-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, SWyhTUei7gMi+AD9aI0BZ5HSAsVoKYigybGSYNWggpdwyIWZNzU//NgzZcyzTrcQ eoj2gIC+ZisAlqRMc3QFpQ== 0000891618-98-005466.txt : 19981228 0000891618-98-005466.hdr.sgml : 19981228 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000891618-98-005466 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 15 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19980930 FILED AS OF DATE: 19981223 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SYNOPSYS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000883241 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE [7372] IRS NUMBER: 561546236 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 0930 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-19807 FILM NUMBER: 98774549 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 700 E MIDDLEFIELD RD CITY: MOUNTAIN VIEW STATE: CA ZIP: 94043-4033 BUSINESS PHONE: 4159625000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 700 E MIDDLEFIELD RD CITY: MOUNTAIN VIEW STATE: CA ZIP: 94043-4033 10-K 1 FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPT. 30, 1998 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ---------------------- FORM 10-K ---------------------- (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number: 0-45138 SYNOPSYS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 56-1546236 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) of incorporation or organization) 700 East Middlefield Road Mountain View, California 94043-4033 (Address of Principal Executive Offices, including ZIP Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (650) 962-5000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange Title of each class on which registered ------------------- ------------------- None None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.01 par value Preferred Share Purchase Rights Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of December 4, 1998, was approximately $3,364,251,000. On December 4, 1998, approximately 68,361,000 shares of the registrant's Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (1) Portions of the registrant's 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and IV hereof. (2) Portions of the registrant's Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement for the registrant's annual meeting of stockholders to be held on March 1, 1999 are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. 2 Except for the historical information presented, the matters discussed in this Form 10-K include forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange of 1934. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward looking statements as a result of risk factors that include, but are not limited to, those discussed under the caption "Factors That May Affect Future Results" under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K and is included in Exhibit 13.1 hereto, as well as factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K. PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS INTRODUCTION Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys," or the "Company") is a leading supplier of electronic design automation (EDA) solutions to the global electronics industry. The Company develops, markets, and supports a wide range of integrated circuit (IC) design, verification and analysis products that are used by designers of advanced ICs, including system-on-a-chip ICs, and electronic systems. The Company also provides consulting services to help its customers improve their IC design processes and, where requested, to assist them with their IC designs. The Company's products and services offer its customers the opportunity to improve the productivity of their IC designers and enhance their design quality of results, thereby lowering IC development and manufacturing costs and reducing the time to market for new products. Synopsys also provides training and support services for its customers. Synopsys was incorporated in Delaware in 1987. ADDRESSING SEMICONDUCTOR CHALLENGES WITH EDA PRODUCTS Over the past three decades the semiconductor industry has developed technology that has dramatically increased the number of transistors that can be placed on a chip while simultaneously reducing the cost of manufacturing each chip. In addition to allowing a particular chip to do more than before, each chip also runs faster. A state-of-the-art IC may have several million transistors on it, many of which are smaller than one percent of the width of a human hair, and run at 1 gigahertz, a speed that was unheard of even two years ago. Increasingly, functions that formerly were performed by multiple ICs attached to a printed circuit board are being combined in a single chip, referred to as a system-on-a-chip. The increased capacity of ICs has fostered the development of computers, communications networks, consumer electronics, navigation systems, and many other goods and services with tremendous capabilities at relatively low cost. Exploiting this increased capacity presents challenges for the semiconductor and electronics industries. It takes substantial skill, time and effort on the part of chip designers to design a highly complex IC, running the risk that the product design and development cycle for a new product will lengthen while, at the same time, competition has shortened the life cycle of the product. The rapid pace of semiconductor technology advancement has created both a "designer productivity gap" and a "silicon performance gap." EDA products play a critical role in addressing these problems by providing IC designers with tools and techniques to (a) reduce the time and manual effort required to design, analyze and verify individual ICs, (b) improve the performance and density of complex IC designs, and (c) enhance the reliability of the IC design and manufacturing process. The designer productivity gap occurs because chip capability is increasing faster than the electronics industry is developing and deploying IC designers with skills required to make use of that capability. "High level" EDA tools help increase the productivity of designers by allowing them to specify the desired chip behavior using higher levels of abstraction than transistors, such as gates and Register-Transfer-Language descriptions, and deriving automatically the detailed final design from the higher level description. EDA tools also permit designers to analyze and verify the chip at these higher levels of abstraction. Additionally, as the electronics industry increasingly produces system-on-a-chip ICs, the EDA industry is developing tools and techniques for reusing 2 3 existing IC designs and integrating disparate IC blocks onto a single chip, both of which offer the potential for significant time savings in the design cycle. The silicon performance gap occurs because the design effort required to develop a chip that fully exploits a new semiconductor technology increases as the size of the transistors shrink. A gap has developed between potential performance that can be provided by new semiconductor technology and what a designer can readily take advantage of. As ICs have increased in complexity, the problems faced by IC designers have changed. An IC designer has always had to accommodate the effects of certain physical phenomena such as delay, power consumption, cross-talk, and metal migration into an IC design. At larger transistor sizes, designers could essentially ignore some phenomena until late in the design process and use relatively simple approximations to estimate the effects of others. As transistor size has dropped, these problems became more acute. To help manage the silicon performance gap, the EDA industry has developed more accurate physical analysis tools to provide the designer with insight into a wide range of physical phenomena plaguing IC designs, and to help them devise design techniques that avoid these obstacles. As system-on-a-chip designs become more prevalent, the development of these types of tools will grow more important in closing the silicon performance gap. SYNOPSYS PRODUCT OVERVIEW Synopsys provides products and services that help customers meet the challenges of producing leading edge ICs and the products that incorporate them. Synopsys' design tools include an extensive line of logic synthesis and system design and analysis products that allow an IC designer to describe chip behavior in a high-level language, convert that description into a gate-level representation, and analyze the expected performance of the chip at the gate level. Synopsys' design tools also include tools to facilitate testing of an IC after the IC is built, as well as design reuse products that help reduce design time by permitting the straight-forward reuse of previously-proven circuit "blocks." Synopsys is also actively extending its product line to include floor-planning, placement, and routing tools. Synopsys' verification products are used in several stages of the system and IC design process to ensure that the resulting IC performs the function that the IC designer intended. Synopsys' simulation products permit IC designers to simulate their designs at various levels of abstraction (behavioral, register transfer, gate-level, and switch logic level) and to explore tradeoffs between incorporating functionality in hardware or software. In addition, Synopsys is a leading provider of software and hardware models, which are used to test an IC design within the context of the system in which the IC will eventually be used. Synopsys' EPIC Technology Group offers an extensive line of software tools to analyze power, timing and reliability concerns in an IC design at the transistor level. As semiconductor technology advances and IC complexity increases, transistor-level tools are becoming increasingly important in helping to close the silicon performance gap. Synopsys offers its customers an extensive array of professional services, which can be tailored to meet their specific needs. These services may include methodology consulting, aimed at helping a customer improve its design process; design reuse consulting, which helps a customer modify its inventory of designs to facilitate their reuse in newer designs; and design assistance, which helps a customer design, verify or test a discreet portion of a chip or an entire chip. Synopsys' consulting services also include the provision of semiconductor libraries for IC vendors and their customers. The Company markets its products on a worldwide basis and offers comprehensive customer service, education, consulting, and support as integral components of its product offerings. Products primarily are marketed through its direct sales force. The Company has licensed its products to many of the world's leading semiconductor, computer, communications and electronics companies. 3 4 STRATEGY Synopsys' strategy is to develop and offer to its customers the tools and methodologies required to enable large-scale deep submicron and system-on-a-chip design. The Company is seeking to develop a balanced portfolio of products that address both the designer productivity gap and the silicon performance gap. While continuing to enhance the performance of its current logic design products, Synopsys intends to enter the market for physical design tools by introducing design planning and top level routing products, both of which will be tightly linked with its logic synthesis tools. Synopsys also is continuing to expand the range and performance of its verification and transistor-level analysis products, and continuing its development of tools and techniques for enhancing design reuse. Finally, the Company will expand its ability to offer consulting services to its customers to assist them in taking full advantage of advances in semiconductor technology. MERGER WITH VIEWLOGIC SYSTEMS In December 1997, the Company merged with Viewlogic Systems, Inc. (Viewlogic). Viewlogic's product portfolio included both IC design software and design and analysis software for printed circuit boards (PCBs) and electronic systems. After the merger, the IC related business of Viewlogic was fully integrated into the Synopsys business unit structure, with some products forming the core of a new business unit and others becoming part of an existing Synopsys business unit. The PCB/Systems business of Viewlogic was operated as a separate subsidiary for fiscal year 1998. On October 2, 1998, the Company sold the PCB/Systems business to a group led by the management of that business. A summary of the transaction terms and a more detailed explanation of the reasons for the transaction can be found on pages 18 and 19 of the Synopsys 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders, which has been filed as Exhibit 13.1 to this Form 10-K report. Although these changes took place over the course of the fiscal year, for clarity the discussion in this section describes the Company's organization as it existed at the end of the year. Synopsys' merger with Viewlogic was accounted for as a pooling-of-interests. Accordingly, the Company's consolidated financial statements have been restated to include the financial position and results of Viewlogic for all periods presented. As a result, financial information presented in this Part I for fiscal years 1997 and 1996 may differ from the amounts for such years that appeared in the Company's Form 10-K reports for fiscal years 1997 and 1996. ORGANIZATION AND PRODUCTS Synopsys is currently organized into three tool development groups -- the Design Tools Group, the High-Level Verification Group and the EPIC Technology Group -- and a services group -- the Professional Services Group. Synopsys sells its products and services primarily through its direct sales force, although some products are sold through distributors in limited geographical areas, and some specific products are sold through OEM relationships. DESIGN TOOLS GROUP The Design Tools Group (DTG) produces a variety of products focused on the high-level aspects of designing an IC. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, DTG was divided into five business units. Synthesis & Design Planning Business Unit The Synthesis & Design Planning Business Unit maintains and extends Synopsys' logic synthesis products. Logic synthesis is key technology that maps a high-level description of desired chip behavior into a connected collection of logic gates and other circuit elements that performs the desired behavior. Design Compiler(TM) is the market-leading logic synthesis tool and is currently used by a broad range of companies engaged in the design of 4 5 ICs to optimize their designs for performance and chip area. Design Compiler was introduced in 1988 and has been updated regularly since then. In fiscal year 1998, Synopsys released Design Compiler(TM) 98 as the latest generation in the Design Compiler family. Design Compiler 98 provides customers with an average 13% improvement in circuit timing while running three times faster than previous versions of Design Compiler. Design Compiler 98 also provides automated techniques for developing time budgets for the design process -- customers historically had to spend weeks for each design developing this type of information manually. The Synthesis & Design Planning Business Unit also offers other tools to provide designers with a comprehensive design environment. RTL Analyzer(TM) lets IC designers analyze and improve their source code before synthesis and simulation runs. Power Compiler(TM) allows a designer to optimize their designs for power consumption. Module Compiler(TM) generates optimized general-purpose functions for an IC and permits optimization for size, performance and power consumption. The Synthesis & Design Planning Business Unit is also developing better links between the logic synthesis process and the layout process, by enhancing its floor-planning management product, and developing various new physical design tools. As part of this development effort, in November 1998 Synopsys merged with Everest Design Automation, Inc. which has developed new gridless high-level routing technology. By mutual agreement, Synopsys and SEMATECH have ended their relationship that began in fiscal year 1996. In February 1996, Synopsys entered into a six-year joint development and license agreement with International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), pursuant to which the two companies agreed to develop certain new products. During fiscal year 1997, the first joint product resulting from the alliance, PrimeTime(R), was introduced, and the parties agreed to terminate efforts to develop a product in one of the product areas covered by the Agreement. Synopsys expects to introduce a second joint product in January 1999. The development of the fourth product has been suspended. Synopsys and IBM are currently discussing the future of the alliance. There can be no assurance that joint development will continue, or that the products developed by the alliance will be successful. Test and Static Verification Business Unit The Test and Static Verification Business Unit develops products for developing test strategies for chips. Accurate analysis of timing is critical to ensuring successful chip design. PrimeTime is a full-chip static timing analysis tool that provides customers with essential design verification capabilities. PrimeTime ensures that as a design advances from synthesis (high-level design) to transistor-level implementation, all timing-critical paths in the chip can be clearly understood and verified. During fiscal 1998, the Company announced that it would phase out Motive(TM), timing analysis software offered by Viewlogic, and Motive licensees were offered incentives to migrate to PrimeTime. In addition, certain features of Motive have been integrated into PrimeTime. In fiscal year 1998, Synopsys introduced a new formal verification product---Formality(TM). Formality lets IC designers compare a design at different stages in the design process to determine whether they are functionally equivalent. Thus, if the original design was functionally correct, Formality permits the designer to detect errors introduced during implementation of the design. Historically, such errors have been detected by simulating the modified design using simulation test patterns validated with the functionally correct design. This approach is time-consuming. Formality provides an alternative method for detecting any functional differences without simulating the design, permitting the detection of errors earlier in the design process. Formality was designed to be tightly integrated with PrimeTime and Design Compiler. When used together as part of a new verification methodology, these tools can reduce the amount of gate-level simulation runs, thus enabling designers to complete their designs faster and with a higher level of confidence. Synopsys provides software tools to help customers design into their ICs features that will facilitate the testing of chips after manufacture. After fabrication, an IC is typically subjected to time-consuming tests using expensive automatic testers to determine if it is free of manufacturing defects. Synopsys test synthesis software allows a designer to add circuitry to a design that will facilitate the post-fabrication testing. Synopsys also provides 5 6 software to generate and evaluate test patterns that are ultimately used by the testers. Synopsys is currently integrating the Sunrise technology from the 1997 Viewlogic merger into the Synopsys test product line. System Level Design Business Unit The System-Level Design Business Unit offers three principal products: COSSAP(R) is a digital signal processing (DSP) design system targeted at designers of digital communications devices such as cellular telephones. COSSAP can simulate large, complex, high-level systems that would be hard to model with standard cycle-based or event-driven simulators, and includes a library of DSP building blocks. Behavioral Compiler(TM) permits designers to create complex circuits in a high-level shorthand and then helps them explore design tradeoffs and pick the best architecture, thereby permitting them to work at a higher level of abstraction than does Design Compiler. In fiscal 1998, Synopsys added behavioral clock gating capability to Behavioral Compiler. This allows designers to develop and evaluate low power-consuming designs efficiently. Such low power designs are particularly important in portable telecommunications systems. Protocol Compiler(TM), introduced in fiscal year 1998, facilitates the design and implementation of protocol control logic - a critical aspect of asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) and Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) equipment for networking and telecommunications applications. Protocol Compiler enables control logic design at the behavioral level, generating output that is optimized for Synopsys' flagship Design Compiler tool. By taking protocol control logic design up to the behavioral level, Protocol Compiler greatly simplifies the process of designing complex chips targeted at networking applications. FPGA Business Unit The FPGA Business Unit provides logic synthesis products for high-density field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and complex programmable logic devices (CPLDS). In fiscal year 1998, Synopsys announced new versions of FPGA Compiler II(TM) and FPGA Express(TM). The new versions provide better support of the VHDL '93 language, new visual analysis tools, improved circuit timing, reduced circuit area, and support of fourteen new FPGA device families. Design Reuse Business Unit In June 1998, Synopsys and Mentor Graphics announced the publication of the Reuse Methodology Manual. The Reuse Methodology Manual provides designers with detailed guidelines on planning, specifications, design practices, coding, testing and documentation for creating reusable intellectual property (IP) blocks. The manual also provides users of third party design components descriptions of the deliverables designers should look for in reusable designs. The Design Reuse Business Unit offers a wide range of reusable design modules, tools for creating reusable design blocks and, working through the Professional Services Group, design reuse consulting services based on the principles set forth in the Reuse Methodology Manual. Synopsys' DesignWare(R) products provide IC designers with libraries of pre-designed, pre-verified Synopsys synthesizable (i.e., usable by Synopsys' design tools in optimizing a design), off-the-shelf design modules to incorporate into their own designs. DesignWare foundation libraries include commonly used functions. By the end of fiscal year 1998, 130 design modules were available in DesignWare libraries. DesignWare Macrocells include two commonly used but complex design components - an 8051 microcontroller block and a PCI 2.1 bus interface block. The reuse of these building blocks represents a significant shift from traditional IC design, in which designs have been intimately tied to a particular semiconductor process technology or design methodology and not easily transferred from one chip design to the next. As IC designs get larger, the use of reusable design blocks will be an important method for helping to reduce overall design time. 6 7 DesignWare(R) Developer helps customers develop their own DesignWare components from which they can build an inventory of designs that can be used by multiple development teams or in subsequent design cycles. HIGH-LEVEL VERIFICATION GROUP The High-Level Verification Group provides a range of products that allow IC designers to determine, at different levels of design and at various stages of the design process, whether an IC will perform as intended. Verification is becoming increasingly important in the design process, because as the complexity of chip design increases, the complexity of verification increases exponentially. A verification bottleneck is developing, with designers of complex chips spending half or more of their total design time performing verification. Synopsys verification products are intended to provide an integrated solution for customers that is accurate, exhaustive and fast. Simulation Tools Group In the simulation process, simulation software "exercises" an IC design by running it through a series of tests and comparing the actual outputs from the design with the expected output. The goal of simulation is to make sure that the functionality and timing performance of the design meet the original specifications of the chip. The Simulation Tools Group provides designers with several products for high-level simulation, including VCS(TM) for designs written in Verilog, VSS(TM) for designs written in VHDL, and Cyclone(R) for evaluating designs on a clock-cycle basis. The Company believes that VCS, acquired in connection with the acquisition of Viewlogic, is the fastest Verilog simulator on the market. VCS has gained market share in recent years; sales of VCS grew substantially in fiscal year 1998. VCS is supported by the all of the major semiconductor manufactures. In fiscal 1998, Synopsys (as part of the acquisition of Viewlogic) acquired Radiant Design Tools, a private company which had developed an optimization tool for VCS, which has now been incorporated into VCS to reduce the simulation time substantially for certain classes of designs. VSS and Cyclone are optimized for use with Design Compiler and the Company's other design tools. VERA Group The VERA Group was formed following Synopsys' acquisition of Systems Science, Inc. (SSI) in July 1998. The Company estimates that approximately half of the time spent in the verification phase of IC design is spent designing testbenches, which are the set of test vectors that are used by simulation tools in verifying that a chip design functions properly. The VERA Group provides software that helps generate, manage, and evaluate the data flowing between the