-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, FtX4fovnQ7+/9wQUTIMrmPXIaSDQrzPlFS/9s6uWAarNjDvemL36XQ6v0I7LwUta YnR0QpjFbBK81X5PEXGgyw== 0000893730-07-000011.txt : 20070305 0000893730-07-000011.hdr.sgml : 20070305 20070305111516 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000893730-07-000011 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: N-CSR PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20061229 FILED AS OF DATE: 20070305 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20070305 EFFECTIVENESS DATE: 20070305 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: INTEGRITY FUNDS CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000893730 IRS NUMBER: 000000000 FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: N-CSR SEC ACT: 1940 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 811-07322 FILM NUMBER: 07670002 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1 MAIN STREET NORTH CITY: MINOT STATE: ND ZIP: 58703 BUSINESS PHONE: 7018525292 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1 MAIN STREET NORTH CITY: MINOT STATE: ND ZIP: 58703 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: CANANDAIGUA FUNDS DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19980209 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL COLLECTIVE INV FD FOR QUAL TRUSTS DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19930225 0000893730 S000000136 Integrity Value Fund C000000303 Integrity Value Fund Class A IVUAX 0000893730 S000000137 Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund C000000304 Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund Class A ICPAX 0000893730 S000000138 Integrity Health Sciences Fund C000000305 Integrity Health Sciences Fund Class A IHLAX 0000893730 S000000140 Integrity High Income Fund C000000308 Integrity High Income Fund Class A IHFAX C000000309 Integrity High Income Fund Class C IHFCX 0000893730 S000011868 INTEGRITY GROWTH & INCOME FUND C000032429 INTEGRITY GROWTH & INCOME FUND CLASS A IGIAX 0000893730 S000011869 Integrity All Season Fund C000032430 Integrity All Season Fund Class A IASFX C000032431 Integrity All Season Fund Class C IASCX 0000893730 S000011870 Integrity Technology Fund C000032432 Integrity Technology Fund Class A ITKAX N-CSR 1 ifsncsr20070227.htm THE INTEGRITY FUNDS; N-CSR

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

 

Investment Company Act file number

811-07322

 

The Integrity Funds

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

Address of Registrant

1 Main Street North

 

Minot, ND 58703

 

 

Name and Address of agent for service

Brent Wheeler, Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer
Kevin Flagstad, Investment Adviser Chief Compliance Officer

 

1 Main Street North

 

Minot, ND 58703

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

(701) 852-5292

 

Date of fiscal year end

December 31

Date of reporting period

December 29, 2006

 

Item 1)

Reports to Stockholders.

 

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed is the report of the operations of the Integrity All Season Fund (the “Fund”) for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund’s portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.

Relative Performance

The Integrity All Season Fund (Class A) finished 2006 up 6.13%*, including all distributions.  Currently, the Fund is benchmarked against the Morningstar “Moderate Allocation” category (+11.38%) which was until this year the only category that could approximately capture the objectives of our absolute return oriented Fund.  However, we feel this benchmark is inappropriate and are working toward our inclusion in their new Long/Short category as a more accurate benchmark for the Fund’s established risk and return objectives.

Absolute return strategies like the Fund have various objectives in terms of risk and return.  The vast majority attempt to earn between 3-5% above the risk free return of a treasury bill on a calendar year basis regardless of the action in the benchmark indexes.  Currently, the risk free rate on a t-bill is 4.11% setting the low end of the return objective at 7.11%.  The Fund also has an additional stated objective of attempting to earn 70% of the gain of the S&P 500 in a positive calendar year while avoiding 90% of any calendar year loss on the S&P 500.  Clearly the Fund failed to achieve that lofty goal as the S&P 500 index finished 2006 up +13.62%.

Why did the Fund under perform this year?  In hindsight, we have only the condition and the analysis of our technical model to blame.   As you may know, the Fund is managed using a top down approach, quantifying market risk and allocating assets appropriately.  In lower risk markets, the Fund can be very aggressive.  In high risk markets, the Fund simply cannot be aggressive by its design.  Despite the robust returns at the end of the year in the various equity indices, this was not a low risk year.  Our technical model is based on a composite of total market indicators including, breadth, volume, the number of new highs and new lows, sentiment figures, interest rates, momentum and of course price.  Our composite technical model was factually deteriorating or on outright sell signals for 144 of 256 trading days in 2006 (56%).  This type of environment is not one in which risk managed strategies mak e impressive returns, either relatively or absolutely.  Furthermore, to see market gains in double digits in this type of environment is extraordinary to say the least.  The Fund will offer its shareholders the greatest added value during periods of significant market decline as well as the early recovery period when risk of loss is substantially lower while our technical model is improving.  We look forward to the next market correction or even bear market decline to prove the merit of our risk management controls.  Until that time we will have to suffer in silence and tolerate one of the highest risk market environments of the last 3 years.

For the year, risk metrics are favorable with the Fund showing a beta of .50 and standard deviation of exactly 56% of the S&P 500.  Our Sharpe Ratio is positive at 0.35 and rising.

Current Allocations

The Fund has recently raised its cash position to 13% from a low of 8% in November.  We will continue to raise cash up to a target 20% as the underlying condition of our technical indicators continues to deteriorate.  We continue to hold a maximum 20% exposure to High Yield bonds through our partners at SMH Capital Advisors as well as a 7% position in short and intermediate term treasury bonds.  Equity is spread equally between stocks and ETFs for the remainder of assets.  ETFs held in the portfolio fulfill our exposure to internationals and leading sectors on a risk-adjusted basis.  Stock baskets are held in our “High Dividend” stock basket (mostly banks, financial services and utilities) as well as our “Early Recovery” stock basket (oversold consumer and cyclical stocks).  The Fund also carries a total of 2.4% in leveraged “short” ETFs to control daily volatility and generate positive alpha during sharp down moves in the broad stock market.  Of course, these same positions have a negative impact on positive returns for the Fund so our commitment to “shorts” will remain under 5% of assets (notional value) during up trends.

Pending Allocations and Forecasts

Forecasting beyond a couple months at this point is reserved for sensational media outlets.  The Gurus of CNBC are unanimously forecasting another year in the 13-15% range in the broad US stock market.  If history repeats, it will be anything but that.   When the stock market rebounded strongly this summer in the face of very poor technical evidence, it became obvious that traditional tools to guide investment behavior were no longer effective.  That continues to be the case.  Today, we see many similarities to the market action from January to April of 2006 as well as the final peak in stocks in year 2000.  Today our short term technical systems are moving to strong sells while the benchmark averages continue to hover at their highs.  Longer term systems are now also approaching levels associated with historical major peaks in stocks.  And yet complacency reigns as investors seemed only concerned about underperformance risk rather than the risk of real loss.  The stage is set for another substantial correction and one that should finally coincide with real economic weakness perhaps sooner rather than later.  The writing is on the wall; a protracted inverted yield curve, negative divergences between the transportation sector and the Dow Industrials, recent loss of leadership in technology and small caps and overly optimistic sentiment measures are the most glaring concerns.  Economically, consumers have begun to cut back, the real estate industry is under pressure and earnings expectations are now priced to perfection.  Accurately attempting to call a peak in the market has been a foolish endeavor in the last two years and we won’t go there.  However, the odds of a strong move higher in prices from these levels without a significant correction first, is very low.

Pending allocations are mostly defensive in nature.  The Fund has a high correlation to the mid cap indexes which, like our Fund just made a new high for the year.  Our first trades following a change of trend will be to hedge our portfolio with short positions against the S&P 500 mid cap indexes.  Unless we have new relative strength leaders to invest in, we plan to sell positions to cash as stops are hit.

As the manager of the All Season Fund, I sincerely appreciate your commitment and trust as shareholders.  This has been a challenging year especially for funds oriented toward absolute returns or attempt to effectively manage market risk.  2007 may very well be our year to shine.

If you would like more frequent updates, visit our website at www.integrityfunds.com for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.

Respectfully,

Samuel F. Jones

Senior Portfolio Manager

The views expressed are those of Samuel F. Jones and All Season Financial Advisors, Sub-Advisor to Integrity All Season Fund.  The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally, or any Integrity Mutual Fund.

*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance.

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

High yield securities are lower quality debt securities and are subject to greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer.

December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

PROXY VOTING ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-276-1262.  A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Integrity's web site at www.integrityfunds.com.  This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

The Fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semi-annual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the Fund's second and fourth fiscal quarters on the Form N-CSR(S).  The annual and semi-annual reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the Fund shareholders.  The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.  The Fund's Form N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C., and the information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-942-8090.  You may also access this information from Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.


Terms & Definitions December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

American Depository Receipt (ADR)

A negotiable certificate representing a given number of shares of stock in a foreign corporation.  It is bought and sold in the American securities markets, just as stock is traded.

Appreciation

Increase in the value of an asset.

Average Annual Total Return

A standardized measurement of the return (appreciaiton) earned by a fund on an annual basis.

Consumer Price Index

A commonly used measure of inflation; it does not represent an investment return.

Coupon Rate or Face Rate

The rate of interest payable annually, based on the face amount of the bond; expressed as a percentage.

Depreciation

Decrease in the value of an asset.

Exchange-traded Fund (ETF)

An index fund which is traded on the stock market.

Growth Fund

A type of diversified common stock fund that has capital appreciation as its primary goal. It invests in companies that reinvest most of their earnings for expansion, research, or development.

Load

A mutual fund whose shares are sold with a sales charge added to the net asset value.

Market Value

Actual price at which a fund trades in the market place.

Maturity

A measure of the term or life of a bond in years. When a bond "matures," the issuer repays the principal.

Multiple Classes of Shares

Although an individual mutual fund invests in only one portfolio of securities, it may offer investors several purchase options which are "classes" of shares. Multiple classes permit shareholders to choose the fee structure that best meets their needs and goals. Generally, each class will differ in terms of how and when sales charges and certain fees are assessed.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

The value of all your fund's assets, minus any liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares, not including any initial or contingent deferred sales charge.

Offering Price

The price at which a mutual fund's shares can be purchased. The offering price per share is the current net asset value plus any sales charge.

Quality Ratings

A designation assigned by independent rating companies to give a relative indication of a bond's credit worthiness. "AAA," "AA," "A," and "BBB" indicate investment grade securities. Ratings can range from a high of "AAA" to a low of "D".

Total Return

Measures both the net investment income and any realized and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of the underlying investments in the fund's portfolio for the period, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends. It represents the aggregate percentage or dollar value change over the period.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

TOP TEN HOLDINGS

(As a % of Net Assets)

1.

Berkshire Hathaway 'B'

8.3%

2.

IShares MSCI EAFE

5.5%

3.

IShares Lehman 7-10 Year Treasury

5.5%

4.

Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund

4.3%

5.

Financial Select Sector SPDR

3.5%

6.

IShares Lehman Aggregate Bond Fund

2.5%

7.

IShares Dow Jones US Healthcare Sector Index Fund

2.3%

8.

Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR

2.3%

9.

IShares MSCI Japan IN

2.1%

10.

Materials Select Sector SPDR

2.1%

The Fund’s holdings are subject to change at any time.

COMPOSITION

PORTFOLIO QUALITY RATINGS

(Based on Total Long-Term Investments)

B

63.4%

BB

12.5%

CCC

22.7%

NR

1.4%

Quality ratings reflect the financial strength of the issuer.  They are assigned by independent rating services such as Moody’s Investors Services and Standard & Poor’s. 

These percentages are subject to change.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

DISCLOSURE OF FUND EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

EXAMPLE:

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:  (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses.  This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.  The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from inception June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

The example illustrates the Fund’s costs in two ways:

Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses.  You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.  Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return.  The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.  You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds.  To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees.  Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.  In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

Beginning Account Value 6/30/06

Ending Account Value 12/29/06

Expenses Paid During Period*

Actual

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,052.94

$13.52

Class C

$1,000.00

$1,048.97

$17.32

Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,011.82

$13.25

Class C

$1,000.00

$1,008.10

$16.97

*For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (2.65% for Class A and 3.40% for Class C), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 179/360 days.  Class A’s ending account value in the “Actual” section of the table is based on its actual total return of 5.29% for the six-month period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.  Class C’s ending account value in the “Actual” section of the table is based on its actual total return of 4.90% for the six-month period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS

 

For periods ended December 29, 2006

Integrity All Season Fund

 

 

 

Since Inception

Class A

1 year

5 year

10 year

(August 8, 2005)

Without Sales Charge

6.13%

N/A

N/A

4.72%

With Sales Charge (5.75%)

0.04%

N/A

N/A

0.36%

 

Lipper Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Moderate Index*

1 year

5 year

10 year

Since Inception (August 8, 2005)

 

12.02%

N/A

N/A

10.21%

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

S&P 500 Index

1 year

5 year

10 year

(August 8, 2005)

 

15.79%

N/A

N/A

13.18%

  

 

For periods ended December 29, 2006

Integrity All Season Fund

 

 

 

Since Inception

Class C

1 year

5 year

10 year

(August 8, 2005)

Without CDSC

5.32%

N/A

N/A

3.99%

With CDSC (1.00%)

4.32%

N/A

N/A

3.28%

Lipper Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Moderate Index*

1 year

5 year

10 year

Since Inception (August 8, 2005)

 

12.02%

N/A

N/A

10.21%

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

S&P 500 Index

1 year

5 year

10 year

(August 8, 2005)

 

15.79%

N/A

N/A

13.18%

* The Lipper Balanced Fund Index (referenced in the Fund’s December 30, 2005 annual report) is no longer available for use as a benchmark.

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPARATIVE INDEX GRAPH

Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Integrity All Season Fund, Lipper Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Moderate Index, and S&P 500 Index

Class A Shares

 

Integrity All Season Fund w/o Sales Charge

Integrity All Season Fund w/Max Sales Charge

Lipper Mixed-Asset Target Allocation Moderate Index*

S&P 500 Index

08/08/05

$10,000

$9,425

$10,000

$10,000

2005

$10,047

$9,469

$10,221

$10,259

2006

$10,663

$10,050

$11,449

$11,880

* The Lipper Balanced Fund Index (referenced in the Fund’s December 30, 2005 annual report) is no longer available for use as a benchmark.

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The graph does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The graph comparing your Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how your Fund performed.  To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two.  Your Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees.  A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio.  Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results.  In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities necessary to match the index.  And, if they could, they would incur transaction costs and other expenses.  All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND

The Board of The Integrity Funds consists of four Trustees.  These same individuals, unless otherwise noted, also serve as directors or trustees for the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.  Three Trustees (75% of the total) have no affiliation or business connection with the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates.  These are the “independent” Trustees.  Two of the remaining three Trustees and/or Officers are “interested” by virtue of their affiliation with the Investment Adviser and its affiliates.

The Independent Trustees of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Independent Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Jerry M. Stai
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
54

Trustee

Since January 2006

Faculty, Embry-Riddle University (August 2000 to September 2005); Faculty, Park University (August 2005 to December 2005); Non-Profit Specialist, Bremer Bank (since July 2005); Faculty, Minot State University (since August 2000); Director ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., (since January 2006); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 2006).

16

Marycrest Franciscan Development, Inc.

Orlin W. Backes
15 2nd Ave., SW
Suite 305
Minot, ND 58701
71

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C.; Director, South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (until June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (Since April 2005); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); Director, First Western Bank & Trust.

16

First Western Bank & Trust

R. James Maxson
Town & Country Center
1015 S. Broadway
Suite 15
Minot, ND 58701
59

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, Maxson Law Office (since November 2002); Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C. (April 2000 to November 2002); Director, Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc. and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (since January 1999), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2003); and Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1999).

16

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

The Interested Trustees and executive officers of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Interested Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Robert E. Walstad2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
62

Trustee Chairman President

Since May 2003

Director (since September 1987), President (September 2002 to May 2003), CEO (Since September 2001), Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, President and Treasurer, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Director, President (since inception) and Treasurer (May 1989 to May 2004), ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc., (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds Inc., (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Trustee, Chairman, President and Treasurer (January 2006 to May 2004), Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1996) and The Integrity Funds (since May 2003); Director, President (until August 2003), CEO, and Treasurer, Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc.; Director (October 1999 to June 2003) Magic Internet Services, Inc.; Director (May 2000 to June 2003), Pr esident (October 2002 to June 2003), ARM Securities Corporation; Director, CEO, Chairman, (since January 2002) and President (September 2002 to December 2004), Capital Financial Services, Inc.

16

Capital Financial Services, Inc., and Minot Park Board

Peter A. Quist2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
72

Vice President Secretary

Since May 2003

Attorney; Director and Vice President, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc., Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc., ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); and Director, ARM Securities Corporation (May 2000 to June 2003).

3

None

Laura K. Anderson
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
32

Treasurer

Since October 2005

Fund Accountant (until May 2004), Fund Accounting Supervisor (May 2004 to October 2005), Fund Accounting Manager, Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (since October 2005), Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

Brent M. Wheeler
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
36

Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer

Since October 2005

Fund Accounting Manager (May 1998 through October 2005), Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (May 2004 to October 2005), Mutual Fund Compliance Officer (since October 2005) Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

2Trustees and/or officers who are “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.  Messr. Quist is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser and Principal Underwriter.  Messr. Walstad is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

Board Consideration and Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.

The approval and the continuation of a fund’s investment advisory and investment sub-advisory agreements must be specifically approved at least annually (1) by the vote of the trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the investment advisory agreement or “interested persons” of any party (“independent trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.  In preparation for the meeting, the Board requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by Integrity Money Management, Inc., the Fund’s Investment Adviser (“the Investment Adviser” or “Adviser”), that is deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Management and Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”). The Independent Trustees also received advice from their independent counsel on the issues to focus on during contract renewals.  At a meeting held on October 25, 2006, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees of the Fund, approved the Advisory Agreement between the All Season Fund and the Investment Adviser, the Investment Sub-Advisory Agreements (“Sub-Advisory Agreements”), between the Investment Adviser and All Season Financial Advisors, Inc. (“ASFA”) and between the Investment Adviser and SMH Capital Advisors, Inc. (“SMH”).

The Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are neither party to the Advisory or Sub-Advisory Agreements nor “interested persons” of any such party (as such term is defined for regulatory purposes), unanimously approved the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements.  In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Trustees requested information, provided by the Investment Adviser and each Sub-Adviser that it believed to be reasonably necessary to reach its conclusion.  In connection with the approval of the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Board reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts, which include but are not limited to, the following:

(a)

the nature and quality of services to be provided by the adviser to the fund;

(b)

the various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications;

(c)

the relevant fund’s investment performance as compared to standardized industry performance data;

(d)

the adviser’s costs and profitability of furnishing the investment management services to the fund;

(e)

the extent to which the adviser realizes economies of scale as the fund grows larger and the sharing thereof with the fund;

(f)

an analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds;

(g)

the expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds; and

(h)

information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds.

In evaluating the Investment Adviser’s services and fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of the Fund, the recent financial statements of the Investment Adviser, and the proposed advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds.  In reviewing the Advisory Agreement with the foregoing Fund, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund’s past performance, the nature and quality of the services to be provided, the profitability of the adviser and its parent (estimated costs and estimated profits from furnishing the proposed services to the Fund), and the expense waivers by the Investment Adviser.  The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Investment Adviser and its affiliates for services provided to the Fund.  The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-import ant or controlling.  The Trustees also considered the Investment Adviser’s commitment to contractually or voluntarily limit Fund expenses, the skills and capabilities of the Investment Adviser, and the representations from the Investment Adviser that the Integrity All Season Fund’s portfolio managers, Sam Jones (ASFA) and Jeffrey A. Cummer/Dwayne Moyers (SMH), will continue to manage the Fund in substantially the same way as it had been managed previously.  The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Investment Adviser currently provides services to sixteen funds in the Integrity family of funds with investment strategies ranging from non-diversified sector funds to broad-based equity funds.  The experience and expertise of the Investment Adviser is attributable to the long-term focus on managing investment companies and has the potential to enhance the Fund’s future performance. They have a strong culture of compliance and provide quality services. The overall nature and quality of the services provided by the Investment Adviser had historically been, and continues to be, adequate and appropriate to the Board.

Profitability: The Board has reviewed a year to date and a 12-month profit analysis spreadsheet completed by the controller of the investment adviser.  Based on the relatively small size of each fund under management with the Adviser, the Adviser has shown no profit for the period.  The Board determined that the profitability of the Adviser was not excessive based on the services it will provide for the Fund and the profit analysis spreadsheet presented by the Adviser.

Economies of Scale: The Board briefly discussed the benefits for the Fund as the Adviser could realize economies of scale as the Fund grows larger, but the size of the Fund has not reached an asset level to benefit from economies of scale.  The advisory fees are structured appropriately based on the size of the Fund.  The advisor has indicated that a new advisory fee structure may be looked at if the Fund reaches an asset level where the Fund could benefit from economies of scale.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds: The adviser is voluntarily waiving advisory fees due to the small size of the Fund.  The Board considered the compensation payable under the Advisory Agreement fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided.

Expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds:  Although the Fund’s net expense ratio of 2.65% for the Class A shares and 3.40% for the Class C shares was slightly higher than other funds of similar objective and size, the Board found that the expense ratio was acceptable.

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds: The Board noted that the Adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of ASFA, the strategic plan involving the All Season Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  Thus, the Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the All Season Fund and its shareholders.

Board Consideration and Approval of Sub-Advisory Agreement with All Season Financial Advisors, Inc.

In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement between the Investment Adviser and ASFA with respect to the All Season Fund, the Trustees requested information from ASFA that they believed to be reasonably necessary to reach their conclusion.  The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services: The Board is satisfied with ASFA’s portfolio manager representations to manage the Fund.  The Board was satisfied with the overall high quality of the personnel, operations, financial condition, investment management capabilities, methodologies and expected performance achieved by ASFA.  Based on the review of ASFA by the Investment Adviser Chief Compliance Officer of Integrity Money Management, Inc., including a review of the possible conflicts of interest, its code of ethics, and Advisory Policy and Procedure Manual, the Board felt that the overall nature and quality of services are satisfactory.

Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications: The Board acknowledged that Sam Jones has had success in reaching positive returns in his separate accounts business using a similar strategy over the last 10 years in both up and down markets.  A detailed biography of the portfolio manager was presented to the Trustees.  This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Fund. The Board is satisfied with ASFA’s representations regarding its staffing and capabilities to manage the All Season Fund, including the retention of personnel with significant relevant portfolio management experience.

Investment Performance: The Fund has underperformed its relative benchmark for the YTD, 1-year, and since inception periods as of September 29, 2006. However, the Fund has positive returns for the periods mentioned above as of September 29, 2006.  In addition, the Fund has been meeting its investment objective for providing long-term capital appreciation.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds: The Board considered the sub-advisory fees paid to ASFA to be fair and reasonable, in light of the investment sub-advisory services expected to be provided, the anticipated costs of these services and the comparability of the sub-advisory fees to fees paid by comparable mutual funds.

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds: The Board noted that the Sub-adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Sub-adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of ASFA, the strategic plan involving the All Season Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  Thus, the Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Sub-Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the All Season Fund and its shareholders.

Board Consideration and Approval of Sub-Advisory Agreements with SMH Capital Advisors, Inc.

In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreements between the Investment Adviser and SMH, the Trustees requested information from SMH that they believed to be reasonably necessary to reach their conclusion.  The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services: The Board felt satisfied with the overall high quality of the personnel, operations, financial condition, investment management capabilities, methodologies and expected performance to be achieved by SMH.  Based on the review of SMH by the Investment Adviser Chief Compliance Officer of Integrity Money Management, Inc., including a review of the possible conflicts of interest, its code of ethics, and Advisory policy and procedure manual, the Board felt that the overall nature and quality of services are satisfactory.

Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications: SMH has significant expertise in managing high yield corporate bond portfolios for separately managed accounts and the Integrity High Income Fund. A detailed biography of the portfolio managers was presented to the Trustees.  This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Fund. The Board is satisfied with SMH’s representations regarding its staffing and capabilities to manage the All Season Fund, including the retention of personnel with significant relevant portfolio management experience. 

Investment Performance: The Fund has underperformed its relative benchmark for the YTD, 1-year, and since inception periods as of September 29, 2006. However, the Fund has positive returns for the periods mentioned above as of September 29, 2006.  In addition, the Fund has been meeting its investment objective for providing long-term capital appreciation.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds: The Board considered the sub-advisory fees paid to SMH fair and reasonable, in light of the investment sub-advisory services expected to be provided, the anticipated costs of these services and the comparability of the sub-advisory fees to fees paid by comparable mutual funds.

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds: The Board noted that the Sub-adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Sub-adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of SMH, the strategic plan involving the All Season Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  Thus, the Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Sub-Advisory Agreements would be in the best interest of the All Season Fund and its shareholders.

Potential Conflicts of Interest – Investment Adviser and Investment Sub-Advisers

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account.  More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds are presented with the following potential conflicts:

The management of multiple funds may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund.  The Investment Adviser seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having them focus on a particular investment discipline.  Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.  The management of multiple funds and accounts also may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts.

·

With respect to securities transactions for the Funds, the Investment Adviser determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty to seek best execution of the transaction.  The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for the Funds.

·

The appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Investment Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one fund but not all funds with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.  The management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds' code of ethics will adequately address such conflicts. One of the portfolio manager's numerous responsibilities is to assist in the sale of Fund shares.  Mr. Jones is paid a base salary by ASFA, and is eligible to participate in ASFA’s retirement plan arrangements.  Since ASFA’s profits are expected to increase as assets increase, Mr. Jones is expected to receive increased profits as a shareholder as Account assets (including, without limitation, the assets of the All Season Fund) increase.  Under the Sub - -Advisory Agreement between Integrity Money Management and ASFA, ASFA will be entitled to an increase in its compensation as assets in the All Season Fund increase.  As of December 31, 2006, both Jeffrey Cummer and Dwayne Moyers received compensation that is a combination of salary and a bonus based on profitability of SMH Capital Advisers, the Sub-Adviser.  The profitability bonus is based on a percentage of the profits of SMH over $1,000,000.  Since profits are expected to increase as assets increase, both Jeffrey Cummer and Dwayne Moyers are expected to receive increased profits as a shareholder as Account assets (including, without limitation, the assets of the All Season Fund) increase.

·

Although the Portfolio Managers generally do not trade securities in their own personal account, each of the Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such trades would not adversely impact client accounts.  Nevertheless, the management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.

The Investment Adviser and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures, which are designed to address these types of conflicts.  However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Schedule of Investments  December 29, 2006 

Name of Issuer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentages represent the market value of each investment category to total net assets

 

 

 

Quantity

 

 Market Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMON STOCK (32.2%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banks (1.9%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Associated Banc-Corp

 

 

 

1,735

$

60,517

Bank of America

 

 

 

1,053

 

56,220

Citigroup Inc

 

 

 

1,133

 

                63,108

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

 

 

 

1,907

 

                92,108

US Bancorp

 

 

 

1,701

 

                61,559

 

 

 

 

 

 

              333,512

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Materials (1.5%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barrick Gold Corp.

 

 

 

8,339

 

              256,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broadcasting (1.1%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Dun & Bradstreet Corp

 

 

 

1,153

 

                95,457

Time Warner Inc.

 

 

 

4,543

 

                98,947

 

 

 

 

 

 

              194,404

Building Materials (0.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pulte Homes Inc.

 

 

 

2,815

 

                93,233

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chemicals (0.4%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

RPM International Inc.

 

 

 

2,889

 

                60,351

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Computer Hardware (1.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Dell Inc.

 

 

 

3,690

 

                92,582

Intel Corp.

 

 

 

4,376

 

                88,614

 

 

 

 

 

 

              181,196

Consumer Products (2.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

GAP Inc.

 

 

 

4,636

 

                90,402

Limited Brands Inc.

 

 

 

3,121

 

                90,322

Mattel, Inc

 

 

 

4,247

 

                96,237

UST Inc.

 

 

 

1,029

 

                59,888

 

 

 

 

 

 

              336,849

Diversified Electronic (0.3%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scana Corp

 

 

 

1,380

 

                56,056

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drugs and Pharmaceuticals (2.3%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bristol-Myers Squibb

 

 

 

3,621

 

                95,305

Johnson & Johnson

 

 

 

4,594

 

              303,296

 

 

 

 

 

 

              398,601

Electrical Components &  Equip. (0.8%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Suntech Power Holdings - ADR

 

 

 

4,229

 

              143,828

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Energy (3.8%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ameren Corp.

 

 

 

1,051

 

                56,470

American Electric Power

 

 

 

1,378

 

                58,675

CenterPoint Energy Inc.

 

 

 

3,712

 

                61,545

Duke Energy

 

 

 

1,825

 

                60,608

Entergy Corp

 

 

 

1,299

 

              119,924

FPL Group Inc

 

 

 

2,259

 

              122,935

Nicor Inc.

 

 

 

1,184

 

                55,411

Progress Energy Inc.

 

 

 

1,241

 

                60,908

Southern Co.

 

 

 

1,586

 

                58,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

              654,936

Financial (3.7%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.

 

 

 

735

 

                59,094

Barclays PLC ADR

 

 

 

1,010

 

                58,721

H&R Block Inc.

 

 

 

4,061

 

                93,565

HSBC Holdings PLC ADR

 

 

 

592

 

                54,257

National City Corp

 

 

 

1,553

 

                56,778

Regions Financial Corp

 

 

 

1,752

 

                65,525

Wachovia Corp.

 

 

 

1,024

 

                58,317

Washington Mutual, Inc.

 

 

 

1,947

 

                88,569

First Data Corp.

 

 

 

3,789

 

                96,695

 

 

 

 

 

 

              631,521

Healthcare (0.5%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMS Health Inc.

 

 

 

3,300

 

                90,684

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hotels (0.5%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yum Brands

 

 

 

1,583

 

                93,080

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Industrial Gases (0.4%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

ONEOK, Inc. 

 

 

 

1,389

 

                59,894

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance (8.3%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Berkshire Hathaway 'B'

 

 

 

392

 

           1,437,072

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office Supplies (0.5%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Xerox Corp

 

 

 

5,557

 

                94,191

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil And Gas Operations (1.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Buckeye Partners LP

 

 

 

1,268

 

                58,937

Encana Corporation

 

 

 

2,332

 

              107,155

NiSource, Inc.

 

 

 

2,399

 

                57,816

TransCanada Corporation ADR

 

 

 

1,710

 

                59,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

              283,672

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real Estate Investment Trusts (0.4%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Host Hotels & Resorts

 

 

 

2,468

 

                60,589

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restaurants (0.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

McDonalds Corp

 

 

 

2,186

 

                96,905

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (COST: $5,208,367)

 

 

 

 

$

         5,556,581

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS (36.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR

 

 

 

15,106

 

              395,475

Financial Select Sector SPDR

 

 

 

16,286

 

              598,348

IShares Dow Jones US Healthcare Sector Index Fund

 

 

 

6,000

 

              398,460

IShares Lehman 7-10 Year Treasury

 

 

 

11,412

 

              940,805

IShares Lehman Aggregate Bond Fund

 

 

 

4,302

 

              428,909

IShares MSCI EAFE

 

 

 

12,853

 

              941,097

IShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

 

 

 

3,055

 

              348,789

IShares MSCI Japan IN

 

 

 

25,124

 

              357,012

Materials Select Sector SPDR

 

 

 

10,129

 

              353,300

Powershares Aero & Defense

 

 

 

13,317

 

              247,297

Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund

 

 

 

13,620

 

              317,074

Ultrashort Midcap400 Proshares

 

 

 

2,092

 

              130,583

UltraShort QQQ Proshares

 

 

 

2,407

 

              131,061

Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund

 

 

 

20,079

 

              737,301

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS (COST: $6,144,645)

 

 

 

 

$

         6,325,511

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coupon Rate

Maturity

 

Principal Amount

 

 

CORPORATE BONDS (20.9%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auto-Cars/Light Trucks (1.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

United Rentals North

6.500%

02/15/2012

$

175,000

$

              172,812

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broadcast Serv/Program (2.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sirius Satellite Radio

9.625

08/01/2013

 

177,000

 

              174,124

XM Satellite Radio 

9.750

05/01/2014

 

174,000

 

              173,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

              347,254

Building-Residential/Commer (4.5%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

K Hovnanian Enterprises

6.250

01/15/2016

 

74,000

 

                69,375

Kimball Hill Inc.

10.500

12/15/2012

 

191,000

 

              177,630

M/I Homes Inc.

6.875

04/01/2012

 

76,000

 

                68,590

Standard Pacific Corporation

6.250

04/01/2014

 

77,000

 

                71,899

Tech Olympic USA, Inc.

7.500

03/15/2011

 

45,000

 

                37,350

Tech Olympic USA, Inc.

7.500

01/15/2015

 

155,000

 

              121,675

WCI Communities

9.125

05/01/2012

 

35,000

 

                33,600

WCI Communities Inc

6.625

03/15/2015

 

98,000

 

                84,525

William Lyon Homes

10.750

04/01/2013

 

80,000

 

                76,600

William Lyon Homes

7.500

02/15/2014

 

48,000

 

                40,320

 

 

 

 

 

 

              781,564

Casino Hotels (3.5%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

155 E Tropicana LLC

8.750

04/01/2012

 

203,000

 

              174,072

Boyd Gaming Corp.

6.750

04/15/2014

 

177,000

 

              176,779

Magna Entertainment 

7.250

12/15/2009

 

20,000

 

                19,090

Trump Entertainment Resorts

8.500

06/01/2015

 

175,000

 

              175,000

Wynn Las Vegas

6.625

12/01/2014

 

65,000

 

                64,594

 

 

 

 

 

 

              609,535

Construction Materials (1.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

US Concrete Inc.

8.375

04/01/2014

 

176,000

 

              172,040

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Electronic Comp-Semicon (2.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amkor Technologies

9.250

06/01/2016

 

40,000

 

                39,100

Amkor Technologies, Inc.

7.750

05/15/2013

 

138,000

 

              127,305

Stoneridge Inc.

11.500

05/01/2012

 

170,000

 

              175,525

 

 

 

 

 

 

              341,930

Finance - Auto Loans (1.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ford Motor Credit Co

7.000

10/01/2013

 

184,000

 

              176,658

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food - Retail (1.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Landry's Restaurant

7.500

12/15/2014

 

180,000

 

              175,950

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Medical - Hospitals (0.8%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tenet Healthcare 

6.875

11/15/2031

 

153,000

 

              123,165

Tenet Healthcare Corp.

