10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2014

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _________________________

Commission File Number: 000-21574

DYNACQ HEALTHCARE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	76-0375477
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
4301 Vista Road
Pasadena, Texas	77504
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(713) 378-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. (Check One):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of July 10, 2014, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, par value $.001 per share, was 14,418,626.

Table of Contents

		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements.	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2014 and August 31, 2013.	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013.	5
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013.	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013.	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	18
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	24
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	24
PART II–OTHER INFORMATION		25
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	25
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	25
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	25
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	25
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	25
Item 5.	Other Information.	25
Item 6.	Exhibits.	25
Signatures		27
Index of Exhibits		28

2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	May 31, 2014		August 31, 2013
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,128,361	$	13,585,447
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of approximately $157,920,000 and $170,198,000		1,772,753		1,062,029
Inventories		305,242		293,565
Trading securities		—		1,071,346
Interest receivable		153,477		102,964
Prepaid expenses		146,419		180,883
Income tax receivable		—		569,430
Total current assets		19,506,252		16,865,664
Investments available-for-sale		21,285,689		17,458,985
Property and equipment, net		6,274,306		6,323,657
Income tax receivable		800,920		800,920
Other assets		229,344		187,101
Total assets	$	48,096,511	$	41,636,327

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)

	May 31, 2014		August 31, 2013
	(Unaudited)
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	982,412	$	1,012,328
Accrued liabilities		16,085,797		11,845,317
Current portion of notes payable		16,972		40,256
Current portion of capital lease obligations		28,447		115,737
Total current liabilities		17,113,628		13,013,638
Non-current liabilities:
Long-term portion of notes payable		—		6,744
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations		48,492		69,978
Total liabilities		17,162,120		13,090,360
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Dynacq stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		—		—
Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 14,418,626 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2014; 14,543,626 shares issued and outstanding at August 31, 2013		14,419		14,544
Additional paid-in capital		10,430,404		10,282,256
Accumulated other comprehensive income		13,148,629		9,382,334
Retained earnings		7,277,511		8,803,410
Total Dynacq stockholders’ equity		30,870,963		28,482,544
Non-controlling interest		63,428		63,423
Total equity		30,934,391		28,545,967
Total liabilities and equity	$	48,096,511	$	41,636,327

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net patient service revenue	$	2,748,772		$	1,558,762		$	7,239,406		$	4,514,611
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		1,588,618			1,516,005			4,632,833			4,299,769
Medical services and supplies		532,021			463,715			1,453,584			1,234,241
Other operating expenses		1,158,181			1,145,218			3,316,921			4,839,800
Depreciation and amortization		85,788			109,157			280,632			354,652
Total costs and expenses		3,364,608			3,234,095			9,683,970			10,728,462
Operating loss		(615,836	)		(1,675,333	)		(2,444,564	)		(6,213,851	)
Other income (expense):
Rent and other income		194,775			177,142			611,884			3,708,212
Interest income		226,705			203,310			653,320			678,964
Interest expense		(105,113	)		(135,169	)		(346,535	)		(415,942	)
Total other income, net		316,367			245,283			918,669			3,971,234
Loss before income taxes from continuing operations		(299,469	)		(1,430,050	)		(1,525,895	)		(2,242,617	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		—			—			—			—
Loss from continuing operations		(299,469	)		(1,430,050	)		(1,525,895	)		(2,242,617	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			8,262			—			378,348
Net loss		(299,469	)		(1,421,788	)		(1,525,895	)		(1,864,269	)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		29			31			(4	)		2,804
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(299,440	)	$	(1,421,757	)	$	(1,525,899	)	$	(1,861,465	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			—			0.03
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.13	)
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding		14,418,626			14,543,626			14,431,126			14,543,626

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net loss	$	(299,469	)	$	(1,421,788	)	$	(1,525,895	)	$	(1,864,269	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $-0-, $-0-, $-0-and $(4,414)		—			—			—			(8,196	)
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $-0- for all periods presented		1,194,983			796,836			3,766,295			773,164
Other comprehensive income		1,194,983			796,836			3,766,295			764,968
Comprehensive income (loss)		895,514			(624,952	)		2,240,400			(1,099,301	)
Less comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		29			31			(4	)		2,804
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	895,543		$	(624,921	)	$	2,240,396		$	(1,096,497	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(1,525,895	)	$	(1,864,269	)
Less income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			(378,348	)
Net loss before discontinued operations		(1,525,895	)		(2,242,617	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss before discontinued operations to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		280,632			354,652
Gain on sale of investments available-for-sale and trading securities		(161,864	)		(2,905,850	)
Gain on sale of investment in real estate		—			(480,108	)
Stock based compensation		148,023			60,121
Gain on sale of assets		—			(27,509	)
Foreign currency exchange gains		(60,485	)		(78,159	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(710,724	)		(41,787	)
Interest receivable		(50,513	)		17,307
Inventories		(11,677	)		88,228
Prepaid expenses		34,464			247,071
Income tax receivable		569,430			—
Other assets		(42,243	)		49,794
Accounts payable		(29,916	)		(1,033,054	)
Accrued liabilities		4,240,480			(107,475	)
Cash from continuing activities		2,679,712			(6,099,386	)
Cash from discontinued activities		—			378,348
Net cash from operating activities		2,679,712			(5,721,038	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Sales proceeds of investments available-for-sale and trading securities		1,233,286			3,249,622
Sales proceeds of investment in real estate		—			2,365,017
Purchase of equipment		(231,280	)		(8,045	)
Sales proceeds of equipment		—			14,270
Cash from continuing activities		1,002,006			5,620,864
Cash from discontinued activities		—			396,871
Net cash from investing activities		1,002,006			6,017,735
Cash flows from financing activities
Principal payments on notes payable		(30,028	)		(1,123,144	)
Payments on capital lease		(108,776	)		(86,055	)
Cash from continuing activities		(138,804	)		(1,209,199	)
Cash from discontinued activities		—			—
Net cash from financing activities		(138,804	)		(1,209,199	)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		3,542,914			(912,502	)
Cash at beginning of period		13,585,447			10,638,217
Cash at end of period	$	17,128,361		$	9,725,715
Supplemental cash flow disclosures
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	21,564		$	208,744
Income taxes	$	0		$	0
Non cash investing and financing activities:
Unrealized change in fair value of available-for-sale securities	$	3,766,295		$	773,164
Purchase of equipment under capital lease		—			115,359

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

May 31, 2014

(Unaudited)

General

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), is a holding company that through its subsidiaries in the United States develops and manages general acute care hospitals that principally provide specialized surgeries. The Company through its United States subsidiaries owns and operates one general acute care hospital in Pasadena, Texas. The Company through its subsidiary in Hong Kong invests in debt and equity securities, including short-term investments in initial public offerings and pre-initial public offerings.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The majority of the Company's expenses are "cost of revenue" items. Costs that could be classified as general and administrative by the Company would include the corporate office costs, including advertising and marketing expenses, which were approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately $2.8 million and $4.3 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements as of August 31, 2013. Operating results for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending August 31, 2014.

Reclassification

Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. The impact of such reclassification was not significant to the prior period’s overall presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Investments in Available-for-Sale and Trading Securities

The Company’s investments in debt instruments (corporate and municipal bonds) are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices that are traded in less active markets or priced using a quoted market price for similar investments or are priced using non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2). These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities. These investments are subject to default risk. Unrealized gains in the fair value are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related income tax effect. The Company regularly monitors its investment portfolio for any decline in fair value that is other than temporary and records any such impairment as an impairment loss. The determination of the gain or loss on the sale of any security is made using the specific identification method.

The Company also invests in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. These investments are classified as trading securities, and are carried at fair value. These investments are subject to fluctuations in the market price. During the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a net gain of $161,864 and $706,350, respectively, in these securities. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company sold all of its trading securities and does not hold any such securities as of May 31, 2014.

8

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable

In October 2012, the Company sold an apartment in Hong Kong, which was purchased in March 2010. The net proceeds from the sale of the apartment were $1,273,403, after repayment of the associated note payable, resulting in a gain of $480,108.

In November 2011 and September 2010, the Company borrowed $116,339 and $65,000 as notes payable from a financial institution at an interest rate of 4.5% and 6%, which notes are to be repaid in 36 and 24 monthly installments, respectively, and are secured by specific equipment purchased at our Pasadena facility. The $65,000 note payable was fully repaid during the three months ended November 30, 2012. The Company paid down $30,028 during the nine months ended May 31, 2014, and the current and long-term portions of the notes payable as of May 31, 2014 are $16,972 and $-0-, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting primarily of medical supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by use of the average cost method.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant of the Company’s estimates is the determination of revenue to recognize for the services the Company provides and the determination of allowances, which includes the contractual allowance and the provision for doubtful accounts. See “Revenue Recognition” below for further discussion. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates used in the preparation of these financial statements.

Discontinued Operations

The Company classifies assets to be disposed of as held for sale or, if appropriate, discontinued operations when appropriate approvals for the disposal are made by management or the Board of Directors. Cash flows from discontinued businesses are reflected as discontinued operating, investing, and financing activities in our statement of cash flows.

The Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and sold it in July 2013. The Company took an impairment charge of approximately $1.1 million during the three months ended August 31, 2012, based on the sales price negotiated at that time. An additional loss of $122,975 was taken based on the final sales price during the three months ended August 31, 2013.

The following is a summary of financial information related to our discontinued operations at the Garland facility for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2013:

	Three months ended May 31, 2013			Nine months ended May 31, 2013
Net patient service revenue	$	84,528		$	486,686
Total costs and expenses		73,200			125,715
Operating income		11,328			360,971
Other income (expense), net		(3,066	)		17,377
Income before income taxes		8,262			378,348
Provision for income taxes		—			—
Total income on discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	8,262		$	378,348

9

Net Income (Loss) per Share

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share attributable to the Company:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(299,469	)	$	(1,430,050	)	$	(1,525,895	)	$	(2,242,617	)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		29			31			(4	)		2,804
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.		(299,440	)		(1,430,019	)		(1,525,899	)		(2,239,813	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			8,262			—			378,348
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(299,440	)	$	(1,421,757	)	$	(1,525,899	)	$	(1,861,465	)
Denominator:
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding		14,418,626			14,543,626			14,431,126			14,543,626
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.16	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—			—			—			0.03
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.13	)

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. For the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options determined using the treasury stock method. However, if it is anti-dilutive, the dilutive effect of the stock options is not included in the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share. Stock options with exercise prices exceeding current market prices that were excluded from the computation of net income (loss) per share amounted to approximately 1,013,000 shares and 1,480,000 shares for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Treasury Stock

In September 2013, as part of a settlement agreement with a former employee, the Company received 125,000 shares of common stock of the Company previously issued to him. These shares were accounted for as treasury shares with zero cost, and were retired in the second quarter of fiscal year 2014.

Stock Based Compensation

Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan

The purpose of the Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”) is to strengthen the Company by providing an incentive to its employees, officers, consultants and directors and to encourage them to devote their abilities and industry to the success of the Company’s business enterprise. It is intended that this purpose be achieved by extending to employees, officers, consultants and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries an added long-term incentive for high levels of performance and unusual efforts through the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, performance awards and restricted stock. The Company has reserved 15,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2011 Plan. As of May 31, 2014, there remain 250,000 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and 14,750,000 shares which can be issued under the 2011 Plan after giving effect to shares issued and canceled.

10

2000 Incentive Plan

The Company's 2000 Incentive Plan ("2000 Plan") provides for options and other stock-based awards that may be granted to eligible employees, officers, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Company had reserved 5,000,000 shares of common stock for future issuance under the 2000 Plan. The 2000 Plan does not have a fixed termination date, provided that no incentive stock option can be granted subsequent to August 29, 2011. As of May 31, 2014, there remain 762,850 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and no new stock options awards will be issued under the 2000 Plan.

The following table summarizes the stock option activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 (share amounts in thousands):

	Shares			Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share
Outstanding, August 31, 2013		1,097		$	2.21
Granted		—			—
Exercised		—			—
Expired or canceled		(84	)		2.50
Outstanding, May 31, 2014		1,013			2.18

For the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no stock options exercised. The aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2014 and 2013 is $-0-, since the market price is lower than the exercise price.

The following summarizes information related to stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2014, and related weighted average price and life information:

		Options Outstanding				Options Exercisable
Exercise Prices		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Number of Shares
		(Share Amounts In Thousands)
$	1.10		250		7.6		125
$	1.86		593		7.1		302
$	4.90		170		0.5		170
Total			1,013		6.1		597

For the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company’s stock options was $49,341 in each period. For the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company’s stock options was $148,023 and $60,121, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding stock options as of May 31, 2014 was $230,000, and will be recognized, in general, over 1.2 years.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is estimated based on market trading information, where available. Absent published market values for an instrument or other assets, management uses observable market data to arrive at its estimates of fair value. Management believes that the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-level fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

11

Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted price for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other input that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured and reported in the Company’s statement of financial position at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2014, segregated among the appropriate levels within the fair value hierarchy:

	Quoted prices in active markets for identical		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	$	—	$	21,285,689	$	—

The Company’s investments in Level 2 are in perpetual debt instruments (corporate and municipal bonds) traded on the European markets, at a cost of $7,984,646, are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices that are traded in less active markets or priced using a quoted market price for similar investments or are priced using non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2), and there has been no change in valuation techniques for these investments (Level 2).

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company as a whole is the U.S. Dollar. The Company has designated the U.S. Dollar as the functional currency for Sino Bond Inc. Limited, a Hong Kong corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Sino Bond”). The effects of foreign currency exchange adjustments are included as a component of Rent and Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Revenue Recognition

Background

The Company’s revenue recognition policy is significant because net patient service revenue is a primary component of its results of operations. Revenue is recognized as services are delivered. The determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized in connection with the Company’s services is subject to significant judgments and estimates, which are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition Policy

The Company has established billing rates for its medical services which it bills as gross revenue as services are delivered. Gross billed revenues are then reduced by the Company’s estimate of allowances, which includes the contractual allowance and the provision for doubtful accounts, to arrive at net patient service revenues. Net patient service revenues may not represent amounts ultimately collected. The Company adjusts current period revenue for differences in estimated revenue recorded in prior periods and actual cash collections.

