10-Q/A

FORM 10-Q/A
Amendment No. 2

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

(Mark One)

[X]     QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended May 1, 2004

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________________ to _____________________

Commission file number 00019774

United Retail Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	51-0303670
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. employer identification no.)

365 West Passaic Street, Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(201) 845-0880
Registrant's telephone number, including area code

_______________________________________________________________

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES [X]   NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES [  ]   NO [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

YES [  ]   NO [  ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of May 1, 2004, 12,937,304 units, each consisting of one share of the registrant’s common stock, $.001 par value per share, and one attached stock purchase right, were outstanding. The units are referred to herein as “shares.”

INTRODUCTORY NOTE:

This Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-Q/A amends the Company’s Form 10-Q (i) to restate the Company’s balance sheets and statements of cash flows in Item 1 of Part I, as further discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements to (a) reflect a liability for the unamortized portion of construction allowances and other lease concessions (deferred lease incentives) rather than as a reduction to property and equipment and (b) present construction allowances and other lease concessions received within operating activities rather than as a reduction of capital expenditures, (ii) to make conforming changes and to supply incremental disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements in Item 1 of Part I, and (iii) to make related changes and to supply incremental disclosure in Items 2 and 4 of Part I and Item 6 of Part II. The restatements are made in order to comply with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 and FASB Technical Bulletin No. 88-1. The other Items of the Form 10-Q as previously filed are not amended hereby and remain in effect as of the filing date of the original Form 10-Q or the date of the filing of the first amendment, as applicable. Except as otherwise expressly stated, the information in this Amendment is as of June 14, 2004, the date on which the original Form 10-Q was filed and this Amendment does not purport to provide an update or discussion of any developments subsequent to the original filing.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)

		May 1,          2004	January 31,          2004	May 3,          2003
	ASSETS	(Restated - See Note 2)
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$14,344	$14,421	$12,143
Accounts receivable		1,703	1,789	1,626
Inventory		60,787	49,054	67,821
Prepaid rents		4,740	4,826	4,932
Other prepaid expenses		1,712	2,044	1,711
Total current assets		83,286	72,134	88,233
Property and equipment, net		88,048	91,703	101,202
Deferred compensation plan assets		5,114	4,893	4,144
Trademarks, net of accumulated
amortization of $405, $389 and $341		478	493	541
Other assets		1,366	1,465	1,526
Total Assets		$178,292	$170,688	$195,646
	LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Short-term distribution center financing		$650	$635	$998
Short-term capital leases		2,062	2,086	1,998
Accounts payable and other		29,902	19,795	31,152
Disbursement accounts		9,007	9,434	8,047
Accrued expenses		21,538	21,737	20,869
Total current liabilities		63,159	53,687	63,064
Long-term distribution center financing		3,158	3,326	3,807
Long-term capital leases		3,148	3,646	5,241
Deferred lease incentives		14,331	14,993	16,278
Deferred compensation plan liabilities		5,114	4,893	4,144
Other long-term liabilities		12,725	10,123	8,584
Total liabilities		101,635	90,668	101,118
	STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; authorized
1,000,000 shares; none issued
Series A junior participating preferred stock
$.001 par value; authorized 150,000 shares; none issued
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized
30,000,000 shares; issued 14,248,200 shares		14	14	14
Additional paid-in capital		83,696	83,696	83,679
Retained earnings		623	3,986	18,511
Treasury stock (1,310,896 shares) at cost		(7,676)	(7,676)	(7,676)
Total stockholders' equity		76,657	80,020	94,528
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		$178,292	$170,688	$195,646

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	May 1, 2004	May 3, 2003
Net Sales	$97,519	$101,530
Cost of goods sold, including
buying and occupancy costs	76,645	79,361
Gross profit	20,874	22,169
General, administrative and
store operating expenses	23,972	26,380
Operating Loss	(3,098)	(4,211)
Interest expense, net	216	252
Loss before income taxes	(3,314)	(4,463)
Provision for income taxes	49	82
Net loss	($3,363)	($4,545)
Net loss per share
Basic	($0.26)	($0.35)
Diluted	($0.26)	($0.35)
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding
Basic	12,937,304	12,937,304
Common stock equivalents
(stock options)	-	-
Diluted	12,937,304	12,937,304

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	May 1,          2004	May 3,          2003
	(Restated - See Note 2)
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss	($3,363)	($4,545)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment	3,687	3,794
Amortization of deferred charges and other
intangible assets	117	128
Loss on disposal of assets	26	301
Deferred compensation	-	78
Deferred lease assumption revenue amortization	(2)	(16)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	86	1,368
Income taxes	34	43
Inventory	(11,733)	(6,252)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	9,886	4,898
Prepaid expenses	418	619
Deferred lease incentives	(662)	(710)
Other assets and liabilities	2,599	221
Net Cash Provided by (used in) Operating Activities	1,093	(73)
Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	(58)	(589)
Deferred payment for property and equipment	(10)	4
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	(68)	(585)
Financing Activities
Repayments of long-term debt	(153)	(376)
Payments on capital lease obligations	(522)	(488)
Increase (decrease) in disbursement accounts	(427)	(3,875)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities	(1,102)	(4,739)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(77)	(5,397)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	14,421	17,540
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$14,344	$12,143

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

      UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United Retail Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements as of and for the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003 are unaudited and are presented pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements are condensed and do not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for a full set of financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the financial statement disclosures contained in the Company’s 2003 Annual Report and 2003 Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods, but are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for a full fiscal year.

Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation.

2. Restatement of Financial Statements

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” (“SFAS 13”) and Financial Accounting Standards Board Technical Bulletin No. 88-1, “Issues Relating to Accounting for Leases” (“FTB 88-1”), the Company accounts for rental expense for step provisions and escalation clauses on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term, with such amounts being included along with other related rent expense as part of buying and occupancy costs. Construction allowances and other lease concessions are amortized over the minimum lease term on a straight-line basis as part of buying and occupancy costs. However, in its detailed accounts, the Company had previously recorded this amortization as a reduction of depreciation expense, rather than rent expense. Both depreciation and rent expense are reflected within buying and occupancy costs on the statements of operations.

Also, historically, the Company’s balance sheets have reflected the unamortized portion of construction allowances and other lease concessions as a reduction of property and equipment, instead of as a deferred credit (liability). Further, historically, the Company’s statements of cash flows have reflected construction allowances and other lease concessions received as a reduction of capital expenditures (within “investing” cash flows), rather than as an operating lease activity (within “operating” cash flows).

In order to comply with SFAS 13 and FTB 88-1, we have determined in December of 2004 that we will restate our consolidated balance sheets as of May 1, 2004, January 31, 2004 and May 3, 2003 to reflect a liability for the unamortized portion of construction allowances and other lease concessions (deferred lease incentives) rather than as a reduction to property and equipment.

The following information shows the effect of these restatements on our balance sheets as of May 1, 2004, January 31, 2004 and May 3, 2003:

	As of May 1, 2004 (in thousands)
	As Previously Reported	FTB 88-1 Adjustment	As Restated
Property and equipment, net	$73,717	$14,331	$88,048
Total assets	$163,961	$14,331	$178,292
Deferred lease incentives	$        --	$14,331	$14,331
Total liabilities	$87,304	$14,331	$101,635

	As of January 31, 2004 (in thousands)
	As Previously Reported	FTB 88-1 Adjustment	As Restated
Property and equipment, net	$76,710	$14,993	$91,703
Total assets	$155,695	$14,993	$170,688
Deferred lease incentives	$        --	$14,993	$14,993
Total liabilities	$75,675	$14,993	$90,668

	As of May 3, 2003 (in thousands)
	As Previously Reported	FTB 88-1 Adjustment	As Restated
Property and equipment, net	$84,924	$16,278	$101,202
Total assets	$179,368	$16,278	$195,646
Deferred lease incentives	$        --	$16,278	$16,278
Total liabilities	$84,840	$16,278	$101,118

Further, we are restating our consolidated statements of cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003 to present construction allowances and other lease concessions within operating activities, rather than as a reduction of capital expenditures.