9.875

07/01/2014

 

8,000

 

                  8,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

              131,315

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Miscellaneous Manufacturer (0.7%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Propex Fabrics Inc.

10.000

12/01/2012

 

132,000

 

              116,655

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil Co. - Explor. & Prod. (0.8%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clayton William Energy

7.750

08/01/2013

 

142,000

 

              130,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resorts - Themeparks (1.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six Flags Inc. 

9.750

04/15/2013

 

185,000

 

              173,669

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail - Jewelry (1.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp

8.375

06/01/2012

 

181,000

 

              173,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Telecom Services (0.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grande Communications

14.000

04/01/2011

 

65,000

 

                70,362

PacWest Telecom Inc.

13.500

02/01/2009

 

106,000

 

                31,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

        102,162

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS (COST: $3,656,554)

 

 

 

 

      3,605,589

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (11.2%)

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Wells Fargo Advantage Investment Money Market (COST: $1,934,961)

 

1,934,961

$

         1,934,961

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $16,944,527)

 

 

 

 

$

      17,422,642

OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

          (148,652)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

 

 

 

 

$

      17,273,990

 

* Non-income producing

ADR - American Depository Receipt

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Statement of Assets and Liabilities December 29, 2006

ASSETS

 

 

 

Investments in securities, at value (cost: $16,944,527)

$

17,422,642

 

Accrued dividends receivable

 

17,799

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

80,202

 

Prepaid expenses

 

15,358

 

Receivable for fund shares sold

 

2,000

 

Total Assets

$

17,538,001

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Payable to affiliates

$

31,359

 

Accrued expenses

 

10,945

 

Disbursements in excess of demand deposit cash

 

96,913

 

Payable for fund shares redeemed

 

124,794

 

Total Liabilities

$

264,011

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

$

17,273,990

 

 

 

Net assets are represented by:

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

$

16,795,852

 

Accumulated undistributed net investment income

 

23

 

Unrealized appreciation on investments

 

478,115

 

Total amount representing net assets applicable to

 

 

 

1,676,503 outstanding shares of no par common stock

 

 

 

(unlimited shares authorized)

$

17,273,990

 

 

 

Net Assets Consist of:

 

 

 

Class A

$

15,738,745

 

Class C

$

1,535,245

 

Total Net Assets

$

17,273,990

 

 

 

 

Shares Outstanding:

 

 

 

Class A

 

1,526,082

 

Class C

 

150,421

 

 

 

 

Net Asset Value per share:

 

 

 

Class A

$

10.31

 

Class A – offering price (based on sales charge of 5.75%)

$

10.94

 

Class C

$

10.21

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Statement of Operations For the year ended December 29, 2006

INVESTMENT INCOME

 

 

 

Interest

$

393,963

 

Dividends

 

203,997

 

Total Investment Income

$

597,960

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

Investment advisory fees

$

310,031

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees Class A

 

36,122

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees Class C

 

9,594

 

Transfer agent fees

 

32,836

 

Accounting service fees

 

37,750

 

Administrative service fees

 

31,319

 

Transfer agent out-of-pocket expense

 

331

 

Custodian fees

 

9,296

 

Professional fees

 

11,912

 

Trustees fees

 

2,285

 

Reports to shareholders

 

2,085

 

License, fees, and registrations

 

21,941

 

Insurance expense

 

186

 

Audit fees

 

10,327

 

Other fees

 

390

 

Total Expenses

$

516,405

 

Less expenses waived or absorbed by the Fund’s manager

 

(100,890)

 

Total Net Expenses

$

415,515

 

 

 

NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)

$

182,445

 

 

 

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions

$

507,224

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments

 

269,845

 

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

$

777,069

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS

$

959,514

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the year ended December 29, 2006 and the period since inception (August 8, 2005) through December 30, 2005

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Period Since Inception (August 8, 2005) Through December 30, 2005

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

182,445

$

28,988

 

Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

507,224

 

(154,949)

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

269,845

 

208,270

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Operations

$

959,514

$

82,309

 

 

 

 

 

DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A ($.11 and $.03 per share)

$

(166,339)

$

(28,279)

 

Class C ($.11 and $.03 per share)

 

(16,083)

 

(1,000)

 

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A ($.22 and $.00 per share)

 

(321,226)

 

0

 

Class C ($.21 and $.00 per share)

 

(31,050)

 

0

 

Total Dividends and Distributions

$

(534,698)

$

(29,279)

 

 

 

 

 

CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of shares:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

$

9,804,456

$

12,005,119

 

Class C

 

1,270,501

 

372,518

 

Proceeds from reinvested dividends:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

349,393

 

23,454

 

Class C

 

46,703

 

956

 

Cost of shares redeemed:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

(5,601,506)

 

(1,303,988)

 

Class C

 

(171,462)

 

0

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Capital Share Transactions

$

5,698,085

$

11,098,059

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS

$

6,122,901

$

11,151,089

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

11,151,089

 

0

NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD

$

17,273,990

$

11,151,089

Undistributed Net Investment Income

$

23

$

0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Notes to Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Note 1.  ORGANIZATION

The Integrity All Season Fund (the “Fund”) is an investment portfolio of The Integrity Funds (the “Trust”) registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a non-diversified, open-end management investment company.  The Trust may offer multiple portfolios; currently seven portfolios are offered.  The Fund seeks to provide long-term growth of capital.  Fund commenced operations on August 8, 2005, under The Integrity Funds.  From its inception September 7, 1992 until February 9, 1998, The Integrity Funds were organized by the investment adviser as a Collective Investment Trust under New York Law and the regulations of the U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, participation in which was limited to qualified individual accounts such as IRAs and retirement and pension trusts.  On February 9, 1998, the Collective Investment Trust reorganized as a Delaware business trust.  In conne ction with this reorganization, the name of the Trust was changed from “Canandaigua National Collective Investment Fund for Qualified Trusts” to “The Canandaigua Funds.”  On March 3, 2003, the Trust was renamed “The Integrity Funds”.

For the period from inception (August 8, 2005) through December 30, 2005, Class A shares were sold with an initial sales charge of 1.50%.  The Integrity Funds received an order from the SEC under Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”), for an exemption from the limitations of Section 12(d)(1)(F)(ii) of the Act to the extent necessary to permit the All Season Fund to charge a sales load in excess of 1.50%. 

Class A shares are sold with a distribution fee of up to 0.25% on an annual basis.  Class C shares are sold without a sales charge and are subject to a distribution fee of up to 1.00% on an annual basis and a Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (“CDSC”) of 1.00% if shares are redeemed within 12 months of purchase.  The two classes of shares represent interests in the same portfolio of investments, have the same rights and are generally identical in all respects except that each class bears its separate distribution and certain other class expenses, and have exclusive voting rights with respect to any matter on which a separate vote of any class is required.

Note 2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investment security valuation – Assets for which market quotations are available are valued as follows: (a) each listed security is valued at its closing price obtained from the respective primary exchange on which the security is listed, or, if there were no sales on that day, at its last reported current bid price; (b) each unlisted security is valued at the last current bid price obtained from the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.  All of these prices are obtained by the Administrator from services, which collect and disseminate such market prices. Prices provided by an independent pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices and may take into account appropriate factors such as institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market data.  In the abse nce of an ascertainable market value, assets are valued at their fair value as determined by the Administrator using methods and procedures reviewed and approved by the Trustees.

Repurchase agreements – In connection with transactions in repurchase agreements, it is the Fund’s policy that its custodian take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the fair value of which exceeds the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest, at all times.  If the seller defaults, and the fair value of the collateral declines, realization of the collateral by the Fund may be delayed or limited.

Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (“CDSC”) – In the case of investments of $1 million or more, a 1.00% CDSC may be assessed on shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or distributions).

Federal and state income taxes – It is the policy of the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined in applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized capital gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

 

 

December 29, 2006

 

For The Period From Inception (August 8, 2005) Through December 30, 2005

Tax-exempt Income

$

0

$

0

Ordinary Income

 

518,629

 

29,279

Long-term Capital Gains

 

16,069

 

0

Total

$

534,698

$

29,279

As of December 29, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed Ordinary Income

Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains

Accumulated Earnings

Accumulated Capital and Other Losses

Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation)

Total Accumulated Earnings/(Deficit)

$23

$0

$23

$0

$478,115

$478,138

For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund did not make any permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character.  Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to expiring capital loss carryforwards.

Net capital losses incurred after October 31, and within the tax year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the Fund’s next taxable year.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund deferred to January 1, 2007, post October capital losses, post October currency losses and post October passive foreign investment company losses of $0.

Multiple class allocations - The Fund simultaneously uses the settled shares method to allocate income and fund-wide expenses and uses the relative net assets method to allocate gains and losses.  Class-specific expenses, distribution fees, and any other items that are specifically attributable to a particular class are charged directly to such class.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, distribution fees were the only class-specific expenses.

Distributions to shareholders – Dividends from net investment income, declared yearly and paid yearly, are reinvested in additional shares of the Fund at net asset value or paid in cash.  Capital gains, when available, are distributed along with the net investment income dividend at the end of the calendar year. 

Other - Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis.  Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date for financial reporting purposes. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis.  Distributions to shareholders are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date.  Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount, capital loss carryforwards and losses due to wash sales and futures transactions.

Permanent book and tax basis differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in capital.  Temporary book and tax basis differences will reverse in a subsequent period.

Dividend income – Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

Futures contracts – The Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts to hedge against changes in the values of equity securities the Fund owns or expects to purchase.

A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell units of a particular index at a set price on a future date.  Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with a broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the minimum “initial margin” requirement of the futures exchange on which the contract is traded.  Subsequent payments (“variation margin”) are made or received by the Fund, dependent on the fluctuations in the value of the underlying index.  Daily fluctuations in value are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the fund.  When entering into a closing transaction, the Fund will realize, for book purposes, a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contracts sold and the futures contracts to buy.  Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to open futures contracts is requir ed to be treated as realized gain (loss) for federal income tax purposes.

Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts.  These risks may include changes in the value of the futures contracts that may not directly correlate with changes in the value of the underlying securities.

Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 3.  CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

As of December 29, 2006, there were unlimited shares of no par authorized; 1,676,503 and 1,112,430 shares were outstanding at December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, respectively.

Transactions in capital shares were as follows:

 

Class A Shares

Class C Shares

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Period From Inception (August 8, 2005) Through December 30, 2005

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Period From Inception (August 8, 2005) Through December 30, 2005

Shares sold

960,349

1,203,904

125,014

37,521

Shares issued on reinvestment of dividends

33,790

2,331

4,565

95

Shares redeemed

(542,870)

(131,421)

(16,775)

0

Net increase (decrease)

451,269

1,074,814

112,804

37,616

Note 4.  INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.

The Advisory Agreement provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 2.00% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.  The Fund has recognized $224,594 of investment advisory fees after a partial waiver for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Money Management of $17,917 at December 29, 2006 for investment advisory fees.  Certain officers and trustees of the Fund are also officers and directors of the Adviser.

The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive its management fee and to reimburse expenses, other than extraordinary or non-recurring expenses until March 31, 2007, so that the Net Annual Operating Expenses of the Integrity All Season Fund Class A shares do not exceed 2.65%, and Class C shares do not exceed 3.40%.  After such date, the expense limitation may be terminated or revised.  Amounts waived or reimbursed in a particular fiscal year may be recouped by the Adviser within three years of the waiver or reimbursement to the extent that recoupment will not cause operating expenses to exceed any expense limitation in place at that time.  An expense limitation lowers expense ratios and increases returns to investors.

Principal Underwriter and Shareholder Services

For the year ended December 29, 2006, amounts paid or accrued to Integrity Funds Distributor and fees waived, if any, pursuant to Class A and Class C Distribution Plans were as follows:

 

12b-1 Fees Charged

12b-1 Fees Waived

Class A Shares

$36,122

$14,493

Class C Shares

$9,594

$961

Integrity Fund Services provides shareholder services for a variable fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum of $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $32,836 of transfer agency fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $3,334 at December 29, 2006 for transfer agency fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s accounting services agent for a monthly fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000, and a variable fee equal to 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million an d at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, together with reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional accounting services fee of $500 per month will be charged by Integrity Fund Services for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $37,750 of accounting service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $3,212 at December 29, 2006 for accounting service fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s administrative services agent for a variable fee equal to 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus out-of-pocket expenses.  The Fund will pay an additional minimum fee of $500 per month for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $31,319 of administrative service f ees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $2,621 at December 29, 2006 for administrative service fees.

Note 5.  INVESTMENT SECURITY TRANSACTIONS

The cost of purchases and proceeds from the sale of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) aggregated $51,734,936 and $44,340,791, respectively, for the year ended December 29, 2006.

Note 6.  INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES

At December 29, 2006, the aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was $16,944,527.  The net unrealized appreciation of investments based on the cost was $478,115, which is comprised of $639,666 aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and $161,551 aggregate gross unrealized depreciation.

Note 7.  RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.  This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted  accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Fund is presently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157.


Financial Highlights December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

Class A Shares

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Period From Inception (August 8, 2005) Through December 30, 2005

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

10.02

$

10.00

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

.11

$

.03

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

.51

 

.02

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

.62

$

.05

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

(.11)

$

(.03)

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

(.22)

 

.00

 

Total Distributions

$

(.33)

$

(.03)

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

10.31

$

10.02

 

 

 

 

 

Total Return

 

6.13%(B)

 

1.19%(A)(D)

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

15,739

$

10,775

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

2.65%(C)

 

2.65%(C)(D)

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

1.15%

 

0.89%(D)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

371.65%

 

145.78%

(A) Excludes maximum sales charge of 1.50%.

(B) Excludes maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Integrity Funds received an order from the SEC under Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) for an exemption from the limitations of Section 12(d)(1)(F)(ii) of the Act to the extent necessary to permit the All Season Fund to charge a sales load in excess of 1.50%.

(C) During the periods indicated above, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. assumed/waived expenses of $94,603 and $44,509.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 3.30% and 4.03%.

(D) Ratio is annualized.

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Highlights December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

Class C Shares

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Period From Inception (August 8, 2005) Through December 30, 2005

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

 

10.00

$

10.00

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

.11

$

.03

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

.42

 

.00

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

.53

$

.03

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

(.11)

$

(.03)

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

(.21)

 

.00

 

Total Distributions

$

(.32)

$

(.03)

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

10.21

$

10.00

 

 

 

 

 

Total Return

 

5.32%(A)

 

0.68%(A)(C)

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

1,535

$

376

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

3.40%(B)

 

3.40%(B)(C)

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

1.67%

 

1.33%(C)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

371.65%

 

145.78%

(A) Excludes contingent deferred sales charge of 1.00%.

(B) During the periods indicated above, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. assumed/waived expenses of $6,287 and $1,359.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 4.06% and 5.16%.

(C) Ratio is annualized.

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of the Integrity All Season Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the Integrity All Season Fund (one of the portfolios constituting The Integrity Funds), including the schedule of investments as of December 29, 2006, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for the year ended December 29, 2006 and the period since inception (August 8, 2005) through December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the year ended December 29, 2006 and the period since inception (August 8, 2005) through  December 30, 2005. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements  and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 29, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Integrity All Season Fund of The Integrity Funds as of December 29, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, changes in its net assets for the year then ended and the period since inception (August 8, 2005) through December 30, 2005, and financial highlights for the year ended December 29, 2006, and the period since inception (August 8, 2005) through December 30, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BRADY, MARTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Minot, North Dakota USA

February 12, 2007

 

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed is the report of the operations for the Integrity Growth & Income Fund (the “Fund”) for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund’s portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.

Integrity Growth & Income Fund (IGIAX) continues to keep overall risk low, given the advanced stage of the bull market and the weakening economy. Morningstar, for example, gives us a very low beta of only 0.77 vs. our best fit index, the Russell 1000.  The Fund’s 13-month standard deviation (the best overall measure of risk) is 1.72%, vs. 2.82% for the Value Line Arithmetic Composite, which we view as the best proxy for overall market risk – only 61% as much risk as the overall market.

Despite our very low risk, we have nearly kept pace with the S&P 500. On a raw numbers basis for the 2006 period ended December 29, the Fund’s return was 15.04%*, compared with a total return of 15.79% for the S&P 500. Our year-end cash position is approximately 14.5%, plus a 4% short position against the small cap segment of the market.

In my opinion, alpha is the best measure of the ability of your fund manager, as discussed further below. Morningstar gives the Fund a 3-year alpha of +2.88 vs. the S&P 500, as of December 29, 2006. In other words, active management has added an extra 2.88% more of annual return to your Fund over the last 3 years than we should have earned, based on our level of risk. I am quite happy with our results, with a significant positive 3-year alpha, despite a much lower beta than that of the S&P 500.

For the first time in 3 years, our risk-adjusted return has fallen below that of the S&P 500, as we have become more aggressive in lowering the Fund’s risk. We have purchased more conservative companies at larger discounts to fair value recently, and this segment of the market did not keep pace with the overall market in the strong rally the last half of 2006. As I explained in our Semi-annual report, we added a significant short position in June to move our risk metrics back into safer territory after seeing risk rise mid-year.

This short position was used only to control risk. It is not a bet that we are about to enter a bear market, which is not the kind of thing we do, but it has produced a drag on the fund during strong rallies. We sold 75% of our short position near year-end, after our strategy had accomplished its goal of restoring our risk to a level consistent with where we should be near the end of an aging bull market with stocks priced at well above fair value, deteriorating risk metrics across nearly all major asset classes, an inverted yield curve, and a rapidly weakening North American economy and housing market.

For a conservatively managed fund under such risky market conditions, I view a slightly lower return as an acceptable trade-off for the price of keeping risk low, as I explain further below. While we would prefer to beat the market all the time, of course, no management strategy has ever been devised that can do this, and we are configured more at present to protect against downside risk for the reasons given above. The results are presented below.

Risk-Adjusted Return Comparison

IGIAX vs. S&P 500, 1 year ended 12/29/06

 

Raw

Standard

Risk-Adjusted

 

Return

Deviation

Return

IGIAX

15.04%

1.72%

8.76%

S&P 500

15.79%

1.55%

10.19%

Note:  Standard Deviation is measured over the most recent 13 monthly total returns.

Past risk-adjusted returns may not be a reliable guide to future risk-adjusted returns.

Alpha Chasers vs. Beta Huggers

There are two basic ways fund managers can make money in stocks. You can calibrate your return to that of the market by focusing on beta, or volatility, relative to an appropriate index. A beta of 1.00 vs. the S&P 500 Index, for example, means a fund is exactly as volatile, on average, as the index. A beta over 1.00 is riskier, below 1.00 is less risky.

The other way is to try to earn a consistently positive alpha. Alpha is a classical measure of how much additional return a portfolio manager’s investment decisions have added to the return of his or her fund after expenses, vs. the return of a similar unmanaged index. Positive is good, the more positive the better. A negative alpha means your manager’s active investment management decisions have actually lost the fund money. An alpha around zero means active management isn’t adding anything to the fund’s value.

Investors should understand these two approaches, and their consequences. Index funds, for instance, are “beta huggers.”  They try to avoid any departure at all from the overall risk and return of their chosen index, hugging close to it.  “Alpha chasers,” in contrast, focus only on methodologies and investment decisions that are likely to add measurable alpha, or value, to a fund above what would be expected, given their level of risk. Both alpha and beta are easily measurable; the only question is which one your fund manager is focusing on.

Just so you know, we are “alpha chasers.” We aren’t going to knock the cover off the ball in bull markets, although our controlled risk discipline does allow risk to rise somewhat at the bottom of market cycles and early in bull markets, while keeping it low in later stages of bull markets or in bear markets. We expect to outperform significantly in down markets, and we strive to earn a higher risk-adjusted return over a market cycle, and more “excess” return, or alpha, than implied by our level of risk in all markets.

We have again become very conservative the last half of 2006, as the economy has progressively weakened, and our risk measurement tools tell us to decrease risk. While this may reduce our relative returns a bit shorter term, we believe it will pay off when the market enters the inevitable down part of the overall market cycle. Unlike “beta huggers,” we believe money can be made in any kind of stock market, and we have developed a discipline that we think gives us a good chance of doing so through a focus on earning a positive alpha.

If you would like more frequent updates, visit our website at www.integrityfunds.com for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.

Sincerely,

Robert Loest, Ph.D., CFA

Senior Portfolio Manager

The views expressed are those of Robert Loest and IPS Advisory, Inc., Sub-Adviser to Integrity Growth & Income Fund.  The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally, or any Integrity Mutual Fund.

*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance.

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

PROXY VOTING ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-276-1262.  A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Integrity's web site at www.integrityfunds.com.  This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

The Fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semi-annual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the Fund's second and fourth fiscal quarters on the Form N-CSR(S).  The annual and semi-annual reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the Fund shareholders.  The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.  The Fund's Form N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C., and the information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-942-8090.  You may also access this information from Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.


Terms & Definitions December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

American Depository Receipt (ADR)

A negotiable certificate representing a given number of shares of stock in a foreign corporation.  It is bought and sold in the American securities markets, just as stock is traded.

Appreciation

Increase in the value of an asset.

Average Annual Total Return

A standardized measurement of the return (appreciation) earned by a fund on an annual basis.

Consumer Price Index

A commonly used measure of inflation; it does not represent an investment return.

Depreciation

Decrease in the value of an asset.

Growth Fund

A type of diversified common stock fund that has capital appreciation as its primary goal.  It invests in companies that reinvest most of their earnings for expansion, research, or development.

Growth & Income Fund

Fund that invests in common stocks for both current income and long-term growth of capital and income.

Load

A mutual fund whose shares are sold with a sales charge added to the net asset value.

Market Value

Actual price at which a fund trades in the market place.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

The value of all your fund’s assets, minus any liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares, not including any initial or contingent deferred sales charge.

Offering Price

The price at which a mutual fund’s share can be purchased.  The offering price per share is the current net asset value plus any sales charge.

Total Return

Measures both the net investment income and any realized and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of the underlying investments in the fund’s portfolio for the period, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.  It represents the aggregate percentage or dollar value change over the period.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPOSITION

PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS

(as a % of Net Assets)

T – Technology

24.8%

S – Services

14.8%

B – Basic Materials

9.2%

O – Other

8.0%

R – Repurchase Agreement

6.5%

F – Financial

5.8%

CG – Capital Goods

5.7%

HC – Healthcare

5.0%

CC – Consumer Cyclical

4.8%

I – Industrial Goods

4.2%

C – Conglomerates

3.4%

CS – Consumer Staples

3.1%

CD – Consumer Discretionary

2.5%

E – Energy

2.2%

Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.

These percentages are subject to change.

TOP TEN HOLDINGS

(as a % of Net Assets)

1.

Wells Fargo Repurchase Agreement

6.5%

2.

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

5.8%

3.

Raytheon Co. 

5.7%

4.

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

5.4%

5.

IBM

5.2%

6.

Royal Dutch Shell PLC - ADR

5.2%

7.

Microsoft Corp.

5.2%

8.

Portfolio Recovery Associates

5.0%

9.

Johnson & Johnson

5.0%

10.

Xerox Corp

4.8%

The Fund’s holdings are subject to change at any time.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

DISCLOSURE OF FUND EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

EXAMPLE:

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:  (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses.  This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.  The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

The example illustrates the Fund’s costs in two ways:

Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses.  You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.  Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return.  The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.  You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds.  To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. 

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees.  Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.  In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

Beginning Account Value 06/30/06

Ending Account Value 12/29/06

Expenses Paid During Period*

Actual

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,113.53

$8.39

Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,017.06

$8.01

* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.60%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 179/360 days.  The Fund’s ending account value on the first line in the table is based on its actual total return of 11.35% for the six month period of June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS

 

For periods ending December 29, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Integrity Growth & Income Fund

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(January 3, 1995)

Without Sales Charge

15.04%

12.06%

4.79%

7.62%

10.29%

With Sales Charge (5.75%)

8.43%

9.88%

3.55%

6.98%

9.75%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Lipper Mlt-Cap Core Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(January 3, 1995)

 

14.14%

11.56%

7.37%

8.34%

11.16%

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

S&P 500 Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(January 3, 1995)

 

15.79%

10.44%

6.19%

8.42%

11.77%

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares. 

Performance prior to April 22, 2005, reflects the historical financial information of IPS Millennium Fund.  The assets of IPS Millennium Fund were acquired by Integrity Growth & Income Fund at the close of business on April 22, 2005.  In connection with such acquisition, the shares of IPS Millennium were exchanged for shares of Integrity Growth & Income Fund. 

The Fund’s performance prior to April 22, 2005, was achieved while the Fund was managed by another investment adviser, who used different investment strategies and techniques, which may produce different investment results than those achieved by the current investment adviser.  IPS Advisory, Inc. served as investment adviser to the Fund from January 3, 1995 to April 22, 2005.  Since April 22, 2005, IPS Advisory, Inc. has served as sub-adviser to the Fund.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPARATIVE INDEX GRAPH

Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Integrity Growth & Income Fund, Lipper Mlt-Cap Core Index, and the S&P 500 Index

 

Integrity Growth & Income Fund w/o Sales Charge

Integrity Growth & Income Fund w/Max Sales Charge

Lipper Mlt- Cap Core Index

S&P 500 Index

1996

$10,000

$  9,425

$10,000

$10,000

1997

$12,144

$11,443

$12,627

$13,336

1998

$17,039

$16,055

$14,988

$17,148

1999

$37,277

$35,125

$18,100

$20,756

2000

$28,593

$26,943

$17,496

$18,866

2001

$16,498

$15,546

$15,613

$16,624

2002

$11,947

$11,257

$12,219

$12,950

2003

$14,810

$13,955

$16,045

$16,664

2004

$16,572

$15,615

$18,033

$18,478

2005

$18,196

$17,146

$19,515

$19,385

2006

$20,842

$19,639

$22,275

$22,447

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The graph does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The graph comparing your Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how your Fund performed.  To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two.  Your Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees.  A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio.  Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results.  In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities necessary to match the index.  And, if they could, they would incur transaction costs and other expenses.  All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.

Performance prior to April 22, 2005, reflects the historical financial information of IPS Millennium Fund.  The assets of IPS Millennium Fund were acquired by Integrity Growth & Income Fund at the close of business on April 22, 2005.  In connection with such acquisition, the shares of IPS Millennium were exchanged for shares of Integrity Growth & Income Fund. 

The Fund’s performance prior to April 22, 2005, was achieved while the Fund was managed by another investment adviser, who used different investment strategies and techniques, which may produce different investment results than those achieved by the current investment adviser.  IPS Advisory, Inc. served as investment adviser to the Fund from January 3, 1995 to April 22, 2005.  Since April 22, 2005, IPS Advisory, Inc. has served as sub-adviser to the Fund.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND

The Board of The Integrity Funds consists of four Trustees.  These same individuals, unless otherwise noted, also serve as directors or trustees for the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.  Three Trustees (75% of the total) have no affiliation or business connection with the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates.  These are the “independent” Trustees.  Two of the remaining three Trustees and/or Officers are “interested” by virtue of their affiliation with the Investment Adviser and its affiliates.

The Independent Trustees of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Independent Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Jerry M. Stai
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
54

Trustee

Since January 2006

Faculty, Embry-Riddle University (August 2000 to September 2005); Faculty, Park University (August 2005 to December 2005); Non-Profit Specialist, Bremer Bank (since July 2005); Faculty, Minot State University (since August 2000); Director ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., (since January 2006); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 2006).

16

Marycrest Franciscan Development, Inc.

Orlin W. Backes
15 2nd Ave., SW
Suite 305
Minot, ND 58701
71

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C.; Director, South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (until June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (Since April 2005); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); Director, First Western Bank & Trust.

16

First Western Bank & Trust

R. James Maxson
Town & Country Center
1015 S. Broadway
Suite 15
Minot, ND 58701
59

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, Maxson Law Office (since November 2002); Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C. (April 2000 to November 2002); Director, Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc. and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (since January 1999), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2003); and Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1999).

16

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

The Interested Trustees and executive officers of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Interested Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Robert E. Walstad2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
62

Trustee Chairman President

Since May 2003

Director (since September 1987), President (September 2002 to May 2003), CEO (Since September 2001), Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, President and Treasurer, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Director, President (since inception) and Treasurer (May 1989 to May 2004), ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc., (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds Inc., (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Trustee, Chairman, President and Treasurer (January 2006 to May 2004), Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1996) and The Integrity Funds (since May 2003); Director, President (until August 2003), CEO, and Treasurer, Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc.; Director (October 1999 to June 2003) Magic Internet Services, Inc.; Director (May 2000 to June 2003), President (October 2002 to June 2003), ARM Securities Corporation; Director, CEO, Chairman, (since January 2002) and President (September 2002 to December 2004), Capital Financial Services, Inc.

16

Capital Financial Services, Inc., and Minot Park Board

Peter A. Quist2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
72

Vice President Secretary

Since May 2003

Attorney; Director and Vice President, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc., Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc., ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); and Director, ARM Securities Corporation (May 2000 to June 2003).

3

None

Laura K. Anderson
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
32

Treasurer

Since October 2005

Fund Accountant (until May 2004), Fund Accounting Supervisor (May 2004 to October 2005), Fund Accounting Manager, Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (since October 2005), Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

Brent M. Wheeler
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
36

Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer

Since October 2005

Fund Accounting Manager (May 1998 through October 2005), Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (May 2004 to October 2005), Mutual Fund Compliance Officer (since October 2005) Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

2Trustees and/or officers who are “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.  Messr. Quist is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser and Principal Underwriter.  Messr. Walstad is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement

Integrity Money Management, the Fund's investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. ("Integrity Funds Distributor"), the Fund's underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. ("Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund's transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund's sponsor.

The approval and the continuation of a fund’s investment advisory and investment sub-advisory agreements must be specifically approved at least annually (1) by the vote of the trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the investment advisory agreement or “Interested Persons” of any party (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.  In preparation for the meeting, the Board requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by the Fund’s Investment Adviser that is deemed reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Management and Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”). The Independent Trustees also received advice from their independent counsel on the issues to focus on during contract renewals.  At a meeting held on October 25, 2006, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees of the Fund, approved the Advisory Agreement, between the Growth & Income Fund and Integrity Money Management, Inc., and the Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement (“Sub-Advisory Agreement”), between the Investment Adviser and IPS Advisory, Inc. (“IPS Advisory”). 

The Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are neither party to the Advisory or Sub-Advisory Agreements nor “interested persons” of any such party (as such term is defined for regulatory purposes), unanimously approved the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements.  In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Trustees requested information, provided by the Investment Adviser and each Sub-Adviser that it believed to be reasonably necessary to reach its conclusion.  In connection with the approval of the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Board reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts, which include but are not limited to, the following:

(a)

the nature and quality of services to be provided by the adviser to the fund;

(b)

the various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications;

(c)

the relevant fund’s investment performance as compared to standardized industry performance data;

(d)

the adviser’s costs and profitability of furnishing the investment management services to the fund;

(e)

the extent to which the adviser realizes economies of scale as the fund grows larger and the sharing thereof with the fund;

(f)

an analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds;

(g)

the expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds; and

(h)

information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds.

In evaluating the Investment Adviser’s services and fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of the Fund, the recent financial statements of the Investment Adviser, and the proposed advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds.  In reviewing the Advisory Agreement with the foregoing Fund, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund’s past performance, the nature and quality of the services to be provided, the profitability of the adviser and its parent (estimated costs and estimated profits from furnishing the proposed services to the Fund), and the expense waivers by the Investment Adviser.  The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Investment Adviser and its affiliates for services provided to the Fund.  The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-import ant or controlling.  The Trustees also considered the Investment Adviser’s commitment to contractually or voluntarily limit Fund expenses, the skills and capabilities of the Investment Adviser, and the representations from the Investment Adviser that the Integrity Growth & Income Fund’s portfolio manager, Robert Loest, will continue to manage the Fund in substantially the same way as it had been managed previously.  The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Investment Adviser currently provides services to sixteen funds in the Integrity family of funds with investment strategies ranging from non-diversified sector funds to broad-based equity funds.  The experience and expertise of the Investment Adviser is attributable to the long-term focus on managing investment companies and has the potential to enhance the Fund’s future performance. They have a strong culture of compliance and provide quality services. The overall nature and quality of the services provided by the Investment Adviser had historically been, and continues to be, adequate and appropriate to the Board. 

Profitability:  The Board has reviewed a year to date and a 12-month profit analysis spreadsheet completed by the controller of the investment adviser.  Based on the relatively small size of each fund under management with the Adviser, the Adviser has shown no profit for the period.  The Board determined that the profitability of the Adviser was not excessive based on the services it will provide for the Fund and the profit analysis spreadsheet presented by the Adviser.

Economies of Scale:  The Board briefly discussed the benefits for the Fund as the Adviser could realize economies of scale as the Fund grows larger, but the size of the Fund has not reached an asset level to benefit from economies of scale.  The advisory fees are structured appropriately based on the size of the Fund.  The advisor has indicated that a new advisory fee structure may be looked at if the Fund reaches an asset level where the Fund could benefit from economies of scale.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds:  The adviser is voluntarily waiving advisory fees due to the small size of the Fund.  The Board considered the compensation payable under the Advisory Agreement fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided.

Expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds:  The Fund’s net expense ratio of 1.60% for the Class A shares was comparable to other funds of similar objective and size. 

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds: The Board noted that the Adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

Board Approval of Sub-Advisory Agreement with IPS Advisory

In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement between Integrity Money Management and IPS Advisory, the Trustees requested information from IPS Advisory that they believed to be reasonably necessary to reach their conclusion and reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and SEC directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts. 

In evaluating the Sub-Adviser’s services and its fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of the Fund, and the proposed sub-advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of sub-advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds.  In reviewing the Sub-Advisory Agreements with the foregoing Fund, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund’s past performance, and the nature and quality of the services provided. The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Sub-adviser and its affiliates for services provided to the Fund.  The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-important or controlling.

The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Board is satisfied with IPS Advisory’s portfolio manager representations to manage the Fund. Based on the review of IPS Advisory by the Investment Adviser Chief Compliance Officer of Integrity Money Management, Inc., including a review of the possible conflicts of interest, its code of ethics, and Advisory policy and procedure manual, the Board felt that the overall nature and quality of services are satisfactory.  

Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications:  The Board acknowledged that Robert Loest, the Portfolio Manager for the Fund, has a number of years experience in managing the Fund and has had success in reaching positive returns in prior years.  A detailed biography of the portfolio manager was presented to the Trustees.  This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Fund.

Investment Performance:  Although the Fund has outperformed its relative benchmark for the YTD and 1-year periods, it has underperformed its relative benchmark for the 5-year, and 10-year periods as of September 29, 2006. The Fund has positive returns for the periods mentioned above as of September 29, 2006.  In addition, the Fund has been meeting its investment objective for providing long-term growth of capital with dividend income as a secondary objective.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds:  The Board considered the sub-advisory fees paid to IPS Advisory to be fair and reasonable, in light of the sub-advisory services expected to be provided, the anticipated costs of these services and the comparability of the sub-advisory fees to fees paid by comparable mutual funds. 

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds:  The Board noted that the sub-adviser does realize a material direct benefit from its relationship with the Fund.  The sub-adviser participates in a soft dollar arrangement from securities trading in the Fund.  This arrangement is between IPS Advisory, Inc. and Fidelity Capital Markets Services (“FCMS”).  The soft dollar usage, including relevant spreadsheets and statements provided by the sub-adviser and/or FCMS, is monitored by the Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer.  Monthly statements and spreadsheets are presented to the Fund Board of Directors at each quarterly meeting.

In voting unanimously to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of IPS Advisory, the strategic plan involving the Growth & Income Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  Thus, the Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Sub-Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the Growth & Income Fund and its shareholders.

Potential Conflicts of Interest – Investment Adviser and Investment Sub-Advisers

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account.  More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds are presented with the following potential conflicts:

The management of multiple funds may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund.  The Investment Adviser seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having them focus on a particular investment discipline.  Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.  The management of multiple funds and accounts also may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts.

·

With respect to securities transactions for the Funds, the Sub-adviser determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty to seek best execution of the transaction.  The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for the Funds.

·

The appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Sub-adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one fund to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.  The management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds' code of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.  Because part of Mr. Loest’s compensation may be linked to the sale of Fund shares, he may have an incentive to devote time to marketing efforts designed to increase sales of Fund shares.

·

Although the Portfolio Managers generally do not trade securities in their own personal account, each of the Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such trades would not adversely impact client accounts.  Nevertheless, the management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such conflicts. 

The Investment Adviser, Sub-adviser and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures, which are designed to address these types of conflicts.  However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Schedule of Investments December 29, 2006

Name of Issuer

 

 

 

 

Percentages represent the market value of each investment category to total net assets

 

Quantity

 

Market Value

 

 

 

 

 

COMMON STOCK (85.4%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Materials (4.0%)

 

 

 

 

Barrick Gold Corp.

 

60,000

$

1,842,000

 

 

 

 

 

Business Service (5.0%)

 

 

 

 

*Portfolio Recovery Associates

 

50,000

 

2,334,500

 

 

 

 

 

Business Software & Services (2.6%)

 

 

 

 

*EPIQ Systems, Inc.

 

70,000

 

1,187,900

 

 

 

 

 

Chemicals (3.4%)

 

 

 

 

3M Co.

 

20,000

 

1,558,600

 

 

 

 

 

Computer Hardware (5.2%)

 

 

 

 

IBM

 

25,000

 

2,428,750

 

 

 

 

 

Conglomerates (5.7%)

 

 

 

 

Raytheon Co. 

 

50,000

 

2,640,000

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Products (2.5%)

 

 

 

 

*Apollo Group Inc.

 

30,000

 

1,169,100

 

 

 

 

 

Diversified Machinery (4.2%)

 

 

 

 

Teleflex Inc.

 

30,000

 

1,936,800

 

 

 

 

 

Drugs and Pharmaceuticals (5.0%)

 

 

 

 

Johnson & Johnson

 

35,000

 

2,310,700

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance (5.8%)

 

 

 

 

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

 

45,000

 

2,700,000

 

 

 

 

 

Internet Retail (3.6%)

 

 

 

 

*Expedia Inc.

 

80,000

 

1,678,400

 

 

 

 

 

Office Supplies (4.8%)

 

 

 

 

*Xerox Corp

 

130,000

 

2,203,500

 

 

 

 

 

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (5.2%)

 

 

 

 

Royal Dutch Shell PLC - ADR

 

34,000

 

2,406,860

 

 

 

 

 

Personal Products (4.4%)

 

 

 

 

Mckesson Corp

 

40,000

 

2,028,000

 

 

 

 

 

Publishing (5.4%)

 

 

 

 

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

65,000

 

2,500,550

 

 

 

 

 

Retail - Food (3.1%)

 

 

 

 

Chiquita Brands International, Inc.

 

90,000

 

1,437,300

 

 

 

 

 

Scientific/Technical Instruments (2.2%)

 

 

 

 

*Energy Conversion Devices

 

30,000

 

1,019,400

 

 

 

 

 

Semiconductor (3.5%)

 

 

 

 

*OmniVision Technologies, Inc.

 

120,000

 

1,638,000

 

 

 

 

 

Software And Programming (5.2%)

 

 

 

 

Microsoft Corp.

 

80,000

 

2,388,800

 

 

 

 

 

Telecom Services-Foreign (4.6%)

 

 

 

 

Telecom Corp. of New Zealand (ADR)

 

80,000

 

2,153,600

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (COST:  $36,092,177)

 

 

$

39,562,760

 

 

 

 

 

MUTUAL FUNDS (1.9%)

 

 

 

 

UltraShort Small-Cap ProFund - Investor Class (COST: $1,187,814)

 

65,438

$

875,559

 

 

 

 

 

REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (6.5%)

 

Matured Amount

 

 

Wells Fargo Repurchase Agreement (COST: $3,000,000)

 

 

 

 

5.000%, dated 12/06/06, due 01/03/07, Collateralized by U.S. Treasury Obligations

 

$3,000,000

$

3,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (6.2%)

 

Shares

 

 

Wells Fargo Advantage Investment Money Market (COST: $2,879,579)

 

2,879,579

$

2,879,579

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST:  $43,159,570)

 

 

$

46,317,898

OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES

 

 

 

16,413

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

 

 

$

46,334,311

*Non-income producing

ADR – American Depository Receipt

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Statement of Assets and Liabilities December 29, 2006

ASSETS

 

 

 

Investments in securities, at value (cost: $43,159,570)

$

46,317,898

 

Cash

 

1,322

 

Accrued dividends receivable

 

83,366

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

20,379

 

Prepaid expenses

 

24,507

 

Receivable for funds shares sold

 

130

 

Total Assets

$

46,447,602

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

$

22,880

 

Payable to affiliates

 

47,606

 

Payable for fund shares redeemed

 

42,805

 

Total Liabilities

$

113,291

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

$

46,334,311

 

 

 

Net assets are represented by:

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

$

329,852,712

 

Accumulated undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments

 

(286,709,724)

 

Accumulated undistributed net investment income

 

32,995

 

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

3,158,328

 

Total amount representing net assets applicable to

 

 

 

1,269,747outstanding shares of no par common stock

 

 

 

(unlimited shares authorized)

$

46,334,311

 

 

 

Net asset value per share

$

36.49

Public offering price (based on sales charge of 5.75%)

$

38.72

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Operations For the year ended December 29, 2006

INVESTMENT INCOME

 

 

 

Interest

$

316,925

 

Dividends

 

841,092

 

Total Investment Income

$

1,158,017

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

Investment advisory fees

$

482,227

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees

 

241,114

 

Transfer agent fees

 

114,725

 

Accounting service fees

 

47,987

 

Administrative service fees

 

90,614

 

Custodian fees

 

7,047

 

Professional fees

 

38,466

 

Trustees fees

 

4,027

 

Transfer agent out-of-pockets

 

9,975

 

Reports to shareholders

 

72,127

 

License, fees, and registrations

 

18,144

 

Foreign tax expense

 

13,586

 

Audit fees

 

10,509

 

Insurance expense

 

1,971

 

Legal fees

 

628

 

Total Expenses

$

1,153,147

 

Less expenses waived or absorbed by the Fund’s manager

 

(400,347)

 

Total Net Expenses

$

752,800

 

 

 

NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)

$

405,217

 

 

 

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions

$

4,489,858

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments

 

1,921,138

 

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

$

6,410,996

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS

$

6,816,213

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the year ended December 29, 2006 and the period December 1, 2005 through December 30, 2005

 

 

For the Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Period December 1, 2005 Through December 30, 2005

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

405,217

$

18,356

 

Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

4,489,858

 

391,554

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

1,921,138

 

25,083

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Operations

$

6,816,213

$

434,993

 

 

 

 

 

DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income ($.29 and $.01 per share, respectively)

$

(372,223)

$

(19,298)

 

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions ($.01 and $.00 per share, respectively)

 

(9,677)

 

(2,486)

 

Total Dividends and Distributions

$

(381,900)

$

(21,784)

 

 

 

 

 

CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of shares

$

1,261,156

$

73,540

 

Proceeds from reinvested dividends

 

367,216

 

396,140

 

Cost of shares redeemed

 

(13,876,008)

 

(1,538,954)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Capital Share Transactions

$

(12,247,636)

$

(1,069,274)

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS

$

(5,813,323)

$

(656,065)

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

52,147,634

 

52,803,699

NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD

$

46,334,311

$

52,147,634

Undistributed Net Investment Income

$

32,995

$

0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Notes to Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Note 1. ORGANIZATION

The Integrity Growth & Income Fund (the “Fund”) is an investment portfolio of The Integrity Funds (the “Trust”) registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment company.  The Trust may offer multiple portfolios; currently seven portfolios are offered.  On April 22, 2005, the IPS Millennium Fund and IPS New Frontier Fund reorganized into the Integrity Growth & Income Fund and became a series of The Integrity Funds.  Prior to this, the IPS Funds were organized as an Ohio statutory trust on August 10, 1994, and were registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company.  The accompanying financial statements and financial highlights are those of the Integrity Growth & Income Fund.  The Fund seeks to provide long-term growth of capital wit h dividend income as a secondary objective.

Shares of the Fund are offered at net asset value plus a maximum sales charge of 5.75% and a distribution fee of up to 0.50% on an annual basis. 

Note 2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investment security valuation – Assets for which market quotations are available are valued as follows: (a) each listed security is valued at its closing price obtained from the respective primary exchange on which the security is listed, or, if there were no sales on that day, at its last reported current bid price; (b) each unlisted security is valued at the last current bid price obtained from the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.  All of these prices are obtained by the Administrator from services, which collect and disseminate such market prices. Prices provided by an independent pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices and may take into account appropriate factors such as institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market data.  In the abse nce of an ascertainable market value, assets are valued at their fair value as determined by the Administrator using methods and procedures reviewed and approved by the Trustees.

Repurchase agreements – In connection with transactions in repurchase agreements, it is the Fund’s policy that its custodian take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the fair value of which exceeds the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest, at all times.  If the seller defaults, and the fair value of the collateral declines, realization of the collateral by the Fund may be delayed or limited.

Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (“CDSC”) – In the case of investments of $1 million or more, a 1.00% CDSC may be assessed on shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or distributions).

Federal and state income taxes – It is the policy of the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined in applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized capital gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

 

 

December 29, 2006

 

For The Period December 1, 2005 Through December 30, 2005

Tax-exempt Income

$

0

$

0

Ordinary Income

 

381,900

 

19,298

Long-term Capital Gains

 

0

 

2,486

Total

$

381,900

$

21,784

As of December 29, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed Ordinary Income

Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains

Accumulated Earnings

Accumulated Capital and Other Losses

Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation)

Total Accumulated Earnings/(Deficit)

$32,995

$0

$32,995

($286,709,724)

$3,158,328

($283,518,401)

As of December 29, 2006, the Fund had net capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized gains.  Any difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales.

Year

Unexpired Capital Losses

2007

$248,419,325

2008

$38,290,399

For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund made $11,537,269 in permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character.  Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to expiring capital loss carryforwards.

Net capital losses incurred after October 31, and within the tax year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the Fund’s next taxable year.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund deferred to January 1, 2007, post-October capital losses, post-October currency losses and post-October passive foreign investment company losses of $0.

Distributions to shareholders – Dividends from net investment income, declared yearly and paid yearly, are reinvested in additional shares of the Fund at net asset value or paid in cash.  Capital gains, when available, are distributed along with the net investment income dividend at the end of the calendar year. 

Other - Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis.  Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date for financial reporting purposes. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis.  Distributions to shareholders are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date.  Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount, capital loss carryforwards and losses due to wash sales and futures transactions.

Permanent book and tax basis differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in capital.  Temporary book and tax basis differences will reverse in a subsequent period.

In 2005, the Fund elected to change its financial and tax year-end to December 31 from November 30.

Dividend income – Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

Futures contracts – The Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts to hedge against changes in the values of equity securities the Fund owns or expects to purchase.

A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell units of a particular index at a set price on a future date.  Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with a broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the minimum “initial margin” requirement of the futures exchange on which the contract is traded.  Subsequent payments (“variation margin”) are made or received by the Fund, dependent on the fluctuations in the value of the underlying index.  Daily fluctuations in value are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the fund.  When entering into a closing transaction, the Fund will realize, for book purposes, a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contracts sold and the futures contracts to buy.  Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to open futures contracts are requi red to be treated as realized gain (loss) for federal income tax purposes.

Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts.  These risks may include changes in the value of the futures contracts that may not directly correlate with changes in the value of the underlying securities.

Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications – Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Note 3. CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

As of December 29, 2006, there were unlimited shares of no par authorized; 1,269,747 and 1,630,757 shares were outstanding at December 29, 2006, and December 30, 2005, respectively.

Transactions in capital shares were as follows:

 

Shares

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Period December 1, 2005, Through December 30, 2005

Shares sold

36,398

2,283

Shares issued on reinvestment of dividends

10,011

12,473

Shares redeemed

(407,419)

(47,848)

Net increase (decrease)

(361,010)

(33,092)

Note 4.  ACQUISITION OF FUND

The IPS Funds held a special meeting of shareholders of the IPS Millennium Fund and IPS New Frontier Fund (the “Funds”), at the office of IPS Advisory, Inc. [9111 Cross Park Dr., Suite E-120, Knoxville, TN 37923], on March 30, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time, as adjourned from time to time (the “Meeting”), for the purposes listed:  to approve the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) between IPS Funds, on behalf of each of the Millennium Fund and the New Frontier Fund, and The Integrity Funds, another registered investment company, for itself and on behalf of Integrity Growth & Income Fund (“Growth & Income Fund”), a series of the Integrity Funds and to consider and act upon any other business as may properly come before the Meeting.  After careful consideration, the Trustees of the IPS Funds unanimously approved each of the proposals and recommended that shareholde rs vote “FOR” the proposals.  The IPS Funds Board of Trustees fixed the close of business on January 31, 2005, as the record date for determining shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting.  Each share of a Fund was entitled to one vote for each dollar invested with respect to each proposal.  The Investment Advisory Agreement of the Integrity Growth & Income Fund was approved by the shareholders on April 22, 2005.  The reorganization was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of 1,885,183.819 shares of Integrity Growth & Income Fund for the 1,885,183.819 shares of IPS Millennium Fund on April 22, 2005.  The reorganization was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of 97,619.986 shares of Integrity Growth & Income Fund for the 342,663.871 shares of IPS New Frontier Fund on April 22, 2005.  IPS Millennium Fund’s net assets of $54,123,326 on April 22, 2005, including $154,232 of unrealized appreciation, were reorganized into the Integrity Growth and Income Fund.  IPS New Frontier Fund’s net assets of $2,803,419 on April 22, 2005, including $85,871 of unrealized depreciation, were reorganized into the Integrity Growth and Income Fund.  This resulted in total net assets of $56,926,745 for the Integrity Growth & Income Fund at end of day April 22, 2005.

Note 5.  INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.

The Advisory Agreement provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 1.00% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.  The Fund has recognized $202,436 of investment advisory fees after a partial waiver for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Money Management of $19,116 at December 29, 2006 for investment advisory fees.  Certain officers and trustees of the Fund are also officers and directors of the Adviser.

The Adviser has contractually agreed until March 31, 2007 to waive its management fee and to reimburse expenses, other than extraordinary or non-recurring expenses, so that the Net Annual Operating Expenses of the Integrity Growth & Income Fund do not exceed 1.60%.  Thereafter, the expense limitation may be terminated or revised.  Amounts waived or reimbursed in a particular fiscal year may be recouped by the Adviser within three years of the waiver or reimbursement to the extent that recoupment will not cause operating expenses to exceed any expense limitation in place at that time.  An expense limitation lowers expense ratios and increases returns to investors.

Principal Underwriter and Shareholder Services

Integrity Funds Distributor serves as the principal underwriter for the Fund.  The Fund has adopted a distribution plan for each class of shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act.  Distribution plans permit the Fund to reimburse its principal underwriter for costs related to selling shares of the Fund and for various other services.  These costs, which consist primarily of commissions and service fees to broker-dealers who sell shares of the Fund, are paid by shareholders through expenses called “Distribution Plan expenses.”  The Fund currently pays an annual distribution fee of up to 0.50% of the average daily net assets of the class.  Distribution Plan expenses are calculated daily and paid monthly.  The Fund has recognized $120,557 of distribution fees after partial waiver for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Funds Distributor of $9,404 at December 29, 2006 for distribution fees.

Integrity Fund Services, the transfer agent, provides shareholder services for a variable fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum of $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $114,725 of transfer agency fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $7,523 at December 29, 2006 for transfer agency fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s accounting services agent for a monthly fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000, and a variable fee equal to 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, together with reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional accounting services fee of $500 per month will be charged by Integrity Fund Services for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $47,987 of accounting service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $3,814 at December 29, 2006 for accounting service fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s administrative services agent for a variable fee equal to 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus out-of-pocket expenses.  The Fund will pay an additional minimum fee of $500 per month for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $90,614 of adm inistrative service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $5,642 at December 29, 2006 for administrative service fees.

Note 6. INVESTMENT SECURITY TRANSACTIONS

The cost of purchases and proceeds from the sale of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) aggregated $37,665,278 and $47,349,375, respectively, for the year ended December 29, 2006.

Note 7. INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES

At December 29, 2006, the aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same for financial reporting purposes at $43,159,570.  The net unrealized appreciation of investments based on the cost was $3,158,328, which is comprised of $4,033,778 aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and $875,450 aggregate gross unrealized depreciation.

Note 8. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.  This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted  accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Fund is presently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157.


Financial Highlights December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Period December 1, 2005, Through December 30, 2005

 

For The Year Ended November 30, 2005

 

For The Year Ended November 30, 2004 (A)

 

For The Year Ended November 30, 2003 (A)

 

For The Year Ended November 30, 2002 (A)

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

31.98

$

31.74

$

29.11

$

26.03

$

22.43

$

29.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

.32

$

.01

$

.23

$

.41

$

.08

$

(.07)

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

4.49

 

.24

 

3.11

 

2.78

 

3.52

 

(6.93)

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

4.81

$

.25

$

3.34

$

3.19

$

3.60

$

(7.00)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

(.29)

$

(.01)

$

(.71)

$

(.11)

$

.00

$

.00

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

(.01)

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

Total Distributions

$

(.30)

$

(.01)

$

(.71)

$

(.11)

$

.00

$

.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

36.49

$

31.98

$

31.74

$

29.11

$

26.03

$

22.43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Return

 

15.04%(B)

 

9.58%(B)(E)

 

11.60%(B)

 

12.28%

 

16.05%

 

(23.79%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

46,334

$

52,148

$

52,804

$

67,259

$

79,384

$

94,643

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

1.56%(C)

 

1.50%(C)(E)

 

1.46%(C)

 

1.40%

 

1.40%

 

1.34%

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

0.84%

 

0.41%(E)

 

0.66%

 

1.48%

 

0.36%

 

(0.27%)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

94.23%

 

9.66%

 

107.61%(D)

 

77.87%

 

169.37%

 

209.20%

(A) The financial highlights as set forth herein reflect the historical financial highlights of IPS Millennium Fund.  The assets of IPS Millennium Fund were acquired by Integrity Growth & Income Fund as of the close of business on April 22, 2005.  In connection with such acquisition, the shares of IPS Millennium Fund were exchanged for shares of Integrity Growth & Income Fund.

(B) Excludes maximum sales charge of 5.75%.

(C) During the periods since April 22, 2005, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. assumed/waived expenses of $400,347, $40,314, and $259,259, respectively. If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 2.39%, 2.41% and 1.91%, respectively.  During the periods prior to April 22, 2005, IPS Advisory, Inc. did not assume/waive any expenses.

(D) Calculation excludes the value of securities acquired by the IPS New Frontier Fund of $622,238 in purchases and $2,123,907 in sales for the period.

(E) Ratio is annualized.

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Integrity Growth & Income Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the Integrity Growth & Income Fund (one of the portfolios constituting The Integrity Funds), including the schedule of investments as of December 29, 2006, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for the year ended December 29, 2006 and the period of December 1, 2005 through December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the year ended December 29, 2006, the period of December 1, 2005, through December 30, 2005, and for the year ended November 30, 2005.  These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.  The financial highlights for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2004, were audited by o ther auditors who expressed unqualified opinions on those financial highlights.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 29, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Integrity Growth & Income Fund of The Integrity Funds as of December 29, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for the year ended December 29, 2006 and the period of December 1, 2005 through December 30, 2005, and financial highlights for the year ended December 29, 2006, the period of December 1, 2005, through December 30, 2005, and for the year ended November 30, 2005, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BRADY, MARTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Minot, North Dakota  USA

February 12, 2007

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed is the report of the operations for the Integrity Health Sciences Fund (the "Fund") for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund's portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.

Stock market performance was relatively strong in the first few months of the year, peaking on May 9th, followed by a significant pullback, forming a double bottom in June and July. Various gauges of inflation have been contained, but fear of renewed inflation remains a concern. Commodity prices moved up sharply over the last three years and are likely to continue rising for the balance of the current economic expansion, albeit at a more moderate rate. There is increasing evidence to suggest that world economies are entering a new long term inflationary cycle; characterized by gradual but ever rising prices for virtually everything – not just commodities. Such inflationary pressures are typical of the latter stages of shorter-term cyclical economic expansions, similar to the current expansionary environment. Global appetites will be the key driver of higher energy prices, although short term set backs in price are bound to occur, caused by factors such as mild winter weather across much of the U.S.

The Fund (+3.81%*) slightly underperformed its benchmark in 2006, but did quite well in the final quarter of the year. Kos Pharmaceuticals was sold in Novemberfollowing a tender offer by Abbott at better than a 50% premium (almost double our cost).  Andrx (Pharmaceuticals - sold) benefited from an acquisition proposal from Watson Pharmaceuticals. Merck’s (Pharmaceuticals) price has continued the upward trend that began late in 2005. Investors seem encouraged by the combination of management changes, new products, cost reductions, and some favorable outcomes in the ongoing Vioxx litigation. Boston Scientific performed poorly. Factors include product recalls and negative articles concerning drug eluting stent safety and defibrillator malfunction disclosure (by Boston’s recently acquired Guidant unit) that appeared in the media. Boston’s recent downward revision of third quarter earnings and outlook for its Taxus stents al so had negative implications for Angiotech Pharmaceuticals (sold). When viewed versus the benchmark, we are overweight Healthcare Facilities and Biotechnology. We are underweight Healthcare Distributors, Managed Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals. Our non-healthcare related holdings had mixed results, Anixter (sold) and Cisco Systems provided strong performance, Hyperion Solutions (sold) and Intel performed poorly.

We manage the Fund using our quantitative intelligent expert system for stock selection. The portfolio is focused on profitable healthcare stocks that areexpected increased unit volume beneficiaries.These are typicallyenterprises that are in the process of launching high demand proprietary products, or other firms, cyclical or otherwise, that are experiencing an improved outlook. Such usually leads to upward revisions in earnings estimates and superior investment performance. We do not have significant exposure to speculative, money losing biotechnology stocks. We like to think of ourselves as investors in profitable companies, not speculators.

We continue to evaluate the portfolio and make adjustments as market conditions warrant, focusing on companies that are experiencing “positive change” while still selling at reasonable valuations. At the end of December 2006, the portfolio had an average forward P/E ratio of approximately 17, a consensus future earnings growth rate of just under 16% and an average ROE of about 18%.

With recent advances in gene mapping, technology and a significant expansion of new solutions to health issues, participants in the Fund have potential to take advantage of strong performance.

If you would like more frequent updates, visit our website at www.integrityfunds.com for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.

Sincerely,

F. Martin Koenig, CFA

The views expressed are those of F. Martin Koenig, Senior Portfolio Manager with Integrity Mutual Funds.  The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally, or any Integrity Mutual Fund.

*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance.

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

PROXY VOTING ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-276-1262.  A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.  This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC's”) website at www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

The Fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semi-annual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the Fund's second and fourth fiscal quarters on the Form N-CSR(S).  The annual and semi-annual reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the Fund’s shareholders.  The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C., and the information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-942-8090.  You may also access this information from Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.


Terms & Definitions  December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

American Depository Receipt

A negotiable certificate representing a given number of shares of stock in a foreign corporation.  It is bought and sold in the American securities markets, just as stock is traded.

Appreciation

Increase in the value of an asset.

Average Annual Total Return

A standardized measurement of the return (appreciation) earned by a fund on an annual basis.

Consumer Price Index

A commonly used measure of inflation; it does not represent an investment return.

Depreciation

Decrease in the value of an asset.

Load

A mutual fund whose shares are sold with a sales charge added to the net asset value.

Market Value

Actual price at which a fund trades in the market place.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

The value of all your fund’s assets, minus any liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares, not including any initial or contingent deferred sales charge.

Offering Price

The price at which a mutual fund’s share can be purchased.  The offering price per share is the current net asset value plus any sales charge.

Total Return

Measures both the net investment income and any realized and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of the underlying investments in the fund’s portfolio for the period, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.  It represents the aggregate percentage or dollar value change over the period.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPOSITION

PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS

(As a % of Net Assets)

HC - Healthcare

68.2%

O - Other

11.3%

T - Technology

10.7%

S - Services

6.8%

E - Energy

3.0%

Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.

These percentages are subject to change.

TOP TEN HOLDINGS

(As a % of Net Assets)

1.

Merck & Co.

8.3%

2.

Amgen, Inc.

8.2%

3.

Boston Scientific Corp.

7.4%

4.

Caremark RX, Inc.

6.8%

5.

WellPoint Inc.

6.6%

6.

Lifepoint Hospitals, Inc.

6.4%

7.

Genzyme Corp.

5.2%

8.

Biomet, Inc.

4.9%

9.

Wyeth

4.9%

10.

Community Health Systems

4.8%

The Fund’s holdings are subject to change at any time.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

DISCLOSURE OF FUND EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

EXAMPLE

As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs:  (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses.  This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.  The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

The example illustrates the Fund’s costs in two ways:

Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses.  You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.  Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return.  The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.  You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds.  To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. 

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees.  Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.  In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

Beginning Account Value 06/30/06

Ending Account Value 12/29/06

Expenses Paid During Period*

Actual

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,110.23

$13.90

Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,011.82

$13.26

*Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 2.65% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 179/360 days.  The Fund’s ending account value on the first line in the table is based on its actual total return of 11.02% for the six-month period of June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS

 

For periods ending December 29, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Integrity Health Sciences Fund

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(June 19, 2000)

Without Sales Charge

3.81%

6.64%

1.30%

N/A

1.98%

With Sales Charge (5.75%)

(2.19%)

4.56%

0.11%

N/A

1.06%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Lipper Health/Biotechnology Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(June 19, 2000)

 

4.80%

9.29%

4.68%

N/A

3.94%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

S&P 500 Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(June 19, 2000)

 

15.79%

10.44%

6.19%

N/A

0.95%

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemption of Fund shares.

The Fund's performance prior to September 19, 2003, was achieved while the Fund was managed by another investment adviser, who used different investment strategies and techniques, which may produce different investment results than those achieved by the current investment adviser. The Willamette Asset Managers, Inc., served as investment adviser to the Fund from April 1, 2001 to September 19, 2003.  Prior to April 1, 2001, The Coventry Group served as investment adviser to the Fund.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPARATIVE INDEX GRAPH

Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Integrity Health Sciences Fund, Lipper Health/Biotechnology Index, and the S&P 500 Index

 

Integrity Health Sciences Fund w/o Sales Charge

Integrity Health Sciences Fund w/Max Sales Charge

Lipper Health/ Biotechnology Index

S&P 500 Index

 

 

06/19/00

$10,000

$  9,425

$10,000

$10,000

2000

$11,683

$11,012

$11,431

$  8,937

2001

$10,657

$10,044

$10,235

$  7,875

2002

$  7,169

$  6,757

$  7,553

$  6,135

2003

$  9,376

$  8,837

$  9,859

$  7,894

2004

$  9,559

$  9,009

$11,016

$  8,753

2005

$10,952

$10,322

$12,280

$  9,183

2006

$11,369

$10,715

$12,869

$10,634

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The graph does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The graph comparing your Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how your Fund performed.  To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two.  Your Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees.  A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio.  Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results.  In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities necessary to match the index.  And, if they could, they would incur transaction costs and other expenses.  All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND

The Board of The Integrity Funds consists of four Trustees.  These same individuals, unless otherwise noted, also serve as directors or trustees for the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.  Three Trustees (75% of the total) have no affiliation or business connection with the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates.  These are the “independent” Trustees.  Two of the remaining three Trustees and/or Officers are “interested” by virtue of their affiliation with the Investment Adviser and its affiliates.

The Independent Trustees of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Independent Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Jerry M. Stai
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
54

Trustee

Since January 2006

Faculty, Embry-Riddle University (August 2000 to September 2005); Faculty, Park University (August 2005 to December 2005); Non-Profit Specialist, Bremer Bank (since July 2005); Faculty, Minot State University (since August 2000); Director ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., (since January 2006); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 2006).

16

Marycrest Franciscan Development, Inc.

Orlin W. Backes
15 2nd Ave., SW
Suite 305
Minot, ND 58701
71

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C.; Director, South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (until June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (Since April 2005); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); Director, First Western Bank & Trust.

16

First Western Bank & Trust

R. James Maxson
Town & Country Center
1015 S. Broadway
Suite 15
Minot, ND 58701
59

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, Maxson Law Office (since November 2002); Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C. (April 2000 to November 2002); Director, Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc. and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (since January 1999), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2003); and Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1999).

16

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

he Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

The Interested Trustees and executive officers of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Interested Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Robert E. Walstad2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
62

Trustee Chairman President

Since May 2003

Director (since September 1987), President (September 2002 to May 2003), CEO (Since September 2001), Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, President and Treasurer, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Director, President (since inception) and Treasurer (May 1989 to May 2004), ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc., (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds Inc., (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Trustee, Chairman, President and Treasurer (January 2006 to May 2004), Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1996) and The Integrity Funds (since May 2003); Director, President (until August 2003), CEO, and Treasurer, Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc.; Director (October 1999 to June 2003) Magic Internet Services, Inc.; Director (May 2000 to June 2003), President (October 2002 to June 2003), ARM Securities Corporation; Director, CEO, Chairman, (since January 2002) and President (September 2002 to December 2004), Capital Financial Services, Inc.

16

Capital Financial Services, Inc., and Minot Park Board

Peter A. Quist2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
72

Vice President Secretary

Since May 2003

Attorney; Director and Vice President, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc., Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc., ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); and Director, ARM Securities Corporation (May 2000 to June 2003).

3

None

Laura K. Anderson
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
32

Treasurer

Since October 2005

Fund Accountant (until May 2004), Fund Accounting Supervisor (May 2004 to October 2005), Fund Accounting Manager, Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (since October 2005), Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

Brent M. Wheeler
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
36

Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer

Since October 2005

Fund Accounting Manager (May 1998 through October 2005), Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (May 2004 to October 2005), Mutual Fund Compliance Officer (since October 2005) Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

2Trustees and/or officers who are “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.  Messr. Quist is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser and Principal Underwriter.  Messr. Walstad is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. (“the Company”),  the Fund’s sponsor.

The approval and the continuation of a fund’s investment advisory agreement must be specifically approved at least annually (1) by the vote of the trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the investment advisory agreement or “Interested Persons” of any party (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.  In preparation for the meeting, the Board requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by the Fund’s adviser.  The Independent Trustees also received advice from their independent counsel on the issues to focus on during contract renewals.  At a meeting held on October 25, 2006, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees of the Fund, approved the Management and Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”), between the Fundand Integrity Money Management. 

The Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are neither party to the Advisory Agreements nor “interested persons” of any such party (as such term is defined for regulatory purposes), unanimously approved the Advisory Agreement.  In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees requested information, provided by the Investment Adviser that it believed to be reasonably necessary to reach its conclusion.  In connection with the approval of the Advisory Agreements, the Board reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and Securities Exchange Commission directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts, which include but are not limited to, the following:

(a)

the nature and quality of services to be provided by the adviser to the fund;

(b)

the various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications;

(c)

the relevant fund’s investment performance as compared to standardized industry performance data;

(d)

the adviser’s costs and profitability of furnishing the investment management services to the fund;

(e)

the extent to which the adviser realizes economies of scale as the fund grows larger and the sharing thereof with the fund;

(f)

an analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds;

(g)

the expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds; and

(h)

information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds.

In evaluating the Adviser’s services and its fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of the Fund, the recent financial statements of the Adviser and its parent, and the proposed advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds.  In reviewing the Advisory Agreement with the foregoing Fund, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund’s past performance, the nature and quality of the services provided, the profitability of the Adviser and its parent (estimated costs and estimated profits from furnishing the proposed services to the Fund), and the expense waivers by the Adviser.  The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates for services provided to the Fund.  In this regard, the Trustees noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements involving the Adviser and the only benefits to affiliates were the fees earned for services provided.  The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-important or controlling.  The Trustees also considered the Adviser’s commitment to contractually or voluntarily limit Fund expenses, the skills and capabilities of the Adviser, and the representations from the Adviser that the Fund’s portfolio manager, F. Martin Koenig, will continue to manage the Fund in substantially the same way as it had been managed.

