10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

or

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 0-21214

ORTHOLOGIC CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	86-0585310
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
1275 W. Washington Street, Tempe, Arizona	85281
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(602) 286-5520

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     x Yeso No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  x Non-accelerated filer  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o    No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

41,670,650 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2007.

1

ORTHOLOGIC CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

INDEX

			Page No.
Part I	Financial Information
	Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006	3
		Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006	4
		Condensed Statements of Cash Flow for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006	5
		Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	6
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	12
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	16
Part II	Other Information
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	17
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	18
	Item 6.	Exhibits	18
	EXHIBIT 31.1
	EXHIBIT 31.2
	EXHIBIT 32

2

PART I – Financial Information

Item 1.  Financial Statements

ORTHOLOGIC CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,295		$	18,047
Short-term investments		23,858			35,977
Prepaids and other current assets		1,160			1,950
Total current assets		39,313			55,974
Furniture and equipment, net		369			409
Long-term investments		26,103			16,206
Total assets	$	65,785		$	72,589
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	420		$	1,621
Accrued compensation		335			584
Accrued clinical		95			133
Accrued severance and other restructuring costs		166			366
Other accrued liabilities		519			737
Total current liabilities		1,535			3,441
Stockholders' Equity
Common Stock  $.0005 par value;		21			21
100,000,000 shares authorized; 41,670,650 and   41,564,291 shares issued and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital		188,591			188,236
Accumulated deficit		(124,362	)		(119,109	)
Total stockholders' equity		64,250			69,148
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	65,785		$	72,589

See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements

3

OrthoLogic Corp.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except  per share data)

(Unaudited)

													As a Development
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Stage Company
	2007			2006			2007			2006			8/5/2004 - 6/30/2007
OPERATING EXPENSES
General and administrative	$	928		$	2,061		$	1,908		$	4,153		$	15,254
Research and development		2,252			4,208			5,070			10,924			58,255
Purchased in-process research and development		-			34			-			8,469			34,311
Other gains		-			-			-			-			(375	)
Total operating expenses		3,180			6,303			6,978			23,546			107,445
Interest and other income, net		(841	)		(867	)		(1,725	)		(1,629	)		(8,999	)
Loss from continuing operations		2,339			5,436			5,253			21,917			98,446
Income tax expense		-			1,106			-			1,106			356
Loss from continuing operations		2,339			6,542			5,253			23,023			98,802
Discontinued operations - net gain on sale of the bone device business, net of taxes ($267)		-			-			-			-			(2,202	)
NET LOSS	$	2,339		$	6,542		$	5,253		$	23,023		$	96,600
Per Share Information:
Net loss, basic and diluted	$	0.06		$	0.16		$	0.13		$	0.58
Basic and diluted shares outstanding		41,637			40,622			41,616			39,962

See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements

4

ORTHOLOGIC CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six months ended June 30,						As a Development Stage Company August 5th 2004 -
	2007			2006			June 30, 2007
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(5,253	)	$	(23,023	)	$	(96,600	)
Non cash items:
Deferred tax expense		-			1,106			770
Depreciation and amortization		39			507			3,304
Non-cash stock compensation		354			1,652			3,297
Gain on sale of bone device business		-			-			(2,298	)
In-process research and development		-			8,469			34,311
Change in other operating items:
Prepaids and other current assets		791			310			550
Accounts payable		(1,201	)		(251	)		(551	)
Accrued liabilities		(605	)		(1,105	)		(1,538	)
Cash flows used in operating activities		(5,875	)		(12,335	)		(58,755	)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Expenditures for furniture and equipment, net		(99	)		(83	)		(614	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		-			-			7,000
Cash paid for assets of AzERx/CBI		-			(390	)		(4,058	)
Cash paid for patent assignment rights		-			(100	)		(650	)
Purchases of investments		(23,906	)		(24,463	)		(169,800	)
Maturities of investments		26,128			34,377			177,777
Cash flows provided by investing activities		2,123			9,341			9,655
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from stock option exercises		-			2,962			4,612
Net proceeds from sale of stock		-			1,913			3,376
Cash flows provided by financing activities		-			4,875			7,988
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(3,752	)		1,881			(41,112	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		18,047			35,111			55,407
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	14,295		$	36,992		$	14,295

