XML 22 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Nature Of Operations And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Aug. 31, 2018
Nature Of Operations And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Nature Of Operations And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

1.

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES



Franklin Covey Co. (hereafter referred to as we, us, our, or the Company) is a global company specializing in organizational performance improvement.  We help individuals and organizations achieve results that require a change in human behavior and our mission is to “enable greatness in people and organizations everywhere.”  We have some of the best-known offerings in the training industry, including a suite of individual-effectiveness and leadership-development training and products based on the best-selling books, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, The Speed of Trust, The Leader In Me, and The Four Disciplines of Execution, and proprietary content in the areas of Execution, Sales Performance, Productivity, Customer Loyalty, and Educational improvement.  Our offerings are described in further detail at www.franklincovey.com and elsewhere in this report.  Through our organizational research and curriculum development efforts, we seek to consistently create, develop, and introduce new services and products that help individuals and organizations achieve their own great purposes.



Fiscal Year



Our fiscal year ends on August 31 of each year.  During fiscal 2017, our Board of Directors approved a change to our fiscal quarter ending dates from a modified 52/53-week calendar in which quarterly periods ended on different dates from year to year, to the last day of the calendar month in each quarter.  Beginning with the second quarter of fiscal 2017, our fiscal quarters now end on the last day of November, February, and May.  Unless otherwise noted, references to fiscal years apply to the 12 months ended August 31 of the specified year.



Basis of Presentation



The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, which consist of Franklin Development Corp., and our offices in Japan, China, the United Kingdom, and Australia.  Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.



Pervasiveness of Estimates



The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.



Reclassifications



Certain reclassifications have been made to our prior period financial statements to conform with the current period presentation.  On our consolidated balance sheet, we have separately classified deferred income tax assets and combined amounts receivable from FC Organizational Products (FCOP) with other current and other long-term assets (Note 17).  On our consolidated statements of operations, we reclassified $0.2 million in each of the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016 from interest income to the accretion of discount on related party receivables.



Cash and Cash Equivalents



Some of our cash is deposited with financial institutions located throughout the United States of America and at banks in foreign countries where we operate subsidiary offices, and at times may exceed insured limits.  We consider all highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  We did not hold a significant amount of investments that would be considered cash equivalent instruments at August 31, 2018 or 2017.  Of our $10.2 million in cash at August 31, 2018, $8.9 million of it was held outside the U.S. by our foreign subsidiaries.  We routinely repatriate cash from our foreign subsidiaries and consider cash generated from foreign activities a key component of our overall liquidity position.



Inventories



Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, cost being determined using the first-in, first-out method.  Elements of cost in inventories generally include raw materials and direct labor.  Cash flows from the sale of inventory are included in cash flows provided by operating activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows.  Our inventories are comprised primarily of training materials, books, and training-related accessories, and consisted of the following (in thousands):



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

AUGUST 31,

 

2018

 

2017

Finished goods

$

3,130 

$

3,306 

Raw materials

 

30 

 

47 



$

3,160 

$

3,353 



Provision is made to reduce excess and obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable value.  In assessing the valuation of inventories, we make judgments regarding future demand requirements and compare these estimates with current and committed inventory levels.  Inventory requirements may change based on projected customer demand, training curriculum life-cycle changes, and other factors that could affect the valuation of our inventories.



During fiscal 2017, we exited the publishing business in Japan (Note 12) and wrote off the majority of our book inventory located in Japan, which totaled $2.1 million.  The cost of the books written off was recorded in cost of sales during fiscal 2017.



Other Current Assets



Significant components of our other current assets were as follows (in thousands):





 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

AUGUST 31,

 

2018

 

2017

Deferred commissions

$

6,958 

$

6,150 

Other current assets

 

3,935 

 

3,237 



$

10,893 

$

9,387 



We defer commission expense on subscription-based sales and recognize the commission expense with the recognition of the corresponding revenue.



Property and Equipment



Property and equipment are recorded at cost.  Depreciation expense, which includes depreciation on our corporate campus that is accounted for as a financing obligation (Note 6), and the amortization of assets recorded under capital lease obligations, is calculated using the straight-line method over the lesser of the expected useful life of the asset or the contracted lease period.  We generally use the following depreciable lives for our major classifications of property and equipment:



Description

Useful Lives

Buildings

20 years

Machinery and equipment

57 years

Computer hardware and software

35 years

Furniture, fixtures, and leasehold improvements

57 years



Our property and equipment were comprised of the following (in thousands):





 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

AUGUST 31,

 

2018

 

2017

Land and improvements

$

1,312 

$

1,312 

Buildings

 

30,038 

 

