XML 59 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Allowance for Noncovered Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Commitments and Letters of Credit
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Allowance For Loan And Lease Losses And Unfunded Loan Commitments And Letters Of Credit  
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit
Allowance for Noncovered Loan and Lease Losses and Unfunded Commitments and Letters of Credit
We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The size of the ALLL is determined through quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for making such assessments and determining the adequacy of the ALLL includes the following key elements:
1.
General valuation allowance consistent with the Contingencies topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC").
2.
Classified loss reserves on specific relationships. Specific allowances for identified problem loans are determined in accordance with the Receivables topic of the FASB ASC.
3.
The unallocated allowance provides for other factors inherent in our loan portfolio that may not have been contemplated in the general and specific components of the allowance. This unallocated amount generally comprises less than 5% of the allowance. The unallocated amount is reviewed quarterly based on trends in credit losses, the results of credit reviews and overall economic trends.
The general valuation allowance is systematically calculated quarterly using quantitative and qualitative information about specific loan classes. The minimum required level an entity develops a methodology to determine its allowance for loan and lease losses is by general categories of loans, such as commercial business, real estate, and consumer. However, the Company’s methodology in determining its allowance for loan and lease losses is prepared in a more detailed manner at the loan class level, utilizing specific categories such as commercial business secured, commercial business unsecured, real estate commercial land, and real estate income property multifamily. The quantitative information uses historical losses from a specific loan class and incorporates the loan’s risk rating migration from origination to the point of loss.
A loan’s risk rating is primarily determined based upon the borrower’s ability to fulfill its debt obligation from a cash flow perspective. In the event there is financial deterioration of the borrower, the borrower’s other sources of income or repayment are also considered, including recent appraisal values for collateral dependent loans. The qualitative information takes into account general economic and business conditions affecting our market place, seasoning of the loan portfolio, duration of the business cycle, etc. to ensure our methodologies reflect the current economic environment and other factors as using historical loss information exclusively may not give an accurate estimate of inherent losses within the Company’s loan portfolio.
When a loan is deemed to be impaired, the Company has to determine if a specific valuation allowance is required for that loan. The specific valuation allowance is a reserve, calculated at the individual loan level, for each loan determined to be both, impaired and containing a value less than its recorded investment. The Company measures the impairment based on the discounted expected future cash flows, observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral less selling costs if the loan is collateral dependent or if foreclosure is probable. The specific reserve for each loan is equal to the difference between the recorded investment in the loan and its determined impairment value.
The ALLL is increased by provisions for loan and lease losses (“provision”) charged to expense, and is reduced by loans charged off, net of recoveries. While the Company’s management believes the best information available is used to determine the ALLL, changes in market conditions could result in adjustments to the ALLL, affecting net income, if circumstances differ from the assumptions used in determining the ALLL.
We have used the same methodology for ALLL calculations during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Adjustments to the percentages of the ALLL allocated to loan categories are made based on trends with respect to delinquencies and problem loans within each class of loans. The Company reviews the ALLL quantitative and qualitative methodology on a quarterly basis and makes adjustments when appropriate. The Company continues to strive towards maintaining a conservative approach to credit quality and will continue to prudently adjust our ALLL as necessary in order to maintain adequate reserves. The Company carefully monitors the loan portfolio and continues to emphasize the importance of credit quality while continuously strengthening loan monitoring systems and controls.
The following table shows a detailed analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses for noncovered loans for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011: 
 
 
Beginning
Balance
 
Charge-offs
 
Recoveries
 
Provision
 
Ending
Balance
 
Specific
Reserve
 
General
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
Three months ended March 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial business
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured
 
$
24,745

 
$
(2,354
)
 
$
614

 
$
2,537

 
$
25,542

 
$
451

 
$
25,091

Unsecured
 
689

 
(5
)
 
44

 
58

 
786

 
141

 
645

Real estate:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One-to-four family residential
 
654

 
(116
)
 
43

 
108

 
689

 
72

 
617

Commercial & multifamily residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial land
 
488

 
(305
)
 

 
510

 
693

 

 
693

Income property multifamily
 
9,551

 
(2,008
)
 
18

 
2,688

 
10,249

 
1,087

 
9,162

Owner occupied
 
9,606

 
(365
)
 
53

 
(739
)
 
8,555

 
16

 
8,539

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One-to-four family residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land and acquisition
 
2,331

 
(204
)
 
47

 
(503
)
 
1,671

 

 
1,671

Residential construction
 
864

 

 

 
138

 
1,002

 
18

 
984

Commercial & multifamily residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income property multifamily
 
665

 

 

 
(442
)
 
223

 

 
223

Owner occupied
 
35

 

 

 
9

 
44

 

 
44

Consumer
 
2,719

 
(1,093
)
 
373

 
130

 
2,129

 

 
2,129

Unallocated
 
694

 

 

 
6

 
700

 

 
700

Total
 
$
53,041

 
$
(6,450
)
 
$
1,192

 
$
4,500

 
$
52,283

 
$
1,785

 
$
50,498

 
 
Beginning
Balance
 
Charge-offs
 
Recoveries
 
Provision
 
Ending
Balance
 
Specific
Reserve
 
General
Allocation
 
 
(in thousands)
Three months ended March 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial business
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured
 
