XML 102 R86.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
EarningsPer Share - Calculation of Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share (Details) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2018
Jul. 31, 2018
Apr. 30, 2018
Jan. 31, 2018
Oct. 31, 2017
Jul. 31, 2017
Apr. 30, 2017
Jan. 31, 2017
Oct. 31, 2018
Oct. 31, 2017
Oct. 31, 2016
Numerator                      
Net loss $ (14,096) $ (15,881) $ (13,174) $ (4,183) $ (9,979) $ (17,001) $ (13,238) $ (13,685) $ (47,334) $ (53,903) $ (51,208)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest                 0 0 251
Series B Preferred stock dividends         (800) (800) (800) (800) (3,200) (3,200) (3,200)
Series D Preferred stock redemption accretion                 (2,075)    
Net loss to common stockholders (17,929) (17,620) (18,173) (8,446) $ (10,779) $ (17,801) $ (14,038) $ (14,485) $ (62,168) $ (57,103) $ (54,157)
Denominator                      
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic                 82,754,268 49,914,904 29,773,700
Effect of dilutive securities [1]                 0 0 0
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted                 82,754,268 49,914,904 29,773,700
Net loss to common stockholders per share - basic                 $ (0.75) $ (1.14) $ (1.82)
Net loss to common stockholders per share - diluted [1]                 $ (0.75) $ (1.14) $ (1.82)
Series D Preferred Stock [Member]                      
Numerator                      
Series D Preferred stock redemption accretion (2,075)               $ (2,075) $ 0 $ 0
Series C Preferred Stock [Member]                      
Numerator                      
Series C Preferred stock deemed dividends (958) (939) (4,199) (3,463)         (9,559) 0 0
Series B Preferred Stock [Member]                      
Numerator                      
Series B Preferred stock dividends $ (800) $ (800) $ (800) $ (800)         $ (3,200) $ (3,200) $ (3,200)
[1] Due to the net loss to common stockholders in each of the years presented above, diluted earnings per share was computed without consideration to potentially dilutive instruments as their inclusion would have been antidilutive.