XML 35 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
12.
Fair Value Measurements
 
As defined in ASC Topic 820, fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measures, the following hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation methodologies used to measure fair value:
 
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
 
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data available, which requires management to develop its own assumptions in pricing the asset or liability.
 
Our assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value are summarized below ($000’s omitted):
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
December 31,
 
December 31,
 
Financial Instrument
 
Hierarchy
 
2016
 
2015
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
Level 1
 
$
26,640
 
$
21,614
 
Revolving Credit Facility
 
Level 2
 
 
35,287
 
 
35,287
 
 
Our financial instruments are comprised of cash and cash equivalents, and long-term debt. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is derived from quoted market prices and are considered a level 1. Interest on the Credit Facility is at a variable rate, and as such the debt obligation outstanding approximates fair value and is considered a level 2.
 
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
 
The Company has certain assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis under the circumstances and events described in Note 2 — Broadcast Licenses and Other Intangibles, and are adjusted to fair value only when the carrying values are more than the fair values.
 
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company reviewed the fair value of the assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and concluded that these assets were not impaired as the fair value of these assets equaled or exceeded their carrying values.
 
During the fourth quarter of 2015, as a result of our annual impairment test, the Company wrote down broadcast licenses with a carrying value of $13,282,000 to their fair value of $12,408,000, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $874,000, which is included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2015.  The categorization of the framework used to price the assets is considered a level 3, due to the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value. (See Note 2 for the disclosure of certain key assumptions used to develop the unobservable inputs.)
 
During the fourth quarter of 2014, as a result of our annual impairment test, the Company wrote down broadcast licenses with a carrying value of $15,218,000 to their fair value of $13,282,000, resulting in a non-cash impairment charge of $1,936,000, which is included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2014.  The categorization of the framework used to price the assets is considered a level 3, due to the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value. (See Note 2 for the disclosure of certain key assumptions used to develop the unobservable inputs.)