10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-27816

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

a California Limited Partnership

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California	94-3158788
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1825 S. Grant Street, Suite 250, San Mateo, CA	94402
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(650) 365-5341

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

1

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] YES[   ] NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[X] YES               [   ] NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [   ]	Accelerated filer [   ]
Non-accelerated filer [   ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[   ] YES               [X] NO

2

Part I –FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Consolidated Balance Sheets

March 31, 2014 (unaudited) and December 31, 2013 (audited)

($ in thousands)

ASSETS

	March 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,117		$	16,393
Loans
Secured by deeds of trust
Principal		53,119			51,890
Advances		709			708
Accrued interest		282			222
Unsecured		112			112
Allowance for loan losses		(8,760	)		(8,790	)
Net loans		45,462			44,142
Receivable from affiliate		—			33
Real estate held for sale, net		24,547			16,552
Real estate held as investment		151,512			162,563
Other assets, net		5,226			5,258
Total assets	$	242,864		$	244,941

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

Liabilities
Accounts payable		1,353			980
Payable to affiliate		350			495
Mortgages payable	$	48,612		$	48,938
Total liabilities		50,315			50,413
Capital
Partners’ capital
Limited partners’ capital, subject to redemption, net		192,533			194,236
General partners’ capital (deficit), net		(1,023	)		(1,024	)
Total partners’ capital		191,510			193,212
Non-controlling interest		1,039			1,316
Total capital		192,549			194,528
Total liabilities and capital	$	242,864		$	244,941

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Three and Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

($ in thousands, except for per limited partner amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014			2013
Revenues, net
Interest income
Loans	$	668		$	342
Imputed interest on formation loan		106			93
Other interest income		—			—
Total interest income		774			435
Interest expense
Bank loan, secured		—			—
Mortgages		546			551
Amortization of discount on formation loan		106			93
Other interest expense		—			—
Total interest expense		652			644
Net interest income/(expense)		122			(209	)
Late fees		2			3
Other		145			—
Total revenues/(expense), net		269			(206	)
Provision for loan losses		(30	)		—
Operating Expenses
Mortgage servicing fees		126			153
Asset management fees		190			192
Costs from Redwood Mortgage Corp.		509			390
Professional services		108			450
REO
Rental operations, net		(800	)		(968	)
Holding costs		27			64
Loss/(gain) on disposal		(2	)		—
Other		11			4
Total operating expenses		169			285
Net income (loss)	$	130		$	(491	)
Net income (loss)
General partners (1%)	$	1		$	(5	)
Limited partners (99%)		129			(486	)
	$	130		$	(491	)
Net income (loss) per $1,000 invested by limited
partners for entire period
Where income is reinvested	$	1		$	(2	)
Where partner receives income in monthly distributions	$	1		$	(2	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014

(in thousands) (unaudited)

	Limited Partners
	Capital			Unallocated Syndication Costs		Formation Loan			Capital, net
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	201,863		$	—	$	(7,627	)	$	194,236
Net income (loss)		129			—		—			129
Allocation of syndication costs		—			—		—			—
Withdrawals		(1,875	)		—		—			(1,875	)
Early withdrawal penalties		—			—		43			43
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	200,117		$	—	$	(7,584	)	$	192,533

	General Partners
	Capital			Unallocated Syndication Costs		Capital, net			Total Partners’ Capital
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	(1,024	)	$	—	$	(1,024	)	$	193,212
Net income (loss)		1			—		1			130
Allocation of syndication costs		—			—		—			—
Withdrawals		—			—		—			(1,875	)
Early withdrawal penalties		—			—		—			43
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	(1,023	)	$	—	$	(1,023	)	$	191,510

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013

($ in thousands) (unaudited)

	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	130		$	(491	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Amortization of borrowings-related origination fees		24			20
Imputed interest on formation loan		(106	)		(93	)
Amortization of discount on formation loan		106			93
Provision for loan losses		(30	)		—
REO – depreciation, rental properties		651			602
REO – depreciation, other properties		5			6
REO – loss/(gain) on disposal		(2	)		—
REO – impairment loss		—			—
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Accrued interest		(60	)		10
Advances on loans		(1)			(52	)
Allowance for loan losses-recoveries, net of receivables		—			60
Receivable from affiliates		33			—
Other assets		9			(433	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		372			(154	)
Payable to affiliate		(145	)		91
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		986			(341	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Secured loans funded or acquired		(7,875	)		—
Principal collected on secured loans		6,646			562
Unsecured loans		—			8
Payments for development of REO		(651	)		(682	)
Proceeds from disposition of REO		3,053			—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		1,173			(112	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Payments on mortgages		(326	)		(266	)
Partners’ withdrawals		(1,875	)		(566	)
Early withdrawal fees		43			—
Increase/(decrease) in non-controlling interest		(277	)		(12	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(2,435	)		(844	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(276	)		(1,297	)
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1		16,393			18,943
Cash and cash equivalents, March 31	$	16,117		$	17,646
Cash paid for interest	$	546		$	551

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATIONAL AND GENERAL

In the opinion of the general partners, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial information included therein. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the partnership’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year.

Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII, a California Limited Partnership, (RMI VIII or the partnership) was organized in 1993. The partnership was organized to engage in business as a mortgage lender for the primary purpose of making loans secured by deeds of trust on California real estate.

The general partners of the partnership are Redwood Mortgage Corp. (RMC) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gymno LLC (Gymno), a California limited liability company, and Michael R. Burwell (Burwell), an individual. The general partners are solely responsible for partnership business, subject to the voting rights of the limited partners on specified matters. Any one of the general partners acting alone has the power and authority to act for and bind the partnership. The mortgage loans the company invests in are arranged and are generally serviced by RMC. Michael Burwell is the president and majority shareholder (through his holdings and beneficial interests in certain trusts) of RMC. The general partners are required to contribute to capital 1/10 of 1% of the aggregate capital contributions of the limited partners. As of December 31, 2013, the general partners had contributed capital in accordance with Section 4.1 of the partnership agreement.

The rights, duties and powers of the general and limited partners of the partnership are governed by the limited partnership agreement and Sections 15900 et seq. of the California Corporations Code.

A majority of the outstanding limited partnership interests may, without the permission of the general partners, vote to: (i) terminate the partnership, (ii) amend the limited partnership agreement, (iii) approve or disapprove the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the partnership and (iv) remove or replace one or all of the general partners.

The approval of all the limited partners is required to elect a new general partner to continue the partnership business where there is no remaining general partner after a general partner ceases to be a general partner other than by removal.

On the mortgage loans originated for RMI VIII, RMC may collect loan brokerage commissions (points) limited to an amount not to exceed four percent per year of the total partnership assets. The loan brokerage commissions are paid by the borrowers and thus, are not an expense of the partnership. The proceeds from loan brokerage commissions and other fees earned are the source of funds for the repayment of the formation loans by RMC.

Profits and losses are allocated among the limited partners according to their respective capital accounts after one percent of profits and losses is allocated to the general partners, and are subject to subsequent adjustment as a result of quarterly and year-end accounting and reporting.

RMC, Gymno, and Burwell, as the general partners, are entitled to one percent of the profits and losses of RMI VIII. Beginning with calendar year 2010, and continuing until January 1, 2020, Gymno and RMC each assigned its right to one-third of one percent of profits and losses to Burwell in exchange for Burwell assuming one hundred percent of the general partners’ equity deficit.

Limited partners should refer to the limited partnership agreement for a more complete description of the provisions.

7

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership,

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATIONAL AND GENERAL (continued)

Election to receive monthly, quarterly or annual distributions

At the time of their subscription for units, partners elect to have distributed to them their monthly, quarterly or annual allocation of profits, or to have profits allocated to their capital accounts to compound. Subject to certain limitations, those electing compounding may subsequently change their election. A partner’s election to receive cash distributions is irrevocable.

Liquidity, capital withdrawals and early withdrawals

There are substantial restrictions on transferability of units and accordingly an investment in the partnership is non-liquid. The partnership does not establish a reserve from which to fund withdrawals and, accordingly, the partnership’s capacity to return a limited partner’s capital is restricted to the availability of partnership cash flow. Furthermore, no more than 20% of the total limited partners’ capital accounts outstanding at the beginning of any year, may be liquidated during any calendar year.

In order to provide a certain degree of liquidity to the limited partners, once a limited partner has been in the partnership for the minimum five-year period, they may withdraw all or a portion of their capital accounts in twenty quarterly installments or longer, beginning the last day of the calendar quarter following the quarter in which the notice of withdrawal is given. The general partners, at their discretion, may liquidate all or part of a limited partner’s capital account in four quarterly installments beginning on the last day of the calendar quarter following the quarter in which the notice of withdrawal is given, subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty applicable to any sums withdrawn prior to the time when such sums could have been withdrawn without penalty.

In March 2009, in response to economic conditions then existing, the partnership suspended capital liquidations. In the fourth quarter of 2009 the partnership entered into a forbearance agreement with its banks and subsequently entered into an amended and restated loan agreement (dated October 2010) which included additional restrictions on liquidations and distributions of partners’ capital. The bank loan was paid off in September 2012. The partnership’s four most recently completed quarters have been profitable, and it has re-commenced providing capital liquidation payments as of March 31, 2014. For the quarter ending  March 31, 2014, those investors that had a liquidation payment pending as of March 31, 2009, the partnership resumed liquidation payments based on their current capital balance based on their election existing in March 2009. Limited partners were informed of our reinstitution of accepting liquidation requests and those that requested liquidation between January 1, 2014 and prior to March 31, 2014, will have their liquidation requests added to those previously existing and they will be scheduled to commence June 30, 2014. Each quarter, the partnership will allocate a specific amount of cash for liquidation payments. In the event that the cash allocated is insufficient to meet the liquidation requests of all limited partners requesting liquidations, then liquidation requests will be disbursed based upon the priority schedule set forth in the limited partnership agreement and then on a pro-rata basis. The partnership intends to continue to accept liquidation requests in future quarters and these requests will be added to previously existing requests and be subject to the same priorities and pro-rata allocation of distributable cash as described in the limited partnership agreement.

Syndication costs

The company ultimately incurred its own syndication costs, including expenses incurred in connection with the start-up of the company or ongoing offering of the units, including legal and accounting fees, printing, mailing, distribution costs, filing fees, reimbursements to participating broker-dealers for due diligence expenses, reimbursements for training and education meetings for associated persons of a FINRA member, and marketing reallowances of up to 1% of gross offering proceeds (sale of units, excluding DRIP and premium units, but excluding certain sales commissions paid by RMC, principally to broker dealers). Syndication costs were charged against members’ capital and allocated to individual members consistent with the company’s operating agreement.

8

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATIONAL AND GENERAL (continued)

Sales commissions - formation loans

Sales commissions are paid to the broker dealers by RMC and are not paid directly by the partnership out of the offering proceeds. The partnership loans to RMC, one of the general partners, amounts to pay all sales commissions to broker/dealers for sale of member interests and amounts payable in connection with unsolicited orders.  This loan is unsecured and non-interest bearing and is referred to as the “formation loan,” and is being repaid equally over a ten year period commencing the year after the close of a partnership offering. The formation loan has been deducted from limited partners’ capital in the consolidated balance sheets. As payments on the formation loan are received from RMC, the deduction from capital will be reduced. Interest has been imputed at the market rate of interest in effect in the years the offering closed. If the general partners are removed and RMC is no longer receiving payments for services rendered, the formation loan is forgiven.

RMC acts as the broker in originating mortgage loans for RMI VIII. The corresponding brokerage commissions paid by borrowers from mortgage loans made by these funds are the primary source of cash used to repay the formation loans. RMI VIII was prohibited by its lending banks from originating new loans under the terms of an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated October 2010, and a preceding forbearance agreement that was in effect in the fourth quarter of 2009, until the bank loan was repaid in full, September 2012. The amended loan and forbearance agreements were the result of a technical (i.e. non-payment) covenant default under the original loan. As a result, RMC was deprived of the opportunity to receive brokerage commissions on loans by RMI VIII for the period from the fourth quarter of 2009 continuing through September 30, 2012, a period of almost three years.

During that period, despite receiving no loan brokerage commissions, RMC continued to make the annual formation loan payments of approximately $1.8 million per year (or $5.4 million for the three years) from its own cash reserves that existed as of the date of the forbearance agreement. RMC believes it would have had a reasonable argument that the annual formation loan payments should be suspended until such time as lending by RMI VIII was permitted to resume and brokerage commissions could be earned, but RMC elected not to take such an approach and, instead, continued to make annual formation loan payments due to concerns that the lending banks would view nonpayment of the formation loan as another technical loan default that might have led to a “distressed sale” liquidation of RMI VIII’s assets, resulting in substantial loss of limited partners’ capital.

As the bank loan was fully repaid as of September 2012, RMC has temporarily suspended annual formation loan payments, beginning with the payment due December 31, 2012, for the three-year period then beginning, which is a period commensurate with the period during which lending by RMI VIII was prohibited and RMC was deprived of loan brokerage commissions.

For the offerings, sales commissions paid to brokers ranged from 0% (units sold by general partners) to 9% of gross proceeds. The partnership had anticipated the sales commissions would approximate 7.6% based on the assumption that 65% of investors will elect to reinvest profits, thus generating full 9% commissions. The actual sales commission percentage for all six offerings combined was 7.5%.

Income taxes and Partners’ capital – tax basis

Income taxes – federal and state – are the obligation of the partners, if and when taxes apply, other than for the minimum annual California franchise tax paid by the partnership.

Term of the partnership

The partnership is scheduled to terminate in 2032, unless sooner terminated as provided in the limited partnership agreement.

9

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The partnership’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the partnership, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and its 72.5%-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Management estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions about the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Such estimates relate principally to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, including, when applicable, the valuation of impaired loans, (which itself requires determining the fair value of the collateral), and the valuation of real estate held for sale and held as investment, at acquisition and subsequently. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

- Fair Value Estimates

GAAP defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date (i.e. the balance sheet date). An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

Fair values of assets and liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy established in GAAP. The hierarchy is comprised of three levels of inputs to be used.

- Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is a market in which transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

- Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

- Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect the company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances and may include the company’s own data.

For secured loans, the collaterals’ fair values are reviewed quarterly and the protective equity for each loan is computed. As used herein, “protective equity” is the arithmetic difference between the fair value of the collateral, net of any senior liens, and the loan balance, where “loan balance” is the sum of the unpaid principal, advances and the recorded interest thereon. This computation is done for each loan (whether performing or designated impaired)

The fair value of the collateral is determined by exercise of judgment based on management’s experience informed by appraisals (by licensed appraisers), brokers’ opinion of values, and publicly available information on in-market transactions.  These sources would be considered Level 2 inputs.

Appraisals of commercial real property generally present three approaches to estimating value:  1) market comparables or sales approach; 2) cost to replace and 3) capitalized cash flows or investment approach. These approaches may or may not result in a common, single value. The market-comparables approach may yield several different values depending on certain basic assumptions, such as, determining highest and best use (which may or may not be the current use); determining the condition (e.g. as-is, when-completed, or for land when-entitled); and determining the unit of value (e.g. as a series of individual unit sales or as a bulk disposition).

10

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

- Fair Value Estimates (continued)

Management has the requisite familiarity with the markets it lends in generally and of the properties lent on specifically to analyze sales-comparables and assess their suitability/applicability. Management is acquainted with market participants – investors, developers, brokers, lenders – that are useful, relevant secondary sources of data and information regarding valuation and valuation variability. These secondary sources may have familiarity with and perspectives on pending transactions, successful strategies to optimize value, and the history and details of specific properties – on and off the market – that enhance the process and analysis that is particularly and principally germane to establishing value for property types – or individual properties that do not transact regularly and/or would not qualify for traditional (e.g. bank) financing.

- Allowance for loan losses

Loans and the related advances and accrued interest are analyzed on a periodic basis for ultimate recoverability. Delinquencies are identified and followed as part of the loan system. Delinquencies are determined based upon contractual terms.  If events and or changes in circumstances cause management to have serious doubts about the collectability of the payments of interest and principal in accordance with the loan agreement, a loan may be designated as impaired (impaired loans). Any subsequent payments on impaired loans are applied to late fees, then to the accrued interest, then to advances, and lastly to principal.

Performing loans, are aggregated by the property type of the underlying collateral, and for each loan and for the total by property type, the amount of protective equity or amount of exposure to loss (i.e., the dollar amount of the deficiency of the fair value of the underlying collateral to the loan balance) is computed.

For impaired loans, a provision is made for loan losses to adjust the allowance for loan losses to an amount considered by management to be adequate, with due consideration to collateral values, such that the net carrying amount (principal , plus advances, plus accrued interest less the specific allowance) is reduced to the estimated fair value of the related collateral, net of any senior loans, and net of any costs to sell in arriving at net realizable value if planned disposition of the asset securing a loan is by way of sale.

Based on its knowledge of the borrowers and their historical (and expected) performance, and the exposure to loss, management estimates an appropriate reserve by property type and for individual loans in the loan portfolio. Because the partnership is an asset-based lender, except as to owner-occupied residences, and because specific regions, neighborhoods and even properties within the same neighborhoods, vary significantly as to real estate values and transaction activity, general market trends, which may be indicative of a change in the risk of a loss, and a borrower’s credit worthiness are secondary to the condition of the property, the property type and the neighborhood/region in which the property is located.

The partnership charges off uncollectible loans and related receivables directly to the allowance account once it is determined the full amount is not collectible.

11

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Cash and cash equivalents

The partnership considers all highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Periodically, partnership cash balances in banks exceed federally insured limits.

Loans and interest income

Loans generally are stated at the unpaid principal balance (principal). Management has discretion to pay amounts (advances) to third parties on behalf of borrowers to protect the partnership’s interest in the loan. Advances include, but are not limited to, the payment of interest and principal on a senior lien to prevent foreclosure by the senior lien holder, property taxes, insurance premiums, and attorney fees. Advances generally are stated at the amount paid out on the borrower’s behalf and accrue interest until repaid by the borrower.

The partnership may fund a specific loan origination net of an interest reserve to insure timely interest payments at the inception (one to two years) of the loan. As monthly interest payments become due, the partnership funds the payments into the affiliated trust account.  In the event of an early loan payoff, any unapplied interest reserves would be first applied to any accrued but unpaid interest and then as a reduction to the principal.

From time to time, the partnership negotiates and enters into loan modifications with borrowers whose loans are delinquent. If the loan modification results in a significant reduction in the cash flow compared to the original note, the modification is deemed a troubled debt restructuring and a loss is recognized. In the normal course of the partnership’s operations, loans that mature may be renewed at then current market rates and terms for new loans. Such renewals are not designated as impaired, unless the matured loan was previously designated as impaired.

Interest is accrued daily based on the principal of the loans. An impaired loan continues to accrue as long as the loan is in the process of collection and is considered to be well-secured. Loans are placed on non-accrual status at the earlier of management’s determination that the primary source of repayment will come from the foreclosure and subsequent sale of the collateral securing the loan (which usually occurs when a notice of sale is filed) or when the loan is no longer considered well-secured. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the accrual of interest is discontinued; however, previously recorded interest is not reversed. A loan may return to accrual status when all delinquent interest and principal payments become current in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.

12

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Real estate owned (REO) held for sale

REO, held for sale includes real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations generally through foreclosure that is being marketed for sale. REO, held for sale is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s net realizable value, which is the fair value less estimated costs to sell, as applicable. Any excess of the recorded investment in the loan over the net realizable value is charged against the allowance for loan losses. The fair value estimates are derived from information available in the real estate markets including similar property, and often require the experience and judgment of third parties such as commercial real estate appraisers and brokers. The estimates figure materially in calculating the value of the property at acquisition, the level of charge to the allowance for loan losses and any subsequent valuation reserves. After acquisition, costs incurred relating to the development and improvement of property are capitalized to the extent they do not cause the recorded value to exceed the net realizable value, whereas costs relating to holding and disposition of the property are expensed as incurred. After acquisition, REO, held for sale is analyzed periodically for changes in fair values and any subsequent write down is charged to operating expenses. Any recovery in the fair value subsequent to such a write down is recorded – not to exceed the net realizable value at acquisition – as an offset to operating expenses. Gains or losses on sale of the property are included in REO – operating expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Recognition of gains on the sale of real estate is dependent upon the transaction meeting certain criteria related to the nature of the property and the terms of the sale including potential seller financing.

Real estate owned (REO), held as investment, net

REO, held as investment, net includes real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations generally through foreclosure that is not being marketed for sale and is either being operated, such as rental properties; is being managed through the development process, including obtaining appropriate and necessary entitlements, permits and construction; or are idle properties awaiting more favorable market conditions. REO, held as investment, net is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s estimated fair value, net. After acquisition, costs incurred relating to the development and improvement of the property are capitalized, whereas costs relating to operating or holding the property are expensed. Subsequent to acquisition, management periodically compares the carrying value of real estate to expected undiscounted future cash flows for the purpose of assessing the recoverability of the recorded amounts. If the carrying value exceeds future undiscounted cash flows, the assets are reduced to estimated fair value.

Rental income

Rental income is recognized when earned in accordance with the lease agreement. For commercial leases, the costs associated with originating the lease are amortized over the lease term.  Residential lease terms generally range from month-to-month to one year, and the expenses of originating the lease are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation

Real estate owned held as investment that is being operated is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the property once the asset is placed in service.

Net income per $1,000 invested

Amounts reflected in the statements of operations as net income per $1,000 invested by limited partners for the entire period are amounts allocated to limited partners who held their investment throughout the period and have elected to either leave their profits to compound or have elected to receive periodic distributions of their net income. Individual income is allocated each month based on the limited partners’ pro rata share of partners’ capital. Because the net income percentage varies from month to month, amounts per $1,000 will vary for those individuals who made or withdrew investments during the period, or selected other options.

13

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII.

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 3 – GENERAL PARTNERS AND OTHER RELATED PARTIES

The general partners are entitled to one percent of the profits and losses, which amounted to approximately $1,300 and $(5,000) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Formation loan

The formation loan transactions are summarized in the following table at March 31, 2014 ($ in thousands).

Formation loan made	$	22,567
Unamortized discount on formation loan		(1,728	)
Formation loan made, net		20,839
Repayments to date		(14,297	)
Early withdrawal penalties applied		(686	)
Formation loan, net		5,856
Unamortized discount on formation loan		1,728
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	7,584

Interest has been imputed at the market rate of interest in effect at the date the offerings closed which ranged from 4.00% to 9.50%. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately $106,000 and $93,000, respectively, were recorded related to amortization of the discount on imputed interest.

The future minimum payments on the formation loan are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

2014	$	—
2015		1,893
2016		1,665
2017		1,322
2018		1,150
Thereafter		1,554
Total	$	7,584

RMC acts as the broker in originating mortgage loans for RMI VIII. The corresponding brokerage commissions paid by borrowers from mortgage loans made by these funds are the primary source of cash used to repay the formation loans. RMI VIII was prohibited by its lending banks from originating new loans under the terms of an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated October 2010, and a preceding forbearance agreement that was in effect in the fourth quarter of 2009, until the bank loan was repaid in full, September 2012. The amended loan and forbearance agreements were the result of a technical (i.e. non-payment) covenant default under the original loan. As a result, RMC was deprived of the opportunity to receive brokerage commissions on loans by RMI VIII for the period from the fourth quarter of 2009 continuing through September 30, 2012, a period of almost three years.

During that period, despite receiving no loan brokerage commissions, RMC continued to make the annual formation loan payments of approximately $1.8 million per year (or $5.4 million for the three years) from its own cash reserves that existed as of the date of the forbearance agreement. RMC believes it would have had a reasonable argument that the annual formation loan payments should be suspended until such time as lending by RMI VIII was permitted to resume and brokerage commissions could be earned, but RMC elected not to take such an approach and, instead, continued to make annual formation loan payments due to concerns that the lending banks would view nonpayment of the formation loan as another technical loan default that might have led to a “distressed sale” liquidation of RMI VIII’s assets, resulting in substantial loss of limited partners’ capital.

As the bank loan was fully repaid as of September 2012, RMC has temporarily suspended annual formation loan payments, beginning with the payment due December 31, 2012, for the three-year period then beginning, which is a period commensurate with the period during which lending by RMI VIII was prohibited and RMC was deprived of loan brokerage commissions.

14

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 3 – GENERAL PARTNERS AND OTHER RELATED PARTIES (continued)

The following commissions and fees are paid by the borrowers.

- Brokerage commissions, loan originations

For fees in connection with the review, selection, evaluation, negotiation and extension of loans, the general partners may collect loan brokerage commissions (points) limited to an amount not to exceed 4% of the total partnership assets per year. In the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, loan brokerage commissions paid to the general partners by the borrowers were $134,563 and $0, respectively.

- Other fees

The partnership agreement provides for other fees such as reconveyance, mortgage assumption and mortgage extension fees. Such fees are incurred by the borrowers and are paid to the general partners. In the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, these fees totaled $5,424 and $3,608, respectively.

The following fees are paid by the company.

