XML 35 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Note 10 - Losses and LAE
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Insurance Loss Reserves [Abstract]  
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense
Our reserve for losses and LAE, at the end of each period indicated, consisted of:
(In thousands)
June 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
Mortgage insurance loss reserves
$
448,094

 
$
507,588

Services loss reserves (1) 
3,448

 

Total reserve for losses and LAE
$
451,542

 
$
507,588

______________________
(1)
A majority of this amount is included in the reinsurance recoverables reported in other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet, and relates to the acquisition of EnTitle Direct, completed on March 27, 2018.
The following table shows our mortgage insurance reserve for losses and LAE by category at the end of each period indicated:
(In thousands)
June 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
Reserves for losses by category:
 
 
 
Prime
$
255,284

 
$
285,022

Alt-A and A minus and below
144,379

 
170,873

IBNR and other
14,246

 
16,021

LAE
12,228

 
13,349

Reinsurance recoverable (1) 
9,317

 
8,315

Total primary reserves
435,454

 
493,580

Total pool reserves (2) 
12,197

 
13,463

Total First-lien reserves
447,651

 
507,043

Other (3) 
443

 
545

Total reserve for losses
$
448,094

 
$
507,588

______________________
(1)
Represents ceded losses on captive reinsurance transactions, the QSR Program and the Single Premium QSR Program.
(2)
Includes reinsurance recoverable of $24 thousand and $35 thousand as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.
(3)
Does not include our Second-lien premium deficiency reserve that is included in other liabilities.
The following table presents information relating to our mortgage insurance reserve for losses, including our IBNR reserve and LAE but excluding our Second-lien premium deficiency reserve, for the periods indicated:
        
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
(In thousands)
2018
 
2017
 
Balance at beginning of period
$
507,588

 
$
760,269

 
Less: Reinsurance recoverables (1) 
8,350

 
6,851

 
Balance at beginning of period, net of reinsurance recoverables
499,238

 
753,418

 
Add: Losses and LAE incurred in respect of default notices reported and unreported in:
 
 
 
 
Current year (2) 
67,286

 
88,906

 
Prior years
(11,311
)
 
(24,721
)
 
Total incurred
55,975

 
64,185

 
Deduct: Paid claims and LAE related to:
 
 
 
