-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, FUMLDgTttz04GW1mkwVK4Xt4rxubom5g4WVBA5pFTUa1WsglhUso5CmLX0MG7Mf/ uVjmWJfdK4GtR/B7I6wwaA== 0000088948-06-000016.txt : 20060614 0000088948-06-000016.hdr.sgml : 20060614 20060613174755 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000088948-06-000016 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 8 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20060331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20060614 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20060613 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SENECA FOODS CORP /NY/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000088948 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: CANNED, FRUITS, VEG & PRESERVES, JAMS & JELLIES [2033] IRS NUMBER: 160733425 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NY FISCAL YEAR END: 0331 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-01989 FILM NUMBER: 06903237 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3736 SOUTH MAIN STREET CITY: MARION STATE: NY ZIP: 14505 BUSINESS PHONE: 315 926 8100 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3736 SOUTH MAIN STREET CITY: MARION STATE: NY ZIP: 14505 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: PIERCE S S COMPANY INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19861210 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: SENECA FOODS CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19780425 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: SENECA GRAPE JUICE CORP DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19710419 10-K 1 a10k033106.htm 10-K MARCH 31, 2006 10-K March 31, 2006
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year-ended March 31, 2006  Commission File Number 0-01989

SENECA FOODS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York   16-0733425
(State or other jurisdiction of     (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

3736 South Main Street, Marion, New York   14505
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code  (315) 926-8100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:


Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange on
Which Registered
Common Stock Class A, $.25 Par
NASDAQ National Market
Common Stock Class B, $.25 Par
NASDAQ National Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes     No   X  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes     No   X  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   X   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
 
Yes   X   No    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12(b-2) of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer     Accelerated filer   X   Non-accelerated filer    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes     No   X  

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates based on the closing sales price per market reports by the NASDAQ National Market System on September 30, 2005 was approximately $91,968,000.
 

Common shares outstanding as of May 30, 2006 were Class A: 4,074,509, Class B: 2,760,905.




Documents Incorporated by Reference:

(1)
Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with the Registrant’s annual meeting of stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) applicable to Part III, Items 10-14 of Form 10-K.
 
(2)
Portions of the Annual Report to shareholders for fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the “2006 Annual Report”) applicable to Part I, Part II, Items 5-8 and Part IV, Item 15 of Form 10-K.
 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT - FISCAL 2006
SENECA FOODS CORPORATION

     
     
PART I.
 
Pages
Item 1.
Business
1-4
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
4-6
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
6
Item 2.
Properties
6
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
7
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
7
     
PART II.
   
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Security Holder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
8
     
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
9
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
9
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
9
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
9
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
9
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
10-12
Item 9B.
Other Information
12
     
PART III.
   
Item 10.
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
13
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
13
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Security Holder Matters
13
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
13
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
13
     
     
PART IV.
   
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules
15-16
     
SIGNATURES
 
17
     


Forward-Looking Statements

Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this report are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) of 1995. The Company wishes to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the PSLRA by cautioning that numerous important factors which involve risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to economic, competitive, governmental and technological factors affecting the Company's operations, markets, products, services and prices, and other factors discussed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the future, could affect the Company's actual results and could cause its actual consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by, or on behalf of, the Company.

PART I
Item 1

Business

General Development of Business

SENECA FOODS CORPORATION (the “Company”) was organized in 1949 and incorporated under the laws of the State of New York. In the spring of 1995, the Company initiated a 20-year Alliance Agreement with the Pillsbury Company, which was acquired by General Mills Operations, Inc. (“GMOI”), that created the Company’s most significant business relationship. Under the Alliance Agreement, the Company has packed canned and frozen vegetables carrying GMOI’s Green Giant brand name.

Since the onset of the Alliance Agreement, vegetable production has been the Company’s dominant line of business. In fiscal 1999, the Company sold its fruit juice business and its applesauce and industrial flavors business. As a result of these fiscal 1999 divestitures, the Company’s only non-vegetable food products are a line of fruit and chip products.

On May 27, 2003, the Company completed the acquisition of the sole membership interest in Chiquita Processed Foods, L.L.C. from Chiquita Brands International, Inc.

Available Information

The Company’s Internet address is www.senecafoods.com. The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available on the Company’s web site, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. All such filings on the Company’s web site are available free of charge.

In addition, the Company's website includes items related to corporate governance matters, including charters of various committees of the Board of Directors and the Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Company intends to disclose on its website any amendment to or waiver of any provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that would otherwise be required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC and NASDAQ.

Financial Information about Industry Segments

The Company’s business activities are principally conducted in food processing operations. The food operation constitutes 99% of total sales, of which approximately 99% is vegetable processing and 1% is fruit processing. The non-food operation is mostly trade sales of cans and ends, which represents 1% of the Company’s total sales.

Narrative Description of Business

Principal Products and Markets

Food Processing

The principal products include canned vegetables, frozen vegetables and fruit products. The products are sold to retail and institutional markets. The Company has divided the United States into four major marketing sections: Eastern, Southern, Northwestern, and Southwestern. Food processing operations are primarily supported by plant locations in New York, Wisconsin, Washington, Idaho, Illinois, and Minnesota.
 



The following table summarizes net sales by major product category for the years ended March 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004:
 

Classes of similar products/services:
2006
2005
2004
     
 
(In thousands)
Net Sales:
     
GMOI
$240,490
$225,527
$247,992
Canned vegetables
573,779
574,802
579,103
Frozen vegetables
29,464
28,304
29,410
Fruit and chip products
26,640
23,358
22,838
Other
13,450
12,283
11,507
       
 
$883,823
$864,274
$890,850
       


Source and Availability of Raw Materials


The Company’s food processing plants are located in major vegetable producing states and in one fruit producing state. Fruits and vegetables are primarily obtained through contracts with growers. The Company’s sources of supply are considered equal or superior to its competition for all of its food products.

Intellectual Property

The Company's most significant brand name, Libby's, is held pursuant to a trademark license granted to the Company in March 1982 and renewable by the Company every 10 years for an aggregate period expiring in March 2081. The original licensor was Libby, McNeill & Libby, Inc., then an indirect subsidiary of Nestlé, S. A. ("Nestlé") and the license was granted in connection with the Company's purchase of certain of the licensor's canned vegetable operations in the United States. Corlib Brands Management, LTD, acquired the license from Nestlé during 2006. The license is limited to vegetables which are shelf-stable and thermally processed, and includes the Company's major vegetable varieties - corn, peas and green beans - as well as certain other thermally processed vegetable varieties plus sauerkraut.

The Company is required to pay an annual royalty, initially set at $25,000, and adjustable up or down in subsequent years based upon changes in the "Employment Cost Index-Private Non-farm Workers" published by the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics or an appropriate successor index as defined in the license agreement. For the year which began in March 2006, the royalty was $58,584. Corlib Brands may terminate the license for non-payment of royalty, use of the trademark in sales outside the licensed territory, failure to achieve a minimum level of sales under the licensed trademark during any calendar year or a material breach or default by the Company under the agreement (which is not cured within the specified cure period).

Seasonal Business


While individual fruits and vegetables have seasonal cycles of peak production and sales, the different cycles are usually offsetting to some extent. Minimal food processing occurs in the Company's last fiscal quarter ending March 31, which is the optimal time for maintenance, repairs and equipment changes in its processing plants. The supply of commodities, current pricing, and expected new crop quantity and quality affect the timing of the Company’s sales and earnings. When the seasonal harvesting periods of the Company's major vegetables are newly completed, inventories for these processed vegetables are at their highest levels. For peas, the peak inventory time is mid-summer and for corn, the Company's highest volume vegetable, the peak inventory is in mid-autumn. An Off Season Allowance is established during the year to minimize the effect of seasonal production on earnings. The Off Season Allowance is zero at each fiscal year-end.

Backlog


In the food processing business, the end of year sales order backlog is not considered meaningful. Traditionally, larger customers provide tentative bookings for their expected purchases for the upcoming season. These bookings are further developed as data on the expected size of the related national harvests becomes available. In general, these bookings serve as a yardstick rather than as a firm commitment, since actual harvest results can vary notably from early estimates. In actual practice, the Company has substantially all of its expected seasonal production identified to potential sales outlets before the seasonal production is completed.




Competition and Customers


Competition in the food business is substantial with imaginative brand registration and promotion, quality, service, and pricing being the major determinants in the Company’s relative market position. The Company is aware of approximately 18 competitors in the
U.S. processed vegetable industry, many of which are privately held companies. The Company believes that it is a major producer of canned vegetables, but some producers of canned, frozen and other modes of vegetable products have sales which exceed the Company's sales.

During the past year, approximately 10% of the Company’s processed foods sales were packed for retail customers under the Company’s branded labels of Libby’s®, Blue Boy®, Aunt Nellie’s Farm Kitchen®, Stokely®, Read®, Festal®, Diamond A®, and Seneca®. About 17% of processed foods sales were packed for institutional food distributors and 46% were retail packed under the private label of customers. The remaining 27% is sold under the Alliance Agreement with GMOI (see note 12 of Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data). Termination of the Alliance Agreement would substantially reduce the Company’s sales and profitability unless the Company was to enter into a new substantial supply relationship with GMOI or another major vegetable marketer. The non-Alliance customers represent a full cross section of the retail, institutional, distributor, and industrial markets; and the Company does not consider itself dependent on any single sales source other than sales attributable to the Alliance Agreement.

The Company's principal branded products are its Libby’s canned vegetable products, which rate among the top five national brands.
The information under the heading Results of Operations in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the 2006 Annual Report is incorporated by reference.

Environmental Protection

Environmental protection is an area that has been worked on most diligently at each food processing facility. In all locations, the Company has cooperated with federal, state, and local environmental protection authorities in developing and maintaining suitable antipollution facilities. In general, pollution control facilities are equal to or somewhat superior to those of our competitors and are within environmental protection standards. The Company does not expect any material capital expenditures to comply with environmental regulations in the near future. The Company is a potentially responsible party with respect to a waste disposal site owned and operated by a third party. The Company believes that any reasonably anticipated liabilities will not exceed $300,000 for the waste disposal site.

Environmental Litigation and Contingencies

The Company is one of a number of business and local government entities which contributed waste materials to a landfill in Yates County in upstate New York, which was operated by a party unrelated to the Company primarily in the 1970’s through the early 1980’s. The Company’s wastes were primarily food and juice products. The landfill contained some hazardous materials and was remediated by the State of New York. The New York Attorney General has advised the Company and other known non-governmental waste contributors that New York has sustained a total remediation cost of $4.9 million and seeks recovery of half that cost from the non-governmental waste contributors. The Company is one of four identified contributors who cooperatively are investigating the history of the landfill so as to identify and seek out other potentially responsible parties who are not defunct and are financially able to contribute to the non-governmental parties’ reimbursement liability. Since the search is not expected to be completed until November 1, 2006, the Company’s liability cannot be definitively estimated. The Company does not believe that any ultimate settlement in excess of the amount accrued will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In early 1999, the Company sold to Tree Top, Inc. its applesauce business, including a plant in Prosser, Benton County, Washington. In the sale agreement governing the transaction, the Company represented to Tree Top that it was in compliance with all environmental laws. In 2003, the Benton County Clean Air Authority (“BCAA”) brought an enforcement action against Tree Top under Title V of the Clean Air Act and related State of Washington statutes, alleging that Tree Top was violating the Clean Air Act by failing to register the facility with BCAA pursuant to Title V. The BCAA also alleged that the facility failed to provide BCAA with a required notice of construction when it replaced a fourth boiler in the Prosser plant in 1988 when the Company was the sole owner. Tree Top has reached a settlement with the BCAA which, according to Tree Top, requires Tree Top to pay penalties and make modifications to equipment at a total cost of approximately $493,000. Tree Top has made a formal demand on the Company for reimbursement of the entire amount. The Company disputes Tree Top’s assertion that the Company is liable for the total cost. The Company does not believe that any resolution of this demand will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Employment

The Company has 2,906 employees of which 2,407 full time and 423 seasonal employees work in food processing and 76 full time employees work in other activities.




The Company has six collective bargaining agreements with three union locals covering approximately 665 of its full time employees. The terms of these agreements result in wages and benefits which are substantially the same for comparable positions for the Company's non-union employees. Four collective bargaining agreements expire in calendar 2008. One agreement expires in calendar 2009, and one agreement expires in calendar 2010.

Export Sales

The following table sets forth domestic and export sales:
 
 
Fiscal Year
 
 2006
 2005
 2004
 
(In thousands, except percentages)
Net Sales:
     
United States
$ 804,236
$ 782,282
$ 818,569
Export
79,587
81,992
72,281
Total Net Sales
$ 883,823
$ 864,274
$ 890,850
       
As a Percentage of Net Sales:
     
United States
91.0%
90.5%
91.9%
Export
9.0%
9.5%
8.1%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%


Item 1A

Risk Factors

The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. The Company refers to itself as “we” or “our” in this section.


Excess capacity in the vegetable industry has a downward impact on selling price.

