XML 54 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Oct. 30, 2011
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Examples include provisions for bad debts and inventory reserves and accruals for employee benefits, general liability insurance, warranties and certain contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(b) Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value. Cash equivalents are highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less and may consist of time deposits with a number of commercial banks with high credit ratings, Eurodollar time deposits, money market instruments, certificates of deposit and commercial paper. Our policy allows us to also invest excess funds in no-load, open-end, management investment trusts (“mutual funds”). The mutual funds invest exclusively in high quality money market instruments. As of October 30, 2011, our cash equivalents were all invested in money market instruments.

(c) Accounts Receivable and Related Allowance. We report accounts receivable net of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Trade accounts receivable are the result of sales of building systems, components and coating services to customers throughout the United States and affiliated territories, including international builders who resell to end users. Substantially all sales are denominated in U.S. dollars with the exception of sales at our Canadian operations which are denominated in Canadian dollars. Credit sales do not normally require a pledge of collateral; however, various types of liens may be filed to enhance the collection process.

We establish reserves for doubtful accounts on a customer by customer basis when we believe the required payment of specific amounts owed is unlikely to occur. In establishing these reserves, we consider changes in the financial position of a customer, availability of security, lien rights and bond rights as well as disputes, if any, with our customers. Our allowance for doubtful accounts reflects reserves for customer receivables to reduce receivables to amounts expected to be collected. We determine past due status as of the contractual payment date. Interest on delinquent accounts receivable is included in the trade accounts receivable balance and recognized as interest income when earned and collectability is reasonably assured. Uncollectible accounts are written off when a settlement is reached for an amount that is less than the outstanding historical balance or we have exhausted all collection efforts. The following table represents the rollforward of our uncollectible accounts and backcharge activity for the fiscal years ended October 30, 2011, October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009 (in thousands):

 

                         
    October 30,
2011
    October 31,
2010
    November 1,
2009
 

Beginning balance

  $ 5,232     $ 9,039     $ 10,330  

Provision for bad debts

    1,843       78       1,221  

Amounts charged against allowance for bad debts, net of recoveries

    (966     (3,885     (2,512
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

  $ 6,109     $ 5,232     $ 9,039  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(d) Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value less allowance for inventory obsolescence, using specific identification or the weighted-average method for steel coils and other raw materials. During fiscal 2009, we incurred lower of cost or market adjustments of $8.1 million in the metal coil coating segment, $17.2 million in the metal components segment and $14.7 million in the engineered building systems segment for a total of $40.0 million. Lower of cost or market adjustments were recorded because this inventory exceeded our estimated net realizable value less normal profit margins. All inventory with a lower of cost or market adjustment was fully utilized by July 2009.

The components of inventory are as follows (in thousands):

 

                 
    October 30,
2011
    October 31,
2010
 

Raw materials

  $ 62,801     $ 56,834  

Work in process and finished goods

    25,730       24,552  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 88,531     $ 81,386  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

The following table represents the rollforward of reserve for obsolete materials and supplies activity for the fiscal years ended October 30, 2011, October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009 (in thousands):

 

                         
    October 30,
2011
    October 31,
2010
    November 1,
2009
 

Beginning balance

  $ 1,231     $ 1,592     $ 1,807  

Provisions

    732       639       1,409  

Dispositions

    (614     (1,000     (1,624
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

  $ 1,349     $ 1,231     $ 1,592  
   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During fiscal 2011, we purchased approximately 33% of our steel requirements from two vendors in the United States. No other vendor accounted for over 10% of our steel requirements during fiscal 2011.

(e) Assets Held for Sale. We record assets held for sale at the lower of the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. The following criteria are used to determine if property is held for sale: (i) management has the authority and commits to a plan to sell the property; (iii) the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition; (iii) there is an active program to locate a buyer and the plan to sell the property has been initiated; (iv) the sale of the property is probable within one year; (v) the property is being actively marketed at a reasonable sale price relative to its current fair value; and (vi) it is unlikely that the plan to sell will be withdrawn or that significant changes to the plan will be made.

In determining the fair value of the assets less cost to sell, we considered factors including current sales prices for comparable assets in the area, recent market analysis studies, appraisals and any recent legitimate offers. If the estimated fair value less cost to sell of an asset is less than its current carrying value, the asset is written down to its estimated fair value less cost to sell. During fiscal 2011, we recorded impairments on assets held for sale of $1.0 million.

Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is reasonably possible that actual results could differ from the estimates used in our historical analyses. Our assumptions about property sales prices require significant judgment because the current market is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. We calculated the estimated fair values of assets held for sale based on current market conditions and assumptions made by management, which may differ materially from actual results and may result in additional impairments if market conditions continue to deteriorate.

