N-CSR 1 f5331d1.htm N-CSR

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number

811-06591

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1800 Atlanta, Georgia 30309

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip code)

Sheri Morris 1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1800

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:

(713) 626-1919

Date of fiscal year end:

2/29

 

 

Date of reporting period:

2/29/20

 

 

Item 1. Report to Stockholders.

Annual Report to Shareholders

February 29, 2020

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

NYSE: IQI

Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Trust's shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports from the Trust or from your financial intermediary, such as a broker-dealer or bank. Instead, the reports will be made available on the Trust's web- site, and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report.

If you already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Trust electronically by contacting your financial intermediary (such as a broker-dealer or bank).

You may elect to receive all future reports in paper free of charge. If you invest through a financial intermediary, you can contact your financial intermediary to request that you continue to receive paper copies of your shareholder reports. If you invest directly with the Trust, you can call 800 341 2929 to let the Trust know you wish to continue receiving paper copies of your shareholder reports. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held with your financial intermediary or all funds held with the fund complex if you invest directly with the Trust.

Andrew Schlossberg

Letters to Shareholders

Dear Shareholders:

This annual report includes information about your Trust, including performance data and a complete list of its investments as of the close of the reporting period. Inside is a discussion of how your Trust was managed and the factors that affected its performance during the reporting period.

The reporting period proved to be another tumultuous time for both global equities and fixed-income secu- rities. In early 2019, global equity markets were buoyed by a more accommodative stance from central banks and optimism about a potential US-China trade deal. In May, US-China trade concerns and slowing global growth led to a global equity sell-off and rally in US Treasuries. Despite the May sell-off, domestic equity mar- kets rallied in June in anticipation of a US Federal Reserve (the Fed) interest rate cut and closed the second quarter with modest gains. Continued US-China trade worries and signs of slowing global economic growth led to increased market volatility in August. The US Treasury yield curve inverted several times as fears of a US recession increased. As a result, global equity markets were largely flat for the third quarter. In the final

months of 2019, geopolitical and macroeconomic issues largely abated. This combined with better-than-expected third quarter corporate earnings and initial agreement of the phase one US-China trade deal provided a favorable backdrop for equities and impressive fourth quar- ter global equity returns.

As the new year began, US equities were largely buoyed in January by the signing of the phase one trade agreement and strong eco- nomic data although returns were dampened by the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19). Concerns over the virus had a greater impact on international equities, which were largely lower for the month. As the virus spread outside of China and the number of cases increased, fears of diminished global growth led to a sharp global equity sell-off at the end of February 2020 and sent the yield on the US 10-year Treasury to a new all-time low.

Throughout 2019, central banks continued to be accommodative, providing sources of liquidity. In July, the Fed lowered interest rates for the first time in 11 years. It again lowered rates in September and once again in October. During the rest of the year, the Fed left rates unchanged. Overseas, the European Central Bank left its policy rate unchanged and continued its bond purchasing program. In 2020, with the increased spread of the coronavirus, the Fed shifted from a more neutral policy to the possibility of further rate cuts in the new year. As 2020 unfolds, we'll see how the interplay of interest rates, economic data, geopolitics and a host of other factors affect US and overseas equity and fixed income markets.

Investor uncertainty and market volatility, such as we witnessed during the reporting period, are unfortunate facts of life when it comes to investing. That's why Invesco encourages investors to work with a professional financial adviser who can stress the importance of starting to save and invest early and the importance of adhering to a disciplined investment plan. A financial adviser who knows your unique finan- cial situation, investment goals and risk tolerance can be an invaluable partner as you seek to achieve your financial goals. Financial advis- ers can also offer a long-term perspective when markets are volatile and time-tested advice and guidance when your financial situation or investment goals change.

Visit our website for more information on your investments

Our website, invesco.com/us, offers a wide range of market insights and investment perspectives. On the website, you'll find detailed infor- mation about your Trust's performance and portfolio holdings. In addition to the resources accessible on our website and through our mobile app, you can obtain timely updates to help you stay informed about the markets and the economy by connecting with Invesco on Twitter, LinkedIn or Facebook. You can access our blog at blog.invesco.us.com. Our goal is to provide you the information you want, when and where you want it.

Finally, I'm pleased to share with you Invesco's commitment to both the Principles for Responsible Investment and to considering environ- mental, social and governance issues in our robust investment process. I invite you to learn more at invesco.com/esg.

Have questions?

For questions about your account, contact an Invesco client services representative at 800 341 2929.

All of us at Invesco look forward to serving your investment management needs. Thank you for investing with us.

Sincerely,

Andrew Schlossberg

Head of the Americas,

Senior Managing Director, Invesco Ltd.

2Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

 

Among the many important lessons I've learned in more than 40 years in a variety of business endeavors is

 

the value of a trusted advocate.

 

As independent chair of the Invesco Funds Board, I can assure you that the members of the Board are

 

strong advocates for the interests of investors in Invesco's mutual funds. We work hard to represent your

 

interests through oversight of the quality of the investment management services your funds receive and

 

other matters important to your investment, including but not limited to:

 

￿ Monitoring how the portfolio management teams of the Invesco funds are performing in light of changing

 

economic and market conditions.

Bruce Crockett

￿ Assessing each portfolio management team's investment performance within the context of the fund's

investment strategy.

 

 

￿ Monitoring for potential conflicts of interests that may impact the nature of the services that your funds

receive.

We believe one of the most important services we provide our fund shareholders is the annual review of the funds' advisory and sub- advisory contracts with Invesco Advisers and its affiliates. This review is required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 and focuses on the nature and quality of the services Invesco provides as the adviser to the Invesco funds and the reasonableness of the fees that it charges for those services. Each year, we spend months carefully reviewing information received from Invesco and a variety of independent sources, such as performance and fee data prepared by Lipper, Inc. (a subsidiary of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.), an independent, third-party firm widely recognized as a leader in its field. We also meet with our independent legal counsel and other independent advisers to review and help us assess the information that we have received. Our goal is to assure that you receive quality investment management services for a reasonable fee.

I trust the measures outlined above provide assurance that you have a worthy advocate when it comes to choosing the Invesco Funds. As always, please contact me at bruce@brucecrockett.com with any questions or concerns you may have. On behalf of the Board, we

look forward to continuing to represent your interests and serving your needs.

Sincerely,

Bruce L. Crockett

Independent Chair

Invesco Funds Board of Trustees

3Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Management's Discussion of Trust Performance

Performance summary

For the fiscal year ended February 29, 2020, Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust (the Trust), at net asset value (NAV), outperformed its style-specific bench- mark, the S&P Municipal Bond 5+ Year Investment Grade Index. The Trust's return can be calculated based on either the market price or the NAV of its shares. NAV per share is determined by dividing the value of the Trust's portfolio securities, cash and other assets, less all liabilities and preferred shares, by the total number of common shares outstanding. Market price reflects the supply and demand for Trust shares. As a result, the two returns can differ, as they did during the fiscal year.

Performance

Total returns, 2/28/19 to 2/29/20

Trust at NAV

13.61%

Trust at Market Value

11.39

S&P Municipal Bond Index￿ (Broad Market Index)

8.94

S&P Municipal Bond 5+ Year Investment Grade Index￿ (Style-Specific Index)

10.68

Lipper Closed-End General and Insured Municipal Leveraged Debt Funds Index￿

 

(Peer Group Index)

14.54

Market Price Discount to NAV as of 2/29/20

–9.78

Source(s): ￿RIMES Technologies Corp.; ￿Lipper Inc.

 

The performance data quoted represent past performance and cannot guarantee comparable future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Investment return, NAV and common share market price will fluctuate so that you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares. Please visit invesco.com/us for the most recent month-end performance. Performance figures reflect Trust expenses, the reinvestment of distributions (if any) and changes in NAV for performance based on NAV and changes in market price for performance based on market price.

Since the Trust is a closed-end management investment company, shares of the Trust may trade at a discount or premium from the NAV. This characteristic is separate and distinct from the risk that NAV could decrease as a result of investment activities and may be a greater risk to investors expect- ing to sell their shares after a short time. The Trust cannot predict whether shares will trade at, above or below NAV. The Trust should not be viewed as a vehicle for trading purposes. It is designed primar- ily for risk-tolerant long-term investors.

￿A deterioration or likely deterioration of the broader fundamentals of a particular industry or sector.

￿Opportunities in the secondary or primary market to exchange into a security with better relative value.

Market conditions and your Trust

The broad municipal bond market experi- enced positive returns for the sixth consecu- tive year at the close of 2019, and perfor- mance remained strong throughout the fiscal year. Investment grade municipal bonds re- turned 9.46% and high yield municipal bonds returned 14.40% during the fiscal year.1 In- vestment grade and high yield municipals were among the best performing asset classes over the fiscal year.

The tax changes made as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 were a key driver of strong municipal demand in 2019. During the fiscal year, municipal bonds withstood significant interest rate volatility that saw the 10-year US Treasury yield trade from as high as 2.79% and as low as 1.13% where it ended the fiscal year.2 The municipal bond market performed positively as techni- cal conditions (favorable demand and supply balances) continued to provide tailwinds.

Despite favorable growth and labor trends, the US Federal Reserve (the Fed) lowered the federal funds rate three times by a quarter of a percentage point each in July, September and October 2019, citing uncertainty about the global economic outlook.3 On October 30, 2019, after the third cut, the Fed indicated that any further changes would be based on

How we invest

The Trust seeks to provide investors with cur- rent income that is exempt from federal in- come tax.

We seek to achieve the Trust's investment objective by investing primarily in municipal securities that are rated investment grade at the time of investment. Municipal securities include municipal bonds, municipal notes, mu- nicipal commercial paper and lease obliga- tions. The Trust may also invest up to 20% of its net assets in non-investment grade and unrated securities that we determine to be of comparable quality at the time of investment. From time to time, we may invest in municipal

securities that pay interest subject to the fed- eral alternative minimum tax.

We employ a bottom-up, research-driven approach to identify securities that have at- tractive risk-reward characteristics for the sectors in which we invest. We also integrate macroeconomic analysis and forecasting into our evaluation and ranking of various sectors and individual securities. Finally, we employ leverage in an effort to enhance the Trust's income and total return.

Sell decisions generally are based on:

￿A deterioration or likely deterioration of an individual issuer's capacity to meet its debt obligations on a timely basis.

economic data.

The first nine months of the fiscal year saw heightened demand for perceived safe-haven assets due to economic uncertainty. However, developments in the fourth quarter led inves- tors to favor riskier investments as many of the perceived major threats looming over markets subsided. The US and China reached a phase one trade deal, Congress settled on a funding "deal in principle" eliminating the risk of a government shutdown and the some- what unexpected UK election results set the stage for an orderly exit from the European Union by January 31, 2020.

Portfolio Composition

By credit sector, based on total investments

Revenue Bonds

79.3%

General Obligation Bonds

13.6

Pre-Refunded Bonds

6.8

Other

0.3

Top Five Debt Holdings

% of total net assets

1. North Texas Tollway Authority

 

Series 2008 D, Ref. RB

2.3%

2.William S. Hart Union High School District (Election of 2008)

Series 2009 A, GO Bonds

1.7

3. Illinois (State of) Toll Highway

 

Authority Series 2013 A, RB

1.5

4.North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency Series 2015 B,

Ref. RB

1.4

5. Chicago (City of), IL Transit

 

Authority Series 2011, RB

1.3

The Trust's holdings are subject to change, and there is no assurance that the Trust will continue to hold any particular security.

Data presented here are as of February 29, 2020.

4Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

New issuance of municipal bonds totaled

$438 billion for the fiscal year, an increase of 25% from the previous fiscal year.4 Flows into the municipal bond asset class were posi- tive for the fiscal year.5 Fund flows totaled $97.2 billion from February 2019 through February 2020.5

The end of the fiscal year brought a major market shift as macroeconomic concerns re- garding the global outbreak of the Coronavi- rus (COVID-19) dominated as the virus spread globally at the beginning of 2020. Significant equity sell-offs incited a general flight to qual- ity assets, such as municipal bonds. This re- sulted in a strong rally in February 2020.

At the close of the fiscal year, we believed municipal fundamentals remained strong. We also believed the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions combined with volatility seen in the equity markets would continue to drive municipal demand through 2020. Most municipal issuers were in strong financial shape heading into the COVID-19 pandemic and many provide essential services to all Americans. Though there could be small, iso- lated pockets of defaults in the future, we believe the vast majority of municipal bonds will pay current principal and interest, as his- tory has shown.

During the fiscal year, security selection in the health care and transportation sectors significantly contributed to the Trust's perfor- mance relative to its style-specific bench- mark. Security selection in bonds A-rated† and below, as well as non-rated bonds, also benefited the Trust's relative performance. Security selection in Illinois bonds contributed to the Trust's relative performance, as well.

Conversely, security selection in state and local general obligation bonds and the utilities sector detracted from the Trust's perfor- mance relative to its style-specific benchmark over the fiscal year. Security selection in lower coupon bonds (5.49% and less) also detracted from the Trust's relative perfor- mance. On a state level, security selection in New York and Pennsylvania holdings de- tracted from the Trust's relative results.

One important factor affecting the Trust's performance relative to its style specific benchmark was the use of leverage. The Trust uses leverage because we believe that, over time, leveraging can provide opportuni- ties for additional income and total return for common shareholders. However, the use of leverage also can expose common sharehold- ers to additional volatility. For example, if the prices of securities held by a trust decline, the negative effect of these valuation changes on common-share NAV and total return is magni- fied by the use of leverage. Conversely, lever- age may enhance common-share returns dur- ing periods when the prices of securities held by a trust generally are rising.

During the fiscal year, leverage contributed to the Trust's performance relative to its style-specific benchmark. The Trust achieved a leveraged position through the use of in- verse floating rate securities and variable rate muni term preferred (VMTP) shares. Inverse floating rate securities or tender option bonds

are instruments that have an inverse relation- ship to a referenced interest rate. VMTPs are a variable rate form of preferred stock with a mandatory redemption date. Inverse floating rate securities and VMTPs can be an efficient way to manage duration, yield curve exposure and credit exposure, potentially enhancing yield. At the close of the fiscal year, leverage accounted for 37% of the Trust's total assets and it contributed to returns. For more infor- mation about the Trust's use of leverage, see the Notes to Financial Statements later in this report.

We wish to remind you that the Trust is subject to interest rate risk, meaning when interest rates rise, the value of fixed income securities tends to fall. The risk may be greater in the current market environment because interest rates are near historic lows. The degree to which the value of fixed income securities may decline due to rising interest rates may vary depending on the speed and magnitude of the increase in interest rates, as well as individual security characteristics, such as price, maturity, duration and coupon and market forces, such as supply and de- mand for similar securities. We are monitor- ing interest rates, and the market, economic and geopolitical factors that may impact the direction, speed and magnitude of changes to interest rates across the maturity spectrum, including the potential impact of monetary policy changes by the Fed and certain foreign central banks. If interest rates rise or fall faster than expected, markets may experience increased volatility, which may affect the value and/or liquidity of certain of the Trust's investments and/or the market price of the Trust's common shares.

Thank you for investing in Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust and for sharing our long-term investment horizon.

1 Source: Bloomberg

2Source: US Department of the Treasury

3 Source: US Federal Reserve

4 Source: The Bond Buyer

5 Source: Strategic Insight

†A credit rating is an assessment provided by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) of the creditworthiness of an issuer with respect to debt obligations, including specific securities, money market instruments or other debts. Ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest); ratings are subject to change without notice. For more information on rating methodologies, please visit the following NRSRO

websites: standardandpoors.com and select "Understanding Ratings" under Rating Resources on the homepage; moodys.com and select "Rating Methodologies" under Research and Ratings on the homepage; and fitchratings.com and select "Ratings Definitions" on the homepage.

Portfolio managers:

John (Jack) Connelly

Tim O'Reilly

Mark Paris

James Phillips

John Schorle

Julius Williams

The views and opinions expressed in management's discussion of Trust performance are those of Invesco Advisers, Inc. These views and opinions are subject to change at any time based on factors such as market and economic conditions. These views and opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice or recommendations, or as an offer for a particular security. The information is not a complete analysis of every aspect of any market, country, industry, security or the Trust. Statements of fact are from sources considered reliable, but Invesco Advisers, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy. Although historical performance is no guarantee of future results, these insights may help you understand our investment management philosophy.

See important Trust and, if applicable, index disclosures later in this report.

5Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust's investment objective is to provide current income that is exempt from federal income tax.

￿Unless otherwise stated, information presented in this report is as of February 29, 2020, and is based on total net assets applicable to common shares.

￿Unless otherwise noted, all data provided by Invesco.

￿To access your Trust's reports, visit invesco.com/fundreports.

About indexes used in this report

￿The S&P Municipal Bond Index is a broad, market value-weighted index that seeks to measure the performance of the US municipal bond market.

￿The S&P Municipal Bond 5+ Year Invest- ment Grade Index seeks to measure the performance of investment grade US mu- nicipal bonds with maturities equal to or greater than five years.

￿The Lipper Closed-End General and In- sured Municipal Leveraged Debt Funds Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of closed-end general and insured leveraged municipal debt funds tracked by Lipper.

￿The Trust is not managed to track the per- formance of any particular index, including the index(es) described here, and conse- quently, the performance of the Trust may deviate significantly from the perfor- mance of the index(es).

￿A direct investment cannot be made in an index. Unless otherwise indicated, index results include reinvested dividends, and they do not reflect sales charges. Perfor- mance of the peer group, if applicable, reflects fund expenses; performance of a market index does not.

NOT FDIC INSURED | MAY LOSE VALUE | NO BANK GUARANTEE

6Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

The dividend reinvestment plan (the Plan) offers you a prompt and simple way to reinvest your dividends and capital gains distributions (Distributions) into additional shares of your Invesco closed-end Trust (the Trust). Under the Plan, the money you earn from Distributions will be reinvested automatically in more shares of the Trust, allowing you to potentially increase your investment over time. All shareholders in the Trust are automatically enrolled in the Plan when shares are purchased.

Plan benefits

￿Add to your account:

You may increase your shares in your Trust easily and automatically with the Plan.

￿Low transaction costs:

Shareholders who participate in the Plan may be able to buy shares at below-market prices when the Trust is trading at a premium to its net asset value (NAV). In addition, transaction costs are low because when new shares are issued by the Trust, there is no brokerage fee, and when shares are bought in blocks on the open market, the per share fee is shared among all participants.

￿Convenience:

You will receive a detailed account statement from Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the Agent), which administers the Plan. The state- ment shows your total Distributions, date of investment, shares acquired, and price per share, as well as the total number of shares in your reinvestment account. You can also ac- cess your account at invesco.com/closed-end.

￿Safekeeping:

The Agent will hold the shares it has acquired for you in safekeeping.

Who can participate in the Plan

If you own shares in your own name, your pur- chase will automatically enroll you in the Plan. If your shares are held in "street name" — in the name of your brokerage firm, bank, or other fi- nancial institution — you must instruct that entity to participate on your behalf. If they are unable to participate on your behalf, you may request that they reregister your shares in your own name so that you may enroll in the Plan.

How to enroll

If you haven't participated in the Plan in the past or chose to opt out, you are still eligible to partici- pate. Enroll by visiting invesco.com/closed-end, by calling toll-free 800 341 2929 or by notifying us in writing at Invesco Closed-End Funds, Computer- share Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233-5000. If you are writing to us, please include the Trust name and account number and ensure that all shareholders listed on the account sign these written instructions. Your participation in the Plan will begin with the next Distribution payable after the Agent receives your authorization, as long as they receive it before the "record date," which is generally 10 business days before the Distribution is paid. If your authoriza- tion arrives after such record date, your participa- tion in the Plan will begin with the following Distri- bution.

How the Plan works

If you choose to participate in the Plan, your Dis- tributions will be promptly reinvested for you, au- tomatically increasing your shares. If the Trust is trading at a share price that is equal to its NAV, you'll pay that amount for your reinvested shares. However, if the Trust is trading above or below NAV, the price is determined by one of two ways:

1.Premium: If the Trust is trading at a premium

— a market price that is higher than its NAV — you'll pay either the NAV or 95 percent of

the market price, whichever is greater. When the Trust trades at a premium, you may pay less for your reinvested shares than an inves- tor purchasing shares on the stock exchange. Keep in mind, a portion of your price reduc- tion may be taxable because you are receiv- ing shares at less than market price.

2.Discount: If the Trust is trading at a discount

— a market price that is lower than its NAV — you'll pay the market price for your rein- vested shares.

Costs of the Plan

There is no direct charge to you for reinvesting Distributions because the Plan's fees are paid by the Trust. If the Trust is trading at or above its NAV, your new shares are issued directly by the Trust and there are no brokerage charges or fees. However, if the Trust is trading at a discount, the shares are purchased on the open market, and you will pay your portion of any per share fees. These per share fees are typically less than the standard brokerage charges for individual transac- tions because shares are purchased for all partici- pants in blocks, resulting in lower fees for each individual participant. Any service or per share fees are added to the purchase price. Per share fees include any applicable brokerage commis- sions the Agent is required to pay.

Tax implications

The automatic reinvestment of Distributions does not relieve you of any income tax that may be due on Distributions. You will receive tax information annually to help you prepare your federal income tax return.

Invesco does not offer tax advice. The tax infor- mation contained herein is general and is not ex- haustive by nature. It was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any taxpayer for avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer under US federal tax laws. Federal and state tax laws are complex and constantly chang- ing. Shareholders should always consult a legal or tax adviser for information concerning their indi- vidual situation.

How to withdraw from the Plan

You may withdraw from the Plan at any time by calling 800 341 2929, by visiting invesco.com/ closed-end or by writing to Invesco Closed-End Funds, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233-5000. Simply indicate that you would like to withdraw from the Plan, and be sure to include your Trust name and account number. Also, ensure that all sharehold- ers listed on the account sign these written in- structions. If you withdraw, you have three op- tions with regard to the shares held in the Plan:

1.If you opt to continue to hold your non- certificated whole shares (Investment Plan Book Shares), they will be held by the Agent electronically as Direct Registration Book- Shares (Book-Entry Shares) and fractional shares will be sold at the then-current market price. Proceeds will be sent via check to your address of record after deducting applicable fees, including per share fees such as any applicable brokerage commissions the Agent is required to pay.

2.If you opt to sell your shares through the Agent, we will sell all full and fractional shares and send the proceeds via check to your address of record after deducting a $2.50 service fee and per share fees. Per share fees include any applicable brokerage commissions the Agent is required to pay.

3.You may sell your shares through your finan- cial adviser through the Direct Registration System (DRS). DRS is a service within the securities industry that allows Trust shares to be held in your name in electronic format. You retain full ownership of your shares, without having to hold a share certificate. You should contact your financial adviser to learn more about any restrictions or fees that may apply.

The Trust and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. may amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Participants will receive at least 30 days written notice before the effective date of any amendment. In the case of termination, Partici- pants will receive at least 30 days written notice before the record date for the payment of any such Distributions by the Trust. In the case of amendment or termination necessary or appropri- ate to comply with applicable law or the rules and policies of the Securities and Exchange Commis- sion or any other regulatory authority, such writ- ten notice will not be required.

To obtain a complete copy of the current Dividend Reinvestment Plan, please call our Cli- ent Services department at 800 341 2929 or visit invesco.com/closed-end.

7Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Schedule of Investments

February 29, 2020

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Municipal Obligations–158.43%(a)

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama–2.50%

 

 

 

 

 

Alabama (State of) Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Ascension Health Senior Credit

 

 

 

 

 

Group); Series 2016 B, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/15/2046

$ 4,390

$

5,246,094

Alabaster (City of), AL Board of Education; Series 2014 A, GO Wts. (b)(c)

5.00%

09/01/2024

2,260

 

2,679,320

Birmingham (City of), AL Airport Authority; Series 2010, RB (INS-AGM)(d)

5.25%

07/01/2030

2,100

 

2,129,379

Birmingham (City of), AL Special Care Facilities Financing Authority (Methodist Home for the Aging);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2016, RB

5.25%

06/01/2025

700

 

757,057

Series 2016, RB

5.75%

06/01/2045

25

 

28,475

Birmingham (City of), AL Water Works Board; Series 2011, RB (INS -AGM)(d)(e)

5.00%

01/01/2036

3,060

 

3,167,865

Lower Alabama Gas District (The); Series 2016 A, RB (e)

5.00%

09/01/2046

2,400

 

3,635,568

Tuscaloosa (County of), AL Industrial Development Authority (Hunt Refining); Series 2019 A, Ref.

 

 

 

 

 

IDR (f)

5.25%

05/01/2044

820

 

979,851

 

 

 

 

 

18,623,609

Alaska–0.58%

 

 

 

 

 

Alaska (State of) Industrial Development & Export Authority (Providence Health Services);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011 A, RB (e)

5.50%

10/01/2041

4,065

 

4,312,355

Arizona–4.87%

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Phoenix Children's Hospital); Series 2012, Ref. RB

5.00%

02/01/2042

2,050

 

2,183,967

Arizona (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Scottsdale Lincoln Hospital); Series 2014, Ref. RB

5.00%

12/01/2042

1,965

 

2,288,616

Arizona (State of) Industrial Development Authority (Great Laked Senior Living Community);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019 A, RB

5.00%

01/01/2036

400

 

481,968

Series 2019 A, RB

5.00%

01/01/2037

1,000

 

1,204,950

Arizona (State of) Industrial Development Authority (Leman Academy of Excellence); Series 2017 A,

 

 

 

 

 

Ref. RB (f)

5.00%

07/01/2037

675

 

702,250

Arizona (State of) Transportation Board; Series 2011 A, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

07/01/2036

3,450

 

3,642,372

City of Phoenix Civic Improvement Corp.; Series 2019, RB

5.00%

07/01/2049

2,850

 

3,655,923

Glendale (City of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (The Beatitudes Campus);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/15/2031

1,220

 

1,349,430

Series 2017, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/15/2045

835

 

906,651

La Paz (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Charter School Solutions- Harmony Public

 

 

 

 

 

Schools); Series 2018 A, RB

5.00%

02/15/2048

700

 

817,082

Maricopa (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Legacy Traditional Schools);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019, Ref. RB (f)

5.00%

07/01/2049

600

 

688,824

Maricopa County Pollution Control Corp. (Southern California Education Co.); Series 2000 B, Ref. RB

5.00%

06/01/2035

1,110

 

1,121,921

Mesa (City of), AZ; Series 2013, RB (e)

5.00%

07/01/2032

7,600

 

8,338,340

Phoenix (City of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Legacy Traditional Schools); Series 2014 A,

 

 

 

 

 

RB (f)

6.50%

07/01/2034

450

 

527,414

Phoenix (City of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Rowan University); Series 2012, RB

5.00%

06/01/2042

2,780

 

2,989,501

Pima (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (American Leadership Academy);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017, RB (f)

5.00%

06/15/2047

340

 

353,814

Pima (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Grande Innovations Academy); Series 2018,

 

 

 

 

 

RB (f)

5.25%

07/01/2048

1,125

 

1,181,228

Pima (County of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Tucson Electric Power Co.); Series 2010 A,

 

 

 

 

 

IDR

5.25%

10/01/2040

2,525

 

2,582,469

Yuma (City of), AZ Industrial Development Authority (Regional Medical Center);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2014 A, RB

5.00%

08/01/2020

500

 

508,430

Series 2014 A, RB

5.00%

08/01/2021

800

 

845,416

 

 

 

 

 

36,370,566

California–22.06%

 

 

 

 

 

Alhambra Unified School District (Election of 2004);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS -AGC)(d)(g)

0.00%

08/01/2035

3,570

 

2,672,466

Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS -AGC)(d)(g)

0.00%

08/01/2036

5,770

 

4,204,541

Bay Area Toll Authority (San Francisco Bay Area); Series 2017 F-1, RB (e)

5.00%

04/01/2056

2,280

 

2,792,590

Beverly Hills Unified School District (Election of 2008);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2009, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2026

1,390

 

1,293,798

Series 2009, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2031

2,680

 

2,278,482

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

8Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

California–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

California (County of), CA Tobacco Securitization Agency (Alameda County Tobacco Asset

 

 

 

 

 

Securitization Corp.); Series 2006 C, RB (g)

0.00%

06/01/2055

$10,115

$

727,370

California (State of);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012, GO Bonds

5.25%

04/01/2035

4,305

 

4,692,536

Series 2012, GO Bonds

5.00%

09/01/2036

2,460

 

2,715,988

Series 2012, Ref. GO Bonds

5.00%

02/01/2032

2,600

 

2,808,832

California (State of) Community Housing Agency (Annadel Apartments); Series 2019 A, RB (f)

5.00%

04/01/2049

790

 

950,915

California (State of) Health Facilities Financing Authority (City of Hope); Series 2012 A, RB

5.00%

11/15/2032

3,500

 

3,871,000

California (State of) Housing Finance Agency; Series 2019 2, Class A, Revenue Ctfs.

4.00%

03/20/2033

474

 

573,088

California (State of) Municipal Finance Authority (CHF-Davis I, LLC - West Village Student Housing

 

 

 

 

 

Project); Series 2018, RB

5.00%

05/15/2035

1,185

 

1,487,850

California (State of) Municipal Finance Authority (Linxs APM); Series 2018 A, RB (h)

5.00%

12/31/2043

885

 

1,086,063

California (State of) Municipal Finance Authority (United Airlines, Inc.); Series 2019, Ref. RB (h)

4.00%

07/15/2029

635

 

762,794

California (State of) Pollution Control Finance Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012, RB (f)(h)

5.00%

07/01/2027

1,230

 

1,352,201

Series 2012, RB (f)(h)

5.00%

07/01/2030

1,450

 

1,590,157

Series 2012, RB (f)(h)

5.00%

07/01/2037

3,195

 

3,489,835

California (State of) Public Works Board (Various Capital); Series 2013 I, RB

5.00%

11/01/2020

1,000

 

1,028,100

California (State of) Statewide Communities Development Authority (Loma Linda University Medical

 

 

 

 

 

Center);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2014, RB

5.25%

12/01/2044

780

 

898,271

Series 2016 A, RB (f)

5.00%

12/01/2041

1,245

 

1,433,879

Series 2016 A, RB (f)

5.25%

12/01/2056

950

 

1,097,497

California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2003 A, RB (INS -AMBAC)(d)(e)

5.00%

07/01/2033

1,700

 

4,381,971

(b)(c)(e)

5.00%

01/01/2028

3,300

 

2,257,379

 

 

Clovis Unified School District (Election of 2004); Series 2004 A, GO Bonds (INS -NATL)(d)(g)

0.00%

08/01/2029

695

 

604,796

Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District (Election of 2008-Measure E);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2009, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2040

4,685

 

2,892,332

Series 2009, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2041

4,965

 

2,972,843

Series 2009, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2042

5,265

 

3,043,328

Series 2009, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2043

3,460

 

1,921,303

Series 2009, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2044

4,825

 

2,596,139

East Bay Municipal Utility District; Series 2010 A, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

06/01/2036

4,770

 

4,821,850

El Segundo Unified School District (Election of 2008);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2009 A, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2031

1,775

 

1,458,660

Series 2009 A, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2032

1,980

 

1,592,059

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp.;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 A, RB

5.00%

06/01/2030

3,250

 

3,679,032

Series 2018 A-1, Ref. RB

5.00%

06/01/2047

675

 

716,762

Series 2018 A-2, Ref. RB

5.00%

06/01/2047

2,350

 

2,495,395

Los Angeles (City of), CA Department of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport); Series 2010 A,

 

 

 

 

 

RB (e)

5.00%

05/15/2035

6,000

 

6,050,640

Los Angeles (City of), CA Department of Water & Power; Series 2012 A, RB (e)

5.00%

07/01/2043

6,510

 

7,133,072

Menifee Union School District (Election of 2008); Series 2009 C, GO Bonds (INS -AGC)(d)(g)

0.00%

08/01/2034

1,985

 

1,494,110

Moreland School District (Crossover Series 14); Series 2006 C, Ref. GO Bonds (INS -AMBAC)(d)(g)

0.00%

08/01/2029

3,955

 

3,378,005

Mt. San Antonio Community College District (Election 2008); Series 2013 A, GO Bonds (i)

6.25%

08/01/2043

1,900

 

2,063,362

Oak Grove School District (Election of 2008); Series 2009 A, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2028

2,875

 

2,535,002

Patterson Joint Unified School District (Election of 2008);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS -AGM)(d)(g)

0.00%

08/01/2036

4,025

 

2,862,338

Series 2009 B, GO Bonds (INS-AGM)(d)(g)

0.00%

08/01/2037

1,590

 

1,096,528

Poway Unified School District (Election of 2008 - School Facilities Improvement District No.

 

 

 

 

 

2007-1);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2009 A, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2027

4,005

 

3,661,892

Series 2009 A, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2031

5,000

 

4,179,250

Regents of the University of California; Series 2013 AI, RB (e)

5.00%

05/15/2033

4,000

 

4,521,440

San Buenaventura (City of), CA (Community Memorial Health System); Series 2011, RB

7.50%

12/01/2041

2,085

 

2,274,464

San Diego (City of), CA Community College District (Election of 2006); Series 2011, GO Bonds (e)

5.00%

08/01/2036

6,790

 

7,217,091

San Diego (County of), CA Regional Airport Authority; Series 2010 A, RB (b)

5.00%

07/01/2034

875

 

887,609

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

9Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

California–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

San Francisco (City & County of), CA Airport Commission (San Francisco International Airport);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011 F, Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

05/01/2025

$ 1,000

$

1,048,920

Series 2011 F, Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

05/01/2026

1,995

 

2,092,356

Series 2011 G, Ref. RB (b)(c)

5.25%

05/03/2021

3,615

 

3,809,234

Series 2011 G, Ref. RB

5.25%

05/01/2027

1,385

 

1,459,402

Series 2019 A, Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

05/01/2036

1,110

 

1,440,181

San Francisco (City & County of), CA Public Utilities Commission (Water System Improvement

 

 

 

 

 

Program); Subseries 2011 A, RB (e)

5.00%

11/01/2036

4,320

 

4,635,922

San Jose Evergreen Community College District (Election of 2004); Series 2008 B, GO Bonds (INS

 

 

 

 

 

-AGM)(d)(g)

0.00%

09/01/2030

3,300

 

2,847,900

Santa Margarita Water District (Community Facilities District No. 2013-1); Series 2013, RB

5.50%

09/01/2032

590

 

660,476

Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority (Santa Clara); Series 2007 A, RB (g)

0.00%

06/01/2041

3,295

 

1,002,701

William S. Hart Union High School District (Election of 2008);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2009 A, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2032

15,570

 

12,550,198

Series 2009 A, GO Bonds (g)

0.00%

08/01/2033

5,725

 

4,504,945

 

 

 

 

 

164,649,140

Colorado–3.71%

 

 

 

 

 

Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Adventhealth Obligated); Series 2019, Ref. RB

4.00%

11/15/2043

1,980

 

2,343,409

Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (CommonSpirit Health);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019 A-1, Ref. RB

4.00%

08/01/2044

1,585

 

1,829,930

Series 2019 A-2, Ref. RB

5.00%

08/01/2044

790

 

983,550

Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society (The));

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017, Ref. RB (b)(c)

5.00%

06/01/2027

555

 

715,584

Colorado (State of) Health Facilities Authority (SCL Health System); Series 2013 A, RB (e)

5.50%

01/01/2035

3,900

 

4,520,568

Colorado (State of) Regional Transportation District (Denver Transit Partners Eagle P3);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019, RB

6.00%

01/15/2041

3,200

 

3,248,416

Colorado (State of) Science and Technology Park Metropolitan District No. 1; Series 2018, Ref. RB

5.00%

12/01/2033

500

 

542,915

Denver (City & County of), CO;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 B, RB

5.25%

11/15/2032

5,000

 

5,732,250

Series 2018 A, Ref. RB (e)(h)

5.25%

12/01/2048

4,160

 

5,275,920

Mirabelle Metropolitan District No. 2; Series 2020, GO Bonds

5.00%

12/01/2039

675

 

740,023

Neu Towne Metropolitan District; Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds

5.38%

12/01/2046

665

 

713,904

Prairie Center Metropolitan District No. 3; Series 2017 A, Ref. RB (f)

5.00%

12/15/2041

910

 

998,652

 

 

 

 

 

27,645,121

Connecticut–0.60%

 

 

 

 

 

Connecticut (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Hartford Healthcare); Series 2011

 

 

 

 

 

A, RB (b)(c)

5.00%

07/01/2021

4,300

 

4,488,340

District of Columbia–1.47%

 

 

 

 

 

District of Columbia; Series 2006 B-1, RB (INS-NATL)(d)

5.00%

02/01/2031

785

 

787,284

District of Columbia (Provident Group - Howard Properties LLC); Series 2013, RB

5.00%

10/01/2045

1,910

 

1,994,365

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (Dulles Metrorail & Capital Improvement); Series 2019

 

 

 

 

 

B, Ref. RB

4.00%

10/01/2053

1,580

 

1,845,140

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (Dulles Metrorail and Capital Improvement);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2014 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

10/01/2053

5,930

 

6,360,518

 

 

 

 

 

10,987,307

Florida–11.28%

 

 

 

 

 

Alachua (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019, RB

4.00%

12/01/2049

1,185

 

1,372,467

Alachua (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Terraces at Bonita Springs); Series 2011 A, RB

8.13%

11/15/2041

1,000

 

1,012,000

Broward (County of), FL;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012 A, RB (b)(c)

5.00%

10/01/2022

2,145

 

2,375,545

Series 2013 C, RB (b)(c)

5.25%

10/01/2023

2,500

 

2,892,550

Series 2015 A, RB (h)

5.00%

10/01/2045

1,010

 

1,184,387

Series 2017, RB (e)(h)

5.00%

10/01/2047

3,450

 

4,210,346

Series 2019 B, RB (h)

4.00%

09/01/2049

790

 

893,759

Broward County FL Water & Sewer Utility Revenue; Series 2019 XM0790, Revenue Ctfs. (e)

4.00%

10/01/2044

3,720

 

4,423,006

Cape Coral (City of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Gulf Care, Inc.); Series 2015, Ref. RB (f)

6.00%

07/01/2045

240

 

265,723

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

10

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Florida–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Capital Trust Agency (Sarasota-Manatee Jewish Housing Council, Inc.); Series 2017, Ref. RB (f)

5.00%

07/01/2046

$ 1,250

$

1,353,900

Central Florida Expressway Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019 XM0805, Revenue Ctfs. (e)

5.00%

07/01/2044

1,585

 

2,022,872

Series 2019 XM0806, Revenue Ctfs. (e)

5.00%

07/01/2049

2,255

 

2,859,295

Citizens Property Insurance Corp.; Series 2012 A-1, RB

5.00%

06/01/2021

5,110

 

5,373,216

Davie (Town of), FL (Nova Southeastern University); Series 2013 A, RB

6.00%

04/01/2042

1,250

 

1,405,262

Florida (State of) North Broward Hospital District; Series 2017 B, Ref. RB

5.00%

01/01/2048

2,850

 

3,422,992

Florida (State of) Ports Financing Commission (State Transportation Trust Fund); Series 2011 B,

 

 

 

 

 

Ref. RB (h)

5.13%

06/01/2027

995

 

1,045,755

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority; Series 2019 A, RB (h)

4.00%

10/01/2039

2,500

 

2,967,125

Hillsborough (County of), FL Aviation Authority (Tampa International Airport); Series 2018 E, RB (h)

5.00%

10/01/2048

1,960

 

2,426,186

Martin (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Martin Memorial Medical Center); Series 2012, RB

 

 

 

 

 

(b)(c)

5.00%

11/15/2021

4,630

 

4,951,924

 

 

Miami Beach (City of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Mount Sinai Medical Center); Series 2014, Ref.

 

 

 

 

 

RB

5.00%

11/15/2039

845

 

973,947

Miami-Dade (County of), FL;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012 A, Ref. RB (b)(c)(h)

5.00%

10/01/2022

1,000

 

1,102,070

Series 2012 B, Ref. RB (INS -AGM)(d)

5.00%

10/01/2035

1,750

 

1,925,665

Series 2016 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

10/01/2041

1,170

 

1,431,682

Miami-Dade (County of), FL Educational Facilities Authority (University of Miami); Series 2018 A, RB

 

 

 

 

 

(e)

5.00%

04/01/2053

3,650

 

4,443,145

 

 

Miami-Dade (County of), FL Expressway Authority; Series 2010 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

07/01/2040

2,500

 

2,533,825

Miami-Dade (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Miami Children's Hospital);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2010, Ref. RB (b)(c)

6.00%

08/01/2020

880

 

898,251

Series 2010, Ref. RB

6.00%

08/01/2030

315

 

321,045

Miami-Dade (County of), FL Industrial Development Authority (Waste Management, Inc.);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2018 B, RB (SIFMA Municipal Swap Index + 0.80%)(c)(h)(j)

1.95%

11/01/2021

555

 

555,721

Orange (County of), FL; Series 2012 B, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

01/01/2031

7,855

 

8,462,820

Orlando (City of), FL Greater Orlando Aviation Authority; Series 2017 A, RB (h)

5.00%

10/01/2047

935

 

1,136,642

Osceola (County of), FL;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB (g)

0.00%

10/01/2052

430

 

142,489

Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB (g)

0.00%

10/01/2053

425

 

135,142

Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB (g)

0.00%

10/01/2054

365

 

111,347

Palm Beach (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (BRRH Corp. Obligated Group); Series 2014,

 

 

 

 

 

Ref. RB (b)(c)

5.00%

12/01/2024

1,125

 

1,336,444

Palm Beach (County of), FL Health Facilities Authority (Jupiter Medical Center, Inc.); Series 2013 A,

 

 

 

 

 

RB

5.00%

11/01/2043

2,030

 

2,188,868

Palm Beach (County of), FL Solid Waste Authority; Series 2016, RB (e)

5.00%

10/01/2031

3,330

 

3,544,519

Putnam (County of), FL Development Authority (Seminole Electric Cooperative); Series 2018 B, Ref.

 

 

 

 

 

PCR

5.00%

03/15/2042

790

 

969,567

Sumter (County of), FL Industrial Development Authority (Central Florida Health Alliance);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2014 A, RB

5.00%

07/01/2025

500

 

570,145

Series 2014 A, RB

5.00%

07/01/2027

500

 

567,500

Tallahassee (City of), FL (Tallahassee Memorial Health Care, Inc.); Series 2016, RB

5.00%

12/01/2055

1,270

 

1,461,287

Tampa Bay Water; Series 2001 A, Ref. RB (INS-NATL)(d)

6.00%

10/01/2029

2,000

 

2,878,240

 

 

 

 

 

84,148,671

Georgia–1.18%

 

 

 

 

 

Augusta (City of), GA Development Authority; Series 2018, RB

4.00%

07/01/2037

2,955

 

3,274,081

Brookhaven Development Authority (Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Inc.); Series 2019 A, RB

4.00%

07/01/2049

1,575

 

1,846,561

Fulton (County of), GA Development Authority (Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.); Series 2020, Ref. RB

5.00%

07/01/2044

1,590

 

1,996,468

Georgia (State of) Municipal Electric Authority (Plant Vogtle Units 3 & 4); Series 2019 A, RB

5.00%

01/01/2049

610

 

737,954

Georgia (State of) Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (Plant Vogtle Units 3 &4); Series 2019, RB

4.00%

01/01/2049

870

 

977,549

 

 

 

 

 

8,832,613

Hawaii–1.86%

 

 

 

 

 

Hawaii (State of);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2010 A, RB

5.00%

07/01/2039

4,100

 

4,153,054

Series 2015 A, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2041

780

 

911,173

Series 2015 A, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2045

1,545

 

1,799,693

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

11

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Hawaii–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Hawaii (State of) Department of Budget & Finance (Hawaii Pacific Health Obligated Group);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2010 B, RB (b)(c)

5.75%

07/01/2020

$ 1,630

$

1,656,178

Series 2013 A, Ref. RB

5.50%

07/01/2043

2,000

 

2,235,800

Hawaii (State of) Department of Transportation (Airports Division); Series 2013, COP (h)

5.00%

08/01/2020

3,055

 

3,105,102

 

 

 

 

 

13,861,000

Idaho–0.42%

 

 

 

 

 

Idaho (State of) Health Facilities Authority (Valley Vista Care Corp.);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/15/2032

700

 

757,526

Series 2017 A, Ref. RB

5.25%

11/15/2037

980

 

1,067,210

Regents of the University of Idaho; Series 2011, Ref. RB (c)

5.25%

04/01/2021

1,265

 

1,319,193

 

 

 

 

 

3,143,929

Illinois–17.18%

 

 

 

 

 

Chicago (City of), IL;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 1993 B, Ref. GO Bonds (INS-AGM)(d)

5.13%

01/01/2022

1,025

 

1,075,635

Series 2002 B, GO Bonds

5.50%

01/01/2037

615

 

717,348

Series 2005 D, Ref. GO Bonds

5.50%

01/01/2040

385

 

446,615

Series 2007 E, Ref. GO Bonds

5.50%

01/01/2042

310

 

358,500

Series 2012 A, GO Bonds

5.00%

01/01/2033

1,580

 

1,683,269

Series 2012, RB

5.00%

01/01/2042

2,030

 

2,150,602

Series 2014, RB

5.00%

11/01/2044

790

 

894,549

Series 2014, Ref. RB

5.00%

01/01/2029

1,000

 

1,097,950

Series 2015 A, GO Bonds

5.50%

01/01/2033

3,085

 

3,614,386

Series 2017 A, Ref. GO Bonds

6.00%

01/01/2038

1,850

 

2,331,721

Chicago (City of), IL (Midway Airport);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 B, Ref. RB

5.00%

01/01/2021

3,200

 

3,310,080

Series 2014 A, Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

01/01/2041

1,125

 

1,260,563

Chicago (City of), IL (O'Hare International Airport);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2015 C, RB (h)

5.00%

01/01/2046

775

 

885,600

Series 2015 D, RB

5.00%

01/01/2046

540

 

627,626

Series 2017 D, RB (e)(h)

5.00%

01/01/2042

2,500

 

3,000,375

Series 2017 D, RB

5.25%

01/01/2042

1,240

 

1,539,398

Chicago (City of), IL Board of Education;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 H, GO Bonds

5.00%

12/01/2046

1,825

 

2,179,999

Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds (INS-AGM)(d)

5.00%

12/01/2031

625

 

782,375

Series 2018 C, Ref. GO Bonds

5.00%

12/01/2022

950

 

1,044,193

Series 2018 C, Ref. GO Bonds

5.00%

12/01/2023

500

 

564,775

Chicago (City of), IL Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (Green Bonds); Series 2016 E, GO

 

 

 

 

 

Bonds

5.00%

12/01/2045

1,605

 

1,943,382

Chicago (City of), IL Transit Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011, RB (e)(k)

5.25%

12/01/2036

8,970

 

9,632,704

Series 2014, RB

5.00%

12/01/2044

3,380

 

3,929,385

Cook (County of), IL Forest Preserve District;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012 B, Ref. GO Bonds (e)

5.00%

12/15/2032

2,540

 

2,732,405

Series 2012 B, Ref. GO Bonds (e)

5.00%

12/15/2037

2,540

 

2,721,331

Illinois (State of);

 

 

 

 

 

First Series 2001, GO Bonds (INS-NATL)(d)

6.00%

11/01/2026

2,000

 

2,410,800

Series 2006, GO Bonds

5.50%

01/01/2030

975

 

1,297,608

Series 2012 A, GO Bonds

5.00%

01/01/2031

1,115

 

1,186,784

Series 2013, GO Bonds (INS -AGM)(d)

5.25%

07/01/2029

1,960

 

2,209,430

Series 2014, GO Bonds

5.00%

05/01/2029

1,000

 

1,142,540

Series 2014, GO Bonds

5.00%

05/01/2036

750

 

848,663

Series 2017 D, GO Bonds

5.00%

11/01/2024

4,950

 

5,779,966

Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds

5.00%

10/01/2021

790

 

838,956

Series 2018 A, Ref. GO Bonds

5.00%

10/01/2022

555

 

609,124

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Benedictine University);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 A, RB

5.00%

10/01/2020

1,000

 

1,016,260

Series 2013 A, RB

5.38%

10/01/2022

1,180

 

1,201,441

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Centegra Health System); Series 2014 A, RB

5.00%

09/01/2039

1,300

 

1,497,743

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

12

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Illinois–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (CITGO Petroleum Corp.); Series 2002, RB (h)

8.00%

06/01/2032

$ 340

$

341,901

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Lutheran Communities Obligated Group);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/01/2035

570

 

640,144

Series 2019 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/01/2040

580

 

644,339

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (OSF Healthcare System);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2010, Ref. RB (b)(c)

6.00%

05/15/2020

1,685

 

1,702,170

Series 2010, Ref. RB

6.00%

05/15/2039

270

 

273,173

Series 2015 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/15/2045

2,165

 

2,515,795

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Peace Village); Series 2013, RB (b)(c)

6.25%

08/15/2023

1,000

 

1,168,310

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (Rush University Medical Center); Series 2015 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/15/2038

1,870

 

2,170,303

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (The University of Chicago Medical Center); Series 2011 C, RB (e)

5.50%

08/15/2041

1,440

 

1,502,928

Illinois (State of) Finance Authority (University of Chicago); Series 2013 A, RB (e)

5.25%

10/01/2052

3,390

 

3,756,832

Illinois (State of) Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority; Series 2002, RB (INS-AGM)(d)(g)

0.00%

12/15/2029

2,500

 

2,123,224

Illinois (State of) Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Expansion);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2002 A, RB (INS -NATL)(d)(i)

5.75%

06/15/2026

8,480

 

9,324,014

Series 2010, RB (b)(c)

5.50%

06/15/2020

560

 

567,392

Series 2010, RB (b)

5.50%

06/15/2050

1,740

 

1,762,968

Illinois (State of) Sports Facilities Authority; Series 2014, Ref. RB (INS -AGM)(d)

5.00%

06/15/2027

3,500

 

4,049,605

Illinois (State of) Toll Highway Authority; Series 2013 A, RB (e)

5.00%

01/01/2038

10,050

 

11,103,743

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago; Series 2007 B, Ref. GO Bonds

5.25%

12/01/2035

3,160

 

4,633,508

Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority; Series 2010, RB (b)(c)

5.50%

06/01/2021

4,275

 

4,524,916

Sales Tax Securitization Corp.; Series 2018 A, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

01/01/2048

3,960

 

4,828,943

 

 

 

 

 

128,198,289

Indiana–3.34%

 

 

 

 

 

Indiana (State of) Finance Authority (CWA Authority); Series 2011 B, RB

5.25%

10/01/2031

3,000

 

3,201,090

Indiana (State of) Finance Authority (Ohio River Bridges East End Crossing);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 A, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2035

500

 

556,845

Series 2013 A, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2048

525

 

581,742

Series 2013, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2040

3,480

 

3,866,141

Indiana (State of) Finance Authority (Ohio Valley Electric Corp.); Series 2012 A, RB

5.00%

06/01/2039

2,690

 

2,832,113

Indiana (State of) Municipal Power Agency; Series 2013 A, RB (b)(c)

5.25%

07/01/2023

1,000

 

1,147,970

Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011 K, RB

5.00%

06/01/2027

3,000

 

3,147,630

Series 2013 F, RB (e)

5.00%

02/01/2030

4,500

 

5,021,370

Valparaiso (City of), IN (Pratt Paper, LLC); Series 2013, RB (h)

5.88%

01/01/2024

835

 

918,533

Whiting (City of), IN (BP Products North America); Series 2019, Ref. RB (c)(h)

5.00%

06/05/2026

3,000

 

3,672,300

 

 

 

 

 

24,945,734

Iowa–1.12%

 

 

 

 

 

Iowa (State of) Finance Authority (Iowa Fertilizer Co.);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013, RB (f)

5.88%

12/01/2027

1,000

 

1,041,940

Series 2013, Ref. RB (c)

5.25%

12/01/2037

1,160

 

1,307,297

Series 2019, Ref. RB

3.13%

12/01/2022

555

 

577,627

Iowa (State of) Finance Authority (Lifespace Communities, Inc.); Series 2018 A, RB

5.00%

05/15/2043

790

 

918,099

Iowa (State of) Tobacco Settlement Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2005 C, RB

5.50%

06/01/2042

1,620

 

1,637,253

Series 2005 C, RB

5.63%

06/01/2046

1,030

 

1,040,969

Series 2005 E, RB (g)

0.00%

06/01/2046

11,725

 

1,866,972

 

 

 

 

 

8,390,157

Kansas–0.37%

 

 

 

 

 

Wichita (City of), KS (Presbyterian Manors, Inc.);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 IV-A, RB

6.38%

05/15/2043

1,500

 

1,676,640

Series 2018 I, Ref. RB

5.00%

05/15/2047

1,000

 

1,106,900

 

 

 

 

 

2,783,540

Kentucky–3.16%

 

 

 

 

 

Kentucky (Commonwealth of) Economic Development Finance Authority (Catholic Health Initiatives);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011 B, RB (SIFMA Municipal Swap Index + 1.40%)(c)(j)

2.55%

02/01/2025

670

 

681,966

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

13

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Kentucky–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Kentucky (State of) Economic Development Finance Authority (Next Generation Kentucky

 

 

 

 

 

Information Highway);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2015 A, RB

5.00%

07/01/2040

$ 1,220

$

1,365,595

Series 2015 A, RB

5.00%

01/01/2045

895

 

998,963

Kentucky (State of) Economic Development Finance Authority (Owensboro Health, Inc.);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

06/01/2045

935

 

1,096,951

Kentucky (State of) Economic Development Finance Authority (Owensboro Medical Health System,

 

 

 

 

 

Inc.);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2010 A, RB (b)(c)

6.00%

06/01/2020

1,900

 

1,923,674

Series 2010 A, RB (b)(c)

6.38%

06/01/2020

1,625

 

1,646,726

Series 2010 A, RB (b)(c)

6.50%

06/01/2020

2,050

 

2,077,983

Kentucky (State of) Municipal Power Agency (Prarie State); Series 2019 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

09/01/2037

1,190

 

1,460,356

Kentucky (State of) Turnpike Authority (Revitalization); Series 2012 A, RB (b)(c)

5.00%

07/01/2022

1,860

 

2,040,699

Kentucky Bond Development Corp; Series 2020, RB (INS-BAM)(d)(e)

5.00%

09/01/2044

3,640

 

4,660,074

Louisville (City of) & Jefferson (County of), KY Metropolitan Government (Norton Healthcare, Inc.);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 A, RB

5.50%

10/01/2033

3,000

 

3,445,680

Warren (County of), KY (Bowling Green-Warren County Community Hospital Corp.); Series 2013, Ref.

