COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2021
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	NOTE 4 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company is periodically involved in legal proceedings, legal actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. Management believes that the outcome of such legal proceedings, legal actions and claims will not have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. *Stockholder Demand Letters* On January 21, 2021, the Company received a stockholder litigation demand letter from the law firm of Purcell Julie & Lefkowitz LLP, on behalf of James Self, a purported stockholder of the Company. The letter demands that the Company (i) deem ineffective the December 30, 2020 amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation in which the Company effected a one-for-four reverse stock split of its common stock due to the manner in which non-votes by brokers were tabulated, (ii) seek appropriate relief for damages allegedly suffered by the company and its stockholders or seek a valid stockholder approval of the amendment and reverse stock split, and (iii) adopt adequate internal controls to prevent a recurrence of the alleged misconduct. The Company disputes that the amendment was ineffective or that there were any inadequate internal controls related to the same. However, to eliminate any questions about the amendment, the Company ratified the amendment at a special stockholders’ meeting pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This special stockholders’ meeting occurred on May 14, 2021. On May 14, 2021, the Company filed a certificate of validation with the State of Delaware to ratify the reverse stock split on December 30, 2020. The purported stockholder thereafter agreed that the changes mooted his potential claims, and the Amalgamation successfully closed. The Company paid $65,000 to the purported stockholder’s counsel in connection with the changes effected. On July 14, 2021, the Company received a stockholder demand letter from the law firm of Rigrodsky Law P.A., on behalf of Matthew Whitfield, a purported stockholder of the Company, alleging that the registration statement (the “Amalgamation Registration Statement”) filed by the Company with the SEC on June 21, 2021 omitted material information with respect to the Amalgamation and requesting that the Company and the Company board of directors provide certain corrective disclosures in an amendment or supplement to the Amalgamation Registration Statement. The Company does not believe the request had merit, but made certain changes to the Amalgamation Registration Statement, which it believes sufficed to answer the purported stockholder’s demands. The purported stockholder thereafter agreed that the changes mooted his potential claims, and the Amalgamation successfully closed. The Company agreed to pay $30,000 to the purported stockholder’s counsel in connection with the changes to the Amalgamation Registration Statement. This amount was accrued as of, and paid subsequent to September 30, 2021. On July 22, 2021, the Company received a DGCL Section 220 books and records demand letter from the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, on behalf of Scott Waller, a purported stockholder of the Company, seeking access to certain books and records of the Company in connection with the process underlying the Amalgamation (as defined herein) and the Company’s engagement of its financial advisors. The Company does not believe the request had merit, but made certain changes to the Amalgamation Registration Statement, which it believes sufficed to answer the purported stockholder’s demands. The purported stockholder thereafter agreed that the changes mooted his potential claims, and the Amalgamation successfully closed. The Company agreed to pay $60,000 to the purported stockholder’s counsel in connection with the changes to the Amalgamation Registration Statement. This amount was accrued as of, and paid subsequent to September 30, 2021. On September 2, 2021, Vince Mojta (“Plaintiff”), through his attorney, filed a complaint (Mojta v. Enveric Biosciences, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-07385 (S.D.N.Y.)) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against the Company and the members of its board of directors (the “Directors”). The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Amalgamation Registration Statement omitted material information with respect to the Amalgamation. The complaint sought to enjoin the Company from taking any steps to consummate the Amalgamation unless and until certain information was disclosed to the Company’s shareholders before a vote on the Amalgamation and a judgment for damages. The Company believed that the suit was without merit. Plaintiff never served the Company or the Directors with the suit, and the Amalgamation successfully closed. Plaintiff then voluntarily dismissed the suit on October 25, 2021. *Development and Clinical Supply Agreement* On February 22, 2021, the Company entered into a Development and Clinical Supply Agreement (the “PureForm Agreement”) with PureForm Global, Inc. (“PureForm”), pursuant to which PureForm will be the exclusive provider of synthetic cannabidiol (“API”) for the Company’s development plans for cancer treatment and supportive care. Under the terms of the PureForm Agreement, PureForm has granted the Company the exclusive right to purchase API and related product for cancer treatment and supportive care during the term of the Agreement (contingent upon an initial minimum order of 1 kilogram during the first thirty (30) days from the effective date) and has agreed to manufacture, package and test the API and related product in accordance with specifications established by the parties. All inventions that are developed jointly by the parties in the course of performing activities under the PureForm Agreement will be owned jointly by the parties in accordance with applicable law; however, if the Company funds additional research and development efforts by PureForm, the parties may enter into a further agreement whereby PureForm would assign any