Note 4 - New Accounting Standards	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Description of New Accounting Pronouncements Not yet Adopted [Text Block]	4. New Accounting Standards In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-28 (“ASU No. 2010-28”), Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts, which modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The amendments in ASU No. 2010-28 were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. As a result of the adoption of the amendments, any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the amendments should be included in earnings. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or its consolidated financial position. In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 (“ASU No. 2011-08”), Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-08 provide guidance on testing goodwill for impairment. The new guidance provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that this is the case, it is required to perform the prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit, if any. If an entity determines that the carrying amount of a reporting unit is less than its fair value, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. This guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or its consolidated financial position. Management periodically reviews new accounting standards that are issued. Although some of these standards may be applicable to the Company, Management has not identified any other new standards that it believes merit further discussion, and the Company expects that none would have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 - New Accounting Standards

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Description of New Accounting Pronouncements Not yet Adopted [Text Block]

4. New Accounting Standards

In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-28 (“ASU No. 2010-28”), Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts, which modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The amendments in ASU No. 2010-28 were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. As a result of the adoption of the amendments, any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the amendments should be included in earnings. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or its consolidated financial position.

In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 (“ASU No. 2011-08”), Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-08 provide guidance on testing goodwill for impairment. The new guidance provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that this is the case, it is required to perform the prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit, if any. If an entity determines that the carrying amount of a reporting unit is less than its fair value, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. This guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or its consolidated financial position.

Management periodically reviews new accounting standards that are issued. Although some of these standards may be applicable to the Company, Management has not identified any other new standards that it believes merit further discussion, and the Company expects that none would have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.