 

 

 

 

 

RB

5.00%

04/01/2035

2,000

 

2,188,840

 

 

 

 

 

23,587,507

Louisiana–1.98%

 

 

 

 

 

Jefferson Sales Tax District; Series 2019 B, RB (INS-AGM)(d)

4.00%

12/01/2039

1,000

 

1,196,200

Lafayette (City of), LA Public Trust Financing Authority (Ragin' Cajun Facilities, Inc. - Housing &

 

 

 

 

 

Parking); Series 2010, RB (b)(c)

5.25%

10/01/2020

2,450

 

2,513,136

Louisiana (State of) Energy & Power Authority (LEPA Unit No. 1);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 A, RB (INS -AGM)(d)

5.25%

06/01/2028

2,000

 

2,263,440

Series 2013 A, RB (INS -AGM)(d)

5.25%

06/01/2031

2,000

 

2,264,240

Louisiana (State of) Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority

 

 

 

 

 

(St. John the Baptist); Series 2019, RB (f)

3.90%

11/01/2044

930

 

979,690

New Orleans (City of), LA; Series 2014, Ref. RB

5.00%

12/01/2021

1,000

 

1,064,490

Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 A, Ref. RB

5.50%

05/15/2030

770

 

783,706

Series 2013 A, Ref. RB

5.25%

05/15/2031

770

 

805,967

Series 2013 A, Ref. RB

5.25%

05/15/2032

1,465

 

1,584,412

Series 2013 A, Ref. RB

5.25%

05/15/2033

1,235

 

1,334,418

 

 

 

 

 

14,789,699

Maryland–0.98%

 

 

 

 

 

Howard (County of), MD (Downtown Columbia);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 A, RB (f)

4.38%

02/15/2039

1,000

 

1,086,900

Series 2017 A, RB (f)

4.50%

02/15/2047

500

 

542,000

Maryland (State of) Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority (LifeBridge Health);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2016, Ref. RB

5.00%

07/01/2047

705

 

849,448

Maryland (State of) Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority (Peninsula Regional Medical

 

 

 

 

 

Center); Series 2015, Ref. RB

5.00%

07/01/2045

1,435

 

1,641,195

Maryland Economic Development Corp. (Terminal); Series 2010 B, RB (b)(c)

5.75%

06/01/2020

2,440

 

2,469,573

Prince Georges (County of), MD (Collington Episcopal Life Care Community, Inc.); Series 2017, Ref.

 

 

 

 

 

RB

5.00%

04/01/2028

670

 

754,862

 

 

 

 

 

7,343,978

Massachusetts–3.52%

 

 

 

 

 

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of) Transportation Fund Revenue; Series 2016 B, RB

4.00%

06/01/2046

2,385

 

2,713,510

Massachusetts (State of) (Consolidated Loan of 2019); Series 2019, GO Bonds

5.00%

05/01/2047

3,000

 

3,865,410

Massachusetts (State of) Development Finance Agency (Emerson College); Series 2016 A, RB

5.00%

01/01/2047

1,550

 

1,846,779

Massachusetts (State of) Development Finance Agency (Partners Healthcare); Series 2012, RB (b)(c)

5.00%

07/01/2021

5,620

 

5,933,371

Massachusetts (State of) Development Finance Agency (Tufts Medical Center); Series 2011 I, RB

 

 

 

 

 

(b)(c)

6.75%

01/01/2021

1,225

 

1,285,625

 

 

Massachusetts (State of) Port Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019 A, Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2037

1,000

 

1,286,350

Series 2019 C, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2044

2,000

 

2,528,960

Massachusetts (State of) Port Authority (Bosfuel); Series 2019 A, Ref. RB (h)

4.00%

07/01/2044

1,000

 

1,150,730

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

14

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Massachusetts–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Massachusetts (State of) School Building Authority; Series 2011 B, RB (e)

5.00%

10/15/2035

$ 5,325

$

5,690,615

 

 

 

 

 

26,301,350

Michigan–3.92%

 

 

 

 

 

Detroit Downtown Development Authority; Series 2018 A, RB (INS-AGM)(d)(e)(k)

5.00%

07/01/2038

1,500

 

1,698,030

Grand Rapids Economic Development Corp. (Beacon Hill at Eastgate); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/01/2052

1,185

 

1,282,976

Lansing (City of), MI Board of Water & Light; Series 2011 A, RB (b)(c)

5.00%

07/01/2021

3,400

 

3,589,584

Michigan (State of) Building Authority (Facilities Program); Series 2016 I, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

04/15/2041

2,655

 

3,232,622

Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Beaumont Health Credit Group); Series 2016, RB

5.00%

11/01/2044

1,710

 

2,002,136

Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Bronson Healthcare Group); Series 2020 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

05/15/2036

1,585

 

1,904,758

Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Detroit Water & Sewerage Department);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2014 C-1, Ref. RB

5.00%

07/01/2044

1,130

 

1,221,925

Series 2014 C-6, Ref. RB

5.00%

07/01/2033

565

 

654,168

Series 2014 D-4, Ref. RB

5.00%

07/01/2029

565

 

661,073

Series 2015, Ref. RB

5.00%

07/01/2035

1,165

 

1,374,642

Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (MidMichigan Health Credit Group); Series 2014, Ref. RB

5.00%

06/01/2039

2,070

 

2,352,100

Michigan (State of) Finance Authority (Trinity Health Credit); Series 2017 MI, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

12/01/2046

3,575

 

4,390,744

Michigan (State of) Strategic Fund (Canterbury Health Care, Inc.); Series 2016, RB (f)

5.00%

07/01/2026

700

 

749,952

Michigan (State of) Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority; Series 2007 A, RB

6.00%

06/01/2048

3,180

 

3,245,444

Western Michigan University;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013, Ref. RB

5.25%

11/15/2030

400

 

460,788

Series 2013, Ref. RB

5.25%

11/15/2031

350

 

403,281

 

 

 

 

 

29,224,223

Minnesota–0.06%

 

 

 

 

 

Bethel (City of), MN (Spectrum High School); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB

4.25%

07/01/2047

425

 

459,446

Missouri–1.47%

 

 

 

 

 

Kansas (City of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Downtown Redevelopment District);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011 A, Ref. RB

5.50%

09/01/2028

1,970

 

2,102,423

Kansas (City of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Kansas City International Airport);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019 A, RB (h)

5.00%

03/01/2044

950

 

1,185,695

Series 2019 B, RB (h)

5.00%

03/01/2046

1,580

 

1,966,357

Kirkwood (City of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Aberdeen Heights); Series 2017 A, Ref. RB

5.25%

05/15/2050

465

 

537,163

Missouri (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Lutheran Senior Services); Series 2019

 

 

 

 

 

A, RB

5.00%

02/01/2034

330

 

380,243

Missouri (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (St. Louis College of Pharmacy);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013, RB

5.00%

05/01/2020

1,000

 

1,005,350

St. Louis (County of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Friendship Village of Sunset Hills);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 A, RB

5.50%

09/01/2033

1,375

 

1,532,699

St. Louis (County of), MO Industrial Development Authority (Friendship Village West County);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2018 A, RB

5.00%

09/01/2038

1,975

 

2,267,636

 

 

 

 

 

10,977,566

Nebraska–1.83%

 

 

 

 

 

Central Plains Energy Project (No. 3); Series 2012, RB (l)

5.00%

09/01/2032

5,500

 

6,009,245

Lincoln (County of), NE Hospital Authority No. 1 (Great Plains Regional Medical Center);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012, Ref. RB (b)(c)

5.00%

11/01/2021

2,500

 

2,667,725

Omaha (City of), NE Public Power District; Series 2011 B, RB (e)

5.00%

02/01/2036

4,800

 

4,986,192

 

 

 

 

 

13,663,162

Nevada–0.30%

 

 

 

 

 

Clark (County of), NV; Series 2013 A, Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2028

2,000

 

2,208,880

New Jersey–5.63%

 

 

 

 

 

Garden State Preservation Trust; Series 2005 A, RB (INS-AGM)(d)

5.75%

11/01/2028

2,485

 

3,183,062

New Jersey (State of) Economic Development Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2005 N-1, Ref. RB (INS-NATL)(d)(e)(k)

5.50%

09/01/2022

3,555

 

3,934,247

Series 2005, Ref. RB (INS-AMBAC)(d)

5.50%

09/01/2024

2,000

 

2,370,140

Series 2013, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2023

1,750

 

1,972,443

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

15

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

New Jersey–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

New Jersey (State of) Economic Development Authority (Provident Group-Montclair Properties LLC-

 

 

 

 

 

Montclair State University Student Housing); Series 2010 A, RB (b)(c)

5.75%

06/01/2020

$ 1,990

$

2,014,378

New Jersey (State of) Economic Development Authority (The Goethals Bridge Replacement);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013, RB (h)

5.50%

01/01/2026

1,000

 

1,167,380

Series 2013, RB (h)

5.38%

01/01/2043

1,000

 

1,138,800

New Jersey (State of) Transportation Trust Fund Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 1999 A, RB

5.75%

06/15/2020

2,570

 

2,604,772

Series 2006 C, RB (INS-AGC)(d)(g)

0.00%

12/15/2026

8,435

 

7,545,782

Series 2011 A, RB (b)(c)

5.50%

06/15/2021

1,000

 

1,060,270

Series 2011 B, RB

5.50%

06/15/2031

1,005

 

1,060,456

Series 2018 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

12/15/2034

1,000

 

1,252,430

Series 2018 A, Ref. RN (e)(k)

5.00%

06/15/2029

1,505

 

1,812,216

Series 2018 A, Ref. RN (e)(k)

5.00%

06/15/2030

515

 

618,005

Series 2018 A, Ref. RN

5.00%

06/15/2031

960

 

1,148,995

Series 2019, Ref. RB

5.00%

12/15/2031

875

 

1,124,541

Subseries 2016 A-1, RN

5.00%

06/15/2028

935

 

1,128,844

Salem (County of), NJ Pollution Control Financing Authority (Chambers); Series 2014 A, Ref. PCR (h)

5.00%

12/01/2023

3,645

 

3,942,213

Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.; Series 2018 A, Ref. RB

5.25%

06/01/2046

2,370

 

2,942,497

 

 

 

 

 

42,021,471

New Mexico–0.49%

 

 

 

 

 

Farmington (City of), NM (Public Service Co. of New Mexico San Juan); Series 2010 C, Ref. PCR

5.90%

06/01/2040

2,650

 

2,682,621

Santa Fe (City of), NM (El Castillo Retirement); Series 2019 A, RB

5.00%

05/15/2044

850

 

969,825

 

 

 

 

 

3,652,446

New York–15.70%

 

 

 

 

 

Erie Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.; Series 2005 A, RB

5.00%

06/01/2045

2,460

 

2,461,328

Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp.; Series 2017 A, Ref. RB (INS-AGM)(d)

4.00%

02/15/2047

3,135

 

3,599,356

Metropolitan Transportation Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012 F, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/15/2024

1,500

 

1,665,690

Series 2013 A, RB

5.00%

11/15/2038

1,680

 

1,889,126

New York & New Jersey (States of) Port Authority; Two Hundred Seventh Series 2018, Ref. RB (e)(h)

5.00%

09/15/2028

3,105

 

4,031,656

New York (City of), NY Municipal Water Finance Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2010 FF, RB

5.00%

06/15/2031

2,400

 

2,428,296

Series 2012 FF, RB (e)

5.00%

06/15/2045

1,000

 

1,089,760

Series 2013 DD, RB

5.00%

06/15/2035

2,900

 

3,285,410

New York (City of), NY Transitional Finance Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 I, RB

5.00%

05/01/2038

1,535

 

1,723,590

Subseries 2009 A-1, RB (e)

5.00%

05/01/2030

2,533

 

2,533,000

Subseries 2011 D-1, RB (e)

5.00%

11/01/2033

1,725

 

1,842,852

Subseries 2012 E-1, RB (e)

5.00%

02/01/2037

7,155

 

7,720,531

New York (Counties of), NY Tobacco Trust V; Series 2005 S-2, RB (g)

0.00%

06/01/2050

10,140

 

1,647,446

New York (Counties of), NY Tobacco Trust VI; Subseries 2016 A-1, Ref. RB

5.75%

06/01/2043

2,995

 

3,831,234

New York (State of) Dormitory Authority; Series 2019 A, RB

5.00%

10/01/2033

1,000

 

1,272,820

New York (State of) Dormitory Authority (City of New York); Series 2005 A, RB (INS -AMBAC)(d)

5.50%

05/15/2029

1,805

 

2,492,506

New York (State of) Dormitory Authority (General Purpose);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011 A, RB (e)

5.00%

03/15/2030

5,805

 

6,052,293

Series 2013 A, RB (b)(c)

5.00%

02/15/2023

2,050

 

2,306,927

New York (State of) Dormitory Authority (New York University); Series 1998 A, RB (INS-NATL)(d)

5.75%

07/01/2027

1,000

 

1,211,760

New York (State of) Thruway Authority; Series 2011 A-1, RB (e)

5.00%

04/01/2029

4,860

 

5,074,812

New York City (City of), NY Water & Sewer System; Series 2020 DD-3, Ref. RB

4.00%

06/15/2042

6,750

 

8,196,525

New York City Transitional Finance Authority Future Tax Secured Revenue; Series 2019 XM0802,

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue Ctfs. (e)

4.00%

11/01/2045

3,165

 

3,780,276

New York City Water & Sewer System; Series 2020, RB (e)

4.00%

06/15/2050

2,940

 

3,524,090

New York Liberty Development Corp. (3 World Trade Center); Series 2014, Class 1, Ref. RB (f)

5.00%

11/15/2044

4,840

 

5,453,373

New York Liberty Development Corp. (7 World Trade Center);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012, Class 1, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

09/15/2040

5,100

 

5,520,240

Series 2012, Class 2, Ref. RB

5.00%

09/15/2043

1,770

 

1,906,467

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

16

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

New York–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

New York State Thruway Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2019 XM0794, Revenue Ctfs. (e)

4.00%

01/01/2050

$ 5,110

$

6,022,492

Series 2020-XM0811, RB (INS-AGM)(d)(e)

4.00%

01/01/2050

2,490

 

2,946,840

New York Transportation Development Corp. (American Airlines, Inc.); Series 2016, Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

08/01/2031

1,545

 

1,617,816

New York Transportation Development Corp. (Delta Air Lines, Inc. LaGuardia Airport Terminal C&D

 

 

 

 

 

Redevelopment);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2018, RB (h)

5.00%

01/01/2031

3,160

 

3,934,769

Series 2018, RB (h)

4.00%

01/01/2036

1,425

 

1,620,496

New York Transportation Development Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevelopment);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2016 A, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2046

1,620

 

1,864,847

Series 2016 A, RB (h)

5.25%

01/01/2050

2,985

 

3,459,048

Port Authority of New York & New Jersey; Series 2019 XL0122, Revenue Ctfs. (e)

4.00%

11/01/2049

3,495

 

4,182,187

Rockland Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.; Series 2001, RB

5.75%

08/15/2043

1,500

 

1,539,120

Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority; Series 1992 Y, RB (b)

6.13%

01/01/2021

295

 

308,434

TSASC, Inc.; Series 2016 B, Ref. RB

5.00%

06/01/2048

2,985

 

3,125,056

 

 

 

 

 

117,162,469

North Carolina–4.10%

 

 

 

 

 

Charlotte (City of), NC (Charlotte Douglas International Airport);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 A, RB (e)

5.00%

07/01/2047

4,000

 

4,932,440

Series 2019, RB

4.00%

07/01/2044

640

 

760,198

Series 2017 A, RB (e)

5.00%

07/01/2042

1,775

 

2,203,361

North Carolina (State of) Department of Transportation (I-77 HOT Lanes);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2015, RB (h)

5.00%

12/31/2037

750

 

868,193

Series 2015, RB (h)

5.00%

06/30/2054

1,115

 

1,269,963

North Carolina (State of) Medical Care Commission (Duke University Health System); Series 2012 A,

 

 

 

 

 

RB (e)

5.00%

06/01/2042

5,110

 

5,588,807

North Carolina (State of) Turnpike Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011, RB (e)

5.00%

07/01/2036

1,755

 

1,844,242

Series 2011, RB (e)

5.00%

07/01/2041

2,430

 

2,551,257

North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency; Series 2015 B, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

01/01/2040

8,820

 

10,544,928

 

 

 

 

 

30,563,389

North Dakota–0.61%

 

 

 

 

 

Ward (County of), ND (Trinity Obligated Group);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 C, RB

5.00%

06/01/2043

2,040

 

2,395,551

Series 2017 C, RB

5.00%

06/01/2048

1,815

 

2,116,254

 

 

 

 

 

4,511,805

Ohio–6.78%

 

 

 

 

 

Akron, Bath & Copley Joint Township Hospital District (Summa Health Obligated Group);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2016, Ref. RB

5.25%

11/15/2046

775

 

931,380

Allen (County of), OH (Catholic Health Partners); Series 2012 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

05/01/2042

1,450

 

1,549,847

American Municipal Power, Inc. (Combined Hydroelectric); Series 2016 A, Ref. RB

4.00%

02/15/2035

1,000

 

1,121,560

American Municipal Power, Inc. (Greenup Hydroelectric); Series 2016 A, RB

5.00%

02/15/2046

490

 

577,690

Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2007 A-2, RB

5.75%

06/01/2034

235

 

235,284

Series 2007 A-2, RB

5.88%

06/01/2047

6,955

 

6,963,624

Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB

4.00%

06/01/2038

480

 

571,925

Series 2020 A-2, Ref. RB

4.00%

06/01/2048

445

 

510,602

Series 2020 B-2, Ref. RB

5.00%

06/01/2055

2,500

 

2,827,200

Series 2020 B-3, Ref. RB (g)

0.00%

06/01/2057

3,400

 

478,652

Cleveland (City of) & Cuyahoga (County of), OH Port Authority (Constellation Schools); Series 2014

 

 

 

 

 

A, Ref. RB

6.50%

01/01/2034

1,000

 

1,068,800

Cuyahoga (County of), OH (Metrohealth System);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017, Ref. RB

5.25%

02/15/2047

2,500

 

2,976,675

Series 2017, Ref. RB

5.50%

02/15/2052

1,555

 

1,870,245

Franklin (County of), OH (First Community Village Obligated Group); Series 2013, Ref. RB

5.25%

07/01/2033

2,000

 

2,038,460

Franklin (County of), OH (OhioHealth Corp.); Series 2011 A, RB (e)

5.00%

11/15/2036

3,390

 

3,597,265

Gallia (County of), OH (Holzer Health System Obligated Group); Series 2012, Ref. RB

8.00%

07/01/2042

985

 

1,106,992

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

17

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Ohio–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Hamilton (County of), OH (Christ Hospital); Series 2012, RB (b)(c)

5.50%

06/01/2022

$ 3,000

$

3,307,320

Hamilton (County of), OH (Cincinnati Childrens Hospital); Series 2019 CC, RB

5.00%

11/15/2049

1,190

 

1,936,237

Hamilton (County of), OH (Life Enriching Communities); Series 2016, Ref.RB

5.00%

01/01/2046

1,370

 

1,570,623

Hancock (County of), OH (Blanchard Valley Regional Health Center); Series 2011 A, RB (b)(c)

6.25%

06/01/2021

2,470

 

2,635,367

Lucas (County of), OH (ProMedica Healthcare System); Series 2018 A, Ref. RB

5.25%

11/15/2048

1,585

 

1,930,197

Montgomery (County of), OH (Trousdale Foundation Properties); Series 2018 A, RB (f)

6.00%

04/01/2038

1,425

 

1,627,421

Ohio (State of) (Portsmouth Bypass); Series 2015, RB (INS-AGM)(d)(h)

5.00%

12/31/2039

735

 

853,960

Ohio (State of) Air Quality Development Authority (Pratt Paper LLC); Series 2017, RB (f)(h)

4.25%

01/15/2038

555

 

630,325

Ohio (State of) Higher Educational Facility Commission (Summa Health System);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2010, RB (b)(c)

5.75%

05/15/2020

3,055

 

3,084,664

Series 2010, RB

5.75%

11/15/2040

1,780

 

1,796,465

Ohio (State of) Turnpike Commission (Infrastructure); Series 2013 A, RB

5.00%

02/15/2028

2,500

 

2,787,625

 

 

 

 

 

50,586,405

Oklahoma–0.48%

 

 

 

 

 

Oklahoma (State of) Development Finance Authority (OU Medicine); Series 2018 B, RB

5.50%

08/15/2057

2,055

 

2,542,364

Oklahoma (State of) Development Finance Authority (Provident Oklahoma Education Resources,

 

 

 

 

 

Inc.-Cross Village Student Housing); Series 2017, RB (Acquired 12/24/2018;

 

 

 

 

 

Cost $1,666,547)

5.00%

08/01/2052

1,785

 

999,600

 

 

 

 

 

3,541,964

Pennsylvania–2.17%

 

 

 

 

 

Allegheny (County of), PA Hospital Development Authority (Allegheny Health Network Obligated

 

 

 

 

 

Group Issue); Series 2018 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

04/01/2047

1,000

 

1,226,030

Beaver (County of), PA Industrial Development Authority (FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2006 A, Ref. PCR (c)(m)

4.38%

07/01/2022

850

 

911,625

Pennsylvania (State of) Turnpike Commission;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012 A, RB

5.00%

12/01/2020

1,370

 

1,412,292

Series 2018 B, RB

5.25%

12/01/2048

1,105

 

1,392,289

Subseries 2010 B-2, RB (b)(c)(i)

5.75%

12/01/2020

2,850

 

2,955,410

Subseries 2010 B-2, RB (b)(c)(i)

6.00%

12/01/2020

1,750

 

1,818,124

Philadelphia (City of), PA;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 A, RB

5.00%

10/01/2052

1,010

 

1,232,352

Series 2017 B, Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2047

3,595

 

4,328,272

Philadelphia (City of), PA Industrial Development Authority (Thomas Jefferson University);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

09/01/2047

775

 

926,830

 

 

 

 

 

16,203,224

Puerto Rico–2.49%

 

 

 

 

 

Children's Trust Fund;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2002, RB

5.50%

05/15/2039

3,255

 

3,352,715

Series 2002, RB

5.63%

05/15/2043

1,405

 

1,454,203

Series 2005 A, RB (g)

0.00%

05/15/2050

5,450

 

790,577

Puerto Rico (Commonwealth of) Electric Power Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2007 VV, Ref. RB (INS-NATL)(d)

5.25%

07/01/2033

690

 

751,769

Series 2007 VV, Ref. RB (INS -NATL)(d)

5.25%

07/01/2035

610

 

663,143

Puerto Rico (Commonwealth of) Highway & Transportation Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2007 N, Ref. RB (INS -AGM)(d)

5.50%

07/01/2029

600

 

686,988

Series 2007 N, Ref. RB (INS-NATL)(d)

5.25%

07/01/2032

725

 

791,417

Series 2007 N, Ref. RB (INS-AGC)(d)

5.25%

07/01/2034

1,135

 

1,284,741

Puerto Rico (Commonwealth of) Public Buildings Authority; Series 2007 M-3, Ref. RB (INS -NATL)(d)

6.00%

07/01/2024

1,910

 

1,964,645

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp.;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2018 A-1, RB (g)

0.00%

07/01/2029

1,355

 

1,099,298

Series 2018 A-1, RB (g)

0.00%

07/01/2031

330

 

249,084

Series 2018 A-1, RB (g)

0.00%

07/01/2033

2,000

 

1,407,520

Series 2018 A-1, RB

4.50%

07/01/2034

700

 

770,413

Series 2018 A-1, RB (g)

0.00%

07/01/2046

4,000

 

1,190,080

Series 2018 A-1, RB

4.75%

07/01/2053

475

 

537,757

Series 2019 A-2, RB

4.33%

07/01/2040

1,425

 

1,583,745

 

 

 

 

 

18,578,095

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

18

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

South Carolina–1.63%

 

 

 

 

 

South Carolina (State of) Jobs-Economic Development Authority (Palmetto Health Alliance);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 A, Ref. RB (b)(c)

5.25%

08/01/2023

$ 1,400

$

1,609,720

South Carolina (State of) Ports Authority; Series 2015, RB (b)(c)(h)

5.25%

07/01/2025

4,235

 

5,178,811

South Carolina (State of) Public Service Authority; Series 2014, Ref. RB

5.00%

12/01/2046

1,120

 

1,294,641

South Carolina (State of) Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper Revenue Obligations);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013 E, RB

5.50%

12/01/2053

3,595

 

4,106,461

 

 

 

 

 

12,189,633

South Dakota–0.21%

 

 

 

 

 

South Dakota (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Sanford Obligated Group);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2015, Ref. RB

5.00%

11/01/2045

1,315

 

1,527,517

Tennessee–0.70%

 

 

 

 

 

Greeneville (Town of), TN Health & Educational Facilities Board (Ballad Health); Series 2018 A, Ref.

 

 

 

 

 

RB

5.00%

07/01/2036

1,785

 

2,205,350

Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp.;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2006 A, RB

5.25%

09/01/2023

1,280

 

1,453,990

Series 2006 A, RB

5.25%

09/01/2026

1,275

 

1,559,593

 

 

 

 

 

5,218,933

Texas–18.03%

 

 

 

 

 

Alamo Community College District; Series 2012, Ref. GO Bonds (e)

5.00%

08/15/2034

5,105

 

5,600,696

Austin (City of), TX; Series 2019 B, RB (h)

5.00%

11/15/2044

2,500

 

3,170,425

Bexar County Health Facilities Development Corp. (Army Retirement Residence); Series 2010, RB

 

 

 

 

 

(b)(c)

6.20%

07/01/2020

2,225

 

2,263,626

 

 

Clifton Higher Education Finance Corp. (International Leadership of Texas); Series 2018 D, RB

5.75%

08/15/2033

1,580

 

1,848,869

Dallas-Fort Worth (Cities of), TX International Airport; Series 2014 A, Ref. RB (h)

5.25%

11/01/2026

2,000

 

2,305,440

El Paso Independent School District; Series 2020, GO Bonds (CEP-Texas Permanent School Fund)

4.00%

08/15/2045

1,800

 

2,140,038

Grand Parkway Transportation Corp.; Series 2013 A, RB (b)(c)

5.50%

10/01/2023

1,000

 

1,160,060

Harris (County of), TX; Series 2007 C, Ref. GO Bonds (INS-AGM)(d)

5.25%

08/15/2031

5,395

 

7,712,854

Houston (City of), TX;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2011 D, RB (e)

5.00%

11/15/2033

2,700

 

2,894,886

Series 2011 D, RB (e)

5.00%

11/15/2036

4,005

 

4,294,081

Houston (City of), TX Airport System (United Airlines, Inc. Airport Improvement); Series 2015 C,

 

 

 

 

 

Ref. RB (h)

5.00%

07/15/2020

775

 

785,323

Houston (City of), TX Airport System (United Airlines, Inc. Terminal E); Series 2014, Ref. RB (h)

4.75%

07/01/2024

500

 

545,085

Houston (City of), TX Convention & Entertainment Facilities Department; Series 2001 B, RB (INS

 

 

 

 

 

-AGM)(d)(g)

0.00%

09/01/2025

4,650

 

4,326,313

Keller Independent School District/TX; Series 2020-XM0812, GO Bonds (CEP -Texas Permanent

 

 

 

 

 

School Fund)(e)

4.00%

02/15/2047

7,770

 

9,156,867

La Vernia Higher Education Finance Corp. (Meridian World School); Series 2015 A, RB (f)

5.50%

08/15/2045

1,205

 

1,354,709

Lower Colorado River Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012 A, Ref. RB (b)(c)

5.00%

05/15/2022

5

 

5,448

Series 2012 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

05/15/2030

2,125

 

2,313,254

Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA Transmission Services Corp.); Series 2011 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

05/15/2041

2,250

 

2,352,352

New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Corp. (Presbyterian Village North);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2018, Ref. RB

5.00%

10/01/2032

205

 

233,747

Series 2018, Ref. RB

5.00%

10/01/2033

1,280

 

1,455,194

New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (4-K Housing, Inc.-Stoney Brook); Series 2017

 

 

 

 

 

A-1, RB

4.75%

07/01/2052

750

 

781,995

New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (CHF-Collegiate Housing College Station I,

 

 

 

 

 

LLC-Texas A&M University); Series 2014 A, RB (INS - AGM)(d)

5.00%

04/01/2046

1,900

 

2,132,788

New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Collegiate Housing - Tarleton State

 

 

 

 

 

University); Series 2014 A, RB

5.00%

04/01/2034

1,000

 

1,098,240

New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Morningside Ministries); Series 2013, RB

6.50%

01/01/2043

1,000

 

1,115,770

North Texas Tollway Authority;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2008 D, Ref. RB (INS-AGC)(d)(g)

0.00%

01/01/2028

18,900

 

16,937,235

Series 2008 D, Ref. RB (INS-AGC)(d)(g)

0.00%

01/01/2031

3,740

 

3,120,918

SA Energy Acquisition Public Facility Corp.; Series 2007, RB

5.50%

08/01/2021

1,500

 

1,593,690

San Antonio (City of), TX; Series 2013, RB

5.00%

02/01/2038

2,495

 

2,802,833

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.; Series 2016 A, Ref. RB (e)

5.00%

02/15/2047

3,260

 

3,897,200

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

19

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Texas–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Air Force Village Obligated Group);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2016, Ref. RB

5.00%

05/15/2037

$ 1,395

$

1,545,869

Series 2016, Ref. RB

5.00%

05/15/2045

1,850

 

2,035,296

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (C.C. Young Memorial Home);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017A, RB

6.38%

02/15/2048

1,765

 

2,019,425

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Texas Health Resources System);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2016 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

02/15/2041

3,900

 

4,708,353

Temple (City of), TX; Series 2018 A, RB (f)

5.00%

08/01/2028

705

 

804,708

Texas (State of) Transportation Commission;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2016 A, GO Bonds

5.00%

04/01/2044

1,555

 

1,875,268

Series 2019, RB (g)

0.00%

08/01/2041

2,000

 

884,920

Texas (State of) Transportation Commission (Central Texas Turnpike System);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2015 B, Ref. RB (g)

0.00%

08/15/2036

3,170

 

1,696,489

Series 2015 B, Ref. RB (g)

0.00%

08/15/2037

970

 

495,282

Series 2015 C, Ref. RB

5.00%

08/15/2042

3,835

 

4,428,236

Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. I; Series 2008 D, RB

6.25%

12/15/2026

4,445

 

5,292,395

Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. III;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012, RB

5.00%

12/15/2028

4,095

 

4,521,167

Series 2012, RB

5.00%

12/15/2029

2,000

 

2,204,680

Series 2012, RB

5.00%

12/15/2031

1,200

 

1,319,700

Series 2012, RB

5.00%

12/15/2032

1,195

 

1,312,803

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp. (Blueridge Transportation Group, LLC SH

 

 

 

 

 

288 Toll Lanes); Series 2016, RB (h)

5.00%

12/31/2055

1,050

 

1,218,409

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp. (NTE Mobility Partners LLC - North Tarrant

 

 

 

 

 

Express Managed Lanes); Series 2019 A, Ref. RB

5.00%

12/31/2033

790

 

1,042,895

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp. (NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC

 

 

 

 

 

Segments 3A and 3B Facility); Series 2013, RB (h)

7.00%

12/31/2038

1,300

 

1,540,578

Travis County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Wayside Schools); Series 2012 A, RB

5.25%

08/15/2042

515

 

532,278

University of Houston; Series 2008, Ref. RB (INS -AGM)(d)(e)

5.00%

02/15/2033

1,326

 

1,328,639

Ysleta Independent School District; Series 2020-XL0127, GO Bonds (CEP-Texas Permanent School

 

 

 

 

 

Fund)(e)

4.00%

08/15/2052

3,720

 

4,375,576

 

 

 

 

 

134,582,902

Utah–0.94%

 

 

 

 

 

Salt Lake (City of), UT;

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017 A, RB (e)(h)

5.00%

07/01/2047

2,490

 

3,014,892

Series 2018 A, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2048

1,230

 

1,515,114

Series 2018 A, RB (h)

5.25%

07/01/2048

1,635

 

2,052,383

Salt Lake (City of), UT (IHC Hospitals, Inc.); Series 1991, Ref. RB (b)(n)

12.20%

05/15/2020

400

 

412,472

 

 

 

 

 

6,994,861

Virgin Islands–0.32%

 

 

 

 

 

Virgin Islands (Government of) Public Finance Authority (Matching Fund Loan Note);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2010 A, RB

5.00%

10/01/2025

540

 

543,418

Series 2010 A, RB

5.00%

10/01/2029

1,860

 

1,868,147

 

 

 

 

 

2,411,565

Virginia–1.66%

 

 

 

 

 

Roanoke (City of), VA Economic Development Authority (Richfield Living); Series 2020, RB

5.00%

09/01/2050

300

 

307,887

Virginia (State of) College Building Authority; Series 2019 A, RB

3.00%

02/01/2039

580

 

636,521

Virginia (State of) Small Business Financing Authority (Elizabeth River Crossings Opco, LLC);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012, RB (h)

6.00%

01/01/2037

725

 

800,922

Series 2012, RB (h)

5.50%

01/01/2042

2,930

 

3,187,195

Virginia (State of) Small Business Financing Authority (Express Lanes, LLC);

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2012, RB (h)

5.00%

07/01/2034

3,780

 

4,041,689

Series 2012, RB (h)

5.00%

01/01/2040

1,905

 

2,031,511

Virginia (State of) Small Business Financing Authority (Transform 66 P3); Series 2017, RB (h)

5.00%

12/31/2056

1,170

 

1,387,866

 

 

 

 

 

12,393,591

Washington–2.98%

 

 

 

 

 

Chelan (County of), WA Public Utility District No. 1; Series 2011 A, Ref. RB (h)

5.50%

07/01/2025

925

 

979,381

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

20

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

Principal

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

Maturity

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

Rate

Date

(000)

 

Value

Washington–(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kalispel Tribe of Indians; Series 2018 B, RB (f)

5.25%

01/01/2038

$

1,000

$

1,193,590

 

 

Seattle (Port of), WA; Series 2019, RB (h)

5.00%

04/01/2044

 

1,475

 

1,843,765

 

 

Washington (State of); Series 2019 A, GO Bonds (e)

5.00%

08/01/2042

 

1,770

 

2,254,467

 

 

Washington (State of) Convention Center Public Facilities District;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2018, RB

5.00%

07/01/2043

 

1,105

 

1,386,410

 

 

Series 2018, RB (e)

5.00%

07/01/2048

 

3,955

 

4,919,862

 

 

Series 2018, RB

5.00%

07/01/2048

 

790

 

977,909

 

 

Washington (State of) Health Care Facilities Authority; Series 2019 A-2, Ref. RB (e)(k)

5.00%

08/01/2044

 

3,440

 

3,568,312

 

 

Washington (State of) Health Care Facilities Authority (Catholic Health Initiatives); Series 2011 A,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RB (e)

5.00%

02/01/2041

 

3,000

 

3,112,170

 

 

Washington (State of) Tobacco Settlement Authority; Series 2013, Ref. RB

5.25%

06/01/2031

 

2,000

 

2,019,340

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,255,206

 

West Virginia–0.42%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

West Virginia University; Series 2020, RB (e)

4.00%

10/01/2047

 

2,680

 

3,148,303

 

 

Wisconsin–3.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public Finance Authority (American Dream at Meadowlands);

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2017, RB (f)

6.75%

08/01/2031

 

865

 

1,150,969

 

 

Series 2017, RB (f)

6.75%

12/01/2042

 

2,015

 

2,435,974

 

 

Public Finance Authority (KU Campus Development Corp.); Series 2016, RB (e)

5.00%

03/01/2046

 

3,375

 

4,004,235

 

 

Public Finance Authority (Mallard Creek Stem Academy); Series 2019 A, RB (f)

5.13%

06/15/2039

 

620

 

652,395

 

 

Wisconsin (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Ascension Health Alliance);

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2013, RB

4.00%

11/15/2043

 

2,250

 

2,635,627

 

 

Wisconsin (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Mercy Alliance); Series 2012, RB

5.00%

06/01/2039

 

3,500

 

3,737,300

 

 

Wisconsin (State of) Health & Educational Facilities Authority (Mile Bluff Medical Center, Inc.);

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2014, RB

5.00%

05/01/2026

 

1,100

 

1,218,085

 

 

Series 2014, RB

5.13%

05/01/2029

 

1,000

 

1,109,920

 

 

Wisconsin (State of) Public Finance Authority (Maryland Proton Treatment Center); Series 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A-1, RB (f)

6.38%

01/01/2048

 

615

 

665,006

 

 

Wisconsin (State of) Public Finance Authority (Prime Healthcare Foundation, Inc.);

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 2018 A, RB

5.20%

12/01/2037

 

1,585

 

1,926,631

 

 

Series 2018 A, RB

5.35%

12/01/2045

 

1,585

 

1,913,586

 

 

Wisconsin (State of) Public Finance Authority (Roseman University of Health Sciences); Series 2015,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ref. RB

5.75%

04/01/2035

 

795

 

942,051

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,391,779

 

Wyoming–0.33%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wyoming (State of) Municipal Power Agency; Series 2017 A, Ref. RB (INS-BAM)(d)(e)

5.00%

01/01/2047

 

2,020

 

2,422,465

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN SECURITIES(o)–158.43% (Cost $1,057,753,310)

 

 

 

 

 

1,182,294,205

 

FLOATING RATE NOTE OBLIGATIONS–(27.64)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes with interest and fee rates ranging from 1.63% to 2.07% at 02/29/2020 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

contractual maturities of collateral ranging from 09/01/2022 to 04/01/2056 (See

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note 1J)(p)

 

 

 

 

 

(206,250,000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VARIABLE RATE MUNI TERM PREFERRED SHARES–(31.34)%

 

 

 

 

 

(233,884,736)

OTHER ASSETS LESS LIABILITIES–0.55%

 

 

 

 

 

4,106,362

 

 

NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES–100.00%

 

 

 

 

$

746,265,831

 

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

21

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Investment Abbreviations:

AGC

– Assured Guaranty Corp.

AGM

– Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.

AMBAC – American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp.

BAM

– Build America Mutual Assurance Co.

CEP

– Credit Enhancement Provider

COP

– Certificates of Participation

Ctfs.

– Certificates

GO

– General Obligation

IDR

– Industrial Development Revenue Bonds

INS

– Insurer

NATL

– National Public Finance Guarantee Corp.

PCR

– Pollution Control Revenue Bonds

RB

– Revenue Bonds

Ref.

– Refunding

RN

– Revenue Notes

SIFMA

– Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association

Wts.

– Warrants

Notes to Schedule of Investments:

(a)Calculated as a percentage of net assets. Amounts in excess of 100% are due to the Trust's use of leverage.

(b)Advance refunded; secured by an escrow fund of U.S. Government obligations or other highly rated collateral.

(c)Security has an irrevocable call by the issuer or mandatory put by the holder. Maturity date reflects such call or put.

(d)Principal and/or interest payments are secured by the bond insurance company listed.

(e)Underlying security related to TOB Trusts entered into by the Trust. See Note 1J.

(f)Security purchased or received in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"). The security may be resold pursuant to an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act, typically to qualified institutional buyers. The aggregate value of these securities at February 29, 2020 was $37,335,092, which represented 5.00% of the Trust's Net Assets.

(g)Zero coupon bond issued at a discount.

(h)Security subject to the alternative minimum tax.

(i)Convertible capital appreciation bond. The interest rate shown represents the coupon rate at which the bond will accrue at a specified future date.

(j)Interest or dividend rate is redetermined periodically. Rate shown is the rate in effect on February 29, 2020.

(k)Security is subject to a reimbursement agreement which may require the Trust to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security underlying the TOB Trusts. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Trust could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $13,957,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security underlying the TOB Trusts.

(l)Security subject to crossover refunding.

(m)Defaulted security. Currently, the issuer is in default with respect to principal and/or interest payments. The value of this security at February 29, 2020 represented less than 1% of the Trust's Net Assets.

(n)Current coupon rate for inverse floating rate municipal obligations. This rate resets periodically as the rate on the related security changes. Positions in inverse floating rate municipal obligations have a total value of $412,472, which represented less than 1% of the Trust's Net Assets.

(o)Entities may either issue, guarantee, back or otherwise enhance the credit quality of a security. The entities are not primarily responsible for the issuer's obligation but may be called upon to satisfy issuer's obligations. No concentration of any single entity was greater than 5% each.

(p)Floating rate note obligations related to securities held. The interest and fee rates shown reflect the rates in effect at February 29, 2020. At February 29, 2020, the Trust's investments with a value of $325,570,302 are held by TOB Trusts and serve as collateral for the $206,250,000 in the floating rate note obligations outstanding at that date.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

22

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

February 29, 2020

Assets:

 

 

Investments in securities, at value

 

 

(Cost $1,057,753,310)

$1,182,294,205

Receivable for:

 

 

Investments sold

 

936,109

Interest

 

11,135,011

Investment for trustee deferred compensation and

 

 

retirement plans

 

118,653

Total assets

 

1,194,483,978

Liabilities:

 

 

Floating rate note obligations

 

206,250,000

Variable rate muni term preferred shares ($0.01 par

 

 

value, 2,339 shares issued with liquidation

 

 

preference of $100,000 per share)

 

233,884,736

Payable for:

 

 

Investments purchased

 

6,113,146

Dividends

 

53,810

Amount due custodian

 

1,108,303

Accrued fees to affiliates

 

24,135

Accrued interest expense

 

395,543

Accrued trustees' and officers' fees and benefits

 

2,883

Accrued other operating expenses

 

121,417

Trustee deferred compensation and retirement plans

 

264,174

Total liabilities

 

448,218,147

Net assets applicable to common shares

$

746,265,831

Net assets applicable to common shares

consist of:

 

 

Shares of beneficial interest — common shares

$

649,565,325

Distributable earnings

 

96,700,506

 

$

746,265,831

Common shares outstanding, no par value,

 

 

with an unlimited number of common

 

 

shares authorized:

 

 

Common shares outstanding

 

52,883,797

Net asset value per common share

$

14.11

Market value per common share

$

12.73

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

23

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Statement of Operations

For the year ended February 29, 2020

Investment income:

 

Interest

$46,961,320

Expenses:

 

Advisory fees

6,259,230

Administrative services fees

101,954

Custodian fees

9,827

Interest, facilities and maintenance fees

10,007,552

Transfer agent fees

32,767

Trustees' and officers' fees and benefits

26,490

Registration and filing fees

45,172

Reports to shareholders

50,223

Professional services fees

107,640

Other

20,333

Total expenses

16,661,188

Net investment income

30,300,132

Realized and unrealized gain from:

 

Net realized gain from investment securities

1,649,155

Change in net unrealized appreciation of investment securities

57,241,542

Net realized and unrealized gain

58,890,697

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations applicable to common shares

$89,190,829

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

24

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

For the years ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019

 

 

2020

 

2019

 

 

Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income

$

30,300,132

$

31,717,962

Net realized gain (loss)

 

1,649,155

 

(3,153,948)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

 

57,241,542

 

(4,237,395)

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations applicable to common shares

 

89,190,829

 

24,326,619

Distributions to common shareholders from distributable earnings

 

(30,389,405)

 

(35,516,758)

Return of capital applicable to common shares

 

(1,589,427)

 

—

 

Total distributions

 

(31,978,832)

 

(35,516,758)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares

 

57,211,997

 

(11,190,139)

Net assets applicable to common shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

689,053,834

 

700,243,973

End of year

$

746,265,831

$689,053,834

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

25

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Statement of Cash Flows

For the year ended February 29, 2020

Cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations applicable to common shares

$

89,190,829

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile the change in net assets applicable to common shares from operations to net cash

 

 

 

 

provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

Purchases of investments

 

(129,382,037)

Proceeds from sales of investments

 

130,405,033

Proceeds from sales of short-term investments, net

 

2,127,539

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of premium on investment securities

 

5,575,602

Accretion of discount on investment securities

 

(4,272,222)

Decrease in receivables and other assets

 

70,472

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease in accrued expenses and other payables

 

(60,162)

 

 

 

 

Net realized gain from investment securities

 

(1,649,155)

 

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investment securities

 

(57,241,542)

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

34,764,357

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities:

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid to common shareholders from distributable earnings

 

(30,394,850)

 

 

 

 

Return of capital

 

(1,589,427)

 

 

 

 

Decrease in payable for amount due custodian

 

(1,075,080)

 

 

 

 

Proceeds of TOB Trusts

 

33,855,000

 

 

 

 

Repayments of TOB Trusts

 

(35,560,000)

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(34,764,357)

 

 

 

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

—

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

—

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

—

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the period for interest, facilities and maintenance fees

$

10,080,963

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

26

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Financial Highlights

The following schedule presents financial highlights for a share of the Trust outstanding throughout the periods indicated.

 

Year Ended

 

 

Years ended February 28,

 

 

Year Ended

 

February 29,

 

 

 

 

February 29,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Net asset value per common share, beginning of period

$

13.03

$

13.24

$

13.40

$

14.05

$

13.96

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income(a)

 

0.57

 

 

0.60

 

0.73

 

0.73

 

0.79

 

 

Net gains (losses) on securities (both realized and unrealized)

 

1.11

 

 

(0.14)

 

(0.23)

 

(0.63)

 

0.07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total from investment operations

 

1.68

 

 

0.46

 

0.50

 

0.10

 

0.86

 

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends paid to common shareholders from net investment income

 

(0.57)

 

 

(0.67)

 

(0.66)

 

(0.75)

 

(0.77)

 

 

Return of capital

 

(0.03)

 

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

Total distributions

 

(0.60)

 

 

(0.67)

 

(0.66)

 

(0.75)

 

(0.77)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net asset value per common share, end of period

$

14.11

$

13.03

$

13.24

$

13.40

$

14.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market value per common share, end of period

$

12.73

$

11.99

$

11.98

$

12.46

$

12.98

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total return at net asset value(b)

 

13.61%

 

 

4.19%

 

4.17%

 

0.96%

 

7.08%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total return at market value(c)

 

11.39%

 

 

5.96%

 

1.37%

 

1.62%

 

9.78%

Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000's omitted)

$

746,266

$689,054

$700,244

$708,706

$743,081

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portfolio turnover rate(d)

 

12%

 

 

14%

 

10%

 

17%

 

6%

Ratios/supplemental data based on average net assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

applicable to common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratio of expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements

 

2.33%(e)

 

 

2.48%

 

2.13%

 

1.46%

 

1.01%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements excluding interest,

 

0.93%(e)

 

 

1.01%

 

0.96%

 

0.67%

 

0.50%

facilities and maintenance fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Without fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements

 

2.33%(e)

 

 

2.48%

 

2.13%

 

1.71%

 

1.43%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratio of net investment income to average net assets

 

4.23%(e)

 

 

4.60%

 

5.38%

 

5.23%(f)

 

5.74%

Senior securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total amount of preferred shares outstanding (000's omitted)

$233,900

$233,900

$233,900

$213,900

$213,900

 

 

Asset coverage per preferred share(g)

$419,053

$394,593

$399,377

$431,326

$447,396

 

 

Liquidating preference per preferred share

$100,000

$100,000

$100,000

$100,000

$100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)Calculated using average shares outstanding.

(b)Includes adjustments in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and as such, the net asset value for financial reporting purposes and the returns based upon those net asset values may differ from the net asset value and returns for shareholder transactions. Not annualized for periods less than one year, if applicable.

(c)Total return assumes an investment at the common share market price at the beginning of the period indicated, reinvestment of all distributions for the period in accordance with the Trust's dividend reinvestment plan, and sale of all shares at the closing common share market price at the end of the period indicated. Not annualized for periods less than one year, if applicable.

(d)Portfolio turnover is not annualized for periods less than one year, if applicable.

(e)Ratios are based on average daily net assets applicable to common shares (000's omitted) of $715,568.

(f)Amount includes the effect of insurance settlement proceeds received related to Auction Rate Preferred Shares previously issued by the Trust. The ratio of net investment income excluding these payments would have been 5.03%.

(g)Calculated by subtracting the Trust's total liabilities (not including preferred shares, at liquidation value) from the Trust's total assets and dividing this by the total number of preferred shares outstanding.

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements which are an integral part of the financial statements.

27

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Notes to Financial Statements

February 29, 2020

NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust (the "Trust") is a Delaware statutory trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as a diversified, closed-end management investment company.

The Trust's investment objective is to provide current income that is exempt from federal income tax.

The Trust is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946, Financial Services – Investment Companies.

The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Trust in the preparation of its financial statements.

A.Security Valuations – Securities, including restricted securities, are valued according to the following policy.

Securities are fair valued using an evaluated quote provided by an independent pricing service approved by the Board of Trustees. Evaluated quotes provided by the pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices, and may reflect appropriate factors such as institution-size trading in similar groups of securities, developments related to specific securities, dividend rate (for unlisted equities), yield (for debt obligations), quality, type of issue, coupon rate (for debt obligations), maturity (for debt obligations), individual trading characteristics and other market data. Pricing services generally value debt obligations assuming orderly transactions of institutional round lot size, but a trust may hold or transact in the same securities in smaller, odd lot sizes. Odd lots often trade at lower prices than institutional round lots. Debt obligations are subject to interest rate and credit risks. In addition, all debt obligations involve some risk of default with respect to interest and/or principal payments.

Securities for which market quotations either are not readily available or became unreliable are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the supervision of the Trust's officers following procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. Some of the factors which may be considered in determining fair value are fundamental analytical data relating to the investment; the nature and duration of any restrictions on transferability or disposition; trading in similar securities by the same issuer or comparable companies; relevant political, economic or issuer specific news; and other relevant factors under the circumstances.

The Trust may invest in securities that are subject to interest rate risk, meaning the risk that the prices will generally fall as interest rates rise and, conversely, the prices will generally rise as interest rates fall. Specific securities differ in their sensitivity to changes in interest rates depending on their individual characteristics. Changes in interest rates may result in increased market volatility, which may affect the value and/or liquidity of certain Trust investments.

Valuations change in response to many factors including the historical and prospective earnings of the issuer, the value of the issuer's assets, general economic conditions, interest rates, investor perceptions and market liquidity. Because of the inherent uncertainties of valuation, the values reflected in the financial statements may materially differ from the value received upon actual sale of those investments.

B.Securities Transactions and Investment Income — Securities transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses on sales are computed on the basis of specific identification of the securities sold. Interest income (net of withholding tax, if any) is recorded on an accrual basis from settlement date. Bond premiums and discounts are amortized and/or accreted over the lives of the respective securities. Pay-in-kind interest income and non-cash dividend income received in the form of securities in-lieu of cash are recorded at the fair value of the securities received. Dividend income (net of withholding tax, if any) is recorded on the ex-dividend date.

The Trust may periodically participate in litigation related to Trust investments. As such, the Trust may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received are included in the Statement of Operations as realized gain (loss) for investments no longer held and as unrealized gain (loss) for investments still held.

Brokerage commissions and mark ups are considered transaction costs and are recorded as an increase to the cost basis of securities purchased and/or a reduction of proceeds on a sale of securities. Such transaction costs are included in the determination of net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from investment securities reported in the Statement of Operations and the Statement of Changes in Net Assets and the net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on securities per share in the Financial Highlights. Transaction costs are included in the calculation of the Trust's net asset value and, accordingly, they reduce the Trust's total returns. These transaction costs are not considered operating expenses and are not reflected in net investment income reported in the Statement of Operations and the Statement of Changes in Net Assets, or the net investment income per share and the ratios of expenses and net investment income reported in the Financial Highlights, nor are they limited by any expense limitation arrangements between the Trust and the investment adviser.

C.Country Determination — For the purposes of making investment selection decisions and presentation in the Schedule of Investments, the investment adviser may determine the country in which an issuer is located and/or credit risk exposure based on various factors. These factors include the laws of the country under which the issuer is organized, where the issuer maintains a principal office, the country in which the issuer derives 50% or more of its total revenues and the country that has the primary market for the issuer's securities, as well as other criteria. Among the other criteria that may be evaluated for making this determination are the country in which the issuer maintains 50% or more of its assets, the type of security, financial guarantees and enhancements, the nature of the collateral and the sponsor organization. Country of issuer and/or credit risk exposure has been determined to be the United States of America, unless otherwise noted.

D.Distributions — The Trust declares and pays monthly dividends from net investment income to common shareholders. Distributions from net realized capital gain, if any, are generally declared and paid annually and are distributed on a pro rata basis to common and preferred shareholders.

E.Federal Income Taxes – The Trust intends to comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"), necessary to qualify as a regulated investment company and to distribute substantially all of the Trust's taxable earnings to shareholders. As such, the Trust will not be subject to federal income taxes on otherwise taxable income (including net realized capital gain) that is distributed to shareholders. Therefore, no provision for federal income taxes is recorded in the financial statements.

The Trust recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only when the position is more likely than not to be sustained. Management has analyzed the Trust's uncertain tax positions and concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions. Management is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next 12 months. In addition, the Trust intends to invest in such municipal securities to allow it to qualify to pay shareholders "exempt dividends", as defined in the Internal

Revenue Code.

The Trust files tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction and certain other jurisdictions. Generally, the Trust is subject to examinations by such taxing authorities for up to three years after the filing of the return for the tax period.

F.Interest, Facilities and Maintenance Fees – Interest, Facilities and Maintenance Fees include interest and related borrowing costs such as commitment fees, rating and bank agent fees and other expenses associated with lines of credit and Variable Rate Muni Term Preferred Shares ("VMTP Shares"), and interest and administrative expenses related to establishing and maintaining floating rate note obligations, if any.

G.Accounting Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period including estimates and assumptions related to taxation. Actual results could differ from those estimates by a significant amount. In addition, the Trust monitors for material events or transactions that may occur or become known after the period-end date and before the date the financial statements are released to print.

28

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

H.Indemnifications – Under the Trust's organizational documents, each Trustee, officer, employee or other agent of the Trust is indemnified against certain liabilities that may arise out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into contracts, including the Trust's servicing agreements, that contain a variety of indemnification clauses. The Trust's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred. The risk of material loss as a result of such indemnification claims is considered remote.

I.Cash and Cash Equivalents – For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Trust defines Cash and Cash Equivalents as cash (including foreign currency), money market funds and other investments held in lieu of cash and excludes investments made with cash collateral received.