resulting inventions or technical information to the Company. The initial term of the PureForm Agreement is three (3) years commencing on the effective date of the Agreement, subject to extension by mutual agreement of the parties. The PureForm Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice of an uncured material breach or immediately in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency. The Agreement contains, among other provisions, representation and warranties, indemnification obligations and confidentiality provisions in favor of each party that are customary for an agreement of this nature. The Company has met the minimum purchase requirement of 1 kilogram during the first thirty days of the PureForm Agreement’s effectiveness. *Purchase agreement with Prof. Zvi Vogel and Dr. Ilana Nathan* On December 26, 2017, Jay Pharma entered into a purchase agreement with Prof. Zvi Vogel and Dr. Ilana Nathan (the “Vogel-Nathan Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which Jay Pharma was assigned ownership rights to certain patents, which were filed and unissued as of the date of the Vogel-Nathan Purchase Agreement. The Vogel-Nathan Purchase Agreement includes a commitment to pay a one time milestone totaling $200,000 upon the issuance of a utility patent in the United States or by the European Patent Office, as defined in the agreement. The Company has accrued such amount as of September 30, 2021, as a result of the milestone criteria being achieved during three month period ended September 30, 2021. In addition, a milestone payment totaling $300,000 is due upon initiation of a Phase II(b) study. Research activities related to the relevant patents are still in pre-clinical stage, and accordingly, this milestone has not been achieved. The Vogel-Nathan Purchase Agreement contains a commitment for payment of royalties equalling 2% of the first $20 million in net sales derived from the commercialization of products utilizing the relevant patent. As these products are still in the preclinical phase of development, no royalties have been earned. *Agreements with Tikkun* Assignment and Assumption Agreements On January 10, 2020, Jay Pharma entered into two assignment and assumption agreements, pursuant to which, upon the satisfaction of all closing conditions to the Offer, affiliates of Tikkun Pharma Inc. (“Tikkun”) would assign to Jay Pharma all of such affiliates’ in-licensed and developed rights based on certain Amended and Restated Sublicense Agreements, effective January 12, 2018, pursuant to which Jay Pharma entered into two in-licensing U.S. and rest of world rights to the limited pharmaceutical business (including cancer) from TO Pharmaceuticals USA LLC (“TOP”) and Tikkun Olam IP, LTD (“TOCI”), respectively, each as amended by a First Amendment entered January 10, 2020, with: (i) TOP and Tikkun regarding all of Tikkun’s (i) in-licensed rights and obligations to commercialize pharmaceutical products related to GVHD under the relevant Sublicense in the U.S. and (ii) certain skincare business and all of Tikkun’s rights related thereto as of the January 10, 2020 effective date. Jay Pharma agreed to issue 8,288,006 common shares of Jay Pharma to Tikkun in exchange for these rights; and (ii) TOCI and Tikkun regarding all of Tikkun’s in-licensed rights and obligations to commercialize pharmaceutical products related to GVHD under the relevant sublicense anywhere in the world outside the U.S. Jay Pharma agreed to issue 2,072,001 common shares of Jay Pharma to Tikkun in exchange for these rights. On August 12, 2020, Jay Pharma and the applicable Tikkun affiliates entered into the First Amendment to the Tikkun Agreements, pursuant to which all references to the Original Amalgamation Agreement and the amalgamation were revised to be references to the Tender Agreement and the Offer, as applicable. On October 2, 2020, Jay Pharma and the applicable Tikkun affiliates entered into the Second Amendment to the Tikkun Agreements, pursuant to which the effective date of the transactions was revised to occur as of October 2, 2020. License Agreement Jay Pharma, Tikkun Olam LLC (“TO LLC”) and Tikkun Olam Hemp LLC (“TOH”) entered into a license agreement dated on January 10, 2020, pursuant to which Jay Pharma would acquire certain in-licensed and owned intellectual property rights related to the cannabis products in the United States (presently excluding the state of New York) from TO LLC and TOH, each of which is an affiliate of TO Holdings, in exchange for royalty payments of (i) four percent (4.0%) of net sales of OTC cancer products made via consumer channels; (ii) five percent (5.0%) of net sales of beauty products made via consumer channels; and (iii) three percent (3.0%) of net sales of OTC cancer products made via professional channels, along with a minimum net royalty payment starting in January 1, 2022 and progressively increasing up to a cap of $400,000 maximum each year for the first 10 years, then $600,000 maximum each year for the next 5 years, and an annual maximum cap of $750,000 each year thereafter during the term of the agreement. The licensed intellectual property rights relate to beauty products and OTC cancer products, and branding rights related thereto. The beauty products include any topical or transdermal cannabis-containing or cannabis-derived (including hemp-based) skin care or body care beauty products, and the OTC cancer products means any cancer-related products, in each case excluding those regulated as a drug, medicine, or controlled substance by the FDA or any other relevant governmental authority, such as the USDA. On August 12, 2020, Jay Pharma, TO LLC and TOH entered into the First Amendment to the License Agreement, pursuant to which all references to the Original Amalgamation Agreement and the amalgamation were revised to be references to the Tender Agreement and the Offer, as applicable. On October 2, 2020, Jay Pharma, TO LLC and TOH entered into the Second Amendment to the License Agreement, pursuant to which the effective date of the transactions was revised to occur as of October 2, 2020. Enveric Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2021

