XML 34 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company provides disclosure of financial assets and financial liabilities that are carried at fair value based on the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements may be classified based on the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities using the following three levels:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.) and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. The carrying amount of the Company’s bank term loan at December 31, 2013 approximated fair value due to its variable interest rate and other terms. All such measurements are Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount of the Company’s leased buildings under construction in Cambridge, Massachusetts and the related long-term facility lease obligation reflect replacement cost, of the portion of the building financed or reimbursed by the landlord, which approximates fair value. This measurement is a Level 3 fair value measurement. The fair value of the convertible notes, which differs from their carrying value, is influenced by interest rates and stock price and stock price volatility and is determined by prices for the convertible notes observed in market trading. The market for trading of the convertible notes is not considered to be an active market and therefore the estimate of fair value is based on Level 2 inputs. The estimated fair value of the convertible notes, face value of $200 million, was $198 million at December 31, 2015.

In July 2015, the Company entered into a royalty financing agreement with PDL BioPharma, Inc. (“PDL”) under which the Company received an initial payment of $50 million. As of December 31, 2015 the carrying value of the royalty financing obligation was $48.7 million, excluding unamortized issuance costs of approximately $4.3 million, and the estimated fair value of the royalty financing obligation was approximately $45.2 million. The fair value of the royalty financing obligation is estimated by discounting the future estimated cash flows associated with the repayment of the obligation, and is a form of the income approach. The Company discounted the contractual cash flows of the agreement at a risk-adjusted discount rate to a present value. The risk-adjusted discount rate considered the change in risk-free rates and credit spreads between the issuance date of the financing and the valuation date. The discounted cash flow model included, among others, the following assumptions: projections of revenues and related cash flows based on assumed long-term growth rates and demand trends; and estimated discount rates. The Company based these assumptions on its historical data and experience, micro and macro general economic condition projections, and its expectations. If the Company’s assumptions relative to growth rates were to change or were incorrect, the fair value calculation may change which would impact the estimated fair value of the royalty financing obligation. This measurement is a Level 3 fair value measurement.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company held one marketable security and none as of December 31, 2014. The marketable securities consist of 687,139 shares of common stock of REGENXBIO, Inc. (“REGENXBIO”). The Company obtained these shares in connection with a license agreement it entered into with REGENXBIO in November 2010 for certain gene expression regulation technology. The Company is restricted from trading these securities until March 2016 pursuant to an agreement it entered into with REGENXBIO. The Company has classified these shares as “available for sale” investments and recognized an unrealized gain of $11.4 million, using a Level 1 valuation input, which has been excluded from the determination of net loss and is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, a separate component of stockholders’ equity, in the year ended December 31, 2015. These shares had been accounted for using the equity method with a carrying value of zero due to losses incurred by REGENXBIO in previous years.

Intra-period tax allocation rules require the Company to allocate its provision for income taxes between continuing operations and other categories of earnings, such as other comprehensive income. In periods in which the Company has a year-to-date pre-tax loss from continuing operations and pre-tax income in other categories of earnings, such as other comprehensive income, the Company must allocate the tax provision to the other categories of earnings. The Company then records a related tax benefit in continuing operations. The following table summarizes the fair value, accumulated other comprehensive income and intra-period tax allocation regarding the Company’s investment in REGENXBIO, at December 31, 2015.

 

In thousands    2015  

Fair value of marketable equity securities

   $ 11,407   

Intra-period tax allocation recorded as a benefit from income taxes

     (4,586
  

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on marketable equity securities, net of tax

   $ 6,821