XML 68 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments
Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments
Fair Value Measurements
The estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
Description
Total Carrying Amount
 
Total Fair Value
 
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(2)
 
Level 3(3)
 
Total Carrying Amount
 
Total Fair Value
 
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(2)
 
Level 3(3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents(4)
$
204,687

 
$
204,687


$
204,367

 
$

 
$

 
$
194,855

 
$
194,855

 
$
194,855

 
$

 
$

Total Assets
$
204,687

 
$
204,687


$
204,367

 
$

 
$

 
$
194,855

 
$
194,855

 
$
194,855

 
$

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt)(5)
$
8,074,804

 
$
8,431,220


$
2,888,255

 
$
5,542,965

 
$

 
$
8,489,947

 
$
8,859,310

 
$
3,917,398

 
$
4,941,912

 
$

Total Liabilities
$
8,074,804

 
$
8,431,220


$
2,888,255

 
$
5,542,965

 
$

 
$
8,489,947

 
$
8,859,310

 
$
3,917,398

 
$
4,941,912

 
$

___________________________________
(1)
Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.
(2)
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the liability, either directly or indirectly. For unsecured revolving credit facilities and unsecured term loans, fair value is determined utilizing the income valuation approach. This valuation model takes into account the contract terms of our debt such as the debt maturity and the interest rate on the debt. The valuation model also takes into account our creditworthiness based on publicly available credit default swap rates.
(3)
Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(4)
Consists of cash and marketable securities with original maturities of less than 90 days.
(5)
Consists of unsecured revolving credit facilities, unsecured senior notes, senior debentures and unsecured term loans. Does not include our capital lease obligations.
Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued interest and accrued expenses approximate fair value at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
Assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value have been categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy. The following table presents information about the Company's financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
Description
Total Fair Value
 
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(2)
 
Level 3(3)
 
Total Fair Value
 
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(2)
 
Level 3(3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments(4)
$
188,576

 

 
188,576

 

 
$
96,489

 

 
96,489

 

Investments(5)
$
6,044

 
6,044

 

 

 
$
6,231

 
6,231

 

 

Total Assets
$
194,620

 
$
6,044

 
$
188,576

 
$

 
$
102,720

 
$
6,231

 
$
96,489

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments(6)
$
100,260

 

 
100,260

 

 
$
85,119

 

 
85,119

 

Total Liabilities
$
100,260

 
$

 
$
100,260

 
$

 
$
85,119

 
$

 
$
85,119

 
$

___________________________________
(1)
Inputs based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.
(2)
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and fuel swaps, fair value is derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account the contract terms, such as maturity as well as other inputs, such as foreign exchange rates and curves, fuel types, fuel curves and interest rate yield curves. For fuel call options, fair value is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market. Fair value for foreign currency collar options is determined by using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options' contract terms, such as exercise price and maturity, and readily available public market data, such as foreign exchange curves, foreign exchange volatility levels and discount rates. All derivative instrument fair values take into account the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company.
(3)
Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
(4)
Consists of foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency collar options, interest rate swaps, fuel swaps and purchased fuel call options. Please refer to the "Fair Value of Derivative Instruments" table for breakdown by instrument type.
(5)
Consists of exchange-traded equity securities and mutual funds.
(6)
Consists of interest rate swaps, fuel swaps, foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency collar options and sold fuel call options. Please refer to the "Fair Value of Derivative Instruments" table for breakdown by instrument type.
The reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions. Accordingly, the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012, or that will be realized in the future, and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement.
The following table presents information about the Company's goodwill, indefinite-life intangible assets, long-lived assets for our Pullmantur reporting unit and assets held for sale recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using
 

 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
Description
Total Carrying Amount
 
Total Fair Value
 
Level 3
 
Total Impairment
 
Total Carrying Amount
 
Total Fair Value

Level 3
 
Total Impairment
Pullmantur Goodwill(1)
$
152,107

 
$

 

 
$

 
$
145,539

 
$
145,539


145,539

 
$
319,214

Indefinite-life intangible asset-Pullmantur trademarks and trade names(2)
$
214,112

 
$

 

 
$

 
$
204,866

 
$
204,866


204,866

 
$
17,356

Long-lived assets-Pullmantur aircraft(3)
$
49,507

 
$
49,507

 
49,507

 
$
13,529

 
$
62,288

 
$
62,288


62,288

 
$
48,874

Assets held for sale(4)
$

 
$

 