simulator and the IC design. VERA(TM), the principal product of the Group, automates the design of testbenches, thereby offering the IC designer significant potential reductions in overall verification time. VERA is being integrated into the rest of Synopsys' simulation, modeling and hardware/software co-verification products. Large Systems Technology Group The Large Systems Technology Group provides high-level models and tools to facilitate the modeling and verification of complex electronic systems. The Group manages the Company's hardware and software modeling products as well as the Eagle hardware/software co-design tools acquired in the Viewlogic merger. Since Synopsys' February 1994 merger with Logic Modeling Corporation, Synopsys has offered a full range of hardware and software modeling solutions. Synopsys' ModelSource(TM) 3000 series is a family of hardware modeling systems for ASIC and board level design which provide a flexible means for designers to model complex devices. ModelSource 3000 systems use the actual integrated circuit to model its own behavior. Synopsys' SmartModels(R) Libraries offer models for more than 13,000 commercially available ICs, including a wide range of microprocessors, controllers, DSPs, FPGAs, CPLDs, peripherals, memories and standard logic. Synopsys' bus interface models are used to verify that designs comply with established industry standards. Models are available for most popular standards. In addition, Synopsys offers modeling technologies to allow designers to create models 7 8 of both standard and proprietary devices. These models support all major EDA simulation environments and a wide range of EDA platforms, giving designers access to a broad range of models to assist them with verification of their designs. Success in the modeling business depends, in part, upon making available a wide range of models and model types. Synopsys continues to focus its modeling development efforts on enhancing its ability to quickly and efficiently produce and distribute new models to meet rising verification needs. Synopsys seeks to maintain close relationships with leading semiconductor vendors to ensure model accuracy and the earliest possible availability. Synopsys believes that future design verification methodologies, including those for system-on-a-chip, will require the availability of accurate, high performance models of complex components and intellectual property blocks. The Large Systems Technology Group's Eagle Design Automation tools help shorten the development time of embedded systems through hardware/software (HW/SW) co-development. The term "embedded systems" describes ICs or PCBs that include a microprocessor or microcontroller. The use of embedded systems is growing, in part due to the growth of system-on-a-chip designs, which include logic, memory and at least one processor on the same chip. An important decision in embedded system design is the allocation of functions between hardware and software. An estimated 50% of the overall embedded systems design time is spent in HW/SW design and debug, and prototype debug. As a result, hardware and software development for embedded systems are becoming more interdependent, and given the costs of design cycle iterations, there are advantages to consider hardware and software interaction earlier in the design cycle. By helping IC designers consider this interaction early in the design cycle, the Company's Eaglei(TM) product, which is used for full system integration testing, and its EagleV(TM) product, which is used for verification of embedded processors within an ASIC, can help reduce the overall costs of embedded system designs. EPIC TECHNOLOGY GROUP Advanced electronics products -- most notably in the consumer electronics and wireless communications markets -- require chips that operate at very high speeds, use very little power and last for an extended period of time. Designers of the complex ICs used in these devices rely heavily on analysis and verification tools that operate at the transistor level. Since Synopsys' February 1997 merger with EPIC Design Technology, Inc., Synopsys has offered its customers a complete line of transistor-level tools -- characterization, simulation, modeling, analysis, extraction and physical verification -- which enable designers to address timing, power, and reliability requirements of mixed signal, high performance and low power ICs. Transistor level analysis and verification is important for two principal reasons. First, speed, power consumption and reliability often require tradeoffs - for example, fast chips tend to consume more power and produce more heat (which hurts reliability) than slower chips. It is at the transistor level that the designer has the last chance to optimize a design for speed, power and reliability, and the last chance to analyze and correct design flaws that can result in the failure of a chip to function as intended. Second, as ICs become more powerful and more complex, the size of the transistors and wires contained in those ICs shrinks below one quarter micron (250 nanometers), and the total length of wire connecting the transistors lengthens, in some cases to as much as one mile. At these dimensions, ICs exhibit unique electrical effects; having the ability to analyze these effects is central to the success of an advanced IC design. The EPIC Technology Group's principal software tools include: TimeMill(R) is a transistor-level simulator and dynamic timing analyzer. Used interactively in the prelayout phase, TimeMill helps designers optimize the performance of transistor-level blocks, memories and data paths. TimeMill allows the designer to quickly explore changes in voltage levels, temperature or process parameters to improve design quality. After layout, TimeMill detects problems such as charge sharing and race conditions that are more prevalent in advanced IC design. PowerMill(R) simulates block and full chip current and power behavior, providing fast and accurate current and power analysis and power diagnostics. PowerMill offers static and dynamic diagnostics to identify design flaws 8 9 that cause unnecessary power consumption. After layout, PowerMill helps designers confirm that power consumption is acceptable before committing the design to silicon. The Analog Circuit Engine (ACE(TM)) is an analog simulation option available for TimeMill and PowerMill tools. When used with TimeMill or PowerMill, ACE provides a high speed, accurate, mixed analog/digital circuit simulation solution. PathMill(R) is a static timing tool that provides a detailed critical path analysis and static timing verification capability. PathMill provides accurate and flexible modeling for mixed level static timing analysis. PathMill's behavioral-, gate- and transistor-level models allow accurate analysis at each level of the design hierarchy, allowing the user to mix top-down design and bottom-up implementation. Arcadia(R) provides full chip and net-by-net resistance and capacitance (RC) extraction, and thereby permits designers to focus design analysis effort on critical paths and spend less time on the segments that do not require in-depth analysis. Beginning in July 1998, Arcadia offers a distributed processing capability that enables designers to extract and analyze data from very large designs in a short amount of time. AMPS(R) is the transistor-level tool that simultaneously optimizes power, delay and area in digital CMOS circuits. AMPS automatically resizes transistors, making individual transistors larger or smaller to find the combination that will best meet user-defined power, speed and area goals without changing the functionality of the design. DelayMill(R) enables accurate timing verification at the transistor level. DelayMill is an advanced delay calculation system for IC, which calculates layout parasitics and interconnect delay effects, and is especially useful for IC designers working with multi-million transistor designs in nanometer silicon. RailMill(R) evaluates the reliability of power, clock and signal networks in a design. Evaluating reliability issues during the design process helps prevent field failures by accurately locating EM and voltage-drop violations on full-chip and block-level power networks. RailMill also pinpoints potential failures on signal nets, performs what-if analysis for proper-pad placement, and offers recommendations for correct bus widths. PowerArc(TM) is a stand-alone cell library power characterization tool that generates highly accurate gate-level power libraries in the Synopsys Liberty(TM) library format. Very low power ASIC and cell-based designers seeking longer battery life, proper package selection and lower system noise levels use PowerArc. PowerGate(TM) is a dynamic gate-level power analysis tool used in an ASIC or structured custom design flow. It determines peak power consumption, isolates excessive power dissipation problems, and identifies power-hungry vectors and instructions. The EPIC Technology Group also offers the Direct Silicon Access(TM) silicon characterization services (DSA), which provides accurate models for nanometer processes to customers. The DSA methodology correlates expected chip behavior with measurements performed on actual silicon test circuits, which then provides a reliable source of data for customers to create accurate technology files for RC extraction and circuit simulation tools. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP The Professional Services Group (PSG) provides customized high-level design support for IC and systems designs. Synopsys consultants are experienced designers who provide customers with in-depth technical expertise in the use of Synopsys' design tools, design methodology and Reuse Methodology Manual principles. Synopsys offers both methodology and project consulting. Methodology consulting is aimed at increasing customer productivity, promoting the adoption of the Synopsys' design methodology and reuse principles and solving immediate needs of customers' design teams. Project consulting involves Synopsys experts working with customer design teams from design implementation through simulation, synthesis and tape-out. 9 10 PSG also provides design reuse consulting services. Customers for this service typically have many IC designs for performing a variety of functions. Ideally, to decrease the time to get a new product to market, where feasible, the customer would like to incorporate its existing older designs into the new product. However, those designs may not currently be in a form that is well-suited for redeployment. Based on the principles of the Reuse Methodology Manual, the focus of a typical consulting engagement is to modify the customer's designs and design techniques and to organize them into easily accessible electronic libraries, in order to facilitate later reuse. The Library Services Group within PSG develops and supports silicon libraries of logic functions used in developing ICs. The Library Services Group develops silicon libraries that are optimized to our customer's semiconductor process. The silicon libraries contain the models that are required by the EDA design tools in order to design an IC. Since Synopsys' acquisition of Silicon Architects in May 1995, Synopsys has offered a proprietary gate array IC architecture, known as Cell-Based Array (CBA(TM)). This includes Macrocell Libraries which are collections of low level elements that are combined together to make a complete IC. Synopsys has entered into CBA license agreements with many of the world's leading ASIC vendors and vertically integrated semiconductor companies. In addition to licensing semiconductor manufacturers, Synopsys also licenses a CBA design system to independent design houses and end users in order to facilitate and increase the number of designs that target CBA technology. Synopsys has expanded its offering of silicon libraries to include standard cells and memories. The libraries developed by the Library Services Group within PSG are optimized to work with the Synopsys EDA tools. CUSTOMER SERVICE AND SUPPORT Synopsys devotes substantial resources to providing customers with technical support, customer education, and consulting services. The Company believes that a high level of customer service and support is critical to the adoption and successful utilization of its high-level design automation methodology. As a result of the continued growth of Synopsys' installed base, as well as customer requests for education, support and consulting services, Synopsys' service revenue has increased as a percentage of total revenue, representing 40%, 37% and 34% of total revenue in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. TECHNICAL SUPPORT Technical support for the Company's products is provided through both field- and corporate-based technical application engineering groups. Synopsys provides customers with software updates and a formal problem identification and resolution process through the Synopsys Technical Support Center. Synopsys' central entry point of all customer inquiries is SolvNET(SM), a direct-access service available worldwide, 24 hours per day, through electronic mail and the World Wide Web that lets customers quickly seek answers to design questions or more insight into design problems. SolvNET combines Synopsys' complete design knowledge database with sophisticated information retrieval technology. Updated daily, it includes documentation, design tips, and answers to user questions. CUSTOMER EDUCATION SERVICES Synopsys offers a number of workshops focused on high-level design, simulation, behavioral synthesis, logic synthesis, and test. Regularly scheduled workshops are offered in Mountain View, California; Austin, Texas; Burlington, Massachusetts; Reading, England; Rungis, France; Munich, Germany; Tokyo and Osaka, Japan; and Seoul, Korea. On-site workshops are available on a worldwide basis at customers' facilities. To date, over 24,000 design engineers have been trained in the use of Synopsys' products through participation in Synopsys workshops. PRODUCT WARRANTIES Synopsys generally warrants its products to be free from defects in media and to substantially conform to material specifications for a period of 90 days. Synopsys has not experienced significant returns to date. 10 11 SUPPORT FOR INDUSTRY STANDARDS Synopsys actively supports standards that it believes will help its customers increase productivity and solve design problems, including support for key standards that promote system-on-a-chip design and facilitate interoperability of tools from different vendors. Synopsys' products support the two most commonly used hardware description languages, VHDL and Verilog HDL, and industry standard data formats for the exchange of data between Synopsys' tools and other EDA products. Synopsys is a member of the Virtual Socket Interface Alliance (VSIA), an industry group formed to promote standards that facilitate the integration and reuse of functional blocks of intellectual property, and has representatives on the VSIA's Steering Working Group and several Development Working Groups. A representative of Synopsys is on the Board of Directors of the standards groups Open Verilog International, VHDL International, Open Model Forum, and the steering committee of the Electronics Industry Association/EDIF. Synopsys participates in standards activities conducted by these and other leading EDA industry bodies. To enhance interoperability, in fiscal 1998, Synopsys launched the Tap-In program to provide open access to selected interfaces for Synopsys tools. Synopsys has made its text-based synthesis library format, Liberty, as well as its timing constraint format, SDC, available to all, including the Company's competitors, on reasonable terms. Synopsys' products are written mainly in the C language and utilize the Motif and X11 standards for graphical user interfaces. Synopsys' software runs principally under the UNIX operating system and is offered on the most widely used workstation platforms, including those from Sun Microsystems, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Digital Equipment Corporation and Sony. Many of Synopsys' products now run on the Windows 95/98 and Windows NT operating systems. SALES, DISTRIBUTION AND BACKLOG Synopsys markets its products and services primarily through its direct sales and service force in over 30 offices in the United States and principal international markets. Synopsys employs highly skilled engineers and technically proficient sales persons capable of serving the sophisticated needs of the customers' engineering and management staffs. For fiscal years 1998, 1997 and 1996, international sales represented 39%, 41% and 42%, respectively, of Synopsys' total revenue. Additional information relating to domestic and foreign operations is contained in Note 7 of Notes to Synopsys' Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has 21 sales/support centers throughout the United States. Internationally, the Company has sales/support offices in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, the People's Republic of China, Singapore, Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom, including regional headquarters offices in Germany, Japan and Singapore. On a limited basis, the Company also utilizes manufacturer's representatives and distributors. The Company has established such relationships in Australia, Brazil, Hong Kong, India, Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Synopsys' backlog on November 1, 1998 was approximately $241.1 million, compared to approximately $213.9 million on November 1, 1997. Upon consummation of Synopsys' merger with Viewlogic, Viewlogic's backlog was added to that of Synopsys. Viewlogic orders received subsequent to the merger were accepted under the Synopsys order acceptance policy. No adjustments have been made to the November 1, 1997 backlog number to account for differences between Viewlogic's and Synopsys' methods of calculating backlog. 11 12 Backlog consists of orders for system and software products sold under perpetual and time-based licenses with customer requested ship dates within three months, orders for customer training and consulting services which are expected to be completed within one year, and subscription services, maintenance and support with contract periods extending up to fifteen months. The Company has not historically experienced significant cancellations of orders. Customers frequently reschedule or revise the requested ship dates of orders, however, which can have the effect of deferring recognition of revenue for these orders beyond the expected time period. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Company believes that its future performance will depend in large part on its ability to maintain and enhance its current product lines, develop new products, maintain technological competitiveness, and meet an expanding range of customer requirements. In addition to product development teams, the Company maintains an advanced research group that is responsible for exploring new directions and applications of its core technologies, migrating new technologies into the existing product lines, and maintaining strong research relationships outside the Company within both industry and academia. During fiscal years 1998, 1997 and 1996, research and development expenses, net of capitalized software development costs, were $154.4 million, $146.6 million and $120.0 million, respectively. Synopsys capitalized software development costs of approximately $2.1 million, $4.2 million and $3.7 million in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The Company anticipates that it will continue to commit substantial resources to research and development in the future. MANUFACTURING Synopsys' manufacturing operations consist of assembling, testing, packaging and shipping its system and software products and documentation needed to fulfill each order. Manufacturing is currently performed in Synopsys' Mountain View, California and Beaverton, Oregon, facilities. Outside vendors provide tape and CD-ROM duplication, printing of documentation and manufacturing of packaging materials. Synopsys employees manufacture and test the hardware modeling system products, with some sub-assembly performed by outside vendors. Synopsys typically ships its software products, with either a permanent or temporary access key, within 10 days of acceptance of customer purchase orders and execution of software license agreements, unless the customer has requested otherwise. For its hardware modeling products, Synopsys buys components and assemblies in anticipation of orders and configures units to match orders, typically shipping within one to ten weeks of order acceptance, unless the customer has requested otherwise. COMPETITION The EDA industry is highly competitive. Synopsys competes against other EDA vendors, and with customers' internally developed design tools and internal design capabilities, for a share of the overall EDA budgets of the customers. Synopsys' competitors include companies that offer a broad range of products and services, such as Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (Cadence), Mentor Graphics, Inc. (Mentor) and Avant! Corporation (Avant!), as well as companies, including numerous start-up companies, that offer products focused on a discrete phase of the IC design process. In order to remain successful against such competition, Synopsys must continue to enhance its current products and bring to market new products that address the increasingly sophisticated needs of its customers on a timely and cost-effective basis. Synopsys also will have to expand its ability to offer consulting services. The failure to enhance existing products, develop or acquire new products, or to expand Synopsys' ability to offer such services would have a material adverse effect on Synopsys' business, financial condition and results of operations. Technology advances and customer requirements are causing a change in the nature of competition among EDA vendors. Increasingly, EDA companies compete on the basis of "design flows" involving a broad range of 12 13 products (including both logic and physical design tools) and services rather than on the basis of individual "point" tools performing a discrete phase of the design process. No single EDA company currently offers its customers industry-leading products in a complete design flow, although the Company and its principal competitors are taking steps to fill gaps in their respective design flows. Synopsys offers a wide range of logic design tools but currently offers a relatively limited range of physical design tools. In November 1998, Synopsys merged with Everest Design Automation, Inc., a private company developing physical design software. Synopsys will need to develop or acquire additional physical design tools in order to offer a complete design flow. Synopsys is also attempting to expand its capacity to offer professional services, but for the foreseeable future will continue to have less capacity than Cadence to provide such services. The market for physical design tools is dominated by Cadence and Avant!, both of which are attempting to complete their design flows. Cadence recently acquired a private company offering synthesis and other logic design products and certain physical design verification products from Lucent Technologies, both of which will increase the direct competition between Synopsys and Cadence. In addition, Cadence's acquisition of logic design products may lead to reductions in purchases of Synopsys' logic design software by Cadence, which was one of Synopsys' largest customers in fiscal 1998. Avant! also recently acquired a private company offering logic synthesis software, which will increase the direct competition between Synopsys and Avant!. To meet competition, Synopsys will continue to enhance its product line and promote the adoption of new products and methodologies. However, there can be no assurance that Synopsys will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors or that competitive pressure faced by Synopsys will not materially adversely affect its business, operating results and financial condition. PRODUCT SALES AND LICENSING AGREEMENTS Synopsys typically licenses its software to customers under non-exclusive license agreements that transfer title to the media only and that restrict use of the software to internal purposes at specified sites. The Company currently licenses the majority of its software as a network license that allows a number of individual users to access the software on a defined network. Software is available under a perpetual license or a time-based license, usually with a term of one year. License fees are dependent on the type of license, product mix and number of copies of each product required. On certain products and services, the Company will collect royalty payments in addition to license fees. Synopsys offers its system products for sale or lease. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS The Company primarily relies upon a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws and license and nondisclosure agreements to establish and protect proprietary rights in its products. The source code for Synopsys' products is protected both as a trade secret and as an unpublished copyrighted work. However, it may be possible for third parties to develop similar technology independently, provided they have not violated any contractual agreements or intellectual property laws. In addition, effective copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries. Because the EDA industry is characterized by rapid technological change, the Company believes that factors such as the technological and creative skills of its personnel, new product developments, frequent product enhancements, name recognition and reliable product maintenance, coupled with the various forms of legal protection that are available for its technology, provide an effective means for the Company to establish and maintain a technology leadership position. The Company currently holds several U.S. and foreign patents on some of the technologies included in its products and will continue to pursue additional patents in the future. Although the Company believes that its products, trademarks and other proprietary rights do not infringe on the proprietary rights of third parties, there can be no assurance that infringement claims will not be asserted against the Company in the future or that any such claims will not require the Company to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly and time-consuming litigation. 