30,044 

Machinery and equipment

 

1,723 

 

2,119 

Computer hardware and software

 

27,066 

 

22,647 

Furniture, fixtures, and leasehold

 

 

 

 

improvements

 

8,272 

 

8,319 



 

68,411 

 

64,441 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(47,010)

 

(44,711)



$

21,401 

$

19,730 



We expense costs for repairs and maintenance as incurred.  Gains and losses resulting from the sale of property and equipment are recorded in operating income (loss).  Depreciation of capitalized portal costs is included in depreciation expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  During each of the fiscal years ended August 31, 2018 and 2017, we capitalized $0.1 million of interest expense in connection with the installation of our new enterprise resource planning system and the development of our new All Access Pass portal.



Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



Long-lived tangible assets and finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.  We use an estimate of undiscounted future net cash flows of the assets over the remaining useful lives in determining whether the carrying value of the assets is recoverable.  If the carrying values of the assets exceed the anticipated future cash flows of the assets, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the carrying values of the assets and their estimated fair values.  Impairment of long-lived assets is assessed at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are independent from other groups of assets.  The evaluation of long-lived assets requires us to use estimates of future cash flows.  If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of our long-lived tangible and finite-lived intangible assets change in the future, significant impairment charges could result that would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.



Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Goodwill Impairment Testing



Intangible assets that are deemed to have an indefinite life and acquired goodwill are not amortized, but rather are tested for impairment on an annual basis or more often if events or circumstances indicate that a potential impairment exists.  The Covey trade name intangible asset has been deemed to have an indefinite life.  This intangible asset is tested for impairment using qualitative factors or the present value of estimated royalties on trade name related revenues, which consist primarily of training seminars and work sessions, international licensee sales, and related products.  Based on the fiscal 2018 evaluation of the Covey trade name, we believe the fair value of the Covey trade name substantially exceeds its carrying value.  No impairment charges were recorded against the Covey trade name during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2018, 2017, or 2016.



Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price for an acquisition exceeds the estimated fair value of the net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired.  During August 2017, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:  Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.  This guidance simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill and eliminates the two-step goodwill impairment test.  Under the new guidance, an annual or interim goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value.  The amendments also eliminate the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and two-step goodwill impairment test.



We tested goodwill for impairment at August 31, 2018 at the reporting unit level using a quantitative approach.  The goodwill impairment testing process involves determining whether the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its respective book value.  If the fair value exceeds the book value, goodwill of that reporting unit is not impaired.  If the book value exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value.  The estimated fair value of each reporting unit was calculated using a combination of the income approach (discounted cash flows) and the market approach (using market multiples derived from a set of companies with comparable market characteristics).



On an interim basis, we consider whether events or circumstances are present that may lead to the determination that goodwill may be impaired.  If, based on events or changing circumstances, we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit does not exceed its carrying value, we would be required to test goodwill for impairment.



Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions.  These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions, and determination of appropriate market comparables.  We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain.  Actual future results may differ from those estimates.  In addition, we make certain judgments and assumptions in allocating shared assets and liabilities to determine the carrying values for each of our reporting units.  The timing and frequency of our goodwill impairment tests are based on an ongoing assessment of events and circumstances that would indicate a possible impairment.  Based on the results of our goodwill impairment testing, we determined that no impairment existed at either of August 31, 2018 or 2017 as each reporting unit’s estimated fair value exceeded its carrying value.  We will continue to monitor our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment and conduct formal tests when impairment indicators are present.  For more information regarding our intangible assets and goodwill, refer to Note 4.



Capitalized Curriculum Development Costs



During the normal course of business, we develop training courses and related materials that we sell to our clients.  Capitalized curriculum development costs include certain expenditures to develop course materials such as video segments, course manuals, and other related materials.  Our capitalized curriculum development spending in fiscal 2018, which totaled $3.0 million, was primarily for offerings related to the All Access Pass, including The Four Essential Roles of Leadership, and for various other offerings in our Education practice.  Curriculum costs are capitalized when there is a major revision to an existing course that requires a significant re-write of the course materials.  Costs incurred to maintain existing offerings are expensed when incurred.  In addition, development costs incurred in the research and development of new offerings and software products to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are expensed as incurred until economic and technological feasibility has been established.



Capitalized development costs are amortized over three- to five-year useful lives, which are based on numerous factors, including expected cycles of major changes to our content.  Capitalized curriculum development costs are reported as a component of other long-term assets in our consolidated balance sheets and totaled $9.3 million and $11.6 million at August 31, 2018 and 2017.  Amortization of capitalized curriculum development costs is reported as a component of cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.