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing Activities	AzERx			AzERx and CBI
AzERx/CBI Acquisition
Current assets acquired	$	-		$	29
Patents acquired		-			2,142
Liabilities acquired, and accrued acquisition costs		(315	)		(457	)
Original investment reversal		-			(750	)
In-process research and development acquired		8,469			34,311
Common stock issued for acquisition		(7,764	)		(31,217	)
Cash paid for acquisition	$	390		$	4,058

See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements

5

ORTHOLOGIC CORP.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2007

OVERVIEW OF BUSINESS

Description of the business

OrthoLogic is a biotechnology company committed to developing a pipeline of novel peptides and other molecules aimed at helping patients with under-served conditions.  The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of two product platforms:  Chrysalin® (TP508) and AZX100.

Chrysalin, the Company’s first novel synthetic 23-amino acid peptide, has two lead indications, both of which represent areas of significant unmet medical need – fracture repair and diabetic foot ulcer healing.  The Company owns exclusive worldwide rights to Chrysalin.

AZX100, the Company’s second peptide, is a novel synthetic pre-clinical 24-amino acid peptide, one of a new class of compounds in the field of smooth muscle relaxation. AZX100 is currently being evaluated for medically and commercially significant applications, such as the treatment of vasospasm associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage, the prevention of keloid scarring, pulmonary fibrosis, and the treatment of asthma.  OrthoLogic has an exclusive worldwide license to AZX100.

We continue to explore other biopharmaceutical compounds that can complement our research activity internally and broaden our potential pipeline for successful products.

Company History

Prior to November 26, 2003, we developed, manufactured and marketed proprietary, technologically advanced orthopedic products designed to promote the healing of musculoskeletal bone and tissue, with particular emphasis on fracture healing and spine repair.  Our product lines included bone growth stimulation and fracture fixation devices including the OL1000 product line, SpinaLogic® and OrthoFrame/Mayo, which we sometimes refer to as our “Bone Device Business.”

On November 26, 2003, we sold our Bone Device Business.  Our principal business remains focused on tissue repair, although through biopharmaceutical approaches rather than through the use of medical devices.

On August 5, 2004, we purchased substantially all of the assets and intellectual property of Chrysalis Biotechnology, Inc. (“CBI”), including its exclusive worldwide license for Chrysalin for all medical indications, for $2.5 million in cash and $25.0 million in OrthoLogic common stock, with an additional $7.0 million in OrthoLogic common stock due should certain triggering events occur.  We became a development stage company commensurate with the acquisition.  Subsequently, all of our collective efforts were focused on research and development of our Chrysalin Product Platform, with the goal of commercializing our products.

6

On February 27, 2006, the Company purchased certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of AzERx, Inc.  Under the terms of the transaction, OrthoLogic acquired an exclusive license for the core intellectual property relating to AZX100.

Our development activities for the Chrysalin Product Platform and AZX100 represent a single operating segment as they share the same product development path and utilize the same Company resources.  As a result, we have determined that it is appropriate to reflect our operations as one reportable segment. Through June 30, 2007, we have incurred $97 million in net losses as a development stage company.

In these notes, references to “we”, “our” and the “Company” refer to OrthoLogic Corp.  References to our Bone Device Business refer to our former business line of bone growth stimulation and fracture fixation devices, including the OL1000 product line, SpinaLogic®, OrthoFrame® and OrthoFrame/Mayo.

Financial Statement Presentation

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed interim financial statements include all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.  The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the complete fiscal year.

Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that management make a number of assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and expenses in our financial statements and accompanying notes.  Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable.  Although these estimates are based on management’s assumptions regarding current events and actions that may impact the Company in the future, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.  Our critical accounting policies are those that affect, or could affect our financial statements materially and involve a significant level of judgment by management. The accounting policies and related risks described in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006 are those that depend most heavily on these judgments and estimates.  As of June 30, 2007, there have been no material changes to any of the critical accounting policies contained therein.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  It is suggested that these unaudited condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006.  Information presented as of December 31, 2006 is derived from audited statements.

New Accounting Pronouncement:  We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

7

Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements or adjustments to our deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance. Our evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of June 30, 2007.

We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to our financial results. In the event we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in the financial statements as selling, general and administrative expense.

A. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, (SFAS 123(R)).  SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments, including grants of stock options, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase rights, to be recognized in our financial statements based on their respective grant date fair values. Under this standard, the fair value of each employee stock option and employee stock purchase right is estimated on the date of grant using an option pricing model that meets certain requirements.  We currently use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of our share-based payments.  The determination of the fair value of share-based payment awards utilizing the Black-Scholes model is affected by our stock price and a number of assumptions, including expected volatility, expected life, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends.  We use historical volatility adjusted for future expectations. The expected life of stock options is based on historical data and future expectations.  The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the terms of our stock options and stock purchase rights.  The dividend yield assumption is based on our history and expectation of dividend payouts.  The fair value of our restricted stock units is based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.  Stock-based compensation expense recognized in our financial statements in 2006 and thereafter is based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest.  We recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight line basis over the requisite service period as if the award was, in-substance, a multiple award.  However, the amount of compensation cost recognized at any date must at least equal the portion of grant-date fair value of the award that is vested at that date. The amount of stock-based compensation expense in 2006 and thereafter will be reduced for estimated forfeitures.  Forfeitures are required to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.  We evaluate the assumptions used to value stock awards on a quarterly basis.  If factors change and we employ different assumptions, stock-based compensation expense may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the past.  The Company chose the modified-prospective transition alternatives in adopting SFAS 123(R).  Under the modified-prospective transition method, compensation cost is recognized in financial statements issued subsequent to the date of adoption for all stock-based payments granted, modified or settled after the date of adoption, as well as for any unvested awards that were granted prior to the date of adoption.  Because the Company previously adopted only the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS 123, we recognize compensation cost relating to the unvested portion of awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, the date of adoption, using the same estimate of the grant-date fair value and the same attribution method used to determine the pro forma disclosure under SFAS 123, except that a forfeiture rate has been estimated for all options, as required by SFAS 123(R).

8

Stock Options issued prior to December 31, 2005

Unrecognized non-cash stock compensation expense related to unvested options outstanding as of December 31, 2005 was approximately $1 million (includes 328,124 shares valued at $500,000 unvested and cancelled on April 5, 2006 upon the resignation of James M. Pusey, MD). Because of the significant expected forfeiture rate (54%) caused by the options cancelled at the time of Dr. Pusey’s resignation, the expected compensation cost for unvested options at December 31, 2005, was approximately $388,000.  At June 30, 2007,  the remaining compensation cost related to unvested options outstanding at December 31, 2005, is approximately $36,000, which will be recognized over the remaining vesting period of approximately 2.5 years, with an estimated weighted average period of 1.2 years.

2006 Stock Options

Using an estimated forfeiture rate of 13%, compensation cost recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2007, for options issued in 2006 was $156,000. The options granted generally vest over a two to four-year period from the date of grant and, accordingly, the remaining unamortized cost at June 30, 2007 of approximately $500,000 will be amortized ratably over the period ending December 31, 2009, with an estimated weighted average period of one year.

2007 Stock Options

On January 1, 2007, the Board of Directors granted each Director a fully vested option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.43.  Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company granted a fully vested option to purchase 13,889 shares of the Company’s common stock to a consultant at an exercise price of $1.44 and an option to purchase 5,000 shares that vests over a four-year period, to an employee, at an exercise price of $1.45.  On May 21, 2007, the Company granted an option to Dr. Steer to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.53, which vests pro-rata over a two-year period.

The Company used the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions, to determine the total fair value of $52,000 for options to purchase 78,889 shares of the Company’s common stock issued during the three months ended March 31, 2007, and the fair value of $33,000 for options to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock issued during the three months ended June 30, 2007.

	Three months ended March 31, 2007	Three months ended June 30, 2007
Risk free interest rate	4.6%	4.87%
Volatility	66%	61%
Expected term from vesting	2.8 Years	2.8 Years
Dividend yield	0%	0%

Using an estimated forfeiture rate of 18%, compensation cost recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2007, for options issued in 2007, was $51,000.  The options granted, that did not vest on the grant date, vest over two to four-year periods from the date of grant and, accordingly, the remaining unamortized cost at June 30, 2007 of approximately $28,000 will be amortized ratably over the period ending December 31, 2010, with an estimated weighted average period of two years.

