XML 28 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Notes)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Credit Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value Estimates
The fair value estimates of the following financial instruments have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, and trade payables approximate the fair values of those instruments due to the short-term nature of the instruments. The fair value of receivables on preneed contracts are impracticable to estimate because of the lack of a trading market and the diverse number of individual contracts with varying terms.
The fair value of our debt instruments at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was as follows:
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
(In thousands)
7.625% Senior Notes due October 2018
$

 
$
259,563

4.5% Senior Notes due November 2020
199,842

 
199,590

8.0% Senior Notes due November 2021
165,300

 
175,313

5.375% Senior Notes due January 2022
428,612

 
436,178

5.375% Senior Notes due May 2024
867,178

 
892,118

7.5% Senior Notes due April 2027

222,222

 
238,004

4.625% Senior Notes due December 2027

518,562

 
558,250

Term Loan due December 2022
666,563

 
675,000

Bank Credit Facility due December 2022
370,000

 

Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
5,845

 
6,036

Total fair value of debt instruments
$
3,444,124

 
$
3,440,052


The fair value of our long-term, fixed-rate loans were estimated using market prices for those loans, and therefore are classified within Level 2 of the fair value measurements hierarchy. The Term Loan, Bank Credit Facility agreement, and the mortgage notes and other debt are classified within Level 3 of the fair value measurements hierarchy. The fair value of these instruments was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on our incremental borrowing rate for similar borrowing arrangements. An increase (decrease) in the inputs results in a directionally opposite change in the fair value of the instruments.