The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Investment Adviser currently provides services to sixteen funds in the Integrity family of funds with investment strategies ranging from non-diversified sector funds to broad-based equity funds.  The experience and expertise of the Investment Adviser is attributable to the long-term focus on managing investment companies and has the potential to enhance the Fund’s future performance. They have a strong culture of compliance and provide quality services. The overall nature and quality of the services provided by the Investment Adviser had historically been, and continues to be, adequate and appropriate to the Board.;

Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications:  The Portfolio Manager of the Fund has over 35 years experience in the advisory and money management area adding significant expertise to the Adviser of the Fund. A detailed biography of the portfolio manager was presented to the Trustees.  This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Fund.

Investment Performance:  The Adviser has assured through subsidization that its Fund has had consistent performance relative to comparable and competing funds.  The Fund has underperformed its relative benchmark for the YTD, 1-year, 5-year, 10-year and since inception periods as of September 29, 2006.  However, the Fund has positive returns for the 5-year, 10-year and since inception periods on the Class A shares as of September 29, 2006.  In addition, the Fund has been meeting its investment objective for providing long-term growth through capital appreciation. 

Profitability:  The Board has reviewed a year to date and a 12-month profit analysis spreadsheet completed by the controller of the investment adviser.  Based on the relatively small size of each fund under management with the Adviser, the Adviser has shown no profit for the period.  The Board determined that the profitability of the Adviser was not excessive based on the services it will provide for the Fund and the profit analysis spreadsheet presented by the Adviser.

Economies of Scale:  The Board briefly discussed the benefits for the Fund as the Adviser could realize economies of scale as the Fund grows larger, but the size of the Fund has not reached an asset level to benefit from economies of scale.  The advisory fees are structured appropriately based on the size of the Fund.  The Adviser has indicated that a new advisory fee structure may be looked at if the Fund reaches an asset level where the Fund could benefit from economies of scale.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds:  The Adviser is voluntarily waiving advisory fees due to the small size of the Fund.  The Board considered the compensation payable under the Advisory Agreement fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided.

Expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds: Although the Fund’s net expense ratio of 2.65% for the Class A shares was somewhat higher than other funds of similar objective and size, the Board found that the expense ratio was acceptable.

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds:  The Board noted that the Adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of Integrity Money Management, the strategic plan involving the Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  They determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders.

Potential Conflicts of Interest – Investment Adviser

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account.  More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds are presented with the following potential conflicts:

The management of multiple funds may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund.  The Investment Adviser seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having them focus on a particular investment discipline.  Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.  The management of multiple funds and accounts also may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts.

·

With respect to securities transactions for the Funds, the Investment Adviser determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty to seek best execution of the transaction.  The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for the Funds.

·

The appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Investment Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one fund but not all funds with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.  The management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds' code of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.  One of the portfolio manager's numerous responsibilities is to assist in the sale of Fund shares.  Mr. Koenig's compensation is based on salary paid every other week.  He is not compensated for client retention.   Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., sponsors a 401(k) plan for all its employees.  This plan is funded by employee elective deferrals and, to an extent, matching contributions by the Company. After one year of emp loyment the employee is eligible to participate in the Company matching program.  The Company matches 100% of contribution up to 3% and ½% for each additional percent contributed up to 5%. The Company has established an employee stock option program in which it will grant interests in Integrity Mutual Funds Inc., shares to current employees that meet certain eligibility requirements, as a form of long-term incentive.  The program is designed to allow all employees to participate in the long-term growth of the value of the firm.

·

Although the Portfolio Managers generally do not trade securities in their own personal account, each of the Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such trades would not adversely impact client accounts.  Nevertheless, the management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.

The Investment Adviser and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures, which are designed to address these types of conflicts.  However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.


Schedule of Investments December 29, 2006

Name of Issuer
Percentages represent the market value of each investment category to total net assets

 

Quantity

 

Market Value

 

 

 

 

COMMON STOCKS (88.7%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Communications Equipment (3.9%)

 

 

 

*Cisco Systems, Inc. 

6,000

$

163,980

 

 

 

 

Computer Hardware (4.4%)

 

 

 

Intel Corp. 

9,000

 

182,250

 

 

 

 

Drugs and Pharmaceuticals (35.9%)

 

 

 

*Amgen, Inc. 

5,000

 

341,550

Caremark RX, Inc. 

5,000

 

285,550

*Cephalon, Inc. 

2,500

 

176,025

Merck & Co. 

8,000

 

348,800

*Sciele Pharma, Inc. 

6,000

 

144,000

Wyeth 

4,000

 

203,680

 

 

 

1,499,605

Energy (3.0%)

 

 

 

Ensco International Inc. 

2,500

 

125,150

 

 

 

 

Healthcare (20.5%)

 

 

 

*Amsurg Corporation 

7,000

 

161,000

Biomet, Inc. 

5,000

 

206,350

*Genzyme Corp. 

3,500

 

215,530

*WellPoint Inc. 

3,500

 

275,415

 

 

 

858,295

Hospitals (11.2%)

 

 

 

*Community Health Systems 

5,500

 

200,860

*Lifepoint Hospitals, Inc. 

8,000

 

269,600

 

 

 

470,460

Medical Equipment (7.4%)

 

 

 

*Boston Scientific Corp. 

18,000

 

309,240

 

 

 

 

Semiconductor (2.4%)

 

 

 

Texas Instruments 

3,500

 

100,800

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (COST: $3,264,282)

$

3,709,780

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (11.9%)

Shares

 

 

Wells Fargo Advantage Investment Money Market (COST: $499,252)

499,252

$

499,252

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $3,763,534)

 

$

4,209,032

OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES

 

 

(28,944)

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

 

$

4,180,088

* Non-income producing

ADR – American Depository Receipt

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Assets and Liabilities  December 29, 2006

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

Investments in securities, at value (cost: $3,763,534)

$

4,209,032

 

Receivable for fund shares sold

 

150

 

Accrued dividends receivable

 

3,541

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

2,102

 

Receivable from manager

 

541

 

Prepaid expenses

 

1,334

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

$

4,216,700

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Payable for fund shares redeemed

$

18,703

 

Payable to affiliates

 

6,865

 

Accrued expenses

 

11,044

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

$

36,612

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

$

4,180,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets are represented by:

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

$

3,817,846

 

Accumulated undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments

 

(83,256)

 

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

445,498

 

Total amount representing net assets applicable to 373,940 outstanding shares of no par common stock (unlimited shares authorized)

$

4,180,088

 

 

 

Net asset value per share

$

11.18

Public Offering Price (based on sales charge of 5.75%)

$

11.86

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Operations  For the year ended December 29, 2006

INVESTMENT INCOME

 

 

 

Interest

$

34,219

 

Dividends

 

29,338

 

Total Investment Income

$

63,557

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

Investment advisory fees

$

72,179

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees

 

17,312

 

Transfer agent fees

 

23,934

 

Accounting service fees

 

26,941

 

Administrative service fees

 

23,934

 

Professional fees

 

7,216

 

Reports to shareholders

 

7,580

 

License, fees, and registrations

 

3,488

 

Audit fees

 

8,050

 

Insurance expense

 

2,529

 

Trustees fees

 

1,824

 

Transfer agent out-of-pockets

 

343

 

Other fees

 

470

 

Total Expenses

$

195,800

 

Less expenses waived or absorbed by the Fund’s manager

 

(36,406)

 

Total Net Expenses

$

159,394

 

 

 

NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)

$

(95,837)

 

 

 

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions

$

950,161

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments

 

(755,248)

 

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

$

194,913

 

 

 

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS

$

99,076

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the year ended December 29, 2006 and the year ended December 30, 2005

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

(95,837)

$

(174,336)

 

Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

950,161

 

1,637,278

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

(755,248)

 

(180,646)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Operations

$

99,076

$

1,282,296

 

 

 

 

 

DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

0

$

0

 

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions

 

0

 

0

 

Total Dividends and Distributions

$

0

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of shares

$

202,623

$

289,646

 

Proceeds from reinvested dividends

 

0

 

0

 

Cost of shares redeemed

 

(4,537,919)

 

(6,281,526)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Capital Share Transactions

$

(4,335,296)

$

(5,991,880)

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS

$

(4,236,220)

$

(4,709,584)

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

8,416,308

 

13,125,892

NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD

$

4,180,088

$

8,416,308

Undistributed Net Investment Income

$

0

$

0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Notes to Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Note 1.  ORGANIZATION

The Integrity Health Sciences Fund (the “Fund”) is an investment portfolio of The Integrity Funds (the “Trust”) registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a non-diversified, open-end management investment company.  The Trust may offer multiple portfolios; currently seven portfolios are offered.  On September 19, 2003,the Integrity Health Sciences Fund became a series of The Integrity Funds Trust.  Prior to this the Fund was part of the Willamette Funds Group.  The Willamette Funds were organized as a Delaware statutory trust on January 17, 2001, and were registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company.  Each of the Funds is also the successor to a fund of the same name that was a series of another registered investment company, The Coventry Group.  On March 16, 2001, the shar eholders of each of the predecessor funds approved their reorganization into The Willamette Funds, effective April 1, 2001.  The Willamette Funds offered four managed investment portfolios and were authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares.  The accompanying financial statements and financial highlights are those of the Integrity Health Sciences Fund.  The Fund seeks long term growth through capital appreciation.

Shares of the Fund are offered at net asset value plus a maximum sales charge of 5.75% and a distribution fee of up to 0.50% on an annual basis. 

Note 2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investment security valuation – Assets for which market quotations are available are valued as follows: (a) each listed security is valued at its closing price obtained from the respective primary exchange on which the security is listed, or, if there were no sales on that day, at its last reported current bid price; (b) each unlisted security is valued at the last current bid price obtained from the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.  All of these prices are obtained by the Administrator from services, which collect and disseminate such market prices. Prices provided by an independent pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices and may take into account appropriate factors such as institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market data.  In the abse nce of an ascertainable market value, assets are valued at their fair value as determined by the Administrator using methods and procedures reviewed and approved by the Trustees.

Repurchase agreements – In connection with transactions in repurchase agreements, it is the Fund’s policy that its custodian take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the fair value of which exceeds the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest, at all times.  If the seller defaults, and the fair value of the collateral declines, realization of the collateral by the Fund may be delayed or limited.

Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (“CDSC”) – In the case of investments of $1 million or more, a 1.00% CDSC may be assessed on shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase (excluding shares

Federal and state income taxes – It is the policy of the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined in applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized capital gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

 

 

December 29, 2006

 

December 30, 2005

Tax-exempt Income

$

0

$

0

Ordinary Income

 

0

 

0

Long-term Capital Gains

 

0

 

0

Total

$

0

$

0

During the years ended December 29, 2006, and December 30, 2005, no distributions were paid.

As of December 29, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed Ordinary Income

Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains

Accumulated Earnings

Accumulated Capital and Other Losses

Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation)

Total Accumulated Earnings/(Deficit)

$0

$0

$0

($83,256)

$445,498

$362,242

As of December 29, 2006, the Fund had capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized capital gains.  Any difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales.

Year

Unexpired Capital Losses

2011

$83,256

For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund did not make any permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character.  Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to expiring capital loss carryforwards.

Net capital losses incurred after October 31, and within the tax year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the Fund’s next taxable year.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund deferred to January 1, 2007, post October capital losses, post October currency losses and post October passive foreign investment company losses of $0.

Distributions to shareholders – Dividends from net investment income, declared yearly and paid yearly, are reinvested in additional shares of the Fund at net asset value or paid in cash.  Capital gains, when available, are distributed along with the net investment income dividend at the end of the calendar year. 

Other – Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis.  Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date for financial reporting purposes.  Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Distributions to shareholders are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date.  Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount, capital loss carryforwards and losses due to wash sales and futures transactions.

Permanent book and tax basis differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in capital.  Temporary book and tax basis differences will reverse in a subsequent period.

Dividend income – Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

Futures contracts – The Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts to hedge against changes in the values of equity securities the Fund owns or expects to purchase.

A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell units of a particular index at a set price on a future date.  Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with a broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the minimum “initial margin” requirement of the futures exchange on which the contract is traded.  Subsequent payments (“variation margin”) are made or received by the Fund, dependent on the fluctuations in the value of the underlying index.  Daily fluctuations in value are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the fund.  When entering into a closing transaction, the Fund will realize, for book purposes, a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contracts sold and the futures contracts to buy.  Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to open futures contracts are requi red to be treated as realized gain (loss) for federal income tax purposes.

Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts.  These risks may include changes in the value of the futures contracts that may not directly correlate with changes in the value of the underlying securities.

Use of estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications – Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Note 3.  CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

As of December 29, 2006, there were unlimited shares of no par authorized; 373,940 and 781,180 shares were outstanding at December 29, 2006, and December 30, 2005, respectively.

Transactions in capital shares were as follows:

 

Shares

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

Shares sold

18,880

28,212

Shares issued on reinvestment of dividends

0

0

Shares redeemed

(426,120)

(643,398)

Net increase (decrease)

(407,240)

(615,186)

Note 4.  INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Integrity Money Management, Inc., the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc., the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc., the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.

The Advisory Agreement provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 1.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.  The Fund has recognized $36,810 of investment advisory fees after a partial waiver for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Money Management of $0 at December 29, 2006 for investment advisory fees.  Certain officers and trustees of the Fund are also officers and directors of the Adviser.

The Adviser has contractually agreed until March 31, 2007 to waive its management fee and to reimburse expenses, other than extraordinary or non-recurring expenses, so that the Net Annual Operating Expenses of Integrity Health Sciences Fund do not exceed 2.65%.  After such date, the expense limitation may be terminated or revised.  Amounts waived or reimbursed in a particular fiscal year may be recouped by the Adviser within three years of the waiver or reimbursement to the extent that the recoupment will not cause operating expenses to exceed any expense limitation in place at the time.  An expense limitation lowers expense ratios and increases return to investors.

Principal Underwriter and Shareholder Services

Integrity Funds Distributor serves as the principal underwriter for the Fund.  The Fund has adopted a distribution plan for each class of shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act.  Distribution plans permit the Fund to reimburse its principal underwriter for costs related to selling shares of the Fund and for various other services.  These costs, which consist primarily of commissions and service fees to broker-dealers who sell shares of the Fund, are paid by shareholders through expenses called “Distribution Plan expenses.”  The Fund currently pays an annual distribution fee of up to 0.50% of the average daily net assets of the Fund.  Distribution Plan expenses are calculated daily and paid monthly.  The Fund has recognized $17,312 of service fee expenses for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Funds Distributor of $848 at December 29, 2006 for service f ees.

Integrity Fund Services, the transfer agent, provides shareholder services for a variable fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum of $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $23,934 of transfer agency fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $1,933 at December 29, 2006 for transfer agency fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s accounting services agent for a monthly fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000, and a variable fee equal to 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, together with reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional accounting services fee of $500 per month will be charged by Integrity Fund Services for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $26,941 of accounting service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $2,103 at December 29, 2006 for accounting service fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s administrative services agent for a variable fee equal to 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus out-of-pocket expenses.  The Fund will pay an additional minimum fee of $500 per month for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $23,934 of admi nistrative service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $1,933 at December 29, 2006 for administrative service fees.

Note 5.  INVESTMENT SECURITY TRANSACTIONS

The cost of purchases and proceeds from the sale of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) aggregated $843,467 and $4,998,766, respectively, for the year ended December 29, 2006.

Note 6.  INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES

At December 29, 2006, the aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same for financial reporting purposes at $3,763,534. The net unrealized appreciation of investments based on the cost was $445,498, which is comprised of $825,135 aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and $379,637 aggregate gross unrealized depreciation.

Note 7.  INVESTMENT RISKS

Risks of Health Sciences Companies – Because the Integrity Health Sciences Fund invests primarily in stocks of health sciences companies, it is particularly susceptible to risks associated with these companies.  The Integrity Health Sciences Fund’s performance will depend on the performance of securities of issuers in health sciences-related industries, which may differ from general stock market performance.  The products and services of health sciences companies may become rapidly obsolete due to technological and scientific advances.  In addition, governmental regulation may have a material effect on the demand for products and services of these companies, and new or amended regulations can adversely affect these issuers or the market value of their securities.  Finally, lawsuits or legal proceedings against these companies can adversely affect the value of their securities.

Note 8.  RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.  This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted  accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Fund is presently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157.


Financial Highlights  December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

 

For The Year Ended December 31, 2004

 

For The Period April 1, 2003 Through December 31, 2003

 

For The Year Ended March 31, 2003

 

For The Year Ended March 31, 2002

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

10.77

$

9.40

$

9.22

$

7.29

$

9.28

$

8.71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

(.26)

$

(.22)

$

(.26)

$

(.28)

$

(.26)

$

(.24)

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

.67

 

1.59

 

.44

 

2.21

 

(1.73)

 

0.94

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

.41

$

1.37

$

.18

$

1.93

$

(1.99)

$

0.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

(.13)

 

Total Distributions

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

(.13)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

11.18

$

10.77

$

9.40

$

9.22

$

7.29

$

9.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Return

 

3.81%(A)

 

14.57%(A)

 

1.95%(A)

 

26.47%(A)(D)

 

(21.44%)(A)

 

7.94%(A)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

4,180

$

8,416

$

13,126

$

16,358

$

14,343

$

22,255

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

2.65%(B)

 

2.65%(B)

 

2.65%(B)

 

4.59%(B)(C)

 

3.46%(B)

 

2.85%(B)

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

(1.59%)

 

(1.76%)

 

(2.34%)

 

(4.26%)(C)

 

(3.17%)

 

(2.46%)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

15.88%

 

30.10%

 

39.80%

 

20.40%

 

34.28%

 

68.38%

(A) Excludes maximum sales charge of 5.75%.

(B) During the periods since December 31, 2003, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. assumed/waived expenses of $36,406, $41,089, and $42,433, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 3.26%, 3.06% and 2.93%, respectively.  During the period April 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. and Willamette Asset Managers assumed/waived expenses of $28,935.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 4.84%.  During the periods prior to March 31, 2003, Willamette Asset Managers and The Coventry Group assumed/waived expenses of $32,026 and $47,186, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratios of total expenses to average net assets would have been 3.66% and 3.05%, respectively.

(C) Ratio is annualized.

(D) Ratio is not annualized. 

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Integrity Health Sciences Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the Integrity Health Sciences Fund (one of the portfolios constituting The Integrity Funds), including the schedule of investments as of December 29, 2006, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the years ended December 29, 2006, December 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, and the nine month period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.  The financial highlights for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2003, were audited by other auditors whose report dated May 22, 2003, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 29, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Integrity Health Sciences Fund of The Integrity Funds as of December 29, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the years ended December 29, 2006, December 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, and the nine month period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BRADY, MARTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Minot, North Dakota  USA

February 12, 2007

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed is the report of the operations for the Integrity High Income Fund (the “Fund”) for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund’s portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.

Performance

We are pleased to again provide you with steady returns, both relative and absolute.  Our investment philosophy based upon a three-discipline approach proves to work well in many environments, especially “down” markets.

Class of shares Return 2006 Index

Over/(Under) Performance

A 10.66%* 11.87%

(1.21%)

C 9.84%* 11.87%

(2.03%)

Market Environment

The High Yield market was relatively strong in 2006.  It “softened” a bit at times as higher interest rates and creeping inflation raise concerns about a potential increase in economic weakness to come.  The big example here is homebuilders, where we invested heavily.  Prices sagged through most of the year but began to rally at year-end. 

High Yield prefers an environment where credit quality remains solid throughout and default risk stays low.  We are most likely moving into a less certain time and selected sectors are already softening.  There is risk of spreads “widening” but to us, the risk is less overall than in the beginning of 2005.

Investment Strategies and Techniques

This never changes from fund letter to fund letter.  We essentially use three disciplines to invoke our desire for lower downside risk with relative upside participation:

1.

Balance Sheet Test:  As a banker would do, we require valuable assets as collateral.

2.

Yield Test:  There needs to be enough return (yield spread over the “risk free” treasury).

3.

Focused Portfolio:  We feel we add more value by only using our favourite picks and keeping a nimble number of names in the portfolio.  Just adding names to come with a minimum number of holdings adds risk, in our opinion.  If we had to keep 100 names for instance, numbers 95 through 100 would be the “bottom of the barrel” selections – fillers – with either higher risk or less return.  Furthermore, more holdings add systematic risk, or correlation with the market.

If you would like more frequent updates, visit our website at www.integrityfunds.com for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.

Sincerely,

Jeff Cummer

Senior Portfolio Manager & President

SMH Capital Advisors, Inc.

Certified Financial Planner

The views expressed are those of Jeff Cummer, Senior Portfolio Manager & President, SMH Capital Advisors, Inc. The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally, or any Integrity Mutual Fund.

*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance.

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

High yield securities are lower quality debt securities and are subject to greater risk of default or price changes due to changes in the credit quality of the issuer.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

PROXY VOTING ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-276-1262.  A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.  This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC's”) website at www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

The Fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semi-annual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the Fund's second and fourth fiscal quarters on the Form N-CSR(S).  The annual and semi-annual reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the Fund shareholders.  The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.  The Fund's Form N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C., and the information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-942-8090.  You may also access this information from Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.


Terms & Definitions  December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

Appreciation

The increase in value of an asset.

Average Annual Total Return

A standardized measurement of the return (yield and appreciation) earned by the fund on an annual basis.

Coupon Rate or Face Rate

The rate of interest payable annually, based on the face amount of the bond; expressed as a percentage.

Depreciation

The decrease in value of an asset.

Market Value

The actual (or estimated) price at which a bond trades in the market place.

Maturity

A measure of the term or life of a bond in years.  When a bond “matures,” the issuer repays the principal.

Multiple Classes of Shares

Although an individual mutual fund invests in only one portfolio of securities, it may offer investors several purchase options which are “classes” of shares.  Multiple classes permit shareholders to choose the fee structure that best meets their needs and goals.  Generally, each class will differ in terms of how and when sales charges and certain fees are assessed.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

The value of all your fund’s assets, minus any liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares, not including any initial or contingent deferred sales charge.

Offering Price

The price at which a mutual fund’s share can be purchased.  The offering price per share is the current net asset value plus any sales charge.

Quality Ratings

A designation assigned by independent rating companies to give a relative indication of a bond’s credit worthiness.  “AAA,” “AA,” “A,” and “BBB” indicate investment grade securities.  Ratings can range from a high of “AAA” to a low of “D”.

Total Return

Measures both the net investment income and any realized and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of the underlying investments in the fund’s portfolio for the period, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.  It represents the aggregate percentage or dollar value change over the period.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPOSITION

PORTFOLIO QUALITY RATINGS

(Based on Total Long-Term Investments)

B

58.9%

BB

12.7%

CCC

25.1%

NR

3.3%

Quality ratings reflect the financial strength of the issuer.  They are assigned by independent rating services such as Moody’s Investors Services and Standard & Poor’s. 

These percentages are subject to change.

KEY STATISTICS

A Shares

C Shares

12/30/2005 NAV (share value)

$10.07

12/30/2005 NAV (share value)

$10.09

12/29/2006 NAV

$10.20

12/29/2006 NAV

$10.22

Total Net Assets

$143,385,144

Number of Issues

43

Average Maturity

7.1 years


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

DISCLOSURE OF FUND EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

EXAMPLE

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:  (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses.  This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.  The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

The example illustrates the Fund’s costs in two ways:

Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses.  You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.  Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return.  The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.  You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds.  To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. 

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees.  Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.  In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

Beginning Account Value 06/30/06

Ending Account Value 12/29/06

Expenses Paid During Period*

Actual

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,054.41

$8.93

Class C

$1,000.00

$1,050.53

$12.74

Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,016.30

$8.77

Class C

$1,000.00

$1,012.57

$12.51

*For each class of the Fund, expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of each class (1.75% for Class A and 2.50% for Class C), multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 179/360 days.  Class A’s ending account value in the “Actual” section of the table is based on its actual total return of 5.44% for the six-month period June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.  Class C’s ending account value in the “Actual” section of the table is based on its actual total return of 5.05% for the six-month period of June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS

 

For periods ending December 29, 2006

 

Integrity High Income Fund

 

 

 

 

Since Inception (April 30, 2004)

Class A Shares

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

Without Sales Charge

10.66%

N/A

N/A

N/A

10.54%

With Sales Charge (4.25%)

5.92%

N/A

N/A

N/A

8.77%

Lehman Brothers High Yield Corporate Bond Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

Since Inception (April 30, 2004)

11.87%

N/A

N/A

N/A

8.96%

For periods ending December 29, 2006

Integrity High Income Fund

 

 

Since Inception (April 30, 2004)

Class C Shares

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

Without CDSC

9.84%

N/A

N/A

N/A

9.55%

With CDSC (1.00%)

8.84%

N/A

N/A

N/A

9.55%

Lehman Brothers High Yield Corporate Bond Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

Since Inception (April 30, 2004)

11.87%

N/A

N/A

N/A

8.96%

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemption of Fund shares.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPARATIVE INDEX GRAPH

Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Integrity High Income Fund and the Lehman Brothers High Yield Corporate Bond Index

Class A Shares

Integrity High Income Fund w/o Sales Charge

Integrity High Income Fund w/Max Sales Charge

Lehman Brothers High Yield Corporate Bond Index

04/30/04

$10,000

$  9,575

$10,000

2004

$10,981

$10,518

$10,934

2005

$11,803

$11,306

$11,233

2006

$13,061

$12,511

$12,567

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The graph does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The graph comparing your Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how your Fund performed.  To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two.  Your Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees.  A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio.  Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results.  In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities necessary to match the index.  And, if they could, they would incur transaction costs and other expenses.  All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND

The Board of The Integrity Funds consists of four Trustees.  These same individuals, unless otherwise noted, also serve as directors or trustees for the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.  Three Trustees (75% of the total) have no affiliation or business connection with the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates.  These are the “independent” Trustees.  Two of the remaining three Trustees and/or Officers are “interested” by virtue of their affiliation with the Investment Adviser and its affiliates.

The Independent Trustees of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Independent Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Jerry M. Stai
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
54

Trustee

Since January 2006

Faculty, Embry-Riddle University (August 2000 to September 2005); Faculty, Park University (August 2005 to December 2005); Non-Profit Specialist, Bremer Bank (since July 2005); Faculty, Minot State University (since August 2000); Director ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., (since January 2006); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 2006).

16

Marycrest Franciscan Development, Inc.

Orlin W. Backes
15 2nd Ave., SW
Suite 305
Minot, ND 58701
71

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C.; Director, South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (until June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (Since April 2005); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); Director, First Western Bank & Trust.

16

First Western Bank & Trust

R. James Maxson
Town & Country Center
1015 S. Broadway
Suite 15
Minot, ND 58701
59

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, Maxson Law Office (since November 2002); Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C. (April 2000 to November 2002); Director, Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc. and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (since January 1999), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2003); and Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1999).

16

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

The Interested Trustees and executive officers of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Interested Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Robert E. Walstad2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
62

Trustee Chairman President

Since May 2003

Director (since September 1987), President (September 2002 to May 2003), CEO (Since September 2001), Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, President and Treasurer, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Director, President (since inception) and Treasurer (May 1989 to May 2004), ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc., (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds Inc., (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Trustee, Chairman, President and Treasurer (January 2006 to May 2004), Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1996) and The Integrity Funds (since May 2003); Director, President (until August 2003), CEO, and Treasurer, Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc.; Director (October 1999 to June 2003) Magic Internet Services, Inc.; Director (May 2000 to June 2003), President (October 2002 to June 2003), ARM Securities Corporation; Director, CEO, Chairman, (since January 2002) and President (September 2002 to December 2004), Capital Financial Services, Inc.

16

Capital Financial Services, Inc., and Minot Park Board

Peter A. Quist2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
72

Vice President Secretary

Since May 2003

Attorney; Director and Vice President, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc., Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc., ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); and Director, ARM Securities Corporation (May 2000 to June 2003).

3

None

Laura K. Anderson
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
32

Treasurer

Since October 2005

Fund Accountant (until May 2004), Fund Accounting Supervisor (May 2004 to October 2005), Fund Accounting Manager, Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (since October 2005), Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

Brent M. Wheeler
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
36

Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer

Since October 2005

Fund Accounting Manager (May 1998 through October 2005), Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (May 2004 to October 2005), Mutual Fund Compliance Officer (since October 2005) Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

2Trustees and/or officers who are “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.  Messr. Quist is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser and Principal Underwriter.  Messr. Walstad is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.  SMH Capital Advisors, Inc. (“SMH”), is the Sub-Advisor to the Fund.

The approval and the continuation of a fund’s investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements must be specifically approved at least annually (1) by the vote of the trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the investment advisory agreement or “Interested Persons” of any party (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.  In preparation for the meeting, the Board requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by the Fund’s adviser.  The Independent Trustees also received advice from their independent counsel on the issues to focus on during contract renewals.  At a meeting held on October 25, 2006, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees of the Fund, approved the Management and Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”), between the Fund and Integrity Money Management and the Sub-Advisory Agreement, between the Advisor and SMH.

The Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are neither party to the Advisory or Sub-Advisory Agreements nor “interested persons” of any such party (as such term is defined for regulatory purposes), unanimously approved the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements.  In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Trustees requested information, provided by the Investment Adviser and each Sub-Adviser that it believed to be reasonably necessary to reach its conclusion.  In connection with the approval of the Advisory and Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Board reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts, which include but are not limited to, the following:

(a)

the nature and quality of services to be provided by the adviser to the fund;

(b)

the various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications;

(c)

the relevant fund’s investment performance as compared to standardized industry performance data;

(d)

the adviser’s costs and profitability of furnishing the investment management services to the fund;

(e)

the extent to which the adviser realizes economies of scale as the fund grows larger and the sharing thereof with the fund;

(f)

an analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds;

(g)

the expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds; and

(h)

information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds.

In evaluating the Adviser’s services and their fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of the Fund, the recent financial statements of the Adviser and its parent, and the proposed advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds.  In reviewing the Advisory Agreement with the foregoing Fund, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund’s past performance, the nature and quality of the services provided, the profitability of the adviser and its parent (estimated costs and estimated profits from furnishing the proposed services to the Fund), and the expense waivers by the Adviser.  The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates for services provided to the Fund.  In this regard, the Trustees noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements involving the Adviser or Su b-Advisor and the only benefits to affiliates were the fees earned for services provided.  The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-important or controlling.  The Trustees also considered the Adviser’s commitment to contractually or voluntarily limit Fund expenses, the skills and capabilities of the Adviser, and the representations from the Adviser that the High Income Fund’s portfolio managers, Jeffrey A. Cummer and Dwayne Moyers, will continue to manage the Fund in substantially the same way as it had been managed. 

The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Investment Adviser currently provides services to sixteen funds in the Integrity family of funds with investment strategies ranging from non-diversified sector funds to broad-based equity funds.  The experience and expertise of the Investment Adviser is attributable to the long-term focus on managing investment companies and has the potential to enhance the Fund’s future performance. They have a strong culture of compliance and provide quality services. The overall nature and quality of the services provided by the Investment Adviser had historically been, and continues to be, adequate and appropriate to the Board.

Profitability:  The Board has reviewed a year to date and a 12-month profit analysis spreadsheet completed by the controller of the investment adviser.  Based on the relatively small size of each fund under management with the Adviser, the Adviser has shown no profit for the period.  The Board determined that the profitability of the Adviser was not excessive based on the services it will provide for the Fund and the profit analysis spreadsheet presented by the Adviser.

Economies of Scale:  The Board briefly discussed the benefits for the Fund as the Adviser could realize economies of scale as the Fund grows larger, but the size of the Fund has not reached an asset level to benefit from economies of scale.  The advisory fees are structured appropriately based on the size of the Fund.  The advisor has indicated that a new advisory fee structure may be looked at if the Fund reaches an asset level where the Fund could benefit from economies of scale.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds:  The adviser is voluntarily waiving advisory fees due to the small size of the Fund.  The Board considered the compensation payable under the Advisory Agreement fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided.

Expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds:  The Fund’s net expense ratio of 1.75% for Class A shares and 2.50% for Class C shares was comparable to other funds of similar objective and size.

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds:  The Board noted that the Adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of Integrity Money Management, the strategic plan involving the Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  They determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Advisory Agreements would be in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders.

Sub-Advisory Agreement with SMH

In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement between the Investment Adviser and SMH with respect to the High Income Fund, the Trustees requested information from SMH that they believed to be reasonably necessary to reach their conclusion.  The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Sub-Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Board felt satisfied with the overall high quality of the personnel, operations, financial condition, investment management capabilities, methodologies and expected performance to be achieved by SMH.  Based on the review of SMH by the Investment Adviser Chief Compliance Officer of Integrity Money Management, Inc., including a review of the possible conflicts of interest, its code of ethics, and Advisory policy and procedure manual, the Board felt that the overall nature and quality of services are satisfactory. 

Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications: SMH has significant expertise in managing high yield corporate bond portfolios for separately managed accounts and the Integrity High Income Fund. A detailed biography of the portfolio managers was presented to the Trustees.  This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Fund. The Board is satisfied with SMH’s representations regarding its staffing and capabilities to manage the High Income Fund, including the retention of personnel with significant relevant portfolio management experience.

Investment Performance:  Although the Fund has outperformed its relative benchmark for the 1-year and since inception periods, it has underperformed its relative benchmark for the YTD period as of September 29, 2006. The Fund has positive returns for the periods mentioned above as of September 29, 2006.  In addition, the Fund has been meeting its investment objective for providing high current income with capital appreciation as a secondary objective.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds:  The Board considered the sub-advisory fees paid to SMH fair and reasonable, in light of the investment sub-advisory services expected to be provided, the anticipated costs of these services and the comparability of the sub-advisory fees to fees paid by comparable mutual funds. 

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds:  The Board noted that the Sub-adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Sub-adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of SMH, the strategic plan involving the High Income Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  Thus, the Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Sub-Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the High Income Fund and its shareholders.

Potential Conflicts of Interest – Investment Adviser and Investment Sub-Advisers

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account.  More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds are presented with the following potential conflicts:

The management of multiple funds may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund.  The Investment Adviser seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having them focus on a particular investment discipline.  Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.  The management of multiple funds and accounts also may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts.