The following information shows the effect of this restatement on our statements of cash flows for the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003:

	For the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2004 (in thousands)
	As Previously Reported	FTB 88-1 Adjustment	As Restated
Net cash provided by    operating activities	$1,075	$18	$1,093
Net cash used in    investing activities	($50)	($18)	($68)

	For the thirteen weeks ended May 3, 2003 (in thousands)
	As Previously Reported	FTB 88-1 Adjustment	As Restated
Net cash provided by    operating activities	($68)	($5)	($73)
Net cash used in    investing activities	($590)	$5	($585)

There is no impact on our statements of operations related to the above. However, amortization of construction allowances and other lease concessions is now treated as a reduction of rent expense rather than as a reduction of depreciation expense.

The accompanying financial statements and these footnotes have not been updated except as required to reflect the effects of the restatements discussed above, and certain additions to disclosures. Except as identified in the prior sentence, no other items included in the previously filed financial statements and footnotes have been updated. Additionally, these financial statements and footnotes do not purport to provide an update or discussion of any other developments at the Company subsequent to the original filing.

3. Net Loss Per Share

Basic per share data has been computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted per share data has been computed on the basic shares because for the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003, the effect of stock options is anti-dilutive.

Options to purchase shares of common stock which were not included in the computation of diluted per share data were as follows:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	May 1, 2004	May 3, 2003
Options	1,931,812	1,841,572
Range of option prices per share	$1.80 - $15.13	$2.25 - $15.13

The Company uses the intrinsic value method to account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting For Stock Issued To Employees” (Opinion No. 25) and has adopted the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting For Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123). Under Opinion No. 25, compensation expense, if any, is measured as the excess of the market price of the stock over the exercise price on the measurement date. In accordance with Opinion No. 25, compensation expense is recorded ratably over the five-year vesting period of the options.

The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting For Stock-Based Compensation” to stock-based employee compensation:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
(dollars in thousands except for per share amounts)	May 1, 2004	May 3, 2003
Reported net loss	($3,363)	($4,545)
Add back: Compensation expense	-	78
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects	(75)	(69)
Pro forma net loss	($3,438)	($4,536)
Loss per share:
Basic - as reported	($0.26)	($0.35)
Basic - pro forma	($0.27)	($0.35)
Diluted - as reported	($0.26)	($0.35)
Diluted - pro forma	($0.27)	($0.35)

4. Financing Arrangements

In 1993, the Company executed a ten-year $7.0 million note bearing interest at 7.3%. Interest and principal were payable in equal monthly installments beginning November 1993. Final payment on this note was made in October 2003.

In 1994, the Company executed a fifteen-year $8.0 million loan bearing interest at 8.64%. Interest and principal are payable in equal monthly installments beginning May 1994. The loan is collateralized by a mortgage on the national distribution center owned by the Company in Troy, Ohio.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries, (collectively, the “Companies”) are parties to a Financing Agreement, dated August 15, 1997 (the “Financing Agreement”), with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc.(“CIT”). The Financing Agreement was extended and expanded during fiscal 2003. The term was extended three years to August 15, 2008. The line of credit was increased from $40 million to $50 million for the Companies, subject to availability of credit according to a borrowing base computation. The line of credit may be used on a revolving basis by any of the Companies to support trade letters of credit and standby letters of credit and to finance loans.

The Companies are required to maintain unused at all times combined asset availability of at least $5 million. Except for the maintenance of a minimum availability of $5 million and a limit on capital expenditures, the Financing Agreement does not contain any significant financial covenants.

The Financing Agreement also includes certain restrictive covenants that impose limitations (subject to certain exceptions) on the Companies with respect to, among other things, making certain investments, declaring or paying dividends, making loans, engaging in certain transactions with affiliates, or consolidating, merging or making acquisitions outside the ordinary course of business.

In the event a loan is made to one of the Companies, interest is payable monthly based on a 360-day year at the Chase Manhattan Bank prime rate plus incremental percentages ranging from 0.00% to 0.75% or the LIBOR rate plus incremental percentages ranging from 1.75% to 2.50% as determined by the average excess availability each month per the Financing Agreement on a per annum basis. The borrower can select either the prime rate or the LIBOR rate as the basis for determining the interest rate.

The line of credit is collateralized by a security interest in i) inventory and its proceeds ii) bank credit card receivables and iii) the balance on deposit from time to time in a bank account that has been pledged to the lenders.

At May 1, 2004, the borrowing capacity of the Companies under the Financing Agreement with CIT, after satisfying the $5 million minimum availability requirement, was $22.4 million, trade letters of credit for the account of the Companies were outstanding in the amount of $22.1 million, standby letters of credit were outstanding in the amount of $5.5 million and no loan from CIT was outstanding. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents of $14.3 million were unrestricted.

In January 2002, the Company executed a five-year $8.2 million sale and lease back agreement for certain fixtures in new and remodeled stores. The lease bears an interest rate of 7.0% per annum. The Company was required to pay sales tax as part of the agreement. The agreement provides for equal monthly rent payments beginning February 2002 and gives the Company the option of buying back the fixtures at the end of the term for a nominal price.

In January 2002 through January 2003, the Company executed a series of three-year capital lease agreements for call center systems at the Company’s national distribution center in Troy, Ohio, bearing interest at rates between 6.09% and 6.64% per annum aggregating approximately $1.4 million. The Company has the option of buying the systems at the end of the term for a nominal price.

5. Income Taxes

Reconciliation of the provision for income taxes from the U.S. Federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective rate is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	May 1, 2004		May 3, 2003
Tax at Federal rate	($1,160)	(35.0%)	($1,562)	(35.0%)
State income taxes, net of
Federal benefit	(56)	(1.7%)	(13)	(0.3%)
Change in State NOL	(68)	(2.0%)	(451)	(10.1%)
Other	7	0.2%	7	0.2%
Sub-total	(1,277)	(38.5%)	(2,019)	(45.2%)
Change in deferred tax
valuation allowance	1,326	40.0%	2,101	47.0%
	$49	1.5%	$82	1.8%

In November 2003, the Company agreed in principle with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) on a settlement and the closure of its examination of the Company’s tax returns for the years through 1996.

In November 2003, the Company also agreed in principle with the IRS on the settlement of a matter related to tax refund claims the Company had filed for research credits and for deductions attributable to certain bank financing transactions during 1989 to 1992. Although only a preliminary settlement has been reached with the IRS, in April 2004, the Company received payment from the IRS in the amount of $2.5 million (which includes $1.2 million representing interest). The Company has not received final clearance from the IRS. Upon receipt of final clearance, the Company will recognize the benefit of the refund claims, including the related interest thereon. It is anticipated that the $1.3 million refund will be recorded as an increase to stockholders’ equity as it relates to stock warrant deductions and the $1.2 million interest amount will be recorded in the Company’s results of operations. An additional payment estimated to be approximately $0.7 million is also expected in connection with the claim related to research credits and when received, this item would be recorded in the Company’s operating results.

The Company recorded a $7.3 million non-cash charge to establish a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (SFAS No. 109), which places significant importance on the Company’s cumulative operating results in the most recent three-year period when assessing the need for a valuation allowance. The Company’s cumulative loss in the three-year period ended February 1, 2003, which included the net loss reported in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, was sufficient to require a full valuation allowance under the provisions of SFAS No. 109.

The Company recorded additional valuation allowances of $12.6 million and $1.3 million in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 and quarter ended May 1, 2004, respectively. The Company intends to maintain a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards until sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal.

6. Stock Appreciation Rights Plan

Commencing in May 2000 and annually thereafter, each nonmanagement Director received an award under the Company’s Stock Appreciation Rights Plan that provides for a cash payment by the Company when the Director exercises the stock option granted to him contemporaneously under the Company’s Stock Option Plans. The payment will be an amount equivalent to the after tax equity in the option that is being exercised, that is, the excess of the then current market price of the shares issued over the exercise price of the corresponding option plus any personal income tax withholding on the gain arising from the exercise.

7. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Net cash flow from operating activities reflects cash payments for interest and income taxes as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	May 1, 2004	May 3, 2003
Net cash interest expense
paid, including interest
income of $14 and $10	$193	$256
Income taxes paid	$15	$39

There were no non-cash investing activities for the thirteen weeks ended May 1, 2004 and May 3, 2003.

8. Contingencies

The Company is involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that such litigation and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, annual results of operations or cash flows.

In addition, on May 1, 2003, a suit in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, styled Erik Stanford vs. United Retail Incorporated was served on the Company by a former store manager in California. On March 3, 2004, an amended complaint was served that added another plaintiff. The suit is purportedly a class action on behalf of certain current and former associates in California in the previous four years.

The plaintiffs in the Stanford case assert state wage and hour claims.

The Company intends to oppose class certification strongly and to defend the Stanford case vigorously on the merits.

The Company has recorded an accrual for its estimated losses in the Stanford case.

Although the ultimate outcome of the Stanford case cannot be predicted at this time, management does not believe that the amount related to the outcome of the case, beyond the amount already accrued, will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position. An estimate of the range of reasonably possible losses cannot be made at this stage of the case. However, given the uncertainty at this stage, it is possible that if either an adverse judgment for damages is rendered or a negotiated settlement is agreed upon, the amount payable could be material to the Company’s annual results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

The Executive Summary section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides a high level summary of the more detailed information elsewhere in this Report, an overview to put this information in context and a plan to return the Company to long-term profitability. This section is also an introduction to the discussion and analysis that follows. Accordingly, it necessarily omits details that appear elsewhere in this Report. It should not be relied upon separately from the balance of this Report.

As discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the balance sheets and the statements of cash flows have been restated to reflect a change in accounting for construction allowances received from landlords. As applicable, this Item 2 has been revised to reflect these changes and to make other incremental disclosures.

Products and Purchasing

The Company is a leading specialty retailer of women’s fashions featuring its proprietary AVENUE® brand. Its product line features AVENUE® brand large size women’s wearing apparel, AVENUE BODY® brand large size women’s undergarments and lingerie and CLOUDWALKERS® brand women’s footwear, as well as AVENUE® brand accessories and gifts.

Most of the Company’s products are made for the Company by contract manufacturing abroad.

Customer Base

The Company serves the mass market in the United States and targets fashion conscious women between 25 and 55 years of age who wear large size apparel. Management believes that the number of women in this age range who wear large size apparel has increased in recent years.

Merchandising and Marketing

Design is an important aspect of the Company’s products. Many AVENUE® and AVENUE BODY® products are custom designed. The Company emphasizes a contemporary brand image and consistency of merchandise quality and fit.

The Company uses direct mail, credit card statement inserts, in-store signage and e-mail messages in its marketing activities.

Channel of Distribution

The Company’s channel of distribution is retail stores using its AVENUE® trade name. It leased 533 stores in 37 states, principally in strip shopping centers, at June 14, 2004, the filing date of the original Form 10-Q. The Company also has operated a website at www.avenue.com that sells a selection of the merchandise that is also on sale in the stores.

Until March 2003, the Company also mailed catalogs that featured a merchandise selection that included both items in the stores and similar products.

Increased Competition

The women’s retail apparel and shoe industries are highly competitive. Operating results of businesses in these industries, especially businesses that emphasize fashionable merchandise, can vary materially from year to year. The Company’s competition includes other specialty retailers, mass merchants, department stores, discount stores, mail order companies, television shopping channels and Internet websites. Management believes that total sales of large size women’s apparel from these sources of supply increased in recent years. Among specialty retailers for large size women like the Company, the competition includes large store chains that have announced long-term store growth plans to aggressively expand into additional strip shopping center locations.

Deflationary Price Trend in Apparel Industry

The Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics city average for women’s and girls’ apparel (the “CPI”) declined 5.0% in fiscal 2001, 1.9% in fiscal 2002 and 1.8% in fiscal 2003. There is no assurance that this deflationary trend will not continue.

Company Sales Fluctuations

Sales figures and merchandise margins are central to the Company’s profitability. The Company conducts a weekly interdisciplinary review of sales and merchandise margins and prepares budgets for two six-month seasons each year, the Spring season and the Fall season. Management uses comparable store sales (for stores open at least 12 months at the time) as a management tool.

Seasonal sales and CPI data follow:

	2001		2002		2003
	Spring	Fall	Spring	Fall	Spring	Fall
Total store sales ($ millions)*	$208.8	$206.7	$225.1	$198.7	$203.5	$187.7
Sales per average store ($000's)	$393	$373	$406	$356	$371	$344
Average number of stores	532	554	555	558	548	545
Comparable store sales**	-3.4%	-2.1%	+3.2%	-5.3%	-9.3%	-4.2%
Six-month CPI***	-3.4%	-1.6%	-1.9%	0.0%	-1.4%	-0.4%

______
* Excluding sales on the internet and, until March 2003, through a catalog.
**A store that is relocated within the same shopping center or mall is considered comparable. However, if the store is relocated elsewhere, it is considered a new store and not comparable. A store that is expanded or contracted is still comparable, i.e., the sales from the remodeled store are considered comparable. Stores that are closed are not considered comparable. The comparable store sales calculation is not adjusted for changes in the store sales return reserve.
**U.S. Dept. of Labor, U.S. City Average, Women’s and Girls’ Apparel

Seasonal Operating Results

The declines in sales per average store from fiscal 2001 to fiscal 2003 adversely affected operating results.

The Company had net income of $0.4 million in fiscal 2001 and incurred net losses of $23.1 million in fiscal 2002 and $19.1 million in fiscal 2003. The Company had operating income of $0.6 million in fiscal 2001 and incurred operating losses of $22.8 million in fiscal 2002 and $18.8 million in fiscal 2003. (Excluding a one-time goodwill write-off, the operating loss in fiscal 2002 was $17.2 million.)

Product Repositioning Plan

In the women’s retail specialty apparel industry, sales, especially in businesses that emphasize fashionable merchandise, can vary significantly over time. Sales are volatile because of shifts in consumer spending patterns, consumer preferences and overall economic conditions; the impact of increased competition; variations in weather patterns; fluctuations in consumer acceptance of products; changes in the ability to develop new merchandise; differences in promotional strategies; and movements in consumer confidence levels. These variables caused the Company’s sales per average store to fluctuate in the past. Thus, recent sales performance is not necessarily indicative of future sales performance. As a result, management believes that long-term sales projections within a defined narrow range are not reliable.

After fiscal 2001, when net income declined to $0.4 million, the Company incurred net losses. The Company has sought to return to long-term profitability through a goal of increased sales per average store with higher merchandise margins. This unrealized financial goal was translated into an integrated operational plan early in fiscal 2003 that was designed to reposition the Company’s product offering. This plan has four principal components: (i) to improve the design of the Company’s merchandise and thereby differentiate it from competitors’ merchandise, (ii) to market more items together as coordinated outfits rather than separately as individual garments, (iii) to put more emphasis on fashionable merchandise and less on basic items, and (iv) to raise the level of merchandise presentation in the store to make shopping easier and to encourage outfit buying. This plan relies primarily on the Company’s intellectual capital. Only small amounts of financial capital are required to execute the plan.

This section constitutes forward-looking information under the Reform Act, which is subject to the variables, uncertainties and other risk factors referred to under the caption “Future Results.”

Fluctuation in Store Count

Store counts averaged 543, 557 and 546, respectively, for fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003. In 2003, the Company opened five stores and closed 24 stores. In 2004, the Company is planning to open two stores and close approximately 15-25 stores as part of its normal lease maintenance program. Thus, the average number of stores is expected to decline further in fiscal 2004.

The annual capital expenditure budgets after fiscal 2004 will provide for new store construction and other infrastructure development priorities. Prioritization will be based, among other things, on overall profitability and the availability of suitable locations at rents and on terms that fit the Company’s financial model for new store construction.

