UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

Commission file number: 1-11416

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California	33-0459135
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1400, Las Vegas, Nevada	89169
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including Area Code: (949) 753-6800

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]   No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X]   No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer [_]    Accelerated Filer [X]

Non-Accelerated Filer [_]    Smaller Reporting Company [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [_]  No [X]

As of April 20, 2015 the registrant had 26,101,400 common shares outstanding.

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2015

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014	3
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month  periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	5
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014	6
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	41
	PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	42
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	42
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	43
Item 6.	Exhibits	44
	Signatures	45

2

Item 1. Financial Statements

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	March 31,			December 31,
	2015			2014
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,202		$	17,859
Restricted cash and equivalents		173,451			175,382
Finance receivables		1,683,904			1,595,956
Less: Allowance for finance credit losses		(68,142	)		(61,460	)
Finance receivables, net		1,615,762			1,534,496
Finance receivables measured at fair value		743			1,664
Furniture and equipment, net		1,417			1,161
Deferred financing costs		12,609			12,362
Deferred tax assets, net		40,347			42,847
Accrued interest receivable		24,496			23,372
Other assets		16,426			23,915
	$	1,905,453		$	1,833,058
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	21,665		$	21,660
Warehouse lines of credit		21,965			56,839
Residual interest financing		12,074			12,327
Debt secured by receivables measured at fair value		–			1,250
Securitization trust debt		1,697,649			1,598,496
Subordinated renewable notes		15,082			15,233
		1,768,435			1,705,805
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $1 par value; authorized 4,998,130 shares; none issued		–			–
Series A preferred stock, $1 par value; authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued		–			–
Series B preferred stock, $1 par value; authorized 1,870 shares; none issued		–			–
Common stock, no par value; authorized 75,000,000 shares; 25,750,240 and 24,540,640 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		81,945			80,513
Retained earnings		60,124			51,791
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(5,051	)		(5,051	)
		137,018			127,253
	$	1,905,453		$	1,833,058

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015		2014
Revenues:
Interest income	$	82,359	$	64,996
Servicing fees		148		513
Other income		3,482		2,637
		85,989		68,146
Expenses:
Employee costs		14,486		10,890
General and administrative		4,836		3,603
Interest		13,173		13,381
Provision for credit losses		33,439		23,880
Marketing		4,204		3,846
Occupancy		954		688
Depreciation and amortization		148		94
		71,240		56,382
Income before income tax expense		14,749		11,764
Income tax expense		6,416		5,059
Net income	$	8,333	$	6,705
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.33	$	0.28
Diluted		0.26		0.21
Number of shares used in computing earnings per share:
Basic		25,635		24,355
Diluted		31,991		32,011

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015		2014
Net income	$	8,333	$	6,705
Other comprehensive income/(loss); change in funded status of pension plan		–		–
Comprehensive income	$	8,333	$	6,705

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015			2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	8,333		$	6,705
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Accretion of deferred acquisition fees		(2,881	)		(4,610	)
Accretion of purchase discount on receivables measured at fair value		–			(239	)
Amortization of discount on securitization trust debt		20			41
Amortization of discount on senior secured debt, related party		–			623
Accretion of premium on debt secured by receivables measured at fair value		–			304
Mark to fair value on debt secured by receivables measured at fair value		–			194
Mark to fair value of receivables measured at fair value		–			(7	)
Depreciation and amortization		148			94
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,673			1,684
Provision for credit losses		33,439			23,880
Stock-based compensation expense		1,096			771
Interest income on residual assets		(37	)		(113	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable		(1,124	)		1,213
Deferred tax assets, net		2,500			5,059
Other assets		6,644			530
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		5			26
Net cash provided by operating activities		49,816			36,155
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of finance receivables held for investment		(233,890	)		(189,886	)
Payments received on finance receivables held for investment		122,066			103,936
Payments received on receivables portfolio at fair value		921			5,664
Proceeds received on residual interest in securitizations		–			522
Change in repossessions held in inventory		882			(1,800	)
Decreases (increases) in restricted cash and cash equivalents, net		1,931			(15,312	)
Purchase of furniture and equipment		(404	)		(165	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(108,494	)		(97,041	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of securitization trust debt		245,000			180,000
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated renewable notes		111			155
Payments on subordinated renewable notes		(262	)		(712	)
Net proceeds from (repayments of) warehouse lines of credit		(34,874	)		32,075
Proceeds from (repayments of) residual interest financing debt		(253	)		(3,514	)
Repayment of securitization trust debt		(145,867	)		(110,220	)
Repayment of debt secured by receivables measured at fair value		(1,250	)		(5,039	)
Repayment of senior secured debt, related party		–			(39,182	)
Payment of financing costs		(1,920	)		(1,578	)
Exercise of options and warrants		336			1,356
Net cash provided by financing activities		61,021			53,341
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2,343			(7,545	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		17,859			22,112
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	20,202		$	14,567
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	11,415		$	11,506
Income taxes	$	5		$	261

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

We were formed in California on March 8, 1991. We specialize in purchasing and servicing retail automobile installment sale contracts (“automobile contracts” or “finance receivables”) originated by licensed motor vehicle dealers located throughout the United States (“dealers”) in the sale of new and used automobiles, light trucks and passenger vans. Through our purchases, we provide indirect financing to dealer customers for borrowers with limited credit histories or past credit problems (“sub-prime customers”). We serve as an alternative source of financing for dealers, allowing sales to customers who otherwise might not be able to obtain financing. In addition to purchasing installment purchase contracts directly from dealers, we have also (i) acquired installment purchase contracts in four merger and acquisition transactions, (ii) purchased immaterial amounts of vehicle purchase money loans from non-affiliated lenders, and (iii) lent money directly to consumers for an immaterial amount of loans secured by vehicles. In this report, we refer to all of such contracts and loans as "automobile contracts."

Basis of Presentation

Our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, with the instructions to Form 10-Q and with Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and include all adjustments that are, in management’s opinion, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are, in the opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature. Results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. These Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported periods. Specifically, a number of estimates were made in connection with determining an appropriate allowance for finance credit losses, determining appropriate reserves for contingent liabilities, valuing finance receivables measured at fair value and the related debt, valuing residual interest in securitizations, accreting net acquisition fees, amortizing deferred costs, valuing stock options and warrants issued, and recording deferred tax assets and reserves for uncertain tax positions. These are material estimates that could be susceptible to changes in the near term and, accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

7

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Other Income

The following table presents the primary components of Other Income for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Direct mail revenues	$	2,137	$	1,852
Convenience fee revenue		950		810
Recoveries on previously charged-off contracts		192		35
Sales tax refunds		150		102
Other		53		(162	)
Other income for the period	$	3,482	$	2,637

Stock-based Compensation

We recognize compensation costs in the financial statements for all share-based payments based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 “Stock Compensation”.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we recorded stock-based compensation costs in the amount of $1,096,000 and $771,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2015, unrecognized stock-based compensation costs to be recognized over future periods equaled $12.8 million. This amount will be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.

The following represents stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2015:

						Weighted
	Number of			Weighted		Average
	Shares			Average		Remaining
	(in thousands)			Exercise Price		Contractual Term
Options outstanding at the beginning of period		10,828		$	4.05	6.01 years
Granted		–			–	N/A
Exercised		(209	)		1.34	N/A
Forfeited		–			–	N/A
Options outstanding at the end of period		10,619		$	4.11	5.83 years
Options exercisable at the end of period		5,932		$	2.83	4.88 years

At March 31, 2015, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $32.0 million and $25.1 million, respectively. There were 209,000 options exercised for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to 574,000 for the comparable period in 2014. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $1.2 million and $4.4 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. There were 2.1 million shares available for future stock option grants under existing plans as of March 31, 2015.

Purchases of Company Stock

We did not re-purchase any shares of our common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2015. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2014, we re-purchased 64,430 shares of our common stock, at an average price of $7.97. All purchases were related to net exercises of outstanding options and warrants. In transactions during the three-month period ended March 31, 2014, the holder of options and warrants to purchase 365,000 shares of our common stock paid the aggregate $513,400 exercise price by surrender to us of 64,430 of such 365,000 shares. There were no open market purchases of our common stock.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03), Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the financial statements to present such costs as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of debt issuance costs will be reported as interest expense. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. ASU 2015-03 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

8

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reclassifications

Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Reclassifications had no effect on prior year net income or total shareholders’ equity.

Financial Covenants

Certain of our securitization transactions, our warehouse credit facilities and our residual interest financing contain various financial covenants requiring minimum financial ratios and results. Such covenants include maintaining minimum levels of liquidity and net worth and not exceeding maximum leverage levels. As of March 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all such covenants. In addition, certain securitization and non-securitization related debt agreements contain cross-default provisions that would allow certain creditors to declare a default if a default occurred under a different facility.

Provision for Contingent Liabilities

We are routinely involved in various legal proceedings resulting from our consumer finance activities and practices, both continuing and discontinued. Our legal counsel has advised us on such matters where, based on information available at the time of this report, there is an indication that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably determined.

We have recorded a liability as of March 31, 2015, which represents our best estimate of probable incurred losses for legal contingencies. The amount of losses that may ultimately be incurred cannot be estimated with certainty.

(2) Finance Receivables

Our portfolio of finance receivables consists of small-balance homogeneous contracts comprising a single segment and class that is collectively evaluated for impairment on a portfolio basis according to delinquency status. Our contract purchase guidelines are designed to produce a homogenous portfolio. For key terms such as interest rate, length of contract, monthly payment and amount financed, there is relatively little variation from the average for the portfolio. We report delinquency on a contractual basis. Once a contract becomes greater than 90 days delinquent, we do not recognize additional interest income until the obligor under the contract makes sufficient payments to be less than 90 days delinquent. Any payments received on a contract that is greater than 90 days delinquent are first applied to accrued interest and then to principal reduction.

The following table presents the components of Finance Receivables, net of unearned interest:

	March 31,			December 31,
	2015			2014
Finance Receivables		(In thousands)
Automobile finance receivables, net of unearned interest	$	1,697,894		$	1,612,246
Less: Unearned acquisition fees and originations costs		(13,990	)		(16,290	)
Finance Receivables	$	1,683,904		$	1,595,956

We consider an automobile contract delinquent when an obligor fails to make at least 90% of a contractually due payment by the following due date, which date may have been extended within limits specified in the servicing agreements. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due, as extended where applicable. Automobile contracts less than 31 days delinquent are not included. In certain circumstances we will grant obligors one-month payment extensions to assist them with temporary cash flow problems. The only modification of terms is to advance the obligor’s next due date by one month and extend the maturity date of the receivable by one month. In certain limited cases, a two-month extension may be granted. There are no other concessions such as a reduction in interest rate, forgiveness of principal or of accrued interest. Accordingly, we consider such extensions to be insignificant delays in payments rather than troubled debt restructurings. The following table summarizes the delinquency status of finance receivables as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

9

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	March 31,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Deliquency Status
Current	$	1,604,715	$	1,523,020
31 - 60 days		38,093		42,730
61 - 90 days		23,192		23,300
91 + days		31,894		23,196
	$	1,697,894	$	1,612,246

Finance receivables totaling $31.9 million and $23.2 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, including all receivables greater than 90 days delinquent, have been placed on non-accrual status as a result of their delinquency status.

