EX-99.1 2 a05-21411_1ex99d1.htm EXHIBIT 99

































 

Searchable text section of graphics shown above

 



 

[LOGO]

 

[GRAPHIC]

 

Presentation to               

 

December 2005

 



 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

Statements in this presentation that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” “expects” or comparable terminology or by discussions of future events. Such forward looking statements include statements relating to the clinical development program for TPI 287, the anticipated activity of TPI 287 in taxanes resistant tumors, the safety and efficacy of TPI 287, the time tables for future development of TPI 287, and the company’s ability to continue to fund its development programs, either through existing resources or through new funding sources.  Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include risks that clinical trials for TPI 287 will be delayed due to institutional approvals, patient recruitment, formulation and manufacturing difficulties or other factors; and that human clinical trials may show that TPI 287 is unsafe and/or ineffective in treating cancer in human patients. General implementation risks associated with development of any of our products include the risk that we will be blocked or limited in the development or marketing because of the intellectual property rights of third parties; that we are limited in our ability to obtain, maintain and enforce our own intellectual property rights; that development of our product candidates is delayed or terminated because the costs of further development exceed the value of such candidates; and that the Company’s resources are insufficient to continue development and the Company will be unable to raise sufficient additional capital to continue operations and development. Additional risks, uncertainties and other information is contained in the Company’s reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Particular attention should be paid to information in such SEC reports under the captions “Risk Factors” and “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”  The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this presentation or any other disclosure, whether as a result of new or additional information, future events or otherwise.

 

[LOGO]

 

2



 

Tapestry Today

 

                  Founded in 1991

                  Located in Boulder, Colorado

                  Clinical stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel oncology compounds

                  Experienced pre-clinical & clinical oncology development team

                  Leading clinical oncology advisory team

                  Novel third generation taxane (TPI 287-IV) active in a broad range of solid tumors

                  Oral version of TPI 287 (TPI 287-Oral) has shown bioavailability in animals

 

3



 

Tapestry Financial Overview

 

As of 12/6/2005

 

                  Price: $0.39

                  52 Week High/Low: $0.25 - $1.35

                  Market Value: $13.39M

 

9 Months Ended 9/28/2005

 

                  Cash and Short Term Investments: $17.57M

                  Net Operating Loss: $14.52

                  Number of Shares

                  Primary: 34,238,995

                  Diluted: 41,988,280

 

4



 

Senior Management

 

                  Leonard Shaykin, Chairman and CEO

                  Biotechnology entrepreneur, Venture capital, Private equity

                  Martin Batt, COO

                  Operations expertise in multiple industries including biotechnology, aerospace, computer software

                  Gordon Link, CFO

                  CPA plus over 15 years of biotechnology operations

                  Michael Kurman, CMO

                  Former Director of Clinical Research, Oncology and Allergy for Janssen Research Foundation; other positions at U.S. Biosciences and Quintiles

                  David Emerson, VP of Cancer Biology

                  16 years in biopharmaceuticals; OSI, Gilead and GSK

                  James McChesney, CSO

                  Natural Products Chemistry specialist

                  Gilles Tapolsky, VP of Product Development

                  PhD with 16 years in biopharmaceuticals; FeRx, ViroTex, Rhone Poulenc Rorer and co-founder of Flamel Technologies

 

5



 

Staffing Summary

 

                  34 FTEs

                  29 Full time

                  9 Part time

                  4 Consultants

                  3 MDs, 8 PhDs

                  6 in clinical development and regulatory

 

6



 

Milestones

 

                  Achieved

                  Initial Public Offering in 1994

                  Generic paclitaxel approved in US & 25 other countries, then…

                  Paclitaxel business sold to Mayne Pharma for $70MM in 2003

                  Filed first proprietary IND for TPI 287-IV in 2004

                  Commenced Phase I clinical trial for TPI 287-IV in 2005

                  Evidence of oral bioavailability of TPI 287-Oral

 

                  Upcoming

                  Oral PK study in humans

                  Completion of Phase I clinical trial for TPI 287-IV (in 7 and 21 day dosing)

