XML 112 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
RESTRUCTURING, INTEGRATION AND OTHER CHARGES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
RESTRUCTURING, INTEGRATION AND OTHER CHARGES  
RESTRUCTURING, INTEGRATION AND OTHER CHARGES

6.              RESTRUCTURING, INTEGRATION AND OTHER CHARGES

 

Medicis Acquisition-Related Cost-Rationalization and Integration Initiatives

 

The Company has implemented cost-rationalization and integration initiatives to capture operating synergies and generate cost savings across the Company. These measures included:

 

·                  workforce reductions across the Company and other organizational changes;

 

·                  closing of duplicative facilities and other site rationalization actions company-wide, including research and development facilities, sales offices and corporate facilities;

 

·                  leveraging research and development spend; and

 

·                  procurement savings.

 

The Company estimated that it will incur total costs in the range of up to $275 million in connection with these cost-rationalization and integration initiatives, which are expected to be substantially completed by the end of 2013.  $85.6 million has been incurred as of December 31, 2012. These costs include: employee termination costs payable to approximately 750 employees of the Company and Medicis who have been or will be terminated as a result of the Medicis acquisition; IPR&D termination costs related to the transfer to other parties of product-development programs that did not align with our research and development model; costs to consolidate or close facilities and relocate employees; and contract termination and lease cancellation costs. These estimates do not include a charge of $77.3 million recognized and paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 related to the acceleration of unvested stock options, restricted stock awards, and share appreciation rights for Medicis employees that was triggered by the change in control.

 

The following table summarizes the major components of costs incurred in connection with Medicis acquisition-related initiatives through December 31, 2012:

 

 

 

Employee Termination Costs

 

IPR&D

 

Contract
Termination,

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and
Related Benefits

 

Share-Based
Compensation(1)

 

Termination
Costs

 

Facility Closure
and Other Costs

 

Total

 

Balance, January 1, 2012

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Costs incurred and charged to expense

 

85,253

 

77,329

 

 

370

 

162,952

 

Cash payments

 

(77,975

)

(77,329

)

 

(5

)

(155,309

)

Non-cash adjustments

 

4,073

 

 

 

(162

)

3,911

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

11,351

 

$

 

$

 

$

203

 

$

11,554

 

 

(1)         Relates to the acceleration of unvested stock options, restricted stock awards, and share appreciation rights for Medicis employees that was triggered by the change in control.

 

Merger-Related Cost-Rationalization and Integration Initiatives

 

The Company has completed measures to integrate the operations of Biovail and Valeant, capture operating synergies and generate cost savings across the Company. These measures included:

 

·                  workforce reductions across the Company and other organizational changes;

 

·                  closing of duplicative facilities and other site rationalization actions company-wide, including research and development facilities, sales offices and corporate facilities;

 

·                  leveraging research and development spend; and

 

·                  procurement savings.

 

In connection with these cost-rationalization and integration initiatives, the Company has incurred costs including: employee termination costs (including related share-based payments) payable to approximately 500 employees of Biovail and Valeant who have been terminated as a result of the Merger; IPR&D termination costs related to the transfer to other parties of product-development programs that did not align with the Company’s research and development model; costs to consolidate or close facilities and relocate employees, asset impairments charges to write down property, plant and equipment to fair value; and contract termination and lease cancellation costs.

 

The following table summarizes the major components of costs incurred in connection with Merger-related initiatives through December 31, 2012:

 

 

 

Employee Termination Costs

 

IPR&D

 

Contract
Termination, Facility

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and
Related Benefits

 

Share-Based
Compensation

 

Termination
Costs(1)

 

Closure and Other
Costs

 

Total

 

Balance, January 1, 2010

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Costs incurred and charged to expense

 

58,727

 

49,482

 

13,750

 

12,862

 

134,821

 

Cash payments

 

(33,938

)

 

(13,750

)

(8,755

)

(56,443

)

Non-cash adjustments

 

 

(49,482

)

 

(2,437

)

(51,919

)

Balance, December 31, 2010

 

24,789

 

 

 

1,670

 

26,459

 

Costs incurred and charged to expense

 

14,548

 

3,455

 

 

28,938

 

46,941

 

Cash payments

 

(38,168

)

(2,033

)

 

(15,381

)

(55,582

)

Non-cash adjustments

 

989

 

(741

)

 

(4,913

)

(4,665

)

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

2,158

 

681

 

 

10,314

 

13,153

 

Costs incurred and charged to expense

 

1,654

 

 

 

12,769

 

14,423

 

Cash payments

 

(3,873

)

 

 

(22,767

)

(26,640

)

Non-cash adjustments

 

268

 

(681

)

 

227

 

(186

)

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

207

 

$

 

$

 

$

543

 

$

750

 

 

(1)         As described below under “— Research and Development Pipeline Rationalization”.

 

As described in note 26, restructuring costs are not recorded in the Company’s reportable segments.

 

Employee Termination Costs

 

The Company recognized employee termination costs of $1.7 million, $14.5 million and $58.7 million in the years ended December 31, 2012, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, for severance and related benefits payable to approximately 500 employees of Biovail and Valeant who have been terminated as a result of the Merger. These reductions primarily reflect the elimination of redundancies and consolidation of staff in the research and development, general and administrative, and sales and marketing functions. As of December 31, 2012, $76.0 million of the termination costs had been paid.