Our financial performance and growth are related to conditions in the United States vegetable processing industry which is a mature industry with a modest growth rate in the last 10 years. Our net sales are a function of product availability and market pricing. In the vegetable processing industry, product availability and market prices tend to have an inverse relationship: market prices tend to decrease as more product is available and to increase if less product is available. Product availability is a direct result of plantings, growing conditions, crop yields and inventory levels, all of which vary from year to year. In addition, market prices can be affected by the planting and inventory levels and individual pricing decisions of the three or four largest processors in the industry. Generally, market prices in the vegetable processing industry adjust more quickly to variations in product availability than an individual processor can adjust its cost structure; thus, in an oversupply situation, a processor’s margins likely will weaken. We typically have experienced lower margins during times of industry oversupply.

In the past, the vegetable processing industry has been characterized by excess capacity, with resulting pressure on our prices and profit margins. Both the Company and our competitors have closed processing plants in response to the downward pressure on prices. There can be no assurance that our margins will improve in response to favorable market conditions or that we will be able to operate profitably during depressed market conditions. Moreover, vegetable production outside the United States, particularly in Asia and Latin America, is increasing and, in the future, may have a significant effect on competition and create downward pressure on prices.

Growing cycles and adverse weather conditions may decrease our results from operations.

Our operations are affected by the growing cycles of the vegetables we process. When the vegetables are ready to be picked, we must harvest and process the vegetables or forego the opportunity to process fresh picked vegetables for an entire year. Most of our vegetables are grown by farmers under contract with us. Consequently, we must pay the contract grower for the vegetables even if we cannot or do not harvest or process them. Most of our production occurs during the second quarter (July through September) of our fiscal year. In that quarter, the growing season ends for most of the vegetables processed by us in the northern United States. A majority of our sales occur during the third and fourth quarter of each fiscal year (due to seasonal consumption patterns for our products). Accordingly, inventory levels are highest during the second and third quarters, and accounts receivable levels are highest during the third and fourth quarters. Net sales generated during our third and fourth fiscal quarters have a significant impact on our results of operations. Because of these seasonal fluctuations, the results of any particular quarter, particularly in the first half of our fiscal year, will not necessarily be indicative of results for the full year or for future years.

Because weather conditions during the course of each vegetable crop’s growing season will affect the volume and growing time of that crop, we must set planting schedules without knowing the effect of the weather on the crops or on the entire industry’s production. As most vegetables are produced in more than one part of the U.S., we may somewhat reduce our risk that our entire crop will be subject to disastrous weather. The upper Midwest is the primary growing region for the principal vegetables which we pack, namely peas, green beans and corn, and it is also a substantial source of our competitors’ vegetable production. Consequently, the adverse effects of weather-related reduced production in that region may be partially mitigated by higher prices for the vegetables which are produced.


The commodity materials that we process or otherwise require are subject to price increases that could adversely affect our profitability.

The materials that we use, such as vegetables, steel and packaging materials are commodities that may experience price volatility caused by external factors including market fluctuations, availability, currency fluctuations and changes in governmental regulations and agricultural programs. These events can result in reduced supplies of these materials, higher supply costs or interruptions in our production schedules. If prices of these raw materials increase, but we are not able to effectively pass such price increases along to our customers, our operating income will decrease.

We face risks generally associated with our debt. 

As of March 31, 2006, we had a total of approximately $209 million of indebtedness. Our indebtedness could have important consequences, such as limiting our operational flexibility due to the covenants contained in our debt agreements; limiting our ability to invest in our business due to debt service requirements; limiting our ability to compete with companies that are not as highly leveraged; and increasing our vulnerability to economic downturns and changing market conditions.

Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will depend on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic, governmental and other factors, including potential changes in consumer preferences and pressure from competitors. If we do not have enough money to pay our debt service obligations, we may be required to refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow more money or raise equity. There is a risk that we may not be able to refinance existing debt or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of the existing debt.

Our dependence on the Alliance Agreement could negatively affect sales.

We have an Alliance Agreement with GMOI, whereby we process canned and frozen vegetables for GMOI under the Green Giant brand name. GMOI continues to be responsible for all of the sales, marketing and customer service functions for the Green Giant products. The Alliance Agreement has a remaining term of eight years. Green Giant products packed by us in fiscal 2006 and 2005 constituted approximately 27% and 26%, respectively, of our total sales. General Mills, Inc. guarantees GMOI’s obligations under the Alliance Agreement.

The Alliance Agreement has an initial term ending December 31, 2014, and will be extended automatically for additional five year terms unless terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Alliance Agreement. Upon virtually all of the causes of termination enumerated in the Alliance Agreement, GMOI will acquire legal title to three production plants and certain of the other assets which we acquired under the Alliance Agreement, and various financial adjustments between the parties will occur. If GMOI terminates the Alliance Agreement without cause, it must pay us a substantial termination payment.

Our sales and financial performance under the Alliance Agreement and our sales of Green Giant products depend to a significant extent on our success in producing quality Green Giant vegetables at competitive costs and GMOI’s success in marketing the products produced by us. The ability of GMOI to successfully market these products will depend upon GMOI’s sales efforts, as well as the factors described above under “—Excess capacity in the vegetable industry has a downward effect on price.” We cannot give assurance as to the volume of GMOI’s sales and cannot control many of the key factors affecting that volume. The Alliance Agreement contains extensive covenants by us with respect to quality and delivery of products, maintenance of the Alliance Plants and other standards of our performance. If we were to fail in our performance of these covenants, GMOI would be entitled to terminate the Alliance Agreement.

Termination of the Alliance Agreement will, in most cases, entitle our principal lenders, including our long-term lenders, to declare a default under our loan agreements with them. The principal lenders have a security interest in certain payments that we will receive from GMOI on termination of the Alliance Agreement. Unless we were to enter into a new substantial supply relationship with GMOI or another major vegetable marketer and acquire substantial production capacity to replace the GMOI production plants, any such termination would substantially reduce our sales.

Sales to GMOI have declined $12 million, from $252 million to $240 million, between fiscal year 2003 and fiscal year 2006.





If we do not maintain the market shares of our products, our business and revenues may be adversely affected.

All of our products compete with those of other national, major and smaller regional food processing companies under highly competitive conditions. The vegetable products which we sell under our own brand names not only compete with vegetable products produced by vegetable processing competitors, but also compete with products we produce and sell to other companies who market those products under their own brand names, such as the Green Giant vegetables we sell to GMOI under the Alliance Agreement and the vegetables we sell to various retail grocery chains which carry our buyers’ own brand names.

The customers who buy our products to sell under their own brand names control the marketing programs for those products. In recent years, many major retail food chains have been increasing their promotions, offerings and shelf space allocations for their own vegetable brands, to the detriment of vegetable brands owned by the processors, including our own brands. We cannot predict the pricing or promotional activities of our competitors or whether they will have a negative effect on us. There are competitive pressures and other factors which could cause our products to lose market share or result in significant price erosion, and which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Increases in logistics and other transportation-related costs could materially adversely impact our results of operations. Our ability to competitively serve our customers depends on the availability of reliable and low-cost transportation.

Logistics and other transportation-related costs have a significant impact on our earnings and results of operations. We use multiple forms of transportation to bring our products to market. They include trucks, intermodals, rail cars, and ships. Disruption to the timely supply of these services or increases in the cost of these services for any reason, including availability or cost of fuel, regulations affecting the industry, or labor shortages in the transportation industry, could have an adverse effect on our ability to serve our customers, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.


If we are subject to product liability claims, we may incur significant and unexpected costs and our business reputation could be adversely affected.

Food processors are subject to significant liability should the consumption of their products cause injury or illness. A product liability judgment against us could also result in substantial and unexpected expenditures and divert management’s attention from other responsibilities. Although we maintain product liability insurance coverage in amounts customary within the industry, there can be no assurance that this level of coverage is adequate or that we will be able to continue to maintain our existing insurance or obtain comparable insurance at a reasonable cost, if at all. A product recall or a partially or completely uninsured judgment against us could have a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition. During the second quarter of our fiscal year 2005, the Company recalled certain products and recognized a charge of $1,280,000 as previously reported.


We generate agricultural food processing wastes and are subject to substantial environmental regulation.

As a vegetable processor, we regularly dispose of vegetable wastes (silage) and processing water, as well as materials used in plant operation and maintenance, and our plant boilers, which generate heat used in processing, produce generally small emissions into the air. These activities and operations are regulated by federal and state laws and the respective federal and state environmental agencies. Occasionally, we may be required to remediate conditions found by the regulators to be in violation of environmental law or to contribute to the cost of remediating waste disposal sites which we neither owned nor operated but in which we and many other companies deposited waste materials, usually through independent waste disposal companies. The costs of this remediation and contributions (including occasional fines) have not been significant. As a major vegetable producer, we run the risk of occasional future costs and inadvertent violations, even though we maintain an environmental department to assist us in environmental compliance.

Item 1B

Unresolved Staff Comments

The Company does not have any unresolved comments from the SEC staff regarding its periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





Item 2

Properties


Seven facilities in Minnesota, two facilities in Washington, three facilities in Idaho, three facilities in New York, one facility in Oregon, one facility in Illinois, and ten facilities in Wisconsin provide approximately 9,727,000 square feet of food packaging, freezing and freezer storage, and warehouse storage space. These facilities process and package various vegetable and fruit products. Most of the facilities are owned by the Company. The Company is a lessee under a number of operating and capital leases for equipment and real property used for processing and warehousing.

All of the properties are well maintained and equipped with modern machinery. All locations, although highly utilized, have the ability to expand as sales requirements justify. Because of the seasonal production cycles, the exact extent of utilization is difficult to measure. In certain circumstances, the theoretical full efficiency levels are being reached; however, expansion of the number of production days or hours could increase the output by up to 20% for a season.

Certain of the Company’s facilities are mortgaged to financial institutions to secure long-term debt and capital lease obligations. See Notes 4 and 5 of Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, for additional information about the Company’s long-term debt and lease commitments.
Item 3

Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is made a party to certain legal proceedings seeking monetary damages, including proceedings involving product liability claims, worker’s compensation and other employee claims, tort and other general liability claims, for which it carries insurance, as well as patent infringement and related litigation. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company does not believe that an adverse decision in any of these legal proceedings would have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

During 2004, various claims totaling approximately $3,211,000 were asserted by the Fleming Companies against the Company and a subsidiary acquired in 2003 in the Bankruptcy proceedings in the U. S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for (i)receipt of allegedly preferential payments under the U. S. Bankruptcy Code ($1,292,000), (ii) receipt of alleged overpayments ($1,139,000) and (iii) amounts allegedly owing under various vendor promotional programs ($780,000). During 2005, the Company settled and paid these claims for $399,000.

On June 15, 2004, an accident occurred at the Company’s aircraft hangar located at the Yates County Airport in Penn Yan, New York as disclosed in our March 31, 2005 Annual Report on 10-K. The damaged aircraft were repaired through insurance proceeds, and this matter was terminated in November, 2005. This matter did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or results of operations.

Refer to Item 1, Business -- Environmental Protection, for further information.

Item 4

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders during the last quarter of the fiscal period covered by this report.





PART II

Item 5


Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Security Holder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Each class of preferred stock receives preference as to dividend payment and declaration over any common stock. In addition, refer to the information in the 2006 Annual Report, “Shareholder Information and Quarterly Results”, which is incorporated by reference.


Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The Company has no equity compensation plans or individual compensation arrangements under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance to employees or directors, therefore, no table is necessary as described in Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K.



Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) or Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Class A Common
Class B Common
Class A Common
Class B Common
1/01/06 - 1/31/06
2,500
-
$20.13
$ -
N/A
N/A
2/01/06 - 2/29/06
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
3/01/06 - 3/31/06
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
Total
2,500
-
$20.13
$ -
N/A
N/A

(1) These purchases were made in open market transactions by the trustees under the Seneca Foods Corporation Employees' Savings Plan and the Seneca Foods, L.L.C. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan to provide employee matching contributions under the plans.


Item 6

Selected Financial Data

Refer to the information in the 2006 Annual Report, “Five Year Selected Financial Data”, which is incorporated by reference.


Item 7

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Refer to the information in the 2006 Annual Report, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, which is incorporated by reference.


Item 7A

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Refer to the information in the 2006 Annual Report, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”, which is incorporated by reference.


Item 8

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Refer to the information in the 2006 Annual Report, “Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto including Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms”, which is incorporated by reference.


Item 9

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.





Item 9A

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as of March 31, 2006. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2006, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures: (1) were designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared, so as to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and (2) were effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Company’s financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of March 31, 2006, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

The independent registered public accounting firm BDO Seidman, LLP, which audited the Company’s 2006 financial statements incorporated into this Form 10-K, has issued an opinion on management’s assessment, as of March 31, 2006, of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Their opinion appears on page 12.

Remediation of Material Weaknesses Reported in 2005

As previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005, we concluded that, as of March 31, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in alerting management prior to the end of a reporting period to all material information required to be included in our periodic filings with the SEC.

A material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2), or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement in the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their work. Management’s assessment identified the following three material weaknesses as of March 31, 2005 related to the financial statement close process:

·  
Insufficient controls to review the application of accounting principles over the determination and calculation of asset impairments in accordance with FAS 144.  
·  
Insufficient controls over the calculation and review of accrued promotion expense.
·  
Insufficient controls over the selection and monitoring of key assumptions supporting accounting estimates.