The following table shows gross revenues and allowances for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Gross billed charges	$	8,148,181		$	5,062,079		$	21,806,599		$	14,197,824
Allowances		5,399,409			3,503,317			14,567,193			9,683,213
Net revenue	$	2,748,772		$	1,558,762		$	7,239,406		$	4,514,611
Allowance percentage		66	%		69	%		67	%		68	%

12

Contractual Allowance

The Company computes its contractual allowance based on the estimated collections on its gross billed charges. The Company computes its estimate by taking into account collections received, up to 30 days after the end of the period, for the services performed and also estimating amounts collectible for the services performed within the last six months. A significant amount of our net revenue results from Texas workers' compensation claims, which are governed by the rules and regulations of the Texas Department of Workers’ Compensation (“TDWC”) and the workers’ compensation healthcare networks. If our hospital chooses to participate in a network, the amount of revenue that will be generated from workers’ compensation claims will be governed by the network contract.

For claims arising prior to the implementation of workers’ compensation networks and out of network claims, inpatient and outpatient surgical services are either reimbursed pursuant to the Acute Care In-Patient Hospital Fee Guideline or at a "fair and reasonable" rate for services in which the fee guideline is not applicable. Starting March 1, 2008, the Texas Workers’ Compensation 2008 Acute Care Hospital Outpatient and Inpatient Facility Fee Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) became effective. Under these Guidelines, the reimbursement amounts are determined by applying the most recently adopted and effective Medicare reimbursement formula and factors; however, if the maximum allowable reimbursement for the procedure performed cannot be calculated using these Guidelines, then reimbursement is determined on a fair and reasonable basis.

Based on these Guidelines, the reimbursement due the Company for workers’ compensation cases is lower than we previously experienced. The Company has continued accepting Texas workers’ compensation cases, and has not made any substantial changes in its focus towards such cases. Our net patient service revenue for Texas workers’ compensation cases as a percentage of gross billings has decreased primarily as a result of lower reimbursement rates for workers’ compensation procedures still being performed.

Should we disagree with the amount of reimbursement provided by a third-party payer, we are required to pursue the medical dispute resolution (“MDR”) process at the TDWC to request proper reimbursement for services. From January 2007 to November 2008, the Company had been successful in its pursuit of collections regarding the stop-loss cases pending before the State Office of Administrative Hearings (“SOAH”), receiving positive rulings in over 90% of its claims presented for administrative determination. A 2007 district court decision upholding our interpretation of the statute as applied to the stop-loss claims was appealed by certain insurance carriers, and on November 13, 2008 the Third Court of Appeals determined that in order for a hospital to be reimbursed at 75% of its usual and customary audited charges for an inpatient admission, the hospital must not only bill at least $40,000, but also show that the admission involved unusually costly and unusually extensive services. Procedurally, the decision means that each case where a carrier raised an issue regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly or unusually extensive would be remanded to either SOAH or MDR for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided meet these standards. As a result of the Third Court of Appeals opinion, any stop-loss cases pending at SOAH have been remanded to the TDWC since these cases have not been reviewed or decided by the two-prong standard decided by the Third Court of Appeals. The SOAH Administrative Law judges determined that the most appropriate location for these cases is the TDWC.

A petition asking the Texas Supreme Court to review the Third Court of Appeals decision has been denied. Therefore, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals decision. The Texas Supreme Court’s decision delayed final adjudication in these pending stop-loss cases. The uncertain outcome in these cases will depend on a very lengthy process. We anticipate further, lengthy litigation at the Travis County District Courts and the Texas Courts of Appeals. Because of this lengthy process and the uncertainty of recovery in these cases, collection of a material amount of funds in these pending stop-loss cases cannot be anticipated.

13

Through May 2014, insurance carriers have voluntarily paid the awards in the decisions and orders issued by SOAH, plus interest, in approximately 180 cases, involving approximately $11 million in claims. In most of these cases, when the payments were made, the carriers requested refunds of the payments made in the event that the SOAH decisions and orders were reversed on appeal (which they were). Our request that the TDWC Commissioner enforce the awards which were not voluntarily paid by the carriers was refused in approximately 130 cases. As a result of the reversal of the SOAH decisions and orders, Texas Mutual Insurance Company and other carriers filed petitions in Travis County district court seeking a refund in cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid. The district court found in favor of Texas Mutual and the Company was ordered to refund approximately $4.2 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. The Company did not object to the reversal and remand of the SOAH decisions and orders, but did object to the judgments ordering refunds and those judgments were appealed to the Third Court of Appeals. As part of the appeals, the Company deposited the amounts that were ordered to be refunded as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. On June 6, 2013, the judgments ordering refunds were reversed by the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals held that if Texas Mutual wants a refund, it must pursue the refund demand administratively through the TDWC rather than through the district courts. Texas Mutual filed a motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeals which ultimately was denied. The Company filed motions in all 47 cases with the district court asking that the district clerk be ordered to release the deposited funds to the Company, and in January 2014, the Company received the deposits and accrued interest totaling $4.2 million. In addition, Texas Mutual filed three additional petitions in district court for cases that were left out of the original 47. The court granted Texas Mutual’s petitions and ordered the Company to refund approximately $300,000, including prejudgment interest to Texas Mutual. These judgments were granted before the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s original judgments. These three cases were appealed to the Court of Appeals and the funds ordered refunded were deposited with the district clerk. As with the other 47 cases, the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s final judgments in these three cases and the Company filed motions with the district court asking that the district clerk be ordered to release the deposited funds to the Company, and in February 2014, the Company received the deposits and accrued interest totaling $300,000. During the time that the carriers’ petitions seeking refunds were pending, because of the uncertainty of the results at that time, as of May 31, 2014, the Company has accrued the total potential refund amount of $11.3 million, and an additional amount of $3.4 million in interest payable, as accrued liabilities. This includes the deposit amounts refunded back to the Company in January and February 2014. We do not anticipate that any other carriers will pursue refund demands through district court but instead will pursue them administratively through TDWC. The cases in which the SOAH decisions and orders were reversed have been or are being remanded to TDWC for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and may be ordered to be refunded. After the reversal of the judgments it obtained from the district court ordering refunds, on December 4, 2013, Texas Mutual made a formal request to the Commissioner of Workers’ Compensation that he administratively order the Company to make refunds to Texas Mutual (in the same amount that was sought in the district court). The Company responded to this request on December 11, 2013, asking that it be denied. The matter is pending at this time. As to the matters remanded to TDWC and SOAH, once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in many of the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured. In March 2014, a settlement conference with one self-insured entity successfully resolved the stop-loss cases in which that entity was involved. Although the Company is willing to participate in settlement negotiations, we anticipate that few, if any, other carriers are interested in doing so at this time.

Due to the uncertainties associated with these stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company recognized increases in the contractual allowance at our Pasadena facility of $10,254,990 during fiscal year 2011 and $149,875 during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2013, (and an additional contractual allowance amount of $779,583 during fiscal year 2011 and $136,542 during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2013, at our Garland facility, which was classified as discontinued operations). The Company has also recognized interest expense related to these refunds starting from fiscal year 2011.

Claims regarding payment for ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient services remain pending at the TDWC. It is expected that these claims will be adjudicated at SOAH and possibly in the Texas district and appellate courts. The basis for reimbursement for these services made the subject of these pending cases is the determination of “fair and reasonable” charges. In 2007, we received unfavorable rulings from SOAH in all of our appeals of unfavorable decisions related to services provided in 2001 and 2002. The 179 cases, which were appealed to the Travis County district courts, challenged the constitutionality of the relevant statutory language. The Company received an unfavorable ruling in its lead case in March 2009, which ruling was appealed to and was upheld by the Third Court of Appeals on August 26, 2010. The Texas Supreme Court denied a petition asking for review of the Third Court of Appeals decision. The unfavorable interpretation by the Texas Courts of Appeal in our lead case negatively affects the recovery of additional reimbursement, not only in the lead case, but in the remaining 178 pending cases. Consequently, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals’ ruling that interprets the applicable statute and fee guideline to require that the amount that will be paid to a provider must not only be at a “fair and reasonable rate” but also must “ensure the quality of medical care” and “achieve effective cost control” and be the same or less than that charged to others with an equivalent standard of living. This ruling will impact cases in which a fee guideline was not applicable, specifically all pending cases involving ambulatory surgical services provided from 2001 through 2004 as well as all pending cases involving hospital outpatient services provided prior to March 1, 2008, when the Guidelines took effect. Since the Third Court of Appeals’ unfavorable ruling, collection, if any, in these cases depends on the Company’s ability to establish the criteria in this ruling. The Company was given the opportunity to establish the criteria in approximately 80 cases, which were set for hearing on the merits from March through May 2012 and was unsuccessful. Additionally, there are several thousand ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient cases pending at SOAH which will be heard beginning in March, 2014. Settlement offers have been made in the vast majority of these cases and the Company has been successful in settling many of the cases in which offers were made. Settlement discussions are on-going. Even so, it is likely that hundreds, if not more than a thousand, of these cases may go to hearing at SOAH at which the Company will have the opportunity to continue to establish the criteria in the cases still pending at SOAH during the 2014 fiscal year. On March 31, 2014, hearings were held in 23 of the Company’s hospital outpatient cases at SOAH. On June 26, 2014 a Decision and Order was handed down by SOAH adopting the methodology for determining “fair and reasonable” reimbursement that was put forth by the Company and ordered additional reimbursement plus interest be paid to the Company. We do not know at this time whether or not the carrier will appeal this decision. It is anticipated that this decision will impact many of the other hospital outpatient cases that are pending at SOAH.

14

Due to the uncertainties regarding the accounts receivable in the MDR process, the 2008 and 2010 Third Court of Appeals’ opinions and our legal counsel’s advice that settlements with insurance carriers in stop-loss cases have virtually stopped, the Company had fully reserved all accounts receivable related to the MDR process as of August 31, 2008. The Company is in active settlement negotiations with insurance carriers for ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient cases. Any monies collected for these MDR accounts receivable will be recorded as current period’s net patient service revenues.

Provision for Doubtful Accounts

Although outcomes vary, our policy is to attempt to collect amounts due from patients, including co-payments and deductibles due from patients with insurance, at the time of service while complying with all federal and state laws and regulations. In non-emergency circumstances or for elective procedures and services, it is our policy to verify insurance prior to a patient being treated; however, there are various exceptions that can occur.

The Company computes its allowances based on the estimated collections on its gross billed charges. The Company computes its estimate of allowance, which is a combination of contractual allowance and provision for doubtful accounts, by taking into account collections received, up to 30 days after the end of the period, for the services performed and also estimating amounts collectible for the services performed within the last six months.

Accounts receivable represent net receivables for services provided by the Company. At each balance sheet date management reviews the accounts receivable for collectibility and provides full allowance reserves for any accounts receivable deemed uncollectible.

The allowances stated as a percentage of gross receivables at the balance sheet dates is larger than the allowance percentage used to reduce gross billed charges due to the application of partial cash collections to the outstanding gross receivable balances, without any adjustment being made to the allowances. The allowance amounts netted against gross receivables are not adjusted until such time as the final collections on an individual receivable are recognized.

The focal point of our business is providing patient care services, including complex orthopedic and bariatric procedures. The Company pursues optimal reimbursement from third-party payers for these services. In some instances, we do not have contractual arrangements with third-party payers which provide for “prompt payment” which may result in additional time to collect the expected reimbursement.

The collection process may also be extended due to our efforts to obtain all optimal reimbursement available to the Company. Specifically, for medical services provided to injured workers, the Company may initially receive reimbursement that may not be within the fee guidelines or regulatory guidelines mandating reimbursement. The Company reviews and pursues those particular claims that are determined to warrant additional reimbursement pursuant to the fee or regulatory guidelines. The Company's pursuit of additional reimbursement amounts that it believes are due under fee or regulatory guidelines may be accomplished through established dispute resolution procedures with applicable regulatory authorities.

Noncontrolling Interest

The equity of minority investors (minority investors are generally physician groups and other healthcare providers that perform surgeries at the Company’s facilities) in certain subsidiaries of the Company is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest reported in the consolidated income statements reflect the respective interests in the income or loss of the limited partnerships or limited liability companies attributable to the minority investors (equity interest was 1% at May 31, 2014).

15

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component:

	Three months ended May 31,				Nine months ended May 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Available-for-sale securities
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period	$	11,953,646	$	8,387,456	$	9,382,334	$	8,411,128
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains, net of taxes of $-0- for all periods presented		1,194,983		796,836		3,766,295		2,972,664
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in rent and other income		—		—		—		(2,199,500	)
Tax provision		—		—		—		—
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—		—		—		(2,199,500	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		1,194,983		796,836		3,766,295		773,164
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	$	13,148,629	$	9,184,292	$	13,148,629	$	9,184,292
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8,196
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses)		—		—		—		—
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in rent and other income		—		—		—		(12,610	)
Tax provision included in accrued liabilities		—		—		—		4,414
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—		—		—		(8,196	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—		(8,196	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Contingencies

Due to the uncertainties associated with the stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company has accrued an amount of $11.3 million, and an additional amount of $3.4 million in interest payable, as accrued liabilities. For a detailed discussion of this, see Revenue Recognition Policy under Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company maintains various insurance policies that cover its Pasadena facility including occurrence medical malpractice coverage. In addition, all physicians granted privileges at the Pasadena facility are required to maintain medical malpractice insurance coverage. The Company also maintains general liability and property insurance coverage, including flood coverage. The Company does not currently maintain workers’ compensation coverage in Texas. In regard to the Employee Health Insurance Plan, until April 30, 2014, the Company was self-insured with specific and aggregate re-insurance with stop-loss levels appropriate for the Company’s group size. Effective May 1, 2014, the Company has taken coverage for its employees under a fully insured health plan.

We do not carry director and officer liability insurance. As permitted under Nevada law and pursuant to our governing documents and indemnification agreements with certain of our officers and directors, we indemnify our directors and officers against monetary damages, including advancing expenses, to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law.