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

NOTE 4 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is periodically involved in legal proceedings, legal actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. Management believes that the outcome of such legal proceedings, legal actions and claims will not have a significant adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Stockholder Demand Letters

On January 21, 2021, the Company received a stockholder litigation demand letter from the law firm of Purcell Julie & Lefkowitz LLP, on behalf of James Self, a purported stockholder of the Company. The letter demands that the Company (i) deem ineffective the December 30, 2020 amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation in which the Company effected a one-for-four reverse stock split of its common stock due to the manner in which non-votes by brokers were tabulated, (ii) seek appropriate relief for damages allegedly suffered by the company and its stockholders or seek a valid stockholder approval of the amendment and reverse stock split, and (iii) adopt adequate internal controls to prevent a recurrence of the alleged misconduct. The Company disputes that the amendment was ineffective or that there were any inadequate internal controls related to the same. However, to eliminate any questions about the amendment, the Company ratified the amendment at a special stockholders’ meeting pursuant to Section 204 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This special stockholders’ meeting occurred on May 14, 2021. On May 14, 2021, the Company filed a certificate of validation with the State of Delaware to ratify the reverse stock split on December 30, 2020. The purported stockholder thereafter agreed that the changes mooted his potential claims, and the Amalgamation successfully closed. The Company paid $65,000 to the purported stockholder’s counsel in connection with the changes effected.

On July 14, 2021, the Company received a stockholder demand letter from the law firm of Rigrodsky Law P.A., on behalf of Matthew Whitfield, a purported stockholder of the Company, alleging that the registration statement (the “Amalgamation Registration Statement”) filed by the Company with the SEC on June 21, 2021 omitted material information with respect to the Amalgamation and requesting that the Company and the Company board of directors provide certain corrective disclosures in an amendment or supplement to the Amalgamation Registration Statement. The Company does not believe the request had merit, but made certain changes to the Amalgamation Registration Statement, which it believes sufficed to answer the purported stockholder’s demands. The purported stockholder thereafter agreed that the changes mooted his potential claims, and the Amalgamation successfully closed. The Company agreed to pay $30,000 to the purported stockholder’s counsel in connection with the changes to the Amalgamation Registration Statement. This amount was accrued as of, and paid subsequent to September 30, 2021.