13 14 EMPLOYEES As of September 30, 1998, Synopsys had a total of 2,592 employees, of whom 2,040 were based in the United States and 552 were based internationally. Synopsys' future financial results depend, in part, upon the continued service of its key technical and senior management personnel and its continuing ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical and managerial personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense. Experience at Synopsys is highly valued in the EDA industry, and the Company's employees are recruited aggressively by competitors and by start-up companies. The Company's salaries are competitive in the market, but under certain circumstances, start-up companies can offer more attractive stock option packages. As a result, the Company has experienced, and may continue to experience, significant employee turnover. There can be no assurance that Synopsys can retain its key managerial and technical employees or that it can attract, assimilate or retain other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future. None of Synopsys' employees is represented by a labor union. Synopsys has not experienced any work stoppages and considers its relations with its employees to be good. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Synopsys' principal offices are located in four adjacent buildings in Mountain View, California, which together provide approximately 400,000 square feet of available space. This space is leased through February 2003. Within one half mile of these buildings, in Sunnyvale, California, Synopsys occupies approximately 200,000 square feet of space in two adjacent buildings, which is under lease through 2007, and approximately 70,000 square feet of space in a third building, which is under lease until April 2002. To meet the Company's foreseeable expansion needs, Synopsys has acquired seven acres between its Sunnyvale and Mountain View campuses and twenty-four acres of undeveloped land in San Jose, California. In November 1998, Synopsys acquired an additional nine acres of undeveloped land in San Jose for $9.5 million. The Company leases approximately 67,000 square feet of space in Beaverton, Oregon for administrative, marketing, research and development and support activities. This facility is leased through March 2002. The Company currently leases 21 other domestic sales offices throughout the United States, as well as three remote engineering locations. Synopsys currently leases international sales and service offices in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, the People's Republic of China, Singapore, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom. The Company also leases a research and development facility in India. The Company believes that its existing facilities are adequate for its current needs and that additional space will be available as needed on commercially acceptable terms. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Company. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS No matters were submitted for a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Report. 14 15 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY The executive officers of the Company and their ages, as of September 30, 1998, are as follows:
Name Age Position - --------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aart J. de Geus 44 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors Chi-Foon Chan 48 President, Chief Operating Officer and Director William W. Lattin 58 Executive Vice President and Director David P. Burow 49 Senior Vice President, High Level Verification Group Raul Camposano 43 Senior Vice President and General Manager, Design Tools Group and Chief Technical Officer Ernst W. Hirt 58 Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Facilities Gary A. Larsen 65 Senior Vice President and General Manager, EPIC Technology Group Paul Lippe 40 Senior Vice President, Business and Market Development and Corporate Secretary Edward Ross 56 Senior Vice President, Professional Services Group Robert Russo 53 Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Services Faysal Sohail 34 Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategic Planning David Sugishita 50 Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations and Chief Financial Officer
Dr. Aart J. de Geus co-founded Synopsys and currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. Since the inception of Synopsys in December 1986 he has held a variety of positions including Senior Vice President of Engineering and Senior Vice President of Marketing. From 1986 to 1992 Dr. de Geus served as Chairman of the Board. He served as President from 1992 to 1998. Dr. de Geus has served as Chief Executive Officer since January 1994 and has held the additional title of Chairman of the Board since February 1998. He has served as a Director since 1986. From 1982 to 1986, Dr. de Geus was employed by General Electric Corporation, where he was the Manager of the Advanced Computer-Aided Engineering Group. Dr. de Geus holds an M.S.E.E. from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, Switzerland and a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Southern Methodist University. Dr. Chi-Foon Chan joined Synopsys as Vice President of Application Engineering & Services in May 1990. Since April 1997 he has served as Chief Operating Officer and since February 1998 he has held the additional title of President. Dr. Chan also became a Director of the Company in February 1998. From September 1996 to February 1998 he served as Executive Vice President, Office of the President. From February 1994 until April 1997 he served as Senior Vice President, Design Tools Group and from October 1996 until April 1997 as Acting Senior Vice President, Design Reuse Group. Additionally, he has held the titles of Vice President, Engineering and General Manager, DesignWare Operations and Sr. Vice President, Worldwide Field Organization. From March 1987 to May 1990, Dr. Chan was employed by NEC Electronics, where his last position was General Manager, Microprocessor Division. From 1977 to 1987, Dr. Chan held a number of senior engineering positions at Intel Corporation. Dr. Chan holds an M.S. and Ph.D. in computer engineering from Case Western Reserve University. Dr. William W. Lattin is an Executive Vice President of Synopsys and has been a Director of Synopsys since July 1995. Dr. Lattin joined Synopsys in February 1994 in connection with Synopsys' merger with Logic Modeling Corporation (LMC). He has served as Executive Vice President since July 1995. From October 1994 to July 1995 he served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Marketing, and from February 1994 until October 1994 as Senior Vice President, Logic Modeling Group. From December 1992 to February 1994, Dr. Lattin served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of LMC, and from May 1992 to December 1992 he served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LMC. From 1986 to 1992, Dr. Lattin served as Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of Logic Automation Inc., a predecessor of LMC. Dr. Lattin holds a B.S.E.E. and an M.S.E.E. from the University of California at Berkeley, and a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Arizona State University. Dr. Lattin is a Director of RadiSys Corporation, a supplier of embedded computers, as well as a Director of Easy Street Online Services, an internet service provider and a Trustee of the Oregon Graduate Institute. 15 16 David P. Burow joined Synopsys in connection with the Company's merger with Viewlogic in December 1997 and currently serves as Senior Vice President, High Level Verification Group. He served as Sr. Vice President, Simulation Tools Group from December 1997 to August 1998. Mr. Burow had served as Vice President of Viewlogic's ASIC Group since October 1996. He joined Viewlogic in August 1995 as Vice President of the High Level Design Group after serving in a number of key management positions from October 1991 through August 1995 at Silicon Architects, which was acquired by Synopsys in May 1995. Preceding Silicon Architects, Mr. Burow held other management positions within the EDA and semiconductor industries, including President of CrossCheck, a test company; General Manager of the Analog division at Dazix; and President of Simucad, Inc., a simulation company. Mr. Burow holds a B.S. in Engineering from Purdue University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. Dr. Raul Camposano joined Synopsys in January 1994 and currently serves as Senior Vice President, General Manager of the Design Tools Group and Chief Technical Officer. From January 1997 to December 1997 he served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Design Tools Group. From May 1996 until January 1997 he served as Vice President, Engineering, Design Tools Group. From January 1996 until May 1996 he served as General Manager and Senior Director, Design Planning Group, and from January 1994 until January 1996 as Director of Engineering, Design Environment Group. Prior to joining Synopsys, Dr. Camposano concurrently served as the Design Technology Director for the German National Research Center for Computer Science and as Professor of Computer Science at the University of Paderborn, Germany. Between 1986 and 1991, Dr. Camposano led the project on high-level synthesis at the IBM T.J. Watson Research Center. Active in the EDA professional community, he also serves on various technical program committees and editorial boards worldwide and has published over 70 articles and three books on electronic design automation. Dr. Camposano holds a B.S.E.E. from the University of Chile, and a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Karlsruhe. Ernst W. Hirt joined Synopsys in November 1997 and serves as Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Facilities. Mr. Hirt was Vice President of Human Resources at VLSI Technology, Inc. from March 1984 until he joined Synopsys. He has also worked in high level Human Resources positions at Intel, Siemens, Honeywell and General Electric. Mr. Hirt holds a Masters Degree in Economics from the University of Cincinnati. Gary A. Larsen, Senior Vice President and General Manager, EPIC Technology Group, joined Synopsys nearly two years ago when EPIC Design Technology (EPIC) merged with Synopsys. Prior to his current position, from July 1997 to March 1998, he was the Senior Vice President and Co-General Manager of the EPIC Technology Group. From February 1997, the time of the Synopsys/EPIC merger, to July 1997, he was Vice President, Marketing of the EPIC Technology Group. From August 1994 to February 1997, Mr. Larsen held the position of Vice President, Worldwide Sales of EPIC. Prior to that he was Vice President of the ASIC Solutions Group at Cadence where he held a variety of managerial positions from 1984 to 1994. Mr. Larsen holds a B.A. in Economics from Stanford University. Paul Lippe joined Synopsys in October 1992 and currently serves as Senior Vice President, Business and Market Development (since May 1997) and as Corporate Secretary (since 1992). From November 1996 until May 1997 he served as Senior Vice President, Business Development and Legal, and from January 1995 until November 1996 as Vice President, Business Development and Legal. Prior to 1992, Mr. Lippe was employed by Solbourne Computer as Vice President, Corporate Development, General Counsel and Secretary, and also served as Chairman of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission. Mr. Lippe holds a B.A. from Yale College and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. Dr. Edward Ross joined Synopsys in July 1998 as Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Professional Services Group. Prior to joining Synopsys, Dr. Ross served as President of Technology and Manufacturing at Cirrus Logic since 1995, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Power Integrations, Inc. from 1989 to 1995. Dr. Ross holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Drexel University and an M.S., M.A., and Ph.D., also in electrical engineering, from Princeton University. 16 17 Robert Russo joined Synopsys in April 1993 and currently serves as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Services. From June 1997 to April 1998 he served as Senior Vice President, Sales and Services for the Americas and Europe. From April 1993 until June 1997 Mr. Russo served as Vice President, North America Sales. Prior to joining Synopsys Mr. Russo held senior-level management positions in sales and marketing with Cray Research, Stardent Computers and Votan. Mr. Russo holds degrees in mechanical and aeronautical engineering from New York Institute of Technology. Faysal Sohail serves as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategic Planning. He previously served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Design Architects Group from January 1997 to September 1998. From June 1996 to January 1997 he served as Vice President and General Manager of the Design Reuse Group. Mr. Sohail is one of the founders of Silicon Architects, acquired by Synopsys in 1995. Prior to the acquisition, he was Director of Marketing for Silicon Architects. Prior to founding Silicon Architects, Mr. Sohail held various managerial positions in development and marketing at Actel from 1986 to 1990 and LSI Logic from 1985 to 1986. Mr. Sohail holds a B.S. in computer engineering from the University of Illinois. David Sugishita joined Synopsys in June 1997 and currently serves as Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations and Chief Financial Officer. From 1995 to 1997 he served as Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer for Actel, and from 1994 to 1995 Mr. Sugishita was Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for Micro Component Technology. From 1991 to 1994, he was Vice President and Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer for Applied Materials. From 1982 to 1991 he served as Vice President of Finance, Semiconductor Group for National Semiconductor. He holds a B.S. in finance from San Jose State University and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University. Mr. Sugishita currently serves as a Director for Micro Component Technology, as well as being active in the community by serving on two school boards. There are no family relationships among any executive officers of the Company. PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information required by this item is set forth on page 46 of the Synopsys 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA Information required by Item 201 of Regulation S-K is set forth on page 1 of the Synopsys 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. In November 1998, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Everest Design Automation, Inc. (Everest), pursuant to a merger of a newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company with and into Everest in exchange for 1.4 million shares of the Company's common stock and the assumption of options to purchase (after conversion) 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Such shares were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended (the 1933 Act) in reliance upon the exemptions provided by Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The information required by this item is set forth on pages 14 through 25 of the Synopsys 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. 17 18 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK. Information relating to quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk is set forth in Synopsys' 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders under the captions "Interest Rate Risk" and "Foreign Currency Risk" in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and "Foreign Exchange Hedging" in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Such information is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The consolidated financial statements required by this item are included on pages 27 through 46 of the Synopsys 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders and are incorporated herein by reference. With the exception of the aforementioned information and the information incorporated in Items 5, 6 and 7, the Synopsys 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders is not to be deemed filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The report of Synopsys' Independent Auditors on Synopsys' consolidated financial statements is included on page 26 of the Synopsys 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The report of Synopsys' Independent Auditors on the consolidated financial statement schedule required by this item is included in Exhibit 23 hereto. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Not applicable. PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Information with respect to Directors is included under the caption "Proposal One --Election of Directors" in Synopsys' Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement for Synopsys' annual meeting of stockholders to be held on March 1, 1999 (the "Proxy Statement") and is incorporated herein by reference. Information with respect to Executive Officers is included under the heading "Executive Officers of the Company" in Part I hereof after Item 4. Information regarding delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is included under the heading "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" under the caption "Additional Information" in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this item is included under the heading "Executive Compensation" under the caption "Proposal One -- Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The information required by this item is included under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" under the caption "Proposal One --Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS The information required by this item is included under the caption "Proposal One --Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. PART IV ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: 18 19 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following documents are included in the Synopsys 1998 Annual Report to Stockholders and incorporated by reference in Item 8:
Page No. in Annual Report --------- Report of Independent Auditors 26 Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 1998 and 1997 27 Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 28 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 29 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 30 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 31-46
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE The following schedule of the Company is included herein: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves (Schedule II) All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the amounts are immaterial or the required information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. The following documents are included in Exhibit 23 hereto: Exhibit 23.1 Report on Financial Statement Schedule of Synopsys, Inc. Exhibit 23.2 Report of Deloitte and Touche LLP, Independent Auditors Exhibit 23.3 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, Independent Auditors Exhibit 23.4 Consent of Deloitte and Touche LLP, Independent Auditors 3. EXHIBITS See Item 14(c) below. The following compensatory plans are required to be filed as exhibits. Certain of such plans have been incorporated by reference from prior filings, as indicated under Item 14(c): Exhibit 99.1 -- 1992 Stock Option Plan as restated and amended Exhibit 99.2 -- Employee Stock Purchase Program, as restated and amended Exhibit 99.3 -- International Employee Stock Purchase Program, as restated and amended Exhibit 99.4 -- Synopsys deferred compensation plan dated September 30, 1996 Exhibit 99.5 -- 1994 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as restated and amended Exhibit 99.6 -- Form of Executive Employment Agreement dated October 1, 1997 Exhibit 99.7 -- Schedule of Executive Employment Agreements Exhibit 99.8 -- 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (b) Reports on Form 8-K Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 16, 1998 for the purpose of filing the Company's press release announcing its financial results for the quarter and fiscal year ended September 30, 1998, including condensed consolidated statements of income and balance sheets. 19 20 (c) Exhibits
Exhibit Number Description - ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 14, 1997, by the Company, Post Acquisition Corp. and Viewlogic Systems, Inc.(10) 3.1 Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation(8) 3.2 Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation(8) 3.3 Restated Bylaws of Synopsys, Inc.(13) 4.1 Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated October 24, 1997(9) 4.3 Specimen Common Stock Certificate(1) 10.1 Form of Indemnification Agreement(1) 10.2 Director's and Officer's Insurance and Company Reimbursement Policy(1) 10.6 Lease Agreement, dated August 17, 1990, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(1) 10.7 Lease Agreement, dated March 29, 1991, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(1) 10.15 Lease Agreement, dated June 16, 1992, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(2) 10.16 Lease Agreement, dated June 23, 1993, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(3) 10.21 Lease Agreement, August 24, 1995, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(4) 10.25 Amendment No. 5 to Lease, dated October 4, 1995, to Lease Agreement dated August 17, 1990, between the Company and John Arrillaga,Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Arrillaga Family Trust), and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(5) 10.26 Amendment No. 3 to Lease, dated October 4, 1995, to Lease Agreement dated June 16, 1992, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Arrillaga Family Trust), and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(5) 10.27 Amendment No. 2 to Lease, dated October 4, 1995, to Lease Agreement dated June 23, 1993, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Arrillaga Family Trust), and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(5) 10.28 Lease dated January 2, 1996 between the Company and Tarigo-Paul, a California Limited Partnership(6) 13.1 Portions of the Annual Report to Stockholders for fiscal year ended September 30, 1998, expressly incorporated by reference herein 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company 23.1 Report on Financial Statement Schedule 23.2 Report of Deloitte and Touche LLP, Independent Auditors (related to the financial statements of EPIC Design Technology, Inc.) 23.3 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, Independent Auditors 23.4 Consent of Deloitte and Touche LLP, Independent Auditors
20 21 24.1 Power of Attorney (see page 23) 27.1- 27.8 Financial Data Schedules 99.1 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated(7) 99.2 Employee Stock Purchase Program, as amended and restated(13) 99.3 International Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated(13) 99.4 Synopsys deferred compensation plan dated September 30, 1996(8) 99.5 1994 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated(13) 99.6 Form of Executive Employment Agreement dated October 1, 1997(11) 99.7 Schedule of Executive Employment Agreements(12) 99.8 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan(14)
- --------------- (1) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-45138) which became effective February 24, 1992 (2) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1992 (3) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1993 (4) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1995 (5) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 1995 (6) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1996 (7) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on May 3, 1996 (8) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-21129) of Synopsys, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 1997 (9) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 000-19807) of Synopsys, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 1997 (10) Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the form of prospectus contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-39713) of Synopsys, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 1997 (11) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29(a) in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-19807) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 1998 (12) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29(a) in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-19807) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 1998 (13) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit with the same number filed with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 (File no. 000-198007) (14) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-50947) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 1998 21 22 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SYNOPSYS, INC. By /s/ AART J. DE GEUS ---------------------------------------------- Aart J. de Geus Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer) By /s/ DAVID SUGISHITA ---------------------------------------------- David Sugishita Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations, and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Date: December 23, 1998 22 23 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Aart J. de Geus and David Sugishita, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated: President, Chief Operating Officer /s/ CHI-FOON CHAN and Director December 23, 1998 - ------------------------------ Chi-Foon Chan /s/ WILLIAM W. LATTIN Executive Vice President and Director December 23, 1998 - ------------------------------ William W. Lattin /s/ DEBORAH A. COLEMAN Director December 23, 1998 - ------------------------------ Deborah A. Coleman /s/ HARVEY C. JONES, JR. Director December 23, 1998 - ------------------------------ Harvey C. Jones, Jr. /s/ A. RICHARD NEWTON Director December 23, 1998 - ------------------------------ A. Richard Newton /s/ STEVEN C. WALSKE Director December 23, 1998 - ------------------------------ Steven C. Walske