- Mortgage servicing fees

RMC may earn mortgage servicing fees of up to 1.5% annually of the unpaid principal of the loan portfolio or such lesser amount as is reasonable and customary in the geographic area where the property securing the mortgage is located from RMI VIII. Historically, RMC charged one percent annually, and at times waived additional amounts to improve the partnership’s earnings. Such fee waivers were not made for the purpose of providing the partnership with sufficient funds to satisfy withdrawal requests, nor were such waivers made in order to meet any required level of distributions, as the partnership has no such required level of distributions. RMC does not use any specific criteria in determining the amount of fees, if any, to be waived. The decision to waive fees and the amount, if any, to be waived, is made by RMC in its sole discretion.

Mortgage servicing fees paid to RMC by the partnership are presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31, ($ in thousands).

	2014			2013
Chargeable by RMC	$	189		$	230
Waived by RMC		(63	)		(77	)
Charged	$	126		$	153

- Asset management fees

The general partners receive monthly fees for managing the partnership’s loan portfolio and operations of up to 1/32 of 1% of the “net asset value” (3/8 of 1% annually). At times, the general partners have charged less than the maximum allowable rate to enhance the partnership’s earnings. Such fee waivers were not made with the purpose of providing the partnership with sufficient funds to satisfy withdrawal requests, nor to meet any required level of distributions, as the partnership has no such required level of distributions. RMC does not use any specific criteria in determining the exact amount of fees, if any, to be waived. The decision to waive fees and the amount, if any, to be waived, is made by RMC in its sole discretion.

Asset management fees for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were $190,000 and $192,000, respectively. No asset management fees were waived during any period reported.

15

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 3 – GENERAL PARTNERS AND OTHER RELATED PARTIES (continued)

- Costs from Redwood Mortgage Corp.

RMC is reimbursed by the partnership for operating expenses incurred on behalf of the partnership, including without limitation, accounting and audit fees, legal fees and expenses, postage and preparation of reports to limited partners, and out-of-pocket general and administration expenses. The decision to request reimbursement of any qualifying charges is made by RMC in its sole discretion. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, operating expenses totaling $509,000 and $390,000, respectively, were reimbursed to RMC.RMC did not waive its right to request reimbursement of any qualifying charges during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

- Syndication costs

As of December 31, 2013 all syndication costs, totaling $5,010,000, have been allocated to the limited partner’s capital accounts.

NOTE 4 – LOANS

The partnership generally funds loans with a fixed interest rate and a loan term up to five years. As of March 31, 2014, 22 (58%) of the partnership’s loans (representing 56% of the aggregate principal balance of the partnership’s loan portfolio) have a five year term or less from loan inception. The remaining loans have terms longer than five years. Substantially all loans are written without a prepayment-penalty clause. As of March 31, 2014, 17 (45%) of the loans outstanding (representing 79% of the aggregate principal balance of the partnership’s loan portfolio) provide for monthly payments of interest only, with the principal due in full at maturity. The remaining loans require monthly payments of principal and interest, typically calculated on a 30 year amortization, with the remaining principal balance due at maturity.

The partnership may make construction loans that are not fully disbursed at loan inception. Construction loans are determined by the managers to be those loans made to borrowers for the construction of entirely new structures or dwellings, whether residential, commercial or multi-family properties. The partnership will approve and fund the construction loan up to a maximum loan balance. Disbursements will be made periodically as phases of the construction are completed or at such other times as the loan documents may require. Undisbursed construction funds will be held in escrow pending disbursement. Upon project completion, construction loans are reclassified as permanent loans. Funding of construction loans is limited to 10% of the loan portfolio. As of March 31, 2014, the partnership had no construction loans outstanding.

The partnership may also make rehabilitation loans. A rehabilitation loan will be approved up to a maximum principal balance and, at loan inception, will be either fully or partially disbursed. A rehabilitation loan escrow account is fully funded and advanced periodically as phases of the rehabilitation are completed or at such other times as the loan documents may require. The rehabilitation loan proceeds are generally used to acquire and remodel single family homes for future sale or rental. As of March 31, 2014, the partnership had no rehabilitation loans outstanding.

16

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Loans unpaid principal balance (principal)

Secured loan transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, ($ in thousands).

	2014			2013
Principal, January 1	$	51,890		$	60,870
Loans funded or acquired		7,875			—
Principal collected		(6,646	)		(562	)
Loans assigned to affiliates		—			—
Foreclosures		—			—
Principal, March 31	$	53,119		$	60,308

During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the partnership renewed zero and two loans, respectively, with a remaining aggregate principal of approximately $0 and $353,000, at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, not included in the activity shown on the table above.

Loan characteristics

Secured loans had the characteristics presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013
Number of secured loans		38			36
Secured loans – principal	$	53,119		$	51,890
Secured loans – lowest interest rate (fixed)		4.00	%		4.00	%
Secured loans – highest interest rate (fixed)		12.00	%		12.00	%
Average secured loan – principal	$	1,398		$	1,441
Average principal as percent of total principal		2.63	%		2.78	%
Average principal as percent of partners’ capital		0.73	%		0.75	%
Average principal as percent of total assets		0.58	%		0.59	%
Largest secured loan – principal	$	16,312		$	16,312
Largest principal as percent of total principal		30.71	%		31.44	%
Largest principal as percent of partners’ capital		8.52	%		8.44	%
Largest principal as percent of total assets		6.72	%		6.65	%
Smallest secured loan – principal	$	69		$	79
Smallest principal as percent of total principal		0.13	%		0.15	%
Smallest principal as percent of partners’ capital		0.04	%		0.04	%
Smallest principal as percent of total assets		0.03	%		0.03	%
Number of counties where security is located (all California)		16			17
Largest percentage of principal in one county		36.62	%		41.68	%
Number of secured loans in foreclosure status		2			2
Secured loans in foreclosure – principal	$	16,555		$	16,689
Number of secured loans with an interest reserve		—			—
Interest reserves	$	—		$	—

17

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Loan characteristics (continued)

As of March 31, 2014, the partnership’s largest loan, in the unpaid principal balance of $16,312,000 (representing 30.71% of outstanding secured loans and 6.72% of partnership assets) has an interest rate of 5.00% and is secured by 75 units in a condominium complex with 128 total units, located in Contra Costa County, California. This loan matured April 1, 2012. A court appointed receiver is managing the 75 units. A foreclosure sale date is still to be determined based upon the progress of the receiver.

Larger loans sometimes increase above 10% of the secured loan portfolio or partnership assets as these amounts decrease due to limited partner withdrawals and loan payoffs and due to restructuring of existing loans.

Lien position

At funding secured loans had the following lien positions and are presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Loans	Principal			Percent		Loans	Principal			Percent
First trust deeds	22	$	39,695		75	%	19	$	36,816		71	%
Second trust deeds	15		13,136		24		16		14,784		28
Third trust deeds	1		288		1		1		290		1
Total secured loans	38		53,119		100	%	36		51,890		100	%
Liens due other lenders at loan closing			51,204						53,098
Total debt		$	104,323					$	104,988
Appraised property value at loan closing		$	152,380					$	148,215
Percent of total debt to appraised
values (LTV) at loan closing(1)			68.46	%					70.83	%

(1) Based on appraised values and liens due other lenders at loan closing. The loan to value computation does not take into account subsequent increases or decreases in security property values following the loan closing nor does it include decreases or increases of the amount owing on senior liens to other lenders by payments or interest accruals, if any. Property values likely have changed, particularly over the last four years, and the portfolio’s current loan to value ratio likely is higher than this historical ratio.

Property type

Secured loans summarized by property type are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Loans	Principal		Percent		Loans	Principal		Percent
Single family	28	$	31,470	59	%	27	$	33,771	65	%
Multi-family	1		1,000	2		1		1,000	2
Commercial(2)	9		20,649	39		8		17,119	33
Total secured loans	38	$	53,119	100	%	36	$	51,890	100	%

(2)   Includes one loan with a principal balance of approximately $531,000, secured by an improved land lot, with plans to be developed as a five-unit townhouse by the borrower.

18

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Property type (continued)

Single family properties include owner-occupied and non-owner occupied single family homes (1-4 unit residential buildings), condominium units, townhouses, and condominium complexes. From time to time, loan originations in one sector or property type become more active due to prevailing market conditions. The current concentration of the partnership’s loan portfolio in condominium properties may pose additional or increased risks. Recovery of the condominium sector of the real estate market is generally expected to lag behind that of single-family residences. In addition, availability of financing for condominium properties has been, and will likely continue to be, constricted and more difficult to obtain than other property types. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $16,312,000, of the partnership’s loans were secured by condominium properties.

Condominiums may create unique risks for the partnership that are not present for loans made on other types of properties. In the case of condominiums, a board of managers generally has discretion to make decisions affecting the condominium building, including regarding assessments to be paid by the unit owners, insurance to be maintained on the building, and the maintenance of that building, which may have an impact on the partnership loans that are secured by such condominium property.

The partnership may have less flexibility in foreclosing on the collateral for a loan secured by condominiums upon a default by the borrower. Among other things, the partnership must consider the governing documents of the homeowners association and the state and local laws applicable to condominium units, which may require an owner to obtain a public report prior to the sale of the units.

19

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Distribution by California counties

The distribution of secured loans outstanding by the California county in which the primary collateral is located is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Percent		Unpaid Principal Balance		Percent
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
San Francisco	$	19,450	36.62	%	$	21,627	41.68	%
Contra Costa		16,646	31.34			16,647	32.08
San Mateo		6,188	11.65			1,765	3.40
Santa Clara		3,137	5.91			3,208	6.18
Alameda		1,254	2.36			1,260	2.43
Napa		405	0.76			406	0.78
Marin		180	0.34			180	0.35
		47,260	88.98			45,093	86.90
Other Northern California
Sacramento		243	0.46			249	0.48
Calaveras		178	0.34			182	0.35
Monterey		177	0.33			178	0.34
San Benito		97	0.18			97	0.19
Butte		69	0.13			79	0.15
		764	1.44			785	1.51
Total Northern California		48,024	90.42			45,878	88.41
Los Angeles & Coastal
Los Angeles		2,809	5.29			2,511	4.84
Orange		1,821	3.43			1,354	2.61
Ventura		349	0.66			350	0.67
San Diego		—	—			1,680	3.24
		4,979	9.38			5,895	11.36
Other Southern California
Kern		116	0.20			117	0.23
Total Southern California		5,095	9.58			6,012	11.59
Total Secured Loans	$	53,119	100	%	$	51,890	100	%

(1)    Includes Silicon Valley

20

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Scheduled maturities

Secured loans are scheduled to mature as presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

Scheduled maturities at March 31, 2014	Loans	Principal		Percent
2014	3	$	5,541	10	%
2015	13		18,037	34
2016	5		5,051	10
2017	4		1,385	3
2018	2		583	1
2019	6		4,828	9
Total future maturities	33		35,425	67
Matured at March 31, 2014	5		17,694	33
Total secured loans	38	$	53,119	100	%

It is the partnership’s experience loans may be repaid or refinanced before, at or after the contractual maturity date. For matured loans, the partnership may continue to accept payments while pursuing collection of amounts owed from borrowers. Therefore, the above tabulation for scheduled maturities is not a forecast of future cash receipts.

The partnership reports maturity data based upon the most recent contractual agreement with the borrower. The table above includes five loans with an aggregate principal of $1,173,000 which are renewals.

Matured loans

Secured loans past maturity are summarized in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013
Number of loans(2)(3)		5			5
Principal	$	17,694		$	17,694
Advances		683			683
Accrued interest		65			63
Loan balance	$	18,442		$	18,440
Percent of principal		33	%		34	%

(2) The secured loans past maturity include five loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, also included in the secured loans in non-accrual status.

(3) The secured loans past maturity include five loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, also included in the secured loans delinquency.

21

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Delinquency

Secured loans summarized by payment delinquency are presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31,		December 31,
	2014		2013
Past due
30-89 days	$	394	$	665
90-179 days		405		17,197
180 or more days		17,264		474
Total past due		18,063		18,336
Current		35,056		33,554
Total secured loans	$	53,119	$	51,890

At March 31, 2014, the partnership had 3 workout agreements in effect with an aggregate principal of $1,087,000. All three borrowers had made all required payments under the workout agreements and the loans were included in the above table as current. All three of the loans were designated impaired and were in non-accrual status.

At December 31, 2013, the partnership had three workout agreements in effect with an aggregate principal of $1,097,000. All three borrowers had made all required payments under the workout agreements and the loans were included in the above table as current. All three of the loans were designated impaired and were in non-accrual status.

Interest income accrued on loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 was $9,000 and $62,000, respectively. Accrued interest on loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $83,000 and $81,000, respectively.

Modifications, workout agreements and troubled debt restructurings

Modified secured loan transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Active			Principal			Active			Principal
Balance, January 1		5		$	3,947			5		$	6,085
New modifications		—			—			1			325
Paid off/Foreclosed		(1	)		(325	)		(1	)		(2,140	)
Expired/Voided		—			—			—			—
Principal Collected		—			(87	)		—			(323	)
Ending Balance		4		$	3,535			5		$	3,947

22

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Modifications, workout agreements and troubled debt restructurings (continued)

Workout agreements on secured loan transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Active	Principal			Active		Principal
Balance, January 1	3	$	1,097		4		$	1,126
New agreements	—		—		2			847
Paid off/Foreclosed	—		—		(1	)		(417	)
Expired/Voided	—		—		(2	)		(449	)
Principal collected	—		(10	)	—			(10	)
Balance, end of period	3	$	1,087		3		$	1,097

Modifications and workout agreements may cause a loan to qualify as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) under GAAP, and may result in a provision for loan losses being recorded. TDRs on secured loans transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Active			Principal			Active			Principal
Balance, January 1		5		$	4,228			6		$	8,042
New agreements		—			—			2			990
Paid off/Foreclosed		(1	)		(325	)		(3	)		(4,507	)
Principal collected		—			(75	)		—			(297	)
Balance, end of period		4		$	3,828			5		$	4,228
Provision for loan losses				$	—					$	—

Loans in non-accrual status

Secured loans in nonaccrual status are summarized in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31,		December 31,
	2014		2013
Secured loans in nonaccrual status
Number of loans		8		8
Principal	$	18,350	$	18,361
Advances		688		688
Accrued interest		65		63
Loan balance	$	19,103	$	19,112
Foregone interest	$	246	$	887

At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there was one loan with a loan balance of $423,000, and $425,000, respectively that was contractually 90 or more days past due as to principal or interest and not in non-accrual status.

23

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Loans designated impaired

Impaired loans had the balances shown and the associated allowance for loan losses presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31,		December 31,
	2014		2013
Principal	$	21,092	$	21,499
Recorded investment(4)	$	21,846	$	22,249
Impaired loans without allowance	$	3,753	$	4,149
Impaired loans with allowance	$	18,093	$	18,100
Allowance for loan losses, impaired loans	$	8,760	$	8,740

(4) Recorded investment is the sum of principal, advances, and interest accrued for financial reporting purposes.

Impaired loans had the average balances and interest income recognized and received in cash as presented in the following table as of, and for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31,		December 31,
	2014		2013
Average recorded investment	$	22,048	$	36,652
Interest income recognized	$	46	$	156
Interest income received in cash	$	35	$	378

Allowance for loan losses

Activity in the allowance for loan losses is presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31 ($ in thousands).

	2014			2013
Balance, January 1	$	8,790		$	19,815
Provision for loan losses		(30	)		—
Charge-offs, net
Charge-offs		—			—
Recoveries		—			60
Charge-offs, net		—			60
Balance, March 31	$	8,760		$	19,875
Ratio of charge-offs, net during the period to average
secured loans outstanding during the period		0.00	%		0.10	%

24

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 4 – LOANS (continued)

Allowance for loan losses (continued)

The composition of the allowance for loan losses and the percentage of unpaid principal balance for each property type are presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
Allowance for loan losses
Secured loans by property type
Single family	$	8,760	59	%	$	8,790	65	%
Multi-family		—	2			—	2
Commercial		—	39			—	33
Total allowance for loan losses	$	8,760	100	%	$	8,790	100	%

NOTE 5 – REAL ESTATE OWNED (REO)

Periodically, management reviews the status of the owned properties to evaluate among other things, their asset classification. Properties generally are acquired through foreclosure. Several factors are considered in determining the classification of owned properties as “real estate held for sale” or “real estate held as investment.” These factors include, but are not limited to, real estate market conditions, status of any required permits, repair, improvement or development work to be completed, rental and lease income and investment potential.

REO held for sale

Real estate owned is classified as held for sale in the period in which the GAAP required criteria are met. As a property’s status changes, reclassifications may occur.

Transactions and activity, including changes in the net book values, if any, and the property types of REO held for sale are presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013
Balance, beginning of period	$	16,552		$	—
Acquisitions		—			3,895
Dispositions		(2,524	)		(7,745	)
Improvements/betterments		459			11
Designated (to)from REO held as investment		10,108			20,594
Change in net book value		—			(160	)
Depreciation		(48	)		(43	)
Balance, end of period	$	24,547		$	16,552
Property type
Rental	$	14,839			10,541
Development		—			6,011
Other		9,708			—
Total REO, held for sale	$	24,547		$	16,552
Number of properties, end of period		6			3

25

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 5 – REAL ESTATE OWNED (REO) (continued)

REO held for sale (continued)

The following transactions occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014:

- Designated to REO held for sale from REO held for investment

-   One property consisting of two condominium units located in San Francisco County. One of the units is in contract for sale.

-   Nine units in a condominium complex located in Sutter County. The nine units are in contract for sale.

-   Eight unit condominium complex located in Solano County.

-   38 unit apartment complex located in San Joaquin County. The property is in contract for sale.

-   Sold two tenant-in-common units located in San Francisco County. The units sold for approximately their carrying value after taking into account a previously recorded valuation reserve.

-   Sold a six unit apartment building located in Solano County. This property sold for approximately its carrying value.

The net rental income for the designated properties, and any other REO held for sale rental results, has been reclassified from REO – Rental Operations, to Revenues – Other for all periods presented in the financial statements and the Results of Operations in Item 2 of this report.

REO held as investment

For REO, held as investment, the activity in net book value (NBV) and changes in the impairment reserves are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31 ($ in thousands).

	NBV						Accumulated Depreciation
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Balance, January 1	$	162,563		$	181,333		$	8,275		$	5,926
Acquisitions		—			—			—			—
Dispositions		(526	)		—			(7	)		—
Improvements/betterments		192			682			—			—
Designated (to)from REO held for sale		(10,108	)		—			(133	)		—
Changes in net book values (NBV)		—			—			—			—
Depreciation		(609	)		(608	)		609			608
Balance, March 31	$	151,512		$	181,407		$	8,744		$	6,534

The following transactions occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014:

- Designated from REO held for investment to REO held for sale

-   One property consisting of two condominium units located in San Francisco County. One of the units is in contract for sale.

-   Nine units in a condominium complex located in Sutter County. The nine units are in contract for sale.

-   Eight unit condominium complex located in Solano County.

-   38 unit apartment complex located in San Joaquin County. The property is in contract for sale.

-   Sold two tenant-in-common units located in San Francisco County. The units sold for approximately their carrying value after taking into account a previously recorded valuation reserve.

-   Sold a six unit apartment building located in Solano County. This property sold for approximately its carrying value.

-   Sold an eight unit apartment building located in San Joaquin County. This property sold for approximately its carrying value.

26

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 5 – REAL ESTATE OWNED (REO) (continued)

REO held as investment (continued)

REO, held as investment, summarized by property classification is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
	Properties	NBV		Properties	NBV
Property classification
Rental	15	$	136,456	19	$	141,812
Development	4		15,056	5		20,751
Total REO, held as investment, net	19	$	151,512	24	$	162,563

Rental properties include single-family residences (1-4 units), multi-family buildings, wholly-owned condominium complexes, fractured condominium complexes and commercial property.

Development properties consist of the following four and five properties at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively:

-   At December 31, 2013, a property under construction consisting of two condominium units in San Francisco County, with a carrying value of $5,776,000 and cost to complete of approximately $300,000.  During the three months ended March 31, 2014 the construction was completed and the property was designated to REO held for sale.

-   At December 31, 2013, a property located in Los Angeles County, zoned and entitled as commercial, which was being developed and re-entitled to residential.  During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the property was re-entitled to multi-family.

-   Approximately 14 acres located in Stanislaus County zoned commercial.

-   Approximately 13 acres located in Marin County, zoned for residential development.

-   A partially completed home subdivision located in Fresno County. The property has rental operations of five single-family residences.

27

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 5 – REAL ESTATE OWNED (REO), (continued)

REO held as investment (continued)

REO, held as investment, summarized by geographic area is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014								December 31, 2013
	Rental				Non-Rental				Rental				Non-Rental
	No.		NBV		No.		NBV		No.		NBV		No.		NBV
San Francisco Bay Area
Contra Costa		4	$	13,967		—	$	—		4	$	13,985		—	$	—
Alameda		3		8,484		—		—		3		8,515		—		—
San Francisco		3		3,899		—		—		3		3,915		1		5,776
Napa		1		1,485		—		—		1		1,491		—		—
Marin		—		—		1		1,210		—		—		1		1,209
Solano		—		—		—		—		1		1,149		—		—
Total San Francisco Bay Area		11		27,835		1		1,210		12		29,055		2		6,985
Other Northern California
Sacramento		1		40,040		—		—		1		40,165		—		—
Amador		1		1,543		—		—		1		1,551		—		—
Stanislaus		—		—		1		2,789		—		—		1		2,790
Fresno		—		—		1		1,607		—		—		1		1,612
San Joaquin		—		—		—		—		2		3,235		—		—
Sutter		—		—		—		—		1		475		—		—
Total Other Northern California		2		41,583		2		4,396		5		45,426		2		4,402
Total Northern California		13		69,418		3		5,606		17		74,481		4		11,387
Los Angeles		2		67,038		1		9,450		2		67,331		1		9,364
Total REO Held as investment		15	$	136,456		4	$	15,056		19	$	141,812		5	$	20,751

Non-Rental REO, held as investment, summarized by property type is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
Property type (non-rental)	Units		Properties		NBV		Units		Properties		NBV
Residential - Single family		—		—	$	—		2		2	$	7,388
Commercial(1)		—		4		15,056		—		3		13,363
Total REO, held as investment, net		—		4	$	15,056		2		5	$	20,751

(1)       Includes two parcels of land of 14 and 13 acres respectively.

28

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 5 – REAL ESTATE OWNED (REO) (continued)

REO Held as investment (continued)

Rental REO, held as investment, summarized by property type is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
Property type (rental)	Units		Properties		NBV		Units		Properties		NBV
Residential
Single family		1		1	$	1,485		1		1	$	1,491
Apartments		—		—		—		8		1		527
Condominiums(2)		174		2		60,916		220		4		65,014
Fractured Condominiums(3)		431		9		70,842		440		10		71,589
Total Residential		606		12		133,243		669		16		138,621
Commercial		—		3		3,213		—		3		3,191
Total REO, held as investment, net		606		15	$	136,456		669		19	$	141,812

(2)       Includes units in condominium complexes wholly-owned by the partnership.

(3)       Includes units in condominium complexes where some units had been sold prior to the partnership’s acquisition.

The earnings/(loss) from rental operations of the real estate owned, held as investment is presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31 ($ in thousands).

	2014		2013
Rental income	$	2,676	$	2,791
Operating expenses, rentals
Administration and payroll		342		346
Homeowner association fees		208		201
Professional services		28		—
Utilities and maintenance		290		275
Advertising and promotions		29		31
Property taxes		328		275
Other		48		47
Total operating expenses, rentals		1,273		1,175
Net operating income		1,403		1,616
Depreciation		603		602
Receiver fees		—		46
Rental operations, net		800		968
Interest on mortgages		437		551
Rental operation, net, less related mortgage interest	$	363	$	417

Leases on residential properties are all one year lease terms or month to month. One commercial property has a short term lease, due to the cancellation clause at lessee’s option.

29

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 6 – BORROWINGS

Mortgages payable transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, ($ in thousands).

	2014			2013
Principal, January 1	$	48,938		$	47,293
New mortgages taken		—			—
Principal repaid		(326	)		(266	)
Principal, March 31	$	48,612		$	47,027

Mortgages payable are summarized in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (mortgage balance $ in thousands).

	March 31,		December 31,
Lender – summary of terms	2014		2013
NorthMarq Capital – Secured by a condominium complex,	$	18,055	$	18,170
located in Los Angeles County, matures July 1, 2015,
interest rate (2.90%) varies monthly (LIBOR plus 2.73%),
monthly payment(1)(2) $119,758
East West Bank – Secured by a fractured condominium project		13,340		13,391
located in Sacramento County, matures June 1, 2017,
interest rate varies monthly (greater of Prime plus 1% or 5.50%),
monthly payment(2) $78,283
Business Partners – Secured by a commercial property located		6,622		6,721
in San Francisco County, matures May 1, 2015,
interest rate varies monthly (greater of 5-year Treasuries
plus 2.33% or 6.53%),
monthly payment(1)(2) $79,155
Chase Bank – Secured by a condominium complex		5,011		5,036
located in Contra Costa County, matures September 1, 2042,
interest rate variable (fixed until September 1, 2017 at 3.52%),
monthly payment $23,228
CapitalSource – Secured by a condominium complex,		4,922		4,952
located in Los Angeles County, matures July 1, 2023,
interest rate variable (fixed until June 1, 2016 at 3.95%),
monthly payment(1)(2) $42,258
Wells Fargo Bank – Secured by a condominium unit located in		348		351
San Francisco County, matures October 1, 2032,
interest rate (2.88%) varies annually (LIBOR plus 2.75%),
monthly payment $2,014
Wells Fargo Bank – Secured by a condominium unit located in		314		317
San Francisco County, matures September 15, 2032,
interest rate (4.03%) varies annually (bank rate plus 3.10%),
monthly payment $2,110
Total mortgages payable	$	48,612	$	48,938

(1)       Monthly payments include amounts for various impounds such as property taxes, insurance, and repairs.