(f) Property, Plant and Equipment and Leases. Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the term of the underlying lease. Computer software developed or purchased for internal use is depreciated using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life. Depreciation and amortization are recognized in cost of sales and engineering, selling, general and administrative expenses based on the nature and use of the underlying asset(s). Operating leases are expensed using the straight-line method over the term of the underlying lease.

Depreciation expense for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $26.3 million, $27.7 million and $29.9 million, respectively. Of this depreciation expense, $6.3 million, $6.3 million and $7.1 million was related to software depreciation for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):

 

                 
    October 30,
2011
    October 31,
2010
 

Land

  $ 22,234     $ 22,368  

Buildings and improvements

    168,660       168,126  

Machinery, equipment and furniture

    205,108       207,013  

Transportation equipment

    2,939       3,023  

Computer software and equipment

    79,250       77,482  

Construction in progress

    27,614       16,028  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      505,805       494,040  

Less accumulated depreciation

    (297,291     (279,587
   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    $ 208,514     $ 214,453  
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Estimated useful lives for depreciation are:

 

         

Buildings and improvements

    10 — 39 years  

Machinery, equipment and furniture

    3 — 10 years  

Transportation equipment

    5 — 10 years  

Computer software and equipment

    3 —   7 years  

We capitalize interest on capital invested in projects in accordance with ASC Topic 835, Interest. For each of fiscal 2011 and 2009, the total amount of interest capitalized was 0.7 million. For fiscal 2010, the total amount of interest capitalized was immaterial. Upon commencement of operations, capitalized interest, as a component of the total cost of the asset, is amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset.

(g) Internally Developed Software. Internally developed software is stated at cost less accumulated amortization and is amortized using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life ranging from 3 to 7 years. Certain internally developed software in the amount of $2.6 million and included in construction in progress is currently on-hold but management believes it is probable the software will be completed and implemented in the foreseeable future. Software assets are reviewed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable over the remaining lives of the assets. During the software application development stage, capitalized costs include external consulting costs, cost of software licenses and internal payroll and payroll related costs for employees who are directly associated with a software project. Upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if they result in added functionality which enable the software to perform tasks it was previously incapable of performing. Software maintenance, training, data conversion and business process reengineering costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.

(h) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. We review the carrying values of goodwill and identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying values may not be recoverable and annually for goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as required by ASC Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other. Unforeseen events, changes in circumstances, market conditions and material differences in the value of intangible assets due to changes in estimates of future cash flows could negatively affect the fair value of our assets and result in a non-cash impairment charge. Some factors considered important that could trigger an impairment review include the following: significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of our use of acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business and significant negative industry or economic trends.

(i) Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenues when the following conditions are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Generally, these criteria are met at the time product is shipped or services are complete. Provisions are made upon sale for estimated product returns.

 

(j) Equity Raising and Deferred Financing Costs. Equity raising costs are recorded as a reduction to additional paid in capital upon the execution of an equity transaction. In connection with the Exchange Offer on the Convertible Notes, we incurred $5.7 million in equity raising costs. Deferred financing costs are capitalized as incurred and amortized using the effective interest method over the expected life of the debt. At October 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010, the unamortized balance in deferred financing costs was $11.6 million and $16.2 million, respectively.

Costs related to potential pre-packaged bankruptcy related to our 2009 financial restructuring were expensed as incurred. During fiscal 2009, we expensed $4.8 million of pre-packaged bankruptcy costs which were included in debt extinguishment and refinancing costs in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. All potential pre-packaged bankruptcy costs were incurred in connection with the Recapitalization Plan and were expensed in fiscal 2009.

(k) Cost of sales. Cost of sales includes the cost of inventory sold during the period, including costs for manufacturing, inbound freight, receiving, inspection, warehousing, and internal transfers less vendor rebates. Costs associated with shipping and handling our products are included in cost of sales. Cost of sales is exclusive of lower of cost or market adjustments and asset impairments because these items are shown below cost of sales on our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Purchasing costs and engineering and drafting costs are included in engineering, selling, general and administrative expense. Purchasing costs were $2.7 million, $2.5 million and $3.2 million and engineering and drafting costs were $40.2 million, $39.6 million and $38.2 million in each of fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Approximately $2.0 million and $1.7 million of these engineering, selling, general and administrative costs were capitalized and remained in inventory at the end of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively.