During 2006, The Company completed remediation measures to address the material weaknesses described above. As described in the Company’s Form 10-K for fiscal year 2005, the remediation plans included:

(i)  
The development of an internal audit process in the quarter ending July 2, 2005, which includes using a third party public accounting firm;
(ii)  
The establishment of a control whereby a detailed analysis, in accordance with the provisions of FAS 144, is prepared and reviewed when management identifies an indicator of impairment;
(iii)  
The creation of a control procedure whereby management is required to provide detailed support for each promotion accrual on a quarterly basis and corporate accounting personnel is actively involved in reviewing the documentation for compliance with GAAP;
(iv)  
The implementation of control procedures for the monitoring of key assumptions supporting accounting estimates, on a quarterly basis, to ensure that they are appropriate.

These remediation measures were tested and determined to be effective through management’s fiscal 2006 assessment of internal control over financial reporting.





Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Seneca Foods Corporation
Marion, New York

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that Seneca Foods Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Standards Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Seneca Foods Corporation as of March 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of net earnings, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended and our report dated June 9, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
June 9, 2006


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


Item 9B

Other Information

None.




PART III

Item 10

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. The Code of Ethics is available on our web site www.senecafoods.com (free of charge).

Additional information required by Item 10 will be filed separately with the Commission, pursuant to Regulation 14A, in a definitive proxy statement involving the election of directors, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 11

Executive Compensation

Information required by Item 11 will be filed separately with the Commission, pursuant to Regulation 14A, in a definitive proxy statement involving the election of directors, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 12

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information required by Item 12 will be filed separately with the Commission, pursuant to Regulation 14A, in a definitive proxy statement involving the election of directors, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 13

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Information required by Item 13 will be filed separately with the Commission, pursuant to Regulation 14A, in a definitive proxy statement involving the election of directors, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 14

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information required by Item 14 will be filed separately with the Commission, pursuant to Regulation 14A, in a definitive proxy statement involving the election of directors, which is incorporated herein by reference.




PART IV

Item 15

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules


A. Exhibits, Financial Statements, and Supplemental Schedules 

1. Financial Statements - the following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant, included in the Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2006, are incorporated by reference in Item 8:

   
Consolidated Statements of Net Earnings - Years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

   
Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31, 2006 and 2005

   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity - Years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Years ended March 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004

   
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

Pages

2. Supplemental Schedule:

Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 16

Other schedules have not been filed because the conditions requiring the filing do not exist or the required  
 
information is included in the consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto.
 


3.
Exhibits:
     
         
 
No 3
-
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws - Incorporated by reference to exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 the Company’s Form 10-Q/A filed August, 1995; as amended by exhibit 3 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K filed June 1996 as amended by exhibit 3(i) to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 17, 1998; as amended by exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s form 8-K dated June 10, 2003.
 
         
 
No. 4
-
Articles defining the rights of security holders - Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A filed August, 1995 as amended by amendments filed with the Company’s Form 10-K filed June 1996. Instrument defining the rights of any holder of Long-Term Debt - Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed January 1995 as amended by Exhibit No. 4 of the Company’s Form 10-K filed June, 1997, amended by Exhibit 4 of the Company’s Form 10-Q and Form 10-Q/A filed November, 1997, as amended by amendments filed with the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed July, 1998 as amended by the Company’s 8-K dated June 10, 2003. The Company will furnish, upon request to the SEC, a copy of any instrument defining the rights of any holder of Long-Term Debt.
 
         
 
No. 10
-
Material Contracts - Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 24, 1995 for the First Amended and Restated Alliance Agreement and the First Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement both with The Pillsbury Company amended by the Company’s Form 8-K dated June 11, 2002. Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10 to the Company's Form 10-K filed June 25, 2002 for an Indemnification Agreement dated January 31, 2002. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 8-K dated June 10, 2003 for the Purchase Agreement by and among Seneca Foods Corporation, Chiquita Brands International, Inc. and Friday Holdings, L.C.C. dated as of March 6, 2003.
 
         
 
No. 13
-
The material contained in the 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders under the following headings: “Five Year Selected Financial Data”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, “Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto including Independent Auditors’ Report”, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”, and “Shareholder Information and Quarterly Results” (filed herewith).
 
 
No. 21
-
List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith)
 
         
 
No. 23.1
-
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP (filed herewith)
 
         
 
No. 23.2
-
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (filed herewith)
 
         
 
No. 31.1
-
Certification of Kraig H. Kayser pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
 
         
 
No. 31.2
-
Certification of Philip G. Paras pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
 
         
 
No. 32
-
Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
 
         
         







Schedule II

 
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
 
(In thousands)


 
Balance at
Beginning
of period
Charged/
(Credited)
to income
Charged to
other
accounts
Deductions
from
reserve
Balance
at end
of period
 
Year-ended March 31, 2006:
           
Allowance for doubtful accounts
$ 625
$ (568)
$ ¾
$  (388) (c)
$ 445
             
Year-ended March 31, 2005:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
$ 945
 
$ 913
 
$ ¾
 
$ 1,233 (a)
 
$ 625
             
Year-ended March 31, 2004:
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
$ 761
 
$ 694
 
$  355 (b)
 
$ 155 (a)
 
$ 945
             
 
(a) Accounts written off, net of recoveries.
 
(b) Reclassified to accrued expense related to a liability for Chapter 11 preference payments received from a customer.
 
(c) Recoveries, net of accounts written off.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 

SENECA FOODS CORPORATION

By /s/Jeffrey L. Van Riper June 13, 2006
Jeffrey L. Van Riper
Controller and Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 

 
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
         
         
/s/Arthur S. Wolcott
 
Chairman and Director
 
June 13, 2006
Arthur S. Wolcott
       
         
         
/s/Kraig H. Kayser 
Kraig H. Kayser
 
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
 
June 13, 2006
         
/s/Philip G. Paras
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
June 13, 2006
Philip G. Paras
       
         
         
/s/Jeffrey L. Van Riper Jeffrey L. Van Riper
 
Controller and Secretary (Principal Accounting Officer)
 
June 13, 2006
         
         
/s/Arthur H. Baer
 
Director
 
June 13, 2006
Arthur H. Baer
       
         
         
/s/Andrew M. Boas
 
Director
 
June 13, 2006
Andrew M. Boas
       
         
         
/s/Robert T. Brady
 
Director
 
June 13, 2006
Robert T. Brady
       
         
         
/s/Douglas F. Brush
 
Director
 
June 13, 2006
Douglas F. Brush
       
         
         
/s/G. Brymer Humphreys
 
Director
 
June 13, 2006
G. Brymer Humphreys
       
         
         
/s/Thomas Paulson
 
Director
 
June 13, 2006
Thomas Paulson
       
         
         
/s/Susan W. Stuart
 
Director
 
June 13, 2006
Susan W. Stuart
       

EX-21 2 ex2110k033106.htm LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES List of Subsidiaries

 
Exhibit 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a listing of subsidiaries 100% owned by Seneca Foods Corporation, directly or indirectly:

 
Name
State
   
Marion Foods, Inc.
New York
Seneca Foods International, Ltd.
New York
Seneca Snack Company
Washington
   
EX-23.1 3 ex23110k033106.htm BDO CONSENT BDO Consent
 
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
CONSENT AND REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 

 
 
Seneca Foods Corporation
Marion, New York

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Seneca Foods Corporation of our report dated June 9, 2006, with respect to the 2006 consolidated financial statements of Seneca Foods Corporation, included in the 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders of Seneca Foods Corporation.

Our audit also included the accompanying Schedule II, Valuation of Qualifying Accounts. This schedule is the responsibility of Seneca Foods Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, as to which the date is June 9, 2006, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1)
Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-120982) of Seneca Foods Corporation,
(2)
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12365) pertaining to the Seneca Foods Corporation Employees' Savings Plan, and
(3)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114097) pertaining to the Seneca Foods, L.L.C. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan;

of our report dated June 9, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Seneca Foods Corporation incorporated herein by reference, our report dated June 9, 2006, with respect to Seneca Foods Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Seneca Foods Corporation, included herein, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule of Seneca Foods Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Seneca Foods Corporation.
 

/s/BDO Seidman, LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
 
June 13, 2006

EX-23.2 4 ex23210k033106.htm ERNST & YOUNG CONSENT Ernst & Young Consent
 
Exhibit 23.2
 
 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 

 
Board of Directors
Seneca Foods Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Seneca Foods Corporation of our report dated June 10, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Seneca Foods Corporation for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, included in the 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders of Seneca Foods Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 of Seneca Foods Corporation listed in Item 15(A)(2). This schedule is the responsibility of Seneca Foods Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, as to which the date is June 10, 2005, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1)
Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-120982) of Seneca Foods Corporation,
(2)
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 of Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12365) pertaining to the Seneca Foods Corporation Employees' Savings Plan, and
(3)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114097) pertaining to the Seneca Foods, L.L.C. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan;

of our report dated June 10, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Seneca Foods Corporation incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule of Seneca Foods Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Seneca Foods Corporation.

                                     ; /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Buffalo, New York
June 13, 2006
EX-31.1 5 ex31110k033106.htm CERTIFICATION CEO Certification CEO
 
EXHIBIT 31.1
 

CERTIFICATION


I, Kraig H. Kayser, certify that:
 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Seneca Foods Corporation;

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:


(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 
(c)
 
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 
5.
The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 
(a)
 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: June 13, 2006                    By: /s/Kraig H. Kayser
 
Kraig H. Kayser
President and Chief Executive Officer


EX-31.2 6 ex31210k033106.htm CERTIFICATION CFO Certification CFO
EXHIBIT 31.2

 
CERTIFICATION
 
 


I, Philip G. Paras, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Seneca Foods Corporation;
 
 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 
(a)
 
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 


 
(c)
 
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 
5.
The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: June 13, 2006                      By:/s/Philip G. Paras
 
Philip G. Paras
Chief Financial Officer
EX-32 7 ex3210k033106.htm CERTIFICATION SECTION 1350 Certification Section 1350
 
EXHIBIT 32
 


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
In connection with the Annual Report of Seneca Foods Corporation (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Kraig H. Kayser, Chief Executive Officer and Philip G. Paras, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/Kraig H. Kayser
 
Kraig H. Kayser
Chief Executive Officer
June 13, 2006


/s/ Philip G. Paras
 
Philip G. Paras
Chief Financial Officer
June 13, 2006
 
 
 