On July 22, 2021, the Company received a DGCL Section 220 books and records demand letter from the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, on behalf of Scott Waller, a purported stockholder of the Company, seeking access to certain books and records of the Company in connection with the process underlying the Amalgamation (as defined herein) and the Company’s engagement of its financial advisors. The Company does not believe the request had merit, but made certain changes to the Amalgamation Registration Statement, which it believes sufficed to answer the purported stockholder’s demands. The purported stockholder thereafter agreed that the changes mooted his potential claims, and the Amalgamation successfully closed. The Company agreed to pay $60,000 to the purported stockholder’s counsel in connection with the changes to the Amalgamation Registration Statement. This amount was accrued as of, and paid subsequent to September 30, 2021.

On September 2, 2021, Vince Mojta (“Plaintiff”), through his attorney, filed a complaint (Mojta v. Enveric Biosciences, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-07385 (S.D.N.Y.)) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against the Company and the members of its board of directors (the “Directors”). The complaint alleged, among other things, that the Amalgamation Registration Statement omitted material information with respect to the Amalgamation. The complaint sought to enjoin the Company from taking any steps to consummate the Amalgamation unless and until certain information was disclosed to the Company’s shareholders before a vote on the Amalgamation and a judgment for damages. The Company believed that the suit was without merit. Plaintiff never served the Company or the Directors with the suit, and the Amalgamation successfully closed. Plaintiff then voluntarily dismissed the suit on October 25, 2021.

Development and Clinical Supply Agreement

On February 22, 2021, the Company entered into a Development and Clinical Supply Agreement (the “PureForm Agreement”) with PureForm Global, Inc. (“PureForm”), pursuant to which PureForm will be the exclusive provider of synthetic cannabidiol (“API”) for the Company’s development plans for cancer treatment and supportive care. Under the terms of the PureForm Agreement, PureForm has granted the Company the exclusive right to purchase API and related product for cancer treatment and supportive care during the term of the Agreement (contingent upon an initial minimum order of 1 kilogram during the first thirty (30) days from the effective date) and has agreed to manufacture, package and test the API and related product in accordance with specifications established by the parties. All inventions that are developed jointly by the parties in the course of performing activities under the PureForm Agreement will be owned jointly by the parties in accordance with applicable law; however, if the Company funds additional research and development efforts by PureForm, the parties may enter into a further agreement whereby PureForm would assign any resulting inventions or technical information to the Company.

The initial term of the PureForm Agreement is three (3) years commencing on the effective date of the Agreement, subject to extension by mutual agreement of the parties. The PureForm Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice of an uncured material breach or immediately in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency. The Agreement contains, among other provisions, representation and warranties, indemnification obligations and confidentiality provisions in favor of each party that are customary for an agreement of this nature.

The Company has met the minimum purchase requirement of 1 kilogram during the first thirty days of the PureForm Agreement’s effectiveness.

Purchase agreement with Prof. Zvi Vogel and Dr. Ilana Nathan

On December 26, 2017, Jay Pharma entered into a purchase agreement with Prof. Zvi Vogel and Dr. Ilana Nathan (the “Vogel-Nathan Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which Jay Pharma was assigned ownership rights to certain patents, which were filed and unissued as of the date of the Vogel-Nathan Purchase Agreement. The Vogel-Nathan Purchase Agreement includes a commitment to pay a one time milestone totaling $200,000 upon the issuance of a utility patent in the United States or by the European Patent Office, as defined in the agreement. The Company has accrued such amount as of September 30, 2021, as a result of the milestone criteria being achieved during three month period ended September 30, 2021. In addition, a milestone payment totaling $300,000 is due upon initiation of a Phase II(b) study. Research activities related to the relevant patents are still in pre-clinical stage, and accordingly, this milestone has not been achieved. The Vogel-Nathan Purchase Agreement contains a commitment for payment of royalties equalling 2% of the first $20 million in net sales derived from the commercialization of products utilizing the relevant patent. As these products are still in the preclinical phase of development, no royalties have been earned.

