Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and following the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim reporting. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by U.S. GAAP can be condensed or omitted. These interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the Company’s annual financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial information. These interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending June 30, 2017 or any other interim period or for any other future year.

The balance sheet as of June 30, 2016 has been derived from audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 and the corresponding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The most sensitive accounting estimates affecting the financial statements are revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, depreciation of long-lived assets, fair value of intangible assets and goodwill, amortization of intangible assets, income taxes and associated deferrals and valuation allowances, and commitments and contingencies.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable represent customer obligations due under normal trade terms, net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance. We determine the allowance based on known troubled accounts, historical experience and other currently available evidence. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $874,000 and $769,000 as of December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively.

Inventory

Inventory amounts are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first in, first out basis.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist primarily of trademarks and acquired technologies. The Company acquired approximately $2,344,000 of intangible assets in conjunction with the reverse merger discussed in Note 1 and Note 3. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not amortized, but is assessed annually for impairment. The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill on an annual basis and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of goodwill below its carrying amount. When assessing whether goodwill is impaired, management considers first a qualitative approach to evaluate whether it is more likely than not the fair value of the goodwill is below its carrying amount; if so, management considers a quantitative approach by analyzing changes in performance and market based metrics as compared to those used at the time of the initial acquisition. For the periods presented, no impairment charges were recognized.

Revenue Recognition

The Company provides laboratory testing services, web-based hosted software services, telehealth products and post contract customer support services.

Billings for laboratory testing services are reimbursed by third-party payers net of allowances for differences between amounts billed and the cash receipts from such payers. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ASC-605 “Revenue Recognition”, the Company recognizes revenues when there is a persuasive evidence of an arrangement, title and risk of loss have passed, product is shipped or services have been rendered, sales price is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured.

Historically, the Company had recognized revenue for these services upon cash receipt because the criteria to recognize revenues under ASC-605 had not been met at the time test results were delivered since the fee was not fixed and determinable until the third payer remitted payment given the limited experience and history to develop a reliable estimate of the provision for contractual adjustments (that is, the difference between established rates and expected third-party payments) and discounts (that is, the difference between established rates and the amount billable). The Company has continuously reassessed its ability to develop reliable estimates of the provision for contractual adjustments and discounts and over the past year and has made investments in its systems and process around its billing system to improve the quality of information generated by the system. Given these ongoing investments and improvements and based upon the financial framework the Company uses for estimating the provision for contractual adjustments and discounts, in the second quarter of 2016, the Company concluded that it was able to reasonably estimate its provision for contractual adjustments and discounts and began recognizing revenue at the time test results are delivered, net of estimated contractual allowances.

Revenue for hosted software services, telehealth products, and customer support services are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the selling price is fixed and collectability is reasonably assured. Multiple-element arrangements are assessed to determine whether they can be separated into more than one unit of accounting. A multiple-element arrangement is separated into more than one unit of accounting if all of the following criteria are met: the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis; there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items in the arrangement; if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered items, and delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in our control. If these criteria are not met, then revenue is deferred until such criteria are met or until the period over which the last undelivered element is delivered, which is typically the life of the contract agreement. If these criteria are met, we allocate total revenue among the elements based on the sales price of each element when sold separately which is referred to as vendor specific objective evidence or VSOE.

United Billing Systems (“UBS”) revenue is a type of revenue from laboratory testing that is directly billed to the customer with no third-party reimbursement. This type of revenue makes up approximately 10% of total revenue. An example of UBS revenue is a situation when another reference laboratory contracts us for laboratory testing, and we charge them on a price per sample basis. This typically occurs when a laboratory does not have the capability to run specific tests, and they purchase them from us.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. Accounts are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to certain limits. At December 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016, the Company had approximately $30,000 and approximately $1,165,000, respectively, in excess of FDIC-insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, the Company generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of changes in tax laws or rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates will be recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Prior to the reverse merger, AEON elected to be taxed as an S Corporation for federal and certain state income tax purposes. Under this election substantially all of the profits, losses, credits and deductions of the Company are passed through to the individual shareholders. Therefore prior to the reverse merger no provision or liability for income taxes has been included in these consolidated financial statements except for state and localities where the S Corporation status has not been recognized.

Prior to the reverse merger, AHC tax benefits were fully offset by a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty that the deferred tax assets would be realized. As a result of the reverse merger a deferred tax asset was recorded since it was determined the realization of some of these assets is more likely than not, due to consolidated earnings resulting in the expected usage of net operating loss carryforwards.

Under income tax regulations in the United States AHC is the acquirer of AEON. As such the Company must file a consolidated return for both AHC and AEON for the year ending June 30, 2017.

Management considers the likelihood of changes by taxing authorities in its filed income tax returns and recognizes a liability for or discloses potential changes that management believes are more likely than not to occur upon examination by tax authorities. Management has not identified any uncertain tax positions in filed income tax returns that require recognition or disclosure in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s policy is to include penalties and interest expense related to income taxes as a component of other expense and interest expense, respectively, as necessary.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenues from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606), which affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. Under ASU 2014-09, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU must be applied for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early application permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is evaluating the impact on the consolidated financial statements of adopting the guidance in ASU 2014-09 at year-end and has not determined the impact of adoption at this time.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. The amendments in this update state that in connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued, when applicable). The amendments in this update are effective for the annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016 and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”. ASU 2015-11 requires inventory measured using any method other than last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) or the retail inventory method to be subsequently measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value, rather than at the lower of cost or market. Under this ASU, subsequent measurement of inventory using the LIFO and retail inventory method is unchanged. ASU 2015-11 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company will recognize its inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value upon adoption.

In November 2015, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that requires that the deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent on the consolidated balance sheet. The standard will be effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-2, “Leases,” which establish a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record and ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classifications affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-02 requires modified retrospective adoption for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. We are currently evaluating the effect of adoption of this ASU.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”, which makes several modifications to the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the requirement to recognize the income tax effects of awards that vest or settle as income tax expense. This guidance also clarifies the presentation of certain components of share-based awards in the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We are currently evaluating the effect of adoption of this ASU and do not believe the effect will be material on its financial statements.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”, which clarifies certain issues identified by the FASB-International Accounting Standards Board Joint Transition Resource Group for Revenue Recognition (TRG) on assessing collectability, presentation of sales taxes and other taxes collected from customers, noncash consideration, completed contracts and contract modifications. We are currently evaluating the effect of adoption of this ASU and will report on its effect on the Company when available.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. The amendments in this update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within such annual period. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within such year. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impacts of adopting the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”, which clarifies diversity in practice how the following are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows:

⋅

Debt Prepayment or Debt Extinguishment Costs

⋅

Settlement of Zero-Coupon Debt Instruments or Other Debt Instruments with Coupon Interest Rates That Are Insignificant in Relation to the Effective Interest Rate of the Borrowing

⋅

Contingent Consideration Payments Made after a Business Combination

⋅

Proceeds from the Settlement of Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Policies

⋅

Distributions Received from Equity Method Investees

⋅

Beneficial Interests in Securitization Transactions

⋅

Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle.

This standard is effective beginning with our fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. We are currently evaluating the effect of adoption of this ASU and will report on its effect on the Company when available.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under ASU 2014-04 goodwill impairment will be tested by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The new guidance must be applied on a prospective basis and is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect of adoption of this ASU and do believe the effect will be material on our financial statements.