XML 63 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Commitments and Contingencies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies  
Commitments and Contingencies

10.                               Commitments and Contingencies

 

On October 19, 2009, Freedom Medical, Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Company and others in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. We sought coverage for the Freedom Medical, Inc. lawsuit from a number of our insurance carriers.  On December 30, 2011, two of the insurance carriers, Lexington Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., served us with a Minnesota state court complaint seeking a declaration that they have no obligation to cover certain claims of Freedom Medical, Inc.’s lawsuit.  On January 11, 2012, we filed our own suit, venued in Texas state court, against all of the carriers currently implicated by Freedom Medical, Inc.’s allegations.  This action sought, among other things, a declaration of coverage as to Freedom Medical, Inc.’s suit.  On September 20, 2012, the parties settled all claims asserted in these three actions.  The settlement did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.  On September 26, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas dismissed the Freedom Medical, Inc. lawsuit with prejudice.  On November 5, 2012, the District Court of Hennepin County, Minnesota dismissed the carrier action with prejudice.  We expect that the Texas state court carrier action will be dismissed shortly as well.

 

The Company, in the ordinary course of business, could be subject to liability claims related to employees and the equipment that it rents and services. Asserted claims are subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of individual matters is not predictable. While the ultimate resolution of these actions may have an impact on the Company’s financial results for a particular reporting period, management believes that any such resolution would not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

 

As of September 30, 2012, we were not a party to any other pending legal proceedings the adverse outcome of which could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.