Sub-Item 77E

                               LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

                    INVESCO QUALITY MUNICIPAL INCOME TRUST

The Trust received two shareholder demand letters dated July 16, 2010 and
March 25, 2011. The shareholder in the July 16. 2010 demand letter alleged that
the former Adviser and certain individuals breached their fiduciary duties and
wasted Trust assets by causing the Trust to redeem Auction Rate Preferred
Securities (ARPS) at their liquidation value at the expense of the Trust and
common shareholders. The shareholder in the demand letter dated March 25, 2011
alleged that the Adviser and certain current board and officers of the Trust
breached their fiduciary duties and wasted Trust assets by causing the Trust to
redeem ARPS at their liquidation value, although the actions complained of
occurred prior to the election of the current board and appointment of current
officers and prior to the tenure of the current adviser. The shareholders in
both letters claimed that the Trust was not obliged to provide liquidity to the
preferred shareholders, the redemptions were improperly motivated to benefit
the Adviser, and the market value and fair value of the ARPS were less than
liquidation value at the time they were redeemed. The shareholders demand that:
1) the Board take action against the Adviser and individuals to recover
damages; 2) the Board refrain from authorizing further redemptions or
repurchases of ARPS by the Trust at prices in excess of fair value or market
value at the time of the transaction; and 3) the Board institute corporate
governance measures. The Board formed a Special Litigation Committee ("SLC") to
investigate these claims and make a recommendation to the Board regarding
whether pursuit of these claims is in the best interests of the Trust. Upon
completion of its evaluation, the SLC recommended that the Board reject the
demands specified in the shareholder demand letters, after which the Board
publicly announced on July 12, 2011, that it had adopted the SLC recommendation
and voted to reject the demands.

Management of Invesco and the Trust believe that the outcome of the proceedings
described above will not have a material adverse effect on the Trust or on the
ability of Invesco to provide ongoing services to the Trust.