23 24 SCHEDULE II SYNOPSYS, INC. -------------------- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES (in thousands)
Balance at Additions Charged Balance at Beginning Charged to to Other End of of Period Expense(1) Accounts(2) Deductions(3) Period ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------- ---------- Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales Returns: 1998 $ 8,213 $ 8,431 $(2,098) $ 1,336 $13,210 1997 $ 5,138 $ 5,242 $ (75) $ 2,092 $ 8,213 1996 $ 4,484 $ 1,813 $ (334) $ 825 $ 5,138
- -------------------- (1) Includes $830 and $1,576 charged to other income in fiscal 1997 and 1996, respectively. (2) Fiscal 1998 includes a $2,049 reduction due to the sale of Viewlogic Systems, Inc. Other amounts are translation and other adjustments. (3) Accounts written off, net of recoveries. 24 25
Exhibit Number Description - ------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 14, 1997, by the Company, Post Acquisition Corp. and Viewlogic Systems, Inc.(10) 3.1 Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation(8) 3.2 Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation(8) 3.3 Restated Bylaws of Synopsys, Inc.(13) 4.1 Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated October 24, 1997(9) 4.3 Specimen Common Stock Certificate(1) 10.1 Form of Indemnification Agreement(1) 10.2 Director's and Officer's Insurance and Company Reimbursement Policy(1) 10.6 Lease Agreement, dated August 17, 1990, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(1) 10.7 Lease Agreement, dated March 29, 1991, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(1) 10.15 Lease Agreement, dated June 16, 1992, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(2) 10.16 Lease Agreement, dated June 23, 1993, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(3) 10.21 Lease Agreement, August 24, 1995, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (John Arrillaga Separate Property Trust), as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1977 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(4) 10.25 Amendment No. 5 to Lease, dated October 4, 1995, to Lease Agreement dated August 17, 1990, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Arrillaga Family Trust), and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(5) 10.26 Amendment No. 3 to Lease, dated October 4, 1995, to Lease Agreement dated June 16, 1992, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Arrillaga Family Trust), and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(5) 10.27 Amendment No. 2 to Lease, dated October 4, 1995, to Lease Agreement dated June 23, 1993, between the Company and John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Arrillaga Family Trust), and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his successor trustee, UTA dated July 20, 1997 (Richard T. Peery Separate Property Trust), as amended(5) 10.28 Lease dated January 2, 1996 between the Company and Tarigo-Paul, a California Limited Partnership(6) 13.1 Portions of the Annual Report to Stockholders for fiscal year ended September 30, 1998, expressly incorporated by reference herein 21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company 23.1 Report on Financial Statement Schedule 23.2 Report of Deloitte and Touche LLP, Independent Auditors (related to the financial statements of EPIC Design Technology, Inc.) 23.3 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, Independent Auditors 23.4 Consent of Deloitte and Touche LLP, Independent Auditors
26 24.1 Power of Attorney (see page 23) 27.1- 27.8 Financial Data Schedules 99.1 1992 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated(7) 99.2 Employee Stock Purchase Program, as amended and restated(13) 99.3 International Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated(13) 99.4 Synopsys deferred compensation plan dated September 30, 1996(8) 99.5 1994 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated(13) 99.6 Form of Executive Employment Agreement dated October 1, 1997(11) 99.7 Schedule of Executive Employment Agreements (12) 99.8 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan(14)
- --------------- (1) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-45138) which became effective February 24, 1992 (2) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1992 (3) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1993 (4) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1995 (5) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 1995 (6) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of the same number filed with the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1996 (7) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on May 3, 1996 (8) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-21129) of Synopsys, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 1997 (9) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 000-19807) of Synopsys, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 1997 (10) Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the form of prospectus contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-39713) of Synopsys, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 1997 (11) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29(a) in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-19807) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 1998 (12) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29(a) in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-19807) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 13, 1998 (13) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit with the same number filed with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997 (File no. 000-198007) (14) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-50947) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 1998
EX-13.1 2 PORTION OF ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS 1 Exhibit 13.1 SYNOPSYS, INC. FINANCIAL SUMMARY
As of or For The Year Ended September 30, (In thousands, except per share data) 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Revenue $717,940 $646,956 $525,599 $410,644 $328,644 Income before provision for income taxes and extraordinary items (1) 119,117 133,029 40,228 59,126 31,319 Extraordinary items, net of income tax expense 28,404 -- -- -- -- Provision for income taxes 55,819 51,043 23,426 22,771 17,210 Net income 91,702 81,986 16,802 36,355 14,109 Earnings per share (2) Basic 1.40 1.31 0.28 0.64 0.30 Diluted 1.34 1.25 0.27 0.59 0.24 Working capital 500,340 335,790 238,942 221,425 138,748 Total assets 946,627 768,589 584,853 446,443 336,897 Long-term debt 13,138 9,191 15,974 63 -- Stockholders' equity 660,387 501,543 350,547 287,362 195,297
(1) Includes charges of $33.1 million, $5.5 million, $64.5 million, $12.5 million and $5.9 million for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, for in-process research and development and other costs. Includes merger-related and other costs of $51.0 million, $11.4 million and $7.4 million for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1994, respectively. (2) The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS 128) on October 1, 1997. Earnings per share amounts for all periods presented have been restated to conform to SFAS 128 requirements. 1 2 SYNOPSYS, INC. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere herein as well as the section entitled "Factors That May Affect Future Results." Except for the historical information presented, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below in "Factors That May Affect Future Results." In addition, past results and trends should not be used by investors to anticipate future results and trends. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Mergers Subsequent to fiscal 1998, the Company signed a definitive agreement to merge with Everest Design Automation, Inc. (Everest), a developer of integrated circuit routing software and related technology. The Company will exchange approximately 1.4 million shares of its common stock for all the outstanding stock of Everest and will reserve approximately 100,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under Everest's stock option plan, which the Company will assume in the transaction. The business combination will be accounted for as a pooling-of-interests. The Board of Directors rescinded the Company's stock repurchase program in order to comply with pooling-of-interests accounting rules. Retained earnings will be restated as of October 1, 1998 to reflect the pooling-of-interests combination. In December 1997, the Company issued approximately 11.3 million shares of its common stock in exchange for all the outstanding shares of common stock of Viewlogic Systems, Inc. (Viewlogic), a worldwide supplier of electronic design automation (EDA) software. In addition, options to acquire Viewlogic's common stock were exchanged for options to acquire approximately 2.8 million shares of the Company's common stock. The merger was accounted for as a pooling-of-interests, and accordingly, the Company's consolidated financial statements have been restated to include the financial position and results of Viewlogic for all periods presented. On October 2, 1998, the Company sold Viewlogic Systems, Inc. (VSI), the printed circuit board (PCB) /Systems design segment of the Viewlogic business to a management-led buy-out group for $51.9 million in cash. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain of $26.5 million, net of income tax expense, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998. The Company retained a minority investment of 14.9% of the fully diluted equity in the new company (See Extraordinary Items). In February 1997, the Company issued approximately 10.3 million shares of its common stock in exchange for all the outstanding shares of common stock of EPIC Design Technology, Inc. (EPIC), a developer of design automation tools for deep submicron design in the area of integrated circuit power, timing, and reliability analysis. In addition, options to acquire EPIC's common stock were exchanged for options to acquire approximately 1.5 million shares of the Company's common stock. The EPIC merger was accounted for as a pooling-of-interests, and accordingly, the Company's consolidated financial statements have been restated to include the financial position and results of EPIC for all periods presented. Acquisitions In July 1998, the Company acquired Systems Science, Inc. (SSI), a developer of advanced tools for electronic design verification and test. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase with the Company exchanging a combination of cash of $26.0 million and notes of $12.0 million. In addition, the Company reserved approximately 318,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under SSI's stock option plan, which the Company assumed in the acquisition. The total purchase price of $47.1 million was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. This includes allocations of $18.2 million to goodwill and other intangible assets, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis, generally over a five-year period. Approximately $28.9 million was allocated to in-process research and development and other costs and charged to operations. In October 1997, the Company acquired two small privately held companies in the EDA industry, each of which has been accounted for as a purchase. The purchase price, acquisition costs and net liabilities assumed for these acquisitions totaled approximately $4.2 million, which was allocated to in-process research and development and other costs and charged to operations. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented since the effects of the acquisitions were not material to the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the periods presented. 2 3 Revenue Revenue consists of fees for licenses and subscriptions of the Company's software products, sales of system products, maintenance and support, customer training, and consulting. The Company's revenue increased by 11% to $717.9 million in fiscal 1998 from $647.0 million in fiscal 1997 and by 23% from $525.6 million in fiscal 1996 compared to fiscal 1997. The percentage of the Company's total revenue attributable to software and system products decreased to 60% in fiscal 1998 from 63% in fiscal 1997 and 66% in fiscal 1996, primarily due to an increase in the Company's base of installed software and the associated increase in maintenance and support, customer training, and consulting revenue. Product revenue increased by 6% to $431.0 million in fiscal 1998 from $408.3 million in fiscal 1997 and by 18% from $346.1 million in fiscal 1996 compared to fiscal 1997. For each of the years, these increases were primarily due to increased worldwide licensing and sales of the Company's EDA software products. Service revenue increased by 20% to $287.0 million in fiscal 1998 from $238.7 million in fiscal 1997 and by 33% from $179.5 million in fiscal 1996 compared to fiscal 1997. For each of the years, these increases were primarily attributable to the renewal of maintenance and support contracts for EDA products and growth in customer training and consulting services. In fiscal 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition." The provisions of SOP 97-2 have been applied to transactions entered into beginning October 1, 1997 (See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). The effect of the adoption of SOP 97-2 was not material. Revenue from international operations was $279.8 million, $262.2 million and $221.5 million, or 39%, 41% and 42% of total revenue in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The decrease in international revenue as a percentage of total revenue in fiscal 1998 compared to fiscal 1997 was due primarily to decreased revenue in Asia/Pacific and Japan as a result of the economic turmoil in many Asia/Pacific markets. This decrease was partially offset by growth in European revenue during fiscal 1998. The decrease in international revenue as a percentage of total revenue in fiscal 1997 compared to fiscal 1996 was due primarily to a decrease in revenue in Japan, which was attributable to a decline in the value of the yen versus the U.S. dollar. Cost of Revenue Cost of product revenue includes cost of production personnel, product packaging, documentation, amortization of capitalized software development costs, and costs of the Company's system products. The cost of internally developed capitalized software is amortized based on the greater of the ratio of current product revenue to the total of current and anticipated product revenue or the straight-line method over the software's estimated economic life of approximately two years. Cost of product revenue remained relatively flat at 5% of total revenue in fiscal 1998 compared to 6% of total revenue in fiscal 1997 and 5% of total revenue in fiscal 1996. Cost of service revenue includes personnel and the related costs associated with providing training and consulting services. Cost of service revenue as a percentage of total revenue was 8% of total revenue in both fiscal 1998 and 1997 and 7% in fiscal 1996. The increase in cost of service from fiscal 1996 was due to the Company's investment in the infrastructure required to expand its training and consulting business during fiscal 1998 and 1997. Research and Development Research and development expenses increased by 5% to $154.4 million in fiscal 1998 from $146.6 million in fiscal 1997 and by 22% from $120.0 million in fiscal 1996 compared to fiscal 1997, net of capitalized software development costs. Research and development expenses represented 22%, 23% and 23% of total revenue in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The increase in absolute dollars reflects the Company's ongoing research and development efforts in a wide variety of areas, which the Company believes are essential to developing best-in-class EDA solutions and maintaining technological leadership. A significant portion of the increase for each fiscal year was due to the addition of personnel and personnel-related costs. Also, fiscal 1998 included an additional week of operations, which was partially offset by synergies realized from the integration of Viewlogic into Synopsys' operations. The Company anticipates that it will continue to commit substantial resources to research and development in the future, provided that it is able to continue to hire and retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel. If the Company believes that it is unable to enter a particular market in a timely manner, it may license technology from other businesses or acquire other businesses as an alternative to internal research and development. For fiscal 1999, the Company expects that research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenue will be at or slightly below the fiscal 1998 level. 3 4 Sales and Marketing Sales and marketing expenses increased by 2% to $245.4 million in fiscal 1998 from $240.6 million in fiscal 1997 and by 17% from $204.9 million in fiscal 1996 compared to fiscal 1997. Sales and marketing expenses represented 34%, 37% and 39% of total revenue in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Total expenses increased in absolute dollars in each fiscal year primarily from personnel and personnel-related costs due to the continued growth of the Company's worldwide sales and marketing organizations and an increase in professional services. Also, fiscal 1998 included an additional week of operations, which was partially offset by synergies realized from the integration of Viewlogic into Synopsys' operations. The Company expects that for fiscal 1999, sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenue will be below the fiscal 1998 level. General and Administrative General and administrative expenses remained relatively constant at $47.2 million in fiscal 1998 compared to $47.3 million in fiscal 1997. General and administrative expenses increased in absolute dollars by 13% from $42.0 million in fiscal 1996 compared to fiscal 1997. As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses were 7%, 7% and 8% in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. In fiscal 1998, general and administrative expenses included an additional week of operations; however, the associated expense increases were offset by synergies realized from the integration of Viewlogic into Synopsys' operations. In fiscal 1997, general and administrative expenses increased primarily due to an increase in personnel and personnel-related costs necessary to support the Company's infrastructure. The Company expects that for fiscal 1999, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue will be slightly below the fiscal 1998 level. Merger-Related and Other Costs As a result of various business combinations accounted for as a pooling-of-interests in fiscal 1998 and 1997, the Company incurred merger-related and other costs of $51.0 million and $11.4 million, respectively. These expenses related to transaction costs, employee termination and transition costs, legal costs, write-off of equipment and other assets, and redundant facility and other costs. As of September 30, 1998, there was a balance of $3.5 million in accrued liabilities for expected future cash expenditures, which are expected to be paid in the next six months. In-Process Research and Development and Other Costs During fiscal 1998, the Company acquired three businesses for an aggregate total of $51.3 million. Of the aggregate purchase price, $33.1 million was allocated to in-process research and development and other costs and charged to operations. Each of these business combinations was accounted for as a purchase. Other Income, Net Other income, net was $26.0 million, $24.4 million and $11.6 million, or 4%, 4% and 2% of total revenue in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Other income, net increased in each fiscal year primarily due to higher average invested cash and short-term investment balances. In addition, in fiscal 1998 and 1997 other income, net increased due to gains realized on sales of equity investments. Interest Rate Risk The Company's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to its investment portfolio and long-term debt. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company places its investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards, as specified in the Company's investment policy. The policy also limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer and type of instrument. The Company does not expect any material loss with respect to its investment portfolio. The table below presents the carrying value and related weighted-average interest rates for the Company's investment portfolio. The carrying value approximates fair value at September 30, 1998. In accordance with the Company's investment policy, all investments mature in fifteen months or less. All of the long-term investments mature in December 1999. Principal (Notional) Amounts in U.S. Dollars: 4 5
Carrying Average (in thousands, except interest rates) Amount Interest Rate --------- ------------- Cash equivalents - fixed rate $ 23,806 3.47% Short-term investments - fixed rate 440,082 3.83% Long-term investments - variable rate 255 3.99% -------- Total investment securities 464,143 3.81% Money market funds - variable rate 37,699 3.69% -------- Total interest bearing instruments $501,842 3.80% ========
(See Note 3 in accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information on investment maturity dates, long-term debt and equity price risk related to the Company's long-term investments.) Foreign Currency Risk The Company entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce its exposure to currency fluctuations on intercompany foreign currency denominated balance sheet positions during fiscal 1998. The objective of these contracts is to neutralize the impact of the foreign currency exchange rate movements on the Company's operating results. The Company's accounting policy for these instruments is based on the Company's designation of such instruments as hedging transactions. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company had $38.4 million of short-term foreign exchange forward contracts denominated in Japanese, Italian, German, French, and British currencies which approximated the fair value of such contracts and their underlying transactions as of September 30, 1998. Looking forward, the Company does not expect any material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows resulting from the use of these instruments. There can be no assurance that these strategies will be effective or that transaction losses can be minimized or forecasted accurately. The following table provides information about the Company's foreign exchange forward contracts at September 30, 1998. Due to the short-term nature of these contracts, the contract rate approximates the weighted-average contractual foreign currency exchange rate and the amount in U.S. dollars approximates the fair value of the contract at September 30, 1998. These forward contracts mature in approximately thirty days. Short-Term Forward Contracts to Sell and Buy Foreign Currencies in U.S. Dollars Related to Intercompany Balances:
Contract (in thousands, except for average contract rates) Amount Rate -------- --------- Forward Contracts: Japanese yen $23,143 135.72 British pound sterling 1,010 1.70 German mark 4,835 1.67 French franc 8,565 5.60 Italian lira 867 1,658.20
