XML 21 R6.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Basis of Presentation
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]  
Basis of Presentation

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Articles 8 and 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments and the elimination of intercompany accounts) considered necessary for a fair statement of all periods presented. The results of Adamis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s operations for any interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for any other interim period or for a full fiscal year. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash was $11,243,501 and $3,774,665 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

We prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements assuming that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities during the normal course of business. In preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements, consideration was given to the Company’s future business as described below, which may preclude the Company from realizing the value of certain assets.

The Company has significant operating cash flow deficiencies. Additionally, the Company will need significant funding for future operations and the expenditures that will be required to conduct the clinical and regulatory work to develop the Company’s product candidates. Management’s plans include seeking additional funding to satisfy existing obligations, liabilities and future working capital needs, to build working capital reserves and to fund its research and development projects. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining the necessary funding to meet its business objectives.

Basic and Diluted (Loss) per Share

The Company computes basic loss per share by dividing the loss attributable to holders of common stock for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The diluted loss per share calculation is based on the treasury stock method and gives effect to dilutive options, warrants, convertible notes, convertible preferred stock and other potential dilutive common stock. Except as noted below, the effect of common stock equivalents was anti-dilutive and was excluded from the calculation of weighted average shares outstanding. Potential dilutive securities, which are not included in dilutive weighted average shares for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014 consist of outstanding equity classified warrants (1,730,868 and 362,738, respectively), outstanding options (2,032,885 and 404,622, respectively), outstanding restricted stock units (11,184 and 11,184, respectively),  potential common stock issuable upon conversion of convertible debt (0 and 100,000, respectively), and convertible preferred stock  (1,009,021 and 0, respectively).

The calculation of diluted loss per share requires that, to the extent the average market price of the underlying shares for the reporting period exceeds the exercise price of liability classified equity securities and the presumed exercise of such securities are dilutive to loss per share for the period, an adjustment to net loss used in the calculation is required to remove the change in fair value of the warrants from the numerator for the period. Likewise, an adjustment to the denominator is required to reflect the related dilutive shares, if any, under the treasury stock method. Accordingly, the Company considered the impact of the warrants from the June 2013 private placement (see Note 4) on the calculation of the diluted earnings per share.

 

 

 

For the Quarter Ended

March 31, 2015

 

 

For the Quarter Ended

March 31 2014

 

Loss per Share - Basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator for basic loss per share

 

$

(3,141,706

)

 

$

(1,552,193

)

Denominator for basic loss per share

 

 

12,828,124

 

 

 

10,384,920

 

Loss per common share - basic

 

$

(0.24

)

 

$

(0.15

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss per Share - Diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator for basic loss per share

 

$

(3,141,706

)

 

$

(1,552,193

)

Adjust: Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability

 

$

(1,092,058

)

 

$

(126,906

)

Adjust: Change in Fair Value Warrant Derivative Liability

 

 

84,895

 

 

 

18,282

 

Numerator for dilutive loss per share

 

$

(4,148,869

)

 

$

(1,660,817

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for diluted loss per share

 

 

12,828,124

 

 

 

10,384,920

 

Plus: Incremental shares underlying "in the money" warrants outstanding

 

 

258,166

 

 

 

62,637

 

Denominator for dilutive loss per share

 

 

13,086,290

 

 

 

10,447,557

 

Loss per common share - diluted

 

$

(0.32

)

 

$

(0.16

)

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Summary and Amendments That Create Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Other Assets and Deferred Costs-Contracts with Customers (Subtopic 340-40).” The amendments in ASU 2014-09 supersede most current revenue recognition requirements. The core principal of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods with that reporting period. The Company can apply the amendments using one of the following two methods: (1) retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or (2) retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized at the date of initial application. On April 1, 2015 the FASB proposed a one year delay in the effective date.  If approved, the proposal will also permit early adoption up to the original effective date for public companies. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-50): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, consistent with the debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. For public businesses, ASU 2015-03 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of ASU 2015-03 will be allowed for financial statements that have yet to be issued. The amendments must be applied retrospectively, where the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the period-specific impact of using the new guidance. Upon transition, a business must adhere to the appropriate disclosures for an adjustment in an accounting principle. Such disclosures include why the change in accounting principle is occurring, the transition method, an explanation of the prior period information that was retrospectively adjusted, and how the change impacts the financial statement line items (i.e., debt issuance cost asset and the debt liability). The Company is currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.