                  Commencement of Phase II clinical trials for TPI 287-IV

 

7



 

TPI 287

A Third Generation Taxane
with Activity in
Multi-Drug Resistant Tumors

 

8



 

TPI 287: A Third Generation Taxane

 

                  Preclinical data shows that TPI 287 has more activity than paclitaxel or docetaxel in a variety of taxane-resistant human tumor cell lines

 

                  TPI 287 has the potential to:

                  circumvent expression of the drug efflux transporter, MDR-1 protein, seen in breast, lung and prostate cancers

                  be active in tumor types currently not responsive to paclitaxel, (i.e., colon cancer)

                  be active in tumor cells that express mutant tubulin

 

9



 

TPI 287: Tubulin Binding Model

 

Computational modeling suggests that TPI 287 binds to wild-type tubulin through classic hydrogen bonds that contribute to a higher affinity than paclitaxel.

 

In addition, TPI 287 appears to move closer and bind tighter to mutant tubulin by moving deeper into the binding pocket of mutant B-tubulin.

 

[GRAPHIC]

 

10



 

TPI 287 Tumor Cell Cytotoxicity Studies

 

Tumor Cell Line

 

Origin

 

TPI 287 IC50

 

Comparator IC50

 

Cytotoxicity Index

 

 

 

 

(µM)

 

(µM)

 

(IC50 Comparator ÷

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IC50 TPI 287)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MCF-7/NCI-ADR (mdr1+)

 

Breast

 

0.0100

 

PTX: 2.0

 

200

MCF-7 (mdr1-)

 

Breast

 

0.0006

 

PTX: 0.0003

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HCT-15 (mdr1+++, mrp+)

 

Colon

 

0.0095

 

SN-38: 0.05

 

5.3

HCT-116 (mdr1+)

 

Colon

 

0.0035

 

SN-38: 0.0045

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H69 (mrp-, myc+)

 

Lung

 

0.0046

 

Docetaxel: 0.0072

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MIA PaCa-2 (bcl-2 inducible)

 

Pancreas

 

0.0763

 

GEM: 0.124

 

1.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HepG2 (mdr1+, mrp+)

 

Hepatocellular

 

0.1000

 

Oxaliplatin: 5.5

 

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DU-145 (mdr1+)

 

Prostate

 

0.0050

 

Cisplatin: 1.4

 

280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MESSA/Dx5 (mdr1+)

 

Uterine

 

0.0100

 

Doxorubicin: 0.8

 

80

MESSA (mdr1-)

 

Uterine

 

0.0053

 

Doxorubicin: 0.2

 

38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SK-N-FI (mdr1+)

 

Neuroblastoma

 

0.0034

 

Vincristine: 13.4

 

3900

SK-N-AS (mdr1-, TGF-B1+)

 

Neuroblastoma

 

0.0049

 

Vincristine: 17.7

 

3600

 

TPI 287 is generally more potent in killing tumor cells than the comparator agent, particularly in those tumor cells expressing high levels of multi-drug resistance (mdr1+) protein.

 

11



 

TPI 287 Single Dose Toxicology Studies

 

                  Intravenous or Intraperitoneal dose tolerance and MTD

 

                  Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

                  Mouse – 80 mg/kg or 240 mg/m2

                  Rat – 48 mg/kg or 288 mg/m2

                  Dog – 12.5 mg/kg or 221 mg/m2

 

The toxicology profile and the maximum tolerated dose of TPI 287 is consistent to that routinely seen with other taxanes

 

12



 

TPI 287 Repeat Dose Toxicology Studies

 

                  Maximum Tolerated Dose

                  Mouse – 12 mg/kg or 36 mg/m2

                  Rat – 14 mg/kg or 84 mg/m2

                  Dog – 4 mg/kg or 71 mg/m2 (basis for human dosing)

 

The toxicology profile and the maximum tolerated dose of TPI 287 is consistent to that routinely seen with other taxanes

 

13



 

TPI 287: Preclinical Summary

 

                  In Vitro Studies

                  Evidence of activity in various cell lines including: breast, colon, lung, pancreas, prostate, and others

