COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

We have entered into various non-cancellable operating lease agreements for offices and facilities, passenger vehicles, and IT services throughout the world with original lease periods expiring primarily between 2019 and 2030 and remaining lease terms of 1 to 11 years. Some of these agreements have escalating rent payment provisions, as well as options to extend the lease for up to 5 years.

We recognize rent expense under such agreements on a straight-line basis. Our rent expense under operating leases was $11.0 million in 2018, $7.9 million in 2017 and $0.6 million in 2016.

As of December 31, 2018, undiscounted future minimum lease payments under our non-cancelable operating leases are as follows over each of the next five years and thereafter (in millions):



2019	$	8.3
2020	8.6
2021	6.5
2022	5.9
2023	5.6
Thereafter	13.2
Total	$	48.1

The weighted-average lease term for the operating lease liabilities is approximately 6.3 years.

Legal Proceedings

Beginning in November 2016, purported class actions were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against Pfizer, Inc. subsidiaries, Hospira, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and certain other defendants relating to the intravenous saline solutions part of the HIS business. Plaintiffs seek to represent classes consisting of all persons and entities in the U.S. who directly purchased intravenous saline solution sold by any of the defendants from January 1, 2013 until the time the defendants’ allegedly unlawful conduct ceases. Plaintiffs allege that U.S. manufacturer defendants conspired together to restrict output and artificially fix, raise, maintain and/or stabilize the prices of intravenous saline solution sold throughout the U.S. in violation of federal antitrust laws. Plaintiffs seek treble damages (for themselves and on behalf of the putative classes) and an injunction against defendants for alleged price overcharges for intravenous saline solution in the U.S. since January 1, 2013. On July 5, 2018, the District Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the operative complaint for failing to state a valid antitrust claim, but allowed the plaintiffs to file a second amended complaint. On September 6, 2018, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint adding new allegations in support of their conspiracy claims and adding ICU as a defendant. All defendants have filed a motion to dismiss this second amended complaint. On February 3, 2017, we completed the acquisition of the HIS business from Pfizer. This litigation is the subject of a claim for indemnification against us by Pfizer and a cross-claim for indemnification against Pfizer by us under the HIS stock and asset purchase agreement (“SAPA”).

In addition, in August 2015, the New York Attorney General issued a subpoena to Hospira, Inc. requesting that the company provide information regarding certain business practices in the intravenous solutions part of the HIS business. Separately, in April 2017, we received a grand jury subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in connection with an investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. The subpoena calls for production of documents related to the manufacturing, selling, pricing and shortages of intravenous solutions, including saline, as well as communications among market participants regarding these issues. On December 10, 2018, we were informed by the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, that their investigation has been closed.

In April 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice issued a HIPAA subpoena to Hospira, Inc., requesting production of documents and records regarding the manufacturing, production, testing, quality and validation of the Sapphire™ infusion pumps, sets and related accessories distributed by the Company. We are coordinating with Pfizer to produce the requested records to the Department of Justice.

In March 2018, a dispute with a product partner resulted in a redefinition of our contractual arrangement and in the rights and remedies determined under such arrangement. The resolution of the dispute resulted in a $28.9 million net charge to the consolidated statement of operations. During the fourth quarter of 2018, we incurred $12.7 million in additional contract settlement charges related to this arrangement as a result of the write-off of assets and additional expenses associated with the restructuring of products.

From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings, most of which are routine litigation, in the normal course of business. Our management does not believe that the resolution of the unsettled legal proceedings that we are involved with will have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of business, we have agreed to indemnify our officers and directors to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware law and to indemnify customers as to certain intellectual property matters related to sales of our products. There is no maximum limit on the indemnification that may be required under these agreements. We have never incurred, nor do we expect to incur, any liability for indemnification.

Contingencies

We have a contractual earn-out arrangement in connection with our acquisition of the HIS business, whereby Pfizer may be entitled up to an additional $225 million in cash upon achievement of performance targets for the company for the three years ending December 31, 2019, see (Note 2: Acquisitions and Strategic Transaction Expenses). The amount to be paid cannot be determined until the earn-out period has expired.