Basis of Preparation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Chart Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Chart”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Principles of Consolidation: The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Investments in affiliates where the Company’s ownership is between 20 percent and 50 percent, or where the Company does not have control, but has the ability to exercise significant influence over operations or financial policy, are accounted for under the equity method.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Nature of Operations: The Company is a leading global manufacturer of standard and custom-engineered products and systems serving a wide variety of low-temperature and cryogenic applications. The Company has developed an expertise in cryogenic systems and equipment, which operate at low temperatures sometimes approaching absolute zero. The majority of the Company’s products, including vacuum insulated containment vessels, heat exchangers, cold boxes and other cryogenic components, are used throughout the liquid-gas supply chain for the purification, liquefaction, distribution, storage and end-use of industrial gases and hydrocarbons. The Company has domestic operations located across the United States, including the principal executive offices located in Ohio, and an international presence in Asia, Australia and Europe.

Reclassification: Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2011 condensed consolidated statement of cash flow in order to conform to the 2012 presentation.

Cost of Sales: Manufacturing expenses associated with sales are included in cost of sales. Cost of sales include all materials, direct and indirect labor, inbound freight, purchasing and receiving, inspection, internal transfers and distribution and warehousing of inventory. In addition, shop supplies, facility maintenance costs, manufacturing engineering, project management and depreciation expense for assets used in the manufacturing process are included in cost of sales.

Selling, general and administrative costs (“SG&A”): SG&A includes selling, marketing, customer service, product management, design engineering, and other administrative costs not directly supporting the manufacturing process as well as depreciation expense associated with non-manufacturing assets. In addition, SG&A includes corporate operating expenses for executive management, accounting, tax, treasury, human resources, information technology, legal, internal audit, risk management and stock-based compensation expense.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all investments with an initial maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 balances include money market investments, certificates of deposit, and commercial paper. Chart Cryogenic Distribution Equipment (Changzhou) Company, Limited, a joint venture of the Company, held $988 in restricted cash on deposit to cover guarantees.

Short-Term Investments: From time to time, the Company invests in short-term, highly liquid, variable rate instruments, which have stated maturities of greater than three months but less than six months. These short term investments are recorded at cost which approximates fair value. The Company has determined that its investment securities are available and intended for use in current operations and, accordingly, classifies investment securities as current assets. There are no short term investments at March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.

Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost being determined by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. The components of inventory are as follows:



	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Raw materials and supplies	$	69,833	$	64,832
Work in process	41,093		36,045
Finished goods	56,929		48,945
	$	167,855	$	149,822

Revenue Recognition: For the majority of the Company’s products, revenue is recognized when products are shipped, title has transferred and collection is reasonably assured. For these products, there is also persuasive evidence of an arrangement and the selling price to the buyer is fixed or determinable. For brazed aluminum heat exchangers, cold boxes, liquefied natural gas fueling stations and engineered tanks, the Company uses the percentage of completion method of accounting. Earned revenue is based on the percentage of incurred costs to date compared to total estimated costs at completion after giving effect to the most current estimates. The cumulative impact of revisions in total cost estimates during the progress of work is reflected in the period in which these changes become known. Earned revenue reflects the original contract price adjusted for agreed upon claims and change orders, if any. Losses expected to be incurred on contracts in process, after consideration of estimated minimum recoveries from claims and change orders, are charged to operations as soon as such losses are known. Pre-contract costs relate primarily to salaries and benefits incurred to support the selling effort are expensed as incurred. Change orders resulting in additional revenue and profit are recognized upon approval by the customer based on the percentage of incurred costs to date compared to total estimated costs at completion. Certain contracts include incentive-fee arrangements. The incentive fees in such contracts can be based on a variety of factors but the most common are the achievement of target completion dates, target costs, and/or other performance criteria. Incentive fee revenue is not recognized until it is earned. Timing of amounts billed on contracts varies from contract to contract and could cause a significant variation in working capital requirements. The Company reports sales net of tax assessed by qualifying governmental authorities.

Product Warranties: The Company provides product warranties with varying terms and durations for the majority of its products. The Company calculates its warranty reserve by considering historical warranty experience and specifically identified warranty issues. The Company records warranty expense in cost of sales. The changes in the Company’s consolidated warranty reserve during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Beginning balance	$	13,181		$	13,372
Warranty expense	989			2,171
Warranty usage	(1,973		)	(1,982		)
Ending balance	$	12,197		$	13,561

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: The Company does not amortize goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets, but reviews them at least annually for impairment, and on an interim basis if necessary, using a measurement date of October 1st. The Company amortizes intangible assets that have finite lives over their useful lives.