We use a loss allowance methodology commonly referred to as "static pooling," which stratifies our finance receivable portfolio into separately identified pools based on the period of origination. Using analytical and formula driven techniques, we estimate an allowance for finance credit losses, which we believe is adequate for probable incurred credit losses that can be reasonably estimated in our portfolio of automobile contracts. The estimate for probable incurred credit losses is reduced by our estimate for future recoveries on previously incurred losses. Provision for losses is charged to our consolidated statement of operations. Net losses incurred on finance receivables are charged to the allowance. We establish the allowance for new receivables over the 12-month period following their acquisition.

The following table presents a summary of the activity for the allowance for finance credit losses for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	61,460		$	39,626
Provision for credit losses on finance receivables		33,439			23,880
Charge-offs		(31,829	)		(23,541	)
Recoveries		5,072			4,687
Balance at end of period	$	68,142		$	44,652

Excluded from finance receivables are contracts that were previously classified as finance receivables but were reclassified as other assets because we have repossessed the vehicle securing the Contract. The following table presents a summary of such repossessed inventory together with the allowance for losses in repossessed inventory that is not included in the allowance for finance credit losses:

	March 31,			December 31,
	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Gross balance of repossessions in inventory	$	25,625		$	28,234
Allowance for losses on repossessed inventory		(16,102	)		(17,829	)
Net repossessed inventory included in other assets	$	9,523		$	10,405

10

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(3) Finance Receivables Measured at Fair Value

In September 2011 we purchased approximately $217.8 million of finance receivables from Fireside Bank. These receivables are recorded on our balance sheet at fair value.

The following table presents the components of Finance Receivables measured at fair value:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2015		2014
Finance Receivables Measured at Fair Value	(In thousands)
Finance receivables and accrued interest, net of unearned interest	$	743	$	1,664
Less: Fair value adjustment		–		–
Finance receivables measured at fair value	$	743	$	1,664

The following table summarizes the delinquency status of finance receivables measured at fair value as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	March 31,		December 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Deliquency Status
Current	$	385	$	1,266
31 - 60 days		210		262
61 - 90 days		106		74
91 + days		42		62
	$	743	$	1,664

11

4) Securitization Trust Debt

We have completed many securitization transactions that are structured as secured borrowings for financial accounting purposes. The debt issued in these transactions is shown on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Securitization trust debt,” and the components of such debt are summarized in the following table:

	Final	Receivables				Outstanding		Outstanding		Weighted Average Contractual
	Scheduled	Pledged at				Principal at		Principal at		Interest Rate at
	Payment	March 31,		Initial		March 31,		December 31,		March 31,
Series	Date (1)	2015 (2)		Principal		2015		2014		2015
	(Dollars in thousands)
CPS 2011-A	April 2018	$	10,138	$	100,364	$	5,836	$	8,457		2.82%
CPS 2011-B	September 2018		19,613		109,936		19,299		22,985		4.46%
CPS 2011-C	March 2019		25,918		119,400		26,049		30,601		4.92%
CPS 2012-A	June 2019		31,274		155,000		30,393		35,923		3.35%
CPS 2012-B	September 2019		44,458		141,500		43,388		50,125		3.06%
CPS 2012-C	December 2019		49,655		147,000		48,610		55,619		2.40%
CPS 2012-D	March 2020		60,076		160,000		59,229		67,833		2.06%
CPS 2013-A	June 2020		87,361		185,000		87,059		97,775		1.95%
CPS 2013-B	September 2020		106,376		205,000		106,305		118,692		2.44%
CPS 2013-C	December 2020		122,248		205,000		120,830		133,628		2.87%
CPS 2013-D	March 2021		120,330		183,000		118,794		132,150		2.54%
CPS 2014-A	June 2021		132,426		180,000		130,422		143,456		2.13%
CPS 2014-B	September 2021		166,835		202,500		165,346		177,601		1.92%
CPS 2014-C	December 2021		244,750		273,000		241,176		256,151		2.15%
CPS 2014-D	March 2022		254,224		267,500		249,913		267,500		2.40%
CPS 2015-A (3)	June 2022		170,624		245,000		245,000		–		2.31%
		$	1,646,306	$	2,879,200	$	1,697,649	$	1,598,496

12

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

_________________

(1) The Final Scheduled Payment Date represents final legal maturity of the securitization trust debt. Securitization trust debt is expected to become due and to be paid prior to those dates, based on amortization of the finance receivables pledged to the trusts. Expected payments, which will depend on the performance of such receivables, as to which there can be no assurance, are $491.0 million in 2015, $538.9 million in 2016, $359.4 million in 2017, $200.1 million in 2018, $92.4 million in 2019 and $15.9 million in 2020.

(2) Includes repossessed assets that are included in Other assets on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(3) An additional $72.0 million of receivables were pledged to CPS 2015-A in April 2015.

All of the securitization trust debt was sold in private placement transactions to qualified institutional buyers. The debt was issued through our wholly-owned bankruptcy remote subsidiaries and is secured by the assets of such subsidiaries, but not by our other assets.

The terms of the securitization agreements related to the issuance of the securitization trust debt and the warehouse credit facilities require that we meet certain delinquency and credit loss criteria with respect to the pool of receivables, and certain of the agreements require that we maintain minimum levels of liquidity and not exceed maximum leverage levels. In addition, certain securitization and non-securitization related debt contain cross-default provisions, which would allow certain creditors to declare a default if a default were declared under a different facility. As of March 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all such covenants.

We are responsible for the administration and collection of the automobile contracts. The securitization agreements also require certain funds be held in restricted cash accounts to provide additional collateral for the borrowings, to be applied to make payments on the securitization trust debt or as pre-funding proceeds from a term securitization prior to the purchase of additional collateral. As of March 31, 2015, restricted cash under the various agreements totaled approximately $173.5 million, of which $72.0 million represented pre-funding proceeds. Interest expense on the securitization trust debt consists of the stated rate of interest plus amortization of additional costs of borrowing. Additional costs of borrowing include facility fees, amortization of deferred financing costs and discounts on notes sold. Deferred financing costs and discounts on notes sold related to the securitization trust debt are amortized using a level yield method. Accordingly, the effective cost of the securitization trust debt is greater than the contractual rate of interest disclosed above.

Our wholly-owned bankruptcy remote subsidiaries were formed to facilitate the above asset-backed financing transactions. Similar bankruptcy remote subsidiaries issue the debt outstanding under our credit facilities. Bankruptcy remote refers to a legal structure in which it is expected that the applicable entity would not be included in any bankruptcy filing by its parent or affiliates. All of the assets of these subsidiaries have been pledged as collateral for the related debt. All such transactions, treated as secured financings for accounting and tax purposes, are treated as sales for all other purposes, including legal and bankruptcy purposes. None of the assets of these subsidiaries are available to pay other creditors.

13

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(5) Debt

The terms and amounts of our other debt outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are summarized below:

			Amount Outstanding at
			March 31,		December 31,
			2015		2014
			(In thousands)
Description	Interest Rate	Maturity
Warehouse lines of credit	5.50% over one month Libor (Minimum 6.50%)	April 2019	$	21,965	$	23,581
	5.50% over one month Libor (Minimum 6.25%)	August 2017		–		33,258
Residual interest financing	11.75% over one month Libor	April 2018		12,074		12,327
Debt secured by receivables measured at fair value	n/a	Repayment is based on payments from underlying receivables.  Final payment of the 8.00% loan was made in September 2013, while final residual payment was made in January 2015		–		1,250
Subordinated renewable notes	Weighted average rate of 9.83% and 10.7% at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 , respectively	Weighted average maturity of  November 2016 and October 2016 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		15,082		15,233
			$	49,121	$	85,649

In April 2015 we entered into a new $100 million warehouse credit line with affiliates of Fortress Investment Group. The facility is structured to allow us to fund a portion of the purchase price of automobile contracts by borrowing from a credit facility to our consolidated subsidiary Page Six Funding LLC. This facility, which replaces a revolving credit facility that we have used since December 2010, provides for advances up to 88% of eligible finance receivables and the loans under it accrue interest at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 5.50% per annum, with a minimum rate of 6.50% per annum. There was $22.0 million outstanding under the previous facility at March 31, 2015. The new facility has a revolving period through April 2017 and an amortization period through April 2019 for any receivables pledged to the facility at the end of the revolving period.

14

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(6) Interest Income and Interest Expense

The following table presents the components of interest income:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Interest on finance receivables	$	82,321	$	64,882
Residual interest income		37		113
Other interest income		1		1
Interest income	$	82,359	$	64,996

The following table presents the components of interest expense:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Securitization trust debt	$	10,876	$	9,316
Warehouse lines of credit		1,473		877
Senior secured debt, related party		–		1,651
Debt secured by receivables at fair value		–		328
Residual interest financing		423		579
Subordinated renewable notes		401		630
Interest expense	$	13,173	$	13,381

(7) Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 were calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the related period. The following table reconciles the number of shares used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three-month ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period used to compute basic earnings per share		25,635		24,355
Incremental common shares attributable to exercise of outstanding options and warrants		6,356		7,656
Weighted average number of common shares used to compute diluted earnings per share		31,991		32,011

If the anti-dilutive effects of common stock equivalents were considered, shares included in the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 would have included an additional 4.7 and 2.5 million shares, respectively attributable to the exercise of outstanding options and warrants.

15

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(8) Income Taxes

We file numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns with the United States and with many states. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, or local examinations by tax authorities for years before 2011.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had no unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions. We do not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to any settlements of audits or expirations of statutes of limitations over the next 12 months.

The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return and combined or stand-alone state franchise tax returns for certain states. We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes, under which deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement values of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. A valuation allowance is recognized for a deferred tax asset if, based on the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. Although realization is not assured, we believe that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset of $40.3 million as of March 31, 2015 is more likely than not based on forecasted future net earnings. Our net deferred tax asset of $40.3 million consists of approximately $30.2 million of net U.S. federal deferred tax assets and $10.1 million of net state deferred tax assets. We estimate that we would need to generate approximately $93 million of taxable income during the applicable carryforward periods to realize fully our federal and state net deferred tax assets.

Income tax expense was $6.4 million and $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, and represents an effective income tax rate of 44% and 43%, respectively.