EX-13 8 ex1310k033106.txt EXHIBIT 13 ANNUAL REPORT Five Year Selected Financial Data Summary of Operations and Financial Condition (In thousands of dollars, except per share data)
Years ended March 31, 2006 2005 2004(a) 2003 2002 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Net sales $883,823 $864,274 $890,850 $644,379 $651,075 Operating earnings before interest and other expense (income), net $ 52,357 $ 24,868 $ 36,476 $ 33,035 $ 20,406 Net earnings 21,993 7,907 12,941 9,050 1,140 Basic earnings per common share 1.97 .71 1.18 .89 .11 Diluted earnings per common share 1.96 .70 1.17 .88 .11 Working capital $229,510 $205,430 $187,764 $172,382 $163,606 Inventories 307,292 294,470 270,283 141,649 181,835 Net property, plant, and equipment 148,501 163,290 181,907 132,969 155,189 Total assets 523,666 524,495 533,903 379,540 403,576 Long-term debt and capital lease obligations 142,586 154,125 160,987 133,337 156,100 Stockholders' equity 217,779 195,809 190,249 159,364 151,123 Additions to property, plant, and equipment $ 11,906 $ 14,415 $ 23,109 $ 6,832 $ 13,423 Interest expense, net 15,784 16,592 16,135 13,757 17,441 Net earnings/average equity 10.6% 4.1% 7.4% 5.8% 0.8% Earnings before taxes/sales 4.0% 1.4% 2.3% 2.3% 0.3% Net earnings/sales 2.5% 0.9% 1.5% 1.4% 0.2% Long-term debt/equity 65% 79% 85% 84% 103% Current ratio 2.6:1 2.3:1 2.2:1 3.4:1 3.0:1 Stockholders' equity per common share $23.89 $ 20.77 $ 19.97 $ 17.64 $ 16.46 Class A National Market System closing price range 21.00-15.51 20.00-16.75 21.97-16.20 18.75-10.75 14.75-11.50 Class B National Market System closing price range 20.77-16.00 19.45-16.99 22.88-16.85 18.38-12.75 14.78-12.00 Common cash dividends declared per share - - - - - Price earnings ratio 10.1 23.8 16.0 13.6 84.3 (a) The fiscal 2004 financial results include ten months of operating activity related to the Chiquita Processed Foods acquisition (See Note 2, Acquisition)
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Overview Our Business Seneca Foods is the world's leading producer and distributor of canned vegetables. Canned vegetables are sold nationwide in all channels serving retail markets, certain export markets, the food service industry, and other food processors. Canned vegetables represent 88% of the Company's sales. The Company maintains a number one share in the private label, food service and export canned vegetable markets; and a number three position in the branded canned vegetable market. Our Company also supplies canned and frozen vegetable products to General Mills Operations, Inc. ("GMOI") under an Alliance Agreement. In addition, our Company is the supplier of frozen vegetable products principally to the food service industry, and fruit and snack chip products principally serving retail markets and other food processors. Currently, our business strategies are designed to maintain our market share and enhance our sales and margins and include: (1) position the Company as the low-cost, high quality producer of canned vegetables through the elimination of costs from our supply chain and investment in state-of-the-art production and logistical technology; (2) drive growth in earnings through the use of cash flow to de-leverage the balance sheet; and (3) focus on our growth segments to capitalize on their higher expected returns. The Acquisition On May 27, 2003, the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of the membership interest in Chiquita Processed Foods, L.L.C. ("CPF") from Chiquita Brands International, Inc. The rationale for the acquisition was twofold: (1) strengthen the Company's market position in the canned vegetable segment; and (2) improve the Company's cost structure through the realization of cost savings by eliminating duplicative functions and combining the purchasing power of the two companies. The purchase price totaled $126.1 million plus the assumption of certain liabilities. This acquisition was financed with cash, proceeds from a new $200.0 million revolving credit facility, and $16.1 million of the Company's Participating Convertible Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is convertible into the Company's Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis subject to antidilution adjustments. The Preferred Stock was valued at $16.60 per share based on the market value of the Class A Common Stock at the time the acquisition was announced. Restructuring After a comprehensive review of our production capacities following the CPF acquisition, the Company completed a plant restructuring program in 2005 resulting in a restructuring charge of $7.7 million. The restructuring charge consisted of a non-cash impairment charge of $7.0 million and a cash severance charge of $0.7 million which are included in Plant Restructuring in the Consolidated Statement of Net Earnings. This restructuring program principally involved the closure of three processing facilities including a green bean plant in upstate New York and corn plants in Wisconsin and Washington. In addition, the Company restructured the newly acquired Payette, Idaho facility through the removal of canned meat production to focus exclusively on dry beans. The rationalization of the Company's productive capacity: 1) improved the Company's overall cost structure and competitive position; 2) addressed the excess capacity situation arising from the recent acquisition of CPF; and 3) mitigated the effect of inflationary pressures on the Company's raw material inputs such as steel and fuel. During 2006, the non-cash impairment charge was increased by $0.2 million related to the green bean plant in New York. The closure of the Washington corn processing facility coincided with an amendment to the Alliance Agreement with GMOI. Under the above amendment, the Blue Earth, Minnesota facility was removed from the Alliance Agreement due to a reduction in GMOI volume requirements and will be operated by the Company as a non-Alliance facility. Additionally, GMOI agreed to reimburse the Company in the future for remaining lease and depreciation costs at the Blue Earth facility which, on a net present value basis, approximate the closure costs associated with the Washington facility. With the closure of the Washington corn processing facility in the fall of 2004, the Company's labeling and warehousing requirements at the Salem, Oregon leased distribution facility were dramatically reduced. In 2006, the Company announced the phase out of the Salem labeling operation which resulted in a restructuring charge of $1.8 million consisting of a provision for future lease payments of $1.3 million, a cash severance charge of $0.4 million, and a non-cash impairment charge of $0.1 million. The Company intends to use a portion of the facility for warehousing and will attempt to sublease the remaining unutilized portion of the facility until the February 2008 expiration of the lease. The fiscal 2006 asparagus harvest, completed in the first quarter, represented a partial pack as GMOI was in process of moving the production of asparagus offshore from the Dayton, Washington manufacturing facility. Fiscal 2006 asparagus sales to GMOI totaled $19.3 million. As fiscal 2006 represents the final year of operation for the Dayton, Washington facility, the Company and GMOI have negotiated a definitive agreement related to the closure of this facility. Under the terms of the agreement, any costs incurred by the Company related to the asparagus production prior to March 31, 2006 will be paid by GMOI. The Company shall retain ownership of the real estate associated with the Dayton facility. In addition, the manufacturing equipment of the Dayton facility shall either be conveyed to GMOI, redeployed by the Company, or salvaged. Lastly, GMOI reduced the principal balance of the secured subordinated promissory note by $0.5 million to $42.6 million, which represents the net book value of the equipment to be conveyed to GMOI or salvaged. Divestitures The Company sold three former Chiquita Processed Foods plants and related assets to Lakeside Foods, Inc. on June 17, 2003. The Company sold one additional plant of Chiquita Processed Foods and related assets to Lakeside Foods, Inc. on August 6, 2003. The aforementioned divestitures to Lakeside Foods generated $46.0 million in cash proceeds, which was used to pay down debt. The Company sold additional plant locations and related assets that were previously closed by Chiquita Processed Foods and designated as assets held for sale during 2005 and 2004, generating $1.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in additional proceeds used for debt repayment. During 2006, the Company sold the previously closed corn processing facility in Washington for $0.5 million in cash and a $3.6 million note which carries an interest rate of 8% and is due in full on May 14, 2007. This note is secured by a mortgage on the property. The Company accounted for the sale under the installment method. During the first quarter of 2006, $0.4 million of the gain was included in Other Expense (Income), net and an additional $2.8 million of the gain on this sale was deferred in Other Long-Term Liabilities. During 2006, the Company sold a warehouse location in Oregon, which resulted in cash proceeds of $0.6 million and a pre-tax gain of $0.5 million. This gain was included in Other Expense (Income), net. Liquidity and Capital Resources The Company's primary cash requirements are to make payments on our debt, finance seasonal working capital needs and to make capital expenditures. Internally generated funds and amounts under our revolving credit facility are our primary sources of liquidity. Revolving Credit Facility On May 27, 2003, in connection with the Acquisition, the Company entered into a $200.0 million five-year floating rate secured revolving credit facility (the "Revolver") with several lenders, under which $118.2 million was initially borrowed. As of March 31, 2006, the outstanding balance on the Revolver was $57.0 million. In order to maintain availability of funds under the facility, we pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Revolver. The Revolver is used to fund our seasonal working capital needs, which are affected by the growing cycles of the vegetables we process. The vast majority of vegetable inventories are produced during the harvesting and packing months of June through November and depleted through the remaining six months. Accordingly, our need to draw on the Revolver may fluctuate significantly throughout the year. As a result of the additional liquidity generated by the aforementioned divestitures, the Company provided notice to its bank lenders in 2005 of its intention to reduce the Revolver from $200.0 million to $125.0 million. During 2006, the Company and its lenders extended the term of the Revolver for an additional year with a final maturity date of May 27, 2009 and the Company further reduced the Revolver from $125.0 million to $100.0 million. Subsequent to 2006 year-end, the Company and its lenders extended the term of the Revolver for an additional two years with a final maturity date of July 31, 2011. We believe that cash flows from operations and availability under our Revolver will provide adequate funds for our working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and debt service obligations for at least the next 12 months. Long-Term Debt The Company has two major long-term debt instruments: 1) a $67.8 million secured note payable to John Hancock Life Insurance Company, with an interest rate of 8.03%, which is due through 2014; and 2) a $42.6 million secured note payable to GMOI, with an interest rate of 8%, which is due through 2010. The Company did not issue any significant long-term debt in 2006. During 2005, the Company issued a mortgage to GE Capital for $8.0 million with an interest rate of 6.35% and a term of 15 years. The proceeds were used to finance new warehouse construction in Janesville and Cambria, Wisconsin. At March 31, 2006, scheduled maturities of long-term debt in each of the five succeeding fiscal years are as follows (in thousands): 2007 $ 9,116 2008 8,972 2009 9,169 2010 37,663 2011 5,346 Thereafter 77,663 Restrictive Covenants Our credit facilities contain covenants that restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on and redeem our capital stock, make other restricted payments, including investments, sell our assets, incur liens, transfer all or substantially all of our assets and enter into consolidations or mergers. Our credit facilities also require us to meet certain financial tests, including minimum fixed charge coverage, minimum interest coverage and maximum total debt ratios. These financial requirements and ratios generally become more restrictive over time, subject to allowances for seasonal fluctuations. We are in compliance with all such financial covenants, and were in compliance therewith as of March 31, 2006. The most restrictive financial covenant in the credit agreements is the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. Capital Expenditures Capital expenditures in 2006 totaled $11.9 million and include a $2.3 million waste treatment expansion in the Midwest, equipment replacement and other improvements, and economic return and cost saving projects. Capital expenditures in 2005 totaled $14.4 million and include $7.4 million of construction costs for three warehouse expansion projects in Geneva, New York; Janesville, Wisconsin; and Cambria, Wisconsin together with equipment replacement and cost saving projects. The total cost of the Geneva, Janesville, and Cambria warehouse projects during 2005 and 2004 was $14.8 million. Inventories In 2006, inventories increased by $12.8 million primarily reflecting the effect of higher quantities on hand associated with the large harvest in the summer of 2005, partially offset by unit cost reductions. In 2005, inventories increased by $24.2 million primarily reflecting the effect of unit cost increases for key commodity inputs including steel and energy. Critical Accounting Policies During the year ended 2006, the Company sold for cash, on a bill and hold basis, $197.6 million of Green Giant finished goods inventory to GMOI. At the time of the sale of the Green Giant vegetables to GMOI, title of the specified inventory transferred to GMOI. In addition, the aforementioned finished goods inventory was complete, ready for shipment and segregated from the Company's other finished goods inventory. Further, the Company had performed all of its obligations with respect to the sale of the specified Green Giant finished goods inventory. Trade promotions are an important component of the sales and marketing of the Company's branded products, and are critical to the support of the business. Trade promotion costs, which are recorded as a reduction of net sales, include amounts paid to encourage retailers to offer temporary price reductions for the sale of our products to consumers, amounts paid to obtain favorable display positions in retailers' stores, and amounts paid to retailers for shelf space in retail stores. Accruals for trade promotions are recorded primarily at the time of sale of product to the retailer based on expected levels of performance. Settlement of these liabilities typically occurs in subsequent periods primarily through an authorized process for deductions taken by a retailer from amounts otherwise due to us. As a result, the ultimate cost of a trade promotion program is dependent on the relative success of the events and the actions and level of deductions taken by retailers for amounts they consider due to them. Final determination of the permissible deductions may take extended periods of time. The Company assesses its long-lived assets for impairment whenever there is an indicator of impairment. Property, plant, and equipment are depreciated over their assigned lives. The assigned lives and the projected cash flows used to test impairment are subjective. If actual lives are shorter than anticipated or if future cash flows are less than anticipated, a future impairment charge or a loss on disposal of the assets could be incurred. Impairment losses are evaluated if the net present value of the cash flows are less than carrying value. A loss is recognized when the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value. Obligations and Commitments As of March 31, 2006, the Company is obligated to make cash payments in connection with our capital leases, debt, and operating leases. The effect of these obligations and commitments on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods are listed below. All of these arrangements require cash payments over varying periods of time. Certain of these arrangements are cancelable on short notice and others require termination or severance payments as part of any early termination. Contractual Obligations March 31, 2006 2012 2007 2008-9 2010-11 and beyond ----------------------------------------- Long-term debt $ 9,116 $ 18,141 $ 43,009 $ 77,663 Interest 14,440 26,684 20,547 28,101 Notes payable -- -- -- 57,029 Operating lease obligations 18,689 29,575 20,833 12,113 Purchase commitments 105,266 -- -- -- Capital lease obligations 672 995 851 1,927 ---------------------------------------- Total $148,183 $ 75,395 $ 85,240 $176,833 ======================================== In addition, the Company's defined benefit plan has an unfunded pension liability of $14.6 million which is subject to certain actuarial assumptions. Purchase commitments represent estimated payments to growers for crops during the 2006 season. We have no material off-balance sheet debt or other unrecorded obligations other than the items noted above. Standby Letters of Credit We have standby letters of credit for certain insurance-related requirements and capital leases. The majority of our standby letters of credit are automatically renewed annually, unless the issuer gives cancellation notice in advance. On March 31, 2006, we had $6.2 million in outstanding standby letters of credit. Cash Flows In 2006, our cash and cash equivalents increased by $0.9 million, which is due to the net impact of $31.8 million provided by operating