of Stock which may be purchased under the Plan unless such an increase is approved by the Company’s shareholders, (c) decrease the Purchase Price of the Stock for any purchase period below 85% of the fair market value of the Stock on the Purchase Date or (d) adversely affect of the Plan’s status as an employee stock purchase plan under section 423 of the Code.
     10. Non-Transferability. Rights acquired under the Plan are not transferable and may be exercised only by an employee.

-4-


 

     11. Stockholders’ Rights. No eligible employee shall by reason of the Plan have any rights of a stockholder of the Company until and to the extent he shall acquire shares of Stock as herein provided.
     12. Administration of the Plan. The Plan shall be administered so as to ensure that all eligible employees participating in the Plan have the same rights and privileges as are provided by section 423(b)(5) of the Code.
     Members of the Committee may be appointed from time to time by the Board and shall be subject to removal by the Board. The decision of a majority in number of the members of the Committee in office at the time shall be deemed to be the decision of the Committee.
     The Board or the Committee, from time to time, may approve the forms of any documents or writings provided for in the Plan, may adopt, amend and rescind rules and regulations not inconsistent with the Plan for carrying out the Plan and may construe the Plan. The Board or the Committee may delegate the responsibility for maintaining all or a portion of the records pertaining to employees’ accounts to persons not affiliated with the Participating Companies. All expenses of administering the Plan shall be paid by the Participating Companies, as determined by the Committee.
     13. Maximum Number of Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock which may be purchased under the Plan is 200,000, subject, however, to adjustment as hereinafter set forth. Stock sold hereunder will be authorized and unissued shares. Subject to any required action by the shareholders of the Company, if, during the term of the Plan, the Company shall effect a stock split or reverse stock split or other capital readjustment, the payment of a stock dividend, or other increase receiving compensation therefor in money, services or property, then: (1) in the event of an increase in the number of such shares outstanding, the number of Common Shares then subject to purchase hereunder shall be proportionately increased, and the cash consideration payable per share shall be proportionately reduced; and (2) in the event of a reduction in the number of such shares outstanding, the number of Common Shares then subject to purchase hereunder shall be proportionately reduced, and the cash consideration payable per share shall be proportionately increased.
     14. Miscellaneous. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, any Authorization, election, notice or document under the Plan from an eligible employee shall be delivered to his employer and, subject to any limitations specified in the Plan, shall be effective when so delivered.
     The masculine pronoun shall include the feminine.
     The Plan, and the Company’s obligation to sell and deliver shares of Stock hereunder, shall be subject to all applicable federal, state and foreign laws, rules and regulations, and to such approval by any regulatory or governmental agency as may, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, be required.

-5-

EX-10.24 5 c11362exv10w24.htm DIRECTORS COMPENSATION PLAN, AS AMENDED exv10w24
 

Exhibit 10.24
PLATO LEARNING, INC.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DIRECTORS COMPENSATION PLAN
At the March 2, 2006 Board of Directors Meeting, the Board approved future compensation for outside Directors as follows.
Stock Option Grant and Cash Payment — New Directors Initiation:
Ø   15,000 Stock Options Grant @ FMV as of close of business on the date of election to the Board of Directors to vest immediately.
 
Ø   Prorated Cash payment ($20,000/12 X number of months remaining until the next Annual Meeting).
Restricted Stock Award, Stock Option Grant & Cash Payment — Continuing Directors Annual Retainer & Meeting Preparations:
Ø   1,000 shares Restricted Stock Award @ FMV as of close of business on the date of the Annual Meeting to vest immediately with restrictions to lapse the earlier of five years, retirement or resignation from the Board of Directors [relates to director year going forward].
 
Ø   10,000 Stock Options Grant @ FMV as of close of business on the date of the Annual Meeting to vest immediately [relates to director year going forward].
 
Ø   $20,000 to be paid as soon as possible after the date of the Annual Meeting (except to Non-Employee Chairman of the Board, see below) [relates to director year going forward].
Cash and Stock Option Grant — for Non-Employee Chairman of the Board:
Ø   5,000 Stock Options Grant (in addition to the 10,000 grant as listed above) @ FMV as of close of business on the date of the Annual Meeting to vest immediately [relates to director year going forward].
 