(9) Legal Proceedings

Consumer Litigation. We are routinely involved in various legal proceedings resulting from our consumer finance activities and practices, both continuing and discontinued. Consumers can and do initiate lawsuits against us alleging violations of law applicable to collection of receivables, and such lawsuits sometimes allege that resolution as a class action is appropriate. We are currently defending two such purported class actions, The first of those two has been settled by agreement with the plaintiffs, with the settlement remaining subject to approval by the court. The court hearing the second has been instructed by its court of appeals to grant our motion for dismissal, following which the plaintiff may assert his claim in arbitration on an individual basis and not on a class basis.

For the most part, we have legal and factual defenses to such consumer claims, which we routinely contest or settle (for immaterial amounts) depending on the particular circumstances of each case. We have recorded a liability as of March 31, 2015 with respect to such matters, in the aggregate.

FTC Action. In July 2013, the staff of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) advised us that they were prepared to recommend that the FTC initiate a lawsuit against us relating to allegedly unfair trade practices, and simultaneously advised that settlement of such issues by consent decree might be achieved. On May 29, 2014, the FTC announced its agreement to settle the matter by filing a lawsuit against us, and requesting, with our consent, that the court enter an agreed judgment against us. The lawsuit arose out of the FTC’s inquiry into our business practices. Under the agreed settlement, we made approximately $1.9 million of restitutionary payments and $1.6 million of account adjustments to our customers in September 2014, paid a $2 million penalty to the federal government in June 2014, and implemented procedural changes, all pursuant to a consent decree that was entered by the court in June 2014.

16

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Department of Justice Subpoena. In January 2015, we were served with a subpoena by the U.S. Department of Justice directing us to produce certain documents relating to our and our subsidiaries’ and affiliates’ origination and securitization of sub-prime automobile contracts since 2005 in connection with an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice in contemplation of a civil proceeding for potential violations of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989. Among other matters, the subpoena requests information relating to the underwriting criteria used to originate these automobile contracts and the representations and warranties relating to those underwriting criteria that were made in connection with the securitization of the automobile contracts. We are investigating these matters internally and are cooperating with the request. Such investigation could in the future result in the imposition of damages, fines or civil or criminal claims and/or penalties. No assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of the investigation or any resulting proceeding(s), which might materially and adversely affect us.

In General. There can be no assurance as to the outcomes of the matters referenced above. We have recorded a liability as of March 31, 2015, which represents our best estimate of probable incurred losses for legal contingencies, including all of the matters described or referenced above. The amount of losses that may ultimately be incurred cannot be estimated with certainty. However, based on such information as is available to us, we believe that the range of reasonably possible losses for the legal proceedings and contingencies we face, including those described or referenced above, as of March 31, 2015, and in excess of the liability we have recorded, is from $0 to $250,000.

Accordingly, we believe that the ultimate resolution of such legal proceedings and contingencies, after taking into account our current litigation reserves, should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. We note, however, that in light of the uncertainties inherent in contested proceedings, the wide discretion vested in the U.S. Department of Justice and other government agencies, and the deference that courts may give to assertions made by government litigants, there can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves we have accrued; as a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to our operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of our income for that period.

(10) Employee Benefits

On March 8, 2002 we acquired MFN Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries in a merger. We sponsor the MFN Financial Corporation Benefit Plan (the “Plan”). Plan benefits were frozen June 30, 2001. The table below sets forth the Plan’s net periodic benefit cost for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Components of net periodic cost (benefit)
Service cost	$	–		$	–
Interest cost		211			220
Expected return on assets		(377	)		(432	)
Amortization of transition (asset)/obligation		–			–
Amortization of net (gain) / loss		87			–
Net periodic cost (benefit)	$	(79	)	$	(212	)

We did not make any contributions to the Plan during the three-month period ended March 31, 2015 and we do not anticipate making any contributions for the remainder of 2015. We contributed $112,000 during the three-month period ended March 31, 2014.

(11) Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements" clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy.

17

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The three levels are defined as follows: level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

In September 2011, we acquired $217.8 million of finance receivables from Fireside Bank for a purchase price of $199.6 million. The receivables were acquired by our wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary, CPS Fender Receivables, LLC, which issued a note for $197.3 million, with a fair value of $196.5 million. Since the Fireside receivables were originated by another entity with its own underwriting guidelines and procedures, we have elected to account for the Fireside receivables and the related debt secured by those receivables at their estimated fair values so that changes in fair value will be reflected in our results of operations as they occur. Interest income from the receivables and interest expense on the note are included in interest income and interest expense, respectively. Changes to the fair value of the receivables and debt are included in other income. Our level 3, unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions about the factors that market participants use in pricing similar receivables and debt, and are based on the best information available in the circumstances. They include such inputs as estimated net charge-offs and timing of the amortization of the portfolio of finance receivables. Our estimate of the fair value of the Fireside receivables is performed on a pool basis, rather than separately on each individual receivable. The table below presents a reconciliation of the acquired finance receivables and related debt measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2015			2014
	(in thousands)
Finance Receivables Measured at Fair Value:
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,664		$	14,476
Payments on finance receivables at fair value		(921	)		(5,321	)
Charge-offs on finance receivables at fair value		–			(343	)
Discount accretion		–			239
Mark to fair value		–			7
Balance at end of period	$	$743		$	9,058
Debt Secured by Finance Receivables Measured at Fair Value:
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,250		$	13,117
Principal payments on debt at fair value		(1,250	)		(5,039	)
Premium accretion		–			304
Mark to fair value		–			194
Balance at end of period		–			8,576
Reduction for payments collected and payable		–			(1,399	)
Adjusted balance at end of period	$	–		$	7,177

18

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The table below compares the fair values of the Fireside receivables and the related secured debt to their contractual balances for the periods shown:

	March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
	Contractual		Fair		Contractual		Fair
	Balance		Value		Balance		Value
	(In thousands)
Fireside receivables portfolio	$	743	$	743	$	1,664	$	1,664
Debt secured by Fireside receivables portfolio		–		–		–		1,250

The fair value of the debt secured by the Fireside receivables portfolio represents the discounted value of future cash flows that we estimate will become due to the lender in accordance with the terms of our financing for the Fireside portfolio. The terms of the debt provide for the lenders to receive a share of residual cash flows from the underlying receivables after the contractual balance of the debt is repaid and the Company’s investment in the Fireside portfolio is returned. The final residual payment was made in January 2015.

Repossessed vehicle inventory, which is included in Other assets on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet, is measured at fair value using level 2 assumptions based on our actual loss experience on sale of repossessed vehicles. At March 31, 2015, the finance receivables related to the repossessed vehicles in inventory totaled $25.6 million. We have applied a valuation adjustment, or loss allowance, of $16.1 million, which is based on a recovery rate of approximately 37%, resulting in an estimated fair value and carrying amount of $9.5 million. The fair value and carrying amount of the repossessed inventory at December 31, 2014 was $10.4 million after applying a valuation adjustment of $17.8 million.

There were no transfers in or out of level 1 or level 2 assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. We have no level 3 assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

The following table provides certain qualitative information about our level 3 fair value measurements for assets and liabilities carried at fair value:

Financial Instrument	Fair Values as of						Inputs as of
	March 31,		December 31,		Valuation	Unobservable	March 31,		December 31,
	2015		2014		Techniques	Inputs	2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Finance receivables measured at fair value	$	743	$	1,664	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate		15.4%		15.4%
						Cumulative net losses		5.0%		5.0%
						Monthly average prepayments		0.5%		0.5%
Liabilities:
Debt secured by receivables measured at fair value		–		1,250	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate		n/a		12.2%

19

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, were as follows:

	As of March 31, 2015
Financial Instrument	(In thousands)
	Carrying		Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,202	$	20,202	$	–	$	–	$	20,202
Restricted cash and equivalents		173,451		173,451		–		–		173,451
Finance receivables, net		1,615,762		–		–		1,589,952		1,589,952
Finance receivables measured at fair value		743		–		–		743		743
Residual interest in securitizations		32		–		–		32		32
Accrued interest receivable		24,496		–		–		24,496		24,496
Liabilities:
Warehouse lines of credit	$	21,965	$	–	$	–	$	21,965	$	21,965
Accrued interest payable		2,678		–		–		2,678		2,678
Residual interest financing		12,074		–		–		12,074		12,074
Securitization trust debt		1,697,649		–		–		1,720,705		1,720,705
Subordinated renewable notes		15,082		–		–		15,082		15,082

	As of December 31, 2014
Financial Instrument	(In thousands)
	Carrying		Fair Value Measurements Using:
		Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,859	$	17,859	$	–	$	–	$	17,859
Restricted cash and equivalents		175,382		175,382		–		–		175,382
Finance receivables, net		1,534,496		–		–		1,512,567		1,512,567
Finance receivables measured at fair value		1,664		–		–		1,664		1,664
Residual interest in securitizations		68		–		–		68		68
Accrued interest receivable		23,372		–		–		23,372		23,372
Liabilities:
Warehouse lines of credit	$	56,839	$	–	$	–	$	56,839	$	56,839
Accrued interest payable		2,613		–		–		2,613		2,613
Residual interest financing		12,327		–		–		12,327		12,327
Debt secured by receivables measured at fair value		1,250		–		–		1,250		1,250
Securitization trust debt		1,598,496		–		–		1,619,742		1,619,742
Subordinated renewable notes		15,233		–		–		15,233		15,233

20

CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following summary presents a description of the methodologies and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our financial instruments. Much of the information used to determine fair value is highly subjective. When applicable, readily available market information has been utilized. However, for a significant portion of our financial instruments, active markets do not exist. Therefore, significant elements of judgment were required in estimating fair value for certain items. The subjective factors include, among other things, the estimated timing and amount of cash flows, risk characteristics, credit quality and interest rates, all of which are subject to change. Since the fair value is estimated as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the amounts that will actually be realized or paid at settlement or maturity of the instruments could be significantly different.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Equivalents

The carrying value equals fair value.

Finance Receivables, net

The fair value of finance receivables is estimated by discounting future cash flows expected to be collected using current rates at which similar receivables could be originated.

Finance Receivables Measured at Fair Value and Debt Secured by Receivables Measured at Fair Value

The carrying value equals fair value.

Residual Interest in Securitizations

The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using credit and discount rates that we believe reflect the estimated credit, interest rate and prepayment risks associated with similar types of instruments.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable

The carrying value approximates fair value.

Warehouse Lines of Credit, Residual Interest Financing, and Subordinated Renewable Notes

The carrying value approximates fair value because the related interest rates are estimated to reflect current market conditions for similar types of secured instruments.

Securitization Trust Debt

The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using interest rates that we believe reflect the current market rates.