9

2007 Awards of Shares of Common Stock

On January 1, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company awarded 104,898 shares of restricted stock (17,843 shares to each director), which vest on January 1, 2008.  The total fair value of the grants, determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, was $150,000, of which $61,000 has been recognized as compensation cost in the six months ended June 30, 2007.

On May 10, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company awarded total compensation of $115,000 to various executives, to be paid through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock.  The total number of shares of stock issued was 76,159.

Summary

Non-cash stock compensation cost for the six months ended June 30, 2007, totaled $354,000.  In the condensed Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2007, non-cash stock compensation expense of $251,000 was recorded as a general and administrative expense and $103,000 was recorded as research and development expense.

Non-cash stock compensation cost for the six months ended June 30, 2006, totaled $1,652,000 of which $602,000 related to stock awards.  In the condensed Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006, non-cash stock compensation expense of $1,310,000 was recorded as a general and administrative expense and $342,000 was recorded as a research and development expense.

During the six months ended June 30, 2006, options to purchase 670,400 shares of the Company’s common stock were exercised resulting in the receipt by the Company of net cash proceeds of $2,962,000.  The intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $689,000.  No options were exercised in the six months ended June 30, 2007.

A summary of option activity under our stock option plans for the six months ended June 30, 2007, is as follows:

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual term (years)
Options outstanding December 31, 2006		3,438,126		$	3.69
Plus: Options granted		128,889			1.47
Less:
Options exercised		-
Options expired/forfeited		(323,050	)		4.59
Options outstanding at June 30, 2007		3,243,965			3.51		6.65
Options exercisable at June 30, 2007		2,321,773			3.80		5.79
Options vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2007		3,031,365			3.54		6.50

10

A summary of the status of the Company’s unvested shares as of June 30, 2007, and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2007, is presented below:

Unvested Shares	Number of Options			Weighted average Grant date Fair Value
Unvested shares at December 31, 2006		-		$	-
Granted		181,057		$	1.46
Vested		(76,159	)	$	1.51
Canceled/forfeited		(17,483	)	$	1.43
Unvested shares at June 30, 2007		87,415		$	1.43

It is the Company’s policy to issue options from shareholder approved incentive plans. However, if the options are issued as an inducement for an individual to join the Company, the Company may issue stock options outside of shareholder approved plans.  The options granted under shareholder approved incentive plans have a ten-year term and vest over a two to four-year period of service. All options and stock purchase rights are granted with an exercise price equal to the current market value on the date of grant and, accordingly, options or stock purchase rights have no intrinsic value on the date of grant.  Based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock at June 30, 2007 of $1.42, stock options exercisable or expected to vest at June 30, 2007, have no intrinsic value. At June 30, 2007, 522,026 shares remain available to grant under the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.

Warrants

At June 30, 2007, the Company has warrants outstanding to purchase 46,706 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $6.39 per share which expire in February 2016, and warrants outstanding to purchase 117,423 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $1.91 per share which expire in July 2016.

Additionally, (as described in Note 15 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006), performance based warrants to purchase 240,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $1.91, which expire in February 2016, are outstanding but unvested at June 30, 2007.  The total cost of the performance based warrants will be charged to expense over the period of performance. The costs will be determined based on the fair value of the warrants determined by using the Black-Scholes model, revalued at each Company reporting date until fully vested.  The fair value of the performance based warrants using the Black-Scholes model, 61% volatility, 0% dividend yield, expected term of 8.7 years, and 4.87% interest rate was $223,000 at June 30, 2007.  No costs were charged to expense at June 30, 2007 as it is not yet probable that any performance based warrants will vest.

B. AUTHORIZED PREFERRED STOCK AND NEW RIGHTS AGREEMENT

We have 2,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock, the terms of which may be fixed by our Board of Directors.  We presently have no outstanding shares of preferred stock.  Our Board of Directors has the authority, without stockholder approval, to create and issue one or more series of such preferred stock and to determine the voting, dividend and other rights of holders of such preferred stock. 

11

In connection with a Rights Agreement dated as of March 4, 1997 between the Company and the Bank of New York, as amended (the “Rights Agreement”), we designated 500,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A Preferred Stock. The Rights Agreement expired March 11, 2007.

On June 19, 2007 we entered into a new Rights Agreement (the “New Rights Agreement”) with the Bank of New York.  In connection with the New Rights Agreement, we declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of our common stock to stockholders of record as of July 2, 2007 and designated 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock as Series A Preferred Stock. The Right, exercisable upon a Triggering Event as defined in the New Rights Agreement, allows the holder of each share of the Company’s common stock to purchase 1/100 of a share of Series A Preferred Stock for $6.00.  [Each 1/100 of a share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into $12 of the Company’s common stock.] The new rights replace similar rights that the Company issued under its previous Rights Agreement. The New Rights Agreement and the exercise of rights to purchase Series A Preferred Stock pursuant to the terms thereof may delay, defer or prevent a change in control because the terms of any issued Series A Preferred Stock would potentially prohibit our consummation of certain extraordinary corporate transactions without the approval of the Board of Directors.  In addition to the anti-takeover effects of the rights granted under the New Rights Agreement, the issuance of preferred stock, generally, could have a dilutive effect on our stockholders.  The New Rights Agreement will expire June 19, 2010.

C. FACILITY LEASE

The Company’s current facility lease expires on January 11, 2008. This lease covers a 100,000 square foot facility in Tempe, Arizona, of which the Company subleases approximately 45% to nonaffiliated parties.  On July 19, 2007 the Company entered into a new lease, which will be effective upon the expiration of its current lease, for 17,000 square feet of space in the same Tempe, Arizona facility. The new lease calls for monthly rental payments of $22,000, plus a proportionate share of building operating expenses and property taxes. The term of the new lease is sixty months, with an option to extend the lease for an additional twenty-four months with monthly rental payments set at $24,000, plus a proportionate share of building operating expenses and property taxes, during the extension period. The Company also has the right to terminate the new lease at the end of thirty-six months upon payment of an early termination fee of approximately $158,000. Total base rent for the initial sixty-month term is approximately $1,316,000.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following is management’s discussion of significant events in the six months ended June 30, 2007 and factors that affected OrthoLogic’s interim financial condition and results of operations.  This should be read in conjunction with our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Item 1A. Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and Item 1A. Risk Factors included in Part II of this quarterly report.

Overview of the Business

OrthoLogic is a biotechnology company focused on the development and commercialization of the novel synthetic peptides Chrysalin® (TP508) and AZX100.

12

Chrysalin^® (TP508)

Chrysalin, or TP508, is a 23-amino acid synthetic peptide representing a receptor-binding domain of the human thrombin molecule, a naturally occurring agent responsible for blood clotting and initiating the natural healing cascade of cellular events responsible for tissue repair in both soft tissue and bone.

During the first quarter of 2006, we announced topline results of the Chrysalin Phase 3 clinical trial in distal radius fracture.  While the study showed that Chrysalin did not meet its primary endpoint in the overall evaluable patient population, it did demonstrate that Chrysalin has biologic activity, as evidenced by statistically significant results observed along key radiographic secondary endpoints.

We interrupted enrollment in the concurrent Chrysalin Phase 2b dose-ranging study in the first quarter of 2006 in order to perform an interim analysis of subjects enrolled to that date.  Given the equivocal information obtained from the interim analysis we chose to terminate the study.

In December 2006 we announced a presentation at the American Society for Cell Biology describing results of an experiment demonstrating that TP508 increases the ability of endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide and that TP508 prevents negative effects caused by oxygen deprivation, a condition found in myocardial ischemia and chronic wounds.  This discovery raises the possibility that TP508 could be useful in treating a number of vascular diseases.  Laboratory-based validation work continues in this area.

In January 2007 we announced publication in the journal Wound Repair and Regeneration the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 60-subject Phase 1/2 study of Chrysalin in diabetic foot ulcers.  The article described statistically and clinically significant results achieved with twice-weekly topical application of Chrysalin, combined with good wound care and standard off-loading, in subjects with chronic diabetic foot ulcers.  The study was conducted by Chrysalis Biotechnology prior to its acquisition by OrthoLogic in 2004.