16

On May 21, 2013, Ping S. Chu and James G. Gerace (both former members of our Board of Directors), along with seven other plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit in Probate Court No. 3 of Harris County, Texas, naming as defendants Ella Y.T.C. Chan (in her individual capacity and in her capacity as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Chiu M. Chan, Deceased, our former Chief Executive Officer and director), Eric K. Chan (our current Chief Executive Officer and director), and Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. In the suit, the plaintiffs alleged that the Chan family had received improper financial benefits from us. The plaintiffs sought damages in connection with claims of breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, constructive trust and conspiracy. We, through our legal counsel, filed an answer to the original petition, and filed a motion with the Probate Court to dismiss the lawsuit. The Probate Court granted the motion and dismissed the lawsuit. On August 19, 2013, the same lawsuit was re-filed in the 151^st District Court of Harris County, Texas, in the form of a counterclaim and third party intervention in a lawsuit previously filed by Ella Chan (as Executrix of the Estate of Chiu M. Chan) against Ping Chu for the return of a personal automobile of Chiu M. Chan. Additional parties have joined in the counterclaim and intervention. The counterclaimants and intervenors assert that they are entitled to actual damages, plus fair proportionate dividends and an appraisal and buyout of shares. Dynacq has disputed liability. We believe the counterclaim and intervention are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in the suit.

The Company is routinely involved in litigation and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business. Specifically, all judicial review of unsatisfactory determinations of reimbursement amounts due us for our Texas facilities’ fees must be made in the district courts of Travis County, Texas in what can often be a lengthy procedure.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

No recent accounting pronouncements or other authoritative guidance has been issued that management considers likely to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Industry Segments and Geographic Information

The Industry Segment “U.S. Division” comprises of the Company’s Pasadena facility. The Company at the present time has the U.S. Division and the Corporate Division.

Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Corporate Division

The Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and sold it in July 2013. The Company took an impairment charge of approximately $1.1 million during the three months ended August 31, 2012, based on the sales price negotiated at that time. An additional loss of $122,975 was taken based on the final sales price during the three months ended August 31, 2013.

The Company organized Sino Bond to hold and manage investments in Hong Kong. Sino Bond invests in debt instruments (corporate and municipal) and equity securities in Europe and Asia, including initial public offerings and pre-initial public offerings. The Company invests in various marketable securities. During the three months ended November 30, 2012, one particular security was called on which the Company had a gain of approximately $2.2 million. As of May 31, 2014, the balance of these securities is valued at approximately $21.3 million. During the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company also traded in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and had a net gain of $161,864 and $706,350, respectively. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company sold all of its trading securities and does not hold any such securities as of May 31, 2014.

The Corporate Division includes interest and other income related to its investments in securities, corporate personnel compensation expenses, and general and administrative expenses. Such expenses and income are not allocated to our operating division, as they relate to our general corporate activities.

We generally evaluate performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes and non-recurring charges and other criteria. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. There are no transfers between segments.

Summarized financial information concerning the business segments from continuing operations is as follows:

17

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenues from external customers
Net patient service revenues
U.S. Division	$	2,748,772		$	1,558,762		$	7,239,406		$	4,514,611
Corporate		—			—			—			—
Consolidated	$	2,748,772		$	1,558,762		$	7,239,406		$	4,514,611
Income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations
U.S. Division	$	186,954		$	(906,152	)	$	(165,472	)	$	(2,388,929	)
Corporate		(486,423	)		(523,898	)		(1,360,423	)		146,312
Consolidated	$	(299,469	)	$	(1,430,050	)	$	(1,525,895	)	$	(2,242,617	)

	May 31, 2014		August 31, 2013
Total Assets
U.S. Division	$	15,303,810	$	9,924,501
Corporate		32,792,701		31,711,826
Consolidated	$	48,096,511	$	41,636,327

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. Such forward-looking statements relate to future events or future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our Company’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including the risks and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. You must read the following discussion of the results of our business and our operations and financial condition in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, including the notes, included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

Update on Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no changes to the critical accounting policies used in our reporting of results of operations and financial position for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014. For a discussion of our critical accounting policies see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

18

Results of Operations

	Three Months Ended May 31, 2014									Three Months Ended May 31, 2013
	U.S. Division			Corporate			Total			U.S. Division			Corporate			Total
Net patient service revenue	$	2,748,772		$	—		$	2,748,772		$	1,558,762		$	—		$	1,558,762
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		1,037,457			551,161			1,588,618			983,010			532,995			1,516,005
Medical services and supplies		532,021			—			532,021			463,715			—			463,715
Other operating expenses		855,476			302,705			1,158,181			778,296			366,922			1,145,218
Depreciation and amortization		84,785			1,003			85,788			108,154			1,003			109,157
Total costs and expenses		2,509,739			854,869			3,364,608			2,333,175			900,920			3,234,095
Operating income (loss)		239,033			(854,869	)		(615,836	)		(774,413	)		(900,920	)		(1,675,333	)
Other income (expense):
Rent and other income		44,644			150,131			194,775			3,430			173,712			177,142
Interest income		—			226,705			226,705			—			203,310			203,310
Interest expense		(96,723	)		(8,390	)		(105,113	)		(135,169	)		—			(135,169	)
Total other income (expense), net		(52,079	)		368,446			316,367			(131,739	)		377,022			245,283
Income (loss) before income taxes from continuing operations	$	186,954		$	(486,423	)		(299,469	)	$	(906,152	)	$	(523,898	)		(1,430,050	)
Benefit for income taxes								—									—
Loss from continuing operations								(299,469	)								(1,430,050	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes								—									8,262
Net loss								(299,469	)								(1,421,788	)
Less:  Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest								29									31
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.							$	(299,440	)							$	(1,421,757	)
Operational statistics (Number of medical procedures) for Pasadena facility:
Inpatient:
Bariatric		15									16
Orthopedic		14									4
Other		6									6
Total inpatient procedures		35									26
Outpatient:
Orthopedic		56									28
Other		130									137
Total outpatient procedures		186									165
Total procedures		221									191

19

	Nine Months Ended May 31, 2014									Nine Months Ended May 31, 2013
	U.S. Division			Corporate			Total			U.S. Division			Corporate			Total
Net patient service revenue	$	7,239,406		$	—		$	7,239,406		$	4,514,611		$	—		$	4,514,611
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits		2,928,711			1,704,122			4,632,833			2,798,150			1,501,619			4,299,769
Medical services and supplies		1,453,584			—			1,453,584			1,234,241			—			1,234,241
Other operating expenses		2,502,108			814,813			3,316,921			2,176,881			2,662,919			4,839,800
Depreciation and amortization		277,624			3,008			280,632			336,142			18,510			354,652
Total costs and expenses		7,162,027			2,521,943			9,683,970			6,545,414			4,183,048			10,728,462
Operating income (loss)		77,379			(2,521,943	)		(2,444,564	)		(2,030,803	)		(4,183,048	)		(6,213,851	)
Other income (expense):
Rent and other income		76,202			535,682			611,884			56,535			3,651,677			3,708,212
Interest income		—			653,320			653,320			—			678,964			678,964
Interest expense		(319,053	)		(27,482	)		(346,535	)		(414,661	)		(1,281	)		(415,942	)
Total other income (expense), net		(242,851	)		1,161,520			918,669			(358,126	)		4,329,360			3,971,234
Income (loss) before income taxes from continuing operations	$	(165,472	)	$	(1,360,423	)		(1,525,895	)	$	(2,388,929	)	$	146,312			(2,242,617	)
Benefit for income taxes								—									—
Loss from continuing operations								(1,525,895	)								(2,242,617	)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes								—									378,348
Net loss								(1,525,895	)								(1,864,269	)
Less:  Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest								(4	)								2,804
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.							$	(1,525,899	)							$	(1,861,465	)
Operational statistics (Number of medical procedures) for Pasadena facility:
Inpatient:
Bariatric		50									42
Orthopedic		32									7
Other		19									27
Total inpatient procedures		101									76
Outpatient:
Orthopedic		197									93
Other		371									390
Total outpatient procedures		568									483
Total procedures		669									559

20

Three Months Ended May 31, 2014 Compared to the Three Months Ended May 31, 2013

U.S. Division

Due to the uncertainties associated with the stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company has accrued an amount of $11.3 million, and an additional amount of $3.4 million in interest payable as accrued liabilities. For a detailed discussion of this, see Revenue Recognition discussed in Item 1 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net patient service revenue increased by $1,190,010, or 76%, from $1,558,762 to $2,748,772, and total surgical cases increased by 16% from 191 cases for the three months ended May 31, 2013 to 221 cases for the three months ended May 31, 2014.  While the number of cases increased by 16%, net patient service revenue increased by 76%, primarily due to a change in the surgical mix of cases, and also due to collections on old accounts receivable that were fully reserved for.

 Total costs and expenses increased by $176,564, or 8%, from $2,333,175 for the three months ended May 31, 2013 to $2,509,739 for the three months ended May 31, 2014. The following discusses the various changes in costs and expenses:

· Compensation and benefits increased by $54,447, or 6%, primarily associated with increase in workforce due to higher net patient service revenues.

· Medical services and supplies expenses increased by $68,306 or 15%, primarily due to a 16% increase in the number of cases and also due to a change in the surgical mix of cases.

· Other operating expenses increased by $77,180, or 10%, primarily associated with higher net patient service revenues.

Other expense for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013 of $52,079 and $131,739, respectively, includes interest expense associated with the stop-loss cases discussed above.

Corporate Division

Compensation and benefits for the Corporate Division includes all corporate personnel compensation and benefits, and it increased from $532,995 for the three months ended May 31, 2013 to $551,161 for the three months ended May 31, 2014, primarily due to an increase in marketing personnel. Compensation and benefits also includes $49,341 of non-cash compensation expense for each of the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, related to employees’ incentive stock options granted in fiscal years 2007, 2011 and 2012. Other operating expenses include all corporate general and administrative expenses, including other professional fees such as legal expenses and audit expenses. It decreased by $64,217, from $366,922 for the three months ended May 31, 2013 to $302,705 for the three months ended May 31, 2014. The decrease in other operating expenses is due to a decrease in legal and other professional fees primarily relating to the internal investigation described in note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

Rent and other income decreased by $23,581, from $173,712 for the three months ended May 31, 2013 to $150,131 for the three months ended May 31, 2014. Rent and other income for the three months ended May 31, 2014 includes (a) an amount of $9,791 in foreign currency losses, and (b) miscellaneous other income of $159,922. Rent and other income for the three months ended May 31, 2013 includes (a) a gain of $174,677 in trading securities; (b) an amount of $20,170 in foreign currency losses; and (c) miscellaneous other income of $19,205.

Interest income of $226,705 and $203,310 for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are primarily related to the Company’s investments in bonds.

Investments in securities

The Company’s investments in debt instruments (corporate and municipal bonds) are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices that are traded in less active markets or priced using a quoted market price for similar investments or are priced using non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2). These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities. As of May 31, 2014, these securities are valued at approximately $21.3 million. Unrealized gains in these investments of $13.1 million are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as at May 31, 2014. During the three months ended May 31, 2013, the Company also traded in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and had gains of $174,677. During the first quarter of the current fiscal year, the Company sold all of its trading securities and did not hold any such securities as of May 31, 2014.

21

Discontinued Operations

The Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and sold it in July 2013. The Company took an impairment charge of approximately $1.1 million during the three months ended August 31, 2012, based on the sales price negotiated at that time. An additional loss of $122,975 was taken based on the final sales price during the three months ended August 31, 2013. Net patient service revenue for the three months ended May 31, 2013 was $84,528, due to receipts on old accounts receivable that were fully reserved earlier per the Company’s revenue recognition policy.

Income Taxes

The Company did not recognize a benefit or provision for income taxes for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, due to the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to recognize the benefit from the carry forward of net operating losses. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

Nine Months Ended May 31, 2014 Compared to the Nine Months Ended May 31, 2013

U.S. Division

Due to the uncertainties associated with the stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company has accrued an amount of $11.3 million, and an additional amount of $3.4 million in interest payable as accrued liabilities. For a detailed discussion of this, see Revenue Recognition discussed in Item 1 - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net patient service revenue increased by $2,724,795, or 60%, from $4,514,611 to $7,239,406, and total surgical cases increased by 20% from 559 cases for the nine months ended May 31, 2013 to 669 cases for the nine months ended May 31, 2014.  While the number of cases increased by 20%, net patient service revenue increased by 60%, primarily due to a change in the surgical mix of cases and also due to collections on old accounts receivable that were fully reserved for.

 Total costs and expenses increased by $616,613, or 9%, from $6,545,414 for the nine months ended May 31, 2013 to $7,162,027 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014. The following discusses the various changes in costs and expenses:

· Compensation and benefits increased by $130,561, or 5%, primarily associated with increase in workforce due to higher net patient service revenues.

· Medical services and supplies expenses increased by $219,343, or 18%, primarily due to a 20% increase in the number of cases and also due to a change in the surgical mix of cases.

· Other operating expenses increased by $325,227, or 15%, primarily associated with higher net patient service revenues.

Other expense for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013 of $242,851 and $358,126, respectively, includes interest expense associated with the stop-loss cases discussed above.

Corporate Division

Compensation and benefits for the Corporate Division includes all corporate personnel compensation and benefits, and it increased from $1,501,619 for the nine months ended May 31, 2013 to $1,704,122 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014, primarily due to an increase in marketing personnel. Compensation and benefits also includes $148,023 and $60,121 of non-cash compensation expense for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to employees’ incentive stock options granted in fiscal years 2007, 2011 and 2012.

22

Other operating expenses include all corporate general and administrative expenses, including other professional fees such as legal expenses and audit expenses. It decreased by $1,848,106, from $2,662,919 for the nine months ended May 31, 2013 to $814,813 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014. The decrease in other operating expenses is due to a decrease in legal and other professional fees primarily relating to the internal investigation described in note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.

Rent and other income decreased by $3,115,995, from $3,651,677 for the nine months ended May 31, 2013 to $535,682 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014. Rent and other income for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 includes (a) an amount of $74,839 in foreign currency gains, (b) a gain of $161,864 in trading securities, and (b) miscellaneous other income of $298,979. Rent and other income for the nine months ended May 31, 2013 includes (a) a gain of $2,199,500 on a bond called during the current period, (b) a gain of $480,108 on the sale of the apartment in Hong Kong, (c) an amount of $143,482 in foreign currency gains, (d) a gain of $706,350 in trading securities, and (e) miscellaneous other income of $122,237.

