XML 25 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Notes Payable, Long-term Debt, Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Apr. 02, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies  
Notes Payable, Long-term Debt, Commitments and Contingencies

Note 7 – Notes Payable, Long-term Debt, Commitments and Contingencies

Notes Payable

All of the notes payable outstanding at April 2, 2016 related to foreign subsidiaries, with $66 million denominated in South African rand, $32 million denominated in Argentine pesos and $20 million denominated in Zambian kwacha. The weighted average interest rate for outstanding notes payable was 13.17% and 11.74% at April 2, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. As of April 2, 2016, Seaboard had uncommitted bank lines totaling $371 million, of which $321 million of the uncommitted lines related to foreign subsidiaries. Seaboard’s borrowing capacity was reduced by $146 million outstanding under the uncommitted lines and letters of credit totaling $3 million. The notes payable under the credit lines are unsecured and do not require compensating balances.

 

Long-term Debt

The following is a summary of long-term debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 2,

 

 

December 31,

 

(Millions of dollars)

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Term Loan due 2022

 

$

500

 

$

500

 

Foreign subsidiary obligations due 2020 through 2023

 

 

15

 

 

23

 

Total long-term debt at face value

 

 

515

 

 

523

 

Current maturities of long-term debt and unamortized discount

 

 

(9)

 

 

(5)

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities and unamortized discount

 

$

506

 

$

518

 

 

Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations accounted for $8 million of the decrease in the total long-term debt from December 31, 2015 to April 2, 2016. The interest rate on the Term Loan due 2022 was 2.06% and 1.90% at April 2, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on Seaboard’s Argentine subsidiary’s loans was 30.25% and 30.23% at April 2, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Seaboard was in compliance with all restrictive debt covenants relating to these agreements as of April 2, 2016.

Commitments

In 2015, Seaboard’s Pork segment and Triumph Foods, LLC (“Triumph”) entered into a new joint venture, Seaboard Triumph Foods, LLC (“STF LLC”), with equal ownership of 50%. This joint venture is constructing a new pork processing facility in Sioux City, Iowa, which is expected to be completed by mid-2017. Seaboard originally agreed to contribute up to $207 million in connection with the development and operation of the facility; however, in the first quarter of 2016, third-party financing was obtained and the subscription agreement was amended to require $150 million in contributions. As of April 2, 2016,  $36 million is expected to be contributed during the remainder of 2016, with $73 million due in 2017. As part of the operations, Seaboard agreed to provide a portion of the hogs to be processed at the facility.

Contingencies

On April 29, 2015, Seaboard received from the Department of Justice, Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section (“AFMLS”), a Grand Jury subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (the “DC District Court”) requesting records related to 37 specified foreign companies and five individuals. Seaboard has previously produced documents responsive to Grand Jury subpoenas dated September 18, 2014 and October 17, 2014. The subpoena issued September 18, 2014 requested records related to nine entities and one individual, and the subpoena issued October 17, 2014 requested records with respect to eight additional entities and one additional individual. Two additional subpoenas, each dated July 2, 2015, were received by Seaboard requesting records related to a certain customer. The companies and individuals as to which the requested records relate to are not affiliated with Seaboard. The AFMLS attorney conducting the investigation has advised Seaboard that it is not a target of the investigation. Seaboard has retained outside counsel and is cooperating with the government’s investigation. It is impossible at this stage either to determine the probability of a favorable or unfavorable outcome or to estimate the amount of potential loss, if any, resulting from the government’s inquiry.

On September 19, 2012, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) executed three search warrants authorizing the seizure of certain records from Seaboard’s offices in Merriam, Kansas and at the Seaboard Foods LLC ("Seaboard Foods") employment office and the human resources department in Guymon, Oklahoma. The warrants generally called for the seizure of employment-related files, certain e-mails and other electronic records relating to Medicaid and Medicaid recipients, certain health care providers in the Guymon area, and Seaboard’s health plan and certain personnel issues. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Oklahoma (“USAO”), which has been leading the investigation, previously advised Seaboard that it intended to close its investigation and that no charges would be brought against Seaboard. However, discussions continue with the USAO, ICE and the Oklahoma Attorney General's office regarding the matter, including the possibility of a settlement. No proceedings have been filed or brought as of the date of this report. It is not possible at this time to determine whether a settlement will be reached or whether Seaboard will incur any material fines, penalties or liabilities in connection with this matter.

On February 16, 2016, Seaboard Foods received an information request (“Request”) from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) seeking information under the Clean Air Act with regard to various ammonia releases at Seaboard Foods’ pork processing plant in Guymon, Oklahoma. Seaboard has been cooperating with the EPA with regard to the investigation and has responded to the Request. It is not possible at this time to determine whether Seaboard will incur any material fines, penalties or liabilities in connection with this matter.

Seaboard is subject to various administrative and judicial proceedings and other legal matters related to the normal conduct of its business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these items is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Seaboard.

Contingent Obligations

Certain of the non-consolidated affiliates and third-party contractors who perform services for Seaboard have bank debt supporting their underlying operations. From time to time, Seaboard will provide guarantees of that debt in order to further Seaboard’s business objectives. Seaboard does not issue guarantees of third parties for compensation. As of April 2, 2016, guarantees outstanding to third parties were not material. Seaboard has not accrued a liability for any of the third-party or affiliate guarantees as management considers the likelihood of loss to be remote. See Notes Payable section above for discussion of letters of credit.