Ø   $30,000 to be paid as soon as possible after the date of the Annual Meeting (in place of the $20,000 as listed above) [relates to director year going forward].
Stock Option Grant — for Committee Chairs:
Ø   1,500 Stock Options Grant @ FMV as of close of business on the date of the Annual Meeting to vest immediately [relates to director year going forward].
Cash Payment — for Board and Committee Meeting Attendance:
Ø   $1,500 fee for each Board Meeting attended ($750 for each telephonic Board Meeting attended)
 
Ø   $2,000 fee to the Audit Chair and Nominating & Governance Committee Chair for each Committee Meeting attended (except $1,000 fee for each telephonic Committee Meeting attended)
 
Ø   $1,250 fee to the Compensation Committee Chair for each Committee Meeting attended, and any other ad-hoc Committee Chair named in the future (except $625 fee for each telephonic Committee Meeting attended).
 
Ø   $750 fee to non-Chair Committee Members, for each Committee Meeting attended by each (except $375 fee for each telephonic Committee Meeting attended).
Other
Ø   Chairman of the Board has the option to recommend an additional stock option grant based on the Company’s performance and achievement of goals.

 


 

Ø   Chairman of the Board has the option to request a prorated refund of stock options granted or cash payments made to a Board Member who elects to resign at a time other than at the Annual Meeting.
 
Ø   All travel and business expenses relating to meeting attendance or to conduct business on behalf of PLATO Learning are reimbursed.

 

EX-23.01 6 c11362exv23w01.htm CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM exv23w01
 

Exhibit 23.01
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87594 and 333-101087) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-30963, 333-30965, 333-61721, 333-45228, 333-45230, 333-84592, 333-132290 and 333-111320) of PLATO Learning, Inc. of our report dated January 11, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 12, 2007

 

EX-24.01 7 c11362exv24w01.htm POWER OF ATTORNEY exv24w01
 

Exhibit 24.01
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, a Director of PLATO Learning, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby constitute and appoint Michael A. Morache, Laurence L. Betterley, and Robert J. Rueckl, his or her true and lawful attorneys and agents, each with full power and authority (acting alone and without the other) to execute in the name and on behalf of the undersigned as such Director, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and related amendments, if any. The undersigned hereby grants unto such attorneys and agents, and each of them, full power of substitution and revocation in the premises and hereby ratifies and confirms all that such attorneys and agents may do or cause to be done by virtue of these presents.
Dated this 12th day of January, 2007
         
/s/Joseph E. Duffy
 
Joseph E. Duffy
       
 
       
/s/Ruth L. Greenstein
 
Ruth L. Greenstein
       
 
       
/s/Debra A. Janssen
 
Debra A. Janssen
       
 
       
/s/Susan E. Knight
 
Susan E. Knight
       
 
       
/s/M. Lee Pelton
 
M. Lee Pelton
       
 
       
/s/Robert S. Peterkin
 
Robert S. Peterkin
       
 
       
/s/John T. (Ted) Sanders
 
John T. (Ted) Sanders
       
 
       
/s/Warren Simmons
 
Warren Simmons
       
 
       
/s/David W. Smith
 
David W. Smith
       

 

EX-31.01 8 c11362exv31w01.htm 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER exv31w01
 

Exhibit 31.01
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER RULE 13a-14(a) ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Michael A. Morache, President and Chief Executive Officer of PLATO Learning, Inc., certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PLATO Learning, Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b.   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  c.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  d.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
  a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
Date: January 12, 2007     /s/MICHAEL A. MORACHE    
    Michael A. Morache   
    President and Chief Executive Officer   

 

EX-31.02 9 c11362exv31w02.htm 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER exv31w02
 

         
Exhibit 31.02
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER RULE 13a-14(a) ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Laurence L. Betterley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PLATO Learning, Inc., certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PLATO Learning, Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
  a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
  b.   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  c.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
  d.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
  a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
  b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
     
Date: January 12, 2007     /s/LAURENCE L. BETTERLEY    
    Laurence L. Betterley   
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   

 

EX-32.01 10 c11362exv32w01.htm 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER exv32w01
 

         
Exhibit 32.01
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1350
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PLATO Learning, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael A. Morache, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
     
Date: January 12, 2007     /s/ MICHAEL A. MORACHE    
    Michael A. Morache   
    President and Chief Executive Officer   

 

EX-32.02 11 c11362exv32w02.htm 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER exv32w02
 

         
Exhibit 32.02
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1350
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PLATO Learning, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Laurence L. Betterley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
     
Date: January 12, 2007     /s/ LAURENCE L. BETTERLEY    
    Laurence L. Betterley   
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   
 

 

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----