(l) Warranty. We sell weathertightness warranties to our customers for protection from leaks in our roofing systems related to weather. These warranties range from two years to 20 years. We sell two types of warranties, standard and Single Sourcetm , and three grades of coverage for each. The type and grade of coverage determines the price to the customer. For standard warranties, our responsibility for leaks in a roofing system begins after 24 consecutive leak-free months. For Single Sourcetm warranties, the roofing system must pass our inspection before warranty coverage will be issued. Inspections are typically performed at three stages of the roofing project: (i) at the project start-up; (ii) at the project mid-point; and (iii) at the project completion. These inspections are included in the cost of the warranty. If the project requires or the customer requests additional inspections, those inspections are billed to the customer. Upon the sale of a warranty, we record the resulting revenue as deferred revenue, which is included in other accrued expenses in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize deferred warranty revenue over the warranty coverage period in a manner that matches our estimated expenses relating to the warranty. Additionally, we maintain an accrued warranty at Robertson-Ceco II Corporation (“RCC”) in which the balance was $3.1 million at October 30, 2011. RCC’s accrued warranty programs have similar terms and characteristics to our other warranty programs although this warranty is not amortized in the same manner as our other warranty programs. See Note 10 — Warranty.

(m) Insurance. Group medical insurance is purchased through Blue Cross Blue Shield (“BCBS”). The plans include a Preferred Provider Organization (“PPO”) plan and an Exclusive Provider Organization (“EPO”) plan. These plans are managed-care plans utilizing networks to achieve discounts through negotiated rates with the providers within these networks. The claims incurred under these plans are self-funded for the first $250,000 of each claim. We purchase individual stop loss reinsurance to limit our claims liability to $250,000 per claim. BCBS administers all claims, including claims processing, utilization review and network access charges.

Insurance is purchased for workers compensation and employer liability, general liability, property and auto liability/auto physical damage. We utilize either deductibles or self-insurance retentions (“SIR”) to limit our exposure to catastrophic loss. The workers compensation insurance has a $500,000 per-occurrence deductible. The property and auto liability insurances have per-occurrence deductibles of $50,000 and $250,000, respectively. The general liability insurance has a $350,000 SIR. Umbrella insurance coverage is purchased to protect us against claims that exceed our per-occurrence or aggregate limits set forth in our respective policies. All claims are adjusted utilizing a third-party claims administrator and insurance carrier claims adjusters.

Each reporting period, we record the costs of our health insurance plan, including paid claims, an estimate of the change in incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) claims, taxes and administrative fees, when applicable, (collectively the “Plan Costs”) as general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The estimated IBNR claims are based upon (i) a recent average level of paid claims under the plan, (ii) an estimated lag factor and (iii) an estimated growth factor to provide for those claims that have been incurred but not yet reported and paid. We use an independent actuary to determine the claims lag and estimated liability for IBNR claims.

For workers’ compensation costs, we monitor the number of accidents and the severity of such accidents to develop appropriate estimates for expected costs to provide both medical care and indemnity benefits, when applicable, for the period of time that an employee is incapacitated and unable to work. These accruals are developed using independent third-party actuarial estimates of the expected cost for medical treatment, and length of time an employee will be unable to work based on industry statistics for the cost of similar disabilities, to include statutory impairment ratings. For general liability and automobile claims, accruals are developed based on independent third-party actuarial estimates of the expected cost to resolve each claim, including damages and defense costs, based on legal and industry trends and the nature and severity of the claim. Accruals also include estimates for IBNR claims, and taxes and administrative fees, when applicable. Each reporting period, we record the costs of our workers’ compensation, general liability and automobile claims, including paid claims, an estimate of the change in IBNR claims, taxes and administrative fees as general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(n) Advertising Costs. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $5.0 million, $4.6 million and $5.4 million in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(o) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We assess impairment of property, plant, and equipment in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. We assess the recoverability of the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment if certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable, such as a significant decrease in market value of the assets or a significant change in our business conditions. If we determine that the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable based on expected undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, we record an impairment loss equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. The fair value of assets is determined based on prices of similar assets adjusted for their remaining useful life. During fiscal 2009, we adjusted our property, plant and equipment because we determined that the carrying value of certain assets were not recoverable based on expected undiscounted future cash flows. We recorded asset impairments of $1.1 million in fiscal 2011, which included $1.0 million related to assets held for sale. During fiscal 2010, we recorded impairments on assets held for sale of $1.2 million. We recorded asset impairments of $6.3 million in fiscal 2009, which included $1.2 million related to assets held for sale. See Note 4 – Plant Restructuring and Asset Impairments for asset impairments in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009.