 
$
19,985

 
$
19,168

 
$

 

 
$

___________________________________
(1)
For 2012, we estimated the fair value of the Pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. The principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results, weighted-average cost of capital, and terminal value. Significantly impacting these assumptions were the anticipated future transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to Pullmantur. The discounted cash flow model used our 2013 projected operating results as a base. To that base we added future years' cash flows through 2017 assuming multiple revenue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments for this period on Pullmantur's reporting unit. We assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario. We discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to Pullmantur's reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital, which was determined to be 10%.
(2)
For 2012, we estimated the fair value of our indefinite-life intangible asset using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method. We used a royalty rate of 3% based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry. These trademarks and trade names relate to Pullmantur and we have used a discount rate of 11%, comparable to the rate used in valuing the Pullmantur reporting unit.
(3)
We estimated the fair value of our long-lived assets using an undiscounted cash flow model. A significant assumption in performing the undiscounted cash flow test was the number of years during which we expect to use these aircraft. Additionally, as of December 31, 2013, the expected operating use of the aircraft has modified the expected cash flows.
(4)
For 2013, we estimated the fair value of assets held for sale related to the sale of Pullmantur's non-core businesses. This resulted in an impairment of $20.0 million mostly consisting of $18.2 million for property and equipment. See Note 16. Restructuring and Related Impairment Charges for further discussion.