(2)       Monthly payments based upon a 30 year amortization, with a balloon payment due at maturity.

30

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 6 – BORROWINGS (continued)

Future minimum payments of principal at March 31, 2014 are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

2014	$	1,154
2015		24,698
2016		713
2017		13,230
2018		519
Thereafter		8,298
Total	$	48,612

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE

The partnership does not record loans, REO, nor mortgages payable at fair value on a recurring basis.

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

·   Loans designated impaired (i.e. that are collateral dependent)

·   REO held for sale

·   REO held as investment

·   Loans designated impaired which were acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure during the year

·   Loans designated impaired which were acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure and sold during the year

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

	Fair Value Measurement at Report Date Using
	Quoted Prices		Significant
	in Active		Other		Significant
	Markets for		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs		as of
Item	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		03/31/14
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	$	—	$	9,333	$	—	$	9,333
REO held for sale	$	—	$	24,547	$	—	$	24,547
REO held as investment(2)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Impaired loans with allowance, net
foreclosed upon during 2014(1)(3)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Impaired loans with allowance, net
foreclosed and sold during 2014(1)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

(1)   Sum of principal, advances, interest accrued, less the related specific allowance for financial reporting purposes.

(2)   Only includes properties with a valuation change during the year.

(3)   Excludes any properties included in the REO lines above.

31

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE (continued)

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

	Fair Value Measurement at Report Date Using
	Quoted Prices		Significant
	in Active		Other		Significant
	Markets for		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs		as of
Item	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		12/31/13
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	$	—	$	9,360	$	—	$	9,360
REO held for sale	$	—	$	16,552	$	—	$	16,552
REO held as investment(2)	$	—	$	4,868	$	1,551	$	6,419
Impaired loans with allowance, net
foreclosed upon during 2013(1)(3)	$	—	$	2,662	$	—	$	2,662
Impaired loans with allowance, net
foreclosed and sold during 2013(1)	$	—	$	3,895	$	—	$	3,895

(1)   Sum of principal, advances, interest accrued, less the related specific allowance for financial reporting purposes.

(2)   Only includes properties with a valuation change during the year.

(3)   Excludes any properties included in the REO lines above.

Amounts shown as level 3 in 2013 for REO held as investment have been reclassified to level 2 in light of the improved real estate markets in 2012 and continued to improve during 2013.

The following methods and assumptions are used when estimating fair value.

(a)   Secured loans (Level 2) – The recorded amount of the performing loans (i.e. the loan balance) is deemed to approximate the fair value. The company prices its loans uniquely and generally pricing does not react to other than significant changes in the prevailing interest rate indices. Each loan is reviewed for its delinquency, protective equity (LTV) adjusted for the most recent valuation of the underlying collateral, remaining term to maturity, borrower’s payment history and other factors. Also considered is the limited resale market for the loans. Most companies or individuals making similar loans as the company intend to hold the loans until maturity as the average contractual term of the loans (and the historical experience of the time the loan is outstanding due to pre-payments) is shorter than conventional mortgages. Further, for substantially all loans, there are no prepayment-penalties to be collected and any potential loan buyers would be hesitant to risk paying above par. Due to these factors sales of the loans are infrequent and an active market does not exist.

(b)   Secured loans (Level 2) – designated impaired are deemed collateral dependent, and the fair value of the loan is the lesser of the fair value of the collateral or the enforceable amount owing under the note. The fair value of the collateral is determined by exercise of judgment based on management’s experience informed by appraisals (by licensed appraisers), brokers’ opinion of values, and publicly available information on in-market transactions Level 2 inputs.

32

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE (continued)

The following methods are used depending upon the property type of the collateral of the secured loans.

Single family – Management’s preferred method for determining the fair market value of its single-family residential assets is the sale comparison method. Management primarily obtains sale comps via its subscription to the RealQuest service, but also uses free online services such as Zillow.com and other available resources to supplement this data. Sale comps are reviewed for similarity to the subject property, examining features such as proximity to subject, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, square footage, sale date, condition, and year built.

Where sufficient, applicable sale comps are not available, management will seek additional information in the form of broker’s opinions of value or appraisals.

Multi-family residential – The company’s multi-family residential assets consist of either multiple owned units at fractured condominium projects and wholly owned apartment complexes with condominium overlays. Management’s fair market value analysis compares the aggregate retail value of the units as for-sale condominiums against the asset’s value as an income-producing rental property in determining its most favorable market.

Management’s preferred method for determining the aggregate retail value of its multifamily units is the sale comparison method for the individual condominium units. Management primarily obtains sale comparables (comps) via its subscription to the RealQuest service, but also uses free online services such as Zillow.com to supplement this data. Sale comps are reviewed for similarity to the subject property, examining features such as proximity to subject, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, square footage, sale date, condition, amenities and year built. For fractured condominium projects, sales of units within the same community are preferred.

Management compiles the list of the most relevant sale comps and derives an average price per square foot, which is then applied to the average square footage of company-owned units at the subject property to determine the average price per unit and the gross square footage of all company units to determine the aggregate retail value of the units as for-sale condominiums.

Where adequate sale comps are not available, management will seek additional information in the form of broker’s opinions of value or appraisals.

Management’s preferred method for valuing its multifamily assets as income-producing rental operations is the direct capitalization method when rental operations are consistent and rental income and expenses have been normalized. In order to determine market cap rates, management refers to published data from reliable third-party sources such as the CBRE Cap Rate Survey. Management then applies the appropriate cap rate to the subject’s most recent available annual net operating income to determine the property’s value as an income-producing project. When reliable net operating income information is not available or the project is under development or is under-performing to market, management will seek additional information and analysis to determine the cost to improve and the intrinsic fair value.

Where such information is available, management may also determine the asset’s value as an income-producing rental project via the sale comparison method by comparing the value of similar multifamily assets sold recently. This method typically applies only to wholly owned apartment complexes.

Management compares the aggregate retail value to the value as an income-producing rental project to determine the property’s current highest and best use/ most favorable market, setting the fair market value accordingly.

33

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

A California Limited Partnership

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE (continued)

Commercial buildings – Where commercial rental income information is available, management’s preferred method for determining the fair value of its commercial real estate assets is the direct capitalization method. In order to determine market cap rates for properties of the same class and location as the subject, management refers to reputable third-party sources such as the CBRE Cap Rate Survey. Management then applies the appropriate cap rate to the subject’s most recent available annual net operating income to determine the property’s value as an income-producing commercial rental project.  When reliable net operating income information is not available or the project is under development or is under-performing to market, management will seek additional information and analysis to determine the cost to improve and the intrinsic fair value of stabilized properties performing at market, less any cost to improve.

Supplemental, and particularly when reliable net operating income is not available or the project is under development, management will seek additional information in the form of a sale comparison analysis (where adequate sale comps are available), broker’s opinion of value, or appraisal.

Commercial land – Commercial land has many variations/uses, thus requiring management to employ a variety of methods depending upon the unique characteristics of the subject land.

(c)   Unsecured loans (Level 3). Unsecured loans are valued at their principal less any discount or loss reserves established by management after taking into account the borrower’s creditworthiness and ability to repay the loan.

(d)   Real estate owned (REO), net (Level 2). Real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations, generally through foreclosure, is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s fair value less estimated costs to sell, as applicable. The fair value estimates are derived as above in secured loans for similar property types.  In rare instances where no market comps are available, the fair value of the property will be computed using internal analytics that are expected to be indicative of the value that would be ascribed by a buyer/investor.

(e)   Mortgages payable (Level 2). The partnership has mortgages payable (see Note 6 Borrowings for details). The interest rates are deemed to be at market rates for the type and location of the securing property, the length of the mortgage, and the other terms and conditions are deemed to be customary. All of the partnership’s mortgages are deemed to be at fair value as they are either, with variable interest rates which have adjusted within the past twelve months, or were refinanced/extended within the past twelve months with terms and conditions deemed customary for the collateral property.

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, OTHER THAN LOAN AND REO COMMITMENTS

Legal proceedings

In the normal course of business, the partnership may become involved in various legal proceedings such as assignment of rents, bankruptcy proceedings, appointment of receivers, unlawful detainers, judicial foreclosure, etc., to enforce the provisions of the deeds of trust, collect the debt owed under the promissory notes, or to protect, or recoup its investment from the real property secured by the deeds of trust and to resolve disputes between borrowers, lenders, lien holders and mechanics. None of these actions typically would be of any material importance. As of the date hereof, the partnership is not involved in any legal proceedings other than those that would be considered part of the normal course of business.

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

None

34

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, which are included in Item 1 of this Report, as well as the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this Report on Form 10-Q which are not historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements regarding the partnership’s expectations, hopes, intentions, beliefs and strategies regarding the future. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding economic conditions and their effect on the partnership and its assets, trends in the California real estate market, estimates as to the allowance for loan losses, estimated costs to complete certain property developments, additional foreclosures in 2014, expectations regarding the level of loan delinquencies, plans to develop certain properties, the anticipated diminishment of the difference between amount distributed and net income, and the use of excess cash flow. Actual results may be materially different from what is projected by such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include unexpected changes in economic conditions and interest rates, the impact of competition and competitive pricing and downturns in the real estate markets in which the partnership has made loans. All forward-looking statements and reasons why results may differ included in this Form 10-Q are made as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement or reason why actual results may differ.

Critical Accounting Policies

Management estimates

See Note 2 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report for a detailed presentation of critical accounting policies.

Related Parties

See Note 1 (Organizational and General) and Note 3 (General Partners and Other Related Parties) to the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report for a detailed presentation of various partnership activities for which the general partners and related parties are compensated, and other related-party transactions, including the formation loan.

35

Results of Operations

Changes to the partnership’s operating results are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

	Changes during the three months ended March 31, 2014 versus 2013
	Dollars			Percent
Revenue, net
Interest income
Loans	$	326		95	%
Imputed interest on formation loan		13		14
Other interest income		—		—
Total interest income		339		78
Interest expense
Bank loan, secured		—		—
Mortgages payable		(5	)	(1	)
Amortization of discount on formation loan		13		14
Other interest expense		—		—
Total interest expense		8		1
Net interest income/(expense)		331		158
Late fees		(1	)	(40	)
Other		145		100
Total revenues, net	$	475		230
Provision for loan losses/(recoveries), net		(30	)	100
Operating expenses
Mortgage servicing fees		(27	)	(18	)
Asset management fees		(2	)	(1	)
Costs from RMC		119		30
Professional services		(342	)	(76	)
REO
Rental operations, net		168		17
Holding costs		(37	)	(58	)
Loss/(gain) on disposal		(2	)	100
Impairment loss		—		—
Other		7		169
Total operating expenses, net		(116	)	(41	)
Net income (loss)	$	621		126	%

Please refer to the above table and the consolidated Statement of Operations in the financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report throughout the discussion of Results of Operations.

General Economic Conditions and Financial Overview

As noted in the “California Economic Outlook: March 2014” published by Wells Fargo’s Economics Group:  “The Golden State’s Economy continues to grow at a pace slightly ahead of the nation’s, although gains have been heavily weighted toward the state’s larger metropolitan areas along the coast.  Technology, tourism and retail trade have led the recovery in job growth in recent years, which has helped trim the unemployment rate and revive housing demand.” The report states in its Summary and Outlook Section: “California’s economy continues to gradually gain momentum. While the recovery has been slower than in the past, the state has methodically made progress working through a number of major impediments, most notably the overhang of foreclosures and distressed homes left over from the housing bust.” Further contained in that section:  “The biggest headlines and strongest job gains continue to be in California’s tech sector, much of which is centered in the Bay Area.”

36

Other published reports, including regional real estate market reports prepared by Polaris Pacific as published February 2014, indicate that real estate prices and rents are increasing in the California communities in which we lend. Median condominium resale prices increased 9.3% in San Francisco, 21.2% in the Silicon Valley and 18% in the Greater Los Angeles Area in 2013. During the year, rents in San Francisco increased 11.5% and 10.1% in the Silicon Valley.

Quoting again from the Wells publication:  “We remain optimistic about California’s prospects in 2014 and look for job growth to pick up in construction and manufacturing. Overall nonfarm payrolls should rise 2.3% this year, producing a net gain of at least 330,000 new jobs. The Golden State’s unemployment rate is expected to fall by at least a percentage point and average 7.6% for the year.”

The year 2013 marked the first full year since the 2008 financial crisis the partnership has operated without severe constraints that had been imposed by its lenders (which borrowings since have been repaid) and in a normally operating (i.e. not distressed) real estate markets. For the first time since 2008, the partnership is reporting full year net income for 2013, which continues into the first quarter of 2014, and the transition from crisis management, focused on cash management to a focus on re-building the business’ profitability.

Since the beginning to the financial crisis (2008) and the resultant Great Recession (2009) the partnership has continuously adjusted to the historically volatile and challenging conditions of the economic environment. The combination of general economic conditions, constrained credit, depressed financial markets, distressed real estate markets, and the terms and conditions of the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement (the “Bank Loan”) dated October 2010, resulted in significant changes in the lending and business operations of the partnership.

Performance Highlights

The partnership’s net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $433,000, the first full year of profitability since 2008, and a positive change of $6,087,000 from the $(5,654,000) net loss of 2012. The change in net income is due to several factors:  1) $22,285,000 of new performing loans were created during 2013, 2) recoveries in the real estate markets in our lending area aided collection efforts yielding cash recoveries from three borrowers, and helped loan collateral values to recover, thereby reducing the required allowance for loan losses, 3) improving REO operations and 4) gains on the sale of REO.

Net income for the quarter ending March 31, 2014 increased by $621,000 compared to the quarter ending March 31, 2013.  The change in net income is primarily due to an increase of interest on loans, net of $331,000 due to growth in the performing loan balance and average yield rate, and a decrease in professional fees due the reduction of complex workout agreements, legal costs, and tax and accounting matters regarding the loan and REO portfolios’ stabilization and rental operations.

Loan Characteristics – Ongoing & Legacy Loans

The loans made after the bank loan was repaid (Ongoing) have borrowers underwritten to today’s standards and have significantly higher equity in their properties than the loans created before the bank loan was repaid. The loans created before the bank loan was repaid (Legacy loans), have many borrowers that continue to struggle with the effects of the financial crisis and the resultant loss of equity in their properties.

The partnership has been concentrating its Ongoing lending efforts in the San Francisco Bay Area, and Coastal Metropolitan Southern California. These areas have shown the greatest recoveries in the real estate markets as well as their respective local economies.

37

The tables below show the 2014 activity and various characteristics of the loan portfolio by Ongoing and Legacy groupings as of March 31, 2014 ($ in thousands).

Transactions	Ongoing			Legacy			Total
Principal, January 1, 2014	$	27,402		$	24,488		$	51,890
Loans funded or acquired		7,875			—			7,875
Principal collected		(6,010	)		(636	)		(6,646	)
Loans sold to affiliates		—			—			—
Foreclosures		—			—			—
Other-loans charged off		—			—			—
Principal, March 31, 2014	$	29,267		$	23,852		$	53,119
Portfolio characteristics
Number of secured loans		18			20			38
Average secured loan-principal		1,626			1,193			1,398
Largest secured loan-principal		10,500			16,312			16,312
Smallest secured loan-principal		300			69			69
Number of counties		6			15			16
Average interest rate		7.58	%		5.82	%		6.79	%
Number of loans with workout agreements		—			3			3
Aggregate workout principal balance		—			1,087			1,087
Number of loans with active modifications		—			4			4
Aggregate modifications principal balance		—			3,535			3,535

The Ongoing portfolio has an average interest rate of 7.58% compared to 5.82% for the Legacy portfolio. The difference is primarily due to reducing interest rates from collection efforts through loan modifications and workout agreements over the past several years on Legacy loans.

As of March 31, 2014, the partnership’s largest Legacy loan, in the unpaid principal balance of $16,312,000 (representing 68.39% of outstanding secured Legacy principal balance and 6.72% of total partnership assets) has an interest rate of 5.00% and is secured by 75 units in a 128 unit condominium complex located in Contra Costa County, California. This loan matured April 1, 2012. A court appointed receiver is overseeing the management of the property and exploring the market for the disposition of the remaining units.

38

	Loans		Principal		Percent
Geographic distribution
Ongoing
San Francisco Bay Area		11	$	25.142		86	%
Other Northern California		—		—		—
Los Angeles & Southern Coastal		7		4,125		14
Other Southern California		—		—		—
Total ongoing loans		18	$	29,267		100	%
Legacy
San Francisco Bay Area		11	$	22,117		92	%
Other Northern California		5		765		3
Los Angeles & Southern Coastal		3		854		4
Other Southern California		1		116		1
Total legacy loans		20	$	23,852		100	%
Total
San Francisco Bay Area		22		47,259		89	%
Other Northern California		5		765		1
Los Angeles & Southern Coastal		10		4,979		9
Other Southern California		1		116		1
Total		38	$	53,119		100	%
Lien position
Ongoing
First trust deeds		13	$	21,320		73	%
Second trust deeds		5		7,947		27
Third trust deeds		—		—		—
Total ongoing loans		18	$	29,267		100	%
Legacy
First trust deeds		9	$	18,375		77	%
Second trust deeds		10		5,189		22
Third trust deeds		1		288		1
Total legacy loans		20	$	23,852		100	%
Total
First trust deeds		22	$	39,695		75	%
Second trust deeds		15		13,136		24
Third trust deeds		1		288		1
Total loans		38	$	53,119		100	%

39

	Ongoing			Legacy			Total
Scheduled maturities
2014	$	5,400		$	141		$	5,541
2015		16,740			1,297			18,037
2016		1,950			3,101			5,051
2017		—			1,385			1,385
2018		349			234			583
Thereafter		4,828			—			4,828
Total future maturities		29,267			6,158			35,425
Matured at March 31, 2014		—			17,694			17,694
Total secured loans	$	29,267		$	23,852		$	53,119
Matured loans
Number of loans		—			5			5
Principal	$	—		$	17,694		$	17,694
Advances		—			683			683
Accrued interest		—			65			65
Loan balance	$	—		$	18,442		$	18,442
Percent of principal		—	%		74	%		33	%
Delinquency
Past due
30-89 days	$	394		$	—		$	394
90-179 days		—			405			405
180 or more days		—			17,264			17,264
Total past due		394			17,669			18,063
Current		28,872			6,184			35,056
Total secured loans	$	29,266		$	23,853		$	53,119
Secured loans in nonaccrual status
Number of loans		—			8			8
Principal	$	—		$	18,350		$	18,350
Advances		—			688			688
Accrued interest		—			65			65
Loan balance	$	—		$	19,103		$	19,103
Loans designated impaired
Principal	$	—			21,092		$	21,092
Recorded investment(1)	$	—			21,846		$	21,846
Impaired loans without allowance	$	—			3,753		$	3,753
Impaired loans with allowance	$	—			18,093		$	18,093
Allowance for loan losses
Provision/(Recovery) for loan losses, 2014	$	—		$	(30	)	$	(30	)
Allowance for loan losses	$	—		$	8,760		$	8,760

(1) Recorded investment is the sum of principal, advances, and interest accrued for financial reporting purposes.

40

Revenue – Interest income – Loans

Interest income on loans increased for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as a result of the partnership adding approximately $30,160,000 of new performing loans to the loan portfolio since March 31, 2013. Foregone interest (not recorded for financial reporting purposes on loans designated in non-accrual status) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, was approximately $246,000, and $710,000, respectively. The tables below recap the yearly averages and the effect of the foregone interest on the average yield rate for the Ongoing and Legacy groups of loans ($ in thousands).

	Average							Stated
	Secured				Effective			Average
	Loan		Interest		Yield			Yield
Year	Balance		Income		Rate			Rate
Ongoing
2014	$	26,048	$	481		7.39	%		7.58	%
2013	$	10,500	$	105		4.00	%		4.00	%
Legacy
2014	$	24,540	$	187		3.05	%		5.82	%
2013	$	50,735	$	237		1.87	%		7.37	%
Total
2014	$	50,588	$	668		5.29	%		6.79	%
2013	$	61,235	$	342		2.23	%		6.79	%

Revenue – Interest expense

 - Mortgages

Mortgage interest expense decreased due to one mortgage being paid off in full.  The rental property securing the loan was sold at the end of 2013.

Provision for Losses on Loans/Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses (recoveries), net is primarily driven by the specific reserves maintained in the allowance for loan losses, associated with impaired loans as analyzed each year. All Ongoing loans are performing and are deemed well collateralized and the improving real estate markets in our lending areas is increasing the fair values of the underlying collateral of the legacy loans.  As a result, the allowance for loan losses decreased by $30,000.

See Note 4 (Loans) to the consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report for detailed presentations of loan balances, activity, and characteristics, and the corresponding data regarding the allowance for loan losses.

Operating Expenses

 - Mortgage servicing fees

The decrease in mortgage servicing fees for 2014 is consistent with the decreases in the average daily secured loan portfolio, due to the reduction of Legacy loans.  Fees are charged at the annual rate of 1.5%, less the waived annual rate of 0.5%. RMC at its sole discretion has waived 0.5% through the first quarter of 2014 and all of 2013. There is no guarantee RMC will waive any portion of this fee in the future.

 - Costs from RMC

The increase in costs from RMC was primarily due to an increase in office and payroll expense.  Office expenses increased in the first quarter of 2014 due to office relocation costs, and extensive technology upgrades.  Payroll expense increased in the first quarter of 2014 due to a growing staff of skilled employees.

41

 - Professional services

The decrease in professional services for 2014 was largely due to the above normal operating costs during the first quarter of 2013 related to complex workout agreements, legal costs, and tax and accounting matters regarding the loan and REO portfolios’ stabilization and rental operations. Fees for auditing and tax services decreased approximately $40,000, legal fees decreased $249,000 and consultant’s fees decreased $11,000.

REO – Rental operations, net

The table below summarizes the rental operations, net for the three months ended March 31, ($ in thousands).

	2014		2013
Rental income	$	2,675	$	2,791
Operating expenses, rentals
Administration and payroll		342		346
Homeowner association fees		208		201
Professional services		27		—
Utilities and maintenance		290		275
Advertising and promotions		29		31
Property taxes		328		275
Other		48		47
Total operating expenses, rentals		1,272		1,175
Net operating income		1,403		1,616
Depreciation		603		602
Receiver fees		—		46
Rental operations, net		800		968
Interest on mortgages		437		551
Rental operations, net, less related mortgage interest	$	363	$	417

Rental operations are comprised of residential and commercial properties. There were 12 residential properties at March 31, 2014 with a net book value of $133,242,927, and three commercial properties with a net book value of $3,213,183. Rental financial highlights by property type are presented in the table below for the three months ended March 31, 2014, ($ in thousands).

														Rental
														Operations,
														net, less
					Net									Related
	Rental		Operating		Operating					Receiver		Mortgage		Mortgage
	Income		Expenses		Income			Depreciation		Fees		Interest		Interest
Property type
Residential
Single family	$	13	$	7	$	6		$	6	$	—	$	—	$	—
Condominiums and
apartments		1,007		404		603			263		—		189		152
Fractured condominiums		1,614		753		861			326		—		248		287
Total residential		2,634		1,164		1,470			595		—		437		439
Commercial		41		108		(67	)		8				—		(76	)
Total	$	2,675	$	1,272	$	1,403		$	603	$	—	$	437	$	363

42

The decrease in rental operations for the first quarter of 2014 was largely due to the sale and reclassification of properties previously included in rental operations. The remaining properties included in rental operations have continued to stabilize occupancy rates and increase rental income.  Major areas of change from the first quarter of 2013 to the first quarter of 2014 are summarized in the following table, ($ in thousands).

																			Rental
																			Operations,
																			net, less
							Net												Related
	Rental			Operating			Operating						Receiver			Mortgage			Mortgage
	Income			Expenses			Income			Depreciation			Fees			Interest			Interest
2014 results	$	2,675		$	1,272		$	1,403		$	603		$	—		$	437		$	363
2013 results		2,791			1,175			1,616			602			46			551			417
Change	$	(116	)	$	97		$	(213	)	$	1		$	(46	)	$	(114	)	$	(54	)
Explanation of change
REO sold or assigned
held for sale	$	(350	)	$	(117	)	$	(233	)	$	(57	)	$	—		$	(158	)	$	(18	)
Rents to market rates and
Increased occupancy		234			43			191			—			—			—			191
Refunds / Adjustments		—			90			(90	)		—			—			—			(90	)
Completed deferred
maintenance		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Deferred maintenance		—			41			(41	)		—			—			—			(41	)
Receiver contract complete		—			—			—			—			(46	)		—			46
Depreciation catchup adjust		—			—			—			36			—			—			(36	)
New mortgages		—			—			—			—			—			53			(53	)
Other		—			40			(40	)		22			—			(9	)		(53	)
Change	$	(116	)	$	97		$	(213	)	$	1		$	(46	)	$	(114	)	$	(54	)

- Rental income – In the first quarter of 2014, vacancy rates decreased compared to the first quarter of 2013 due to the continued    stabilization of rental properties post acquisition.  In addition, 70% of rental properties are located in areas such as San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Southern Coastal California, where rental rates continue to increase due to favorable market conditions.

- Operating expenses – The first quarter of 2014 experienced higher operating costs in conjunction with the increase in occupancy rates and rental income as mentioned above.  In the first quarter of 2013 property tax expense was reduced due to refunds received based on the reassessment of rental properties post-acquisition.

- Receiver fees – residential – decreased due to the receiver’s assignment being completed during 2013.

- Mortgage Interest – increased due to a new mortgage being obtained in the third quarter of 2013.

At management’s direction, the property management companies have worked to improve net operating income by executing the strategy of increasing occupancy while achieving market rent growth. We manage market rents across our portfolio by reviewing market surveys and by communicating with property managers. Additionally, as tenants vacate units we anticipate moving rents to the currently existing higher market rents. Management is also reviewing administrative cost such as management fees and operating costs.

REO – Holding costs – The decrease in holding costs in the three months ended March 31, 2014 was primarily due to the sale of properties during 2013.

43

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The partnership relies upon loan payoffs, borrowers’ mortgage payments, the sale and financing of real estate owned and to a lesser degree, retention of income when profitable for the source of funds for operations, lending and payments to partners.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments, and Contingencies

A summary of the contractual obligations of the partnership as of March 31, 2014 is set forth below ($ in thousands).

Contractual Obligation	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years
Mortgages payable	$	48,612	$	1,548	$	25,201	$	21,863
Construction contracts		100		100		—		—
Construction loans		—		—		—		—
Rehabilitation loans		—		—		—		—
Total	$	48,712	$	1,648	$	25,201	$	21,863

Distributions to limited partners

The percent of limited partners electing cash distributions, if any, by weighted average to total partners’ capital was 56%, for each of the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, $1,875,000 and $574,000, respectively, was distributed to limited partners. Should the full year results of operations be a net loss, these amounts distributed would constitute a return of capital.

Withdrawals of limited partners’ capital

There are substantial restrictions on transferability of units and accordingly an investment in the partnership is non-liquid. The partnership does not establish a reserve from which to fund withdrawals and, accordingly, the partnership’s capacity to return a limited partner’s capital is restricted to the availability of partnership cash flow. Furthermore, no more than 20% of the total limited partners’ capital accounts outstanding at the beginning of any year, may be liquidated during any calendar year.

In order to provide a certain degree of liquidity to the limited partners, once a limited partner has been in the partnership for the minimum five-year period, they may withdraw all or a portion of their capital accounts in twenty quarterly installments or longer, beginning the last day of the calendar quarter following the quarter in which the notice of withdrawal is given. The general partners, at their discretion, may liquidate all or part of a limited partner’s capital account in four quarterly installments beginning on the last day of the calendar quarter following the quarter in which the notice of withdrawal is given, subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty applicable to any sums withdrawn prior to the time when such sums could have been withdrawn without penalty.

In March 2009, in response to economic conditions then existing, the partnership suspended capital liquidations.  In the fourth quarter of 2009 the partnership entered into a forbearance agreement with its banks and subsequently entered into an amended and restated loan agreement (dated October 2010) which included additional restrictions on liquidations and distributions of partners’ capital. The bank loan was paid off in September 2012. The partnership’s four most recently completed quarters have been profitable, and it has re-commenced providing capital liquidation payments as of March 31, 2014. For the quarter ending March 31, 2014, those investors that had a liquidation payment pending as of March 31, 2009, the partnership resumed liquidation payments based on their current capital balance based on their election existing in March 2009. Limited partners were informed of our reinstitution of accepting liquidation requests and those that requested liquidation between January 1, 2014 and prior to March 31, 2014, will have their liquidation requests added to those previously existing and they will be scheduled to commence June 30, 2014. Each quarter, the partnership will allocate a specific amount of cash for liquidation payments. In the event that the cash allocated is insufficient to meet the liquidation requests of all limited partners requesting liquidations, then liquidation requests will be disbursed based upon the priority schedule set forth in the limited partnership agreement and then on a pro-rata basis. The partnership intends to continue to accept liquidation requests in future quarters and these requests will be added to previously existing requests and be subject to the same priorities and pro-rata allocation of distributable cash as described in the limited partnership agreement.

44

Valuation of partners’ capital as units

In some cases in order to satisfy broker-dealers and other reporting requirements, the general partners have valued the limited partners’ interest in the partnership on a basis which utilizes a per unit system of calculation, rather than based upon the investors’ capital account. This information has been reported in this manner in order to allow the partnership to integrate with certain software used by the broker-dealers and other reporting entities. In those cases, the partnership will report to broker-dealers, trust companies and others a “reporting” number of units based upon a $1.00 per unit calculation. The number of reporting units provided will be calculated based upon the limited partner’s capital account value divided by $1.00. Each investor’s capital account balance is set forth periodically on the partnership account statement provided to investors. The reporting units are solely for broker-dealers requiring such information for their software programs and do not reflect actual units owned by a limited partner or the limited partners’ right or interest in cash flow or any other economic benefit in the partnership. Each investor’s capital account balance is set forth periodically on the partnership account statement provided to investors. The amount of partnership profits each investor is entitled to receive is determined by the ratio each investor’s capital account bears to the total amount of all investor capital accounts then outstanding. The capital account balance of each investor should be included on any FINRA member client account statement in providing a per unit estimated value of the client’s investment in the partnership in accordance with NASD Rule 2340.

While the general partners have set an estimated value for the units, such determination may not be representative of the ultimate price realized by an investor for such units upon sale. No public trading market exists for the units and none is likely to develop. Thus, there is no certainty the units can be sold at a price equal to the stated value of the capital account. Furthermore, the ability of an investor to liquidate his or her investment is limited subject to certain liquidation rights provided by the partnership, which may include early withdrawal penalties.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not included as the partnership is a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the general partners of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the general partners concluded the partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in the partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

45

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.              Legal Proceedings

In the normal course of business, the partnership may become involved in various types of legal proceedings such as assignment of rents, bankruptcy proceedings, appointment of receivers, unlawful detainers, judicial foreclosure, etc., to enforce provisions of the deeds of trust, collect the debt owed under promissory notes, or to protect, or recoup its investment from real property secured by the deeds of trust and resolve disputes between borrowers, lenders, lien holders and mechanics. None of these actions would typically be of any material importance. As of the date hereof, the partnership is not involved in any legal proceedings other than those that would be considered part of the normal course of business.

ITEM 1A.           Risk Factors

Not included as the partnership is a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2.              Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not Applicable.

ITEM 3.              Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4.               Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5.              Other Information

None.

ITEM 6.              Exhibits

31.1 Certification of General Partner pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2 Certification of General Partner pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.3 Certification of General Partner pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1 Certification of General Partner pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2 Certification of General Partner pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.3 Certification of General Partner pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS* XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

46

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII
	(Registrant)
Date:  May 15, 2014	By:	Redwood Mortgage Corp., General Partner
		By:	/s/ Michael R. Burwell
		Name:	Michael R. Burwell
		Title:	President, Secretary and Treasurer
			(On behalf of the registrant, and in the capacity of principal financial officer), Director
Date:  May 15, 2014	By:	Gymno LLC, General Partner
		By:	/s/ Michael R. Burwell
		Name:	Michael R. Burwell
		Title:	Manager
Date:  May 15, 2014	By:	Michael R. Burwell, General Partner
		By:	/s/ Michael R. Burwell
		Name:	Michael R. Burwell
		Title:	General Partner

47

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

PRINCIPAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII, a California Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15-d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Michael R. Burwell

___________________________

Michael R. Burwell, President,

(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

Redwood Mortgage Corp.,

General Partner

May 15, 2014

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

MANAGER CERTIFICATION

I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII, a California Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15-d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Michael R. Burwell

_____________________________

Michael R. Burwell,

Manager of Gymno LLC,

General Partner

May 15, 2014

EX-31.3

Exhibit 31.3

GENERAL PARTNER CERTIFICATION

I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII, a California Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15-d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Michael R. Burwell

_____________________________

Michael R. Burwell, General Partner

May 15, 2014

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII and will be retained by Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Michael R. Burwell

___________________________

Michael R. Burwell, President,

(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

Redwood Mortgage Corp.,

General Partner

May 15, 2014

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII and will be retained by Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Michael R. Burwell

_____________________________

Michael R. Burwell,

Manager of Gymno LLC,

General Partner

May 15, 2014

EX-32.3

Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII and will be retained by Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Michael R. Burwell

_____________________________

Michael R. Burwell, General Partner

May 15, 2014

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Impaired Loans - Average Balances and Interest Income (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Impaired Loans - Average Balances and Interest Income [Abstract]
Average recorded investment	$ 22,048	$ 36,652
Interest income recognized	46	156
Interest income received in cash	$ 35	$ 378

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - Earnings/(Loss) from Rental Operations of the Real Estate Owned, Held as Investment (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013
Operating expenses, rentals
Professional services	$ 108,000	$ 450,000
Other	11,000	4,000
Total operating expenses, rentals	169,000	285,000
Depreciation	(48,000)		(43,000)
Interest on mortgages	546,000	551,000
REO Held as Investment [Member] | REO Held as Investment [Member]
Operating expenses, rentals
Other	48,000	47,000
Total operating expenses, rentals	1,273,000	1,175,000
REO Held as Investment [Member]
Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - Earnings/(Loss) from Rental Operations of the Real Estate Owned, Held as Investment [Line Items]
Rental income	2,676,000	2,791,000
Operating expenses, rentals
Administration and payroll	342,000	346,000
Homeowner association fees	208,000	201,000
Professional services	28,000
Utilities and maintenance	290,000	275,000
Advertising and promotions	29,000	31,000
Property taxes	328,000	275,000
Net operating income	1,403,000	1,616,000
Depreciation	603,000	602,000
Receiver fees		46,000
Rental operations, net	800,000	968,000
Interest on mortgages	437,000	551,000
Rental operation, net, less related mortgage interest	$ 363,000	$ 417,000

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - REO, Held as Investment, by Geographic Area (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	6	3
NBV	$ 151,512,000	$ 162,563,000	$ 181,407,000	$ 181,333,000
Rental REO [Member] | Contra Costa [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	4	4
NBV	13,967,000	13,985,000
Rental REO [Member] | Alameda [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	3	3
NBV	8,484,000	8,515,000
Rental REO [Member] | San Francisco [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	3	3
NBV	3,899,000	3,915,000
Rental REO [Member] | Napa [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	1	1
NBV	1,485,000	1,491,000
Rental REO [Member] | Solano [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties		1
NBV		1,149,000
Rental REO [Member] | San Francisco Bay Area [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	11	12
NBV	27,835,000	29,055,000
Rental REO [Member] | Sacramento [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	1	1
NBV	40,040,000	40,165,000
Rental REO [Member] | Amador [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	1	1
NBV	1,543,000	1,551,000
Rental REO [Member] | San Joaquin [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties		2
NBV		3,235,000
Rental REO [Member] | Sutter [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties		1
NBV		475,000
Rental REO [Member] | Other Northern California [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	2	5
NBV	41,583,000	45,426,000
Rental REO [Member] | Northern California [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	13	17
NBV	69,418,000	74,481,000
Rental REO [Member] | Los Angeles [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	2	2
NBV	67,038,000	67,331,000
Rental REO [Member] | CALIFORNIA
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	15	19
NBV	136,456,000	141,812,000
Rental REO [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	15	19
NBV	136,456,000	141,812,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | San Francisco [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties		1
NBV		5,776,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | Marin [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	1	1
NBV	1,210,000	1,209,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | San Francisco Bay Area [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	1	2
NBV	1,210,000	6,985,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | Stanislaus County [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	1	1
NBV	2,789,000	2,790,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | Fresno County,California [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	1	1
NBV	1,607,000	1,612,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | Other Northern California [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	2	2
NBV	4,396,000	4,402,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | Northern California [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	3	4
NBV	5,606,000	11,387,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | Los Angeles [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	1	1
NBV	9,450,000	9,364,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | CALIFORNIA
San Francisco Bay Area
Number of Properties	4	5
NBV	$ 15,056,000	$ 20,751,000

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans Scheduled Maturities (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Secured Loans Scheduled Maturities [Abstract]
2014	3
2014 (in Dollars)	$ 5,541
2014	10.00%
2015	13
2015 (in Dollars)	18,037
2015	34.00%
2016	5
2016 (in Dollars)	5,051
2016	10.00%
2017	4
2017 (in Dollars)	1,385
2017	3.00%
2018	2
2018 (in Dollars)	583
2018	1.00%
2019	6
2019 (in Dollars)	4,828
2019	9.00%
Total future maturities	33
Total future maturities (in Dollars)	35,425
Total future maturities	67.00%
Matured at March 31, 2014	5	[1],[2]	5	[1],[2]
Matured at March 31, 2014 (in Dollars)	17,694
Matured at March 31, 2014	33.00%
Total secured loans	38		36
Total secured loans (in Dollars)	$ 53,119	[3]	$ 51,890	[3]
Total secured loans	100.00%

[1] The secured loans past maturity include 5 loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, also included in the secured loans in non-accrual status.

[2] The secured loans past maturity include 5 loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, also included in the secured loans delinquency.

[3] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 3 - General Partners and Other Related Parties (Details) - Future Minimum Payments on Formation Loan (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014
Future Minimum Payments on Formation Loan [Abstract]
2014	$ 0
2015	1,896
2016	1,665
2017	1,322
2018	1,150
Thereafter	1,554
Total	$ 7,584

XML

Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender [Line Items]
Secured debt	$ 48,612	$ 48,938
NorthMarq Capital [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender [Line Items]
Secured debt	18,055	18,170
East West Bank [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender [Line Items]
Secured debt	13,340	13,391
Business Partners [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender [Line Items]
Secured debt	6,622	6,721
Chase [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender [Line Items]
Secured debt	5,011	5,036
Capital Source [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender [Line Items]
Secured debt	4,922	4,952
Wells Fargo Bank [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender [Line Items]
Secured debt	348	351
Wells Fargo Bank (Wachovia Mortgage) [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender [Line Items]
Secured debt	$ 314	$ 317

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) (USD $)																			3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2014 Condominium Complex [Member] San Francisco County [Member] Under Contract For Sale [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Condominium Complex [Member] San Francisco County [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Condominium Complex [Member] Sutter [Member] Under Contract For Sale [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Condominium Complex [Member] Solano County [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Condominium Complex [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Apartment Building [Member] Solano County [Member] Sold [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Apartment Building [Member] San Joaquin [Member] Under Contract For Sale [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Apartment Building [Member] San Joaquin [Member] Sold [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Tenants-in-common Units [Member] San Francisco County [Member] Sold [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Development REO [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Development REO [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Two Condominium Units [Member] San Francisco County [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Two Condominium Units [Member] San Francisco County [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Residential Single Family [Member] Fresno County,California [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Rental Property [Member] REO Held as Investment [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Stanislaus County [Member] acre	Mar. 31, 2014 Marin County [Member] acre	Dec. 31, 2013 Marin County [Member] sqm	Mar. 31, 2014 REO Held as Investment [Member] 14 Acre Parcel of Land [Member] acre
Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Real Estate Properties	6	3				1								4	5			5
Number of Units in Real Estate Property					1	2	9	8	128	6	38	8	2				2
Real Estate Investment Property, Net (in Dollars)	$ 151,512,000	$ 162,563,000	$ 181,407,000	$ 181,333,000												$ 5,776,000	$ 300,000
Area of Real Estate Property																				14	13	13	14
Lessor Leasing Arrangements, Operating Leases, Term of Contract																			1 year

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans in Nonaccrual Status (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans in Nonaccrual Status [Line Items]
Number of loans	38		36
Principal	$ 53,119,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	[1]
Nonaccrual Status [Member] | Principal [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans in Nonaccrual Status [Line Items]
Principal	18,350,000		18,361,000
Nonaccrual Status [Member] | Advances [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans in Nonaccrual Status [Line Items]
Principal	688,000		688,000
Nonaccrual Status [Member] | Accrued Interest [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans in Nonaccrual Status [Line Items]
Principal	65,000		63,000
Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans in Nonaccrual Status [Line Items]
Number of loans	8		8
Principal	19,103,000		19,112,000
Foregone interest	$ 246,000		$ 887,000

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Future Minimum Payments of Principal on Mortgages (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014
Future Minimum Payments of Principal on Mortgages [Abstract]
2014	$ 1,154
2015	24,698
2016	713
2017	13,230
2018	519
Thereafter	8,298
Total	$ 48,612

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - Rental Properties (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013		Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Properties	6		3
NBV (in Dollars)	$ 151,512,000		$ 162,563,000		$ 181,407,000	$ 181,333,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | Single Family [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units			2
Properties			2
NBV (in Dollars)			7,388,000
Non Rental REO [Member] | Commercial [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units		[1]		[1]
Properties	4	[1]	3	[1]
NBV (in Dollars)	15,056,000	[1]	13,363,000	[1]
Non Rental REO [Member] | REO Held as Investment [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units			2
Properties	4		5
NBV (in Dollars)	15,056,000		20,751,000
Rental REO [Member] | Single Family [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units	1		1
Properties	1		1
NBV (in Dollars)	1,485,000		1,491,000
Rental REO [Member] | Commercial [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Properties	3		3
NBV (in Dollars)	3,213,000		3,191,000
Rental REO [Member] | REO Held as Investment [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units	606		669
Properties	15		19
NBV (in Dollars)	136,456,000		141,812,000
Rental REO [Member] | Apartment Building [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units			8
Properties			1
NBV (in Dollars)			527,000
Rental REO [Member] | Residential Condominiums [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units	174	[2]	220	[2]
Properties	2	[2]	4	[2]
NBV (in Dollars)	60,916,000	[2]	65,014,000	[2]
Rental REO [Member] | Residential Fractured Condominiums [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units	431	[3]	440	[3]
Properties	9	[3]	10	[3]
NBV (in Dollars)	70,842,000	[3]	71,589,000	[3]
Rental REO [Member] | Residential [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Units	606		669
Properties	12		16
NBV (in Dollars)	133,243,000		138,621,000
Rental REO [Member]
Real Estate Properties [Line Items]
Properties	15		19
NBV (in Dollars)	$ 136,456,000		$ 141,812,000

[1] Includes two parcels of land of 14 and 13 acres respectively.

[2] Includes units in condominium complexes wholly-owned by the partnership.

[3] Includes units in condominium complexes where some units had been sold prior to the partnership's acquisition.

XML

Note 4 - Loans

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Receivables [Abstract]

Financing Receivables [Text Block]

NOTE 4 – LOANS

The partnership generally funds loans with a fixed interest rate and a loan term up to five years. As of March 31, 2014, 22 (58%) of the partnership’s loans (representing 56% of the aggregate principal balance of the partnership’s loan portfolio) have a five year term or less from loan inception. The remaining loans have terms longer than five years. Substantially all loans are written without a prepayment-penalty clause. As of March 31, 2014, 17 (45%) of the loans outstanding (representing 79% of the aggregate principal balance of the partnership’s loan portfolio) provide for monthly payments of interest only, with the principal due in full at maturity. The remaining loans require monthly payments of principal and interest, typically calculated on a 30 year amortization, with the remaining principal balance due at maturity.

The partnership may make construction loans that are not fully disbursed at loan inception. Construction loans are determined by the managers to be those loans made to borrowers for the construction of entirely new structures or dwellings, whether residential, commercial or multi-family properties. The partnership will approve and fund the construction loan up to a maximum loan balance. Disbursements will be made periodically as phases of the construction are completed or at such other times as the loan documents may require. Undisbursed construction funds will be held in escrow pending disbursement. Upon project completion, construction loans are reclassified as permanent loans. Funding of construction loans is limited to 10% of the loan portfolio. As of March 31, 2014, the partnership had no construction loans outstanding.

The partnership may also make rehabilitation loans. A rehabilitation loan will be approved up to a maximum principal balance and, at loan inception, will be either fully or partially disbursed. A rehabilitation loan escrow account is fully funded and advanced periodically as phases of the rehabilitation are completed or at such other times as the loan documents may require. The rehabilitation loan proceeds are generally used to acquire and remodel single family homes for future sale or rental. As of March 31, 2014, the partnership had no rehabilitation loans outstanding.

Loans unpaid principal balance (principal)

Secured loan transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, ($ in thousands).

	2014			2013
Principal, January 1	$	51,890		$	60,870
Loans funded or acquired		7,875			—
Principal collected		(6,646	)		(562	)
Loans assigned to affiliates		—			—
Foreclosures		—			—
Principal, March 31	$	53,119		$	60,308

During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the partnership renewed zero and two loans, respectively, with a remaining aggregate principal of approximately $0 and $353,000, at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, not included in the activity shown on the table above.

Loan characteristics

Secured loans had the characteristics presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Number of secured loans		38			36
Secured loans – principal	$	53,119		$	51,890
Secured loans – lowest interest rate (fixed)		4.00	%		4.00	%
Secured loans – highest interest rate (fixed)		12.00	%		12.00	%
Average secured loan – principal	$	1,398		$	1,441
Average principal as percent of total principal		2.63	%		2.78	%
Average principal as percent of partners’ capital		0.73	%		0.75	%
Average principal as percent of total assets		0.58	%		0.59	%
Largest secured loan – principal	$	16,312		$	16,312
Largest principal as percent of total principal		30.71	%		31.44	%
Largest principal as percent of partners’ capital		8.52	%		8.44	%
Largest principal as percent of total assets		6.72	%		6.65	%
Smallest secured loan – principal	$	69		$	79
Smallest principal as percent of total principal		0.13	%		0.15	%
Smallest principal as percent of partners’ capital		0.04	%		0.04	%
Smallest principal as percent of total assets		0.03	%		0.03	%
Number of counties where security is located (all California)		16			17
Largest percentage of principal in one county		36.62	%		41.68	%
Number of secured loans in foreclosure status		2			2
Secured loans in foreclosure – principal	$	16,555		$	16,689
Number of secured loans with an interest reserve		—			—
Interest reserves	$	—		$	—

As of March 31, 2014, the partnership’s largest loan, in the unpaid principal balance of $16,312,000 (representing 30.71% of outstanding secured loans and 6.72% of partnership assets) has an interest rate of 5.00% and is secured by 75 units in a condominium complex with 128 total units, located in Contra Costa County, California. This loan matured April 1, 2012. A court appointed receiver is managing the 75 units. A foreclosure sale date is still to be determined based upon the progress of the receiver.

Larger loans sometimes increase above 10% of the secured loan portfolio or partnership assets as these amounts decrease due to limited partner withdrawals and loan payoffs and due to restructuring of existing loans.

Lien position

At funding secured loans had the following lien positions and are presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Loans		Principal		Percent		Loans		Principal		Percent
First trust deeds	22	$	39,695		75	%	19	$	36,816		71	%
Second trust deeds	15		13,136		24		16		14,784		28
Third trust deeds	1		288		1		1		290		1
Total secured loans	38		53,119		100	%	36		51,890		100	%
Liens due other lenders at loan closing			51,204						53,098
Total debt		$	104,323					$	104,988
Appraised property value at loan closing		$	152,380					$	148,215
Percent of total debt to appraised values (LTV) at loan closing (1)			68.46	%					70.83	%

(1) Based on appraised values and liens due other lenders at loan closing. The loan to value computation does not take into account subsequent increases or decreases in security property values following the loan closing nor does it include decreases or increases of the amount owing on senior liens to other lenders by payments or interest accruals, if any. Property values likely have changed, particularly over the last four years, and the portfolio’s current loan to value ratio likely is higher than this historical ratio.

Property type

Secured loans summarized by property type are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Loans		Principal	Percent		Loans		Principal	Percent
Single family	28	$	31,470	59	%	27	$	33,771	65	%
Multi-family	1		1,000	2		1		1,000	2
Commercial(2)	9		20,649	39		8		17,119	33
Total secured loans	38	$	53,119	100	%	36	$	51,890	100	%

(2) Includes one loan with a principal balance of approximately $531,000, secured by an improved land lot, with plans to be developed as a five-unit townhouse by the borrower.

Property type

Single family properties include owner-occupied and non-owner occupied single family homes (1-4 unit residential buildings), condominium units, townhouses, and condominium complexes. From time to time, loan originations in one sector or property type become more active due to prevailing market conditions. The current concentration of the partnership’s loan portfolio in condominium properties may pose additional or increased risks. Recovery of the condominium sector of the real estate market is generally expected to lag behind that of single-family residences. In addition, availability of financing for condominium properties has been, and will likely continue to be, constricted and more difficult to obtain than other property types. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $16,312,000, of the partnership’s loans were secured by condominium properties.

Condominiums may create unique risks for the partnership that are not present for loans made on other types of properties. In the case of condominiums, a board of managers generally has discretion to make decisions affecting the condominium building, including regarding assessments to be paid by the unit owners, insurance to be maintained on the building, and the maintenance of that building, which may have an impact on the partnership loans that are secured by such condominium property.

