Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands):



			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using										Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents⁽⁴⁾	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—	$	204,687	$	204,687	$	204,687	$	—	$	—
Total Assets	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	189,241	$	—	$	—	$	204,687	$	204,687	$	204,687	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)⁽⁵⁾	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—	$	8,020,061	$	8,431,220	$	2,888,255	$	5,542,965	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	8,391,301	$	8,761,414	$	1,859,361	$	6,902,053	$	—	$	8,020,061	$	8,431,220	$	2,888,255	$	5,542,965	$	—

___________________________________


(1)	Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2)

Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account the creditworthiness of the Company.


(3)	Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.


(4)	Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.


(5)	Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, senior notes, senior debentures and term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations.

Other Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses approximate fair value at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company's financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):



	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using
Description	Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾		Total Fair Value		Level 1⁽¹⁾		Level 2⁽²⁾		Level 3⁽³⁾
Assets:
Derivative financial instruments⁽⁴⁾	$	63,981	$	—	$	63,981	$	—	$	188,576	$	—	$	188,576	$	—
Investments⁽⁵⁾	$	5,531	5,531		—		—		$	6,044	6,044		—		—
Total Assets	$	69,512	$	5,531	$	63,981	$	—	$	194,620	$	6,044	$	188,576	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative financial instruments⁽⁶⁾	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	100,260	$	—	$	100,260	$	—
Total Liabilities	$	767,635	$	—	$	767,635	$	—	$	100,260	$	—	$	100,260	$	—

___________________________________


(1)	Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.

(2)

Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options' contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.


(3)	Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.


(4)	Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency collar options, interest rate swaps and fuel swaps. Please refer to the "Fair Value of Derivative Instruments" table for breakdown by instrument type.


(5)	Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds.


(6)	Consists of interest rate swaps, fuel swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency collar options. Please refer to the "Fair Value of Derivative Instruments" table for breakdown by instrument type.

The reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of December 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013, or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement.

The following table presents information about the Company's long-lived assets for our Pullmantur reporting unit and assets held for sale recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):



	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using
Description	Total Carrying Amount		Total Fair Value		Level 3		Total Impairment
Long-lived assets — Pullmantur aircraft⁽¹⁾	$	49,507	$	49,507	$	49,507	$	13,529
Assets held for sale⁽²⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	19,985

___________________________________


(1)	For 2013, we estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using an undiscounted cash flow model. A significant assumption in performing the undiscounted cash flow test was the number of years during which we expect to use these aircraft. Additionally, as of December 31, 2013, the expected operating use of the aircraft modified the expected cash flows.


(2)	For 2013, we estimated the fair value of assets held for sale related to the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses. This resulted in an impairment of $20.0 million mostly consisting of $18.2 million for property and equipment. See Note 16. Restructuring and Related Impairment Charges for further discussion.

The assets related to Pullmantur’s non-core businesses that met the criteria for held for sale classification as of December 31, 2013 were adjusted to the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. At December 31, 2013, the fair value of certain assets held for sale was lower than the carrying amount, resulting in a loss of $20.0 million which was recognized during the fourth quarter of 2013 and is reported within Restructuring and related impairment charges in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). See Note 16. Restructuring and Related Impairment Charges for further discussion.

In 2013, long-lived assets with a carrying amount of $63.0 million were written down to their fair value of $49.5 million, resulting in losses of $13.5 million, which were recognized during the fourth quarter of 2013 and were reported within Restructuring and related impairment charges in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Long-lived assets are reported within Property and equipment, net in our consolidated balance sheets.

We have master International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) agreements in place with our derivative instrument counterparties. These ISDA agreements provide for final close out netting with our counterparties for all positions in the case of default or termination of the ISDA agreement. We have determined that our ISDA agreements provide us with rights of setoff on the fair value of derivative instruments in a gain position and those in a loss position with the same counterparty. We have elected not to offset such derivative instrument fair values in our consolidated balance sheets.

As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, no cash collateral was received or pledged under our ISDA agreements. See Credit Related Contingent Features for further discussion on contingent collateral requirements for our derivative instruments.