Liquidity

United Retail Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Companies”) are parties to a Financing Agreement, dated August 15, 1997, as amended (the “Financing Agreement”), with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. (“CIT”). The Financing Agreement provides credit on a revolving basis.

In early fiscal 2003, the Company adopted an integrated operational plan designed to reposition the Company’s product offering. This plan has four principal components: (i) to improve the design of the Company’s merchandise and thereby differentiate it from competitors’ merchandise, (ii) to market more items together as coordinated outfits rather than separately as individual garments, (iii) to put more emphasis on fashionable merchandise and less on basic items; and (iv) to raise the level of merchandise presentation in the store to make shopping easier and to encourage outfit buying.

The Company plans to use the Financing Agreement for its immediate and future working capital needs. Management believes that the borrowing capacity under the Financing Agreement, together with cash on hand and current and anticipated cash flow from operations, will be adequate to meet the Company’s working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least 12 months after June 14, 2004, the filing date of the original Form 10-Q.

This section constitutes forward-looking information under the Reform Act and is subject to the variables, uncertainties and other risk factors referred to under the caption “Future Results.”

DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This section provides details about the material line items in the Company’s statement of operations.

First Quarter of Fiscal 2004 Versus First Quarter of Fiscal 2003

Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 decreased 4.0% from the first quarter of fiscal 2003, to $97.5 million from $101.5 million.

The components of this decrease in net sales are as follows:

Amount	Attributable to
($2.1) million	2.2% decrease in comparable store sales
1.0 million	new stores
(2.9) million	closed stores
-	other
($4.0) million	Total

Units sold per average store decreased 1% and average price per unit sold was flat, in comparison to the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

There was less customer acceptance of denim, which reduced sales $2.2 million in comparison to sales of denim in the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

Average number of stores decreased from 550 to 534. See, "Stores."

Gross profit decreased to $20.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 from $22.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 decreasing as a percentage of net sales to 21.4% from 21.8%. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased principally because of lower merchandise margins (100 basis points as a percentage of net sales), partially offset by lower marketing expenses (30 basis points). Merchandise margins were lower because of weaker customer demand. Marketing expenses declined as a result of fewer mailings to customers. Gross profit levels in the future will be subject to the uncertainties and other risk factors referred to under the caption “Future Results.”

General, administrative and store operating expenses decreased to $24.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 from $26.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, decreasing as a percentage of net sales to 24.6% from 26.0%. The percentage decrease was principally because of lower insurance expense in the current quarter (100 basis points).

The Company incurred operating losses of $3.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and $4.2 million in the first quarter of the previous year.

The Company’s effective tax rate was 1.5% for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and 1.8% for the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The primary factor contributing to this rate in each period was that the Company provides a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets. The tax valuation allowance was increased by $1.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and by $2.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

The provision for income taxes was $49,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and $82,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

The Company incurred net losses of $3.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and $4.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

See, “Critical Accounting Policies” for a discussion of estimates made by management in preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

May Sales Results

Net sales for May 2004 decreased 2.5% from May 2003, to $36.0 million from $36.9 million. Comparable store sales for the month declined 1.2%.

Increased Competition

The women’s retail apparel and shoe industries are highly competitive. Operating results of businesses in these industries, especially businesses that emphasize fashionable merchandise, can vary materially from year to year. The Company’s competition includes other specialty retailers, mass merchants, department stores, discount stores, mail order companies, television shopping channels and Internet websites. Management believes that total sales of large size women’s apparel from these sources of supply increased in recent years. Among specialty retailers for large size women like the Company, the competition includes large store chains that have announced long-term store growth plans to aggressively expand into additional strip shopping center locations.

Product Repositioning Plan

In the women’s retail specialty apparel industry, sales, especially in businesses that emphasize fashionable merchandise, can vary significantly over time. Sales are volatile because of shifts in consumer spending patterns, consumer preferences and overall economic conditions; the impact of increased competition; variations in weather patterns; fluctuations in consumer acceptance of products; changes in the ability to develop new merchandise; differences in promotional strategies; and movements in consumer confidence levels. These variables caused the Company’s sales per average store to fluctuate in the past. Thus, recent sales performance is not necessarily indicative of future sales performance. As a result, management believes that long-term sales projections that fall within a defined narrow range are not reliable.

After fiscal 2001, when net income declined to $0.4 million, the Company incurred net losses. The Company has sought to return to long-term profitability through a goal of increased sales per average store with higher merchandise margins. This unrealized financial goal was translated into an integrated operational plan early in fiscal 2003 that was designed to reposition the Company’s product offering. This plan has four principal components: (i) to improve the design of the Company’s merchandise and thereby differentiate it from competitors’ merchandise, (ii) to market more items together as coordinated outfits rather than separately as individual garments, (iii) to put more emphasis on fashionable merchandise and less on basic items, and (iv) to raise the level of merchandise presentation in the store to make shopping easier and encourage outfit buying. This plan relies primarily on the Company’s intellectual capital. Only small amounts of financial capital are required to execute the plan. There is no assurance, however, that the Company’s product repositioning plan will succeed.

This section constitutes forward-looking information under the Reform Act, which is subject to the uncertainties and other risk factors referred to under the caption “Future Results.”

Liquidity and Capital Resources

This section provides details about the Company’s sources of liquidity.

Cash Flow

Net cash provided from operating activities was $1.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 compared with net cash used in operating activities of $0.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. This improvement resulted principally from (i) a larger increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses ($9.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 versus $4.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003) and (ii) a larger improvement in the balance of other assets and liabilities ($2.6 million versus $0.2 million), primarily from receipt in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 of a federal income tax refund and related interest, partially offset by a larger increase in inventory from year end to quarter end ($11.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 versus $6.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003).

Balance Sheet Sources of Liquidity

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents were $14.3 million at May 1, 2004 compared with $12.1 million at May 3, 2003 and $14.4 million at January 31, 2004.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, a planned decrease in inventories was implemented. Inventories were stated at $60.8 million at May 1, 2004 compared with $67.8 million at May 3, 2003, principally as a result of fewer units, and compared with $49.1 million at January 31, 2004. (See, “Critical Accounting Policies – Inventory” for a discussion of estimates made by management in stating inventories in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.)

Property and equipment decreased to $88.0 million at May 1, 2004 from $101.2 million at May 3, 2003, principally from depreciation, compared with $91.7 million at January 31, 2004.

Other Liquidity Sources

Purchases of merchandise directly imported by the Company are made in U.S. dollars. Direct imports are generally financed by trade letters of credit. They constituted approximately 53% of total purchases in fiscal 2003.

The Financing Agreement was extended and expanded during fiscal 2003. The term was extended three years to August 15, 2008. The line of credit was increased from $40 million to $50 million for the Companies, subject to availability of credit as described in the following paragraphs. The line of credit may be used on a revolving basis by any of the Companies to support trade letters of credit and standby letters of credit and to finance loans. At May 1, 2004, trade letters of credit for the account of the Companies and supported by CIT were outstanding in the amount of $22.1 million and standby letters of credit were outstanding in the amount of $5.5 million. Standby letters of credit were used principally in connection with insurance policies issued to the Company.

Subject to the following paragraph, the availability of credit (within the aggregate $50 million line of credit) to any of the Companies at any time is the excess of its borrowing base over the aggregate outstanding amount of its letters of credit and its revolving loans, if any. The borrowing base, as to any of the Companies, is (i) the sum of (x) a percentage of the book value of its eligible inventory (both on hand and unfilled purchase orders financed with letters of credit), ranging from 65% to 75% depending on the time of year, (y) the balance from time to time in an account in its name that has been pledged to the lenders (a “Pledged Account”) and (z) 85% of certain receivables from credit card companies less (ii) reserves for rent for stores located in the states of Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington and liens other than permitted liens and, at CIT’s option, a reserve for sales taxes collected but not yet paid.

The provisions of the preceding paragraph to the contrary notwithstanding, the Companies are required to maintain unused at all times combined availability of at least $5 million. Except for the maintenance of a minimum availability of $5 million and a limit on capital expenditures, the Financing Agreement does not contain any financial covenants.