J.Floating Rate Note Obligations – The Trust invests in inverse floating rate securities, such as Tender Option Bonds ("TOBs"), for investment purposes and to enhance the yield of the Trust. Such securities may be purchased in the secondary market without first owning an underlying bond but generally are created through the sale of fixed rate bonds by the Trust to special purpose trusts established by a broker dealer or by the Trust ("TOB Trusts") in exchange for cash and residual interests in the TOB Trusts' assets and cash flows, which are in the form of inverse floating rate securities. The TOB Trusts finance the purchases of the fixed rate bonds by issuing floating rate notes to third parties and allowing the Trust to retain residual interests in the bonds. The floating rate notes issued by the TOB Trusts have interest rates that reset weekly and the floating rate note holders have the option to tender their notes to the TOB Trusts for redemption at par at each reset date. The residual interests held by the Trust (inverse floating rate securities) include the right of the Trust (1) to cause the holders of the floating rate notes to tender their notes at par at the next interest rate reset date, and (2) to transfer the municipal bond from the TOB Trust to the Trust, thereby collapsing the TOB Trust. Inverse floating rate securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when interest rates decline or remain relatively stable.

The Trust generally invests in inverse floating rate securities that include embedded leverage, thus exposing the Trust to greater risks and increased costs. The primary risks associated with inverse floating rate securities are varying degrees of liquidity and decreases in the value of such securities in response to changes in interest rates to a greater extent than fixed rate securities having similar credit quality, redemption provisions and maturity, which may cause the Trust's net asset value to be more volatile than if it had not invested in inverse floating rate securities. In certain instances, the short-term floating rate notes created by the TOB Trust may not be able to be sold to third parties or, in the case of holders tendering (or putting) such notes for repayment of principal, may not be able to be remarketed to third parties. In such cases, the TOB Trust holding the fixed rate bonds may be collapsed with the entity that contributed the fixed rate bonds to the TOB Trust. In the case where a TOB Trust is collapsed with the Trust, the Trust will be required to repay the principal amount of the tendered securities, which may require the Trust to sell other portfolio holdings to raise cash to meet that obligation. The Trust could therefore be required to sell other portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous time or price to raise cash to meet this obligation, which risk will be heightened during times of market volatility, illiquidity or uncertainty. The embedded leverage in the TOB Trust could cause the Trust to lose more money than the value of the asset it has contributed to the TOB Trust and greater levels of leverage create the potential for greater losses. In addition, a Trust may enter into reimbursement agreements with the liquidity provider of certain TOB transactions in connection with certain residuals held by the Trust. These agreements commit a Trust to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a TOB Trust, including following the termination of a TOB Trust resulting from a mandatory tender event ("liquidity shortfall"). The reimbursement agreement will effectively make the Trust liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying security and the purchase price of the floating rate notes issued by the TOB Trust.

The Trust accounts for the transfer of fixed rate bonds to the TOB Trusts as secured borrowings, with the securities transferred remaining in the Trust's investment assets, and the related floating rate notes reflected as Trust liabilities under the caption Floating rate note obligations on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The carrying amount of the Trust's floating rate note obligations as reported on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities approximates its fair value. The Trust records the interest income from the fixed rate bonds under the caption Interest and records the expenses related to floating rate obligations and any administrative expenses of the TOB Trusts as a component of Interest, facilities and maintenance fees on the Statement of Operations.

Final rules implementing section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Volcker Rule") prohibit banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading of certain instruments and limit such entities' investments in, and relationships with, "covered funds", as defined in the rules. These rules preclude banking entities and their affiliates from sponsoring and/or providing services for existing TOB Trusts. A new TOB structure is being utilized by the Trust wherein the Trust, as holder of the residuals, will perform certain duties previously performed by banking entities as "sponsors" of TOB Trusts. These duties may be performed by a third-party service provider. The Trust's expanded role under the new TOB structure may increase its operational and regulatory risk. The new structure is substantially similar to the previous structure; however, pursuant to the Volcker Rule, the remarketing agent would not be able to repurchase tendered floaters for its own account upon a failed remarketing. In the event of a failed remarketing, a banking entity serving as liquidity provider may loan the necessary funds to the TOB Trust to purchase the tendered floaters. The TOB Trust, not the Trust, would be the borrower and the loan from the liquidity provider will be secured by the purchased floaters now held by the TOB Trust. However, as previously described, the Trust would bear the risk of loss with respect to any liquidity shortfall to the extent it entered into a reimbursement agreement with the liquidity provider.

Further, the SEC and various banking agencies have adopted rules implementing credit risk retention requirements for asset-backed securities (the "Risk Retention Rules"). The Risk Retention Rules require the sponsor of a TOB Trust to retain at least 5% of the credit risk of the underlying assets supporting the TOB Trust's municipal bonds. The Trust has adopted policies intended to comply with the Risk Retention Rules. The Risk Retention Rules may adversely affect the Trust's ability to engage in TOB Trust transactions or increase the costs of such transactions in certain circumstances.

There can be no assurances that the new TOB structure will continue to be a viable form of leverage. Further, there can be no assurances that alternative forms of leverage will be available to the Trust in order to maintain current levels of leverage. Any alternative forms of leverage may be less advantageous to the Trust, and may adversely affect the Trust's net asset value, distribution rate and ability to achieve its investment objective.

TOBs are presently classified as private placement securities. Private placement securities are subject to restrictions on resale because they have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"), or are otherwise not readily marketable. As a result of the absence of a public trading market for these securities, they may be less liquid than publicly traded securities. Although atypical, these securities may be resold in privately negotiated transactions, the prices realized from these sales could be less than those originally paid by the Trust or less than what may be considered the fair value of such securities.

K.Other Risks - The value of, payment of interest on, repayment of principal for and the ability to sell a municipal security may be affected by constitutional amendments, legislative enactments, executive orders, administrative regulations, voter initiatives and the economics of the regions in which the issuers are located. Since many municipal securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care, transportation and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect the overall municipal securities market and the Trust's investments in municipal securities. There is some risk that a portion or all of the interest received from certain tax-free municipal securities could become taxable as a result of determinations by the Internal Revenue Service. The current low interest rate environment was created in part by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and certain foreign central banks keeping the federal funds and equivalent foreign rates near historical lows. Increases in the federal funds and equivalent foreign rates may expose fixed income markets to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity for certain fixed income investments, particularly those with longer maturities. In addition, decreases in fixed income dealer market-making capacity may also potentially lead to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity in the fixed income markets. As a result, the value of the Trust's investments and share price may decline. Changes in central bank policies could also result in higher than normal shareholder redemptions, which could potentially increase portfolio turnover and the Trust's transaction costs.

29

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

NOTE 2—Advisory Fees and Other Fees Paid to Affiliates

The Trust has entered into a master investment advisory agreement with Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the "Adviser" or "Invesco"). Under the terms of the investment advisory agreement, the Trust accrues daily and pays monthly an advisory fee to the Adviser based on the annual rate of 0.55% of the Trust's average weekly managed assets. Managed assets for this purpose means the Trust's net assets, plus assets attributable to outstanding preferred shares and the amount of any borrowings incurred for the purpose of leverage (whether or not such borrowed amounts are reflected in the Trust's financial statements for purposes of GAAP).

Under the terms of a master sub-advisory agreement between the Adviser and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Limited, Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Canada Ltd. (collectively, the "Affiliated Sub-Advisers") the Adviser, not the Trust, will pay 40% of the fees paid to the Adviser to any such Affiliated Sub-Adviser(s) that provide(s) discretionary investment management services to the Trust based on the percentage of assets allocated to such Affiliated Sub-Adviser(s).

The Trust has entered into a master administrative services agreement with Invesco pursuant to which the Trust has agreed to pay Invesco for certain administrative costs incurred in providing accounting services to the Trust. For the year ended February 29, 2020, expenses incurred under this agreement are shown in the Statement of Operations as Administrative services fees. Invesco has entered into a sub-administration agreement whereby State Street Bank and Trust Company ("SSB") serves as fund accountant and provides certain administrative services to the Trust. Pursuant to a custody agreement with the Trust, SSB also serves as the Trust's custodian.

Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are officers and directors of Invesco.

NOTE 3—Additional Valuation Information

GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, under current market conditions. GAAP establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods, giving the highest priority to readily available unadjusted quoted prices in an active market for identical assets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), generally when market prices are not readily available or are unreliable. Based on the valuation inputs, the securities or other investments are tiered into one of three levels. Changes in valuation methods may result in transfers in or out of an investment's assigned level:

Level 1 — Prices are determined using quoted prices in an active market for identical assets.

Level 2 — Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants may use in pricing a security. These may include quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, loss severities, default rates, discount rates, volatilities and others.

Level 3 — Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity for an investment at the end of the period), unobservable inputs may be used. Unobservable inputs reflect the Trust's own assumptions about the factors market participants would use in determining fair value of the securities or instruments and would be based on the best available information.

As of February 29, 2020, all of the securities in this Trust were valued based on Level 2 inputs (see the Schedule of Investments for security categories). The level assigned to the securities valuations may not be an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investing in those securities. Because of the inherent uncertainties of valuation, the values reflected in the financial statements may materially differ from the value received upon actual sale of those investments.

NOTE 4—Security Transactions with Affiliated Funds

The Trust is permitted to purchase or sell securities from or to certain other Invesco Funds under specified conditions outlined in procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Trust. The procedures have been designed to ensure that any purchase or sale of securities by the Trust from or to another fund or portfolio that is or could be considered an affiliate by virtue of having a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Trustees and/or common officers complies with Rule 17a-7 of the 1940 Act. Further, as defined under the procedures, each transaction is effected at the current market price. Pursuant to these procedures, for the year ended February 29, 2020, the Trust engaged in securities purchases of $26,461,540 and securities sales of $50,492,978, which did not result in any net realized gains (losses).

NOTE 5—Trustees' and Officers' Fees and Benefits

Trustees' and Officers' Fees and Benefits include amounts accrued by the Trust to pay remuneration to certain Trustees and Officers of the Trust. Trustees have the option to defer compensation payable by the Trust, and Trustees' and Officers' Fees and Benefits also include amounts accrued by the Trust to fund such deferred compensation amounts. Those Trustees who defer compensation have the option to select various Invesco Trusts in which their deferral accounts shall be deemed to be invested. Finally, certain current Trustees were eligible to participate in a retirement plan that provided for benefits to be paid upon retirement to Trustees over a period of time based on the number of years of service. The Trust may have certain former Trustees who also participate in a retirement plan and receive benefits under such plan. Trustees' and Officers' Fees and Benefits include amounts accrued by the Trust to fund such retirement benefits. Obligations under the deferred compensation and retirement plans represent unsecured claims against the general assets of the Trust.

NOTE 6—Cash Balances and Borrowings

The Trust is permitted to temporarily carry a negative or overdrawn balance in its account with SSB, the custodian bank. Such balances, if any at period-end, are shown in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities under the payable caption Amount due custodian. To compensate the custodian bank for such overdrafts, the overdrawn Trust may either (1) leave funds as a compensating balance in the account so the custodian bank can be compensated by earning the additional interest; or (2) compensate by paying the custodian bank at a rate agreed upon by the custodian bank and Invesco, not to exceed the contractually agreed upon rate. The Trust may not purchase additional securities when any borrowings from banks or broker-dealers exceed 5% of the Trust's total assets, or when any borrowings from an Invesco Fund are outstanding.

Inverse floating rate obligations resulting from the transfer of bonds to TOB Trusts are accounted for as secured borrowings. The average floating rate notes outstanding and average annual interest and fee rate related to inverse floating rate note obligations during the year ended February 29, 2020 were $191,210,417 and 2.20%, respectively.

30

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

NOTE 7—Distributions to Shareholders and Tax Components of Net Assets

Tax Character of Distributions to Shareholders Paid During the Fiscal Years Ended February 29, 2020 and February 28, 2019:

 

 

 

2020

2019

 

 

Ordinary income

$

—

$ 327,290

 

Ordinary income-tax-exempt

 

30,389,405

35,189,468

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary income-tax-exempt VMTP shares

 

5,615,685

5,765,603

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return of capital

 

1,589,427

—

 

Total distributions

$37,594,517

$41,282,361

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Components of Net Assets at Period-End:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation — investments

 

 

$122,369,272

Temporary book/tax differences

 

 

(243,532)

 

 

 

 

 

Capital loss carryforward

 

 

(25,425,234)

 

 

 

 

Shares of beneficial interest

 

 

649,565,325

 

 

 

 

Total net assets

 

 

$746,265,831

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is due to differences in the timing of recognition of gains and losses on investments for tax and book purposes. The Trust's net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) difference is attributable primarily to tax treatment of TOBs and accretion of bond discount.

The temporary book/tax differences are a result of timing differences between book and tax recognition of income and/or expenses. The Trust's temporary book/tax differences are the result of the trustee deferral of compensation and retirement plan benefits.

Capital loss carryforward is calculated and reported as of a specific date. Results of transactions and other activity after that date may affect the amount of capital loss carryforward actually available for the Trust to utilize. The ability to utilize capital loss carryforward in the future may be limited under the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations based on the results of future transactions.

The Trust has a capital loss carryforward as of February 29, 2020, as follows:

Capital Loss Carryforward*

Expiration

Short-Term

Long-Term

Total

Not subject to expiration

$16,285,812

$9,139,422

$25,425,234

 

 

 

 

*Capital loss carryforward is reduced for limitations, if any, to the extent required by the Internal Revenue Code and may be further limited depending upon a variety of factors, including the realization of net unrealized gains or losses as of the date of any reorganization.

NOTE 8—Investment Transactions

The aggregate amount of investment securities (other than short-term securities, U.S. Treasury obligations and money market funds, if any) purchased and sold by the Trust during the year ended February 29, 2020 was $135,562,580 and $131,311,142, respectively. Cost of investments, including any derivatives, on a tax basis includes the adjustments for financial reporting purposes as of the most recently completed federal income tax reporting period-end.

Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Investments on a Tax Basis

Aggregate unrealized appreciation of investments

$124,807,484

 

Aggregate unrealized (depreciation) of investments

(2,438,212)

Net unrealized appreciation of investments

$122,369,272

 

Cost of investments for tax purposes is $1,059,924,933.

NOTE 9—Reclassification of Permanent Differences

Primarily as a result of differing book/tax treatment of return of capital distributions, on February 29, 2020, undistributed net investment income was increased by $1,444,080, undistributed net realized gain (loss) was increased by $41,505 and shares of beneficial interest was decreased by $1,485,585. This reclassification had no effect on the net assets of the Trust.

NOTE 10—Common Shares of Beneficial Interest

Transactions in common shares of beneficial interest were as follows:

 

Year Ended

Year Ended

 

February 29,

February 28,

 

2020

2019

Beginning shares

52,883,797

52,883,797

Shares issued through dividend reinvestment

—

—

Ending shares

52,883,797

52,883,797

The Trust may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price not above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at the time of purchase.

31

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

NOTE 11—Variable Rate Muni Term Preferred Shares

On May 17, 2012, the Trust issued 1,168 Series 2015/12-IQI VMTP Shares, with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share, pursuant to an offering exempt from registration under the 1933 Act. Proceeds from the issuance of VMTP Shares on May 17, 2012 were used to redeem all of the Trust's outstanding Auction Rate Preferred Shares ("ARPS"). In addition, the Trust issued 971, Series 2015/12-IQI VMTP Shares in connection with the reorganization of Invesco Quality Municipal Securities and Invesco Quality Municipal Investments Trust with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share. VMTP Shares are a floating-rate form of preferred shares with a mandatory redemption date and are considered debt for financial reporting purposes. On June 5, 2015, the Trust extended the term of the VMTP Shares and is required to redeem all outstanding VMTP Shares on December 1, 2018, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or extended. On June 1, 2017, the Trust issued an additional 200 Series 2015/12-IQI VMTP Shares, with a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share. In addition, on June 1, 2017, the Trust extended the term of the VMTP Shares and is required to redeem all outstanding VMTP Shares on December 1, 2020, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or extended. VMTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends and a redemption premium, if any. On or prior to the redemption date, the Trust will be required to segregate assets having a value equal to 110% of the redemption amount.

The Trust incurred costs in connection with the issuance of the VMTP Shares. These costs were recorded as a deferred charge and were amortized over the original 3 year life of the VMTP Shares. In addition, the Trust incurred costs in connection with the extension of the VMTP Shares that are recorded as a deferred charge and are being amortized over the extended term. Amortization of these costs is included in Interest, facilities and maintenance fees on the Statement of Operations, and the unamortized balance is included in the value of Variable rate muni term preferred shares on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

Dividends paid on the VMTP Shares (which are treated as interest expense for financial reporting purposes) are declared daily and paid monthly. The initial rate for dividends was equal to the sum of 1.10% per annum plus the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association Municipal Swap Index (the "SIFMA" Index). As of February 29, 2020, the dividend rate is equal to the SIFMA Index plus a spread of 1.00%, which is based on the long term preferred share ratings assigned to the VMTP Shares by a ratings agency. The average aggregate liquidation preference outstanding and the average annualized dividend rate of the VMTP Shares during the year ended February 29, 2020 were $233,900,000 and 2.38%, respectively.

The Trust utilizes the VMTP Shares as leverage in order to enhance the yield of its common shareholders. The primary risk associated with VMTP Shares is exposing the net asset value of the common shares and total return to increased volatility if the value of the Trust decreases while the value of the VMTP Shares remain unchanged. Fluctuations in the dividend rates on the VMTP Shares can also impact the Trust's yield or its distributions to common shareholders. The Trust is subject to certain restrictions relating to the VMTP Shares, such as maintaining certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements. Failure to comply with these restrictions could preclude the Trust from declaring any distributions to common shareholders or purchasing common shares and/or could trigger an increased rate which, if not cured, could cause the mandatory redemption of VMTP Shares at the liquidation preference plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends.

The liquidation preference of VMTP Shares, which approximates fair value, is recorded as a liability under the caption Variable rate muni term preferred shares on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The fair value of VMTP Shares is expected to be approximately their liquidation preference so long as the credit rating on the VMTP Shares, and therefore the "spread" on the VMTP Shares (determined in accordance with the VMTP Shares' governing document) remains unchanged. At period-end, the Trust's Adviser has determined that fair value of VMTP Shares is approximately their liquidation preference. Fair value could vary if market conditions change materially. Unpaid dividends on VMTP Shares are recognized as Accrued interest expense on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends paid on VMTP Shares are recognized as a component of Interest, facilities and maintenance fees on the Statement of Operations.

NOTE 12—Dividends

The Trust declared the following dividends to common shareholders from net investment income subsequent to February 29, 2020:

Declaration Date

Amount per Share

Record Date

Payable Date

March 2, 2010

$0.0487

March 17,

2020

March 31,

2020

April 1, 2020

$0.0487

April 15,

2020

April 30,

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE 13—Subsequent Event

During the first quarter of 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus (COVID-19) to be a public health emergency. COVID-19 has led to increased short-term market volatility and may have adverse long-term effects on U.S. and world economies and markets in general. COVID-19 may adversely impact the Trust's ability to achieve its investment objective. Because of the uncertainties on valuation, the global economy and business operations, values reflected in these financial statements may materially differ from the value received upon actual sales of those investments.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, commonly referred to as the "CARES Act," was signed into law on March 27, 2020 by President Trump. The Adviser is assessing the components of the Act, and the impacts to the Trust should be immaterial.

32

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, of Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust (the "Trust") as of February 29, 2020, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year ended February 29, 2020, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period ended February 29, 2020, including the related notes, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended February 29, 2020 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Trust as of February 29, 2020, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period ended February 29, 2020 and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period ended February 29, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Trust's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of February 29, 2020 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

April 28, 2020

We have served as the auditor of one or more of the investment companies in the Invesco group of investment companies since at least 1995. We have not been able to determine the specific year we began serving as auditor.

33

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Tax Information

Form 1099-DIV, Form 1042-S and other year–end tax information provide shareholders with actual calendar year amounts that should be included in their tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers.

The following distribution information is being provided as required by the Internal Revenue Code or to meet a specific state's requirement.

The Trust designates the following amounts or, if subsequently determined to be different, the maximum amount allowable for its fiscal year ended February 29, 2020:

Federal and State Income Tax

Qualified Dividend Income*

0%

Corporate Dividends Received Deduction*

0%

U.S. Treasury Obligations*

0%

Tax-Exempt Interest Dividends*

100%

* The above percentages are based on ordinary income dividends paid to shareholders during the Trust's fiscal year.

34

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers

The address of each trustee and officer is 1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Generally, each trustee serves for a three year term or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, and each officer serves for a one year term or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified. Column two below includes length of time served with predecessor entities, if any.

 

Trustee

 

Number of

Other

Name, Year of Birth and

 

Funds in

Directorship(s)

and/or

 

Fund Complex

Held by Trustee

Position(s)

Officer

Principal Occupation(s)

Overseen by

During Past 5

Held with the Trust

Since

During Past 5 Years

Trustee

Years

Interested Trustee

 

 

 

 

Martin L. Flanagan1 — 1960

2010

Executive Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Ltd.

229

None

Trustee and Vice Chair

 

(ultimate parent of Invesco and a global investment management firm);

 

 

 

 

Trustee and Vice Chair, The Invesco Funds; Vice Chair, Investment Company

 

 

 

 

Institute; and Member of Executive Board, SMU Cox School of Business

 

 

 

 

Formerly: Advisor to the Board, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as

 

 

 

 

Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,

 

 

 

 

Invesco Advisers, Inc. (registered investment adviser); Director, Chairman,

 

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Holding Company (US), Inc.

 

 

 

 

(formerly IVZ Inc.) (holding company), Invesco Group Services, Inc. (service

 

 

 

 

provider) and Invesco North American Holdings, Inc. (holding company);

 

 

 

 

Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Holding Company

 

 

 

 

Limited (parent of Invesco and a global investment management firm);

 

 

 

 

Director, Invesco Ltd.; Chairman, Investment Company Institute and President,

 

 

 

 

Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief

 

 

 

 

Financial Officer, Franklin Resources, Inc. (global investment management

 

 

 

 

organization)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1Mr. Flanagan is considered an interested person (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) of the Trust because he is an officer of the Adviser to the Trust, and an officer and a director of Invesco Ltd., ultimate parent of the Adviser.

T-1

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers—(continued)

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

Funds

Other

 

Trustee

 

in

Directorship(s)

Name, Year of Birth and

and/or

 

Fund Complex

Held by Trustee

Position(s)

Officer

Principal Occupation(s)

Overseen by

During Past 5

Held with the Trust

Since

During Past 5 Years

Trustee

Years

Independent Trustees

 

 

 

 

Bruce L. Crockett – 1944

2010

Chairman, Crockett Technologies Associates (technology consulting company)

229

Director and

Trustee and Chair

 

Formerly: Director, Captaris (unified messaging provider); Director, President

 

Chairman of the

 

 

 

Audit Committee,

 

 

and Chief Executive Officer, COMSAT Corporation; Chairman, Board of

 

 

 

 

ALPS (Attorneys

 

 

Governors of INTELSAT (international communications company); ACE Limited

 

 

 

 

Liability

 

 

(insurance company); Independent Directors Council and Investment Company

 

 

 

 

Protection

 

 

Institute: Member of the Audit Committee, Investment Company Institute;

 

 

 

 

Society)

 

 

Member of the Executive Committee and Chair of the Governance Committee,

 

 

 

 

(insurance

 

 

Independent Directors Council

 

 

 

 

company);

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director and

 

 

 

 

Member of the

 

 

 

 

Audit Committee

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

 

 

Committee,

 

 

 

 

Ferroglobe PLC

 

 

 

 

(metallurgical

 

 

 

 

company)

David C. Arch – 1945

2010

Chairman of Blistex Inc. (consumer health care products manufacturer);

229

Board member of

Trustee

 

Member, World Presidents' Organization

 

the Illinois

 

 

 

 

Manufacturers'

 

 

 

 

Association

Beth Ann Brown – 1968

2019

Independent Consultant

229

Director, Board of

Trustee

 

Formerly: Head of Intermediary Distribution, Managing Director, Strategic

 

Directors of

 

 

 

Caron

 

 

Relations, Managing Director, Head of National Accounts, Senior Vice

 

 

 

 

Engineering Inc.;

 

 

President, National Account Manager and Senior Vice President, Key Account

 

 

 

 

Advisor, Board of

 

 

Manager, Columbia Management Investment Advisers LLC; Vice President, Key

 

 

 

 

Advisors of Caron

 

 

Account Manager, Liberty Funds Distributor, Inc.; and Trustee of certain

 

 

 

 

Engineering Inc.;

 

 

Oppenheimer Funds

 

 

 

 

President and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director, Acton

 

 

 

 

Shapleigh Youth

 

 

 

 

Conservation

 

 

 

 

Corps (non -

 

 

 

 

profit); and Vice

 

 

 

 

President and

 

 

 

 

Director of

 

 

 

 

Grahamtastic

 

 

 

 

Connection (non-

 

 

 

 

profit)

Jack M. Fields – 1952

2010

Chief Executive Officer, Twenty First Century Group, Inc. (government affairs

229

Member, Board of Directors of

Trustee

 

company); and Chairman, Discovery Learning Alliance (non-profit)

 

Baylor College of Medicine

 

 

Formerly: Owner and Chief Executive Officer, Dos Angeles Ranch L.P. (cattle,

 

 

 

 

hunting, corporate entertainment); Director, Insperity, Inc. (formerly known as

 

 

 

 

Administaff) (human resources provider); Chief Executive Officer, Texana

 

 

 

 

Timber LP (sustainable forestry company); Director of Cross Timbers Quail

 

 

 

 

Research Ranch (non-profit); and member of the U.S. House of Representatives

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-2

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers—(continued)

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

Funds

Other

 

Trustee

 

in

Directorship(s)

Name, Year of Birth and

and/or

 

Fund Complex

Held by Trustee

Position(s)

Officer

Principal Occupation(s)

Overseen by

During Past 5

Held with the Trust

Since

During Past 5 Years

Trustee

Years

Independent Trustees—(continued)

 

 

 

Cynthia Hostetler —1962

2017

Non-Executive Director and Trustee of a number of public and private business

229

Vulcan Materials

Trustee

 

corporations

 

Company

 

 

Formerly: Director, Aberdeen Investment Funds (4 portfolios); Head of

 

(construction

 

 

 

materials

 

 

Investment Funds and Private Equity, Overseas Private Investment

 

 

 

 

company); Trilinc

 

 

Corporation; President, First Manhattan Bancorporation, Inc.; Attorney,

 

 

 

 

Global Impact

 

 

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

 

 

 

 

Fund; Genesee &

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wyoming, Inc.

 

 

 

 

(railroads); Artio

 

 

 

 

Global Investment

 

 

 

 

LLC (mutual fund

 

 

 

 

complex); Edgen

 

 

 

 

Group, Inc.

 

 

 

 

(specialized

 

 

 

 

energy and

 

 

 

 

infrastructure

 

 

 

 

products

 

 

 

 

distributor);

 

 

 

 

Investment

 

 

 

 

Company Institute

 

 

 

 

(professional

 

 

 

 

organization);

 

 

 

 

Independent

 

 

 

 

Directors Council

 

 

 

 

(professional

 

 

 

 

organization)

Eli Jones – 1961

2016

Professor and Dean, Mays Business School - Texas A&M University

229

Insperity, Inc.

Trustee

 

Formerly: Professor and Dean, Walton College of Business, University of

 

(formerly known

 

 

 

as Administaff)

 

 

Arkansas and E.J. Ourso College of Business, Louisiana State University;

 

 

 

 

(human resources

 

 

Director, Arvest Bank

 

 

 

 

provider)

 

 

 

 

Elizabeth Krentzman – 1959

2019

Formerly: Principal and Chief Regulatory Advisor for Asset Management

229

Trustee of the

Trustee

 

Services and U.S. Mutual Fund Leader of Deloitte & Touche LLP; General

 

University of

 

 

Counsel of the Investment Company Institute (trade association); National

 

Florida National

 

 

Director of the Investment Management Regulatory Consulting Practice,

 

Board Foundation

 

 

Principal, Director and Senior Manager of Deloitte & Touche LLP; Assistant

 

and Audit

 

 

Director of the Division of Investment Management - Office of Disclosure and

 

Committee

 

 

Investment Adviser Regulation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange

 

Member; Member

 

 

Commission and various positions with the Division of Investment Management

 

of the Cartica

 

 

– Office of Regulatory Policy of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission;

 

Funds Board of

 

 

Associate at Ropes & Gray LLP; Advisory Board Member of the Securities and

 

Directors (private

 

 

Exchange Commission Historical Society; and Trustee of certain Oppenheimer

 

investment

 

 

Funds

 

funds); Member

 

 

 

 

of the University

 

 

 

 

of Florida Law

 

 

 

 

Center

 

 

 

 

Association, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Board of Trustees

 

 

 

 

and Audit

 

 

 

 

Committee

 

 

 

 

Member

Anthony J. LaCava, Jr. – 1956

2019

Formerly: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Blue Hills Bank

229

Blue Hills Bank;

Trustee

 

(publicly traded financial institution) and Managing Partner, KPMG LLP

 

Chairman,

 

 

 

 

Bentley

 

 

 

 

University;

 

 

 

 

Member,

 

 

 

 

Business School

 

 

 

 

Advisory Council;

 

 

 

 

and Nominating

 

 

 

 

Committee

 

 

 

 

KPMG LLP

Prema Mathai-Davis – 1950

2010

Retired

229

None

Trustee

 

Co-Owner & Partner of Quantalytics Research, LLC, (a FinTech Investment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research Platform for the Self-Directed Investor)

T-3

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers—(continued)

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

Funds

Other

 

Trustee

 

in

Directorship(s)

Name, Year of Birth and

and/or

 

Fund Complex

Held by Trustee

Position(s)

Officer

Principal Occupation(s)

Overseen by

During Past 5

Held with the Trust

Since

During Past 5 Years

Trustee

Years

Independent Trustees—(continued)

 

 

 

Joel W. Motley – 1952

2019

Director of Office of Finance, Federal Home Loan Bank System; Member of the

229

Member of Board

Trustee

 

Vestry of Trinity Wall Street; Managing Director of Carmona Motley Inc.

 

of Greenwall

 

 

(privately held financial advisor); Member of the Council on Foreign Relations

 

Foundation

 

 

and its Finance and Budget Committee; Chairman Emeritus of Board of Human

 

(bioethics

 

 

Rights Watch and Member of its Investment Committee; and Member of

 

research

 

 

Investment Committee and Board of Historic Hudson Valley (non-profit cultural

 

foundation) and

 

 

organization)

 

its Investment

 

 

Formerly: Managing Director of Public Capital Advisors, LLC (privately held

 

Committee;

 

 

 

Member of Board

 

 

financial advisor); Managing Director of Carmona Motley Hoffman, Inc.

 

 

 

 

of Friends of the

 

 

(privately held financial advisor); Trustee of certain Oppenheimer Funds; and

 

 

 

 

LRC (non-profit

 

 

Director of Columbia Equity Financial Corp. (privately held financial advisor)

 

 

 

 

legal advocacy);

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board Member

 

 

 

 

and Investment

 

 

 

 

Committee

 

 

 

 

Member of

 

 

 

 

Pulitzer Center for

 

 

 

 

Crisis Reporting

 

 

 

 

(non-profit journalism)

Teresa M. Ressel — 1962

2017

Non-executive director and trustee of a number of public and private business

229

Atlantic Power

Trustee

 

corporations

 

Corporation

 

 

Formerly: Chief Financial Officer, Olayan America, The Olayan Group

 

(power generation

 

 

 

company); ON

 

 

(international investor/commercial/industrial); Chief Executive Officer, UBS

 

 

 

 

Semiconductor

 

 

Securities LLC; Group Chief Operating Officer, Americas, UBS AG; Assistant

 

 

 

 

Corp.

 

 

Secretary for Management & Budget and CFO, US Department of the Treasury

 

 

 

 

(semiconductor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

supplier)

 

 

 

 

 

Ann Barnett Stern – 1957

2017

President and Chief Executive Officer, Houston Endowment Inc. (private

229

Federal Reserve

Trustee

 

philanthropic institution)

 

Bank of Dallas

 

 

Formerly: Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Texas Children's

 

 

 

 

Hospital; Attorney, Beck, Redden and Secrest, LLP; Business Law Instructor,

 

 

 

 

University of St. Thomas; Attorney, Andrews & Kurth LLP

 

 

Robert C. Troccoli – 1949

2016

Retired

229

None

Trustee

 

Formerly: Adjunct Professor, University of Denver – Daniels College of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Business; Senior Partner, KPMG LLP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel S. Vandivort –1954

2019

Treasurer, Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee, and Trustee, Board

229

Chairman and

Trustee

 

of Trustees, Huntington Disease Foundation of America; and President, Flyway

 

Lead Independent

 

 

Advisory Services LLC (consulting and property management)

 

Director,

 

 

Formerly: Trustee and Governance Chair, of certain Oppenheimer Funds

 

Chairman of the

 

 

 

Audit Committee,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and Director,

 

 

 

 

Board of

 

 

 

 

Directors, Value

 

 

 

 

Line Funds

James D. Vaughn – 1945

2019

Retired

229

Board member

Trustee

 

Formerly: Managing Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP; Trustee and Chairman of

 

and Chairman of

 

 

 

Audit Committee

 

 

the Audit Committee, Schroder Funds; Board Member, Mile High United Way,

 

 

 

 

of AMG National

 

 

Boys and Girls Clubs, Boy Scouts, Colorado Business Committee for the Arts,

 

 

 

 

Trust Bank;

 

 

Economic Club of Colorado and Metro Denver Network (economic development

 

 

 

 

Trustee and

 

 

corporation); and Trustee of certain Oppenheimer Funds

 

 

 

 

Investment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Committee

 

 

 

 

member,

 

 

 

 

University of

 

 

 

 

South Dakota

 

 

 

 

Foundation;

 

 

 

 

Board member,

 

 

 

 

Audit Committee

 

 

 

 

Member and past

 

 

 

 

Board Chair,

 

 

 

 

Junior

 

 

 

 

Achievement

 

 

 

 

(non-profit)

Christopher L. Wilson -

2017

Retired

229

ISO New

1957

 

Formerly: Director, TD Asset Management USA Inc. (mutual fund complex) (22

 

England, Inc.

Trustee, Vice Chair and Chair

 

 

(non-profit

 

portfolios); Managing Partner, CT2, LLC (investing and consulting firm);

 

Designate

 

 

organization

 

President/Chief Executive Officer, Columbia Funds, Bank of America

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation; President/Chief Executive Officer, CDC IXIS Asset Management

managing

regional electricity

Services, Inc.; Principal & Director of Operations, Scudder Funds, Scudder,

market)

Stevens & Clark, Inc.; Assistant Vice President, Fidelity Investments

 

T-4

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers—(continued)

 

 

 

Number of

Other

 

Trustee

 

Funds in

Directorship(s)

Name, Year of Birth and

and/or

 

Fund Complex

Held by Trustee

Position(s)

Officer

Principal Occupation(s)

Overseen by

During Past 5

Held with the Trust

Since

During Past 5 Years

Trustee

Years

Officers

 

 

 

 

Sheri Morris — 1964

2010

Head of Global Fund Services, Invesco Ltd.; President, Principal Executive

N/A

N/A

President, Principal Executive

 

Officer and Treasurer, The Invesco Funds; Vice President, Invesco Advisers,

 

 

Officer

 

Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered

 

 

and Treasurer

 

investment adviser); and Vice President, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust,

 

 

 

 

Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund

 

 

 

 

Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively

 

 

 

 

Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust; and Vice President,

 

 

 

 

OppenheimerFunds, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Formerly: Vice President and Principal Financial Officer, The Invesco Funds;

 

 

 

 

Vice President, Invesco AIM Advisers, Inc., Invesco AIM Capital Management,

 

 

 

 

Inc. and Invesco AIM Private Asset Management, Inc.; Assistant Vice President

 

 

 

 

and Assistant Treasurer, The Invesco Funds and Assistant Vice President,

 

 

 

 

Invesco Advisers, Inc., Invesco AIM Capital Management, Inc. and Invesco AIM

 

 

 

 

Private Asset Management, Inc.; and Treasurer, Invesco Exchange-Traded

 

 

 

 

FundTrust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Fund Trust and Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded

 

 

 

 

Fund Trust

 

 

Russell C. Burk — 1958

2010

Senior Vice President and Senior Officer, The Invesco Funds

N/A

N/A

Senior Vice President and Senior

 

 

 

 

Officer

 

 

 

 

Jeffrey H. Kupor – 1968

2018

Head of Legal of the Americas, Invesco Ltd.; Senior Vice President and

N/A

N/A

Senior Vice President, Chief Legal

 

Secretary, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional

 

 

Officer and Secretary

 

(N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Senior Vice President and

 

 

 

 

Secretary, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM

 

 

 

 

Distributors, Inc.); Vice President and Secretary, Invesco Investment Services,

 

 

 

 

Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Investment Services, Inc.) Senior Vice

 

 

 

 

President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, The Invesco Funds; Secretary and

 

 

 

 

General Counsel, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van

 

 

 

 

Kampen Asset Management); Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Capital

 

 

 

 

Markets, Inc. (formerly known as Van Kampen Funds Inc.) and Chief Legal

 

 

 

 

Officer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund

 

 

 

 

Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded

 

 

 

 

Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust;

 

 

 

 

Secretary, Invesco Indexing LLC; Secretary, W.L. Ross & Co., LLC

 

 

 

 

Formerly: Secretary and Vice President, Jemstep, Inc.; Head of Legal,

 

 

 

 

Worldwide Institutional, Invesco Ltd.; Secretary and General Counsel, INVESCO

 

 

 

 

Private Capital Investments, Inc.; Senior Vice President, Secretary and General

 

 

 

 

Counsel, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM

 

 

 

 

Management Group, Inc.); Assistant Secretary, INVESCO Asset Management

 

 

 

 

(Bermuda) Ltd.; Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Private Capital, Inc.;

 

 

 

 

Assistant Secretary and General Counsel, INVESCO Realty, Inc.; Secretary and

 

 

 

 

General Counsel, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.; and Secretary,

 

 

 

 

Sovereign G./P. Holdings Inc.

 

 

Andrew R. Schlossberg – 1974

2019

Head of the Americas and Senior Managing Director, Invesco Ltd.; Director and

N/A

N/A

Senior Vice President

 

Senior Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco

 

 

 

 

Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Director and

 

 

 

 

Chairman, Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM

 

 

 

 

Investment Services, Inc.) (registered transfer agent); Senior Vice President,

 

 

 

 

The Invesco Funds; Director, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known

 

 

 

 

as Van Kampen Asset Management); Director, President and Chairman, Invesco

 

 

 

 

Insurance Agency, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Formerly: Director, Invesco UK Limited; Director and Chief Executive, Invesco

 

 

 

 

Asset Management Limited and Invesco Fund Managers Limited; Assistant Vice

 

 

 

 

President, The Invesco Funds; Senior Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.

 

 

 

 

(formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment

 

 

 

 

adviser); Director and Chief Executive, Invesco Administration Services Limited

 

 

 

 

and Invesco Global Investment Funds Limited; Director, Invesco Distributors,

 

 

 

 

Inc.; Head of EMEA, Invesco Ltd.; President, Invesco Actively Managed

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II and Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust;

 

 

 

 

Managing Director and Principal Executive Officer, Invesco Capital

 

 

 

 

Management LLC

 

 

T-5

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers—(continued)

 

 

 

Number of

Other

 

Trustee

 

Funds in

Directorship(s)

Name, Year of Birth and

and/or

 

Fund Complex

Held by Trustee

Position(s)

Officer

Principal Occupation(s)

Overseen by

During Past 5

Held with the Trust

Since

During Past 5 Years

Trustee

Years

Officers—(continued)

 

 

 

 

John M. Zerr — 1962

2010

Chief Operating Officer of the Americas; Senior Vice President, Invesco

N/A

N/A

Senior Vice President

 

Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered

 

 

 

 

investment adviser); Senior Vice President, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly

 

 

 

 

known as Invesco AIM Distributors, Inc.); Director and Vice President, Invesco

 

 

 

 

Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Investment

 

 

 

 

Services, Inc.) Senior Vice President, The Invesco Funds; Managing Director,

 

 

 

 

Invesco Capital Management LLC; Director, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC

 

 

 

 

(formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management); Senior Vice President,

 

 

 

 

Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (formerly known as Van Kampen Funds Inc.);

 

 

 

 

Manager, Invesco Indexing LLC; Manager, Invesco Specialized Products, LLC;

 

 

 

 

Director and Senior Vice President, Invesco Insurance Agency, Inc.; Member,

 

 

 

 

Invesco Canada Funds Advisory Board; Director, President and Chief Executive

 

 

 

 

Officer, Invesco Corporate Class Inc. (corporate mutual fund company); and

 

 

 

 

Director, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Canada Ltd.

 

 

 

 

(formerly known as Invesco Trimark Ltd./Invesco Trimark Ltèe) (registered

 

 

 

 

investment adviser and registered transfer agent); President, Invesco, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Formerly: Director and Senior Vice President, Invesco Management Group, Inc.

 

 

 

 

(formerly known as Invesco AIM Management Group, Inc.); Secretary and

 

 

 

 

General Counsel, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco

 

 

 

 

AIM Management Group, Inc.); Secretary, Invesco Investment Services, Inc.

 

 

 

 

(formerly known as Invesco AIM Investment Services, Inc.); Chief Legal Officer

 

 

 

 

and Secretary, The Invesco Funds; Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco

 

 

 

 

Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management);

 

 

 

 

Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (formerly known

 

 

 

 

as Van Kampen Funds Inc.); Chief Legal Officer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund

 

 

 

 

Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded

 

 

 

 

Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco

 

 

 

 

Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Self-Indexed Fund Trust; Secretary, Invesco Indexing LLC;

 

 

 

 

Director, Secretary, General Counsel and Senior Vice President, Van Kampen

 

 

 

 

Exchange Corp.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, IVZ Distributors, Inc.

 

 

 

 

(formerly known as INVESCO Distributors, Inc.); Director and Vice President,

 

 

 

 

INVESCO Funds Group, Inc.; Director and Vice President, Van Kampen

 

 

 

 

Advisors Inc.; Director, Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Van

 

 

 

 

Kampen Investor Services Inc.;Director and Secretary, Invesco Distributors,

 

 

 

 

Inc. (formerly known as Invesco AIM Distributors, Inc.); Director, Senior Vice

 

 

 

 

President, General Counsel and Secretary, Invesco AIM Advisers, Inc. and Van

 

 

 

 

Kampen Investments Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Fund

 

 

 

 

Management Company; Director, Senior Vice President, Secretary, General

 

 

 

 

Counsel and Vice President, Invesco AIM Capital Management, Inc.; Chief

 

 

 

 

Operating Officer and General Counsel, Liberty Ridge Capital, Inc. (an

 

 

 

 

investment adviser)

 

 

Gregory G. McGreevey - 1962

2012

Senior Managing Director, Invesco Ltd.; Director, Chairman, President, and

N/A

N/A

Senior Vice President

 

Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco

 

 

 

 

Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Director, Invesco

 

 

 

 

Mortgage Capital, Inc. and Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.; and

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President, The Invesco Funds; and President, SNW Asset

 

 

 

 

Management Corporation and Invesco Managed Accounts, LLC

 

 

 

 

Formerly: Senior Vice President, Invesco Management Group, Inc. and Invesco

 

 

 

 

Advisers, Inc.; Assistant Vice President, The Invesco Funds

 

 

Kelli Gallegos – 1970

2010

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer – Investments Pool, Invesco

N/A

N/A

Vice President, Principal Financial

 

Specialized Products, LLC; Vice President, Principal Financial Officer and

 

 

Officer and Assistant Treasurer

 

Assistant Treasurer, The Invesco Funds; Principal Financial and Accounting

 

 

 

 

Officer – Pooled Investments, Invesco Capital Management LLC; Vice President

 

 

 

 

and Treasurer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded

 

 

 

 

Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively

 

 

 

 

Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded

 

 

 

 

Self-Indexed Fund Trust; Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.

 

 

 

 

Formerly: Assistant Treasurer, Invesco Specialized Products, LLC; Assistant

 

 

 

 

Treasurer, Invesco Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Exchange-Traded

 

 

 

 

Fund Trust II, Invesco India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively

 

 

 

 

Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, Invesco Actively Managed

 

 

 

 

Exchange-Traded Commodity Fund Trust and Invesco Exchange-Traded

 

 

 

 

Self-Indexed Fund Trust; Assistant Treasurer, Invesco Capital

 

 

 

 

Management LLC; Assistant Vice President, The Invesco Funds

 

 

Crissie M. Wisdom – 1969

2013

Anti-Money Laundering and OFAC Compliance Officer for Invesco U.S. entities

N/A

N/A

Anti-Money Laundering

 

including: Invesco Advisers, Inc. and its affiliates, Invesco Capital Markets,

 

 

Compliance

 

Inc., Invesco Distributors, Inc., Invesco Investment Services, Inc., The Invesco

 

 

Officer

 

Funds, Invesco Capital Management, LLC, Invesco Trust Company;

 

 

 

 

OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc., and Fraud Prevention Manager for

 

 

 

 

Invesco Investment Services, Inc.

 

 

T-6

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Trustees and Officers—(continued)

 

 

 

Number of

Other

 

Trustee

 

Funds in

Directorship(s)

Name, Year of Birth and

and/or

 

Fund Complex

Held by Trustee

Position(s)

Officer

Principal Occupation(s)

Overseen by

During Past 5

Held with the Trust

Since

During Past 5 Years

Trustee

Years

Officers—(continued)

 

 

 

 

Robert R. Leveille – 1969

2016

Chief Compliance Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (registered investment

N/A

N/A

Chief Compliance Officer

 

adviser); and Chief Compliance Officer, The Invesco Funds

 

 

 

 

Formerly: Chief Compliance Officer, Putnam Investments and the Putnam

 

 

 

 

Funds

 

 

Office of the Fund

Investment Adviser

Auditors

Custodian

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E.

Invesco Advisers, Inc.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

State Street Bank and Trust Company

Atlanta, GA 30309

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E.

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5800

225 Franklin Street

 

Atlanta, GA 30309

Houston, TX 77002-5021

Boston, MA 02110-2801

Counsel to the Fund

Counsel to the Independent Trustees

Transfer Agent

Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP

Goodwin Procter LLP

Computershare Trust Company, N.A

2005 Market Street, Suite 2600

901 New York Avenue, N.W.

250 Royall Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7018

Washington, D.C. 20001

Canton, MA 02021

T-7

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

(This page intentionally left blank)

(This page intentionally left blank)

Correspondence information

Send general correspondence to Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, KY 40233-5000.

Trust holdings and proxy voting information

The Trust provides a complete list of its holdings four times in each fiscal year, at the quarter ends. For the second and fourth quarters, the lists appear in the Trust's semiannual and annual reports to shareholders. For the first and third quarters, the Trust files the lists with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. The most recent list of portfolio holdings is available at invesco.com/us. Shareholders can also look up the Trust's Form N-PORT filings on the SEC website at sec.gov. The SEC file number for the Trust is shown below.

A description of the policies and procedures that the Trust uses to determine how to vote proxies

relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, from our Client Services department at 800 341 2929 or at invesco.com/proxyguidelines. The information is also available on

the SEC website, sec.gov.

Information regarding how the Trust voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available at invesco.com/proxysearch. The information is also available on the SEC website, sec.gov.

SEC file number: 811-06591

MS-CE-QMINC-AR-1

ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

There were no amendments to the Code of Ethics (the "Code") that applies to the Registrant's Principal Executive Officer ("PEO") and Principal Financial Officer ("PFO") during the period covered by the report. The Registrant did not grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from any provisions of the Code to the PEO or PFO during the period covered by this report.

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

The Board of Trustees has determined that the Registrant has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its Audit Committee. The Audit Committee financial experts are David C. Arch, Bruce L. Crockett, Cynthia Hostetler, Elizabeth Krentzman, Anthony J. LaCava, Jr., Teresa M. Ressel, Jr. Robert C. Troccoli and James Vaughn. David C. Arch, Bruce L. Crockett, Cynthia Hostetler, Elizabeth Krentzman, Anthony J. LaCava, Jr., Teresa M. Ressel, Jr. Robert C. Troccoli and James Vaughn are "independent" within the meaning of that term as used in Form N-CSR.

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

During the reporting period, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC ("PwC") advised the Audit Committee of the following matters for consideration under the SEC's auditor independence rules. PwC advised the Audit Committee that a PwC Manager and a PwC Senior Associate each held financial interests in investment companies within the Invesco Fund Complex that were inconsistent with the requirements of Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. PwC noted, among other things, that during the time of its audit, the engagement team was not aware of the investments, (or with respect to the PwC Senior Associate was not aware until after the investments were confirmed as SEC exceptions), the individuals were not in the chain of command of the audit or the audit partners of Invesco or the affiliate of the Registrant, the services each individual provided were not relied upon by the audit engagement team with respect to the audit of the Registrant or its affiliates (or with respect to the PwC Senior Associate, the services were performed by an individual who did not have decision-making responsibility for matters that materially affected the audit and were reviewed by team members at least two levels higher than the PwC Senior Associate), and the investments were not material to the net worth of each individual or their respective immediate family members which PwC considered in reaching its conclusion. PwC advised the Audit Committee that it believes its objectivity and impartiality had not been adversely affected by these matters as they related to the audit of the Registrant.

(a) to (d)

Fees Billed by PwC Related to the Registrant

PwC billed the Registrant aggregate fees for services rendered to the Registrant for the last two fiscal years as shown in the following table. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided to the Registrant.

 

 

 

Fees Billed for

Fees Billed for

 

Services Rendered to

Services Rendered to

 

 

the Registrant for

the Registrant for

 

fiscal year end 2020

fiscal year end 2019

Audit Fees

$

56,907

$

52,825

Audit-Related Fees

$

0

$

0

 

Tax Fees(1)

$

19,377

$

5,700

 

All Other Fees

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Fees

 

$

76,284

$

58,525

(1)Tax Fees for the fiscal year end February 29, 2020 includes fees billed for preparation of U.S. Tax Returns and Taxable Income calculations, including excise tax and year-to-date estimates for various book-to-tax differences. Tax fees for fiscal year end February 28, 2019 includes fees billed for reviewing tax returns and/or services related to tax compliance.

 

Fees Billed by PwC Related to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates

PwC billed Invesco Advisers, Inc. ("Invesco"), the Registrant's adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with Invesco that provides ongoing services to the Registrant ("Invesco Affiliates") aggregate fees for pre-approved non-audit services rendered to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates for the last two fiscal years as shown in the following table. The Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services provided to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates that were required to be pre-approved.

 

Fees Billed for Non-Audit

Fees Billed for Non-Audit Services

 

Services Rendered to Invesco and

Rendered to Invesco and Invesco

 

Invesco Affiliates for fiscal year

Affiliates for fiscal year end 2019

 

end 2020 That Were Required

That Were Required

 

to be Pre-Approved

to be Pre-Approved

 

by the Registrant's

by the Registrant's

 

Audit Committee

Audit Committee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit-Related Fees(1)

$

690,000

$

690,000

 

Tax Fees

$

0

 

$

0

All Other Fees

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Fees

$

690,000

$

690,000

(1)Audit-Related Fees for the fiscal years ended 2020 and 2019 include fees billed related to reviewing controls at a service organization.

(e)(1)

PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES As adopted by the Audit Committees of the Invesco Funds (the "Funds")

Last Amended March 29, 2017

I.Statement of Principles

The Audit Committees (the "Audit Committee") of the Boards of Trustees of the Funds (the "Board") have adopted these policies and procedures (the "Procedures") with respect to the pre- approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Funds' independent auditor (the "Auditor") to the Funds, and to the Funds' investment adviser(s) and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser(s) that provides ongoing services to the Funds (collectively, "Service Affiliates").

Under Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all audit and non-audit services provided to the Funds by the Auditor must be preapproved by the Audit Committee. Rule 2-01 of Regulation S- X requires that the Audit Committee also pre-approve a Service Affiliate's engagement of the Auditor for non-audit services if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds (a "Service Affiliate's Covered Engagement").

These Procedures set forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which the Audit Committee may pre-approve audit and non-audit services for the Funds and a Service Affiliate's Covered Engagement pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and other organizations and regulatory bodies applicable to the Funds ("Applicable

 

Rules").1 They address both general pre-approvals without consideration of specific case-by-case services ("general pre-approvals") and pre-approvals on a case-by-case basis ("specific pre- approvals"). Any services requiring pre-approval that are not within the scope of general pre- approvals hereunder are subject to specific pre-approval. These Procedures also address the delegation by the Audit Committee of pre-approval authority to the Audit Committee Chair or Vice Chair.

II.Pre-Approval of Fund Audit Services

The annual Fund audit services engagement, including terms and fees, is subject to specific pre- approval by the Audit Committee. Audit services include the annual financial statement audit and other procedures required to be performed by an independent auditor to be able to form an opinion on the Funds' financial statements. The Audit Committee will receive, review and consider sufficient information concerning a proposed Fund audit engagement to make a reasonable evaluation of the Auditor's qualifications and independence. The Audit Committee will oversee the Fund audit services engagement as necessary, including approving any changes in terms, audit scope, conditions and fees.

In addition to approving the Fund audit services engagement at least annually and specifically approving any changes, the Audit Committee may generally or specifically pre-approve engagements for other audit services, which are those services that only an independent auditor reasonably can provide. Other audit services may include services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and other documents filed with the SEC.

III.General and Specific Pre-Approval of Non-Audit Fund Services

The Audit Committee will consider, at least annually, the list of General Pre-Approved Non-Audit Services which list may be terminated or modified at any time by the Audit Committee. To inform the Audit Committee's review and approval of General Pre-Approved Non-Audit Services, the Funds' Treasurer (or his or her designee) and Auditor shall provide such information regarding independence or other matters as the Audit Committee may request.

Any services or fee ranges that are not within the scope of General Pre-Approved Non-Audit Services have not received general pre-approval and require specific pre-approval. Each request for specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee for services to be provided by the Auditor to the Funds must be submitted to the Audit Committee by the Funds' Treasurer (or his or her designee) and must include detailed information about the services to be provided, the fees or fee ranges to be charged, and other relevant information sufficient to allow the Audit Committee to consider whether to pre-approve such engagement, including evaluating whether the provision of such services will impair the independence of the Auditor and is otherwise consistent with Applicable Rules.

IV. Non-Audit Service Types

The Audit Committee may provide either general or specific pre-approval of audit-related, tax or other services, each as described in more detail below.

1Applicable Rules include, for example, New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") rules applicable to closed-end funds managed by Invesco and listed on NYSE.

 

a.Audit-Related Services

"Audit-related services" are assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Fund's financial statements or that are traditionally performed by an independent auditor. Audit-related services include, among others, accounting consultations related to accounting, financial reporting or disclosure matters not classified as "Audit services"; assistance with understanding and implementing new accounting and financial reporting guidance from rulemaking authorities; services related to mergers, acquisitions or dispositions; compliance with ratings agency requirements and interfund lending activities; and assistance with internal control reporting requirements.

b.Tax Services

"Tax services" include, but are not limited to, the review and signing of the Funds' federal tax returns, the review of required distributions by the Funds and consultations regarding tax matters such as the tax treatment of new investments or the impact of new regulations. The Audit Committee will not approve proposed services of the Auditor which the Audit Committee believes are to be provided in connection with a service or transaction initially recommended by the Auditor, the sole business purpose of which may be tax avoidance and the tax treatment of which may not be supported in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. The Audit Committee will consult with the Funds' Treasurer (or his or her designee) and may consult with outside counsel or advisers as necessary to ensure the consistency of tax services rendered by the Auditor with the foregoing policy. The Auditor shall not represent any Fund or any Service Affiliate before a tax court, district court or federal court of claims.

Each request to provide tax services under either the general or specific pre-approval of the Audit Committee will include a description from the Auditor in writing of (i) the scope of the service, the fee structure for the engagement, and any side letter or other amendment to the engagement letter, or any other agreement (whether oral, written, or otherwise) between the Auditor and the Funds, relating to the service; and (ii) any compensation arrangement or other agreement, such as a referral agreement, a referral fee or fee-sharing arrangement, between the Auditor (or an affiliate of the Auditor) and any person (other than the Funds or Service Affiliates receiving the services) with respect to the promoting, marketing, or recommending of a transaction covered by the service. The Auditor will also discuss with the Audit Committee the potential effects of the services on the independence of the Auditor, and document the substance of its discussion with the Audit Committee.

c.Other Services

The Audit Committee may pre-approve other non-audit services so long as the Audit Committee believes that the service will not impair the independence of the Auditor. Appendix I includes a list of services that the Auditor is prohibited from performing by the SEC rules. Appendix I also includes a list of services that would impair the Auditor's independence unless the Audit Committee reasonably concludes that the results of the services will not be subject to audit procedures during an audit of the Funds' financial statements.

V.Pre-Approval of Service Affiliate's Covered Engagements

 

Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X requires that the Audit Committee pre-approve a Service Affiliate's engagement of the Auditor for non-audit services if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds, defined above as a "Service Affiliate's Covered Engagement".

The Audit Committee may provide either general or specific pre-approval of any Service Affiliate's Covered Engagement, including for audit-related, tax or other services, as described above, if the Audit Committee believes that the provision of the services to a Service Affiliate will not impair the independence of the Auditor with respect to the Funds. Any Service Affiliate's Covered Engagements that are not within the scope of General Pre-Approved Non-Audit Services have not received general pre-approval and require specific pre-approval.

Each request for specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee of a Service Affiliate's Covered Engagement must be submitted to the Audit Committee by the Funds' Treasurer (or his or her designee) and must include detailed information about the services to be provided, the fees or fee ranges to be charged, a description of the current status of the pre-approval process involving other audit committees in the Invesco investment company complex (as defined in Rule 2-201 of Regulation S-X) with respect to the proposed engagement, and other relevant information sufficient to allow the Audit Committee to consider whether the provision of such services will impair the independence of the Auditor from the Funds. Additionally, the Funds' Treasurer (or his or her designee) and the Auditor will provide the Audit Committee with a statement that the proposed engagement requires pre-approval by the Audit Committee, the proposed engagement, in their view, will not impair the independence of the Auditor and is consistent with Applicable Rules, and the description of the proposed engagement provided to the Audit Committee is consistent with that presented to or approved by the Invesco audit committee.

Information about all Service Affiliate engagements of the Auditor for non-audit services, whether or not subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee, shall be provided to the Audit Committee at least quarterly, to allow the Audit Committee to consider whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence from the Funds. The Funds' Treasurer and Auditor shall provide the Audit Committee with sufficiently detailed information about the scope of services provided and the fees for such services, to ensure that the Audit Committee can adequately consider whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence from the Funds.

VI. Pre-Approved Fee Levels or Established Amounts

Pre-approved fee levels or ranges for audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Auditor to the Funds, and for a Service Affiliate's Covered Engagement, under general pre-approval or specific pre-approval will be set periodically by the Audit Committee. Any proposed fees exceeding 110% of the maximum pre-approved fee levels or ranges for such services or engagements will be promptly presented to the Audit Committee and will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee before payment of any additional fees is made.

VII. Delegation

The Audit Committee hereby delegates, subject to the dollar limitations set forth below, specific authority to its Chair, or in his or her absence, Vice Chair, to pre-approve audit and non-audit services proposed to be provided by the Auditor to the Funds and/or a Service Affiliate's Covered Engagement, between Audit Committee meetings. Such delegation does not preclude the Chair or Vice Chair from declining, on a case by case basis, to exercise his or her delegated authority and

 

instead convening the Audit Committee to consider and pre-approve any proposed services or engagements.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Audit Committee must pre-approve: (a) any non-audit services to be provided to the Funds for which the fees are estimated to exceed $500,000; (b) any Service Affiliate's Covered Engagement for which the fees are estimated to exceed $500,000; or (c) any cost increase to any previously approved service or engagement that exceeds the greater of $250,000 or 50% of the previously approved fees up to a maximum increase of $500,000.

VIII. Compliance with Procedures

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, failure to pre-approve any services or engagements that are not required to be pre-approved pursuant to the de minimis exception provided for in Rule 2- 01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X shall not constitute a violation of these Procedures. The Audit Committee has designated the Funds' Treasurer to ensure services and engagements are pre- approved in compliance with these Procedures. The Funds' Treasurer will immediately report to the Chair of the Audit Committee, or the Vice Chair in his or her absence, any breach of these Procedures that comes to the attention of the Funds' Treasurer or any services or engagements that are not required to be pre-approved pursuant to the de minimis exception provided for in Rule 2- 01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.

On at least an annual basis, the Auditor will provide the Audit Committee with a summary of all non-audit services provided to any entity in the investment company complex (as defined in section 2-01(f)(14) of Regulation S-X, including the Funds and Service Affiliates) that were not pre- approved, including the nature of services provided and the associated fees.

IX. Amendments to Procedures

All material amendments to these Procedures must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. Non-material amendments to these Procedures may be made by the Legal and Compliance Departments and will be reported to the Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee.

Appendix I

Non-Audit Services That May Impair the Auditor's Independence

The Auditor is not independent if, at any point during the audit and professional engagement, the Auditor provides the following non-audit services:

∙Management functions;

∙Human resources;

∙Broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services ;

∙Legal services;

∙Expert services unrelated to the audit;

∙Any service or product provided for a contingent fee or a commission;

∙Services related to marketing, planning, or opining in favor of the tax treatment of confidential transactions or aggressive tax position transactions, a significant purpose of which is tax avoidance;

 

∙Tax services for persons in financial reporting oversight roles at the Fund; and

∙Any other service that the Public Company Oversight Board determines by regulation is impermissible.

An Auditor is not independent if, at any point during the audit and professional engagement, the Auditor provides the following non-audit services unless it is reasonable to conclude that the results of the services will not be subject to audit procedures during an audit of the Funds' financial statements:

∙Bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client;

∙Financial information systems design and implementation;

∙Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contribution-in-kind reports;

∙Actuarial services; and

∙Internal audit outsourcing services.

(e)(2) There were no amounts that were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minimus exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f)Not applicable.

(g)In addition to the amounts shown in the tables above, PwC billed Invesco and Invesco Affiliates aggregate fees of $4,089,000 for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2020 and $3,550,000 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2019 for non-audit services not required to be pre-approved by the Registrant's Audit Committee. In total, PwC billed the Registrant, Invesco and Invesco Affiliates aggregate non-audit fees of $4,798,377 for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2020 and $4,245,700 for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2019.

PwC provided audit services to the Investment Company complex of approximately $33 million.

(h)The Audit Committee also has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Invesco and Invesco Affiliates that were not required to be pre-approved pursuant to

SEC regulations, if any, is compatible with maintaining PwC's independence.

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.

Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers is included as part of the reports to stockholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.

 

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Invesco's Policy Statement on Global Corporate Governance and Proxy Voting

February, 2020

I.Guiding Principles and Philosophy

Public companies hold shareholder meetings, attended by the company's executives, directors, and shareholders, during which important issues, such as appointments to the company's board of directors, executive compensation, and auditors, are addressed and where applicable, voted on. Proxy voting gives shareholders the opportunity to vote on issues that impact the company's operations and policies without being present at the meetings.

Invesco views proxy voting as an integral part of its investment management responsibilities and believes that the right to vote proxies should be managed with the same high standards of care and fiduciary duty to its clients as all other elements of the investment process. Invesco's proxy voting philosophy, governance structure and process are designed to ensure that proxy votes are cast in accordance with clients' best interests, which Invesco interprets to mean clients' best economic interests, this Policy and the operating guidelines and procedures of Invesco's regional investment centers.

Invesco investment teams vote proxies on behalf of Invesco-sponsored funds and both fund and non- fund advisory clients that have explicitly granted Invesco authority in writing to vote proxies on their behalf.

The proxy voting process at Invesco, which is driven by investment professionals, focuses on maximizing long-term value for our clients, protecting clients' rights and promoting governance structures and practices that reinforce the accountability of corporate management and boards of directors to shareholders. Invesco takes a nuanced approach to voting and, therefore, many matters to be voted upon are reviewed on a case by case basis.

Votes in favor of board or management proposals should not be interpreted as an indication of insufficient consideration by Invesco fund managers. Such votes may reflect the outcome of past or ongoing engagement and active ownership by Invesco with representatives of the companies in which we invest.

II.Applicability of this Policy

This Policy sets forth the framework of Invesco's corporate governance approach, broad philosophy and guiding principles that inform the proxy voting practices of Invesco's investment teams around the world. Given the different nature of these teams and their respective investment processes, as well as the significant differences in regulatory regimes and market practices across jurisdictions, not all aspects of this Policy may apply to all Invesco investment teams at all times. In the case of a conflict between this Policy and the operating guidelines and procedures of a regional investment center the latter will control.

 

III.Proxy Voting for Certain Fixed Income, Money Market and Index Strategies

For proxies held by certain client accounts managed in accordance with fixed income, money market and index strategies (including exchange traded funds), Invesco will typically vote in line with the majority holder of the active-equity shares held by Invesco outside of those strategies ("Majority Voting"). In this manner Invesco seeks to leverage the active-equity expertise and comprehensive proxy voting reviews conducted by teams employing active-equity strategies, which typically incorporate analysis of proxy issues as a core component of the investment process. Portfolio managers for accounts employing Majority Voting still retain full discretion to override Majority Voting and to vote the shares as they determine to be in the best interest of those accounts, absent certain types of conflicts of interest, which are discussed elsewhere in this Policy. When there are no corresponding active-equity shares held by Invesco, the proxies for those strategies will be voted in the following manner: (i) for U.S. issuers, in line with Invesco custom voting guidelines derived from the guidelines set forth below; and (ii) for non-U.S. issuers, in line with the recommendations of a third-party proxy advisory service.

IV. Conflicts of Interest

There may be occasions where voting proxies may present a real or perceived conflict of interest between Invesco, as investment manager, and one or more of Invesco's clients or vendors. Under Invesco's Code of Conduct, Invesco entities and individuals are strictly prohibited from putting personal benefit, whether tangible or intangible, before the interests of clients. "Personal benefit" includes any intended benefit for Invesco, oneself or any other individual, company, group or organization of any kind whatsoever, except a benefit for the relevant Invesco client.

Firm-level Conflicts of Interest

A conflict of interest may exist if Invesco has a material business relationship with, or is actively soliciting business from, either the company soliciting a proxy or a third party that has a material interest in the outcome of a proxy vote or that is actively lobbying for a particular outcome of a proxy vote (e.g., issuers that are distributors of Invesco's products, or issuers that employ Invesco to manage portions of their retirement plans or treasury accounts). Invesco's proxy governance team maintains a list of all such issuers for which a conflict of interest exists.

If the proposal that gives rise to the potential conflict is specifically addressed by this Policy or the operating guidelines and procedures of the relevant regional investment center, Invesco generally will vote the proxy in accordance therewith. Otherwise, based on a majority vote of its members, the Global IPAC (as described below) will vote the proxy.

Because this Policy and the operating guidelines and procedures of each regional investment center are pre-determined and crafted to be in the best interest of clients, applying them to vote client proxies should, in most instances, resolve any potential conflict of interest. As an additional safeguard, persons from Invesco's marketing, distribution and other customer-facing functions may not serve on the Global IPAC. For the avoidance of doubt, Invesco may not consider Invesco Ltd.'s pecuniary interest when voting proxies on behalf of clients.

Personal Conflicts of Interest

A conflict also may exist where an Invesco employee has a known personal relationship with other proponents of proxy proposals, participants in proxy contests, corporate directors, or candidates for directorships.

 

All Invesco personnel with proxy voting responsibilities are required to report any known personal conflicts of interest regarding proxy issues with which they are involved. In such instances, the individual(s) with the conflict will be excluded from the decision-making process relating to such issues.

Other Conflicts of Interest

To avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest, Invesco will not vote proxies issued by, or related to matters involving, Invesco Ltd. that may be held in client accounts from time to time.2 Shares of an Invesco-sponsored fund held by other Invesco funds will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of external shareholders of the underlying fund. Shares of an unaffiliated registered fund held by one or more Invesco funds will be voted in the same proportion as the votes of external shareholders of the underlying fund as required by federal securities law or any exemption therefrom. Additionally, Invesco or its Funds may vote proportionally in other cases where required by law.

V.Use of Third-Party Proxy Advisory Services

Invesco may supplement its internal research with information from third-parties, such as proxy advisory firms. However, Invesco generally retains full and independent discretion with respect to proxy voting decisions.

As part of its fiduciary obligation to clients, Invesco performs extensive initial and ongoing due diligence on the proxy advisory firms it engages. This includes reviews of information regarding the capabilities of their research staffs, methodologies for formulating voting recommendations, the adequacy and quality of staffing, personnel and technology, as applicable, and internal controls, policies and procedures, including those relating to possible conflicts of interest. In addition, Invesco regularly monitors and communicates with these firms and monitors their compliance with Invesco's performance and policy standards.

VI.

Global Proxy Voting Platform and Administration

Guided by its philosophy that investment teams should manage proxy voting, Invesco has created the Global Invesco Proxy Advisory Committee ("Global IPAC"). The Global IPAC is a global investments-driven committee comprised of representatives from various investment management teams and Invesco's Global Head of ESG. The Global IPAC provides a forum for investment teams to monitor, understand and discuss key proxy issues and voting trends within the Invesco complex. Absent a conflict of interest, the Global IPAC representatives, in consultation with the respective investment team, are responsible for voting proxies for the securities the team manages (unless such responsibility is explicitly delegated to the portfolio managers of the securities in question). In addition to the Global IPAC, for some clients, third parties (e.g., U.S. fund boards) provide oversight of the proxy process. The Global IPAC and Invesco's proxy administration and governance team, compliance and legal teams annually communicate and review this Policy and the operating guidelines and procedures of each regional investment center to ensure that they remain consistent with clients' best interests, regulatory requirements, governance trends and industry best practices.

Invesco maintains a proprietary global proxy administration platform, known as the "fund manager portal" and supported by the Global Head of ESG and a dedicated team of internal proxy specialists. The platform streamlines the proxy voting and ballot reconciliation processes, as well as related

2Generally speaking, Invesco does not invest for its clients in the shares of Invesco Ltd., however, limited exceptions apply in the case of funds or accounts designed to track an index that includes Invesco Ltd. as a component.

 

functions, such as share blocking and managing conflicts of interest issuers. Managing these processes internally, as opposed to relying on third parties, gives Invesco greater quality control, oversight and independence in the proxy administration process.

The platform also includes advanced global reporting and record-keeping capabilities regarding proxy matters that enable Invesco to satisfy client, regulatory and management requirements. Historical proxy voting information, including commentary by investment professionals regarding the votes they cast, where applicable, is stored to build institutional knowledge across the Invesco complex with respect to individual companies and proxy issues. Certain investment teams also use the platform to access third-party proxy research.

VII. Non-Votes

In the great majority of instances, Invesco will vote proxies. However, in certain circumstances, Invesco may refrain from voting where the economic or other opportunity costs of voting exceeds any benefit to clients. Such circumstances could include, for example:

∙If the security in question is on loan as part of a securities lending program, Invesco may determine that the benefit to the client of voting a particular proxy is outweighed by the revenue that would be lost by terminating the loan and recalling the securities;

∙In some countries the exercise of voting rights imposes temporary transfer restrictions on the related securities ("share blocking"). Invesco generally refrains from voting proxies in share-blocking countries unless Invesco determines that the benefit to the client(s) of voting a specific proxy outweighs the client's temporary inability to sell the security; or

∙Some companies require a representative to attend meetings in person to vote a proxy. Invesco may determine that the costs of sending a representative or signing a power-of- attorney outweigh the benefit of voting a particular proxy.

In addition, there may be instances in which Invesco is unable to vote all of its clients' proxies despite using commercially reasonable efforts to do so. For example, Invesco may not receive proxy materials from the relevant fund or client custodian with sufficient time and information to make an informed independent voting decision. In other cases, voting may not be practicable due to operational limitations. In such cases, Invesco may choose not to vote, to abstain from voting, to vote in line with management or to vote in accordance with proxy advisor recommendations. These matters are left to the discretion of the relevant portfolio manager.

VIII. Proxy Voting Guidelines

The following guidelines describe Invesco's general positions on various proxy voting issues. The guidelines are not intended to be exhaustive or prescriptive. As noted above, Invesco's proxy process is investor-driven, and each portfolio manager retains ultimate discretion to vote proxies in the manner he or she deems most appropriate, consistent with Invesco's proxy voting principles and philosophy discussed in Sections I. through IV. Individual proxy votes therefore will differ from these guidelines from time to time.

Invesco generally affords management discretion with respect to the operation of a company's business and will generally support a board's discretion on proposals relating to ordinary business practices and routine matters, unless there is insufficient information to decide about the nature of the proposal.

 

Invesco generally abstains from voting on or opposes proposals that are "bundled" or made contingent on each other (e.g., proposals to elect directors and approve compensation plans) where there is insufficient information to decide about the nature of the proposals.

A. Shareholder Access and Treatment of Shareholder Proposals – General

Invesco reviews on a case by case basis but generally votes in favor of proposals that would increase shareholders' opportunities to express their views to boards of directors, proposals that would lower barriers to shareholder action, and proposals to promote the adoption of generally accepted best practices in corporate governance, provided that such proposals would not require a disproportionate amount of management attention or corporate resources or otherwise that may inappropriately disrupt the company's business and main purpose, usually set out in their reporting disclosures and business model. Likewise, Invesco reviews on a case by case basis but generally votes for shareholder proposals that are designed to protect shareholder rights if a company's corporate governance standards indicate that such additional protections are warranted (for example, where minority shareholders' rights are not adequately protected).

B. Environmental, Social and Corporate Responsibility Issues

Invesco believes that a company's long-term response to environmental, social and corporate responsibility issues can significantly affect long-term shareholder value. We recognize that to manage a corporation effectively, directors and management may consider not only the interests of shareholders, but also the interests of employees, customers, suppliers, creditors and the local community, among others. While Invesco generally affords management discretion with respect to the operation of a company's business, Invesco generally will evaluate proposals relating to environmental, social and corporate responsibility issues on a case by case basis and will vote on those proposals in a manner intended to maximize long-term shareholder value. Invesco may choose, however, to abstain on voting on proposals relating to environmental, social and corporate responsibility issues.

Invesco reviews on a case by case basis but generally supports the following proposals relating to these issues:

∙Gender pay gap proposals

∙Political contributions disclosure/political lobbying disclosure/political activities and action

∙Data security, privacy, and internet issues

∙Report on climate change/climate change action

∙Gender diversity on boards

C. Capitalization Structure Issues

i.Stock Issuances

Invesco generally supports a board's proposal to issue additional capital stock to meet ongoing corporate needs, except where the request could adversely affect Invesco clients' ownership stakes or voting rights. Some capitalization proposals, such as those to authorize common or preferred stock with special voting rights or to issue additional stock in connection with an acquisition, may

 

require additional analysis. Invesco generally opposes proposals to issue additional stock without preemptive rights, as those issuances do not permit shareholders to share proportionately in any new issues of stock of the same class. Invesco generally opposes proposals to authorize classes of preferred stock with unspecified voting, conversion, dividend or other rights ("blank check" stock) when they appear to be intended as an anti-takeover mechanism; such issuances may be supported when used for general financing purposes.

ii.Stock Splits

Invesco generally supports a board's proposal to increase common share authorization for a stock split, provided that the increase in authorized shares would not result in excessive dilution given the company's industry and performance in terms of shareholder returns.

iii.Share Repurchases

Invesco generally supports a board's proposal to institute open-market share repurchase plans only if all shareholders participate on an equal basis.

D.Corporate Governance Issues

i.General

Invesco reviews on a case by case basis but generally supports the following proposals related to governance matters:

∙Adopt proxy access right

∙Require independent board chairperson

∙Provide right to shareholders to call special meetings

∙Provide right to act by written consent

∙Submit shareholder rights plan (poison pill) to shareholder vote

∙Reduce supermajority vote requirement

∙Remove antitakeover provisions

∙Declassify the board of directors

∙Require a majority vote for election of directors

∙Require majority of independent directors on the board

∙Approve executive appointment

∙Adopt exclusive forum provision

Invesco generally supports a board's discretion to amend a company's articles concerning routine matters, such as formalities relating to shareholder meetings. Invesco generally opposes non-routine

 

amendments to a company's articles if any of the proposed amendments would limit shareholders' rights or there is insufficient information to decide about the nature of the proposal.

ii.Board of Directors

1.Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections

Subject to the other considerations described below, in an uncontested director election for a company without a controlling shareholder, Invesco generally votes in favor of the director slate if it is comprised of at least a majority of independent directors and if the board's key committees are

fully independent, effective and balanced. Key committees include the audit, compensation/remuneration and governance/nominating committees. Invesco's standard of independence excludes directors who, in addition to the directorship, have any material business or family relationships with the companies they serve.

2.Director Nominees in Contested Elections

Invesco recognizes that short-term investment sentiments influence the corporate governance landscape and may influence companies in Invesco clients' portfolios and more broadly across the market. Invesco recognizes that short-term investment sentiment may conflict with long-term value creation and as such looks at each proxy contest matter on a case by case basis, considering factors such as:

∙Long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry

∙Management's track record

∙Background to the proxy contest

∙Qualifications of director nominees (both slates)

∙Evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders as well as the likelihood that the proposed objectives and goals can be met

∙Stock ownership positions in the company

3.Director Accountability

Invesco generally withholds votes from directors who exhibit a lack of accountability to shareholders. Examples include, without limitation, poor attendance (less than 75%, absent extenuating circumstances) at meetings, director "overboarding" (as described below), failing to implement shareholder proposals that have received a majority of votes and/or by adopting or approving egregious corporate-governance or other policies. In cases of material financial restatements, accounting fraud, habitually late filings, adopting shareholder rights plan ("poison pills") without shareholder approval, or other areas of poor performance, Invesco may withhold votes from some or all of a company's directors. Invesco generally supports shareholder proposals relating to the competence of directors that are in the best interest of the company's performance and the interest of its shareholders. In situations where directors' performance is a concern, Invesco may also support shareholder proposals to take corrective actions such as so-called "clawback" provisions.

 

Invesco generally withholds votes from directors who serve on an excessive number of boards of directors ("overboarding"). Examples of overboarding may include when (i) a non-executive director is sitting on more than six public company boards, and (ii) a CEO is sitting on the board of more than two public companies besides the CEO's own company, excluding the boards of majority-owned subsidiaries of the parent company.

4.Director Independence

Invesco generally supports proposals to require a majority of directors to be independent unless particular circumstances make this not feasible or in the best interests of shareholders. We generally vote for proposals that would require the board's audit, compensation/remuneration, and/or governance/nominating committees to be composed exclusively of independent directors because this minimizes the potential for conflicts of interest.

5.Director Indemnification

Invesco recognizes that individuals may be reluctant to serve as corporate directors if they are personally liable for all related lawsuits and legal costs. As a result, reasonable limitations on directors' liability can benefit a company and its shareholders by helping to attract and retain qualified directors while preserving recourse for shareholders in the event of misconduct by directors. Accordingly, unless there is insufficient information to make a decision about the nature of the proposal, Invesco will generally support a board's discretion regarding proposals to limit directors' liability and provide indemnification and/or exculpation, provided that the arrangements are limited to the director acting honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company and, in criminal matters, are limited to the director having reasonable grounds for believing the conduct was lawful.

6.Separate Chairperson and CEO

Invesco evaluates these proposals on a case by case basis, recognizing that good governance requires either an independent chair or a qualified, proactive, and lead independent director.

Voting decisions may consider, among other factors, the presence or absence of:

∙a designated lead director, appointed from the ranks of the independent board members, with an established term of office and clearly delineated powers and duties

∙a majority of independent directors

∙completely independent key committees

∙committee chairpersons nominated by the independent directors

∙CEO performance reviewed annually by a committee of independent directors

∙established governance guidelines

7.Majority/Supermajority/Cumulative Voting for Directors

The right to elect directors is the single most important mechanism shareholders have to promote accountability. Invesco generally votes in favor of proposals to elect directors by a majority vote. Except in cases where required by law in the jurisdiction of incorporation or when a company has

 

adopted formal governance principles that present a meaningful alternative to the majority voting standard, Invesco generally votes against actions that would impose any supermajority voting requirement, and generally supports actions to dismantle existing supermajority requirements.

The practice of cumulative voting can enable minority shareholders to have representation on a company's board. Invesco generally opposes such proposals as unnecessary where the company has adopted a majority voting standard. However, Invesco generally supports proposals to institute the practice of cumulative voting at companies whose overall corporate-governance standards indicate a particular need to protect the interests of minority shareholders.

8.Staggered Boards/Annual Election of Directors

Invesco generally supports proposals to elect each director annually rather than electing directors to staggered multi-year terms because annual elections increase a board's level of accountability to its shareholders.

9.Board Size

Invesco believes that the number of directors is an important factor to consider when evaluating the board's ability to maximize long-term shareholder value. Invesco approaches proxies relating to board size on a case by case basis but generally will defer to the board with respect to determining the optimal number of board members, provided that the proposed board size is sufficiently large to represent shareholder interests and sufficiently limited to remain effective.

10.Director Term Limits and Retirement Age

Invesco believes it is important for a board of directors to examine its membership regularly with a view to ensuring that the company continues to benefit from a diversity of director viewpoints and experience. We generally believe that an individual board's nominating committee is best positioned to determine whether director term limits would be an appropriate measure to help achieve these goals and, if so, the nature of such limits. Invesco generally opposes proposals to limit the tenure of outside directors through mandatory retirement ages.

iii.Audit Committees and Auditors

1.Qualifications of Audit Committee and Auditors

Invesco believes a company's Audit Committee has a high degree of responsibility to shareholders in matters of financial disclosure, integrity of the financial statements and effectiveness of a company's internal controls. Independence, experience and financial expertise are critical elements of a well-functioning Audit Committee. When electing directors who are members of a company's Audit Committee, or when ratifying a company's auditors, Invesco considers the past performance of the Audit Committee and holds its members accountable for the quality of the company's financial statements and reports.