Accrued Liabilities



Significant components of our accrued liabilities were as follows (in thousands):





 

 

 

 

AUGUST 31,

 

2018

 

2017

Accrued compensation

$

11,858 

$

10,611 

Other accrued liabilities

 

8,903 

 

12,006 



$

20,761 

$

22,617 



Contingent Consideration Payments from Business Acquisitions



Business acquisitions may include contingent consideration payments based on various future financial measures related to the acquired entity.  Contingent consideration is required to be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date.  We estimate the fair value of these liabilities based on financial projections of the acquired company and estimated probabilities of achievement.  Based on updated estimates and projections, the contingent consideration liabilities are adjusted at each reporting date to their estimated fair value.  Changes in fair value subsequent to the acquisition date are reported in selling, general, and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of operations, and may have a material impact on our operating results.  Variations in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities may result from changes in discount periods or rates, changes in the timing and amount of earnings estimates, and changes in probability assumptions with respect to the likelihood of achieving various payment criteria.



Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions



The functional currencies of our foreign operations are the reported local currencies.  Translation adjustments result from translating our foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements into United States dollars.  The balance sheet accounts of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet dates.  Revenues and expenses are translated using average exchange rates for each month during the fiscal year.  The resulting translation differences are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.  Foreign currency transaction losses totaled $0.5 million, $0.2 million, and $0.3 million for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are included as a component of selling, general, and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.



Sales Taxes



We collect sales tax on qualifying transactions with customers based upon applicable sales tax rates in various jurisdictions.  We account for sales taxes collected using the net method; accordingly, we do not include sales taxes in net sales reported in our consolidated statements of operations.



Revenue Recognition



We recognize revenue when: 1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, 2) delivery of the product has occurred or services have been rendered, 3) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and 4) collectability is reasonably assured.  For training and service sales, these conditions are generally met upon presentation of the training seminar or delivery of the consulting services based upon daily rates.  For most of our product sales, these conditions are met upon shipment of the product to the customer.  At times, our customers may request access to our intellectual property for the flexibility to print certain training materials or to have access to certain training videos and other training aids at their convenience.  For intellectual property license sales, the revenue recognition conditions are generally met at the later of delivery of the content to the client or the effective date of the arrangement.



Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the fair value for each of the elements.  A deliverable constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value to our clients.  We routinely enter into arrangements that can include various combinations of multiple training offerings, consulting services, and intellectual property licenses.  The timing of delivery and performance of the elements typically varies from contract to contract.  Generally, these items qualify as separate units of accounting because they have value to the customer on a standalone basis.



When the Company’s training and consulting arrangements contain multiple deliverables, consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices at the beginning of the agreement, and revenue is recognized as each offering, consulting service, or intellectual property license is delivered.  We use the following selling price hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to the elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (VSOE), (ii) third-party evidence (TPE), and (iii) best estimate of selling price (BESP).  Generally, VSOE is based on established pricing and discounting practices for the deliverables when sold separately.  In determining VSOE, we require that a substantial majority of the selling prices fall within a narrow range.  When VSOE cannot be established, judgment is applied with respect to whether a selling price can be established based on TPE, which is determined based on competitor prices for similar offerings when sold separately.  Our products and services normally contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of services with similar functionality cannot be obtained.  When we are unable to establish a selling price using VSOE or TPE, BESP is used in our allocation of arrangement consideration.  BESPs are established as best estimates of what the selling price would be if the deliverables were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis.  Our process for determining BESPs requires judgment and considers multiple factors, such as market conditions, type of customer, geographies, stage of product lifecycle, internal costs, and gross margin objectives.  These factors may vary over time depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable.  However, we do not expect the effect of changes in the selling price or method or assumptions used to determine selling price to have a significant effect on the allocation of arrangement consideration.



Our multiple-element arrangements generally do not include performance, cancellation, termination, or refund-type provisions.



Our international strategy includes the use of licensees in countries where we do not have a wholly-owned direct office.  Licensee companies are unrelated entities that have been granted a license to translate our content and offerings, adapt the content to the local culture, and sell our content in a specific country or region.  Licensees are required to pay us royalties based upon a percentage of their sales to clients.  We recognize royalty income each period based upon the sales information reported to us from our licensees.  Licensee royalty revenues are included as a component of training sales and totaled $10.7 million, $10.6 million, and $14.4 million for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.  The decrease in international licensee royalties in fiscal 2017 was primarily due to the conversion of our licensee operations in China into directly-owned offices.



Revenue is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts and product returns.