With respect to goodwill, the Company assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The reporting units are the same as our operating segments, which are also the reportable segments: Energy & Chemicals, Distribution & Storage, and BioMedical. The Company first evaluates relevant events and circumstances, such as macroeconomic conditions and the Company's overall financial performance to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company then evaluates how significant each of the identified factors could be to the fair value or carrying amount of a reporting unit and weighs these factors in totality in forming a conclusion whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the Company determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the first and second steps of the goodwill impairment test are not necessary. Otherwise, the Company would perform the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. As of October 1, 2011 and based on the Company's qualitative assessment, the Company determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount of each reporting unit and, therefore, the two-step goodwill impairment test was not necessary.

With respect to other indefinite-lived intangible assets, the Company determines the fair value of any indefinite-lived intangible assets using an income approach, compares the fair value to its carrying amount and records an impairment loss if the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. The Company uses the relief from royalty method to develop fair value estimates for trade names and trademarks. This method focuses on the level of royalty payments that the user of an intangible asset would be willing to pay for the use of the asset if it were not owned by the user. This method has been consistently applied between years. As of October 1, 2011, the Company determined that the fair values of trademarks, trade names, and in-process research and development exceeded their carrying amounts.

The following table displays the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for all intangible assets:



		March 31, 2012					December 31, 2011
	Estimated Useful Life	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Finite-lived assets:
Unpatented technology	9 years	$	18,229	$	(9,562	)	$	18,113	$	(9,024	)
Patents	10 years	8,978		(6,482		)	9,080		(5,434		)
Product names	14 years	5,674		(1,858		)	5,638		(1,818		)
Customer relations	13 years	130,614		(50,634		)	130,488		(48,840		)
		$	163,495	$	(68,536	)	$	163,319	$	(65,116	)
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademarks and trade names		$	39,305				$	39,280
In-process research and development		3,070					3,070
		$	42,375				$	42,350

The following table represents the changes in goodwill:



Balance as of January 1, 2012	$	288,770
Foreign currency adjustments	666
Balance as of March 31, 2012	$	289,436

Amortization expense for intangible assets subject to amortization was $3,070 and $3,317 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and is estimated to be approximately $13,300 for 2012 and an average of $10,800 for years 2013 through 2017.

Stock-based Compensation: The Company records stock-based compensation according to current accounting guidance which requires all share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of employee stock options, to be measured at fair value on the date of grant.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company granted 104 stock options, 31 shares of restricted stock and stock unit awards and 34 performance stock units and leveraged restricted stock units. The stock options vest over a four year period. Restricted stock and stock unit awards vest over a three year period and performance stock units and leveraged restricted stock units vest at the end of three years based on the achievement of certain performance and market conditions.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, participants in the Company's stock option plans exercised options to purchase 184 shares of the Company's common stock.

Stock-based compensation expense was $2,505 and $1,401 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, the total stock-based compensation expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of approximately 2.1 years is $9,077.

Convertible Debt: The Company determines if the embedded conversion feature within the Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes (the “Convertible Notes”) is clearly and closely related to the Company’s common stock and therefore exempt from separate accounting treatment under ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Convertible Notes exempt from derivative accounting are recognized according to ASC 470-20, “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” by bifurcating the principal balance into a liability component and an equity component where the fair value of the liability component is estimated by calculating the present value of its cash flows discounted at an interest rate that the Company would have received for similar debt instruments that have no conversion rights (the “straight-debt rate”), and the equity component is the residual amount, net of tax, which creates a discount on the Convertible Notes. The Company subsequently recognizes non-cash interest expense as the carrying value of the Convertible Notes is accreted back to its principal amount.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income – Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (Topic 220).” The amendments were made to allow the FASB time to consider whether there should be additional presentation and disclosure requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by this update. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-09, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80).” The Company has historically participated in the multiemployer plan for union employees at the Company's La Crosse, Wisconsin facility. The amendments in the ASU require the Company to provide additional separate disclosures for multiemployer pension plans and multiemployer other postretirement benefit plans. The amendments are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011 and are applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350).” The amendments in the ASU permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the first and second steps of the goodwill impairment test are not necessary. Otherwise, the entity would perform the first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011. The Company early adopted the new guidance and its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220).” The amendments in the ASU revise the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The new guidance removes the presentation options in Topic 220 and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company since the amendments affect financial statement presentation only.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (Topic 820).” The amendments in the ASU aim to align the principles for fair value measurements and the related disclosure requirements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This ASU mainly contains clarifications such as the specification that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and are not relevant when measuring the fair value of financial assets or of liabilities. The ASU also requires new disclosures under U.S. GAAP such as quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in a fair value measurement that is categorized within the Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. This ASU is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption by public companies is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.