activities, $10.7 million used in investing activities, and $20.2 million used by financing activities. Operating Activities Cash provided by operating activities increased to $31.8 million in 2006 from $18.0 million in 2005. The increase is primarily a function of higher operating earnings in 2006 and the lower inventory buildup in 2006 versus 2005. The cash requirements of the business fluctuate significantly throughout the year to coincide with the seasonal growing cycles of vegetables. The vast majority of the inventories are produced during the packing months, from June through November, and then depleted during the remaining six months. Cash flow from operating activities is one of our main sources of liquidity. Cash provided by operating activities increased to $18.0 million in 2005 from $1.6 million in 2004. The increase is primarily a function of the negative cash flow impact in 2004 associated with the inventory increase related to the CPF acquisition partially offset by lower operating earnings in 2005. Investing Activities Cash used in investing activities was $10.7 million in 2006, principally reflecting capital expenditures partially offset by $1.2 million in proceeds from the sale of certain fixed assets. Capital expenditures aggregated $11.9 million in 2006 versus $14.4 million in 2005. Capital expenditures in 2006 include a $2.3 million waste treatment expansion in the Midwest, equipment replacements and other improvements, and economic return and cost saving projects. Cash used in investing activities was $8.2 million in 2005, principally reflecting capital expenditures partially offset by $6.2 million in proceeds from the sale of assets including $4.6 million from the sale of Class B Common Stock of Moog Inc. Capital expenditures aggregated $14.4 million in 2005 versus $23.1 million in 2004. Capital expenditures were unusually high in 2004 reflecting a significant number of equipment upgrades and other improvements in connection with the CPF acquisition. Capital expenditures in 2005 and 2004 included $7.4 million and $7.2 million, respectively, for warehouse expansion projects. This included the completion of the Janesville and Cambria, Wisconsin projects started in 2004 and a Geneva, New York warehouse expansion. Cash used in investing activities was $85.9 million for 2004, primarily reflecting the cash requirements of the CPF acquisition partially offset by proceeds from the sale of assets primarily involving the divestiture of four plants to Lakeside Foods. Capital expenditures aggregated $23.1 million in 2004 versus $6.8 million in 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to equipment replacement and other improvements at the former CPF locations together with $7.2 million of construction in progress on two warehouse expansion projects in Janesville and Cambria, Wisconsin. Financing Activities Cash used in financing activities was $20.2 million in 2006 principally consisting of the repayment of $17.0 million in long-term debt and the repayment of $3.7 million in notes payable. Cash used in financing activities was $9.2 million in 2005 principally consisting of the repayment of $21.9 million in long-term debt partially offset by the $9.1 million in proceeds from long-term debt. Cash provided by financing activities was $23.9 million in 2004. During 2004, we borrowed cash to fund the CPF acquisition. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Fiscal 2006 versus Fiscal 2005 Classes of similar products/services: 2006 2005 2004 ---- ----- ---- (In thousands) Net Sales: GMOI $240,490 $225,527 $247,992 Canned vegetables 573,779 574,802 579,103 Frozen vegetables 29,464 28,304 29,410 Fruit and chip products 26,640 23,358 22,838 Other 13,450 12,283 11,507 - --------------------------------------------------------------- $883,823 $864,274 $890,850 =============================================================== Net sales for fiscal 2006 increased $19.5 million, or 2%, from $864.3 million to $883.8 million. The increase primarily reflects a $14.9 million increase in sales to GMOI associated with the favorable growing conditions in the summer of 2005 together with a $3.3 million increase in Fruit and Chip Product sales reflecting increased co-pack potato chip volume associated with improved market conditions. Cost of product sold as a percentage of sales decreased from 92.6% in 2005 to 90.1% in 2006 primarily reflecting favorable manufacturing variances associated with the excellent growing season which drove improved crop yields and plant recovery rates. Furthermore, the Company's overall cost structure benefited from the closure of three processing facilities in connection with the plant restructuring program implemented in 2005. Selling, general and administrative expense increased slightly from 3.7% of sales in 2005 to 3.8% in 2006 principally reflecting strategic initiatives undertaken in the information technology area. Plant restructuring costs decreased from $7.7 million in 2005 to $1.9 million in 2006 and are described in detail in the Restructuring section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Interest expense decreased from $16.6 million in 2005 to $15.8 million in 2006 primarily reflecting the scheduled repayment of long-term debt in 2006. Other expense of $1.1 million in 2006 primarily reflects the effect of a $1.9 million non-cash loss on the disposal of property, plant and equipment which was partially offset by a $1.0 million gain on the sale of certain fixed assets. Other income of $3.8 million in 2005 reflects the gain on the sale of Moog Inc. stock of $3.9 million and the gain on the sale of certain fixed assets of $0.6 million. This was partially offset by a non-cash charge of $0.7 million reflecting the write-down of deferred financing costs associated with the reduction of the Revolver from $200 million to $125 million. As a result of the above factors, pre-tax earnings increased from $12.0 million in 2005 to $35.5 million in 2006. The effective tax rate was 38.0% in 2006 and 34.3% in 2005. The increase in the 2006 effective tax rate reflects the reversal of certain tax reserves in 2005 which were no longer required. Fiscal 2005 versus Fiscal 2004 Net sales for fiscal 2005 decreased $26.6 million, or 3%, from $890.9 million to $864.3 million. The decrease primarily reflects a planned reduction of $22.5 million in GMOI production which was exacerbated by the poor sweet corn growing conditions in the summer of 2004. In addition, we experienced a planned reduction of $15.0 million in canned vegetable co-pack volume reflecting a strategic decision by the Company to exit certain unprofitable co-pack business. Although 2004 included only 10 months of CPF acquisition-related sales activity, the sales retention rate from the acquisition was higher in 2004, reflecting volume associated with plants that were ultimately divested to Lakeside Foods. Cost of product sold as a percentage of sales increased from 92.2% in 2004 to 92.6% in 2005. The increase in the percentage of the cost of product sold reflects higher production costs in fiscal 2005 associated with unfavorable manufacturing variances principally the result of commodity inflation in key inputs such as steel, natural gas, and fuel. In addition, we experienced a difficult growing season in fiscal 2005 due to lower average temperatures in August which impacted crop yields, plant recovery rates and further resulted in certain contracted raw produce being unable to be harvested. The cost of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which totaled $2.5 million in 2005, was also a significant factor in the cost increase. Furthermore, the cost of a product recall, initiated in the second quarter of 2005, amounted to $1.4 million. Finally, we were unable to fully pass along those higher costs to our customers, since many of our customer contracts are semi-annual and annual in nature. Selling, general and administrative expense remained at 3.7% of sales, as the negative impact of the sales reduction was offset by effective expense control. Plant restructuring costs were $7.7 million in 2005 primarily involving the closure of three processing facilities which are detailed in the Restructuring section above. As a result of the CPF acquisition, the Company was able to complete plant consolidations which will result in substantial savings by moving the volumes into other plants with minimal capital investment. Interest expense increased from $16.1 million in 2004 to $16.6 million in 2005 primarily reflecting a full year of acquisition-related debt in 2005. Other income of $3.8 million in 2005 reflects the gain on the sale of Moog Inc. stock of $3.9 million and the sale of certain fixed assets of $0.6 million. This was partially offset by a non-cash charge of $0.7 million reflecting the write-down of deferred financing costs associated with the reduction of the Revolver from $200 million to $125 million. Other income of $0.2 million in 2004 reflects the gain on the sale of certain fixed assets. As a result of the above factors, pre-tax earnings decreased from $20.5 million in 2004 to $12.0 million in 2005. The effective tax rate was 34.3% in 2005 and 37.0% in 2004. The reduction in the 2005 effective tax reflects the reversal of certain tax reserves which were no longer required. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections ("SFAS 154"). SFAS 154 replaces APB No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, and establishes retrospective application of a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application is impracticable. The reporting of a correction of an error by restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS 154 will have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 151, "Inventory Costs, and amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS 151"). This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, "Inventory Pricing," to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS 151 requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criteria "so abnormal." In addition, this statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to cost of conversion be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of SFAS 151 shall be applied prospectively and are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, with earlier application permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after the date this Statement is issued. The Company's adoption of SFAS 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Interest Rate Risk As a result of its regular borrowing activities, the Company's operating results are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates, which it manages primarily through its regular financing activities. The Company uses a revolving credit facility with variable interest rates to finance seasonal working capital requirements. The Company maintains $6.0 million in cash equivalents as of March 31, 2006. Long-term debt is used to finance long-term investments, such as business acquisitions, and principally consists of secured notes payable and capital lease obligations. Long-term debt bears interest at fixed and variable rates. With $88.8 million in average variable-rate debt, a 1% change in interest rates would have an $888 thousand effect on interest expense. The following table provides information about the Company's financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity date. Weighted average interest rates on long-term variable-rate debt are based on rates as of March 31, 2006. Weighted average interest rates on short-term variable-rate debt are based on average rates throughout fiscal 2006. Commodity Risk The materials that the Company uses, such as vegetables, steel, and packaging materials are commodities that may experience price volatility caused by external factors including market fluctuations, availability, currency fluctuations, and changes in governmental regulations and agricultural programs. These events can result in reduced supplies of these materials, higher supply costs, or interruptions in our production schedules. If prices of these raw materials increase and the Company is not able to effectively pass such price increases along to its customers, operating income will decrease. In light of the recent volatility in steel pricing, a 5% change in steel unit costs would equate to a $3.2 million cost impact. The Company does not currently use derivative instruments to potentially alter its interest rate or commodity risks. Interest Rate Sensitivity of Long-Term Debt, Short-Term Debt, and Short-Term Investments March 31, 2006 (In thousands) EXPECTED MATURITY DATE
Total/ Estimated Weighted Fair 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Thereafter Average Value ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---------- -------- --------- Fixed-rate L/T debt: Principal cash flows $ 9,638 $ 9,416 $ 9,420 $ 37,933 $ 5,626 $ 56,810 $ 128,843 $ 125,010 Average interest rate 6.69% 6.98% 7.14% 7.89% 7.89% 7.70% 7.55% -- Variable-rate L/T debt: Principal cash flows $ 150 $ 150 $ 150 $ 150 $ 150 $ 22,780 $ 23,530 $ 23,530 Average interest rate 3.35% 3.35% 3.35% 3.35% 3.35% 3.35% 3.31% -- Average variable-rate S/T debt: Principal cash flows $ 65,227 $ 65,227 Average interest rate 5.38% -- Short-term investments: Average balance $ 34 $ 34 Average interest rate 3.93% --
Consolidated Statements of Net Earnings Seneca Foods Corporation and Subsidiaries (In thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
Years ended March 31, 2006 2005 2004 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net sales $ 883,823 $ 864,274 $ 890,850 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Costs and expenses: Cost of product sold 796,224 800,002 821,604 Selling, general, and administrative expense 33,322 31,726 32,770 Plant restructuring 1,920 7,678 -- ------------------------------------------------------ Total costs and expenses 831,466 839,406 854,374 ------------------------------------------------------ Operating income 52,357 24,868 36,476 Other expense (income), net 1,115 (3,757) (207) Interest expense, net of interest income of $286, $102, and $395, respectively 15,784 16,592 16,135 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Earnings before income taxes 35,458 12,033 20,548 Income taxes 13,465 4,126 7,607 ------------------------------------------------------ Net earnings $ 21,993 $ 7,907 $ 12,941 =================================================================================================================================== Basic earnings per common share $ 1.97 $ .71 $ 1.18 =================================================================================================================================== Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.96 $ .70 $ 1.17 =================================================================================================================================== See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Balance Sheets Seneca Foods Corporation and Subsidiaries (In thousands)
March 31, 2006 2005 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assets Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 6,046 $ 5,179 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $445 and $625, respectively 46,618 43,664 Inventories: Finished products 220,185 209,874 In process 22,012 17,168 Raw materials and supplies 65,095 67,428 Deferred income taxes 6,426 5,669 Assets held for sale 1,369 1,451 Refundable income taxes -- 1,199 Prepaid expenses 2,141 7,192 --------------------------------------------- Total Current Assets 369,892 358,824 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other assets 5,273 2,381 Property, Plant, and Equipment: Land 9,945 9,981 Building 119,937 122,644 Equipment 275,667 296,512 --------------------------------------------- 405,549 429,137 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 257,048 265,847 --------------------------------------------- Net Property, Plant, and Equipment 148,501 163,290 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Assets $523,666 $524,495 =================================================================================================================================== Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Current Liabilities: Notes payable $ 57,029 $ 60,733 Accounts payable 35,163 38,719 Accrued expenses 32,312 38,271 Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations 9,788 15,671 Income taxes 6,090 -- ---------------------------------------------- Total Current Liabilities 140,382 153,394 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Long-term debt, less current portion 138,813 148,318 Capital lease obligations, less current portion 3,773 5,807 Other liabilities 15,381 10,042 Deferred income taxes 7,538 11,125 --------------------------------------------- Total Liabilities 305,887 328,686 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) Stockholders' Equity: Preferred stock 54,486 56,335 Common stock 2,890 2,859 --------------------------------------------- Total Capital Stock 57,376 59,194 Additional paid-in capital 17,810 15,992 Retained earnings 142,593 120,623 --------------------------------------------- Total Stockholders' Equity 217,779 195,809 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $523,666 $524,495 ====================================================================================================================================
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Seneca Foods Corporation and Subsidiaries (In thousands)