·

With respect to securities transactions for the Funds, the Investment Adviser determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty to seek best execution of the transaction.  The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for the Funds.

·

The appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Investment Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one fund but not all funds with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.  The management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds' code of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.  One of the portfolio manager's numerous responsibilities is to assist in the sale of Fund shares.  As of December 31, 2006, both Jeffrey Cummer and Dwayne Moyers received compensation that is a combination of salary and a bonus based on profitability of SMH Capital Advisers, the Sub-Adviser.  The profitability bonus is based on a percentage of the profits of SMH over $1,000,000.  Since profits are expected to increase as assets increase, both Jeff Cumm er and Dwayne Moyers are expected to receive increased profits as a shareholder as Account assets (including, without limitation, the assets of the High Income Fund) increase.  Under the Sub-Advisory Agreement between Integrity Money Management and SMH Capital Advisers, SMH Capital Advisers will be entitled to an increase in its compensation as assets in the High Income Fund increase. 

·

Although the Portfolio Managers generally do not trade securities in their own personal account, each of the Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such trades would not adversely impact client accounts.  Nevertheless, the management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such conflicts. 

· In general, SMH Capital Advisers does not invest Accounts in private placements, IPOs or similar limited investment opportunities.  However, to the extent that either Jeffrey Cummer and Dwayne Moyers recommend a limited investment opportunity for multiple Accounts, SMH Capital Advisers has adopted a policy to allocate such limited opportunities pro rata based on account size, available cash or any other method determined to be fair by SMH Capital Advisers; provided, however, that SMH Capital Advisers may determine a minimum amount that accounts must be able to purchase to participate.

The Investment Adviser and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures, which are designed to address these types of conflicts.  However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Schedule of Investments December 29, 2006

Name of Issuer
Percentages represent the market value of each investment category to total net assets

Coupon Rate

Maturity

Principal Amount

 

Market Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

CORPORATE BONDS (90.7%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerospace & Defense (0.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

Spacehab 

5.500%

10/15/2010

1,095,000

$

862,142

 

 

 

 

 

 

Auto-Cars/Light Trucks (4.2%)

 

 

 

 

 

United Rentals North 

6.500

02/15/2012

6,087,000

 

6,010,913

 

 

 

 

 

 

Broadcast Serv/Program (8.8%)

 

 

 

 

 

Sirius Satellite Radio 

9.625

08/01/2013

6,460,000

 

6,355,025

XM Satellite Radio 

9.750

05/01/2014

6,264,000

 

6,232,680

 

 

 

 

 

12,587,705

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building-Residential/Commer (13.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

K Hovnanian Enterprises 

6.250

01/15/2016

600,000

 

562,500

Kimball Hill Inc. 

10.500

12/15/2012

6,205,000

 

5,770,650

M/I Homes Inc. 

6.875

04/01/2012

3,000,000

 

2,707,500

Standard Pacific Corporation 

6.250

04/01/2014

243,000

 

226,901

Tech Olympic USA, Inc. 

7.500

03/15/2011

243,000

 

201,690

Tech Olympic USA, Inc. 

7.500

01/15/2015

2,598,000

 

2,039,430

WCI Communities 

9.125

05/01/2012

1,234,000

 

1,184,640

WCI Communities Inc 

6.625

03/15/2015

2,018,000

 

1,740,525

William Lyon Homes 

10.750

04/01/2013

4,461,000

 

4,271,407

 

 

 

 

 

18,705,243

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino Hotels (17.1%)

 

 

 

 

 

155 E Tropicana LLC 

8.750

04/01/2012

6,504,000

 

5,577,180

Boyd Gaming Corp. 

6.750

04/15/2014

4,814,000

 

4,807,982

Magna Entertainment  

7.250

12/15/2009

1,304,000

 

1,244,661

MGM Mirage 

6.625

07/15/2015

6,128,000

 

5,852,240

Trump Entertainment Resorts 

8.500

06/01/2015

6,372,000

 

6,372,000

Wynn Las Vegas 

6.625

12/01/2014

705,000

 

700,594

 

 

 

 

 

24,554,657

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction Materials (4.2%)

 

 

 

 

 

US Concrete Inc. 

8.375

04/01/2014

6,187,000

 

6,047,793

 

 

 

 

 

 

Electronic Comp-Semicon (8.1%)

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Micro Devices 

7.750

11/01/2012

259,000

 

269,360

Amkor Technologies 

9.250

06/01/2016

735,000

 

718,463

Amkor Technologies, Inc. 

7.750

05/15/2013

5,140,000

 

4,741,650

Stoneridge Inc. 

11.500

05/01/2012

5,768,000

 

5,955,460

 

 

 

 

 

11,684,933

Finance - Auto Loans (4.5%)

 

 

 

 

 

Ford Motor Credit Co 

7.000

10/01/2013

6,658,000

 

6,392,339

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance - Invest Bnkr/Brkr (0.9%)

 

 

 

 

 

Labranche & Company 

11.000

05/15/2012

1,254,000

 

1,349,617

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food - Retail (3.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

Landry's Restaurant 

7.500

12/15/2014

4,347,000

 

4,249,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marine Services (1.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock 

7.750

12/15/2013

1,378,000

 

1,350,440

 

 

 

 

 

 

Medical - Hospitals (3.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

Tenet Healthcare  

6.875

11/15/2031

5,115,000

 

4,117,575

Tenet Healthcare Corp. 

9.875

07/01/2014

1,027,000

 

1,046,256

 

 

 

 

 

5,163,831

Miscellaneous Manufacturer (3.2%)

 

 

 

 

 

Propex Fabrics Inc. 

10.000

12/01/2012

5,118,000

 

4,523,033

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil Co. - Explor. & Prod. (5.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

Callon Petroleum 

9.750

12/08/2010

1,813,000

 

1,862,857

Clayton William Energy 

7.750

08/01/2013

6,746,000

 

6,189,455

 

 

 

 

 

8,052,312

Oil Refining & Marketing (1.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

United Refining 

10.500

08/15/2012

2,218,000

 

2,320,583

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recreational Centers (0.4%)

 

 

 

 

 

Town Sports International 

9.625

04/15/2011

581,000

 

610,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resorts - Themeparks (3.9%)

 

 

 

 

 

Six Flags Inc.  

8.875

02/01/2010

173,000

 

167,378

Six Flags Inc.  

9.750

04/15/2013

5,708,000

 

5,358,385

 

 

 

 

 

5,525,763

Retail - Jewelry (2.4%)

 

 

 

 

 

Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp 

8.375

06/01/2012

3,554,000

 

3,411,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retail - Major Dept Store (1.3%)

 

 

 

 

 

Toys R Us  

7.375

10/15/2018

2,367,000

 

1,917,270

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage/Warehousing (0.1%)

 

 

 

 

 

Mobile Mini Inc. 

9.500

07/01/2013

83,000

 

88,603

 

 

 

 

 

 

Telecom Services (2.8%)

 

 

 

 

 

Grande Communications 

14.000

04/01/2011

3,432,000

 

3,715,140

PacWest Telecom Inc. 

13.500

02/01/2009

1,179,000

 

353,700

 

 

 

 

 

4,068,840

Telephone-Integrated (0.4%)

 

 

 

 

 

Level 3 Communications Inc. 

11.000

03/15/2008

599,000

 

619,216

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS (COST: $130,263,601)

 

$

130,096,315

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (8.1%)

Shares

 

 

Wells Fargo Advantage Investment Money Market (COST: $11,550,912)

11,550,912

$

11,550,912

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $141,814,513)

 

$

141,647,227

 

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES

 

 

1,737,917

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

143,385,144

NET ASSETS

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Assets and LiabilitiesDecember 29, 2006

ASSETS

 

 

 

Investments in securities, at value (cost: $141,814,513)

$

141,647,227

 

Accrued dividends receivable

 

26,117

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

2,665,348

 

Receivable for fund shares sold

 

788,719

 

Prepaid expenses

 

48,762

 

Receivable for income taxes withheld

 

239

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

$

145,176,412

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Dividends payable

$

830,030

 

Disbursements in excess of demand deposit cash

 

441,786

 

Payable for fund shares redeemed

 

292,812

 

Payable to affiliates

 

211,063

 

Accrued expenses

 

15,577

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

$

1,791,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

$

143,385,144

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets are represented by:

 

 

 

Capital stock outstanding

$

143,552,430

 

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

(167,286)

 

Total amount representing net assets applicable to 14,047,515 outstanding shares of no par common stock (unlimited shares authorized)

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

143,385,144

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Assets Consist of:

 

 

 

Class A

$

101,544,885

 

Class C

$

41,840,259

 

Total Net Assets

$

143,385,144

 

 

 

 

Shares Outstanding:

 

 

 

Class A

 

9,954,975

 

Class C

 

4,092,540

 

 

 

 

Net Asset Value per share:

 

 

 

Class A

$

10.20

 

Class A – offering price (based on sales charge of 4.25%)

$

10.65

 

Class C

$

10.22

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Statement of Operations For the year ended December 29, 2006

INVESTMENT INCOME

 

 

 

Interest

$

8,793,313

 

Dividends

 

277,434

 

Total Investment Income

$

9,070,747

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

Investment advisory fees

$

985,899

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees Class A

 

164,250

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees Class C

 

321,872

 

Administrative service fees

 

203,163

 

Transfer agent fees

 

252,458

 

Accounting service fees

 

73,264

 

Transfer agent out-of-pockets

 

3,842

 

Custodian fees

 

13,803

 

Professional fees

 

48,997

 

Trustees fees

 

6,382

 

Reports to shareholders

 

18,137

 

Insurance expense

 

1,900

 

Legal fees

 

4,758

 

Audit fees

 

7,893

 

License, fees, and registrations

 

42,158

 

Total Expenses

$

2,148,776

 

Less expenses waived or absorbed by the Fund’s manager

 

(194,346)

 

Total Net Expenses

$

1,954,430

 

 

 

NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)

$

7,116,317

 

 

 

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions

$

1,955,734

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments

 

819,213

 

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

$

2,774,947

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS

$

9,891,264

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the year ended December 29, 2006 and the year ended December 30, 2005

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income

$

7,116,317

$

2,988,202

 

Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

1,955,734

 

1,268,464

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

819,213

 

(1,381,759)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Operations

$

9,891,264

$

2,874,907

 

 

 

 

 

DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A ($.76 and $.79, respectively)

$

(4,938,511)

$

(1,819,506)

 

Class C ($.69 and $.71, respectively)

 

(2,177,807)

 

(1,168,697)

 

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A ($.14 and $.21, respectively)

 

(1,383,377)

 

(771,538)

 

Class C ($.14 and $.21, respectively)

 

(572,357)

 

(496,926)

 

Total Dividends and Distributions

$

(9,072,052)

$

(4,256,667)

 

 

 

 

 

CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of shares:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

$

75,112,459

$

31,022,015

 

Class C

 

20,222,970

 

15,968,437

 

Proceeds from reinvested dividends:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

3,848,522

 

1,754,147

 

Class C

 

1,732,778

 

1,059,603

 

Cost of shares redeemed:

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

(15,682,402)

 

(5,284,315)

 

Class C

 

(4,789,665)

 

(1,116,750)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Capital Share Transactions

$

80,444,662

$

43,403,137

TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS

$

81,263,874

$

42,021,377

NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

62,121,270

 

20,099,893

NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD

$

143,385,144

$

62,121,270

Undistributed Net Investment Income

$

0

$

0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Notes to Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Note 1. ORGANIZATION

The Integrity High Income Fund (the “Fund”) is an investment portfolio of The Integrity Funds (the “Trust”) registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a non-diversified, open-end management investment company.  The Trust may offer multiple portfolios; currently seven portfolios are offered. The Fund seeks a high level of current income with capital appreciation as a secondary objective.  Fund commenced operations on April 30, 2004 under The Integrity Funds.  From its inception September 7, 1992 until February 9, 1998, The Integrity Funds were organized by the investment adviser as a Collective Investment Trust under New York Law and the regulations of the U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, participation in which was limited to qualified individual accounts such as IRAs and retirement and pension trusts.  On February 9, 1998, the Collective Investment Trust reorganized as a Delaware busine ss trust.  In connection with this reorganization, the name of the trust was changed from “Canandaigua National Collective Investment Fund for Qualified Trusts” to “The Canandaigua Funds.”  On March 3, 2003, the trust was renamed “The Integrity Funds”.

Class A shares are sold with an initial sales charge of 4.25% and a distribution fee of up to 0.25% on an annual basis.  Class C shares are sold without a sales charge and are subject to a distribution fee of up to 1.00% on an annual basis and a Contingent Deferred Sales Charge of 1.00% if shares are redeemed within 12 months of purchase.  The two classes of shares represent interests in the same portfolio of investments, have the same rights and are generally identical in all respects except that each class bears its separate distribution and certain other class expenses, and have exclusive voting rights with respect to any matter on which a separate vote of any class is required.

Note 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investment security valuation – Assets for which market quotations are available are valued as follows: (a) each listed security is valued at its closing price obtained from the respective primary exchange on which the security is listed, or, if there were no sales on that day, at its last reported current bid price; (b) each unlisted security is valued at the last current bid price obtained from the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.  All of these prices are obtained by the Administrator from services which collect and disseminate such market prices. Prices provided by an independent pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices and may take into account appropriate factors such as institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market data.  In the absen ce of an ascertainable market value, assets are valued at their fair value as determined by the Administrator using methods and procedures reviewed and approved by the Trustees.

Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (“CDSC”) – In the case of investments of $1 million or more, a 1.00% CDSC may be assessed on shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or distributions).

Federal and state income taxes – It is the policy of the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined in applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized capital gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

 

 

December 29, 2006

 

December 30, 2005

Tax-exempt Income

$

0

$

0

Ordinary Income

 

8,260,318

 

3,979,551

Long-term Capital Gains

 

811,734

 

277,116

Total

$

9,072,052

$

4,256,667

As of December 29, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed Ordinary Income

Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains

Accumulated Earnings

Accumulated Capital and Other Losses

Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation)

Total Accumulated Earnings/(Deficit)

$0

$0

$0

$0

($167,286)

($167,286)

For the for the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund did not make any permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character.

Net capital losses incurred after October 31, and within the tax year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the Fund’s next taxable year.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund deferred to January 1, 2007, post October capital losses, post October currency losses and post October passive foreign investment company losses of $0.

Multiple class allocations - The Fund simultaneously uses the settled shares method to allocate income and fund-wide expenses and uses the relative net assets method to allocate gains and losses.  Class-specific expenses, distribution fees, and any other items that are specifically attributable to a particular class are charged directly to such class.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, distribution fees were the only class-specific expenses.

Distributions to shareholders - Dividends from net investment income, declared daily and payable monthly, are reinvested in additional shares of the Fund at net asset value or paid in cash.  Capital gains, when available, are distributed along with the last income dividend of the calendar year.  Net investment income, other than distribution fees, are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the settled shares of each class.

Premiums and discounts - Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. 

Other - Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Distributions to shareholders are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount, capital loss carryforwards and losses due to wash sales and futures transactions.

Permanent book and tax basis differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in capital.  Temporary book and tax basis differences will reverse in a subsequent period.

Futures contracts - The Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts to hedge against changes in the values of tax-exempt municipal securities the Fund owns or expects to purchase.

A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell units of a particular index or a certain amount of U.S. Government or municipal securities at a set price on a future date.  Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with a broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the minimum “initial margin” requirement of the futures exchange on which the contract is traded.  Subsequent payments (“variation margin”) are made or received by the Fund, dependent on the fluctuations in the value of the underlying index.  Daily fluctuations in value are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund.  When entering into a closing transaction, the Fund will realize, for book purposes, a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contracts sold and the futures contracts to buy.  Unrealized apprecia tion (depreciation) related to open futures contracts is required to be treated as realized gain (loss) for Federal income tax purposes.

Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover initial margin requirements on open futures contracts are noted in the Schedule of Investments.  The Statement of Assets and Liabilities reflects a receivable or payable for the daily mark to market for variation margin.

Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts.  These risks may include changes in the value of the futures contracts that may not directly correlate with changes in the value of the underlying securities.

Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 3. CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

As of December 29, 2006, there were unlimited shares of no par authorized; 14,047,515 and 6,165,932 shares were outstanding at December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, respectively.

Transactions in capital shares were as follows:

 

Class A Shares

Class C Shares

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

Shares sold

7,358,845

3,021,763

1,975,863

1,551,490

Shares issued on reinvestment of dividends

377,363

172,284

169,530

103,975

Shares redeemed

(1,533,009)

(517,589)

(467,009)

(109,204)

Net increase (decrease)

6,203,199

2,676,458

1,678,384

1,546,261

Note 4. INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.  SMH Capital Advisors, Inc. (“SMH”), is the Sub-Adviser to the Fund.

The Advisory Agreement between the Fund and Integrity Money Management provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 1.00% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.  The Fund has recognized $791,553 of investment advisory fees after a partial waiver for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Money Management of $85,083 at December 29, 2006 for investment advisory fees.  Certain officers and trustees of the Fund are also officers and directors of the investment adviser. 

The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive its management fee and to reimburse expenses other than extraordinary or non-recurring expenses, so that the Net Annual Operating Expenses of the Integrity High Income Fund do not exceed 1.75% for the Class A shares and 2.50% for the Class C shares until March 31, 2007.  Thereafter, the expense limitation may be terminated or revised.  Amounts waived or reimbursed may be recouped by the Adviser within three years of the waiver or reimbursement to the extent that recoupment will not cause expenses to exceed any expense limitation in place at that time.  An expense limitation lowers expense ratios and increases returns to investors.

Principal Underwriter and Shareholder Services

Integrity Funds Distributor serves as the principal underwriter for the Fund.  The Fund has adopted a distribution plan for each class of shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act.  Distribution plans permit the Fund to reimburse its principal underwriter for costs related to selling shares of the Fund and for various other services.  These costs, which consist primarily of commissions and service fees to broker-dealers who sell shares of the Fund, are paid by shareholders through expenses called “Distribution Plan expenses.”  Class A currently pays an annual distribution fee of up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the class.  Class C currently pays an annual distribution fee of up to 1.00% of the average daily net assets of the class.  Distribution Plan expenses are calculated daily and paid monthly. 

For the year ended December 29, 2006, amounts paid or accrued to Integrity Funds Distributor and fees waived, if any, pursuant to Class A and Class C Distribution Plans were as follows:

 

12b-1 Fees Charged

12b-1 Fees Waived

Class A Shares

$164,250

$0

Class C Shares

$321,872

$0

Integrity Fund Services provides shareholder services for a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.25% of average net assets with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum of $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $252,458 of transfer agency fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $28,787 at December 29, 2006 for transfer agency fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s accounting services agent for a monthly fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000, and a variable fee equal to 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, together with reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additi onal accounting services fee of $500 per month will be charged by Integrity Fund Services for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $73,264 of accounting service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $7,021at December 29, 2006 for accounting service fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s administrative services agent for an annual fee equal to the rate of 0.20% of average daily net assets with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus out-of-pocket expenses.  The Fund will pay an additional minimum fee of $500 per month for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $203,163 of administrative service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $23,126 at December 29, 2006 for administrative service fees.

Note 5. INVESTMENT SECURITY TRANSACTIONS

The cost of purchases and proceeds from the sale of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) aggregated $104,140,589 and $35,352,818, respectively, for the year ended December 29, 2006.

Note 6. INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES

At December 29, 2006, the aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same for financial reporting purposes at $141,814,513. The net unrealized depreciation of investments based on the cost was $167,286, which is comprised of $2,618,074 aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and $2,785,360 aggregate gross unrealized depreciation.

Note 7.  RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.  This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted  accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Fund is presently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157.


Financial Highlights December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

Class A Shares

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

 

For The Period Since Inception (April 30, 2004) Through December 31, 2004

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

10.07

$

10.33

$

10.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

.76

$

.79

$

.57

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

.27

 

(.05)

 

.38

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

1.03

$

.74

$

.95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

(.76)

$

(.79)

$

(.57)

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

(.14)

 

(.21)

 

(.05)

 

Total Distributions

$

(.90)

$

(1.00)

$

(.62)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

10.20

$

10.07

$

10.33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Return

 

10.66%(A)

 

7.48%(A)

 

9.81%(A)(D)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

101,545

$

37,764

$

11,112

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

1.75%(B)

 

1.75%(B)

 

1.69%(B)(C)

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

7.49%

 

7.71%

 

7.20%(C)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

38.76%

 

31.69%

 

29.81%

(A) Excludes maximum sales charge of 4.25%

(B) During the periods indicated above, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., assumed/waived expenses of $130,316, $71,122, and $32,195, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 1.95%, 2.05%, and 3.00%, respectively.

(C) Ratio is annualized.

(D) Ratio is not annualized.

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Highlights December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

Class C Shares

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

 

For The Period Since Inception (April 30, 2004) Through December 31, 2004

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

10.09

$

10.36

$

10.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

.69

$

.71

$

.46

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

.27

 

(.06)

 

.41

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

.96

$

.65

$

.87

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

(.69)

$

(.71)

$

(.46)

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

(.14)

 

(.21)

 

(.05)

 

Total Distributions

$

(.83)

$

(.92)

$

(.51)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

10.22

$

10.09

$

10.36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Return

 

9.84%(A)

 

6.59%(A)

 

8.93%(A)(D)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

41,840

$

24,357

$

8,988

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

2.50%(B)

 

2.50%(B)

 

2.48%(B)(C)

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

6.75%

 

6.96%

 

6.83%(C)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

38.76%

 

31.69%

 

29.81%

(A) Excludes contingent deferred sales charge of 1.00%.

(B) During the periods indicated above, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. assumed/waived expenses of $64,030, $51,581 and $62,188, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 2.70%, 2.81%, and 4.26%, respectively.

(C) Ratio is annualized.

(D) Ratio is not annualized.

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Integrity High Income Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Integrity High Income Fund (one of the portfolios constituting The Integrity Funds), including the schedule of investments as of December 29, 2006, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the year ended December 29, 2006, the year ended December 30, 2005 and the period since inception (April 30, 2004) through December 31, 2004.  These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 29, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Integrity High Income Fund of The Integrity Funds as of December 29, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for the year ended December 29, 2006, the year ended December 30, 2005, and the period since inception (April 30, 2004) through December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BRADY, MARTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Minot, North Dakota   USA

February 12, 2007

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed is the report of the operations for the Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund (the "Fund") for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund's portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.

Stock market performance was relatively strong in the first few months of the year, peaking on May 9th, followed by a significant pullback, forming a double bottom in June and July. Various gauges of inflation have been contained, but fear of renewed inflation remains a concern. Commodity prices moved up sharply over the last three years and are likely to continue rising for the balance of the current economic expansion, albeit at a more moderate rate. There is increasing evidence to suggest that world economies are entering a new long term inflationary cycle; characterized by gradual but ever rising prices for virtually everything – not just commodities. Such inflationary pressures are typical of the latter stages of shorter-term cyclical economic expansions, similar to the current expansionary environment. Global appetites will be the key driver of higher energy prices, although short term set backs in price are bound to occur, caused by factors such as mild winter weather across much of the US.

The Fund (+7.73%*) slightly underperformed its benchmark in 2006, but did quite well in the final quarter of the year. Kos Pharmaceuticals was sold in Novemberfollowing a tender offer by Abbott at better than a 50% premium (almost double our cost).Andrx (Pharmaceuticals - sold) benefited from strong institutional buying followed by an acquisition proposal from Watson Pharmaceuticals. Maverick Tube (Oil & Gas Equipment – sold) agreed to be acquired by Tenaris SA. Other bright spots were: Anixter (Technology Distribution) and Agrium (Specialty Chemicals).Cisco, the leader in networking equipment was very strong. Angiotech (sold) fell on the negative revision to Boston Scientific’s third quarter outlook for its Taxus stents. When viewed versus the benchmark, we are underweight positions in Construction & Engineering, Industrial Machinery, Diversified Commercial Services, and Consumer Discretionary. We are currently overweight Chemicals, Trucking, Capital Markets, Insurance, Pharmaceuticals, Healthcare Providers & Facilities, Biotechnology, Semiconductor & Semiconductor Equipment, Wireless Telecom, and Electronic Equipment.

We manage the Fund using our quantitative intelligent expert system for stock selection. The portfolio is focused on profitable small and mid cap growth stocks that areexpected increased unit volume beneficiaries.These are typicallyenterprises that are in the process of launching high demand proprietary products, or other firms, cyclical or otherwise, that are experiencing an improved outlook. Such usually leads to upward revisions in earnings estimates and superior investment performance. We do not own speculative micro cap “Story Stocks”. We like to think of ourselves as investors in profitable companies, not speculators.

We focus on rapidly growing companies that were selling at reasonable P/E ratios. We continue to focus on companies that are experiencing “positive change”. At the end of December 2006, the portfolio had an average forward P/E ratio of approximately 14, a consensus future earnings growth rate of 16% and an average ROE of about 22%.

Smaller companies generally have much higher growth prospects than their larger competitors. For this and other reasons, we believe our portfolio is well positioned to take advantage of the expanding economy and current market conditions.

If you would like more frequent updates, visit our website at www.integrityfunds.com for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.

Sincerely,

F. Martin Koenig, CFA

The views expressed are those of F. Martin Koenig, Senior Portfolio Manager with Integrity Mutual Funds.  The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally, or any Integrity Mutual Fund.

*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance.

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The Fund invests in small and mid-sized companies.  Stocks of small and mid-sized companies are more sensitive to changing market conditions and, therefore, investing in such securities involves greater risk than investing in the securities of larger companies.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

PROXY VOTING ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-276-1262.  A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.  This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC's”) website at www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

The Fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semi-annual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the Fund's second and fourth fiscal quarters on the Form N-CSR(S).  The annual and semi-annual reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the Fund shareholders.  The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C., and the information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-942-8090.  You may also access this information from Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.


Terms & Definitions  December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

American Depository Receipt (ADR)

A negotiable certificate representing a given number of shares of stock in a foreign corporation.  It is bought and sold in the American securities markets, just as stock is traded.

Appreciation

Increase in the value of an asset.

Average Annual Total Return

A standardized measurement of the return (appreciation) earned by a fund on an annual basis.

Consumer Price Index

A commonly used measure of inflation; it does not represent an investment return.

Depreciation

Decrease in the value of an asset.

Load

A mutual fund whose shares are sold with a sales charge added to the net asset value.

Market Value

Actual price at which a fund trades in the market place.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

The value of all your fund’s assets, minus any liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares, not including any initial or contingent deferred sales charge.

Offering Price

The price at which a mutual fund’s share can be purchased.  The offering price per share is the current net asset value plus any sales charge.

Total Return

Measures both the net investment income and any realized and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of the underlying investments in the fund’s portfolio for the period, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.  It represents the aggregate percentage or dollar value change over the period.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPOSITION

PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS

(As a % of Net Assets)

HC – Healthcare

24.7%

T – Technology

24.5%

E – Energy

17.5%

F – Financial

9.5%

O – Other

8.8%

TR – Transportation

7.5%

BM – Basic Materials

4.3%

CG – Capital Goods

3.2%

Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.

These percentages are subject to change.

TOP TEN HOLDINGS

(As a % of Net Assets)

1.

Cephalon, Inc. 

6.7%

2.

Netease.com Inc. ADR 

6.4%

3.

Newfield Exploration 

6.2%

4.

E*Trade Financial Corp. 

5.5%

5.

Ensco International Inc. 

5.5%

6.

Cisco Systems, Inc. 

5.2%

7.

Biomet, Inc. 

4.8%

8.

Sciele Pharma, Inc. 

4.6%

9.

Community Health Systems 

4.5%

10.

Agrium Inc. 

4.3%

The Fund’s holdings are subject to change at any time.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

DISCLOSURE OF FUND EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

EXAMPLE

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:  (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses.  This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.  The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

The example illustrates the Fund’s costs in two ways:

Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses.  You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.  Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return.  The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.  You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds.  To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees.  Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.  In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

Beginning Account Value 06/30/06

Ending Account Value 12/29/06

Expenses Paid During Period*

Actual

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,062.51

$13.59

Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,011.82

$13.26

*Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 2.65%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 179/360 days.  The Fund’s ending account value on the first line in the table is based on its actual total return of 6.25% for the six-month period of June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS

 

For periods ending December 29, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(April 5, 1999)

Without Sales Charge

7.73%

10.46%

5.81%

N/A

9.46%

With Sales Charge (5.75%)

1.57%

8.31%

4.55%

N/A

8.62%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Lipper Small Cap Growth Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(April 5, 1999)

 

10.65%

8.90%

6.23%

N/A

7.77%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Russell 2000 Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(April 5, 1999)

 

18.37%

13.56%

11.38%

N/A

10.46%

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares. 

The Fund's performance prior to September 19, 2003, was achieved while the Fund was managed by another investment adviser, who used different investment strategies and techniques, which may produce different investment results than those achieved by the current investment adviser.  The Willamette Asset Managers, Inc., served as investment adviser to the Fund from April 1, 2001 to September 19, 2003.  Prior to April 1, 2001, The Coventry Group served as investment adviser to the Fund.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPARATIVE INDEX GRAPH

Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund, Lipper Small Cap Growth Index, and the Russell 2000 Index

 

Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund w/o Sales Charge

Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund w/Max Sales Charge

Lipper Small Cap Growth Index

Russell 2000 Index

 

 

04/05/99

$10,000

$  9,425

$10,000

$10,000

1999

$17,892

$16,863

$16,519

$12,673

2000

$17,327

$16,331

$15,155

$12,290

2001

$15,191

$14,318

$13,190

$12,596

2002

$11,467

$10,808

$  9,546

$10,016

2003

$14,946

$14,087

$13,820

$14,748

2004

$16,747

$15,784

$15,312

$17,452

2005

$18,698

$17,623

$16,129

$18,246

2006

$20,143

$18,985

$17,847

$21,598

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The graph does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The graph comparing your Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how your Fund performed.  To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two.  Your Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees.  A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio.  Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results.  In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities necessary to match the index.  And, if they could, they would incur transaction costs and other expenses.  All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND

The Board of The Integrity Funds consists of four Trustees.  These same individuals, unless otherwise noted, also serve as directors or trustees for the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.  Three Trustees (75% of the total) have no affiliation or business connection with the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates.  These are the “independent” Trustees.  Two of the remaining three Trustees and/or Officers are “interested” by virtue of their affiliation with the Investment Adviser and its affiliates.

The Independent Trustees of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Independent Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Jerry M. Stai
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
54

Trustee

Since January 2006

Faculty, Embry-Riddle University (August 2000 to September 2005); Faculty, Park University (August 2005 to December 2005); Non-Profit Specialist, Bremer Bank (since July 2005); Faculty, Minot State University (since August 2000); Director ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., (since January 2006); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 2006).

16

Marycrest Franciscan Development, Inc.

Orlin W. Backes
15 2nd Ave., SW
Suite 305
Minot, ND 58701
71

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C.; Director, South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (until June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (Since April 2005); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); Director, First Western Bank & Trust.

16

First Western Bank & Trust

R. James Maxson
Town & Country Center
1015 S. Broadway
Suite 15
Minot, ND 58701
59

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, Maxson Law Office (since November 2002); Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C. (April 2000 to November 2002); Director, Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc. and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (since January 1999), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2003); and Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1999).

16

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

The Interested Trustees and executive officers of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Interested Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Robert E. Walstad2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
62

Trustee Chairman President

Since May 2003

Director (since September 1987), President (September 2002 to May 2003), CEO (Since September 2001), Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, President and Treasurer, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Director, President (since inception) and Treasurer (May 1989 to May 2004), ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc., (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds Inc., (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Trustee, Chairman, President and Treasurer (January 2006 to May 2004), Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1996) and The Integrity Funds (since May 2003); Director, President (until August 2003), CEO, and Treasurer, Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc.; Director (October 1999 to June 2003) Magic Internet Services, Inc.; Director (May 2000 to June 2003), President (October 2002 to June 2003), ARM Securities Corporation; Director, CEO, Chairman, (since January 2002) and President (September 2002 to December 2004), Capital Financial Services, Inc.

16

Capital Financial Services, Inc., and Minot Park Board

Peter A. Quist2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
72

Vice President Secretary

Since May 2003

Attorney; Director and Vice President, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc., Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc., ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); and Director, ARM Securities Corporation (May 2000 to June 2003).

3

None

Laura K. Anderson
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
32

Treasurer

Since October 2005

Fund Accountant (until May 2004), Fund Accounting Supervisor (May 2004 to October 2005), Fund Accounting Manager, Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (since October 2005), Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

Brent M. Wheeler
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
36

Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer

Since October 2005

Fund Accounting Manager (May 1998 through October 2005), Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (May 2004 to October 2005), Mutual Fund Compliance Officer (since October 2005) Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

2Trustees and/or officers who are “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.  Messr. Quist is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser and Principal Underwriter.  Messr. Walstad is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. (“the Company”), the Fund’s sponsor.

The approval and the continuation of a fund’s investment advisory agreement must be specifically approved at least annually (1) by the vote of the trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the investment advisory agreement or “Interested Persons” of any party (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.  In preparation for the meeting, the Board requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by the Fund’s adviser.  The Independent Trustees also received advice from their independent counsel on the issues to focus on during contract renewals.  At a meeting held on October 25, 2006, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees of the Fund, approved the Management and Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”), between the Fundand Integrity Money Management.

The Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are neither party to the Advisory Agreements nor “interested persons” of any such party (as such term is defined for regulatory purposes), unanimously approved the Advisory Agreement.  In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees requested information, provided by the Investment Adviser that it believed to be reasonably necessary to reach its conclusion.  In connection with the approval of the Advisory Agreements, the Board reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and Securities and Exchange Commission directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts, which include but are not limited to, the following:

(a)

the nature and quality of services to be provided by the adviser to the fund;

(b)

the various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications;

(c)

the relevant fund’s investment performance as compared to standardized industry performance data;

(d)

the adviser’s costs and profitability of furnishing the investment management services to the fund;

(e)

the extent to which the adviser realizes economies of scale as the fund grows larger and the sharing thereof with the fund;

(f)

an analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds;

(g)

the expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds; and

(h)

information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds.