Stock-Based Compensation



We record the compensation expense for all stock-based payments, including grants of stock options and the compensatory elements of our employee stock purchase plan, in our consolidated statements of operations based upon their fair values over the requisite service period.  For more information on our stock-based compensation plans, refer to Note 11.



Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs



All shipping and handling fees billed to customers are recorded as a component of net sales.  All costs incurred related to the shipping and handling of products are recorded in cost of sales.



Advertising Costs



Costs for advertising are expensed as incurred.  Advertising costs included in selling, general, and administrative expenses totaled $6.9 million, $6.4 million, and $6.6 million for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.



Income Taxes



Our income tax provision has been determined using the asset and liability approach of accounting for income taxes.  Under this approach, deferred income taxes represent the future tax consequences expected to occur when the reported amounts of assets and liabilities are recovered or paid.  The income tax provision represents income taxes paid or payable for the current year plus the change in deferred taxes during the year.  Deferred income taxes result from differences between the financial and tax bases of our assets and liabilities and are adjusted for tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted.  A valuation allowance is provided against deferred income tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized.  Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as components of income tax benefit or expense in our consolidated statements of operations.



We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.



We provide for income taxes, net of applicable foreign tax credits, on temporary differences in our investment in foreign subsidiaries, which consist primarily of unrepatriated earnings.



Comprehensive Income



Comprehensive income includes changes to equity accounts that were not the result of transactions with shareholders.  Comprehensive income is comprised of net income or loss and other comprehensive income and loss items.  Our other comprehensive income and losses generally consist of changes in the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax.



Accounting Pronouncements Issued and Adopted



In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.  The guidance in ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for stock-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification of items on the statement of cash flows.  The guidance in ASU 2016-09 is effective for public companies’ annual periods, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016.  We adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-09 on September 1, 2017 on a prospective basis and prior periods have not been restated for these amendments.  The primary impact of adopting this guidance on our financial statements has been the classification of excess income tax benefits or expense in income taxes rather than as a component of additional paid-in capital.  The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on our financial statements in fiscal 2018.



Accounting Pronouncements Issued Not Yet Adopted



On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).  This new standard was issued in conjunction with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and is designed to create a single, principles-based process by which all businesses calculate revenue.  The core principle of this standard is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services.  The standard also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.  The new standard replaces numerous individual, industry-specific revenue rules found in generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.  We will adopt this standard on September 1, 2018 and apply the new guidance during interim periods within fiscal 2019.  We plan to adopt ASU No. 2014-09 using the “modified retrospective” approach.



Based upon our analysis of Topic 606, we expect that revenue recognition among our products and services will remain largely unchanged except for our initial license fee associated with licensing an international location.  The Company currently records the non-refundable initial license fee from licensing an international location as revenue at the time the license period begins if all other revenue requirements have been met.  However, under Topic 606, we have concluded that initial upfront fees should be recognized over the course of the initial contract.



Under Topic 606, we will account for the All Access Pass (AAP) as a single performance obligation and recognize the associated transaction price on a straight-line basis over the term of the underlying contract.  This determination was reached after considering that our web-based functionality and content, in combination with our intellectual property, each represent inputs that transform into a combined output that represents the intended outcome of the AAP, which is to provide a continuously accessible, customized, and dynamic learning and development solution only accessible through the AAP platform.



We do not expect the accounting for fulfillment costs or costs incurred to obtain a contract to be affected materially in any period due to the adoption of Topic 606.



Although the Company is still finalizing its analysis of the adoption of Topic 606, we estimate that the initial impact upon adoption will be a reduction to the opening balance of retained earnings with offsetting amounts recorded to deferred revenue and deferred tax asset in an amount between $2 million and $4 million.  We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to have any impact on our operating cash flows.



On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases.  The new lease accounting standard is the result of a collaborative effort with the IASB (similar to the new revenue standard described above), although some differences remain between the two standards.  This new standard will affect all entities that lease assets and will require lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases (except for short-term leases that have a duration of less than one year) as of the date on which the lessor makes the underlying asset available to the lessee.  For lessors, accounting for leases is substantially the same as in prior periods.  For public companies, the new lease standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption is permitted for all entities.  We expect to adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-02 on September 1, 2019, and we may elect to apply the new standard on a prospective basis.  At August 31, 2018, our leases primarily consist of the lease on our corporate campus, which is accounted for as a financing obligation (Note 6) on our consolidated balance sheets and operating leases for office and warehousing space.  We expect the adoption of this new standard will increase our reported assets and liabilities since we will record the lease obligation and a corresponding right of use asset on our balance sheet for leases that are currently accounted for as operating leases (Note 7).  However, as of August 31, 2018, we have not yet elected the transition method or determined the full impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements.