10QSB/A

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-QSB/A
AMENDMENT NO. 2

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

Commission File Number: 1-11140

OPHTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)  

California	94-3035367
(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

  221 Lathrop Way, Suite I, Sacramento, CA 95815
(Address of principal executive offices)

(916) 646-2020
(Issuer’s telephone number)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes    No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):  Yes  No 

As of November 13, 2006, 16,120,829 shares of common stock, no par value, were outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:  Yes     No  

Explanatory Note

        Ophthalmic Imaging Systems (“we,” “us,” or “our”) is filing this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-QSB/A (this “Amendment No. 2”) to amend our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on November 13, 2006 (the “Original Filing”). The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 is to correct a typographical error contained on the officers’ certification attached as Exhibit 32, thus changing the date from June 30, 2006 to September 30, 2006.

        In accordance with the rules of the SEC, the complete text of the Original Filing has been set forth in this Amendment No. 2.

        Except for the revised Exhibit 32 and updated dates on the signature page and the certifications of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer on Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, respectively, we have not undertaken in this Amendment No. 2 to modify or update any other disclosures in our Original Filing, and this Amendment No. 2 does not reflect any events occurring after the date of filing of the Original Filing.

OPHTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS

FORM 10-QSB

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED September 30, 2006

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	1
	Condensed Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2006	2
	Condensed Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005	3
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005	4
	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation	13
Item 3.	Controls and Procedures	21
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	22
Item 6.	Exhibits	22

i

PART I      FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1

Ophthalmic Imaging Systems

Condensed Balance Sheet

September 30, 2006

(Unaudited)

Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,887,388
Accounts receivable, net		2,001,744
Receivable from related party		196,715
Inventories, net		624,665
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		543,991
Deferred tax asset		1,138,674
Total current assets		10,393,177
Furniture and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization of $373,747		245,108
Restricted cash		158,502
Licensing agreement		273,808
Prepaid products		160,000
Other assets		52,378
Total assets	$	11,282,973
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	801,101
Accrued liabilities		1,713,411
Deferred extended warranty revenue		1,082,320
Customer deposits		545,460
Lease payable- current portion		8,797
Total current liabilities		4,154,089
Noncurrent liabilities:
Line of credit		150,000
Lease payable, less current portion		8,220
Total liabilities		4,312,309
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, no par value, 35,000,000 shares authorized;
16,104,162 issued and outstanding		15,693,470
Accumulated deficit		(8,722,806	)
Total stockholders' equity		6,970,664
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	11,282,973

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements.

2

Ophthalmic Imaging Systems

Condensed Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2006		2005			2006		2005
Net revenues	$	3,927,257	$	3,389,560		$	11,395,147	$	9,508,335
Cost of sales		1,709,611		1,395,084			4,964,845		4,035,782
Gross profit		2,217,646		1,994,476			6,430,302		5,472,553
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		825,023		779,482			2,476,196		2,258,363
General and administrative		425,448		360,291			1,194,348		998,922
Research and development		413,302		327,501			1,175,550		835,313
Total operating expenses		1,663,773		1,467,274			4,846,094		4,092,598
Income from operations		553,873		527,202			1,584,208		1,379,955
Interest and other income (expense), net		39,328		6,378			29,163		(97,240	)
Net income before income taxes		593,201		533,580			1,613,371		1,282,715
Income tax benefit (expense)		13,632		(17,200	)		13,632		(26,224	)
Net income	$	606,833	$	516,380		$	1,627,003	$	1,256,491
Shares used in the calculation of basic
net income per share		16,104,162		15,263,798			16,026,730		15,125,515
Basic net income per share	$	0.04	$	0.03		$	0.10	$	0.08
Shares used in the calculation of diluted
net income per share		17,862,301		16,427,844			17,701,767		16,295,525
Diluted net income per share	$	0.03	$	0.03		$	0.09	$	0.08

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements.

3

Ophthalmic Imaging Systems

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2006			2005
Operating activities:
Net income	$	1,627,002		$	1,256,491
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		52,212			59,703
Compensation expense related to FAS123R		16,958			-
Non-cash interest charge		1,994			8,011
Net increase (decrease) in current assets other
than cash and cash equivalents		163,035			(1,104,642	)
Net (increase) decrease in other assets		(261,071	)		87,236
Net increase in current liabilities other
than short-term borrowings		39,099			830,692
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,639,229			1,137,491
Investing activities:
Acquisition of furniture and equipment		(189,533	)		(24,745	)
Financing activities:
Principal payments on notes payable		(152,262	)		(254,886	)
Proceeds from note receivable from related parties		486,803			285,406
Proceeds from sale of stock		12,445			47,680
Proceeds from line of credit, net		150,000			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		496,986			78,200
Net increase in cash and equivalents		1,946,682			1,190,946
Cash and equivalents, beginning of the period		3,940,706			1,990,310
Cash and equivalents, end of the period	$	5,887,388		$	3,181,256
Supplemental schedule of noncash financing activities:
Conversion of notes payable with common stock	$	688,067		$	210,253
Conversion of interest with common stock	$	1,994		$	8,011
Reduction in receivable from
Related party in exchange for inventory and
other noncash transactions, net	$	(50,469	)	$	46,778
Supplemental schedule of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	6,740		$	60,478
Cash paid for taxes	$	117,660		$	41,026

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed financial statements.

4

Ophthalmic Imaging Systems

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Three and Nine Month Periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

(Unaudited)

Note 1.   Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2006, condensed statements of income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 and the condensed statements of cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-QSB and Item 310(b) of Regulation S-B. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in Ophthalmic Imaging Systems’ (the “Company’s”) Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005 on Form 10-KSB. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. The results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

Note 2. Net Income Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”), which excludes dilution, is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock, such as stock options, result in the issuance of common stock, which shares in the earnings of the Company. The treasury stock method is applied to determine the dilutive effect of stock options in computing diluted EPS.

5

	Unaudited Three Months Ended September 30,				Unaudited Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Numerator for basic and diluted
net income per share	$	606, 833	$	516,380	$	1,627,003	$	1,256,491
Denominator for basic net income per share:
Weighted average shares		16,102,997		15,263,798		16,026,730		15,125,515
Effect of dilutive employee/director stock options		1,759,304		1,164,046		1,675,037		1,170,010
Dilutive potential common shares		1,759,304		1,164,046		1,675,037		1,170,010
Denominator for diluted net income per share		17,862,301		16,427,844		17,701,767		16,295,525
Basic net income per share	$	0.04	$	0.03	$	0.10	$	0.08
Diluted net income per share	$	0.03	$	0.03	$	0.09	$	0.08

As of September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2005 there were 21,500 and 744,500 options and warrants, respectively whose exercise price exceeded the average market price of the stock and have been excluded from this computation.

Note 3. Related Parties Transactions

On March 2, 2005, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement and Promissory Note with MediVision (the “Loan Agreement”) whereby we agreed to loan MediVision up to $2,000,000. Under the terms of the agreement, interest is 7.25% per annum and is payable on February 28, 2006 along with all outstanding principal due at that date. The note was secured by 2,409,000 shares of our common stock owned by MediVision. The number of shares was based on the average closing price of shares of our stock during the period covering the last ten (10) business days of February, 2005, which average closing price was $1.11, discounted by 25%. In the event that MediVision were to sell any shares of our stock it owns during the period of the agreement, a minimum of 50% of the proceeds from such sales would be required to be paid to us to reduce the outstanding amount owed. On July 28, 2005, we and MediVision entered into an amendment to the Loan Agreement whereby MediVision repaid $1,000,000 to us, decreasing the agreed upon loan of $2,000,000 to $1,000,000 and the amount of shares securing the loan was decreased by 1,204,500 shares.

On July 20, 2005, our Board of Directors, at MediVision’s request, authorized us to guarantee and/or provide security interests in our assets for certain of MediVision’s loans with United Mizrahi Bank Ltd. We entered into a Secured Debenture (the “Debenture”) in favor of United Mizrahi Bank Ltd., in an amount of up to $2,000,000 (plus interest, commissions and all expenses).

6

Under the terms of the Debenture, we guarantee the payment of all of the debts and liabilities of MediVision to United Mizrahi Bank. The Debenture is secured by a first lien on all of our assets. MediVision pledged 2,345,500 shares of our common stock it owns to us in order to secure the Debenture.

The amount owed to the financial institutions by MediVision and secured by us as of September 30, 2006 was approximately $1,750,000.

On July 28, 2005, pursuant to the aforementioned Debenture signed by us, MediVision executed the amended Loan Agreement and paid back $1,000,000 of the loan from us; reducing the amount MediVision owed us on the promissory note to $955,558. On September 20, 2005, pursuant to a Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2005, between MediVision and Meadowbrook Opportunity Fund LLC, MediVision sold 400,000 shares of our common stock to Meadowbrook Opportunity Fund LLC at a price of $1.20 per share. MediVision used $240,000 of the proceeds from this sale to repay part of the aforementioned loan to us, reducing the amount MediVision owes us on the promissory note to $715,556, plus accrued interest under the loan. On December 8, 2005, MediVision sold 310,000 shares to the clients of an institutional investor at the price per share of $1.45. MediVision used $225,000 of the proceeds from this sale to repay part of the aforementioned loan to us, reducing the amount MediVision owes us on the promissory note to $492,556, plus accrued interest under the loan. On February 14, 2006, MediVision sold 1 million shares of our common stock to Wasatch Advisors, Inc. at the market price of $1.80 per share. MediVision used $492,556 of the proceeds from this sale to repay the remaining principal balance of the aforementioned loan to us.

As a result of the foregoing transactions, as of September 30, 2006, MediVision owns approximately 59% of our outstanding common stock.

On June 28, 2006, we and MediVision entered a License and Distribution Agreement whereby MediVision appointed us to be its exclusive distributor of a new digital imaging system in the Americas and the Pacific Rim (excluding China and India), for a term of ten years. In return, we paid $273,808, consisting of a cash payment of $200,000, and recognition of $73, 808 of research and development advances made in previous periods. Additionally, we are obligated to pay advances totaling $460,000 based on the completion of certain phases of development of the new digital imaging system and the completion of certain documents, and granted MediVision a license to use our OIS WinStation software and any other applicable OIS system and the accompanying intellectual property rights therein. On September 21, 2006, we paid $160,000 based on the completion of the first milestone in the agreement. The advanced funds will be recovered as we purchase new digital imaging systems in accordance with the specified quotas. The quota mandates that we purchase a minimum amount of the new digital imaging systems each year. If we fail to satisfy our quota obligation, then we may pay MediVision the gross profit on the shortfall units to maintain exclusivity in the agreed upon territory. If no such shortfall payment is made, such failure to meet the quota will constitute a material breach and MediVision may terminate the exclusivity provision or the entire agreement. The quotas for 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 are 50, 70, 80, and 90 units, respectively, and will be at least 95 units for each year thereafter. The initial term of the agreement is for ten years, which will be automatically renewed in one year periods. Either party may terminate the agreement with at least 6 months prior written notice, provided that, we meet the purchase quota. Cash payments made under this agreement for exclusive distribution rights have been capitalized and will be amortized over the term of the agreement.

7

At September 30, 2006 we had recorded a net amount due from MediVision of approximately $94,000 for products.

Sales to MediVision during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 totaled approximately $64,000 and $211,000. Sales to MediVision during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 totaled approximately $178,200 and $584,200, respectively.

During the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, we paid approximately $285,000 and $761,000, respectively, to MediVision for research and development performed by MediVision on our behalf. During the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005, we paid approximately $134,000 and $504,000, respectively, to MediVision for research and development performed by MediVision on our behalf.

At September 30, 2006 we had recorded a net amount due from CCS Pawlowski, a subsidiary of MediVision, of approximately $103,000 for products and services. Sales to CCS Pawlowski during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 totaled approximately $63,000 and $275,000, respectively. Sales to CCS Pawlowski during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 totaled approximately $67,000 and $127,000, respectively.

8

Note 4. Stock Based Compensation

At September 30, 2006, we had six stock-based compensation plans (the “Plans”). On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments,” which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions whereby an entity receives employee services in exchange for equity instruments, including stock options. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and instead generally requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value based method. The Company has elected the modified prospective transition method as permitted under SFAS No. 123R, and accordingly prior periods have not been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123R. The modified prospective transition method requires that stock-based compensation expense be recorded for all new and unvested stock options that are ultimately expected to vest as the requisite service is rendered beginning on January 1, 2006. Stock-based compensation for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 is based upon the grant-date fair value of such compensation as determined under the pro forma provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” The Company issues new shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options.

The Company uses a Black-Scholes option valuation model to determine the fair value of stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123R, consistent with that used for pro forma disclosures under SFAS No. 123. The Black-Scholes model incorporates various assumptions including the expected term of awards, volatility of stock price, risk-free rates of return and dividend yield. The expected term of an award is generally no less than the option vesting period and is based on the Company’s historical experience. Expected volatility is based upon the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk-free interest rate is approximated using rates available on U.S. Treasury securities with a remaining term equal to the option’s expected life. The Company uses a dividend yield of zero in the Black-Scholes option valuation model as it does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Stock Options

In calculating compensation related to stock option grants, the fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black – Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted average assumptions:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2006	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
Dividend Yield	None	None
Expected volatility	71.40 %	71.40%
Risk-free interest rate	4.27	4.27
Expected term (years)	10	10

9

The Company recorded an incremental $4,000 and $17,000 of stock-based compensation expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. The following table presents the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R on selected statement of operations line items for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006:

	For the Three Months Ended			For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2006			September 30, 2006
	As Reported Under SFAS No. 123R	Under APB No. 25	Difference	As Reported Under SFAS No. 123R	Under APB No. 25	Difference
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net Income	$          607	$          611	$             4	$       1,627	$       1,644	$           17
Basic Income Per Share	$         0.04	$         0.04	$         ----	$         0.10	$         0.10	$         ----
Diluted Income Per Share	$         0.03	$         0.03	$         ----	$         0.09	$         0.09	$         ----

A summary of the changes in stock options outstanding under our equity-based compensation plans during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is presented below:

	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2006	2,107,543	$0.55	7.45	2,845,183
Granted	190,000	$1.84	9.95	11,400
Exercised	18,510	$0.67	-	-
Forfeited/Expired	19,500	$0.96	-	-
Outstanding at September 30, 2006	2,259,533	$0.65	7.28	3,208,537
Exercisable at September 30, 2006	1,734,991	$0.51	6.92	2,706,586

10

The incremental stock-based compensation expense resulting from the adoption of SFAS No.123R represents expense related to stock options granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, the Company had $35,594 of total unrecognized expense related to non-vested stock-based compensation, which is expected to be recognized through 2009. The total fair value of options vested during the three – and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was $4,105 and $16,958, respectively. Cash received from stock option exercises for the three- month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was $6,129 and $12,445, respectively.

There were 0 and 190,000 options granted for the three and nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, respectively, all of which were qualified options, granted to non-executive employees. The exercise price of the 170,000 options granted is $1.83. The exercise price of the remaining 20,000 options granted is $1.96. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 was $11,170 and $14,943, respectively.

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company accounted for its stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method of accounting in accordance with APB No. 25. Under the intrinsic value method, compensation cost is generally the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the grant or other measurement date over the exercise price.     The Company recorded no compensation expense under APB No. 25 and FIN No. 44 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005.

Had compensation expense related to the Company’s stock option awards to employees and directors been determined under the fair value method prescribed under SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income and income per share would have been the pro forma amounts set forth in the table below:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
Net income as reported	$         516,380	$         1,256,491
Stock-based employee compensation included in net loss as reported	---	---
Stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value method, net of tax	$           (7,449)	$             (17,509)
Net income	$         508,931	$         1,238,982
Basic Income Per Share	$               0.03	$                  0.08

11

Note 5. Warranty Obligations

We generally offer a one-year warranty to our customers. Our warranty requires us to repair or replace defective products during the warranty period. At the time product revenue is recognized, we record a liability for estimated costs that may be incurred under our warranties. The costs are estimated based on historical experience and any specific warranty issues that have been identified. The amount of warranty liability accrued reflects our best estimate of the expected future cost of honoring our obligations under the warranty plans. We periodically assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liability and adjust the balance as necessary.

The following provides a reconciliation of changes in our warranty reserve.

	Unaudited Three Months Ended September 30,		Unaudited Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2006	2005	2006	2005
Warranty balance at beginning of period	$ 502,100	$ 410,013	$ 614,500	$ 505,850
Net provision for current period	7,725	173,650	41,825	243,900
Warranty costs incurred	(87,188)	(57,813)	(233,688)	(223,900)
Warranty balance at end of period	$ 422,637	$ 525,850	$ 422,638	$ 525,850

12

ITEM 2.          MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

        We make forward-looking statements in this report, in other materials we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or otherwise release to the public, and on our website. In addition, our senior management might make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, the media, and others. Statements concerning our future operations, prospects, strategies, financial condition, future economic performance (including growth and earnings) and demand for our products and services, and other statements of our plans, beliefs, or expectations, including the statements contained in this Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation,” regarding our future plans, strategies, and expectations are forward-looking statements. In some cases these statements are identifiable through the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “target,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements because these forward-looking statements we make are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to various assumptions, risks, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by these forward-looking statements. Thus, our ability to predict results or the actual effect of our future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in: economic conditions generally and the medical instruments market specifically, legislative or regulatory changes that affect us, including changes in healthcare regulation, the availability of working capital, and the introduction of competing products. These risks and uncertainties, together with the other risks described from time to time in reports and documents that we file with the SEC should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. (There also are other factors that we do not describe because currently, we do not perceive that such factors will cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations.) Indeed, it is likely that some of our assumptions will prove to be incorrect. Our actual results and financial position will vary from those projected or implied in the forward-looking statements and the variances may be material. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law.

Overview

        To date, we have designed, developed, manufactured, and marketed ophthalmic digital imaging systems and informatics solutions and have derived substantially all of our revenues from the sale of such products. The primary target market for our digital angiography systems and related products has traditionally been retinal specialists. In 2003, we made a strategic decision to expand our product offering to include the ophthalmic informatics field. In 2004, we introduced our Ophthalmology Office line composed of Electronic Medical Records (“EMR”) and Enterprise Practice Management (“EPM”) software products by NextGen Healthcare Information Systems, Inc. and our Ophthalmic Picture Archiving and Communication System (“Ophthalmic PACS”). This decision enabled us to offer a wider variety of products and comprehensive solutions to our customer base of ophthalmology departments and practices.

13

        At September 30, 2006, we had stockholders’ equity of $6,970,664 and our current assets exceeded our current liabilities by $6,239,088.

        The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim financial statements and the notes thereto which are set forth in Item 1, “Financial Statements (unaudited).” In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim period financial statements include all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, that are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the periods. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve or sustain significant positive cash flows, revenues, or profitability in the future.

Critical Accounting Policies

        Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The financial information contained in the financial statements is, to a significant extent, financial information based on transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value obtained when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset, or relieving a liability. Our revenue recognition policies are in compliance with applicable accounting rules and regulations, including Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, American Institute of Certified Public accountants (“AICPA”), Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, with Respect to Certain Transactions and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” As such, revenue is recorded when there is evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from installation and training services are recognized when such services are performed. Revenue generated from service contracts are recognized ratably over the term of the contracts. Estimates are used relative to the expected useful lives of depreciable assets.

        We calculate a tax provision quarterly and assess how much deferred tax asset is more likely than not to be used in the future. According to IRS rule 382, our net operating losses prior to August of 2000 are capped at $389,000 per year as of fiscal year 2000 for 20 years. We use the following analysis to assess whether we will more likely than not realize the deferred tax asset. We assume that we will be able to use all of our unlimited NOL amounts. We then assess the amount of our future capped net operating losses we will more likely than not be able to use.

        We were not profitable for seventeen consecutive years between 1984 and 2000. We turned a profit in 2001 and have been profitable for the last five years. There is significant uncertainty projecting future profitability due to the history of our business, and the volatility of the market that we are in. We calculate our tax provision quarterly and assess how much deferred tax asset is more likely than not to be used in the future.

        In the fourth quarter of every fiscal year, we participate in the industry’s largest tradeshow of the year, which contributes approximately 25% of our revenue generated in the last month of the fiscal year. This tradeshow substantially influences the outcome of our profitability for that year, as well as gives us an indication of the years to come. Significant expenses, resources, and risk are put into the tradeshow every year in hopes of generating revenue. We can also see how the market responds to our new products, as well as our competitor’s products. With this tradeshow behind us in the fourth quarter of every fiscal year, we are in a better position to assess how we are doing, will be doing in the years to come, and determine whether it is more likely than not that we will be able to realize our deferred tax assets.

14

        We have two types of warranty reserves. A general product reserve on a per product basis, and specific reserves created as we become aware of issues. The product reserve is calculated based on a fixed dollar amount per system shipped each quarter. The unanticipated reserves usually arise from the introduction of new products at our largest tradeshow of the year in October/November of every year. When a new product is introduced, we reserve for specific problems arising from potential issues during the implementation phase. As time passes, and the issues are resolved, we reduce the specific reserve. These types of issues can cause our warranty reserve to fluctuate outside of sales fluctuations.

        Management is also required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of our transactions would be the same, the timing of the recognition of such events that would impact transactions could change.

        On November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123R-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards (“FSP 123R-3”). The alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (“APIC pool”) related to the tax effects of employee share-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and consolidated statements of cash flows of the tax effects of employee share-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment, (“SFAS 123R”). We are currently evaluating the available transition alternatives of FSP 123R-3.  We do not believe the adoption of FSP 123R-3 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        On September 13, 2006, the SEC published Staff Accounting Bulleting No. 108 Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.  The interpretations in this Staff Accounting Bulleting are being issued to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements and the potential under current practice to build up improper amounts on the balance sheet.  This guidance will apply to the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006 and early application in interim periods is encouraged.  We do not believe the adoption of SAB 108 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

15

Results of Operations

Revenues

        On December 31, 2005, due to a continued increase in installation activity, we elected to classify installation income within our revenues, versus a net effect within sales and marketing expenses. We reclassified the respective 2005 amounts of $143,344 and $472,515 for the three and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2005 for comparative purposes.

        Our revenues for the third quarter ended September 30, 2006 were $3,927,257, ($3,643,135 excluding installation revenue), representing a 16% increase from revenues of $3,389,560 ($3,246,216 excluding installation revenue) for the third quarter ended September 30, 2005. The increase in revenues of $537,697 is due to higher revenues generated from product sales of $426,400 and service sales for these products of $111,297.

        Revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 were $11,395,147 ($10,699,964 excluding installation revenue), representing a 20% increase from revenues of $9,508,335 ($9,035,820 excluding installation revenue), for the comparable nine months of fiscal 2005. The increase in revenues of $1,886,811 is due to higher revenues generated from product sales of $1,566,541 and service sales for these products of $320,270. Products accounted for approximately 85% and 86% of our revenue for the third quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and 85% and 86% of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

        Service revenues for these products accounted for approximately 15% and 14% of our revenue for the third quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and approximately 15% and 14% of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in service revenue is mainly derived from increases in our extended service contract revenue. The volume of extended service contracts sold continues to increase relative to total sales as we continue to educate our customers about the benefits of the contracts. This education process has been ongoing for the last five years and the service revenue increases as more customers buy extended service contracts. The other components of service revenue have stayed relatively constant. Total service revenue during the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 was comprised mostly of service contract revenue and the rest consists of non warranty repairs and parts, and technical support phone billings for customers not under warranty.

        Revenues from sales of our products to related parties were approximately $127,000 and $486,000 during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and $245,000 and $711,000 for the comparable three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2005, respectively.

16

        In the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, we participate in the industry’s largest trade show of the year. Based on our prior experience, substantial income is generated from the trade show, which comprises approximately 25% of our annual revenue recognized in December of each year. The trade show substantially determines our profitability for the current year and provides an indication of the years to come. Significant expenses, resources, and risk are put into the tradeshow every year in hopes of generating revenue.

Gross Margins

        Gross margins were approximately 57% (60% before installation change) during the three month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 59% (61% before installation change) for the three month period ended September 30, 2005. Gross margins were approximately 56% (58% before installation change) during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 58% (60% before installation change) for the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. The changed presentation in connection with presenting installation income within our revenues, versus a net effect within sales and marketing expenses, resulted in a 3% and 2% decrease in gross margins for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and a 2% decrease in gross margins for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005. We anticipate that our gross margins will decrease, as our sales of the Ophthalmology Office software products become more significant, because gross margins associated with the sales of these products are lower than the majority of the products that we currently sell.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

        The changed presentation of installation income within our revenues, versus a net effect within sales and marketing expenses, resulted in a change in sales and marketing expenses. We reclassified the respective 2005 amounts for comparative purposes.

        Sales and marketing expenses accounted for approximately 21% of total revenues during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to approximately 23% during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Actual expenses increased to $825,023 ($805,034 before the installation change) during the third quarter of 2006 versus $779,482 ($781,521 before the installation change) during the third quarter of 2005. For the first nine months of fiscal 2006 and 2005 such expenses accounted for approximately 22% and 24% of total revenues for the respective nine-month periods. Actual expenses increased to $2,476,196 ($2,456,207 before the installation change) during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 versus $2,258,363 ($2,195,917 before the installation change) during the first nine months of fiscal 2005. The primary contributing factor to the increased expenses were new hires to the sales force.

General and Administrative Expenses

        General and administrative expenses were $425,448 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and $360,291 in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Such expenses accounted for approximately 11% of revenues during the third quarters of 2006 and 2005. Expenses increased to $1,194,348 from $998,922 during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the first nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, such expenses accounted for approximately 11% of total revenues. The % increase in general and administrative expenses of 19.6%, was consistent with the increase in sales of 19.8%.

17

Research and Development Expenses

        Research and development expenses were $413,302 in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and $327,501 in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Such expenses accounted for approximately 11% and 10% of revenues during the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the first nine months of fiscal 2006, such expenses were $1,175,550 and accounted for approximately 10% of total revenues, as compared to expenses of $835,313 that accounted for approximately 9% during the first nine months of 2005. We have been and will continue to focus our research and development efforts on new digital image capture products. Outside consultants and MediVision currently conduct most of our research and development.

Interest and Other Expense, net

        Interest and other expenses were ($39,328) during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 versus ($6,378) during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. These amounts were comprised principally of interest income of $68,248, and financing facilitations provided to certain of our customers in connection with sales of our products of $18,817. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, interest and other expenses were ($29,163) and $97,240, respectively. These amounts were comprised principally of interest income of $174,763 and financing facilitations provided to certain of our customers in connection with sales of our products of $95,775. Pursuant to paragraph 16 of SFAS 140, we participate in tri-party arrangements with our customers and an intermediary lender. Specifically, the lender accepts an IOU from the customer and then presents a separate IOU to us. The agreement with the lender allows the customer to pay over time interest-free. With the IOU, we may require that the lender make accelerated payment(s) at an appropriately discounted amount. In substance these transactions allow the customer to obtain financing from an lender to pay amounts due to us. The customer’s original liability to us is extinguished when the lender remits cash or a lender IOU to us. We incur these financing costs to expedite payment and lessen the necessary collection efforts.

Income Taxes

        Income tax benefit (expense) was $13,632 during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 versus ($17,200) during the third quarter of fiscal 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, income tax benefit (expense) was $13,632 and ($26,224), respectively.

        We calculate a tax provision quarterly and assess how much deferred tax asset is more likely than not to be used in the future. We use the following analysis to assess whether we will more likely than not realize the deferred tax asset. We assume that we will be able to use all of our unlimited NOL amounts. We then assess the amount of our future capped net operating losses we will more likely than not be able to use.

Net Income

        We recorded net income of $606,833, or $0.04 and $0.03 per share basic and diluted earnings, respectively, for the third quarter ended September 30, 2006 as compared to net income of $516,380 or $0.03 per share basic and diluted earnings for the third quarter ended September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, we recorded net income of $1,627,003 or $0.10 and $0.09 per share basic earnings and diluted earnings, respectively, as compared to $1,256,491, or $0.08 per share basic and diluted earnings, respectively.

18

Balance Sheet

         Our assets increased by $2,321,955 as of September 30, 2006 as compared to the September 30, 2005. There was a substantial increase in cash and equivalents of $2,706,132, generated primarily from our profitable operations from the previous 12 months of $2,125,765 and receipt of $717,556 in repayments from MediVision. Our inventory increased primarily in finished goods as several orders were substantially completed, but did not meet all of the applicable criteria for sales recognition. We did not recognize $382,663 in revenue because these sales failed to meet our revenue recognition policies. Certain of these revenues did not meet the acceptance rights specified in the contract and for others we were uncertain about the collectability of the sale, even though the inventory was physically shipped. The amount of inventory related to this revenue was $73,710.

        We have entered a long term distribution and license agreement for a new digital imaging system, which required a cash payment of $200,000 and an amount previously paid for research and development of $73,808 being applied and shown as a licensing agreement. We have exclusive distributing rights to a new digital imaging system in the Americas and the Pacific Rim (not including China and India) and the indicated capitalized fee will be amortized over the term of the agreement. We also prepaid $160,000 for products related to this new digital imaging system. Our liabilities decreased by $720,455 mainly due to the repayment and conversion of our notes to Laurus Master Fund. Our stockholders’ equity increased by $3,042,410 primarily due to net income from the previous 12 months of $2,125,765, and the conversion of a portion of our notes payable to Laurus Master Fund into common stock of $882,661.

         During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, our assets increased by $644,010 as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2006. This increase is primarily due to an increase in our prepaid expenses of $193,375 related to our largest tradeshow of the year taking place in November 2006, an increase in our fixed assets of $123,043, an increase in our accounts receivable of $198,697, and a prepayment of products of $160,000 related to our new digital imaging system. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, our liabilities increased by $147,393, as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to an increase in accounts payable due to timing differences between when we cut our checks and when we sent them out.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Our operating activities generated cash of $1,639,229 during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to cash generated of $1,137,491 in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The cash generated from operations during the first nine months of 2006 was principally from net income for the period of $1,627,002. There were no significant changes in working capital for the period. The cash generated from operations during the first nine months of 2005 was principally from net income of $1,256,491 for the period and an increase in customer deposits of $616,104, increase in trade payables of $164,494, partially offset by increased receivables of $978,011.

        Cash used in investing activities was $189,533 during the first nine months of 2006 as compared to $24,745 during the first nine months of 2005. Our investing activities consisted of purchases of software, equipment, telephone and security system, and furniture. We anticipate continued capital expenditures in connection with our ongoing efforts to upgrade our existing management information and corporate communication systems. We anticipate that related expenditures, if any, will be financed from our cash flow from operations or other financing arrangements available to us, if any.

        We generated cash in financing activities of $496,986 during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 as compared to cash generated of $78,200 during the first nine months of fiscal 2005. The cash generated in financing activities during the first nine months of 2006 was principally from proceeds on the note receivable from MediVision of $486,803, draw on our line of credit of $150,000, offset by repayments of the debt to Laurus of $144,579. The cash generated in financing activities during the first nine months of 2005 was primarily due to a payment from MediVision of an intercompany receivable of $285,406, offset by monthly payments of the debt instrument to Laurus of $247,005.

19

        On September 30, 2006 our cash and cash equivalents were $5,887,388. Management anticipates that additional sources of capital beyond those currently available to us may be required to continue funding for research and development of new products and selling and marketing related expenses for existing products.

        We will continue to evaluate alternative sources of capital to meet our growth requirements, including other asset or debt financing, issuing equity securities and entering into other financing arrangements. There can be no assurance, however, that any of the contemplated financing arrangements described herein will be available and, if available, can be obtained on terms favorable to us.

        On October 18, 2006, the investment agreement we entered into with Dutchess Private Equities Fund II, LP (“Dutchess”) on December 28, 2004, providing for an equity line of credit was terminated. Pursuant to the original investment agreement, Dutchess agreed to provide us with up to $9,000,000 of funding. We had not requested any drawdowns under the investment agreement on or before the time of termination.