In evaluating the Adviser’s services and its fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of the Fund, the recent financial statements of the Adviser and its parent, and the proposed advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds.  In reviewing the Advisory Agreement with the foregoing Fund, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund’s past performance, the nature and quality of the services provided, the profitability of the Adviser and its parent (estimated costs and estimated profits from furnishing the proposed services to the Fund), and the expense waivers by the Adviser.  The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates for services provided to the Fund.  In this regard, the Trustees noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements involving the Adviser and the only benefits to affiliates were the fees earned for services provided.  The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-important or controlling.  The Trustees also considered the Adviser’s commitment to contractually or voluntarily limit Fund expenses, the skills and capabilities of the Adviser, and the representations from the Adviser that the Fund’s portfolio manager, F. Martin Koenig, will continue to manage the Fund in substantially the same way as it had been managed.

The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Investment Adviser currently provides services to sixteen funds in the Integrity family of funds with investment strategies ranging from non-diversified sector funds to broad-based equity funds.  The experience and expertise of the Investment Adviser is attributable to the long-term focus on managing investment companies and has the potential to enhance the Fund’s future performance. They have a strong culture of compliance and provide quality services. The overall nature and quality of the services provided by the Investment Adviser had historically been, and continues to be, adequate and appropriate to the Board. 

Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications:  The Portfolio Manager of the Fund has over 35 years experience in the advisory and money management area adding significant expertise to the Adviser of the Fund. A detailed biography of the portfolio manager was presented to the Trustees.  This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Fund.

Investment Performance:  The Adviser has assured through subsidization that its Fund has had consistent performance relative to comparable and competing funds.  The Fund has underperformed its relative benchmark for the YTD, 1-year, 5-year, 10-year and since inception periods as of September 29, 2006.  However, the Fund has positive returns for the 1-year, 5-year, 10-year and since inception periods on the Class A shares as of September 29, 2006.  In addition, the Fund has been meeting its investment objective for providing long-term growth of asset value through capital appreciation. 

Profitability:  The Board has reviewed a year to date and a 12-month profit analysis spreadsheet completed by the controller of the investment adviser.  Based on the relatively small size of each fund under management with the Adviser, the Adviser has shown no profit for the period.  The Board determined that the profitability of the Adviser was not excessive based on the services it will provide for the Fund and the profit analysis spreadsheet presented by the Adviser.

Economies of Scale:  The Board briefly discussed the benefits for the Fund as the Adviser could realize economies of scale as the Fund grows larger, but the size of the Fund has not reached an asset level to benefit from economies of scale.  The advisory fees are structured appropriately based on the size of the Fund.  The Adviser has indicated that a new advisory fee structure may be looked at if the Fund reaches an asset level where the Fund could benefit from economies of scale.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds:  The Adviser is voluntarily waiving advisory fees due to the small size of the Fund.  The Board considered the compensation payable under the Advisory Agreement fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided.

Expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds: Although the Fund’s net expense ratio of 2.65% for the Class A shares was somewhat higher than other funds of similar objective and size, the Board found that the expense ratio was acceptable.

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds:  The Board noted that the Adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of Integrity Money Management, the strategic plan involving the Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  They determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders.

Potential Conflicts of Interest – Investment Adviser

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account.  More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds are presented with the following potential conflicts:

The management of multiple funds may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund.  The Investment Adviser seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having them focus on a particular investment discipline.  Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.  The management of multiple funds and accounts also may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts.

·

With respect to securities transactions for the Funds, the Investment Adviser determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty to seek best execution of the transaction.  The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for the Funds.

·

The appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Investment Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one fund but not all funds with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.  The management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds' code of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.  One of the portfolio manager's numerous responsibilities is to assist in the sale of Fund shares.  Mr. Koenig's compensation is based on salary paid every other week.  He is not compensated for client retention.   Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., sponsors a 401(k) plan for all its employees.  This plan is funded by employee elective deferrals and, to an extent, matching contributions by t he Company. After one year of employment the employee is eligible to participate in the Company matching program.  The Company matches 100% of contribution up to 3% and ½% for each additional percent contributed up to 5%. The Company has established an employee stock option program in which it will grant interests in Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. shares to current employees that meet certain eligibility requirements, as a form of long-term incentive.  The program is designed to allow all employees to participate in the long-term growth of the value of the firm.

·

Although the Portfolio Managers generally do not trade securities in their own personal account, each of the Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such trades would not adversely impact client accounts.  Nevertheless, the management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.

The Investment Adviser and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures, which are designed to address these types of conflicts.  However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Schedule of Investments December 29, 2006

Name of Issuer

 

 

 

Percentages represent the market value of each investment category to total net assets

Quantity

 

Market Value

 

 

 

 

COMMON STOCKS (91.2%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Materials (5.9%)

 

 

 

CONSOL Energy, Inc. 

6,000

$

192,780

*Dril-Quip, Inc. 

6,000

 

234,960

 

 

 

427,740

 

 

 

 

Chemicals (4.3%)

 

 

 

Agrium Inc. 

10,000

 

314,900

 

 

 

 

Communications Equipment (5.2%)

 

 

 

*Cisco Systems, Inc. 

14,000

 

382,620

 

 

 

 

Computer Hardware (7.0%)

 

 

 

Intel Corp. 

14,500

 

293,625

*ManTech International 

6,000

 

220,980

 

 

 

514,605

 

 

 

 

Computer Services (6.4%)

 

 

 

*Netease.com Inc. ADR 

25,000

 

467,250

 

 

 

 

Diversified Electronic (1.9%)

 

 

 

*Anixter International Inc 

2,500

 

135,750

 

 

 

 

Drugs and Pharmaceuticals (11.3%)

 

 

 

*Cephalon, Inc. 

7,000

 

492,870

*Sciele Pharma, Inc. 

14,000

 

336,000

 

 

 

828,870

 

 

 

 

Energy (5.5%)

 

 

 

Ensco International Inc. 

8,000

 

400,480

 

 

 

 

Engineering (3.2%)

 

 

 

*Hovnanian Enterprises 

7,000

 

237,300

 

 

 

 

Financial (5.6%)

 

 

 

*Dime Bancorp Warrants 

20,400

 

2,958

*E*Trade Financial Corp. 

18,000

 

403,560

 

 

 

406,518

 

 

 

 

Healthcare (8.9%)

 

 

 

*Amsurg Corporation 

13,000

 

299,000

Biomet, Inc. 

8,500

 

350,795

 

 

 

649,795

 

 

 

 

Hospital (4.5%)

 

 

 

*Community Health Systems 

9,000

 

328,680

 

 

 

 

Insurance (3.9%)

 

 

 

Berkley (W.R.) 

8,250

 

284,708

 

 

 

 

Oil And Gas Operations (6.2%)

 

 

 

*Newfield Exploration 

9,800

 

450,310

 

 

 

 

Semiconductor (3.9%)

 

 

 

Texas Instruments, Inc. 

10,000

 

288,000

 

 

 

 

Transportation (7.5%)

 

 

 

Arkansas Best Corp. 

5,500

 

198,000

Hunt (JB) Transport 

5,000

 

103,850

*YRC Worldwide Inc. 

6,500

 

245,245

 

 

 

547,095

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (COST:  $5,405,267)

 

$

6,664,621

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (9.8%)

Shares

 

 

Wells Fargo Advantage Investment Money Market (COST: $718,571)

718,571

$

718,571

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST:  $6,123,838)

 

$

7,383,192

OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES

 

 

(74,740)

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

 

$

7,308,452

 

 

 

 

*Non-income producing

 

 

 

ADR - American Depository Receipt

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements; December 29, 2006

Statement of Assets and Liabilities December 29, 2006

ASSETS

 

 

 

Investments in securities, at value (cost: $6,123,838)

$

7,383,192

 

Accrued dividends receivable

 

881

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

3,032

 

Prepaid expenses

 

250

 

Receivable for fund shares sold

 

150

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

$

7,387,505

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Disbursement in excess of demand deposit cash

$

32,901

 

Accrued expenses

 

12,756

 

Payable to affiliates

 

13,971

 

Payable for fund shares redeemed

 

19,425

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

$

79,053

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

$

7,308,452

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets are represented by:

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

$

6,049,098

 

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

1,259,354

 

Total amount representing net assets applicable to

 

 

 

822,622 outstanding shares of no par common stock

 

 

 

(unlimited shares authorized)

$

7,308,452

 

 

 

Net Asset Value per share

$

8.88

Public Offering Price (based on sales charge of 5.75%)

$

9.42

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Operations For the year ended December 29, 2006

INVESTMENT INCOME

 

 

 

Interest

$

61,033

 

Dividends

 

34,536

 

Total Investment Income

$

95,569

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

Investment advisory fees

$

132,526

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees

 

55,219

 

Transfer agent fees

 

29,041

 

Accounting service fees

 

29,455

 

Administrative service fees

 

25,664

 

Professional fees

 

8,406

 

Reports to shareholders

 

9,412

 

Insurance expense

 

6,267

 

License, fees, and registrations

 

3,855

 

Audit fees

 

5,042

 

Trustees fees

 

2,095

 

Transfer agent out-of-pockets

 

280

 

Other fees

 

966

 

Total Expenses

$

308,228

 

Less expenses waived or absorbed by the Fund’s manager

 

(15,566)

 

Total Net Expenses

$

292,662

 

 

 

NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)

$

(197,093)

 

 

 

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions

$

2,591,567

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments

 

(1,651,327)

 

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

$

940,240

 

 

 

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS

$

743,147

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the year ended December 29, 2006 and the year ended December 30, 2005

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

(197,093)

$

(299,428)

 

Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

2,591,567

 

3,348,668

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

(1,651,327)

 

(1,372,352)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Operations

$

743,147

$

1,676,888

 

 

 

 

 

DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

0

$

0

 

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions ($4.29 and $3.10 respectively)

 

(2,394,746)

 

(3,061,875)

 

Total Dividends and Distributions

$

(2,394,746)

$

(3,061,875)

 

 

 

 

 

CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of shares

$

253,424

$

151,051

 

Proceeds from reinvested dividends

 

2,358,909

 

3,011,449

 

Cost of shares redeemed

 

(8,686,322)

 

(8,286,674)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Capital Share Transactions

$

(6,073,989)

$

(5,124,174)

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS

$

(7,725,588)

$

(6,509,161)

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

15,034,040

 

21,543,201

NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD

$

7,308,452

$

15,034,040

Undistributed Net Investment Income

$

0

$

0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Notes to Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Note 1.  ORGANIZATION

The Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund (the Fund) is an investment portfolio of The Integrity Funds (the “Trust”) registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment company.  The Trust may offer multiple portfolios; currently seven portfolios are offered.  On September 19, 2003, the Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund became a series of The Integrity Funds Trust.  Prior to this the Fund was a part of the Willamette Funds Group.  The Willamette Funds were organized as a Delaware statutory trust on January 17, 2001 and were registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company.  Each of the Funds is also the successor to a fund of the same name that was a series of another registered investment company, The Coventry Group.  On March 16, 2001, the shareholders of ea ch of the predecessor funds approved their reorganization into The Willamette Funds, effective April 1, 2001.  The Willamette Funds offered four managed investment portfolios and were authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares.  The accompanying financial statements and financial highlights are those of the Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund.  The Fund seeks to provide long-term growth through capital appreciation.

Shares are offered at net asset value plus a maximum sales charge of 5.75% and a distribution fee of up to 0.50% on an annual basis. 

Note 2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investment security valuation – Assets for which market quotations are available are valued as follows: (a) each listed security is valued at its closing price obtained from the respective primary exchange on which the security is listed, or, if there were no sales on that day, at its last reported current bid price; (b) each unlisted security is valued at the last current bid price obtained from the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.  All of these prices are obtained by the Administrator from services, which collect and disseminate such market prices. Prices provided by an independent pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices and may take into account appropriate factors such as institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market data.  In the abse nce of an ascertainable market value, assets are valued at their fair value as determined by the Administrator using methods and procedures reviewed and approved by the Trustees.

Repurchase agreements – In connection with transactions in repurchase agreements, it is the Fund’s policy that its custodian take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the fair value of which exceeds the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest, at all times.  If the seller defaults, and the fair value of the collateral declines, realization of the collateral by the Fund may be delayed or limited.

Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (“CDSC”) – In the case of investments of $1 million or more, a 1.00% CDSC may be assessed on shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or distributions).

Federal and state income taxes – It is the policy of the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined in applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized capital gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

 

 

December 29, 2006

 

December 30, 2005

Tax-exempt Income

$

0

$

0

Ordinary Income

 

114,382

 

0

Long-term Capital Gains

 

2,280,364

 

3,061,875

Total

$

2,394,746

$

3,061,875

As of December 29, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed Ordinary Income

Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains

Accumulated Earnings

Accumulated Capital and Other Losses

Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation)

Total Accumulated Earnings/(Deficit)

$0

$0

$0

$0

$1,259,354

$1,259,354

As of December 29, 2006, the Fund did not have net capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized capital gains.  Any difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales.

For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund did not make any permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character.  Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to expiring capital loss carryforwards.

Net capital losses incurred after October 31, and within the tax year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the Fund’s next taxable year.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund deferred to January 1, 2007 post October capital losses, post October currency losses and post October passive foreign investment company losses of $0.

Distributions to shareholders – Dividends from net investment income, declared yearly and paid yearly, are reinvested in additional shares of the Fund at net asset value or paid in cash.  Capital gains, when available, are distributed along with the net investment income dividend at the end of the calendar year. 

Other - Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date for financial reporting purposes.  Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis.  Distributions to shareholders are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date.  Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount, capital loss carryforwards and losses due to wash sales and futures transactions.

Permanent book and tax basis differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in capital.  Temporary book and tax basis differences will reverse in a subsequent period.

Dividend income – Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

Futures contracts – The Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts to hedge against changes in the values of equity securities the Fund owns or expects to purchase.

A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell units of a particular index at a set price on a future date.  Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with a broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the minimum “initial margin” requirement of the futures exchange on which the contract is traded.  Subsequent payments (“variation margin”) are made or received by the Fund, dependent on the fluctuations in the value of the underlying index.  Daily fluctuations in value are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the fund.  When entering into a closing transaction, the Fund will realize, for book purposes, a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contracts sold and the futures contracts to buy.  Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to open futures contracts are requi red to be treated as realized gain (loss) for federal income tax purposes.

Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts.  These risks may include changes in the value of the futures contracts that may not directly correlate with changes in the value of the underlying securities.

Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications – Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Note 3.  CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

As of December 29, 2006, there were unlimited shares of no par authorized; 822,622 and 1,233,638 shares were outstanding at December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, respectively.

Transactions in capital shares were as follows:

 

Shares

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

Shares sold

19,874

10,767

Shares issued on reinvestment of dividends

263,565

245,032

Shares redeemed

(694,455)

(598,400)

Net increase (decrease)

(411,016)

(342,601)

Note 4.  INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.

The Advisory Agreement provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 1.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.  The Fund has recognized $116,960 of investment advisory fees after a partial waiver for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Money Management of $4,798 at December 29, 2006 for investment advisory fees.  Certain officers and trustees of the Fund are also officers and directors of the Adviser.

The Adviser has contractually agreed until March 31, 2007 to waive its management fee and to reimburse expenses, other than extraordinary or non-recurring expenses, so that the Net Annual Operating Expenses of the Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund do not exceed 2.65%.  After such a date, the expense limitation may be terminated or revised.  Amounts waived or reimbursed in a particular fiscal year may be recouped by the Adviser within three years of the waiver or reimbursement to the extent that recoupment will not cause operating expenses to exceed any expense limitation in place at that time.  An expense limitation lowers expense ratios and increases returns to investors.

Principal Underwriter and Shareholder Services

Integrity Funds Distributor serves as the principal underwriter for the Fund.  The Fund has adopted a distribution plan for each class of shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act.  Distribution plans permit the Fund to reimburse its principal underwriter for costs related to selling shares of the Fund and for various other services.  These costs, which consist primarily of commissions and service fees to broker-dealers who sell shares of the Fund, are paid by shareholders through expenses called “Distribution Plan expenses.”  The Fund currently pays an annual distribution fee of up to 0.50% of the average daily net assets of the class.  Distribution Plan expenses are calculated daily and paid monthly.  The Fund has recognized $55,219 of distribution fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Funds Distributor of $2,996 at December 29, 2006 for service f ees.

Integrity Fund Services, the transfer agent, provides shareholder services for a variable fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum of $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $29,041 of transfer agency fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $1,933 at December 29, 2006 for transfer agency fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s accounting services agent for a monthly fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000, and a variable fee equal to 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, together with reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional accounting services fee of $500 per month will be charged by Integrity Fund Services for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $29,455 of accounting service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $2,233 at December 29, 2006 for accounting service fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s administrative services agent for a variable fee equal to 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum of $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $25,664 of administrative service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $1,933 at December 29, 2006 for administrative service fees.

Note 5.  INVESTMENT SECURITY TRANSACTIONS

The cost of purchases and proceeds from the sale of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) aggregated $2,511,573 and $10,575,661, respectively, for the year ended December 29, 2006.

Note 6.  INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES

At December 29, 2006, the aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same for financial reporting purposes at $6,123,838.  The net unrealized appreciation of investments based on the cost was $1,259,354, which is comprised of $1,535,868 aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and $276,514 aggregate gross unrealized depreciation.

Note 7.  RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.  This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted  accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Fund is presently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157.


Financial Highlights  December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

 

For The Year Ended December 31, 2004

 

For The Period April 1, 2003 Through December 31, 2003

 

For The Year Ended March 31, 2003

 

For The Year Ended March 31, 2002

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

12.19

$

13.67

$

12.20

$

8.94

$

12.54

$

12.93

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

(.24)

$

(.24)

$

(.31)

$

(.34)

$

(.29)

$

(.26)

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

1.22

 

1.86

 

1.78

 

3.60

 

(3.31)

 

.73

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

.98

$

1.62

$

1.47

$

3.26

$

(3.60)

$

.47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

(4.29)

 

(3.10)

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

(.86)

 

Total Distributions

$

(4.29)

$

(3.10)

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

(.86)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

8.88

$

12.19

$

13.67

$

12.20

$

8.94

$

12.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Return

 

7.73%(A)

 

11.65%(A)

 

12.05%(A)

 

36.47%(A)(D)

 

(28.71%)(A)

 

4.02%(A)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

7,308

$

15,034

$

21,543

$

23,485

$

19,099

$

31,528

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

2.65%(B)

 

2.65%(B)

 

2.65%(B)

 

4.45%(B)(C)

 

3.13%(B)

 

2.64%(B)

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

(1.78%)

 

(1.76%)

 

(2.19%)

 

(3.89%)(C)

 

(2.67%)

 

(2.09%)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

25.71%

 

28.64%

 

58.45%

 

59.04%

 

27.74%

 

52.13%

(A) Excludes maximum sales charge of 5.75%.

(B) During the periods since December 31, 2003, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., assumed/waived expenses of $15,566, $15,012, and $53,156, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratios of total expenses to average net assets would have been 2.79%, 2.74%, and 2.89%, respectively. During the period April 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., and Willamette Asset Managers assumed/waived expenses of $4,713.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratios of total expenses to average net assets would have been 4.47%. During the periods prior to March 31, 2003, Willamette Asset Managers and The Coventry Group waived expenses of $46,274 and $62,878, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratios of total expenses to average net assets would have been 3.33% and 2.84%, respectively.

(C) Ratio is annualized.

(D) Ratio is not annualized.

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund (one of the portfolios constituting The Integrity Funds), including the schedule of investments as of December 29, 2006, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the years ended December 29, 2006, December 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, and the nine month period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.  The financial highlights for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2003 were audited by other auditors whose report dated May 22, 2003 expressed an u nqualified opinion on those financial highlights.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 29, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Integrity Small Cap Growth Fund of The Integrity Funds as of December 29, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the years ended December 29, 2006, December 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, and the nine month period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BRADY, MARTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Minot, North Dakota  USA

February 12, 2007

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed is the report of the operations for the Integrity Technology Fund (the “Fund”) for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund's portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.

Stock market performance was relatively strong in the first few months of the year, peaking on May 9th, followed by a significant pullback, forming a double bottom in June and July. Various gauges of inflation have been contained, but fear of renewed inflation remains a concern. Commodity prices moved up sharply over the last three years and are likely to continue rising for the balance of the current economic expansion, albeit at a more moderate rate. There is increasing evidence to suggest that world economies are entering a new long term inflationary cycle; characterized by gradual but ever rising prices for virtually everything – not just commodities. Such inflationary pressures are typical of the latter stages of shorter-term cyclical economic expansions, similar to the current expansionary environment. Global appetites will be the key driver of higher energy prices, although short term set backs in price are bound to occur, caused by factors such as mild winter weather across much of the U.S.

The Fund (+9.43%*) outperformed its benchmark indices in 2006 as well as for the trailing 3 years and 5 years. Kos Pharmaceuticals was sold in Novemberfollowing a tender offer by Abbott at better than a 50% premium (almost double our cost).Andrx (Pharmaceuticals –sold) benefited from an acquisition proposal from Watson Pharmaceuticals. Our better performers include: America Movil (Wireless Telecom), which continues to grow its subscriber base in Latin America. Trimble Navigation, a provider of GPS equipment and solutions performed well. Anixter (sold) the world’s leading distributor of communications products also performed well. Intel and Boston Scientific performed poorly. Boston’s recent downward revision of third quarter earnings also had negative implications for Angiotech Pharmaceuticals (sold). Intel’s prior negative performance has recently reversed, as its new line of semiconductors has come on-line.  Also hurting performance was Labor Ready (sold).When viewed versus the benchmark, we are overweight Wireless Telecom, Electronic Equipment, and Electronic Manufacturing. We also have significant Healthcare holdings. We are underweight Data Processing, Systems Software, Internet Software, Computer Hardware, Computer Storage, Semiconductors, and Integrated Telecom.

We manage the Fund using our quantitative intelligent expert system for stock selection. The portfolio is focused on profitable technology stocks that areexpected increased unit volume beneficiaries.These are typicallyenterprises that are in the process of launching high demand proprietary products, or other firms, cyclical or otherwise, that are experiencing an improved outlook. Such usually leads to upward revisions in earnings estimates and superior investment performance. We do not own speculative micro cap “Story Stocks” and “Hot New Issues” that don’t have a real business franchise, reminiscent of the “Dot Com” era of 1999 and early 2000. We like to think of ourselves as investors in profitable companies, not speculators.

We focus on investment in rapidly growing companies with good price momentum selling at reasonable P/E ratios. We continue to evaluate the portfolio and make adjustments as market conditions warrant, focusing on companies that are experiencing “positive change”. At the end of December 2006, the portfolio had an average forward P/E ratio of approximately 17, a consensus future earnings growth rate of 16% and an average ROE of 30%.

Contrary to popular belief, the tech’s are likely to be the driving force behind the current economic expansion and for decades to come. Participants in the Technology Fund should continue to benefit from these trends.

If you would like more frequent updates, visit our website at www.integrityfunds.com for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.

Sincerely,

F. Martin Koenig, CFA

The views expressed are those of F. Martin Koenig, Senior Portfolio Manager with Integrity Mutual Funds.  The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally, or any Integrity Mutual Fund.

*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance.

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.


December 29, 2006(Unaudited)

PROXY VOTING ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-276-1262.  A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.  This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC's”) website at www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

The Fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semi-annual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the Fund's second and fourth fiscal quarters on the Form N-CSR(S).  The annual and semi-annual reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the Fund’s shareholders.  The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C., and the information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-942-8090.  You may also access this information from Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.


Terms & Definitions  December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

American Depository Receipt

A negotiable certificate representing a given number of shares of stock in a foreign corporation.  It is bought and sold in the American securities markets, just as stock is traded.

Appreciation

Increase in the value of an asset.

Average Annual Total Return

A standardized measurement of the return (appreciation) earned by a fund on an annual basis.

Consumer Price Index

A commonly used measure of inflation; it does not represent an investment return.

Depreciation

Decrease in the value of an asset.

Load

A mutual fund whose shares are sold with a sales charge added to the net asset value.

Market Value

Actual price at which a fund trades in the market place.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

The value of all your fund’s assets, minus any liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares, not including any initial or contingent deferred sales charge.

Offering Price

The price at which a mutual fund’s share can be purchased.  The offering price per share is the current net asset value plus any sales charge.

Total Return

Measures both the net investment income and any realized and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of the underlying investments in the fund’s portfolio for the period, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.  It represents the aggregate percentage or dollar value change over the period.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPOSITION

PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS

(as a % of Net Assets)

T – Technology

38.1%

H – Healthcare

32.5%

O – Other

18.0%

S – Services

4.2%

F – Financial

3.7%

E – Energy

3.5%

Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.

These percentages are subject to change.

TOP TEN HOLDINGS

(as a % of Net assets)

1.

Intel Corp. 

7.1%

2.

Netease.com Inc. ADR 

6.5%

3.

Harris Corp 

6.4%

4.

Merck & Co. 

5.1%

5.

Texas Instruments, Inc. 

5.0%

6.

Biomet, Inc. 

4.8%

7.

Cisco Systems, Inc. 

4.5%

8.

Genzyme Corp. 

4.3%

9.

America Movil SA ADR 

4.2%

10.

Cephalon, Inc. 

4.1%

The Fund’s holdings are subject to change at any time


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

DISCLOSURE OF FUND EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

EXAMPLE

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:  (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other Fund expenses.  This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.  The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

The example illustrates the Fund’s costs in two ways:

Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses.  You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.  Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return.  The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.  You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds.  To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. 

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees.  Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.  In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

Beginning Account Value 06/30/06

Ending Account Value 12/29/06

Expenses Paid During Period*

Actual

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,102.91

$13.86

Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,011.82

$13.26

*Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 2.65%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 179/360 days.  The Fund’s ending account value on the first line in the table is based on its actual total return of 10.29% for the six-month period of June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS

 

For periods ending December 29, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception (March 2, 2000)

Integrity Technology Fund

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

Without Sales Charge

9.43%

10.34%

2.35%

N/A

(21.15%)

With Sales Charge (5.75%)

3.14%

8.17%

1.13%

N/A

(21.83%)

 

Lipper Science & Technology Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

Since Inception (March 2, 2000)

 

6.73%

5.40%

0.76%

N/A

(13.46%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nasdaq 100 Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

Since Inception (March 2, 2000)

 

6.79%

6.17%

2.18%

N/A

(12.08%)

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The Fund's performance prior to September 19, 2003, was achieved while the Fund was managed by another investment adviser, who used different investment strategies and techniques, which may produce different investment results than those achieved by the current investment adviser.  The Willamette Asset Managers, Inc., served as investment adviser to the Fund from April 1, 2001 to September 19, 2003. Prior to April 1, 2001, The Coventry Group served as investment adviser to the Fund.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPARATIVE INDEX GRAPH

Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Integrity Technology Fund, the Lipper Science & Technology Index, and the Nasdaq 100 Index

 

Integrity Technology Fund w/o Sales Charge

Integrity Technology Fund w/Max Sales Charge

Lipper Science & Technology Index

Nasdaq 100 Index

03/02/2000

$10,000

$  9,425

$10,000

$10,000

2000

$  3,953

$  3,725

$  5,497

$  5,530

2001

$  1,757

$  1,656

$  3,588

$  3,725

2002

$  1,003

$     945

$  2,103

$  2,325

2003

$  1,469

$  1,385

$  3,183

$  3,467

2004

$  1,679

$  1,583

$  3,314

$  3,829

2005

$  1,801

$  1,698

$  3,492

$ 3,885

2006

$ 1,973

$ 1,860

$ 3,727

$ 4,149

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The graph does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The graph comparing your Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how your Fund performed.  To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two.  Your Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees.  A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio.  Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results.  In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities necessary to match the index.  And, if they could, they would incur transaction costs and other expenses.  All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND

The Board of The Integrity Funds consists of four Trustees.  These same individuals, unless otherwise noted, also serve as directors or trustees for the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.  Three Trustees (75% of the total) have no affiliation or business connection with the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates.  These are the “independent” Trustees.  Two of the remaining three Trustees and/or Officers are “interested” by virtue of their affiliation with the Investment Adviser and its affiliates.

The Independent Trustees of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Independent Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Jerry M. Stai
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
54

Trustee

Since January 2006

Faculty, Embry-Riddle University (August 2000 to September 2005); Faculty, Park University (August 2005 to December 2005); Non-Profit Specialist, Bremer Bank (since July 2005); Faculty, Minot State University (since August 2000); Director ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., (since January 2006); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 2006).

16

Marycrest Franciscan Development, Inc.

Orlin W. Backes
15 2nd Ave., SW
Suite 305
Minot, ND 58701
71

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C.; Director, South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (until June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (Since April 2005); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); Director, First Western Bank & Trust.

16

First Western Bank & Trust

R. James Maxson
Town & Country Center
1015 S. Broadway
Suite 15
Minot, ND 58701
59

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, Maxson Law Office (since November 2002); Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C. (April 2000 to November 2002); Director, Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc. and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (since January 1999), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2003); and Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1999).

16

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited) 

The Interested Trustees and executive officers of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Interested Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Robert E. Walstad2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
62

Trustee Chairman President

Since May 2003

Director (since September 1987), President (September 2002 to May 2003), CEO (Since September 2001), Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, President and Treasurer, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Director, President (since inception) and Treasurer (May 1989 to May 2004), ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc., (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds Inc., (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Trustee, Chairman, President and Treasurer (January 2006 to May 2004), Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1996) and The Integrity Funds (since May 2003); Director, President (until August 2003), CEO, and Treasurer, Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc.; Director (October 1999 to June 2003) Magic Internet Services, Inc.; Director (May 2000 to June 2003), President (October 2002 to June 2003), ARM Securities Corporation; Director, CEO, Chairman, (since January 2002) and President (September 2002 to December 2004), Capital Financial Services, Inc.

16

Capital Financial Services, Inc., and Minot Park Board

Peter A. Quist2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
72

Vice President Secretary

Since May 2003

Attorney; Director and Vice President, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc., Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc., ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); and Director, ARM Securities Corporation (May 2000 to June 2003).

3

None

Laura K. Anderson
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
32

Treasurer

Since October 2005

Fund Accountant (until May 2004), Fund Accounting Supervisor (May 2004 to October 2005), Fund Accounting Manager, Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (since October 2005), Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

Brent M. Wheeler
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
36

Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer

Since October 2005

Fund Accounting Manager (May 1998 through October 2005), Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (May 2004 to October 2005), Mutual Fund Compliance Officer (since October 2005) Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

2Trustees and/or officers who are “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.  Messr. Quist is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser and Principal Underwriter.  Messr. Walstad is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. (“the Company”), the Fund’s sponsor.

The approval and the continuation of a fund’s investment advisory agreement must be specifically approved at least annually (1) by the vote of the trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the investment advisory agreement or “Interested Persons” of any party (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.  In preparation for the meeting, the Board requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by the Fund’s adviser.  The Independent Trustees also received advice from their independent counsel on the issues to focus on during contract renewals.  At a meeting held on October 25, 2006, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees of the Fund, approved the Management and Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”), between the Fundand Integrity Money Management. 

The Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are neither party to the Advisory Agreements nor “interested persons” of any such party (as such term is defined for regulatory purposes), unanimously approved the Advisory Agreement.  In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees requested information, provided by the Investment Adviser that it believed to be reasonably necessary to reach its conclusion.  In connection with the approval of the Advisory Agreements, the Board reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and Securities and Exchange Commission directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts, which include but are not limited to, the following:

(a)

the nature and quality of services to be provided by the adviser to the fund;

(b)

the various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications;

(c)

the relevant fund’s investment performance as compared to standardized industry performance data;

(d)

the adviser’s costs and profitability of furnishing the investment management services to the fund;

(e)

the extent to which the adviser realizes economies of scale as the fund grows larger and the sharing thereof with the fund;

(f)

an analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds;

(g)

the expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds; and

(h)

information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds.

In evaluating the Adviser’s services and its fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of the Fund, the recent financial statements of the Adviser and its parent, and the proposed advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds.  In reviewing the Advisory Agreement with the foregoing Fund, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund’s past performance, the nature and quality of the services provided, the profitability of the Adviser and its parent (estimated costs and estimated profits from furnishing the proposed services to the Fund), and the expense waivers by the Adviser.  The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates for services provided to the Fund.  In this regard, the Trustees noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements involving the Adviser and the only benefits to affiliates were the fees earned for services provided.  The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-important or controlling.  The Trustees also considered the Adviser’s commitment to contractually or voluntarily limit Fund expenses, the skills and capabilities of the Adviser, and the representations from the Adviser that the Fund’s portfolio manager, F. Martin Koenig, will continue to manage the Fund in substantially the same way as it had been managed. 

The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Investment Adviser currently provides services to sixteen funds in the Integrity family of funds with investment strategies ranging from non-diversified sector funds to broad-based equity funds.  The experience and expertise of the Investment Adviser is attributable to the long-term focus on managing investment companies and has the potential to enhance the Fund’s future performance. They have a strong culture of compliance and provide quality services. The overall nature and quality of the services provided by the Investment Adviser had historically been, and continues to be, adequate and appropriate to the Board.

Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications:  The Portfolio Manager of the Fund has over 35 years experience in the advisory and money management area adding significant expertise to the Adviser of the Fund. A detailed biography of the portfolio manager was presented to the Trustees.  This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Fund.

Investment Performance:  The Adviser has assured through subsidization that its Fund has had consistent performance relative to comparable and competing funds.  Although the Fund has outperformed its relative benchmark for the YTD and 5-year periods, it has underperformed its relative benchmark for the 1-year, and since inception periods as of September 29, 2006. The Fund has positive returns for the YTD, 1-year, and 5-year periods on the Class A shares as of September 29, 2006.  In addition, the Fund has been meeting its investment objective for providing long-term growth through capital appreciation. 

Profitability:  The Board has reviewed a year to date and a 12-month profit analysis spreadsheet completed by the controller of the investment adviser.  Based on the relatively small size of each fund under management with the Adviser, the Adviser has shown no profit for the period.  The Board determined that the profitability of the Adviser was not excessive based on the services it will provide for the Fund and the profit analysis spreadsheet presented by the Adviser.