2.Auditor Indemnifications

A company's independent auditors play a critical role in ensuring and attesting to the integrity of the company's financial statements. It is therefore essential that they perform their work in accordance with the highest standards. Invesco generally opposes proposals that would limit the liability of or indemnify auditors because doing so could serve to undermine this obligation.

 

3.Adequate Disclosure of Auditor Fees

Understanding the fees earned by the auditors is important for assessing auditor independence. Invesco's support for the re-appointment of the auditors will take into consideration the availability of adequate disclosure concerning the amount and nature of audit versus non-audit fees. Invesco generally will support proposals that call for this disclosure if it is not already being made.

E. Remuneration and Incentives

Invesco believes properly constructed compensation plans that include equity ownership are effective in creating incentives that induce management and employees of portfolio companies to create greater shareholder wealth. Invesco generally supports equity compensation plans that promote the proper alignment of incentives with shareholders' long-term interests, and generally votes against plans that are overly dilutive to existing shareholders, plans that contain objectionable structural features, and plans that appear likely to reduce the value of the client's investment.

i.Independent Compensation/Remuneration Committee

Invesco believes that an independent, experienced and well-informed compensation/remuneration committee is critical to ensuring that a company's remuneration practices align with shareholders' interests and, therefore, generally supports proposals calling for a compensation/remuneration committee to be comprised solely of independent directors.

ii.Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

Invesco believes that an independent compensation/remuneration committee of the board, with input from management, is generally best positioned to determine the appropriate components and levels of executive compensation, as well as the appropriate frequency of related shareholder advisory votes. This is particularly the case where shareholders can express their views on remuneration matters through annual votes for or against the election of the individual directors who comprise the compensation/remuneration committee. Invesco, therefore, generally will support management's recommendations regarding the components and levels of executive compensation and the frequency of shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation. However, Invesco will vote against such recommendations where Invesco determines that a company's executive remuneration policies are not properly aligned with shareholder interests or may create inappropriate incentives for management.

iii.Equity Based Compensation Plans

Invesco generally votes against plans that contain structural features that would impair the alignment of incentives between shareholders and management. Such features include, without limitation, the ability to reprice or reload options without shareholder approval, the ability to issue options below the stock's current market price, or the ability to replenish shares automatically without shareholder approval.

iv.Severance Arrangements

Invesco considers proposed severance arrangements (sometimes known as "golden parachute" arrangements) on a case by case basis due to the wide variety among their terms. Invesco acknowledges that in some cases such arrangements, if reasonable, may be in shareholders' best interests as a method of attracting and retaining high quality executive talent. Invesco generally votes in favor of proposals requiring advisory shareholder ratification of senior executives'

 

severance agreements while generally opposing proposals that require such agreements to be ratified by shareholders in advance of their adoption.

v."Claw Back" Provisions

Invesco generally supports so called "claw back" policies intended to recoup remuneration paid to senior executives based upon materially inaccurate financial reporting (as evidenced by later restatements) or fraudulent accounting or business practices.

vi.Employee Stock Purchase Plans

Invesco generally supports employee stock purchase plans that are reasonably designed to provide proper incentives to a broad base of employees, provided that the price at which employees may acquire stock represents a reasonable discount from the market price.

F. Anti-Takeover Defenses

Measures designed to protect a company from unsolicited bids can adversely affect shareholder value and voting rights, and they have the potential to create conflicts of interests among directors, management and shareholders. Such measures include adopting or renewing shareholder rights plans ("poison pills"), requiring supermajority voting on certain corporate actions, classifying the election of directors instead of electing each director to an annual term, or creating separate classes of common or preferred stock with special voting rights. In determining whether to support a proposal to add, eliminate or restrict anti-takeover measures, Invesco will examine the elements of the proposal to assess the degree to which it would adversely affect shareholder rights of adopted. Invesco generally supports shareholder proposals directing companies to subject their anti-takeover provisions to a shareholder vote, as well as the following proposals:

∙Provide right to act by written consent

∙Provide right to call special meetings

∙Adopt fair price provision

∙Approve control share acquisition

Invesco generally opposes payments by companies to minority shareholders intended to dissuade such shareholders from pursuing a takeover or another change (sometimes known as "greenmail") because these payments result in preferential treatment of some shareholders over others.

Companies occasionally require shareholder approval to engage in certain corporate actions or transactions such as mergers, acquisitions, name changes, dissolutions, reorganizations, divestitures and reincorporations. Invesco generally determines its votes for these types of corporate actions after a careful evaluation of the proposal. Generally, Invesco will support proposals to approve different types of restructurings that provide the necessary financing to save the company from involuntary bankruptcy. However, Invesco will generally oppose proposals to change a company's corporate form or to "go dark" (i.e., going private transactions) without shareholder approval.

Reincorporation involves re-establishing the company in a different legal jurisdiction. Invesco generally will vote for proposals to reincorporate a company if the board and management have demonstrated sound financial or business reasons for the move. Invesco generally will oppose

 

proposals to reincorporate if they are solely part of an anti-takeover defense or intended to limit directors' liability.

Invesco will generally support proposals that ask the board to consider non"shareholder constituencies or other non"financial effects when evaluating a merger or business combination.

 

 

 

 

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

 

 

 

 

I

Applicable to

 

All Advisory Clients, including the Invesco

 

 

 

Funds

 

Risk Addressed by the

 

Breach of fiduciary duty to client under

 

Guidelines

 

Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by placing

 

 

 

Invesco's interests ahead of client's best

 

 

 

interests in voting proxies

 

Relevant Law and Other Sources

U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as

 

 

 

amended

 

Last

 

April 19, 2016

 

xReviewed xRevised

 

 

 

by Compliance for Accuracy

 

 

Guideline Owner

 

U.S. Compliance and Legal

 

Policy Approver

 

Invesco Advisers, Inc., Invesco Funds Board

 

Approved/Adopted Date

 

May 3-4, 2016

The following guidelines apply to all institutional and retail funds and accounts that have explicitly authorized Invesco Advisers, Inc. ("Invesco") to vote proxies associated with securities held on their behalf (collectively, "Clients").

A. INTRODUCTION

Invesco Ltd. ("IVZ"), the ultimate parent company of Invesco, has adopted a global policy statement on corporate governance and proxy voting (the "Invesco Global Proxy Policy"). The policy describes IVZ's views on governance matters and the proxy administration and governance approach. Invesco votes proxies by using the framework and procedures set forth in the Invesco Global Proxy Policy, while maintaining the Invesco-specific guidelines described below.

B. PROXY VOTING OVERSIGHT: THE MUTUAL FUNDS' BOARD OF TRUSTEES

In addition to the Global Invesco Proxy Advisory Committee, the Invesco mutual funds' board of trustees provides oversight of the proxy process through quarterly reporting and an annual in-person presentation by Invesco's Global Head of Proxy Governance and Responsible Investment.

 

C. USE OF THIRD PARTY PROXY ADVISORY SERVICES

Invesco has direct access to third-party proxy advisory analyses and recommendations (currently provided by Glass Lewis ("GL") and Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. ("ISS")), among other research tools, and uses the information gleaned from those sources to make independent voting decisions.

Invesco's proxy administration team performs extensive initial and ongoing due diligence on the proxy advisory firms that it engages. When deemed appropriate, representatives from the proxy advisory firms are asked to deliver updates directly to the mutual funds' board of trustees. Invesco conducts semi-annual, in-person policy roundtables with key heads of research from ISS and GL to ensure transparency, dialogue and engagement with the firms. These meetings provide Invesco with an opportunity to assess the firms' capabilities, conflicts of interest and service levels, as well as provide investment professionals with direct insight into the advisory firms' stances on key governance and proxy topics and their policy framework/methodologies. Invesco's proxy administration team also reviews the annual SSAE 16 reports for, and the periodic proxy guideline updates published by, each proxy advisory firm to ensure that their guidelines remain consistent with Invesco's policies and procedures. Furthermore, each proxy advisory firm completes an annual due diligence questionnaire submitted by Invesco, and Invesco conducts on-site due diligence at each firm, in part to discuss their responses to the questionnaire.

If Invesco becomes aware of any material inaccuracies in the information provided by ISS or GL, Invesco's proxy administration team will investigate the matter to determine the cause, evaluate the adequacy of the proxy advisory firm's control structure and assess the efficacy of the measures instituted to prevent further errors.

ISS and GL provide updates to previously issued proxy reports when necessary to incorporate newly available information or to correct factual errors. ISS also has a Feedback Review Board, which provides a mechanism for stakeholders to communicate with ISS about issues related to proxy voting and policy formulation, research, and the accuracy of data contained in ISS reports.

D. PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

The following guidelines describe Invesco's general positions on various common proxy issues. The guidelines are not intended to be exhaustive or prescriptive. Invesco's proxy process is investor-driven, and each portfolio manager retains ultimate discretion to vote proxies in the manner that he or she deems to be the most appropriate, consistent with the proxy voting principles and philosophy discussed in the Invesco Global Proxy Policy. Individual proxy votes therefore will differ from these guidelines from time to time.

I. Corporate Governance

Management teams of companies are accountable to the boards of directors and directors of publicly held companies are accountable to shareholders. Invesco endeavors to vote the proxies of companies in a manner that will reinforce the notion of a board's accountability. Consequently, Invesco generally votes against any actions that would impair the rights of shareholders or would reduce shareholders' influence over the board.

2

 

The following are specific voting issues that illustrate how Invesco applies this principle of accountability.

Elections of directors

In uncontested director elections for companies that do not have a controlling shareholder, Invesco generally votes in favor of slates if they are comprised of at least a majority of independent directors and if the boards' key committees are fully independent. Key committees include the audit, compensation and governance or nominating Committees. Invesco's standard of independence excludes directors who, in addition to the directorship, have any material business or family relationships with the companies they serve. Contested director elections are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Director performance

Invesco generally withholds votes from directors who exhibit a lack of accountability to shareholders, either through their level of attendance at meetings or by adopting or approving egregious corporate-governance or other policies. In cases of material financial restatements, accounting fraud, habitually late filings, adopting shareholder rights plan ("poison pills") without shareholder approval, or other areas of poor performance, Invesco may withhold votes from some or all of a company's directors. In situations where directors' performance is a concern, Invesco may also support shareholder proposals to take corrective actions, such as so-called "clawback" provisions.

Auditors and Audit Committee members

Invesco believes a company's audit committee has a high degree of responsibility to shareholders in matters of financial disclosure, integrity of the financial statements and effectiveness of a company's internal controls. Independence, experience and financial expertise are critical elements of a well-functioning audit committee. When electing directors who are members of a company's audit committee, or when ratifying a company's auditors, Invesco considers the past performance of the committee and holds its members accountable for the quality of the company's financial statements and reports.

Majority standard in director elections

The right to elect directors is the single most important mechanism shareholders have to promote accountability. Invesco supports the nascent effort to reform the U.S. convention of electing directors, and generally votes in favor of proposals to elect directors by a majority vote.

Staggered Boards/Annual Election of Directors

Invesco generally supports proposals to elect each director annually rather than electing directors to staggered multi-year terms because annual elections increase a board's level of accountability to its shareholders.

Supermajority voting requirements

Unless required by law in the state of incorporation, Invesco generally votes against actions that would impose any supermajority voting requirement, and generally supports actions to dismantle existing supermajority requirements.

Responsiveness of Directors

Invesco generally withholds votes for directors who do not adequately respond to shareholder proposals that were approved by a majority of votes cast the prior year.

3

 

Cumulative voting

The practice of cumulative voting can enable minority shareholders to have representation on a company's board. Invesco generally supports proposals to institute the practice of cumulative voting at companies whose overall corporate-governance standards indicate a particular need to protect the interests of minority shareholders.

Proxy access

Invesco generally supports shareholders' nominations of directors in the proxy statement and ballot because it increases the accountability of the board to shareholders. Invesco will generally consider the proposed minimum period of ownership (e.g., three years), minimum ownership percentage (e.g., three percent), limitations on a proponent's ability to aggregate holdings with other shareholders and the maximum percentage of directors who can be nominated when determining how to vote on proxy access proposals.

Shareholder access

On business matters with potential financial consequences, Invesco generally votes in favor of proposals that would increase shareholders' opportunities to express their views to boards of directors, proposals that would lower barriers to shareholder action and proposals to promote the adoption of generally accepted best practices in corporate governance. Furthermore, Invesco generally votes for shareholder proposals that are designed to protect shareholder rights if a company's corporate governance standards indicate that such additional protections are warranted.

Exclusive Forum

Invesco generally supports proposals that would designate a specific jurisdiction in company bylaws as the exclusive venue for certain types of shareholder lawsuits in order to reduce costs arising out of multijurisdictional litigation.

II. Compensation and Incentives

Invesco believes properly constructed compensation plans that include equity ownership are effective in creating incentives that induce management and employees of companies to create greater shareholder wealth. Invesco generally supports equity compensation plans that promote the proper alignment of incentives with shareholders' long-term interests, and generally votes against plans that are overly dilutive to existing shareholders, plans that contain objectionable structural features, and plans that appear likely to reduce the value of the Client's investment.

Following are specific voting issues that illustrate how Invesco evaluates incentive plans.

Executive compensation

Invesco evaluates executive compensation plans within the context of the company's performance under the executives' tenure. Invesco believes independent compensation committees are best positioned to craft executive-compensation plans that are suitable for their company-specific circumstances. Invesco views the election of independent compensation committee members as the appropriate mechanism for shareholders to express their approval or disapproval of a company's compensation practices. Therefore, Invesco generally does not support shareholder proposals to limit or eliminate certain forms of executive compensation. In the interest of reinforcing the notion of a compensation committee's accountability to shareholders, Invesco generally supports proposals requesting that companies subject each year's compensation record to an advisory shareholder vote, or so-called "say on pay" proposals.

4

 

Equity-based compensation plans

Invesco generally votes against plans that contain structural features that would impair the alignment of incentives between shareholders and management. Such features include the ability to reprice or reload options without shareholder approval, the ability to issue options below the stock's current market price, or the ability automatically to replenish shares without shareholder approval.

Employee stock-purchase plans

Invesco generally supports employee stock-purchase plans that are reasonably designed to provide proper incentives to a broad base of employees, provided that the price at which employees may acquire stock is at most a 15 percent discount from the market price.

Severance agreements

Invesco generally votes in favor of proposals requiring advisory shareholder ratification of executives' severance agreements. However, Invesco generally opposes proposals requiring such agreements to be ratified by shareholders in advance of their adoption. Given the vast differences that may occur in these agreements, some severance agreements are evaluated on an individual basis.

III. Capitalization

Examples of management proposals related to a company's capital structure include authorizing or issuing additional equity capital, repurchasing outstanding stock, or enacting a stock split or reverse stock split. On requests for additional capital stock, Invesco analyzes the company's stated reasons for the request. Except where the request could adversely affect the Client's ownership stake or voting rights, Invesco generally supports a board's decisions on its needs for additional capital stock. Some capitalization proposals require a case-by-case analysis. Examples of such proposals include authorizing common or preferred stock with special voting rights, or issuing additional stock in connection with an acquisition.

IV. Mergers, Acquisitions and Other Corporate Actions

Issuers occasionally require shareholder approval to engage in certain corporate actions such as mergers, acquisitions, name changes, dissolutions, reorganizations, divestitures and reincorporations and the votes for these types of corporate actions are generally determined on a case-by-case basis.

V.Anti-Takeover Measures

Practices designed to protect a company from unsolicited bids can adversely affect shareholder value and voting rights, and they potentially create conflicts of interests among directors, management and shareholders. Except under special issuer-specific circumstances, Invesco generally votes to reduce or eliminate such measures. These measures include adopting or renewing "poison pills", requiring supermajority voting on certain corporate actions, classifying the election of directors instead of electing each director to an annual term, or creating separate classes of common or preferred stock with special voting rights. Invesco generally votes against management proposals to impose these types of measures, and generally votes for shareholder proposals designed to reduce such measures. Invesco generally supports shareholder proposals directing companies to subject their anti-takeover provisions to a shareholder vote.

5

 

VI. Environmental, Social and Corporate Responsibility Issues

Invesco believes that a company's response to environmental, social and corporate responsibility issues and the risks attendant to them can have a significant effect on its long-term shareholder value. Invesco recognizes that to manage a corporation effectively, directors and management must consider not only the interest of shareholders, but also the interests of employees, customers, suppliers and creditors, among others. While Invesco generally affords management discretion with respect to the operation of a company's business, Invesco will evaluate such proposals on a case-by-case basis and will vote proposals relating to these issues in a manner intended to maximize long-term shareholder value.

VII. Routine Business Matters

Routine business matters rarely have the potential to have a material effect on the economic prospects of Clients' holdings, so Invesco generally supports a board's discretion on these items. However, Invesco generally votes against proposals where there is insufficient information to make a decision about the nature of the proposal. Similarly, Invesco generally votes against proposals to conduct other unidentified business at shareholder meetings.

D. EXCEPTIONS

Client Maintains Right to Vote Proxies

In the case of institutional or sub-advised Clients, Invesco will vote the proxies in accordance with these guidelines and the Invesco Global Proxy Policy, unless the Client retains in writing the right to vote or the named fiduciary of a Client (e.g., the plan sponsor of an ERISA Client) retains in writing the right to direct the plan trustee or a third party to vote proxies.

Voting for Certain Investment Strategies

For cash sweep investment vehicles selected by a Client but for which Invesco has proxy voting authority over the account and where no other Client holds the same securities, Invesco will vote proxies based on ISS recommendations.

Funds of Funds

Some Invesco Funds offering diversified asset allocation within one investment vehicle own shares in other Invesco Funds. A potential conflict of interest could arise if an underlying Invesco Fund has a shareholder meeting with any proxy issues to be voted on, because Invesco's asset-allocation funds or target-maturity funds may be large shareholders of the underlying fund. In order to avoid any potential for a conflict, the asset-allocation funds and target maturity funds vote their shares in the same proportion as the votes of the external shareholders of the underlying fund.

6

 

F. POLICIES AND VOTE DISCLOSURE

A copy of these guidelines, the Invesco Global Proxy Policy and the voting record of each Invesco Retail Fund are available on Invesco's web site, www.invesco.com .  In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, all Invesco Funds file a record of all proxy-voting activity for the prior 12 months ending June 30th. That filing is made on or before August 31st of each year. In the case of institutional and sub-advised Clients, Clients may contact their client service representative to request information about how Invesco voted proxies on their behalf. Absent specific contractual guidelines, such requests may be made on a semi-annual basis.

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

As of February 29, 2020, the following individuals are jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Trust:

∙Mark Paris, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2015 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

∙John Connelly, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2016 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2016. From 1994 to 2015, he was employed by Raymond James & Associates, where he served as Senior Vice President of Municipal High Yield Trading from 2012 to 2015.

∙Tim O'Reilly, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2016 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

∙James Phillips, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2015 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

∙John Schorle, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2018 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

∙Julius Williams, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Trust since 2015 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010.

Portfolio Manager Fund Holdings and Information on Other Managed Accounts

Invesco's portfolio managers develop investment models which are used in connection with the management of certain Invesco Funds as well as other mutual funds for which Invesco or an affiliate acts as sub- adviser, other pooled investment vehicles that are not registered mutual funds, and other accounts managed for organizations and individuals. The 'Investments' chart reflects the portfolio managers' investments in the Fund(s) that they manage and includes investments in the Fund's shares beneficially owned by a portfolio manager, as determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (beneficial ownership includes ownership by a portfolio manager's immediate family members sharing the same household). The 'Assets Managed' chart reflects information regarding accounts other than the Funds for which each portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. Accounts are grouped into three categories: (i) other registered investment companies; (ii) other pooled investment vehicles; and (iii) other accounts. To the extent that any of these accounts pay advisory fees that are based on account performance (performance-based fees), information on those accounts is specifically noted. In addition, any assets denominated in foreign currencies have been converted into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates as of the applicable date.

 

Investments

The following information is as of February 29, 2020 (unless otherwise noted):

Dollar Range

Portfolio Managerof Investments

in the Fund

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

Mark Paris

None

 

 

 

John Connelly

$100,001

- $500,000

 

 

 

Tim O'Reilly

$10,001

- $50,000

 

 

James Phillips

None

 

 

John Schorle

None

 

 

Julius Williams

None

 

 

 

Assets Managed

The following information is as of February 29, 2020 (unless otherwise noted):

 

Portfolio

 

 

Other Registered

 

 

Other Pooled Investment

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Investment Companies

 

 

Vehicles Managed

 

 

Accounts

 

 

Manager

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Managed

 

 

 

 

 

 

Managed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

Assets

 

 

Number of

Assets

 

 

Number of

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts

(in millions)

 

 

Accounts

(in millions)

 

 

Accounts

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Paris

30

$53,069.6

 

 

None

None

31

$0.71

 

 

John Connelly

17

$28,061.3

 

 

None

None

31

$0.71

 

 

Tim O'Reilly

23

$41,595.4

 

 

None

None

31

$0.71

 

 

James Phillips

17

$28,061.3

 

 

None

None

31

$0.71

 

 

John Schorle

17

$28,061.3

 

 

None

None

31

$0.71

 

 

Julius Williams

22

$39,256.7

 

 

None

None

31

$0.71

 

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one Fund or other account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple Funds and/or other accounts may be presented with one or more of the following potential conflicts:

The management of multiple Funds and/or other accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each Fund and/or other account. The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser seek to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having portfolio managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.

If a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity which may be suitable for more than one Fund or other account, a Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of filled purchase or sale orders across all eligible Funds and other accounts. To deal with these situations, the Adviser, each Sub-Adviser and the Funds have adopted procedures for allocating portfolio transactions across multiple accounts.

1These are accounts of individual investors for which Invesco provides investment advice. Invesco offers separately managed accounts that are managed according to the investment models developed by its portfolio managers and used in connection with the management of certain Invesco Funds. These accounts may be invested in accordance with one or more of those investment models and investments held in those accounts are traded in accordance with the applicable models.

 

The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser determine which broker to use to execute each order for securities transactions for the Funds, consistent with its duty to seek best execution of the transaction. However, for certain other accounts (such as mutual funds for which Invesco or an affiliate acts as sub-adviser, other pooled investment vehicles that are not registered mutual funds, and other accounts managed for organizations and individuals), the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser may be limited by the client with respect to the selection of brokers or may be instructed to direct trades through a particular broker. In these cases, trades for a Fund in a particular security may be placed separately from, rather than aggregated with, such other accounts. Having separate transactions with respect to a security may temporarily affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the possible detriment of the Fund or other account(s) involved.

Finally, the appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Adviser or Sub-Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one Fund or account but not all Funds and accounts for which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. None of the Invesco Fund accounts managed have a performance fee.

The Adviser, each Sub-Adviser, and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Description of Compensation Structure

For the Adviser and each affiliated Sub-Adviser

The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser seek to maintain a compensation program that is competitively positioned to attract and retain high-caliber investment professionals. Portfolio managers receive a base salary, an incentive cash bonus opportunity and a deferred compensation opportunity. Portfolio manager compensation is reviewed and may be modified each year as appropriate to reflect changes in the market, as well as to adjust the factors used to determine bonuses to promote competitive Fund performance. The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser evaluate competitive market compensation by reviewing compensation survey results conducted by an independent third party of investment industry compensation. Each portfolio manager's compensation consists of the following three elements:

Base Salary. Each portfolio manager is paid a base salary. In setting the base salary, the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser's intention is to be competitive in light of the particular portfolio manager's experience and responsibilities.

Annual Bonus. The portfolio managers are eligible, along with other employees of the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser, to participate in a discretionary year-end bonus pool. The Compensation Committee of Invesco Ltd. reviews and approves the firm-wide bonus pool based upon progress against strategic objectives and annual operating plan, including investment performance and financial results. In addition, while having no direct impact on individual bonuses, assets under management are considered when determining the starting bonus funding levels. Each portfolio manager is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus which is based on quantitative (i.e. investment performance) and non-quantitative factors (which may include, but are not limited to, individual performance, risk management and teamwork).

Each portfolio manager's compensation is linked to the pre-tax investment performance of the Funds/accounts managed by the portfolio manager as described in Table 1 below.

Table 1

Sub-Adviser

Performance time period2

Invesco3

One-, Three- and Five-year performance

Invesco Deutschland

against Fund peer group

Invesco Hong Kong3

 

Invesco Asset Management

 

Invesco India

 

Invesco Listed Real Assets Division3

 

2Rolling time periods based on calendar year-end.

3Portfolio Managers may be granted an annual deferral award that vests on a pro-rata basis over a four year period.

 

Invesco Senior Secured3, 4

Not applicable

Invesco Capital3,5

 

Invesco Canada3

One-year performance against Fund peer

 

group

 

Three- and Five-year performance against

 

entire universe of Canadian funds

Invesco Japan6

One-, Three- and Five-year performance

High investment performance (against applicable peer group and/or benchmarks) would deliver compensation generally associated with top pay in the industry (determined by reference to the third-party provided compensation survey information) and poor investment performance (versus applicable peer group) would result in low bonus compared to the applicable peer group or no bonus at all. These decisions are reviewed and approved collectively by senior leadership which has responsibility for executing the compensation approach across the organization.

With respect to Invesco Capital, there is no policy regarding, or agreement with, the Portfolio Managers or any other senior executive of the Adviser to receive bonuses or any other compensation in connection with the performance of any of the accounts managed by the Portfolio Managers.

Deferred / Long Term Compensation. Portfolio managers may be granted a deferred compensation award based on a firm-wide bonus pool approved by the Compensation Committee of Invesco Ltd. Deferred compensation awards may take the form of annual deferral awards or long-term equity awards. Annual deferral awards may be granted as an annual stock deferral award or an annual fund deferral award. Annual stock deferral awards are settled in Invesco Ltd. common shares. Annual fund deferral awards are notionally invested in certain Invesco Funds selected by the Portfolio Manager and are settled in cash. Long-term equity awards are settled in Invesco Ltd. common shares. Both annual deferral awards and long-term equity awards have a four-year ratable vesting schedule. The vesting period aligns the interests of the Portfolio Managers with the long-term interests of clients and shareholders and encourages retention.

Retirement and health and welfare arrangements. Portfolio managers are eligible to participate in retirement and health and welfare plans and programs that a

ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None

ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a)As of April 14, 2020, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the officers of the Registrant, including the Principal Executive Officer

("PEO") and Principal Financial Officer ("PFO"), to assess the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, as that term is defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Act"), as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Registrant's officers, including the PEO and PFO, concluded that, as of April 14, 2020, the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures were reasonably designed so as to ensure: (1) that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is

4Invesco Senior Secured's bonus is based on annual measures of equity return and standard tests of collateralization performance.

5Portfolio Managers for Invesco Capital base their bonus on Invesco results as well as overall performance of Invesco Capital.

6Portfolio Managers for Invesco Pacific Growth Fund's compensation is based on the one-, three- and five-year performance against the appropriate Micropol benchmark.

 

recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (2) that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to the PEO and PFO as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)There have been no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the

Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12. DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES LENDING ACTIVITIES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable.

 

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Registrant: Invesco Quality Municipal Income Trust

By:

/s/ Sheri Morris

 

Sheri Morris

 

Principal Executive Officer

Date:

May 6, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By:

/s/ Sheri Morris

 

Sheri Morris

 

Principal Executive Officer

Date:

May 6, 2020

By:

/s/ Kelli Gallegos

 

Kelli Gallegos

 

Principal Financial Officer

Date:

May 6, 2020