Material Agreement

        On June 28, 2006, we and MediVision entered into a License and Distribution Agreement whereby MediVision appointed us to be its exclusive distributor of a new digital imaging system in the Americas and the Pacific Rim (excluding China and India), for a term of ten years. In return, we paid $273,808, consisting of a cash payment of $200,000, and recognition of $73,808 of research and development advances made in previous periods. Additionally, we are obligated to pay an advance totaling $460,000 based on the completion of certain phases of development of the new digital imaging system and the completion of certain documents. On September 21, 2006, we paid $160,000 based on the completion of the first milestone in the agreement. We also granted MediVision a license to use our OIS WinStation software and any other applicable OIS system and the accompanying intellectual property rights therein and a license to use our patents to develop the new digital imaging system and fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Our foregoing appointment as an exclusive distributor is conditional upon the payment of the advance and MediVision’s successful completion of the engineering, mass manufacture, and supply of the new digital imaging system, which has specifically dedicated features for the retinal market, in accordance with the technical specifications contained in the agreement.

        The advanced funds will be recovered as we purchase new digital imaging systems in accordance with specified quotas. The quotas mandate that we purchase a minimum amount of the new digital imaging system each year. The quotas for 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 are 50, 70, 80, and 90 units, respectively, and will be at least 95 units for each year thereafter. If we fail to satisfy our quota obligation, then we may pay MediVision the gross profit on the shortfall units to maintain exclusivity in the agreed upon territory. If no such shortfall payment is made, such failure to meet the quota will constitute a material breach and MediVision may terminate the exclusivity provision or the entire distribution agreement.

20

        Under this Agreement, we may not deal in the new digital imaging system outside the agreed upon territory. Moreover, excluding our current products or products derived from our current products, we may not deal in products that compete directly with the new digital imaging system or represent or provide services to a company which has a product or products that compete with the new digital imaging system. We also agreed to, among other things, as confined to the agreed upon territory, (1) use commercially reasonable efforts in promoting, marketing and selling the new digital imaging system, (2) service customers who purchased the new digital imaging system in the agreed upon territory, (3) diligently advertise the new digital imaging system in the agreed upon territory in relevant journals and by direct mail, (4) cooperate with MediVision in dealing with customer complaints concerning the new digital imaging system, and (5) provide MediVision with a 12 month forecast of our intended purchases during such year, including, at least 30 days prior to the beginning of each quota year, providing MediVision with an annual purchase order that includes a breakdown of our purchases by quarter; at least 70% of the applicable annual quota must be ordered in this annual purchase order.

        Under this Agreement, excluding intellectual property rights, neither party is entitled to damages as a result of loss of use, sales or profits, or any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential loss or damage. Moreover, MediVision will not be liable to OIS in connection with any patent infringement claim in certain instances whereby (1) the new digital imaging system is combined with another device not manufactured by MediVision, (2) the new digital imaging system is used in a way other than for which it was designed, and (3) the new digital imaging system is modified by OIS or a third party.

        The initial term of this agreement is for ten years, which will be automatically renewed in one year periods. Cash payments made under this agreement for exclusive distribution rights have been capitalized, and will be amortized over the term of the agreement. Either party may terminate the agreement with at least 6 months prior written notice of the intent to terminate, provided that, we meet the purchase quota.

ITEM 3.          CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

        As of the end of the period covered by this Report, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, these officers concluded that, as of September 30, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

        During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

21

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS

31.1   –	Certification Required Under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	*
31.2   –	Certification Required Under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	*
32      –	Certification Required Under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	*

* Filed herewith.

22

SIGNATURES

        In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	OPHTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS
Date:  April 30, 2007

By:	/s/ Gil Allon
Name:	Gil Allon,
Title:	Chief Executive Officer
By:	/s/ Ariel Shenhar
Name:	Ariel Shenhar,
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

23

EX-31

Exhibit 31.1

Section 302 Certification

      CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB

I, Gil Allon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Ophthalmic Imaging Systems;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2007 /s/ Gil Allon Gil Allon
Chief Executive Officer

EX-31

Exhibit 31.2

Section 302 Certification

      CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB

I, Ariel Shenhar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Ophthalmic Imaging Systems;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2007 /s/ Ariel Shenhar Ariel Shenhar
Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the filing of the financial statements of Ophthalmic Imaging Systems (“Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

Date:  April 30, 2007
	/s/ Gil Allon
	Gil Allon
	Chief Executive Officer
	/s/ Ariel Shenhar
	Ariel Shenhar
	Chief Financial Officer