                  Tumor Xenograft Studies

                  Evidence of activity in breast, colon, lung, and prostate tumors models, including those tumors with expression of mdr-1 protein

                  Toxicity

                  Generally well-tolerated

                  Key findings are GI in nature

                  MTD based on dog repeat study is 4 mg/kg or 71 mg/m2

                  Starting human dosing programs

                  Based on 1/10 of MTD in dog

                  Starting dose is 7 mg/m2

 

14



 

TPI 287 Additional Studies

 

                  Studies comparing TPI 287 to epothilones and other new taxanes in clinical development

                  Studies designed to investigate TPI 287 at alternative dosing regimens

                  Studies designed to investigate combinations of TPI 287 with other anticancer drugs

                  Studies designed to investigate sequencing of TPI 287 with other anticancer drugs

 

Tapestry is expanding its pre-clinical package in anticipation of additional clinical studies

 

15



 

TPI 287:
Q7D (7-day dosing) Phase
I Study

 

[GRAPHIC]

 

16



 

Q7D Trial Sites and Investigators

 

                  Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.

                  John Marshall, M.D., Principal Investigator, Associate Professor of Oncology and Medicine at Georgetown University and Director of the Developmental Therapeutics program at the Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.

 

                  Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York

                  Tauseef Ahmed, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Oncology/Hematology at New York Medical College

 

17



 

Q7D Phase I Trial Objectives

 

Primary Objective:

                  To determine the maximum tolerated dose of TPI 287

 

Secondary Objectives:

                  To determine the safety of TPI 287

                  To determine the antitumor activity of TPI 287

                  To determine the pharmacokinetic profile of TPI 287

                  To determine the pharmacodynamic profile of TPI 287

 

18



 

Q7D Phase I Trial Design - 1

 

                  Open-Label

                  Multicenter

                  Sequential groups

                  Dose-escalation until MTD

                  Anticipated number of patients: up to 48

 

19



 

Q7D Phase I Trial Design - 2

 

                  Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) = Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) - 1

                  Enroll 4 patients at each dose level

                  Escalate dose after 3 patients have completed one cycle

                  If 0/3 with DLT, the next cohort will be enrolled at twice the previous dose

                  If 1/3 with DLT, add 3 more patients at current dose

                  If 1/6 with DLT, the next cohort will be enrolled at 1.25 the previous dose

                  If 2/6 with DLT, stop escalation

                  If 2/3 with DLT, stop escalation

 

20



 

Q7D Phase I Study Duration

 

                  Patients will be treated until the following:

                  Dose Limiting Toxicity

                  Patient or Investigator decision

                  Progressive disease

                  Patient develops significant other illness

                  If the study is not discontinued for above reasons, patients can remain enrolled in trial until disease progression

 

21



 

Q7D Status of Phase I Trial

(as of December 5, 2005)

 

                  Completed third cohort (28 mg/m2)

 

                  Currently dosing the fourth cohort (56 mg/m2)

 

                  Types of cancers of patients enrolled to date include: breast, prostate, kidney, colorectal, basal cell, endometrial, glioblastoma and cervical cancers as well as osteosarcoma

 

22



 

Dosing Ranges of Approved Taxanes

 

Weekly Administration

 

21 Day Administration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxol

 

60-90 mg/m2

 

 

Taxol

 

135-175 mg/m2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxotere

 

30-40 mg/m2

 

 

Taxotere

 

75-100 mg/m2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abraxane

 

100-125 mg/m2

 

 

Abraxane

 

260-300 mg/m2

 

7 day dosing of TPI 287 has already safely achieved the typical range of other taxanes.