The combined borrowing capacity of the Companies is cyclical due to the seasonality of the retail industry. At May 1, 2004, the combined borrowing capacity of the Companies, after satisfying the $5 million minimum availability requirement, was $22.4 million; the Pledged Account had a zero balance; the Companies’ cash on hand was unrestricted; and no loan was outstanding.

The line of credit is collateralized by a security interest in (i) inventory and its proceeds, (ii) receivables from credit card companies and (iii) the balance from time to time in the Pledged Account.

The Financing Agreement includes certain restrictive covenants that impose limitations (subject to certain exceptions) on the Companies with respect to making certain investments, declaring or paying dividends, making loans, engaging in certain transactions with affiliates, or consolidating, merging or making acquisitions outside the ordinary course of business.

The Company has drawn on the revolving loan facility under the Financing Agreement from time to time to meet its peak working capital requirements. Interest is payable monthly based on a 360-day year either at the prime rate plus an incremental percentage up to 0.75% per annum or at the LIBOR rate plus an incremental percentage ranging from 1.75% to 2.50% per annum. The borrower can select either the prime rate or the LIBOR rate as the basis for determining the interest rate. In either case, the incremental percentage is determined by the average excess availability.

The Company’s obligation to pay customs duties on merchandise imports was collateralized by an unsecured surety bond for $1.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The surety bond has been $2.0 million since May 2004. The tightening market for surety bonds has made it necessary for the Company to support the surety bond with a standby letter of credit under the Financing Agreement in the amount of $0.5 million.

Short-term trade credit represents a significant source of financing for merchandise purchases other than merchandise directly imported by the Company. Trade credit arises from the willingness of the Company’s vendors of these products to grant extended payment terms for inventory purchases and is generally financed either by the vendor or a third-party factor. The availability of trade credit depends on the Company’s having other sources of liquidity, as well. In particular, credit authorizations by trade creditors focus on the amount of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and its borrowing capacity under the Financing Agreement.

In November 2003, the Company also agreed in principle with the IRS on the settlement of a matter related to tax refund claims the Company had filed for research credits and for deductions attributable to certain bank financing transactions during 1989 to 1992. Although only a preliminary settlement has been reached with the IRS, in April 2004, the Company received payment from the IRS in the amount of $2.5 million (which includes $1.2 million representing interest.) The Company has not received final clearance from the IRS. Upon receipt of final clearance, the Company will recognize the benefit of the refund claims, including the related interest thereon. It is anticipated that the $1.3 million refund will be recorded as an increase to stockholders’ equity as it relates to stock warrant deductions and the $1.2 million interest amount will be recorded in the Company’s results of operations. An additional payment estimated to be approximately $0.7 million is also expected in connection with the claim related to research credits and, when received, this item would be recorded in the Company’s operating results.

Capital Expenditures

This section and the one that follows provide details about certain uses of cash by the Company.

Capital expenditures in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 were $0.1 million compared with $0.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

Capital expenditures are projected to be approximately $2.5 million for fiscal 2004, including implementation of the Company’s product repositioning plan. This paragraph constitutes forward-looking information under the Reform Act and is subject to the variables, uncertainties and other risk factors referred to under the caption “Future Results.”

Pending Litigation

The Company is involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that such litigation and claims, net of reserves, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, annual results of operations or cash flows.

In addition, on May 1, 2003, a suit in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, styled Erik Stanford vs. United Retail Incorporated was served on the Company by a former store manager in California. On March 3, 2004, an amended complaint was served that added another plaintiff. The suit is purportedly a class action on behalf of certain current and former associates in California in the previous four years.

The plaintiffs in the Stanford case assert state wage and hour claims.

The Company intends to oppose class certification strongly. To the extent that the plaintiffs successfully obtain class certification, the Company intends to defend the Stanford case vigorously on the merits.

The Company has recorded an accrual for its estimated losses in the Stanford case.

Although the ultimate overall outcome of the Stanford case can not be predicted at this time, management does not believe that the amount related to the outcome of the case, beyond the amount already accrued, will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position. An estimate of the range of reasonably possible losses can not be made at this stage of the case. Given the uncertainty at this stage, it is possible that if either an adverse judgment for damages is rendered or a negotiated settlement is agreed upon, the amount payable could be material to the Company’s cash flows and results of operations for the fiscal year in which the matter is resolved.

Meeting Cash Requirements

The Company’s cash requirements include (i) anticipated working capital needs, including seasonal inventory financing, (ii) financing activities, including payments due on its principal contractual obligations and (iii) investing activities, including costs for building the stores that it plans to open, renovating certain other stores and replacing fixtures where appropriate. Also, the Stanford wage and hour class action lawsuit might be settled with Court approval (see, “Pending Litigation”).

During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company funded repayments of long term debt and payments on capital lease obligations and net cash used in investing activities from net cash provided from operating activities. The Company’s historical sources of liquidity have been the availability of credit under the Financing Agreement on a revolving basis and short-term trade credit, as well as its cash on hand and net cash provided by operating activities.

The Company plans to use the Financing Agreement for its immediate and future working capital needs. Management believes that the borrowing capacity under the Financing Agreement, together with cash on hand and current and anticipated cash flow from operations, will be adequate to meet the Company’s working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least 12 months after June 14, 2004, the filing date of the original Form 10-Q.

In the women’s retail specialty apparel industry, operating results of businesses, especially businesses that emphasize fashionable merchandise, can vary significantly over time because of shifts in consumer spending patterns, consumer preferences and overall economic conditions; the impact of increased competition and pricing; variations in weather patterns; fluctuations in consumer acceptance of products; and changes in the ability to develop new merchandise.

This section constitutes forward-looking information under the Reform Act and is subject to the variables, uncertainties and other risk factors referred to under the caption “Future Results.”

Critical Accounting Policies

Introduction

This section discusses the Company’s critical accounting policies.

Financial statements prepared by companies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles are affected by the policies followed by management in preparing them. Some accounting policies require difficult, subjective or complex judgments by corporate management, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Among the most important accounting policies of the Company that involve such management judgments are (i) the use of the retail method of accounting for inventory, (ii) the use of estimates of incurred but not reported claims for uninsured damages for personal injuries and workers’ compensation benefits and for benefits under the Company’s self-insured medical, dental and prescription plans for its associates, as well as future development costs of reported claims (collectively, “IBNR Claims”) and (iii) determining whether to continue the valuation allowance for the Company’s net deferred tax assets, including NOL’s.

Inventory

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The Company utilizes the retail method, under which a cost-to-price relationship is developed on the basis of original cost as compared to initial retail selling price. The valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting margins are calculated by applying this cost-to-price relationship to the retail value of inventories. Consequently, the use of the retail inventory method results in valuing inventories at lower of cost or market.

Inherent in the retail inventory method are management estimates on current and future selling value of the inventory. These estimates, which are described in the following paragraphs, can significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost, as well as resulting margins. In the women’s retail specialty apparel industry, sales, especially in businesses that emphasize fashionable merchandise, can vary significantly over time. Sales are volatile because of shifts in consumer spending patterns, consumer preferences and overall economic conditions; the impact of competition and pricing; variations in weather patterns; fluctuations in consumer acceptance of the Company’s products; changes in the ability to develop new merchandise; differences in promotional strategies; and movements in consumer confidence levels. The necessity for management estimates based on these variables, coupled with the fact that the retail inventory method is an averaging process, can produce inventory valuations at any point in time that are inexact.

Permanent markdowns, when taken, reduce both the price and cost components of inventory on hand, which maintains the established cost-to-price relationship. Deferred markdowns can result in an overstatement of inventories under the lower of cost or market principle. Accordingly, at the end of each fiscal year, management conducts a thorough review of inventory on hand. Based on management’s business judgment, the Company may reduce further the carrying value of inventories by recording a markdown reserve. Markdown reserves are established for inventory categories with sales performance below expectations and/or unsold quantities in excess of expectations.

