XML 27 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.1
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Notes)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2019
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value Estimates
The fair value estimates of the following financial instruments have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, and trade payables approximate the fair values of those instruments due to the short-term nature of the instruments. The fair value of receivables on preneed contracts are impracticable to estimate because of the lack of a trading market and the diverse number of individual contracts with varying terms.
The fair value of our debt instruments at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was as follows:
 
March 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
(In thousands)
4.5% Senior Notes due November 2020
$
199,940

 
$
198,930

8.0% Senior Notes due November 2021
163,665

 
160,800

5.375% Senior Notes due January 2022
427,673

 
428,188

5.375% Senior Notes due May 2024
874,225

 
851,275

7.5% Senior Notes due April 2027
230,000

 
214,940

4.625% Senior Notes due December 2027
550,676

 
517,077

Term Loan due December 2022
632,813

 
629,579

Bank Credit Facility due December 2022
275,000

 
387,061

Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
24,920

 
4,076

Total fair value of debt instruments
$
3,378,912

 
$
3,391,926


The fair value of our long-term, fixed-rate loans were estimated using market prices for those loans, and therefore they are classified within Level 2 of the fair value measurements hierarchy. The Term Loan, Bank Credit Facility agreement, and the mortgage notes and other debt are classified within Level 3 of the fair value measurements hierarchy. The fair value of these instruments has been estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on our incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing arrangements. An increase (decrease) in the inputs results in a directionally opposite change in the fair value of the instruments.