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial assets under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:



	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of December 31, 2014									As of December 31, 2013
	Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets		Gross Amount of Derivative Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet		Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount of Derivative Assets
(In thousands of dollars)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—	$	188,576	$	(91,627	)	$	—	$	96,949
Total	$	63,981	$	(63,981	)	$	—	$	—	$	188,576	$	(91,627	)	$	—	$	96,949

The following table presents information about the Company’s offsetting of financial liabilities under master netting agreements with derivative counterparties:



	Gross Amounts not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are Subject to Master Netting Agreements
	As of December 31, 2014										As of December 31, 2013
	Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Assets		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities			Gross Amount of Derivative Liabilities Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet			Gross Amount of Eligible Offsetting Recognized Derivative Liabilities		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities
(In thousands of dollars)
Derivatives subject to master netting agreements	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)	$	(100,260	)	$	91,627	$	—	$	(8,633	)
Total	$	(767,635	)	$	63,981	$	—	$	(703,654	)	$	(100,260	)	$	91,627	$	—	$	(8,633	)

Derivative Instruments

We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. We manage these risks through a combination of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies. The financial impact of these hedging instruments is primarily offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. We achieve this by closely matching the amount, term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged. Although certain of our derivative financial instruments do not qualify or are not accounted for under hedge accounting, we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. We monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses.

We enter into various forward, swap and option contracts to manage our interest rate exposure and to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. These instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and the vast majority are designated as hedges. We also have non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in our foreign operations and investments.

At inception of the hedge relationship, a derivative instrument that hedges the exposure to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or a recognized asset or liability is designated as a fair value hedge. A derivative instrument that hedges a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments. Gains and losses on derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income until the underlying hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss of our non-derivative financial instruments and the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign operations and investments are recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income along with the associated foreign currency translation adjustment of the foreign operation.

On an ongoing basis, we assess whether derivatives used in hedging transactions are "highly effective" in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flow of hedged items. We use the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis for each hedge relationship under our interest rate, foreign currency and fuel hedging programs. We apply the same methodology on a consistent basis for assessing hedge effectiveness to all hedges within each hedging program (i.e., interest rate, foreign currency and fuel). We perform regression analyses over an observation period of up to three years, utilizing market data relevant to the hedge horizon of each hedge relationship. High effectiveness is achieved when a statistically valid relationship reflects a high degree of offset and correlation between the changes in the fair values of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. The determination of ineffectiveness is based on the amount of dollar offset between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item at the end of the reporting period. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or hedge accounting is discontinued, any change in fair value of the derivative since the last date at which it was determined to be effective is recognized in earnings. In addition, the ineffective portion of our highly effective hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and reported in Other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Cash flows from derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. In the event that hedge accounting is discontinued, cash flows subsequent to the date of discontinuance are classified within investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are classified as investing activities.

We consider the classification of the underlying hedged item’s cash flows in determining the classification for the designated derivative instrument’s cash flows. We classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of benchmark interest rate or hedges of fuel expense as operating activities due to the nature of the hedged item. Likewise, we classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on our newbuild ship payments as investing activities and derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on debt payments as financing activities.

Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our long-term debt obligations including future interest payments. At December 31, 2014, approximately 28.5% of our long-term debt was effectively fixed as compared to 34.6% as of December 31, 2013. We use interest rate swap agreements to modify our exposure to interest rate movements and to manage our interest expense.

Market risk associated with our long-term fixed rate debt is the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating-rate basis to manage this risk. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the $420.0 million fixed rate portion of our Oasis of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan and on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes due 2022. The interest rate swap agreements on Oasis of the Seas debt effectively changed the interest rate on the balance of the unsecured term loan, which was $245.0 million as of December 31, 2014, from a fixed rate of 5.41% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.87%, currently approximately 4.20%. The interest rate swap agreements on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes effectively changed the interest rate of the unsecured senior notes from a fixed rate of 5.25% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.63%, currently approximately 3.86%. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges.

Market risk associated with our long-term floating rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis to manage this risk. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we maintained forward-starting interest rate swap agreements that hedge the anticipated unsecured amortizing term loans that will finance our purchase of Anthem of the Seas. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging the Anthem of the Seas loan will effectively convert the interest rate for $725.0 million of the anticipated loan balance from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.86% (inclusive of margin) beginning in April 2015. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

In addition, at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our Celebrity Reflection term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the Celebrity Reflection unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $545.4 million from LIBOR plus 0.40% to a fixed rate (including applicable margin) of 2.85% through the term of the loan. Furthermore, at December 31, 2014, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on our Quantum of the Seas term loan. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on a portion of the Quantum of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan balance of approximately $735.0 million from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.74% (inclusive of margin) through the term of the loan. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements related to outstanding debt and on our current unfunded financing arrangements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $2.9 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Derivative Instruments

Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to our ship construction contracts denominated in Euros, our foreign currency denominated debt and our international business operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements to manage portions of the exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate cost of our ships on order was approximately $5.0 billion, of which we had deposited $394.4 million as of such date. Approximately 28.8% and 36.3% of the aggregate cost of the ships under construction was exposed to fluctuations in the Euro exchange rate at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow, fair value or net investment hedges depending on the designation of the related hedge.