The unrealized gain (loss) on the outstanding forward contracts at September 30, 1998 was immaterial to the Company's consolidated financial statements. The realized gain (loss) on these contracts as they matured was not material to the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for the periods presented. Extraordinary Items During the first quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain on extinguishment of debt of $1.9 million, net of income tax expense of $1.0 million, related to the cancellation of certain interest bearing notes issued by the Company to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). During the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, Synopsys completed the partial spin-off of Viewlogic Systems, Inc. (VSI), a company that owns the printed circuit board (PCB)/Systems business of Viewlogic. Synopsys' merger with Viewlogic in December 1997 was accounted for as a pooling-of-interests. The spin-off was accounted for as an extraordinary item, as provided by paragraph 60 of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16 (APB 16), and Synopsys recorded an 5 6 extraordinary gain, net of income tax expense, of $26.5 million in fiscal 1998 in respect to the spin-off. Synopsys retained common stock equal to 14.9 percent of the fully diluted equity in VSI. The Company concluded that the disposition of VSI was consistent with its treatment of the Synopsys-Viewlogic merger as a pooling-of-interests. APB 16 (paragraph 48(c)) states that a condition of pooling-of-interests treatment is that at the time of the merger, management did not plan to dispose of any significant part of the assets of the merged entity. The Company concluded that this condition was met because, on the date of the Synopsys-Viewlogic merger, the Company did not plan to dispose of the PCB/Systems business. The Company believed that there would be synergies between the Company's "high-level" integrated circuit design products and VSI's PCB design products. The ultimate decision to spin-off VSI was based on changes in circumstances following the Synopsys-Viewlogic merger. During the months following the merger, the Company came to realize that certain of its assumptions and expectations regarding the operation of the PCB/Systems business as part of Synopsys were not being fulfilled. The Company's initial intent to retain VSI altered due to changes in circumstances as follows: - A number of engineers working in the PCB/Systems business were hired by competitors, and management became concerned that it would lose more if the business remained part of Synopsys. - Certain synergies anticipated from operation of the PCB/Systems business as part of Synopsys did not materialize. - The revenues of the PCB/Systems business grew more slowly than those of Synopsys' other businesses. Management concluded that the reduction in the Company's overall growth rate caused by the PCB/Systems business was contributing to a market discounting of the Company's stock value. - Managers of the PCB/Systems business concluded that the business could grow faster if it was a stand-alone entity, which would allow them to attract and retain key employees. Accordingly, Synopsys has not changed its accounting for the Viewlogic merger and has reported the gain on the VSI disposition as an extraordinary item. Accounting Pronouncements In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" and SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." SFAS 130 establishes new standards for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components. Synopsys will adopt SFAS 130 as required for its first quarterly filing of fiscal 1999. SFAS 131 requires disclosure of certain information regarding operating segments, products and services, geographic areas of operation, and major customers. Management is in the process of evaluating the effects of this change on its reporting segments. Synopsys will adopt SFAS 131 as required for its fiscal 1999 annual report. In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities and requires the Company to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure them at fair value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value would be accounted for based on the use of the derivative and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. The Company will be required to implement SFAS 133 for its fiscal 2000. The Company has not determined the impact that SFAS 133 will have on its financial statements and believes that such determination will not be meaningful until closer to the date of initial adoption. Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $599.8 million at September 30, 1998, an increase of $164.9 million from fiscal 1997. The increase is primarily a result of cash generated by operations of $144.1 million, and to a lesser extent, through financing and investing activities, mainly the exercise of stock options and purchases of stock through the employee stock purchase plan of $62.3 million, the sale of VSI for $51.9 million and the sale of long-term investments of $15.2 million. These cash flows were partially offset by cash outflows for investing and financing activities, 6 7 mainly capital expenditures of $58.0 million, acquisitions of three businesses of $30.4 million, the repurchase of common stock of $12.4 million and cash paid on debt obligations of $7.8 million. Accounts receivable increased 6% during fiscal 1998, while sales grew by 11%. Days sales outstanding in receivables decreased to 59 days as of September 30, 1998 from 62 days at September 30, 1997. As of September 30, 1998, the Company had sold $12.6 million of its accounts receivable to a financial institution. At September 30, 1998, the Company had two foreign exchange lines of credit available totaling $70.0 million, which expire in October 1998 and July 1999. The Company's management believes that its current cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, lines of credit, and cash generated from operations will satisfy its expected working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months. YEAR 2000 READINESS Year 2000 Problem The failure of a computer program to accurately process date information beginning on January 1, 2000 is referred to as the "Year 2000 problem." The problem arises because many existing computer programs use two digits rather than four to refer to a year. As a result, these programs may interpret a date that begins with "20" (i.e., any date after December 31, 1999) as a date that begins with a "19" (i.e., one hundred years earlier). This may result in a system failure, miscalculation or other malfunction. Synopsys has potential Year 2000 issues both as a vendor of software and as a user of software. As a vendor, Synopsys could have Year 2000 issues either if our software were not Year 2000 compliant or our customers have Year 2000 issues that interfere with their purchases of Synopsys' products. As a user of software, Synopsys could have Year 2000 issues if any of the many systems we use to perform key corporate functions - such as financial accounting, billing, payroll and license control - were not Year 2000 compliant. For the purposes of the following discussion our efforts to identify, assess, fix and test Year 2000 problems relating to our business are referred to as our "Year 2000 Efforts." State of Readiness In general, Synopsys' products are not date-sensitive, and therefore are less likely to have Year 2000 issues. We have inspected or tested approximately 80% of our products to determine whether they have Year 2000 problems. None of our tested products experienced significant date-related failures. In addition, we recently opened a dedicated Year 2000 test laboratory, which we will use to test all of our untested products and to maintain Year 2000 compliance of all future products. We do not expect that we will experience significant date-related failures with respect to the products to be tested or, if we do, that we will incur substantial costs to fix such failures. To determine whether our customers' purchases will be affected by Year 2000 issues we have held, and are continuing to hold, discussions with a number of such customers to determine whether our interfaces with such customers are vulnerable to Year 2000 issues. Synopsys has taken a number of steps to determine whether the internal computer systems and software we rely upon to run our business will have Year 2000 problems. Our efforts have covered both systems that are commonly thought of as "information technology" (IT) systems, including accounting, data processing, and telephone/PBX systems, as well as certain systems that are not commonly thought of as IT systems, such as alarm systems and fax machines. Our Year 2000 Efforts are being conducted primarily by Synopsys employees and in Synopsys facilities. We began our Year 2000 Efforts in February of 1997. We currently anticipate that they will be completed by June 30, 1999, prior to any currently anticipated impact on our internal computer systems and software. As of September 30, 1998, we had completed approximately 30% of the projects we believe are necessary to fully address potential Year 2000 issues relating to our internal computer systems and software. The remaining projects are in process. In addition to conducting an assessment of our products and internal systems and software, we have mailed letters to our 200 most important vendors and service providers. As of October 1, 1998, we had received responses from approximately 40% of such third parties. A follow-up phone survey will be conducted with each such vendor and service 7 8 provider, including those who responded to the initial survey, which we expect to be completed by January 30, 1999. We have requested our third party vendors to be Year 2000 compliant by April 30, 1999. Those suppliers who do not meet this requirement will be replaced by alternate vendors. In addition to assessing the Year 2000 readiness of our existing software and systems, in the ordinary course of replacing computer equipment and software, we attempt to obtain replacements that are Year 2000 compliant. Based upon our efforts to date, we believe that certain of the computer equipment and software we currently use will require replacement or modification. Costs of Readiness Synopsys has not incurred, and does not expect to incur, material expense in connection with our Year 2000 Efforts. We estimate that the cost of our Year 2000 Efforts, including the costs of our own employees who work on such Year 2000 Efforts, will not exceed $5.9 million. This number is a current estimate based on our Year 2000 Efforts to date. Should we encounter significant unforeseen Year 2000 problems, either in our products or internal systems, or in our customers' operations, this number could increase, perhaps by a material amount. These expenses will be funded from operating cash flows. Such amount represents less than 4.9 percent of our total actual and anticipated IT expenditures for fiscal 1998 through March 31, 2000 (including employee expenses of our IT department). As of September 30, 1998, we had incurred costs of approximately $1.0 million related to our Year 2000 Efforts. All of this amount relates to analysis, repair or replacement of existing software, upgrades of existing software, or evaluation of information received from significant vendors, service providers, or customers. Expansion and upgrade of our internal systems unrelated to our Year 2000 Efforts have not been materially delayed or impacted by our Year 2000 Efforts. Contingency Plans Synopsys has begun, but not yet completed, a comprehensive analysis of the operational problems and costs (including loss of revenues) that would be reasonably likely to result from the failure by us and certain third parties to complete efforts necessary to achieve Year 2000 compliance on a timely basis. The most likely worst case scenario has not yet been clearly identified, nor has a contingency plan been developed for dealing with such scenario. We currently plan to complete such analysis and contingency planning by June 30, 1999. EUROPEAN MONETARY UNIT The Company's sales to European customers are primarily U.S. dollar based. However, the Company does recognize the emergence of a new monetary unit and the potential importance of such a new monetary unit to its customers residing in the European union. The Company's information systems are capable of functioning in multiple currencies. The Company has already started to make system changes to make all infrastructures capable of operations in the European Monetary Unit. The Company does not expect to incur significant expenses for these system changes. The Company does not expect any disruption in operations due to the European Monetary Unit implementation. FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS Potential Earnings Fluctuations We attempt to plan our business to achieve quarter-to-quarter revenue and earnings growth. Achieving predictable revenue and earnings growth is difficult. Quarterly revenue and earnings are affected by many factors, including customer product demand, product license terms, the size of our backlog, and the timing of revenue recognition on products and services sold. The following factors could affect our revenues and earnings per share in a particular quarter or over several quarterly or annual periods: - Our orders are seasonal. Historically, our first fiscal quarter ending December 31 is our weakest, and may have a book-to-bill ratio below one. - Our products are complex, and before buying them potential customers spend a great deal of time reviewing and testing them. This is particularly true if they are new customers or current customers purchasing a new product or switching from a competitor's product. The sales cycle does not necessarily match quarterly periods, and if by the end of any quarter our sales force has not sold enough new licenses, our orders and revenues could be substantially reduced. - Like many companies in the software industry, we receive a disproportionate volume of orders in the last week of a quarter, and recognize a disproportionate amount of revenue in the last week of a quarter. In addition, the proportion 8 9 of our business attributable to our largest customers is increasing. As a result, if any order, and especially a large order, is delayed beyond the end of a fiscal period, our orders and revenue for that period could be substantially reduced. - The accounting rules we are required to follow only permit us to recognize revenue when certain criteria are met. Orders for certain of the Company's products and services, including certain time-based product licenses, consulting services, and software support, yield revenue (or a significant portion thereof) over multiple quarters (often extending beyond the current fiscal year) or upon completion of performance rather than at the time of sale. In addition, in negotiating a purchase order with a customer, we may agree to terms that have the effect of requiring deferral of revenue in whole or in part. As a result, it may be difficult for us to convert orders, particularly those received late in a quarter, or backlog, to revenue in any given quarter. It is therefore possible for the Company to fall short in its revenue and/or earnings plan for a given quarter even while orders and backlog remain on plan. Competition The EDA industry is highly competitive. We compete against other EDA vendors, and with customers' internally developed design tools and internal design capabilities, for a share of the overall EDA budgets of our customers. Our competitors include companies that offer a broad range of products and services, such as Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (Cadence), Mentor Graphics, Inc. (Mentor) and Avant! Corporation (Avant!), as well as companies, including numerous start-up companies, that offer products focused on a discrete phase of the integrated circuit (IC) design process. In order to remain successful against such competition, we must continue to enhance our current products and bring to market new products that address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers on a timely and cost-effective basis. We also will have to expand our ability to offer consulting services. The failure to enhance existing products, develop and/or acquire new products or to expand our ability to offer such services would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Technology advances and customer requirements are fueling a change in the nature of competition among EDA vendors. Increasingly, EDA companies compete on the basis of "design flows" involving a broad range of products (including both logic and physical design tools) and services rather than on the basis of individual "point" tools performing a discrete phase of the design process. No single EDA company currently offers its customers industry-leading products in a complete design flow. We offer a wide range of logic design tools but currently offer a relatively limited range of physical design tools. In November 1998 we acquired Everest, a private company developing physical design software. We will need to develop or acquire additional physical design tools in order to offer a complete design flow. We are also attempting to expand our capacity to offer professional services, but for the foreseeable future will continue to have less capacity than Cadence to provide such services. The market for physical design tools is dominated by Cadence and Avant!, both of which are attempting to complete their design flows. Cadence recently acquired Ambit Design Systems, a private company offering synthesis and other logic design products, as well as certain physical design verification products from Lucent Technologies, both of which will increase the direct competition between Synopsys and Cadence. In addition, Cadence's acquisition of logic design products may lead to reductions in purchases of our logic design software by Cadence, which was one of Synopsys' ten largest customers in fiscal 1998. Avant! also recently acquired a private company offering logic synthesis software, which will increase the direct competition between Synopsys and Avant!. Success of Non-Synthesis Products Historically, much of the Company's growth has been attributable to the strength of its logic synthesis products. Opportunities for growth in market share in this area are limited, and synthesis revenues are expected to grow more slowly than our target for overall revenue growth. Synthesis and related "design creation" products account for approximately 45-50% of our revenue. As a result, in order to meet our revenue plan, non-synthesis design creation products, high level verification products and deep submicron products and our services business will have to grow faster than our overall revenue growth target. Our PrimeTime(R) timing analysis, Formality(R) formal verification, Module Compiler(TM) datapath synthesis and VCS(TM) Verilog simulation products are expected to be among the most important contributors to product revenue growth. These products have achieved initial customer acceptance, but we will only derive significant revenue from these products if they are accepted by a broad range of customers. Product success is difficult to predict. The introduction of new products and growth of a market for such products cannot be assured in a highly competitive environment like EDA. In the past we, like all companies, have had products that despite initial successes, have failed to meet our revenue expectations. Expanding our capacity to offer consulting services and our revenues derived therefrom will require us to recruit, hire and train a large number of talented people, and to implement management controls on bidding and executing on services engagements. The consulting business is significantly different than the software business, however, and as indicated by recent layoffs announced by Cadence in its service business, increasing consulting orders and revenue while maintaining an adequate level of profit can be difficult. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in expanding revenues from existing or new products at the desired rate or expanding its services business, and the failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. 9 10 Integration of Acquired Businesses We have acquired or merged with a number of companies in recent years, including EPIC, Viewlogic, SSI and Everest, and as part of our efforts to expand our product and services offerings we may acquire additional companies in the future. In addition to direct costs, acquisitions pose a number of risks, including potential dilution of earnings per share, problems of integrating the acquired products and employees into our business, the failure to realize expected synergies or cost savings, the drain on management time for acquisition-related activities, possible adverse effects on customer buying patterns due to uncertainties resulting from an acquisition, and assumption of unknown liabilities. While we attempt to review proposed acquisitions carefully and negotiate terms that are favorable to the Company, there is no assurance that any individual acquisition will have the projected effect on the Company's performance. Dependence on Semiconductor and Electronics Business Our business has benefited from the rapid worldwide growth of the semiconductor industry. Purchases of our products are largely dependent upon the commencement of new design projects by semiconductor manufacturers and their customers. The outlook for the semiconductor industry for the remainder of calendar year 1998 and 1999 is uncertain, owing in part to adverse economic conditions in Asia and to potential slowing of growth in the United States. A number of the Company's customers have announced layoffs of their employees or the suspension of investment plans, and although the Company has not seen a significant drop-off in demand from these customers, their EDA budgets could be reduced, alone or as part of overall expense control efforts. In addition, there have been a number of mergers in the semiconductor and systems industries, which may reduce the aggregate level of purchases of our products and services by the merged companies. Slower growth in the semiconductor and systems industries, a reduced number of design starts, tightening of customers' operating budgets or continued consolidation among the Company's customers may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. International Exposure In fiscal 1998, international revenue accounted for 39% of our revenue, after accounting for 41% and 42% of our revenue in fiscal 1997 and 1996, respectively. We expect that international revenue will continue to account for a significant portion of our revenue in the future. As a result, the Company's performance may be negatively affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates and changes in regional or worldwide economic or political conditions. In particular: - Revenue from sales in Japan during fiscal 1998 was adversely affected by the weakness of the yen against the dollar, overall weakness in the Japanese economy, and the deferral of investments in semiconductor facilities and technology by Japanese companies. Continued weakness of the Japanese economy during fiscal 1999 is likely to adversely affect revenue from Japan during the year. The yen has recently strengthened, but the exchange rate for fiscal 1999 remains subject to unpredictable fluctuations. Renewed weakness of the yen could adversely affect revenue from Japan during fiscal 1999. - Significant declines in the value of the Korean won during fiscal 1998, and the subsequent economic crisis had a significant adverse affect on our business in Korea during the year, and is likely to continue to affect our orders and revenue from Korea in fiscal 1999. Declines in the currencies of other countries in the Asia Pacific region, particularly Taiwan, have also negatively affected the Company's sales in the region. Continued instability in Asian currency markets and weaknesses in Asian economies would continue to have an adverse effect on our orders and revenues from the Asia Pacific region. Risk of Joint Development In February 1996, we entered into a six-year joint development and license agreement with IBM, pursuant to which the two companies agreed to develop certain new products. Joint development of products is subject to risks and uncertainties over and above those affecting internal development. During fiscal 1997, the first joint product resulting from the alliance, PrimeTime, was introduced, and the parties agreed to terminate efforts to develop a product in one of the product areas covered by the Agreement. A second joint product is expected to be introduced in January 1999, and the fourth product to be developed under the agreement has been suspended. Synopsys and IBM are currently discussing the future of the alliance. There can be no assurance that joint development will continue, or that the products developed by the alliance will be successful. Need to Recruit and Retain Key Personnel Our success is dependent on technical and other contributions of key employees. We participate in a dynamic industry, with significant start-up activity, and our headquarters is in Silicon Valley, where skilled technical, sales and management employees are in high demand. There are a limited number of qualified EDA engineers, and the competition for such individuals is intense. Experience at Synopsys is highly valued in the EDA industry, and our employees are recruited aggressively by our competitors and by start-up companies. Our salaries are competitive in the market, but under certain circumstances, start-up companies can offer more attractive stock option packages. As a result, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, significant employee turnover. In addition, 10 11 there can be no assurance that we can continue to recruit and retain key personnel. Failure to successfully recruit and retain such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Poison Pill Provisions The Company has adopted a number of provisions that could have anti-takeover effects. The Board of Directors has adopted a Preferred Shares Rights Plan, commonly referred to as a "poison pill." In addition, the Board of Directors has the authority, without further action by its stockholders, to fix the rights and preferences and issue shares of, authorized but undesignated shares of Preferred Stock. This provision and other provisions of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying or preventing changes in control or management of the Company, including transactions in which the stockholders of the Company might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. Year 2000 Synopsys presently believes that we will not experience significant operational problems arising from the Year 2000 problem (i.e., the inability of certain computer programs to correctly process date information on or after January 1, 2000). However, if unforeseen Year 2000 issues arise with respect to Synopsys products, one or more important customers experiences Year 2000-related problems that interferes with their purchases of Synopsys products, or we are not able to identify and fix Year 2000 problems relating to the computer systems and software we rely on to run our business, we may experience a disruption in our business, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Change in Financial Accounting Standards We prepare our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP are subject to interpretation by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting policies. A change in these policies can have a significant effect on our reported results, and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced. Accounting policies affecting many other aspects of our business, including rules relating to software revenue recognition, purchase and pooling-of-interests accounting for business combinations, employee stock purchase plans and stock option grants have recently been revised or are under review by one or more groups. Changes to these rules, or the questioning of current practices, may have a significant adverse effect on our reported financial results or in the way we conduct our business. In addition, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of those assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the recorded amounts of expenses during the reporting period. A change in the facts and circumstances surrounding these estimates could result in a change to the estimates and impact future operating results. 11 12 REPORT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS To The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Synopsys, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Synopsys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1998. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the consolidated financial statements of EPIC Design Technology, Inc., a company acquired by Synopsys, Inc. in a business combination accounted for as a pooling-of-interests as described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, which statements reflect total revenues constituting 8% in fiscal 1996, of the related consolidated total. Those consolidated statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for EPIC Design Technology, Inc., is based solely on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of the other auditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Synopsys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1998 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Mountain View, California October 26, 1998 12 13 SYNOPSYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands, except share data) 1998 1997 - --------------------------------- --------- --------- ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 159,687 $ 126,414 Short-term investments 440,082 308,416 --------- --------- Cash and short-term investments 599,769 434,830 Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $13,210 and $8,213, respectively 126,336 119,030 Prepaid expenses, deferred taxes and other 42,451 36,580 --------- --------- Total current assets 768,556 590,440 Property and equipment, net 99,879 92,079 Long-term investments 38,265 61,056 Other assets 39,927 25,014 --------- --------- Total assets $ 946,627 $ 768,589 ========= ========= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 14,921 $ 21,439 Accrued liabilities 102,354 93,442 Current portion of long-term debt 7,648 8,964 Income taxes payable 50,313 33,282 Deferred revenue 92,980 97,523 --------- --------- Total current liabilities 268,216 254,650 --------- --------- Long-term debt 13,138 9,191 Deferred compensation 4,886 3,205 Commitments Stockholders' equity: Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding -- -- Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 66,534,000 and 63,844,000 shares outstanding, respectively 665 638 Additional paid-in capital 416,943 334,086 Retained earnings 242,957 151,664 Treasury stock, at cost, 318,000 shares outstanding (11,184) -- Cumulative translation adjustment (666) (1,552) Net unrealized gain on investments 11,672 16,707 --------- --------- Total stockholders' equity 660,387 501,543 --------- --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 946,627 $ 768,589 ========= =========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 13 14 SYNOPSYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands, except per share data) 1998 1997 1996 - ------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- Revenue: Product $430,979 $408,256 $346,133 Service 286,961 238,700 179,466 -------- -------- -------- Total revenue 717,940 646,956 525,599 -------- -------- -------- Cost of revenue: Product 36,371 36,777 28,752 Service 57,396 50,108 36,794 -------- -------- -------- Total cost of revenue 93,767 86,885 65,546 -------- -------- -------- Gross margin 624,173 560,071 460,053 Operating expenses: Research and development 154,407 146,613 120,005 Sales and marketing 245,376 240,606 204,920 General and administrative 47,179 47,284 41,999 Merger-related and other costs 51,009 11,400 -- In-process research and development and other costs 33,069 5,500 64,529 -------- -------- -------- Total operating expenses 531,040 451,403 431,453 -------- -------- -------- Operating income 93,133 108,668 28,600 Other income, net 25,984 24,361 11,628 -------- -------- -------- Income before provision for income taxes and extraordinary items 119,117 133,029 40,228 Provision for income taxes 55,819 51,043 23,426 -------- -------- -------- Net income before extraordinary items 63,298 81,986 16,802 Extraordinary items - gains on extinguishment of debt and sale of business unit, net of income tax expense 28,404 -- -- -------- -------- -------- Net income $ 91,702 $ 81,986 $ 16,802 ======== ======== ======== Basic earnings per share: Net income before extraordinary items $ 0.97 $ 1.31 $ 0.28 Extraordinary items 0.43 -- -- -------- -------- -------- Net income $ 1.40 $ 1.31 $ 0.28 ======== ======== ======== Weighted average common shares 65,501 62,413 60,162 ======== ======== ======== Diluted earnings per share: Net income before extraordinary items $ 0.93 $ 1.25 $ 0.27 Extraordinary items 0.42 -- -- -------- -------- -------- Net income $ 1.34 $ 1.25 $ 0.27 ======== ======== ======== Weighted average common shares and equivalents 68,427 65,486 62,991 ======== ======== ========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 14 15 SYNOPSYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Net Additional Deferred Cumulative Unrealized Common Stock Paid-in Retained Stock Translation Gain on Treasury (in thousands) Shares Amount Capital Earnings Compensation Adjustment Investments Stock Total - -------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- Balance at September 30, 1995 59,140 $ 591 $ 218,875 $ 68,030 $ (203) $ (39) $ 108 $ -- $ 287,362 Acquisition of treasury stock (778) (7) -- -- -- -- -- (14,817) (14,824) Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition 545 5 14,506 -- -- -- -- -- 14,511 Stock issued under stock option and stock purchase plans 2,663 27 20,793 (9,282) -- -- -- 14,817 26,355 Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options -- -- 8,967 -- -- -- -- -- 8,967 Amortization of deferred stock compensation -- -- -- -- 93 -- -- -- 93 Translation adjustment -- -- -- -- -- (320) -- -- (320) Adjustment to unrealized gain on investments, net -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,601 -- 11,601 Net income -- -- -- 16,802 -- -- -- -- 16,802 ------- ------- --------- --------- ------- -------- --------- --------- --------- Balance at September 30, 1996 61,570 616 263,141 75,550 (110) (359) 11,709 -- 350,547 Acquisition of treasury stock (440) (5) -- -- -- -- -- (9,489) (9,494) Stock issued under stock option and stock purchase plans 2,714 27 40,921 (5,872) -- -- -- 9,489 44,565 Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options -- -- 30,024 -- -- -- -- -- 30,024 Amortization of deferred stock compensation -- -- -- -- 110 -- -- -- 110 Translation adjustment -- -- -- -- -- (1,193) -- -- (1,193) Adjustment to unrealized gain on investments, net -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,998 -- 4,998 Net income -- -- -- 81,986 -- -- -- -- 81,986 ------- ------- --------- --------- ------- -------- --------- --------- --------- Balance at September 30, 1997 63,844 638 334,086 151,664 -- (1,552) 16,707 -- 501,543 Acquisition of treasury stock (353) (4) -- -- -- -- -- (12,403) (12,407) Stock options assumed in connection with acquisition -- -- 7,636 -- -- -- -- -- 7,636 Stock issued under stock option and stock purchase plans 3,043 31 61,454 (409) -- -- -- 1,219 62,295 Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options -- -- 13,767 -- -- -- -- -- 13,767 Translation adjustment -- -- -- -- -- 886 -- -- 886 Adjustment to unrealized gain on investments, net -- -- -- -- -- -- (5,035) -- (5,035) Net income -- -- -- 91,702 -- -- -- -- 91,702 ------- ------- --------- --------- ------- -------- --------- --------- --------- Balance at September 30, 1998 66,534 $ 665 $ 416,943 $ 242,957 $ -- $ (666) $ 11,672 $ (11,184) $ 660,387 ======= ======= ========= ========= ======= ======== ========= ========= =========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 15 16 \ SYNOPSYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 1996 - -------------- --------- --------- --------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 91,702 $ 81,986 $ 16,802 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Extraordinary gains (28,404) -- -- Depreciation and amortization 44,152 39,826 28,947 Interest accretion on notes payable 510 526 470 Provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns 8,431 2,574 624 Tax benefit associated with stock options 13,767 30,024 8,967 Deferred taxes (6,617) (20,811) (13,015) Non-cash merger-related and other costs 8,367 3,084 -- In-process research and development and other costs 33,069 5,500 64,529 Gain on sale of long-term investments (9,930) (15,856) (1,173) Net changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (25,754) (25,490) (20,138) Prepaid expenses and other (689) (3,134) (7,085) Other assets (6,009) (1,735) (2,175) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 9,432 10,337 32,531 Income taxes payable 1,147 16,424 3,307 Deferred revenue 9,197 7,020 13,958 Deferred compensation 1,681 3,205 -- --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by operating activities 144,052 133,480 126,549 --------- --------- --------- Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sales of long-term investments 15,158 22,503 8,460 Proceeds from sale of business unit 51,900 5,000 -- Purchases of long-term investments (1,998) (25,342) (34,154) Purchases and maturities of short-term investments (127,849) (52,886) (91,971) Purchases of property and equipment (58,001) (61,308) (50,006) Purchase of technology -- (335) (10,900) Acquisitions (net of cash acquired) (30,354) -- 67 Capitalization of software development costs (2,122) (4,211) (3,696) --------- --------- --------- Net cash used in investing activities (153,266) (116,579) (182,200) --------- --------- --------- Cash flows from financing activities: Principal payments on debt obligations (7,762) (11,568) (8,396) Proceeds from sale of common stock, net 62,295 44,565 26,355 Purchases of treasury stock (12,407) (9,494) (14,824) --------- --------- --------- Net cash provided by financing activities 42,126 23,503 3,135 --------- --------- --------- Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 361 (1,090) (287) --------- --------- --------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 33,273 39,314 (52,803) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 126,414 87,100 139,903 --------- --------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 159,687 $ 126,414 $ 87,100 ========= ========= ========= Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the year for: Interest $ 770 $ 769 $ 704 Income taxes $ 46,206 $ 25,215 $ 21,181 Non-cash transactions: Purchase of technology for notes -- -- $ 28,500 Notes payable issued in connection with acquisition $ 12,000 -- --
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 17 SYNOPSYS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Nature of Operations. Synopsys, Inc. (Synopsys or the Company) is a leading supplier of electronic design automation (EDA) solutions to the global electronics market. The Company provides comprehensive design technologies to creators of advanced integrated circuits, electronic systems, and systems on a chip. The Company also provides consulting services and support to its customers to streamline overall design process and accelerate time-to-market. Fiscal Year End. The Company has a fiscal year that ends on the Saturday nearest September 30. Fiscal 1998 was a 53-week year. Fiscal 1997 and 1996 were 52-week years. For presentation purposes, the consolidated financial statements and notes refer to the calendar month end. Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts of revenues, assets and liabilities, disclosure of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the recorded amounts of expenses during the reporting period. A change in the facts and circumstances surrounding these estimates could result in a change to the estimates and impact future operating results. Cash Equivalents, Fair Values of Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, investments and trade receivables. All of the Company's cash equivalents and investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value with material unrealized gains and losses, if any, included in stockholders' equity. The fair value of investments is based on quoted market prices. Realized gains and losses are included in other income, net. Cash equivalents have original maturities of three months or less. The Company has cash equivalents and investments with various high quality institutions and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. The Company sells its products worldwide primarily to customers in the semiconductor industry. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses, and such losses have been within management's expectations and have not been material in any year. As of September 30, 1998, the Company had sold approximately $12.6 million of its accounts receivable to a financial institution. The fair value of the Company's cash, accounts receivable, long-term investments, put and call and forward contracts relating to certain of the Company's equity securities, accounts payable, long-term debt and foreign currency contracts, approximates the carrying amount, which is the amount the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. Foreign Currency Translation. The functional currency of each of the Company's international subsidiaries is the foreign subsidiary's local currency. Assets and liabilities of the Company's international operations are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Accumulated net translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity. Foreign exchange transaction gains and losses were not material for all periods presented and are included in the results of operations. Synopsys' international business is an important contributor to the Company's revenue and net profits. However, the majority of Synopsys' international sales are denominated in the U.S. dollar, and an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make products sold internationally less competitive. The operating expenses of Synopsys' overseas offices are paid in local currencies and are subject to the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates as compared to their respective local currency. The effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations did not 16 18 significantly impact the Company's operating results. Financial exposure may nonetheless result, primarily from the timing of transactions and the movement of foreign exchange rates. Foreign Exchange Hedging. The Company operates internationally and thus is exposed to potentially adverse movements in foreign currency rate changes. In fiscal 1998, the Company entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign currency rate changes on intercompany foreign currency denominated balance sheet positions. The objective of these contracts is to neutralize the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on the Company's operating results. These contracts require the Company to exchange currencies at rates agreed upon at the inception of the contracts. The hedge contracts reduce the exposure to fluctuations in exchange rate movements because the gains and losses associated with foreign currency balances and transactions are generally offset with the gains and losses of the hedge contracts. Because the impact of movements in currency exchange rates on forward contracts offsets the related impact on the underlying items being hedged, these financial instruments help alleviate the risk that might otherwise result from changes in currency exchange rate fluctuations. The Company's accounting policies for these instruments are based on the Company's designation of such instruments as hedging transactions. The criteria the Company uses for designating an instrument as a hedge includes the instrument's effectiveness in risk reduction. Gains and losses on these contracts, all of which are designated and effective as hedges of existing transactions, are recognized in operations in the period in which gains and losses on the underlying transactions occur. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. In the event of termination or extinguishment of a contract, associated gains and losses would be recognized in operations in the period in which the contract was terminated or extinguished. These contracts contain credit risk in that the counterparty may be unable to meet the terms of the agreements. The Company has limited these agreements to major financial institutions to reduce such credit risk. Furthermore, the Company monitors the potential risk of loss with any one financial institution and does not expect any material loss as a result of default by the counterparties. Revenue Recognition. During the first quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company adopted Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition." The provisions of SOP 97-2 have been applied to transactions entered into beginning October 1, 1997. SOP 97-2 generally requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple elements to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of the elements. The revenue allocated to software products, including time-based software licenses, generally is recognized upon delivery of the products. The revenue allocated to postcontract customer support (PCS) is recognized ratably over the term of the support and revenue allocated to service elements is recognized as the services are performed. In connection with the adoption of SOP 97-2, the Company has analyzed all of the elements included in its multiple-element arrangements and determined that the Company has sufficient evidence to allocate revenue to the license and PCS components of certain of its time-based product licenses. Accordingly, the portion of the time-based license fee allocated to the license component is recognized upon delivery of the software product and the portion of the fee allocated to PCS is recognized ratably over the term of the support. Prior to the adoption of SOP 97-2, all revenue from time-based product licenses was recognized ratably over the term of the license. Software subscriptions continue to be recognized on a ratable basis. Revenue consists of fees for licenses and subscriptions of the Company's software products, sales of system products, maintenance and support, customer training, and consulting. Cost of product revenue includes cost of production personnel, product packaging, documentation, amortization of capitalized software development costs, and costs of the Company's systems products. Cost of service revenue includes personnel and the related costs associated with providing such service. Accounts receivable include amounts due from customers for which revenue has been recognized. Deferred revenue includes amounts received from customers for which revenue has not been recognized. Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of property and equipment (three to five years). Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining lease term or the economic useful life of the related asset, whichever is shorter. Property and equipment detail is as follows: 17 19
SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 - ------------- --------- --------- Computer and other equipment $ 126,915 $ 125,702 Furniture and fixtures 15,341 18,792 Land 29,414 10,450 Leasehold improvements 23,579 19,743 --------- --------- 195,249 174,687 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (95,370) (82,608) --------- --------- $ 99,879 $ 92,079 ========= =========
Software Development Costs. Capitalization of computer software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility, which is generally the completion of a working prototype. Software development costs capitalized were $2.1 million, $4.2 million and $3.7 million in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Amortization of computer software development costs is computed as the greater of the ratio of current product revenue to the total of current and anticipated product revenue or the straight-line method over the software's estimated economic life of approximately two years. Amortization amounted to $2.2 million, $3.7 million and $3.2 million in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired in various acquisitions and is being amortized over the estimated useful life of five years. The Company assesses the recoverability of goodwill by determining whether the amortized asset over its useful life may be recovered through estimated future cash flows. Amortization of goodwill charged to operations was not material in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Accrued Liabilities. Accrued liabilities consist of:
SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 - -------------- -------- -------- Payroll and related benefits $ 63,865 $ 55,723 Accrued merger and acquisition costs 3,513 1,237 Other accrued liabilities 34,976 36,482 -------- -------- Total $102,354 $ 93,442 ======== ========
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset-and-liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, net operating loss carryforwards, and credit carryforwards if it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will be realized. To the extent a deferred tax asset cannot be recognized under the preceding criteria, a valuation allowance has been established. Earnings per Share. On October 1, 1997, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS 128), "Earnings per Share." In accordance with SFAS 128, basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of employee stock options using the treasury stock method. All earnings per share amounts for all periods presented have been restated to conform to SFAS 128 requirements. Stock-Based Compensation. As permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," in accounting for stock-based awards to employees. Effect of New Accounting Standards. In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" and SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." SFAS 130 establishes new standards for reporting and 18 20 displaying comprehensive income and its components. Synopsys will adopt SFAS 130 as required for its first quarterly filing of fiscal 1999. SFAS 131 requires disclosure of certain information regarding operating segments, products and services, geographic areas of operation, and major customers. Management is in the process of evaluating the effects of this change on its reporting segments. Synopsys will adopt SFAS 131 as required for its fiscal 1999 annual report. In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities and requires the Company to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure them at fair value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value would be accounted for based on the use of the derivative and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. The Company will be required to implement SFAS 133 for its fiscal 2000. The Company has not determined the impact that SFAS 133 will have on its financial statements and believes that such determination will not be meaningful until closer to the date of initial adoption. Reclassifications. Certain amounts reported in previous years have been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 1998 presentation. NOTE 2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS Mergers In December 1997, the Company issued approximately 11.3 million shares of its common stock in exchange for all the outstanding shares of common stock of Viewlogic Systems, Inc. (Viewlogic), a worldwide supplier of EDA software. In addition, options to acquire Viewlogic's common stock were exchanged for options to acquire approximately 2.8 million shares of the Company's common stock. In February 1997, the Company issued approximately 10.3 million shares of its common stock in exchange for all the outstanding shares of common stock of EPIC Design Technology, Inc. (EPIC), a developer of design automation tools for deep submicron design in the area of integrated circuit power, timing, and reliability analysis. In addition, options to acquire EPIC's common stock were exchanged for options to acquire approximately 1.5 million shares of the Company's common stock. These mergers were accounted for as pooling-of-interests, and accordingly, the Company's consolidated financial statements have been restated to include the financial position and results of EPIC and Viewlogic for all periods presented. The following information shows revenue and net income of the separate enterprises through the periods preceding the business combinations and the combined results following the business combinations.
