XML 25 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments
Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands): 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017 Using
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
Description
 
Total Carrying Amount
 
Total Fair Value
 
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(2)
 
Level 3(3)
 
Total Carrying Amount
 
Total Fair Value
 
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(2)
 
Level 3(3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents(4)
 
$
109,309

 
$
109,309

 
$
109,309

 
$

 
$

 
$
132,603

 
$
132,603

 
$
132,603

 
$

 
$

Total Assets
 
$
109,309

 
$
109,309

 
$
109,309

 
$

 
$

 
$
132,603

 
$
132,603

 
$
132,603

 
$

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)(5)
 
$
8,531,379

 
$
9,074,027

 
$

 
$
9,074,027

 
$

 
$
9,347,051

 
$
9,859,266

 
$

 
$
9,859,266

 
$

Total Liabilities
 
$
8,531,379

 
$
9,074,027

 
$

 
$
9,074,027

 
$

 
$
9,347,051

 
$
9,859,266

 
$

 
$
9,859,266

 
$


(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.
(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company.
(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
(4) Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.
(5) Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. This does not include our capital lease obligations.
Other Financial Instruments
 
The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses approximate fair value at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
 
Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017 Using
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016 Using
Description
 
Total
 
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(2)
 
Level 3(3)
 
Total
 
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(2)
 
Level 3(3)
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Derivative financial instruments(4)
 
$
16,297

 
$

 
$
16,297

 
$

 
$
19,397

 
$

 
$
19,397

 
$

Investments(5)
 
$
3,105

 
3,105

 

 

 
$
3,576

 
3,576

 

 

Total Assets
 
$
19,402

 
$
3,105

 
$
16,297

 
$

 
$
22,973

 
$
3,576

 
$
19,397

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Derivative financial instruments(6)
 
$
357,973

 
$

 
$
357,973

 
$

 
$
373,497

 
$

 
$
373,497

 
$

Total Liabilities
 
$
357,973

 
$

 
$
357,973

 
$

 
$
373,497

 
$

 
$
373,497

 
$


(1) Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.
(2) Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity, as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options’ contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.
(3) Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
(4) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.
(5) Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds reported within Other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
(6) Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” table for breakdown by instrument type.
 
The reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016, or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement.

We have master International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreements in place with our derivative instrument counterparties. These ISDA agreements provide for final close out netting with our counterparties for all positions in the case of default or termination of the ISDA agreement. We have determined that our ISDA agreements provide us with rights of setoff on the fair value of derivative instruments in a gain position and those in a loss position with the same counterparty. We have elected not to offset such derivative instrument fair values in our consolidated balance sheets.
See Credit Related Contingent Features for further discussion on contingent collateral requirements for our derivative instruments.

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial assets under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:
 
 
Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
 
 
As of March 31, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
 
Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting
Recognized
Derivative Liabilities
 
Cash Collateral
Received
 
Net Amount of
Derivative Assets
 
Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting
Recognized
Derivative Assets
 
Cash Collateral
Received
 
Net Amount of
Derivative Assets
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements
 
$
16,297

 
$
(16,297
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
19,397

 
$
(19,397
)
 
$

 
$

Total
 
$
16,297

 
$
(16,297
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
19,397

 
$
(19,397
)
 
$

 
$



The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial liabilities under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:
 
 
Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
 
 
As of March 31, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
 
Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting
Recognized
Derivative Assets
 
Cash Collateral
Pledged
 
Net Amount of
Derivative Liabilities
 
Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting
Recognized
Derivative Liabilities
 
Cash Collateral
Pledged
 
Net Amount of
Derivative Liabilities
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements
 
$
(357,973
)
 
$
16,297

 
$
8,516

 
$
(333,160
)
 
$
(373,497
)
 
$
19,397

 
$
7,213

 
$
(346,887
)
Total
 
$
(357,973
)
 
$
16,297

 
$
8,516

 
$
(333,160
)
 
$
(373,497
)
 
$
19,397

 
$
7,213

 
$
(346,887
)


Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
We monitor our credit risk associated with financial and other institutions with which we conduct significant business and, to minimize these risks, we select counterparties with credit risks acceptable to us and we seek to limit our exposure to an individual counterparty. Credit risk, including but not limited to counterparty nonperformance under derivative instruments, our credit facilities and new ship progress payment guarantees, is not considered significant, as we primarily conduct business with large, well-established financial institutions, insurance companies and export credit agencies many of which we have long-term relationships with and which have credit risks acceptable to us or where the credit risk is spread out among a large number of counterparties. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we did not have any exposure under our derivative instruments. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any of our significant counterparties. In addition, we have established guidelines we follow regarding credit ratings and instrument maturities to maintain safety and liquidity. We do not normally require collateral or other security to support credit relationships; however, in certain circumstances this option is available to us.
Derivative Instruments
 
We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. We try to mitigate these risks through a combination of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies. The financial impact of these hedging instruments is primarily offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. We achieve this by closely matching the notional amount, term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged. Although certain of our derivative financial instruments do not qualify or are not accounted for under hedge accounting, our objective is not to hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. 
 
We enter into various forward, swap and option contracts to manage our interest rate exposure and to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. These instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and the vast majority are designated as hedges. We also use non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in our foreign operations and investments.
 
At inception of the hedge relationship, a derivative instrument that hedges the exposure to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or a recognized asset or liability is designated as a fair value hedge. A derivative instrument that hedges a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge.
 
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments. Gains and losses on derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss until the underlying hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss of our non-derivative financial instruments and the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign operations and investments are recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss along with the associated foreign currency translation adjustment of the foreign operation.
 
On an ongoing basis, we assess whether derivatives used in hedging transactions are “highly effective” in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flow of hedged items. We use the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis for each hedge relationship under our interest rate, foreign currency and fuel hedging programs. We apply the same methodology on a consistent basis for assessing hedge effectiveness to all hedges within each hedging program (i.e., interest rate, foreign currency and fuel). We perform regression analyses over an observation period of up to three years, utilizing market data relevant to the hedge horizon of each hedge relationship. High effectiveness is achieved when a statistically valid relationship reflects a high degree of offset and correlation between the changes in the fair values of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. The determination of ineffectiveness is based on the amount of dollar offset between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item at the end of the reporting period. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or hedge accounting is discontinued, any change in fair value of the derivative since the last date at which it was determined to be effective is recognized in earnings. In addition, the ineffective portion of our highly effective hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and reported in Other expense in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
 
Cash flows from derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. In the event that hedge accounting is discontinued, cash flows subsequent to the date of discontinuance are classified within investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are classified as investing activities.
 
We consider the classification of the underlying hedged item’s cash flows in determining the classification for the designated derivative instrument’s cash flows. We classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of benchmark interest rate or hedges of fuel expense as operating activities due to the nature of the hedged item. Likewise, we classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on our newbuild ship payments as investing activities and derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on debt payments as financing activities.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our long-term debt obligations including future interest payments. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately 44.3% and 40.5%, respectively, of our long-term debt was effectively fixed. We use interest rate swap agreements to modify our exposure to interest rate movements and to manage our interest expense.
Market risk associated with our long-term fixed rate debt is the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating-rate basis to manage this risk. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the following fixed-rate debt instruments:
Debt Instrument
Swap Notional as of March 31, 2017 (In thousands)
Maturity
Debt Fixed Rate
Swap Floating Rate: LIBOR plus
All-in Swap Floating Rate as of March 31, 2017
Oasis of the Seas term loan
$
175,000

October 2021
5.41%
3.87%
5.13%
Unsecured senior notes
650,000

November 2022
5.25%
3.63%
4.67%
 
$
825,000

 
 
 
 


These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges.

Market risk associated with our long-term floating rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis to manage this risk. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the following floating-rate debt instruments:
Debt Instrument
Swap Notional as of March 31, 2017 (In thousands)
Maturity
Debt Floating Rate
All-in Swap Fixed Rate
Celebrity Reflection term loan
$
436,333

October 2024
LIBOR plus
0.40%
2.85%
Quantum of the Seas term loan
612,500

October 2026
LIBOR plus
1.30%
3.74%
Anthem of the Seas term loan
634,375

April 2027
LIBOR plus
1.30%
3.86%
Ovation of the Seas term loan 
795,417

April 2028
LIBOR plus
1.00%
3.16%
Harmony of the Seas term loan (1)
710,492

May 2028
EURIBOR plus
1.15%
2.26%
 
$
3,189,117

 
 
 
 


(1) Interest rate swap agreements hedging the Euro-denominated term loan for Harmony of the Seas include EURIBOR zero-floors matching the hedged debt EURIBOR zero-floor. Amount presented is based on the exchange rate as of March 31, 2017.

These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
 
The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements related to outstanding debt as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $4.0 billion.
 
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Derivative Instruments
 
Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to our ship construction contracts denominated in Euros, our foreign currency denominated debt and our international business operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements to manage portions of the exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As of March 31, 2017, the aggregate cost of our ships on order, not including the TUI Cruises' ships on order and those subject to conditions to effectiveness, was approximately $8.5 billion, of which we had deposited $316.3 million as of such date. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately 60.5% and 66.7%, respectively, of the aggregate cost of the ships under construction was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow, fair value or net investment hedges depending on the designation of the related hedge.

On a regular basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and, from time to time, we utilize cross-currency swap agreements to minimize the volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than our functional currency or the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries. During the first quarter of 2017, we maintained an average of approximately $627.7 million of these foreign currency forward contracts. These instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts resulted in a gain, of approximately $13.8 million and $15.4 million during the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively, that were recognized in earnings within Other expense in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

The notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts including our forward contracts as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was $1.9 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively.

Non-Derivative Instruments

We also address the exposure of our investments in foreign operations by denominating a portion of our debt in our subsidiaries’ and investments’ functional currencies and designating it as a hedge of these subsidiaries and investments. We had designated debt as a hedge of our net investments in TUI Cruises of approximately €323.0 million, or approximately $345.4 million, as of March 31, 2017.

 Fuel Price Risk
 
Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates primarily to the consumption of fuel on our ships. We use fuel swap agreements to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices.
 
Our fuel swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At March 31, 2017, we have hedged the variability in future cash flows for certain forecasted fuel transactions occurring through 2021. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements:
 
Fuel Swap Agreements
 
As of March 31, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
(metric tons)
2017
599,865

 
799,065

2018
616,300

 
616,300

2019
521,000

 
521,000

2020
381,400

 
306,500

2021
75,100

 

 
Fuel Swap Agreements
 
As of March 31, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
(% hedged)
Projected fuel purchases:
 

 
 

2017
60
%
 
60
%
2018
44
%
 
44
%
2019
35
%
 
35
%
2020
25
%
 
20
%
2021
5
%
 


 
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $138.4 million and $138.5 million, respectively, of estimated unrealized net loss associated with our cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements were expected to be reclassified to earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive loss within the next twelve months. Reclassification is expected to occur as the result of fuel consumption associated with our hedged forecasted fuel purchases.

The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
 
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
As of March 31, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
As of March 31, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
 
 
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
 
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
Other assets
 
$
5,935

 
$
5,246

 
Other long-term liabilities
 
$
53,274

 
$
57,679

Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
614

 

 
Derivative financial instruments
 
12,896

 
5,574

Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Other assets
 
605

 

 
Other long-term liabilities
 
54,073

 
68,165

Fuel swaps
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
483

 

 
Derivative financial instruments
 
130,815

 
129,486

Fuel swaps
 
Other assets
 
8,345

 
13,608

 
Other long-term liabilities
 
92,065

 
95,125

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under 815-20
 
 
 
15,982

 
18,854

 
 
 
343,123

 
356,029

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fuel swaps
 
Derivative financial instruments
 

 

 
Derivative financial instruments
 
10,110

 
11,532

Fuel swaps
 
Other Assets
 
315

 
543

 
Other long-term liabilities
 
4,740

 
5,936

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under 815-20
 
 
 
315

 
543

 
 
 
14,850

 
17,468

Total derivatives
 
 
 
$
16,297

 
$
19,397

 
 
 
$
357,973

 
$
373,497


(1) Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated
balance sheets were as follows:
 