Agreements with Tikkun

Assignment and Assumption Agreements

On January 10, 2020, Jay Pharma entered into two assignment and assumption agreements, pursuant to which, upon the satisfaction of all closing conditions to the Offer, affiliates of Tikkun Pharma Inc. (“Tikkun”) would assign to Jay Pharma all of such affiliates’ in-licensed and developed rights based on certain Amended and Restated Sublicense Agreements, effective January 12, 2018, pursuant to which Jay Pharma entered into two in-licensing U.S. and rest of world rights to the limited pharmaceutical business (including cancer) from TO Pharmaceuticals USA LLC (“TOP”) and Tikkun Olam IP, LTD (“TOCI”), respectively, each as amended by a First Amendment entered January 10, 2020, with:

(i) TOP and Tikkun regarding all of Tikkun’s (i) in-licensed rights and obligations to commercialize pharmaceutical products related to GVHD under the relevant Sublicense in the U.S. and (ii) certain skincare business and all of Tikkun’s rights related thereto as of the January 10, 2020 effective date. Jay Pharma agreed to issue 8,288,006 common shares of Jay Pharma to Tikkun in exchange for these rights; and

(ii) TOCI and Tikkun regarding all of Tikkun’s in-licensed rights and obligations to commercialize pharmaceutical products related to GVHD under the relevant sublicense anywhere in the world outside the U.S. Jay Pharma agreed to issue 2,072,001 common shares of Jay Pharma to Tikkun in exchange for these rights.

On August 12, 2020, Jay Pharma and the applicable Tikkun affiliates entered into the First Amendment to the Tikkun Agreements, pursuant to which all references to the Original Amalgamation Agreement and the amalgamation were revised to be references to the Tender Agreement and the Offer, as applicable.

On October 2, 2020, Jay Pharma and the applicable Tikkun affiliates entered into the Second Amendment to the Tikkun Agreements, pursuant to which the effective date of the transactions was revised to occur as of October 2, 2020.

License Agreement

Jay Pharma, Tikkun Olam LLC (“TO LLC”) and Tikkun Olam Hemp LLC (“TOH”) entered into a license agreement dated on January 10, 2020, pursuant to which Jay Pharma would acquire certain in-licensed and owned intellectual property rights related to the cannabis products in the United States (presently excluding the state of New York) from TO LLC and TOH, each of which is an affiliate of TO Holdings, in exchange for royalty payments of (i) four percent (4.0%) of net sales of OTC cancer products made via consumer channels; (ii) five percent (5.0%) of net sales of beauty products made via consumer channels; and (iii) three percent (3.0%) of net sales of OTC cancer products made via professional channels, along with a minimum net royalty payment starting in January 1, 2022 and progressively increasing up to a cap of $400,000 maximum each year for the first 10 years, then $600,000 maximum each year for the next 5 years, and an annual maximum cap of $750,000 each year thereafter during the term of the agreement. The licensed intellectual property rights relate to beauty products and OTC cancer products, and branding rights related thereto. The beauty products include any topical or transdermal cannabis-containing or cannabis-derived (including hemp-based) skin care or body care beauty products, and the OTC cancer products means any cancer-related products, in each case excluding those regulated as a drug, medicine, or controlled substance by the FDA or any other relevant governmental authority, such as the USDA.

On August 12, 2020, Jay Pharma, TO LLC and TOH entered into the First Amendment to the License Agreement, pursuant to which all references to the Original Amalgamation Agreement and the amalgamation were revised to be references to the Tender Agreement and the Offer, as applicable.

On October 2, 2020, Jay Pharma, TO LLC and TOH entered into the Second Amendment to the License Agreement, pursuant to which the effective date of the transactions was revised to occur as of October 2, 2020.

Enveric Biosciences, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements