XML 46 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Intangibles
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Intangibles [Abstract] 
Intangibles [Text Block]
3.   Intangibles
 
Goodwill
 
We evaluate goodwill for impairment on May 31 of each year.  For this purpose, we have six reporting units as follows: (i) Products Pipelines (excluding associated terminals); (ii) Products Pipelines Terminals (evaluated separately from Products Pipelines for goodwill purposes, but combined with Products Pipelines for presentation in the table below); (iii) Natural Gas Pipelines; (iv) CO2; (v) Terminals; and (vi) Kinder Morgan Canada.  There were no impairment charges resulting from our May 31, 2011 impairment testing, and no event indicating an impairment has occurred subsequent to that date.
 
The fair value of each reporting unit was determined from the present value of the expected future cash flows from the applicable reporting unit (inclusive of a terminal value calculated using market multiples between six and ten times cash flows) discounted at a rate of 8.0%.  The value of each reporting unit was determined on a stand-alone basis from the perspective of a market participant and represented the price that would be received to sell the unit as a whole in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
 
Changes in the gross amounts of our goodwill and accumulated impairment losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are summarized as follows (in millions):
 
   
Products
Pipelines
  
Natural Gas
Pipelines
  
CO2
  
Terminals
  
Kinder Morgan
Canada
  
Total
 
                    
Historical Goodwill.
 $263.2  $337.0  $46.1  $337.9  $626.5  $1,610.7 
Accumulated impairment losses(a).
  -   -   -   -   (377.1)  (377.1)
Balance as of December 31, 2010
  263.2   337.0   46.1   337.9   249.4   1,233.6 
Acquisitions(b).
  -   94.2   -   -   -   94.2 
Disposals(c).
  -   -   -   (11.8)  -   (11.8)
Impairments
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Currency translation adjustments
  -   -   -   -   (12.7)  (12.7)
Balance as of September 30, 2011
 $263.2  $431.2  $46.1  $326.1  $236.7  $1,303.3 
__________

(a)
On April 18, 2007, we announced that we would acquire the Trans Mountain pipeline system from KMI, and we completed this transaction on April 30, 2007.  Following the provisions of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the consideration of this transaction caused KMI to consider the fair value of the Trans Mountain pipeline system, and to determine whether goodwill related to these assets was impaired.  Based on this determination, KMI recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $377.1 million in the first quarter of 2007, and because we have included all of the historical results of Trans Mountain as though the net assets had been transferred to us on January 1, 2006, this impairment is now included in our accumulated impairment losses. We have no other goodwill impairment losses.
 
(b)
2011 acquisition amount relates to our July 2011 purchase of the remaining 50% ownership interest in KinderHawk Field Services LLC that we did not already own (discussed further in Note 2).
 
(c)
2011 disposal amount consists of (i) $10.6 million related to the sale of our ownership interest in the boat fleeting business we acquired from Megafleet Towing Co., Inc. in April 2009; and (ii) $1.2 million related to the sale of our subsidiary Arrow Terminals B.V. (both discussed further in Note 2).
 
In addition, we identify any premium or excess cost we pay over our proportionate share of the underlying fair value of net assets acquired and accounted for as investments under the equity method of accounting.  This premium or excess cost is referred to as equity method goodwill and is also not subject to amortization but rather to impairment testing.  For all investments we own containing equity method goodwill, no event or change in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of our equity investments has occurred during the first nine months of 2011.
 
As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we reported $138.2 million and $283.0 million, respectively, in equity method goodwill within the caption "Investments" in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  The decrease in our equity method goodwill since December 31, 2010 was due to our July 2011 purchase of the remaining 50% ownership interest in KinderHawk Field Services LLC that we did not already own (discussed further in Note 2).  Effective July 1, 2011, we exchanged our status as an owner of an equity investment in KinderHawk for a full controlling financial interest, and we began accounting for our investment under the full consolidation method.
 
Other Intangibles
 
Excluding goodwill, our other intangible assets include customer relationships, contracts and agreements, lease value, and technology-based assets.  These intangible assets have definite lives and are reported separately as "Other intangibles, net" in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  Following is information related to our intangible assets subject to amortization (in millions):
 
   
September 30,
2011
  
December 31,
2010
 
Customer relationships, contracts and agreements
      
Gross carrying amount
 $1,312.7  $399.8 
Accumulated amortization
  (152.0)  (112.0)
Net carrying amount
  1,160.7   287.8 
          
Lease value, technology-based assets and other
        
Gross carrying amount
  10.6   17.9 
Accumulated amortization
  (3.8)  (3.5)
Net carrying amount
  6.8   14.4 
          
Total Other intangibles, net
 $1,167.5  $302.2 
 
The increase in the carrying amount of our customer relationships, contacts and agreements since December 31, 2010 was mainly due to the acquisition of (i) a natural gas gathering customer contract in July 2011, associated with our purchase of the remaining 50% ownership interest in KinderHawk Field Services LLC that we did not already own; and (ii) two separate petroleum coke handling customer contracts in June 2011, associated with our purchase of terminal assets from TGS Development, L.P.  Both acquisitions are described further in Note 2.
 
We amortize the costs of our intangible assets to expense in a systematic and rational manner over their estimated useful lives.  Among the factors we weigh, depending on the nature of the asset, are the effects of obsolescence, new technology, and competition.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the amortization expense on our intangibles totaled $20.9 million and $40.3 million, respectively, and for the same prior year periods, the amortization expense on our intangibles totaled $11.5 million and $33.9 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, the weighted average amortization period for our intangible assets was approximately 18.6 years, and our estimated amortization expense for these assets for each of the next five fiscal years (2012 - 2016) is approximately $77.1 million, $73.2 million, $70.1 million, $67.3 million and $63.8 million, respectively.