The partnership may have less flexibility in foreclosing on the collateral for a loan secured by condominiums upon a default by the borrower. Among other things, the partnership must consider the governing documents of the homeowners association and the state and local laws applicable to condominium units, which may require an owner to obtain a public report prior to the sale of the units.

Distribution by California counties

The distribution of secured loans outstanding by the California county in which the primary collateral is located is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Percent			Unpaid Principal Balance		Percent
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
San Francisco	$	19,450		36.62	%	$	21,627		41.68	%
Contra Costa		16,646		31.34			16,647		32.08
San Mateo		6,188		11.65			1,765		3.40
Santa Clara		3,137		5.91			3,208		6.18
Alameda		1,254		2.36			1,260		2.43
Napa		405		0.76			406		0.78
Marin		180		0.34			180		0.35
		47,260		88.98			45,093		86.90
Other Northern California
Sacramento		243		0.46			249		0.48
Calaveras		178		0.34			182		0.35
Monterey		177		0.33			178		0.34
San Benito		97		0.18			97		0.19
Butte		69		0.13			79		0.15
		764		1.44			785		1.51
Northern California Total		48,024		90.42			45,878		88.41
Los Angeles & Coastal
Los Angeles		2,809		5.29			2,511		4.84
Orange		1,821		3.43			1,354		2.61
Ventura		349		0.66			350		0.67
San Diego		—		—			1,680		3.24
		4,979		9.38			5,895		11.36
Other Southern California
Kern		116		0.20			117		0.23
Southern California Total		5,095		9.58			6,012		11.59
Total Secured Loans	$	53,119		100	%		51,890		100	%

(1)    Includes Silicon Valley

Scheduled maturities

Secured loans are scheduled to mature as presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

Scheduled maturities at March 31, 2014	Loans		Principal		Percent
2014		3	$	5,541		10	%
2015		13		18,037		34
2016		5		5,051		10
2017		4		1,385		3
2018		2		583		1
2019		6		4,828		9
Total future maturities		33		35,425		67
Matured at March 31, 2014		5		17,694		33
Total secured loans		38	$	53,119		100	%

It is the partnership’s experience loans may be repaid or refinanced before, at or after the contractual maturity date. For matured loans, the partnership may continue to accept payments while pursuing collection of amounts owed from borrowers. Therefore, the above tabulation for scheduled maturities is not a forecast of future cash receipts.

The partnership reports maturity data based upon the most recent contractual agreement with the borrower. The table above includes five loans with an aggregate principal of $1,173,000 which are renewals.

Matured loans

Secured loans past maturity are summarized in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Number of loans(3)(4)		5			5
Principal	$	17,694		$	17,694
Advances		683			683
Accrued interest		65			63
Loan balance	$	18,442		$	18,440
Percent of principal		33	%		34	%

(3) The secured loans past maturity include 5 loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, also included in the secured loans in non-accrual status.

(4) The secured loans past maturity include 5 loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, also included in the secured loans delinquency.

Delinquency

Secured loans summarized by payment delinquency are presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Past due
30-89 days	$	394	$	665
90-179 days		405		17,197
180 or more days		17,264		474
Total past due		18,063		18,336
Current		35,056		33,554
Total secured loans	$	53,119	$	51,890

At March 31, 2014, the partnership had 3 workout agreements in effect with an aggregate principal of $1,087,000. All three borrowers had made all required payments under the workout agreements and the loans were included in the above table as current. All three of the loans were designated impaired and were in non-accrual status.

At December 31, 2013, the partnership had three workout agreements in effect with an aggregate principal of $1,097,000. All three borrowers had made all required payments under the workout agreements and the loans were included in the above table as current. All three of the loans were designated impaired and were in non-accrual status.

Interest income accrued on loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 was $9,000 and $62,000, respectively. Accrued interest on loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $83,000 and $81,000, respectively.

Modifications, workout agreements and troubled debt restructurings

Modified secured loan transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Active			Principal		Active			Principal
Balance, January 1	5		$	3,947		5		$	6,085
New modifications	—			—		1			325
Paid off/Foreclosed	(1	)		(325	)	(1	)		(2,140	)
Expired/Voided	—			—		—			—
Principal Collected	—			(87	)	—			(323	)
Ending Balance	4		$	3,535		5		$	3,947

Modifications, workout agreements and troubled debt restructurings (continued)

Workout agreements on secured loan transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Active		Principal		Active			Principal
Balance, January 1	3	$	1,097		4		$	1,126
New agreements	—		—		2			847
Paid off/Foreclosed	—		—		(1	)		(417	)
Expired/Voided	—		—		(2	)		(449	)
Principal collected	—		(10	)	—			(10	)
Balance, end of period	3	$	1,087		3		$	1,097

Modifications and workout agreements may cause a loan to qualify as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) under GAAP, and may result in a provision for loan losses being recorded. TDRs on secured loans transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Active			Principal		Active			Principal
Balance, January 1	5		$	4,228		6		$	8,042
New agreements	—			—		2			990
Paid off/Foreclosed	(1	)		(325	)	(3	)		(4,507	)
Principal collected	—			(75	)	—			(297	)
Balance, end of period	4		$	3,828		5		$	4,228
Provision for loan losses			$	—				$	—

Loans in non-accrual status

Secured loans in nonaccrual status are summarized in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Secured loans in nonaccrual status
Number of loans		8		8
Principal	$	18,350		18,361
Advances		688		688
Accrued interest		65		63
Loan balance	$	19,103		19,112
Foregone interest	$	246		887

At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there was one loan with a loan balance of $423,000, and $425,000, respectively that was contractually 90 or more days past due as to principal or interest and not in non-accrual status.

Loans designated impaired

Impaired loans had the balances shown and the associated allowance for loan losses presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Principal	$	21,092	$	21,499
Recorded investment(5)	$	21,846	$	22,249
Impaired loans without allowance	$	3,753	$	4,149
Impaired loans with allowance	$	18,093	$	18,100
Allowance for loan losses, impaired loans	$	8,760	$	8,740

(5) Recorded investment is the sum of principal, advances, and interest accrued for financial reporting purposes.

Impaired loans had the average balances and interest income recognized and received in cash as presented in the following table as of, and for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Average recorded investment	$	22,048	$	36,652
Interest income recognized	$	46	$	156
Interest income received in cash	$	35	$	378

Allowance for loan losses

Activity in the allowance for loan losses is presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31 ($ in thousands).

	2014			2013
Balance, January 1	$	8,790		$	19,815
Provision for loan losses		(30	)		—
Charge-offs, net
Charge-offs		—			—
Recoveries		—			60
Charge-offs, net		—			60
Balance, March 31	$	8,760		$	19,875
Ratio of charge-offs, net during the period to average secured loans outstanding during the period		0.00	%		0.10	%

The composition of the allowance for loan losses and the percentage of unpaid principal balance for each property type are presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Allowance for loan losses
Secured loans by property type
Single family	$	8,760		59	%	$	8,790		65	%
Multi-family		—		2			—		2
Commercial		—		39			—		33
Total allowance for loan losses	$	8,760		100	%	$	8,790		100	%

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - REO, Held for Sale (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2014 Rental REO [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Rental REO [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Rental REO [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Development REO [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Development REO [Member]	Dec. 31, 2012 Development REO [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Other Property Class REO [Member]
Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - REO, Held for Sale [Line Items]
REO	$ 16,552			$ 14,839	$ 10,541			$ 6,011	$ 9,708
Acquisitions		3,895
Dispositions	(2,524)	(7,745)
Improvements/betterments	459	11
Designated (to)from REO held as investment	10,108	20,594
Change in net book value		(160)
Depreciation	(48)	(43)
REO, Balance	$ 24,547	$ 16,552		$ 14,839	$ 10,541			$ 6,011	$ 9,708
Number of properties, end of period	6	3	15	19		4	5

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans Characteristics (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Secured Loans Characteristics [Abstract]
Number of secured loans	38		36
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	$ 53,119	[1]	$ 51,890	[1]
Secured loans – lowest interest rate (fixed)	4.00%		4.00%
Secured loans – highest interest rate (fixed)	12.00%		12.00%
Average secured loan – principal (in Dollars)	1,398		1,441
Average principal as percent of total principal	2.63%		2.78%
Average principal as percent of partners’ capital	0.73%		0.75%
Average principal as percent of total assets	0.58%		0.59%
Largest secured loan – principal (in Dollars)	16,312		16,312
Largest principal as percent of total principal	30.71%		31.44%
Largest principal as percent of partners’ capital	8.52%		8.44%
Largest principal as percent of total assets	6.72%		6.65%
Smallest secured loan – principal (in Dollars)	69		79
Smallest principal as percent of total principal	0.13%		0.15%
Smallest principal as percent of partners’ capital	0.04%		0.04%
Smallest principal as percent of total assets	0.03%		0.03%
Number of counties where security is located (all California)	16		17
Largest percentage of principal in one county	36.62%		41.68%
Number of secured loans in foreclosure status	2		2
Secured loans in foreclosure – principal (in Dollars)	$ 16,555		$ 16,689

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loan Transactions (USD $)	3 Months Ended					3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013		Mar. 31, 2014 Secured Loans [Member]	Mar. 31, 2013 Secured Loans [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Total secured loans (in Dollars)		$ 53,119,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	$ 60,870,000
Loans funded or acquired	(8,000)					7,875,000
Principal collected						(6,646,000)	(562,000)
Total secured loans (in Dollars)		$ 53,119,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	[1]	$ 53,119,000	$ 60,308,000

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - REO, Held as Investment, the Activity and Changes in the Impairment Reserves (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - REO, Held as Investment, the Activity and Changes in the Impairment Reserves [Line Items]
Real Estate Held As Investment	$ 162,563,000	$ 181,333,000
Real Estate Held As Investment	8,275,000	5,926,000
Balance	(526,000)
Balance	(7,000)
Depreciation	(609,000)	(608,000)
Depreciation	609,000	608,000
Improvements/betterments	192,000	682,000
Real Estate Held As Investment	151,512,000	181,407,000
Real Estate Held As Investment	8,744,000	6,534,000
Designated to REO Held For Sale [Member]
Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - REO, Held as Investment, the Activity and Changes in the Impairment Reserves [Line Items]
Balance	(10,108,000)
Balance	$ (133,000)

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Lien Position in the Collateral (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Lien Position in the Collateral [Line Items]
Secured loans	38		36
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	$ 53,119,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	[1]
Secrured loans - percent	100.00%	[1]	100.00%	[1]
Liens due other lenders at loan closing (in Dollars)	51,204,000		53,098,000
Total debt (in Dollars)	104,323,000		104,988,000
Appraised property value at loan closing (in Dollars)	152,380,000		148,215,000
Percent of total debt to appraised values (LTV) at loan closing (1)	68.46%	[2]	70.83%	[2]
First Trust Deeds [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Lien Position in the Collateral [Line Items]
Secured loans	22		19
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	39,695,000		36,816,000
Secrured loans - percent	75.00%		71.00%
Second Trust Deeds [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Lien Position in the Collateral [Line Items]
Secured loans	15		16
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	13,136,000		14,784,000
Secrured loans - percent	24.00%		28.00%
Third Trust Deeds [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Lien Position in the Collateral [Line Items]
Secured loans	1		1
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	$ 288,000		$ 290,000
Secrured loans - percent	1.00%		1.00%

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

[2] Based on appraised values and liens due other lenders at loan closing. The loan to value computation does not take into account subsequent increases or decreases in security property values following the loan closing nor does it include decreases or increases of the amount owing on senior liens to other lenders by payments or interest accruals, if any. Property values likely have changed, particularly over the last four years, and the portfolio's current loan to value ratio likely is higher than this historical ratio.

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Property Type of the Collateral (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Property Type of the Collateral [Line Items]
Secured loans - loans	38		36
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	$ 53,119,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	[1]
Secured loans - percent	100.00%	[1]	100.00%	[1]
Single Family [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Property Type of the Collateral [Line Items]
Secured loans - loans	28		27
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	31,470,000		33,771,000
Secured loans - percent	59.00%		65.00%
Multi-family [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Property Type of the Collateral [Line Items]
Secured loans - loans	1		1
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	1,000,000		1,000,000
Secured loans - percent	2.00%		2.00%
Commercial [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans by Property Type of the Collateral [Line Items]
Secured loans - loans	9	[2]	8	[2]
Secured loans – principal (in Dollars)	$ 20,649,000	[2]	$ 17,119,000	[2]
Secured loans - percent	39.00%	[2]	33.00%	[2]

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

[2] Includes one loan with a principal balance of approximately $531,000, secured by an improved land lot, with plans to be developed as a five-unit townhouse by the borrower.

XML

Note 3 - General Partners and Other Related Parties

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 3 – GENERAL PARTNERS AND OTHER RELATED PARTIES

The general partners are entitled to one percent of the profits and losses, which amounted to approximately $1,300 and $(5,000) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Formation loan

The formation loan transactions are summarized in the following table at March 31, 2014 ($ in thousands).

Formation loan made	$	22,567
Unamortized discount on formation loan		(1,728	)
Formation loan made, net		20,839
Repayments to date		(14,297	)
Early withdrawal penalties applied		(686	)
Formation loan, net		5,856
Unamortized discount on formation loan		1,728
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	7,584

Interest has been imputed at the market rate of interest in effect at the date the offerings closed which ranged from 4.00% to 9.50%. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, approximately $106,000 and $93,000, respectively, were recorded related to amortization of the discount on imputed interest.

The future minimum payments on the formation loan are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

2014	$	—
2015		1,896
2016		1,665
2017		1,322
2018		1,150
Thereafter		1,554
Total	$	7,584

RMC acts as the broker in originating mortgage loans for RMI VIII. The corresponding brokerage commissions paid by borrowers from mortgage loans made by these funds are the primary source of cash used to repay the formation loans. RMI VIII was prohibited by its lending banks from originating new loans under the terms of an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated October 2010, and a preceding forbearance agreement that was in effect in the fourth quarter of 2009, until the bank loan was repaid in full, September 2012. The amended loan and forbearance agreements were the result of a technical (i.e. non-payment) covenant default under the original loan. As a result, RMC was deprived of the opportunity to receive brokerage commissions on loans by RMI VIII for the period from the fourth quarter of 2009 continuing through September 30, 2012, a period of almost three years.

During that period, despite receiving no loan brokerage commissions, RMC continued to make the annual formation loan payments of approximately $1.8 million per year (or $5.4 million for the three years) from its own cash reserves that existed as of the date of the forbearance agreement. RMC believes it would have had a reasonable argument that the annual formation loan payments should be suspended until such time as lending by RMI VIII was permitted to resume and brokerage commissions could be earned, but RMC elected not to take such an approach and, instead, continued to make annual formation loan payments due to concerns that the lending banks would view nonpayment of the formation loan as another technical loan default that might have led to a “distressed sale” liquidation of RMI VIII’s assets, resulting in substantial loss of limited partners’ capital.

Formation loan (continued)

As the bank loan was fully repaid as of September 2012, RMC has temporarily suspended annual formation loan payments, beginning with the payment due December 31, 2012, for the three-year period then beginning, which is a period commensurate with the period during which lending by RMI VIII was prohibited and RMC was deprived of loan brokerage commissions.

The following commissions and fees are paid by the borrowers.

-Brokerage commissions, loan originations

For fees in connection with the review, selection, evaluation, negotiation and extension of loans, the general partners may collect loan brokerage commissions (points) limited to an amount not to exceed 4% of the total partnership assets per year. In the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, loan brokerage commissions paid to the general partners by the borrowers were $134,563 and $0, respectively.

-Other fees

The partnership agreement provides for other fees such as reconveyance, mortgage assumption and mortgage extension fees. Such fees are incurred by the borrowers and are paid to the general partners. In the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, these fees totaled $5,424 and $3,608, respectively.

The following fees are paid by the company.

-Mortgage servicing fees

RMC may earn mortgage servicing fees of up to 1.5% annually of the unpaid principal of the loan portfolio or such lesser amount as is reasonable and customary in the geographic area where the property securing the mortgage is located from RMI VIII. Historically, RMC charged one percent annually, and at times waived additional amounts to improve the partnership’s earnings. Such fee waivers were not made for the purpose of providing the partnership with sufficient funds to satisfy withdrawal requests, nor were such waivers made in order to meet any required level of distributions, as the partnership has no such required level of distributions. RMC does not use any specific criteria in determining the amount of fees, if any, to be waived. The decision to waive fees and the amount, if any, to be waived, is made by RMC in its sole discretion.

-Mortgage servicing fees (continued)

Mortgage servicing fees paid to RMC by the partnership are presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31, ($ in thousands).

	2014			2013
Chargeable by RMC	$	189		$	230
Waived by RMC		(63	)		(77	)
Charged	$	126		$	153

-Asset management fees

The general partners receive monthly fees for managing the partnership’s loan portfolio and operations of up to 1/32 of 1% of the “net asset value” (3/8 of 1% annually). At times, the general partners have charged less than the maximum allowable rate to enhance the partnership’s earnings. Such fee waivers were not made with the purpose of providing the partnership with sufficient funds to satisfy withdrawal requests, nor to meet any required level of distributions, as the partnership has no such required level of distributions. RMC does not use any specific criteria in determining the exact amount of fees, if any, to be waived. The decision to waive fees and the amount, if any, to be waived, is made by RMC in its sole discretion.

Asset management fees for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were $190,000 and $192,000, respectively. No asset management fees were waived during any period reported.

-Costs from Redwood Mortgage Corp.

RMC is reimbursed by the partnership for operating expenses incurred on behalf of the partnership, including without limitation, accounting and audit fees, legal fees and expenses, postage and preparation of reports to limited partners, and out-of-pocket general and administration expenses. The decision to request reimbursement of any qualifying charges is made by RMC in its sole discretion. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, operating expenses totaling $509,000 and $390,000, respectively, were reimbursed to RMC. RMC did not waive its right to request reimbursement of any qualifying charges during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

-Syndication costs

As of December 31, 2013 all syndication costs, totaling $5,010,000, have been allocated to the limited partner’s capital accounts.

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans Distributed within California (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	$ 53,119,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	[1]
Percent	100.00%	[1]	100.00%	[1]
San Francisco [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	19,450,000	[1]	21,627,000	[1]
Percent	36.62%	[1]	41.68%	[1]
Contra Costa [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	16,646,000	[1]	16,647,000	[1]
Percent	31.34%	[1]	32.08%	[1]
San Mateo [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	6,188,000	[1]	1,765,000	[1]
Percent	11.65%	[1]	3.40%	[1]
Santa Clara [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	3,137,000	[1]	3,208,000	[1]
Percent	5.91%	[1]	6.18%	[1]
Alameda [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	1,254,000	[1]	1,260,000	[1]
Percent	2.36%	[1]	2.43%	[1]
Napa [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	405,000	[1]	406,000	[1]
Percent	0.76%	[1]	0.78%	[1]
Marin [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	180,000	[1]	180,000	[1]
Percent	0.34%	[1]	0.35%	[1]
San Francisco Bay Area [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	47,260,000	[1]	45,093,000	[1]
Percent	88.98%	[1]	86.90%	[1]
Sacramento [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	243,000	[1]	249,000	[1]
Percent	0.46%	[1]	0.48%	[1]
Calaveras [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	178,000	[1]	182,000	[1]
Percent	0.34%	[1]	0.35%	[1]
Monterey [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	177,000	[1]	178,000	[1]
Percent	0.33%	[1]	0.34%	[1]
San Benito [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	97,000	[1]	97,000	[1]
Percent	0.18%	[1]	0.19%	[1]
Butte [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	69,000	[1]	79,000	[1]
Percent	0.13%	[1]	0.15%	[1]
Other Northern California [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	764,000	[1]	785,000	[1]
Percent	1.44%	[1]	1.51%	[1]
Northern California [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	48,024,000	[1]	45,878,000	[1]
Percent	90.42%	[1]	88.41%	[1]
Los Angeles [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	2,809,000	[1]	2,511,000	[1]
Percent	5.29%	[1]	4.84%	[1]
Orange [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	1,821,000	[1]	1,354,000	[1]
Percent	3.43%	[1]	2.61%	[1]
Ventura [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	349,000	[1]	350,000	[1]
Percent	0.66%	[1]	0.67%	[1]
San Diego [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal		[1]	1,680,000	[1]
Percent		[1]	3.24%	[1]
Los Angeles And Souther Coastal [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	4,979,000	[1]	5,895,000	[1]
Percent	9.38%	[1]	11.36%	[1]
Southern California [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	5,095,000	[1]	6,012,000	[1]
Percent	9.58%	[1]	11.59%	[1]
Kern [Member]
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
Principal	$ 116,000	[1]	$ 117,000	[1]
Percent	0.20%	[1]	0.23%	[1]

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Allowance for Loan Losses Activity (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Allowance for Loan Losses Activity [Abstract]
Balance	$ 8,790	$ 19,815
Ratio of charge-offs, net during the period to average secured loans outstanding during the period	0.00%	0.10%
Provision for loan losses	(30)
Charge-offs, net
Recoveries		60
Charge-offs, net		60
Balance	$ 8,760	$ 19,875

XML

Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	$ 18,093		$ 18,100
REO held for sale	24,547		16,552
Net of Foreclosed [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1],[2]		[1],[2]
Net of Foreclosed [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1],[2]	2,662	[1],[2]
Net of Foreclosed [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1],[2]		[1],[2]
Net of Foreclosed [Member] | Estimate of Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1],[2]	2,662	[1],[2]
Net of Foreclosed and Sold [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1]		[1]
Net of Foreclosed and Sold [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1]	3,895	[1]
Net of Foreclosed and Sold [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1]		[1]
Net of Foreclosed and Sold [Member] | Estimate of Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1]	3,895	[1]
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1]		[1]
REO held as investment(2)		[3]		[3]
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	9,333	[1]	9,360	[1]
REO held for sale	24,547		16,552
REO held as investment(2)		[3]	4,868	[3]
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)		[1]		[1]
REO held as investment(2)		[3]	1,551	[3]
Estimate of Fair Value Measurement [Member]
Note 7 - Fair Value (Details) - Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis [Line Items]
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	9,333		9,360	[1]
REO held for sale	24,547		16,552
REO held as investment(2)			$ 6,419	[3]

[1] Sum of principal, advances, interest accrued, less the related specific allowance for financial reporting purposes.

[2] Excludes any properties included in the REO lines above.

[3] Only includes properties with a valuation change during the year.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Current Period Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 16,117		$ 16,393
Secured by deeds of trust
Principal	53,119	[1]	51,890	[1]
Advances	709		708
Accrued interest	282		222
Unsecured	112		112
Allowance for loan losses	(8,760)		(8,790)
Net loans	45,462		44,142
Receivable from affiliate			33
Real estate held for sale, net	24,547		16,552
Real estate held as investment	151,512		162,563
Other assets, net	5,226		5,258
Total assets	242,864		244,941
Liabilities
Accounts payable	1,353		980
Payable to affiliate	350		495
Mortgages payable	48,612		48,938
Total liabilities	50,315		50,413
Capital
Limited partners’ capital, subject to redemption, net	192,533		194,236
General partners’ capital (deficit), net	(1,023)		(1,024)
Total partners’ capital	191,510		193,212
Non-controlling interest	1,039		1,316
Total capital	192,549		194,528
Total liabilities and capital	$ 242,864		$ 244,941

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Details) - REO, Held as Investment, by Property Type (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Property classification
Properties	6	3
NBV	$ 151,512,000	$ 162,563,000	$ 181,407,000	$ 181,333,000
Rental REO [Member]
Property classification
Properties	15	19
NBV	136,456,000	141,812,000
Development REO [Member]
Property classification
Properties	4	5
NBV	15,056,000	20,751,000
REO Held as Investment [Member]
Property classification
Properties	19	24
NBV	$ 151,512,000	$ 162,563,000

XML

Note 1 - Organizational and General

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Disclosure Text Block [Abstract]

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATIONAL AND GENERAL

In the opinion of the general partners, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial information included therein. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the partnership’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year.

Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII, a California Limited Partnership, (“RMI VIII” or the “partnership”) was organized in 1993. The partnership was organized to engage in business as a mortgage lender for the primary purpose of making loans secured by deeds of trust on California real estate.

The general partners of the partnership are Redwood Mortgage Corp. (“RMC”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gymno LLC (“Gymno”), a California limited liability company, and Michael R. Burwell (“Burwell”), an individual. The general partners are solely responsible for partnership business, subject to the voting rights of the limited partners on specified matters. Any one of the general partners acting alone has the power and authority to act for and bind the partnership. The mortgage loans the company invests in are arranged and are generally serviced by RMC. Michael Burwell is the president and majority shareholder (through his holdings and beneficial interests in certain trusts) of RMC. The general partners are required to contribute to capital 1/10 of 1% of the aggregate capital contributions of the limited partners. As of December 31, 2013, the general partners had contributed capital in accordance with Section 4.1 of the partnership agreement.

The rights, duties and powers of the general and limited partners of the partnership are governed by the limited partnership agreement and Sections 15900 et seq. of the California Corporations Code.

A majority of the outstanding limited partnership interests may, without the permission of the general partners, vote to: (i) terminate the partnership, (ii) amend the limited partnership agreement, (iii) approve or disapprove the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the partnership and (iv) remove or replace one or all of the general partners.

