XML 22 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
 3. Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of our financial instruments are estimates of the amounts that would be received if we were to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date or exit price. The assets and liabilities are categorized and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1 – based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
 
Level 2 – based on quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities, using observable market based inputs or unobservable market based inputs corroborated by market data; and
 
Level 3 – based on unobservable inputs using management’s best estimate and assumptions when inputs are unavailable.

The following tables present the fair value of our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the valuation hierarchy.
 
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Total
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
 
$
240,256

 
$

 
$
240,256

 
$
121,095

 
$

 
$
121,095

Certificates of deposit
 

 
26,375

 
26,375

 

 
26,128

 
26,128

Corporate debt securities
 

 
1,002

 
1,002

 

 
13,572

 
13,572

Total
 
$
240,256

 
$
27,377

 
$
267,633

 
$
121,095

 
$
39,700

 
$
160,795

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Foreign currency hedge contracts
 
$

 
$
2,410

 
$
2,410

 
$

 
$
7,581

 
$
7,581


 
The fair value of the certificates of deposit is determined using quoted market prices for similar instruments and non-binding market prices that are corroborated by observable market data. The certificates of deposit include a $20.0 million certificate of deposit that is restricted as it was purchased to collateralize the line of credit for Merus Labs; see Note 6.

The fair value of the foreign currency hedging contracts is estimated based on pricing models using readily observable inputs from actively quoted markets and are disclosed on a gross basis.

Corporate debt securities consist primarily of U.S. corporate bonds. The fair value of corporate debt securities is estimated using recently executed transactions or market quoted prices, where observable. Independent pricing sources are also used for valuation.

There have been no transfers between levels during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012. The Company recognizes transfers between levels on the date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer.

The following tables present the fair value of assets and liabilities not subject to fair value recognition by level within the valuation hierarchy:

 
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Level 2
 
Fair Value
Level 3
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Level 2
 
Fair Value
Level 3
(In thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wellstat Diagnostics note receivable
 
$
43,585

 
$

 
$
43,585

 
$
41,098

 
$

 
$
41,098

Merus Labs note receivable
 
22,500

 
22,500

 

 
30,000

 
30,000

 

AxoGen note receivable and embedded derivative
 
24,380

 

 
24,380

 
22,110

 

 
22,110

Avinger note receivable
 
20,168

 

 
20,168

 

 

 

Total
 
$
110,633

 
$
22,500

 
$
88,133

 
$
93,208

 
$
30,000

 
$
63,208

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Series 2012 Notes
 
$
168,528

 
$
246,322

 
$

 
$
165,528

 
$
227,187

 
$

May 2015 Notes
 
145,799

 
192,254

 

 
143,433

 
182,031

 

February 2015 Notes
 
993

 
1,376

 

 
991

 
1,269

 

Total
 
$
315,320

 
$
439,952

 
$

 
$
309,952

 
$
410,487

 
$


 
As of June 30, 2013 the fair value of our Avinger note receivable, and as of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the fair values of our Wellstat Diagnostics note receivable, Merus Labs note receivable and AxoGen note receivable and derivative were determined using one or more discounted cash flow models, incorporating expected principal payments and the interest rate extended for notes with fixed interest rates and incorporating expected payments for notes with a variable rate of return.

On June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the carrying value of the AxoGen note and derivative approximates its fair value. We determined this note to be a Level 3 asset, as our valuation utilized significant unobservable inputs, including estimates of AxoGen's future revenues, expectations about settlement and required yield. To provide support for the estimated fair value measurement, we considered forward looking performance related to AxoGen, current measures associated with high yield indices, and reviewed the terms and yields of notes placed by specialty finance and venture firms both across industries and in a similar sector. Additionally, we reviewed market yield indices for changes since the issuance of the note. We observed no material events with AxoGen or in the market in which it participates since the placement. The carrying value and estimated fair value of the AxoGen note include the value of a change of control embedded derivative valued at $1.0 million and $0.6 million at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively. We utilized discounted cash flows and probability analysis to determine the fair value of the embedded derivative.
 
On June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the carrying value of the note receivable from Wellstat Diagnostics approximates its fair value. Due to the breach of the credit agreement as of December 31, 2012, as discussed in Note 6, we considered the fair value of the underlying collateral when estimating fair value of the note. The note is collateralized by all assets and equity interest in Wellstat Diagnostics. The fair value of the collateral was determined by using a discounted cash flow analysis related to the underlying technology included in the collateral. The discounted cash flow was based upon expected income from sales of planned products over a 15-year period. The terminal value was estimated using selected market multiples based on sales and EBITDA. Our valuation of the collateral utilized significant unobservable inputs including a discount rate of 35%, terminal value EBITDA multiple of 17.5, terminal value sales multiple of 3.0 and future revenue and expenses related to commercialization of the borrower's technology.

On June 30, 2013, the carrying value of the Avinger note approximates its fair value. We determined this note to be a Level 3 asset, as our valuation utilized significant unobservable inputs, including a discount rate of 18.5%, estimates of Avinger's future revenues, expectations about settlement and required yield. To provide support for the fair value measurement, we considered forward looking performance related to Avinger, current measures associated with high yield and Standard & Poor's Leveraged Commentary & Data indices, and reviewed the terms and yields of notes placed by specialty finance and venture firms both across industries and in a similar sector.

The fair values of our convertible notes were determined using quoted market pricing or dealer quotes.