EX-5.4 5 dex54.htm OPINION OF STOEL RIVES, LLP WITH RESPECT TO USF REDDAWAY INC. Opinion of Stoel Rives, LLP with respect to USF Reddaway Inc.

[LETTERHEAD]

Exhibit 5.4

April 30, 2010

USF Reddaway Inc.

c/o YRC Worldwide Inc.

10990 Roe Avenue

Overland Park, Kansas 66211

Re:      Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-164877)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are issuing this opinion letter in our capacity as special counsel to USF Reddaway Inc., an Oregon corporation (the “Guarantor”), in connection with the preparation of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-164877) (as amended or supplemented, the “Registration Statement”).

You have advised us as follows:

(a) That the Registration Statement was originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on February 12, 2010, under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), by YRC Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), the Guarantor and certain other guarantors named therein (collectively, the “Guarantors”).

(b) The Registration Statement relates to the resale by the selling securityholders named therein from time to time, pursuant to Rule 415 of the General Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Securities Act (the “Rules”), of up to $70,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 6% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the “Notes”), the guarantees of the Guarantors with respect to the Notes (the “Guarantees”) and up to 201,880,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, which are issuable on account of the Notes (the “Shares” and together with the Notes and the Guarantees, the “Securities”).

(c) On February 23, 2010, Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $49,800,000 (the “Initial Notes”), were issued pursuant to that certain Note Purchase Agreement (the “NPA”), dated as of February 11, 2010, by and among the Company, the Guarantors and the purchasers named therein and an indenture, dated as of February 23, 2010, by and among the Company, the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Indenture” and collectively with the NPA, the “Transaction Documents”).

(d) Additional Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $20,200,000 (the “Additional Notes”) will be issued pursuant to the Transaction Documents provided that certain additional closing conditions as set forth in the NPA are satisfied or waived in accordance with the terms of the NPA. The Initial Notes and the Additional Notes are collectively referred to herein as the Notes.


USF Reddaway Inc.

April 30, 2010

Page 2

 

In connection with the registration of the Securities, we have examined originals, or copies certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of such documents, corporate records and other instruments as we have deemed necessary for the purposes of this opinion, including: (a) the organizational documents of the Guarantor, (b) minutes and records of the corporate proceedings of the Guarantor, (c) the Transaction Documents, (d) the Initial Notes, (e) the Guarantee by Guarantor in respect to the Initial Notes (the “Initial Guarantee”), (f) the form of Additional Note, and (g) the form of Guarantee with respect to the Additional Notes (the “Additional Guarantees”).

For purposes of this opinion, in addition to the foregoing, which we have assumed is correct, we have assumed the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to the originals of all documents submitted to us as copies and the authenticity of the originals of all documents submitted to us as copies. We have also assumed the legal capacity of all natural persons, the genuineness of the signatures of persons signing all documents in connection with which this opinion is rendered, the authority of such persons signing on behalf of the parties thereto other than the Guarantor and the due authorization, execution and delivery of all documents by the parties thereto other than the Guarantor. We have not independently investigated, established or verified any facts relevant to the opinion expressed herein, but have relied upon statements and representations of the officers and other representatives of the Company and the Guarantors.

We have also assumed that:

(i) the Registration Statement will be effective at the time the Securities are offered as contemplated by the Registration Statement;

(ii) any applicable prospectus supplement will have been prepared and filed with the Commission describing the Securities offered thereby to the extent necessary;

(iii) all Securities will be offered and sold in the manner stated in the Registration Statement or any applicable prospectus supplement and in compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws;

(iv) the Initial Notes and the Initial Guarantees were issued and sold in accordance with, and in the form and containing the terms as set forth in, the Transaction Documents and in compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws;

(v) the Additional Notes and the Additional Guarantees will be issued and sold in accordance with, and in the form and containing the terms as set forth in, the Transaction Documents and in compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws; and

(vi) the Company will have obtained any legally required consents, approvals, authorizations and other orders of the Commission and any other federal regulatory agencies necessary for the Securities to be offered and sold in the manner stated in the Registration Statement or any applicable prospectus supplement.


USF Reddaway Inc.

April 30, 2010

Page 3

 

Based upon and subject to the foregoing qualifications, assumptions and limitations and the further limitations set forth below, we are of the opinion that:

 

1. The Guarantor is a corporation duly incorporated, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Oregon.

 

2. The Guarantor has duly authorized, executed and delivered the Indenture and the Initial Guarantees and has the corporate power and authority to perform its obligations under the Indenture and the Initial Guarantees and has the corporate power and authority to execute and deliver, and perform its obligations under, any Additional Guarantees issued pursuant to the Transaction Documents.

 

3. No consent, waiver, approval, authorization or order of any State of Oregon court or governmental authority of the State of Oregon was required in connection with the execution and delivery of the Indenture and the Initial Guarantees or will be required in connection with the execution and delivery of the Additional Guarantees issued pursuant to the Transaction Documents.

 

4. The execution and delivery of the Indenture by the Guarantor and the performance by the Guarantor of its obligations thereunder (including with respect to the Initial Guarantee) do not and will not conflict with or constitute or result in a breach or default under (or an event which with notice or the passage of time or both would constitute a default under) or result in the creation of a lien or encumbrance under or violation of any of, (i) the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the Guarantor or (ii) any state or governmental rule or regulation of the State of Oregon.

Our opinion expressed above is subject to the qualifications that we express no opinion as to the applicability of, compliance with, or effect of: (i) any bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent transfer, fraudulent conveyance, moratorium or other similar law affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally; (ii) general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law); (iii) public policy considerations which may limit the rights of parties to obtain certain remedies; (iv) any laws except the laws of the State of Oregon and the Oregon case law decided thereunder; and (v) the “Blue Sky” laws and regulations of State of Oregon.

This opinion is limited to the specific issues addressed herein, and no opinion may be inferred or implied beyond that expressly stated herein. You have advised us that the Securities may be sold from time to time by the holders thereof as contemplated by the Registration Statement, and this opinion is limited to the laws, including the rules and regulations, as in effect on the date on which the Registration Statement is declared effective by the Commission under the Securities Act, which laws are subject to change with possible retroactive effect. We assume no obligation to revise or supplement this opinion should the present laws of the State of Oregon be changed by legislative action, judicial decision or otherwise.


USF Reddaway Inc.

April 30, 2010

Page 4

 

This opinion is furnished to you in connection with the filing of the Registration Statement in accordance with the requirements of Item 601(b)(5) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. Kirkland & Ellis LLP may rely upon this opinion in connection with its opinion addressed to the Company, dated the date hereof and filed with the Registration Statement, to the same extent as if it were an addressee hereof.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the commission as Exhibit 5.4 to the Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Legal Matters” in the Registration Statement with respect to the laws of the State of Oregon. In giving this consent, we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission.

 

Very truly yours,
STOEL RIVES, LLP

By:

 

/s/    GARY R. BARNUM

  Gary R. Barnum