21

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We are a specialty finance company focused on consumers who have limited credit histories or past credit problems, whom we refer to as sub-prime customers. Our business is to purchase and service retail automobile contracts originated primarily by franchised automobile dealers and, to a lesser extent, by select independent dealers in the United States in the sale of new and used automobiles, light trucks and passenger vans. Through our automobile contract purchases, we provide indirect financing to sub-prime customers of dealers. We serve as an alternative source of financing for dealers, facilitating sales to customers who otherwise might not be able to obtain financing from traditional sources, such as commercial banks, credit unions and the captive finance companies affiliated with major automobile manufacturers. In addition to purchasing installment purchase contracts directly from dealers, we have also (i) acquired installment purchase contracts in four merger and acquisition transactions, (ii) purchased immaterial amounts of vehicle purchase money loans from non-affiliated lenders, and (iii) lent money directly to consumers for an immaterial amount of loans secured by vehicles. In this report, we refer to all of such contracts and loans as "automobile contracts."

We were incorporated and began our operations in March 1991. From inception through March 31, 2015, we have purchased a total of approximately $11.6 billion of automobile contracts from dealers. In addition, we obtained a total of approximately $822.3 million of automobile contracts in mergers and acquisitions in 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2011. In 2004 and 2009, we were appointed as a third-party servicer for certain portfolios of automobile receivables originated and owned by non-affiliated entities. Beginning in 2008 through the third quarter of 2011, our managed portfolio decreased each year due to our strategy of limiting contract purchases in 2008 and 2009 to conserve our liquidity, as discussed further below. However, since October 2009 we have gradually increased contract purchases, which, in turn has resulted in recent increases to our managed portfolio. Recent contract purchase volumes and managed portfolio levels are shown in the table below:

Contract Purchases and Outstanding Managed Portfolio
	$ in thousands
Period	Contracts Purchased in Period		Managed Portfolio at Period End
2008	$	296,817	$	1,664,122
2009		8,599		1,194,722
2010		113,023		756,203
2011		284,236		794,649
2012		551,742		897,575
2013		764,087		1,231,422
2014		944,944		1,643,920
Three months ended March 31, 2015		233,890		1,725,523

Our principal executive offices are in Las Vegas, Nevada. Most of our operational and administrative functions take place in Irvine, California. Credit and underwriting functions are performed primarily in our California branch with certain of these functions also performed in our Florida and Nevada branches. We service our automobile contracts from our California, Nevada, Virginia, Florida and Illinois branches.

We purchase contracts in our own name (“CPS”) and, until July 2008, also in the name of our wholly-owned subsidiary, TFC. Programs marketed under the CPS name are intended to serve a wide range of sub-prime customers, primarily through franchised new car dealers. Our TFC program served vehicle purchasers enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces, primarily through independent used car dealers. In July 2008, we suspended contract purchases under our TFC program. We purchase automobile contracts with the intention of financing them on a long-term basis through securitizations. Securitizations are transactions in which we sell a specified pool of contracts to a special purpose subsidiary of ours, which in turn issues asset-backed securities to fund the purchase of the pool of contracts from us.

22

Securitization and Warehouse Credit Facilities

Throughout the period for which information is presented in this report, we have purchased automobile contracts with the intention of financing them on a long-term basis through securitizations, and on an interim basis through warehouse credit facilities. All such financings have involved identification of specific automobile contracts, sale of those automobile contracts (and associated rights) to one of our special-purpose subsidiaries, and issuance of asset-backed securities to fund the transactions. Depending on the structure, these transactions may be accounted for under generally accepted accounting principles as sales of the automobile contracts or as secured financings.

When structured to be treated as a secured financing for accounting purposes, the subsidiary is consolidated with us. Accordingly, the sold automobile contracts and the related debt appear as assets and liabilities, respectively, on our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. We then periodically (i) recognize interest and fee income on the contracts, (ii) recognize interest expense on the securities issued in the transaction and (iii) record as expense a provision for credit losses on the contracts.

Since 1994 we have conducted 66 term securitizations (generally quarterly) of automobile contracts that we purchased from dealers under our regular programs. As of March 31, 2015, 17 of those securitizations are active and all but one are structured as secured financings. Our September 2010 transaction is our only active securitization that is structured as a sale of the related contracts. From 1994 through April 2008 we generally utilized financial guarantees for the senior asset-backed notes issued in the securitization. Since September 2010 we have utilized senior subordinated structures without any financial guarantees.

Our recent history of term securitizations is summarized in the table below:

Recent Asset-Backed Term Securitizations
	$ in thousands
Period	Number of Term Securitizations	Amount of Term Securitizations
2006	4	$	957,681
2007	3		1,118,097
2008	2		509,022
2009	0		–
2010	1		103,772
2011	3		335,593
2012	4		603,500
2013	4		778,000
2014	4		923,000
Three months ended March 31, 2015	1		245,000

Our 2010 securitization was, in substance, a re-securitzation of the receivables from our second securitization of 2008, which allowed us to take advantage of a lower interest rate environment at that time. Our 2012 securitizations included $58.2 million in contracts that were repurchased in 2012 from securitizations closed in 2006 and 2007. Our 2013 securitizations included $7.4 million in contracts that were repurchased from a securitization closed in 2008.

From time to time we have also completed financings of our residual interests in other securitizations that we and our affiliates previously sponsored. As of March 31, 2015 we have one such residual interest financing outstanding.

23

Since December 2011, our securitizations have included a pre-funding feature in which a portion of the receivables to be sold to the trust were not delivered until after the initial closing. As a result, our restricted cash balance at March 31, 2015 included $72.0 million from the proceeds of the sale of the asset-backed notes that were held by the trustee pending delivery of the remaining receivables. In April 2015, the requisite additional receivables were delivered to the trust and we received the related restricted cash, most of which was used to repay amounts owed under our warehouse credit facilities.

Our current short-term funding capacity is $200 million, comprising two credit facilities. The first $100 million credit facility was established in December 2010. This facility was renewed in March 2013, extending the revolving period to March 2015, and extended again in March 2015 to April 2015, when it was repaid in full. Our second $100 million credit facility was established in May 2012. This facility was renewed in August 2014, extending the revolving period to August 2016, and adding an amortization period through August 2017. In April 2015, we entered into a new $100 million facility with a revolving period extending to April 2017 followed by an amortization period to April 2019.

Financial Covenants

Certain of our securitization transactions and our warehouse credit facilities contain various financial covenants requiring certain minimum financial ratios and results. Such covenants include maintaining minimum levels of liquidity and net worth and not exceeding maximum leverage levels. In addition, certain securitization and non-securitization related debt contain cross-defaulted provisions that would allow certain creditors to declare a default if a default occurred under a different facility. As of March 31, 2015 we were in compliance with all such covenants.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Operating Results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 with the three months ended March 31, 2014

Revenues.  During the three months ended March 31, 2015, our revenues were $86.0 million, an increase of $17.8 million, or 26.2%, from the prior year revenue of $68.1 million. The primary reason for the increase in revenues is an increase in interest income. Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 increased $17.4 million, or 26.7%, to $82.4 million from $65.0 million in the prior year. The primary reason for the increase in interest income is the increase in finance receivables held by consolidated subsidiaries, which increased from $1,295.2 million at March 31, 2014 to $1,725.5 million at March 31, 2015. The table below shows the average balances of our portfolio held by consolidated subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

	March 31, 2015		March 31, 2014
	Amount		Amount
Finance Receivables Owned by	($ in millions)
Consolidated Subsidiaries
CPS Originated Receivables	$	1,703.3	$	1,228.5
Fireside		1.0		10.9
Total	$	1,704.3	$	1,239.4

24

Servicing fees totaling $148,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 decreased $365,000, or 71.2%, from $513,000 in the prior year. We earn base servicing fees on three portfolios and incentive servicing fees on one of those three portfolios. All three of these portfolios are decreasing in size as we receive customer payments and, consequently, base servicing and incentive servicing fees are decreasing also. As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, our managed portfolio owned by consolidated vs. non-consolidated subsidiaries and other third parties was as follows:

	March 31, 2015				March 31, 2014
	Amount (1)		%   (2)		Amount (1)		%   (2)
Total Managed Portfolio	($ in millions)
Owned by Consolidated Subsidiaries
CPS Originated Receivables	$	1,723.6		99.9%	$	1,280.3		98.8%
Fireside		0.7		0.0%		9.1		0.7%
Owned by Non-Consolidated Subsidiaries		0.2		0.0%		2.4		0.2%
Third-Party Servicing Portfolios		1.0		0.1%		3.4		0.3%
Total	$	1,725.5		100.0%	$	1,295.2		100.0%

(1) Contractual balances.

(2) Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

At March 31, 2015, we were generating income and fees on a managed portfolio with an outstanding principal balance of $1,725.5 million (this amount includes $189,000 of automobile contracts on which we earn servicing fees and own a residual interest and also includes another $1.0 million of automobile contracts on which we earn base and incentive servicing fees), compared to a managed portfolio with an outstanding principal balance of $1,295.2million as of March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2015 and 2014, the managed portfolio composition was as follows:

	March 31, 2015				March 31, 2014
	Amount (1)		% (2)		Amount (1)		% (2)
Originating Entity		($ in millions)
CPS	$	1,724.5		99.9%	$	1,282.6		99.0%
Fireside		0.7		0.0%		9.1		0.7%
Third Party Portfolio		0.3		0.0%		3.5		0.3%
Total	$	1,725.5		100.0%	$	1,295.2		100.0%

(1) Contractual balances.

(2) Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

Other income of $3.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 increased by $845,000, or 32.0% compared to the prior year. The three-month period ended March 31, 2015 includes an increase of $285,000 in revenue associated with direct mail and other related products and services that we offer to our dealers, an increase of $140,000 in payments from third-party providers of convenience fees paid by our customers for web based and other electronic payments and an increase of $48,000 in sales tax refunds. In addition, in the prior year period, we incurred a markdown of $187,000 in the fair value of the principal balance and related debt of the Fireside portfolio.

Expenses.  Our operating expenses consist largely of provision for credit losses, interest expense, employee costs, marketing and general and administrative expenses. Provision for credit losses and interest expense are significantly affected by the volume of automobile contracts we purchased during the trailing 12-month period and by the outstanding balance of finance receivables held by consolidated subsidiaries. Employee costs and general and administrative expenses are incurred as applications and automobile contracts are received, processed and serviced. Factors that affect margins and net income include changes in the automobile and automobile finance market environments, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and changes in the unemployment level.

25

Employee costs include base salaries, commissions and bonuses paid to employees, and certain expenses related to the accounting treatment of outstanding stock options, and are one of our most significant operating expenses. These costs (other than those relating to stock options) generally fluctuate with the level of applications and automobile contracts processed and serviced.

Other operating expenses consist largely of facilities expenses, telephone and other communication services, credit services, computer services, marketing and advertising expenses, and depreciation and amortization.

Total operating expenses were $71.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $56.4 million for the prior year, an increase of $14.9 million, or 26.4%. The increase is primarily due to costs associated with the increase in the amount of new contracts we purchased, the resulting increase in our consolidated portfolio and associated servicing costs, and the related increase in our provision for credit losses. Increases in core operating expenses and provision for credit losses were partially offset by decreases in interest expense.

