XML 29 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures
Note 11 - Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows fair value measurement accounting guidance for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Market or observable inputs are the preferred sources of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. The fair value hierarchy for grouping these assets and liabilities is based on the significance level of the following inputs:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 – quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable
Level 3 – significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.
The following table is a listing of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in the accompanying balance sheets and where they are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2020:
Level 1Level 2Level 3
(in thousands)
Assets:
Derivatives (1)
$— $159,555 $— 
Liabilities:
Derivatives (1)
$— $110,037 $— 
__________________________________________
(1)    This represents a financial asset or liability that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
The following table is a listing of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in the accompanying balance sheets and where they are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2019:
Level 1Level 2Level 3
(in thousands)
Assets:
Derivatives (1)
$— $75,808 $— 
Liabilities:
Derivatives (1)
$— $54,290 $— 
____________________________________________
(1)    This represents a financial asset or liability that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are categorized within the above fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the above fair value hierarchy.
Derivatives
The Company uses Level 2 inputs to measure the fair value of oil, gas, and NGL commodity derivatives. Fair values are based upon interpolated data. The Company derives internal valuation estimates taking into consideration forward commodity price curves, counterparties’ credit ratings, the Company’s credit rating, and the time value of money. These valuations are then compared to the respective counterparties’ mark-to-market statements. The considered factors result in an estimated exit price that management believes provides a reasonable and consistent methodology for valuing derivative instruments. The commodity derivative instruments utilized by the Company are not considered by management to be complex, structured, or illiquid. The oil, gas, and NGL commodity derivative markets are highly active.
Please refer to Note 10 - Derivative Financial Instruments and to Note 11 - Fair Value Measurements in the 2019 Form 10-K for more information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments.
Oil and Gas Properties and Other Property and Equipment
The Company had no assets included in total property and equipment, net, measured at fair value as of September 30, 2020, or December 31, 2019.
Proved oil and gas properties. Proved oil and gas property costs are evaluated for impairment and reduced to fair value when there is an indication that associated carrying costs may not be recoverable. The Company uses an income valuation technique, which converts future cash flows to a single present value amount, to measure the fair value of proved properties using a discount rate, price and cost forecasts, and certain reserve risk-adjustment factors, as selected by the Company’s management. The Company uses a discount rate that represents a current market-based weighted average cost of capital. The prices for oil and gas are forecast based on NYMEX strip pricing, adjusted for basis differentials, for the first five years, after which a flat terminal price is used for each commodity stream. The prices for NGLs are forecasted using Oil Price Information Service (“OPIS”) Mont Belvieu pricing, for as long as the market is actively trading, after which a flat terminal price is used. Future operating costs are also adjusted as deemed appropriate for these estimates. Certain undeveloped reserve estimates are also risk-adjusted given the risk to related projected cash flows due to performance and exploitation uncertainties.
Other Property and Equipment. Other property and equipment costs are evaluated for impairment and reduced to fair value when there is an indication the carrying costs may not be recoverable. To measure the fair value of other property and equipment, the Company uses an income valuation technique or market approach depending on the quality of information available to support management’s assumptions and the circumstances. The valuation includes consideration of the proved and unproved assets supported by the property and equipment, future cash flows associated with the assets, and fixed costs necessary to operate and maintain the assets.
No proved property impairment expense was recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2020. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company recorded impairment expense of $956.7 million related to its South Texas proved oil and gas properties and related support facilities due to the decrease in commodity price forecasts at the end of the first quarter of 2020, specifically decreases in oil and NGL prices. The Company used a discount rate of 11 percent in its calculation of the present value of expected future cash flows based on the prevailing market-based weighted average cost of capital as of March 31, 2020. No proved property impairment expense was recorded during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2019.
The following table presents impairment of oil and gas properties expense and abandonment and impairment of unproved properties expense recorded during the periods presented:
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2020201920202019
(in millions)
Impairment of proved oil and gas properties and related support equipment$— $— $956.7 $— 
Abandonment and impairment of unproved properties (1)
8.8 6.3 50.6 25.1 
Impairment$8.8 $6.3 $1,007.3 $25.1 
____________________________________________
(1)    These impairments related to actual and anticipated lease expirations, as well as actual and anticipated losses on acreage due to title defects, changes in development plans, and other inherent acreage risks. The balances in the unproved oil and gas properties line item on the accompanying balance sheets as of September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, are recorded at carrying value.
Please refer to Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 11 - Fair Value Measurements in the 2019 Form 10-K for more information regarding the Company’s approach in determining the fair value of its properties.
Long-Term Debt
The following table reflects the fair value of the Company’s Senior Note obligations measured using Level 1 inputs based on quoted secondary market trading prices. These notes were not presented at fair value on the accompanying balance sheets as of September 30, 2020, or December 31, 2019, as they were recorded at carrying value, net of any unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs. Please refer to Note 5 - Long-Term Debt for additional discussion.
As of September 30, 2020As of December 31, 2019
Principal AmountFair ValuePrincipal AmountFair Value
(in thousands)
6.125% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2022
$231,881 $182,027 $476,796 $481,564 
5.0% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024
$315,633 $173,655 $500,000 $479,815 
5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025
$349,118 $162,228 $500,000 $475,835 
6.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026
$419,235 $192,659 $500,000 $494,860 
6.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2027
$416,791 $185,964 $500,000 $493,750 
10.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2025
$446,675 $426,820 $— $— 
1.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2021 (1)
$— $— $172,500 $164,430 
1.50% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2021 (1)
$65,485 $61,195 $— $— 
____________________________________________
(1)    The Company’s 2021 Senior Convertible Notes became secured in the second quarter of 2020 upon the closing of the Exchange Offers. Please refer to Note 5 - Long-Term Debt for additional information.
The carrying value of the Company’s revolving credit facility approximates its fair value, as the applicable interest rates are floating, based on prevailing market rates.
Warrants
As discussed in Note 5 - Long-Term Debt, on June 17, 2020, the Company issued warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately 5.9 million shares, or approximately five percent of its outstanding common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The warrants are exercisable any time from and after the Triggering Date, as subsequently defined, until June 30, 2023. The Triggering Date is defined by the Warrant Agreement as the first trading day following five consecutive trading days on which the product of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on four of the five trading days multiplied by the closing price per share of common stock for each such trading day exceeds $1.0 billion (“Triggering Date”). The warrants issued are indexed to the Company’s common stock and are required to be settled through physical settlement or net share settlement if exercised. The warrants were not exercisable during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and through the filing of this report.
The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was determined using a stochastic Monte Carlo simulation using the GBM Model. The Company evaluated the warrants under authoritative accounting guidance and determined that they should be classified as
equity instruments. Upon issuance, the warrants were recorded in additional paid-in capital on the accompanying balance sheets at a fair value of $21.5 million, with no recurring fair value measurement required. There have been no changes to the initial carrying amount of the warrants since issuance.