XML 32 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Abstract 
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
 
 
Latin
America
 
North
America
 
Central &
Eastern
Europe
 
Western
Europe, Middle
East & Africa
 
Asia
Pacific
 
Total
Balance at December 31, 2010
$
113.5

 
$
314.7

 
$
8.4

 
$
158.5

 
$
80.0

 
$
675.1

Adjustments

 

 

 
(2.8
)
 

 
(2.8
)
Foreign exchange
(0.1
)
 

 
(0.6
)
 
(0.4
)
 
2.9

 
1.8

Balance at September 30, 2011
$
113.4

 
$
314.7

 
$
7.8

 
$
155.3

 
$
82.9

 
$
674.1



In July 2010, we acquired substantially all the assets and liabilities of Silpada Designs, Inc. (“Silpada”), for approximately $650 in cash, plus a potential additional payment in early 2015 based on the achievement of earnings growth of the Silpada North America business during the periods between 2012 through 2014. Silpada is included within our North America segment. The purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill of $314.7, indefinite-lived trademarks of $150.0 and customer relationships of $172.8. The customer relationships have an average 10-year useful life. At the date of the acquisition, a liability of approximately $26 was recorded associated with this potential additional consideration (“contingent consideration”), based on a valuation of the estimated fair value of the liability after probability-weighting and discounting various potential payments. At December 31, 2010, we estimated that the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability was $11. At September 30, 2011, we estimated that the potential additional payment associated with the contingent consideration could range from $0 to approximately $15 and that the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability was $4.2. The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration was recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses and was primarily due to a decrease in estimates of the ultimate consideration.




In the second quarter of 2011, due to the impact of rising silver prices and a decline in revenues relative to our internal forecasts, we completed an interim analysis of the fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles impairment assessment related to Silpada. The asset impairment analyses performed for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles require several estimates including future cash flows, growth rates and the selection of discount rates. The estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected growth rates and the selection of discount rates as well as assumptions regarding general economic and business conditions, among other factors. Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of Silpada included the discount rate (based on the weighted-average cost of capital), revenue growth, silver prices, and Representative growth and activity rates. The fair value of Silpada for the goodwill impairment assessment was determined using an income approach, which focuses on the income producing capability of a reporting unit based on a prospective analysis of the business that is discounted at a risk adjusted rate. Based upon our interim assessment, Silpada's estimated fair value exceeded its carrying value by 13% as of June 30, 2011. The interim impairment review of the Silpada trademarks during the second quarter of 2011 used a risk-adjusted discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. The royalty rate used was based on a consideration of market rates. Based on the discounted cash flow model, we determined the fair value of the Silpada trademarks exceeded their carrying value by a small amount. As a result of the asset impairment analyses performed for goodwill and indefinite-lived trademarks related to Silpada, no adjustments were necessary as of June 30, 2011. We have considered whether any circumstances exist that would more likely than not reduce Silpada's fair value below its carrying value and an interim impairment analysis was not considered necessary as of September 30, 2011. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we will be performing our annual impairment analysis of our reporting units, including Silpada. A decline in expected future cash flows and growth rates or a change in the risk-adjusted discount rate used to fair value expected future cash flows may result in an impairment charge for the goodwill and/or the indefinite-lived trademarks.

Intangible assets
 
September 30, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
 
Gross
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Gross
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
Amortized Intangible Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Customer relationships
$
222.2

 
$
(58.6
)
 
$
221.9

 
$
(45.6
)
Licensing agreements
58.7

 
(49.1
)
 
58.5

 
(46.1
)
Noncompete agreements
8.2

 
(7.0
)
 
8.2

 
(6.8
)
Trademarks
6.6

 
(3.5
)
 
6.6

 
(1.8
)
Indefinite Lived Trademarks
173.6

 

 
173.4

 

Total
$
469.3

 
$
(118.2
)
 
$
468.6

 
$
(100.3
)

 
Estimated Amortization Expense:
 
2011
$
23.6

2012
23.6

2013
21.4

2014
20.6

2015
20.0


Aggregate amortization expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $5.2 and $17.6, respectively, compared to $8.4 and $10.7 for the same periods of 2010