Employee costs increased by $3.6 million or 33.0%, to $14.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, representing 20.3% of total operating expenses, from $10.9 million for the prior year, or 19.3% of total operating expenses. Since 2010, we have added employees in our Originations and Marketing departments in conjunction with the increase in contract purchases. More recently, we have also added Servicing staff to accommodate the increase in the number of accounts in our managed portfolio. The table below summarizes our employees by category as well as contract purchases and units in our managed portfolio as of, and for the three-month periods ended, March 31, 2015 and 2014:

	March 31, 2015		March 31, 2014
	Amount		Amount
	($ in millions)
Contracts purchased (dollars)	$	233.9	$	189.9
Contracts purchased (units)		14,688		12,854
Managed portfolio outstanding (dollars)	$	1,725.5	$	1,295.2
Managed portfolio outstanding (units)		129,657		103,540
Number of Originations staff		214		171
Number of Marketing staff		140		113
Number of Servicing staff		457		340
Number of other staff		73		81
Total number of employees		884		705

General and administrative expenses include costs associated with purchasing and servicing our portfolio of finance receivables, including expenses for facilities, credit services, and telecommunications. General and administrative expenses were $4.8 million, an increase of $1.2 million, or 34.2% compared to the previous year and represented 6.8% of total operating expenses.

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 decreased by $208,000 to $13.2 million, or 18.5% of total operating expenses, compared to $13.4 million in the previous year.

The debt on the Fireside portfolio was repaid in full in January 2015. As a result, we incurred no interest expense on that debt compared to $328,000 in the prior year period.

Interest on securitization trust debt increased by $1.6 million, or 16.7%, for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the prior year. The average balance of securitization trust debt increased 35.9% to $1,582.9 million at March 31, 2015 compared to $1,164.5 million at March 31, 2014. However, the blended interest rates on term securitizations completed since 2012 are significantly less than the blended interest rates on securitization trust debt incurred prior to 2012. As a result, the cost of securitization debt during the three month period ended March 31, 2015 was 2.7%, compared to 3.2% in the prior year period.

26

Interest expense on senior secured debt was zero in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $1.7 million in the prior year period. This was due to the repayment in full of senior secured debt on March 31, 2014. Interest expense on subordinated renewable notes decreased by $229,000. The decrease is due to a decrease in the average balance from $18.7 million to $15.1 million and a decrease in the average cost from 13.4% to 10.6%. Interest expense on residual interest financing decreased $156,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the prior year. The decrease is due to net repayments of $3.5 million during the twelve months ended March 31, 2015.

Interest expense on warehouse debt increased by $596,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the prior year. We increased our contract purchases to $233.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $189.9 million in the prior period.

The following table presents the components of interest income and interest expense and a net interest yield analysis for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015						2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
	Average				Annualized Average		Average				Annualized Average
	Balance (1)		Interest		Yield/Rate		Balance (1)		Interest		Yield/Rate
Interest Earning Assets
Finance receivables gross (2)	$	1,678,610	$	82,205		19.6%	$	1,228,499	$	64,304		20.9%
Finance receivables measured at fair value		1,009		154		61.1%		10,884		692		25.4%
	$	1,679,619		82,359		19.6%	$	1,239,383		64,996		21.0%
Interest Bearing Liabilities$
Warehouse lines of credit (3)	$	63,626		1,473		9.3%	$	22,338		877		15.7%
Residual interest financing		12,191		423		13.9%		16,778		579		13.8%
Debt secured by receivables measured at fair value		–		–		0.0%		10,099		328		13.0%
Securitization trust debt		1,582,934		10,876		2.7%		1,164,468		9,316		3.2%
Senior secured debt, related party		–		–		0.0%		28,412		1,651		23.2%
Subordinated renewable notes		15,126		401		10.6%		18,742		630		13.4%
	$	1,673,877		13,173		3.1%	$	1,260,837		13,381		4.2%
Net interest income/spread			$	69,186					$	51,615
Net interest yield (4)						16.5%						16.7%
Ratio of average interest earning assets to average interest bearing liabilities		100%						98%

(1)  Average balances are based on month end balances except for warehouse lines of credit, which are based on daily balances.

(2)  Net of deferred fees and direct costs.

(3)  Interest expense includes deferred financing costs and non-utilization fees.

(4)  Annualized net interest income divided by average interest earning assets.  

27

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
	Compared to March 31, 2014
	Total			Change Due			Change Due
	Change			to Volume			to Rate
Interest Earning Assets	(In thousands)
Finance receivables gross	$	17,901		$	23,560		$	(5,659	)
Finance receivables measured at fair value		(538	)		(628	)		90
		17,363			22,932			(5,569	)
Interest Bearing Liabilities
Warehouse lines of credit		596			1,621			(1,025	)
Residual interest financing		(156	)		(158	)		2
Debt secured by receivables measured at fair value		(328	)		(328	)		–
Securitization trust debt		1,560			3,348			(1,788	)
Senior secured debt, related party		(1,651	)		(1,651	)		–
Subordinated renewable notes		(229	)		(122	)		(107	)
		(208	)		2,710			(2,918	)
Net interest income/spread	$	17,571		$	20,222		$	(2,651	)

The reduction in the annualized yield on our finance receivables for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to the prior year period is the result of our decision to offer dealers slightly lower acquisition fees and also to require slightly lower contract interest rates on a portion of the contracts we purchase.

Provision for credit losses was $33.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, an increase of $9.6 million, or 40.0% compared to the prior year and represented 46.9% of total operating expenses. The provision for credit losses maintains the allowance for finance credit losses at levels that we feel are adequate for probable incurred credit losses that can be reasonably estimated. Our approach for establishing the allowance requires greater amounts of provision for credit losses early in the terms of our finance receivables. Consequently, the increase in provision expense is the result of the increase in contract purchases during the last year and the larger portfolio owned by our consolidated subsidiaries compared to the prior year.

Marketing expenses consist primarily of commission-based compensation paid to our employee marketing representatives. Our marketing representatives earn a salary plus commissions based on volume of contract purchases and sales of ancillary products and services that we offer our dealers, such as training programs, internet lead sales, and direct mail products. Marketing expenses increased by $358,000, or 9.3%, to $4.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2015, compared to $3.8 million in the prior year period, and represented 5.9% of total operating expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, we purchased 14,688 contracts representing $233.9 million in receivables compared to 12,854 contracts representing $189.9 million in receivables in the prior year.

Occupancy expenses increased by $266,000 or 38.8%, to $954,000 compared to $688,000 in the previous year and represented 1.3% of total operating expenses. The increase is primarily due to the establishment in April 2014 of our Nevada branch.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $54,000 or 57.4%, to $148,000 compared to $94,000 in the previous year and represented 0.2% of total operating expenses.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, we recorded income tax expense of $6.4 million, representing a 43.5% effective income tax rate. In the prior year period, we recorded $5.1 million in income tax expense, representing a 43.0% effective income tax rate.

28

Credit Experience

Our financial results are dependent on the performance of the automobile contracts in which we retain an ownership interest. Broad economic factors such as recession and significant changes in unemployment levels influence the credit performance of our portfolio, as does the weighted average age of the receivables at any given time. The tables below document the delinquency, repossession and net credit loss experience of all such automobile contracts that we originated or own an interest in as of the respective dates shown. The tables do not include the experience of third party originated and owned portfolios.

Delinquency, Repossession and Extension Experience (1)

Total Originated Portfolio Excluding Fireside

	March 31, 2015				March 31, 2014				December 31, 2014
	Number of				Number of				Number of
	Contracts		Amount		Contracts		Amount		Contracts		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Delinquency Experience
Gross servicing portfolio (1)		125,874	$	1,683,639		99,719	$	1,284,243		123,033	$	1,641,807
Period of delinquency (2)
31-60 days		2,726		38,165		2,322		27,009		3,571		42,823
61-90 days		2,101		23,230		1,499		19,255		1,813		23,334
91+ days		2,427		31,920		688		6,699		1,890		23,239
Total delinquencies (2)		7,254		93,315		4,509		52,963		7,274		89,396
Amount in repossession (3)		2,251		21,971		3,518		28,043		2,664		28,249
Total delinquencies and amount in repossession (2)		9,505	$	115,286		8,027	$	81,006		9,938	$	117,645
Delinquencies as a percentage of gross servicing portfolio		5.8%		5.5%		4.5%		4.1%		5.9%		5.4%
Total delinquencies and amount in repossession as a percentage of gross servicing portfolio		7.6%		6.8%		8.0%		6.3%		8.1%		7.2%
Extension Experience
Contracts with one extension, accruing (4)		19,860	$	259,381		14,801	$	193,375		18,165	$	238,267
Contracts with two or more extensions, accruing (4)		9,258		118,808		5,295		49,428		7,537		93,220
		29,118		378,189		20,096		242,803		25,702		331,487
Contracts with one extension, non-accrual (4)		1,068		13,202		1,048		8,972		1,268		14,701
Contracts with two or more extensions, non-accrual (4)		608		6,546		531		2,891		594		6,468
		1,676		19,748		1,579		11,863		1,862		21,169
Total contracts with extensions		30,794	$	397,937		21,675	$	254,666		27,564	$	352,656

29

Delinquency, Repossession and Extension Experience (1)

Fireside Portfolio

	March 31, 2015				March 31, 2014				December 31, 2014
	Number of				Number of				Number of
	Contracts		Amount		Contracts		Amount		Contracts		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Delinquency Experience
Gross servicing portfolio (1)		416	$	743		3,321	$	9,122		911	$	1,664
Period of delinquency (2)
31-60 days		66	$	109		211	$	507		113	$	262
61-90 days		40		65		91		218		53		74
91+ days		16		30		44		54		45		62
Total delinquencies (2)		122		204		346		779		211		398
Amount in repossession (3)		5		22		25		118		1		1
Total delinquencies and amount in repossession (2)		127	$	226		371	$	897		212	$	399
Delinquencies as a percentage of gross servicing portfolio		29.3%		27.5%		10.4%		8.5%		23.2%^		23.9%
Total delinquencies and amount in repossession as a percentage of gross servicing portfolio		30.5%		30.4%		11.2%		9.8%		23.3%		24.0%
Extension Experience
Contracts with one extension, accruing (4)		98	$	142		886	$	2,504		212	$	376
Contracts with two or more extensions, accruing (4)		180		439		622		2,334		303		815
		278		581		1,508		4,838		515		1,191
Contracts with one extension, non-accrual (4)		10		22		24		73		17		22
Contracts with two or more extensions, non-accrual (4)		8		26		17		47		18		30
		18		48		41		120		35		52
Total contracts with extensions		296	$	629		1,549	$	4,958		550	$	1,243

30

Delinquency, Repossession and Extension Experience (1)