The approval of all the limited partners is required to elect a new general partner to continue the partnership business where there is no remaining general partner after a general partner ceases to be a general partner other than by removal.

On the mortgage loans originated for RMI VIII, RMC may collect loan brokerage commissions (points) limited to an amount not to exceed four percent per year of the total partnership assets. The loan brokerage commissions are paid by the borrowers and thus, are not an expense of the partnership. The proceeds from loan brokerage commissions and other fees earned are the source of funds for the repayment of the formation loans by RMC.

Profits and losses are allocated among the limited partners according to their respective capital accounts after one percent of profits and losses is allocated to the general partners, and are subject to subsequent adjustment as a result of quarterly and year-end accounting and reporting.

RMC, Gymno, and Burwell, as the general partners, are entitled to one percent of the profits and losses of RMI VIII. Beginning with calendar year 2010, and continuing until January 1, 2020, Gymno and RMC each assigned its right to one-third of one percent of profits and losses to Burwell in exchange for Burwell assuming one hundred percent of the general partners’ equity deficit.

Limited partners should refer to the limited partnership agreement for a more complete description of the provisions.

Election to receive monthly, quarterly or annual distributions

At the time of their subscription for units, partners elect to have distributed to them their monthly, quarterly or annual allocation of profits, or to have profits allocated to their capital accounts to compound. Subject to certain limitations, those electing compounding may subsequently change their election. A partner’s election to receive cash distributions is irrevocable.

Liquidity, capital withdrawals and early withdrawals

There are substantial restrictions on transferability of units and accordingly an investment in the partnership is non-liquid. The partnership does not establish a reserve from which to fund withdrawals and, accordingly, the partnership’s capacity to return a limited partner’s capital is restricted to the availability of partnership cash flow. Furthermore, no more than 20% of the total limited partners’ capital accounts outstanding at the beginning of any year, may be liquidated during any calendar year.

In order to provide a certain degree of liquidity to the limited partners, once a limited partner has been in the partnership for the minimum five-year period, they may withdraw all or a portion of their capital accounts in twenty quarterly installments or longer, beginning the last day of the calendar quarter following the quarter in which the notice of withdrawal is given. The general partners, at their discretion, may liquidate all or part of a limited partner’s capital account in four quarterly installments beginning on the last day of the calendar quarter following the quarter in which the notice of withdrawal is given, subject to a 10% early withdrawal penalty applicable to any sums withdrawn prior to the time when such sums could have been withdrawn without penalty.

In March 2009, in response to economic conditions then existing, the partnership suspended capital liquidations. In the fourth quarter of 2009 the partnership entered into a forbearance agreement with its banks and subsequently entered into an amended and restated loan agreement (dated October 2010) which included additional restrictions on liquidations and distributions of partners’ capital. The bank loan was paid off in September 2012. The partnership’s four most recently completed quarters have been profitable, and it has re-commenced providing capital liquidation payments as of March 31, 2014. For the quarter ending March 31, 2014, those investors that had a liquidation payment pending as of March 31, 2009, the partnership resumed liquidation payments based on their current capital balance based on their election existing in March 2009. Limited partners were informed of our reinstitution of accepting liquidation requests and those that requested liquidation between January 1, 2014 and prior to March 31, 2014, will have their liquidation requests added to those previously existing and they will be scheduled to commence June 30, 2014. Each quarter, the partnership will allocate a specific amount of cash for liquidation payments. In the event that the cash allocated is insufficient to meet the liquidation requests of all limited partners requesting liquidations, then liquidation requests will be disbursed based upon the priority schedule set forth in the limited partnership agreement and then on a pro-rata basis. The partnership intends to continue to accept liquidation requests in future quarters and these requests will be added to previously existing requests and be subject to the same priorities and pro-rata allocation of distributable cash as described in the limited partnership agreement.

Syndication costs

The company ultimately incurred its own syndication costs, including expenses incurred in connection with the start-up of the company or ongoing offering of the units, including legal and accounting fees, printing, mailing, distribution costs, filing fees, reimbursements to participating broker-dealers for due diligence expenses, reimbursements for training and education meetings for associated persons of a FINRA member, and marketing reallowances of up to 1% of gross offering proceeds (sale of units, excluding DRIP and premium units, but excluding certain sales commissions paid by RMC, principally to broker dealers). Syndication costs were charged against members’ capital and allocated to individual members consistent with the company’s operating agreement.

Sales commissions - formation loans

Sales commissions are paid to the broker dealers by RMC and are not paid directly by the partnership out of the offering proceeds. The partnership loans to RMC, one of the general partners, amounts to pay all sales commissions to broker/dealers for sale of member interests and amounts payable in connection with unsolicited orders. This loan is unsecured and non-interest bearing and is referred to as the “formation loan,” and is being repaid equally over a ten year period commencing the year after the close of a partnership offering. The formation loan has been deducted from limited partners’ capital in the consolidated balance sheets. As payments on the formation loan are received from RMC, the deduction from capital will be reduced. Interest has been imputed at the market rate of interest in effect in the years the offering closed. If the general partners are removed and RMC is no longer receiving payments for services rendered, the formation loan is forgiven.

RMC acts as the broker in originating mortgage loans for RMI VIII. The corresponding brokerage commissions paid by borrowers from mortgage loans made by these funds are the primary source of cash used to repay the formation loans. RMI VIII was prohibited by its lending banks from originating new loans under the terms of an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement dated October 2010, and a preceding forbearance agreement that was in effect in the fourth quarter of 2009, until the bank loan was repaid in full, September 2012. The amended loan and forbearance agreements were the result of a technical (i.e. non-payment) covenant default under the original loan. As a result, RMC was deprived of the opportunity to receive brokerage commissions on loans by RMI VIII for the period from the fourth quarter of 2009 continuing through September 30, 2012, a period of almost three years.

During that period, despite receiving no loan brokerage commissions, RMC continued to make the annual formation loan payments of approximately $1.8 million per year (or $5.4 million for the three years) from its own cash reserves that existed as of the date of the forbearance agreement. RMC believes it would have had a reasonable argument that the annual formation loan payments should be suspended until such time as lending by RMI VIII was permitted to resume and brokerage commissions could be earned, but RMC elected not to take such an approach and, instead, continued to make annual formation loan payments due to concerns that the lending banks would view nonpayment of the formation loan as another technical loan default that might have led to a “distressed sale” liquidation of RMI VIII’s assets, resulting in substantial loss of limited partners’ capital.

As the bank loan was fully repaid as of September 2012, RMC has temporarily suspended annual formation loan payments, beginning with the payment due December 31, 2012, for the three-year period then beginning, which is a period commensurate with the period during which lending by RMI VIII was prohibited and RMC was deprived of loan brokerage commissions.

For the offerings, sales commissions paid to brokers ranged from 0% (units sold by general partners) to 9% of gross proceeds. The partnership had anticipated the sales commissions would approximate 7.6% based on the assumption that 65% of investors will elect to reinvest profits, thus generating full 9% commissions. The actual sales commission percentage for all six offerings combined was 7.5%.

Income taxes and Partners’ capital – tax basis

Income taxes – federal and state – are the obligation of the partners, if and when taxes apply, other than for the minimum annual California franchise tax paid by the partnership.

Term of the partnership

The partnership is scheduled to terminate in 2032, unless sooner terminated as provided in the limited partnership agreement.

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans Summarized by Payment Delinquency (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Principal	$ 53,119,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	[1]
Past Due 30-89 Days [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Principal	394,000		665,000
Past Due 90-179 Days [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Principal	405,000		17,197,000
Past Due 180 Days or More [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Principal	17,264,000		474,000
Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Principal	18,063,000		18,336,000
Current [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Principal	$ 35,056,000		$ 33,554,000

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) [Line Items]
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Parent	72.50%
Estimating Real Property Value, Number of Approaches	3
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Maximum Initial Maturity	3 months
Per Amount of Net Income Invested by Limited Partners (in Dollars)	$ 1,000
Minimum [Member]
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) [Line Items]
Interest Reserve Minimum Length	1 year
Maximum [Member]
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) [Line Items]
Interest Reserve Maximum Length	2 years
Residential Lease Term	1 year

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, Balance	38	36
Beginning of Period [Member] | Modified Secured Loan [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, Balance	5	5
Principal, Balance	$ 3,947	$ 6,085
Beginning of Period [Member] | Workout Agreements [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, Balance	3	4
Principal, Balance	1,097	1,126
Beginning of Period [Member] | Troubled Debt Restructuring [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, Balance	5	6
Principal, Balance	4,228	8,042
End of Period [Member] | Modified Secured Loan [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, Balance	4	5
Principal, Balance	3,535	3,947
End of Period [Member] | Workout Agreements [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, Balance	3	3
Principal, Balance	1,087	1,097
End of Period [Member] | Troubled Debt Restructuring [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, Balance	4	5
Principal, Balance	3,828	4,228
Modified Secured Loan [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, New modifications/ agreements		1
Principal, New modifications/ agreements		325
Number, Paid off/Foreclosed	(1)	(1)
Principal, Paid off/Foreclosed	(325)	(2,140)
Principal, Principal collected	(87)	(323)
Workout Agreements [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, New modifications/ agreements		2
Principal, New modifications/ agreements		847
Number, Paid off/Foreclosed		(1)
Principal, Paid off/Foreclosed		(417)
Number, Expired/Voided		(2)
Principal, Expired/Voided		(449)
Principal, Principal collected	(10)	(10)
Troubled Debt Restructuring [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Line Items]
Number, New modifications/ agreements		2
Principal, New modifications/ agreements		990
Number, Paid off/Foreclosed	(1)	(3)
Principal, Paid off/Foreclosed	(325)	(4,507)
Principal, Principal collected	$ (75)	$ (297)

XML

Note 3 - General Partners and Other Related Parties (Details) - Formation Loan - Transactions (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Formation Loan - Transactions [Abstract]
Formation loan made	$ 22,567
Unamortized discount on formation loan	(1,728)
Formation loan made, net	20,839
Repayments to date	(14,297)
Early withdrawal penalties applied	(686)
Formation loan, net	5,856
Unamortized discount on formation loan	1,728
Balance, March 31, 2014	$ 7,584

XML

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The partnership’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the partnership, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and its 72.5%-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Management estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions about the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Such estimates relate principally to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, including, when applicable, the valuation of impaired loans, (which itself requires determining the fair value of the collateral), and the valuation of real estate held for sale and held as investment, at acquisition and subsequently. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

– Fair Value Estimates

GAAP defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date (i.e. the balance sheet date). An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

Fair values of assets and liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy established in GAAP. The hierarchy is comprised of three levels of inputs to be used.

- Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is a market in which transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

- Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

- Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect the company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances and may include the company’s own data.

For secured loans, the collaterals’ fair values are reviewed quarterly and the protective equity for each loan is computed. As used herein, “protective equity” is the arithmetic difference between the fair value of the collateral, net of any senior liens, and the loan balance, where “loan balance” is the sum of the unpaid principal, advances and the recorded interest thereon. This computation is done for each loan (whether performing or designated impaired)

The fair value of the collateral is determined by exercise of judgment based on management’s experience informed by appraisals (by licensed appraisers), brokers’ opinion of values, and publicly available information on in-market transactions. These sources would be considered Level 2 inputs.

Appraisals of commercial real property generally present three approaches to estimating value: 1) market comparables or sales approach; 2) cost to replace and 3) capitalized cash flows or investment approach. These approaches may or may not result in a common, single value. The market-comparables approach may yield several different values depending on certain basic assumptions, such as, determining highest and best use (which may or may not be the current use); determining the condition (e.g. as-is, when-completed, or for land when-entitled); and determining the unit of value (e.g. as a series of individual unit sales or as a bulk disposition).

Management has the requisite familiarity with the markets it lends in generally and of the properties lent on specifically to analyze sales-comparables and assess their suitability/applicability. Management is acquainted with market participants – investors, developers, brokers, lenders – that are useful, relevant secondary sources of data and information regarding valuation and valuation variability. These secondary sources may have familiarity with and perspectives on pending transactions, successful strategies to optimize value, and the history and details of specific properties – on and off the market – that enhance the process and analysis that is particularly and principally germane to establishing value for property types – or individual properties that do not transact regularly and/or would not qualify for traditional (e.g. bank) financing.

- Allowance for loan losses

Loans and the related advances and accrued interest are analyzed on a periodic basis for ultimate recoverability. Delinquencies are identified and followed as part of the loan system. Delinquencies are determined based upon contractual terms. If events and or changes in circumstances cause management to have serious doubts about the collectability of the payments of interest and principal in accordance with the loan agreement, a loan may be designated as impaired (impaired loans). Any subsequent payments on impaired loans are applied to late fees, then to the accrued interest, then to advances, and lastly to principal.

Performing loans, are aggregated by the property type of the underlying collateral, and for each loan and for the total by property type, the amount of protective equity or amount of exposure to loss (i.e., the dollar amount of the deficiency of the fair value of the underlying collateral to the loan balance) is computed.

For impaired loans, a provision is made for loan losses to adjust the allowance for loan losses to an amount considered by management to be adequate, with due consideration to collateral values, such that the net carrying amount (principal , plus advances, plus accrued interest less the specific allowance) is reduced to the estimated fair value of the related collateral, net of any senior loans, and net of any costs to sell in arriving at net realizable value if planned disposition of the asset securing a loan is by way of sale.

Based on its knowledge of the borrowers and their historical (and expected) performance, and the exposure to loss, management estimates an appropriate reserve by property type and for individual loans in the loan portfolio. Because the partnership is an asset-based lender, except as to owner-occupied residences, and because specific regions, neighborhoods and even properties within the same neighborhoods, vary significantly as to real estate values and transaction activity, general market trends, which may be indicative of a change in the risk of a loss, and a borrower’s credit worthiness are secondary to the condition of the property, the property type and the neighborhood/region in which the property is located.

The partnership charges off uncollectible loans and related receivables directly to the allowance account once it is determined the full amount is not collectible.

Cash and cash equivalents

The partnership considers all highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Periodically, partnership cash balances in banks exceed federally insured limits.

Loans and interest income

Loans generally are stated at the unpaid principal balance (principal). Management has discretion to pay amounts (advances) to third parties on behalf of borrowers to protect the partnership’s interest in the loan. Advances include, but are not limited to, the payment of interest and principal on a senior lien to prevent foreclosure by the senior lien holder, property taxes, insurance premiums, and attorney fees. Advances generally are stated at the amount paid out on the borrower’s behalf and accrue interest until repaid by the borrower.

The partnership may fund a specific loan origination net of an interest reserve to insure timely interest payments at the inception (one to two years) of the loan. As monthly interest payments become due, the partnership funds the payments into the affiliated trust account. In the event of an early loan payoff, any unapplied interest reserves would be first applied to any accrued but unpaid interest and then as a reduction to the principal.

From time to time, the partnership negotiates and enters into loan modifications with borrowers whose loans are delinquent. If the loan modification results in a significant reduction in the cash flow compared to the original note, the modification is deemed a troubled debt restructuring and a loss is recognized. In the normal course of the partnership’s operations, loans that mature may be renewed at then current market rates and terms for new loans. Such renewals are not designated as impaired, unless the matured loan was previously designated as impaired.

Interest is accrued daily based on the principal of the loans. An impaired loan continues to accrue as long as the loan is in the process of collection and is considered to be well-secured. Loans are placed on non-accrual status at the earlier of management’s determination that the primary source of repayment will come from the foreclosure and subsequent sale of the collateral securing the loan (which usually occurs when a notice of sale is filed) or when the loan is no longer considered well-secured. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the accrual of interest is discontinued; however, previously recorded interest is not reversed. A loan may return to accrual status when all delinquent interest and principal payments become current in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.

Real estate owned (REO) held for sale

REO, held for sale includes real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations generally through foreclosure that is being marketed for sale. REO, held for sale is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s net realizable value, which is the fair value less estimated costs to sell, as applicable. Any excess of the recorded investment in the loan over the net realizable value is charged against the allowance for loan losses. The fair value estimates are derived from information available in the real estate markets including similar property, and often require the experience and judgment of third parties such as commercial real estate appraisers and brokers. The estimates figure materially in calculating the value of the property at acquisition, the level of charge to the allowance for loan losses and any subsequent valuation reserves. After acquisition, costs incurred relating to the development and improvement of property are capitalized to the extent they do not cause the recorded value to exceed the net realizable value, whereas costs relating to holding and disposition of the property are expensed as incurred. After acquisition, REO, held for sale is analyzed periodically for changes in fair values and any subsequent write down is charged to operating expenses. Any recovery in the fair value subsequent to such a write down is recorded – not to exceed the net realizable value at acquisition – as an offset to operating expenses. Gains or losses on sale of the property are included in REO - operating expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Recognition of gains on the sale of real estate is dependent upon the transaction meeting certain criteria related to the nature of the property and the terms of the sale including potential seller financing.

Real estate owned (REO), held as investment, net

REO, held as investment, net includes real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations generally through foreclosure that is not being marketed for sale and is either being operated, such as rental properties; is being managed through the development process, including obtaining appropriate and necessary entitlements, permits and construction; or are idle properties awaiting more favorable market conditions. REO, held as investment, net is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s estimated fair value, net. After acquisition, costs incurred relating to the development and improvement of the property are capitalized, whereas costs relating to operating or holding the property are expensed. Subsequent to acquisition, management periodically compares the carrying value of real estate to expected undiscounted future cash flows for the purpose of assessing the recoverability of the recorded amounts. If the carrying value exceeds future undiscounted cash flows, the assets are reduced to estimated fair value.

Rental income

Rental income is recognized when earned in accordance with the lease agreement. For commercial leases, the costs associated with originating the lease are amortized over the lease term.  Residential lease terms generally range from month-to-month to one year, and the expenses of originating the lease are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation

Real estate owned held as investment that is being operated is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the property once the asset is placed in service.

Net income per $1,000 invested

Amounts reflected in the statements of operations as net income per $1,000 invested by limited partners for the entire period are amounts allocated to limited partners who held their investment throughout the period and have elected to either leave their profits to compound or have elected to receive periodic distributions of their net income. Individual income is allocated each month based on the limited partners’ pro rata share of partners’ capital. Because the net income percentage varies from month to month, amounts per $1,000 will vary for those individuals who made or withdrew investments during the period, or selected other options.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operation (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Interest income
Loans	$ 668,000	$ 342,000
Imputed interest on formation loan	106,000	93,000
Mortgages	546,000	551,000
Amortization of discount on formation loan	106,000	93,000
Total interest income	774,000	435,000
Total interest expense	652,000	644,000
Net interest income/(expense)	122,000	(209,000)
Late fees	2,000	3,000
Other	145,000
Total revenues/(expense), net	269,000	(206,000)
Provision for loan losses	(30,000)
Operating Expenses
Mortgage servicing fees	126,000	153,000
Asset management fees	190,000	192,000
Costs from Redwood Mortgage Corp.	509,000	390,000
Professional services	108,000	450,000
REO
Rental operations, net	(800,000)	(968,000)
Holding costs	27,000	64,000
Loss/(gain) on disposal	(2,000)
Other	11,000	4,000
Total operating expenses	169,000	285,000
Net income (loss)	130,000	(491,000)
Net income (loss)
General partners (1%)	1,000	(5,000)
Limited partners (99%)	129,000	(486,000)
	$ 130,000	$ (491,000)
Where Income Is Reinvested [Member]
Net income (loss) per $1,000 invested by limited partners for entire period
Net income (loss) per $1,000 invested by limited partners for entire period (in Dollars per share)	$ 1	$ (2)
Where Partner Receives Income In Monthly Distributions [Member]
Net income (loss) per $1,000 invested by limited partners for entire period
Net income (loss) per $1,000 invested by limited partners for entire period (in Dollars per share)	$ 1	$ (2)

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Note 4 - Loans (Tables) [Line Items]

Secured Loan Principal Transactions [Table Text Block]

	2014			2013
Principal, January 1	$	51,890		$	60,870
Loans funded or acquired		7,875			—
Principal collected		(6,646	)		(562	)
Loans assigned to affiliates		—			—
Foreclosures		—			—
Principal, March 31	$	53,119		$	60,308

Secured Loans Characteristics [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Number of secured loans		38			36
Secured loans – principal	$	53,119		$	51,890
Secured loans – lowest interest rate (fixed)		4.00	%		4.00	%
Secured loans – highest interest rate (fixed)		12.00	%		12.00	%
Average secured loan – principal	$	1,398		$	1,441
Average principal as percent of total principal		2.63	%		2.78	%
Average principal as percent of partners’ capital		0.73	%		0.75	%
Average principal as percent of total assets		0.58	%		0.59	%
Largest secured loan – principal	$	16,312		$	16,312
Largest principal as percent of total principal		30.71	%		31.44	%
Largest principal as percent of partners’ capital		8.52	%		8.44	%
Largest principal as percent of total assets		6.72	%		6.65	%
Smallest secured loan – principal	$	69		$	79
Smallest principal as percent of total principal		0.13	%		0.15	%
Smallest principal as percent of partners’ capital		0.04	%		0.04	%
Smallest principal as percent of total assets		0.03	%		0.03	%
Number of counties where security is located (all California)		16			17
Largest percentage of principal in one county		36.62	%		41.68	%
Number of secured loans in foreclosure status		2			2
Secured loans in foreclosure – principal	$	16,555		$	16,689
Number of secured loans with an interest reserve		—			—
Interest reserves	$	—		$	—

Secured Loans by Lien Position in the Collateral [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Loans		Principal		Percent		Loans		Principal		Percent
First trust deeds	22	$	39,695		75	%	19	$	36,816		71	%
Second trust deeds	15		13,136		24		16		14,784		28
Third trust deeds	1		288		1		1		290		1
Total secured loans	38		53,119		100	%	36		51,890		100	%
Liens due other lenders at loan closing			51,204						53,098
Total debt		$	104,323					$	104,988
Appraised property value at loan closing		$	152,380					$	148,215
Percent of total debt to appraised values (LTV) at loan closing (1)			68.46	%					70.83	%

Secured Loans by Property Type of the Collateral [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Loans		Principal	Percent		Loans		Principal	Percent
Single family	28	$	31,470	59	%	27	$	33,771	65	%
Multi-family	1		1,000	2		1		1,000	2
Commercial(2)	9		20,649	39		8		17,119	33
Total secured loans	38	$	53,119	100	%	36	$	51,890	100	%

Secured Loans Distributed within California [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Percent			Unpaid Principal Balance		Percent
San Francisco Bay Area(1)
San Francisco	$	19,450		36.62	%	$	21,627		41.68	%
Contra Costa		16,646		31.34			16,647		32.08
San Mateo		6,188		11.65			1,765		3.40
Santa Clara		3,137		5.91			3,208		6.18
Alameda		1,254		2.36			1,260		2.43
Napa		405		0.76			406		0.78
Marin		180		0.34			180		0.35
		47,260		88.98			45,093		86.90
Other Northern California
Sacramento		243		0.46			249		0.48
Calaveras		178		0.34			182		0.35
Monterey		177		0.33			178		0.34
San Benito		97		0.18			97		0.19
Butte		69		0.13			79		0.15
		764		1.44			785		1.51
Northern California Total		48,024		90.42			45,878		88.41
Los Angeles & Coastal
Los Angeles		2,809		5.29			2,511		4.84
Orange		1,821		3.43			1,354		2.61
Ventura		349		0.66			350		0.67
San Diego		—		—			1,680		3.24
		4,979		9.38			5,895		11.36
Other Southern California
Kern		116		0.20			117		0.23
Southern California Total		5,095		9.58			6,012		11.59
Total Secured Loans	$	53,119		100	%		51,890		100	%

Secured Loans Scheduled Maturities [Table Text Block]

Scheduled maturities at March 31, 2014	Loans		Principal		Percent
2014		3	$	5,541		10	%
2015		13		18,037		34
2016		5		5,051		10
2017		4		1,385		3
2018		2		583		1
2019		6		4,828		9
Total future maturities		33		35,425		67
Matured at March 31, 2014		5		17,694		33
Total secured loans		38	$	53,119		100	%

Modifications, Workout Agreements and Troubled Debt Restructurings on Secured Loan Transactions [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Active			Principal		Active			Principal
Balance, January 1	5		$	3,947		5		$	6,085
New modifications	—			—		1			325
Paid off/Foreclosed	(1	)		(325	)	(1	)		(2,140	)
Expired/Voided	—			—		—			—
Principal Collected	—			(87	)	—			(323	)
Ending Balance	4		$	3,535		5		$	3,947

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Active		Principal		Active			Principal
Balance, January 1	3	$	1,097		4		$	1,126
New agreements	—		—		2			847
Paid off/Foreclosed	—		—		(1	)		(417	)
Expired/Voided	—		—		(2	)		(449	)
Principal collected	—		(10	)	—			(10	)
Balance, end of period	3	$	1,087		3		$	1,097

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Active			Principal		Active			Principal
Balance, January 1	5		$	4,228		6		$	8,042
New agreements	—			—		2			990
Paid off/Foreclosed	(1	)		(325	)	(3	)		(4,507	)
Principal collected	—			(75	)	—			(297	)
Balance, end of period	4		$	3,828		5		$	4,228
Provision for loan losses			$	—				$	—