 
 
 
Carrying Value
Non-derivative instrument designated as
hedging instrument under ASC 815-20
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
As of March 31, 2017
 
As of December 31, 2016
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency debt
 
Current portion of long-term debt
 
$
62,431

 
$
61,601

Foreign currency debt
 
Long-term debt
 
282,921

 
249,624

 
 
 
 
$
345,352

 
$
311,225


The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
Derivatives and Related Hedged Items under ASC 815-20 Fair Value Hedging Relationships
 
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on Derivative
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on Hedged Item
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
 
$
1,173

 
$
2,362

 
$

 
$
3,925

Interest rate swaps
 
Other expense
 
(1,531
)
 
26,268

 
2,457

 
(23,700
)
 
 
 
 
$
(358
)
 
$
28,630

 
$
2,457

 
$
(19,775
)


The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:
Derivatives
under ASC 815-20  Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative 
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of
Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive
Loss into Income
(Effective
Portion)
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income  (Effective Portion)
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
 
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
(In thousands)
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

Interest rate swaps
 
$
(2,489
)
 
$
(97,371
)
 
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
 
$
(8,857
)
 
$
(9,128
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
2,129

 
46,049

 
Depreciation and amortization expenses
 
(2,710
)
 
(718
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
 

 

 
Other expense
 
(3,570
)
 
6,087

Foreign currency collar options
 

 

 
Depreciation and amortization expenses
 
(602
)
 
(602
)
Fuel swaps
 

 

 
Other expense
 
2,277

 
(7,335
)
Fuel swaps
 
(30,569
)
 
(48,337
)
 
Fuel
 
(39,928
)
 
(90,700
)
 
 
$
(30,929
)
 
$
(99,659
)
 
 
 
$
(53,390
)
 
$
(102,396
)


Derivatives under ASC 815-20 
Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 

 
 

Interest rate swaps
 
Other expense
 

 
(900
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Other expense
 
(18
)
 

Fuel swaps
 
Other expense
 
(2,281
)
 
(16
)
 
 
 
 
$
(2,299
)
 
$
(916
)

The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:
 
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Effective Portion)
Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20 Net
Investment Hedging Relationships
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
(In thousands)
 
 

 
 

Foreign Currency Debt
 
$
4,369

 
$

 
 
$
4,369

 
$



There was no amount recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) for the quarters March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:
 
 
 
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging
Instruments under ASC 815-20
 
Location of
Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
 
Quarter Ended March 31, 2016
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 

 
 

Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Other expense
 
$
13,812

 
$
14,455

Fuel swaps
 
Other expense
 
(60
)
 
22

 
 
 
 
$
13,752

 
$
14,477


 
Credit Related Contingent Features
 
Our current interest rate derivative instruments may require us to post collateral if our Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s credit ratings are below specified levels. Specifically, if on the fifth anniversary of executing a derivative instrument, or on any succeeding fifth-year anniversary, our credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt were to be rated below BBB- by Standard & Poor’s and Baa3 by Moody’s, then the counterparty may periodically demand that we post collateral in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the net market value of all derivative transactions with such counterparty that have reached their fifth year anniversary, to the extent negative, and (ii) the applicable minimum call amount.

The amount of collateral required to be posted following such event will change as, and to the extent, our net liability position increases or decreases by more than the applicable minimum call amount. If our credit rating for our senior unsecured debt is subsequently equal to or above BBB- by Standard & Poor’s or Baa3 by Moody’s, then any collateral posted at such time will be released to us and we will no longer be required to post collateral unless we meet the collateral trigger requirement at the next fifth-year anniversary. At March 31, 2017, our senior unsecured debt credit rating was BB+ with a positive outlook by Standard & Poor’s and Ba1 with a positive outlook by Moody’s. As of March 31, 2017, two of our interest rate derivative instruments had reached their fifth anniversary and, accordingly, we posted $8.5 million in collateral as of such date.

In April 2017, Moody's changed our senior unsecured debt credit rating to Baa3 with a stable outlook.  Consistent with the provisions of our interest rate derivatives instruments, all collateral that was posted with our counterparties as of such date was returned in April 2017.