Years ended March 31, 2006 2005 2004 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net earnings $21,993 $ 7,907 $ 12,941 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operations: Depreciation and amortization 23,793 29,178 29,393 Deferred income tax provision (benefit) (4,344) (1,552) 1,107 Gain on the sale of assets (966) (4,469) (207) Impairment provision and other expenses 2,081 5,673 -- Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (2,591) 2,516 9,991 Inventories (12,822) (24,187) (41,122) Prepaid expenses 5,051 4,906 (10,782) Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities (7,640) (1,218) (1,686) Income taxes 7,289 (748) 1,987 --------------------------------------------------- Net cash provided by operations 31,844 18,006 1,622 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Additions to property, plant, and equipment (11,906) (14,415) (23,109) Proceeds from the sale of assets 1,215 6,233 48,808 Business acquisition -- -- (114,172) Cash received from business acquisition -- -- 2,560 -------------------------------------------------------- Net cash used in investing activities (10,691) (8,182) (85,913) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Borrowings on notes payable 311,481 285,425 396,568 Payments on notes payable (315,185) (283,087) (363,548) Payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations (17,039) (21,856) (51,903) Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 397 9,146 42,562 Other assets 83 1,180 221 Preferred dividends paid (23) (23) (23) --------------------------------------------------------- Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (20,286) (9,215) 23,877 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 867 609 (60,414) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 5,179 4,570 64,984 -------------------------------------------------------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $6,046 $ 5,179 $ 4,570 =================================================================================================================================== Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for: Interest $15,260 $ 16,973 $ 15,023 Income taxes 10,520 6,425 5,768 Supplemental information of non-cash investing and financing activities: $16.1 million of Preferred Stock was issued in partial consideration for the CPF acquisition in 2004. The Company assumed $9.1 million of long-term debt related to the CPF acquisition. The Company acquired a $3.6 million note receivable from the sale of the Washington corn processing facility. ==================================================================================================================================== See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity Seneca Foods Corporation and Subsidiaries (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
Preferred Stock ----------------------------------------------------------- 6% 10% Cumulative Par Cumulative ------------------------- Par Participating Participating Class A Class B Additional Value $.25 Value $0.25 Convertible Convertible Common Stock Common Stock Paid-In Callable at Par Convertible Par Par Par Value Par Value Capital Voting Voting Value $.025 Value $.025 $.25 $.25 - ------------------ -------------------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- ---------- Shares Authorized 200,000 1,400,000 967,742 4,166,667 20,000,000 10,000,000 ================== ========================== ============== ============== =============== ============== ============== Shares issued and Outstanding: - ------------------ -------------------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- March 31, 2004 200,000 807,240 967,742 3,443,596 3,950,380 2,764,005 - ------------------ -------------------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- March 31, 2005 200,000 807,240 967,742 3,443,359 3,951,717 2,762,905 - ------------------ -------------------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- March 31, 2006 200,000 807,240 853,500 3,436,809 4,074,509 2,760,905 ================== ========================== ============== ============== =============== ============== ============== - ------------------------------------ -------- -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- ---------- Balance March 31, 2003 $50 $20 $-- $41,586 $978 $1,871 $14,616 Net earnings -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Cash dividends paid on preferred stock -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Preferred stock conversion -- -- -- (500) 10 -- 490 Preferred stock issued -- -- 15,000 -- -- -- 1,065 Minimum pension liability (net of tax $477) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Preferred stock adjustment -- 182 -- -- -- -- (182) Net unrealized gain on investments (net of tax $658) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------ -------- -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- ---------- Balance March 31, 2004 50 202 15,000 41,086 988 1,871 15,989 Net earnings -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Cash dividends paid on preferred stock -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Preferred stock conversion -- -- -- (3) -- -- 3 Net unrealized gain on investments (net of tax $16) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net reclassification of accumulated Other comprehensive income (net of tax $1,160) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - ------------------------------------ -------- -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- ---------- Balance March 31, 2005 50 202 15,000 41,083 988 1,871 15,992 Net earnings -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Cash dividends paid on preferred stock -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Preferred stock conversion -- -- (1,771) (78) 31 -- 1,818 - ------------------------------------ -------- -------------- -------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- ---------- Balance March 31, 2006 $50 $202 $13,229 $41,005 $1,019 $1,871 $17,810 ==================================== ======== ============== ============== =============== ============== ============== ========== Accumulated Other Comprehensive Retained Comprehensive Income Earnings Income - ------------------ ------------- --------- ------------- Shares Authorized ================== Shares issued and Outstanding: - ------------------ March 31, 2004 - ------------------ March 31, 2005 - ------------------ March 31, 2006 ================== - ------------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- Balance March 31, $422 99,821 Net earnings -- 12,941 $12,941 Cash dividends paid on preferred stock -- (23) -- Preferred stock conversion -- -- -- Preferred stock issued -- -- -- Minimum pension liability (net of tax $477) 778 -- 778 Preferred stock adjustment -- -- -- Net unrealized gain on investments (net of tax 1,124 -- 1,124 - --------------------- ------------ ------------ ----------- Balance March 31, 2004 2,324 112,739 $14,843 ======= Net earnings -- 7,907 $7,907 Cash dividends paid on preferred stock -- (23) -- Preferred stock conversion -- -- -- Net unrealized gain on investments (net of tax $16) 32 -- 32 Net reclassification of accumulated Other comprehensive income (net of tax $1,160) (2,356) -- (2,356) - ------------------------- -------- ------------ ----------- Balance March 31, 2005 -- 120,623 $5,583 ====== Net earnings -- 21,993 $21,993 Cash dividends paid on preferred stock -- (23) -- Preferred stock conversion -- -- -- - ----------------------------- -------- --------- --------- Balance March 31, 2006 $-- $142,593 $21,993 ========================= ======== ============ =========== See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Seneca Foods Corporation and Subsidiaries 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Nature of Operations - Seneca Foods Corporation and subsidiaries ("The Company") conducts its business almost entirely in food processing, operating 27 plants and warehouses in seven states. The Company markets branded and private label processed foods to retailers and institutional food distributors. Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts for the parent Company and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany transactions, profits, and balances. Revenue Recognition - Sales and related cost of product sold are recognized when legal title passes to the purchaser, which is primarily upon shipment of products. When customers, under the terms of specific orders, request that the Company invoice goods and hold the goods for future shipment, the Company recognizes revenue when legal title to the finished goods inventory passes to the purchaser. Generally, the Company receives cash from the purchaser when legal title passes. During the year ended 2006, the Company sold for cash, on a bill and hold basis, $197.6 million of Green Giant finished goods inventory to GMOI. At the time of the sale of the Green Giant vegetables to GMOI, title of the specified inventory transferred to GMOI. In addition, the aforementioned finished goods inventory was complete, ready for shipment and segregated from the Company's other finished goods inventory. Further, the Company had performed all of its obligations with respect to the sale of the specified Green Giant finished goods inventory. Trade promotions are an important component of the sales and marketing of the Company's branded products, and are critical to the support of the business. Trade promotion costs, which are recorded as a reduction of net sales, include amounts paid to encourage retailers to offer temporary price reductions for the sale of our products to consumers, amounts paid to obtain favorable display positions in retailers' stores, and amounts paid to retailers for shelf space in retail stores. Accruals for trade promotions are recorded primarily at the time of sale of product to the retailer based on expected levels of performance. Settlement of these liabilities typically occurs in subsequent periods primarily through an authorized process for deductions taken by a retailer from amounts otherwise due to us. As a result, the ultimate cost of a trade promotion program is dependent on the relative success of the events and the actions and level of deductions taken by retailers for amounts they consider due to them. Final determination of the permissible deductions may take extended periods of time. Concentration of Credit Risk - Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist of trade receivables and interest-bearing investments. Wholesale and retail food distributors comprise a significant portion of the trade receivables; collateral is generally not required. A relatively limited number of customers account for a large percentage of our total sales. GMOI sales represented 27%, 26% and 28% of net sales in fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The top ten customers represented approximately 55%, 52% and 49%, of net sales for fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company closely monitors the credit risk associated with its customers. The Company places substantially all of its interest-bearing investments with financial institutions and monitors credit exposure. Cash and short-term investments in certain accounts exceed the federal insured limit, however, the Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. Cash and Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less as short-term investments. Inventories - Inventories are stated at lower of cost; determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method; or market. Income Taxes - The provision for income taxes includes federal and state income taxes currently payable and those deferred because of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and tax credit carryforwards. Shipping and Handling Costs - The Company includes all shipping and handling costs billed to customers in net sales and the corresponding costs in cost of product sold. Doubtful Accounts - A provision for doubtful accounts is recorded based upon an assessment of credit risk within the accounts receivable portfolio, experience of delinquencies (accounts over 15 days past due) and charge-offs (accounts removed from accounts receivable for expectation of non-payment), and current market conditions. Management believes these provisions are adequate based upon the relevant information presently available. However, it is possible that the Company's provisions may change in the future. Earnings per Common Share - The Company has two classes of convertible preferred stock, which are deemed to be participating securities that are entitled to participate in any dividend on Class A common stock as if the preferred stock had been converted into common stock immediately prior to the record date for such dividend. Basic earnings per share for common stock must be calculated using the "two-class" method by dividing the earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing earnings allocated to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted average common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock using the "if-converted" method, which treats the contingently-issuable shares of convertible preferred stock as common stock. Years ended March 31, 2006 2005 2004 - ---------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands, except per share amounts) Basic Net earnings $21,993 $7,907 $12,941 Deduct preferred stock dividends paid 23 23 23 ----------------------------- Undistributed earnings 21,970 7,884 12,918 Earnings allocated to participating preferred 8,522 3,126 5,035 ---------------------------- Earnings allocated to common shareholders $13,448 $4,758 $ 7,883 ================================================================ Weighted average common shares outstanding 6,811 6,714 6,691 ================================================================ Basic earnings per common share $1.97 $ .71 $ 1.18 ================================================================ Diluted Earnings allocated to common shareholders $13,448 $4,758 $ 7,883 Add dividends on convertible preferred stock 20 20 20 ---------------------------- Earnings applicable to common stock on a diluted basis $13,468 $4,778 $ 7,903 ================================================================ Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic 6,811 6,714 6,691 Additional shares to be issued under full conversion of preferred stock 67 67 67 --------------------------- Total shares for diluted 6,878 6,781 6,758 ================================================================ Diluted earnings per share $ 1.96 $ .70 $ 1.17 ================================================================ Depreciation and Valuation - Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost or, in the case of capital leases, the present value of future lease payments. For financial reporting, the Company provides for depreciation and capital lease amortization on the straight-line method at rates based upon the estimated useful lives of the various assets on term of lease, if shorter. Depreciation and capital lease amortization was $23,011,000, $28,503,000, and $28,676,000 in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The estimated useful lives are as follows: buildings - 30 years; machinery and equipment - 10-15 years; vehicles - 3-7 years; and land improvements - 10-20 years. Impairment losses are evaluated if the net present value of the cash flows are less than carrying value. A loss is recognized when the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value. The Company assesses its long-lived assets for impairment whenever there is an indicator of impairment. There were $79,000 of impairment loses in 2006 that were included in Plant Restructuring. There were $4,960,000 of impairment losses in 2005 that were included in Plant Restructuring (see Plant Restructuring, note 15). There were no impairment losses in 2004. Assets held for sale are carried at the lower of estimated fair value less selling costs or depreciated value at date of determination to sell. Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the related revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from those estimated. Recently Issued Accounting Standards - In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections ("SFAS 154"). SFAS 154 replaces APB No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, and establishes retrospective application of a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application is impracticable. The reporting of a correction of an error by restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS 154 will have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 151, "Inventory Costs, and amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS 151"). This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, "Inventory Pricing," to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS 151 requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criteria "so abnormal." In addition, this statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to cost of conversion be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of SFAS 151 shall be applied prospectively and are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005, with earlier application permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after the date this Statement was issued. The Company's adoption of SFAS 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. 2. Acquisition On May 27, 2003, the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of the membership interest in Chiquita Processed Foods, L.L.C. ("CPF") from Chiquita Brands International, Inc. The primary reason for the acquisition was to acquire additional production capacity in the Canned Vegetable business. The purchase price totaled $126.1 million plus the assumption of certain liabilities. This acquisition was financed with cash, proceeds from a new $200.0 million revolving credit facility, and $16.1 million of the Company's Participating Convertible Preferred Stock. The Preferred Stock is convertible into the Company's Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. The Preferred Stock was valued at $16.60 per share based on the market value of the Class A Common Stock at the time the acquisition was announced. As part of this acquisition, the Company assumed and immediately paid off most of CPF's debt and capital lease obligations with proceeds from the new $200.0 million revolving credit facility. The Company sold three former CPF plants and related assets to Lakeside Foods, Inc. on June 17, 2003. The Company sold one additional former CPF plant and related assets to Lakeside Foods, Inc. on August 6, 2003. The aforementioned sales to Lakeside Foods, Inc. generated $46 million in cash proceeds, which was used to pay down debt. The Company sold additional plant locations that were designated as assets held for sale during 2005 and 2004. 