Schedule of Financing Receivables, Non Accrual Status [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Secured loans in nonaccrual status
Number of loans		8		8
Principal	$	18,350		18,361
Advances		688		688
Accrued interest		65		63
Loan balance	$	19,103		19,112
Foregone interest	$	246		887

Past Due [Member]

Note 4 - Loans (Tables) [Line Items]

Past Due Financing Receivables [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Number of loans(3)(4)		5			5
Principal	$	17,694		$	17,694
Advances		683			683
Accrued interest		65			63
Loan balance	$	18,442		$	18,440
Percent of principal		33	%		34	%

By Days Past Due [Member]

Note 4 - Loans (Tables) [Line Items]

Past Due Financing Receivables [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Past due
30-89 days	$	394	$	665
90-179 days		405		17,197
180 or more days		17,264		474
Total past due		18,063		18,336
Current		35,056		33,554
Total secured loans	$	53,119	$	51,890

Impaired Loans [Member]

Note 4 - Loans (Tables) [Line Items]

Impaired Financing Receivables [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Principal	$	21,092	$	21,499
Recorded investment(5)	$	21,846	$	22,249
Impaired loans without allowance	$	3,753	$	4,149
Impaired loans with allowance	$	18,093	$	18,100
Allowance for loan losses, impaired loans	$	8,760	$	8,740

Average Balances and Interest Income [Member]

Note 4 - Loans (Tables) [Line Items]

Impaired Financing Receivables [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Average recorded investment	$	22,048	$	36,652
Interest income recognized	$	46	$	156
Interest income received in cash	$	35	$	378

Loan Loss Activity [Member]

Note 4 - Loans (Tables) [Line Items]

Allowance for Credit Losses on Financing Receivables [Table Text Block]

	2014			2013
Balance, January 1	$	8,790		$	19,815
Provision for loan losses		(30	)		—
Charge-offs, net
Charge-offs		—			—
Recoveries		—			60
Charge-offs, net		—			60
Balance, March 31	$	8,760		$	19,875
Ratio of charge-offs, net during the period to average secured loans outstanding during the period		0.00	%		0.10	%

By Property Typle [Member]

Note 4 - Loans (Tables) [Line Items]

Allowance for Credit Losses on Financing Receivables [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014					December 31, 2013
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
Allowance for loan losses
Secured loans by property type
Single family	$	8,760		59	%	$	8,790		65	%
Multi-family		—		2			—		2
Commercial		—		39			—		33
Total allowance for loan losses	$	8,760		100	%	$	8,790		100	%

XML

Document And Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII
Document Type	10-Q
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	0
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0000889123
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2014
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO) (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Real Estate [Abstract]

REO Held for Sale [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Balance, begining of period	$	16,552		$	—
Acquisitions		—			3,895
Dispositions		(2,524	)		(7,745	)
Improvements/betterments		459			11
Designated (to)from REO held as investment		10,108			20,594
Change in net book value		—			(160	)
Depreciation		(48	)		(43	)
Balance, end of period	$	24,547		$	16,552
Property type
Rental	$	14,839			10,541
Development		—			6,011
Other		9,708			—
Total REO, held for sale	$	24,547			16,552
Number of properties, end of period		6			3

REO, Held as Investment, the Activity and Changes in the Impairment Reserves [Table Text Block]

	NBV						Accumulated Depreciation
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Balance, January 1	$	162,563		$	181,333		$	8,275		$	5,926
Acquisitions		—			—			—			—
Dispositions		(526	)		—			(7	)		—
Improvements/betterments		192			682			—			—
Designated (to)from REO held for sale		(10,108	)		—			(133	)		—
Changes in net book values (NBV)		—			—			—			—
Depreciation		(609	)		(608	)		609			608
Balance, March 31	$	151,512		$	181,407		$	8,744		$	6,534

REO, Held as Investment by Property Type [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Properties		NBV		Properties		NBV
Property classification
Rental		15	$	136,456		19	$	141,812
Development		4		15,056		5		20,751
Total REO, held as investment, net		19	$	151,512		24	$	162,563

REO Held as Investment by Geographic Area [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014								December 31, 2013
	Rental				Non-Rental				Rental				Non-Rental
	No.		NBV		No.		NBV		No.		NBV		No.		NBV
San Francisco Bay Area
Contra Costa		4	$	13,967		—	$	—		4	$	13,985		—	$	—
Alameda		3		8,484		—		—		3		8,515		—		—
San Francisco		3		3,899		—		—		3		3,915		1		5,776
Napa		1		1,485		—		—		1		1,491		—		—
Marin		—		—		1		1,210		—		—		1		1,209
Solano		—		—		—		—		1		1,149		—		—
Total San Francisco Bay Area		11		27,835		1		1,210		12		29,055		2		6,985
Other Northern California
Sacramento		1		40,040		—		—		1		40,165		—		—
Amador		1		1,543		—		—		1		1,551		—		—
Stanislaus		—		—		1		2,789		—		—		1		2,790
Fresno		—		—		1		1,607		—		—		1		1,612
San Joaquin		—		—		—		—		2		3,235		—		—
Sutter		—		—		—		—		1		475		—		—
Total Other Northern California		2		41,583		2		4,396		5		45,426		2		4,402
Total Northern California		13		69,418		3		5,606		17		74,481		4		11,387
Los Angeles		2		67,038		1		9,450		2		67,331		1		9,364
Total REO Held as investment		15	$	136,456		4	$	15,056		19	$	141,812		5	$	20,751

Schedule of Real Estate Properties [Table Text Block]

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
Property type (non-rental)	Units		Properties		NBV		Units		Properties		NBV
Residential - Single family		—		—	$	—		2		2	$	7,388
Commercial(1)		—		4		15,056		—		3		13,363
Total REO, held as investment, net		—		4	$	15,056		2		5	$	20,751

									December 31,
	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
Property type (rental)	Units		Properties		NBV		Units		Properties		NBV
Residential
Single family		1		1	$	1,485		1		1	$	1,491
Apartments		—		—		—		8		1		527
Condominiums(2)		174		2		60,916		220		4		65,014
Fractured Condominiums(3)		431		9		70,842		440		10		71,589
Total Residential		606		12		133,243		669		16		138,621
Commercial		—		3		3,213		—		3		3,191
Total REO, held as investment, net		606		15	$	136,456		669		19	$	141,812

Earnings/(Loss) from Rental Operations of the Real Estate Owned, Held as Investment [Table Text Block]

	2014		2013
Rental income	$	2,676	$	2,791
Operating expenses, rentals
Administration and payroll		342		346
Homeowner association fees		208		201
Professional services		28		—
Utilities and maintenance		290		275
Advertising and promotions		29		31
Property taxes		328		275
Other		48		47
Total operating expenses, rentals		1,273		1,175
Net operating income		1,403		1,616
Depreciation		603		602
Receiver fees		—		46
Rental operations, net		800		968
Interest on mortgages		437		551
Rental operation, net, less related mortgage interest	$	363	$	417

XML

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Unaudited) (USD $)	Partner Capital [Member] Limited Partner [Member]	Partner Capital [Member] General Partner [Member]	Formation Loan, Gross [Member] Limited Partner [Member]	Formation Loan, Gross [Member] General Partner [Member]	Limited Partner [Member]	General Partner [Member]	Total
Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	$ 201,863,000	$ (1,024,000)	$ (7,627,000)	$ (1,024,000)	$ 194,236,000	$ 193,212,000	$ 193,212,000
Net income (loss)	129,000	1,000		1,000	129,000	130,000	130,000
Withdrawals	(1,875,000)				(1,875,000)	(1,875,000)
Formation Loan Payments Received			43,000		43,000	43,000	43,000
Balance at Mar. 31, 2014	$ 200,117,000	$ (1,023,000)	$ (7,584,000)	$ (1,023,000)	$ 192,533,000	$ 191,510,000	$ 191,510,000

XML

Note 7 - Fair Value

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE

The partnership does not record loans, REO, nor mortgages payable at fair value on a recurring basis.

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

● Loans designated impaired (i.e. that are collateral dependent).

● REO held for sale.

● REO held as investment.

● Loans designated impaired which were acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure during the year.

● Loans designated impaired which were acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure and sold during the year.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

	Fair Value Measurement at Report Date Using
	Quoted Prices		Significant
	in Active		Other		Significant
	Markets for		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs		as of
Item	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		03/31/14
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	$	—	$	9,333	$	—	$	9,333
REO held for sale	$	—	$	24,547	$	—	$	24,547
REO held as investment(2)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Impaired loans with allowance, net foreclosed upon during 2014(1)(3)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Impaired loans with allowance, net foreclosed and sold during 2014(1)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

(1)	Sum of principal, advances, interest accrued, less the related specific allowance for financial reporting purposes.
(2)	Only includes properties with a valuation change during the year.
(3)	Excludes any properties included in the REO lines above.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

	Fair Value Measurement at Report Date Using
	Quoted Prices		Significant
	in Active		Other		Significant
	Markets for		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs		as of
Item	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		12/31/13
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	$	—	$	9,360	$	—	$	9,360
REO held for sale	$	—	$	16,552	$	—	$	16,552
REO held as investment(2)	$	—	$	4,868	$	1,551	$	6,419
Impaired loans with allowance, net foreclosed upon during 2013(1)(3)	$	—	$	2,662	$	—	$	2,662
Impaired loans with allowance, net foreclosed and sold during 2013(1)	$	—	$	3,895	$	—	$	3,895

(1)	Sum of principal, advances, interest accrued, less the related specific allowance for financial reporting purposes.
(2)	Only includes properties with a valuation change during the year.
(3)	Excludes any properties included in the REO lines above.

Amounts shown as level 3 in 2013 for REO held as investment have been reclassified to level 2 in light of the improved real estate markets in 2012 and continued to improve during 2013.

The following methods and assumptions are used when estimating fair value.

(a) Secured loans (Level 2) – The recorded amount of the performing loans (i.e. the loan balance) is deemed to approximate the fair value. The company prices its loans uniquely and generally pricing does not react to other than significant changes in the prevailing interest rate indices. Each loan is reviewed for its delinquency, protective equity (LTV) adjusted for the most recent valuation of the underlying collateral, remaining term to maturity, borrower’s payment history and other factors. Also considered is the limited resale market for the loans. Most companies or individuals making similar loans as the company intend to hold the loans until maturity as the average contractual term of the loans (and the historical experience of the time the loan is outstanding due to pre-payments) is shorter than conventional mortgages. Further, for substantially all loans, there are no prepayment-penalties to be collected and any potential loan buyers would be hesitant to risk paying above par. Due to these factors sales of the loans are infrequent and an active market does not exist.

(b) Secured loans (Level 2) – designated impaired are deemed collateral dependent, and the fair value of the loan is the lesser of the fair value of the collateral or the enforceable amount owing under the note. The fair value of the collateral is determined by exercise of judgment based on management’s experience informed by appraisals (by licensed appraisers), brokers’ opinion of values, and publicly available information on in-market transactions Level 2 inputs.   The following methods are used depending upon the property type of the collateral of the secured loans. Single family – Management’s preferred method for determining the fair market value of its single-family residential assets is the sale comparison method. Management primarily obtains sale comps via its subscription to the RealQuest service, but also uses free online services such as Zillow.com and other available resources to supplement this data. Sale comps are reviewed for similarity to the subject property, examining features such as proximity to subject, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, square footage, sale date, condition, and year built. Where sufficient, applicable sale comps are not available, management will seek additional information in the form of broker’s opinions of value or appraisals.

Multi-family residential – The company’s multi-family residential assets consist of either multiple owned units at fractured condominium projects and wholly owned apartment complexes with condominium overlays. Management’s fair market value analysis compares the aggregate retail value of the units as for-sale condominiums against the asset’s value as an income-producing rental property in determining its most favorable market.

Management’s preferred method for determining the aggregate retail value of its multifamily units is the sale comparison method for the individual condominium units. Management primarily obtains sale comparables (comps) via its subscription to the RealQuest service, but also uses free online services such as Zillow.com to supplement this data. Sale comps are reviewed for similarity to the subject property, examining features such as proximity to subject, number of bedrooms and bathrooms, square footage, sale date, condition, amenities and year built. For fractured condominium projects, sales of units within the same community are preferred.

Management compiles the list of the most relevant sale comps and derives an average price per square foot, which is then applied to the average square footage of company-owned units at the subject property to determine the average price per unit and the gross square footage of all company units to determine the aggregate retail value of the units as for-sale condominiums.

Where adequate sale comps are not available, management will seek additional information in the form of broker’s opinions of value or appraisals.

Management’s preferred method for valuing its multifamily assets as income-producing rental operations is the direct capitalization method when rental operations are consistent and rental income and expenses have been normalized. In order to determine market cap rates, management refers to published data from reliable third-party sources such as the CBRE Cap Rate Survey. Management then applies the appropriate cap rate to the subject’s most recent available annual net operating income to determine the property’s value as an income-producing project. When reliable net operating income information is not available or the project is under development or is under-performing to market, management will seek additional information and analysis to determine the cost to improve and the intrinsic fair value.

Where such information is available, management may also determine the asset’s value as an income-producing rental project via the sale comparison method by comparing the value of similar multifamily assets sold recently. This method typically applies only to wholly owned apartment complexes.

Management compares the aggregate retail value to the value as an income-producing rental project to determine the property’s current highest and best use/ most favorable market, setting the fair market value accordingly.

Commercial buildings – Where commercial rental income information is available, management’s preferred method for determining the fair value of its commercial real estate assets is the direct capitalization method. In order to determine market cap rates for properties of the same class and location as the subject, management refers to reputable third-party sources such as the CBRE Cap Rate Survey. Management then applies the appropriate cap rate to the subject’s most recent available annual net operating income to determine the property’s value as an income-producing commercial rental project. When reliable net operating income information is not available or the project is under development or is under-performing to market, management will seek additional information and analysis to determine the cost to improve and the intrinsic fair value of stabilized properties performing at market, less any cost to improve.

Supplemental, and particularly when reliable net operating income is not available or the project is under development, management will seek additional information in the form of a sale comparison analysis (where adequate sale comps are available), broker’s opinion of value, or appraisal.

Commercial land – Commercial land has many variations/uses, thus requiring management to employ a variety of methods depending upon the unique characteristics of the subject land.

(c) Unsecured loans (Level 3). Unsecured loans are valued at their principal less any discount or loss reserves established by management after taking into account the borrower’s creditworthiness and ability to repay the loan.

(d) Real estate owned (REO), net (Level 2). Real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations, generally through foreclosure, is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s fair value less estimated costs to sell, as applicable. The fair value estimates are derived as above in secured loans for similar property types. In rare instances where no market comps are available, the fair value of the property will be computed using internal analytics that are expected to be indicative of the value that would be ascribed by a buyer/investor.

(e) Mortgages payable (Level 2). The partnership has mortgages payable (see Note 6 Borrowings for details). The interest rates are deemed to be at market rates for the type and location of the securing property, the length of the mortgage, and the other terms and conditions are deemed to be customary. All of the partnership’s mortgages are deemed to be at fair value as they are either, with variable interest rates which have adjusted within the past twelve months, or were refinanced/extended within the past twelve months with terms and conditions deemed customary for the collateral property.

XML

Note 6 - Borrowings

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Debt Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 6 – BORROWINGS

Mortgages payable transactions are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31, ($ in thousands).

	2014			2013
Principal, January 1	$	48,938		$	47,293
New mortgages taken		—			—
Principal repaid		(326	)		(266	)
Principal, March 31	$	48,612		$	47,027

Mortgages payable are summarized in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (mortgage balance $ in thousands).

Lender – summary of terms	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
NorthMarq Capital – Secured by a condominium complex, located in Los Angeles County, matures July 1, 2015, interest rate (2.90%) varies monthly (LIBOR plus 2.73%), monthly payment(1)(2) $119,758	$	18,055	$	18,170
East West Bank – Secured by a fractured condominium project located in Sacramento County, matures June 1, 2017, interest rate varies monthly (greater of Prime plus 1% or 5.50%), monthly payment(2) $78,283		13,340		13,391
Business Partners – Secured by a commercial property located in San Francisco County, matures May 1, 2015, interest rate varies monthly (greater of 5-year Treasuries plus 2.33% or 6.53%), monthly payment(1)(2) $79,155		6,622		6,721
Chase Bank – Secured by a condominium complex located in Contra Costa County, matures September 1, 2042, interest rate variable (fixed until September 1, 2017 at 3.52%), monthly payment $23,228		5,011		5,036
CapitalSource – Secured by a condominium complex, located in Los Angeles County, matures July 1, 2023, interest rate variable (fixed until June 1, 2016 at 3.95%), monthly payment(1)(2) $42,258		4,922		4,952
Wells Fargo Bank – Secured by a condominium unit located in San Francisco County, matures October 1, 2032, interest rate (2.88%) varies annually (LIBOR plus 2.75%), monthly payment $2,014		348		351
Wells Fargo Bank – Secured by a condominium unit located in San Francisco County, matures September 15, 2032, interest rate (4.03%) varies annually (bank rate plus 3.10%), monthly payment $2,110		314		317
Total mortgages payable	$	48,612	$	48,938

(1)     Monthly payments include amounts for various impounds such as property taxes, insurance, and repairs.

(2)     Monthly payments based upon a 30 year amortization, with a balloon payment due at maturity.

Future minimum payments of principal at March 31, 2014 are presented in the following table ($ in thousands).

2014	$	1,154
2015		24,698
2016		713
2017		13,230
2018		519
Thereafter		8,298
Total	$	48,612

XML

Note 3 - General Partners and Other Related Parties (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		36 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012	Mar. 31, 2014 One Percent of Total Profits and Losses [Member] General Partner [Member]	Mar. 31, 2012 One Percent of Total Profits and Losses [Member] General Partner [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Imputed interest [Member]	Mar. 31, 2013 Imputed interest [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Reimbursed to RMC [Member]	Mar. 31, 2013 Reimbursed to RMC [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 General Partner [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Three Years [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Maximum [Member]
Note 3 - General Partners and Other Related Parties (Details) [Line Items]
Net Income (Loss), Including Portion Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest	$ 130,000	$ (491,000)		$ 1,300	$ (5,000)					$ 130,000
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage Rate Range, Minimum												4.00%
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage Rate Range, Maximum	9.50%
Interest Expense, Related Party						106,000	93,000
Annual Formation Loan Payments	1,800,000		1,800,000								5,400,000
Limit Percentage of Total Assets For Brokerage Commissions	4.00%
Related Party Transaction, Amounts of Transaction	134,563	0
Fees and Commissions, Other	5,424	3,608
Servicing Fees, Percentage	1.00%											1.50%
Asset Management Fees	190,000	192,000
Operating Expenses	169,000	285,000						509,000	390,000
Syndication Costs Incurred	$ 5,010,000

XML

Note 6 - Borrowings (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Schedule of Participating Mortgage Loans [Table Text Block]

	2014			2013
Principal, January 1	$	48,938		$	47,293
New mortgages taken		—			—
Principal repaid		(326	)		(266	)
Principal, March 31	$	48,612		$	47,027

Schedule of Debt [Table Text Block]

Lender – summary of terms	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
NorthMarq Capital – Secured by a condominium complex, located in Los Angeles County, matures July 1, 2015, interest rate (2.90%) varies monthly (LIBOR plus 2.73%), monthly payment(1)(2) $119,758	$	18,055	$	18,170
East West Bank – Secured by a fractured condominium project located in Sacramento County, matures June 1, 2017, interest rate varies monthly (greater of Prime plus 1% or 5.50%), monthly payment(2) $78,283		13,340		13,391
Business Partners – Secured by a commercial property located in San Francisco County, matures May 1, 2015, interest rate varies monthly (greater of 5-year Treasuries plus 2.33% or 6.53%), monthly payment(1)(2) $79,155		6,622		6,721
Chase Bank – Secured by a condominium complex located in Contra Costa County, matures September 1, 2042, interest rate variable (fixed until September 1, 2017 at 3.52%), monthly payment $23,228		5,011		5,036
CapitalSource – Secured by a condominium complex, located in Los Angeles County, matures July 1, 2023, interest rate variable (fixed until June 1, 2016 at 3.95%), monthly payment(1)(2) $42,258		4,922		4,952
Wells Fargo Bank – Secured by a condominium unit located in San Francisco County, matures October 1, 2032, interest rate (2.88%) varies annually (LIBOR plus 2.75%), monthly payment $2,014		348		351
Wells Fargo Bank – Secured by a condominium unit located in San Francisco County, matures September 15, 2032, interest rate (4.03%) varies annually (bank rate plus 3.10%), monthly payment $2,110		314		317
Total mortgages payable	$	48,612	$	48,938

Schedule of Future Minimum Rental Payments for Operating Leases [Table Text Block]

2014	$	1,154
2015		24,698
2016		713
2017		13,230
2018		519
Thereafter		8,298
Total	$	48,612

XML

Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of presentation

The partnership’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the partnership, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and its 72.5%-owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Management estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions about the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities, at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Such estimates relate principally to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, including, when applicable, the valuation of impaired loans, (which itself requires determining the fair value of the collateral), and the valuation of real estate held for sale and held as investment, at acquisition and subsequently. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

Fair Value Measurement, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fair Value Estimates

GAAP defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date (i.e. the balance sheet date). An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

Fair values of assets and liabilities are determined based on the fair value hierarchy established in GAAP. The hierarchy is comprised of three levels of inputs to be used.

- Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market is a market in which transactions occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

- Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

- Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect the company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances and may include the company’s own data.

For secured loans, the collaterals’ fair values are reviewed quarterly and the protective equity for each loan is computed. As used herein, “protective equity” is the arithmetic difference between the fair value of the collateral, net of any senior liens, and the loan balance, where “loan balance” is the sum of the unpaid principal, advances and the recorded interest thereon. This computation is done for each loan (whether performing or designated impaired)

The fair value of the collateral is determined by exercise of judgment based on management’s experience informed by appraisals (by licensed appraisers), brokers’ opinion of values, and publicly available information on in-market transactions. These sources would be considered Level 2 inputs.

Appraisals of commercial real property generally present three approaches to estimating value: 1) market comparables or sales approach; 2) cost to replace and 3) capitalized cash flows or investment approach. These approaches may or may not result in a common, single value. The market-comparables approach may yield several different values depending on certain basic assumptions, such as, determining highest and best use (which may or may not be the current use); determining the condition (e.g. as-is, when-completed, or for land when-entitled); and determining the unit of value (e.g. as a series of individual unit sales or as a bulk disposition).

Management has the requisite familiarity with the markets it lends in generally and of the properties lent on specifically to analyze sales-comparables and assess their suitability/applicability. Management is acquainted with market participants – investors, developers, brokers, lenders – that are useful, relevant secondary sources of data and information regarding valuation and valuation variability. These secondary sources may have familiarity with and perspectives on pending transactions, successful strategies to optimize value, and the history and details of specific properties – on and off the market – that enhance the process and analysis that is particularly and principally germane to establishing value for property types – or individual properties that do not transact regularly and/or would not qualify for traditional (e.g. bank) financing.

Loans and Leases Receivable, Allowance for Loan Losses Policy [Policy Text Block]

Allowance for loan losses

Loans and the related advances and accrued interest are analyzed on a periodic basis for ultimate recoverability. Delinquencies are identified and followed as part of the loan system. Delinquencies are determined based upon contractual terms. If events and or changes in circumstances cause management to have serious doubts about the collectability of the payments of interest and principal in accordance with the loan agreement, a loan may be designated as impaired (impaired loans). Any subsequent payments on impaired loans are applied to late fees, then to the accrued interest, then to advances, and lastly to principal.

Performing loans, are aggregated by the property type of the underlying collateral, and for each loan and for the total by property type, the amount of protective equity or amount of exposure to loss (i.e., the dollar amount of the deficiency of the fair value of the underlying collateral to the loan balance) is computed.

For impaired loans, a provision is made for loan losses to adjust the allowance for loan losses to an amount considered by management to be adequate, with due consideration to collateral values, such that the net carrying amount (principal , plus advances, plus accrued interest less the specific allowance) is reduced to the estimated fair value of the related collateral, net of any senior loans, and net of any costs to sell in arriving at net realizable value if planned disposition of the asset securing a loan is by way of sale.

Based on its knowledge of the borrowers and their historical (and expected) performance, and the exposure to loss, management estimates an appropriate reserve by property type and for individual loans in the loan portfolio. Because the partnership is an asset-based lender, except as to owner-occupied residences, and because specific regions, neighborhoods and even properties within the same neighborhoods, vary significantly as to real estate values and transaction activity, general market trends, which may be indicative of a change in the risk of a loss, and a borrower’s credit worthiness are secondary to the condition of the property, the property type and the neighborhood/region in which the property is located.

The partnership charges off uncollectible loans and related receivables directly to the allowance account once it is determined the full amount is not collectible.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash and cash equivalents

The partnership considers all highly liquid financial instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Periodically, partnership cash balances in banks exceed federally insured limits.

Finance, Loans and Leases Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Loans and interest income

Loans generally are stated at the unpaid principal balance (principal). Management has discretion to pay amounts (advances) to third parties on behalf of borrowers to protect the partnership’s interest in the loan. Advances include, but are not limited to, the payment of interest and principal on a senior lien to prevent foreclosure by the senior lien holder, property taxes, insurance premiums, and attorney fees. Advances generally are stated at the amount paid out on the borrower’s behalf and accrue interest until repaid by the borrower.