We announced on February 16, 2007 findings of a post hoc subgroup analysis of data from the Phase 3 clinical trial showed that within the subset of 157 female osteopenic subjects, treatment with 10 μg Chrysalin demonstrated a statistically significant benefit compared to placebo in the primary efficacy endpoint of time to removal of immobilization.  Secondary endpoints including clinical assessment of fracture healing (pain or motion at the fracture site), time to radial cortical bridging and time to overall radiographic healing also showed a significant effect of Chrysalin treatment.  These data are part of a post hoc subgroup analysis, and therefore provide only supporting - rather than pivotal - evidence of safety and efficacy.

Chrysalin Product Platform Status

· Demonstration of statistically significant healing in the primary endpoint and multiple secondary endpoints within the osteopenic female cohort from the Phase 3 distal radius fracture study.  This is a patient population where bone tissue was physiologically compromised.

· Demonstration of statistically significant healing with respect to wound closure endpoints in the Phase 1/2 diabetic foot ulcer trial, an example of Chrysalin’s biologic activity in compromised dermal tissue.

13

· Laboratory experiments tying Chrysalin to potential modulation of the health of endothelial tissue in blood vessels and other mechanism-of-action studies.

· Evaluations are ongoing as to the appropriate pre-clinical and clinical studies which would serve to strengthen our portfolio and partnering possibilities.

AZX100

We strengthened and diversified our development pipeline during the first quarter of 2006 with the acquisition of the 24-amino acid synthetic peptide AZX100.  AZX100 relaxes smooth muscle, which modulates blood pressure and the function of blood vessels, airways, sphincters, the gastrointestinal tract and the genitourinary tract.  Sustained abnormal contraction of any of these muscles is called spasm.  Any disorders known to be associated with excessive constriction or inadequate dilation of smooth muscle represent potential applications for AZX100.

AZX100 may also inhibit the fibrotic phenotype of fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells in a mechanism similar to that which causes vasorelaxation.  Through phenotypic modulation of fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, AZX100 may inhibit the scarring that results from wound healing and disease states in the dermis, blood vessels, lungs, liver and other organs.

 We are executing a development plan for this peptide, with the goal of filing an IND by year-end 2007.  We continue to make progress with respect to toxicology, pharmacology and cGMP manufacturing efforts.  We have chosen to explore partnering opportunities for pulmonary and vascular indications, and will continue to pursue in-house development of other selected indications.

Results of Operations Comparing Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2007 to the Corresponding Period in 2006

General and Administrative (“G&A”) Expenses:  G&A expenses related to our ongoing development operations decreased by $1,133,000 from $2,061,000 in the second quarter of 2006 to $928,000 in the second quarter of 2007.  Our administrative expenses during the second quarter of 2007 were lower than the same period of 2006 primarily as a result of a decrease of non-cash stock compensation expense of $281,000, reduced costs in 2007 reflecting management changes and staff reductions which occurred in the first half of 2006, and general cost containment efforts.

Research and Development Expenses:  Research and development expenses were $2,252,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $4,208,000 for the same period in 2006. Our research and development expenses decreased $1,956,000 in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 primarily due to a decline in clinical costs related to our fracture repair Phase 3 and Phase 2b clinical trials, which were substantially completed as of December 31, 2006.

Interest and Other Income, Net:  Interest and Other Income Net was $867,000 in the second quarter of 2006 compared to $841,000 in the second quarter of 2007.  The decrease is due to the decrease in cash and investments available for investment during 2007, partially offset by an increase in interest rates between the two periods.

Net Loss:  We incurred a net loss in the three months ended June 30, 2007 of $2.3 million compared to a net loss of $6.5 million in same period in 2006.  The $4.2 million decrease in the net loss in the three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, results primarily from a decrease of $378,000 in non-cash stock compensation expense, reduced costs in 2007 reflecting management changes and staff reductions which occurred in the first half of 2006, a decline in clinical costs related to our fracture repair Phase 3 and Phase 2b clinical trials, which were substantially completed as of December 31, 2006, and  the recognition in 2006 of income tax expense related to the recording of a valuation allowance of $1.1 million for a deferred tax asset related to a Alternative Minimum Tax credit carryover.

14

Results of Operations Comparing Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2007 to the Corresponding Period in 2006

General and Administrative (“G&A”) Expenses:  G&A expenses related to our ongoing development operations decreased by $2,245,000 to $1,908,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $4,153,000 in the same period in 2006.  Our administrative expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2007 were lower than the same period of 2006 primarily as a result of a decrease of non-cash stock compensation expense of $1,059,000, reduced costs in 2007 reflecting management changes and staff reductions which occurred in the first half of 2006, and general cost containment efforts.