 
Current year (2) 
1,091

 
1,027

 
Prior years
115,369

 
172,356

 
Total paid
116,460

 
173,383

 
Balance at end of period, net of reinsurance recoverables
438,753

 
644,220

 
Add: Reinsurance recoverables (1) 
9,341

 
7,371

 
Balance at end of period
$
448,094

 
$
651,591

 
______________________
(1)
Related to ceded losses recoverable, if any, on captive reinsurance transactions, the QSR Program and the Single Premium QSR Program. See Note 7 for additional information.
(2)
Related to underlying defaulted loans with a most recent default notice dated in the year indicated. For example, if a loan had defaulted in a prior year, but then subsequently cured and later re-defaulted in the current year, that default would be considered a current year default.
Reserve Activity
2018 Activity
Our mortgage insurance loss reserves at June 30, 2018 declined as compared to December 31, 2017, primarily as a result of the amount of paid claims continuing to outpace losses incurred related to new default notices reported in the current year. Reserves established for new default notices were the primary driver of our incurred losses for the six months ended June 30, 2018, and they were primarily impacted by the number of new primary default notices received in the period and our related gross Default to Claim Rate assumption applied to those new defaults, which was 9% as of June 30, 2018. The provision for losses during the first six months of 2018 was positively impacted by favorable reserve development on prior year defaults, which was primarily driven by a reduction during the period in certain Default to Claim Rate assumptions for these prior year defaults compared to the assumptions used at December 31, 2017. The reductions in Default to Claim Rate assumptions resulted from observed trends, primarily higher Cures than were previously estimated.
Following Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, which occurred in the third quarter of 2017, we observed an increase in new primary defaults from FEMA designated areas associated with these hurricanes. We expect most of these hurricane-related defaults to cure by the end of 2018, and at higher cure rates than the rates of our general population of defaults. We therefore assigned a 3% Default to Claim Rate assumption to the new primary defaults from FEMA Designated Areas associated with Hurricanes Harvey and Irma that were reported subsequent to those two natural disasters and through February 2018. These incremental defaults did not have a material impact on our provision for losses as of June 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017. However, the future reserve impact may be affected by various factors, including the pace of economic recovery in the FEMA Designated Areas.
Total claims paid decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to the same period in 2017, consistent with the ongoing decline in the outstanding default inventory.
2017 Activity
Our loss reserves at June 30, 2017 declined as compared to December 31, 2016, primarily as a result of the amount of paid claims and Cures continuing to outpace losses incurred related to new default notices reported in the current year. Reserves established for new default notices were the primary driver of our total incurred loss for the six months ended June 30, 2017, and they were primarily impacted by the number of new primary default notices received in the period and our related gross Default to Claim Rate assumption applied to those new defaults, which was 11% as of June 30, 2017. The provision for losses during the first six months of 2017 was positively impacted by favorable reserve development on prior year defaults, which was primarily driven by a reduction during the period in certain Default to Claim Rate assumptions for these prior year defaults compared to those used at December 31, 2016. The reductions in Default to Claim Rate assumptions resulted from observed trends, primarily higher Cures than were previously estimated. The positive development in prior year defaults was partially offset by a decrease in estimated rates of future Loss Mitigation Activities compared to those used at December 31, 2016.
Reserve Assumptions
Default to Claim Rate
Our aggregate weighted-average net Default to Claim Rate assumption (net of Claim Denials and Rescissions) used in estimating our primary reserve for losses was 35% at June 30, 2018, compared to 31% at December 31, 2017. This increase in the default to claim rate was entirely driven by a reduction in the number of defaults in FEMA Designated Areas associated with Hurricanes Harvey and Irma. Excluding the impact of defaults associated with these FEMA Designated Areas (which had a lower Default to Claim Rate of 3%), our aggregate weighted-average net Default to Claim Rate (net of Claim Denials and Rescissions) was 38% at both June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2018. As of June 30, 2018 our gross Default to Claim Rate assumptions on our primary portfolio ranged from 9% for new defaults, up to 68% for defaults not in foreclosure stage, and 75% for Foreclosure Stage Defaults. Our Default to Claim Rate estimates on defaulted loans are mainly developed based on the Stage of Default and Time in Default of the underlying defaulted loans grouped according to the period in which the default occurred, as measured by the progress toward foreclosure sale and the number of months in default. Our estimate of expected Rescissions and Claim Denials (net of expected Reinstatements) embedded in our estimated Default to Claim Rate is generally based on our recent experience. Consideration is also given to any differences in characteristics between those rescinded policies and denied claims and the loans remaining in our defaulted inventory.
Loss Mitigation
As our Legacy Portfolio has become a smaller percentage of our overall insured portfolio, a reduced amount of Loss Mitigation Activity has occurred with respect to the claims we receive, and we expect this general trend to continue. As a result, our future Loss Mitigation Activity is not expected to mitigate our paid losses significantly. The amount of estimated Loss Mitigation Activities incorporated into our reserve analysis at any point in time is affected by a number of factors, including not only our estimated rate of Rescissions, Claim Denials and Claim Curtailments on future claims, but also the volume and attributes of our defaulted insured loans, our estimated Default to Claim Rate and our estimated Claim Severity, among other assumptions. Our estimate of net future Loss Mitigation Activities has not materially impacted our loss reserves at June 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017.
Our reported Rescission, Claim Denial and Claim Curtailment activity in any given period is subject to challenge by our lender and servicer customers. We expect that a portion of previous Rescissions will be reinstated and previous Claim Denials will be resubmitted with the required documentation and ultimately paid; therefore, we have incorporated this expectation into our IBNR reserve estimate. Our IBNR reserve estimate of $6.2 million and $10.4 million at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, includes reserves for this activity.
We also accrue for the premiums that we expect to refund to our lender customers in connection with our estimated Rescissions.