(p) Share-Based Compensation. Compensation expense recorded for restricted stock awards under the intrinsic value method is consistent with the expense that is recorded under the fair value-based method. We recorded the recurring pretax compensation expense relating to restricted stock awards and stock options of $6.9 million, $5.0 million and $4.8 million for fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The acceleration of the unamortized compensation expense upon the change in control was $9.1 million in fiscal 2009 and was included in change of control charges on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

(q) Foreign Currency Re-measurement and Translation. In accordance ASC Topic 830, Foreign Currency Matters, the functional currency for our Mexico operations is the U.S. dollar. Adjustments resulting from the re-measurement of the local currency financial statements into the U.S. dollar functional currency, which uses a combination of current and historical exchange rates, are included in net income in the current period. Net foreign currency re-measurement gains (losses) are reflected in income for the period. Net foreign currency re-measurement gains (losses) were $(0.4) million for the fiscal year ended October 30, 2011 and were immaterial for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009.

The functional currency for our Canadian operations is the Canadian dollar. Translation adjustments resulting from translating the functional currency financial statements into U.S. dollar equivalents are reported separately in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The net foreign currency gains (losses) included in net income for the fiscal years ended October 30, 2011, October 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009 was $(0.1) million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million. Net foreign currency translation gain (loss), net of tax, and included in other comprehensive income was immaterial for the fiscal years ended October 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010.

(r) Contingencies. We establish reserves for estimated loss contingencies and unasserted claims when we believe a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Our contingent liability reserves are related primarily to litigation and environmental matters. Revisions to contingent liability reserves are reflected in income in the period in which there are changes in facts and circumstances that affect our previous assumptions with respect to the likelihood or amount of loss. Reserves for contingent liabilities are based upon our assumptions and estimates regarding the probable outcome of the matter. We estimate the probable cost by evaluating historical precedent as well as the specific facts relating to each particular contingency (including the opinion of outside advisors, professionals and experts). Should the outcome differ from our assumptions and estimates or other events result in a material adjustment to the accrued estimated reserves, revisions to the estimated reserves for contingent liabilities would be required and would be recognized in the period the new information becomes known.

(s) Beneficial conversion features and dividend policy. Our Convertible Preferred Stock contains beneficial conversion features. We expect to recognize additional beneficial conversion feature charges in the future as paid-in-kind dividends are accrued on the Preferred Shares to the extent the market price of our Common Stock exceeds $6.37. Our policy is to recognize beneficial conversion feature charges on paid-in-kind dividends based on a daily dividend recognition and the daily closing stock price of our Common Stock. We believe this recognition policy is reasonable as our policy matches the legal transfer and conversion rights of the majority shareholder.

At any time prior to the Dividend Rate Reduction Event, if dividends are not declared in cash on the applicable dividend declaration date, the rate at which the dividends are payable will be at least 12% per annum. Prior to the vote of the Dividend Payment Committee, the Company is obligated to the 12% dividend rate. Therefore, we accrue dividends based on the 12% rate and if and when we determine the dividends will be paid at a different rate due to either cash payment on the applicable dividend declaration date or obtaining a waiver, we will record a subsequent benefit of the excess 4% accrual upon our board’s declaration of a cash dividend and reverse the beneficial conversion feature charge associated with such accrual.

(t) Income taxes. The determination of our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Our provision for income taxes reflects a combination of income earned and taxed in the various U.S. federal and state, Canadian federal and provincial as well as Mexican federal jurisdictions. Jurisdictional tax law changes, increases or decreases in permanent differences between book and tax items, accruals or adjustments of accruals for tax contingencies or valuation allowances, and the change in the mix of earnings from these taxing jurisdictions all affect the overall effective tax rate.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, we must consider whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, in determining whether a valuation allowance is required. Such evidence includes the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment, and judgment is required in considering the relative weight of negative and positive evidence. At October 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010, we had a full valuation allowance in the amount of $5.4 million and $5.2 million, respectively, on the deferred tax assets of Robertson Building Systems Ltd., our Canadian subsidiary.

We expect to generate sufficient operating profits in future periods to fully utilize the net U.S. deferred tax assets of $14.6 million. In the event our expectations of future operating results change, a valuation allowance may be required on our existing unreserved net U.S. deferred tax assets. Our expectations could change in the near term if nonresidential construction fails to continue its projected recovery.

(u) Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Operations and Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications include the reclassification of shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 (the “Common Stock”), to redeemable common stock. See Note 13 – Redeemable Common Stock. The net effect of these reclassifications was not material to our Consolidated Financial Statements.