Research and Development Expenses:  Research and development expenses were $5,070,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to $10,924,000 in the same period of 2006.  Our research and development expenses decreased $5,854,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 primarily due to a decline in clinical costs related to our fracture repair Phase 3 and Phase 2b clinical trials, which were substantially completed as of December 31, 2006.  Given the overlapping nature of our research efforts it is not possible to clearly separate research expenditures between Chrysalin and AZX100; however, currently we anticipate that the substantial majority of our research and development expenses in 2007 will be directed towards AZX100 development efforts.

Interest and Other Income, Net:  Interest and Other Income Net increased from $1,629,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2006 to $1,725,000 in the same period in 2007, due to an increase in interest rates between the two periods, partially offset by reduction in the cash and investments available for investment during 2007.

Net Loss:  We incurred a net loss in the first six months of 2007 of $5.3 million compared to a net loss of $23.0 million in the first six months of 2006.  The $17.7 million decrease in the net loss in the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, results primarily from $8.4 million purchased in-process research and development costs in 2006, a decrease of $1.3 million in non-cash stock compensation expense, reduced costs in 2007 reflecting management changes and staff reductions which occurred in the first half of 2006,  a decline in clinical costs related to our fracture repair Phase 3 and Phase 2b clinical trials, which were substantially completed as of December 31, 2006, and  the recognition in 2006 of income tax expense related to the recording of a valuation allowance of $1.1 million for a deferred tax asset related to a Alternative Minimum Tax credit carryover.

15

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We historically financed our operations through operating cash flows and the public and private sales of equity securities.  However, with the sale of our Bone Device Business in November 2003, we sold all of our revenue producing operations.  We received approximately $93.0 million in cash from the sale of our Bone Device Business.  On December 1, 2005, we received the additional $7.2 million, including interest, from the escrow balance related to the sale of the Bone Device Business.  On February 27, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with Quintiles (see Note 15 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006), which provided an investment by Quintiles in the Company’s common stock,  of which $2,000,000 was received on February 27, 2006 and $1,500,000 was received on July 3, 2006.  We also received net proceeds of $4,612,000 from the exercise of stock options during our development stage period. At June 30, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of $14.3 million, short-term investments of $23.9 million and long-term investments of $26.1 million.

On November 2, 2006, the Company announced that it has no immediate plans to re-enter clinical trials for Chrysalin-based product candidates and a strategic shift in its development approach to its Chrysalin Product Platform.  The Company currently intends to pursue development partnering or licensing opportunities for its Chrysalin-based product candidates, a change from its previous development history of independently conducting clinical trials necessary to advance its Chrysalin-based product candidates to market.  We will continue expenditures related to ongoing regulatory requirements for the Phase 2b clinical trial for Chrysalin in fracture repair, and expenditures necessary to continue to explore the science behind and potential of Chrysalin. We will also continue research and development expenditures for further pre-clinical studies for AZX100.

Our future research and development expenses may vary significantly from prior periods depending on the Company’s decisions on its future Chrysalin and AZX100 development plans.

We anticipate that our cash and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet our presently projected cash and working capital requirements for the next year. However, the timing and amounts of cash used will depend on many factors, including our ability to continue to control our expenditures related to our current research and development programs.  If we enter into new clinical trials or if we consider other opportunities in the market, our expense levels may change, which could require us to seek other sources of capital.  If additional funding is required, we would be required to seek new sources of funds, including raising capital through the sales of securities or licensing agreements.  These sources of funds may not be available or could only be available at terms that would have a material adverse impact on our existing stockholders’ interests.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our principal executive officer and chief financial officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and chief financial officer have each concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective and provide reasonable assurance that we record, process, summarize, and report information required to be disclosed in the reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

16

Part II– Other Information

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Forward looking statements

OrthoLogic may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our reports to stockholders.  The safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 protects companies from liability for their forward looking statements if they comply with the requirements of that Act.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to that safe harbor.  These forward-looking statements relate to future events or to our future financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.  In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.  You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.  Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to:

· unfavorable results of our product candidate development efforts;

· unfavorable results of our pre-clinical or clinical testing;

· delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain FDA approvals;

· increased regulation by the FDA and other agencies;

· the introduction of competitive products;

· impairment of license, patent or other proprietary rights;

· failure to achieve market acceptance of our products;

· the impact of present and future collaborative agreements; and

· failure to successfully implement our drug development strategy.