Total Originated and Fireside Portfolio

	March 31, 2015				March 31, 2014				December 31, 2014
	Number of				Number of				Number of
	Contracts		Amount		Contracts		Amount		Contracts		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Delinquency Experience
Gross servicing portfolio (1)		126,290	$	1,684,382		103,040	$	1,293,365		123,944	$	1,643,471
Period of delinquency (2)
31-60 days		2,792	$	38,274		2,533	$	27,516		3,684	$	43,085
61-90 days		2,141		23,295		1,590		19,472		1,866		23,407
91+ days		2,443		31,950		732		6,753		1,935		23,301
Total delinquencies (2)		7,376		93,519		4,855		53,741		7,485		89,793
Amount in repossession (3)		2,256		21,993		3,543		28,161		2,665		28,250
Total delinquencies and amount in repossession (2)		9,632	$	115,512		8,398	$	81,902		10,150	$	118,043
Delinquencies as a percentage of gross servicing portfolio		5.8%		5.6%		4.7%		4.2%		6.0%		5.5%
Total delinquencies and amount in repossession as a percentage of gross servicing portfolio		7.6%		6.9%		8.2%		6.3%		8.2%		7.2%
Extension Experience
Contracts with one extension, accruing (4)		19,958	$	259,523		15,687	$	195,879		18,377	$	238,643
Contracts with two or more extensions, accruing (4)		9,438		119,247		5,917		51,762		7,840		94,035
		29,396		378,770		21,604		247,641		26,217		332,678
Contracts with one extension, non-accrual (4)		1,078		13,224		1,072		9,045		1,285		14,723
Contracts with two or more extensions, non-accrual (4)		616		6,572		548		2,938		612		6,498
		1,694		19,796		1,620		11,983		1,897		21,221
Total contracts with extensions		31,090	$	398,566		23,224	$	259,624		28,114	$	353,899

____________________________________

(1) All amounts and percentages are based on the amount remaining to be repaid on each automobile contract, including, for pre-computed automobile contracts, any unearned interest. The information in the table represents the gross principal amount of all automobile contracts we have purchased, including automobile contracts subsequently sold in securitization transactions that we continue to service. The table does not include certain contracts we have serviced for third parties on which we earn servicing fees only and have no credit risk.

(2) We consider an automobile contract delinquent when an obligor fails to make at least 90% of a contractually due payment by the following due date, which date may have been extended within limits specified in the Servicing Agreements. The period of delinquency is based on the number of days payments are contractually past due. Automobile contracts less than 31 days delinquent are not included. The delinquency aging categories shown in the tables reflect the effect of extensions.

(3) Amount in repossession represents financed vehicles that have been repossessed but not yet liquidated.

(4) Accounts past due more than 90 days are on non-accrual.

31

Net Charge-Off Experience (1)

Total Owned Portfolio Excluding Fireside

	March 31,		March 31,		December 31,
	2015		2014		2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Average servicing portfolio outstanding	$	1,703,250	$	1,261,757	$	1,415,667
Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average servicing portfolio (2)		6.7%		5.5%		5.9%

Net Charge-Off Experience (1)  

Fireside Portfolio

	March 31,		March 31,		December 31,
	2015		2014		2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Average servicing portfolio outstanding	$	1,009		10,889	$	5,919
Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average servicing portfolio (2)		0.6%		4.1%		0.6%

Net Charge-Off Experience (1)

Total Owned Portfolio Including Fireside

	March 31,		March 31,		December 31,
	2015		2014		2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Average servicing portfolio outstanding	$	1,704,259	$	1,272,646	$	1,421,586
Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average servicing portfolio (2)		6.6%		5.5%		5.8%

_________________________

(1) All amounts and percentages are based on the principal amount scheduled to be paid on each automobile contract, net of unearned income on pre-computed automobile contracts.

(2) Net charge-offs include the remaining principal balance, after the application of the net proceeds from the liquidation of the vehicle (excluding accrued and unpaid interest) and amounts collected subsequent to the date of charge-off, including some recoveries which have been classified as other income in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements. March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 percentage represents three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 annualized. December 31, 2014 represents 12 months ended December 31, 2014.

32

Extensions

In certain circumstances we will grant obligors one-month payment extensions to assist them with temporary cash flow problems. In general, an obligor would not be entitled to more than two such extensions in any 12-month period and no more than six over the life of the contract. The only modification of terms is to advance the obligor’s next due date by one month and extend the maturity date of the receivable by one month. In some cases, a two-month extension may be granted. There are no other concessions such as a reduction in interest rate, forgiveness of principal or of accrued interest. Accordingly, we consider such extensions to be insignificant delays in payments rather than troubled debt restructurings.

The basic question in deciding to grant an extension is whether or not we will (a) be delaying the inevitable repossession and liquidation or (b) risk losing the vehicle as a result of not being able to locate the obligor and vehicle. In both of those situations, the loss would likely be higher than if the vehicle had been repossessed without the extension. The benefits of granting an extension include minimizing current losses and delinquencies, minimizing lifetime losses, getting the obligor’s account current (or close to it) and building goodwill with the obligor so that he might prioritize us over other creditors on future payments. Our servicing staff are trained to identify when a past due obligor is facing a temporary problem that may be resolved with an extension. In most cases, the extension will be granted in conjunction with our receiving a past due payment (and where allowed by law, a nominal fee) from the obligor, thereby indicating an additional monetary and psychological commitment to the contract on the obligor’s part.

The credit assessment for granting an extension is initially made by our collector, who bases the recommendation on the collector’s discussions with the obligor. In such assessments the collector will consider, among other things, the following factors: (1) the reason the obligor has fallen behind in payment; (2) whether or not the reason for the delinquency is temporary, and if it is, have conditions changed such that the obligor can begin making regular monthly payments again after the extension; (3) the obligor's past payment history, including past extensions if applicable; and (4) the obligor’s willingness to communicate and cooperate on resolving the delinquency. If the collector believes the obligor is a good candidate for an extension, he must obtain approval from his supervisor, who will review the same factors stated above prior to offering the extension to the obligor. After receiving an extension, an account remains subject to our normal policies and procedures for interest accrual, reporting delinquency and recognizing charge-offs.

33

We believe that a prudent extension program is an integral component to mitigating losses in our portfolio of sub-prime automobile receivables. The table below summarizes the status, as of March 31, 2015, for accounts that received extensions from 2008 through 2013 (2014 extension data are not included at this time due to insufficient passage of time for meaningful evaluation of results):

Period of Extension	# Extensions Granted		Active or Paid Off at March 31, 2015		% Active or Paid Off at March 31, 2015		Charged Off > 6 Months After Extension		% Charged Off > 6 Months After Extension		Charged Off <= 6 Months After Extension		% Charged Off <= 6 Months After Extension		Avg Months to Charge Off Post Extension
2008		35,588		10,825		30.4%		19,944		56.0%		4,819		13.5%	19
2009		32,226		10,437		32.4%		16,006		49.7%		5,783		17.9%	17
2010		26,167		12,396		47.4%		11,772		45.0%		1,999		7.6%	19
2011		18,786		11,289		60.1%		6,565		34.9%		932		5.0%	18
2012		18,783		12,207		65.0%		5,780		30.8%		796		4.2%	14
2013		23,398		16,766		71.7%		5,656		24.2%		976		4.2%	12

Table excludes extensions on portfolios serviced for third parties.

We view these results as a confirmation of the effectiveness of our extension program. For the accounts receiving extensions in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, 30.4%, 32.6%, 47.4%, 60.1%, 65.0% and 71.7%, respectively, were either paid in full or active and performing at March 31, 2015. Each of these successful accounts represent continued payments of interest and principal (including payment in full in many cases), where without the extension we likely would have incurred a substantial loss and no interest revenue subsequent to the extension.

For the extension accounts that ultimately charge off, we consider any that charged off more than six months after the extension to be at least partially successful. For the 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 extensions, of the accounts that charged off, the charge off was incurred, on average, 19, 17, 19, 18, 14 and 12 months, respectively, after the extension, indicating that even in the cases of an ultimate loss, the obligor serviced the account with additional payments of principal and interest.

34

Additional information about our extensions is provided in the tables below:

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Year Ended December 31,
	2015		2014		2014
Average number of extensions granted per month		3,248		1,753		2,148
Average number of outstanding accounts		127,986		101,647		110,356
Average monthly extensions as % of average outstandings		2.5%		1.7%		1.9%

Table excludes portfolios originated and owned by third parties.

	March 31, 2015				March 31, 2014				December 31, 2014
	Number of Contracts		Amount		Number of Contracts		Amount		Number of Contracts		Amount
					(Dollars in thousands)
Contracts with one extension		21,036	$	272,747		16,759	$	204,924		19,662	$	253,366
Contracts with two extensions		7,390		95,163		4,410		43,449		6,378		79,774
Contracts with three extensions		2,132		25,691		1,287		8,109		1,603		17,452
Contracts with four extensions		424		4,127		501		2,003		365		2,710
Contracts with five extensions		82		648		211		866		74		442
Contracts with six extensions		26		190		56		273		32		157
		31,090	$	398,566		23,224	$	259,624		28,114	$	353,901
Managed portfolio (excluding originated and owned by 3rd parties)		126,290	$	1,684,382		103,040	$	1,293,365		123,944	$	1,643,471

Table excludes portfolios originated and owned by third parties.

Non-Accrual Receivables

It is not uncommon for our obligors to fall behind in their payments. However, with the diligent efforts of our Servicing staff and systems for managing our collection efforts, we regularly work with our customers to resolve delinquencies. Our staff are trained to employ a counseling approach to assist our customers with their cash flow management skills and help them to prioritize their payment obligations in order to avoid losing their vehicle to repossession. Through our experience, we have learned that once a customer becomes greater than 90 days past due, it is not likely that the delinquency will be resolved and will ultimately result in a charge-off. As a result, we do not recognize any interest income or retain on our balance sheet any accrued interest for contracts that are greater than 90 days past due.

35

If a contract exceeds the 90 days past due threshold at the end of one period, and then makes the necessary payments such that it becomes less than or equal to 90 days delinquent at the end of a subsequent period, it would be restored to full accrual status for our financial reporting purposes. At the time a contract is restored to full accrual in this manner, there can be no assurance that full repayment of interest and principal will ultimately be made. However, we monitor each obligor’s payment performance and are aware of the severity of his delinquency at any time. The fact that the delinquency has been reduced below the 90-day threshold is a positive indicator. Should the contract again exceed the 90-day delinquency level at the end of any reporting period, it would again be reflected as a non-accrual account.