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 1996 - --------------- --------- --------- --------- Total revenue: Synopsys $ 639,658 $ 469,277 $ 353,500 Viewlogic 78,282 147,811 128,180 Epic -- 29,868 43,919 --------- --------- --------- Combined $ 717,940 $ 646,956 $ 525,599 ========= ========= ========= Net income: Synopsys (1) $ 90,157 $ 69,490 $ 23,700 Viewlogic 1,545 9,592 2,780 Epic -- 2,904 (9,678) --------- --------- --------- Combined $ 91,702 $ 81,986 $ 16,802 ========= ========= =========
(1) Includes extraordinary gains of $28.4 million, net of income tax expense, in fiscal 1998. The Company recorded merger-related and other costs of $51.0 million during fiscal 1998. The following table presents the components of merger-related and other costs recorded in fiscal 1998, along with charges against the reserves through September 30, 1998: 19 21
NON-CASH WRITE-OFF RESERVE (in thousands) TOTAL CHARGE AMOUNTS PAID OF ASSETS BALANCE -------------- ------------ ------------ --------- -------- Transaction costs $ 9,245 $ (8,292) $ -- $ 953 Employee termination and transition costs 10,975 (10,593) -- 382 Write-off of equipment and other assets 8,367 -- (8,367) -- Legal and other settlements 6,894 (6,869) -- 25 Redundant facility and other costs 15,528 (13,375) -- 2,153 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total $ 51,009 $(39,129) $ (8,367) $ 3,513 ======== ======== ======== ========
In connection with the EPIC merger, the Company recorded merger-related costs of $11.4 million, which included transaction costs of $4.7 million, and costs associated with integrating the operations of the two companies of $6.7 million. Included in integration charges were redundant facility costs of $0.7 million, computer and other equipment abandonment and removal costs of $5.2 million, contract termination charges and other related expenses of $0.3 million and other expenses of $0.5 million. Of the $11.4 million of merger-related expenses, $8.3 million related to cash expenditures while $3.1 million related to non-cash write-off of assets. As of September 30, 1998, all cash expenditures associated with this merger had been paid, and there was no remaining balance in the accrual. During fiscal 1998, the Company sold VSI, the PCB/Systems design segment of the Viewlogic business to a management-led buy-out group for $51.9 million in cash. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain of $26.5 million, net of income tax expense, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998. The Company retained a minority investment of 14.9% (fully diluted) in the new company. Acquisitions In July 1998, the Company acquired Systems Science, Inc. (SSI). The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase with the Company exchanging a combination of cash of $26.0 million and notes of $12.0 million. In addition, the Company reserved approximately 318,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under SSI's stock option plan, which the Company assumed in the acquisition. The total purchase price of $47.1 million was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. This includes allocations of $18.2 million to goodwill and other intangible assets, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis, generally over a five-year period. Approximately $28.9 million was allocated to in-process research and development and other costs and charged to operations because the acquired technology had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative uses. The Company acquired two small privately held companies in the EDA industry in October 1997, each of which has been accounted for as a purchase. The purchase price, acquisition costs and net liabilities assumed for these acquisitions totaled $4.2 million, which was allocated to in-process research and development and other costs and charged to operations in the first quarter of fiscal 1998 because the acquired technology had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative uses. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented since the effects of the acquisitions were not material to the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the periods presented. NOTE 3. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Cash, cash equivalents and investments. All cash equivalents, short-term investments, and non-current investments have been classified as available-for-sale securities and consist of the following:
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 UNREALIZED UNREALIZED ESTIMATED (in thousands) COST GAINS LOSSES FAIR VALUE - -------------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- Classified as current assets: Tax-exempt commercial paper $ 23,806 $ -- $ -- $ 23,806 Money market funds 37,699 -- -- 37,699 Tax-exempt municipal obligations 282,542 26 -- 282,568 Money market preferred stock 122,975 -- -- 122,975 Municipal auction rate preferred stock 34,078 -- -- 34,078 Certificate of deposit 461 -- -- 461 --------- --------- --------- --------- 501,561 26 -- 501,587 Classified as non-current assets: Tax-exempt municipal obligations 253 2 -- 255 Equity securities 19,820 22,111 (3,921) 38,010 --------- --------- --------- --------- 20,073 22,113 (3,921) 38,265 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total securities $ 521,634 $ 22,139 $ (3,921) $ 539,852 ========= ========= ========= =========
20 22
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 UNREALIZED UNREALIZED ESTIMATED (in thousands) COST GAINS LOSSES FAIR VALUE - -------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Classified as current assets: Tax-exempt commercial paper $ 37,673 $ -- $ -- $ 37,673 Tax-exempt municipal obligations 210,123 49 -- 210,172 Money market preferred stock 49,823 -- -- 49,823 Municipal auction rate preferred stock 43,418 -- -- 43,418 U.S. government obligations 1,996 7 -- 2,003 Certificate of deposit 2,000 -- -- 2,000 Corporate annuity 1,000 -- -- 1,000 -------- -------- -------- -------- 346,033 56 -- 346,089 Classified as non-current assets: Tax-exempt municipal obligations 6,209 17 -- 6,226 Equity securities 28,797 26,033 -- 54,830 -------- -------- -------- -------- 35,006 26,050 -- 61,056 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total securities $381,039 $ 26,106 $ -- $407,145 ======== ======== ======== ========
Short-term investments include tax-exempt municipal obligations which have underlying maturities of less than one year or contain put options that are either supported by a letter of credit from a top-rated bank or insurance company or are over-collateralized for redemption at par at the reset date. Therefore, the underlying maturity for certain items may exceed one year. At September 30, 1998, the underlying maturities of the short-term investments are $172.1 million within one year, $6.5 million within five to ten years and $261.5 million after ten years. At September 30, 1998, $61.5 million and $440.1 million are classified as cash equivalents and short-term investments, respectively. At September 30, 1997, $37.7 million and $308.4 million are classified as cash equivalents and short-term investments, respectively. Realized gains and losses on sales of short-term investments have not been material. During fiscal 1998, the Company realized gains on sales of long-term investments of $13.9 million, which is included in other income, net. Strategic investments. In May 1996, the Company purchased 1,207,000 shares, approximately 9.9 percent of the outstanding shares of Cooper and Chyan Technology, Inc. (CCT), for $14.50 per share, pursuant to a strategic relationship between the companies. In April 1997, the Company purchased an additional 86,000 shares for $15.00 per share and the investment was classified as available-for-sale. In May 1997, CCT and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (Cadence) consummated a merger, whereby each share of CCT was converted to 0.85 shares of Cadence stock. During fiscal year 1998, the Company sold 469,000 shares of Cadence stock and realized a gain of $10.0 million. As of September 30, 1998, the Company owns 823,000 shares of Cadence stock. The Company entered into a put and call contract in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998 for the sale of 425,000 Cadence shares with prices and expiration dates as follows:
Date Shares Put Strike Call Strike - ------------------ ------- ---------- ----------- December 15, 1999 105,000 $ 27.31 $ 33.78 March 15, 2000 105,000 $ 27.31 $ 34.50 June 15, 2000 105,000 $ 27.31 $ 35.37 September 15, 2000 110,000 $ 26.60 $ 35.28
As of September 30, 1998, the fair market value of the puts and calls, based on a quoted market price of $24.625, was $1.1 million, which has been recorded in unrealized gains on investments. 21 23 As of September 30, 1998, the Company has an investment in Artisan Components (Artisan) of 594,000 shares, which is included in long-term investments. The Company entered into a forward contract for the sale of its Artisan shares in the third quarter of fiscal 1998. The contract has remaining prices and expiration dates as follows:
Date Shares Forward Price ---- ------ ------------- December 15, 1998 148,574 $17.01 May 4, 1999 148,574 $17.01 June 15, 1999 148,574 $17.01 September 15, 1999 148,578 $17.01
As of September 30, 1998, the fair market value of the forward contract, based on a quoted market price of $7.00, was $5.9 million, which has been recorded in unrealized gains on investments. Foreign exchange hedging. The Company has two foreign exchange lines of credit available totaling $70.0 million, which expire in October 1998 and July 1999. The Company had $38.4 million of short-term foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding which approximated the fair value of such contracts and their underlying transactions at September 30, 1998. These contracts are denominated in Japanese, Italian, German, French and British currencies. The outstanding forward contracts have maturities that expire in approximately one month. The gains and losses on forward exchange contracts are included in earnings when the underlying foreign currency denominated transaction is recognized. Gains and losses related to these instruments at September 30, 1998 were not material. In addition, the Company has not terminated or extinguished any foreign exchange forward contracts. The Company does not anticipate any material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows resulting from the use of these instruments. Long-term debt. During fiscal 1996, the Company and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) entered into a six-year Joint Development and License Agreement Concerning EDA Software and Related Intellectual Property (the IBM Agreement). In accordance with the IBM Agreement, the Company paid IBM $11.0 million in cash and issued $30.0 million in notes, which bear interest at 3%, and are payable to IBM upon the earlier of achievement of scheduled milestones or at maturity in fiscal 2006. The notes were recorded at fair value of $28.5 million, using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved. The Company will also pay royalties on revenues from the sale of new products developed pursuant to the IBM Agreement. As a result of the transaction, the Company incurred an in-process research and development charge of $39.7 million in fiscal 1996. In the first quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company and IBM modified the terms of one of the notes which has been accounted for as an extinguishment of debt. Accordingly, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain of $1.9 million, net of income tax expense, related to the extinguishment of the note. As of September 30, 1998, the notes had a balance of $7.4 million, of which $3.2 million is included in long-term debt. During fiscal 1998, in connection with the acquisition of SSI, the Company issued $14.0 million in notes, which bear interest at 6.6%, and are payable upon the earlier of achievement of certain milestones or at maturity in fiscal 2005. The notes were recorded at fair value of $12.0 million, using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved. As of September 30, 1998, the notes had a balance of $12.0 million, of which $9.3 million is included in long-term debt. The fair value of the Company's long-term debt approximates the carrying amount. NOTE 4. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company leases its domestic and international facilities under cancelable, non-cancelable and month-to-month operating leases and certain office equipment under operating leases. Rent expense was $25.5 million, $25.2 million and $21.4 million in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Future minimum lease payments as of September 30, 1998, of which $2.2 million has been accrued as merger-related expenses, are as follows:
(in thousands) Fiscal Years Ending ------------------- 1999 $18,383 2000 17,510 2001 16,046 2002 14,688 2003 8,521 Thereafter 15,401 ------- Total minimum payments required $90,549 =======
22 24 NOTE 5. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Net Income Per Share. The following is a reconciliation of the weighted-average common shares used to calculate basic net income per share to the weighted-average common shares used to calculate diluted net income per share for fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996:
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 1996 - -------------- ------ ------ ------ Weighted-average common shares used to calculate basic net income per share 65,501 62,413 60,162 Stock options outstanding 2,926 3,073 2,829 ------ ------ ------ Weighted-average common shares used to calculate diluted net income per share 68,427 65,486 62,991 ====== ====== ======
Stock Repurchase Program. In July 1998, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 3,250,000 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock in the open market over the following 24 months. The repurchased shares were to be used for issuance under the Company's employee stock plans and for other corporate purposes. During fiscal 1998, the Company purchased approximately 353,000 shares at an average price of $35. In October 1998, the Company announced that it had rescinded its stock repurchase program to comply with pooling-of-interests accounting guidance provided in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 96 (See Note 9). In May 1996, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock in the open market over the following 24 months. During fiscal 1996, the Company purchased approximately 361,000 shares at an average price of $41 per share. During fiscal 1997, the Company purchased approximately 205,000 shares at an average price of $46 per share. All shares repurchased during fiscal 1996 and 1997 were reissued prior to the merger with EPIC in February 1997, at which time the Company announced that it had rescinded this stock repurchase program in order to comply with pooling-of-interests accounting guidance provided in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 96. Preferred Shares Rights Plan. The Company has adopted a number of provisions that could have anti-takeover effects. In September 1997, the Board of Directors adopted a Preferred Shares Rights Plan. In addition, the Board of Directors has the authority, without further action by its stockholders, to fix the rights and preferences and issue shares of, authorized but undesignated shares of Preferred Stock. This provision and other provisions of the Company's Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and the Delaware General Corporation Law may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying or preventing changes in control or management of the Company, including transactions in which the stockholders of the Company might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. The rights expire on October 24, 2007. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under the Company's 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), 3,150,000 shares have been authorized for issuance as of September 30, 1998. Under the ESPP, employees are granted the right to purchase shares of common stock at a price per share that is 85% of the lesser of: the fair market value of the shares at (i) the beginning of a rolling two-year offering period, or (ii) the end of each semi-annual purchase period. During fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, shares totaling 433,036, 457,877 and 486,887, respectively, were issued under the plan at average prices of $27.61, $26.96 and $16.95 per share, respectively. As of September 30, 1998, 1,379,421 shares of common stock are reserved for the ESPP. Stock Option Plans. Under the Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan (the 1992 Plan), the Board of Directors may grant either incentive or non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of the Company's stock to eligible individuals at not less than 100% of the fair market value of those shares on the grant date. The shares and stock options issued to new employees 23 25 typically vest 25% after one year with the remaining shares and options vesting on a pro rata basis over the following 36 months, and shares and stock options issued to existing employees typically vest on a pro rata basis over 48 months or 16 quarters. Options expire ten years from the date of grant. As of September 30, 1998, 823,537 shares of common stock are reserved for future grants. In fiscal 1998, Synopsys established a Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan (the 1998 Plan) under which it authorized 566,736 shares of common stock for granting of non-qualified stock options to employees excluding officers and directors. Exercisibility, option price and other terms are determined by the Board of Directors, but the option price shall not be less than the fair value of the stock at the date of grant. Options currently expire no later than ten years and generally vest at the rate of 25% after one year from the date of grant, and then ratably over the following 36 months. At September 30, 1998, 2,149 shares of common stock are reserved for future grants. Under the Company's 1994 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (the Directors Plan), a total of 275,000 shares have been reserved for issuance. Pursuant to the Directors Plan, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors (the Board) is automatically granted an option to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company's stock upon initial appointment or election to the Board, 10,000 shares of the Company's stock upon reelection to the Board, and 5,000 shares of the Company's stock annually for service on Board committees, subject to a limit of two committee-service grants per year. Stock options are granted at not less than 100% of the fair market value of those shares on the grant date. Stock options granted upon appointment or election to the Board vest 25% annually. Stock options granted upon reelection to the Board and committee-service grants vest 100% after the first year of continuous service. As of September 30, 1998, 116,000 shares of common stock are reserved for future grants. The Company has assumed certain option plans in connection with business combinations (See Note 2). Generally, these options were granted under terms similar to the terms of the Company's stock option plans at prices adjusted to reflect the relative exchange ratios. All assumed plans were terminated as to future grants upon completion of each of the business combinations. Additional information concerning stock option activity under the various plans is as follows:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE ----------- -------------- Outstanding at October 1, 1995 10,634,285 $17.63 Granted 4,406,013 $30.52 Exercised (2,173,998) $11.60 Canceled (1,549,325) $27.37 ----------- Outstanding at September 30, 1996 11,316,975 $22.38 Granted and assumed 7,563,443 $31.03 Exercised (2,255,850) $15.86 Canceled (4,302,151) $34.34 ----------- Outstanding at September 30, 1997 12,322,417 $24.72 Granted and assumed 4,455,781 $33.80 Exercised (2,641,655) $19.16 Canceled (2,003,247) $26.48 ----------- Outstanding at September 30, 1998 12,133,296 $29.05 =========== Options Exercisable at: September 30, 1996 3,849,289 $16.93 September 30, 1997 4,017,263 $20.53 September 30, 1998 5,144,762 $24.50