Interest income of $653,320 and $678,964 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, are primarily related to the Company’s investments in bonds.

Investments in securities

The Company’s investments in debt instruments (corporate and municipal bonds) are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices that are traded in less active markets or priced using a quoted market price for similar investments or are priced using non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2). These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities. As of May 31, 2014, these securities are valued at approximately $21.3 million. Unrealized gains in these investments of $13.1 million are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as at May 31, 2014. During the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company also traded in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and had gains of $161,864 and $706,350, respectively. During the first quarter of the current fiscal year, the Company sold all of its trading securities and did not hold any such securities as of May 31, 2014.

Discontinued Operations

The Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and sold it in July 2013. The Company took an impairment charge of approximately $1.1 million during the three months ended August 31, 2012, based on the sales price negotiated at that time. An additional loss of $122,975 was taken based on the final sales price during the three months ended August 31, 2013. Net patient service revenue for the nine months ended May 31, 2013 was $486,686, due to receipts on old accounts receivable that were fully reserved earlier per the Company’s revenue recognition policy.

Income Taxes

The Company did not recognize a benefit or provision for income taxes for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, due to the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to recognize the benefit from the carry forward of net operating losses. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our fiscal year 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a detailed discussion of our liquidity, contractual obligations and commitments. The information presented below updates and should be read in conjunction with the information disclosed in that Form 10-K.

Cash flow from operating activities

Cash flow provided by operating activities for continuing activities was $2,679,712 during the nine months ended May 31, 2014, primarily due to (a) an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $4,210,564; (The increase in these liabilities is due to receipt of refunds on deposits of approximately $4,476,097 made earlier with the Travis County District Court in relation to the stop-loss cases discussed above); (b) receipt of income tax refund of $569,430; and (c) depreciation and amortization of $280,632. Partially offsetting these cash inflows were (a) a net loss before discontinued operations of $1,525,895, (b) an increase in accounts receivable of $710,724, and (c) a gain of $161,864 in trading securities.

23

Cash flows from investing activities

Cash flow provided by investing activities for continuing activities was $1,002,006, primarily due to sales proceeds of $1,233,286 in trading securities, which was partially offset by purchase of equipment of $231,280.

Cash flows from financing activities

Cash flow used in financing activities for continuing activities was $138,804 for payments on capital leases and notes payable.

The Company had working capital of $2,392,624 as of May 31, 2014 and maintained a liquid position by a current ratio of approximately 1.1 to 1.

We believe we will be able to meet our ongoing liquidity and cash needs for at least the next twelve months based on the amount of available cash and cash equivalents.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - Recent Accounting Pronouncements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not required.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation to assess the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of May 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of error of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management’s override of the control. The design of any systems of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

24

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

On May 21, 2013, Ping S. Chu and James G. Gerace (both former members of our Board of Directors), along with seven other plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit in Probate Court No. 3 of Harris County, Texas, naming as defendants Ella Y.T.C. Chan (in her individual capacity and in her capacity as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Chiu M. Chan, Deceased, our former Chief Executive Officer and director), Eric K. Chan (our current Chief Executive Officer and director), and Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. In the suit, the plaintiffs alleged that the Chan family had received improper financial benefits from us. The plaintiffs sought damages in connection with claims of breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, constructive trust and conspiracy. We, through our legal counsel, filed an answer to the original petition, and filed a motion with the Probate Court to dismiss the lawsuit. The Probate Court granted the motion and dismissed the lawsuit. On August 19, 2013, the same lawsuit was refiled in the 151^st District Court of Harris County, Texas, in the form of a counterclaim and third party intervention in a lawsuit previously filed by Ella Chan (as Executrix of the Estate of Chiu M. Chan) against Ping Chu for the return of a personal automobile of Chiu M. Chan. Additional parties have joined in the counterclaim and intervention. The counterclaimants and intervenors assert that they are entitled to actual damages, plus fair proportionate dividends and an appraisal and buyout of shares. Dynacq has disputed liability. We believe the counterclaim and intervention are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in the suit.

The Company is routinely involved in litigation and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business. Specifically, all judicial review of unsatisfactory determinations of reimbursement amounts due us for our Texas facilities’ fees must be made in the district courts of Travis County, Texas in what can often be a lengthy procedure. Please refer to Revenue Recognition, as well as Business – Government Regulation – Texas Workers’ Compensation Systems in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013, for a detailed description of the MDR process and our accounts receivable. The Company cannot predict whether any litigation or administrative proceeding to which it may become a party will have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The Company’s Risk Factors as disclosed in its Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2013 have not materially changed.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

EXHIBIT NO.	IDENTIFICATION OF EXHIBIT
Exhibit 31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

25

EXHIBIT NO.	IDENTIFICATION OF EXHIBIT
	Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

26

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	DYNACQ HEALTHCARE, INC.
Date: July 11, 2014	By:	/s/ Eric K. Chan
	Eric K. Chan
	Chief Executive Officer
	(duly authorized officer)
Date: July 11, 2014	By:	/s/ Hemant Khemka
	Hemant Khemka
	Chief Financial Officer
	(principal financial and accounting officer)

27

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT NO.	IDENTIFICATION OF EXHIBIT
Exhibit 31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

28

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Eric K. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Eric K. Chan

Eric K. Chan

Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer)

Date: July 11, 2014

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Hemant Khemka, Chief Financial Officer of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Hemant Khemka

Hemant Khemka

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)

Date: July 11, 2014

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric K. Chan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Eric K. Chan

Eric K. Chan

Chief Executive Officer

July 11, 2014

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hemant Khemka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Hemant Khemka

Hemant Khemka

Chief Financial Officer

July 11, 2014

XML

Discontinued Operations (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Net patient service revenue	$ 84,528		$ 486,686
Total costs and expenses	73,200		125,715
Operating income	11,328		360,971
Other income (expense), net	(3,066)		17,377
Income before income taxes	8,262		378,348
Provision for income taxes	0		0
Total income on discontinued operations, net of taxes	$ 8,262	$ 0	$ 378,348

XML

Contingencies (Details Textual) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	May 31, 2014
Commitment And Contingencies [Line Items]
Loss Contingencies Additional Refund Payable	$ 11.3
Loss Contingencies Additional Interest Payable Amount	$ 3.4

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Details Textual) (Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2 [Member], USD $)	May 31, 2014
Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2 [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Trading Securities, Cost	$ 7,984,646

XML

Industry Segments and Geographic Information (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net patient service revenues	$ 2,748,772	$ 1,558,762	$ 7,239,406	$ 4,514,611
Income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations	(299,469)	(1,430,050)	(1,525,895)	(2,242,617)
US Division [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net patient service revenues	2,748,772	1,558,762	7,239,406	4,514,611
Income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations	186,954	(906,152)	(165,472)	(2,388,929)
Corporate [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Net patient service revenues	0	0	0	0
Income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations	$ (486,423)	$ (523,898)	$ (1,360,423)	$ 146,312

XML

Stock Based Compensation (Details Textual) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		0 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	Jan. 12, 2012 Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]	May 31, 2014 Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]	May 31, 2014 Year 2000 Stock Incentive Plan [Member]
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Common Stock, Capital Shares Reserved for Future Issuance						15,000,000	5,000,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Grants in Period, Gross			0	0	250,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Exercisable, Number						250,000	762,850
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Number of Shares Available for Grant						14,750,000
Stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company's stock options	$ 49,341	$ 49,341	$ 148,023	$ 60,121
Total unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding stock options	$ 230,000		$ 230,000
Employee Service Share Based Compensation Nonvested Stock Options Compensation Cost Not Yet Recognized Period			1 year 2 months 12 days

XML

Revenue Recognition (Tables)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Revenue Recognition [Abstract]

Schedule Of Gross Revenues And Contractual Allowance [Table Text Block]

The following table shows gross revenues and allowances for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Gross billed charges	$	8,148,181		$	5,062,079		$	21,806,599		$	14,197,824
Allowances		5,399,409			3,503,317			14,567,193			9,683,213
Net revenue	$	2,748,772		$	1,558,762		$	7,239,406		$	4,514,611
Allowance percentage		66	%		69	%		67	%		68	%

XML

Industry Segments and Geographic Information (Details Textual) (USD $)	3 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2013	Nov. 30, 2012	Aug. 31, 2012	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2014 HONG KONG [Member]	May 31, 2013 HONG KONG [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Impairment charge			$ 1,100,000
Gain from marketable securities		2,200,000
Balance from marketable securities	17,458,985			21,285,689
Gain (Loss) on the initial public offerings of equity securities					161,864	706,350
Discontinued Operation Gain Loss On Disposal Of Discontinued Operation Net Of Tax	$ 122,975

XML

Contingencies

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

Contingencies

Due to the uncertainties associated with the stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company has accrued an amount of $11.3 million, and an additional amount of $3.4 million in interest payable, as accrued liabilities. For a detailed discussion of this, see Revenue Recognition Policy under Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company maintains various insurance policies that cover its Pasadena facility including occurrence medical malpractice coverage. In addition, all physicians granted privileges at the Pasadena facility are required to maintain medical malpractice insurance coverage. The Company also maintains general liability and property insurance coverage, including flood coverage. The Company does not currently maintain workers’ compensation coverage in Texas. In regard to the Employee Health Insurance Plan, until April 30, 2014, the Company was self-insured with specific and aggregate re-insurance with stop-loss levels appropriate for the Company’s group size. Effective May 1, 2014, the Company has taken coverage for its employees under a fully insured health plan.

We do not carry director and officer liability insurance. As permitted under Nevada law and pursuant to our governing documents and indemnification agreements with certain of our officers and directors, we indemnify our directors and officers against monetary damages, including advancing expenses, to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law.

On May 21, 2013, Ping S. Chu and James G. Gerace (both former members of our Board of Directors), along with seven other plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit in Probate Court No. 3 of Harris County, Texas, naming as defendants Ella Y.T.C. Chan (in her individual capacity and in her capacity as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Chiu M. Chan, Deceased, our former Chief Executive Officer and director), Eric K. Chan (our current Chief Executive Officer and director), and Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. In the suit, the plaintiffs alleged that the Chan family had received improper financial benefits from us. The plaintiffs sought damages in connection with claims of breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, constructive trust and conspiracy. We, through our legal counsel, filed an answer to the original petition, and filed a motion with the Probate Court to dismiss the lawsuit. The Probate Court granted the motion and dismissed the lawsuit. On August 19, 2013, the same lawsuit was re-filed in the 151^st District Court of Harris County, Texas, in the form of a counterclaim and third party intervention in a lawsuit previously filed by Ella Chan (as Executrix of the Estate of Chiu M. Chan) against Ping Chu for the return of a personal automobile of Chiu M. Chan. Additional parties have joined in the counterclaim and intervention. The counterclaimants and intervenors assert that they are entitled to actual damages, plus fair proportionate dividends and an appraisal and buyout of shares. Dynacq has disputed liability. We believe the counterclaim and intervention are without merit and intend to vigorously defend ourselves in the suit.

The Company is routinely involved in litigation and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business. Specifically, all judicial review of unsatisfactory determinations of reimbursement amounts due us for our Texas facilities’ fees must be made in the district courts of Travis County, Texas in what can often be a lengthy procedure.

XML

Revenue Recognition (Details Textual) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	1 Months Ended	9 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Nov. 13, 2008	Jan. 31, 2014	May 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2013 Pasadena Facility [Member]	Aug. 31, 2011 Pasadena Facility [Member]	Aug. 31, 2013 Garland Facility [Member]	Aug. 31, 2011 Garland Facility [Member]
Health Care Organization, Receivable and Revenue Disclosures [Line Items]
Receivables Collection Period			30 days
Percentage Of Claims With Positive Rulings			90.00%
Reimbursement Of Usual And Customary Audited Charges Percentage	75.00%
Minimum Billing Requirement For Reimbursement	$ 40,000
Number Of Cases Awards Paid By Insurance Carriers			180
Awards Paid By Insurance Carriers Amount			11,000,000
Number Of Cases In Which Awards Not Paid By Insurance Carriers			130
Loss Contingency Refund Of Voluntary Award Including Prejudgment Interest			4,200,000
Accrued Liabilities			300,000
Loss Contingency Amount Of Refund In Case Of Additional Motions Granted			11,300,000
Interest Payable, Current			3,400,000
Loss Contingency Pending Claims Number Negatively Affecting Recovery Of Additional Reimbursement			178
Number Of Cases With Opportunity To Establish Criteria			80
Loss Contingency, Pending Claims, Number			179
Service Period For Estimation Of Amounts Collectible			6 months
Increase In Facility Contractual Allowance				149,875	10,254,990
Additional Loss Contractual Allowance						136,542	779,583
Number Of Cases Filed Motions			47
Loss Contingency, Receivable, Receipts		4,200,000
Accrued Income Current And Non Current			$ 300,000

XML

Net Income (Loss) per Share (Details Textual)	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share [Line Items]
Stock options with exercise prices exceeding current market prices	1,013,000	1,480,000

XML

Investments in Available-for-Sale and Trading Securities (Details Textual) (HONG KONG [Member], USD $)	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
HONG KONG [Member]
Investment Securities [Line Items]
Trading Securities Realized Gain Loss	$ 161,864	$ 706,350

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Components Of Other Comprehensive Income Loss [Line Items]
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period			$ 9,382,334
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Tax provision included in accrued liabilities	0	0	0	4,414
Other comprehensive income (loss)	1,194,983	796,836	3,766,295	764,968
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	13,148,629	9,184,292	13,148,629	9,184,292
Available-for-sale Securities [Member]
Components Of Other Comprehensive Income Loss [Line Items]
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period	11,953,646	8,387,456	9,382,334	8,411,128
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains, net of taxes of $-0- for all periods presented	1,194,983	796,836	3,766,295	2,972,664
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in rent and other income	0	0	0	(2,199,500)
Tax provision	0	0	0	0
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	0	0	0	(2,199,500)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	1,194,983	796,836	3,766,295	773,164
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	13,148,629	9,184,292	13,148,629	9,184,292
Foreign currency translation adjustment [Member]
Components Of Other Comprehensive Income Loss [Line Items]
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period	0	0	0	8,196
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses)	0	0	0	0
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in rent and other income	0	0	0	(12,610)
Tax provision included in accrued liabilities	0	0	0	4,414
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	0	0	0	(8,196)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	0	0	0	(8,196)
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Details) (Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member], USD $)	May 31, 2014
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Level 1 [Member]
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	$ 0
Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2 [Member]
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	21,285,689
Significant Unobservable Level 3 [Member]
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	$ 0

XML

Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The majority of the Company's expenses are "cost of revenue" items. Costs that could be classified as general and administrative by the Company would include the corporate office costs, including advertising and marketing expenses, which were approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately $2.8 million and $4.3 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements as of August 31, 2013. Operating results for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending August 31, 2014.