$
21,811

 
$
(3,287
)
 
$
96

 
$
3,687

 
$
22,307

 
$
247

 
$
22,060

Unsecured
 
738

 
(84
)
 
9

 
(45
)
 
618

 
73

 
545

Real estate:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One-to-four family residential
 
1,100

 
(448
)
 

 
448

 
1,100

 
1

 
1,099

Commercial & multifamily residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial land
 
634

 

 

 
(79
)
 
555

 
58

 
497

Income property multifamily
 
15,210

 
(365
)
 
42

 
(2,591
)
 
12,296

 
51

 
12,245

Owner occupied
 
9,692

 

 
31

 
689

 
10,412

 

 
10,412

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One-to-four family residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land and acquisition
 
3,769

 
(768
)
 
1,068

 
(773
)
 
3,296

 
355

 
2,941

Residential construction
 
2,292

 
(659
)
 
36

 
449

 
2,118

 
34

 
2,084

Commercial & multifamily residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income property multifamily
 
274

 
(487
)
 

 
340

 
127

 

 
127

Owner occupied
 
70

 

 

 
(2
)
 
68

 

 
68

Consumer
 
2,120

 
(925
)
 
63

 
1,160

 
2,418

 

 
2,418

Unallocated
 
3,283

 

 

 
(3,283
)
 

 

 

Total
 
$
60,993

 
$
(7,023
)
 
$
1,345

 
$

 
$
55,315

 
$
819

 
$
54,496


Changes in the allowance for unfunded commitments and letters of credit are summarized as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
March 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
 
 
(in thousands)
Beginning balance
 
$
1,535

 
$
1,165

Net changes in the allowance for unfunded commitments and letters of credit
 
130

 
495

Ending balance
 
$
1,665

 
$
1,660


Risk Elements
The extension of credit in the form of loans to individuals and businesses is one of our principal commerce activities. Our policies and applicable laws and regulations require risk analysis as well as ongoing portfolio and credit management. We manage our credit risk through lending limit constraints, credit review, approval policies and extensive, ongoing internal monitoring. We also manage credit risk through diversification of the loan portfolio by type of loan, type of industry, type of borrower and by limiting the aggregation of debt to a single borrower.
The monitoring process for the loan portfolio includes periodic reviews of individual loans with risk ratings assigned to each loan. Based on the analysis, loans are given a risk rating of 1-10 based on the following criteria:
ratings of 1-3 indicate minimal to low credit risk,
ratings of 4-5 indicate an average credit risk with adequate repayment capacity when prolonged periods of adversity do not exist,
rating of 6 indicate higher than average risk requiring greater than routine attention by bank personnel due to conditions affecting the borrower, the borrower's industry or economic environment,
rating of 7 indicate potential weaknesses that, if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Company's credit position at some future date,
rating of 8 indicates a loss is possible if loan weaknesses are not corrected,
rating of 9 indicates loss is highly probable; however, the amount of loss has not yet been determined,
and a rating of 10 indicates the loan is uncollectable, and when identified is charged-off.
Loans with a risk rating of 1-6 are considered Pass loans and loans with risk ratings of 7, 8, 9 and 10 are considered Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss, respectively. Loans with a risk rating of Substandard or worse are reported as classified loans in our allowance for loan and lease losses analysis. We review these loans to assess the ability of our borrowers to service all interest and principal obligations and, as a result, the risk rating may be adjusted accordingly. Risk ratings are reviewed and updated whenever appropriate, with more periodic reviews as the risk and dollar value of loss on the loan increases. In the event full collection of principal and interest is not reasonably assured, the loan is appropriately downgraded and, if warranted, placed on non-accrual status even though the loan may be current as to principal and interest payments. Additionally, we assess whether an impairment of a loan warrants specific reserves or a write-down of the loan.
The following is an analysis of the credit quality of our noncovered loan portfolio as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
 
 
March 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
 
Weighted-
Average
Risk Rating
 
Recorded
Investment
Noncovered
Loans
 
Weighted-
Average
Risk Rating
 
Recorded
Investment
Noncovered
Loans
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
Commercial business
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secured
 
4.92

 
$
1,028,402

 
4.89

 
$
981,417

Unsecured
 
4.26

 
47,265

 
4.25

 
47,406

Real estate:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One-to-four family residential
 
4.76

 
58,876

 
4.81

 
64,063

Commercial & multifamily residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial land
 
5.11

 
45,380

 
5.22

 
50,681

Income property multifamily
 
4.00

 
558,570

 
4.94

 
533,993

Owner occupied
 
5.09

 
380,196

 
5.05

 
404,789

Real estate construction:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
One-to-four family residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land and acquisition
 
6.29

 
23,384

 
6.43

 
25,201

Residential construction
 
5.80

 
24,480

 
5.94

 
23,931

Commercial & multifamily residential
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income property multifamily
 
5.06

 
19,235

 
5.49

 
20,877

Owner occupied
 
4.60

 
16,008

 
4.55

 
12,790

Consumer
 
4.22

 
170,022

 
4.24

 
183,223

Total recorded investment of noncovered loans
 
 
 
$
2,371,818

 
 
 
$
2,348,371