Our policy for placing a contract on non-accrual status is independent of our policy to grant an extension. In practice, it would be an uncommon circumstance where an extension was granted and the account remained in a non-accrual status, since the goal of the extension is to bring the contract current (or nearly current).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our business requires substantial cash to support our purchases of automobile contracts and other operating activities. Our primary sources of cash have been cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, including proceeds from term securitization transactions and other sales of automobile contracts, amounts borrowed under various revolving credit facilities (also sometimes known as warehouse credit facilities), servicing fees on portfolios of automobile contracts previously sold in securitization transactions or serviced for third parties, customer payments of principal and interest on finance receivables, fees for origination of automobile contracts, and releases of cash from securitization transactions and their related spread accounts. Our primary uses of cash have been the purchases of automobile contracts, repayment of amounts borrowed under lines of credit, securitization transactions and otherwise, operating expenses such as employee, interest, occupancy expenses and other general and administrative expenses, the establishment of spread accounts and initial overcollateralization, if any, the increase of credit enhancement to required levels in securitization transactions, and income taxes. There can be no assurance that internally generated cash will be sufficient to meet our cash demands. The sufficiency of internally generated cash will depend on the performance of securitized pools (which determines the level of releases from those pools and their related spread accounts), the rate of expansion or contraction in our managed portfolio, and the terms upon which we are able to acquire and borrow against automobile contracts.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2015 was $49.8 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2014 of $36.2 million. Cash provided by operating activities is significantly affected by our net income before provisions for credit losses. The increase is due primarily to the increase in net income of $1.6 million and the increase in provision for credit losses of $9.6 million.

Net cash used in investing activities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2015 was $108.5 million compared to net cash used in investing activities of $97.0 million in the prior year period. Cash provided by investing activities primarily results from principal payments and other proceeds received on finance receivables held for investment and increases in restricted cash. Cash used in investing activities generally relates to purchases of automobile contracts. Purchases of finance receivables held for investment were $233.9 million and $189.9 million during the first three months of 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was $61.0 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $53.3 million in the prior year period. Cash provided by financing activities is primarily related to the issuance of securitization trust debt, reduced by the amount of repayment of securitization trust debt and net proceeds or repayments on our warehouse lines of credit and other debt. In the first three months of 2015, we issued $245.0 million in new securitization trust debt compared to $180.0 million in the same period of 2014. In addition, we repaid $145.9 million in securitization trust debt and $1.3 million in debt associated with the Fireside portfolio in the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to repayments of securitization trust debt of $110.2 million and repayment of $5.0 million in debt associated with the Fireside portfolio in the prior year period. In the three months ended March 31, 2015, we had net repayments of warehouse lines of credit of $34.9 million, compared to net proceeds of $32.1 million in the prior year’s period. During the first three months of 2014, we repaid in full $39.2 million of senior secured related party debt.

36

We purchase automobile contracts from dealers for a cash price approximately equal to their principal amount, adjusted for an acquisition fee which may either increase or decrease the automobile contract purchase price. Those automobile contracts generate cash flow, however, over a period of years. As a result, we have been dependent on warehouse credit facilities to purchase automobile contracts, and on the availability of cash from outside sources in order to finance our continuing operations, as well as to fund the portion of automobile contract purchase prices not financed under revolving warehouse credit facilities.

The acquisition of automobile contracts for subsequent financing in securitization transactions, and the need to fund spread accounts and initial overcollateralization, if any, and increase credit enhancement levels when those transactions take place, results in a continuing need for capital. The amount of capital required is most heavily dependent on the rate of our automobile contract purchases, the required level of initial credit enhancement in securitizations, and the extent to which the previously established trusts and their related spread accounts either release cash to us or capture cash from collections on securitized automobile contracts. Of those, the factor most subject to our control is the rate at which we purchase automobile contracts.

We are and may in the future be limited in our ability to purchase automobile contracts due to limits on our capital. As of March 31, 2015, we had unrestricted cash of $20.2 million, $78.0 million available under one warehouse credit facility and $100.0 million available under another warehouse credit facility (such figures assume the availability of sufficient eligible collateral). As of March 31, 2015 we had approximately $39.1 million of such eligible collateral. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2015, we completed one securitization aggregating $245.0 million of notes sold. We intend to complete more securitizations during 2015, although there can be no assurance that we will be able to so. Our plans to manage our liquidity include maintaining our rate of automobile contract purchases at a level that matches our available capital, and, as appropriate, minimizing our operating costs. If we are unable to complete such securitizations, we may be unable to increase our rate of automobile contract purchases, in which case our interest income and other portfolio related income could decrease.

Our liquidity will also be affected by releases of cash from the trusts established with our securitizations. While the specific terms and mechanics of each spread account vary among transactions, our securitization agreements generally provide that we will receive excess cash flows, if any, only if the amount of credit enhancement has reached specified levels and the delinquency or net losses related to the automobile contracts in the pool are below certain predetermined levels. In the event delinquencies or net losses on the automobile contracts exceed such levels, the terms of the securitization may require increased credit enhancement to be accumulated for the particular pool. There can be no assurance that collections from the related trusts will continue to generate sufficient cash. Moreover, certain of our retained interests in securitization transactions and their related spread accounts are pledged as collateral to our residual interest financing and cash releases from these transactions will be used to repay the financings.

One of our securitization transactions, our warehouse credit facilities, our residual interest financing and our financing for the Fireside portfolio contain various financial covenants requiring certain minimum financial ratios and results. Such covenants include maintaining minimum levels of liquidity and net worth and not exceeding maximum leverage levels. In addition, some agreements contain cross-default provisions that would allow certain creditors to declare a default if a default occurred under a different facility. As of March 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all such financial covenants.

We have and will continue to have a substantial amount of indebtedness. At March 31, 2015, we had approximately $1,746.8 million of debt outstanding. Such debt consisted primarily of $1,697.6 million of securitization trust debt, and also included $22.0 million of warehouse lines of credit, $12.1 million of residual interest financing and $15.1 million in subordinated renewable notes. We are also currently offering the subordinated notes to the public on a continuous basis, and such notes have maturities that range from three months to 10 years.

Our recent operating results include pre-tax earnings of $14.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and $52.2 million, $37.2 million and $9.2 for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Those periods were preceded by pre-tax losses of $14.5 million and $16.2 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively. We believe that our 2011 and 2010 results were materially and adversely affected by the disruption in the capital markets that began in the fourth quarter of 2007, by the recession that began in December 2007, and by related high levels of unemployment.

37

Although we believe we are able to service and repay our debt, there is no assurance that we will be able to do so. If our plans for future operations do not generate sufficient cash flows and earnings, our ability to make required payments on our debt would be impaired. If we fail to pay our indebtedness when due, it could have a material adverse effect on us and may require us to issue additional debt or equity securities.

Critical Accounting Policies

We believe that our accounting policies related to (a) Allowance for Finance Credit Losses, (b) Amortization of Deferred Originations Costs and Acquisition Fees, (c) Term Securitizations, (d) Accrual for Contingent Liabilities, and (e) Income Taxes are the most critical to understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. Such policies are described below.

Allowance for Finance Credit Losses

In order to estimate an appropriate allowance for losses incurred on finance receivables, we use a loss allowance methodology commonly referred to as "static pooling," which stratifies our finance receivable portfolio into separately identified pools based on the period of origination. Using analytical and formula driven techniques, we estimate an allowance for finance credit losses, which we believe is adequate for probable incurred credit losses that can be reasonably estimated in our portfolio of automobile contracts. For each monthly pool of contracts that we purchase, we begin establishing the allowance in the month of acquisition and increase it over the subsequent 11 months, through a provision for credit losses charged to our consolidated statement of operations. Net losses incurred on finance receivables are charged to the allowance. We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance by examining current delinquencies, the characteristics of the portfolio, prospective liquidation values of the underlying collateral and general economic and market conditions. As circumstances change, our level of provisioning and/or allowance may change as well.

Broad economic factors such as recession and significant changes in unemployment levels influence the credit performance of our portfolio, as does the weighted average age of the receivables at any given time. Our internal credit performance data consistently show that new receivables have lower levels of delinquency and losses early in their lives, with delinquencies increasing throughout their lives and losses gradually increasing to a peak between 36 and 42 months, after which they gradually decrease. As of March 31, 2015 the weighted average age of our portfolio of finance receivables was 14.7 months.

Amortization of Deferred Originations Costs and Acquisition Fees

Upon purchase of a contract from a dealer, we generally either charge or advance the dealer an acquisition fee. In addition, we incur certain direct costs associated with originations of our contracts. All such acquisition fees and direct costs are applied to the carrying value of finance receivables and are accreted into earnings as an adjustment to the yield over the estimated life of the contract using the interest method.

Term Securitizations

Our term securitization structure has generally been as follows:

We sell automobile contracts we acquire to a wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary, which has been established for the limited purpose of buying and reselling our automobile contracts. The special-purpose subsidiary then transfers the same automobile contracts to another entity, typically a statutory trust. The trust issues interest-bearing asset-backed securities, in a principal amount equal to or less than the aggregate principal balance of the automobile contracts. We typically sell these automobile contracts to the trust at face value and without recourse, except that representations and warranties similar to those provided by the dealer to us are provided by us to the trust. One or more investors purchase the asset-backed securities issued by the trust; the proceeds from the sale of the asset-backed securities are then used to purchase the automobile contracts from us. We may retain or sell subordinated asset-backed securities issued by the trust or by a related entity. Through 2008, we generally purchased external credit enhancement for most of our term securitizations in the form of a financial guaranty insurance policy, guaranteeing timely payment of interest and ultimate payment of principal on the senior asset-backed securities, from an insurance company. However, in our 17 most recent securitizations since 2010, we have not purchased financial guaranty insurance policies and do not expect to do so in the near future.

38

We structure our securitizations to include internal credit enhancement for the benefit of the investors (i) in the form of an initial cash deposit to an account ("spread account") held by the trust, (ii) in the form of overcollateralization of the senior asset-backed securities, where the principal balance of the senior asset-backed securities issued is less than the principal balance of the automobile contracts, (iii) in the form of subordinated asset-backed securities, or (iv) some combination of such internal credit enhancements. The agreements governing the securitization transactions require that the initial level of internal credit enhancement be supplemented by a portion of collections from the automobile contracts until the level of internal credit enhancement reaches specified levels, which are then maintained. The specified levels are generally computed as a percentage of the principal amount remaining unpaid under the related automobile contracts. The specified levels at which the internal credit enhancement is to be maintained will vary depending on the performance of the portfolios of automobile contracts held by the trusts and on other conditions, and may also be varied by agreement among us, our special purpose subsidiary, the insurance company, if any, and the trustee. Such levels have increased and decreased from time to time based on performance of the various portfolios, and have also varied from one transaction to another. The agreements governing the securitizations generally grant us the option to repurchase the sold automobile contracts from the trust when the aggregate outstanding balance of the automobile contracts has amortized to a specified percentage of the initial aggregate balance.