At the end of the first fiscal quarter of each year, management values prior season merchandise to achieve historical margin rates. A markdown reserve is established to reduce the carrying value of the prior season merchandise. Also, a markdown reserve is established by management to reduce the carrying value of obsolete categories of merchandise to their estimated net realizable value.

The markdown reserves at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2004, fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively, ranged from a high of $1.0 million to a low of $0.2 million. Giving effect to these reserves, inventories were stated at approximately $60.8 million at May 1, 2004, $67.8 million at May 3, 2003 and $72.3 million at May 4, 2002.

Markdown reserves are likely to continue to fluctuate, principally because the market environment is dynamic for the reasons set forth above.

Recording a reserve reduces the inventory on the Company’s balance sheet and is charged to the Company’s cost of sales. If inventories, net of reserves, were overestimated at the end of a period, assets and income for that period would be overstated and margins for the beginning of the next period would be lower. (The opposite would be true if inventories were underestimated.)

Management believes that the inventories shown on all the balance sheets included in the financial statements contained in this Report were properly stated in all material respects. Further, margins in the quarter that followed May 3, 2003 were within the historical range of margins for the second fiscal quarter, indicating that the inventory valuation at May 3, 2003 was estimated properly.

Incurred But Not Reported Claims For Personal Injuries and Medical Benefits

The Company records a liability for IBNR Claims which is based on (i) the number and size of outstanding claims, (ii) a comparison between the dates paid claims were incurred and the dates they were paid, (iii) an analysis of the amounts previously paid, (iv) projections of inflation in medical costs and (v) advice from time to time from its insurance broker. The Company has insurance policies with coverage for auto, general liability and workers’ compensation claims but it remains liable for a self-insured retention of $0.1 million for each auto claim and $0.3 million for each general liability and workers’ compensation claim. The Company is self-insured for its medical, dental and prescription plans for associates. The Company currently has stop loss insurance coverage for medical claims over $0.2 million each with an aggregate limit of $6.9 million.

To estimate its casualty (auto, general liability and workers’ compensation) IBNR, the Company uses policy year (July 1) maturation factors based on the Company’s history of claim development (currently eight fully developed years; the high and low year factors are excluded to arrive at an average). Another possible methodology would be to use industry maturation factors.

The Company estimates its health claims IBNR by (i) dividing the “run-off” amounts (claims paid after a policy expired without being renewed) by claims paid during the last policy year (December 31) and (ii) applying the resulting percentage to the trailing 12 months of paid claims at the time of the calculation. An alternative methodology would be to use industry factors.

The Company believes that industry factors are less reliable because they are broad based.

If the outcome of claims made with respect to a fiscal period were to exceed the recorded IBNR liability for that period, the liabilities on the balance sheet would have been understated and income would have been overstated for the period in question. (The opposite would be true if the subsequent outcome was less than the recorded IBNR liability.) The estimates underlying the liability for IBNR Claims are matters of judgment on which insurance experts may differ.

As the use of different estimates would change the IBNR liability recorded materially, a consistent approach to estimating liability for IBNR Claims is one of the Company’s important accounting objectives.

Management believes that the liabilities for IBNR Claims reflected in all the balance sheets included in the financial statements contained in this Report were fairly stated in all material respects, subject to the uncertainties of litigation and the risk of different than anticipated inflation in medical costs.

Tax Valuation Allowance

In fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a $7.3 million charge to establish a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets. The tax valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”), which places significant importance on the Company’s cumulative operating results in the most recent three-year period when assessing the need for a tax valuation allowance. The tax valuation allowance was increased by $12.6 million in fiscal 2003 and by $1.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

The Company intends to maintain a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets until management determines that sufficient positive evidence regarding operating results exists to support reversal of the allowance remaining at that time. A reversal of the tax valuation allowance would improve the Company’s net income/loss. Accordingly, whether to continue a tax valuation allowance is one of the Company’s important accounting matters.

Private Label Credit Cards Issued By The Bank

The Company and World Financial Network National Bank (the “Bank”) are parties to a Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement, dated January 27, 1998 (as amended, the “Credit Card Program Agreement”).

Under the Credit Card Program Agreement, the Bank issues credit cards to eligible Company customers who apply to the Bank. Net credit sales volume with the Bank increased to $27.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 from $25.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. Customers must meet standards for creditworthiness set by the Bank with the approval of the Company, provided, however, that the Bank shall take any actions required to prevent unsafe and unsound banking practices. The credit cards issued by the Bank are co-branded with both the Company’s AVENUE service mark and the Bank’s name. The credit cards are used only for merchandise and services offered by the Company. Credit card holders remit payments to the Bank, generally by mailing personal checks. The Bank also handles all statement processing, payment processing, cardholder customer service and collections from delinquent cardholders.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company does not include the receivable asset created under the Credit Card Program Agreement in the Company’s accounts receivable on its balance sheets because the Company has no interest in the customer accounts or receivables. In this connection, it should be noted that the Credit Card Program Agreement states that (i) the Bank is the sole and exclusive owner of all customer accounts, (ii) the Company has no interest in the customer accounts and (iii) the Bank is the creditor in respect of receivables (defined in the Credit Card Program Agreement as amounts owed with respect to retail purchases, finance charges, deferred finance charges, other fees and charges for sales tax). Also, depending on the circumstances, the Company might not purchase the accounts from the Bank upon the expiration of the contractual term.

The Credit Card Program Agreement is currently scheduled to expire on February 28, 2007. The Company shall then have the right to purchase the customer accounts from the Bank for a price equal to the receivables. Also, the Bank shall then have the right to sell the customer accounts to the Company at that price if the Company commences a private label credit card program either on its own or through another issuer of credit cards. When the Credit Card Program Agreement is about to expire without being renewed, the Company is likely to submit requests for proposals to other banks that issue private label credit cards to retailers’ customers and to use the banks’ proposals to evaluate a continuation of the private label credit card program. There is no assurance, however, that other banks would make proposals to continue the program on terms satisfactory to the Company or that the Company could finance a program on its own without involving a bank.

Receivables as defined in the Credit Card Program Agreement at the close of the last billing cycle in the quarter were $70.7 million at May 1, 2004 and $71.5 million at May 3, 2003.

The credit card program premium (or, potentially, discount) reflected in general, administrative and store operating expenses is an amount equal to royalties paid to the Company by the Bank minus costs charged by the Bank. Costs are based on the volume of credit card program processing activities performed by the Bank.

General, administrative and store operating expenses were offset in part by premiums received from the Bank of $1.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. The increase in premiums from the Bank was primarily due to a decrease in bad debt write-offs by the Bank.

Royalties are based on program revenues minus receivables written off by the Bank and the cost of funds for the program. For up to the first $85 million of receivables, cost of funds means the one-year Constant Maturities Treasury (“CMT”) rate plus 25 basis points to be reset every three months (the published CMT rate was 1.55% per annum at May 1, 2004). However, the CMT rate shall not be more than 6.75% per annum and not be less than 5.00% per annum for the purpose of this calculation. (The Bank’s receivables for the program were less than $85 million at May 1, 2004, but, if they grew larger than that amount, the cost of funds for the excess would be based primarily on the cost of borrowing of a trust for the purpose of securitizing receivables.)

Stores

The Company’s channel of distribution is retail stores using its AVENUE® trade name. The Company leased 533 stores at May 1, 2004.

Store counts averaged 543, 557 and 546, respectively, for fiscal 2001, 2002 and 2003. In 2003, the Company opened five stores and closed 24 stores. In 2004, the Company is planning to open two stores and close approximately 15-25 stores as part of its normal lease maintenance program. Thus, the average number of stores is expected to decline further in fiscal 2004. This paragraph includes forward-looking information under the Reform Act, which is subject to the variables, uncertainties and other risk factors referred to under the caption “Future Results.”

The annual capital expenditure budgets after fiscal 2004 will provide for new store construction and other infrastructure development priorities. Prioritization will be based, among other things, on overall profitability and the availability of suitable locations at rents and on terms that fit the Company’s financial model for new store construction.