Economies of Scale:  The Board briefly discussed the benefits for the Fund as the Adviser could realize economies of scale as the Fund grows larger, but the size of the Fund has not reached an asset level to benefit from economies of scale.  The advisory fees are structured appropriately based on the size of the Fund.  The Adviser has indicated that a new advisory fee structure may be looked at if the Fund reaches an asset level where the Fund could benefit from economies of scale.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds:  The Adviser is voluntarily waiving advisory fees due to the small size of the Fund.  The Board considered the compensation payable under the Advisory Agreement fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided.

Expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds: Although the Fund’s net expense ratio of 2.65% for the Class A shares was somewhat higher than other funds of similar objective and size, the Board found that the expense ratio was acceptable.

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds:  The Board noted that the Adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of Integrity Money Management, the strategic plan involving the Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  They determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders.

Potential Conflicts of Interest – Investment Adviser

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account.  More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds are presented with the following potential conflicts:

The management of multiple funds may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund.  The Investment Adviser seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having them focus on a particular investment discipline.  Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.  The management of multiple funds and accounts also may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts.

·

With respect to securities transactions for the Funds, the Investment Adviser determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty to seek best execution of the transaction.  The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for the Funds.

·

The appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Investment Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one fund but not all funds with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.  The management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds' code of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.  One of the portfolio manager's numerous responsibilities is to assist in the sale of Fund shares.  Mr. Koenig's compensation is based on salary paid every other week.  He is not compensated for client retention.   Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., sponsors a 401(k) plan for all its employees.  This plan is funded by employee elective deferrals and, to an extent, matching contributions by t he Company. After one year of employment the employee is eligible to participate in the Company matching program.  The Company matches 100% of contribution up to 3% and ½% for each additional percent contributed up to 5%. The Company has established an employee stock option program in which it will grant interests in Integrity Mutual Funds Inc., shares to current employees that meet certain eligibility requirements, as a form of long-term incentive.  The program is designed to allow all employees to participate in the long-term growth of the value of the firm.

·

Although the Portfolio Managers generally do not trade securities in their own personal account, each of the Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such trades would not adversely impact client accounts.  Nevertheless, the management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such conflicts. 

The Investment Adviser and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures, which are designed to address these types of conflicts.  However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Schedule of Investments  December 29, 2006

Name of Issuer

Percentages represent the market value of each investment category to total net assets

Quantity

 

Market Value

 

 

 

 

COMMON STOCKS (82.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Communications Equipment (4.5%)

 

 

 

*Cisco Systems, Inc. 

7,000

$

191,310

 

 

 

 

Computer Hardware (7.1%)

 

 

 

Intel Corp. 

15,000

 

303,750

 

 

 

 

Computer Services (6.5%)

 

 

 

*Netease.com Inc. ADR 

15,000

 

280,350

 

 

 

 

Diversified Electronic (2.8%)

 

 

 

*Benchmark Electronic 

5,000

 

121,800

 

 

 

 

Drugs and Pharmaceuticals (16.4%)

 

 

 

*Cephalon, Inc. 

2,500

 

176,025

Merck & Co. 

5,000

 

218,000

*Sciele Pharma, Inc. 

6,500

 

156,000

Wyeth 

3,000

 

152,760

 

 

 

702,785

 

 

 

 

Energy (3.5%)

 

 

 

Ensco International Inc. 

3,000

 

150,180

 

 

 

 

Financial (3.7%)

 

 

 

*E*Trade Financial Corp. 

7,000

 

156,940

 

 

 

 

Healthcare (12.9%)

 

 

 

*Amsurg Corporation 

7,000

 

161,000

Biomet, Inc. 

5,000

 

206,350

*Genzyme Corp. 

3,000

 

184,740

 

 

 

552,090

 

 

 

 

Medical Equipment (3.2%)

 

 

 

*Boston Scientific Corp. 

8,000

 

137,440

 

 

 

 

Semiconductor (5.0%)

 

 

 

Texas Instruments, Inc. 

7,500

 

216,000

 

 

 

 

Software And Programming (2.8%)

 

 

 

Microsoft Corp. 

4,000

 

119,440

 

 

 

 

Telecommunications (13.6%)

 

 

 

America Movil SA ADR 

4,000

 

180,880

*Covad Communications Group Inc. 

667

 

920

Harris Corp 

6,000

 

275,160

*Trimble Navigation 

2,500

 

126,825

 

 

 

583,785

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (COST: $2,928,888)

 

$

3,515,870

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (19.1%)

Shares

 

 

Wells Fargo Advantage Investment Money Market (COST: $818,816)

818,816

$

818,816

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $3,747,704)

 

$

4,334,686

OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES

 

 

(46,747)

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

 

$

4,287,939

*Non-income producing

ADR - American Depository Receipt

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Assets and Liabilities  December 29, 2006

ASSETS

 

 

 

Investments in securities, at value (cost: $3,747,704)

$

4,334,686

 

Accrued dividends receivable

 

1,901

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

3,208

 

Receivable from manager

 

623

 

Receivable for fund shares sold

 

150

 

Prepaid expenses

 

2,698

 

Total Assets

$

4,343,266

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

$

9,691

 

Payable to affiliates

 

6,923

 

Payable for fund shares redeemed

 

38,713

 

Total Liabilities

$

55,327

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

$

4,287,939

 

 

 

Net assets are represented by:

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

$

42,362,594

 

Accumulated undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments

 

(38,661,637)

 

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

586,982

 

Total amount representing net assets applicable to 435,060 outstanding shares of no par common stock (unlimited shares authorized)

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,287,939

 

 

 

Net asset value per share

$

9.86

Public Offering Price (based on sales charge of 5.75%)

$

10.46

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Operations  For the year ended December 29, 2006

INVESTMENT INCOME

 

 

 

Interest

$

51,774

 

Dividends

 

36,326

 

Total Investment Income

$

88,100

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

Investment advisory fees

$

73,691

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees

 

17,779

 

Transfer agent fees

 

23,934

 

Accounting service fees

 

27,004

 

Administrative service fees

 

23,934

 

Custodian fees

 

3,906

 

Professional fees

 

7,662

 

Trustees fees

 

1,832

 

Transfer agent out-of-pockets

 

537

 

Reports to shareholders

 

10,265

 

Insurance expense

 

2,826

 

License, fees, and registrations

 

3,458

 

Foreign tax expense

 

178

 

Legal fees

 

504

 

Audit fees

 

8,182

 

Total Expenses

$

205,692

 

Less expenses waived or absorbed by the Fund’s manager

 

(42,958)

 

Total Net Expenses

$

162,734

 

 

 

NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)

$

(74,634)

 

 

 

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions

$

1,865,057

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments

 

(1,287,554)

 

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

$

577,503

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS

$

502,869

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the year ended December 29, 2006 and the year ended December 30, 2005

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

(74,634)

$

(150,440)

 

Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

1,865,057

 

1,777,060

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

(1,287,554)

 

(1,042,829)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Operations

$

502,869

$

583,791

 

 

 

 

 

DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

0

$

0

 

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions

 

0

 

0

 

Total Dividends and Distributions

$

0

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of shares

$

192,707

$

514,978

 

Proceeds from reinvested dividends

 

0

 

0

 

Cost of shares redeemed

 

(5,140,901)

 

(4,685,410)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Capital Share Transactions

$

(4,948,194)

$

(4,170,432)

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS

$

(4,445,325)

$

(3,586,641)

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

8,733,264

 

12,319,905

NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD

$

4,287,939

$

8,733,264

Undistributed Net Investment Income

$

0

$

0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Notes to Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Note 1.  ORGANIZATION

The Integrity Technology Fund (the “Fund”) is an investment portfolio of The Integrity Funds (the “Trust”) registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a non-diversified, open-end management investment company.  The Trust may offer multiple portfolios; currently seven portfolios are offered.  On September 19, 2003,the Integrity Technology Fund became a series of The Integrity Funds Trust.  Prior to this the Fund was a part of the Willamette Funds Group.  The Willamette Funds were organized as a Delaware statutory trust on January 17, 2001 and were registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company.  Each of the Funds is also the successor to a fund of the same name that was a series of another registered investment company, The Coventry Group. On March 16, 2001, the shareholders of eac h of the predecessor funds approved their reorganization into The Willamette Funds, effective April 1, 2001.  The Willamette Funds offered four managed investment portfolios and were authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares.  The accompanying financial statements and financial highlights are those of the Integrity Technology Fund.  The Fund seeks long-term growth through capital appreciation.

Shares of the Fund are offered at net asset value plus a maximum sales charge of 5.75% and a distribution fee of up to 0.50% on an annual basis. 

Note 2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investment security valuation –Assets for which market quotations are available are valued as follows: (a) each listed security is valued at its closing price obtained from the respective primary exchange on which the security is listed, or, if there were no sales on that day, at its last reported current bid price; (b) each unlisted security is valued at the last current bid price obtained from the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.  All of these prices are obtained by the Administrator from services, which collect and disseminate such market prices. Prices provided by an independent pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices and may take into account appropriate factors such as institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market data.  In the absen ce of an ascertainable market value, assets are valued at their fair value as determined by the Administrator using methods and procedures reviewed and approved by the Trustees.

Repurchase agreements – In connection with transactions in repurchase agreements, it is the Fund’s policy that its custodian take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the fair value of which exceeds the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest, at all times.  If the seller defaults, and the fair value of the collateral declines, realization of the collateral by the Fund may be delayed or limited.

Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (“CDSC”) – In the case of investments of $1 million or more, a 1.00% CDSC may be assessed on shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or distributions).

Federal and state income taxes – It is the policy of the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined in applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized capital gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

 

 

December 29, 2006

 

December 30, 2005

Tax-exempt Income

$

0

$

0

Ordinary Income

 

0

 

0

Long-term Capital Gains

 

0

 

0

Total

$

0

$

0

During the years ended December 29, 2006, and December 30, 2005, no distributions were paid. 

As of December 29, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed Ordinary Income

Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains

Accumulated Earnings

Accumulated Capital and Other Losses

Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation)

Total Accumulated Earnings/(Deficit)

$0

$0

$0

($38,661,637)

$586,982

($38,074,655)

As of December 29, 2006, the Fund had net capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized capital gains.  Any difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales.

Year

Unexpired Capital Losses

2008

$6,818,038

2009

$24,860,489

2010

$6,063,295

2011

$919,815

For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund did not make any permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character.  Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to expiring capital loss carryforwards.

Net capital losses incurred after October 31, and within the tax year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the Fund’s next taxable year.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund deferred to January 1, 2007 post October capital losses, post October currency losses and post October passive foreign investment company losses of $0.

Distributions to shareholders –Dividends from net investment income, declared yearly and paid yearly, are reinvested in additional shares of the Fund at net asset value or paid in cash.  Capital gains, when available, are distributed along with the net investment income dividend at the end of the calendar year. 

Other – Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis.  Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date for financial reporting purposes.  Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis.  Distributions to shareholders are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date.  Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount, capital loss carryforwards and losses due to wash sales and futures transactions.

Permanent book and tax basis differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in capital.  Temporary book and tax basis differences will reverse in a subsequent period.

Dividend income – Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

Futures contracts – The Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts to hedge against changes in the values of equity securities the Fund owns or expects to purchase.

A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell units of a particular index at a set price on a future date.  Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with a broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the minimum “initial margin” requirement of the futures exchange on which the contract is traded.  Subsequent payments (“variation margin”) are made or received by the Fund, dependent on the fluctuations in the value of the underlying index.  Daily fluctuations in value are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the fund.  When entering into a closing transaction, the Fund will realize, for book purposes, a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contracts sold and the futures contracts to buy.  Unrealized appreciation (depreciation), related to open futures contracts, is requ ired to be treated as realized gain (loss) for federal income tax purposes.

Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts.  These risks may include changes in the value of the futures contracts that may not directly correlate with changes in the value of the underlying securities.

Use of estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications – Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Note 3.  CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

As of December 29, 2006, there were unlimited shares of no par authorized; 435,060 and 969,319 shares were outstanding at December 29, 2006, and December 30, 2005, respectively.

Transactions in capital shares were as follows:

 

Shares

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

Shares sold 

20,317

59,357

Shares issued on reinvestment of dividends

0

0

Shares redeemed

(554,576)

(558,855)

Net increase (decrease)

(534,259)

(499,498)

Note 4.  INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.

The Advisory Agreement provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 1.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.  The Fund has recognized $32,282 of investment advisory fees after a partial waiver for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Money Management of $0 at December 29, 2006 for investment advisory fees.  Certain officers and trustees of the Fund are also officers and directors of the investment adviser.

The Adviser has contractually agreed until March 31, 2007 to waive its management fee and to reimburse expenses, other than extraordinary or non-recurring expenses, so that the Net Annual Operating Expenses of the Integrity Technology Fund do not exceed 2.65%.  After such a date, the expense limitation may be terminated or revised.  Amounts waived or reimbursed in a particular fiscal year may be recouped by the Adviser within three years of the waiver or reimbursement to the extent that recoupment will not cause operating expenses to exceed any expense limitation in place at that time.  An expense limitation lowers expense ratios and increases returns to investors.

Principal Underwriter and Shareholder Services

Integrity Funds Distributor serves as the principal underwriter for the Fund.  The Fund has adopted a distribution plan for each class of shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act.  Distribution plans permit the Fund to reimburse its principal underwriter for costs related to selling shares of the Fund and for various other services.  These costs, which consist primarily of commissions and service fees to broker-dealers who sell shares of the Fund, are paid by shareholders through expenses called “Distribution Plan expenses.”  The Fund currently pays an annual distribution fee of up to 0.50% of the average daily net assets of the class.  Distribution Plan expenses are calculated daily and paid monthly.  The Fund has recognized $17,779 of distribution fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Funds Distributor of $ 874 at December 29, 2006.

Integrity Fund Services, the transfer agent, provides shareholder services for a variable fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum of $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $23,934 of transfer agency fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $1,933 at December 29, 2006 for transfer agency fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s accounting services agent for a fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000, and a variable fee equal to 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the F und’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, together with reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional accounting services fee of $500 per month will be charged by Integrity Fund Services for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $27,004 of accounting service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $2,108 at December 29, 2006 for accounting service fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s administrative services agent for a variable fee equal to 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus out-of-pocket expenses.  The Fund will pay an additional minimum fee of $500 per month for each additional share class.  The Fun d has recognized $23,934 of administrative service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $1,933 at December 29, 2006 for administrative service fees. 

Note 5.  INVESTMENT SECURITY TRANSACTIONS

The cost of purchases and proceeds from the sale of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) aggregated $984,259 and $6,038,477, respectively, for the year ended December 29, 2006.

Note 6.  INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES

At December 29, 2006, the aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same for financial reporting purposes at $3,747,704.  The net unrealized appreciation of investments based on the cost was $586,982, which is comprised of $820,131 aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and $233,149 aggregate gross unrealized depreciation.

Note 7.  INVESTMENT RISKS

Risks of Technology-Related Companies – Because the Integrity Technology Fund invests primarily in stocks of technology-related companies, it is particularly susceptible to risks associated with these companies.  The Technology Fund’s performance will depend on the performance of securities of issuers in technology-related industries, which may differ from general stock market performance.  The products and services of technology-related companies may become rapidly obsolete due to technological advances, competing technologies or price competition.  In addition, government regulation may have a material effect on the demand for products and services of these companies, and new or amended regulations can adversely affect these companies or the market value of their securities.  Finally, lawsuits or legal proceedings against these companies can adversely affect the value of their securities.

Note 8.  RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.  This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted  accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Fund is presently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157.


Financial Highlights  December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

 

For The Year Ended December 31, 2004

 

For The Period April 1, 2003 Through December 31, 2003

 

For The Year Ended March 31, 2003

 

For The Year Ended March 31, 2002*

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

9.01

$

8.39

$

7.34

$

4.71

$

8.00

$

10.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

(.17)

$

(.16)

$

(.20)

$

(.23)

$

(.21)

$

(.22)

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

1.02

 

.78

 

1.25

 

2.86

 

(3.08)

 

(2.00)

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

.85

$

.62

$

1.05

$

2.63

$

(3.29)

$

(2.22)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

Total Distributions

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

9.86

$

9.01

$

8.39

$

7.34

$

4.71

$

8.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Returns

 

9.43%(A)

 

7.39%(A)

 

14.31%(A)

 

55.84%(A)(D)

 

(41.13%)(A)

 

(21.72%)(A)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

4,288

$

8,733

$

12,320

$

13,456

$

9,447

$

16,763

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

2.65%(B)

 

2.65%(B)

 

2.65%(B)

 

4.85%(B)(C)

 

4.12%(B)

 

3.26%(B)

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

(1.21%)

 

(1.54%)

 

(2.33%)

 

(4.64%)(C)

 

(3.93%)

 

(3.01%)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

18.26%

 

33.51%

 

49.29%

 

77.40%

 

116.42%

 

360.05%

* Adjusted for a 1:5 reverse split on April 13, 2001.

(A)  Excludes maximum sales charges of 5.75%.

(B)  During the periods since December 31, 2003, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. assumed/waived expenses of $42,958, $50,468 and $39,849, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 3.35%, 3.17% and 2.96%, respectively.  During the period April 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. and Willamette Asset Managers assumed/waived expenses of $44,352.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 5.34%.  During the periods prior to March 31, 2003, Willamette Asset Managers and The Coventry Group assumed/waived expenses of $54,037 and $63,109, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratios of total expenses to average net assets would have been 4.62% and 3.68%, respectively.

(C)  Ratio is annualized.

(D)  Ratio is not annualized.

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Integrity Technology Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the Integrity Technology Fund (one of the portfolios constituting The Integrity Funds), including the schedule of investments as of December 29, 2006, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the years ended December 29, 2006, December 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, and the nine month period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.  The financial highlights for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2003, were audited by other auditors whose report dated May 22, 2003, expressed an unqua lified opinion on those financial highlights.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 29, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Integrity Technology Fund of The Integrity Funds as of December 29, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the years ended December 29, 2006, December 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, and the nine month period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BRADY, MARTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Minot, North Dakota  USA

February 12, 2007

Dear Shareholder:

Enclosed is the report of the operations for the Integrity Value Fund (the “Fund”) for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund’s portfolio and related financial statements are presented within for your review.

Stock market performance was relatively strong in the first few months of the year, peaking on May 9th, followed by a significant pullback, forming a double bottom in June and July. Various gauges of inflation have been contained, but fear of renewed inflation remains a concern. Commodity prices moved up sharply over the last three years and are likely to continue rising for the balance of the current economic expansion, albeit at a more moderate rate. There is increasing evidence to suggest that world economies are entering a new long term inflationary cycle; characterized by gradual but ever rising prices for virtually everything – not just commodities. Such inflationary pressures are typical of the latter stages of shorter-term cyclical economic expansions, similar to the current expansionary environment. Global appetites will be the key driver of higher energy prices, although short term set backs in price are bound to occur, caused by factors such as mild winter weather across much of the U.S.

The Fund (+8.60%*) underperformed its benchmark over the first twelve months of 2006, but did quite well in the final quarter of the year. Kos Pharmaceuticals (one of our largest holdings) was sold in Novemberfollowing a tender offer by Abbott at better than a 50% premium (almost double our cost). We had expected a buy out from someone for quite some time. Andrx (Pharmaceuticals – sold) benefited from strong institutional buying followed by an acquisition proposal from Watson Pharmaceuticals. Maverick Tube (Oil & Gas Equipment – sold), agreed to be acquired by Tenaris SA. In the technology area, Anixter (Technology Distribution - sold) and Cisco Systems (Communication Equipment) appreciated nicely. Merck (Pharmaceuticals) was also strong. Investors seem encouraged by the combination of management changes, new products, cost reductions, and ongoing Vioxx litigation. When viewed versus the benchmark, the Fund’s performance w as negatively affected by its underweight exposure to Metals & Mining, Railroads, Consumer Discretionary, Aerospace & Defense, Media, Food & Staples Retail, and Integrated Telecom. Intel (Electronics) and Boston Scientific (Health Care Equipment) performed poorly. Boston’s recent downward revision of third quarter earnings had negative implications for Angiotech Pharmaceuticals (sold).

We manage the Fund using our quantitative intelligent expert system for stock selection.  The portfolio is focused on profitable value stocks that areexpected increased unit volume beneficiaries.These are typicallyenterprises, cyclical or otherwise, that are experiencing an improved outlook. Such usually leads to upward revisions in earnings estimates and superior investment performance. We do not own speculative “Red Ink Turn Arounds” with an unattractive business franchise. We like to think of ourselves as investors in profitable companies, not speculators.

We continue to focus on companies that are experiencing “positive change” while still selling at reasonable valuations as opposed to high-yielding, low-growth defensive stocks such as utilities and consumer staples. We do not invest in high yield issues without regard to the viability and attractiveness of the underlying business franchise. At the end of December 2006, the portfolio had an average forward P/E ratio of approximately 15, a consensus future earnings growth rate of 14% and an average ROE of over 22%.

While value investing is generally considered to be a defensive style, often underperforming in a bull market, we nevertheless believe our Value Fund is well positioned to take advantage of what we expect to be a vibrant economic expansion in the years ahead.

If you would like more frequent updates, visit our website at <www.integrityfunds.com> for daily prices along with pertinent Fund information.

Sincerely,

F. Martin Koenig, CFA

The views expressed are those of F. Martin Koenig, Senior Portfolio Manager with Integrity Mutual Funds.  The views are subject to change at any time in response to changing circumstances in the market and are not intended to predict or guarantee the future performance of any individual security, market sector or the markets generally, or any Integrity Mutual Fund.

*Performance does not include applicable front-end or contingent deferred sales charges, which would have reduced the performance.

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The Fund invests in small and mid-sized companies.  Stocks of small and mid-sized companies are more sensitive to changing market conditions and, therefore, investing in such securities involves greater risk than investing in the securities of larger companies.

December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

PROXY VOTING ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-276-1262.  A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.  This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC's”) website at www.sec.gov.

QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

The Fund provides a complete schedule of portfolio holdings in its semi-annual and annual reports within 60 days of the end of the Fund's second and fourth fiscal quarters on the Form N-CSR(S).  The annual and semi-annual reports are filed electronically with the SEC and are delivered to the Fund’s shareholders.  The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.  The Fund's Forms N-Q and N-CSR(S) may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C., and the information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-942-8090.  You may also access this information from Integrity's website at www.integrityfunds.com.


Terms & Definitions  December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

American Depository Receipt

A negotiable certificate representing a given number of shares of stock in a foreign corporation.  It is bought and sold in the American securities markets, just as stock is traded.

Appreciation

Increase in the value of an asset.

Average Annual Total Return

A standardized measurement of the return (appreciation) earned by a fund on an annual basis.

Consumer Price Index

A commonly used measure of inflation; it does not represent an investment return.

Depreciation

Decrease in the value of an asset.

Load

A mutual fund whose shares are sold with a sales charge added to the net asset value.

Market Value

Actual price at which a fund trades in the market place.

Net Asset Value (NAV)

The value of all your fund’s assets, minus any liabilities, divided by the number of outstanding shares, not including any initial or contingent deferred sales charge.

Offering Price

The price at which a mutual fund’s share can be purchased.  The offering price per share is the current net asset value plus any sales charge.

Total Return

Measures both the net investment income and any realized and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of the underlying investments in the fund’s portfolio for the period, assuming the reinvestment of all dividends.  It represents the aggregate percentage or dollar value change over the period.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPOSITION

PORTFOLIO MARKET SECTORS

(as a % of Net Assets)

H - Healthcare

35.7%

T - Technology

18.5%

F - Financial

12.9%

E - Energy

10.3%

O - Other

10.0%

CG - Capital Goods

9.9%

TR - Transportation

2.7%

Market sectors are breakdowns of the Fund’s portfolio holdings into specific investment classes.

These percentages are subject to change.

TOP TEN HOLDINGS

(as a % of Net Assets)

1.

ConocoPhillips 

6.8%

2.

Netease.com Inc. ADR 

6.2%

3.

Biomet, Inc. 

5.8%

4.

Intel Corp. 

5.7%

5.

Hovnanian Enterprises 

5.6%

6.

Merck & Co. 

5.1%

7.

Cephalon, Inc. 

5.0%

8.

Boston Scientific Corp. 

4.9%

9.

Wyeth 

4.8%

10.

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 

4.6%

The Fund’s holdings are subject to change at any time.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

DISCLOSURE OF FUND EXPENSES

The Example below is intended to describe the fees and expenses borne by shareholders and the impact of those costs on your investment.

EXAMPLE

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:  (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads), redemption fees and exchange fees; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution (12b-1) fees and other fund expenses.  This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.  The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.

The example illustrates the Fund’s costs in two ways:

Actual expenses

The section in the table under the heading “Actual” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses.  You may use the information in these columns, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.  Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the appropriate column for your share class, in the column entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical example for comparison purposes

The section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return.  The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.  You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds.  To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. 

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), redemption fees or exchange fees.  Therefore, the section in the table under the heading “Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)” is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.  In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

Beginning Account Value 06/30/06

Ending Account Value 12/29/06

Expenses Paid During Period*

Actual

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,094.45

$13.80

Hypothetical (5% return before expenses)

 

 

 

Class A

$1,000.00

$1,011.82

$13.26

* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 2.65%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 179/360 days.  The Fund’s ending account value on the first line in the table is based on its actual total return of 9.45% for the six-month period from June 30, 2006 to December 29, 2006.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS

 

For periods ending December 29, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Integrity Value Fund

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(May 26, 1998)

Without Sales Charge

8.60%

7.53%

4.99%

N/A

1.84%

With Sales Charge (5.75%)

2.37%

5.43%

3.75%

N/A

1.14%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Lipper Large Cap Value Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(May 26, 1998)

 

18.28%

12.07%

7.67%

N/A

5.59%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Since Inception

Dow Jones Composite Index

1 year

3 year

5 year

10 year

(May 26, 1998)

 

15.71%

13.55%

9.75%

N/A

6.69%

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The Fund's performance prior to September 19, 2003, was achieved while the Fund was managed by another investment adviser, who used different investment strategies and techniques, which may produce different investment results than those achieved by the current investment adviser.  The Willamette Asset Managers, Inc., served as investment adviser to the Fund from April 1, 2001 to September 19, 2003.  Prior to April 1, 2001, The Coventry Group served as investment adviser to the Fund.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

COMPARATIVE INDEX GRAPH

Comparison of change in value of a $10,000 investment in the Integrity Value Fund, Lipper Large Cap Value Index, and the Dow Jones Composite Index

 

Integrity Value Fund w/o Sales Charge

Integrity Value Fund w/Max Sales Charge

Lipper Large Cap Value Index

Dow Jones Composite Index

05/26/98

$10,000

$  9,425

$10,000

$10,000

1998

$  9,990

$  9,416

$10,682

$10,279

1999

$10,468

$  9,866

$11,833

$11,717

2000

$10,237

$  9,648

$12,065

$12,316

2001

$  9,165

$  8,638

$11,030

$10,952

2002

$  7,677

$  7,236

$  8,860

$  9,207

2003

$  9,404

$  8,864

$11,340

$11,914

2004

$10,091

$  9,511

$12,700

$13,770

2005

$10,767

$10,148

$13,496

$15,076

2006

$11,693

$11,021

$15,963

$17,445

Putting Performance into Perspective

Performance data quoted above is historical.  Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Current performance may be higher or lower than the performance data quoted.  The principal value and investment return of an investment will fluctuate so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost.  You can obtain performance data current to the most recent month end (available within seven business days of the most recent month end) by calling 1-800-276-1262.

You should consider the Fund's investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses carefully before investing.  For this and other important information, please obtain a Fund prospectus at no cost from your financial adviser and read it carefully before investing.

The graph does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions and redemptions of Fund shares.

The graph comparing your Fund’s performance to a benchmark index provides you with a general sense of how your Fund performed.  To put this information in context, it may be helpful to understand the special differences between the two.  Your Fund’s total return for the period shown appears with and without sales charges and includes Fund expenses and management fees.  A securities index measures the performance of a theoretical portfolio.  Unlike a fund, the index is unmanaged; there are no expenses that affect the results.  In addition, few investors could purchase all of the securities necessary to match the index.  And, if they could, they would incur transaction costs and other expenses.  All Fund and benchmark returns include reinvested dividends.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND

The Board of The Integrity Funds consists of four Trustees.  These same individuals, unless otherwise noted, also serve as directors or trustees for the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios, and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.  Three Trustees (75% of the total) have no affiliation or business connection with the Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates.  These are the “independent” Trustees.  Two of the remaining three Trustees and/or Officers are “interested” by virtue of their affiliation with the Investment Adviser and its affiliates.

The Independent Trustees of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Independent Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Jerry M. Stai
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
54

Trustee

Since January 2006

Faculty, Embry-Riddle University (August 2000 to September 2005); Faculty, Park University (August 2005 to December 2005); Non-Profit Specialist, Bremer Bank (since July 2005); Faculty, Minot State University (since August 2000); Director ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., (since January 2006); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 2006).

16

Marycrest Franciscan Development, Inc.

Orlin W. Backes
15 2nd Ave., SW
Suite 305
Minot, ND 58701
71

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C.; Director, South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (until June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (Since April 2005); Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); Director, First Western Bank & Trust.

16

First Western Bank & Trust

R. James Maxson
Town & Country Center
1015 S. Broadway
Suite 15
Minot, ND 58701
59

Trustee

Since May 2003

Attorney, Maxson Law Office (since November 2002); Attorney, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, P.C. (April 2000 to November 2002); Director, Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc. and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (since January 1999), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (January 1999 to June 2003); and Trustee, Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1999).

16

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

The Interested Trustees and executive officers of the Fund, their term of office and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios overseen in the Fund Complex by each Interested Trustee and other directorships, if any, held outside the Fund Complex, are shown below.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Name, Address and Age

Position(s) Held with Registrant

Term and Length Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Portfolios Overseen In The Fund Complex1

Other Directorships Held Outside The Fund Complex

Robert E. Walstad2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
62

Trustee Chairman President

Since May 2003

Director (since September 1987), President (September 2002 to May 2003), CEO (Since September 2001), Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, President and Treasurer, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Director, President (since inception) and Treasurer (May 1989 to May 2004), ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc., (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds Inc., (September 1998 to June 2003), Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Trustee, Chairman, President and Treasurer (January 2006 to May 2004), Integrity Managed Portfolios (since January 1996) and The Integrity Funds (since May 2003); Director, President (until August 2003), CEO, and Treasurer, Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc.; Director (October 1999 to June 2003) Magic Internet Services, Inc.; Director (May 2000 to June 2003), President (October 2002 to June 2003), ARM Securities Corporation; Director, CEO, Chairman, (since January 2002) and President (September 2002 to December 2004), Capital Financial Services, Inc.

16

Capital Financial Services, Inc., and Minot Park Board

Peter A. Quist2
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
72

Vice President Secretary

Since May 2003

Attorney; Director and Vice President, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Money Management, Inc., Integrity Fund Services, Inc., Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc., ND Capital, Inc. (August 1988 to September 2004), South Dakota Tax-Free Fund, Inc. (April 1994 to June 2004), Integrity Small-Cap Fund of Funds, Inc. (September 1998 to June 2003), Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc., ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, Integrity Managed Portfolios (Since January 1996); and Director, ARM Securities Corporation (May 2000 to June 2003).

3

None

Laura K. Anderson
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
32

Treasurer

Since October 2005

Fund Accountant (until May 2004), Fund Accounting Supervisor (May 2004 to October 2005), Fund Accounting Manager, Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (since October 2005), Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

Brent M. Wheeler
1 N. Main St.
Minot, ND 58703
36

Mutual Fund Chief Compliance Officer

Since October 2005

Fund Accounting Manager (May 1998 through October 2005), Integrity Fund Services, Inc.; Treasurer (May 2004 to October 2005), Mutual Fund Compliance Officer (since October 2005) Integrity Managed Portfolios, ND Tax-Free Fund, Inc., Montana Tax-Free Fund, Inc., and Integrity Fund of Funds, Inc.

N/A

None

1The Fund Complex consists of the three incorporated funds in the Integrity family of funds, the six series of Integrity Managed Portfolios and the seven series of The Integrity Funds.

2Trustees and/or officers who are “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.  Messr. Quist is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser and Principal Underwriter.  Messr. Walstad is an interested person by virtue of being an officer and Director of the Fund’s Investment Adviser.

Trustees and officers of the Fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement.

The Statement of Additional Information contains more information about the Fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request, by calling Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. at 1(800) 276-1262.


December 29, 2006 (Unaudited)

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. (“the Company”), the Fund’s sponsor.

The approval and the continuation of a fund’s investment advisory agreement must be specifically approved at least annually (1) by the vote of the trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of the fund, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the trustees who are not parties to the investment advisory agreement or “Interested Persons” of any party (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval.  In preparation for the meeting, the Board requests and reviews a wide variety of materials provided by the Fund’s adviser.  The Independent Trustees also received advice from their independent counsel on the issues to focus on during contract renewals.  At a meeting held on October 25, 2006, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the independent Trustees of the Fund, approved the Management and Investment Advisory Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”), between the Fund and Integrity Money Management. 

The Trustees, including a majority of Trustees who are neither party to the Advisory Agreements nor “interested persons” of any such party (as such term is defined for regulatory purposes), unanimously approved the Advisory Agreement.  In determining whether it was appropriate to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees requested information, provided by the Investment Adviser that it believed to be reasonably necessary to reach its conclusion.  In connection with the approval of the Advisory Agreements, the Board reviewed factors set out in judicial decisions and Securities Exchange Commission directives relating to the approval of advisory contracts, which include but are not limited to, the following:

(a)

the nature and quality of services to be provided by the adviser to the fund;

(b)

the various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications;

(c)

the relevant fund’s investment performance as compared to standardized industry performance data;

(d)

the adviser’s costs and profitability of furnishing the investment management services to the fund;

(e)

the extent to which the adviser realizes economies of scale as the fund grows larger and the sharing thereof with the fund;

(f)

an analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds;

(g)

the expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds; and

(h)

information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds.