If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary significantly from what we projected. Any forward-looking statement you read in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflects our current views with respect to future events and is subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, business strategy and liquidity.  We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

There are no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

17

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

On May 10, 2007, the Company held its Annual Shareholder Meeting at which the shareholders voted to elect one Class I Director, whose term will expire at the annual meeting to be held in the year  2010 and to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007.

Fredric J. Feldman, Ph.D., was elected as a Class I director with 33,726,039 votes for, and 967,155 votes withheld.  The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, was approved with 34,529,732 for, 105,525 votes against, and 57,937 votes abstained.

Elwood D. Howse, Jr., John M. Holliman, III, William M. Wardell, MD, Ph.D., and Augustus A. White, III, MD, Ph.D., are directors whose terms continued after the meeting.

Item 6. Exhibits

See Exhibit List following this report

18

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ORTHOLOGIC CORP.
(Registrant)
Signature	Title	Date
/s/ John M. Holliman, III	Executive Chairman	August 8, 2007
John M. Holliman, III	(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Les M. Taeger	Senior Vice-President and Chief	August 8, 2007
Les M. Taeger	Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

19

OrthoLogic Corp.

(the “Company”)

Exhibit Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Period Ended June 30, 2007

Exhibit No.	Description	Incorporated by Reference To:	Filed Herewith
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, executed April 15, 2005	Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on May 10, 2005
3.2	Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock, executed June 19, 2007	Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 25, 2007 (“June 2007 8-K”)
3.3	Bylaws of the Company	Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.  33-47569) filed with the SEC on January 25, 1993
4.1	Rights Agreement dated as of June 19, 2007, between the Company and The Bank of New York, and Exhibits A, B and C thereto	Exhibit 4.1 to the June 2007 8-K
4.2	Class A Warrant Agreement dated February 24, 2006, between OrthoLogic Corp. and PharmaBio Development Inc.  (d/b/a NovaQuest)	Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 3, 2006
4.3	Amended and Restated Class B Warrant Agreement dated February 24, 2006, and amended and restated as of June 30, 2006, between OrthoLogic Corp. and PharmaBio Development Inc. (d/b/a NovaQuest) (asterisks located within exhibit denote information that has been deleted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission)	Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on September 22, 2006 (the “September 22nd S-3”)
4.4	Amended and Restated Class C Warrant Agreement dated February 24, 2006, and amended and restated as of June 30, 2006, between OrthoLogic Corp. and PharmaBio Development Inc. (d/b/a NovaQuest)	Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed with the SEC on May 7, 2007
4.5	Amended and Restated Class D Warrant Agreement dated February 24, 2006, andamended and restated as of June 30, 2006, between OrthoLogic Corp. and PharmaBio Development Inc. (d/b/a NovaQuest) (asterisks located within exhibit denote information that has been deleted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission)	Exhibit 4.7 to the September 22nd S-3

20

Exhibit No.	Description	Incorporated by Reference To:	Filed Herewith
4.6	Class A Warrant Agreement dated June 30, 2006, between OrthoLogic Corp. and PharmaBio Development Inc. (d/b/a NovaQuest)	Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 6, 2006
10.1	Lease Agreement dated July 19, 2007, by and between the Company and Phoenix Investors #13, L.L.C.	Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 23, 2007
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14		X
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14		X
32	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350*
	* Furnished herewith

21

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John M. Holliman, III certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OrthoLogic Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 8, 2007

By:	/s/ John M. Holliman, III
John M. Holliman, III
Principal Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Les M. Taeger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OrthoLogic Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 8, 2007

By:	/s/ Les M. Taeger
Les M. Taeger
Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OrthoLogic Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of John M. Holliman, III, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Les M. Taeger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8, 2007

/s/ John M. Holliman, III

John M. Holliman, III

Principal Executive Officer

/s/ Les M. Taeger

Les M. Taeger

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OrthoLogic Corp. and will be retained by OrthoLogic Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.