Retail selling space was approximately 2.3 million square feet at May 1, 2004 and 2.4 million square feet at May 3, 2003.

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment relate principally to assets in stores and were $3.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and $3.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

E-Commerce

The Company has an Internet site (www.avenue.com) that sells a selection of the merchandise that is also for sale in the Company’s stores. The Company ships its avenue.com orders from its national distribution center in Troy, Ohio.

Sales on the website have not been material to the Company’s operations.

Suspension of Catalog Operations

The Company mailed catalogs until March 2003, when the Company suspended catalog mailings indefinitely.

Stock Repurchases

The Company did not repurchase shares of its own stock in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company has no plans to repurchase shares of its own stock at present except with trust funds under the Company’s Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan to satisfy obligations that are expected to arise under that plan to invest a portion of participants’ accounts in Company stock.

Corporate Acquisition Reviews

As a matter of routine, the Company from time to time conducts “due diligence” reviews of businesses that are either for sale as a going concern or are in liquidation. The Company would consider making a bid on a suitable corporate acquisition at an opportune price if adequate financing at acceptable rates were available.

Future Results

The Company cautions that any forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in the Reform Act) contained in this Report or otherwise made by management of the Company involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various important factors, many of which may be beyond the Company’s control. Accordingly, the Company’s future performance and financial results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in any such forward-looking statements.

The following factors, among others, could affect the Company’s actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements included in this Report or otherwise made by management: threats of terrorism; war risk; shifts in consumer spending patterns, consumer preferences and overall economic conditions; the impact of competition and pricing; variations in weather patterns; fluctuations in consumer acceptance of the Company’s products; changes in the ability to develop new merchandise; store lease expirations; risks associated with the financial performance of the World Financial Network National Bank private label credit card program; increases in interest rates; the ability to retain, hire and train key personnel; risks associated with the ability of the Company’s manufacturers to deliver products in a timely manner; political instability and other risks associated with foreign sources of production and increases in fuel costs. Also, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the transition from the international quota system for apparel may disrupt imports into the United States. Further, the Stanford wage and hour class action lawsuit might be settled or go to trial (see, “Pending Litigation”). As a result of these variables, risks and uncertainties, the projections made in this Report may not be reliable.

The Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In December 2004, the Company re-evaluated the manner in which it accounts for construction allowances and other concessions from landlords of retail stores leased by the Company (“Construction Allowances”) on its balance sheets and statements of cash flows. The Company’s accounting for Construction Allowances on its statements of operations has complied with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 (“SFAS 13”) and FASB Technical Bulletin No. 88-1 (“FTB 88-1”) because Construction Allowances have been amortized over the minimum lease term on a straight-line basis, as part of buying and occupancy costs. However, in its detailed accounts, the Company historically followed the practice of recording this amortization as a reduction of depreciation expense, rather than rent expense. Additionally, on the Company’s balance sheets, the unamortized portion of Construction Allowances was netted against fixed assets and not presented as a deferred credit. Further, the Company’s statements of cash flows reflected Construction Allowances received as a reduction of capital expenditures (within “investing” cash flows), rather than as an operating lease activity (within “operating” cash flows).

The Company, in consultation with and with the concurrence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is changing the manner in which it accounts for Construction Allowances to provide for, pursuant to SFAS 13 and FTB 88-1, the establishment of a deferred credit on the balance sheets for the unamortized portion of Construction Allowances, rather than netting these amounts against fixed assets. Further, the Company will present Construction Allowances received within “operating” activities on the statements of cash flows. These changes to the accounting presentation of Construction Allowances are reflected in the balance sheets and statements of cash flows included in this Amendment.

In addition, this Amendment includes conforming changes to the financial statement footnotes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Based on the definition of the term “material weakness” in the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction With an Audit of Financial Statements, the need to file amendments to restate financial statements in prior filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission indicates the existence of a “material weakness” in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting. Management notified the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm of this matter.

The Company also performed its evaluation, in which the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the “CEO” and “CFO”) participated, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), “Disclosure Controls”) with respect to information required to be disclosed by the Company (“Disclosures”) in filings with the Commission. Based on the issue that they identified in the Company’s accounting for Construction Allowances and certain other matters, the CEO and CFO each concluded that the Disclosure Controls were not effective as of May 1, 2004 in providing reasonable assurance that Disclosures were (i) recorded, accumulated, processed, summarized and communicated to him on a timely basis and (ii) reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company is currently studying ways (i) to strengthen its evaluation and monitoring of ongoing compliance with leasing matters and other generally accepted accounting principles and (ii) to ensure that it has appropriate staffing in its financial reporting function with qualifications for evaluating ongoing compliance with relevant accounting and financial reporting requirements.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)     The following exhibit is filed herewith:

Number	Description
31	Certifications pursuant to Section 302

Certifications pursuant to Section 906 are furnished as Exhibit 32 hereto

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference.

Number in Filing	Description
10*	Bonus Agreement, dated May 28, 2004, between the Corporation and Joann Fielder

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004 are incorporated herein by reference.

Number in Filing	Description
3	Restated By-laws of the Corporation
10.1*	Form of Tandem Bonus Plan Agreement
10.2	Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Corporation and each of its Directors
14	Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers pursuant to Section 406

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10	Amendment, dated December 23, 2003, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc., as Agent and Lender ("CIT")

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated September 2, 2003, to Employment Agreement, dated November 20, 1998, between the Corporation and Raphael Benaroya ("Benaroya Employment Agreement")
10.2*	Amendment, dated September 2, 2003, to Employment Agreement, dated November 20, 1998, between the Corporation and George R. Remeta ("Remeta Employment Agreement")
10.3*	Amendment, dated September 2, 2003, to Employment Agreement, dated November 20, 1998, between the Corporation and Kenneth P. Carroll ("Carroll Employment Agreement")
21	Subsidiaries of the Corporation

The following exhibit to the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 3, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10*	Amendments to Restated Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan ("SRSP")

The 2003 Stock Option Plan set forth as the appendix to the Corporation’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its 2003 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.*

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended February 1, 2003 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated January 31, 2003, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and CIT
10.2*	Amendment to SRSP

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 2002 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated December 6, 2002, to Benaroya Employment Agreement
10.2*	Amendment, dated December 6, 2002, to Remeta Employment Agreement
10.3*	Amendment, dated December 6, 2002, to Carroll Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 3, 2002 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated August 2, 2002, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and CIT
10.2*	Amendment to SRSP
10.3	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2002, between Raphael Benaroya and the Corporation

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 4, 2002 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated May 30, 2002, to Benaroya Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2002 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated April 5, 2002, to Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement, dated January 27, 1998, between the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated and World Financial Network National Bank ("Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement")
10.2	Amendment, dated December 29, 1999, to Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement
10.3	Amendment, dated August 19, 1999, to Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement
10.4*	Letter, dated March 1, 2002, from the Corporation to Raphael Benaroya with respect to the cost of living adjustment under the Benaroya Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2001 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated November 29, 2001, to Benaroya Employment Agreement
10.2*	Amendment, dated November 29, 2001, to Remeta Employment Agreement
10.3*	Amendment, dated November 29, 2001, to Carroll Employment Agreement
10.4*	Summary Plan Description for United Retail Group, Inc. Incentive Compensation Program for Executives
10.5	Amendment, dated October 1, 2001, to Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement (Confidential portions filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission)
10.6*	Promissory note, dated November 30, 2001, from Raphael Benaroya to the Corporation (paid as of July 1, 2002)

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2001 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Restated Stock Appreciation Rights Plan

The 2001 Stock Option Plan set forth as an appendix to the Corporation’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its 2001 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.*

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-44868) is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10	Amendment, dated August 21, 2000, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and CIT

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2000 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated August 18, 2000, to Benaroya Employment Agreement
10.2*	Amendment, dated August 18, 2000, to Carroll Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2000 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.2	Amendment, dated December 28, 1999, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated and CIT ("Financing Agreement")
10.3	Amendment, dated January 31, 2000, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and CIT

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 1999 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated October 6, 1999, to Financing Agreement

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 23, 1999, is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
3	Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

The stockholders’ rights plan filed as the exhibit to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated September 15, 1999, is incorporated herein by reference.