During 2013, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge €365.0 million of our €745.0 million 5.625% unsecured senior notes due January 2014. These foreign currency forward contracts were accounted for as cash flow hedges and matured January 2014.

On a regular basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts and, from time to time, we utilize cross-currency swap agreements to minimize the volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than our functional currency or the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries. During 2014, we maintained an average of approximately $474.0 million of these foreign currency forward contracts. These instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. In 2014, 2013 and 2012 changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts were (losses) gains of approximately $(48.6) million, $(19.3) million and $7.7 million, respectively, which offset gains (losses) arising from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies in those same years of $49.5 million, $13.4 million and $(11.8) million, respectively. These changes were recognized in earnings within Other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

We consider our investments in our foreign operations to be denominated in relatively stable currencies and of a long-term nature. In January 2014, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts and designated them as hedges of a portion of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises of €415.6 million, or approximately $502.9 million, based on the exchange rate at December 31, 2014. These forward currency contracts mature in April 2016.

The notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts, including our forward contracts and collar options, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $3.0 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively.

Non-Derivative Instruments

We also address the exposure of our investments in foreign operations by denominating a portion of our debt in our subsidiaries' and investments' functional currencies and designating it as a hedge of these subsidiaries and investments. We designated debt as a hedge of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises of approximately €139.4 million and €544.9 million, or approximately $168.7 million and $750.8 million, through December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Fuel Price Risk

Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates primarily to the consumption of fuel on our ships. We use fuel swap agreements and fuel call options to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices.

Our fuel swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2014, we have hedged the variability in future cash flows for certain forecasted fuel transactions occurring through 2018. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements:



	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of December 31, 2014	As of December 31, 2013
	(metric tons)
2014	—	762,000
2015	806,000	665,000
2016	802,000	372,000
2017	525,000	74,000
2018	226,000	—



	Fuel Swap Agreements
	As of December 31, 2014		As of December 31, 2013
	(% hedged)
Projected fuel purchases for year:
2014	—		57	%
2015	58	%	45	%
2016	55	%	25	%
2017	35	%	5	%
2018	15	%	—	%

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, $(223.1) million and $9.5 million, respectively, of estimated unrealized net (loss) gain associated with our cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements were expected to be reclassified to earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income within the next twelve months. Reclassification is expected to occur as the result of fuel consumption associated with our hedged forecasted fuel purchases.

The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:



	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
	Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet Location	As of December 31, 2014		As of December 31, 2013		Balance Sheet Location	As of December 31, 2014		As of December 31, 2013
	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Fair Value
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20⁽¹⁾
Interest rate swaps	Other assets	$	—	$	56,571	Other long-term liabilities	$	65,768	$	66,920
Foreign currency forward contracts	Derivative financial instruments	—		61,596		Derivative financial instruments	17,619		—
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other assets	63,981		13,783		Other long-term liabilities	164,627		—
Foreign currency collar options	Other assets	—		22,172		Other long-term liabilities	—		—
Foreign currency collar options	Derivative financial instruments	—		—		Derivative financial instruments	21,855		—
Fuel swaps	Derivative financial instruments	—		10,902		Derivative financial instruments	227,512		1,657
Fuel swaps	Other assets	—		8,205		Other long-term liabilities	270,254		9,052
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20		63,981		173,229			767,635		77,629
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
Foreign currency forward contracts	Derivative Financial Instruments	—		15,347		Derivative financial instruments	—		22,631
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20		—		15,347			—		22,631
Total derivatives		$	63,981	$	188,576		$	767,635	$	100,260

___________________________________


(1)	Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 "Derivatives and Hedging."

