XML 26 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurement
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement

MRV's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted time deposits, accounts receivable, other receivables, other assets, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and short-term debt obligations, are carried at cost, which approximates their fair value due to their short term nature.

ASC 820-10 Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 establishes a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the use of observable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is divided into three levels based on the source of inputs as follows: Level 1 - Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access; Level 2 - Valuations for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, other than level 1 inputs for similar assets and liabilities; Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Under this standard, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

As of September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, the Company had cash equivalents consisting of money market funds of $11.6 million and $14.0 million, respectively that were classified as Level 1 investments and were quoted at market price. Cash equivalents are included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Cost
Fair Value
September 30, 2014
 
$
11,605

$
11,605

 
 
 
 
December 31, 2013
 
$
14,001

$
14,001



During 2014, the Company updated the estimated fair value as of the issuance date of 250,000 warrants that were issued to plaintiffs' counsel on February 18, 2014, in a litigation matter originally recorded as a liability in 2013. In calculating the fair value, the Company used the Black Scholes option pricing model with level 2 inputs, including a volatility of 41% based on the Company's historical quoted prices and peer company data, the risk free interest rate of 1.5% and the 5 years expected term of the warrants. Volatility based on both the Company's historical quoted prices and peer company data was used as the Company's stock is thinly traded. The resulting fair value was $6.59 per warrant. In relation to this revaluation, the Company recorded expense of $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. No additional expense was recorded in the three months ended September 30, 2014. Upon issuance and revaluation, the warrants were removed from liabilities and recorded as a component of additional paid in capital.