XML 72 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Jan. 02, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 21—Fair Value Measurements

ASC No. 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized based on a three-level hierarchy. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 

    Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

    Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

    Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

We have certain assets and liabilities such as our derivative instruments that are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Our derivative assets and liabilities represent Level 2 instruments. Level 2 instruments are valued based on observable inputs for quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets. The fair value of the derivative assets as of January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 was $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The fair value of the derivative liabilities as of January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 was $8.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively.

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amounts reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, short-term borrowings and long-term debt approximate their respective fair values, except as otherwise indicated. The carrying values and estimated fair values of our significant outstanding debt as of January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 were as follows:

 

     January 2, 2016      January 3, 2015  
     Carrying      Fair      Carrying      Fair  

(in millions of U.S. dollars)

   Value      Value      Value      Value  

6.750% senior notes due in 2020 1,3

   $ 613.0       $ 641.4       $ 610.8       $ 630.1   

10.000% senior notes due in 2021 1,2

     390.1         397.3         405.6         403.4   

5.375% senior notes due in 2022 1,3

     516.8         522.4         516.2         481.7   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,519.9       $ 1,561.1       $ 1,532.6       $ 1,515.2   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

1.  The fair values were based on the trading levels and bid/offer prices observed by a market participant and are considered Level 1 financial instruments.
2.  The outstanding aggregate principal amount of the DSS Notes of $350.0 million was assumed by Cott at fair value of $406.0 million in connection with the DSS Acquisition. The premium of $56.0 million is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense using the effective interest method over the remaining contractual term of the DSS Notes.
3.  Carrying value of our significant outstanding debt is net of unamortized debt issuance costs as of January 2, 2016 and January 3, 2015 (see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Fair value of contingent consideration

We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration related to the Aimia Acquisition based on financial projections of the acquired business and estimated probabilities of achievement of certain EBITDA targets. The fair value was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represented a Level 3 instrument. Level 3 instruments are valued based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect our own assumptions in measuring fair value. The acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration was determined to be £10.6 million ($15.6 million at exchange rates in effect on January 2, 2016) using a present valued probability-weighted income approach. During the second quarter of 2015, we recorded a fair value adjustment of £0.4 million ($0.6 million at exchange rates in effect on July 4, 2015) to the contingent consideration based on review of the key assumptions used to calculate the fair value at the acquisition date. During the fourth quarter of 2015, we recorded a fair value adjustment of £0.1 million ($0.2 million at exchange rates in effect on January 2, 2016) to the contingent consideration based on review of the key assumptions used to calculate the fair value at the acquisition date. The changes in the fair value adjustment of the contingent consideration were recognized in other (income) expense, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended January 2, 2016. The maximum potential payout is £16.0 million ($23.6 million at exchange rates in effect on January 2, 2016) on an undiscounted basis.