Our September 2008 securitization and the subsequent re-securitization of the remaining receivables from such transaction in September 2010 were each in substance sales of the underlying receivables, and have been treated as sales for financial accounting purposes. They differ from those treated as secured financings in that the trust to which our special-purpose subsidiaries sold the automobile contracts met the definition of a "qualified special-purpose entity" under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 (ASC 860 10 65-2). As a result, assets and liabilities of those trusts are not consolidated into our consolidated balance sheet.

Historically, our warehouse credit facility structures were similar to the above, except that (i) our special-purpose subsidiaries that purchased the automobile contracts pledged the automobile contracts to secure promissory notes that they issued, (ii) no increase in the required amount of internal credit enhancement was contemplated, and (iii) we did not purchase financial guaranty insurance.

Upon each transfer of automobile contracts in a transaction structured as a secured financing for financial accounting purposes, whether a term securitization or a warehouse financing, we retain on our consolidated balance sheet the related automobile contracts as assets and record the asset-backed notes or loans issued in the transaction as indebtedness.

Under the September 2008 and September 2010 securitizations, and other term securitizations completed prior to July 2003 that were structured as sales for financial accounting purposes, we removed from our consolidated balance sheet the automobile contracts sold and added to our consolidated balance sheet (i) the cash received, if any, and (ii) the estimated fair value of the ownership interest that we retained in the automobile contracts sold in the transaction. That retained or residual interest consisted of (a) the cash held in the spread account, if any, (b) overcollateralization, if any, (c) asset-backed securities retained, if any, and (d) receivables from the trust, which include the net interest receivables. Net interest receivables represent the estimated discounted cash flows to be received from the trust in the future, net of principal and interest payable with respect to the asset-backed notes, the premium paid to the insurance company, if any, and certain other expenses. The excess of the cash received and the assets we retained over the carrying value of the automobile contracts sold, less transaction costs, equaled the net gain on sale of automobile contracts we recorded.

We receive periodic base servicing fees for the servicing and collection of the automobile contracts. Under our securitization structures treated as secured financings for financial accounting purposes, such servicing fees are included in interest income from the automobile contracts. In addition, we are entitled to the cash flows from the trusts that represent collections on the automobile contracts in excess of the amounts required to pay principal and interest on the asset-backed securities, base servicing fees, and certain other fees and expenses (such as trustee and custodial fees). Required principal payments on the asset-backed notes are generally defined as the payments sufficient to keep the principal balance of such notes equal to the aggregate principal balance of the related automobile contracts (excluding those automobile contracts that have been charged off), or a pre-determined percentage of such balance. Where that percentage is less than 100%, the related securitization agreements require accelerated payment of principal until the principal balance of the asset-backed securities is reduced to the specified percentage. Such accelerated principal payment is said to create overcollateralization of the asset-backed notes.

39

If the amount of cash required for payment of fees, expenses, interest and principal on the senior asset-backed notes exceeds the amount collected during the collection period, the shortfall is withdrawn from the spread account, if any. If the cash collected during the period exceeds the amount necessary for the above allocations plus required principal payments on the subordinated asset-backed notes, and there is no shortfall in the related spread account or the required overcollateralization level, the excess is released to us. If the spread account and overcollateralization is not at the required level, then the excess cash collected is retained in the trust until the specified level is achieved. Although spread account balances are held by the trusts on behalf of our special-purpose subsidiaries as the owner of the residual interests (in the case of securitization transactions structured as sales for financial accounting purposes) or the trusts (in the case of securitization transactions structured as secured financings for financial accounting purposes), we are restricted in use of the cash in the spread accounts. Cash held in the various spread accounts is invested in high quality, liquid investment securities, as specified in the securitization agreements. The interest rate payable on the automobile contracts is significantly greater than the interest rate on the asset-backed notes. As a result, the residual interests described above historically have been a significant asset of ours.

In all of our term securitizations and warehouse credit facilities, whether treated as secured financings or as sales, we have sold the automobile contracts (through a subsidiary) to the securitization entity. The difference between the two structures is that in securitizations that are treated as secured financings we report the assets and liabilities of the securitization trust on our consolidated balance sheet. Under both structures, recourse to us by holders of the asset-backed securities and by the trust, for failure of the automobile contract obligors to make payments on a timely basis, is limited to the automobile contracts included in the securitizations or warehouse credit facilities, the spread accounts and our retained interests in the respective trusts.

Accrual for Contingent Liabilities

We are routinely involved in various legal proceedings resulting from our consumer finance activities and practices, both continuing and discontinued. Our legal counsel has advised us on such matters where, based on information available at the time of this report, there is an indication that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably determined.

We have recorded a liability as of March 31, 2015, which represents our best estimate of probable incurred losses for legal contingencies. The amount of losses that may ultimately be incurred cannot be estimated with certainty. However, based on such information as is available to us, we believe that the range of reasonably possible losses for the legal proceedings and contingencies described or referenced above, as of March 31, 2015, and in excess of the liability we have recorded, is from zero to $250,000.

Accordingly, we believe that the ultimate resolution of such legal proceedings and contingencies, after taking into account our current litigation reserves, should not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. We note, however, that in light of the uncertainties inherent in contested proceedings, there can be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves we have accrued; as a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to our operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of our income for that period.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

40

Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. A valuation allowance is recognized for a deferred tax asset if, based on the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified.

In determining the possible future realization of deferred tax assets, we have considered future taxable income from the following sources: (a) reversal of taxable temporary differences; and (b) forecasted future net earnings from operations. Based upon those considerations, we have concluded that it is more likely than not that the U.S. and state net operating loss carryforward periods provide enough time to utilize the deferred tax assets pertaining to the existing net operating loss carryforwards and any net operating loss that would be created by the reversal of the future net deductions which have not yet been taken on a tax return. Our estimates of taxable income are forward-looking statements, and there can be no assurance that our estimates of such taxable income will be correct.

We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, if any, within the income tax expense line in the consolidated statement of operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheet.

Forward Looking Statements

This report on Form 10-Q includes certain “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “plans,” “estimates,” or words of like meaning. Our provision for credit losses is a forward-looking statement, as it is dependent on our estimates as to future chargeoffs and recovery rates. Factors that could affect charge-offs and recovery rates include changes in the general economic climate, which could affect the willingness or ability of obligors to pay pursuant to the terms of automobile contracts, changes in laws respecting consumer finance, which could affect our ability to enforce rights under automobile contracts, and changes in the market for used vehicles, which could affect the levels of recoveries upon sale of repossessed vehicles. Factors that could affect our revenues in the current year include the levels of cash releases from existing pools of automobile contracts, which would affect our ability to purchase automobile contracts, the terms on which we are able to finance such purchases, the willingness of dealers to sell automobile contracts to us on the terms that we offer, and the terms on which and whether we are able to complete term securitizations once automobile contracts are acquired. Factors that could affect our expenses in the current year include competitive conditions in the market for qualified personnel and interest rates (which affect the rates that we pay on notes issued in our securitizations).

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We maintain a system of internal controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of our published financial statements and other disclosures included in this report. As of the end of the period covered by this report, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of such disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer (Charles E. Bradley, Jr.) and the principal financial officer (Jeffrey P. Fritz) concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, material information relating to us that is required to be included in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

41

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The information provided under the caption “Legal Proceedings,” Note 9 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part I of this report, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We remind the reader that risk factors are set forth in Item 1A of our report on Form 10-K, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2015. Where we are aware of material changes to such risk factors as previously disclosed, we set forth below an updated discussion of such risks. The reader should note that the other risks identified in our report on Form 10-K remain applicable.

We have substantial indebtedness.

We have and will continue to have a substantial amount of indebtedness. At March 31, 2015, we had approximately $1,746.8 million of debt outstanding. Such debt consisted primarily of $1,697.6 million of securitization trust debt, $22.0 million of warehouse lines of credit, $12.1 million of residual interest financing and $15.1 million in subordinated renewable notes (which are outstanding with maturities that range from three months to 10 years). Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition by, among other things:

· increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

· requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing amounts available for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;

· limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

· placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and

· limiting our ability to borrow additional funds.

Although we believe we are able to service and repay such debt, there is no assurance that we will be able to do so. If we do not generate sufficient operating profits, our ability to make required payments on our debt would be impaired. Failure to pay our indebtedness when due could have a material adverse effect.

Forward-Looking Statements

Discussions of certain matters contained in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the market and statements regarding our mission and vision. You can generally identify forward-looking statements as statements containing the words "will," "would," "believe," "may," "could," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "assume" or other similar expressions. Our actual results, performance and achievements may differ materially from the results, performance and achievements expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. The discussion under "Risk Factors" identifies some of the factors that might cause such a difference, including the following:

42

· changes in general economic conditions;

· our ability or inability to obtain necessary financing, and the terms of any such financing

· changes in interest rates, especially as applicable to securitization trust debt;

· our ability to generate sufficient operating and financing cash flows;

· competition;

· level of future provisioning for receivables losses;

· the levels of actual losses on receivables; and

· regulatory requirements.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual results may differ from expectations due to many factors beyond our ability to control or predict, including those described herein, and in documents incorporated by reference in this report. For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking information. You are advised to consult any additional disclosure we make in our periodic reports filed with the SEC.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we repurchased no shares from existing shareholders, as reflected in the table below.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

	Total Number of Shares		Average Price Paid		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or
Period(1)	Purchased		per Share		Programs		Programs (2)
January 2015		–	$	–		–	$	986,193
February 2015		–		–		–	$	986,193
March 2015		–		–		–	$	986,193
Total		–	$	–		–

____________________

(1) Each monthly period is the calendar month.

(2) Through March 31, 2015, our board of directors had authorized the purchase of up to $34.5 million of our outstanding securities, which program was first announced in our annual report for the year 2002, filed on March 26, 2003. All purchases described in the table above were under the plan announced in March 2003, which has no fixed expiration date.

43

Item 6. Exhibits

The Exhibits listed below are filed with this report.

4.14	Instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of certain consolidated subsidiaries of the registrant are omitted pursuant to the exclusion set forth in subdivisions (b)(iv)(iii)(A) and (b)(v) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.601).  The registrant agrees to provide copies of such instruments to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
4.61	Indenture dated March 1, 2015 re Notes issued by CPS Auto Receivables Trust 2015-A. Incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.59 filed with the registrant’s Form 8-K on March 26, 2015.
4.62	Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2015. Incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.60 filed with the registrant’s Form 8-K on March 26, 2015.
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the registrant.
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the registrant.
32	Section 1350 Certifications.*

* These Certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. These Certifications shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registration statement specifically states that such Certifications are incorporated therein.

44

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CONSUMER PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC.
	(Registrant)
Date: April 24, 2015
		By:  /s/   CHARLES E. BRADLEY, JR.
		Charles E. Bradley, Jr.
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: April 24, 2015
		By:  /s/   JEFFREY P. FRITZ
		Jeffrey P. Fritz
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

45