XML

Treasury Stock (Details Textual) (USD $)	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2013	Feb. 28, 2014
Treasury Stock [Line Items]
Treasury Stock, Shares, Acquired	125,000
Treasury Stock, Value, Acquired, Cost Method		$ 0

XML

Discontinued Operations (Tables)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Discontinued Operations And Disposal Groups [Abstract]

Schedule of Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations, Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures [Table Text Block]

The following is a summary of financial information related to our discontinued operations at the Garland facility for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2013:

	Three months ended May 31, 2013		Nine months ended May 31, 2013
Net patient service revenue	$	84,528	$	486,686
Total costs and expenses		73,200		125,715
Operating income		11,328		360,971
Other income (expense), net		(3,066)		17,377
Income before income taxes		8,262		378,348
Provision for income taxes		—		—
Total income on discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	8,262	$	378,348

XML

Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The majority of the Company's expenses are "cost of revenue" items. Costs that could be classified as general and administrative by the Company would include the corporate office costs, including advertising and marketing expenses, which were approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and approximately $2.8 million and $4.3 million for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements as of August 31, 2013. Operating results for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending August 31, 2014.

Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Reclassification

Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. The impact of such reclassification was not significant to the prior period’s overall presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Marketable Securities, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Investments in Available-for-Sale and Trading Securities

The Company’s investments in debt instruments (corporate and municipal bonds) are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices that are traded in less active markets or priced using a quoted market price for similar investments or are priced using non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2). These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities. These investments are subject to default risk. Unrealized gains in the fair value are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related income tax effect. The Company regularly monitors its investment portfolio for any decline in fair value that is other than temporary and records any such impairment as an impairment loss. The determination of the gain or loss on the sale of any security is made using the specific identification method.

The Company also invests in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. These investments are classified as trading securities, and are carried at fair value. These investments are subject to fluctuations in the market price. During the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a net gain of $161,864 and $706,350, respectively, in these securities. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company sold all of its trading securities and does not hold any such securities as of May 31, 2014.

Investment In Real Estates And Notes Payable [Policy Text Block]

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable

In October 2012, the Company sold an apartment in Hong Kong, which was purchased in March 2010. The net proceeds from the sale of the apartment were $1,273,403, after repayment of the associated note payable, resulting in a gain of $480,108.

In November 2011 and September 2010, the Company borrowed $116,339 and $65,000 as notes payable from a financial institution at an interest rate of 4.5% and 6%, which notes are to be repaid in 36 and 24 monthly installments, respectively, and are secured by specific equipment purchased at our Pasadena facility. The $65,000 note payable was fully repaid during the three months ended November 30, 2012. The Company paid down $30,028 during the nine months ended May 31, 2014, and the current and long-term portions of the notes payable as of May 31, 2014 are $16,972 and $-0-, respectively.

Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Inventories

Inventories, consisting primarily of medical supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by use of the average cost method.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant of the Company’s estimates is the determination of revenue to recognize for the services the Company provides and the determination of allowances, which includes the contractual allowance and the provision for doubtful accounts. See “Revenue Recognition” below for further discussion. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates used in the preparation of these financial statements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is estimated based on market trading information, where available. Absent published market values for an instrument or other assets, management uses observable market data to arrive at its estimates of fair value. Management believes that the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-level fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted price for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other input that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured and reported in the Company’s statement of financial position at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2014, segregated among the appropriate levels within the fair value hierarchy:

	Quoted prices in active markets for identical		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	$	—	$	21,285,689	$	—

The Company’s investments in Level 2 are in perpetual debt instruments (corporate and municipal bonds) traded on the European markets, at a cost of $7,984,646, are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices that are traded in less active markets or priced using a quoted market price for similar investments or are priced using non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2), and there has been no change in valuation techniques for these investments (Level 2).

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Revenue Recognition

Background

The Company’s revenue recognition policy is significant because net patient service revenue is a primary component of its results of operations. Revenue is recognized as services are delivered. The determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized in connection with the Company’s services is subject to significant judgments and estimates, which are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition Policy

The Company has established billing rates for its medical services which it bills as gross revenue as services are delivered. Gross billed revenues are then reduced by the Company’s estimate of allowances, which includes the contractual allowance and the provision for doubtful accounts, to arrive at net patient service revenues. Net patient service revenues may not represent amounts ultimately collected. The Company adjusts current period revenue for differences in estimated revenue recorded in prior periods and actual cash collections.

The following table shows gross revenues and allowances for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Gross billed charges	$	8,148,181		$	5,062,079		$	21,806,599		$	14,197,824
Allowances		5,399,409			3,503,317			14,567,193			9,683,213
Net revenue	$	2,748,772		$	1,558,762		$	7,239,406		$	4,514,611
Allowance percentage		66	%		69	%		67	%		68	%

Contractual Allowance

The Company computes its contractual allowance based on the estimated collections on its gross billed charges. The Company computes its estimate by taking into account collections received, up to 30 days after the end of the period, for the services performed and also estimating amounts collectible for the services performed within the last six months. A significant amount of our net revenue results from Texas workers' compensation claims, which are governed by the rules and regulations of the Texas Department of Workers’ Compensation (“TDWC”) and the workers’ compensation healthcare networks. If our hospital chooses to participate in a network, the amount of revenue that will be generated from workers’ compensation claims will be governed by the network contract.

For claims arising prior to the implementation of workers’ compensation networks and out of network claims, inpatient and outpatient surgical services are either reimbursed pursuant to the Acute Care In-Patient Hospital Fee Guideline or at a "fair and reasonable" rate for services in which the fee guideline is not applicable. Starting March 1, 2008, the Texas Workers’ Compensation 2008 Acute Care Hospital Outpatient and Inpatient Facility Fee Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) became effective. Under these Guidelines, the reimbursement amounts are determined by applying the most recently adopted and effective Medicare reimbursement formula and factors; however, if the maximum allowable reimbursement for the procedure performed cannot be calculated using these Guidelines, then reimbursement is determined on a fair and reasonable basis.

Based on these Guidelines, the reimbursement due the Company for workers’ compensation cases is lower than we previously experienced. The Company has continued accepting Texas workers’ compensation cases, and has not made any substantial changes in its focus towards such cases. Our net patient service revenue for Texas workers’ compensation cases as a percentage of gross billings has decreased primarily as a result of lower reimbursement rates for workers’ compensation procedures still being performed.

Should we disagree with the amount of reimbursement provided by a third-party payer, we are required to pursue the medical dispute resolution (“MDR”) process at the TDWC to request proper reimbursement for services. From January 2007 to November 2008, the Company had been successful in its pursuit of collections regarding the stop-loss cases pending before the State Office of Administrative Hearings (“SOAH”), receiving positive rulings in over 90% of its claims presented for administrative determination. A 2007 district court decision upholding our interpretation of the statute as applied to the stop-loss claims was appealed by certain insurance carriers, and on November 13, 2008 the Third Court of Appeals determined that in order for a hospital to be reimbursed at 75% of its usual and customary audited charges for an inpatient admission, the hospital must not only bill at least $40,000, but also show that the admission involved unusually costly and unusually extensive services. Procedurally, the decision means that each case where a carrier raised an issue regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly or unusually extensive would be remanded to either SOAH or MDR for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided meet these standards. As a result of the Third Court of Appeals opinion, any stop-loss cases pending at SOAH have been remanded to the TDWC since these cases have not been reviewed or decided by the two-prong standard decided by the Third Court of Appeals. The SOAH Administrative Law judges determined that the most appropriate location for these cases is the TDWC.

A petition asking the Texas Supreme Court to review the Third Court of Appeals decision has been denied. Therefore, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals decision. The Texas Supreme Court’s decision delayed final adjudication in these pending stop-loss cases. The uncertain outcome in these cases will depend on a very lengthy process. We anticipate further, lengthy litigation at the Travis County District Courts and the Texas Courts of Appeals. Because of this lengthy process and the uncertainty of recovery in these cases, collection of a material amount of funds in these pending stop-loss cases cannot be anticipated.

Through May 2014, insurance carriers have voluntarily paid the awards in the decisions and orders issued by SOAH, plus interest, in approximately 180 cases, involving approximately $11 million in claims. In most of these cases, when the payments were made, the carriers requested refunds of the payments made in the event that the SOAH decisions and orders were reversed on appeal (which they were). Our request that the TDWC Commissioner enforce the awards which were not voluntarily paid by the carriers was refused in approximately 130 cases. As a result of the reversal of the SOAH decisions and orders, Texas Mutual Insurance Company and other carriers filed petitions in Travis County district court seeking a refund in cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid. The district court found in favor of Texas Mutual and the Company was ordered to refund approximately $4.2 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. The Company did not object to the reversal and remand of the SOAH decisions and orders, but did object to the judgments ordering refunds and those judgments were appealed to the Third Court of Appeals. As part of the appeals, the Company deposited the amounts that were ordered to be refunded as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. On June 6, 2013, the judgments ordering refunds were reversed by the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals held that if Texas Mutual wants a refund, it must pursue the refund demand administratively through the TDWC rather than through the district courts. Texas Mutual filed a motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeals which ultimately was denied. The Company filed motions in all 47 cases with the district court asking that the district clerk be ordered to release the deposited funds to the Company, and in January 2014, the Company received the deposits and accrued interest totaling $4.2 million. In addition, Texas Mutual filed three additional petitions in district court for cases that were left out of the original 47. The court granted Texas Mutual’s petitions and ordered the Company to refund approximately $300,000, including prejudgment interest to Texas Mutual. These judgments were granted before the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s original judgments. These three cases were appealed to the Court of Appeals and the funds ordered refunded were deposited with the district clerk. As with the other 47 cases, the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s final judgments in these three cases and the Company filed motions with the district court asking that the district clerk be ordered to release the deposited funds to the Company, and in February 2014, the Company received the deposits and accrued interest totaling $300,000. During the time that the carriers’ petitions seeking refunds were pending, because of the uncertainty of the results at that time, as of May 31, 2014, the Company has accrued the total potential refund amount of $11.3 million, and an additional amount of $3.4 million in interest payable, as accrued liabilities. This includes the deposit amounts refunded back to the Company in January and February 2014. We do not anticipate that any other carriers will pursue refund demands through district court but instead will pursue them administratively through TDWC. The cases in which the SOAH decisions and orders were reversed have been or are being remanded to TDWC for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and may be ordered to be refunded. After the reversal of the judgments it obtained from the district court ordering refunds, on December 4, 2013, Texas Mutual made a formal request to the Commissioner of Workers’ Compensation that he administratively order the Company to make refunds to Texas Mutual (in the same amount that was sought in the district court). The Company responded to this request on December 11, 2013, asking that it be denied. The matter is pending at this time. As to the matters remanded to TDWC and SOAH, once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in many of the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured. In March 2014, a settlement conference with one self-insured entity successfully resolved the stop-loss cases in which that entity was involved. Although the Company is willing to participate in settlement negotiations, we anticipate that few, if any, other carriers are interested in doing so at this time.

Due to the uncertainties associated with these stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company recognized increases in the contractual allowance at our Pasadena facility of $10,254,990 during fiscal year 2011 and $149,875 during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2013, (and an additional contractual allowance amount of $779,583 during fiscal year 2011 and $136,542 during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2013, at our Garland facility, which was classified as discontinued operations). The Company has also recognized interest expense related to these refunds starting from fiscal year 2011.

Claims regarding payment for ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient services remain pending at the TDWC. It is expected that these claims will be adjudicated at SOAH and possibly in the Texas district and appellate courts. The basis for reimbursement for these services made the subject of these pending cases is the determination of “fair and reasonable” charges. In 2007, we received unfavorable rulings from SOAH in all of our appeals of unfavorable decisions related to services provided in 2001 and 2002. The 179 cases, which were appealed to the Travis County district courts, challenged the constitutionality of the relevant statutory language. The Company received an unfavorable ruling in its lead case in March 2009, which ruling was appealed to and was upheld by the Third Court of Appeals on August 26, 2010. The Texas Supreme Court denied a petition asking for review of the Third Court of Appeals decision. The unfavorable interpretation by the Texas Courts of Appeal in our lead case negatively affects the recovery of additional reimbursement, not only in the lead case, but in the remaining 178 pending cases. Consequently, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals’ ruling that interprets the applicable statute and fee guideline to require that the amount that will be paid to a provider must not only be at a “fair and reasonable rate” but also must “ensure the quality of medical care” and “achieve effective cost control” and be the same or less than that charged to others with an equivalent standard of living. This ruling will impact cases in which a fee guideline was not applicable, specifically all pending cases involving ambulatory surgical services provided from 2001 through 2004 as well as all pending cases involving hospital outpatient services provided prior to March 1, 2008, when the Guidelines took effect. Since the Third Court of Appeals’ unfavorable ruling, collection, if any, in these cases depends on the Company’s ability to establish the criteria in this ruling. The Company was given the opportunity to establish the criteria in approximately 80 cases, which were set for hearing on the merits from March through May 2012 and was unsuccessful. Additionally, there are several thousand ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient cases pending at SOAH which will be heard beginning in March, 2014. Settlement offers have been made in the vast majority of these cases and the Company has been successful in settling many of the cases in which offers were made. Settlement discussions are on-going. Even so, it is likely that hundreds, if not more than a thousand, of these cases may go to hearing at SOAH at which the Company will have the opportunity to continue to establish the criteria in the cases still pending at SOAH during the 2014 fiscal year. On March 31, 2014, hearings were held in 23 of the Company’s hospital outpatient cases at SOAH. On June 26, 2014 a Decision and Order was handed down by SOAH adopting the methodology for determining “fair and reasonable” reimbursement that was put forth by the Company and ordered additional reimbursement plus interest be paid to the Company. We do not know at this time whether or not the carrier will appeal this decision. It is anticipated that this decision will impact many of the other hospital outpatient cases that are pending at SOAH.