The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:



		Carrying Value
Non-derivative instrument designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815-20	Balance Sheet Location	As of December 31, 2014		As of December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Foreign currency debt	Current portion of long-term debt	$	—	$	477,442
Foreign currency debt	Long-term debt	168,718		273,354
		$	168,718	$	750,796

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:



	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative and Hedged Item	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative					Amount of (Loss) Gain Recognized in Income on Hedged Item
Derivatives and related Hedged Items under ASC 815-20 Fair Value Hedging Relationships		Year Ended December 31, 2014		Year Ended December 31, 2013			Year Ended December 31, 2014			Year Ended December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Interest rate swaps	Interest expense, net of interest capitalized	$	12,217	$	9,354		$	17,403		$	37,745
Interest rate swaps	Other income (expense)	42,530		(71,630		)	(34,304		)	68,743
		$	54,747	$	(62,276	)	$	(16,901	)	$	106,488

The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:



	Amount of (Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)					Location of (Loss) Gain Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of (Loss) Gain Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)						Location of (Loss) Gain Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of (Loss) Gain Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness testing)
Derivatives under ASC 815-20 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Year Ended December 31, 2014			Year Ended December 31, 2013			Year Ended December 31, 2014			Year Ended December 31, 2013				Year Ended December 31, 2014			Year Ended December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Cross currency swaps	$	—		$	—	Interest Expense	$	(261	)	$	(3,531	)	Other income (expense)	$	—		$	—
Interest rate swaps	(97,851		)	111,223		Other income (expense)	—			—			Other income (expense)	(99		)	431
Foreign currency forward contracts	(246,627		)	68,364		Depreciation and amortization expenses	(1,887		)	(1,797		)	Other income (expense)	(34		)	9
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—		Other income (expense)	(4,291		)	27,423			Other income (expense)	—			—
Foreign currency forward contracts	—			—		Interest expense	(57		)	(440		)	Other income (expense)	—			—
Foreign currency collar options	(44,028		)	13,199		Depreciation and amortization expenses	—			—			Other income (expense)	—			—
Fuel swaps	(515,324		)	4,642		Fuel	(27,984		)	47,944			Other income (expense)	(14,936		)	(3,413		)
	$	(903,830	)	$	197,428		$	(34,480	)	$	69,599			$	(15,069	)	$	(2,973	)

The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:



	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)					Location of Gain (Loss) in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20 Net Investment Hedging Relationships	Year Ended December 31, 2014		Year Ended December 31, 2013				Year Ended December 31, 2014		Year Ended December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Foreign Currency Debt	$	25,382	$	(34,295	)	Other income (expense)	$	—	$	—
	$	25,382	$	(34,295	)		$	—	$	—

The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:



		Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815-20	Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	Year Ended December 31, 2014			Year Ended December 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income (expense)	$	(48,791	)	$	(21,244	)
Fuel swaps	Other income (expense)	(1,795		)	243
Fuel call options	Other income (expense)	—			(23		)
		$	(50,586	)	$	(21,024	)

Credit Related Contingent Features

Our current interest rate derivative instruments may require us to post collateral if our Standard & Poor's and Moody's credit ratings remain below specified levels. Specifically, if on the fifth anniversary of entering into a derivative transaction or on any succeeding fifth-year anniversary our credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt were to be below BBB- by Standard & Poor's and Baa3 by Moody's, then each counterparty to such derivative transaction with whom we are in a net liability position that exceeds the applicable minimum call amount may demand that we post collateral in an amount equal to the net liability position. The amount of collateral required to be posted following such event will change each time our net liability position increases or decreases by more than the applicable minimum call amount. If our credit rating for our senior unsecured debt is subsequently equal to, or above BBB- by Standard & Poor's or Baa3 by Moody's, then any collateral posted at such time will be released to us and we will no longer be required to post collateral unless we meet the collateral trigger requirement at the next fifth-year anniversary. Currently, our senior unsecured debt credit rating is BB with a positive outlook by Standard & Poor's and Ba1 with a stable outlook by Moody's. We currently have five interest rate derivative hedges that have a term of at least five years. The aggregate fair values of all derivative instruments with such credit-related contingent features in net liability positions as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $65.8 million and $66.9 million, respectively, which do not include the impact of any such derivatives in net asset positions. The earliest that any of the five interest rate derivative hedges will reach their fifth anniversary is November 2016. Therefore, as of December 31, 2014, we were not required to post collateral for any of our derivative transactions.