The assets related to Pullmantur’s non-core businesses that met the criteria for held for sale classification as of December 31, 2013 were adjusted to the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. At December 31, 2013, the fair value of certain assets held for sale was lower than the carrying amount, resulting in a loss of $20.0 million which was recognized during the fourth quarter of 2013 and is reported within Restructuring and related impairment charges in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). See Note 16. Restructuring and Related Impairment Charges for further discussion.
In 2013 and 2012, long-lived assets with carrying amounts of $63.0 million and $116.3 million were written down to their fair values of $49.5 million and $62.3 million, respectively, resulting in losses of $13.5 million and $48.9 million, which were recognized during the fourth quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively, and are reported within Restructuring and related impairment charges and Impairment of Pullmantur related assets, respectively, in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Long-lived assets are reported within Property and equipment, net in our consolidated balance sheets.
In 2012, goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets related to Pullmantur with a carrying amount of $459.1 million and $218.9 million, respectively, were written down to its implied fair value of $145.5 million and its fair value of $204.9 million, respectively. The impairment charges, totaling approximately $336.6 million, were recognized during the fourth quarter of 2012 and are reported within Impairment of Pullmantur related assets in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). Pullmantur's goodwill and indefinite-life intangible assets are reported within Goodwill and Other assets, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheets.
Derivative Instruments
We are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. We manage these risks through a combination of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies. The financial impact of these hedging instruments is primarily offset by corresponding changes in the underlying exposures being hedged. We achieve this by closely matching the amount, term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged. Although certain of our derivative financial instruments do not qualify or are not accounted for under hedge accounting, we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. We monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses.
We enter into various forward, swap and option contracts to manage our interest rate exposure and to limit our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices. These instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value and the vast majority are designated as hedges. We also have non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in our foreign operations and investments.
At inception of the hedge relationship, a derivative instrument that hedges the exposure to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or a recognized asset or liability is designated as a fair value hedge. A derivative instrument that hedges a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows related to a recognized asset or liability is designated as a cash flow hedge.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges are offset against changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments. Gains and losses on derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the underlying hedged transactions are recognized in earnings. The foreign currency transaction gain or loss of our non-derivative financial instruments designated as hedges of our net investment in foreign operations and investments are recognized as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) along with the associated foreign currency translation adjustment of the foreign operation.
On an ongoing basis, we assess whether derivatives used in hedging transactions are "highly effective" in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flow of hedged items. We use the long-haul method to assess hedge effectiveness using regression analysis for each hedge relationship under our interest rate, foreign currency and fuel hedging programs. We apply the same methodology on a consistent basis for assessing hedge effectiveness to all hedges within each hedging program (i.e., interest rate, foreign currency and fuel). We perform regression analyses over an observation period of up to three years, utilizing market data relevant to the hedge horizon of each hedge relationship. High effectiveness is achieved when a statistically valid relationship reflects a high degree of offset and correlation between the changes in the fair values of the derivative instrument and the hedged item. The determination of ineffectiveness is based on the amount of dollar offset between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item at the end of the reporting period. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or hedge accounting is discontinued, any change in fair value of the derivative since the last date at which it was determined to be effective is recognized in earnings. In addition, the ineffective portion of our highly effective hedges is immediately recognized in earnings and reported in Other income (expense) in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
Cash flows from derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the underlying hedged items. In the event that hedge accounting is discontinued, cash flows subsequent to the date of discontinuance are classified within investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments are classified as investing activities.
We consider the classification of the underlying hedged item’s cash flows in determining the classification for the designated derivative instrument’s cash flows. We classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of benchmark interest rate or hedges of fuel expense as operating activities due to the nature of the hedged item. Likewise, we classify derivative instrument cash flows from hedges of foreign currency risk on our newbuild ship payments as investing activities. Cash flows from derivative instruments not designated under hedge accounting, such as our fuel call options, are classified as investing activities.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our long-term debt obligations including future interest payments. At December 31, 2013, approximately 34.6% of our long-term debt was effectively fixed as compared to 45.8% as of December 31, 2012. We use interest rate swap agreements to modify our exposure to interest rate movements and to manage our interest expense.
Market risk associated with our long-term fixed rate debt is the potential increase in fair value resulting from a decrease in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our fixed-rate debt to a floating-rate basis to manage this risk. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on the $420.0 million fixed rate portion of our Oasis of the Seas unsecured amortizing term loan. The interest rate swap agreements effectively changed the interest rate on the balance of the unsecured term loan, which was $280.0 million as of December 31, 2013, from a fixed rate of 5.41% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.87%, currently approximately 4.23%. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges.
During 2013, we entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively changed the interest rate on the $650.0 million unsecured senior notes due 2022, from a fixed rate of 5.25% to a LIBOR-based floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.63%, currently approximately 3.87%. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as fair value hedges.
Market risk associated with our long-term floating rate debt is the potential increase in interest expense from an increase in interest rates. We use interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis to manage this risk. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we maintained forward-starting interest rate swap agreements that hedge the anticipated unsecured amortizing term loans that will finance our purchase of Quantum of the Seas and Anthem of the Seas. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging the Quantum of the Seas loan will effectively convert the interest rate for $735.0 million of the anticipated loan balance from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.74% (inclusive of margin) beginning in October 2014. Forward-starting interest rate swaps hedging the Anthem of the Seas loan will effectively convert the interest rate for $725.0 million of the anticipated loan balance from LIBOR plus 1.30% to a fixed rate of 3.86% (inclusive of margin) beginning in April 2015. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
In addition, at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we maintained interest rate swap agreements on a portion of the Celebrity Reflection unsecured amortizing term loan. Beginning April 2013, the interest rate swap agreements effectively converted the interest rate on the balance of the unsecured term loan, which was $600.0 million as of December 31, 2013, from a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus 0.40% to a fixed rate (including applicable margin) of 2.85% through the term of the loan. These interest rate swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements related to outstanding debt and on our current unfunded financing arrangements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $3.0 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Derivative Instruments
Our primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to our ship construction contracts denominated in Euros, our foreign currency denominated debt and our international business operations. We enter into foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements to manage portions of the exposure to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate cost of our ships on order was approximately $4.7 billion, of which we had disbursed $518.8 million as of such date. Approximately 36.3% and 49.7% of the aggregate cost of the ships under construction was exposed to fluctuations in the euro exchange rate at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts, collar options and cross currency swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow or fair value hedges depending on the designation of the related hedge.
During 2013, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge €365.0 million of our €745.0 million 5.625% unsecured senior notes due January 2014. These foreign currency forward contracts are accounted for as cash flow hedges and mature January 2014.
On a regular basis, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize the volatility resulting from the remeasurement of net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than our functional currency or the functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries. During 2013, we maintained an average of approximately $406.7 million of these foreign currency forward contracts. These instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts were losses of approximately $19.3 million, which offset gains arising from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies of $13.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts were gains of approximately $7.7 million, which offset losses arising from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies of $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts were losses of approximately $1.1 million and losses arising from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies of $1.6 million, which resulted in a total loss of $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. These changes were recognized in earnings within Other (expense) income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).
The notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts including our forward contracts and collar options as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $2.5 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively.
Non-Derivative Instruments
We consider our investments in our foreign operations to be denominated in relatively stable currencies and of a long-term nature. We partially address the exposure of our investments in foreign operations by denominating a portion of our debt in our subsidiaries' and investments' functional currencies and designating it as a hedge of these subsidiaries and investments. We had designated debt as a hedge of our net investments in Pullmantur and TUI Cruises of approximately €544.9 million and €481.7 million, or approximately $750.8 million and $635.1 million, through December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Fuel Price Risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates primarily to the consumption of fuel on our ships. We use fuel swap agreements and fuel call options to mitigate the financial impact of fluctuations in fuel prices.
Our fuel swap agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2013, we have hedged the variability in future cash flows for certain forecasted fuel transactions occurring through 2017. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had the following outstanding fuel swap agreements:
 