In evaluating the Adviser’s services and its fees, the Trustees reviewed information concerning the performance of the Fund, the recent financial statements of the Adviser and its parent, and the proposed advisory fee and other fund expenses compared to the level of advisory fees and expenses paid by other similar funds.  In reviewing the Advisory Agreement with the foregoing Fund, the Trustees considered, among other things, the fees, the Fund’s past performance, the nature and quality of the services provided, the profitability of the Adviser and its parent (estimated costs and estimated profits from furnishing the proposed services to the Fund), and the expense waivers by the Adviser.  The Trustees also considered any ancillary benefits to the Adviser and its affiliates for services provided to the Fund.  In this regard, the Trustees noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements involving the Adviser and the only benefits to affiliates were the fees earned for services provided.  The Trustees did not identify any single factor discussed above as all-important or controlling.  The Trustees also considered the Adviser’s commitment to contractually or voluntarily limit Fund expenses, the skills and capabilities of the Adviser, and the representations from the Adviser that the Fund’s portfolio manager, F. Martin Koenig, will continue to manage the Fund in substantially the same way as it had been managed. 

The following paragraphs summarize the material information and factors considered by the Board, including the Independent Trustees, as well as their conclusions relative to such factors in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreement:

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services:  The Investment Adviser currently provides services to sixteen funds in the Integrity family of funds with investment strategies ranging from non-diversified sector funds to broad-based equity funds.  The experience and expertise of the Investment Adviser is attributable to the long-term focus on managing investment companies and has the potential to enhance the Fund’s future performance. They have a strong culture of compliance and provide quality services. The overall nature and quality of the services provided by the Investment Adviser had historically been, and continues to be, adequate and appropriate to the Board. 

Various personnel furnishing such services and their duties and qualifications:  The Portfolio Manager of the Fund has over 35 years experience in the advisory and money management area adding significant expertise to the Adviser of the Fund. A detailed biography of the portfolio manager was presented to the Trustees.  This information is disclosed in the prospectus and/or SAI of the Fund.

Investment Performance:  The Adviser has assured through subsidization that its Fund has had consistent performance relative to comparable and competing funds.  The Fund has underperformed its relative benchmark for the YTD, 1-year, 5-year, 10-year and since inception periods as of September 29, 2006.  However, the Fund has positive returns for the 1-year, 5-year, and since inception periods on the Class A shares as of September 29, 2006.

Profitability:  The Board has reviewed a year to date and a 12-month profit analysis spreadsheet completed by the controller of the investment adviser.  Based on the relatively small size of each fund under management with the Adviser, the Adviser has shown no profit for the period.  The Board determined that the profitability of the Adviser was not excessive based on the services it will provide for the Fund and the profit analysis spreadsheet presented by the Adviser.

Economies of Scale:  The Board briefly discussed the benefits for the Fund as the Adviser could realize economies of scale as the Fund grows larger, but the size of the Fund has not reached an asset level to benefit from economies of scale.  The advisory fees are structured appropriately based on the size of the Fund.  The Adviser has indicated that a new advisory fee structure may be looked at if the Fund reaches an asset level where the Fund could benefit from economies of scale.

Analysis of the rates charged by other investment advisers of similar funds:  The Adviser is voluntarily waiving advisory fees due to the small size of the Fund.  At times the Adviser is reimbursing the Fund for expenses paid above the contractual expense cap.  The Board considered the compensation payable under the Advisory Agreement fair and reasonable in light of the services to be provided.

Expense ratios of the applicable fund as compared to data for comparable funds: Although the Fund’s net expense ratio of 2.65% for the Class A shares was somewhat higher than other funds of similar objective and size, the Board found that the expense ratio was acceptable.

Information with respect to all benefits to the adviser associated with the fund, including an analysis of so-called “fallout” benefits or indirect profits to the adviser from its relationship to the funds:  The Board noted that the Adviser does not realize material direct benefits from its relationship with the Fund.  The Adviser does not participate in any soft dollar arrangements from securities trading in the Fund.

In voting unanimously to approve the Advisory Agreement, the Trustees did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance.  The Trustees noted that their discussion in this regard was premised on numerous factors including the nature, quality and resources of Integrity Money Management, the strategic plan involving the Fund, and the potential for increased distribution and growth of the Fund.  They determined that, after considering all relevant factors, the adoption of the Advisory Agreement would be in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders.

Potential Conflicts of Interest – Investment Adviser

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account.  More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple funds are presented with the following potential conflicts:

The management of multiple funds may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund.  The Investment Adviser seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having them focus on a particular investment discipline.  Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.  The management of multiple funds and accounts also may give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts.

·

With respect to securities transactions for the Funds, the Investment Adviser determines which broker to use to execute each order, consistent with the duty to seek best execution of the transaction.  The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the value of securities held by the Funds. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Funds may outperform the securities selected for the Funds.

·

The appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Investment Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one fund but not all funds with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.  The management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest; there is no assurance that the Funds' code of ethics will adequately address such conflicts.  One of the portfolio manager's numerous responsibilities is to assist in the sale of Fund shares.  Mr. Koenig's compensation is based on salary paid every other week.  He is not compensated for client retention.   Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., sponsors a 401(k) plan for all its employees.  This plan is funded by employee elective deferrals and, to an extent, matching contributions by the Company. After one year of emp loyment the employee is eligible to participate in the Company matching program.  The Company matches 100% of contribution up to 3% and ½% for each additional percent contributed up to 5%. The Company has established an employee stock option program in which it will grant interests in Integrity Mutual Funds Inc., shares to current employees that meet certain eligibility requirements, as a form of long-term incentive.  The program is designed to allow all employees to participate in the long-term growth of the value of the firm.

·

Although the Portfolio Managers generally do not trade securities in their own personal account, each of the Funds has adopted a code of ethics that, among other things, permits personal trading by employees under conditions where it has been determined that such trades would not adversely impact client accounts.  Nevertheless, the management of personal accounts may give rise to potential conflicts of interest, and there is no assurance that these codes of ethics will adequately address such conflicts. 

The Investment Adviser and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures, which are designed to address these types of conflicts.  However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.


Schedule of Investments  December 29, 2006

Name of Issuer
Percentages represent the market value of each investment category to total net assets

 

Quantity

 

Market Value

 

 

 

 

COMMON STOCKS (90.1%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banks (4.6%)

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 

2,000

$

96,600

 

 

 

 

Communications Equipment (3.9%)

 

 

 

*Cisco Systems, Inc. 

3,000

 

81,990

 

 

 

 

Computer Hardware (5.7%)

 

 

 

Intel Corp. 

6,000

 

121,500

 

 

 

 

Computer Services (6.2%)

 

 

 

*Netease.com Inc. ADR

7,000

 

130,830

 

 

 

 

Drugs and Pharmaceuticals (17.7%)

 

 

 

*Cephalon, Inc. 

1,500

 

105,615

Merck & Co. 

2,500

 

109,000

*Sciele Pharma, Inc. 

2,500

 

60,000

Wyeth 

2,000

 

101,840

 

 

 

376,455

Energy (3.5%)

 

 

 

Ensco International Inc. 

1,500

 

75,090

 

 

 

 

Engineering (5.6%)

 

 

 

*Hovnanian Enterprises 

3,500

 

118,650

 

 

 

 

Financial (4.4%)

 

 

 

Merrill Lynch 

1,000

 

93,100

 

 

 

 

Healthcare (13.1%)

 

 

 

*Amsurg Corporation 

3,500

 

80,500

Biomet, Inc. 

3,000

 

123,810

*Genzyme Corp. 

1,200

 

73,896

 

 

 

278,206

Insurance (4.0%)

 

 

 

Berkley (W.R.) 

2,450

 

84,550

 

 

 

 

Machinery & Equipment (4.3%)

 

 

 

Caterpillar Inc 

1,500

 

91,995

 

 

 

 

Medical Equipment (4.9%)

 

 

 

*Boston Scientific Corp. 

6,000

 

103,080

 

 

 

 

Oil And Gas Operations (6.8%)

 

 

 

ConocoPhillips 

2,000

 

143,900

 

 

 

 

Semiconductor (2.7%)

 

 

 

Texas Instruments 

2,000

 

57,600

 

 

 

 

Transportation (2.7%)

 

 

 

*YRC Worldwide Inc. 

1,500

 

56,595

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL COMMON STOCKS (COST: $1,699,809)

$

1,910,141

 

 

 

 

SHORT-TERM SECURITIES (10.5%)

Shares

 

 

Wells Fargo Advantage Investment Money Market (COST: $223,325)

223,325

$

223,325

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES (COST: $1,923,134)

 

$

2,133,466

OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES

 

 

(13,002)

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

 

$

2,120,464

*Non-income producing

ADR – American Depository Receipt

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements December 29, 2006

Statement of Assets and Liabilities  December 29, 2006

ASSETS

 

 

 

Investments in securities, at value (cost: $1,923,134)

$

2,133,466

 

Accrued dividends receivable

 

1,048

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

906

 

Receivable from manager

 

4,672

 

Prepaid expenses

 

1,174

 

Total Assets

$

2,141,266

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

Payable to affiliates

$

6,369

 

Accrued expenses

 

8,902

 

Payable for fund shares redeemed

 

5,531

 

Total Liabilities

$

20,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS

$

2,120,464

 

 

 

Net assets are represented by:

 

 

 

Paid-in capital

$

2,327,889

 

Accumulated undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments

 

(417,757)

 

Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

210,332

 

Total amount representing net assets applicable to

 

 

 

188,719 outstanding shares of no par common stock

 

 

 

(unlimited shares authorized)

$

2,120,464

 

 

 

Net asset value per share

$

11.24

Public Offering Price (based on sales charge of 5.75%)

$

11.93

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Operations  For the year ended December 29, 2006

INVESTMENT INCOME

 

 

 

Interest

$

20,010

 

Dividends

 

25,382

 

Total Investment Income

$

45,392

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

Investment advisory fees

$

33,520

 

Distribution (12b-1) fees

 

9,733

 

Transfer agent fees

 

23,934

 

Accounting service fees

 

25,609

 

Administrative service fees

 

23,934

 

Custodian fees

 

3,591

 

Professional fees

 

7,742

 

Insurance expense

 

2,650

 

Reports to shareholders

 

4,356

 

Audit fees

 

7,237

 

Other fees

 

992

 

Total Expenses

$

143,298

 

Less expenses waived or absorbed by the Fund’s manager

 

(54,469)

 

Total Net Expenses

$

88,829

 

 

 

NET INVESTMENT INCOME (LOSS)

$

(43,437)

 

 

 

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions

$

422,105

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments

 

(137,823)

 

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments

$

284,282

 

 

 

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS

$

240,845

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the year ended December 29, 2006 and the year ended December 30, 2005

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

(43,437)

$

(85,886)

 

Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

422,105

 

829,993

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

 

(137,823)

 

(480,234)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Operations

$

240,845

$

263,873

 

 

 

 

 

DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS

 

0

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

$

0

 

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions

 

0

 

0

 

Total Dividends and Distributions

$

0

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of shares

$

75,502

$

238,205

 

Proceeds from reinvested dividends

 

0

 

0

 

Cost of shares redeemed

 

(3,077,208)

 

(5,272,297)

 

Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting From Capital Share Transactions

$

(3,001,706)

$

(5,034,092)

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS

$

(2,760,861)

$

(4,770,219)

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSETS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

4,881,325

 

9,651,544

NET ASSETS, END OF PERIOD

$

2,120,464

$

4,881,325

Undistributed Net Investment Income

$

0

$

0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Notes to Financial Statements  December 29, 2006

Note 1.  ORGANIZATION

The Integrity Value Fund (the “Fund”) is an investment portfolio of The Integrity Funds (the “Trust”) registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment company.  The Trust may offer multiple portfolios; currently seven portfolios are offered.  On September 19, 2003, the Integrity Value Fund became a series of the Integrity Funds Trust.  Prior to this the Fund was part of the Willamette Funds Group.  The Willamette Funds which were organized as a Delaware statutory trust on January 17, 2001 and were registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company.  Each of the Funds is also the successor to a fund of the same name that was a series of another registered investment company, The Coventry Group.  On March 16, 2001, the shareholders of each o f the predecessor funds approved their reorganization into The Willamette Funds, effective April 1, 2001.  The Willamette Funds offered four managed investment portfolios and were authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares.  The accompanying financial statements and financial highlights are those of the Integrity Value Fund.  The Fund seeks above average total return through a combination of capital appreciation and dividend income.

Shares of the Fund are offered at net asset value plus a maximum sales charge of 5.75% and a distribution fee of up to 0.50% on an annual basis. 

Note 2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Investment security valuation – Assets for which market quotations are available are valued as follows: (a) each listed security is valued at its closing price obtained from the respective primary exchange on which the security is listed, or, if there were no sales on that day, at its last reported current bid price; (b) each unlisted security is valued at the last current bid price obtained from the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System.  All of these prices are obtained by the Administrator from services, which collect and disseminate such market prices. Prices provided by an independent pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices and may take into account appropriate factors such as institutional-size trading in similar groups of securities, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other market data.  In the abse nce of an ascertainable market value, assets are valued at their fair value as determined by the Administrator using methods and procedures reviewed and approved by the Trustees.

Repurchase agreements – In connection with transactions in repurchase agreements, it is the Fund’s policy that its custodian take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the fair value of which exceeds the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest, at all times.  If the seller defaults, and the fair value of the collateral declines, realization of the collateral by the Fund may be delayed or limited.

Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (“CDSC”) – In the case of investments of $1 million or more, a 1.00% CDSC may be assessed on shares redeemed within 12 months of purchase (excluding shares purchased with reinvested dividends and/or distributions).

Federal and state income taxes – It is the policy of the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined in applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized capital gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes.

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

 

 

December 29, 2006

 

December 30, 2005

Tax-Exempt Income

$

0

$

0

Ordinary Income

 

0

 

0

Long-term Capital Gains

 

0

 

0

Total

$

0

$

0

During the fiscal years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, no distributions were paid.

As of December 29, 2006, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed Ordinary Income

Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains

Accumulated Earnings

Accumulated Capital and Other Losses

Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation)

Total Accumulated Earnings/(Deficit)

$0

$0

$0

($417,757)

$210,332

($207,425)

As of December 29, 2006, the Fund had net capital loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future realized gains.  Any difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales.

Year

Unexpired Capital Losses

2011

$417,757

For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund did not make any permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character.  Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to expiring capital loss carryforwards.

Net capital losses incurred after October 31, and within the tax year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the Fund’s next taxable year.  For the year ended December 29, 2006, the Fund deferred to January 1, 2007 post October capital losses, post October currency losses and post October passive foreign investment company losses of $0.

Distributions to shareholders – Dividends from net investment income, declared yearly and paid yearly, are reinvested in additional shares of the Fund at net asset value or paid in cash.  Capital gains, when available, are distributed along with the net investment income dividend at the end of the calendar year. 

Other - Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis.  Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date for financial reporting purposes. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis.  Distributions to shareholders are recorded by the Fund on the ex-dividend date.  Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  These differences are primarily due to differing treatment for market discount, capital loss carryforwards and losses due to wash sales and futures transactions.

Permanent book and tax basis differences relating to shareholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in capital.  Temporary book and tax basis differences will reverse in a subsequent period.

Dividend income – Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date.

Futures contracts – The Fund may purchase and sell financial futures contracts to hedge against changes in the values of equity securities the Fund owns or expects to purchase.

A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell units of a particular index at a set price on a future date.  Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with a broker an amount of cash or securities equal to the minimum “initial margin” requirement of the futures exchange on which the contract is traded.  Subsequent payments (“variation margin”) are made or received by the Fund, dependent on the fluctuations in the value of the underlying index.  Daily fluctuations in value are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the fund.  When entering into a closing transaction, the Fund will realize, for book purposes, a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contracts sold and the futures contracts to buy.  Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to open futures contracts is requir ed to be treated as realized gain (loss) for federal income tax purposes.

Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts.  These risks may include changes in the value of the futures contracts that may not directly correlate with changes in the value of the underlying securities.

Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications – Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Note 3.  CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

As of December 29, 2006, there were unlimited shares of no par authorized; 188,719 and 471,835 shares were outstanding at December 29, 2006, and December 30, 2005, respectively.

Transactions in capital shares were as follows:

 

Shares

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

Shares sold

7,065

23,906

Shares issued on reinvestment of dividends

0

0

Shares redeemed

(290,181)

(546,779)

Net increase (decrease)

(283,116)

(522,873)

Note 4.  INVESTMENT ADVISORY FEES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Integrity Money Management, Inc. (“Integrity Money Management” or “Adviser”), the Fund’s investment adviser; Integrity Funds Distributor, Inc. (“Integrity Funds Distributor”), the Fund’s underwriter; and Integrity Fund Services, Inc. (“Integrity Fund Services”), the Fund’s transfer, accounting, and administrative services agent; are subsidiaries of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., the Fund’s sponsor.

The Advisory Agreement provides for fees to be computed at an annual rate of 1.00% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.  The Fund has recognized $895 of investment advisory fees after a partial waiver for the year ended December 29, 2006.  Certain officers and trustees of the Fund are also officers and directors of the Adviser.

The Adviser has contractually agreed until March 31, 2007 to waive its management fee and to reimburse expenses, other than extraordinary or non-recurring expenses, so that the Net Annual Operating Expenses of the Integrity Value Fund do not exceed 2.65%.  After such a date, the expense limitation may be terminated or revised.  Amounts waived or reimbursed in a particular fiscal year may be recouped by the Adviser within three years of the waiver or reimbursement to the extent that recoupment will not cause operating expenses to exceed any expense limitation in place at that time.  An expense limitation lowers expense ratios and increases returns to investors.

Principal Underwriter and Shareholder Services

Integrity Funds Distributor serves as the principal underwriter for the Fund.  The Fund has adopted a distribution plan for each class of shares as allowed by Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act.  Distribution plans permit the Fund to reimburse its principal underwriter for costs related to selling shares of the Fund and for various other services.  These costs, which consist primarily of commissions and service fees to broker-dealers who sell shares of the Fund, are paid by shareholders through expenses called “Distribution Plan expenses.”  The Fund currently pays an annual distribution fee of up to 0.50% of the average daily net assets of the class.  Distribution Plan expenses are calculated daily and paid monthly.  The Fund has recognized $9,733 of distribution fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Funds Distributor of $431 at December 29, 2006 for distribution fees.

Integrity Fund Services, the transfer agent, provides shareholder services for a variable fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum of $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $23,934 of transfer agency fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $1,933 at December 29, 2006 for transfer agency fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s accounting services agent for a monthly fee equal to the sum of a fixed fee of $2,000, and a variable fee equal to 0.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, together with reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional accounting services fee of $500 per month will be charged by Integrity Fund Services for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $25,609 of accounting service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $2,019 at December 29, 2006 for accounting service fees.  Integrity Fund Services also acts as the Fund’s administrative services agent for a variable fee equal to 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets on an annual basis for the Fund’s first $50 million and at a lower rate on the average daily net assets in excess of $50 million, with a minimum of $2,000 per month plus out-of-pocket expenses.  An additional fee with a minimum $500 per month will be charged for each additional share class.  The Fund has recognized $23,934 of ad ministrative service fees for the year ended December 29, 2006.  The Fund has a payable to Integrity Fund Services of $1,933 at December 29, 2006 for administrative service fees.

Note 5.  INVESTMENT SECURITY TRANSACTIONS

The cost of purchases and proceeds from the sale of investment securities (excluding short-term securities) aggregated $435,195 and $3,260,686, respectively, for the year ended December 29, 2006.

Note 6.  INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES

At December 29, 2006, the aggregate cost of securities for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same for financial reporting purposes at $1,923,134.  The net unrealized appreciation of investments based on the cost was $210,332, which is comprised of $379,850 aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and $169,518 aggregate gross unrealized depreciation.

Note 7.  RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.  This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted  accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Fund is presently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157.


Financial Highlights  December 29, 2006

Selected per share data and ratios for the period indicated

 

 

For The Year Ended December 29, 2006

 

For The Year Ended December 30, 2005

 

For The Year Ended December 31, 2004

 

For The Period April 1, 2003 Through December 31, 2003

 

For The Year Ended March 31, 2003

 

For The Year Ended March 31, 2002

NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD

$

10.35

$

9.70

$

9.04

$

6.82

$

9.28

$

9.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

$

(.23)

$

(.18)

$

(.11)

$

(.12)

$

(.05)

$

(.07)

 

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

 

1.12

 

.83

 

.77

 

2.34

 

(2.41)

 

.23

 

Total Income (Loss) From Investment Operations

$

.89

$

.65

$

.66

$

2.22

$

(2.46)

$

.16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

 

Distributions from net realized gains

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

.00

 

Total Distributions

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

$

.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD

$

11.24

$

10.35

$

9.70

$

9.04

$

6.82

$

9.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Return

 

8.60%(A)

 

6.70%(A)

 

7.30%(A)

 

32.55%(A)(C)

 

(26.51%)(A)

 

1.75%(A)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATIOS/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net assets, end of period (in thousands)

$

2,120

$

4,881

$

9,652

$

10,730

$

8,562

$

11,826

 

Ratio of net expenses (after expense assumption) to average net assets

 

2.65%(B)

 

2.65%(B)

 

2.65%(B)

 

4.66%(B)(D)

 

3.64%(B)

 

3.13%(B)

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

(1.29%)

 

(1.34%)

 

(1.06%)

 

(1.94%)(D)

 

(0.63%)

 

(0.71%)

 

Portfolio turnover rate

 

14.80%

 

29.96%

 

81.42%

 

34.08%

 

45.09%

 

30.41%

(A) Excludes maximum sales charge of 5.75%.

(B) During the periods since December 31, 2003, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., assumed/waived expenses of $54,469, $37,394 and $22,747, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratio of total expenses to average net assets would have been 4.28%, 3.23% and 2.87%, respectively.  During the period April 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc., and Willamette Asset Managers assumed/waived expenses of $14,133.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratios of total expenses to average net assets would have been 4.85%. During the periods prior to March 31, 2003, Willamette Asset Managers and The Coventry Group assumed/waived expenses of $0 and $0, respectively.  If the expenses had not been assumed/waived, the annualized ratios of total expenses to average net assets would have been 3.64% and 3.13%, respectively.

(C) Ratio is not annualized.

(D) Ratio is annualized.

Total return represents the rate that an investor would have earned or lost on an investment in the Fund assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Integrity Value Fund

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of the Integrity Value Fund (one of the portfolios constituting The Integrity Funds), including the schedule of investments as of December 29, 2006, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the years ended December 29, 2006, December 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, and the nine month period ended December 31, 2003.  These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.  The financial highlights for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2003, were audited by other auditors whose report dated May 22, 2003, expressed an unqu alified opinion on those financial highlights.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 29, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Integrity Value Fund of The Integrity Funds as of December 29, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for the years ended December 29, 2006 and December 30, 2005, and the financial highlights for the years ended December 29, 2006, December 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, and the nine month period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BRADY, MARTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

Minot, North Dakota  USA

February 12, 2007

Item 2)

Code of Ethics.

 

(a)

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions (the “Code”).

 

(b)

For purposes of this Item, the term “code of ethics” means written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

 

 

(1)

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

 

 

(2)

Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a registrant files with, or submits to, the Commission and in other public communications made by the registrant;

 

 

(3)

Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations;

 

 

(4)

The prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and

 

 

(5)

Accountability for adherence to the Code.

 

(c)

There were no amendments to the Code during the period covered by the report.

 

(d)

The registrant did not grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from any provisions of the Code to the PFO and PEO during the period covered by this report.

 

(e)

Not applicable.

 

(f)

See Item 12(a) regarding the filing of the Code of Ethics for the Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers of the Integrity Funds and Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc.

Item 3)

Audit Committee Financial Expert.

 

The Trust’s Board of Trustees has determined that Jerry Stai is an audit committee financial expert, as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Stai is independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

Item 4)

Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

 

(a)

Audit fees include the amounts related to the professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.

 

 

 

Audit Fees

 

 

 

2005

$44,950

 

 

 

2006

$42,100

 

(b)

Audit-related fees are fees principally paid for professional services rendered for due diligence and technical accounting consulting and research.

 

 

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

 

 

2005

$6,125

 

 

 

2006

$11,700

 

(c)

Tax fees include amounts related to the preparation and review of the registrant’s tax returns.

 

 

 

Tax Fees

 

 

 

2005

$15,100

 

 

 

2006

$7,700

 

(d)

All Other Fees.

 

 

 

None.

 

(e)

(1)

The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures that require the audit committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided to the registrant by the principal accountant.

 

 

(2)

0% of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of item 4 were not pre-approved by the audit committee. All of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of item 4 were approved by the audit committee.

 

(f)

All services performed on the engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year end were performed by the principal accountant’s full-time permanent employees.

 

(g)

None.

 

(h)

The registrant’s independent auditor did not provide any non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by or controlled with the registrant’s investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.

Item 5)

Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

 

 

Not applicable.

Item 6)

Schedule of Investments.

 

 

The Schedule of Investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7)

Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

 

 

Not applicable.

Item 8)

Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

 

 

Not Applicable.

Item 9)

Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

 

 

Not Applicable.

Item 10)

Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

 

 

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors in the last fiscal half-year.

Item 11)

Controls and Procedures.

 

(a)

Based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR (the “Report”), the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer believe that the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effectively designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the Report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by the filing date, including ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Report is accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer who are making certifications in the Report, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

(b)

There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal half-year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12)

Exhibits.

 

(a)

(1)

The registrant’s Code of Ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto.

 

 

(2)

Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 is filed and attached hereto.

 

(b)

Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is filed and attached hereto.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

By:

/s/Robert E. Walstad

Robert E. Walstad

President, The Integrity Funds

 

Date:

March 5, 2007

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:

/s/Robert E. Walstad

Robert E. Walstad

President, The Integrity Funds

 

Date:

March 5, 2007

 

By:

/s/Laura K. Anderson

Laura K. Anderson

Treasurer, The Integrity Funds

 

Date:

March 5, 2007

 

EX-99.CERT 2 ifscert20070227.htm THE INTEGRITY FUNDS; CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

 

 

 

I, Robert E. Walstad, certify that:

 

 

 

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of The Integrity Funds;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;

 

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation;

 

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 5, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Robert E. Walstad

 

 

Robert E. Walstad

 

 

President, The Integrity Funds


 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Laura K. Anderson, certify that:

 

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of The Integrity Funds;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;

 

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation;

 

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 5, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Laura K. Anderson

 

 

Laura K. Anderson

 

 

Treasurer, The Integrity Funds

 

EX-99.906 CERT 3 ifscert90620070227.htm THE INTEGRITY FUNDS--CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Name of Issuer:

The Integrity Funds

 

In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR of the above-named issuer that is accompanied by this certification, the undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

 

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

Date:

March 5, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Robert E. Walstad

 

Robert E. Walstad

 

President, The Integrity Funds

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Name of Issuer:

The Integrity Funds

 

In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR of the above-named issuer that is accompanied by this certification, the undersigned hereby certifies, to her knowledge, that:

 

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

Date:

March 5, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Laura K. Anderson

 

Laura K. Anderson

 

Treasurer, The Integrity Funds

 

EX-99.CODE ETH 4 ncsrcode20061211.htm CODE OF ETHICS

Code of Ethics For The Principal Executive and Principal
Financial Officers of the Integrity Family of Funds

This Code of Ethics (the “Code”) for Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officers has been adopted by each of the investment companies within the Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. complex (collectively, “Funds”) to effectuate compliance with Section 406 under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules adopted to implement Section 406.

This Code applies to each Fund’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller or persons deemed to be performing similar critical financial and accounting functions (the “Covered Officers”).

Purpose of the Code

This Code sets forth standards and procedures that are reasonably designed to promote:

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a registrant files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in other public communications made by the Funds;

Compliance with applicable laws and governmental rules and regulations;

The prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code; and

Accountability for adherence to the Code.

In general, the principles that govern honest and ethical conduct, including the avoidance of conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, reflect, at the minimum: (1) the duty in performing any responsibilities as a Covered Officer, to place the interests of the Funds ahead of personal interests; (2) the fundamental standard that Covered Officers should not take inappropriate advantage of their positions; (3) the duty to assure that the Fund’s financial reports to its shareholders are prepared honestly and accurately in accordance with applicable rules and regulations; and (4) the duties performed by the Covered Officer on behalf of the Funds are conducted in an honest and ethical manner.

Each Covered Officer should adhere to a high standard of business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual and apparent conflicts of interest.

Ethical Handling of Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest

A “conflict of interest” occurs when a Covered Officer’s private interest interferes with the interests of the Funds. Certain conflicts of interest arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Funds and already are subject to the conflict of interest provisions in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Investment Advisers Act”). This Code does not, and is not intended to, repeat or replace existing programs and procedures, and such conflicts fall outside of the parameters of this Code.

Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between each Fund and the investment adviser of which the Covered Officers are also officers and/or employees. As a result, this Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties, be involved in establishing procedures and implementing decisions that will have different effects on the adviser and the Funds. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between the Funds and the adviser and is consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Funds. If such duties are performed in conformity with the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, such activities will be deemed to have been handled ethically. In addition, it is recognized by the Funds’ Boards of Directors/Trustees (“Boards”) that the Covered Officers may also be officers or employees of one or more other investment companies covered by this or other codes.

Prohibited Activities

Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Code, even if such conflicts of interest are not subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act. The following list provides examples of conflicts of interest under the Code, but keep in mind that these examples are not exhaustive. The foremost principle is that the personal interest of a Covered Officer should not be placed before the interest of the Funds or their shareholders.

Each Covered Officer must:

Not use his personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions or financial reporting by the Funds whereby the Covered Officer would benefit personally to the detriment of the Funds or their shareholders;

Not cause the Funds to take action, or fail to take action, for the individual personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather than the benefit the Funds;

Not use material non-public knowledge of portfolio transactions made or contemplated for the Funds to trade personally or cause others to trade personally in contemplation of the market effect of such transactions;

Not intentionally cause a Fund to fail to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations, including failure to comply with the requirement of full, fair, accurate, understandable and timely disclosure in reports and documents that a Fund files with, or submits to, the SEC and in public communications made by the Funds;

Not fail to acknowledge or certify compliance with this Code on an annual basis.

There are some conflict of interest situations that should always be discussed with the Compliance Department or, under certain circumstances, the Board of Directors/Trustees if material. Examples of these include:

Service as a director on the board of any public company absent prior authorization by the Board;

The receipt of any gifts of more than de minimis value, generally gifts in excess of $100;

The receipt of any entertainment from any company with which the Funds have current or prospective business dealings unless such entertainment is business related, reasonable in cost, appropriate as to time and place, and not so frequent as to raise a suggestion of unethical conduct;

Any ownership interest in, or employment relationship with, any of the Fund’s service providers, other than its investment adviser, principal underwriter, administrator or any affiliated person thereof;

A direct or indirect financial interest in commissions paid by the Funds for effecting portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest arising from the Covered Officer’s employment, such as compensation or equity ownership.

Disclosure and Compliance

Each Covered Officer must familiarize himself with the disclosure requirements generally applicable to the Funds;

Each Covered Officer must not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about the Funds to others, including to the Fund’s directors/trustees and auditors, and to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations;

Each Covered Officer should, to the extent appropriate within his area of responsibility, consult with other officers and employees of the Funds and the adviser with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Funds file with the SEC and in other public communications made by the Funds; and

It is the responsibility of each Covered Officer to promote compliance with the standards and restrictions imposed by applicable laws, rules and regulations.

Reporting and Accountability

Each Covered Officer must:

Upon adoption of the Code or upon becoming a Covered Officer, affirm in writing to the Board that he has received, read, understands and will adhere to this Code;

Annually affirm to the Board that he has received and read the Code and that he understands that he is subject to, and has complied with, the requirements of the Code;

Not retaliate against any other Covered Officer or any employee of the Funds or their affiliated persons for reports of potential violations that are made in good faith; and

Notify Compliance, who will then notify the Fund’s Audit Committee or the Fund’s legal counsel promptly if he knows of any violation of this Code or if a potential violation exists. Failure to do so is itself a violation of this Code.

The Fund’s Audit Committee (the ”Committee”) or in their discretion, the Fund’s legal counsel, is responsible for applying this Code to specific situations in which questions are presented under it and has the authority to interpret this Code in any particular situation. Any approvals or waivers sought by the Principal Executive Officer will be considered by the Committee. In determining whether to waive any of the provisions of this Code, the Committee will consider whether the proposed waiver (1) is prohibited by the Code; (2) is consistent with honest and ethical conduct; and (3) will result in a conflict of interest between the Covered Officer’s personal and professional obligations to the Funds.

Investigating Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest

The Funds will follow these procedures in investigating and enforcing the Code: 

The Committee will take all appropriate action to investigate any potential violations reported to them;

If, after such investigation, the Committee believes that no violation has occurred, no further action is necessary;

Any matter that the Committee believes is a violation will be reported to the Board;

If the Board agrees that a violation has occurred, it will consider appropriate action, which may include review of, and appropriate modifications to, applicable policies and procedures; notification to appropriate personnel of the investment adviser or its board; or a recommendation to dismiss the Covered Officer;

The Committee will be responsible for granting waivers, as appropriate; and

Any changes to or waivers of this Code will, to the extent required, be disclosed as provided by SEC rules.

Other Policies and Procedures

This Code shall be the sole code of ethics adopted by the Funds for purposes of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and forms applicable to registered investment companies thereunder. While other policies or procedures of the Funds, the Funds’ adviser, principal underwriter, or other service providers govern the behavior or activities of the Covered Officers who are subject to this Code, they are superseded by this Code to the extent that they overlap or conflict with the provisions of this Code.

Amendments

At least annually, the Board of Directors/Trustees of each Fund will review the Code and determine whether any amendments are necessary or desirable. Any amendments to this Code, other than amendments to Exhibit A, must be approved or ratified by a majority vote of the Board, including a majority of independent directors.

Record Retention and Confidentiality

All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to this Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly to the extent permitted by applicable laws, rules and regulations. Except as otherwise required by law or this Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the appropriate Board and its counsel.

For Internal Use Only

The Code is intended solely for the internal use by the Funds and does not constitute an admission, by or on behalf of any Fund, as to any fact, circumstance, or legal conclusion.

/s/Robert E. Walstad

Robert E. Walstad

President

Date: _____________________

Exhibit A

Persons covered by this Code of Ethics:

President

Treasurer

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----