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 1998: 24 26
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- WEIGHTED- AVERAGE WEIGHTED- WEIGHTED- REMAINING AVERAGE AVERAGE NUMBER CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE NUMBER EXERCISE RANGE OF EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING LIFE (IN YEARS) PRICE EXERCISABLE PRICE - ------------------------ ----------- --------------- ---------- ----------- --------- $ 0.11 - $23.19 2,627,020 5.85 $15.93 2,121,829 $15.52 $23.22 - $28.19 2,887,130 7.74 $27.15 1,316,841 $26.65 $28.25 - $33.69 2,617,690 8.64 $32.22 773,873 $31.20 $33.74 - $37.38 2,589,573 8.78 $35.35 785,248 $35.23 $37.44 - $45.75 1,411,883 9.37 $39.90 146,971 $42.43 ---------- ---- ------ --------- ------ $ 0.11 - $45.75 12,133,296 7.94 $29.05 5,144,762 $24.50 ========== ==== ====== ========= ======
Stock-Based Compensation. Under APB 25, the Company generally recognizes no compensation expense with respect to stock-based awards to employees. Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is required by SFAS 123 for awards granted after September 30, 1995, as if the Company had accounted for its stock-based awards to employees under the fair value method of SFAS 123. The fair value method of the Company's stock-based awards to employees was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's stock-based awards to employees have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock-based awards to employees. The fair value of the Company's stock-based awards to employees was estimated assuming no expected dividends and the following weighted-average assumptions:
STOCK OPTION PLANS ESPP 1998 1997 1996 1998 1997 1996 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Expected life (in years) 5.3 5.4 5.4 1.25 0.9 0.9 Risk-free interest rate 5.3% 6.3% 6.0% 5.5% 5.8% 5.6% Volatility 55.0% 55.1% 53.6% 55.0% 55.1% 53.6%
The weighted-average estimated fair value of stock options granted during fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $20.32, $12.87 and $17.49 per share, respectively. The weighted-average estimated fair value of shares granted under the ESPP during fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $11.70, $10.74 and $9.64 per share, respectively. For pro forma purposes, the estimated fair value of the Company's stock-based awards to employees is generally amortized over the options' vesting period of four years (for options) and the six-month purchase period (for stock purchases under the ESPP). The Company's pro forma information is as follows:
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands, except per share amounts) 1998 1997 1996 - ---------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income As reported $ 91,702 $ 81,986 $ 16,802 Pro forma $ 46,936 $ 54,114 $ 5,239 Earnings per share - basic As reported $ 1.40 $ 1.31 $ 0.28 Pro forma $ 0.72 $ 0.87 $ 0.09 Earnings per share - diluted As reported $ 1.34 $ 1.25 $ 0.27 Pro forma $ 0.71 $ 0.83 $ 0.08
Because SFAS 123 is applicable only to awards granted subsequent to September 30, 1995, its pro forma effect will not be fully reflected until fiscal 1999. 25 27 NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES The Company is entitled to a deduction for federal and state tax purposes with respect to employees' stock option activity. The net reduction in taxes otherwise payable arising from that deduction has been credited to additional paid-in capital. The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 1996 - -------------- -------- -------- -------- Current: Federal $ 40,452 $ 26,998 $ 14,154 State 5,555 4,562 2,525 Foreign 2,662 5,875 5,083 -------- -------- -------- 48,669 37,435 21,762 -------- -------- -------- Deferred: Federal (6,003) (14,325) (6,636) State (858) (2,062) (992) Foreign 244 (29) 325 -------- -------- -------- (6,617) (16,416) (7,303) -------- -------- -------- Charge equivalent to the federal and state tax benefit related to employee stock options 13,767 30,024 8,967 -------- -------- -------- Provision for income taxes $ 55,819 $ 51,043 $ 23,426 ======== ======== ========
The components of the Company's total income before provision for income taxes are as follows:
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 1996 - -------------- -------- -------- -------- United States $113,254 $122,520 $ 35,274 Foreign 5,863 10,509 4,954 -------- -------- -------- $119,117 $133,029 $ 40,228 ======== ======== ========
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount obtained by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes as follows:
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 1996 - -------------- -------- -------- -------- Statutory federal tax $ 41,691 $ 46,560 $ 14,080 State tax, net of federal benefit 6,121 6,712 2,231 Tax credits (1,665) (3,717) (993) Tax benefit from foreign sales corporation (3,826) (2,920) (2,013) Tax exempt income (5,911) (3,797) (3,239) Equity method for investments -- 744 -- Foreign tax in excess of U.S. statutory tax 872 1,501 575 Non-deductible merger and acquisition expenses 7,379 6,884 1,500 In-process research and development expenses 9,888 1,921 8,694 Other 1,270 2,590 2,591 Valuation Allowance -- (5,435) -- -------- -------- -------- $ 55,819 $ 51,043 $ 23,426 ======== ======== ========
A net deferred tax asset of $30.5 million and $23.8 million is included in prepaid expenses, deferred taxes, and other at September 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards which give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows: 26 28
SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 - -------------- -------- -------- Deferred tax assets: Tax credit carryovers $ 220 $ 672 Prepaid commissions -- 951 Accounts receivable -- 618 Deferred revenue 4,346 9,645 Joint venture and acquisition costs 4,882 7,912 Reserves and other expenses not currently deductible 23,333 18,601 Depreciation and amortization 4,187 599 Unrealized foreign exchange losses 269 -- Other 1,187 670 -------- -------- Deferred tax assets 38,424 39,668 Deferred tax liabilities: Depreciation and amortization -- (932) Unrealized gain on investments (7,287) (9,382) Unrealized foreign exchange gains -- (212) Net capitalized software development costs (674) (2,994) Other -- (2,302) -------- -------- Deferred tax liabilities (7,961) (15,822) -------- -------- Net deferred tax asset $ 30,463 $ 23,846 ======== ========
At September 30, 1998, the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets. At September 30, 1998, the Company had alternative minimum tax credit carryovers of $0.2 million, which do not expire. NOTE 7. GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMER INFORMATION The Company operates in a single industry segment, the development, marketing, and support of electronic design automation software and systems products. The Company's foreign operations consist primarily of sales, marketing and service activities in subsidiaries throughout the world. No one customer accounted for more than ten percent of the Company's revenue in fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Summarized financial information by major geographic area is as follows:
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (in thousands) 1998 1997 1996 - -------------- --------- --------- --------- Revenue: North America $ 506,566 $ 456,669 $ 358,959 Europe 128,347 109,760 88,856 Pacific Rim 151,409 152,413 132,619 Transfers between geographic areas (68,382) (71,886) (54,835) --------- --------- --------- Consolidated $ 717,940 $ 646,956 $ 525,599 ========= ========= ========= Operating income: North America $ 95,040 $ 61,408 $ 50,567 Europe 30,995 17,110 8,483 Pacific Rim 51,176 42,545 28,790 Corporate and eliminations (84,078) (12,395) (59,240) --------- --------- --------- Consolidated $ 93,133 $ 108,668 $ 28,600 ========= ========= ========= Identifiable assets: North America $ 411,150 $ 351,398 $ 312,983 Europe 38,949 25,410 39,139 Pacific Rim 53,376 57,739 41,330 Corporate assets and eliminations 443,152 334,042 191,401 --------- --------- --------- Consolidated $ 946,627 $ 768,589 $ 584,853 ========= ========= =========
27 29 Transfers between geographic areas represent both intercompany product and service revenue accounted for at prices representative of unaffiliated party transactions, and export shipments directly to customers. In fiscal 1998, identifiable assets in the Pacific Rim include $22.5 million of accounts receivable from customers located in Japan. Management believes allowances are adequate to cover any uncollectible amounts. Corporate assets consist primarily of cash and investments. NOTE 8. SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED (in thousands, except per share data) DEC. 31 MAR. 31 JUN. 30 SEP. 30 - ------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- 1998: Revenue $ 174,212 $ 170,105 $ 179,606 $ 194,017 Gross margin 150,720 148,815 156,280 168,358 Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and extraordinary items (1) (4,195) 38,678 52,532 32,102 Net income (loss) (6,400) 25,527 34,671 37,904 Earnings (loss) per share Basic (0.10) 0.39 0.52 0.57 Diluted (0.10) 0.38 0.50 0.55 Market stock price range: (2) High $ 46.06 $ 36.00 $ 45.81 $ 42.44 Low $ 35.06 $ 29.50 $ 30.97 $ 26.13 1997: Revenue $ 153,903 $ 156,771 $ 162,610 $ 173,672 Gross margin 134,339 135,834 139,567 150,331 Income before provision for income taxes (3) 37,444 17,516 37,132 40,937 Net income 24,332 6,905 24,120 26,629 Earnings per share Basic 0.39 0.11 0.39 0.42 Diluted 0.37 0.11 0.37 0.40 Market stock price range: (2) High $ 50.00 $ 46.25 $ 38.00 $ 45.19 Low $ 39.75 $ 24.25 $ 21.75 $ 29.50
(1) Includes merger-related and other costs of $36.0 million, $11.9 million and $3.1 million, for the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 1998, respectively. Includes in-process research and development and other costs of $4.2 million and $28.9 million in the first and fourth quarters of fiscal 1998, respectively. (2) The Company's common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol "SNPS." The stock prices shown represent quotations among dealers without adjustments for retail markups, markdowns or commissions and may not represent actual transactions. As of October 3, 1998, there were approximately 734 stockholders of record. To date, the Company has paid no cash dividends on its capital stock, and has no current intention to do so. (3) Includes merger-related and other costs of $11.4 million and in-process research and development and other costs of $5.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 1997. NOTE 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENT 28 30 On October 26, 1998, the Company signed a definitive agreement to merge with Everest Design Automation, Inc. (Everest). The Company will exchange approximately 1.4 million shares of its common stock for all the outstanding stock of Everest and will reserve approximately 100,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under Everest's stock option plan, which the Company will assume in the transaction. The business combination will be accounted for as a pooling-of-interests. The Board of Directors approved the rescission of the Company's stock repurchase program in order to comply with pooling-of-interests accounting guidance provided in the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 96. Retained earnings will be restated as of October 1, 1998 to reflect the pooling-of-interests combination.
EX-21.1 3 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY 1 Exhibit 21.1 Synopsys, Inc. Subsidiaries
Name Jurisdiction of Incorporation - ---- ----------------------------- Archer Systems, Inc. U.S.A. Chronologic Simulation, Inc. U.S.A. CIDA Technology, Inc. U.S.A. CSW Land Development Corporation U.S.A. Eagle Design Automation, Inc. U.S.A. Electronic Design Automation Services Europe Netherlands Epic International, Inc. U.S.A. Maude Avenue Land Corporation U.S.A. Nihon Synopsys K.K Japan Quad Design Technology, Inc. U.S.A. Radiant Design Tools, Inc. U.S.A. Silerity, Inc. U.S.A. Sunrise Test Systems, Inc. U.S.A. Synopsys GmbH Germany Synopsys Holding Co. U.S.A. Synopsys (India) Pvte. Ltd. India Synopsys International, Inc. Barbados Synopsys Italia, SRL Italy Synopsys Korea, Inc. Korea Synopsys Leasing Company U.S.A. Synopsys (Northern Europe) Ltd. United Kingdom Synopsys SARL France Synopsys Scandinavia AB Sweden Synopsys Singapore Pte. Ltd. Singapore Synthesis and Optimisation Systems Ltd. Israel Systems Science, Inc. U.S.A. The CAE Company Netherlands Viewlogic Asia Corporation U.S.A. Viewlogic Europe BV Netherlands Viewlogic Foreign Sales Corporation U.S. Virgin Islands Viewlogic India Private, Ltd. India Viewlogic Security Corporation U.S.A. Viewlogic Systems Europe BV Netherlands Viewlogic Systems GmbH Germany Viewlogic Systems, Ltd. United Kingdom Viewlogic Systems SA France
EX-23.1 4 REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE 1 Exhibit 23.1 REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE The Board of Directors Synopsys, Inc.: Under the date of October 26, 1998, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Synopsys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1998, as incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Mountain View, California October 26, 1998 EX-23.2 5 REPORT OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP 1 Exhibit 23.2 REPORT OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of EPIC Design Technology, Inc.: We have audited the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows of EPIC Design Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 1996 (none of which are presented herein). Those financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on those financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of EPIC Design Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP San Jose, California October 11, 1996 EX-23.3 6 CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP 1 Exhibit 23.3 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS The Board of Directors Synopsys, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statement Nos. 33-82804, 33-78560, 33-76206, 33-92144, 333-04410, 333-22663, 333-42069, 333-45181, 333-50947, 333-60783 and 333-68883 on Form S-8 of Synopsys, Inc. of our reports dated October 26, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Synopsys, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1998, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports appear or are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Synopsys, Inc. KPMG Peat Marwick LLP Mountain View, California December 18, 1998 EX-23.4 7 CONSENT OF DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP 1 Exhibit 23.4 CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-82804, 33-78560, 33-76206, 33-92144, 333-04410, 333-22663, 333-42069, 333-45181, 333-50947, 333-60783 and 333-68883 of Synopsys, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated October 11, 1996 (relating to the consolidated financial statements of EPIC Design Technology, Inc. not presented separately herein), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1998. DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP San Jose, California December 18, 1998 EX-27.1 8 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (10/1/97 - 9/30/98)
5 1,000 YEAR SEP-30-1998 OCT-01-1997 SEP-30-1998 159,687 440,082 139,546 13,210 0 768,556 195,249 95,370 946,627 268,216 13,138 0 0 665 659,722 946,627 717,940 717,940 93,767 93,767 531,040 0 1,975 119,117 55,819 63,298 0 28,404 0 91,702 1.40 1.34
EX-27.2 9 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (10/1/96 - 9/30/97)
5 1,000 YEAR SEP-30-1997 OCT-01-1996 SEP-30-1997 126,414 308,416 127,243 8,213 0 590,440 174,687 82,608 768,589 254,650 9,191 0 0 638 500,905 768,589 646,956 646,956 86,885 86,885 451,403 0 2,080 133,029 51,043 81,986 0 0 0 81,986 1.31 1.25
EX-27.3 10 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (10/1/96 - 6/30/97)
5 1,000 9-MOS SEP-30-1997 OCT-01-1996 JUN-30-1997 108,371 273,604 125,920 6,498 0 533,546 155,688 76,676 687,779 230,549 10,634 0 0 629 443,028 687,779 473,284 473,284 63,544 63,544 337,190 0 1,339 92,092 36,735 55,357 0 0 0 55,357 0.89 0.85
EX-27.4 11 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (10/1/96 - 3/31/97)
5 1,000 6-MOS SEP-30-1997 OCT-01-1996 MAR-31-1997 76,478 272,652 117,370 7,589 0 493,168 147,576 73,628 630,771 214,208 12,260 0 0 622 401,474 630,771 310,674 310,674 40,501 40,501 229,002 0 745 54,960 23,723 31,237 0 0 0 31,237 0.51 0.48
EX-27.5 12 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (10/1/96 - 12/31/96)
5 1,000 3-MOS SEP-30-1997 OCT-01-1996 DEC-31-1996 93,375 239,265 112,284 4,949 0 465,407 136,108 61,620 607,650 206,447 14,122 0 0 617 384,440 607,650 153,903 153,903 19,564 19,564 104,493 0 416 37,444 13,122 24,332 0 0 0 24,332 0.39 0.37
EX-27.6 13 FINANICAL DATA SCHEDULE (10/1/95 - 9/30/96)
5 1,000 YEAR SEP-30-1996 OCT-01-1995 SEP-30-1996 87,100 251,324 100,542 5,138 0 457,274 131,646 62,158 584,853 218,332 15,974 0 0 616 349,931 584,853 525,599 525,599 65,546 65,546 431,453 0 1,353 40,228 23,426 16,802 0 0 0 16,802 0.28 0.27
EX-27.7 14 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (10/1/95 - 6/30/96)
5 1,000 9-MOS SEP-30-1996 OCT-01-1995 JUN-30-1996 71,954 258,434 82,038 4,324 0 432,754 125,163 63,200 543,303 195,859 17,818 0 0 672 328,954 543,303 380,145 380,145 47,625 47,625 311,004 0 958 29,313 12,899 16,414 0 0 0 16,414 0.27 0.26
EX-27.8 15 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE (10/1/95 - 3/31/96)
5 1,000 6-MOS SEP-30-1996 OCT-01-1995 MAR-31-1996 133,550 177,914 86,259 4,718 0 418,748 113,923 57,761 497,786 182,892 19,649 0 0 662 294,583 497,786 245,227 245,227 29,971 29,971 217,388 0 0 3,272 3,701 (429) 0 0 0 (429) (0.01) (0.01)
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----