3. Line of Credit The Company obtains required short-term funds through bank borrowings. On May 27, 2003, in connection with the acquisition of CPF, the Company entered into a $200 million five-year floating rate secured revolving credit facility (the "Revolver") with various banks. During 2005, the Company provided its bank lenders with notice to reduce the Revolver from $200 million to $125 million. During 2006, the Company and its lenders extended the term of the Revolver for an additional year with a final maturity date of May 27, 2009 and the Company provided its lenders with notice to further reduce the Revolver from $125 million to $100 million. Subsequent to the 2006 year-end, the Company and its lenders extended the term of the Revolver for an additional two years with a final maturity date of July 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2006, the outstanding balance of the Revolver was $57,029,000, with a weighted average interest rate of 6.32%, and is included in notes payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Revolver is secured by accounts receivable and inventory with a carrying value of $353,910,000. There were $60,733,000 in bank borrowings under the Revolver at March 31, 2005. The Company had $5,937,000 of outstanding standby letters of credit as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 that reduce borrowing availability under the Revolver. See Note 4, Long-Term Debt, for additional comments related to the Revolver. 4. Long-Term Debt 2006 2005 ------------------ (In thousands) Secured note payable to insurance company, 8.03%, due through 2014 $ 67,816 $ 70,862 Secured subordinated promissory note, 8.00%, due through 2010 42,618 46,583 Secured Industrial Revenue Development Bonds, 4.89% and 3.53%, due through 2029 22,630 22,630 Secured promissory note, 6.35%, due through 2020 7,438 7,782 Secured Industrial Revenue Development Bond, 5.69%, due through 2010 2,550 3,173 Secured notes payable to utility company, 3.00%, due through 2011 1,414 2,295 Other 3,463 9,889 ------------------- 147,929 163,214 Less current portion 9,116 14,896 ------------------- $ 138,813 $ 148,318 =================== Our credit facilities, including the Revolver, contain covenants that restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends on and redeem our capital stock; make other restricted payments, including investments; sell our assets; incur liens; transfer all or substantially all of our assets; and enter into consolidations or mergers. Our credit facilities also require us to meet certain financial tests, including minimum fixed charge coverage, minimum interest coverage, and maximum total debt ratios. These financial requirements and ratios generally become more restrictive over time, subject to allowances for seasonal fluctuations. We are in compliance with all such financial covenants, and were in compliance therewith as of March 31, 2006. The most restrictive financial covenant in the credit agreements is the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. As of March 31, 2006, the most restrictive credit agreement limitation on the Company's payment of dividends and other distributions, such as purchases of shares, to holders of Class A or Class B Common Stock is an annual total limitation of $500,000 reduced by aggregate annual dividend payments totaling $23,000, which the Company presently pays on two outstanding classes of preferred stock. The Company has five Industrial Revenue Bonds ("IRB's") totaling $23,530,000, which are secured by direct pay letters of credit. The interest rates in the table above reflect the direct pay letters of credit costs and amortization of other related costs for those IRB's. Other than the five IRB's above, the carrying value of assets pledged for secured debt, including the $100 million Revolver is $433,795,000. During the quarter ended September 27, 2003, the Company refinanced $42.5 million of debt outstanding under the revolving credit facility with new term debt from an insurance company. The new term debt from the insurance company of $42.5 million, when combined with the refinancing of existing insurance company debt of $32.5 million, has an interest rate of 8.03%, a fifteen-year amortization and a ten-year term. Debt repayment requirements for the next five fiscal years are: (In thousands) 2007 $ 9,116 2008 8,972 2009 9,169 2010 37,663 2011 5,346 Thereafter 77,663 -------- $147,929 ======== 5. Leases The Company leases a portion of its equipment and buildings. Capitalized leases consist primarily of limited obligation special revenue bonds, which bear interest rates from 1.42% to 4.75%. Other leases include non-cancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through 2016. Generally, operating leases provide for early purchase options one year prior to expiration. Leased assets under capital leases consist of the following: 2006 2005 - --------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) Land $ 67 $ 67 Buildings 1,033 1,033 Equipment 11,262 11,476 -------------------- 12,362 12,576 Less accumulated amortization 11,026 10,651 -------------------- $ 1,336 $ 1,925 =============================================================== The following is a schedule, by year, of minimum rental payments due under leases as of March 31, 2006: Operating Capital (In thousands) Years ending March 31: 2007 $ 18,689 $ 841 2008 16,062 744 2009 13,513 534 2010 11,797 536 2011 9,036 529 2012-2016 12,113 2,132 ------------------- Total minimum payment required $81,210 $5,316 ================================================== Less interest 871 ----- Present value of minimum lease payments 4,445 Amount due within one year 672 ----- Long-term capital lease obligations $ 3,773 ================================================================ Rental expense in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $23,999,000, $23,059,000, and $20,538,000, respectively. 6. Income Taxes The Company files a consolidated income tax return. The provision for income taxes is as follows: 2006 2005 2004 - --------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) Current: Federal $14,852 $ 4,489 $ 4,938 State 2,957 1,189 1,562 --------------------------------- 17,809 5,678 6,500 --------------------------------- Deferred: Federal (3,898) (1,448) 1,009 State (446) (104) 98 -------------------------------- (4,344) (1,552) 1,107 -------------------------------- Total income taxes $13,465 $ 4,126 $ 7,607 =============================================================== A reconciliation of the expected U.S. statutory rate to the effective rate follows: 2006 2005 2004 - ------------------------------------------------------------- Computed (expected tax rate) 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% State income taxes (net of federal tax benefit) 4.5 5.9 5.2 Manufacturer's deduction (1.6) -- -- Reversal of tax reserves (1.0) (4.2) -- Other permanent differences not deductible 0.4 1.7 1.1 Tax-exempt income (0.3) -- (0.7) Other 1.0 (4.1) (3.6) ---------------------- Effective income tax rate 38.0% 34.3% 37.0% ============================================================ The following is a summary of the significant components of the Company's deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2006 and 2005: 2006 2005 - --------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) Deferred income tax liabilities: Property basis and depreciation difference $11,504 $14,178 Other 264 142 --------------------- 11,768 14,320 Deferred income tax assets: Inventory valuation 1,238 704 Employee benefits 2,810 2,667 Pension 4,073 3,028 Insurance 2,138 1,963 Deferred gain on sale/leaseback 331 405 Severance 66 97 --------------------- 10,656 8,864 --------------------- Net deferred income tax liability $ 1,112 $ 5,456 =============================================================== Net current deferred income tax assets of $6,426,000 and $5,669,000 as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, are recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Also recognized are net non-current deferred income tax liabilities of $7,538,000 and $11,125,000 as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. 7. Stockholders' Equity Preferred Stock - The Company has issued two classes of voting participating convertible preferred stock, par values of $.025, which are convertible at the holders' option on a one-for-one basis into shares of Class A Common Stock, subject to antidilution adjustments. Both classes have the right to receive dividends and distributions at a rate equal to the amount of any dividends and distributions declared or made on the Class A Common Stock. No dividends were declared or paid on this preferred stock in fiscal 2006, 2005 or 2004. In addition, this preferred stock has certain distribution rights upon liquidation. One class of participating preferred stock has a liquidation value of $12 per share and has 3,436,809 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2006 after conversion of 6,550 shares into Class A Common Stock during fiscal 2006. The second class of participating preferred stock was issued as partial consideration of the purchase price in the CPF acquisition. The 967,742 shares issued in that acquisition were valued at $16.60 per share which represented the then market value of the Class A Common Stock into which the preferred shares were immediately convertible. This class of shares has a liquidation value of $15.50 per share and has 853,500 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2006 after conversion of 114,242 shares into Class A Common Stock during fiscal 2006. The Company also has an aggregate of 2,633,333 shares of non-participating preferred stock authorized for issuance. There are three classes of preferred stock designated as of March 31, 2006, including 1,000,000 shares of Class A 10% cumulative, convertible, voting preferred stock ("Class A preferred"), 400,000 shares of Class B 10% cumulative, convertible, voting preferred stock ("Class B Preferred") and 200,000 shares of 6% cumulative, voting preferred stock ("6% preferred"). Each share of designated preferred stock has as many votes as the number of common shares into which it is convertible and a stated value of $0.25 per share. There are 407,240 shares of Class A preferred issued and outstanding with a par value of $.025 which are convertible into one share of Class A Common Stock and one share of Class B Common stock for every 20 shares of Class A preferred. There are 400,000 shares of Class B preferred issued and outstanding with a par value of $.025 which are convertible into one share of Class A Common Stock and one share of Class B Common stock for every 30 shares of Class B preferred. There are 200,000 shares of 6% preferred issued and outstanding with a par value of $.25, which are callable at their par value at any time at the option of the Company. The Company paid dividends of $20,181 on the Class A and Class B preferred and $3,000 on the 6% preferred during each of fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004. Common Stock - The Class A Common Stock and the Class B Common Stock have substantially identical rights with respect to any dividends or distributions of cash or property declared on shares of common stock, and rank equally as to the right to receive proceeds on liquidation or dissolution of the Company after payment of the Company's indebtedness and liquidation right to the holders of preferred shares. However, holders of Class B Common Stock retain a full vote per share, whereas the holders of Class A Common Stock have voting rights of 1/20th of one vote per share on all matters as to which shareholders of the Company are entitled to vote. Unissued shares of common stock reserved for conversion privileges of designated non-participating preferred stock were 33,695 of both Class A and Class B as of March 31, 2006 and 2005. Additionally, there were 4,290,309 and 4,411,101 shares of Class A reserved for conversion of the Participating Preferred Stock as of March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. 8. Retirement Plans The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering all employees who meet certain age-entry requirements and work a stated minimum number of hours per year. Annual contributions are made to the Plan sufficient to satisfy legal funding requirements. The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the Plan's benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets over the two-year period ended March 31, 2006 and a statement of the funded status as of March 31, 2006 and 2005: 2006 2005 - -------------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) Change in Benefit Obligation Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 74,683 $ 66,991 Service cost 3,998 3,050 Interest cost 4,124 3,987 Actuarial gain 1,414 3,877 Benefit payments and expenses (2,959) (3,222) - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Benefit obligation at end of year $ 81,260 $ 74,683 ===================================================================== Change in Plan Assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $ 62,972 $ 59,687 Actual return on plan assets 6,658 3,686 Employer contributions -- 2,821 Benefit payments and expenses (2,959) (3,222) - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Fair value of plan assets at end of year $ 66,671 $ 62,972 ===================================================================== 2006 2005 ---- ---- (In thousands) Funded Status Funded status at end of year $(14,589) $(11,711) Unrecognized transition asset (1,609) (1,885) Unrecognized loss 6,419 6,336 - -------------------------------------------------------------- Accrued benefit cost $ (9,779) $ (7,260) ============================================================== The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Plan for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004: 2006 2005 2004 - -------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) Service cost $ 3,998 $3,050 $ 2,545 Interest cost 4,124 3,987 3,519 Expected return on plan assets (5,377) (5,183) (3,850) Amortization of transition asset (276) (276) (276) Amortization of net gain 50 -- 649 - --------------------------------------------------------------- Net periodic benefit cost $ 2,519 $1,578 $ 2,587 ============================================================== The Plan's accumulated benefit obligation was $72,552,000 at March 31, 2006, and $66,941,000 at March 31, 2005. The prior service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of active participants. Gains and losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the benefit obligation and the market-related value of assets are amortized over the average remaining service period of active participants. The assumptions used to measure the Company's benefit obligation are shown in the following table: 2006 2005 ---- ---- Discount rate 5.50% 5.75% Expected return on plan assets 8.75% 8.75% Rate of compensation increase 3.50% 3.50% Target Percentage of Plan Allocation Assets at March 31, 2007 2006 2005 - -------------------------------------------------------------- Plan Assets: Equity Securities 99% 98% 99% Debt Securities -- -- -- Real Estate -- -- -- Cash 1 2 1 ----------------------------- Total 100% 100% 100% ============================================================== Expected Return on Plan Assets The expected rate of return on Plan assets is 8.75%. The Company expects 8.75% to fall within the 40-to-50 percentile range of returns on investment portfolios with asset diversification similar to that of the pension plan's target asset allocation. Investment Policy and Strategy The Company maintains an investment policy designed to achieve a long-term rate of return, including investment income through dividends and equity appreciation, sufficient to meet the actuarial requirements of the pension plans. The Company seeks to accomplish its return objectives by prudently investing in a diversified portfolio of public company equities with broad industry representation seeking to provide long-term growth consistent with the performance of relevant market indices, as well as maintain an adequate level of liquidity for pension distributions as they fall due. The strategy of being fully invested in equities has historically provided greater rates of return over extended periods of time. The Plan holds the Company's common stock with a fair market value of $5,310,000 as of March 31, 2006. Cash Flows The Company does not expect to have to fund the Plan in 2007. Estimated future benefit payments reflecting expected future service for the fiscal years ending March 31: 2007 $ 3,077 2008 3,256 2009 3,489 2010 3,621 2011 3,855 2012-2016 22,290 The Company has Employees' Savings Plans 401(k) covering all employees who meet certain age-entry requirements and work a stated minimum number of hours per year. Participants may make contributions up to the legal limit. The Company's matching contributions are discretionary. Costs charged to operations for the Company's matching contributions amounted to $1,240,000, $1,519,000, and $1,708,000, in fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. 9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company's debt are summarized as follows: 2006 2005 --------------------------------------- Carrying Estimated Carrying Estimated Amount Fair Value Amount Fair Value - ---------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) Long-term debt, including current portion $147,929 $144,836 $163,214 $159,211 Notes payable 57,029 57,029 60,733 60,733 Capital leases, including current portion 4,445 3,704 6,582 5,796 The estimated fair values were determined as follows: Long-term debt and capital lease obligations - The quoted market prices for similar debt or current rates offered to the company for debt with the same maturities. Notes payable - The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of the notes. All other financial instruments of the Company have estimated fair value equal to carrying cost due to the short-term nature of these instruments. 10. Common Stock of Moog Inc. During 2005, the Company sold its investment in the common stock of Moog Inc. The sale provided proceeds of $4,578,000 and a realized gain of $3,862,000. The Company's investment in the Class B Common Stock of Moog Inc., totaling $4,465,000 as of March 31, 2004, was included in marketable securities. The gross unrealized holding gains were $3,749,000 and $1,967,000 in 2004 and 2003 respectively. 11. Other Income and Expense Other income in 2006 consisted of a gain of $427,000 from the sale of a processing facility in Washington and $539,000 from the sale of a warehouse located in Oregon. Other expenses in 2006 include a non-cash loss on the disposal of property, plant and equipment of $1,938,000 and a $143,000 non-cash charge reflecting the write down of the corresponding pro-rata amount of deferred financing cost due to reducing the Revolver from $125 million to $100 million. Other income in 2005 consisted of a gain on the sale of Moog stock of $3,862,000 and a gain of the sale of certain fixed assets of $607,000. Other expenses included a $712,000 non-cash charge reflecting the write down of the corresponding pro-rata amount of deferred financing cost due to reducing the Revolver from $200 million to $125 million. 12. Segment Information The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable segment - the processing and sale of vegetables. The Company markets its product almost entirely in the United States. The Company has an Alliance Agreement with General Mills Operations, Inc. (GMOI) whereby the Company processes canned and frozen vegetables for GMOI under the Green Giant brand name. GMOI continues to be responsible for all of the sales, marketing, and customer service functions for the Green Giant products. In 2006, 2005, and 2004, the sale of Green Giant vegetables accounted for 27%, 26%, and 28% of net sales. The following information is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information": Classes of similar products/services: 2006 2005 2004 - --------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) Net Sales: GMOI $240,490 $225,527 $247,992 Canned vegetables 573,779 574,802 579,103 Frozen vegetables 29,464 28,304 29,410 Fruit and chip products 26,640 23,358 22,838 Other 13,450 12,283 11,507 - --------------------------------------------------------------- $883,823 $864,274 $890,850 =============================================================== The vegetable component, consisting of GMOI, canned vegetables and frozen vegetables, represents 99%, 99% and 98% of assets and 92%, 101% and 98% of pre-tax earnings in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. 13. Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is made a party to certain legal proceedings seeking monetary damages, including proceedings involving product liability claims, worker's compensation and other employee claims, tort and other general liability claims, for which it carries insurance, as well as patent infringement and related litigation. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company does not believe that an adverse decision in any of these legal proceedings would have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The Company is one of a number of business and local government entities which contributed waste materials to a landfill in Yates County in upstate New York, which was operated by a party unrelated to the Company primarily in the 1970's through the early 1980's. The Company's wastes were primarily food and juice products. The landfill contained some hazardous materials and was remediated by the State of New York. The New York Attorney General has advised the Company and other known non-governmental waste contributors that New York has sustained a total remediation cost of $4.9 million and seeks recovery of half that cost from the non-governmental waste contributors. The Company is one of four identified contributors who cooperatively are investigating the history of the landfill so as to identify and seek out other potentially responsible parties who are not defunct and are financially able to contribute to the non-governmental parties' reimbursement liability. Since this search is not expected to be completed until November 1, 2006, the Company's liability cannot be definitively estimated. The Company does not believe that any ultimate settlement in excess of the amount accrued will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. In early 1999, the Company sold to Tree Top, Inc. its applesauce business, including a plant in Prosser, Benton County, Washington. In the sale agreement governing the transaction, the Company represented to Tree Top that it was in compliance with all environmental laws. In 2003, the Benton County Clean Air Authority ("BCAA") brought an enforcement action against Tree Top under Title V of the Clean Air Act and related State of Washington statutes, alleging that Tree Top was violating the Clean Air Act by failing to register the facility with BCAA pursuant to Title V. The BCAA also alleged that the facility failed to provide BCAA with a required notice of construction when it replaced a fourth boiler in the Prosser plant in 1988 when the Company was the sole owner. Tree Top has reached a settlement with the BCAA which, according to Tree Top, requires Tree Top to pay penalties and make modifications to equipment at a total cost of approximately $493,000. Tree Top has made a formal demand on the Company for reimbursement of the entire amount. The Company disputes Tree Top's assertion that the Company is liable for the total cost. The Company does not believe that any resolution of this demand will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. During 2004, various claims totaling approximately $3,211,000 were asserted by the Fleming Companies against the Company and a subsidiary acquired in 2003 in the Bankruptcy proceedings in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for (i) receipt of allegedly preferential payments under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code ($1,292,000), (ii) receipt of alleged overpayments ($1,139,000) and (iii) amounts allegedly owing under various vendor promotional programs ($780,000). During 2005, the Company settled and paid these claims for $399,000. On June 15, 2004, an accident occurred at the Company's aircraft hangar located at the Yates County Airport in Penn Yan, New York. The damaged aircraft were repaired through insurance proceeds, and this matter did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. The Company has six collective bargaining agreements with three union locals covering approximately 665 of its full-time employees. The terms of these agreements result in wages and benefits, which are substantially the same for comparable positions for the Company's non-union employees. Four collective bargaining agreements expire in calendar 2008. One agreement expires in calendar 2009, and one agreement expires in calendar 2010. 14. Plant Restructuring After a comprehensive review of its production capacities following the CPF acquisition in 2004, the Company completed a plant restructuring program in 2005 resulting in a restructuring charge of $7,678,000. The restructuring charge consisted of a non-cash impairment charge of $6,952,000 and a cash severance charge of $726,000, which are included in Plant Restructuring in the Consolidated Statements of Net Earnings. The Company used two methods to determine fair value: (1) no value was assigned to machinery and equipment that could not be redeployed within the Company and where there was no ready market for the asset; and (2) quoted prices or prices for similar assets for real estate. This restructuring program principally involved the closure of three processing facilities, including a green bean plant in upstate New York and corn plants in Wisconsin and Washington. In addition, the Company restructured the newly acquired Payette, Idaho facility through the removal of canned meat production to focus exclusively on dry beans. The rationalization of the Company's productive capacity has: (1) improved the Company's overall cost structure and competitive position; (2) addressed the excess capacity situation arising from the acquisition of CPF; and (3) mitigated the effect of inflationary pressures on the Company's raw material inputs such as steel and fuel. The closure of the Washington corn processing facility coincided with an amendment to the Alliance Agreement with GMOI. Under the above amendment, the Blue Earth, Minnesota facility was removed from the Alliance Agreement due to a reduction in GMOI volume requirements and will be operated by the Company as a non-Alliance facility. Additionally, GMOI agreed to reimburse the Company in the future for remaining lease and depreciation costs at the Blue Earth facility which, on a net present value basis, approximate the closure costs associated with the Washington facility. With the closure of the Washington corn processing facility in the fall of 2004, the Company's labeling and warehousing requirements at the Salem, Oregon leased distribution facility were dramatically reduced. In 2006, the Company announced the phase out of the Salem labeling operation which resulted in a restructuring charge of $1,754,000 consisting of a provision for future lease payments of $1,306,000, a cash severance charge of $369,000, and a non-cash impairment charge of $79,000. The Company intends to use a portion of the facility for warehousing and will attempt to sublease the remaining unutilized portion of the facility until the February 2008 expiration of the lease. The fiscal 2006 asparagus harvest, completed in the first quarter, represented a partial pack as GMOI was in process of moving the production of asparagus offshore from the Dayton, Washington manufacturing facility. As fiscal 2006 represents the final year of operation for the Dayton, Washington facility, the Company and GMOI have negotiated a definitive agreement related to the closure of this facility. Under the terms of the agreement, any costs incurred by the Company related to the asparagus production prior to March 31, 2006 will be paid by GMOI. The Company shall retain ownership of the real estate associated with the Dayton facility. In addition, the manufacturing equipment of the Dayton facility shall either be conveyed to GMOI, redeployed by the Company, or salvaged. Lastly, GMOI reduced the principal balance of the secured nonrecourse subordinated promissory note by $466,000 to $42,618,000, which represents the net book value of the equipment to be conveyed to GMOI or salvaged. During 2006, the Company sold the previously closed corn processing facility in Washington for $0.5 million in cash and a $3.6 million note which carries an interest rate of 8% and is due in full on May 14, 2007. This note is secured by a mortgage on the property. The Company accounted for the sale under the installment method. During the first quarter of 2006, $0.4 million of the gain was included in Other Expense (Income), net and an additional $2.8 million of the gain on this sale was deferred in Other Long-Term Liabilities. The following table summarizes the restructuring and related asset impairment charges recorded and the accruals established during 2005 and 2006: Long-Lived Asset Other Severance Charges Costs Total - -------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) Total expected restructuring charge $1,097 $5,287 $ 3,214 $9,598 ============================================================== Balance March 31, 2004 -- -- -- -- Second-quarter charge to expense 619 -- -- 619 Third-quarter charge to expense 94 3,798 1,912 5,804 Fourth-quarter charge to expense 13 1,162 80 1,255 Loss on disposal of assets -- (3,361) -- (3,361) Cash payments (470) -- -- (470) - -------------------------------------------------------------- Balance March 31, 2005 $ 256 $1,599 $ 1,992 $3,847 Second-quarter charge to expense 368 77 1,016 1,461 Third-quarter charge to expense -- -- 290 290 Disposal of assets -- (1,676) -- (1,676) Cash payments (458) -- (527) (985) Fourth-quarter charge to expense 3 250 (84) 169 - -------------------------------------------------------------- Balance March 31, 2006 $ 169 $ 250 $ 2,687 $3,106 ============================================================== Total costs incurred to date $ 928 $5,037 $ 527 $6,492 ============================================================== In addition, $771,000 was charged to cost of product sold in the second quarter of 2005 related to exiting a line of contract packing business. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors and Stockholders Seneca Foods Corporation Marion, New York We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Seneca Foods Corporation as of March 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of net earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statements presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Seneca Foods Corporation as of March 31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Seneca Foods Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated June 9, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP Milwaukee, Wisconsin June 9, 2006 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Seneca Foods Corporation Marion, New York We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Seneca Foods Corporation and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of net earnings, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Seneca Foods Corporation and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Seneca Foods Corporation and its Subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated June 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Buffalo, New York June 10, 2005 Shareholder Information and Quarterly Results The Company's common stock is traded on The NASDAQ National Stock Market. The 4.1 million of Class A outstanding shares and 2.8 million Class B outstanding shares are owned by 281 and 269 shareholders of record, respectively. The high and low prices of the Company's common stock during each quarter of the past two years are shown below: Class A: 2006 2005 ------------------------------------------- Quarter High Low High Low - -------------------------------------------------------------- First $18.48 $15.75 $20.00 $17.92 Second 17.90 15.51 18.81 18.25 Third 20.88 17.25 19.00 18.00 Fourth 21.00 18.77 18.75 16.75 Class B: 2006 2005 ------------------------------------------- Quarter High Low High Low First $20.00 $16.00 $19.45 $18.25 Second 17.90 16.00 18.95 17.65 Third 20.77 17.50 19.10 18.25 Fourth 20.75 19.00 18.75 16.99 As of March 31, 2006, the most restrictive credit agreement limitation on the Company's payment of dividends and other distributions, such as purchases of shares, to holders of Class A or Class B Common Stock is an annual total limitation of $500,000, reduced by aggregate annual dividend payments totaling $23,000, which the Company presently pays on two outstanding classes of preferred stock. Payment of dividends to common stockholders is made at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors and depends, among other factors, on earnings; capital requirements; and the operating and financial condition of the Company. The Company has not declared or paid a common dividend in many years. The following is a summary of the unaudited interim results of operations by quarter: First Second Third Fourth --------------------------------------- (In thousands, except per share data) Year ended March 31, 2006: Net sales $156,595 $244,169 $316,253 $166,806 Gross margin 14,662 21,549 23,395 27,993 Net earnings 2,420 3,687 6,936 8,950 Basic earnings per common share .22 .33 .62 .80 Diluted earnings per common share .22 .33 .62 .80 Year ended March 31, 2005: Net sales $164,678 $220,375 $307,966 $171,255 Gross margin 15,147 16,546 16,580 15,999 Net earnings 4,502 2,445 (1,513) 2,473 Basic earnings per common share .40 .22 (.14) .23 Diluted earnings per common share .40 .22 (.14) .23 Earnings for the fourth quarter have historically reflected adjustments of previously estimated raw material costs and production levels. Due to the dependence on fruit and vegetable yields of the Company's food processing segment, interim costing must be estimated. Notice of Annual Meeting The 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Friday, August 4, 2006, beginning at 1:00 P.M. (CDT) at the offices of Seneca Foods Corporation at 418 East Conde Street, Janesville, Wisconsin. A formal notice of the meeting, together with a proxy statement and proxy form, will be mailed to shareholders of record as of June 16, 2006. Additional Information A copy of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, will be provided by the Company to any shareholder who so requests in writing. Requests should be sent to Philip G. Paras, Seneca Foods Corporation, 3736 South Main Street, Marion, New York 14505, or contact us via our web site at http://www.senecafoods.com, or email us at senecafoods@senecafoods.com. Forward-Looking Statements Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in this annual report are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) of 1995. The Company wishes to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the PSLRA by cautioning that numerous important factors, which involve risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to economic, competitive, governmental, and technological factors affecting the Company's operations, markets, products, services and prices, and other factors discussed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the future, could affect the Company's actual results and could cause its actual consolidated results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by, or on behalf of, the Company.
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----