The partnership may fund a specific loan origination net of an interest reserve to insure timely interest payments at the inception (one to two years) of the loan. As monthly interest payments become due, the partnership funds the payments into the affiliated trust account. In the event of an early loan payoff, any unapplied interest reserves would be first applied to any accrued but unpaid interest and then as a reduction to the principal.

From time to time, the partnership negotiates and enters into loan modifications with borrowers whose loans are delinquent. If the loan modification results in a significant reduction in the cash flow compared to the original note, the modification is deemed a troubled debt restructuring and a loss is recognized. In the normal course of the partnership’s operations, loans that mature may be renewed at then current market rates and terms for new loans. Such renewals are not designated as impaired, unless the matured loan was previously designated as impaired.

Interest is accrued daily based on the principal of the loans. An impaired loan continues to accrue as long as the loan is in the process of collection and is considered to be well-secured. Loans are placed on non-accrual status at the earlier of management’s determination that the primary source of repayment will come from the foreclosure and subsequent sale of the collateral securing the loan (which usually occurs when a notice of sale is filed) or when the loan is no longer considered well-secured. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the accrual of interest is discontinued; however, previously recorded interest is not reversed. A loan may return to accrual status when all delinquent interest and principal payments become current in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.

Real Estate Held for Development and Sale, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Real estate owned (REO) held for sale

REO, held for sale includes real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations generally through foreclosure that is being marketed for sale. REO, held for sale is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s net realizable value, which is the fair value less estimated costs to sell, as applicable. Any excess of the recorded investment in the loan over the net realizable value is charged against the allowance for loan losses. The fair value estimates are derived from information available in the real estate markets including similar property, and often require the experience and judgment of third parties such as commercial real estate appraisers and brokers. The estimates figure materially in calculating the value of the property at acquisition, the level of charge to the allowance for loan losses and any subsequent valuation reserves. After acquisition, costs incurred relating to the development and improvement of property are capitalized to the extent they do not cause the recorded value to exceed the net realizable value, whereas costs relating to holding and disposition of the property are expensed as incurred. After acquisition, REO, held for sale is analyzed periodically for changes in fair values and any subsequent write down is charged to operating expenses. Any recovery in the fair value subsequent to such a write down is recorded – not to exceed the net realizable value at acquisition – as an offset to operating expenses. Gains or losses on sale of the property are included in REO - operating expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Recognition of gains on the sale of real estate is dependent upon the transaction meeting certain criteria related to the nature of the property and the terms of the sale including potential seller financing.

Real Estate, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Real estate owned (REO), held as investment, net

REO, held as investment, net includes real estate acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations generally through foreclosure that is not being marketed for sale and is either being operated, such as rental properties; is being managed through the development process, including obtaining appropriate and necessary entitlements, permits and construction; or are idle properties awaiting more favorable market conditions. REO, held as investment, net is recorded at acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan, plus any senior indebtedness, or at the property’s estimated fair value, net. After acquisition, costs incurred relating to the development and improvement of the property are capitalized, whereas costs relating to operating or holding the property are expensed. Subsequent to acquisition, management periodically compares the carrying value of real estate to expected undiscounted future cash flows for the purpose of assessing the recoverability of the recorded amounts. If the carrying value exceeds future undiscounted cash flows, the assets are reduced to estimated fair value.

Rental Income [Policy Text Block]

Rental income

Rental income is recognized when earned in accordance with the lease agreement. For commercial leases, the costs associated with originating the lease are amortized over the lease term.  Residential lease terms generally range from month-to-month to one year, and the expenses of originating the lease are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization [Policy Text Block]

Depreciation

Real estate owned held as investment that is being operated is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the property once the asset is placed in service.

Net Income per $1,000 Invested [Policy Text Block]

Net income per $1,000 invested

Amounts reflected in the statements of operations as net income per $1,000 invested by limited partners for the entire period are amounts allocated to limited partners who held their investment throughout the period and have elected to either leave their profits to compound or have elected to receive periodic distributions of their net income. Individual income is allocated each month based on the limited partners’ pro rata share of partners’ capital. Because the net income percentage varies from month to month, amounts per $1,000 will vary for those individuals who made or withdrew investments during the period, or selected other options.

XML

Note 8 - Commitments and Contingencies, Other Than Loan and REO Commitments

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, OTHER THAN LOAN AND REO COMMITMENTS

Legal proceedings

In the normal course of business, the partnership may become involved in various legal proceedings such as assignment of rents, bankruptcy proceedings, appointment of receivers, unlawful detainers, judicial foreclosure, etc., to enforce the provisions of the deeds of trust, collect the debt owed under the promissory notes, or to protect, or recoup its investment from the real property secured by the deeds of trust and to resolve disputes between borrowers, lenders, lien holders and mechanics. None of these actions typically would be of any material importance. As of the date hereof, the partnership is not involved in any legal proceedings other than those that would be considered part of the normal course of business.

XML

Note 9 - Subsequent Events

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events [Text Block]

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

None

XML

Note 3 - General Partners and Other Related Parties (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Schedule of Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Table Text Block]

Formation loan made	$	22,567
Unamortized discount on formation loan		(1,728	)
Formation loan made, net		20,839
Repayments to date		(14,297	)
Early withdrawal penalties applied		(686	)
Formation loan, net		5,856
Unamortized discount on formation loan		1,728
Balance, March 31, 2014	$	7,584

Schedule of Financing Receivables, Minimum Payments [Table Text Block]

2014	$	—
2015		1,896
2016		1,665
2017		1,322
2018		1,150
Thereafter		1,554
Total	$	7,584

Mortgage Servicing Fee Activities [Table Text Block]

	2014			2013
Chargeable by RMC	$	189		$	230
Waived by RMC		(63	)		(77	)
Charged	$	126		$	153

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans Past Maturity (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Number of loans(3)(4)	5	[1],[2]	5	[1],[2]
Principal	$ 53,119,000	[3]	$ 51,890,000	[3]
Advances	709,000		708,000
Accrued interest	282,000		222,000
Loan balance	45,462,000		44,142,000
Percent of principal	100.00%	[3]	100.00%	[3]
Past Maturity [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Principal	17,694,000		17,694,000
Advances	683,000		683,000
Accrued interest	65,000		63,000
Loan balance	$ 18,442,000		$ 18,440,000
Percent of principal	33.00%		34.00%

[1] The secured loans past maturity include 5 loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, also included in the secured loans in non-accrual status.

[2] The secured loans past maturity include 5 loans as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, also included in the secured loans delinquency.

[3] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
NorthMarq Capital [Member] | Interest Rate LIBOR Plus 273 [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Yеar End Intеrst Rate	2.90%		2.90%
NorthMarq Capital [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Monthly Paymеnt	$ 119,758	[1],[2]	$ 119,758	[1],[2]
Mortgagеs Payablе Maturity Datе	Jul. 01, 2015		Jul. 01, 2015
East West Bank [Member] | Interest Rate Greater of Prime Plus 1 or 550 [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Yеar End Intеrst Rate	5.50%		5.50%
East West Bank [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Monthly Paymеnt	78,283	[1]	78,283	[1]
Mortgagеs Payablе Maturity Datе	Jun. 01, 2017		Jun. 01, 2017
Business Partners [Member] | Interest Rate Greater of 5 Year Treasuries Plus 2.33% or 6.53% [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Yеar End Intеrst Rate	6.53%		6.53%
Business Partners [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Monthly Paymеnt	79,155	[1],[2]	79,155	[1],[2]
Mortgagеs Payablе Maturity Datе	May 01, 2015		May 01, 2015
Chase [Member] | Interest Rate Fixed Until Sep 1 at 3.52% [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Yеar End Intеrst Rate	3.52%		3.52%
Chase [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Monthly Paymеnt	23,228		23,228
Mortgagеs Payablе Maturity Datе	Sep. 01, 2042		Sep. 01, 2042
Capital Source [Member] | Interest Rate Fixed Until June1 at 3.95% [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Yеar End Intеrst Rate	3.95%		3.95%
Capital Source [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Monthly Paymеnt	42,258	[1],[2]	42,258
Mortgagеs Payablе Maturity Datе	Jul. 01, 2023		Jul. 01, 2023
Wells Fargo Bank [Member] | Interest Rate LIBOR Plus 2.75% [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Yеar End Intеrst Rate	2.88%		2.88%
Wells Fargo Bank [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Monthly Paymеnt	2,014		2,014
Mortgagеs Payablе Maturity Datе	Oct. 01, 2032		Oct. 01, 2032
Wells Fargo Bank (Wachovia Mortgage) [Member] | Interest Rate Internal Bank Rate 3.10% [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Yеar End Intеrst Rate	4.03%		4.03%
Wells Fargo Bank (Wachovia Mortgage) [Member]
Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable by Lender (Parentheticals) [Line Items]
Mortgagеs Payablе Monthly Paymеnt	$ 2,110		$ 2,110
Mortgagеs Payablе Maturity Datе	Sep. 15, 2032		Sep. 15, 2032

[1] Monthly payments based upon a 30 year amortization, with a balloon payment due at maturity.

[2] Monthly payments include amounts for various impounds such as property taxes, insurance, and repairs.

XML

Note 1 - Organizational and General (Details) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	36 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2012
Note 1 - Organizational and General (Details) [Line Items]
Maximum Percentage of Total Limited Partners Capital Available for Liquidation During One Year	20.00%
Number of Quarterly Installments for Withdrawal From Partnership	4
Early Withdrawl Penalty Percentage	10.00%
Annual Formation Loan Payments (in Dollars)	$ 1.8	$ 1.8
After Five Year Period [Member]
Note 1 - Organizational and General (Details) [Line Items]
Number of Quarterly Installments for Withdrawal From Partnership	20
Three Years [Member]
Note 1 - Organizational and General (Details) [Line Items]
Annual Formation Loan Payments (in Dollars)		$ 5.4
Scenario, Forecast [Member]
Note 1 - Organizational and General (Details) [Line Items]
Percentage of Gross Proceeds Paid for Sale Commissions	7.60%
Percentage of Investors Estimated to Reinvest Profits	65.00%
Percentage of Commissions	9.00%
Scenario, Actual [Member]
Note 1 - Organizational and General (Details) [Line Items]
Percentage of Commissions	7.50%
Minimum [Member]
Note 1 - Organizational and General (Details) [Line Items]
Percentage of Gross Proceeds Paid for Sale Commissions	0.00%
Maximum [Member]
Note 1 - Organizational and General (Details) [Line Items]
Percentage of Gross Proceeds Paid for Sale Commissions	9.00%

XML

Note 3 - General Partners and Other Related Parties (Details) - Mortgage Servicing Fee Activities (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Mortgage Servicing Fee Activities [Abstract]
Chargeable by RMC	$ 189	$ 230
Waived by RMC	(63)	(77)
Charged	$ 126	$ 153

XML

Note 6 - Borrowings (Details) - Mortgages Payable (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Mortgages Payable [Abstract]
Principal, January 1	$ 48,612	$ 48,938	$ 47,027	$ 47,293
Principal repaid	(326)		(266)
Principal, March 31	$ 48,612	$ 48,938	$ 47,027	$ 47,293

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Allowance for Loan Losses by Property Type (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Secured loans by property type
Amount (in Dollars)	$ 8,760	$ 8,790
Percent	100.00%	100.00%
Single Family [Member]
Secured loans by property type
Amount (in Dollars)	$ 8,760	$ 8,790
Percent	59.00%	65.00%
Multi-family [Member]
Secured loans by property type
Percent	2.00%	2.00%
Commercial [Member]
Secured loans by property type
Percent	39.00%	33.00%

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$ 130,000	$ (491,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Amortization of borrowings-related origination fees	24,000	20,000
Imputed interest on formation loan	(106,000)	(93,000)
Amortization of discount on formation loan	106,000	93,000
Provision for loan losses	(30,000)
REO – depreciation	(48,000)
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	986,000	(341,000)
Cash flows from investing activities
Secured loans funded or acquired	(7,875,000)
Unsecured loans		8,000
Payments for development of REO	(651,000)	(682,000)
Proceeds from disposition of REO	3,053,000
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	1,173,000	(112,000)
Cash flows from financing activities
Payments on mortgages	(326,000)	(266,000)
Partners’ withdrawals	(1,875,000)	(566,000)
Early withdrawal fees	43,000
Increase/(decrease) in non-controlling interest	(277,000)	(12,000)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(2,435,000)	(844,000)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(276,000)	(1,297,000)
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1	16,393,000	18,943,000
Cash and cash equivalents, March 31	16,117,000	17,646,000
Cash paid for interest	546,000	551,000
Rental Operations [Member]
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
REO – depreciation	651,000	602,000
REO – loss/(gain) on disposal	(2,000)
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Accrued interest	(60,000)	10,000
Advances on loans	(1,000)	(52,000)
Allowance for loan losses-recoveries, net of receivables		60,000
Receivable from affiliates	33,000
Other assets	9,000	(433,000)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	372,000	(154,000)
Payable to affiliate	(145,000)	91,000
Non-Rental Operations [Member]
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
REO – depreciation	5,000	6,000
Unsecured Loan [Member]
Cash flows from investing activities
Principal collected on secured loans	$ 6,646,000	$ 562,000

XML

Note 5 - Real Estate Owned (REO)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Real Estate [Abstract]

Real Estate Disclosure [Text Block]

NOTE 5 – REAL ESTATE OWNED (REO)

Periodically, management reviews the status of the owned properties to evaluate among other things, their asset classification. Properties generally are acquired through foreclosure. Several factors are considered in determining the classification of owned properties as “real estate held for sale” or “real estate held as investment.” These factors include, but are not limited to, real estate market conditions, status of any required permits, repair, improvement or development work to be completed, rental and lease income and investment potential.

REO held for sale

Real estate owned is classified as held for sale in the period in which the GAAP required criteria are met. As a property’s status changes, reclassifications may occur.

REO held for sale (continued)

Transactions and activity, including changes in the net book values, if any, and the property types of REO held for sale are presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Balance, begining of period	$	16,552		$	—
Acquisitions		—			3,895
Dispositions		(2,524	)		(7,745	)
Improvements/betterments		459			11
Designated (to)from REO held as investment		10,108			20,594
Change in net book value		—			(160	)
Depreciation		(48	)		(43	)
Balance, end of period	$	24,547		$	16,552
Property type
Rental	$	14,839			10,541
Development		—			6,011
Other		9,708			—
Total REO, held for sale	$	24,547			16,552
Number of properties, end of period		6			3

The following transactions occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014:

Designated to REO held for sale from REO held for investment

- One property consisting of two condominium units located in San Francisco County. One of the units is in contract for sale.

- Nine units in a condominium complex located in Sutter County. The nine units are in contract for sale.

- Eight unit condominium complex located in Solano County.

- 38 unit apartment complex located in San Joaquin County. The property is in contract for sale.

- Sold two tenant-in-common units located in San Francisco County. The units sold for approximately their carrying value after taking into account a previously recorded valuation reserve.

- Sold a six unit apartment building located in Solano County. This property sold for approximately its carrying value.

The net rental income for the designated properties, and any other REO held for sale rental results, has been reclassified from REO – Rental Operations, to Revenues – Other for all periods presented in the financial statements and the Results of Operations in Item 2 of this report.

REO held as investment

For REO, held as investment, the activity in net book value (NBV) and changes in the impairment reserves are summarized in the following table for the three months ended March 31 ($ in thousands).

	NBV						Accumulated Depreciation
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Balance, January 1	$	162,563		$	181,333		$	8,275		$	5,926
Acquisitions		—			—			—			—
Dispositions		(526	)		—			(7	)		—
Improvements/betterments		192			682			—			—
Designated (to)from REO held for sale		(10,108	)		—			(133	)		—
Changes in net book values (NBV)		—			—			—			—
Depreciation		(609	)		(608	)		609			608
Balance, March 31	$	151,512		$	181,407		$	8,744		$	6,534

The following transactions occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2014:

Designated from REO held for investment to REO held for sale

- One property consisting of two condominium units located in San Francisco County. One of the units is in contract for sale.

- Nine units in a condominium complex located in Sutter County. The nine units are in contract for sale.

- Eight unit condominium complex located in Solano County.

- 38 unit apartment complex located in San Joaquin County. The property is in contract for sale.

- Sold two tenant-in-common units located in San Francisco County. The units sold for approximately their carrying value after taking into account a previously recorded valuation reserve.

- Sold a six unit apartment building located in Solano County. This property sold for approximately its carrying value.

- Sold a eight unit apartment building located in San Joaquin County. This property sold for approximately its carrying value.

REO, held as investment, summarized by property classification is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Properties		NBV		Properties		NBV
Property classification
Rental		15	$	136,456		19	$	141,812
Development		4		15,056		5		20,751
Total REO, held as investment, net		19	$	151,512		24	$	162,563

Rental properties include single-family residences (1-4 units), multi-family buildings, wholly-owned condominium complexes, fractured condominium complexes and commercial property.

REO held as investment, net (continued)

Development properties consist of the following four and five properties at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively:

- At December 31, 2013, a property under construction consisting of two condominium units in San Francisco County, with a carrying value of $5,776,000 and cost to complete of approximately $300,000. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 the construction was completed and the property was designated to REO held for sale.

- At December 31, 2013, a property located in Los Angeles County, zoned and entitled as commercial, which was being developed and re-entitled to residential. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the property was re-entitled to multi-family.

- Approximately 14 acres located in Stanislaus County zoned commercial.

- Approximately 13 acres located in Marin County, zoned for residential development.

- A partially completed home subdivision located in Fresno County. The property has rental operations of five single-family residences.

REO, held as investment, summarized by geographic area is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014								December 31, 2013
	Rental				Non-Rental				Rental				Non-Rental
	No.		NBV		No.		NBV		No.		NBV		No.		NBV
San Francisco Bay Area
Contra Costa		4	$	13,967		—	$	—		4	$	13,985		—	$	—
Alameda		3		8,484		—		—		3		8,515		—		—
San Francisco		3		3,899		—		—		3		3,915		1		5,776
Napa		1		1,485		—		—		1		1,491		—		—
Marin		—		—		1		1,210		—		—		1		1,209
Solano		—		—		—		—		1		1,149		—		—
Total San Francisco Bay Area		11		27,835		1		1,210		12		29,055		2		6,985
Other Northern California
Sacramento		1		40,040		—		—		1		40,165		—		—
Amador		1		1,543		—		—		1		1,551		—		—
Stanislaus		—		—		1		2,789		—		—		1		2,790
Fresno		—		—		1		1,607		—		—		1		1,612
San Joaquin		—		—		—		—		2		3,235		—		—
Sutter		—		—		—		—		1		475		—		—
Total Other Northern California		2		41,583		2		4,396		5		45,426		2		4,402
Total Northern California		13		69,418		3		5,606		17		74,481		4		11,387
Los Angeles		2		67,038		1		9,450		2		67,331		1		9,364
Total REO Held as investment		15	$	136,456		4	$	15,056		19	$	141,812		5	$	20,751

Held as investment, net (continued)

Non-Rental REO, held as investment, summarized by property type is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
Property type (non-rental)	Units		Properties		NBV		Units		Properties		NBV
Residential - Single family		—		—	$	—		2		2	$	7,388
Commercial(1)		—		4		15,056		—		3		13,363
Total REO, held as investment, net		—		4	$	15,056		2		5	$	20,751

Rental REO, held as investment, summarized by property type is presented in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 ($ in thousands).

									December 31,
	March 31, 2014						December 31, 2013
Property type (rental)	Units		Properties		NBV		Units		Properties		NBV
Residential
Single family		1		1	$	1,485		1		1	$	1,491
Apartments		—		—		—		8		1		527
Condominiums(2)		174		2		60,916		220		4		65,014
Fractured Condominiums(3)		431		9		70,842		440		10		71,589
Total Residential		606		12		133,243		669		16		138,621
Commercial		—		3		3,213		—		3		3,191
Total REO, held as investment, net		606		15	$	136,456		669		19	$	141,812

(2)     Includes units in condominium complexes wholly-owned by the partnership.

(3)     Includes units in condominium complexes where some units had been sold prior to the partnership’s acquisition.

REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII,

Held as investment, net (continued)

The earnings/(loss) from rental operations of the real estate owned, held as investment is presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31 ($ in thousands).

	2014		2013
Rental income	$	2,676	$	2,791
Operating expenses, rentals
Administration and payroll		342		346
Homeowner association fees		208		201
Professional services		28		—
Utilities and maintenance		290		275
Advertising and promotions		29		31
Property taxes		328		275
Other		48		47
Total operating expenses, rentals		1,273		1,175
Net operating income		1,403		1,616
Depreciation		603		602
Receiver fees		—		46
Rental operations, net		800		968
Interest on mortgages		437		551
Rental operation, net, less related mortgage interest	$	363	$	417

Leases on residential properties are all one year lease terms or month to month. One commercial property has a short term lease, due to the cancellation clause at lessee’s option.

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended		3 Months Ended							3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended				3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013		Mar. 31, 2014 Maturity Date Extended [Member] Renewed in Current Period [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Maturity Date Extended [Member]	Mar. 31, 2013 Maturity Date Extended [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Largest Loan [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Larger Loans [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Secured by Condominium Properties [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Secured by Condominium Properties [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Workout Agreements [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Workout Agreements [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Past Due 90 Days or More [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Past Due 90 Days or More [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Generally [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Condominium Units in Contra Costa County, California [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Condominium Complex [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Construction Loans [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Rehabilitation Loans [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Secured by an Improved Land Lot [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Construction Loan [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Term of 5 Years or Less [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Interest Only [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Nonaccrual Status [Member] Past Maturity [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Nonaccrual Status [Member] Past Maturity [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Nonaccrual Status [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Nonaccrual Status [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Secured Loans [Member] Past Maturity [Member]	Dec. 31, 2013 Secured Loans [Member] Past Maturity [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Secured Debt [Member]	Mar. 31, 2013 Secured Debt [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Maximum [Member]	Mar. 31, 2014 Minimum [Member]
Note 4 - Loans (Details) [Line Items]
Loans Receivable, Term																5 years																	5 years	5 years
Loans Receivable Number of Loans	38		36																				22	17	5	5			5	5
Loans Receivable, Percent of Total	100.00%	[1]	100.00%	[1]				30.71%	10.00%														58.00%	45.00%
Loans Receivable, Percent of Aggregate Principal																							56.00%	79.00%
Loans Receivable, Amortization Term																30 years
Percentage of Loan Portfolio Limited for Funding of Constuction Loans																						10.00%
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate, Number of Loans	38		36		0	5	2					3	3						0	0	1
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate, Commercial and Consumer, Net (in Dollars)	$ 53,119,000	[1]	$ 51,890,000	[1]		$ 1,173,000		$ 16,312,000		$ 16,312,000	$ 16,312,000	$ 1,087,000	$ 1,097,000								$ 531,000						$ 423,000	$ 425,000			$ 0	$ 353,000
Loans Receivable, Percent of Assets								6.72%
Loans Receivable, Interest Rate, Stated								5.00%
Number of Units in Real Estate Property																	75	128
Residential Buildings, Number of Units																																	4	1
Number of Sectors	1
Loans Receivable, Interest Accrual, Number of Days	90 days
Loans Receivable, Interest Accrued During Period (in Dollars)														9,000	62,000
Interest Receivable (in Dollars)	$ 282,000		$ 222,000											$ 83,000	$ 81,000

[1] Includes Silicon Valley

XML

Note 4 - Loans (Details) - Secured Loans Designated as Impaired Loans (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Mar. 31, 2014		Dec. 31, 2013
Secured Loans Designated as Impaired Loans [Abstract]
Principal	$ 21,092		$ 21,499
Recorded investment(5)	21,846	[1]	22,249	[1]
Impaired loans without allowance	3,753		4,149
Impaired loans with allowance	18,093		18,100
Allowance for loan losses, impaired loans	$ 8,760		$ 8,740

[1] Recorded investment is the sum of principal, advances, and interest accrued for financial reporting purposes.

XML

Note 7 - Fair Value (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2014

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements, Nonrecurring [Table Text Block]

	Fair Value Measurement at Report Date Using
	Quoted Prices		Significant
	in Active		Other		Significant
	Markets for		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs		as of
Item	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		03/31/14
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	$	—	$	9,333	$	—	$	9,333
REO held for sale	$	—	$	24,547	$	—	$	24,547
REO held as investment(2)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Impaired loans with allowance, net foreclosed upon during 2014(1)(3)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Impaired loans with allowance, net foreclosed and sold during 2014(1)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

	Fair Value Measurement at Report Date Using
	Quoted Prices		Significant
	in Active		Other		Significant
	Markets for		Observable		Unobservable		Total
	Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs		as of
Item	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		12/31/13
Impaired loans with allowance, net(1)	$	—	$	9,360	$	—	$	9,360
REO held for sale	$	—	$	16,552	$	—	$	16,552
REO held as investment(2)	$	—	$	4,868	$	1,551	$	6,419
Impaired loans with allowance, net foreclosed upon during 2013(1)(3)	$	—	$	2,662	$	—	$	2,662
Impaired loans with allowance, net foreclosed and sold during 2013(1)	$	—	$	3,895	$	—	$	3,895