Due to the uncertainties regarding the accounts receivable in the MDR process, the 2008 and 2010 Third Court of Appeals’ opinions and our legal counsel’s advice that settlements with insurance carriers in stop-loss cases have virtually stopped, the Company had fully reserved all accounts receivable related to the MDR process as of August 31, 2008. The Company is in active settlement negotiations with insurance carriers for ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient cases. Any monies collected for these MDR accounts receivable will be recorded as current period’s net patient service revenues.

Provision for Doubtful Accounts

Although outcomes vary, our policy is to attempt to collect amounts due from patients, including co-payments and deductibles due from patients with insurance, at the time of service while complying with all federal and state laws and regulations. In non-emergency circumstances or for elective procedures and services, it is our policy to verify insurance prior to a patient being treated; however, there are various exceptions that can occur.

The Company computes its allowances based on the estimated collections on its gross billed charges. The Company computes its estimate of allowance, which is a combination of contractual allowance and provision for doubtful accounts, by taking into account collections received, up to 30 days after the end of the period, for the services performed and also estimating amounts collectible for the services performed within the last six months.

Accounts receivable represent net receivables for services provided by the Company. At each balance sheet date management reviews the accounts receivable for collectibility and provides full allowance reserves for any accounts receivable deemed uncollectible.

The allowances stated as a percentage of gross receivables at the balance sheet dates is larger than the allowance percentage used to reduce gross billed charges due to the application of partial cash collections to the outstanding gross receivable balances, without any adjustment being made to the allowances. The allowance amounts netted against gross receivables are not adjusted until such time as the final collections on an individual receivable are recognized.

The focal point of our business is providing patient care services, including complex orthopedic and bariatric procedures. The Company pursues optimal reimbursement from third-party payers for these services. In some instances, we do not have contractual arrangements with third-party payers which provide for “prompt payment” which may result in additional time to collect the expected reimbursement.

The collection process may also be extended due to our efforts to obtain all optimal reimbursement available to the Company. Specifically, for medical services provided to injured workers, the Company may initially receive reimbursement that may not be within the fee guidelines or regulatory guidelines mandating reimbursement. The Company reviews and pursues those particular claims that are determined to warrant additional reimbursement pursuant to the fee or regulatory guidelines. The Company's pursuit of additional reimbursement amounts that it believes are due under fee or regulatory guidelines may be accomplished through established dispute resolution procedures with applicable regulatory authorities.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

No recent accounting pronouncements or other authoritative guidance has been issued that management considers likely to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

XML

Industry Segments and Geographic Information (Details 1) (USD $)	May 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2013
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total Assets	$ 48,096,511	$ 41,636,327
US Division [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total Assets	15,303,810	9,924,501
Corporate [Member]
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]
Total Assets	$ 32,792,701	$ 31,711,826

XML

Stock Based Compensation (Details) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares Outstanding, Beginning balance	1,097
Shares, Granted	0	0
Shares, Exercised	0
Shares, Expired or canceled	(84)
Shares Outstanding, Ending balance	1,013
Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share Outstanding, Beginning balance	$ 2.21
Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share, Granted	$ 0
Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share, Exercised	$ 0
Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share, Expired or canceled	$ 2.50
Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share, Ending balance	$ 2.18

XML

Net Income (Loss) per Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Table Text Block]

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share attributable to the Company:

	Three months ended May 31,				Nine months ended May 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(299,469)	$	(1,430,050)	$	(1,525,895)	$	(2,242,617)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		29		31		(4)		2,804
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.		(299,440)		(1,430,019)		(1,525,899)		(2,239,813)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—		8,262		—		378,348
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(299,440)	$	(1,421,757)	$	(1,525,899)	$	(1,861,465)
Denominator:
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding		14,418,626		14,543,626		14,431,126		14,543,626
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.02)	$	(0.10)	$	(0.11)	$	(0.16)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—		—		—		0.03
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.02)	$	(0.10)	$	(0.11)	$	(0.13)

XML

Stock Based Compensation (Tables)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes the stock option activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 (share amounts in thousands):

	Shares	Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share
Outstanding, August 31, 2013	1,097	$	2.21
Granted	—		—
Exercised	—		—
Expired or canceled	(84)		2.50
Outstanding, May 31, 2014	1,013		2.18

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, by Exercise Price Range [Table Text Block]

The following summarizes information related to stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2014, and related weighted average price and life information:

		Options Outstanding		Options Exercisable
Exercise Prices		Number of Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Number of Shares
		(Share Amounts In Thousands)
$	1.10	250	7.6	125
$	1.86	593	7.1	302
$	4.90	170	0.5	170
Total		1,013	6.1	597

XML

General

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Business Description and Basis of Presentation [Text Block]

General

Dynacq Healthcare, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), is a holding company that through its subsidiaries in the United States develops and manages general acute care hospitals that principally provide specialized surgeries. The Company through its United States subsidiaries owns and operates one general acute care hospital in Pasadena, Texas. The Company through its subsidiary in Hong Kong invests in debt and equity securities, including short-term investments in initial public offerings and pre-initial public offerings.

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Tables)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured and reported in the Company’s statement of financial position at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2014, segregated among the appropriate levels within the fair value hierarchy:

	Quoted prices in active markets for identical		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	$	—	$	21,285,689	$	—

XML

Discontinued Operations (Details Textual) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Aug. 31, 2012	Aug. 31, 2013
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items]
Disposal Group Impairment Charge	$ 1,100,000
Assets of Disposal Group, Including Discontinued Operation		$ 122,975

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Details Textual) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Other Comprehensive Income Unrealized Holding Gain Loss On Securities Arising During Period Tax	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	May 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2013
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 17,128,361	$ 13,585,447
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of approximately $157,920,000 and $170,198,000	1,772,753	1,062,029
Inventories	305,242	293,565
Trading securities	0	1,071,346
Interest receivable	153,477	102,964
Prepaid expenses	146,419	180,883
Income tax receivable	0	569,430
Total current assets	19,506,252	16,865,664
Investments available-for-sale	21,285,689	17,458,985
Property and equipment, net	6,274,306	6,323,657
Income tax receivable	800,920	800,920
Other assets	229,344	187,101
Total assets	48,096,511	41,636,327
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	982,412	1,012,328
Accrued liabilities	16,085,797	11,845,317
Current portion of notes payable	16,972	40,256
Current portion of capital lease obligations	28,447	115,737
Total current liabilities	17,113,628	13,013,638
Non-current liabilities:
Long-term portion of notes payable	0	6,744
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations	48,492	69,978
Total liabilities	17,162,120	13,090,360
Commitments and contingencies
Dynacq stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding	0	0
Common stock, $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 14,418,626 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2014; 14,543,626 shares issued and outstanding at August 31, 2013	14,419	14,544
Additional paid-in capital	10,430,404	10,282,256
Accumulated other comprehensive income	13,148,629	9,382,334
Retained earnings	7,277,511	8,803,410
Total Dynacq stockholders’ equity	30,870,963	28,482,544
Non-controlling interest	63,428	63,423
Total equity	30,934,391	28,545,967
Total liabilities and equity	$ 48,096,511	$ 41,636,327

XML

Stock Based Compensation (Details 1) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Options Outstanding, Shares	1,013
Options Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	6 years 1 month 6 days
Options Exercisable, Shares	597
Range One [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Range of Exercise Prices, Lower Range Limit	$ 1.10
Options Outstanding, Shares	250
Options Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	7 years 7 months 6 days
Options Exercisable, Shares	125
Range Two [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Range of Exercise Prices, Lower Range Limit	$ 1.86
Options Outstanding, Shares	593
Options Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	7 years 1 month 6 days
Options Exercisable, Shares	302
Range Three [Member]
Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, Exercise Price Range [Line Items]
Range of Exercise Prices, Lower Range Limit	$ 4.90
Options Outstanding, Shares	170
Options Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	6 months
Options Exercisable, Shares	170

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Parenthetical] (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ (4,414)
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of taxes	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Industry Segments and Geographic Information (Tables)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Reconciliation of Revenue from Segments to Consolidated [Table Text Block]

Summarized financial information concerning the business segments from continuing operations is as follows:

	Three months ended May 31,				Nine months ended May 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Revenues from external customers
Net patient service revenues
U.S. Division	$	2,748,772	$	1,558,762	$	7,239,406	$	4,514,611
Corporate		—		—		—		—
Consolidated	$	2,748,772	$	1,558,762	$	7,239,406	$	4,514,611
Income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations
U.S. Division	$	186,954	$	(906,152)	$	(165,472)	$	(2,388,929)
Corporate		(486,423)		(523,898)		(1,360,423)		146,312
Consolidated	$	(299,469)	$	(1,430,050)	$	(1,525,895)	$	(2,242,617)

Reconciliation of Assets from Segment to Consolidated [Table Text Block]

	May 31, 2014		August 31, 2013
Total Assets
U.S. Division	$	15,303,810	$	9,924,501
Corporate		32,792,701		31,711,826
Consolidated	$	48,096,511	$	41,636,327

XML

Revenue Recognition

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Revenue Recognition [Abstract]

Revenue Recognition [Text Block]

Revenue Recognition

Background

The Company’s revenue recognition policy is significant because net patient service revenue is a primary component of its results of operations. Revenue is recognized as services are delivered. The determination of the amount of revenue to be recognized in connection with the Company’s services is subject to significant judgments and estimates, which are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition Policy

The Company has established billing rates for its medical services which it bills as gross revenue as services are delivered. Gross billed revenues are then reduced by the Company’s estimate of allowances, which includes the contractual allowance and the provision for doubtful accounts, to arrive at net patient service revenues. Net patient service revenues may not represent amounts ultimately collected. The Company adjusts current period revenue for differences in estimated revenue recorded in prior periods and actual cash collections.

The following table shows gross revenues and allowances for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013:

	Three months ended May 31,						Nine months ended May 31,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Gross billed charges	$	8,148,181		$	5,062,079		$	21,806,599		$	14,197,824
Allowances		5,399,409			3,503,317			14,567,193			9,683,213
Net revenue	$	2,748,772		$	1,558,762		$	7,239,406		$	4,514,611
Allowance percentage		66	%		69	%		67	%		68	%

Contractual Allowance

The Company computes its contractual allowance based on the estimated collections on its gross billed charges. The Company computes its estimate by taking into account collections received, up to 30 days after the end of the period, for the services performed and also estimating amounts collectible for the services performed within the last six months. A significant amount of our net revenue results from Texas workers' compensation claims, which are governed by the rules and regulations of the Texas Department of Workers’ Compensation (“TDWC”) and the workers’ compensation healthcare networks. If our hospital chooses to participate in a network, the amount of revenue that will be generated from workers’ compensation claims will be governed by the network contract.

For claims arising prior to the implementation of workers’ compensation networks and out of network claims, inpatient and outpatient surgical services are either reimbursed pursuant to the Acute Care In-Patient Hospital Fee Guideline or at a "fair and reasonable" rate for services in which the fee guideline is not applicable. Starting March 1, 2008, the Texas Workers’ Compensation 2008 Acute Care Hospital Outpatient and Inpatient Facility Fee Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) became effective. Under these Guidelines, the reimbursement amounts are determined by applying the most recently adopted and effective Medicare reimbursement formula and factors; however, if the maximum allowable reimbursement for the procedure performed cannot be calculated using these Guidelines, then reimbursement is determined on a fair and reasonable basis.

Based on these Guidelines, the reimbursement due the Company for workers’ compensation cases is lower than we previously experienced. The Company has continued accepting Texas workers’ compensation cases, and has not made any substantial changes in its focus towards such cases. Our net patient service revenue for Texas workers’ compensation cases as a percentage of gross billings has decreased primarily as a result of lower reimbursement rates for workers’ compensation procedures still being performed.

Should we disagree with the amount of reimbursement provided by a third-party payer, we are required to pursue the medical dispute resolution (“MDR”) process at the TDWC to request proper reimbursement for services. From January 2007 to November 2008, the Company had been successful in its pursuit of collections regarding the stop-loss cases pending before the State Office of Administrative Hearings (“SOAH”), receiving positive rulings in over 90% of its claims presented for administrative determination. A 2007 district court decision upholding our interpretation of the statute as applied to the stop-loss claims was appealed by certain insurance carriers, and on November 13, 2008 the Third Court of Appeals determined that in order for a hospital to be reimbursed at 75% of its usual and customary audited charges for an inpatient admission, the hospital must not only bill at least $40,000, but also show that the admission involved unusually costly and unusually extensive services. Procedurally, the decision means that each case where a carrier raised an issue regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly or unusually extensive would be remanded to either SOAH or MDR for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided meet these standards. As a result of the Third Court of Appeals opinion, any stop-loss cases pending at SOAH have been remanded to the TDWC since these cases have not been reviewed or decided by the two-prong standard decided by the Third Court of Appeals. The SOAH Administrative Law judges determined that the most appropriate location for these cases is the TDWC.

A petition asking the Texas Supreme Court to review the Third Court of Appeals decision has been denied. Therefore, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals decision. The Texas Supreme Court’s decision delayed final adjudication in these pending stop-loss cases. The uncertain outcome in these cases will depend on a very lengthy process. We anticipate further, lengthy litigation at the Travis County District Courts and the Texas Courts of Appeals. Because of this lengthy process and the uncertainty of recovery in these cases, collection of a material amount of funds in these pending stop-loss cases cannot be anticipated.

Through May 2014, insurance carriers have voluntarily paid the awards in the decisions and orders issued by SOAH, plus interest, in approximately 180 cases, involving approximately $11 million in claims. In most of these cases, when the payments were made, the carriers requested refunds of the payments made in the event that the SOAH decisions and orders were reversed on appeal (which they were). Our request that the TDWC Commissioner enforce the awards which were not voluntarily paid by the carriers was refused in approximately 130 cases. As a result of the reversal of the SOAH decisions and orders, Texas Mutual Insurance Company and other carriers filed petitions in Travis County district court seeking a refund in cases in which the awards were voluntarily paid. The district court found in favor of Texas Mutual and the Company was ordered to refund approximately $4.2 million, including prejudgment interest, pending remand for a case-by-case determination of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. The Company did not object to the reversal and remand of the SOAH decisions and orders, but did object to the judgments ordering refunds and those judgments were appealed to the Third Court of Appeals. As part of the appeals, the Company deposited the amounts that were ordered to be refunded as cash deposits into the registry of the court in order to stay execution of the judgments ordering refunds. On June 6, 2013, the judgments ordering refunds were reversed by the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals held that if Texas Mutual wants a refund, it must pursue the refund demand administratively through the TDWC rather than through the district courts. Texas Mutual filed a motion for rehearing with the Court of Appeals which ultimately was denied. The Company filed motions in all 47 cases with the district court asking that the district clerk be ordered to release the deposited funds to the Company, and in January 2014, the Company received the deposits and accrued interest totaling $4.2 million. In addition, Texas Mutual filed three additional petitions in district court for cases that were left out of the original 47. The court granted Texas Mutual’s petitions and ordered the Company to refund approximately $300,000, including prejudgment interest to Texas Mutual. These judgments were granted before the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s original judgments. These three cases were appealed to the Court of Appeals and the funds ordered refunded were deposited with the district clerk. As with the other 47 cases, the Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s final judgments in these three cases and the Company filed motions with the district court asking that the district clerk be ordered to release the deposited funds to the Company, and in February 2014, the Company received the deposits and accrued interest totaling $300,000. During the time that the carriers’ petitions seeking refunds were pending, because of the uncertainty of the results at that time, as of May 31, 2014, the Company has accrued the total potential refund amount of $11.3 million, and an additional amount of $3.4 million in interest payable, as accrued liabilities. This includes the deposit amounts refunded back to the Company in January and February 2014. We do not anticipate that any other carriers will pursue refund demands through district court but instead will pursue them administratively through TDWC. The cases in which the SOAH decisions and orders were reversed have been or are being remanded to TDWC for determinations of whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive. Voluntary payments made pursuant to the Decisions and Orders are premature payments by the carriers and may be ordered to be refunded. After the reversal of the judgments it obtained from the district court ordering refunds, on December 4, 2013, Texas Mutual made a formal request to the Commissioner of Workers’ Compensation that he administratively order the Company to make refunds to Texas Mutual (in the same amount that was sought in the district court). The Company responded to this request on December 11, 2013, asking that it be denied. The matter is pending at this time. As to the matters remanded to TDWC and SOAH, once the Company is given the opportunity to present its evidence regarding whether the services provided were unusually costly and unusually extensive, the Company anticipates that it will prevail in many of the underlying stop-loss fee disputes and that payments refunded to the carriers will be recaptured. In March 2014, a settlement conference with one self-insured entity successfully resolved the stop-loss cases in which that entity was involved. Although the Company is willing to participate in settlement negotiations, we anticipate that few, if any, other carriers are interested in doing so at this time.

Due to the uncertainties associated with these stop-loss fee dispute cases, the Company recognized increases in the contractual allowance at our Pasadena facility of $10,254,990 during fiscal year 2011 and $149,875 during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2013, (and an additional contractual allowance amount of $779,583 during fiscal year 2011 and $136,542 during the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2013, at our Garland facility, which was classified as discontinued operations). The Company has also recognized interest expense related to these refunds starting from fiscal year 2011.

Claims regarding payment for ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient services remain pending at the TDWC. It is expected that these claims will be adjudicated at SOAH and possibly in the Texas district and appellate courts. The basis for reimbursement for these services made the subject of these pending cases is the determination of “fair and reasonable” charges. In 2007, we received unfavorable rulings from SOAH in all of our appeals of unfavorable decisions related to services provided in 2001 and 2002. The 179 cases, which were appealed to the Travis County district courts, challenged the constitutionality of the relevant statutory language. The Company received an unfavorable ruling in its lead case in March 2009, which ruling was appealed to and was upheld by the Third Court of Appeals on August 26, 2010. The Texas Supreme Court denied a petition asking for review of the Third Court of Appeals decision. The unfavorable interpretation by the Texas Courts of Appeal in our lead case negatively affects the recovery of additional reimbursement, not only in the lead case, but in the remaining 178 pending cases. Consequently, the Company is bound by the Third Court of Appeals’ ruling that interprets the applicable statute and fee guideline to require that the amount that will be paid to a provider must not only be at a “fair and reasonable rate” but also must “ensure the quality of medical care” and “achieve effective cost control” and be the same or less than that charged to others with an equivalent standard of living. This ruling will impact cases in which a fee guideline was not applicable, specifically all pending cases involving ambulatory surgical services provided from 2001 through 2004 as well as all pending cases involving hospital outpatient services provided prior to March 1, 2008, when the Guidelines took effect. Since the Third Court of Appeals’ unfavorable ruling, collection, if any, in these cases depends on the Company’s ability to establish the criteria in this ruling. The Company was given the opportunity to establish the criteria in approximately 80 cases, which were set for hearing on the merits from March through May 2012 and was unsuccessful. Additionally, there are several thousand ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient cases pending at SOAH which will be heard beginning in March, 2014. Settlement offers have been made in the vast majority of these cases and the Company has been successful in settling many of the cases in which offers were made. Settlement discussions are on-going. Even so, it is likely that hundreds, if not more than a thousand, of these cases may go to hearing at SOAH at which the Company will have the opportunity to continue to establish the criteria in the cases still pending at SOAH during the 2014 fiscal year. On March 31, 2014, hearings were held in 23 of the Company’s hospital outpatient cases at SOAH. On June 26, 2014 a Decision and Order was handed down by SOAH adopting the methodology for determining “fair and reasonable” reimbursement that was put forth by the Company and ordered additional reimbursement plus interest be paid to the Company. We do not know at this time whether or not the carrier will appeal this decision. It is anticipated that this decision will impact many of the other hospital outpatient cases that are pending at SOAH.

Due to the uncertainties regarding the accounts receivable in the MDR process, the 2008 and 2010 Third Court of Appeals’ opinions and our legal counsel’s advice that settlements with insurance carriers in stop-loss cases have virtually stopped, the Company had fully reserved all accounts receivable related to the MDR process as of August 31, 2008. The Company is in active settlement negotiations with insurance carriers for ambulatory surgical center and hospital outpatient cases. Any monies collected for these MDR accounts receivable will be recorded as current period’s net patient service revenues.

Provision for Doubtful Accounts

Although outcomes vary, our policy is to attempt to collect amounts due from patients, including co-payments and deductibles due from patients with insurance, at the time of service while complying with all federal and state laws and regulations. In non-emergency circumstances or for elective procedures and services, it is our policy to verify insurance prior to a patient being treated; however, there are various exceptions that can occur.

The Company computes its allowances based on the estimated collections on its gross billed charges. The Company computes its estimate of allowance, which is a combination of contractual allowance and provision for doubtful accounts, by taking into account collections received, up to 30 days after the end of the period, for the services performed and also estimating amounts collectible for the services performed within the last six months.

Accounts receivable represent net receivables for services provided by the Company. At each balance sheet date management reviews the accounts receivable for collectibility and provides full allowance reserves for any accounts receivable deemed uncollectible.

The allowances stated as a percentage of gross receivables at the balance sheet dates is larger than the allowance percentage used to reduce gross billed charges due to the application of partial cash collections to the outstanding gross receivable balances, without any adjustment being made to the allowances. The allowance amounts netted against gross receivables are not adjusted until such time as the final collections on an individual receivable are recognized.

The focal point of our business is providing patient care services, including complex orthopedic and bariatric procedures. The Company pursues optimal reimbursement from third-party payers for these services. In some instances, we do not have contractual arrangements with third-party payers which provide for “prompt payment” which may result in additional time to collect the expected reimbursement.

The collection process may also be extended due to our efforts to obtain all optimal reimbursement available to the Company. Specifically, for medical services provided to injured workers, the Company may initially receive reimbursement that may not be within the fee guidelines or regulatory guidelines mandating reimbursement. The Company reviews and pursues those particular claims that are determined to warrant additional reimbursement pursuant to the fee or regulatory guidelines. The Company's pursuit of additional reimbursement amounts that it believes are due under fee or regulatory guidelines may be accomplished through established dispute resolution procedures with applicable regulatory authorities.

XML

Basis of Presentation (Details Textual) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Basis Of Presentation [Line Items]
Corporate Office Costs	$ 1.0	$ 0.9	$ 2.8	$ 4.3

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Equity [Abstract]

Comprehensive Income Note [Text Block]

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component:

	Three months ended May 31,				Nine months ended May 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Available-for-sale securities
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period	$	11,953,646	$	8,387,456	$	9,382,334	$	8,411,128
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains, net of taxes of $-0- for all periods presented		1,194,983		796,836		3,766,295		2,972,664
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in rent and other income		—		—		—		(2,199,500)
Tax provision		—		—		—		—
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—		—		—		(2,199,500)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		1,194,983		796,836		3,766,295		773,164
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	$	13,148,629	$	9,184,292	$	13,148,629	$	9,184,292
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8,196
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses)		—		—		—		—
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in rent and other income		—		—		—		(12,610)
Tax provision included in accrued liabilities		—		—		—		4,414
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—		—		—		(8,196)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—		(8,196)
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$ (1,525,895)	$ (1,864,269)
Less income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	0	(378,348)
Net loss before discontinued operations	(1,525,895)	(2,242,617)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss before discontinued operations to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	280,632	354,652
Gain on sale of investments available-for-sale and trading securities	(161,864)	(2,905,850)
Gain on sale of investment in real estate	0	(480,108)
Stock based compensation	148,023	60,121
Gain on sale of assets	0	(27,509)
Foreign currency exchange gains	(60,485)	(78,159)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(710,724)	(41,787)
Interest receivable	(50,513)	17,307
Inventories	(11,677)	88,228
Prepaid expenses	34,464	247,071
Income tax receivable	569,430	0
Other assets	(42,243)	49,794
Accounts payable	(29,916)	(1,033,054)
Accrued liabilities	4,240,480	(107,475)
Cash from continuing activities	2,679,712	(6,099,386)
Cash from discontinued activities	0	378,348
Net cash from operating activities	2,679,712	(5,721,038)
Cash flows from investing activities
Sales proceeds of investments available-for-sale and trading securities	1,233,286	3,249,622
Sales proceeds of investment in real estate	0	2,365,017
Purchase of equipment	(231,280)	(8,045)
Sales proceeds of equipment	0	14,270
Cash from continuing activities	1,002,006	5,620,864
Cash from discontinued activities	0	396,871
Net cash from investing activities	1,002,006	6,017,735
Cash flows from financing activities
Principal payments on notes payable	(30,028)	(1,123,144)
Payments on capital lease	(108,776)	(86,055)
Cash from continuing activities	(138,804)	(1,209,199)
Cash from discontinued activities	0	0
Net cash from financing activities	(138,804)	(1,209,199)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	3,542,914	(912,502)
Cash at beginning of period	13,585,447	10,638,217
Cash at end of period	17,128,361	9,725,715
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	21,564	208,744
Income taxes	0	0
Non cash investing and financing activities:
Unrealized change in fair value of available-for-sale securities	3,766,295	773,164
Purchase of equipment under capital lease	$ 0	$ 115,359

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets [Parenthetical] (USD $)	May 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2013
Allowance For Doubtful Accounts Receivable Current (in dollars)	$ 157,920,000	$ 170,198,000
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	100,000,000	100,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	14,418,626	14,543,626
Common Stock, shares outstanding	14,418,626	14,543,626

XML

Net Income (Loss) per Share

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share [Text Block]

Net Income (Loss) per Share

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share attributable to the Company:

	Three months ended May 31,				Nine months ended May 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(299,469)	$	(1,430,050)	$	(1,525,895)	$	(2,242,617)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest		29		31		(4)		2,804
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.		(299,440)		(1,430,019)		(1,525,899)		(2,239,813)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—		8,262		—		378,348
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(299,440)	$	(1,421,757)	$	(1,525,899)	$	(1,861,465)
Denominator:
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding		14,418,626		14,543,626		14,431,126		14,543,626
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.02)	$	(0.10)	$	(0.11)	$	(0.16)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes		—		—		—		0.03
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$	(0.02)	$	(0.10)	$	(0.11)	$	(0.13)

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. For the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share, the basic weighted average number of shares is increased by the dilutive effect of stock options determined using the treasury stock method. However, if it is anti-dilutive, the dilutive effect of the stock options is not included in the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share. Stock options with exercise prices exceeding current market prices that were excluded from the computation of net income (loss) per share amounted to approximately 1,013,000 shares and 1,480,000 shares for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. 

XML

Document And Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	Jul. 10, 2014
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	May 31, 2014
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Trading Symbol	DYII
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		14,418,626
Entity Registrant Name	DYNACQ HEALTHCARE INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000890908
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--08-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company

XML

Treasury Stock

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Equity [Abstract]

Treasury Stock [Text Block]

Treasury Stock

In September 2013, as part of a settlement agreement with a former employee, the Company received 125,000 shares of common stock of the Company previously issued to him. These shares were accounted for as treasury shares with zero cost, and were retired in the second quarter of fiscal year 2014.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Net patient service revenue	$ 2,748,772	$ 1,558,762	$ 7,239,406	$ 4,514,611
Costs and expenses:
Compensation and benefits	1,588,618	1,516,005	4,632,833	4,299,769
Medical services and supplies	532,021	463,715	1,453,584	1,234,241
Other operating expenses	1,158,181	1,145,218	3,316,921	4,839,800
Depreciation and amortization	85,788	109,157	280,632	354,652
Total costs and expenses	3,364,608	3,234,095	9,683,970	10,728,462
Operating loss	(615,836)	(1,675,333)	(2,444,564)	(6,213,851)
Other income (expense):
Rent and other income	194,775	177,142	611,884	3,708,212
Interest income	226,705	203,310	653,320	678,964
Interest expense	(105,113)	(135,169)	(346,535)	(415,942)
Total other income, net	316,367	245,283	918,669	3,971,234
Loss before income taxes from continuing operations	(299,469)	(1,430,050)	(1,525,895)	(2,242,617)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	0	0	0	0
Loss from continuing operations	(299,469)	(1,430,050)	(1,525,895)	(2,242,617)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes	0	8,262	0	378,348
Net loss	(299,469)	(1,421,788)	(1,525,895)	(1,864,269)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	29	31	(4)	2,804
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$ (299,440)	$ (1,421,757)	$ (1,525,899)	$ (1,861,465)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (in dollars per share)	$ (0.02)	$ (0.10)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.16)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes (in dollars per share)	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0.03
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (in dollars per share)	$ (0.02)	$ (0.10)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.13)
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding (in shares)	14,418,626	14,543,626	14,431,126	14,543,626

XML

Investments in Available-for-Sale and Trading Securities

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Investments Debt And Equity Securities [Abstract]

Investments in Debt and Marketable Equity Securities (and Certain Trading Assets) Disclosure [Text Block]

Investments in Available-for-Sale and Trading Securities

The Company’s investments in debt instruments (corporate and municipal bonds) are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices that are traded in less active markets or priced using a quoted market price for similar investments or are priced using non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2). These investments are classified as available-for-sale securities. These investments are subject to default risk. Unrealized gains in the fair value are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of related income tax effect. The Company regularly monitors its investment portfolio for any decline in fair value that is other than temporary and records any such impairment as an impairment loss. The determination of the gain or loss on the sale of any security is made using the specific identification method.

The Company also invests in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. These investments are classified as trading securities, and are carried at fair value. These investments are subject to fluctuations in the market price. During the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a net gain of $161,864 and $706,350, respectively, in these securities. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company sold all of its trading securities and does not hold any such securities as of May 31, 2014.

XML

Cash and Cash Equivalents

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Cash And Cash Equivalents [Abstract]

Cash and Cash Equivalents Disclosure [Text Block]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less on the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

XML

Noncontrolling Interest

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Noncontrolling Interest [Abstract]

Noncontrolling Interest Disclosure [Text Block]

Noncontrolling Interest

The equity of minority investors (minority investors are generally physician groups and other healthcare providers that perform surgeries at the Company’s facilities) in certain subsidiaries of the Company is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest reported in the consolidated income statements reflect the respective interests in the income or loss of the limited partnerships or limited liability companies attributable to the minority investors (equity interest was 1% at May 31, 2014).

XML

Stock Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block]

Stock Based Compensation 

Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan

The purpose of the Year 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”) is to strengthen the Company by providing an incentive to its employees, officers, consultants and directors and to encourage them to devote their abilities and industry to the success of the Company’s business enterprise. It is intended that this purpose be achieved by extending to employees, officers, consultants and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries an added long-term incentive for high levels of performance and unusual efforts through the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, performance awards and restricted stock. The Company has reserved 15,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2011 Plan. As of May 31, 2014, there remain 250,000 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and 14,750,000 shares which can be issued under the 2011 Plan after giving effect to shares issued and canceled.

2000 Incentive Plan

The Company's 2000 Incentive Plan ("2000 Plan") provides for options and other stock-based awards that may be granted to eligible employees, officers, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Company had reserved 5,000,000 shares of common stock for future issuance under the 2000 Plan. The 2000 Plan does not have a fixed termination date, provided that no incentive stock option can be granted subsequent to August 29, 2011. As of May 31, 2014, there remain 762,850 shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, and no new stock options awards will be issued under the 2000 Plan.

The following table summarizes the stock option activities for the nine months ended May 31, 2014 (share amounts in thousands):

	Shares	Weighted Average Option Exercise Price Per Share
Outstanding, August 31, 2013	1,097	$	2.21
Granted	—		—
Exercised	—		—
Expired or canceled	(84)		2.50
Outstanding, May 31, 2014	1,013		2.18

For the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no stock options exercised. The aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2014 and 2013 is $-0-, since the market price is lower than the exercise price.

The following summarizes information related to stock options outstanding as of May 31, 2014, and related weighted average price and life information:

		Options Outstanding		Options Exercisable
Exercise Prices		Number of Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Number of Shares
		(Share Amounts In Thousands)
$	1.10	250	7.6	125
$	1.86	593	7.1	302
$	4.90	170	0.5	170
Total		1,013	6.1	597

For the three months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company’s stock options was $49,341 in each period. For the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, stock-based compensation expense associated with the Company’s stock options was $148,023 and $60,121, respectively. The total unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding stock options as of May 31, 2014 was $230,000, and will be recognized, in general, over 1.2 years.

XML

Use of Estimates

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Use Of Estimates [Abstract]

Usage Of Estimates [Text Block]

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant of the Company’s estimates is the determination of revenue to recognize for the services the Company provides and the determination of allowances, which includes the contractual allowance and the provision for doubtful accounts. See “Revenue Recognition” below for further discussion. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates used in the preparation of these financial statements.

XML

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Investment In Real Estate And Notes Payable [Abstract]

Investment In Real Estates And Notes Payable [Text Block]

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable

In October 2012, the Company sold an apartment in Hong Kong, which was purchased in March 2010. The net proceeds from the sale of the apartment were $1,273,403, after repayment of the associated note payable, resulting in a gain of $480,108.

In November 2011 and September 2010, the Company borrowed $116,339 and $65,000 as notes payable from a financial institution at an interest rate of 4.5% and 6%, which notes are to be repaid in 36 and 24 monthly installments, respectively, and are secured by specific equipment purchased at our Pasadena facility. The $65,000 note payable was fully repaid during the three months ended November 30, 2012. The Company paid down $30,028 during the nine months ended May 31, 2014, and the current and long-term portions of the notes payable as of May 31, 2014 are $16,972 and $-0-, respectively.

XML

Inventories

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Inventory Disclosure [Abstract]

Inventory Disclosure [Text Block]

Inventories

Inventories, consisting primarily of medical supplies, are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by use of the average cost method.

XML

Discontinued Operations

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Discontinued Operations And Disposal Groups [Abstract]

Disposal Groups Including Discontinued Operations Disclosure [Text Block]

Discontinued Operations

The Company classifies assets to be disposed of as held for sale or, if appropriate, discontinued operations when appropriate approvals for the disposal are made by management or the Board of Directors. Cash flows from discontinued businesses are reflected as discontinued operating, investing, and financing activities in our statement of cash flows.

The Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and sold it in July 2013. The Company took an impairment charge of approximately $1.1 million during the three months ended August 31, 2012, based on the sales price negotiated at that time. An additional loss of $122,975 was taken based on the final sales price during the three months ended August 31, 2013.

The following is a summary of financial information related to our discontinued operations at the Garland facility for the three and nine months ended May 31, 2013:

	Three months ended May 31, 2013		Nine months ended May 31, 2013
Net patient service revenue	$	84,528	$	486,686
Total costs and expenses		73,200		125,715
Operating income		11,328		360,971
Other income (expense), net		(3,066)		17,377
Income before income taxes		8,262		378,348
Provision for income taxes		—		—
Total income on discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	8,262	$	378,348

XML

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Tables)

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Equity [Abstract]

Schedule of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Table Text Block]

The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component:

	Three months ended May 31,				Nine months ended May 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Available-for-sale securities
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period	$	11,953,646	$	8,387,456	$	9,382,334	$	8,411,128
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains, net of taxes of $-0- for all periods presented		1,194,983		796,836		3,766,295		2,972,664
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in rent and other income		—		—		—		(2,199,500)
Tax provision		—		—		—		—
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—		—		—		(2,199,500)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		1,194,983		796,836		3,766,295		773,164
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	$	13,148,629	$	9,184,292	$	13,148,629	$	9,184,292
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, beginning of period	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8,196
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses)		—		—		—		—
Reclassification adjustments for gains included in rent and other income		—		—		—		(12,610)
Tax provision included in accrued liabilities		—		—		—		4,414
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		—		—		—		(8,196)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—		(8,196)
Accumulated other comprehensive income balance, end of period	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

XML

Noncontrolling Interest (Details Textual)	May 31, 2014
Noncontrolling Interest [Line Items]
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Noncontrolling Owners	1.00%

XML

Foreign Currency Translation

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Foreign Currency [Abstract]

Foreign Currency Disclosure [Text Block]

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company as a whole is the U.S. Dollar. The Company has designated the U.S. Dollar as the functional currency for Sino Bond Inc. Limited, a Hong Kong corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Sino Bond”). The effects of foreign currency exchange adjustments are included as a component of Rent and Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

XML

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Accounting Changes And Error Corrections [Abstract]

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting Principles [Text Block]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

No recent accounting pronouncements or other authoritative guidance has been issued that management considers likely to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

XML

Revenue Recognition (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Gross Revenues And Contractual Allowances [Line Items]
Gross billed charges	$ 8,148,181	$ 5,062,079	$ 21,806,599	$ 14,197,824
Allowances	5,399,409	3,503,317	14,567,193	9,683,213
Net revenue	$ 2,748,772	$ 1,558,762	$ 7,239,406	$ 4,514,611
Allowance percentage	66.00%	69.00%	67.00%	68.00%

XML

Net Income (Loss) per Share (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$ (299,469)	$ (1,430,050)	$ (1,525,895)	$ (2,242,617)
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	29	31	(4)	2,804
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	(299,440)	(1,430,019)	(1,525,899)	(2,239,813)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes	0	8,262	0	378,348
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$ (299,440)	$ (1,421,757)	$ (1,525,899)	$ (1,861,465)
Denominator:
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding	14,418,626	14,543,626	14,431,126	14,543,626
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$ (0.02)	$ (0.10)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.16)
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0.03
Net loss attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$ (0.02)	$ (0.10)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.13)

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Net loss	$ (299,469)	$ (1,421,788)	$ (1,525,895)	$ (1,864,269)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes of $-0-, $-0-, $-0-and $(4,414)	0	0	0	(8,196)
Net change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $-0- for all periods presented	1,194,983	796,836	3,766,295	773,164
Other comprehensive income	1,194,983	796,836	3,766,295	764,968
Comprehensive income (loss)	895,514	(624,952)	2,240,400	(1,099,301)
Less comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest	29	31	(4)	2,804
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.	$ 895,543	$ (624,921)	$ 2,240,396	$ (1,096,497)

XML

Reclassification

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Reclassification [Abstract]

Disclosure of Reclassification Amount [Text Block]

Reclassification

Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. The impact of such reclassification was not significant to the prior period’s overall presentation.

XML

Industry Segments and Geographic Information

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Segment Reporting Disclosure [Text Block]

Industry Segments and Geographic Information

The Industry Segment “U.S. Division” comprises of the Company’s Pasadena facility. The Company at the present time has the U.S. Division and the Corporate Division.

Certain previously reported financial information has been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.

Corporate Division

The Company closed the Garland facility on September 30, 2011, and sold it in July 2013. The Company took an impairment charge of approximately $1.1 million during the three months ended August 31, 2012, based on the sales price negotiated at that time. An additional loss of $122,975 was taken based on the final sales price during the three months ended August 31, 2013.

The Company organized Sino Bond to hold and manage investments in Hong Kong. Sino Bond invests in debt instruments (corporate and municipal) and equity securities in Europe and Asia, including initial public offerings and pre-initial public offerings. The Company invests in various marketable securities. During the three months ended November 30, 2012, one particular security was called on which the Company had a gain of approximately $2.2 million. As of May 31, 2014, the balance of these securities is valued at approximately $21.3 million. During the nine months ended May 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company also traded in initial public offerings of equity securities on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and had a net gain of $161,864 and $706,350, respectively. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company sold all of its trading securities and does not hold any such securities as of May 31, 2014.

The Corporate Division includes interest and other income related to its investments in securities, corporate personnel compensation expenses, and general and administrative expenses. Such expenses and income are not allocated to our operating division, as they relate to our general corporate activities.

We generally evaluate performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes and non-recurring charges and other criteria. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. There are no transfers between segments.

Summarized financial information concerning the business segments from continuing operations is as follows:

	Three months ended May 31,				Nine months ended May 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Revenues from external customers
Net patient service revenues
U.S. Division	$	2,748,772	$	1,558,762	$	7,239,406	$	4,514,611
Corporate		—		—		—		—
Consolidated	$	2,748,772	$	1,558,762	$	7,239,406	$	4,514,611
Income (loss) before taxes and discontinued operations
U.S. Division	$	186,954	$	(906,152)	$	(165,472)	$	(2,388,929)
Corporate		(486,423)		(523,898)		(1,360,423)		146,312
Consolidated	$	(299,469)	$	(1,430,050)	$	(1,525,895)	$	(2,242,617)

	May 31, 2014		August 31, 2013
Total Assets
U.S. Division	$	15,303,810	$	9,924,501
Corporate		32,792,701		31,711,826
Consolidated	$	48,096,511	$	41,636,327

XML

Investment in Real Estate and Notes Payable (Details Textual) (USD $)	1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2012	Nov. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Nov. 30, 2012	May 31, 2014	May 31, 2013
Schedule Of Investments In Real Estate [Line Items]
Proceeds from Sale of Real Estate	$ 1,273,403
Gains Losses On Sales Of Investment Real Estate	480,108				0	480,108
Secured Debt		116,339	65,000
Notes Payable Secured By Equipment At Interest Rate		4.50%	6.00%
Notes Payable Repayment Period		36 months	24 months
Repayments of Long-term Debt, Total				65,000
Repayments Of Notes Payable Secured By Equipment					30,028
Notes Payable Secured By Equipment Amount Outstanding Current					16,972
Notes Payable Secured By Equipment Amount Outstanding Non Current					$ 0

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

May 31, 2014

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is estimated based on market trading information, where available. Absent published market values for an instrument or other assets, management uses observable market data to arrive at its estimates of fair value. Management believes that the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A three-level fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted price for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other input that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured and reported in the Company’s statement of financial position at fair value on a recurring basis as of May 31, 2014, segregated among the appropriate levels within the fair value hierarchy:

	Quoted prices in active markets for identical		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets
Investments available-for-sale	$	—	$	21,285,689	$	—

The Company’s investments in Level 2 are in perpetual debt instruments (corporate and municipal bonds) traded on the European markets, at a cost of $7,984,646, are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices that are traded in less active markets or priced using a quoted market price for similar investments or are priced using non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated by observable market data (Level 2), and there has been no change in valuation techniques for these investments (Level 2).