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 1999 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated March 29, 1999, to Financing Agreement

The 1999 Stock Option Plan set forth as the Appendix to the Corporation’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its 1999 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.*

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 1998 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Benaroya Employment Agreement
10.2*	Remeta Employment Agreement
10.3*	Carroll Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 1998 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	1998 Stock Option Agreement, dated May 21, 1998, between the Corporation and Raphael Benaroya
10.2*	1998 Stock Option Agreement, dated May 21, 1998, between the Corporation and George R. Remeta

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1998 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Restated Stockholders' Agreement, dated December 23, 1992, between the Corporation and certain of its stockholders and Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3 thereto
10.2	Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement
10.4*	Restated 1990 Stock Option Plan as of March 6, 1998
10.5*	Restated 1990 Stock Option Plan as of May 28, 1996
10.6*	Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan as of March 6, 1998

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 1997 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated September 15, 1997, to Financing Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 1997 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Financing Agreement
10.2*	Amendment to SRSP

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 1996 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	SRSP

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-44499), as amended, are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
4.1	Specimen Certificate for Common Stock of the Corporation
10.2.1	Software License Agreement, dated as of April 30, 1989, between The Limited Stores, Inc. and Sizes Unlimited, Inc. (now known as United Retail Incorporated) ("Software License")
10.2.2	Amendment, dated December 10, 1991, to Software License

*A compensatory plan for the benefit of the Corporation’s management or a management contract.

(b) During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2004, to furnish summary financial information for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

(Registrant)     UNITED RETAIL GROUP, INC.

Date: February 16, 2005 By: /s/GEORGE R. REMETA
George R. Remeta
Vice Chairman of the Board,
Chief Administrative Officer
and Chief Financial Officer - Authorized Signatory

EXHIBIT INDEX

(a)     The following exhibit is filed herewith:

Number	Description
31	Certifications pursuant to Section 302

Certifications pursuant to Section 906 are furnished as Exhibit 32 hereto

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference.

Number in Filing	Description
10*	Bonus Agreement, dated May 28, 2004, between the Corporation and Joann Fielder

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004 are incorporated herein by reference.

Number in Filing	Description
3	Restated By-laws of the Corporation
10.1*	Form of Tandem Bonus Plan Agreement
10.2	Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Corporation and each of its Directors
14	Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers pursuant to Section 406

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10	Amendment, dated December 23, 2003, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc., as Agent and Lender ("CIT")

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated September 2, 2003, to Employment Agreement, dated November 20, 1998, between the Corporation and Raphael Benaroya ("Benaroya Employment Agreement")
10.2*	Amendment, dated September 2, 2003, to Employment Agreement, dated November 20, 1998, between the Corporation and George R. Remeta ("Remeta Employment Agreement")
10.3*	Amendment, dated September 2, 2003, to Employment Agreement, dated November 20, 1998, between the Corporation and Kenneth P. Carroll ("Carroll Employment Agreement")
21	Subsidiaries of the Corporation

The following exhibit to the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 3, 2003 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10*	Amendments to Restated Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan ("SRSP")

The 2003 Stock Option Plan set forth as the appendix to the Corporation’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its 2003 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.*

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended February 1, 2003 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated January 31, 2003, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and CIT
10.2*	Amendment to SRSP

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 2002 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated December 6, 2002, to Benaroya Employment Agreement
10.2*	Amendment, dated December 6, 2002, to Remeta Employment Agreement
10.3*	Amendment, dated December 6, 2002, to Carroll Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 3, 2002 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated August 2, 2002, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and CIT
10.2*	Amendment to SRSP
10.3	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2002, between Raphael Benaroya and the Corporation

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 4, 2002 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated May 30, 2002, to Benaroya Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2002 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated April 5, 2002, to Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement, dated January 27, 1998, between the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated and World Financial Network National Bank ("Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement")
10.2	Amendment, dated December 29, 1999, to Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement
10.3	Amendment, dated August 19, 1999, to Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement
10.4*	Letter, dated March 1, 2002, from the Corporation to Raphael Benaroya with respect to the cost of living adjustment under the Benaroya Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2001 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated November 29, 2001, to Benaroya Employment Agreement
10.2*	Amendment, dated November 29, 2001, to Remeta Employment Agreement
10.3*	Amendment, dated November 29, 2001, to Carroll Employment Agreement
10.4*	Summary Plan Description for United Retail Group, Inc. Incentive Compensation Program for Executives
10.5	Amendment, dated October 1, 2001, to Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement (Confidential portions filed separately with the Secretary of the Commission)
10.6*	Promissory note, dated November 30, 2001, from Raphael Benaroya to the Corporation (paid as of July 1, 2002)

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2001 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Restated Stock Appreciation Rights Plan

The 2001 Stock Option Plan set forth as an appendix to the Corporation’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its 2001 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.*

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-44868) is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10	Amendment, dated August 21, 2000, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and CIT

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2000 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Amendment, dated August 18, 2000, to Benaroya Employment Agreement
10.2*	Amendment, dated August 18, 2000, to Carroll Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2000 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.2	Amendment, dated December 28, 1999, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated and CIT ("Financing Agreement")
10.3	Amendment, dated January 31, 2000, to Financing Agreement among the Corporation, United Retail Incorporated, Cloudwalkers, Inc. and CIT

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 1999 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated October 6, 1999, to Financing Agreement

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 23, 1999, is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
3	Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

The stockholders’ rights plan filed as the exhibit to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, dated September 15, 1999, is incorporated herein by reference.

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 1999 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated March 29, 1999, to Financing Agreement

The 1999 Stock Option Plan set forth as the Appendix to the Corporation’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its 1999 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.*

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 1998 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	Benaroya Employment Agreement
10.2*	Remeta Employment Agreement
10.3*	Carroll Employment Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 1998 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	1998 Stock Option Agreement, dated May 21, 1998, between the Corporation and Raphael Benaroya
10.2*	1998 Stock Option Agreement, dated May 21, 1998, between the Corporation and George R. Remeta

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1998 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Restated Stockholders' Agreement, dated December 23, 1992, between the Corporation and certain of its stockholders and Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3 thereto
10.2	Private Label Credit Card Program Agreement
10.4*	Restated 1990 Stock Option Plan as of March 6, 1998
10.5*	Restated 1990 Stock Option Plan as of May 28, 1996
10.6*	Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan as of March 6, 1998

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 1997 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Amendment, dated September 15, 1997, to Financing Agreement

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 1997 are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1	Financing Agreement
10.2*	Amendment to SRSP

The following exhibit to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 1996 is incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
10.1*	SRSP

The following exhibits to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-44499), as amended, are incorporated herein by reference:

Number in Filing	Description
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
4.1	Specimen Certificate for Common Stock of the Corporation
10.2.1	Software License Agreement, dated as of April 30, 1989, between The Limited Stores, Inc. and Sizes Unlimited, Inc. (now known as United Retail Incorporated) ("Software License")
10.2.2	Amendment, dated December 10, 1991, to Software License

*A compensatory plan for the benefit of the Corporation’s management or a management contract.

EX-31

Exhibit No. 31

CERTIFICATIONS

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Raphael Benaroya, the registrant’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of United Retail Group, Inc.;

2. based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. the registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. the registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:   February 16, 2005 /s/RAPHAEL BENAROYA
Raphael Benaroya

I, George R. Remeta, the registrant’s Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of United Retail Group, Inc.;

2. based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. the registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

(a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)         disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. the registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:   February 16, 2005 /s/GEORGE R. REMETA
George R. Remeta

EX-32

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Retail Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May 1, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Raphael Benaroya, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and George R. Remeta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that based on our knowledge:

    (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.)

/s/ RAPHAEL BENAROYA
Raphael Benaroya
Chief Executive Officer
February 16, 2005

/s/ GEORGE R. REMETA
George R. Remeta
Chief Financial Officer
February 16, 2005