Fuel Swap Agreements
 
As of December 31, 2013
 
As of December 31, 2012
 
(metric tons)
2013

 
755,000

2014
762,000

 
635,000

2015
665,000

 
363,000

2016
372,000

 
104,000

2017
74,000

 

 
Fuel Swap Agreements
 
As of December 31, 2013
 
As of December 31, 2012
 
(% hedged)
Projected fuel purchases for year:
 
 
 
2013

 
55
%
2014
57
%
 
45
%
2015
45
%
 
25
%
2016
25
%
 
7
%
2017
5
%
 


At December 31, 2013 and 2012, $9.5 million and $47.2 million, respectively, of estimated unrealized net gains associated with our cash flow hedges pertaining to fuel swap agreements were expected to be reclassified to earnings from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within the next twelve months. Reclassification is expected to occur as the result of fuel consumption associated with our hedged forecasted fuel purchases.
The fair value and line item caption of derivative instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
As of December 31, 2013
 
As of December 31, 2012
 
Balance Sheet
Location
 
As of December 31, 2013
 
As of December 31, 2012
 
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
 
 
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
In thousands
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
Other assets
 
$
56,571

 
$
5,099

 
Other long-term liabilities
 
$
66,920

 
$
55,471

Foreign currency forward contracts
Derivative financial instruments
 
61,596

 
951

 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
 

 
338

Foreign currency forward contracts
Other assets
 
13,783

 
11,564

 
Other long-term liabilities
 

 
1,000

Foreign currency collar options
Other assets
 
22,172

 
8,974

 
Other long-term liabilities
 

 

Fuel swaps
Derivative financial instruments
 
10,902

 
48,624

 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
 
1,657

 
1,761

Fuel swaps
Other assets
 
8,205

 
8,585

 
Other long-term liabilities
 
9,052

 
6,369

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
 
 
$
173,229

 
$
83,797

 
 
 
$
77,629

 
$
64,939

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forward contracts
Derivative Financial Instruments
 
$
15,347

 
$

 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
 
$
22,631

 
$

Foreign currency forward contracts
Other assets
 

 
4,440

 
Other long-term liabilities
 

 
11,475

Fuel swaps
Derivative financial instruments
 

 

 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
 

 
475

Fuel call options
Derivative financial instruments
 

 
8,252

 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
 

 
8,230

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-20
 
 
15,347

 
12,692

 
 
 
22,631

 
20,180

Total derivatives
 
 
$
188,576

 
$
96,489

 
 
 
$
100,260

 
$
85,119

___________________________________
(1)
Accounting Standard Codification 815-20 "Derivatives and Hedging".
The carrying value and line item caption of non-derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments recorded within our consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
 
 
 
 
Carrying Value
Non-derivative instrument designated as
hedging instrument under ASC 815-20
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
As of December 31, 2013
 
As of December 31, 2012
In thousands
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency debt
 
Current portion of long-term debt
 
$
477,442

 
$
17,516

Foreign currency debt
 
Long-term debt
 
273,354

 
617,593


 

 
$
750,796

 
$
635,109



The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as hedging instruments and the related hedged items in fair value hedges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
 
 
Location of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative and
Hedged Item
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on Derivative
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
Income on Hedged Item
Derivatives and related Hedged Items
under ASC 815-20 Fair Value Hedging
Relationships
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
In thousands
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swaps
 
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
 
$
9,354

 
$
13,682

 
$
37,745

 
$
32,389

Interest rate swaps
 
Other (expense) income
 
(71,630
)
 