 

In addition, in the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized incremental share-based compensation expense of $49.5 million related to the following stock options and RSUs held by terminated employees of Biovail and Valeant:

 

Stock options and time-based RSUs held by Biovail employees with employment agreements

 

$

9,622

 

Stock options held by Biovail employees without employment agreements

 

(492

)

Performance-based RSUs held by Biovail executive officers and selected employees

 

20,287

 

Stock options and RSUs held by former executive officers of Valeant

 

20,065

 

 

 

$

49,482

 

 

The Company recognized an additional $3.5 million in share-based compensation expense in the year ended December 31, 2011, related to stock options and RSUs held by terminated employees of Biovail and Valeant.

 

Research and Development Pipeline Rationalization

 

Prior to the Merger, the Company’s product development and business development efforts were focused on unmet medical needs in specialty CNS disorders. Since the Merger, the Company has been employing a leveraged research and development model that allows it to progress development programs, while minimizing research and development expense, through partnerships and other means. In consideration of this model, following the Merger, the Company conducted a strategic and financial review of its product development pipeline and identified the programs that did not align with the Company’s new research and development model. These programs are outlined in the table below. In respect of the Staccato® loxapine, GDNF, tetrabenazine, fipamezole and pimavanserin programs, the Company provided notices of termination to, or entered into termination agreements with, the counterparties to the agreements. Regarding the Ampakine® program, the Company suspended development of these compounds and the program was sold back to Cortex on March 15, 2011 for an upfront fee of $0.2 million.

 

Program

 

Counterparty

 

Compound

 

Contingent
Milestone
Obligations
Terminated(1)

 

IPR&D
Termination
Charges

 

AZ-004

 

Alexza

 

Staccato® loxapine

 

$

90,000

 

Nil

 

BVF-007

 

Cortex

 

AMPAKINE®

 

$

15,000

 

Nil

 

BVF-014

 

MedGenesis

 

GDNF

 

$

20,000

 

$

5,000

(2)

BVF-018

 

LifeHealth Limited

 

Tetrabenazine

 

Nil

 

$

28,000

(3)

BVF-025

 

Santhera

 

Fipamezole

 

$

200,000

 

Nil

 

BVF-036,-040, -048

 

ACADIA

 

Pimavanserin

 

$

365,000

 

$

8,750

(2)

 

(1)         Represents the maximum amount of previously disclosed milestone payments the Company could have been required to make to the counterparty under each agreement. These milestone payments were contingent on the achievement of specific developmental, regulatory and commercial milestones. In addition, the Company could have been obligated to make royalty payments based on future net sales of the products if regulatory approval was obtained. As a consequence of the termination of these arrangements, the Company has no ongoing or future obligation in respect of these milestone or royalty payments.

 

(2)         Represents the amount of negotiated settlements with each counterparty that was recognized and paid by the Company in the three-month period ended December 31, 2010.

 

(3)         Represents the carrying amount of the related acquired IPR&D asset capitalized in connection with the tetrabenazine acquisition in June 2009.

 

In addition to the settlement payments identified in the table above, the Company incurred internal and external costs of $5.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2010 that were directly associated with the fulfillment of its remaining contractual obligations under these terminated arrangements, which costs have been recognized as restructuring costs.

 

Contract Termination, Facility Closure and Other Costs

 

Facility closure costs incurred in the year ended December 31, 2012 included an incremental $10.2 million charge for the remaining operating lease obligations related to the Company’s vacated Mississauga, Ontario corporate office facility.

 

Facility closure costs incurred in the year ended December 31, 2011 included a $9.8 million charge for the remaining operating lease obligations (net of estimated sublease rentals that could be reasonably obtained) related to the Company’s vacated Mississauga, Ontario corporate office facility and a charge of $1.4 million related to a lease termination payment on the Company’s Aliso Viejo, California corporate office facility. The Company has transitioned a number of its corporate office functions to Bridgewater, New Jersey. As a result, a portion of the previously vacated space in the Bridgewater facility have been reoccupied, resulting in a $2.0 million reversal of a previously recognized restructuring accrual related to that space.

 

In addition to costs associated with the Company’s Medicis acquisition-related and Merger-related initiatives shown in the tables above, the Company incurred an additional $167.0 million of other restructuring, integration-related and other costs in the year ended December 31, 2012, including (i) $73.5 million of integration consulting, duplicate labor, transition service, and other, (ii) $57.6 million of severance costs, (iii) $17.6 million of facility closure costs and (iv) $18.3 million of other costs, including non-personnel manufacturing integration costs. The Company also made payments of $147.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. In the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred $50.9 million of integration-related costs, of which $37.5 million had been paid as of December 31, 2011. The costs in 2012 and 2011 were primarily related to the acquisitions of Medicis, Dermik, iNova, Sanitas, OraPharma, Ortho Dermatologics, Afexa, PharmaSwiss, and a U.S. restructuring in 2012 focused primarily on a reduction in the prescription dermatology field force, the global consolidation of the Company’s manufacturing facilities, and systems integration initiatives.