 

23



 

Q7D Phase I Timelines for TPI 287

 

                  IND Submission Completed: December 2004

                  First patient in Q7D Protocol Completed: May 2005

                  Expected Q7D Phase I trial Completion: 2Q06

 

24



 

TPI 287:
Q21D (21-day dosing)
Phase I Study

 

[GRAPHIC]

 

25



 

Differences between the Q7D and Q21D Phase I Studies

 

Q7D

 

                  Q7 Day Administration one dose per week for three weeks followed by one week of rest

 

                  Completed the third cohort (patients exposed to 84 mg/m2 in a 28 day period)

 

                  Four patients per cohort, 3 of which must complete one cycle before the next cohort can be recruited

 

Q21D

 

                  Q21 Day Administration one dose every 21 days

 

                  First cohort starting at 7 mg/m2 in November 2005

 

                  One patient per cohort until the first drug related Grade 2 or greater toxicity is seen, then three patients per cohort

 

26



 

Q21D Phase I Timelines for TPI 287

 

                  Q21D Protocol Submission Completed: July 2005

                  First patient in expected: December 2005

                  Expected Q21D Phase I trial Completion : Mid-2006

 

27



 

TPI 287 Oral Program

 

[GRAPHIC]

 

28



 

Oral Program for TPI 287

 

                  TPI 287 has been shown to have oral efficacy in mouse xenografts

 

                  TPI 287 has been shown to have oral bioavailability in rats

 

                  File a protocol amendment to TPI 287 IND for bioavailability study in man

 

                  If oral bioavailability in man is sufficient, then Tapestry will file new IND to continue development of TPI 287-Oral

 

29



 

Oral Program for TPI 287

 

On November 16, 2005, at the AACR/NCI/EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics in Philadelphia, Tapestry presented supportive preclinical data on the oral bioavailability of TPI 287.

 

30



 

Intellectual Property for TPI 287

 

Composition of Matter:

                  Pending patent claims cover the composition of matter and the methods of making TPI 287

                  Various modifications on the sidechain and on some key positions on the taxane unit are the subject of a pending patent application

                  A study done on possible combination therapies (using TPI 287 in combination with quassinoids) is the subject of a pending patent application

 

On-Going Work:

                  Patent application is begin drafted to cover the new coupling methods (to provide key intermediates) generated. These new methods of manufacture demonstrated an efficient way of synthesizing this family of semi-synthetic taxanes, including paclitaxel, docetaxel and TPI 287

                  Various side chain compositions and methods to synthesize taxanes are the subject of this new application

 

31



 

Board of Directors

 

                  Leonard P. Shaykin

Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer

                  Stephen K. Carter, M.D.

Former Senior Vice President, Worldwide Clinical Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Deputy Director, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute

                  George M. Gould, Esq.

Attorney, Of Counsel, Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Giffinger & Vecchione; formerly Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel of Hoffman-La Roche

                  Arthur Hull Hayes, Jr., M.D.

President, MediScience Associates a pharmaceutical consulting company; Former FDA Commissioner

                  The Honorable Richard N. Perle

Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense; Director of Hollinger International, Inc.; Autonomy, PLC

                  Patricia Pilia, Ph.D.

Executive VP, Secretary, Co-founder of Company

                  Robert E. Pollack, Ph.D.

Professor of Biological Sciences and Director of the Center for the Study of Science and Religion at Columbia University

                  Elliot M. Maza, J.D., C.P.A.

Chief Financial Officer of Emisphere Technologies, Inc.

 

32



 

Scientific Advisory Board

 

                  Paul A. Bunn, Jr., M.D. (Chair)

Director of the University of Colorado Cancer Center, past president of American Society of Clinical Oncology (2002-2003), and former chairman of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) for FDA

 

                  S. Gail Eckhardt, M.D.

Professor of Medicine and Director of the Developmental Therapeutics and GI Malignancies Programs at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver

 

                  Robert E. Pollack, Ph.D.

Professor of Biological Sciences and Director of the Center for the Study of Science and Religion at Columbia University

 

                  Eric K. Rowinsky, M.D.

Former Director of the Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research Center and Clinical Professor of Medicine at the University of Medicine at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

 

                  Daniel D. Von Hoff, M.D.

Professor of Medicine, Pathology, Molecular and Cellular Biology and the Director of the Arizona Health Sciences Center’s Cancer Therapeutics Program

 

33



 

[LOGO]

 

Strategies for LifeTM

 

34