(1,763
)
 
68,743

 
2,070

Interest rate swaps
 
Extinguishment of unsecured senior notes
 

 

 

 
9,698


 

 
$
(62,276
)
 
$
11,919

 
$
106,488

 
$
44,157


The effect of derivative instruments qualifying and designated as cash flow hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:
 
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI
on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain
(Loss) Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
(Ineffective
Portion and Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness
Testing)
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivative (Ineffective
Portion and
Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness testing)
Derivatives under
ASC 815-20 Cash Flow
Hedging Relationships
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
In thousands
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cross currency swaps
 
$

 
$
851

 
Other (expense) income
 
$

 
$
2,505

 
Other (expense) income
 
$

 
$

Cross currency swaps
 

 

 
Interest Expense
 
(3,531
)
 
(2,209
)
 
Other (expense) income
 

 

Interest rate swaps
 
111,223

 
(44,971
)
 
Other (expense) income
 

 

 
Other (expense) income
 
431

 
(348
)
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
68,364

 
11,928

 
Depreciation and amortization expenses
 
(1,797
)
 
(953
)
 
Other (expense) income
 
9

 

Foreign currency forward contracts
 

 

 
Other (expense) income
 
27,423

 
(953
)
 
Other (expense) income
 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts
 

 

 
Interest expense
 
(440
)
 

 
Other (expense) income
 

 

Foreign currency collar options
 
13,199

 
3,316

 
Depreciation and amortization expenses
 

 

 
Other (expense) income
 

 

Fuel swaps
 
4,642

 
87,014

 
Fuel
 
47,944

 
110,995

 
Other (expense) income
 
(3,413
)
 
(1,041
)
 
 
$
197,428

 
$
58,138

 
 
 
$
69,599

 
$
109,385

 
 
 
$
(2,973
)
 
$
(1,389
)

The effect of non-derivative instruments qualifying and designated as net investment hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:
 
 
Amount of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI
(Effective Portion)
 
Location of Gain
(Loss) in Income
(Ineffective Portion
and Amount
Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(Ineffective Portion and
Amount Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
Non-derivative instruments under ASC 815-20
Net Investment Hedging Relationships
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
In thousands
 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Debt
 
$
(34,295
)
 
$
(11,065
)
 
Other (expense) income
 
$

 
$

 
 
$
(34,295
)
 
$
(11,065
)
 

 
$

 
$


The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated financial statements was as follows:
 
 
 
 
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivative
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging
Instruments under ASC 815-20
 
Location of Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivative
 
Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Year Ended December 31, 2012
In thousands
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forward contracts
 
Other (expense) income
 
$
(21,244
)
 
$
7,152

Fuel swaps
 
Other (expense) income
 
243

 
(3,058
)
Fuel call options
 
Other (expense) income
 
(23
)
 
(5,613
)

 

 
$
(21,024
)
 
$
(1,519
)

Credit Related Contingent Features
Our current interest rate derivative instruments may require us to post collateral if our Standard & Poor's and Moody's credit ratings remain below specified levels. Specifically, if on the fifth anniversary of entering into a derivative transaction and on all succeeding fifth-year anniversaries our credit ratings for our senior unsecured debt were to be below BBB- by Standard & Poor's and Baa3 by Moody's, then each counterparty to such derivative transaction with whom we are in a net liability position that exceeds the applicable minimum call amount may demand that we post collateral in an amount equal to the net liability position. The amount of collateral required to be posted following such event will change each time our net liability position increases or decreases by more than the applicable minimum call amount. If our credit rating for our senior unsecured debt is subsequently equal to, or above BBB- by Standard & Poor's or Baa3 by Moody's, then any collateral posted at such time will be released to us and we will no longer be required to post collateral unless we meet the collateral trigger requirement at the next fifth-year anniversary. Currently, our senior unsecured debt credit rating is BB with a stable outlook by Standard & Poor's and Ba1 with a stable outlook by Moody's. We currently have five interest rate derivative hedges that have a term of at least five years. The aggregate fair values of all derivative instruments with such credit-related contingent features in net liability positions as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $66.9 million and $55.5 million, respectively, which do not include the impact of any such derivatives in net asset positions. The earliest that any of the five interest rate derivative hedges will reach their fifth anniversary is November 2016. Therefore, as of December 31, 2013, we were not required to post collateral for any of our derivative transactions.